EP2576713B1 - Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance - Google Patents

Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2576713B1
EP2576713B1 EP11724868.2A EP11724868A EP2576713B1 EP 2576713 B1 EP2576713 B1 EP 2576713B1 EP 11724868 A EP11724868 A EP 11724868A EP 2576713 B1 EP2576713 B1 EP 2576713B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
layer
test
overcoat
coating composition
coating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11724868.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2576713A1 (en
Inventor
Laurence Waino Mckeen
Ying Wang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chemours Co FC LLC
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP2576713A1 publication Critical patent/EP2576713A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2576713B1 publication Critical patent/EP2576713B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09DCOATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR
    • C09D127/00Coating compositions based on homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Coating compositions based on derivatives of such polymers
    • C09D127/02Coating compositions based on homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Coating compositions based on derivatives of such polymers not modified by chemical after-treatment
    • C09D127/12Coating compositions based on homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Coating compositions based on derivatives of such polymers not modified by chemical after-treatment containing fluorine atoms
    • C09D127/18Homopolymers or copolymers of tetrafluoroethene
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16LPIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L58/00Protection of pipes or pipe fittings against corrosion or incrustation
    • F16L58/02Protection of pipes or pipe fittings against corrosion or incrustation by means of internal or external coatings
    • F16L58/04Coatings characterised by the materials used
    • F16L58/10Coatings characterised by the materials used by rubber or plastics
    • F16L58/1009Coatings characterised by the materials used by rubber or plastics the coating being placed inside the pipe
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16LPIPES; JOINTS OR FITTINGS FOR PIPES; SUPPORTS FOR PIPES, CABLES OR PROTECTIVE TUBING; MEANS FOR THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16L58/00Protection of pipes or pipe fittings against corrosion or incrustation
    • F16L58/02Protection of pipes or pipe fittings against corrosion or incrustation by means of internal or external coatings
    • F16L58/04Coatings characterised by the materials used
    • F16L58/10Coatings characterised by the materials used by rubber or plastics
    • F16L58/1009Coatings characterised by the materials used by rubber or plastics the coating being placed inside the pipe
    • F16L58/1027Coatings characterised by the materials used by rubber or plastics the coating being placed inside the pipe the coating being a sprayed layer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K13/00Use of mixtures of ingredients not covered by one single of the preceding main groups, each of these compounds being essential
    • C08K13/04Ingredients characterised by their shape and organic or inorganic ingredients
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K5/00Use of organic ingredients
    • C08K5/04Oxygen-containing compounds
    • C08K5/05Alcohols; Metal alcoholates
    • C08K5/053Polyhydroxylic alcohols
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K7/00Use of ingredients characterised by shape
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L2205/00Polymer mixtures characterised by other features
    • C08L2205/02Polymer mixtures characterised by other features containing two or more polymers of the same C08L -group
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L27/00Compositions of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers
    • C08L27/02Compositions of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers not modified by chemical after-treatment
    • C08L27/12Compositions of homopolymers or copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a halogen; Compositions of derivatives of such polymers not modified by chemical after-treatment containing fluorine atoms
    • C08L27/18Homopolymers or copolymers or tetrafluoroethene
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/25Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/25Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
    • Y10T428/251Mica
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/3154Of fluorinated addition polymer from unsaturated monomers
    • Y10T428/31544Addition polymer is perhalogenated

