EP2605223B1 - An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission - Google Patents

An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2605223B1
EP2605223B1 EP20110193091 EP11193091A EP2605223B1 EP 2605223 B1 EP2605223 B1 EP 2605223B1 EP 20110193091 EP20110193091 EP 20110193091 EP 11193091 A EP11193091 A EP 11193091A EP 2605223 B1 EP2605223 B1 EP 2605223B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
acoustic emission
processor
alarm
signal
material properties
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20110193091
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2605223A1 (en
Inventor
Niclas Olsson
Niklas Isaksson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Securitas Direct AB
Original Assignee
Securitas Direct AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Securitas Direct AB filed Critical Securitas Direct AB
Priority to ES11193091.3T priority Critical patent/ES2502441T3/en
Priority to EP20110193091 priority patent/EP2605223B1/en
Publication of EP2605223A1 publication Critical patent/EP2605223A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2605223B1 publication Critical patent/EP2605223B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02Mechanical actuation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/16Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid
    • G08B13/1654Actuation by interference with mechanical vibrations in air or other fluid using passive vibration detection systems

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission.
  • Systems of this type comprise an acoustic emission sensor for detecting acoustic emission signals in a structure, a processor for processing the detected signal and an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal when a predetermined threshold value of the detected signal is exceeded.
  • Such systems are commonly used in domestic houses and office premises as well as other buildings as alarm systems to detect unauthorised intrusion such as burglary, damages and similar.
  • AE Acoustic emission
  • the properties of AE can be a frequency of 10 kHz to over 1 MHz and with an amplitude in the order of nm.
  • Alarm systems for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission are known in the prior art.
  • Acoustic emission (AE) sensors are used in alarm systems for measuring acoustic emission in order to detect when glass is breaking.
  • acoustic emission is the propagation of mechanical waves in the glass, wherein acoustic emission signals exceeding a predetermined threshold value set off an alarm.
  • WO2009/144724 discloses an intrusion detection system comprising sensors with a processor that enables local analyzing of a phenomena sensed by said sensor.
  • An object of the present invention is to avoid the drawbacks and problems of the prior art.
  • the system and method according to the invention result in a reliable and flexible alarm system which is easy to set up and can be used on different types of structures.
  • the present invention relates to an alarm system for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of AE, comprising an AE sensor to be mounted on said structure so as to detect AE signals propagated through it, a processor for analysing the detected signal and determining if the detected signal exceeds a parameter threshold value, an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal if the detected signal exceeds the parameter threshold value, and an actuator for generating an AE test signal through the structure, which test signal is to be detected by the AE sensor, characterised by the processor being adapted to analyse the detected test signal to determine material properties of the structure, the processor being provided with a plurality of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different materials, the processor being adapted to classify the material of the structure and select the parameter threshold value according to the selected class.
  • an AE sensor such as a conventional AE sensor
  • the invention result in a flexible alarm system which can be used in several different applications without any time consuming modifications and settings, such as manual modifications and settings at the location of the structure, which possibly also result in inaccurate settings triggering false alarms.
  • the detector algorithms for different materials may be different.
  • the processor can be adapted to select a suitable detector algorithm according to the determined material properties of the structure.
  • the processor can be arranged so as to select a suitable detector algorithm from a set of predetermined detector algorithms for different materials.
  • the AE sensor can be arranged as the actuator for generating the AE test signal through the structure.
  • the same AE sensor can be used both as the actuator and detector, which results in a simple and cost efficient alarm system for use on different types of materials.
  • the alarm system can comprise a switch for switching the acoustic emission sensor between an actuator mode and a detection mode.
  • first and second AE sensors can be used, wherein the first AE sensor is arranged as the actuator and the second AE sensor is arranged as the detector.
  • the test signal is generated by hitting the structure, e.g. by knocking on the structure by hand or hitting the structure with an object, such as a small hammer, pen or similar.
  • the processor can be adapted to automatically select the parameter threshold value according to the determined material properties of the structure.
  • the processor can also be adapted to automatically select the detector algorithm to be used.
  • the setup of the alarm system after mounting can be substantially or entirely automatic, which in most cases results in a very simple and effective installation of the alarm system.
  • the alarm system can be set up substantially or entirely automatically regardless of whether the AE sensor is mounted on the glass of a window pane or the wood of a window frame, a door or a door frame.
  • the processor is provided with a plurality of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different materials.
  • Software used in the processor can be provided with algorithms for a plurality of different materials.
  • the processor is adapted to classify the material of the structure and select a detector algorithm and/or a parameter threshold value in accordance with the selected class. Classes can be provided for a desired number of materials.
  • the alarm system can determine the material properties of the structure in great detail and select appropriate algorithms in accordance with the determined material properties so as to provide reliable parameter threshold values for triggering the alarm.
  • the invention also relates to a method of detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission, including the steps of
  • the method provides a simple and reliable detection of intrusion in a structure.
  • the method also provides a simple and reliable set up of an alarm system.
  • an alarm system is arranged in a building 10.
