EP2601321A1 - A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel - Google Patents

A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel

Info

Publication number
EP2601321A1
EP2601321A1 EP11760871.1A EP11760871A EP2601321A1 EP 2601321 A1 EP2601321 A1 EP 2601321A1 EP 11760871 A EP11760871 A EP 11760871A EP 2601321 A1 EP2601321 A1 EP 2601321A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hardness
depth
compressive residual
shot
residual stress
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP11760871.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2601321B1 (en
Inventor
Yuji Kobayashi
Toshiya Tsuji
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sintokogio Ltd
Original Assignee
Sintokogio Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sintokogio Ltd filed Critical Sintokogio Ltd
Publication of EP2601321A1 publication Critical patent/EP2601321A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2601321B1 publication Critical patent/EP2601321B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • C21D7/06—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface by shot-peening or the like
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24C—ABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/10—Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for compacting surfaces, e.g. shot-peening
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00—Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/80—After-treatment
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D11/00—Process control or regulation for heat treatments

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for shot peening. Specifically, it relates to a method for shot-peening a gas carburized steel.
  • shot peening has been known to produce compressive residual stresses and to increase hardness to improve the fatigue strength of gears (see authored by the Society of Shot Peening Technology of Japan; Fatigue of Metals and Shot Peening; published by Gendai Kogaku-sha; 2004). Further, to achieve high fatigue strength aimed at reducing the weight of parts, a method for increasing compressive residual stresses produced by shot peening has been known (see Kazuyoshi Ogawa and Takashi Asano; Theoretical Prediction of Residual Stress Produced by Shot Peening for Hardened Steel; Transactions of JSSR, No. 48 (2003) pp. 31-38).
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing high compressive residual stresses in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer on the surface.
  • a depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated, and no data on the hardness on the surface or near the surface is used.
  • the method for shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention is to produce a compressive residual stress in a processed steel by peening shot media onto the processed steel.
  • the processed steel comprises a gas carburized steel having a hardness of 750HV or higher at the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the depth z is estimated by using Equations (1) to (4) below.
  • the shot media have a hardness that is above that of the processed steel by 50HV or more.
  • the method for the shot peening of the second aspect of the present invention is characterized in that the diameters of shot media are in the range from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in the method for the shot peening of the first aspect.
  • the position where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated by multiplying the depth by a constant.
  • the depth is determined as the depth where the maximum stress is generated by the collision of shot media.
  • a gas carburized steel By shot-peening a gas carburized steel a maximum compressive residual stress that is equal to, or more than, 1,600 MPa, is produced. At that depth the gas carburized steel has a hardness that is equal to, or more than, 750HV.
  • the shot media have a hardness that is above that of the processed steel by 50HV or more.
  • the processed steel is processed to have a high fatigue strength. That is, by estimating the depth z, where the maximum compressive stress is generated, from Equations (1) to (4), it is possible to produce a high compressive residual stress in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer.
  • the diameters of shot media are in the range from 0.2 to 1.0 mm, the maximum compressive residual stress can be securely produced in the processed steel.
  • Fig. 1 is a graph showing the distribution of the hardness of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions and the results of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the estimated values and measured values where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the differences between the hardness of shot media from the hardness at the depth where the maximum residual stresses is generated and the maximum compressive residual stresses.
  • Fig. 1 is a graph showing the distribution of the hardness of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments.
  • the abscissa denotes depths (micrometer) from the surface of the steel, and the ordinate denotes the Vickers hardness.
  • a gas carburized steel is used for the processed steels.
  • TP. A and TP. B denote the steels which have been tempered at 180 degree C and 180 degree C, respectively.
  • Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions and the results of shot peening that were used in the embodiments.
  • a compressive-air shot peening system was used. Shot media that have a hardness of 700HV to 1,000HV and diameters (the mean diameters) of 0.2 to 1.0 mm were used.
  • the in the table denotes the maximum compressive residual stresses in the processed steels.
  • the compressive residual stresses were measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation
