EP2626662B1 - Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle - Google Patents

Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2626662B1
EP2626662B1 EP20120166887 EP12166887A EP2626662B1 EP 2626662 B1 EP2626662 B1 EP 2626662B1 EP 20120166887 EP20120166887 EP 20120166887 EP 12166887 A EP12166887 A EP 12166887A EP 2626662 B1 EP2626662 B1 EP 2626662B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
engine
frequency
transmit antenna
range
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20120166887
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2626662A1 (en
Inventor
Steven L. Kaufman
Jack E. White
Vincent C. Hougo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Raytheon Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US13/372,073 external-priority patent/US9079555B2/en
Application filed by Raytheon Co filed Critical Raytheon Co
Publication of EP2626662A1 publication Critical patent/EP2626662A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2626662B1 publication Critical patent/EP2626662B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0043Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target
    • F41H13/0075Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target the high-energy beam being a radiofrequency beam

Definitions

  • exemplary techniques include road blocks, barricades, and tack strips.
  • these techniques may have limited effectiveness and may present safety issues. For example, obstacles such as barricades, patrol cars, nets, and tack strips on a public road, can create dangerous conditions if vehicle operators escalate the situation. A driver may attempt to go through a roadblock by speeding through barricades.
  • roadblocks typically require the services of law enforcement officers for setup, which requires advance notice and planning. In the event that the vehicle forces its way through the barricade, officers may engage in a dangerous high-speed pursuit.
  • EMP electromagnetic pulse
  • high power microwaves require high energy levels that are difficult to deploy in the field.
  • high power microwaves requires a high power microwave source that is difficult to deploy and package.
  • EMP and high power microwaves may be unsafe for people in the area of application.
  • microwave radiation is directed toward the vehicle to disable or inhibit electronic components of the vehicle. It is difficult to direct the microwave energy directly against a single vehicle.
  • the microwave radiation is adapted to disable a particular vehicle's electronic components, all or many of the vehicles in the vicinity of the targeted vehicle may also be temporarily or permanently disabled. Disabling non-targeted vehicles may become a hazard to law enforcement personnel and public.
  • WO2011/046777 A1 discloses a system according to the preamble of claim 1 and a method according to the preamble of claim 8. The system and method disrupt the engine of a vehicle by transmitting a frequency targeting a vehicle, whereby said frequency is selected from a database comprising engine information.
  • US 2008/0223641 discloses a method of disabling a vehicle, comprising: providing a database of one or more parameters for disabling specific vehicles; identifying a vehicle; and transmitting modulated microwave radiation to the vehicle, the radiation being varied according to one or more of the parameters specific to the vehicle.
  • the present invention provides a method and system for disabling a vehicle by disrupting an engine control unit (ECU).
  • a receiver is used to monitor engine parameters, such as ignition timing, to detect disruption caused by a particular frequency transmitted by a transmit antenna.
  • the system can dwell on this frequency to disable the vehicle. With this arrangement, a vehicle can be quickly and safely disabled. While exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown and described in conjunction with particular frequencies, power, vehicles and engine control unit characteristics, it is understood that embodiments of the invention are applicable to applications in which it is desirable to disrupt and/or stop an engine.
  • exemplary embodiments of the invention enable disruption of an engine control unit (ECU) of a vehicle.
  • a system employs a scanning VHF/UHF signal using RF tones to disrupt the vehicle ECU, detect the disrupting frequency, and dwell on the disrupting frequency to bring the vehicle to a stop.
  • Exemplary embodiments of the system can be located at fixed location, such as a checkpoint, a mobile vehicle, or other platform.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary vehicle disruption system 100 in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention.
  • the system includes a transmit antenna 102 to transmit a range of frequencies while illuminating a target 10, such as vehicle.
  • a signal controller 104 controls the characteristics of the transmitted signals.
  • a receive antenna 106 receives a signal emitted by the internal combustion engine ignition system of the vehicle 10.
  • a signal processor 108 is coupled to the receive antenna 106 and to a control module 110 that controls overall operation of the system.
  • a user interface 112 is coupled to the controller 110 to enable a user to interact with the system.
  • signals emitted by the engine correspond to the vehicle ignition timing and other characteristics that factor in to frequency susceptibility of the internal combustion engine.
  • the signal processor 108 analyzes the received information and determines scan and dwell tones that can be transmitted by the transmit antenna 102 to initiate disruption and eventual default of the ECU controlling the ignition timing of the internal combustion engine.