Definitions

  • This invention relates to increasing the adhesion between primer and overcoat layer forming a non-stick coating on a substrate and to increasing the cohesive strength of the overcoat layer.
  • U.S. Patent 7,575,789 discloses a lining adhered to the interior surface of an oil well pipe, also known as oil production tube or down-hole oil pipe, the lining including a primer layer and an overcoat layer on the primer layer, the overcoat providing a non-stick perfluoropolymer surface.
  • the primer layer is formed by spraying a liquid-based primer composition onto the interior surface of the pipe and drying or baking the primer composition to form the primer layer, followed by spraying a liquid composition onto the primer layer and drying and baking this composition to form the overcoat layer.
  • This lining has performed admirably in oil well application, preventing the plugging of the oil well pipe by deposition of asphaltenes, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale present in the oil flowing through the pipe
  • a water-miscible organic liquid with a high boiling temperature notably glycerin, which boils at 291 °C
  • U.S. Patent 7,575,789 discloses the use of such high boiling liquid in the coating composition to prevent sloughing off of the coating from a vertical surface.
  • the interior of oil well pipe presents a continuum of surface varying from the non-horizontal, including vertical and overhanging (upper), looking down on the lower surface of the pipe.
  • This sloughing off of the dried coating from non-horizontal surface is a problem, especially if the pipe being lined is moved or impacted during drying, until the baking of the dried layer fuses the perfluoropolymer present in the layer, resulting in the overcoat adhering to the primer layer.
  • the high boiling organic liquid is effective in resisting sloughing, its boiling temperature is less than that of the baking temperature, whereby the liquid volatilizes, often resulting in excessive smoking (fuming) of the layer.
  • U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0078328 discloses an Autoclave Test simulating the effect pressurization and rapid decompression on a pipe having a non-stick lining.
  • the autoclave contains test fluids, liquid and gas, comparable to those encountered in an oil well and a non-stick lining that would be used for oil well pipe.
  • the lining is formed from a primer layer on the metal surface, which could be that of the interior of the pipe, and an inner layer adhered to the primer layer and an outer layer adhered to the inner layer.
  • the combination of the inner layer and outer layer is the overcoat for the primer layer. Pressurization forces test fluids to permeate into the coating, and rapid decompression results in the rapid exit of these penetrated fluids from the coating, causing blistering (layer separation) within the coating, namely between the primer layer and the inner layer of the overcoat.
  • This blistering represents locations for potential corrosive attack and coating failure in actual service, wherein the coating forms the interior surface of oil well pipe.
  • the outer layer of the oil pipe lining of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 may contain particles that form a mechanical barrier against the permeation of water, solvents, and gases. While these particles are effective in protecting the metal surface of the pipe underlying the non-stick coating from corrosion, the coating is nevertheless susceptible to blistering upon rapid decompression. Apparently enough fluid permeates into the lining to give this disadvantageous result. While the presence of the permeation barrier particles, usually platelet in shape, protects the underlying pipe surface from corrosion, the inner layer of the overcoat containing these particles exhibits decreased cohesive strength. Cohesive strength is the strength of the layer within itself, i.e. the ability of the layer to retain its integrity under stress, in contrast to the strength of the bond between the inner layer and adjacent layers.
  • the lining is subject to delamination from physical abuse that may be encountered in down-hole operation, for example being struck by a down-hole tool inserted into the pipe.
  • This delamination has been found to be a failure within the thickness of the overcoat, i.e. within the inner layer of the lining of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 , by separation of the fluoropolymer constituent of the inner layer from the surface of the particles lying within the inner layer.
  • the location of this delamination then becomes a point for corrosive attack on the underlying pipe surface and a loss of non-stick character inviting the build-up and plugging from one or more of asphaltenes, wax and inorganic scale.
  • WO 00/58389 discloses aqueous dispersion of PFA and FEP, and the powder coating compositions obtained by spray-drying these dispersions. However, there is no discussion of how to improve rapid decompression adhesion and nor is there any disclosure of a ratio of PFA to FEP according to the present invention, as set out below.
  • the present invention in its various embodiments provides a non- stick coating or lining that satisfies all these needs.
  • This embodiment (A) can be defined as a coating composition that resists sloughing from a non-horizontal metal substrate prior to baking, with the components comprising (a) an aqueous medium, (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of at least 290°C, and a sloughing- resistant amount of the combination of (c) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C and (d) water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C.
  • Another aspect of this embodiment is the use of the composition in the formation of a baked layer on the metal substrate, e.g. in down-hole oil pipe or a heat exchanger tube. Baking drives off all lower boiling materials present in the as-applied composition. Thus, components (a) and (d) would no longer be present in the baked layer. Another component that would not be present in any significant amount is heat resistant polymer binder that is used in primer layer compositions to adhere the primer layer to a metal substrate. This would not be present in the baked layer because the composition of embodiment A is essentially free of such polymer binder, the baked layer formed from embodiment A therefore requiring a primer layer to be first applied to the metal substrate, on which the composition of embodiment A is then applied.
  • the baking to form the overcoat layer of this composition thus comprises fusing said melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers of (b) and (c).
  • the metal substrate has a non-stick lining comprising a primer layer on the metal substrate and an overcoat layer on the primer layer, the overcoat layer comprising melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C and melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C.
  • melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C.
  • the amount of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C present in the baked layer is that which is effective to produce this improvement, whereby this aspect of embodiment A produces a baked layer that has improved resistance to blistering when the lining is subjected to rapid decompression.
  • the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are the same as the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) of embodiment A and filler (e) is added in place of the liquids.
  • melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C is the beneficial effect of adding melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C to the composition to be applied to the primer layer-coated metal substrate, whereby this polymer is also present in the baked layer formed from this composition.
  • this lower melting perfluoropolymer replaces most of the water immiscible high boiling organic liquid as the anti-sloughing additive to the composition, thereby reducing organic volatiles in the baking step, and provides the further beneficial effect of improved resistance to blistering as described above.
  • the water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C is a required component in the as-applied composition in embodiment A, it is not required when the metal substrate has the shape that avoids the sloughing problem. In that event, the baked layer having improved resistance to blistering under rapid decompression is obtained without using the high boiling organic liquid.
  • the as-applied composition of embodiment B which can be applied as a powder coating, thereby not requiring the as-applied composition to be in the form of a liquid medium.
  • Filler is present in the composition of embodiment B, whereby the presence of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C provides the improved cohesive strength to the overcoat layer.
  • the present invention can be described as the use of perfluoropolymer (c) to reduce sloughing in the context of embodiment A, or to reduce or eliminate blistering (rapid decompression adhesion) also in the context of embodiment A, even when liquid (d) is not present.
  • perfluoropolymer (c) can be separately sought and obtained or collectively sought and obtained in the compositions of the present invention.
  • metal substrates described hereinafter such as metal pipes, preferably oil well pipe and heat exchanger pipe, especially forming the interior surface thereof.
  • metal substrates also apply to the application of the compositions of embodiments A and B.
  • a preferred embodiment of the present invention when the non-stick coating on a metal substrate forms the interior surface of a metal pipe (tube), is the as-applied composition that is the combination of embodiments A and B i.e. that contains both the filler (e) and the water miscible organic liquid (d) having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C.
  • compositions of the present invention will first be described, followed by description of the use of these components in the compositions of the embodiments of the present invention.
  • melt fabricable is meant that the fluoropolymer is sufficiently flowable in the molten state that it can be fabricated by melt processing such as extrusion, to produce products having sufficient strength so as to be useful.
  • melt flowability enables the compositions to be fused in the baking step to form tough pin-hole free layers.
  • the sufficient strength characteristic of melt fabricability can be characterized by the fluoropolymer by itself exhibiting an MIT Flex Life of at least 1000 cycles, preferably at least 2000 cycles using 8 mil (0.21 mm) thick compression molded film. In the MIT Flex Life test, the film is gripped between jaws and is flexed back and forth over a 135° range in accordance with ASTM D 2176.
  • melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer examples include the copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) (PAVE) in which the linear or branched alkyl group contains 1 to 5 carbon atoms.
  • TFE tetrafluoroethylene
  • PAVE perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether)
  • These perfluoropolymers are partially crystalline fluoroplastics and are not perfluoroelastomers and are commonly known as PFA.
  • partially crystalline is meant that the polymers have some crystallinity and are characterized by a detectable melting point measured according to ASTM D 3418, and a melting endotherm of at least about 3 J/g.
  • Preferred PAVE monomers are those in which the alkyl group contains 1, 2, 3 or 4 carbon atoms, respectively known as perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (PMVE), perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE), perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE), and perfluoro(butyl vinyl ether) (PBVE).
  • the copolymer can be made using several PAVE monomers, such as the TFE/perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether)/perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer, sometimes called MFA by the manufacturer, but included as PFA herein.
  • the selection of the PAVE monomer(s) for copolymerization with TFE and their amount is such that the melting temperature of the resulting perfluoropolymer is at least 290 °C, preferably at least 300°C, but typically no greater than 310°C for best melt flowability to pin-hole free layers.
  • the PAVE monomer PPVE lowers the melting temperature of the PFA less than when the PAVE monomer is PEVE, whereby PPVE is the preferred monomer for copolymerization with TFE to form high melting PFA.
  • PFA has a high thermal stability, and the higher its melting temperature, the greater is its integrity in use as linings at high temperature.
  • the PAVE content will be no greater than 10 wt%, no greater than 7 wt% to achieve a melt temperature of at least 300°C, and its minimum content will be at least 1.5 wt% to provide the melt flowability needed for melt fabricability, the remainder to total 100 wt% being TFE.
  • the melt flow rate (MFR) of the PFA is preferably at least 0.1 g/10 min, preferably at least 5 g/10 min, as measured according to ASTM D-1238 and ASTM D 3307-93, at 372°C using a 5 kg weight on the molten PFA.
  • the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C is not polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or PTFE micropowder. Neither of these polymers are melt fabricable. PTFE is not melt fabricable because it does not flow in the molten state. This non-melt flowability arises from the extremely high molecular weight of the PTFE, i.e. at least 1,000,000, and the accompanying high melt viscosity.
  • the non-melt flowability of the PTFE can also be characterized by high melt creep viscosity, sometimes called specific melt viscosity, which involves the measurement of the rate of elongation of a molten sliver of PTFE under a known tensile stress for 30 min, as further described in and determined in accordance with U.S. Patent 6,841,594 , referring to the specific melt viscosity measurement procedure of U.S. Patent 3,819,594 . In this test, the molten sliver made in accordance with the test procedure is maintained under load for 30 min, before the measurement of melt creep viscosity is begun, and this measurement is then made during the next 30 min of applied load.
  • specific melt viscosity sometimes called specific melt viscosity
  • the PTFE preferably has a melt creep viscosity of at least about 1 x 10 6 Pa•s, more preferably at least about 1 x 10 7 Pa•s, and most preferably at least about 1 x 10 8 Pa•s, all at 380°C.
  • PTFE micropowder is melt flowable, because it is low molecular weight PTFE, but it is not melt fabricable.
  • melt flowable PTFE which has an MFR that is measurable by ASTM D 1238-94a, is obtained by direct polymerization under conditions that prevent very long polymer chains from forming, or by irradiation degradation of non-melt flowable PTFE.
  • PTFE micropowder is not melt fabricable because the article molded from the melt is useless, by virtue of extreme brittleness. Because of its low molecular weight (relative to non-melt-flowable PTFE), it has no strength. An extruded filament of the PTFE micropowder is so brittle that it breaks upon flexing. Compression molded film for the MIT flex life test generally cannot be made from PTFE micropowder, i.e. the film tends to crack in the mold. Any intact portions of the film crack when flexed.
  • this fluoropolymer is preferably a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hexafluoropropylene (HFP), typically referred to as FEP.
  • TFE tetrafluoroethylene
  • HFP hexafluoropropylene
  • the HFP content is typically about 6-17 wt%, preferably 9-17 wt% (calculated from HFPI x 3.2).
  • HFPI is the ratio of infrared radiation (IR) absorbances at specified IR wavelengths as disclosed in U.S. Statutory Invention Registration H130.
  • the TFE/HFP copolymer includes a small amount of additional comonomer to improve properties.
  • the preferred TFE/HFP copolymer is TFE/HFP/perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) (PAVE), wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
  • Preferred PAVE monomers are perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE) and perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE).
  • Preferred TFE/HFP copolymers containing the additional comonomer have an HFP content of about 6-17 wt%, preferably 9-17 wt% and PAVE content, preferably PEVE, of about 0.2 to 3 wt%, with the remainder of the copolymer being TFE to total 100 wt% of the copolymer.
  • FEP compositions are those disclosed in U.S. Patents 4,029,868 (Carlson ), 5,677,404 (Blair ), and 6,541,588 (Kaulbach et al. ) and in U.S. Statutory Invention Registration H130.
  • the FEP is partially crystalline as defined above, that is, it is not a fluoroelastomer.
  • the composition of the FEP described above is chosen so the its melt temperature of no greater than 270°C, preferably no greater than 265°C so that this copolymer commences melting before the high boiling organic liquid is completely volatilized from the layer being baked. This melting holds the layer in place, not allowing it to slough off of the primer layer before baking is complete. It is also preferred that the FEP have a melting temperature of at least 250°C, more preferably at least 255°C, to provide the highest thermal stability for the copolymer.
  • the melting temperature range for this lower melting perfluoropolymer component can be 250-270°C, 255-270°C, 250-265°C or 255-265°C, and any of these lower melting perfluoropolymers can be used in the composition along with the perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of at least 290°C or at least 300°C.
  • the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) may be present in the composition in the form of a powder, which is an agglomeration of submicrometer-size dispersion-polymerized particles formed in an aqueous medium (a).
  • the powder is preferably obtained by spray drying the aqueous medium containing the dispersion polymerized perfluoropolymer particles as disclosed in U.S. Patent 6,418,349 .
  • the powder formed by the spray drying comprises friable granules of agglomerated primary particles (as polymerized). The friable nature of the granules gives them a high bulk density, e.g.
  • SSA specific surface area
  • perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are preferably in the form of powders as described above, they can also be in the form of as-polymerized submicrometer-size primary particles.
  • the powder form provides the advantage of promoting the high viscosity desired for the liquid form of the coating composition for achieving thick overcoat layer thicknesses, i.e. at least 30 micrometers thick.
  • the water miscible high boiling organic liquid (d) having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C examples include glycerin and polyethylene glycol and mixtures thereof. These liquids impart sloughing resistance to the layer being formed on non-horizontal surfaces by drying the composition and before the baking temperature is reached. When the baking temperature reaches the boiling temperature of the organic liquid, the liquid volatilizes without leaving any measurable residue in the layer.
  • the baking temperature for the lining will generally be between 360-410°C, depending on layer thickness and time of baking desired, without decomposing any of the perfluoropolymers present in the lining.
  • the baking step is well above the melting temperatures of the perfluoropolymers in the composition, whereby they flow and fuse together to form a pin-hole free layer.
  • the boiling temperature of the organic liquid will be at least 10°C less than the baking temperature for the layer and thus the lining, generally no greater than 340°C.
  • the volatilization of the high boiling organic liquid is accompanied by the emission of smoke from the coating (lining) during baking.
  • the present invention provides for greatly reduced smoke emission, by enabling the amount of high boiling organic liquid to be reduced without loss of sloughing resistance by virtue of the presence of the fluoropolymer (c) in the composition forming the baked layer.
  • platelet-shaped filler include glass flakes and mica, including mica particles coated with an oxide layer like iron or titanium oxide.
  • the platelet particles will be small in size so as to be containable within the thickness of the layer containing these particles.
  • these particles will generally have an average particle size (diameter) of about 10 to 200 micrometers, preferably 20 -100 micrometers, with no more than 50% of the particles of flake having average particle size of more than about 300 micrometers.
  • the thickness of the platelets will be less than the diameter, usually at least 1/5 the diameter, and most often no greater than 5 micrometers in thickness.
  • Mica particles coated with oxide layer that can be used in the present invention include those described in U. S. Patent Nos. 3,087,827 (Klenke and Stratton ); 3,087,828 (Linton ); and 3,087,829 (Linton ).
  • the micas described in these Patents are coated with oxides or hydrous oxides of titanium, zirconium, aluminum, zinc, antimony, tin, iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium, or vanadium. Mixtures of coated micas can also be used.
