EP2576138B1 - Method for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co² blasting - Google Patents

Method for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co² blasting Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2576138B1
EP2576138B1 EP11723670.3A EP11723670A EP2576138B1 EP 2576138 B1 EP2576138 B1 EP 2576138B1 EP 11723670 A EP11723670 A EP 11723670A EP 2576138 B1 EP2576138 B1 EP 2576138B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
solid
coating
blasting
recited
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11723670.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2576138A1 (en
EP2576138B2 (en
Inventor
Andrea Scrivani
Carlo Giolli
Bruno Antonio Allegrini
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
A&G Chemical Production Srl
Turbocoating SpA
Original Assignee
A&G Chemical Production Srl
Turbocoating SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=42942267&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2576138(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by A&G Chemical Production Srl, Turbocoating SpA filed Critical A&G Chemical Production Srl
Publication of EP2576138A1 publication Critical patent/EP2576138A1/en
Publication of EP2576138B1 publication Critical patent/EP2576138B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2576138B2 publication Critical patent/EP2576138B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/003Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods using material which dissolves or changes phase after the treatment, e.g. ice, CO2
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/08Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for polishing surfaces, e.g. smoothing a surface by making use of liquid-borne abrasives

Definitions

  • Ceramic thick coatings are defined as the protective layer with a thickness greater than 100 ⁇ m while the thin films are defined as protective layers with a thickness lower than 100 ⁇ m.
  • Ceramic thick coatings are made by thermal spray technologies as Air Plasma Spray (APS), Vacuum Plasma Spray (VPS), Suspension Plasma Spray (SPS), Solution Precursor Plasma Spray (SPPS) and High Velocity Oxygen Fuel (HVOF), mainly.
  • Ceramic Thin Films are applied by Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), mainly. Thick Ceramic Coatings are used for different application:
  • Dry-ice particle blasting is similar to sand blasting, plastic bead blasting, or soda blasting where a media is accelerated in a pressurized air stream (or other inert gas) to impact the surface to be cleaned or prepared.
  • a pressurized air stream or other inert gas
  • the media that impacts the surface is solid carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) particles.
  • CO 2 solid carbon dioxide
  • One unique aspect of using dry-ice particles as a blast media is that the particles sublimate (vaporize) upon impact with the surface. The combined impact energy dissipation and extremely rapid heat transfer between the pellet and the surface cause instantaneous sublimation of the solid CO 2 into a gas.
  • the gas expands to nearly eight hundred times the volume of the particle in a few milliseconds in what is effectively a "micro-explosion" at the point of impact that aids the coating removal process. Because of the CO 2 vaporizing, the dry-ice blasting process does not generate any secondary waste. All that remains to be collected is the removed coating. As with other blast media, the kinetic energy associated with dry-ice blasting is a function of the particle mass density and impact velocity. Since CO 2 particles have a relatively low density, the process relies on high particle velocities to achieve the needed impact energy. The high particle velocities are the result of supersonic propellant or air-stream velocities.
  • the CO 2 particles have a very low temperature of -109°F (-78.5°C). This inherent low temperature gives the dry-ice blasting process unique thermodynamically induced surface mechanisms that affect the coating or contaminate in greater or lesser degrees, depending on coating type. Because of the temperature differential between the dry ice particles and the surface being treated, a phenomenon known as thermal shock can occur. As a material's temperature decreases, it becomes brittle, enabling the particle impact to break-up the coating and sever the chemical bond that is weakened by the lower temperature. The thermal gradient or differential between two dissimilar materials with different thermal expansion coefficients can serve to break the bond between the two materials. This thermal shock is most evident when blasting a nonmetallic coating or contaminate bonded to a metallic substrate.
  • Dry Ice stripping should enable the removal of ceramic TC without modifying the MCrAlY bond coat characteristics and mainly the surface morphology.
  • the state of the art of dry ice stripping developed in the previous cited patents offers a coating removal methods which risk to damage the substrate and suffer from low efficiency or very long term duration.
  • a coating removal system having a solid particle nozzle with a detector for detecting particle flow and associated method
  • an apparatus for removing a coating from a substrate, comprising a nozzle having an outlet and adapted to direct a particle stream therethrough at a predetermined flow rate, a signal source for emitting a signal capable of traversing the particle stream, and a signal sensor positioned to detect the signal emitted by the signal source once the signal has passed through the particle stream.