  • the alarm system comprises a control panel also referred to as a gateway 12 that, for example, includes a processor and an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal when the alarm is set off.
  • the gateway 12 is connected to a central station 14, either by a telephone line or by a wireless telecommunications system such as GSM or other radio frequency systems.
  • the connection also can be through the internet 16.
  • the central station can be connected to an alarm receiving office centre, such as a remote alarm receiving office centre.
  • the gateway can be provided with input means or be activated and controlled by control device such as a keypad 18 which can be a wireless remote device.
  • the keypad 18 is arranged in the vicinity of an entrance door 20. Alternatively, the keypad 18 is arranged in any suitable location or is a portable device.
  • the alarm system comprises at least one acoustic emission sensor 22 for detecting acoustic emission (AE) due to fracture of the material in the structure on which the AE sensor 22 is mounted.
  • the AE sensor 22 is a piezoelectric sensor or any other type of suitable AE sensor.
  • the AE sensor 22 includes a piezoelectric ceramic or a piezoelectric plastic film.
  • the AE sensor 22 is mounted on structures in the form of windows 24 and the door 20 to detect fracture of the glass in the windows and the material of the door 20, such as wood, metal or any other type of material.
  • the alarm system comprises also other types of detectors or sensors 26, such as perimeter alarm detectors, magnetic sensors, infrared detectors, etc.
  • the AE sensor 22 is connected to the processor, for example through a wireless connection.
  • the processor is included in the AE sensor 22, wherein the processor is a part of the AE sensor 22 or a unit including the AE sensor 22.
  • the processor ise located in the central station 14, in the gateway 12 or in any other suitable location.
  • the processor is arranged for analysing a signal from the AE sensor and determining if the signal exceeds a threshold value for setting off the alarm.
  • the AE sensor 22 is mounted on a door frame 28 for detecting fracture in the material of the door frame 28.
  • the AE sensor is mounted in the vicinity of an expected breakage area, such as close to a lock 30 and handle 32 of the door 20.
  • the door frame 28 is made of wood. Due to the large amounts of irregularities found in wood, for example, knots and growth rings, attenuation is greater in a wooden material than in e.g. glass or metal. This result in difficulties measuring AE on large distances and the AE sensor should, if possible, be arranged close to the source of activity, i.e. the breakage area.
  • the AE sensor is mounted 0-2 m, 0-1 m, 0-0.5 m or 0-0.2 m from the expected breakage area.
  • the AE sensor 22 is mounted on the door 20.
  • the AE sensor 22 is mounted in a side of the door 20 opposite the hinges and in the same side of the door 20 as the handle 32.
  • the AE sensor 22 can, as part of an alarm system for detecting intrusion, be mounted on any suitable structure, such as a house, building, locker, safe and similar, to detect fracture therein.
  • the AE sensor 22 is integrated with a magnetic contact and mounted on the door 20 and/or doorframe 28. Then, the AE sensor 22 detects fractures in the door 20 and/or doorframe 28, and the magnetic contact detects opening of the door 20.
  • the AE sensor is mounted on the glass of a window 24.
  • the alarm system according to the invention is arranged for detecting intrusion in a plurality of different structures comprising different materials.
  • the alarm system can easily be set up for detecting fracture by means of AE in a first structure comprising a first material or a second structure comprising a second material.
  • the first structure is a window made of glass and the second structure is a door frame made of wood.
  • a function of the alarm system is illustrated schematically by means of a block diagram.
  • the AE sensor 22 is arranged in an actuator mode for generating an AE test signal through the structure.
  • a voltage is applied to the AE sensor 22 in the form of a piezoelectric sensor to obtain the AE test signal.
  • the AE sensor 22 is set in a detector mode for detecting the test signal propagated through the structure.
  • the alarm system comprises a switch for switching the AE sensor 22 between the actuator mode and the detector mode.
  • the AE sensor 22 functions both as actuator for generating the test signal and detector for detecting said test signal, i.e. detecting the test signal generated by itself.
  • the test signal is received by the processor, wherein the processor is arranged for analysing the detected test signal to determine material properties of the structure.
  • the processor is arranged for classifying the structure according to the detected test signal.
  • the processor is provided with stored data of material properties for a plurality of different materials. Said data can be arranged in predetermined classes, each class representing a particular material, such as glass, wood or any other material, wherein the detected test signal is compared to said classes to select the suitable class.
  • Each class sets one or more detector algorithms and/or parameter threshold values for activating the alarm unit and setting off the alarm.
  • the processor is adapted to analyse the detected AE test signal from the structure to be protected, determine the material properties of the structure and select detector algorithms and/or parameter threshold values according to the determined material properties.
  • the selected parameter threshold values are, for example, set to indicate fracture of the material in the structure to detect intrusion therein, such as a window cracking or a door frame splintering or similar, wherein an alarm is set off when one or more parameter threshold values are exceeded.
  • a single AE sensor is used for generating the test signal, detecting the test signal and, after setting up the threshold parameters for triggering an alarm in accordance with the detected test signal, also detecting events for triggering the alarm due to fracture in the material in the protected structure.
  • a first AE sensor 22 is used as an actuator to generate the AE test signal, wherein a second AE sensor is used for detecting said signal.
  • the first and second AE sensors are arranged in a single housing forming a single sensor unit.
  • the test signal is generated by hitting the structure, e.g. by an object, such as a small hammer, pen or similar, wherein the AE sensor 22 is arranged as a detector.
  • the same sensor 22 or sensor unit can be used in an alarm system for detecting intrusion through different materials.
  • the same processor including suitable software can be used.
  • a single alarm system can be used on different materials, such as glass, wood, metal, etc., for detecting fracture by means of AE.
  • the alarm system can be adapted to different types of wood, different glass structures, etc.
  • the processor is adapted to calculate appropriate parameter threshold values according to the detected test signal to obtain suitable parameter threshold values for the material of the structure.