  • compositions of the present invention examples include thickeners such as acrylic polymer, low boiling organic solvents, e.g. those disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 having a boiling temperature of 50 to 200°C, and dispersing agents. All of these other components are fugitive in the sense they are volatilized away from the layer during the baking step.
  • aqueous medium is primarily water and includes the solution of other soluble components in the water. In the calculation of composition wt%s, however, aqueous medium (a) is considered to be entirely of water.
  • the coating compositions will not contain any significant amount of non-fluorinated heat resistant (thermally stable) polymer binder. As disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 , this polymer binder is present in the primer layer to adhere it to the metal substrate.
  • the compositions of the present invention do not contain enough of such polymer binder to serve as a primer layer, whereby layers formed from these compositions require that a primer layer be formed on the metal substrate for adhering said coating composition to said surface. Examples of primer layers are those disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 .
  • the baked layer(s) from the coating compositions of the present invention that are formed on the primer layer will be essentially free of heat-resistant polymer binder.
  • a small amount of polymer binder can be present in the coating composition to modify an adhesion property between overcoat and primer layer, but preferably no heat-resistant polymer binder is present in either the coating compositions of the present invention or in the baked layers obtained therefrom. If a small amount of heat-resistant polymer binder is present, such amount will preferably be no greater than 20% of the total weight of perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) in the composition, more preferably no greater than 10 wt%, most preferably no greater than 5 wt%.
  • the preferred primer contains both perfluoropolymer along with an effective amount of heat-resistant polymer binder to adhere the layer formed from the primer to the metal substrate.
  • the preferred perfluoropolymer in the primer layer is perfluoropolymer (c), most preferably FEP.
  • the perfluoropolymer or FEP content of the primer is preferably at least 80% of the entire perfluoropolymer content of the primer, more preferably at least 90 wt%, and most preferably, 100%.
  • compositions of the invention can use any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a melting temperature of at least 290°C described above as component (b) and any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C described above as component (c) dispersed in aqueous medium (a).
  • the amount of (c) plus (d) is at least 3 wt% based on the sum of (a), (b), (c), and (d).
  • U.S. Patent 7,575,789 discloses the presence of 8.3 wt% glycerin in the coating composition (Table 4).
  • equivalent sloughing resistance can be obtained with the combination of no more than 2 wt% component (d) together with no more than 3 wt% component (c), based on the sum of components (a), (b), (c) and (d).
  • the amount of component (b) present in the compositions is preferably 35 to 55 wt%, based on the sum of (a), (b), (c) and (d) components; and the amount of (c) present in the compositions is preferably at least 1 wt% and no more than 15 wt%, preferably no more than 10 wt%, of the sum of (b) and (c).
  • the aqueous medium (a) of the compositions is preferably 30 to 55 wt%, based on the sum of the components (b), (c), and (e) when present.
  • the baked layer composition will comprise the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c), with the preferred amount of (c) being no more than 15 wt% of the amount of (b) and preferably constituting 2 to 10 wt% of (b). More preferably, the baked layer contains 2 to 8 wt% of (c) based on the sum of (b) and (c). Perfluoropolymer (b) constitutes the remainder of the (b) + (c) components to total 100 wt%. The sum of components on which wt%s are based total 100 wt%.
  • the overcoat layer from the coating composition of embodiment A preferably consists of an inner layer and an outer layer, with the inner layer forming the interface between the primer layer and the overcoat, and the outer layer providing the surface of the non-stick lining that is exposed to the environment, e.g. when the metal substrate is a pipe and the surface of the outer layer forms the interior of the pipe exposed to the fluids passing through the pipe.
  • the compositions described in the preceding paragraph apply to the composition of the inner layer.
  • these compositions also apply to the outer layer.
  • the inner layer formed from the coating composition of embodiment A also preferably contains filler (e), preferably having the platelet shape and identities described for increasing the impermeability of said coating composition, i.e. the baked layer formed from the coating composition.
  • the amount of filler (e) used in the compositions of embodiment A will be from 2-10 wt% of the sum of (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) in the coating composition, more preferably 3 to 6 wt%.
  • the amount of filler will preferably be from 4 to 20 wt%, preferably 5 to 15 wt%, based on the sum of (b), (c) and (e).
  • the proportions of (b) and (c) in this baked layer will be the same as in the baked layer of the composition that is free of filler (e).
  • the outer layer formed from the coating composition is preferably free of filler.
  • Example 2 herein discloses the embodiment wherein the overcoat layer is entirely an inner layer composition, and no outer layer is present.
  • the coating composition is especially useful in providing an overcoat of a non-stick lining of a metal substrate that is a metal pipe, especially down-hole oil pipe, sometimes called oil well pipe or oil production tube.
  • the lining forms the interior surface of the pipe.
  • Dimensions of down-hole oil well pipe and preparation of the interior surface of the pipe for coating are disclosed in U.S.7,575,789 .
  • the oil pipe has an interior diameter of at least two inches (5.1 cm).
  • Another application of the non-stick linings made using compositions of the present invention is the smaller diameter metal pipe used in heat exchangers through which hot water/oil recovered from the earth, especially from extracting oil from tar sand deposits by steam injection, is passed to recover heat expended to recover the oil.
  • Such heat exchanger pipe often referred to as heat exchanger tube(s) generally has an interior diameter of no greater than one inch (2.54 cm) and as little as no greater than one-half inch (1.3 cm).
  • heat exchanger tube(s) generally has an interior diameter of no greater than one inch (2.54 cm) and as little as no greater than one-half inch (1.3 cm).
  • these small diameter pipes are especially prone to pluggage from solids (wax, asphaltenes, and inorganic scale), coming out of solution in the oil. It has been found that compositions of the present invention providing the overcoat for the non-stick coating (lining) forming the interior surface of the heat exchanger pipe (tube(s)), greatly reduces or prevents this pluggage.
  • the coating operation is also free of the intense smoking that arises from baking of the overcoat layer composition when it contains the large amount of component (d) needed to by itself provide the sloughing resistance needed prior to the perfluoropolymer (b) being melted enough to retain the coating composition in place to form the baked overcoat layer within the pipe.
  • the non-stick lining will preferably have a total thickness of at least 75 micrometers, more preferably at least 100 micrometers, of which the primer layer will be 8 to 25 micrometers in thickness and the overcoat will constitute the remaining thickness. Of this remaining thickness, the overcoat inner and outer layers each constitute about 30 to 70% of the total thickness of the overcoat, to total 100% of the thickness of the overcoat. Exemplary of inner layer and outer layer thicknesses are the following: 30 to 60 micrometers thick for each layer. Generally, the non-stick lining will be no thicker than 200 micrometers and the overcoat will be no thicker than 175 micrometers.
  • the procedure for determining melting temperature of the perfluoropolymers disclosed herein is by DSC (differential scanning calorimeter) analysis in accordance with ASTM D3418-08.
  • the melting temperatures disclosed herein are the peak melting temperature.
  • the dried coating layer (film) thickness (DFT) for primer / overcoat is measured using magnetic instruments as described in ASTM D1186.
  • the particle size for the perfluoropolymer powder disclosed herein is the number average particle size as determined by the laser diffraction method in accordance with ISO 13320-1:1999 using the Microtac® 101 Laser Particle Counter, available from Leeds & Northrup, a division of the Honeywell Corporation.
  • Test panels of carbon steel 1.5"x6" (3.8 cm x 15.2 cm) are cleaned with an acetone rinse, followed by baking for 30 min @ 800°F. (427° C.) and grit blasting with 40 grit aluminum oxide) to a roughness of approximately 70-125 microinches Ra (1.78 - 3.18 micrometers).
  • the coatings on the test panels are liquid coatings and are applied by using a spray gun, Model Number MSA-510 available from DeVilbiss located in Glendale Heights, III.
  • the panels have a grit blasted surface and are coated according to the description in each of the Examples.
  • the panels are subjected to the Autoclave Test described below for determining adhesion quality in two ways, the difficulty in removing the coating from the test panel after being exposed to the Tests and the degree of blistering within the coating arising from exposure to the Tests.
  • Adhesion of the non-stick coating of this invention to the interior surface of a pipe is tested using the Autoclave Test on non-stick coated test panels described above.
  • the non-stick coatings are described in the Examples below and include a primer layer for adhering the overcoat to the test panel, and an overcoat outer layer that is free of filler. The presence of this outer layer increases the danger of blistering in the Autoclve Test because of the greater layer thickness through which absorbed gas or aqueous medium must travel to escape from the coating during rapid decompression.
  • the Autoclave Test is conducted using a modification of NACE TM0185-06 "Evaluation of Internal Plastic Coatings for Corrosion Control of Tubular Goods by Autoclave Testing.” Samples of non-stick coated test panels are prepared and suspended in a beaker where test fluids are added and then the beaker is placed into an autoclave unit. The unit is secured and gases are metered into the unit using partial pressures. The heat is turned on and the pressure is monitored until full temperature is reached.
  • the panels are in this way suspended in an autoclave containing two phases: 1) an aqueous phase solution of synthetic formation water (formation water is water produced together with oil from the oil-bearing strata in oil wells; the ionic composition of the formation water is described below), and 2) a gas phase overlying the liquid phase, according to the following test conditions and composition of the two phases: Temperature: 163° C/325° F.
  • Aqueous Formation water (Na: 65,000 mg/L; Ca: 23,000 mg/L; Cl: 150,000 mg/L; SO 4 : 100 mg/L, HCO 3 : 300 mg/L) Gas: 16%, H 2 S, 5% CO2, 79% CH 4 Duration: 24 Hours Decompression Rate: as described in each example
  • a simplified alternative aqueous phase /gas phase for use in within the autoclave according to the above conditions is as follows:
  • Blister size is rated by comparison with photographic standards in FIGS. 1-4 (in the standard) according to ASTM D 714-02 using the scale:
  • Blister frequency is D (dense), Medium Dense (MD), Medium (M) and Few (F).
  • a blister frequency of None means that no blisters (Blister size of #10) are visible when viewed with the unaided eye (2) Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test
  • Adhesion is evaluated by the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test wherein the coating is scored to the metal in two parallel scribes approximately 1/8" (5 mm) apart. This scribing is done on the metal panels after being subjected to the Autoclave Test conditions. A knife blade is then inserted into one of the scribes in an attempt to lift the coating from the metal surface of the panel.
  • the adhesion of each layer in the coating system is rated as follows:
  • Post Boiling Water Fingernail Adhesion (PWA) Test- Coated test panels are submerged in boiling water for 60 minutes. The water is allowed to come to a full boil after inserting the coated panel, before timing is begun. After the boiling water treatment, the panel is cooled to room temperature and dried thoroughly.
  • the fingernail scratch test involves the use of the fingernail, to chip or peel away the coating from the edge of a deliberate knife scratch in the shape of an X in the film, to test the degree of adhesion of the film. If the coating can be pulled away from the substrate for 1 cm or more, the coating is considered to fail the PWA Test. If the coating cannot be pulled loose for a distance of 1 cm, the coating is considered to pass the PWA Test.
  • Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test Coated test panels are subjected to a cross-hatch (x-hatch) test for adhesion.
  • the coated test panel is scribed with a razor blade, aided by a stainless steel template, to make 11 parallel cuts about 3/32 inch (2.4 mm) apart through the film to the metal surface. This procedure is repeated at right angles to the first cuts to produce a grid of 100 squares in the coating.
  • the coated and scribed sample is immersed in boiling water for 60 minutes, and then is removed from the water and cooled to room temperature without quenching the sample. Then a strip of transparent tape (3M Brand No.
  • Taber Shear-Scratch Test Before mounting a coated test panel on the Taber ® Shear/Scratch Tester, the height of the scale beam is adjusted to match the thickness of the coated test panel. A precision cutting tool, which is attached to a balanced and calibrated scale beam, is then placed on the test panel. Tungsten Carbide Contour Shear tool (S-20) is used for this test. Operated by an on/off switch, the turntable rotates at a constant speed. By changing the load on the cutting tool, the resistance to shearing or scratching of the coating can be evaluated. The removable scale beam is affixed to the instrument by sliding it onto an adjustable gage block shaft. So the scale beam can remain in a level position relative to the specimen and turntable, the gage block can be raised and lowered. By changing the position of the sliding weight(s), the load applied on the specimen by the cutting tool can be selected from 0 - 1000g.
  • the primer layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-bake composition: TABLE 1 Liquid Primer Ingredient Liquid Wt % Solid Wt % Fluoropolymer FEP 12.5 40.3 Polyamideimide 1.1 3.5 Polyethersulfone 7.6 24.4 NMP* 47.8 Other Organics** 20.1 Pigments 9.9 31.8 Dispersing Agent 1.0 Total 100.0 100.0 (*NMP is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone **Other organics may include solvents such as butyrolactone, NMP, alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, and xylene, furfuryl alcohol, triethanol amine, and mixtures thereof.
  • solvents such as butyrolactone, NMP, alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, and xylene, furfuryl alcohol, tri
  • FEP TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, a having an average particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10 min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238 (5 kg weight), and a melting temperature of 260°C.
  • the overcoat inner and outer layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-bake compositions: TABLE 2 Liquid Overcoat Outer Layer Composition Outer Layer Liquid Outer Layer Solid 1* 2 1* 2 Ingredient wt % wt % wt% wt % Perfluoropolymer PFA 45.0 49.3 100.0 95.2 Perfluoropolymer FEP 0.0 2.5 4.8 Other Organics 1.9 1.9 Water 42.5 43.4 Glycerin 9.0 1.2 Thickener 0.7 0.7 Dispersing Agents 0.9 1.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 * Comparative FEP: TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, and having an average particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10 min measured at 372° C.
  • the outer layer composition 2 is a composition of the present invention, and the outer layer composition 1 is a comparative example composition.
  • a layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a carbon steel panel prepared as described above, followed by drying at 150°C. for 10 minutes.
  • the dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is 12-19 micrometers.
  • a layer of inner layer 1 composition is applied over the dried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399°C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers.
  • a layer of outer layer 1 composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125 micrometers.
  • the baking of the inner layer results in considerable smoke being emitted by the inner layer as a result of the volatilization of the glycerin.
  • the density of the smoke is comparable to the density of steam in a steam room of a health club or the smoke from a smoky fire.
  • a layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a prepared a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by drying at 150°C. for 10 minutes.
  • the dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is 12-19 micrometers.
  • a layer of inner layer 2 composition is applied over the dried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399°C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. Very little smoke is emitted by the baking of this layer, i.e. the smoke is barely visible, because of its greatly reduced glycerin content.
  • a layer of outer layer 2 composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125 micrometers.
  • Panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test. At the conclusion of and as part of the Test the pressure is released at a rate of 100 psia (0.7 MPa)/min. The panels are rated for blister formation. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test.
  • Adhesion and Blister test results Test 1 (100 psia (0.7 MPa)/min decompression rate) Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion GAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A As described above with respect to the blister size and frequency rating, the blister size rating of 10 means there are no blisters in the coating, and the blister frequency rating of "none" means that there are no blisters are visible. The meaning of the adhesion rating of A (no layer release) is described above. This system of ratings is used in the tables below reporting the results decompression at different rates. As is apparent from the ratings in the table above, both coated panels passed the Autoclave Test and the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. The blister and adhesion ratings are made after the decompression step of the Autoclave Test.
  • the coated panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the coated panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation in the aqueous phase.
  • the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test result is not rated (NR) because of the blistering of the coating.
  • test panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the test panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss in the aqueous phase.
  • Adhesion and Blister test results Test 4 (3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min decompression rate) Comparative Example Example 1 PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion GAS #1(D) NR #10 (None) A AQUEOUS #0(D) NR #10 (None) A The test panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the test panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss in both phases. The blisters rated as #0 are in fact lose flaps of coating exposing the underlying surface of the test panel, resulting from the rupture of blisters.
  • Example 1 A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. At the conclusion of the testing procedure, the pressure is released at a rate of 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. The results are the same as reported under Test 4 above.
  • the test panels coated according to Example 1 exhibit a blister rating of #10 and Adhesion rating of A for both the gas and aqueous phase areas of contact of the coated panels within the autoclave.
  • the compositions of the present invention provide a Blister rating of #10 at a decompression rate of at least 300 psia (2.1 MPa)/min, more preferably at least 1000 psia (6.9 MPa)/min., and even more preferably, at least 3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min., and most preferably, at least 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. in the Autoclave Test.
  • the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test rating at each of these decompression rates is A.
  • the overcoat compositions of the present invention exhibit another improvement, which is improved abrasion resistance.