  • the signal controller 104 controls scan and dwell signal transmission over a defined frequency range to determine the optimally disruptive frequency tone by monitoring the ignition response. Continued signal transmission at the frequency of susceptibility results in ECU default until the signal is removed.
  • a selected area is radiated for one or more specific vehicles. Since the transmitted frequency corresponds to engine timing for a specific vehicle, the system can disrupt a targeted vehicle in the midst of several vehicles without affecting the non-targeted vehicles. With an array for the transmission, the beam width can be narrow or wide depending on the application.
  • the engine By disrupting the vehicle ECU, the engine will stop in milliseconds.
  • the ECU can go into a default mode in seconds, thereby requiring much less to power (e.g., 8 dB) to maintain disruption to the ECU and prevent the engine from restarting.
  • the ECU Upon removal of the disrupting signal, the ECU can regain normal functionality without damage.
  • the closed loop feedback determines the most disruptive frequency tone to produce an ECU default. In addition, this results in an inability of the ECU to reacquire at a much lower power level.
  • the disruptive dwell tone may be modulated to reduce the power level compared with a continuous wave transmitted tone.
  • a transmitter includes a power combined GaN Amplifier for provide CW power in the order of 170 kW for ECU disruption at about 100m and for 10m about 17W.
  • a series of vehicle disruption systems 200a-N are distributed along a vehicle pathway 20.
  • the distributed systems are synchronized by a remote receiver/processor to focus the energy at a target vehicle/ECU 10.
  • a single receive antenna monitors engine operation of a targeted vehicle. This arrangement is well suited for vehicle checkpoints, such as border crossings.
  • vehicle disruption systems are hidden and/or camouflaged.
  • An aggressive vehicle can be disabled from a hidden disruption system.
  • An operator of the vehicle may not even be aware that the vehicle has been targeted for disruption.
  • the system 100 illuminates the vehicle over a range of frequencies, monitors a response of the vehicle engine, and identifies the frequency of the signal that disrupts operation of the vehicle ECU.
  • inventions of an inventive vehicle disruption system can be used for any vehicle having electronic ignition control.
  • Exemplary vehicles include automobiles, motorcycles, boats, armored vehicles, snowmachines, and the like.
  • a transmit antenna comprises a series of antennas identified as Part No. FRF-110A from First RF corporation in Boulder, CO.
  • the antennas are arranged in a 3 x 4 lattice on a mobile platform shown as a truck.
  • the receive antenna is an omni operating at frequencies higher than those of the transmit antenna.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary sequence of steps for providing vehicle disruption in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention.
  • an object of interest such as a vehicle
  • the target is illuminated by transmitting signals in a range of frequencies in step 402.
  • a receive antenna monitors operation of the engine, such as ignition timing.
  • the information from the receive antenna is used to detect disruption of engine operation due to the signals from the transmit antenna. More particularly, the system analyzes operation of the engine to identify the specific frequency that produces the most disruption. It is understood that transmit and receive operations are coordinated in a known manner.
  • the signal of maximum disruption is transmitted by the transmit antenna to disable the vehicle. Once the vehicle is disabled, the power level can be decreased to a level that prevents restart of the engine.
  • engine operating characteristics can be stored in a database, as described in U.S. Patent Application No. 12,581,087 , published as US 2011/0093180 A1 and as WO 2011/046777 A1 .
  • a computer includes a processor 502, a volatile memory 504, an output device 505, a non-volatile memory 506 (e.g., hard disk), and a graphical user interface (GUI) 508 (e.g., a mouse, a keyboard, a display, for example).
  • the non-volatile memory 506 stores computer instructions 512, an operating system 516 and data 518, for example.
  • the computer instructions 512 are executed by the processor 502 out of volatile memory 504 to perform all or part of the processing described above.
  • An article 519 can comprise a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions causing a machine to perform any portion of the processing described herein.
  • Processing is not limited to use with the hardware and software described herein and may find applicability in any computing or processing environment and with any type of machine or set of machines that is capable of running a computer program. Processing may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of the two. Processing may be implemented in computer programs executed on programmable computers/machines that each includes a processor, a storage medium or other article of manufacture that is readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices. Programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs may be implemented in assembly or machine language.
  • the language may be a compiled or an interpreted language and it may be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
  • a computer program may be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
  • a computer program may be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform processing.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
  • Control Of Vehicle Engines Or Engines For Specific Uses (AREA)