  • the processor is adapted to select a detector algorithm according to the analysed test signal and calculate or select parameter threshold values indicating unauthorised tampering of the structure, such as fracture of the material, hitting the material with an object in order to break it or similar.
  • the alarm system is configured so that analyse of the AE test signal and the selection of parameter threshold values are performed automatically. If applicable, also selection of detector algorithm is performed automatically.
  • the alarm system is set up automatically according to the material of the structure to be protected.
  • the alarm system is also configured to automatically generate the test signal when initially turned on after mounting on the structure.
  • the switch from actuator mode to detector mode of the AE sensor is performed automatically after generating the test signal, such as after a predetermined period of time.
  • the processor comprises software with an algorithm for determination and separation of fracture signals for a plurality of different materials, such as glass and wood, and optionally also materials in different types of structures, such as glass of a specific thickness and wood of a specific type.
  • Different types of wood have different characteristics and results in differences in AE signal propagation through the material.
  • oak is a more dense material than pine. However both are used in doors, door frames and window frames.
  • the processor can contain a large number of classes or algorithms for determining the material properties of the structure by calculation, so that a very accurate determination of the material properties can be obtained and false alarms be avoided.
  • the algorithm is arranged to determine whether to classify or calculate an AE signal as an alarm signal or not, i.e. whether or not the detected AE signal is to set off the alarm or not.
  • the processor can be adapted to take a plurality of different parameters into account when determining the material properties and also when determining if a detected signal is to set off the alarm or not.
  • the parameters includes one or more of frequency content, time signal, amplitude, pulse duration and rise time, calculated as the duration from passing a predetermined value to reaching its peak amplitude.
  • the algorithms of the processor are arranged for considering a combination of methods where both the time signal and frequency spectrum is analysed. For example, in a power spectrum, the number of detected peaks is counted and the area is calculated. Different band-pass filters can be applied. In a time signal, the mean value of a number of the largest peaks is calculated and a peak is detected. Also in this case, different band-pass filters can be applied. These algorithms made it possible to distinguish fractures from other signals due to the difference in appearance and characteristics. All signals can be classified or categorised by specific parameters.
  • Fracture in a material can be determined by counting number of AE events detected.
  • an alarm system could be designed to not trigger an alarm until a certain number of AE events have occurred in a given timeframe.
  • the signal recorded and analysed with suitable algorithms are e.g. 100 ms. With the introduction of a buffer memory, a longer signal could be recorded and analyzed in intervals of 100 ms once the system is triggered.
  • AE signals associated with crack formation in wood When studying a frequency spectrum, AE signals associated with crack formation in wood generally have larger response in the higher regions. Crack formation in oak is associated with a strong frequency response from 25 kHz to ca 60 kHz, while in pine which is a softer material and thus more efficient in dampening higher frequencies, this corresponding region is instead seen from 15 kHz to 40-45 kHz. Further, in some events responses associated with cracks also contain frequency response in the region 100-300 kHz for both pine and oak and, sometimes, a larger amount of detected frequencies.
  • Fig. 7 One example of a flowchart of the algorithms used to detect crack formations is illustrated in Fig. 7 . In addition a threshold for allowed amplitudes and the time-signal optionally is included to faster detect clearly suspicious signals by counting the number of peaks.
  • the signal is disregarded and considered a non-fracture if the calculated number of peaks falls under the first threshold. If the number of calculated peaks is more than the second threshold it is considered a fracture and immediately triggers an alarm. If the calculated peaks are greater than the first threshold but lower than the second it is considered a possible fracture and an FFT is performed with a band-pass filter in the range 300 Hz to 100 kHz to further study the frequency content associated with AE. If the area of the frequency spectrum, in the range 20- 100 kHz, and the number of detected frequencies are above the threshold the signal is considered a fracture.
  • AE signals acquired in glass have higher frequency content than the corresponding signals in wood. Also since the attenuation is much lower, more details in the power spectrum could be observed. For example, an algorithm for detecting fracture in glass only analyses the frequency domain.
  • Non-destructive signals i.e. signals not related to fracture of the material
  • fracture of glass such as by breakage or cut, generally have frequencies around and above 200 kHz.
  • Some of the signals from non-destructing events also had similarly high frequencies, but filtering the signal 10 kHz to 500 kHz and using a combination of peak detection in the power spectrum and area calculation between 150-500 kHz, they could be separated from the fracture signals.
  • a flowchart showing one example of the detector of glass fractures can be seen in Fig. 8 .
  • the same software handles a plurality of different materials.
  • the software sets the variables used in the suitable algorithms.
  • the parameters are obtained from start, when the material properties have been selected as a response to the detected AE test signal.
  • the signal is filtered with a band-pass filter with cut-off frequencies 100 Hz and 500 kHz. This is basically the whole signal content with exceptions of very high and low frequencies with no significance to the tests.
  • a power spectrum is performed, and the area is calculated from 60 to 100 kHz. This is due to the high frequency content obtained in glass material failure. If the area calculated is below a specific threshold, the detector indicates no alarm, but if the area is sufficient, it is treated as a suspicious signal and further testing is performed.
  • the signal is filtered with the same type of band-pass filter, but with the cut-off frequencies 10 to 500 kHz. Peak detection is performed on the power spectrum to calculate the number of detected frequencies and if the number is below a specific threshold, again no alarm is indicated. If the threshold is exceeded, a final test is done to make sure it is really a fracture signal. The area of the power spectrum between 150 and 500 kHz is calculated, and if the threshold for this is exceeded, alarm is indicated