  • a separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are tested for resistance to abrasion using ASTM D968 - 05(2010) Standard Test Methods for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by Falling Abrasive.
  • the abrasive used for the test is 24 grit aluminum oxide.
  • the Comparative Example requires 12.37 Kg of abrasive to cut through the non-stick coating to the panel surface (substrate).
  • Example 1 requires 18.49 Kg of abrasive to cut through the coating to the substrate, offering an improvement of about 49% more resistance to abrasion.
  • the improvement in abrasion resistance can also be expressed in terms of kg/unit of coating thickness, the original non-stick coating thickness for both coatings being 5.6 mils (141 micrometers).
  • the 12.37 Kg amount of abrasive corresponds to 2.2 Kg/mil (0.088 kg/micrometer) of coating thickness
  • the 18.49 kg of abrasive corresponds to 3.3 kg/mil (0.13 kg/micrometer) of coating thickness.
  • the preferred amount of improved abrasion resistance for non-stick coatings made using compositions of the present invention and according to this Falling Abrasion Test is at least 20%. This Test 6 easily exceeds this amount.
  • the overcoat layers formed in this Example have the following pre-bake compositions: Table 4 Overcoat Layer Composition Liquid Solid (baked) Ingredient wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% 1* 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Perfluoropolymer PFA 46.9 43.3 36.17 22.52 89.2 85.2 67.3 44.9 Perfluoropolymer FEP 0 2.2 12.06 22.52 4.3 22.4 44.9 Glycerin 9.5 1.1 1.4 1.31 Water 34.1 43.6 41.21 44.57 Red mica filler 4.4 4.1 4.25 3.97 8.4 8.1 7.9 7.9 Thickener 0.9 1.1 0.82 1.28 Dispersion agents 1.1 1 0.45 0.42 Other organics 1.8 2.4 2.37 2.22 Tin metal 1.3 1.2 1.27 1.19 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 * Comparative The PFA and FEP perfluoropolymers are the same as described in table
  • Overcoat layer 1 in Table 4 contains no FEP and is therefore a layer for comparison with layers 2-4 that do contain FEP.
  • the red-colored overcoat layer is still visible on the primed test panel. There is no visible red color on the tape peeled from overcoat layers 3 and 4
  • the improvement in overcoat layer cohesive strength exhibited for the overcoat layers 2, 3, and 4 is as follows: The presence of a smaller amount of red color on the tape used on overcoat layer 2 indicates an increase in cohesive strength as compared to the overcoat layer 1 having no FEP present. The absence of red color on the tape used on the overcoat layers 3 and 4 indicates a further increase in cohesive strength of the overcoats in accordance with the result of no cohesive failure of these overcoat layers when this layer is subjected to the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test.
  • the Taber Shear-Scratch Tests The overcoat layer 1 is broken to the primer at 600 - 650 g loading while the overcoat layers 2 - 4 are broken to the primer at 750 - 800 g loading. "Broken to the primer” means that the cutting tool has scratched through the overcoat layer to expose the primer, which is visible by not having the red coloration of the overcoat layer. The greater resistance to scratching by overcoat layers 2-4 is another indicator of their improved cohesive strength.
  • compositions of the present invention as an overcoat on a primed metal substrate preferably exhibit the following: Pass the PWA Test, and/or no delamination between overcoat and primer and reduced or no cohesive failure in the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test and/or a Taber Shear-Scratch Test load that is 10% greater than when no FEP is present. These results are preferably individually or collectively in addition to the preferred results for the Autoclave and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test results reported under Example 1 for the composition of Example 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to increasing the adhesion between primer and overcoat layer forming a non-stick coating on a substrate and to increasing the cohesive strength of the overcoat layer.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • U.S. Patent 7,575,789 discloses a lining adhered to the interior surface of an oil well pipe, also known as oil production tube or down-hole oil pipe, the lining including a primer layer and an overcoat layer on the primer layer, the overcoat providing a non-stick perfluoropolymer surface. In a preferred embodiment, the primer layer is formed by spraying a liquid-based primer composition onto the interior surface of the pipe and drying or baking the primer composition to form the primer layer, followed by spraying a liquid composition onto the primer layer and drying and baking this composition to form the overcoat layer. This lining has performed admirably in oil well application, preventing the plugging of the oil well pipe by deposition of asphaltenes, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale present in the oil flowing through the pipe
  • A water-miscible organic liquid with a high boiling temperature, notably glycerin, which boils at 291 °C, is included in the overcoat composition of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 in a substantial amount to prevent the dried coating, prior to baking, from sloughing off of the primer layer within the interior of the pipe wherein the cylindrical surface is mostly non-horizontal. U.S. Patent 5,502,097 discloses the use of such high boiling liquid in the coating composition to prevent sloughing off of the coating from a vertical surface. The interior of oil well pipe presents a continuum of surface varying from the non-horizontal, including vertical and overhanging (upper), looking down on the lower surface of the pipe. This sloughing off of the dried coating from non-horizontal surface is a problem, especially if the pipe being lined is moved or impacted during drying, until the baking of the dried layer fuses the perfluoropolymer present in the layer, resulting in the overcoat adhering to the primer layer. While the high boiling organic liquid is effective in resisting sloughing, its boiling temperature is less than that of the baking temperature, whereby the liquid volatilizes, often resulting in excessive smoking (fuming) of the layer. There is a need for solving the sloughing problem without having to volatilize so much organic liquid.
  • While, the pipe lining of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 performs admirably well in oil well operation, there are occasions in oil recovery or maintenance of the oil well pipe that the interior of the pipe is exposed to pressurization and rapid decompression. U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0078328 discloses an Autoclave Test simulating the effect pressurization and rapid decompression on a pipe having a non-stick lining. The autoclave contains test fluids, liquid and gas, comparable to those encountered in an oil well and a non-stick lining that would be used for oil well pipe. The lining is formed from a primer layer on the metal surface, which could be that of the interior of the pipe, and an inner layer adhered to the primer layer and an outer layer adhered to the inner layer. The combination of the inner layer and outer layer is the overcoat for the primer layer. Pressurization forces test fluids to permeate into the coating, and rapid decompression results in the rapid exit of these penetrated fluids from the coating, causing blistering (layer separation) within the coating, namely between the primer layer and the inner layer of the overcoat. This blistering represents locations for potential corrosive attack and coating failure in actual service, wherein the coating forms the interior surface of oil well pipe. There is a need to increase the adhesion between the primer layer and overcoat of the pipe lining so that the lining has greater resistance to blistering should the occasion of rapid decompression of the pressurized interior of the lined pipe arise in actual down-hole service.
  • The outer layer of the oil pipe lining of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 may contain particles that form a mechanical barrier against the permeation of water, solvents, and gases. While these particles are effective in protecting the metal surface of the pipe underlying the non-stick coating from corrosion, the coating is nevertheless susceptible to blistering upon rapid decompression. Apparently enough fluid permeates into the lining to give this disadvantageous result. While the presence of the permeation barrier particles, usually platelet in shape, protects the underlying pipe surface from corrosion, the inner layer of the overcoat containing these particles exhibits decreased cohesive strength. Cohesive strength is the strength of the layer within itself, i.e. the ability of the layer to retain its integrity under stress, in contrast to the strength of the bond between the inner layer and adjacent layers. As a result of this reduced cohesive strength, the lining is subject to delamination from physical abuse that may be encountered in down-hole operation, for example being struck by a down-hole tool inserted into the pipe. This delamination has been found to be a failure within the thickness of the overcoat, i.e. within the inner layer of the lining of U.S. Patent 7,575,789 , by separation of the fluoropolymer constituent of the inner layer from the surface of the particles lying within the inner layer. The location of this delamination then becomes a point for corrosive attack on the underlying pipe surface and a loss of non-stick character inviting the build-up and plugging from one or more of asphaltenes, wax and inorganic scale. There is a need to increase the cohesive strength of the layer containing the barrier particles.
  • WO 00/58389 discloses aqueous dispersion of PFA and FEP, and the powder coating compositions obtained by spray-drying these dispersions. However, there is no discussion of how to improve rapid decompression adhesion and nor is there any disclosure of a ratio of PFA to FEP according to the present invention, as set out below.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention in its various embodiments provides a non- stick coating or lining that satisfies all these needs.
  • Thus the present invention is directed at reducing the emission of volatiles from the coating during baking of the coating, without loss of sloughing resistance from non-horizontal surfaces on which the coating is applied. This embodiment (A) can be defined as a coating composition that resists sloughing from a non-horizontal metal substrate prior to baking, with the components comprising (a) an aqueous medium, (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of at least 290°C, and a sloughing- resistant amount of the combination of (c) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C and (d) water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C.
  • Another aspect of this embodiment is the use of the composition in the formation of a baked layer on the metal substrate, e.g. in down-hole oil pipe or a heat exchanger tube. Baking drives off all lower boiling materials present in the as-applied composition. Thus, components (a) and (d) would no longer be present in the baked layer. Another component that would not be present in any significant amount is heat resistant polymer binder that is used in primer layer compositions to adhere the primer layer to a metal substrate. This would not be present in the baked layer because the composition of embodiment A is essentially free of such polymer binder, the baked layer formed from embodiment A therefore requiring a primer layer to be first applied to the metal substrate, on which the composition of embodiment A is then applied. The baking to form the overcoat layer of this composition thus comprises fusing said melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers of (b) and (c).
  • The result of the baking of the overcoat layer, and thus the primer layer if not already baked, is the aspect of embodiment A wherein the metal substrate has a non-stick lining comprising a primer layer on the metal substrate and an overcoat layer on the primer layer, the overcoat layer comprising melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C and melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C. This aspect of embodiment A produces the surprising result of increasing rapid decompression adhesion between the primer layer and the overcoat layer. The amount of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C present in the baked layer is that which is effective to produce this improvement, whereby this aspect of embodiment A produces a baked layer that has improved resistance to blistering when the lining is subjected to rapid decompression.
  • In another embodiment (B), not claimed in this application, the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are the same as the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) of embodiment A and filler (e) is added in place of the liquids.
  • Common to both embodiments A and B is the beneficial effect of adding melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C to the composition to be applied to the primer layer-coated metal substrate, whereby this polymer is also present in the baked layer formed from this composition. In embodiment A, this lower melting perfluoropolymer replaces most of the water immiscible high boiling organic liquid as the anti-sloughing additive to the composition, thereby reducing organic volatiles in the baking step, and provides the further beneficial effect of improved resistance to blistering as described above. While the water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C is a required component in the as-applied composition in embodiment A, it is not required when the metal substrate has the shape that avoids the sloughing problem. In that event, the baked layer having improved resistance to blistering under rapid decompression is obtained without using the high boiling organic liquid. The same is true for the as-applied composition of embodiment B, which can be applied as a powder coating, thereby not requiring the as-applied composition to be in the form of a liquid medium. Filler is present in the composition of embodiment B, whereby the presence of melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C provides the improved cohesive strength to the overcoat layer.
  • Thus, the present invention can be described as the use of perfluoropolymer (c) to reduce sloughing in the context of embodiment A, or to reduce or eliminate blistering (rapid decompression adhesion) also in the context of embodiment A, even when liquid (d) is not present. These improvements arising from the use of perfluoropolymer (c) can be separately sought and obtained or collectively sought and obtained in the compositions of the present invention. These uses of perfluoropolymer (c) also apply to the many embodiments of metal substrates described hereinafter, such as metal pipes, preferably oil well pipe and heat exchanger pipe, especially forming the interior surface thereof. These uses on metal substrates also apply to the application of the compositions of embodiments A and B.
  • A preferred embodiment of the present invention when the non-stick coating on a metal substrate forms the interior surface of a metal pipe (tube), is the as-applied composition that is the combination of embodiments A and B i.e. that contains both the filler (e) and the water miscible organic liquid (d) having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C.
  • The amounts of each component of each composition of the present invention will depend on the application intended and improvement desired as will be discussed hereinafter.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The components used in the compositions of the present invention will first be described, followed by description of the use of these components in the compositions of the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Both the perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C, and the perfluoropolymer (c) having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C are melt fabricable. By melt fabricable is meant that the fluoropolymer is sufficiently flowable in the molten state that it can be fabricated by melt processing such as extrusion, to produce products having sufficient strength so as to be useful. This melt flowability enables the compositions to be fused in the baking step to form tough pin-hole free layers. The sufficient strength characteristic of melt fabricability can be characterized by the fluoropolymer by itself exhibiting an MIT Flex Life of at least 1000 cycles, preferably at least 2000 cycles using 8 mil (0.21 mm) thick compression molded film. In the MIT Flex Life test, the film is gripped between jaws and is flexed back and forth over a 135° range in accordance with ASTM D 2176.
  • With respect to the perfluoropolymer (b) having a melt temperature of at least 290°C, examples of this melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer are the copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) (PAVE) in which the linear or branched alkyl group contains 1 to 5 carbon atoms. These perfluoropolymers are partially crystalline fluoroplastics and are not perfluoroelastomers and are commonly known as PFA. By partially crystalline is meant that the polymers have some crystallinity and are characterized by a detectable melting point measured according to ASTM D 3418, and a melting endotherm of at least about 3 J/g.
  • Preferred PAVE monomers are those in which the alkyl group contains 1, 2, 3 or 4 carbon atoms, respectively known as perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (PMVE), perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE), perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE), and perfluoro(butyl vinyl ether) (PBVE). The copolymer can be made using several PAVE monomers, such as the TFE/perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether)/perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer, sometimes called MFA by the manufacturer, but included as PFA herein. The selection of the PAVE monomer(s) for copolymerization with TFE and their amount is such that the melting temperature of the resulting perfluoropolymer is at least 290 °C, preferably at least 300°C, but typically no greater than 310°C for best melt flowability to pin-hole free layers. The PAVE monomer PPVE lowers the melting temperature of the PFA less than when the PAVE monomer is PEVE, whereby PPVE is the preferred monomer for copolymerization with TFE to form high melting PFA. PFA has a high thermal stability, and the higher its melting temperature, the greater is its integrity in use as linings at high temperature. To obtain the high melting PFA, generally the PAVE content will be no greater than 10 wt%, no greater than 7 wt% to achieve a melt temperature of at least 300°C, and its minimum content will be at least 1.5 wt% to provide the melt flowability needed for melt fabricability, the remainder to total 100 wt% being TFE. The melt flow rate (MFR) of the PFA is preferably at least 0.1 g/10 min, preferably at least 5 g/10 min, as measured according to ASTM D-1238 and ASTM D 3307-93, at 372°C using a 5 kg weight on the molten PFA.
  • The melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer (b) having a melting temperature of at least 290°C is not polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or PTFE micropowder. Neither of these polymers are melt fabricable. PTFE is not melt fabricable because it does not flow in the molten state. This non-melt flowability arises from the extremely high molecular weight of the PTFE, i.e. at least 1,000,000, and the accompanying high melt viscosity. The non-melt flowability of the PTFE can also be characterized by high melt creep viscosity, sometimes called specific melt viscosity, which involves the measurement of the rate of elongation of a molten sliver of PTFE under a known tensile stress for 30 min, as further described in and determined in accordance with U.S. Patent 6,841,594 , referring to the specific melt viscosity measurement procedure of U.S. Patent 3,819,594 . In this test, the molten sliver made in accordance with the test procedure is maintained under load for 30 min, before the measurement of melt creep viscosity is begun, and this measurement is then made during the next 30 min of applied load. The PTFE preferably has a melt creep viscosity of at least about 1 x 106 Pa•s, more preferably at least about 1 x 107 Pa•s, and most preferably at least about 1 x 108 Pa•s, all at 380°C. The fact that the creep of the sliver can be measured under this condition, means that the sliver remained intact during the creep test, instead of elongating to rupture if the sliver (PTFE) were melt flowable. PTFE micropowder is melt flowable, because it is low molecular weight PTFE, but it is not melt fabricable. This melt flowable PTFE, which has an MFR that is measurable by ASTM D 1238-94a, is obtained by direct polymerization under conditions that prevent very long polymer chains from forming, or by irradiation degradation of non-melt flowable PTFE. PTFE micropowder is not melt fabricable because the article molded from the melt is useless, by virtue of extreme brittleness. Because of its low molecular weight (relative to non-melt-flowable PTFE), it has no strength. An extruded filament of the PTFE micropowder is so brittle that it breaks upon flexing. Compression molded film for the MIT flex life test generally cannot be made from PTFE micropowder, i.e. the film tends to crack in the mold. Any intact portions of the film crack when flexed.