  • the “Depth of Peak” in the table denotes the depth from the surface where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the “Hardness at Peak” denotes the hardness at the "Depth of Peak,” i.e., the Vickers hardness of the processed steels at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the “Relative Hardness” denotes the differences between the hardness of shot media and that of the processed steels, specifically the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness at peak of the processed steels from the hardness of shot media. As shown in the table, if the relative hardness is 50HV or more, the maximum compressive residual stress of -1,600 MPa or more can be obtained. The maximum compressive residual stress of -1,600 MPa is a typical value that is required for gear materials.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph showing the estimated values and measured values of the depths where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the estimated values are calculated by using the following Equations (1) to (4).
  • the estimated values where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated are generally coincident with the measured values. That means that the depths where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated can be estimated by multiplying the depth where the maximum stress is generated under contact stresses caused by the collision of shot media, by the constant K.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the differences between the hardness of shot media and the hardness at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. Specifically, it shows the values (the relative hardness) that are calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media on the abscissa and the maximum compressive residual stresses (MPa) of the processed steels on the ordinate.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress does not reach -1,600 MPa. This is because shot media are subject to plastic deformation when they are shot onto the processed steel. Thus energy is insufficiently transmitted from shot media to the processed steel.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress exceeds -1,600 MPa. Since the maximum compressive residual stress is generally expressed as a minus value, that means that the absolute value exceeds 1,600 MPa. This is because shot media are seldom subject to plastic deformation when they are shot onto the processed steel. Thus sufficient energy is transmitted from shot media to the processed steel.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress does not reach -1,600 MPa even when the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media is 50HV or more.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress to be produced in a steel is known as being limited by the yield strength of the steel. The yield strength is proportional to the hardness. Thus, unless the hardness of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is 750HV or more, the yield strength that is required to produce the maximum compressive residual strength of -1,600 MPa cannot be ensured.
  • the threshold for the difference in the hardness of shot media and the processed steels i.e., 50HV is determined as follows. As shown in Fig. 4, the maximum compressive residual stresses are shown in relation to the values that are calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the "Depth of Peak" from the hardness of shot media. An estimated curve is drawn by the least square method. Based on the curve the threshold is determined. The threshold for the hardness at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated, i.e., 750HV, is determined as follows. The maximum compressive residual stresses are shown in relation to the hardness of the processed steels. An estimated curve is drawn by the least square method. Based on the curve the threshold is determined.
  • processed steels are used that have a hardness that is greater than 750HV at the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the depth z is estimated from Equations (1) to (4).
  • the shot media that have the hardness that is greater than that of the processed steels at the depth z by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steels.
  • a compressive residual stress is produced in the processed steels.
  • the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated by multiplying the depth where the maximum stress is generated under contact stresses caused by the collision of shot media by the constant K.
  • the processed steels that have a hardness at that depth that exceeds 750HV are used.
  • the shot media that have a hardness that is greater than that of the processed steels at the estimated depth by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steels.
  • a maximum compressive residual stress that is 1,600 MPa or more can be produced in the processed steels.
  • the processed steels can be improved in fatigue strength. That is, by estimating the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated, from Equations (1) to (4), a high compressive residual stress can be produced in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer.
  • a maximum compressive residual stress that is 1,600 MPa or more can be securely produced in the processed steels.
  • any shot media can be used.
  • shot media made of steels, etc., are preferable.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
  • Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing a high compressive residual stress in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer. In this method, a depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated and the hardness on the surface or near the surface is not used. The depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated by multiplying the depth where the maximum stress is generated under contact stresses caused by the collision of shot media by the constant K. A processed steel that comprises a gas carburized steel and that has a hardness at that depth that exceeds 750HV is used. Shot media that have a hardness that is greater than that of the processed steels at that depth by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steels to produce a high compressive residual stress in the processed steels.