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The invention relates to an alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission. Systems of this type comprise an acoustic emission sensor for detecting acoustic emission signals in a structure, a processor for processing the detected signal and an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal when a predetermined threshold value of the detected signal is exceeded. Such systems are commonly used in domestic houses and office premises as well as other buildings as alarm systems to detect unauthorised intrusion such as burglary, damages and similar.
  • PRIOR ART
  • Acoustic emission (AE) is the propagation of mechanical waves in a solid caused by breakage or fracture of the material. When a material cracks the material emits energy in the form of transient elastic waves that propagates through the material and can be detected by means of different types of sensors, such as piezo-electric sensors. The properties of AE can be a frequency of 10 kHz to over 1 MHz and with an amplitude in the order of nm.
  • Alarm systems for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission are known in the prior art. Acoustic emission (AE) sensors are used in alarm systems for measuring acoustic emission in order to detect when glass is breaking. Hence, in such a case acoustic emission is the propagation of mechanical waves in the glass, wherein acoustic emission signals exceeding a predetermined threshold value set off an alarm.
  • WO2009/144724 discloses an intrusion detection system comprising sensors with a processor that enables local analyzing of a phenomena sensed by said sensor.
  • One problem with such prior art systems for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission is that they quite often can be inaccurate and set off false alarms.
  • Another problem with such prior art systems for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of AE is that they lack in flexibility and can result in expensive alarm systems.
  • One drawback with such prior art systems for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of AE is that they can be difficult to set up appropriately.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An object of the present invention is to avoid the drawbacks and problems of the prior art. The system and method according to the invention result in a reliable and flexible alarm system which is easy to set up and can be used on different types of structures.
  • The present invention relates to an alarm system for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of AE, comprising an AE sensor to be mounted on said structure so as to detect AE signals propagated through it, a processor for analysing the detected signal and determining if the detected signal exceeds a parameter threshold value, an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal if the detected signal exceeds the parameter threshold value, and an actuator for generating an AE test signal through the structure, which test signal is to be detected by the AE sensor, characterised by the processor being adapted to analyse the detected test signal to determine material properties of the structure, the processor being provided with a plurality of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different materials, the processor being adapted to classify the material of the structure and select the parameter threshold value according to the selected class. Hence, according to the invention an AE sensor, such as a conventional AE sensor, can be mounted on different structures, such as glass, wood or metal structures, to detect fractures therein due to intrusion. The invention result in a flexible alarm system which can be used in several different applications without any time consuming modifications and settings, such as manual modifications and settings at the location of the structure, which possibly also result in inaccurate settings triggering false alarms. Also, the detector algorithms for different materials may be different. Hence, the processor can be adapted to select a suitable detector algorithm according to the determined material properties of the structure. The processor can be arranged so as to select a suitable detector algorithm from a set of predetermined detector algorithms for different materials.
  • The AE sensor can be arranged as the actuator for generating the AE test signal through the structure. Hence, the same AE sensor can be used both as the actuator and detector, which results in a simple and cost efficient alarm system for use on different types of materials. For this purpose, the alarm system can comprise a switch for switching the acoustic emission sensor between an actuator mode and a detection mode. Alternatively, first and second AE sensors can be used, wherein the first AE sensor is arranged as the actuator and the second AE sensor is arranged as the detector. Alternatively, the test signal is generated by hitting the structure, e.g. by knocking on the structure by hand or hitting the structure with an object, such as a small hammer, pen or similar.
  • The processor can be adapted to automatically select the parameter threshold value according to the determined material properties of the structure. The processor can also be adapted to automatically select the detector algorithm to be used. Hence, the setup of the alarm system after mounting can be substantially or entirely automatic, which in most cases results in a very simple and effective installation of the alarm system. For example, the alarm system can be set up substantially or entirely automatically regardless of whether the AE sensor is mounted on the glass of a window pane or the wood of a window frame, a door or a door frame.
  • The processor is provided with a plurality of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different materials. Software used in the processor can be provided with algorithms for a plurality of different materials. Further, the processor is adapted to classify the material of the structure and select a detector algorithm and/or a parameter threshold value in accordance with the selected class. Classes can be provided for a desired number of materials. Hence, the alarm system can determine the material properties of the structure in great detail and select appropriate algorithms in accordance with the determined material properties so as to provide reliable parameter threshold values for triggering the alarm.
  • The invention also relates to a method of detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission, including the steps of
    1. a) mounting an acoustic emission sensor on the structure,
    2. b) generating an acoustic emission test signal through the structure,
    3. c) detecting the test signal by the acoustic emission sensor,
    4. d) analysing the detected test signal and determining material properties of the structure by means of a processor,
    5. e) selecting, from a plurality of predetermined classes for different materials, a class corresponding to the determined material properties of the structure,
    6. f) setting a parameter threshold value in accordance with the selected class, and
    7. g) setting off an alarm if a signal detected by the acoustic emission sensor exceeds the parameter threshold value.
  • Hence, the method provides a simple and reliable detection of intrusion in a structure. The method also provides a simple and reliable set up of an alarm system.
  • Further characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the description of the embodiments below, the appended drawings and the dependent claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In order that the manner in which the above recited and other advantages and objects of the invention are obtained will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.
  • Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
  • Fig. 1
    is a schematic view of an alarm system installed in a building in accordance with one embodiment of the invention,
    Fig. 2
    is a schematic view of a structure in the form of a door and a door frame, wherein an AE sensor of an alarm system is mounted on the door frame,
    Fig. 3
    is a schematic view of a structure in the form of a door and a door frame, wherein the AE sensor of an alarm system is mounted on the door,
    Fig. 4
    is a schematic view of a structure in the form of a door and a door frame, wherein the AE sensor is combined with a magnetic contact in an alarm system and mounted on the door and the door frame,
    Fig. 5
