EP2612101A1 - Device and method for producing an effective fog wall or fog cloud - Google Patents
Device and method for producing an effective fog wall or fog cloudInfo
- Publication number
- EP2612101A1 EP2612101A1 EP11745935.4A EP11745935A EP2612101A1 EP 2612101 A1 EP2612101 A1 EP 2612101A1 EP 11745935 A EP11745935 A EP 11745935A EP 2612101 A1 EP2612101 A1 EP 2612101A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fog
- wall
- image
- cloud
- infrared
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title abstract description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000001931 thermography Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000003595 mist Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 238000002834 transmittance Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000013543 active substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000475481 Nebula Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008033 biological extinction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000191 radiation effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001454 recorded image Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003313 weakening effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H3/00—Camouflage, i.e. means or methods for concealment or disguise
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
- F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H9/00—Equipment for attack or defence by spreading flame, gas or smoke or leurres; Chemical warfare equipment
- F41H9/06—Apparatus for generating artificial fog or smoke screens
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
- F42B12/46—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing gases, vapours, powders or chemically-reactive substances
- F42B12/48—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing gases, vapours, powders or chemically-reactive substances smoke-producing, e.g. infrared clouds
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
- F42B12/56—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies
- F42B12/70—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies for dispensing radar chaff or infrared material
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B5/00—Cartridge ammunition, e.g. separately-loaded propellant charges
- F42B5/02—Cartridges, i.e. cases with charge and missile
- F42B5/145—Cartridges, i.e. cases with charge and missile for dispensing gases, vapours, powders, particles or chemically-reactive substances
- F42B5/15—Cartridges, i.e. cases with charge and missile for dispensing gases, vapours, powders, particles or chemically-reactive substances for creating a screening or decoy effect, e.g. using radar chaff or infrared material
- F42B5/155—Smoke-pot projectors, e.g. arranged on vehicles
Definitions
- the invention relates to an apparatus and method for creating an effective fog cloud to protect a platform or target from a threat.
- Environmental factors such as wind strength, wind direction etc. as well as the fact of a moving platform / target are considered.
- this information / parameter need not be extra measured and not known. Rather, the entirety of this information is determined / derived in or out of the cloud of fog itself. Considered are the quality and quantity, that is, the density and homogeneity of the smoke screen. In evaluation of this information, then this wall or cloud can be stabilized or expanded accordingly by targeted Verschuß other fog generating means.
- DE 199 51 767 A1 describes a method for providing a decoy target and decoys.
- DE 196 17 701 C2 discloses such a stored method.
- a launching device for the firing of a plurality of active bodies can be taken from DE 199 10 074 B4.
- DE 103 46 001 B4 deals with a device for protecting ships against end-phase guided missiles. Among other things, this is characterized by the fact that some environmental data are taken into account, which are taken into account when designing the cloud of protection.
- An object protection system is also the subject of DE 10 2004 005 105 A1.
- a light ammunition magazine is published with DE 10 2006 004 954 A1, while DE 10 2005 054 275 A1 shows a further self-protection system.
- a missile for generating a smoke screen is further known from DE 296 06 669 U1.
- mortar systems are used in particular, with several mists being fired simultaneously from litter beakers.
- These mist pots contain mist-active substances which cause a visual line interruption due to scattering and / or reflection and / or absorption and / or emission (overexposure).
- fog agents are mainly pyrotechnic substances such as hetachloroethane, red phosphorus and carbon and metal dusts, such as brass dust used.
- the visual line interruption takes place in the visible and / or in the infrared ranges.
- EP 0 588 015 B discloses a one-sided transparent infrared mist which is formed by a curtain of infrared-emitting particles, wherein the own thermal imaging device is not disturbed, or is insignificantly disturbed, while retaining a sufficient camouflage effect. This is achieved by a special composition of the particles. In order to minimize the influence of this wall on the own thermal imaging device, the device optics are strongly dimmed, whereby a large depth of focus is achieved.
- a method for generating a one-sided transparent in the infrared spectral range camouflage nebula is DE 199 14 033 A1.
- a known pyrotechnic Tarnnebel is spread with pyrotechnic scattering particles and irradiated this two-component mist from the side of the applicator with an IR radiation source.