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • As is known in the art, there are a variety of techniques to deal with vehicle drivers that do not operate their vehicle safely or have bad intentions. Exemplary techniques include road blocks, barricades, and tack strips. However, these techniques may have limited effectiveness and may present safety issues. For example, obstacles such as barricades, patrol cars, nets, and tack strips on a public road, can create dangerous conditions if vehicle operators escalate the situation. A driver may attempt to go through a roadblock by speeding through barricades. Furthermore, roadblocks typically require the services of law enforcement officers for setup, which requires advance notice and planning. In the event that the vehicle forces its way through the barricade, officers may engage in a dangerous high-speed pursuit.
  • Other known techniques for stopping vehicles include the use of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or high power microwaves to disrupt the electronic components of the vehicles. However, the use of EMP to disable a moving vehicle requires high energy levels that are difficult to deploy in the field. Similarly, the use of high power microwaves requires a high power microwave source that is difficult to deploy and package. Furthermore, EMP and high power microwaves may be unsafe for people in the area of application. When high power microwaves or EMPs are used to stop a moving vehicle, microwave radiation is directed toward the vehicle to disable or inhibit electronic components of the vehicle. It is difficult to direct the microwave energy directly against a single vehicle. Thus, when the microwave radiation is adapted to disable a particular vehicle's electronic components, all or many of the vehicles in the vicinity of the targeted vehicle may also be temporarily or permanently disabled. Disabling non-targeted vehicles may become a hazard to law enforcement personnel and public.
  • WO2011/046777 A1 discloses a system according to the preamble of claim 1 and a method according to the preamble of claim 8. The system and method disrupt the engine of a vehicle by transmitting a frequency targeting a vehicle, whereby said frequency is selected from a database comprising engine information.
  • US 2008/0223641 discloses a method of disabling a vehicle, comprising: providing a database of one or more parameters for disabling specific vehicles; identifying a vehicle; and transmitting modulated microwave radiation to the vehicle, the radiation being varied according to one or more of the parameters specific to the vehicle.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention, as defined by the appended claims, provides a method and system for disabling a vehicle by disrupting an engine control unit (ECU). In an exemplary embodiment, a receiver is used to monitor engine parameters, such as ignition timing, to detect disruption caused by a particular frequency transmitted by a transmit antenna. The system can dwell on this frequency to disable the vehicle. With this arrangement, a vehicle can be quickly and safely disabled. While exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown and described in conjunction with particular frequencies, power, vehicles and engine control unit characteristics, it is understood that embodiments of the invention are applicable to applications in which it is desirable to disrupt and/or stop an engine.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The foregoing features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings in which:
    • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an exemplary vehicle disruption system in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention;
    • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a checkpoint having at least one vehicle disruption system;
    • FIG. 3 is a pictorial representation of a transmit antenna array that can form a part of the system of FIG. 1;
    • FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing an exemplary sequence of steps for implementing vehicle disruption in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention; and
    • FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of an exemplary computer that can perform at least of the processing for vehicle disruption.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In general, exemplary embodiments of the invention enable disruption of an engine control unit (ECU) of a vehicle. In one embodiment, a system employs a scanning VHF/UHF signal using RF tones to disrupt the vehicle ECU, detect the disrupting frequency, and dwell on the disrupting frequency to bring the vehicle to a stop. Exemplary embodiments of the system can be located at fixed location, such as a checkpoint, a mobile vehicle, or other platform.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary vehicle disruption system 100 in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention. The system includes a transmit antenna 102 to transmit a range of frequencies while illuminating a target 10, such as vehicle. A signal controller 104 controls the characteristics of the transmitted signals.
  • A receive antenna 106 receives a signal emitted by the internal combustion engine ignition system of the vehicle 10. A signal processor 108 is coupled to the receive antenna 106 and to a control module 110 that controls overall operation of the system. A user interface 112 is coupled to the controller 110 to enable a user to interact with the system.
  • In general, signals emitted by the engine correspond to the vehicle ignition timing and other characteristics that factor in to frequency susceptibility of the internal combustion engine. The signal processor 108 analyzes the received information and determines scan and dwell tones that can be transmitted by the transmit antenna 102 to initiate disruption and eventual default of the ECU controlling the ignition timing of the internal combustion engine. In general, the signal controller 104 controls scan and dwell signal transmission over a defined frequency range to determine the optimally disruptive frequency tone by monitoring the ignition response. Continued signal transmission at the frequency of susceptibility results in ECU default until the signal is removed.
  • In one embodiment, a selected area is radiated for one or more specific vehicles. Since the transmitted frequency corresponds to engine timing for a specific vehicle, the system can disrupt a targeted vehicle in the midst of several vehicles without affecting the non-targeted vehicles. With an array for the transmission, the beam width can be narrow or wide depending on the application.