    is a schematic view of a structure in the form of a window, wherein the AE sensor of an alarm system is mounted on the window pane,
    Fig. 6
    is a schematic block diagram showing a function of the alarm system according to one embodiment of the invention,
    Fig. 7
    is a flowchart showing an example of an algorithm for detecting intrusion in a wood structure, and
    Fig. 8
    is a flowchart showing an example of an algorithm for detecting intrusion in a glass structure.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In Fig. 1 an alarm system is arranged in a building 10. The alarm system comprises a control panel also referred to as a gateway 12 that, for example, includes a processor and an alarm unit for providing an alarm signal when the alarm is set off. In the embodiment of Fig. 1 the gateway 12 is connected to a central station 14, either by a telephone line or by a wireless telecommunications system such as GSM or other radio frequency systems. The connection also can be through the internet 16. The central station can be connected to an alarm receiving office centre, such as a remote alarm receiving office centre. The gateway can be provided with input means or be activated and controlled by control device such as a keypad 18 which can be a wireless remote device. The keypad 18 is arranged in the vicinity of an entrance door 20. Alternatively, the keypad 18 is arranged in any suitable location or is a portable device.
  • The alarm system comprises at least one acoustic emission sensor 22 for detecting acoustic emission (AE) due to fracture of the material in the structure on which the AE sensor 22 is mounted. For example, the AE sensor 22 is a piezoelectric sensor or any other type of suitable AE sensor. For example, the AE sensor 22 includes a piezoelectric ceramic or a piezoelectric plastic film. In the embodiment of Fig. 1 the AE sensor 22 is mounted on structures in the form of windows 24 and the door 20 to detect fracture of the glass in the windows and the material of the door 20, such as wood, metal or any other type of material. Optionally, the alarm system comprises also other types of detectors or sensors 26, such as perimeter alarm detectors, magnetic sensors, infrared detectors, etc.
  • The AE sensor 22 is connected to the processor, for example through a wireless connection. For example, the processor is included in the AE sensor 22, wherein the processor is a part of the AE sensor 22 or a unit including the AE sensor 22. Alternatively, the processor ise located in the central station 14, in the gateway 12 or in any other suitable location. The processor is arranged for analysing a signal from the AE sensor and determining if the signal exceeds a threshold value for setting off the alarm.
  • With reference to Fig. 2 the AE sensor 22 is mounted on a door frame 28 for detecting fracture in the material of the door frame 28. The AE sensor is mounted in the vicinity of an expected breakage area, such as close to a lock 30 and handle 32 of the door 20. For example, the door frame 28 is made of wood. Due to the large amounts of irregularities found in wood, for example, knots and growth rings, attenuation is greater in a wooden material than in e.g. glass or metal. This result in difficulties measuring AE on large distances and the AE sensor should, if possible, be arranged close to the source of activity, i.e. the breakage area. For example, the AE sensor is mounted 0-2 m, 0-1 m, 0-0.5 m or 0-0.2 m from the expected breakage area. In Fig. 3 the AE sensor 22 is mounted on the door 20. The AE sensor 22 is mounted in a side of the door 20 opposite the hinges and in the same side of the door 20 as the handle 32. The AE sensor 22 can, as part of an alarm system for detecting intrusion, be mounted on any suitable structure, such as a house, building, locker, safe and similar, to detect fracture therein. In Fig. 4 the AE sensor 22 is integrated with a magnetic contact and mounted on the door 20 and/or doorframe 28. Then, the AE sensor 22 detects fractures in the door 20 and/or doorframe 28, and the magnetic contact detects opening of the door 20. With reference to Fig. 5, the AE sensor is mounted on the glass of a window 24.
  • The alarm system according to the invention is arranged for detecting intrusion in a plurality of different structures comprising different materials. Hence, the alarm system can easily be set up for detecting fracture by means of AE in a first structure comprising a first material or a second structure comprising a second material. For example, the first structure is a window made of glass and the second structure is a door frame made of wood.
  • With reference to Fig. 6 a function of the alarm system according to one embodiment is illustrated schematically by means of a block diagram. After mounting on the structure, the AE sensor 22 is arranged in an actuator mode for generating an AE test signal through the structure. For example, a voltage is applied to the AE sensor 22 in the form of a piezoelectric sensor to obtain the AE test signal. Then, the AE sensor 22 is set in a detector mode for detecting the test signal propagated through the structure. For example, the alarm system comprises a switch for switching the AE sensor 22 between the actuator mode and the detector mode. Hence, according to one embodiment of the invention the AE sensor 22 functions both as actuator for generating the test signal and detector for detecting said test signal, i.e. detecting the test signal generated by itself.
  • The test signal is received by the processor, wherein the processor is arranged for analysing the detected test signal to determine material properties of the structure. Hence, the processor is arranged for classifying the structure according to the detected test signal. For example, the processor is provided with stored data of material properties for a plurality of different materials. Said data can be arranged in predetermined classes, each class representing a particular material, such as glass, wood or any other material, wherein the detected test signal is compared to said classes to select the suitable class. Each class sets one or more detector algorithms and/or parameter threshold values for activating the alarm unit and setting off the alarm. Hence, the processor is adapted to analyse the detected AE test signal from the structure to be protected, determine the material properties of the structure and select detector algorithms and/or parameter threshold values according to the determined material properties. The selected parameter threshold values are, for example, set to indicate fracture of the material in the structure to detect intrusion therein, such as a window cracking or a door frame splintering or similar, wherein an alarm is set off when one or more parameter threshold values are exceeded. Hence, a single AE sensor is used for generating the test signal, detecting the test signal and, after setting up the threshold parameters for triggering an alarm in accordance with the detected test signal, also detecting events for triggering the alarm due to fracture in the material in the protected structure.
  • In an alternative embodiment a first AE sensor 22 is used as an actuator to generate the AE test signal, wherein a second AE sensor is used for detecting said signal. For example, the first and second AE sensors are arranged in a single housing forming a single sensor unit. Alternatively, the test signal is generated by hitting the structure, e.g. by an object, such as a small hammer, pen or similar, wherein the AE sensor 22 is arranged as a detector. Hence, according to the invention the same sensor 22 or sensor unit can be used in an alarm system for detecting intrusion through different materials. Also the same processor including suitable software can be used. Hence, a single alarm system can be used on different materials, such as glass, wood, metal, etc., for detecting fracture by means of AE. Depending on the processor and the software used, the alarm system can be adapted to different types of wood, different glass structures, etc.
  • According to one alternative embodiment the processor is adapted to calculate appropriate parameter threshold values according to the detected test signal to obtain suitable parameter threshold values for the material of the structure. For example, the processor is adapted to select a detector algorithm according to the analysed test signal and calculate or select parameter threshold values indicating unauthorised tampering of the structure, such as fracture of the material, hitting the material with an object in order to break it or similar.