- the object of the invention is to provide a device and an optimized method for producing a one-sided transparent mist, whereby an optimal privacy of an object is realized.
- the effectiveness of a fog system or a fog cloud is dependent on the environmental parameters on site, such as wind speed, wind direction and relative humidity, etc. Such parameters are disregarded due to the unpredictable values.
- the fog is often driven by the action of the wind not only from the line of sight, but also the fog cloud accordingly defibrated, so that gaps. Also, the proper motion and the spontaneous use of the fog system in 360 ° are not considered. Similar influences occur in calm weather, however driving the driving tool. Again, it may happen that the line of sight is briefly interrupted by the fog.
- the effectiveness of, for example, an infrared nebula is dependent on the density of the infrared emitting particles. Due to environmental and systemic effects temporal and spatial inhomogeneities of the wall arise, which leads to a restriction or to a loss of effectiveness.
- the invention is therefore based on the idea to create multi-spectral fog walls, in which the threat direction, threat distance, wind direction, wind speed, direction of travel and speed in the temporal and spatial application of the visual and infrared line-of-sight are taken into account.
- the charm of the idea lies in the fact that these information / parameters are not measured separately or even need to be known. Rather, quality and quantity, that is, the density and homogeneity of the cloud of fog (s) are determined.
- friend-side transparent smoke walls can be generated, which do not disturb a private thermal imaging device while maintaining a sufficient camouflage effect. This ensures that the platform, such as a vehicle, by the homogeneously distributed infrared radiating particles and a one-sided transparent infrared effectiveness is created, but these are protected against wind attack and vehicle independent of an enemy attack.
- the measurement of the cloud of fog for density and homogeneity and thus the effectiveness of the fog wall in the vicinity of the line of sight is accomplished in the visible range, for example by a TV camera.
- a thermal imaging device is used for the infrared areas. With the aid of digital image processing, the recorded image in the visual area is examined as to whether it has the white reflection typical of the red phosphorus fog in the vicinity of the line of sight.
- the image of the heating device is analyzed for a homogeneous, one-sided infrared-effective particle density.
- the device or the system consists at least of a combination of sensors and digital image and data processing and at least one fog-thrower, which can be linked to a TV camera, a thermal imaging device and at least one UV sensor.
- the images of both devices are evaluated in an image and data processing, wherein in evaluation of this information, the fog wall is stabilized or extended, if certain criteria such as density and / or homogeneity are exceeded.
- One or the Nebel Rush determined in evaluation of the fog wall or cloud of fog further spreading fog media through the at least one launcher.
- a wind sensor can be integrated, whose information is used to better align the projector and thus the formation of the fog. wall can be used. This creates a good smoke screen for the viewing area as well as a sufficient infrared effect in the fog wall.
- the method for generating a line of sight interruption is now independent of wind and travel. It is created in the visible wavelength range opaque in the infrared areas, however, a residual transmission fog cloud. This is achieved (manipulated) by a clever choice or selection and coordination of the fog substance itself, the fog concentration and the thickness of the fog wall, as well as the infrared particles at Nebelabbrand. Disturbance variables are largely eliminated by the digital image processing of a thermal image and the thermal image is thus "friend-friendly" optimized.
- Fig. 2 is an illustration of a visual line interruption by visual fog
- FIG. 3 is an illustration of the partial loss of visual line interruption of the visual fog.
- FIG. 5 shows a representation of the analysis and optimization of the infrared particles
- 6a / b a representation of the infrared image disturbed thermal image from the "friend side” view and after their optimization
- FIG. 7 shows a schematic representation of a device for dispensing active agents
- FIG. 1 shows a system or a device comprising at least one mist thrower 2, a computer 3 and at least one thermal imaging device 5. Further assemblies are a camera 4 and / or UV sensors 6 and preferably a wind sensor 7.
- a digital image and data processing of the images of the camera 4 and / or the thermal imaging device 5 For this purpose, a separate module can be integrated.
- image and data processing are deposited algorithms for the analysis of the fog effectiveness (quality, quantity). With the help of the wind sensor 7, the wind direction and the wind force can be determined.
- the system 1 further comprises a monitor 8 for imaging the sensor image of the TV camera 4 and preferably a further monitor 9 for imaging the sensor image of the thermal imaging device 5 for a viewer.