Description

A METHOD FOR SHOT PEENING
The present invention relates to a method for shot peening. Specifically, it relates to a method for shot-peening a gas carburized steel.
Conventionally, shot peening has been known to produce compressive residual stresses and to increase hardness to improve the fatigue strength of gears (see authored by the Society of Shot Peening Technology of Japan; Fatigue of Metals and Shot Peening; published by Gendai Kogaku-sha; 2004). Further, to achieve high fatigue strength aimed at reducing the weight of parts, a method for increasing compressive residual stresses produced by shot peening has been known (see Kazuyoshi Ogawa and Takashi Asano; Theoretical Prediction of Residual Stress Produced by Shot Peening for Hardened Steel; Transactions of JSSR, No. 48 (2003) pp. 31-38).
However, in these studies only the mean values of the hardness on the surface of, or near the surface of, the material are focused on. Thus the methods by these studies are difficult to be applied to a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer on the surface, since residual stresses are affected by plastic deformations caused by the collision of shot media and the mechanical properties of the processed steels that relate to the suppression of the plastic deformation.
 Disclosure of the Invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing high compressive residual stresses in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer on the surface. In this method, a depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated, and no data on the hardness on the surface or near the surface is used.
The method for shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention is to produce a compressive residual stress in a processed steel by peening shot media onto the processed steel. The processed steel comprises a gas carburized steel having a hardness of 750HV or higher at the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The depth z is estimated by using Equations (1) to (4) below. The shot media have a hardness that is above that of the processed steel by 50HV or more.
The method for the shot peening of the second aspect of the present invention is characterized in that the diameters of shot media are in the range from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in the method for the shot peening of the first aspect.
By the method for the shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention, the position where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated by multiplying the depth by a constant. The depth is determined as the depth where the maximum stress is generated by the collision of shot media. By shot-peening a gas carburized steel a maximum compressive residual stress that is equal to, or more than, 1,600 MPa, is produced. At that depth the gas carburized steel has a hardness that is equal to, or more than, 750HV. The shot media have a hardness that is above that of the processed steel by 50HV or more. Thus the processed steel is processed to have a high fatigue strength. That is, by estimating the depth z, where the maximum compressive stress is generated, from Equations (1) to (4), it is possible to produce a high compressive residual stress in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer.
By the method for the shot peening of the second aspect of the present invention, since the diameters of shot media are in the range from 0.2 to 1.0 mm, the maximum compressive residual stress can be securely produced in the processed steel.
The basic Japanese patent application, No. 2010-176681, filed August 5, 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in the present application.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given below. However, the detailed description and the specific embodiment are illustrations of desired embodiments of the present invention, and are described only for an explanation. Various possible changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art on the basis of the detailed description.
The applicant has no intention to dedicate to the public any disclosed embodiment. Among the disclosed changes and modifications, those which may not literally fall within the scope of the present claims constitute, therefore, a part of the present invention in the sense of the doctrine of equivalents.
The use of the articles "a," "an," and "the" and similar referents in the specification and claims are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by the context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., "such as") provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention, and so does not limit the scope of the invention, unless otherwise claimed.
Fig. 1 is a graph showing the distribution of the hardness of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions and the results of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.

Fig. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the estimated values and measured values where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.

Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the differences between the hardness of shot media from the hardness at the depth where the maximum residual stresses is generated and the maximum compressive residual stresses.
Below, the embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the drawings.
Fig. 1 is a graph showing the distribution of the hardness of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments. The abscissa denotes depths (micrometer) from the surface of the steel, and the ordinate denotes the Vickers hardness. A gas carburized steel is used for the processed steels. In the drawing, "TP. A" and "TP. B" denote the steels which have been tempered at 180 degree C and 180 degree C, respectively.
Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions and the results of shot peening that were used in the embodiments. A compressive-air shot peening system was used. Shot media that have a hardness of 700HV to 1,000HV and diameters (the mean diameters) of 0.2 to 1.0 mm were used.
The
in the table denotes the maximum compressive residual stresses in the processed steels. The compressive residual stresses were measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation
The "Depth of Peak" in the table denotes the depth from the surface where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The "Hardness at Peak" denotes the hardness at the "Depth of Peak," i.e., the Vickers hardness of the processed steels at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The "Relative Hardness" denotes the differences between the hardness of shot media and that of the processed steels, specifically the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness at peak of the processed steels from the hardness of shot media. As shown in the table, if the relative hardness is 50HV or more, the maximum compressive residual stress of -1,600 MPa or more can be obtained. The maximum compressive residual stress of -1,600 MPa is a typical value that is required for gear materials.
Fig. 3 is a graph showing the estimated values and measured values of the depths where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The estimated values are calculated by using the following Equations (1) to (4).
As shown in Fig. 3, the estimated values where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated are generally coincident with the measured values. That means that the depths where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated can be estimated by multiplying the depth where the maximum stress is generated under contact stresses caused by the collision of shot media, by the constant K.
Fig. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the differences between the hardness of shot media and the hardness at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. Specifically, it shows the values (the relative hardness) that are calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media on the abscissa and the maximum compressive residual stresses (MPa) of the processed steels on the ordinate.
As shown in Fig. 4, if the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media is less than 50HV, the maximum compressive residual stress does not reach -1,600 MPa. This is because shot media are subject to plastic deformation when they are shot onto the processed steel. Thus energy is insufficiently transmitted from shot media to the processed steel.
On the contrary, if the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media is 50HV or more, the maximum compressive residual stress exceeds -1,600 MPa. Since the maximum compressive residual stress is generally expressed as a minus value, that means that the absolute value exceeds 1,600 MPa. This is because shot media are seldom subject to plastic deformation when they are shot onto the processed steel. Thus sufficient energy is transmitted from shot media to the processed steel.
Further, as shown in Fig. 4, if the hardness of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is less than 750HV, the maximum compressive residual stress does not reach -1,600 MPa even when the value that is calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the peak depth from the hardness of shot media is 50HV or more. The maximum compressive residual stress to be produced in a steel is known as being limited by the yield strength of the steel. The yield strength is proportional to the hardness. Thus, unless the hardness of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is 750HV or more, the yield strength that is required to produce the maximum compressive residual strength of -1,600 MPa cannot be ensured.
The threshold for the difference in the hardness of shot media and the processed steels, i.e., 50HV, is determined as follows. As shown in Fig. 4, the maximum compressive residual stresses are shown in relation to the values that are calculated by subtracting the hardness of the processed steels at the "Depth of Peak" from the hardness of shot media. An estimated curve is drawn by the least square method. Based on the curve the threshold is determined. The threshold for the hardness at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated, i.e., 750HV, is determined as follows. The maximum compressive residual stresses are shown in relation to the hardness of the processed steels. An estimated curve is drawn by the least square method. Based on the curve the threshold is determined.
As discussed above, in the embodiments of the present invention processed steels are used that have a hardness that is greater than 750HV at the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The depth z is estimated from Equations (1) to (4). The shot media that have the hardness that is greater than that of the processed steels at the depth z by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steels. In these ways a compressive residual stress is produced in the processed steels. In other words, the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is estimated by multiplying the depth where the maximum stress is generated under contact stresses caused by the collision of shot media by the constant K. The processed steels that have a hardness at that depth that exceeds 750HV are used. The shot media that have a hardness that is greater than that of the processed steels at the estimated depth by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steels. As a result, a maximum compressive residual stress that is 1,600 MPa or more can be produced in the processed steels. Thus the processed steels can be improved in fatigue strength. That is, by estimating the depth z, where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated, from Equations (1) to (4), a high compressive residual stress can be produced in a gas carburized steel that has a soft layer.
Further, by having the diameters of shot media being in the range from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm, a maximum compressive residual stress that is 1,600 MPa or more can be securely produced in the processed steels.
In this invention, any shot media can be used. However, shot media made of steels, etc., are preferable.

Claims (2)

  1. A method for shot peening,
    wherein a processed steel comprises a gas carburized steel that has hardness at 750HV or more at a depth z, where a maximum compressive residual stress is generated, the depth z being estimated by using Equations (1) to (4), and
    wherein shot media that have a hardness that is greater than the hardness of the processed steel by 50HV or more are shot onto the processed steel to produce a compressive residual stress in the processed steel:
  2. The method for shot peening of claim 1, wherein diameters of the shot media are in a range from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm.
EP11760871.1A 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel Active EP2601321B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010176681 2010-08-05
PCT/JP2011/004416 WO2012017658A1 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2601321A1 true EP2601321A1 (en) 2013-06-12
EP2601321B1 EP2601321B1 (en) 2017-11-29