  • the particle stream is directed from the outlet of the nozzle toward a coating on a substrate to remove the coating from the substrate.
  • This method does not include the step of pre-demaging the ceramic coating before removing the ceramic layer using dry ice blasting as included instead in the previous cited patent [ US20080178907 ].
  • the pre-damaging using shot peening or another sand blasting method using abrasive media shows the risk to damage the substrate characteristics as roughness and thickness.
  • the only pre-heating is not able to pre-damage the ceramic coating.
  • the pre-heating alone or the combination of pre-heating and quenching are not able to pre-damage or to remove the ceramic coating as a TBC or to get faster the dry ice stripping process.
  • the only thermal shock is not able to remove the ceramic coating. Dry Ice Blasting is not able to remove in a fast way the ceramic coatings treated with shot peening or/and pre-heating as indicate in the previous cited patent [ US20080178907 ].
  • This method includes only pre-heating by irradiation performed during or immediately before the blasting with solid CO 2 . This is due to the ceramic coating damage mechanism.
  • the density of the solid CO 2 pellets is proportional to the shock wave power. The more the pellets are dense, the more the gas volume growing during the sublimation is greater, the more the shock wave is stronger.
  • the equipment used in this invention is able to maintain high the density of the CO 2 pellets sudden out of the spray gun nozzle.
  • the mass flow of the solid CO 2 pellets is proportional to the shock wave power. The more the amount of Dry Ice pellets interact with the coating surface subliming, the stronger is the shock wave.
  • the present invention refers to a method and an equipment to remove ceramic protective coatings 2 (i.e. Thermal Barrier Coating such a Yttria Partially Stabilized Zirconia - YPSZ) with high removal efficiency and without damaging the substrate 1 characteristics.
  • the removing of the ceramic coating 2 without damaging the substrate 1 characteristics is obtained by a combination of coating/substrate pre-heating by irradiation immediately before ( Fig.2 (b) ) or during the stripping ( Fig.2 (a) ) and improved solid CO 2 4 blasting parameters.
  • the substrate 1 can be metallic, ceramic, plastic or composite.
  • the substrate characteristics not affected by the present invention are the substrate thickness and roughness. Substrate thickness can vary in an range of 1 ⁇ m to 1 m.
  • the substrate can be rough (Ra > 9 ⁇ m) or smooth (Ra ⁇ 9 ⁇ m).
  • the stripping method is a single stage process where only a combination of a pre-heating during or immediately before the blasting with solid CO 2 4 can lead to the ceramic coating stripping.
  • the equipment to remove ceramic protective coatings is divided in two parts: Pre-heating Station 5 and Sand Blasting Machine Station 20. This method does not include the step of pre-damaging the ceramic coating 2 before stripping step by dry ice blasting.
  • the substrates 1 coated with ceramic coating 2 are pre-heated in sequence in the pre-heating stations 5 ( Fig.3 ) up to the maximum temperature that the substrate can tolerate.
  • the pre-heating station 5 is able to heat the coating/substrate up to a maximum temperature of 1000°C.
  • the coated component in moved in the solid CO 2 blasting station 20.
  • the coating stripping using solid CO 2 blasting with optimized parameters is performed up to the quenching of the process at room temperature.
  • the component is then moved in another pre-heating station 5 while another hot component is moved into the stripping station 20 ( Fig.3 ).
  • the steps of pre-heating and solid CO 2 blasting are repeated for each substrate up to the complete coating removal.
  • the Sand Blasting Machine Station 20 for blasting by solid CO 2 4 used in the method consists of a compressor, a feeder unit to feed dry ice into one or more spray guns 3.
  • dry-ice particles are delivered and metered by various mechanical means to the inlet end of a hose and are drawn through the hose to the nozzle by means of vacuum produced by an ejector-type nozzle.
  • a stream of compressed air supplied by the second hose
  • this type of nozzle produces vacuum on the cavity around the primary jet and can therefore drag particles up through the ice hose and into the mixing tube where they are accelerated as the jet mixes with the entrained air/particle mixture.
  • the exhaust Mach number from this type of nozzle is, in general, slightly supersonic.