- the integration of the monitors 8, 9 is optional, the method for determining an optimal fog wall 11 + 13 thereof independently.
- All modules of the system 1 are functionally connected to each other electrically.
- a sensor 12 observing the environment, for example a laser detector, and the camera 4, the thermal imaging device 5 and the UV sensor 6 are installed directly on the projector 2.
- the fog cloud 11 in the visible range and 13 jets (throwing equipment) 2 producing transparent infrared fog and the sensors 4 - 6 are always aligned in the same direction.
- a smoke screen 1 1 + 13 is set up when a threat is detected.
- This is done conventionally by Verschuß of preferably in the air separable cartridges with an active mass, consisting of preferably red phosphorus and other infrared active particles / substances / platelets - agent - etc. (not shown in detail).
- the large-scale visual cloud of fog 11 is applied to interrupt the line of sight of the enemy in no time.
- the launcher 2 has a sufficient number of fog cartridges, which he can deploy simultaneously and / or sequentially in any timing.
- the particle cloud 13 necessary for the unilaterally transparent infrared mist is simultaneously generated with a corresponding configuration.
- the efficiency of the fog wall 1 1 + 13 in the vicinity of the line of sight is monitored by means of the intelligent sensor systems 4 - 6, the density and homogeneity are measured.
- the image in the visual area is obtained by means of TV camera 4 and given to the image and data unit in the computer 3. With the aid of the algorithms stored in this unit, this image is analyzed to determine whether the visual field in the vicinity of the line of sight has the white reflection typical for the red phosphorus fog. In the infrared range, the field of view is scanned in the vicinity of the line of sight 10 by means of thermal imaging device 4 and this analyzed in the image and data processing unit to a homogeneous, one-sided infrared effective particle density.
- the method can also be started manually, for example if an observer detects a weakening of the smoke screen 11, 13. If density and homogeneity are given, no further measures are instructed.
- the computer 3 instructs further measures. This may be the targeted firing of further mist cartridges through the fog ejector 2 into the determined uninterrupted line of sight area 10 (FIG. 4) and / or increasing the concentration throughout the cloud of fog 11 + 13 in general (FIG. 5).
- the instructing can also be done by a, the monitors 8, 9 viewing person 12, ie manually.
- the data of the wind sensor 7 are included in the evaluation.
- the computer 3 is supplied with additional information, so that the extent, position and drift of the cloud of fog 13 can be calculated and this is taken into account in the alignment of the launcher 2.
- the optimized particle density of the infrared mist wall 13 ensures that the line of sight 10 for enemy thermal imaging devices is completely interrupted. With the help of your own heat From the point of view of the platform to be protected, imaging device 5 has residual information of the generic side. Although this is significantly disturbed by the infrared particles (FIG. 6a), it can be improved by means of complex image-optimizing methods and algorithms. Thus, it is possible to eliminate the interfering particles as much as possible and thus to produce an almost interference-free enemy image on the monitor 9 (FIG. 6b).
- the processing of the image can be realized for example by a histogram optimization filter, a median filter and / or a mask filter.
- Fig. 7 shows the device 1 for generating the one-sided transparent mist consisting of the fog generator or the throwing machine 2 for the introduction of fog-generating active bodies, the thermal imaging device 5 and the computer or computer 3 with the digital image processing.
- Another component of the device 1 may be an additional weapon station 20.
- the litter 2 is used to create or create the specific fog wall or the mist-the cloud of mist 1 1, 13 - with wavelength-dependent transmission properties.
- the thermal imaging device 5 has the specific filtering, wherein the spectral sensitivity of the thermal imaging device 3 is highest where the transmission properties of the mist also has a maximum.
- the selective smoke wall 1 1, 13 is generated, the properties of which are essentially defined by the following parameters:
- RP fog has a selective mass extinction coefficient. This coefficient is significantly higher for the visible range than for the infrared ranges. According to Lambert-Beer's law, the transmission of this fog is thus significantly higher in the infrared ranges than in the visible range.
- the fog concentration (CL c 2 , c 3 ), the thickness of the fog wall (d ⁇ d 2 , d 3 ) and the generation of infrared particles it is now possible to generate a mist, which is opaque in the visible wavelength range but has a residual transmission in the infrared ranges (eg c 3 * d 3 ), see FIG. 9.