  • It is understood that with feedback from engine operation, it can be determined what frequency is effective to disrupt the engine ECU. It is believed that signals are coupling into the ECU through its wiring harness to cause the disruptive effect. It is believed that the disruptions are temporary because the communication between the ECU and sensors are 'jammed'.
  • By disrupting the vehicle ECU, the engine will stop in milliseconds. The ECU can go into a default mode in seconds, thereby requiring much less to power (e.g., 8 dB) to maintain disruption to the ECU and prevent the engine from restarting. Upon removal of the disrupting signal, the ECU can regain normal functionality without damage.
  • The closed loop feedback determines the most disruptive frequency tone to produce an ECU default. In addition, this results in an inability of the ECU to reacquire at a much lower power level. The disruptive dwell tone may be modulated to reduce the power level compared with a continuous wave transmitted tone.
  • It has been found that most ECUs have susceptible frequencies that fall within VHF and UHF bands. In one embodiment, a transmitter includes a power combined GaN Amplifier for provide CW power in the order of 170 kW for ECU disruption at about 100m and for 10m about 17W.
  • In one embodiment shown in FIG. 2, a series of vehicle disruption systems 200a-N are distributed along a vehicle pathway 20. The distributed systems are synchronized by a remote receiver/processor to focus the energy at a target vehicle/ECU 10. With this arrangement, higher levels of energy are present at the target 20 to minimize energy levels in the area in the pathway vicinity. In one embodiment, a single receive antenna monitors engine operation of a targeted vehicle. This arrangement is well suited for vehicle checkpoints, such as border crossings.
  • In an exemplary embodiment, vehicle disruption systems are hidden and/or camouflaged. An aggressive vehicle can be disabled from a hidden disruption system. An operator of the vehicle may not even be aware that the vehicle has been targeted for disruption.
  • It should be noted that no a priori information is required by exemplary embodiments of a vehicle disruption system. The system 100 illuminates the vehicle over a range of frequencies, monitors a response of the vehicle engine, and identifies the frequency of the signal that disrupts operation of the vehicle ECU.
  • It is understood that embodiments of an inventive vehicle disruption system can be used for any vehicle having electronic ignition control. Exemplary vehicles include automobiles, motorcycles, boats, armored vehicles, snowmachines, and the like.
  • A variety of suitable antennas can be used. In one particular embodiment, a transmit antenna comprises a series of antennas identified as Part No. FRF-110A from First RF corporation in Boulder, CO. In one embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the antennas are arranged in a 3 x 4 lattice on a mobile platform shown as a truck. In one embodiment, the receive antenna is an omni operating at frequencies higher than those of the transmit antenna.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary sequence of steps for providing vehicle disruption in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the invention. In step 400, an object of interest, such as a vehicle, is targeted. The target is illuminated by transmitting signals in a range of frequencies in step 402. During illumination of the vehicle, in step 404 a receive antenna monitors operation of the engine, such as ignition timing. In step 406, the information from the receive antenna is used to detect disruption of engine operation due to the signals from the transmit antenna. More particularly, the system analyzes operation of the engine to identify the specific frequency that produces the most disruption. It is understood that transmit and receive operations are coordinated in a known manner. In step 408, the signal of maximum disruption is transmitted by the transmit antenna to disable the vehicle. Once the vehicle is disabled, the power level can be decreased to a level that prevents restart of the engine.
  • It is understood that engine operating characteristics can be stored in a database, as described in U.S. Patent Application No. 12,581,087 , published as US 2011/0093180 A1 and as WO 2011/046777 A1 .
  • Referring to FIG. 5, a computer includes a processor 502, a volatile memory 504, an output device 505, a non-volatile memory 506 (e.g., hard disk), and a graphical user interface (GUI) 508 (e.g., a mouse, a keyboard, a display, for example). The non-volatile memory 506 stores computer instructions 512, an operating system 516 and data 518, for example. In one example, the computer instructions 512 are executed by the processor 502 out of volatile memory 504 to perform all or part of the processing described above. An article 519 can comprise a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions causing a machine to perform any portion of the processing described herein.
  • Processing is not limited to use with the hardware and software described herein and may find applicability in any computing or processing environment and with any type of machine or set of machines that is capable of running a computer program. Processing may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of the two. Processing may be implemented in computer programs executed on programmable computers/machines that each includes a processor, a storage medium or other article of manufacture that is readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and one or more output devices. Programs may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs may be implemented in assembly or machine language. The language may be a compiled or an interpreted language and it may be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network. A computer program may be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform processing.
  • Having described exemplary embodiments of the invention, it will now become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating their concepts may also be used. The embodiments contained herein should not be limited to disclosed embodiments but rather should be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (16)