  • With respect to the perfluoropolymer (c) component, this fluoropolymer is preferably a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hexafluoropropylene (HFP), typically referred to as FEP. In these copolymers, the HFP content is typically about 6-17 wt%, preferably 9-17 wt% (calculated from HFPI x 3.2). HFPI is the ratio of infrared radiation (IR) absorbances at specified IR wavelengths as disclosed in U.S. Statutory Invention Registration H130. Preferably, the TFE/HFP copolymer includes a small amount of additional comonomer to improve properties. The preferred TFE/HFP copolymer is TFE/HFP/perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) (PAVE), wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Preferred PAVE monomers are perfluoro(ethyl vinyl ether) (PEVE) and perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE). Preferred TFE/HFP copolymers containing the additional comonomer have an HFP content of about 6-17 wt%, preferably 9-17 wt% and PAVE content, preferably PEVE, of about 0.2 to 3 wt%, with the remainder of the copolymer being TFE to total 100 wt% of the copolymer. Examples of FEP compositions are those disclosed in U.S. Patents 4,029,868 (Carlson ), 5,677,404 (Blair ), and 6,541,588 (Kaulbach et al. ) and in U.S. Statutory Invention Registration H130. The FEP is partially crystalline as defined above, that is, it is not a fluoroelastomer.
  • The composition of the FEP described above is chosen so the its melt temperature of no greater than 270°C, preferably no greater than 265°C so that this copolymer commences melting before the high boiling organic liquid is completely volatilized from the layer being baked. This melting holds the layer in place, not allowing it to slough off of the primer layer before baking is complete. It is also preferred that the FEP have a melting temperature of at least 250°C, more preferably at least 255°C, to provide the highest thermal stability for the copolymer. Thus, the melting temperature range for this lower melting perfluoropolymer component can be 250-270°C, 255-270°C, 250-265°C or 255-265°C, and any of these lower melting perfluoropolymers can be used in the composition along with the perfluoropolymer having a melting temperature of at least 290°C or at least 300°C.
  • The perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) may be present in the composition in the form of a powder, which is an agglomeration of submicrometer-size dispersion-polymerized particles formed in an aqueous medium (a). The powder is preferably obtained by spray drying the aqueous medium containing the dispersion polymerized perfluoropolymer particles as disclosed in U.S. Patent 6,418,349 . As disclosed in this patent, the powder formed by the spray drying comprises friable granules of agglomerated primary particles (as polymerized). The friable nature of the granules gives them a high bulk density, e.g. at least 20 g/100 cm3 and a lower specific surface area (SSA), 1-6 g/m2, than the 10-12 m2/g for the as-polymerized dispersed primary particles of the perfluoropolymer. SSA is measured as described in this patent. At the time of the patenting of the invention of U.S. Patent 6,518,329 , the average particle size of the powder produced by the spray drying was 5 to 100 micrometers, which could be reduced by densifying and comminution as disclosed in the patent. The perfluoropolymer powder used in the present invention can be as spray dried or densified, with the preferred average particle size being 2 to 100 micrometers, more preferably, 2 to 60 micrometers.
  • While the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) are preferably in the form of powders as described above, they can also be in the form of as-polymerized submicrometer-size primary particles. The powder form, however, provides the advantage of promoting the high viscosity desired for the liquid form of the coating composition for achieving thick overcoat layer thicknesses, i.e. at least 30 micrometers thick.
  • With respect to the water miscible high boiling organic liquid (d) having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C, examples of such liquids include glycerin and polyethylene glycol and mixtures thereof. These liquids impart sloughing resistance to the layer being formed on non-horizontal surfaces by drying the composition and before the baking temperature is reached. When the baking temperature reaches the boiling temperature of the organic liquid, the liquid volatilizes without leaving any measurable residue in the layer. The baking temperature for the lining will generally be between 360-410°C, depending on layer thickness and time of baking desired, without decomposing any of the perfluoropolymers present in the lining. The baking step is well above the melting temperatures of the perfluoropolymers in the composition, whereby they flow and fuse together to form a pin-hole free layer. The boiling temperature of the organic liquid will be at least 10°C less than the baking temperature for the layer and thus the lining, generally no greater than 340°C. The volatilization of the high boiling organic liquid is accompanied by the emission of smoke from the coating (lining) during baking. The present invention provides for greatly reduced smoke emission, by enabling the amount of high boiling organic liquid to be reduced without loss of sloughing resistance by virtue of the presence of the fluoropolymer (c) in the composition forming the baked layer.
  • With respect to the filler component (e), these are particles that are preferably platelet in shape to provide the most effective mechanical barrier to permeation of gases and liquids through the thickness of the layer containing this filler, thereby protecting the metal substrate from corrosion. Examples of platelet-shaped filler include glass flakes and mica, including mica particles coated with an oxide layer like iron or titanium oxide. The platelet particles will be small in size so as to be containable within the thickness of the layer containing these particles. Thus, these particles will generally have an average particle size (diameter) of about 10 to 200 micrometers, preferably 20 -100 micrometers, with no more than 50% of the particles of flake having average particle size of more than about 300 micrometers. The thickness of the platelets will be less than the diameter, usually at least 1/5 the diameter, and most often no greater than 5 micrometers in thickness. Mica particles coated with oxide layer that can be used in the present invention include those described in U. S. Patent Nos. 3,087,827 (Klenke and Stratton ); 3,087,828 (Linton ); and 3,087,829 (Linton ). The micas described in these Patents are coated with oxides or hydrous oxides of titanium, zirconium, aluminum, zinc, antimony, tin, iron, copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium, or vanadium. Mixtures of coated micas can also be used.
  • Examples of other components that can be present in compositions of the present invention, include thickeners such as acrylic polymer, low boiling organic solvents, e.g. those disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 having a boiling temperature of 50 to 200°C, and dispersing agents. All of these other components are fugitive in the sense they are volatilized away from the layer during the baking step.
  • The aqueous medium is primarily water and includes the solution of other soluble components in the water. In the calculation of composition wt%s, however, aqueous medium (a) is considered to be entirely of water.
  • The coating compositions will not contain any significant amount of non-fluorinated heat resistant (thermally stable) polymer binder. As disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 , this polymer binder is present in the primer layer to adhere it to the metal substrate. The compositions of the present invention do not contain enough of such polymer binder to serve as a primer layer, whereby layers formed from these compositions require that a primer layer be formed on the metal substrate for adhering said coating composition to said surface. Examples of primer layers are those disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 . Thus, the baked layer(s) from the coating compositions of the present invention that are formed on the primer layer will be essentially free of heat-resistant polymer binder. A small amount of polymer binder can be present in the coating composition to modify an adhesion property between overcoat and primer layer, but preferably no heat-resistant polymer binder is present in either the coating compositions of the present invention or in the baked layers obtained therefrom. If a small amount of heat-resistant polymer binder is present, such amount will preferably be no greater than 20% of the total weight of perfluoropolymers (b) and (c) in the composition, more preferably no greater than 10 wt%, most preferably no greater than 5 wt%.
  • The preferred primer contains both perfluoropolymer along with an effective amount of heat-resistant polymer binder to adhere the layer formed from the primer to the metal substrate. The preferred perfluoropolymer in the primer layer is perfluoropolymer (c), most preferably FEP. In this regard, the perfluoropolymer or FEP content of the primer is preferably at least 80% of the entire perfluoropolymer content of the primer, more preferably at least 90 wt%, and most preferably, 100%.
  • The compositions of the invention can use any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a melting temperature of at least 290°C described above as component (b) and any of the melt-fabricable perfluoropolymers having a melting temperature of no greater than 270°C described above as component (c) dispersed in aqueous medium (a). Preferably the amount of (c) plus (d) is at least 3 wt% based on the sum of (a), (b), (c), and (d). U.S. Patent 7,575,789 discloses the presence of 8.3 wt% glycerin in the coating composition (Table 4). It has been found that equivalent sloughing resistance can be obtained with the combination of no more than 2 wt% component (d) together with no more than 3 wt% component (c), based on the sum of components (a), (b), (c) and (d). The amount of component (b) present in the compositions is preferably 35 to 55 wt%, based on the sum of (a), (b), (c) and (d) components; and the amount of (c) present in the compositions is preferably at least 1 wt% and no more than 15 wt%, preferably no more than 10 wt%, of the sum of (b) and (c).
  • The aqueous medium (a) of the compositions is preferably 30 to 55 wt%, based on the sum of the components (b), (c), and (e) when present.
  • The baked layer composition will comprise the perfluoropolymers (b) and (c), with the preferred amount of (c) being no more than 15 wt% of the amount of (b) and preferably constituting 2 to 10 wt% of (b). More preferably, the baked layer contains 2 to 8 wt% of (c) based on the sum of (b) and (c). Perfluoropolymer (b) constitutes the remainder of the (b) + (c) components to total 100 wt%. The sum of components on which wt%s are based total 100 wt%.
  • The overcoat layer from the coating composition of embodiment A preferably consists of an inner layer and an outer layer, with the inner layer forming the interface between the primer layer and the overcoat, and the outer layer providing the surface of the non-stick lining that is exposed to the environment, e.g. when the metal substrate is a pipe and the surface of the outer layer forms the interior of the pipe exposed to the fluids passing through the pipe. The compositions described in the preceding paragraph apply to the composition of the inner layer. Preferably, these compositions also apply to the outer layer.
  • The inner layer formed from the coating composition of embodiment A also preferably contains filler (e), preferably having the platelet shape and identities described for increasing the impermeability of said coating composition, i.e. the baked layer formed from the coating composition. Preferably, the amount of filler (e) used in the compositions of embodiment A will be from 2-10 wt% of the sum of (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) in the coating composition, more preferably 3 to 6 wt%. In the baked layer obtained from the composition, the amount of filler will preferably be from 4 to 20 wt%, preferably 5 to 15 wt%, based on the sum of (b), (c) and (e). The proportions of (b) and (c) in this baked layer will be the same as in the baked layer of the composition that is free of filler (e). The outer layer formed from the coating composition is preferably free of filler. Example 2 herein discloses the embodiment wherein the overcoat layer is entirely an inner layer composition, and no outer layer is present.
  • The coating composition is especially useful in providing an overcoat of a non-stick lining of a metal substrate that is a metal pipe, especially down-hole oil pipe, sometimes called oil well pipe or oil production tube. The lining forms the interior surface of the pipe. Dimensions of down-hole oil well pipe and preparation of the interior surface of the pipe for coating are disclosed in U.S.7,575,789 . Generally the oil pipe has an interior diameter of at least two inches (5.1 cm). Another application of the non-stick linings made using compositions of the present invention is the smaller diameter metal pipe used in heat exchangers through which hot water/oil recovered from the earth, especially from extracting oil from tar sand deposits by steam injection, is passed to recover heat expended to recover the oil. This recovered heat is then useful, saving the generation of such heat. Such heat exchanger pipe, often referred to as heat exchanger tube(s), generally has an interior diameter of no greater than one inch (2.54 cm) and as little as no greater than one-half inch (1.3 cm). As heat is removed from the hot water/oil, these small diameter pipes are especially prone to pluggage from solids (wax, asphaltenes, and inorganic scale), coming out of solution in the oil. It has been found that compositions of the present invention providing the overcoat for the non-stick coating (lining) forming the interior surface of the heat exchanger pipe (tube(s)), greatly reduces or prevents this pluggage. The coating operation is also free of the intense smoking that arises from baking of the overcoat layer composition when it contains the large amount of component (d) needed to by itself provide the sloughing resistance needed prior to the perfluoropolymer (b) being melted enough to retain the coating composition in place to form the baked overcoat layer within the pipe.
  • Methods useful for coating the interior of a pipe with composition of the present invention are disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 and U.S. Patent Publication 2009/0078328 . In the present invention, the non-stick lining will preferably have a total thickness of at least 75 micrometers, more preferably at least 100 micrometers, of which the primer layer will be 8 to 25 micrometers in thickness and the overcoat will constitute the remaining thickness. Of this remaining thickness, the overcoat inner and outer layers each constitute about 30 to 70% of the total thickness of the overcoat, to total 100% of the thickness of the overcoat. Exemplary of inner layer and outer layer thicknesses are the following: 30 to 60 micrometers thick for each layer. Generally, the non-stick lining will be no thicker than 200 micrometers and the overcoat will be no thicker than 175 micrometers.
  • TEST METHODS
  • The procedure for determining melting temperature of the perfluoropolymers disclosed herein is by DSC (differential scanning calorimeter) analysis in accordance with ASTM D3418-08. The melting temperatures disclosed herein are the peak melting temperature.
  • The dried coating layer (film) thickness (DFT) for primer / overcoat is measured using magnetic instruments as described in ASTM D1186.
  • The particle size for the perfluoropolymer powder disclosed herein is the number average particle size as determined by the laser diffraction method in accordance with ISO 13320-1:1999 using the Microtac® 101 Laser Particle Counter, available from Leeds & Northrup, a division of the Honeywell Corporation.
  • Adhesion Tests (Autoclave Test and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test)
  • Test panels of carbon steel 1.5"x6" (3.8 cm x 15.2 cm) are cleaned with an acetone rinse, followed by baking for 30 min @ 800°F. (427° C.) and grit blasting with 40 grit aluminum oxide) to a roughness of approximately 70-125 microinches Ra (1.78 - 3.18 micrometers). The coatings on the test panels are liquid coatings and are applied by using a spray gun, Model Number MSA-510 available from DeVilbiss located in Glendale Heights, III. The panels have a grit blasted surface and are coated according to the description in each of the Examples. The panels are subjected to the Autoclave Test described below for determining adhesion quality in two ways, the difficulty in removing the coating from the test panel after being exposed to the Tests and the degree of blistering within the coating arising from exposure to the Tests.
  • (1) Autoclave Test
  • Adhesion of the non-stick coating of this invention to the interior surface of a pipe is tested using the Autoclave Test on non-stick coated test panels described above. The non-stick coatings are described in the Examples below and include a primer layer for adhering the overcoat to the test panel, and an overcoat outer layer that is free of filler. The presence of this outer layer increases the danger of blistering in the Autoclve Test because of the greater layer thickness through which absorbed gas or aqueous medium must travel to escape from the coating during rapid decompression. The Autoclave Test is conducted using a modification of NACE TM0185-06 "Evaluation of Internal Plastic Coatings for Corrosion Control of Tubular Goods by Autoclave Testing." Samples of non-stick coated test panels are prepared and suspended in a beaker where test fluids are added and then the beaker is placed into an autoclave unit. The unit is secured and gases are metered into the unit using partial pressures. The heat is turned on and the pressure is monitored until full temperature is reached. The panels are in this way suspended in an autoclave containing two phases: 1) an aqueous phase solution of synthetic formation water (formation water is water produced together with oil from the oil-bearing strata in oil wells; the ionic composition of the formation water is described below), and 2) a gas phase overlying the liquid phase, according to the following test conditions and composition of the two phases:
    Temperature: 163° C/325° F.
    Pressure: 58.6 MPa/8500 psi
    Aqueous: Formation water (Na: 65,000 mg/L; Ca: 23,000 mg/L; Cl: 150,000 mg/L; SO4: 100 mg/L, HCO3: 300 mg/L)
    Gas: 16%, H2S, 5% CO2, 79% CH4
    Duration: 24 Hours
    Decompression Rate: as described in each example
  • A simplified alternative aqueous phase /gas phase for use in within the autoclave according to the above conditions is as follows:
    • Aqueous: deionized water containing 5 wt% NaCl
    • Gas: 1 wt% H2S/99 wt% N
    These alternative aqueous/gas phases used in the autoclave gives equivalent results with respect to the results obtained in the Autoclave Test using the aqueous/gas phases first mentioned above. The alternative aqueous/gas phases are used to obtain the Autoclave Test results reported in the Examples. This Autoclave Test is more severe than the autoclave permeation testing disclosed in U.S. Patent 7,575,789 , wherein the test temperature is 122°C (251°F).
  • During pressurization and soaking under pressure, vapors from the gas and liquid media permeate into the non-stick coating and become the Test Vapor that exits the coating upon the depressurization next described. After twenty four (24) hours, the autoclave is cooled to 93°C (200°F). It is then depressurized at a controlled rate as described in each of the examples. This short time frame is used to stimulate different rapid decompression rates that might be experienced in actual field service in downhole pipe. After depressurization the coated test panel is removed and examined within one hour for blistering change and adhesion in accordance with NACE TM0185-06.
  • Blister size is rated by comparison with photographic standards in FIGS. 1-4 (in the standard) according to ASTM D 714-02 using the scale:
    • Blister size from 10 to 0 (10 being no blisters). Blister size #8 represents blisters whose diameters are so small that they are barely visible with the unaided eye. Blister sizes #6, #4, and #2 represent increasingly larger blister sizes. Blister size #2, e.g. has blisters measuring 4 to 5 mm in diameter. Blister sizes #1 and #0 have increasingly larger blister sizes. These details on blister sizes are given to enable the visualization of these sizes without resorting to the photographic standards, but are not intended as a substitute for reliance on the photographic standards for the actual rating of blister size.
  • Blister frequency is D (dense), Medium Dense (MD), Medium (M) and Few (F). A blister frequency of None means that no blisters (Blister size of #10) are visible when viewed with the unaided eye (2) Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test