  • For example, the alarm system is configured so that analyse of the AE test signal and the selection of parameter threshold values are performed automatically. If applicable, also selection of detector algorithm is performed automatically. Hence, the alarm system is set up automatically according to the material of the structure to be protected. For example, the alarm system is also configured to automatically generate the test signal when initially turned on after mounting on the structure. Optionally, also the switch from actuator mode to detector mode of the AE sensor is performed automatically after generating the test signal, such as after a predetermined period of time.
  • For example, the processor comprises software with an algorithm for determination and separation of fracture signals for a plurality of different materials, such as glass and wood, and optionally also materials in different types of structures, such as glass of a specific thickness and wood of a specific type. Different types of wood have different characteristics and results in differences in AE signal propagation through the material. For example, oak is a more dense material than pine. However both are used in doors, door frames and window frames. The processor can contain a large number of classes or algorithms for determining the material properties of the structure by calculation, so that a very accurate determination of the material properties can be obtained and false alarms be avoided. The algorithm is arranged to determine whether to classify or calculate an AE signal as an alarm signal or not, i.e. whether or not the detected AE signal is to set off the alarm or not.
  • The processor can be adapted to take a plurality of different parameters into account when determining the material properties and also when determining if a detected signal is to set off the alarm or not. For example, the parameters includes one or more of frequency content, time signal, amplitude, pulse duration and rise time, calculated as the duration from passing a predetermined value to reaching its peak amplitude. According to one embodiment, the algorithms of the processor are arranged for considering a combination of methods where both the time signal and frequency spectrum is analysed. For example, in a power spectrum, the number of detected peaks is counted and the area is calculated. Different band-pass filters can be applied. In a time signal, the mean value of a number of the largest peaks is calculated and a peak is detected. Also in this case, different band-pass filters can be applied. These algorithms made it possible to distinguish fractures from other signals due to the difference in appearance and characteristics. All signals can be classified or categorised by specific parameters.
  • Fracture in a material can be determined by counting number of AE events detected. Depending on the application, an alarm system could be designed to not trigger an alarm until a certain number of AE events have occurred in a given timeframe. The signal recorded and analysed with suitable algorithms are e.g. 100 ms. With the introduction of a buffer memory, a longer signal could be recorded and analyzed in intervals of 100 ms once the system is triggered.
  • When studying a frequency spectrum, AE signals associated with crack formation in wood generally have larger response in the higher regions. Crack formation in oak is associated with a strong frequency response from 25 kHz to ca 60 kHz, while in pine which is a softer material and thus more efficient in dampening higher frequencies, this corresponding region is instead seen from 15 kHz to 40-45 kHz. Further, in some events responses associated with cracks also contain frequency response in the region 100-300 kHz for both pine and oak and, sometimes, a larger amount of detected frequencies. One example of a flowchart of the algorithms used to detect crack formations is illustrated in Fig. 7. In addition a threshold for allowed amplitudes and the time-signal optionally is included to faster detect clearly suspicious signals by counting the number of peaks.
  • Because of the different characteristics of dense and softer wood, different parameters are set for e.g. oak and pine. A mean value for a number of the maximal peaks in the time signal is calculated. Even if a signal is not associated with a crack formation it might be desired to trigger an alarm if the amplitude is high, resulting from e.g. a hammer strike or similar. This threshold could be changed or completely disregarded depending on the application. Fracture signals can in most cases be separated from other disturbances, e.g. hand-knocks that probably are the most common signal to be analysed in a door application, merely by considering the time signal. By analysing the time signal under 30 kHz and calculating the number of peaks, most disturbances are disregarded and some of the fractures are detected without performing a more complex and time-consuming FFT. The signal is disregarded and considered a non-fracture if the calculated number of peaks falls under the first threshold. If the number of calculated peaks is more than the second threshold it is considered a fracture and immediately triggers an alarm. If the calculated peaks are greater than the first threshold but lower than the second it is considered a possible fracture and an FFT is performed with a band-pass filter in the range 300 Hz to 100 kHz to further study the frequency content associated with AE. If the area of the frequency spectrum, in the range 20- 100 kHz, and the number of detected frequencies are above the threshold the signal is considered a fracture.
  • AE signals acquired in glass have higher frequency content than the corresponding signals in wood. Also since the attenuation is much lower, more details in the power spectrum could be observed. For example, an algorithm for detecting fracture in glass only analyses the frequency domain.
  • Non-destructive signals, i.e. signals not related to fracture of the material, have a response up to ca. 50 kHz, with exception for some events that have a frequency content up to 160 kHz. However, fracture of glass, such as by breakage or cut, generally have frequencies around and above 200 kHz. Some of the signals from non-destructing events also had similarly high frequencies, but filtering the signal 10 kHz to 500 kHz and using a combination of peak detection in the power spectrum and area calculation between 150-500 kHz, they could be separated from the fracture signals. A flowchart showing one example of the detector of glass fractures can be seen in Fig. 8.
  • For example, the same software handles a plurality of different materials. When the kind of material the current measurements are performed on has been determined, the software sets the variables used in the suitable algorithms.
  • Due to the lower signal attenuation in glass, more details of the signals can be observed and makes it possible to have fewer tests than in the wood detector. As in the wood detector, the parameters are obtained from start, when the material properties have been selected as a response to the detected AE test signal. The signal is filtered with a band-pass filter with cut-off frequencies 100 Hz and 500 kHz. This is basically the whole signal content with exceptions of very high and low frequencies with no significance to the tests. Then a power spectrum is performed, and the area is calculated from 60 to 100 kHz. This is due to the high frequency content obtained in glass material failure. If the area calculated is below a specific threshold, the detector indicates no alarm, but if the area is sufficient, it is treated as a suspicious signal and further testing is performed. Before the second test the signal is filtered with the same type of band-pass filter, but with the cut-off frequencies 10 to 500 kHz. Peak detection is performed on the power spectrum to calculate the number of detected frequencies and if the number is below a specific threshold, again no alarm is indicated. If the threshold is exceeded, a final test is done to make sure it is really a fracture signal. The area of the power spectrum between 150 and 500 kHz is calculated, and if the threshold for this is exceeded, alarm is indicated
  • While certain illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described in particularity, it will be understood that various other modifications will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the claims appended hereto be limited to the description set forth herein but rather that the claims be construed as encompassing all equivalents of the present invention which are apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.