  1. A system (100) for disabling a vehicle, the system comprising:
    a transmit antenna (102);
    a controller (110) to control frequencies transmitted by the transmit antenna (102);
    a receive antenna (106); and
    a signal processor (108) configured to monitor the performance of an engine of the vehicle by processing information from the receive antenna; the system is characterized in that:
    the transmit antenna (102) is configured to transmit a range of frequencies targeting a vehicle and the signal processor (108) is configured to identify a frequency transmitted by the transmit antenna that disrupts operation of an engine of a vehicle,
    wherein the controller (110) controls the signal transmitted by the transmit antenna (102) to dwell on the frequency that disrupts the engine.
  2. The system according to claim 1, wherein a range of frequencies for transmission by the transmit antenna (102) range in specific region of the VHF/UHF bands.
  3. The system according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the information from the receive antenna (106) includes ignition timing.
  4. The system according to claim 1 or any preceding claim, wherein the dwell frequency disrupts operation of an engine control unit (ECU) coupled to the engine.
  5. The system according to claim 1 or any preceding claim, wherein the transmit antenna (102) comprises an array.
  6. The system according to claim 1 or any preceding claim, wherein the system is mounted on a vehicle.
  7. The system according to claim 1 or any preceding claim, further including a vehicle checkpoint.
  8. A vehicle checkpoint system, comprising:
    at least one system (100) according to claim 1.
  9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the at least one system to disable vehicles is hidden.
  10. A method of operating a system (100) for disabling a vehicle, the method is characterized by the system being configured to perform the steps of:
    transmitting (402) a range of frequencies targeting a vehicle (10);
    monitoring (404) performance of an engine of the vehicle (10);
    determining (406) a first frequency in the range of frequencies that disrupts operation of the engine from the engine performance monitoring; and
    dwelling (408) on the first frequency to maintain disruption of the engine.
  11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the vehicle (10) comprises or more of an automobile, a truck, a boat, a helicopter, and/or snowmobile.
  12. The method according to claim 10 or 11, further including reducing a power of the first frequency after the engine is disabled to a level that prevents engine restart.
  13. The method according to claim 10, 11 or 12, further including monitoring the vehicles (10) at a vehicle checkpoint.
  14. The method according to claim 10, or any of claims 11 to 13, wherein a range of frequencies for transmission by the transmit antenna range in specific regions of the VHF /UHF bands.
  15. The method according to claim 10, or any of claims 11 to 14, wherein the information from the receive antenna (108) includes ignition timing.
  16. The method according to claim 10, or any of claims 11 to 15, wherein the dwell frequency disrupts operation of an engine control unit (ECU) coupled to the engine.
EP20120166887 2012-02-13 2012-05-04 Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle Active EP2626662B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/372,073 US9079555B2 (en) 2009-10-16 2012-02-13 Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2626662A1 EP2626662A1 (en) 2013-08-14
EP2626662B1 true EP2626662B1 (en) 2015-04-15