  • Adhesion is evaluated by the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test wherein the coating is scored to the metal in two parallel scribes approximately 1/8" (5 mm) apart. This scribing is done on the metal panels after being subjected to the Autoclave Test conditions. A knife blade is then inserted into one of the scribes in an attempt to lift the coating from the metal surface of the panel. The adhesion of each layer in the coating system is rated as follows:
  • A (8-10)
    The coating does not release from the layer below it. In the case of primer, it does not release from the metal substrate. The only bare metal visible is in the scribes.
    B (6-7)
    Less than 50% of the coating layer below (or in the case of primer, the metal substrate) is visible between the scribes.
    C (4-5)
    More than 50% of the coating layer below (or in the case of primer, the metal substrate 1) is visible between the scribes.
    D (2-3)
    All coating releases from the layer below it between the scribes (or in the case of primer, the metal substrate) when probed with a blade, but remains adhered adjacent to the cuts made by the parallel scribes.
    E (0-1)
    No bond exists between coating and the layer below it (or in the case of primer, the metal substrate metal). Once the film has been scribed, the coating releases.
  • Post Boiling Water Fingernail Adhesion (PWA) Test- Coated test panels are submerged in boiling water for 60 minutes. The water is allowed to come to a full boil after inserting the coated panel, before timing is begun. After the boiling water treatment, the panel is cooled to room temperature and dried thoroughly. The fingernail scratch test involves the use of the fingernail, to chip or peel away the coating from the edge of a deliberate knife scratch in the shape of an X in the film, to test the degree of adhesion of the film. If the coating can be pulled away from the substrate for 1 cm or more, the coating is considered to fail the PWA Test. If the coating cannot be pulled loose for a distance of 1 cm, the coating is considered to pass the PWA Test.
  • Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test- Coated test panels are subjected to a cross-hatch (x-hatch) test for adhesion. The coated test panel is scribed with a razor blade, aided by a stainless steel template, to make 11 parallel cuts about 3/32 inch (2.4 mm) apart through the film to the metal surface. This procedure is repeated at right angles to the first cuts to produce a grid of 100 squares in the coating. The coated and scribed sample is immersed in boiling water for 60 minutes, and then is removed from the water and cooled to room temperature without quenching the sample. Then a strip of transparent tape (3M Brand No. 898), 0.75 by 2.16 inch (1.9 by 5.5 cm), is pressed firmly over the scribed area with the tape oriented in a parallel direction to the scribed lines. The tape is then pulled off at a 90° angle rapidly but without jerking. This step is repeated at a 90° angle to the first step with a fresh piece of tape, and then repeated two times more again at 90° angles to the previous step, each time with a fresh piece of tape. Passing this Test requires that no squares be removed from the 100-square grid.
  • Taber Shear-Scratch Test - Before mounting a coated test panel on the Taber® Shear/Scratch Tester, the height of the scale beam is adjusted to match the thickness of the coated test panel. A precision cutting tool, which is attached to a balanced and calibrated scale beam, is then placed on the test panel. Tungsten Carbide Contour Shear tool (S-20) is used for this test. Operated by an on/off switch, the turntable rotates at a constant speed. By changing the load on the cutting tool, the resistance to shearing or scratching of the coating can be evaluated. The removable scale beam is affixed to the instrument by sliding it onto an adjustable gage block shaft. So the scale beam can remain in a level position relative to the specimen and turntable, the gage block can be raised and lowered. By changing the position of the sliding weight(s), the load applied on the specimen by the cutting tool can be selected from 0 - 1000g.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The primer layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-bake composition: TABLE 1
    Liquid Primer
    Ingredient Liquid Wt % Solid Wt %
    Fluoropolymer FEP 12.5 40.3
    Polyamideimide 1.1 3.5
    Polyethersulfone 7.6 24.4
    NMP* 47.8
    Other Organics** 20.1
    Pigments 9.9 31.8
    Dispersing Agent 1.0
    Total 100.0 100.0
    (*NMP is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
    **Other organics may include solvents such as butyrolactone, NMP, alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, and xylene, furfuryl alcohol, triethanol amine, and mixtures thereof.
    FEP: TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, a having an average particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10 min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238 (5 kg weight), and a melting temperature of 260°C.
  • The overcoat inner and outer layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-bake compositions: TABLE 2
    Liquid Overcoat Outer Layer Composition
    Outer Layer Liquid Outer Layer Solid
    1* 2 1* 2
    Ingredient wt % wt % wt% wt %
    Perfluoropolymer PFA 45.0 49.3 100.0 95.2
    Perfluoropolymer FEP 0.0 2.5 4.8
    Other Organics 1.9 1.9
    Water 42.5 43.4
    Glycerin 9.0 1.2
    Thickener 0.7 0.7
    Dispersing Agents 0.9 1.0
    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    * Comparative
    FEP: TFE/HFP fluoropolymer powder containing 11-12.5 wt % HFP, and having an average particle size of 8 micrometers, a melt flow rate of 6.8-7.8 g/10 min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238, and a melting temperature of 260°C.
    PFA: TFE/PPVE fluoropolymer powder containing 3.8-4.8 wt % PPVE and having a melt flow rate of 10-17 g/10 min measured at 372° C. by the method of ASTM D-1238 (5 kg weight), an average particle size of 35 micrometers, and a melting temperature of 305°C. The outer layer composition 2 is a composition of the present invention, and the outer layer composition 1 is a comparative example composition.
    TABLE 3
    Liquid Overcoat Inner Layer Composition
    Inner Layer Liquid Inner Layer Solid
    1* 2 1* 2
    Ingredient wt % wt % wt % wt%
    Perfluoropolymer PFA 46.9 43.3 89.1 85.2
    Perfluoropolymer FEP 0.0 2.2 4.3
    Glycerin 9.5 1.1
    Water 34.1 43.6
    Red Mica filler 4.4 4.1 8.4 8.1
    Thickener 0.9 1.1
    Dispersing Agents 1.1 1.0
    Other Organics 1.8 2.4
    Tin Metal 1.3 1.2 2.5 2.4
    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    *Comparative
    The inner layer composition 2 is a composition of the present invention, and the inner layer composition 1 is a comparative example composition. The FEP and PFA in both compositions are the same as described in Table 2. The glycerin used in the compositions described in Tables 2 and 3 has a boiling temperature of 291 °C. The baking conditions are set forth in the Examples.
  • Comparative Example FEP Primer/Inner Layer 1/Outer Layer 1
  • A layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a carbon steel panel prepared as described above, followed by drying at 150°C. for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is 12-19 micrometers. A layer of inner layer 1 composition is applied over the dried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399°C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. A layer of outer layer 1 composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125 micrometers. The baking of the inner layer results in considerable smoke being emitted by the inner layer as a result of the volatilization of the glycerin. The density of the smoke is comparable to the density of steam in a steam room of a health club or the smoke from a smoky fire.
  • Example 1 FEP Primer/Inner Layer 2/Outer Layer 2
  • A layer of primer (liquid FEP) is applied to both sides of a prepared a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by drying at 150°C. for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is 12-19 micrometers. A layer of inner layer 2 composition is applied over the dried primer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 399°C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. Very little smoke is emitted by the baking of this layer, i.e. the smoke is barely visible, because of its greatly reduced glycerin content. A layer of outer layer 2 composition is applied over the baked inner layer to both sides of the panel. It is baked at 360° C. for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 110-125 micrometers.
  • Test 1 - Autoclave Test with slow decompression rate
  • Panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test. At the conclusion of and as part of the Test the pressure is released at a rate of 100 psia (0.7 MPa)/min. The panels are rated for blister formation. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. Adhesion and Blister test results Test 1 (100 psia (0.7 MPa)/min decompression rate)
    Comparative Example Example 1
    PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion
    GAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A
    AQUEOUS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A
    As described above with respect to the blister size and frequency rating, the blister size rating of 10 means there are no blisters in the coating, and the blister frequency rating of "none" means that there are no blisters are visible. The meaning of the adhesion rating of A (no layer release) is described above. This system of ratings is used in the tables below reporting the results decompression at different rates. As is apparent from the ratings in the table above, both coated panels passed the Autoclave Test and the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. The blister and adhesion ratings are made after the decompression step of the Autoclave Test.
  • Test 2 - Autoclave Test with medium decompression rate
  • A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. At the conclusion of the Test, the pressure is released at a rate of 300 psia (2.1 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. Adhesion and Blister test results Test 2 (300 psia (2.1 MPa) /min decompression rate)
    Comparative Example Example 1
    PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion
    GAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A
    AQUEOUS #2(F) NR #10 (None) A
  • The coated panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the coated panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation in the aqueous phase. The Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test result is not rated (NR) because of the blistering of the coating.
  • Test 3 - Autoclave Test with fast decompression rate
  • A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. At the conclusion of the Test, the pressure is released at a rate of 1000 psia (6.9 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. Adhesion and Blister test results Test 3 (1000 psia (6.9 MPa)/min decompression rate)
    Comparative Example Example 1
    PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion
    GAS #10 (None) A #10 (None) A
    AQUEOUS #2(MD) NR #10 (None) A
  • The test panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the test panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss in the aqueous phase.
  • Test 4 - Autoclave Test with very fast decompression rate
  • A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. At the conclusion of the testing procedure, the pressure is released at a rate of 3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. Adhesion and Blister test results Test 4 (3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min decompression rate)
    Comparative Example Example 1
    PHASE Blisters Adhesion Blisters Adhesion
    GAS #1(D) NR #10 (None) A
    AQUEOUS #0(D) NR #10 (None) A
    The test panel of Example 1 passed both Tests, and the test panel of the Comparative Example failed due to blister formation and adhesion loss in both phases. The blisters rated as #0 are in fact lose flaps of coating exposing the underlying surface of the test panel, resulting from the rupture of blisters.
  • Test 5 - Autoclave Test with extremely fast decompression rate
  • A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are exposed to the Autoclave Test under the same conditions as test 1. At the conclusion of the testing procedure, the pressure is released at a rate of 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. The panels are scribed with parallel cuts for the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test. The results are the same as reported under Test 4 above. The test panels coated according to Example 1 exhibit a blister rating of #10 and Adhesion rating of A for both the gas and aqueous phase areas of contact of the coated panels within the autoclave. In addition to the higher decompression rate used in this test as compared to Test 4, an additional challenge is introduced in the Test 5, namely the 3.8 cm x 15.2 cm panels, instead of being flat are curved having been cut from either a 3-1/2 " (8.9 cm) outer diameter pipe or a 4-1/2 in. (11.4 cm) outer diameter pipe, each containing the test lining. The curved lining is more prone to blistering and loss of adhesion than a flat lining that is characteristic of the panels used in Tests 1-4. When flat panels are used under the Test 5 conditions as in Tests 1-4, such flat panels also pass the Autoclave and Adhesion Tests
  • These tests show that the presence of a small amount of FEP in the overcoat of the formulation change has made a substantial change in the resistance of the coating to rapid decompression, at least up to 10,000 psia (69 MPa)/min. Preferably, the compositions of the present invention provide a Blister rating of #10 at a decompression rate of at least 300 psia (2.1 MPa)/min, more preferably at least 1000 psia (6.9 MPa)/min., and even more preferably, at least 3000 psia (20.7 MPa)/min., and most preferably, at least 10000 psia (69 MPa)/min. in the Autoclave Test. Preferably, the Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test rating at each of these decompression rates is A.
  • Test 6 - Falling Abrasive Test
  • The overcoat compositions of the present invention exhibit another improvement, which is improved abrasion resistance. A separate set of panels of the Comparative Example and Example 1 are tested for resistance to abrasion using ASTM D968 - 05(2010) Standard Test Methods for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by Falling Abrasive. The abrasive used for the test is 24 grit aluminum oxide. The Comparative Example requires 12.37 Kg of abrasive to cut through the non-stick coating to the panel surface (substrate). Example 1 requires 18.49 Kg of abrasive to cut through the coating to the substrate, offering an improvement of about 49% more resistance to abrasion. The improvement in abrasion resistance can also be expressed in terms of kg/unit of coating thickness, the original non-stick coating thickness for both coatings being 5.6 mils (141 micrometers). Expressed in these terms, the 12.37 Kg amount of abrasive corresponds to 2.2 Kg/mil (0.088 kg/micrometer) of coating thickness, and the 18.49 kg of abrasive corresponds to 3.3 kg/mil (0.13 kg/micrometer) of coating thickness. The preferred amount of improved abrasion resistance for non-stick coatings made using compositions of the present invention and according to this Falling Abrasion Test is at least 20%. This Test 6 easily exceeds this amount.
  • Example 2
  • The overcoat layers formed in this Example have the following pre-bake compositions: Table 4
    Overcoat Layer Composition
    Liquid Solid (baked)
    Ingredient wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%
    1* 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
    Perfluoropolymer PFA 46.9 43.3 36.17 22.52 89.2 85.2 67.3 44.9
    Perfluoropolymer FEP 0 2.2 12.06 22.52 4.3 22.4 44.9
    Glycerin 9.5 1.1 1.4 1.31
    Water 34.1 43.6 41.21 44.57
    Red mica filler 4.4 4.1 4.25 3.97 8.4 8.1 7.9 7.9
    Thickener 0.9 1.1 0.82 1.28
    Dispersion agents 1.1 1 0.45 0.42
    Other organics 1.8 2.4 2.37 2.22
    Tin metal 1.3 1.2 1.27 1.19 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4
    Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
    * Comparative
    The PFA and FEP perfluoropolymers are the same as described in table 2.
  • Overcoat layer 1 in Table 4 contains no FEP and is therefore a layer for comparison with layers 2-4 that do contain FEP.
  • Preparation of samples for Adhesion and Taber Scratch Tests: Carbon steel 4" x 4" x 1/8" test panels are cleaned by baking 30 min. at 800°F (427°C) and grit blasted with 24 grit aluminum oxide to a roughness of around 70 - 125 microinches Ra (1.78 - 3.18 micrometers). The panels are coated with the primer layer composition of Table 1 (22 micrometers DFT), then coated with the compositions in Table 4 (50 micrometers DFT for the overcoat). The coated panels are baked at 399°C for 20 min. The overcoat compositions in Table 4 form a single layer overcoat, i.e. the is no mica-free outer layer applied to layer formed from the compositions of Table 4. The panels are subjected to the PWA and Cross-Hatch Adhesion Tests, as follows:
    • For the PWA Test, all of the coatings showed no delamination or peel-off of the coating (primer plus overcoat layer) greater than 1 cm, thereby passing the PWA Test. However, the comparison overcoat layer 1 exhibited weak cohesion within the overcoat, i.e., part of the thickness of this layer is easily scratched away by fingernail.
  • For the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test, all of the overcoats including the comparison overcoat layer 1, has no delamination between the overcoat layer and the primer. However, the red color residue on the tape after the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test is different. The presence of red residue on the tape, when the overcoat layer on the primed test panel still exhibits a red color, indicates that the overcoat layer has failed cohesively, i.e. the tape is pulling the overcoat layer apart, leaving some thickness of this layer on the primed test panel and some thickness of this layer on the tape. The overcoat layer 1 gives a red color on tape peeled from the full 100-squares grids. Overcoat 2 shows a smaller amount of red color on the tape. For both these test panels, the red-colored overcoat layer is still visible on the primed test panel. There is no visible red color on the tape peeled from overcoat layers 3 and 4 Thus, the improvement in overcoat layer cohesive strength exhibited for the overcoat layers 2, 3, and 4 is as follows: The presence of a smaller amount of red color on the tape used on overcoat layer 2 indicates an increase in cohesive strength as compared to the overcoat layer 1 having no FEP present. The absence of red color on the tape used on the overcoat layers 3 and 4 indicates a further increase in cohesive strength of the overcoats in accordance with the result of no cohesive failure of these overcoat layers when this layer is subjected to the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test.
  • The Taber Shear-Scratch Tests: The overcoat layer 1 is broken to the primer at 600 - 650 g loading while the overcoat layers 2 - 4 are broken to the primer at 750 - 800 g loading. "Broken to the primer" means that the cutting tool has scratched through the overcoat layer to expose the primer, which is visible by not having the red coloration of the overcoat layer. The greater resistance to scratching by overcoat layers 2-4 is another indicator of their improved cohesive strength.
  • Both adhesion and shear-scratch tests demonstrated that FEP addition to the overcoat improves cohesive strength within the overcoat layer. The primer/overcoat layers 2-4 of this Example 2 also exhibit improved Autoclave Test and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Tests results as compared to when the Comparative Example compositions are used. To confirm this fact, test panels coated with overcoat 4 (Table 4) are overcoated with the same overcoat 4 composition, but omitting the filler component, and baked. The resulting coated panels are subjected to the Autoclave Test and a decompression rate of 1000 psia (6.9 MPa). These coated panels exhibit a blister rating of #10 and Adhesion rating of A for both the gas phase and aqueous medium phase contact areas of the panels within the autoclave. The same results are obtained when the overcoat has both an inner layer and an outer layer and (i) the outer layer is overcoat 4 of Table 4 but without filler and (ii) the inner layer is overcoat 2 of Table 4.
  • The compositions of the present invention as an overcoat on a primed metal substrate preferably exhibit the following: Pass the PWA Test, and/or no delamination between overcoat and primer and reduced or no cohesive failure in the Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test and/or a Taber Shear-Scratch Test load that is 10% greater than when no FEP is present. These results are preferably individually or collectively in addition to the preferred results for the Autoclave and Parallel Scribe Adhesion Test results reported under Example 1 for the composition of Example 1.