Claims (15)

  1. An alarm system for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission, comprising
    an acoustic emission sensor (22) to be mounted on said structure so as to detect acoustic emission signals propagated through it,
    a processor (12, 14) for analysing the detected signal and determining if the detected signal exceeds a parameter threshold value,
    an alarm unit (12) for providing an alarm signal if the detected signal exceeds the parameter threshold value, and
    an actuator for generating an acoustic emission test signal through the structure, which test signal is to be detected by the acoustic emission sensor (22), characterised by
    the processor (12, 14) being adapted to analyse the detected test signal to determine material properties of the structure,
    the processor (12, 14) being provided with a plurality of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different materials,
    the processor (12, 14) being adapted to classify the material of the structure, and select the parameter threshold value according to the selected class.
  2. A system according to claim 1, wherein the actuator for generating the acoustic emission test signal through the structure is the acoustic emission sensor, and wherein the system includes a switch for switching the acoustic emission sensor between an actuator mode and a detection mode.
  3. A system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the processor is adapted to automatically select the parameter threshold value according to the determined material properties of the structure.
  4. A system according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the processor is adapted to set one or more detector algorithms for setting off the alarm according to the selected class.
  5. A system according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the processor is provided with predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for glass and/or wood and/or metal.
  6. A system according to claim 5, wherein the processor is provided with predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different types of glass and/or different types of wood and/or different types of metal.
  7. A system according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the parameter threshold value corresponds to fracture in the material of the structure.
  8. A method of detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission, including the steps of
    a) mounting an acoustic emission sensor on the structure,
    b) generating an acoustic emission test signal through the structure,
    c) detecting the test signal by the acoustic emission sensor,
    d) analysing the detected test signal and determining material properties of the structure by means of a processor,
    e) selecting, from a plurality of predetermined classes for different materials, a class corresponding to the determined material properties of the structure,
    f) setting a parameter threshold value in accordance with the selected class, and
    g) setting off an alarm if a signal detected by the acoustic emission sensor exceeds the parameter threshold value.
  9. A method according to claim 8, including the step of setting the acoustic emission sensor in an actuator mode for generating the acoustic emission test signal through the structure.
  10. A method according to claim 9, including the step of switching the acoustic emission sensor from the actuator mode to a detection mode for detecting acoustic emission signals through the structure.
  11. A method according to any of claims 8-10, including the step of automatically selecting the parameter threshold value according to the determined material properties of the structure.
  12. A method according to any of claims 8-11, including the step of setting one or more detector algorithms according to the selected class.
  13. A method according to any of claims 8-12, including the step of selecting a class from a set of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for glass and/or wood and/or metal.
  14. A method according to claim 13, including the step of selecting a class from a set of predetermined classes corresponding to material properties for different types of glass and/or different types of wood and/or different types of metal.
  15. A method according to any of the preceding claims, including the step of setting off the alarm if a signal detected by the acoustic emission sensor exceeds a parameter threshold value corresponding to fracture in the material of the structure.
EP20110193091 2011-12-12 2011-12-12 An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission Active EP2605223B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ES11193091.3T ES2502441T3 (en) 2011-12-12 2011-12-12 An alarm system and a method to detect intrusion into a structure by acoustic emission
EP20110193091 EP2605223B1 (en) 2011-12-12 2011-12-12 An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20110193091 EP2605223B1 (en) 2011-12-12 2011-12-12 An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2605223A1 EP2605223A1 (en) 2013-06-19
EP2605223B1 true EP2605223B1 (en) 2014-07-30