Family

ID=46027829

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20120166887 Active EP2626662B1 (en) 2012-02-13 2012-05-04 Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2626662B1 (en)
IL (1) IL222701A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2657143C1 (en) * 2015-11-06 2018-06-08 Евгений Алексеевич Куликов System of remote stopping of vehicles

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB201404209D0 (en) * 2014-03-10 2014-04-23 E2V Tech Uk Ltd Method and apparatus for remotely disabling vehicles

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5907290A (en) * 1997-08-22 1999-05-25 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army In-road microwave vehicle stopper
WO2008118532A2 (en) * 2007-01-30 2008-10-02 Fiore Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for remotely disabling vechicles
US8116966B2 (en) * 2009-10-16 2012-02-14 Raytheon Company Low power microwave vehicle stopper with feedback

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2657143C1 (en) * 2015-11-06 2018-06-08 Евгений Алексеевич Куликов System of remote stopping of vehicles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2626662A1 (en) 2013-08-14
IL222701A (en) 2017-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9079555B2 (en) Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle
US8116966B2 (en) Low power microwave vehicle stopper with feedback
Yan et al. Can you trust autonomous vehicles: Contactless attacks against sensors of self-driving vehicle
US20190072646A1 (en) Automotive radar sensor blockage detection using adaptive overlapping visibility
US10197665B2 (en) Radar false alert reduction
EP3321710B1 (en) Apparatus and associated method
EP2489399A1 (en) Radiant electromagnetic energy management
WO2016088752A1 (en) Target detecting apparatus using reflection point information of target
KR102012386B1 (en) Apparatus for generating a deception signal for a pulse compression signal and method therefor
JP2009031053A (en) Device for detecting forward obstacle
EP2626662B1 (en) Methods and apparatus to disrupt the engine of a vehicle
US7215276B2 (en) Radar detector
Bloecher et al. Automotive radar sensor interference–thread and probable countermeasures
US5907290A (en) In-road microwave vehicle stopper
KR102443265B1 (en) Method and apparatus for remotely disabling vehicles
CN108566215B (en) Ultra-wideband radio spectrum management and control system and implementation method thereof
RU2657143C1 (en) System of remote stopping of vehicles
KR20100077420A (en) Remote vehicle stop system
WO2021175619A1 (en) Plasma burst application system and method
Meryem et al. Security study and challenges of connected autonomous vehicles
Hamid et al. Conceptual design of electromagnetic pulse for denied vehicular access application
KR200399712Y1 (en) RADAR detector have extensive detecting function using cigarette jack of automobile
WO2022239420A1 (en) Movable body supervision system and attack notification method
CN116133351A (en) Anti-disclosure system and method applied to intelligent driving vehicle
US20220281477A1 (en) Dynamic Unmanned Threat Emitter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130912

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150112

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 722230

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012006635

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150528

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20150415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 722230

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150715

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150815

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150716

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012006635

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150531

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150531

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120504

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150504

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150415

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230420

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 13