Claims (7)

  1. Coating composition resisting sloughing from a non-horizontal metal substrate prior to baking, comprising (a) an aqueous medium, (b) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a peak melting temperature of at least 290°C as determined by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) in accordance with ASTM D 3418-08, and a sloughing-resistant amount of the combination of
    (c) melt-fabricable perfluoropolymer dispersed in said aqueous medium and having a peak melting temperature of no greater than 270°C as determined by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) in accordance with ASTM D 3418-08, and
    (d) water miscible organic liquid having a boiling temperature of at least 280°C, wherein said sloughing-resistant amount is no more than 3 wt% of (c) and no more than 2 wt% of (d), all based on the sum of (a), (b), (c), and (d); and wherein the aqueous medium (a) is considered to be entirely of water in the calculation of weight percentages.
  2. The coating composition of claim 1 wherein said (c) and (d) are present in at least 3 wt% based on the sum of (a), (b), (c) and (d).
  3. The coating composition of claim 1 additionally containing filler (e) for increasing the impermeability of said coating composition.
  4. The coating composition of claim 1 which is essentially free of heat resistant polymer binder, whereby said non-horizontal surface requires a primer layer for adhering said coating composition to said substrate.
  5. The coating composition of claim 1 wherein said both said perfluoropolymer (b) and said perfluoropolymer (c) are powder.
  6. The coating composition of claim 3 wherein said filler (e) is particles which are platelet in shape.
  7. Use of the coating composition of claim 1 in the formation of a non-stick overcoat on the interior surface of a down-hole oil pipe or heat exchanger tube.
EP11724868.2A 2010-05-25 2011-05-25 Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance Active EP2576713B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US34783310P 2010-05-25 2010-05-25
PCT/US2011/037831 WO2011150003A1 (en) 2010-05-25 2011-05-25 Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2576713A1 EP2576713A1 (en) 2013-04-10
EP2576713B1 true EP2576713B1 (en) 2016-03-09