Family

ID=45098954

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20110193091 Active EP2605223B1 (en) 2011-12-12 2011-12-12 An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2605223B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2502441T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015090714A1 (en) * 2013-12-18 2015-06-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Detection of a physical intrusion into a protective receptacle
US9349269B2 (en) * 2014-01-06 2016-05-24 Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh Glass breakage detection system and method of configuration thereof

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2646160C2 (en) * 1975-12-08 1983-12-22 Cerberus AG, 8708 Männedorf, Zürich Method and device for monitoring sound-conducting media
US4196423A (en) * 1978-08-09 1980-04-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Acoustic emission intrusion detector
US5640142A (en) * 1995-02-01 1997-06-17 Pittway Corporation Alarm system testing circuit
IL191755A0 (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-05-04 Sabra De Fence Technologies Lt Intrusion detection system and its sensors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2502441T3 (en) 2014-10-03
EP2605223A1 (en) 2013-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6735808B2 (en) Method of operating surface treatment equipment
US5428345A (en) Method of and apparatus for operating a security system to produce an alarm signal
US4134109A (en) Alarm system responsive to the breaking of glass
EP2255344B1 (en) Intrusion detection system with signal recognition
US11295586B2 (en) Determining when a break-in attempt is in process
BR0315050A (en) Method and apparatus for indicating activation of a smoke detector alarm
US20100183160A1 (en) Vibration sensor assembly with ambient noise detection
CN110853269B (en) Door state detection method and device
US5450061A (en) Glass break detection using temporal sequence of selected frequency characteristics
US5543783A (en) Glass break detector and a method therefor
AU6730196A (en) Glass break sensor
JPH09297892A (en) Glass cracking detector
US5608377A (en) Acoustic anti-tampering detector
WO2013190973A1 (en) State determination device for structure and state determination method for structure
EP2605223B1 (en) An alarm system and a method for detecting intrusion in a structure by means of acoustic emission
US9349269B2 (en) Glass breakage detection system and method of configuration thereof
KR20110086210A (en) System and method for intrusion perception using 3-dimensional sound source position measurement
CN112889093B (en) Method for classifying vibrations, vibration classifier and computer readable device
JPH0620164A (en) Intrusion detector
WO2013098861A1 (en) Monitoring system of an intrusion barrier.
US11430324B2 (en) Controlling operational state of a sensor device for break-in detection
RU2263968C1 (en) Method for vibro-metric detection of an intruder and device for realization of said method
EP2620924B1 (en) Crime prevention device, crime prevention system and method for determining state of opening/closing body
JP2011002276A (en) Method and device for detecting breakage of glass
Bhosale et al. A Review of Glass Break Detector System

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131126

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140320

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 680290

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011008694

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140911

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2502441

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20141003

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 680290

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140730

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20140730

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141030

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141031

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141202

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141130

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011008694

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20150504

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141212

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602011008694

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: VERISURE SARL, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SECURITAS DIRECT AB, MALMOE, SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20170824 AND 20170830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: FP

Effective date: 20140828

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: PD

Owner name: VERISURE SARL; CH

Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), AFFECTATION / CESSION; FORMER OWNER NAME: SECURITAS DIRECT AB

Effective date: 20170630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20171109

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: VERISURE SARL, CH

Effective date: 20171109

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: VERISURE SARL

Effective date: 20180119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140730

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240102

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231229

Year of fee payment: 13