- This residual transmission may be subject to temporal and spatial fluctuations and be additionally disturbed by disturbances such as Sprintungs binen the fog burn.
- This can be corrected by optimizing the image by the digital image processing of the thermal image of the thermal imaging camera 5 in the computer 3, so that the interference effects are eliminated “friendly.”
- digital image processing in the computer 3 adjusts the sensitivity of the thermal image by digitally adjusting Range and leveling out the transmission and emission characteristics, and eliminating temporal and spatial variations in transmission by measuring stable reference targets within the thermal image, and eliminating "over-the-air” effects caused by the infrared particles by using specific algorithms such as masking filters , Cloning Filter, Median Filter, Poisson Hole Filing etc.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Radiation Pyrometers (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)
- Studio Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102010036026A DE102010036026A1 (en) | 2010-08-31 | 2010-08-31 | Smoke screen effectiveness determining device for protecting e.g. military platform, has measuring sensor system connected with data processing unit, and data processing algorithms provided for analysis of effectiveness of smoke screen |
DE201110106201 DE102011106201A1 (en) | 2011-06-07 | 2011-06-07 | Device for producing multi-spectral fog walls and/or fog clouds for protection of e.g. land vehicle from threat, has sensor connected with computer, where fog walls/clouds are stabilized/expanded during evaluation of information in computer |
PCT/EP2011/004082 WO2012028257A1 (en) | 2010-08-31 | 2011-08-13 | Device and method for producing an effective fog wall or fog cloud |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2612101A1 true EP2612101A1 (en) | 2013-07-10 |
EP2612101B1 EP2612101B1 (en) | 2017-01-11 |
Family
ID=45772184
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11745935.4A Active EP2612101B1 (en) | 2010-08-31 | 2011-08-13 | Device and method for producing an effective fog wall or fog cloud |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2612101B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012028257A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202015003966U1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-07-24 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | fog ammunition |
DE102018110241A1 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2019-10-31 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Method and device for protecting a vehicle from a threat |
CN111964532A (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-20 | 天津蓝马博达科技有限公司 | People's air defense intelligent smoke screen transmitting system |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2582640T3 (en) * | 2011-02-17 | 2016-09-14 | Theravance Biopharma R&D Ip, Llc | Substituted aminobutyric derivatives as neprilysin inhibitors |
CN104111006B (en) * | 2014-05-21 | 2016-03-09 | 黄建 | A kind of gas blowout formula camouflage with smoke device of transport vehicle |
DE102015002737B4 (en) | 2015-03-05 | 2023-05-25 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Method and device for providing a decoy to protect a vehicle and/or object from radar-guided seekers |
CN106284461B (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2018-03-13 | 威斯塔技术(北京)有限公司 | A kind of sliding loader anti-terrorism hydraulic impact device |
DE102018131524A1 (en) | 2018-12-10 | 2020-06-10 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Process for protecting moving or immovable objects from approaching laser-guided threats |
DE102020103249B4 (en) | 2020-02-10 | 2022-02-03 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method for protecting a helicopter with smoke and helicopter with smoke protection system |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4115384C2 (en) * | 1991-05-10 | 1994-07-07 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Method for protecting objects emitting IR radiation |
DE4230826C1 (en) | 1992-09-15 | 1994-03-03 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Camouflage method for protecting a military object and camouflage particles for its implementation |
DE4238038C1 (en) * | 1992-11-11 | 1994-06-16 | Buck Chem Tech Werke | Method of providing a dummy target |
DE19601506C2 (en) * | 1996-01-17 | 2000-05-18 | Rheinmetall W & M Gmbh | Method and device for generating a visual barrier using an artificial fog |
DE29606669U1 (en) | 1996-04-12 | 1996-08-01 | Buck Neue Technologien GmbH, 79395 Neuenburg | Missile to create a smoke screen |
DE19617701C2 (en) | 1996-05-03 | 2000-01-13 | Buck Werke Gmbh & Co I K | Method of providing a dummy target |
DE19910074B4 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2005-02-10 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Launcher for shooting a plurality of active bodies as well as litter plant using them |
DE19914033A1 (en) | 1999-03-27 | 2000-09-28 | Piepenbrock Pyrotechnik Gmbh | Process for generating a camouflage fog that is transparent on one side in the infrared spectral range |
DE19951767C2 (en) | 1999-10-27 | 2002-06-27 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Dual mode decoy |
AUPQ413299A0 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 1999-12-09 | Metal Storm Limited | Forming temporary airborne images |
DE10346001B4 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2006-01-26 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Device for protecting ships from end-phase guided missiles |
DE102004005105A1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2005-09-01 | Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh | Object protection system and method for protecting objects |