  • Blast machines are also differentiated into dry ice block shaver blasters and dry-ice pellet blasters.
  • Pellet blast machines have a hopper that is filled with pre-manufactured CO 2 pellets. The hopper uses mechanical agitation to move the pellets to the bottom of the hopper and into the feeder system. The pellets are extruded through a die plate under great pressure. This creates an extremely dense pellet for maximum impact energy.
  • the pellets are available in several sizes ranging from 0.040 inch (1 mm) to 0.120 inch (3 mm) in diameter. The 0.120 inch (3 mm) in diameter pellets are commercially available.
  • the solid CO 2 blasting machine station use a continuous (not pulsing) solid CO 2 blasting flow (constant pressure). Said continuous flow is obtained using a core in the feeder device ( Figure 4 ) in combination with a spray two-hose nozzle gun 3 ( Figure 5 ).
  • the Dry Ice is fed using a special feeding device as schematized in Figure 4 .
  • the dry ice pellets contained in a box 9 are moved by a rotating scoop 10 in a large hole 11. Then the dry ice pellets are moved from the position 11 by a rotating punched tool in a further hole in the position 12. In this way the dry ice pellets 4 are continuously stocked in the feedstock area 12.
  • the two-hose nozzle is schematized in Figure 5 .
  • Solid CO 2 pellets are fed in the main nozzle hose 17 by axial injection 16 in the internal injector 18.
  • a second pipe with high pressure air up to thirty bar is connected with the convergent/divergent nozzle 19 ( Fig.5 ).
  • the high pressure air is accelerated by convergent/divergent nozzle up to supersonic speed.
  • the dry ice pellets 4 are injected directly in the accelerated high pressure air stream after the nozzle throat 19.
  • the continuous flow shows a mass flow of solid CO 2 4 in a range of about 100 - 3500 g/min and a pressure in a range of 1 - 30 bar.
  • a continuous flow of solid CO 2 is very important in order to reach very high removal rate. In fact if the flow is pulsed not only solid CO 2 will arrive on the coating surface but cool air, too. The cool air will decrease the substrate/coating temperature without a contribution to the stripping process that is due to the shock waves due to the solid CO 2 sublimation. In that way the removal rate will be less than using a continuous flow of solid CO 2 .
  • High pressure is very important to increase the mass flow and to increase the removal rate. In fact, when the shock waves crumble ceramic coatings, the high pressure aids ceramic fragments removal.
  • the solid CO 2 Pellets used for blasting have very high density (Density 1.4 - 1.6 g/cm 3 ).
  • the CO 2 pellets density is very important because the more is the density, the more is the shock wave power due to the solid CO 2 sublimation.
  • the sand blasting equipment is designed to maintain the pellets density in a range of 1.525 - 1.6 g/cm 3 before the impact on the ceramic coating. This is obtained using in combination the above mentioned feeder and two-hose nozzle.
  • the pre-heating systems is performed by IR lamps 6 using irradiation. This method shows two advantages:

Description

    Background
  • The industrial market is focused on the optimization of the products quality and on the production and environmental costs reduction. In this contest the surface engineering has more and more importance because it enables to get better component performances only modifying the component surface. One of the main aspects of the surface engineering is the application of ceramic thick coatings and ceramic thin films. The thick coatings are defined as the protective layer with a thickness greater than 100 µm while the thin films are defined as protective layers with a thickness lower than 100 µm. Ceramic thick coatings are made by thermal spray technologies as Air Plasma Spray (APS), Vacuum Plasma Spray (VPS), Suspension Plasma Spray (SPS), Solution Precursor Plasma Spray (SPPS) and High Velocity Oxygen Fuel (HVOF), mainly. Ceramic Thin Films are applied by Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), mainly.