Family

ID=44303490

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11724868.2A Active EP2576713B1 (en) 2010-05-25 2011-05-25 Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (2) US8889779B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2576713B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102906205A (en)
AR (1) AR081548A1 (en)
BR (1) BR112012029879A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2797671C (en)
CO (1) CO6761297A2 (en)
DK (1) DK2576713T3 (en)
EA (1) EA023960B1 (en)
MX (1) MX2012013520A (en)
MY (2) MY158256A (en)
WO (1) WO2011150003A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8889779B2 (en) * 2010-05-25 2014-11-18 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings
JP6898247B2 (en) 2015-04-01 2021-07-07 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー Multi-layer articles including peeled surfaces and methods thereof
CN107531010A (en) * 2015-04-01 2018-01-02 3M创新有限公司 Including the multi-layer product of adherent surfaces and its method
JP6909787B2 (en) * 2015-11-11 2021-07-28 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー Conductive fluoropolymer composition
US20220136341A1 (en) * 2019-02-13 2022-05-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Coating compositions for erosion mitigation, and coated components and methods using said coatings

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2833686A (en) 1955-06-20 1958-05-06 Du Pont Bonding polytetrafluoroethylene resins
US3087828A (en) 1961-06-28 1963-04-30 Du Pont Nacreous pigment compositions
US3087829A (en) 1961-06-28 1963-04-30 Du Pont Micaceous pigment composition
DE1165182B (en) 1961-06-28 1964-03-12 Du Pont Pigment based on translucent mica-like flakes and process for its manufacture
US3356108A (en) 1963-02-26 1967-12-05 Texas Instruments Inc Composite tubular articles and method of making same
US3819594A (en) 1972-05-17 1974-06-25 Du Pont Tetrafluoroethylene fine powder resin of a copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether)
US4029868A (en) 1976-03-10 1977-06-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Tetrafluoroethylene terpolymers
JP3340798B2 (en) * 1993-06-03 2002-11-05 三井・デュポンフロロケミカル株式会社 Fluororesin powder dispersion
ZA948098B (en) 1993-10-18 1995-06-05 Gillette Co Liquid ink
US5566984A (en) 1994-04-01 1996-10-22 Abbema; William D. Cylindrical corrosion barrier for pipe connections
US5677404A (en) 1996-02-23 1997-10-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Tetrafluoroethylene terpolymer
US5972494A (en) * 1996-11-01 1999-10-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Filled fluoropolymer composition for corrosion resistance
CA2313539C (en) 1997-12-19 2011-05-31 Keith Dixon-Roche Hoses or flexible pipes
DE19827337A1 (en) 1998-06-19 1999-12-23 Philips Patentverwaltung Arrangement and method for transmitting address, command and / or data telegrams
US6541588B1 (en) 1999-01-29 2003-04-01 3M Innovative Properties Company Tetrafluoroethylene/hexafluoropropylene copolymers with higher drawability
US6518349B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2003-02-11 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Sprayable powder of non-fibrillatable fluoropolymer
US6397895B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2002-06-04 F. Glenn Lively Insulated pipe
JP4384913B2 (en) 2002-01-04 2009-12-16 イー・アイ・デュポン・ドウ・ヌムール・アンド・カンパニー Core-shell fluoropolymer dispersion
US7575789B2 (en) 2003-12-17 2009-08-18 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Coated pipes for conveying oil
US7588058B2 (en) * 2004-11-24 2009-09-15 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Coated pipes for harsh environments
US8616245B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2013-12-31 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Pipe interior coatings
US8889779B2 (en) * 2010-05-25 2014-11-18 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9416292B2 (en) 2016-08-16
EA201291351A1 (en) 2013-04-30
CA2797671C (en) 2017-01-03
EP2576713A1 (en) 2013-04-10
BR112012029879A2 (en) 2017-06-27
US20110293920A1 (en) 2011-12-01
CN102906205A (en) 2013-01-30
MY165282A (en) 2018-03-21
US20150024193A1 (en) 2015-01-22
CA2797671A1 (en) 2011-12-01
US8889779B2 (en) 2014-11-18
EA023960B1 (en) 2016-07-29
MX2012013520A (en) 2013-01-24
MY158256A (en) 2016-09-30
AR081548A1 (en) 2012-10-03
DK2576713T3 (en) 2016-06-06
WO2011150003A1 (en) 2011-12-01
CO6761297A2 (en) 2013-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9416292B2 (en) Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings
CA2695493C (en) Pipe interior coatings
US7575789B2 (en) Coated pipes for conveying oil
US8211497B2 (en) Process for forming a nonstick surface on the interior surface of a pipe
EP1830971B1 (en) Coated tools for use in oil well pipes
BRPI0516902B1 (en) fluid media piping and process for forming a non-stick surface
WO2007119450A1 (en) Aqueous dispersion composition for primer
JP6519481B2 (en) Powder primer composition and laminate using the same
US20050173012A1 (en) Coated pipes for conveying oil
EP1795565A1 (en) Water-based fluoropolymer composition
OA16250A (en) Fluoropolymer non-stick coatings with improved sloughing and blistering resistance.
CA2550112C (en) Coated pipes for conveying oil
MXPA06011474A (en) Lined vessels for conveying chemicals

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121024

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130905

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20151002

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 779520

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160315

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011023836

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20160602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20160309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160610

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 779520

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160531

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160709

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160711

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011023836

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160525

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160531

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20161212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160609

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160525

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160531

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160309

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: PD

Owner name: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC; US

Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

Effective date: 20190509

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20190426

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190418

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190419

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190423

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: CHAD

Owner name: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, US

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602011023836

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MARKS & CLERK (LUXEMBOURG) LLP, LU

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602011023836

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, WILMINGTON, US

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO., WILMINGTON, DEL., US

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011023836

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200601

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200525

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201201

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230527

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20240419

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 14