Family

ID=44675768

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11760871.1A Active EP2601321B1 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20130118220A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2601321B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5720690B2 (en)
CN (1) CN102869794A (en)
WO (1) WO2012017658A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013220509A (en) * 2012-04-17 2013-10-28 Daido Steel Co Ltd Shot peening method and gear material using the same
JP6714371B2 (en) 2016-01-29 2020-06-24 日東電工株式会社 Masking tape for shot peening process
JP6881420B2 (en) * 2018-11-07 2021-06-02 新東工業株式会社 Deterioration evaluation method

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2723150B2 (en) * 1987-03-16 1998-03-09 マツダ株式会社 Surface treatment method for steel members
JPH05140726A (en) * 1991-11-16 1993-06-08 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacturing method of drivetrain mechanical parts with high fatigue strength
JP2000220627A (en) * 1999-01-28 2000-08-08 Honda Motor Co Ltd Method of manufacturing connecting rod for internal combustion engine
JP5164539B2 (en) * 2007-11-28 2013-03-21 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Shot peening method
US20100322816A1 (en) * 2008-02-28 2010-12-23 Yuji Kobayashi Raw material for shot-peening materials, finished wire, method of manufacturing shot-peening materials, and shot-peening materials
JP5490373B2 (en) * 2008-04-30 2014-05-14 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 High hardness shot material
CN101358271A (en) * 2008-09-26 2009-02-04 无锡透平叶片有限公司 Blade root surface strengthening method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2012017658A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130118220A1 (en) 2013-05-16
WO2012017658A1 (en) 2012-02-09
EP2601321B1 (en) 2017-11-29
JP5720690B2 (en) 2015-05-20
JP2013535341A (en) 2013-09-12
CN102869794A (en) 2013-01-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Miková et al. Fatigue behavior of X70 microalloyed steel after severe shot peening
Zhang et al. Effect of roller burnishing on the high cycle fatigue performance of the high-strength wrought magnesium alloy AZ80
WO2008139702A1 (en) Ball screw and method for manufacturing the ball screw
TW200531756A (en) Method for producing seamless pipe
Ren et al. Dynamic response characteristics and damage mechanism of impact wear for deep plasma nitrided layer
He et al. Optimization of several surface treatment processes for alleviating fretting damage of a locking pin
EP2618028B1 (en) Gear
JP2011036949A (en) Method for manufacturing die steel tool, and form rolling die
Kang et al. Effect of grinding parameters on surface quality, microstructure and rolling contact fatigue behaviors of gear steel for vacuum pump
WO2012017658A1 (en) A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel
Bansal et al. Effects of combined diffusion treatments and cold working on the sliding friction and wear behavior of Ti–6Al–4V
Chang et al. Wear and chattering characteristics of rail materials by ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification
JP2022133587A (en) Shot-peening method
Gilman et al. Experience in the application of nitriding in a glow discharge to increase the efficiency of gear processing by the method of grinding
US9340846B2 (en) Method for improving fatigue strength of cast iron material
Molinari et al. Surface modifications induced by shot peening and their effect on the plane bending fatigue strength of a Cr–Mo steel produced by powder metallurgy
Varol Özkavak Wear resistance, hardness, and residual stress of shot-peened and heat-treated 8620 nickel-chromium-molybdenum steel
JP6274743B2 (en) Shot peening method to obtain high compressive residual stress
WO2012017656A1 (en) A method for shot peening
Deveci et al. Microstructure, hardness and tribological behaviour of plasma nitrided R260 rail steel with different nitrogen and hydrogen gas mixtures
Maharjan et al. Post-Processing of Cold Sprayed Ti-6Al-4V Coatings by Mechanical Peening. Metals 2021, 11, 1038
JP6125780B2 (en) Surface modification method by shot peening
Jifan et al. Optimization of several surface treatment processes for alleviating fretting damage of a locking pin
Wójcik et al. Damage of the Surface Layer Gears in Grinding Process.
CN112639442A (en) Deterioration evaluation method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121018

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160330

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170725

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 950461

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011043797

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 26113

Country of ref document: SK

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 950461

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180301

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180228

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011043797

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180804

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110804

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171129

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180329

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250820

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20250729

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20250825

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250829

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20250725

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20250731

Year of fee payment: 15