DE102005054275A1 (en) | 2005-11-11 | 2007-05-16 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition | Self-protection system for combat vehicles or other objects to be protected |
DE102006004954A1 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2007-08-02 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Ammunition magazine consisting of adjoining shafts connected by struts determining appearance and how ammunition is brought out; self-defence throwing device with magazine connected to control and release units |
US7999720B2 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2011-08-16 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Camouflage positional elements |
-
2011
- 2011-08-13 EP EP11745935.4A patent/EP2612101B1/en active Active
- 2011-08-13 WO PCT/EP2011/004082 patent/WO2012028257A1/en active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2012028257A1 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202015003966U1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2015-07-24 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | fog ammunition |
US10422609B2 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2019-09-24 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Smoke munition |
DE102018110241A1 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2019-10-31 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Method and device for protecting a vehicle from a threat |
CN111964532A (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-20 | 天津蓝马博达科技有限公司 | People's air defense intelligent smoke screen transmitting system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2012028257A1 (en) | 2012-03-08 |
EP2612101B1 (en) | 2017-01-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2612101B1 (en) | Device and method for producing an effective fog wall or fog cloud | |
EP2690611B1 (en) | Fire monitoring system | |
DE102011010334B4 (en) | Camera system and method for observing objects at a great distance, in particular for monitoring target objects at night, mist, dust or rain | |
EP3514477B1 (en) | System and method for interfering with a detection of a target | |
DE4238038C1 (en) | Method of providing a dummy target | |
WO2012103878A2 (en) | Air surveillance system for detecting missiles launched from inside an area to be monitored and air surveillance method | |
DE102010036026A1 (en) | Smoke screen effectiveness determining device for protecting e.g. military platform, has measuring sensor system connected with data processing unit, and data processing algorithms provided for analysis of effectiveness of smoke screen | |
DE102015002737A1 (en) | Method and device for providing a decoy target for protecting a vehicle and / or object from radar-directed seekers | |
DE4230826C1 (en) | Camouflage method for protecting a military object and camouflage particles for its implementation | |
EP1173393B1 (en) | Method of producing a screening smoke with one-way transparency in the infrared spectrum | |
EP3591427B1 (en) | Missile alerter and a method for issuing a warning about a missile | |
DE102017100068A1 (en) | Laser system with protective device | |
DE102010015045B4 (en) | Method and system for determining trajectories of fast-moving objects or projectiles by means of a time-wavelength-coded detection space | |
EP3139347B1 (en) | Method for determining an alignment of an object | |
DE102013015324A1 (en) | Device for enhancing aiming accuracy of hand-held weapon, has laser or electronic camera adapted to upstream micro channel plate for temporal association of image data supplied from camera by pulse-modulated square wave | |
DE3022460A1 (en) | Method for laying smoke screen using carrier projectiles - with first screen laid in close proximity to protected position, and further screens at increasing distances and heights | |
EP2840414B1 (en) | Method for protecting an object needing protection | |
DE3941391C2 (en) | Process for the passive detection of muzzle flashes | |
DE102019006717A1 (en) | Laser weapon system and method for irradiating a target | |
DE19601506C2 (en) | Method and device for generating a visual barrier using an artificial fog | |
DE3635816C2 (en) | ||
DE69408079T2 (en) | System for localization of mobile objects | |
EP0795759B1 (en) | Missile for detecting and attacking hostile helicopters | |
WO2018206325A1 (en) | Protection system for protecting against light flying objects such as drones | |
EP3260808B1 (en) | Method for offset correction of a weapon system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130213 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160906 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 861696 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502011011512 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20170111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170511 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170412 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170411 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170511 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502011011512 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20171012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 861696 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170813 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20180621 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: MMEP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502011011512 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502011011512 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DREISS PATENTANWAELTE PARTG MBB, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20230811 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240821 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240826 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240829 Year of fee payment: 14 |