    Thick Ceramic Coatings are used for different application:
    • Coatings to improve component wear resistance as Al2O3, Cr2O3, Al2O3-TiO2, Al2O3-ZrO2-TiO2;
    • Coatings to improve the component corrosion resistance as Al2O3, Al2O3-TiO2, Cr2O3, ZrO2-CaO;
    • Alumina-based coatings to improve electrical insulation of a metallic component;
    • Thermal Barrier Coatings are composite coatings systems. TBC systems consist of (i) a Bond Coat (BC) of MCrAlY alloy (where "M" can be Ni, Co or a combination of both) and (ii) a ceramic Top Coat (TC) of Yttria Partially Stabilized Zirconia (YPSZ). MCrAlY coatings are able to protect the substrates from high temperature oxidation and hot corrosion. Zirconia coating, for its low thermal conduction coefficient is able to reduce the service temperature at the substrate surface in combination with a cooling gas system. For these reasons TBC systems are applied on gas turbine hot parts. Usually, the specifications of the main OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) require the deposition of MCrAlY alloys by low pressure plasma spray (LPPS) or vacuum plasma spray (VPS). Other methods such as air plasma spray (APS) and high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) may be desirable for their lower cost. The thermally sprayed ceramic TC adhesion is mainly determined by the BC roughness that must have an Ra greater than 10 µm (about 12-16 µm) to guarantee a good thermal fatigue resistance during the component service life. Ceramic TC in YPSZ is applied on metallic BC by APS;
    • Coatings to improve bio-compatibility of the metallic prosthesis based on TiO2 and hydrossyapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2.
    Ceramic Thin Films are applied for different application:
    • Thin films to modify optical properties of the component;
    • Decorative thin films based of metallic nitrides and oxides;
    • Thin films to improve wear and corrosion resistance of the components based on metallic nitrides, oxides and oxi-nitrides, mainly.
    The ceramic coating removal is an important aspect in the production of coated components. "Decoating" or "stripping" is needed during the production of new components as well as for the reconditioning of existing ones:
    1. (i) Stripping offers the possibility to correct problems of coating quality (thickness, porosity, roughness, adhesion, etc.) during the production steps;
    2. (ii) During repair operations on serviced coated components, the removing of the ceramic layer is the first operation step;
    The main characteristic of the stripping processes is to remove the coating without damaging the substrate characteristics (avoiding corrosion, geometrical variations, etc.). The Thermal Barrier Coating removal is a good example to understand the stripping process. The TC and/or BC stripping is necessary on new coated parts during MCrAlY or TBC manufacturing to correct problems of coating quality and during repair operations on serviced coated components. At the state of the art the removing of the TBC system is very time consuming and expensive: If it is necessary to remove only the ceramic TC, it is necessary to remove all the TBC using sand blasting to strip the ceramic top coat and chemical acid attack to remove the metallic MCrAlY BC. This procedure is necessary because sand blasting decreases bond coat roughness which is fundamental for TC adhesion. So, in the end, it is necessary to strip both the coatings to fix only the top coat. This leads to have very high re-work and environmental costs.
    It would be desirable to have available a less costly and locally applicable process by which only the ceramic coating (i.e. Thermal Barrier Coating) can be purposefully removed without modifying the characteristics of the substrate such as roughness and thickness.
    From the prior art, different methods for local removal of ceramic coatings are already known (see, for example, the publications US-A1-2005/0126001 , US-A1-2004/0244910 , WO-A1-02/103088 , WO-A1-2005/083158 , DE-A1-10 2004 009 757 , US-A1-2004/0115447 , US-A1-2004/0256504 , US-A1-2003/0100242 and DE-B4-103 60 063 ). Other methods for local repair of coating systems are known from the publications US-A1-2002/0164417 , DE-T2-601 , 03 612 , US-A1-2003/0101687 , EP-A1-1 304 446 , EP-A1-0 808 913 and US-B1-6, 235, 352 .
  • The complete removal of Thermal Barrier Coating Systems, by means of chemical methods alone, or in combination with other methods, have been handled in a different way in the publications DE-A1-10 2004 049 825 , US-A1-2001/0009246 , US-A1-2001/0009247 and EP-B1-1 076 114 .
  • Furthermore, it is known (Fr.-W. Bach et al., "Abtragen von thermisch gespritzten Schichten mit dem Trockeneis-Laserstrahl", GTS-Strahl Vol. 14, September 2004; Fr.-W. Bach et al., "Dry ice blasting and water jet processes for the removal of thermal sprayed coatings", Conf. Proc. ITSC 2005, Basle, p. 1542-1548 (2005)) to remove protective coatings, such as Thermal Barrier Coatings, which are on components, by means of a dry ice blasting process.
    A possible faster and lower cost alternative to the state of the art of ceramic coatings removal is the Dry Ice CO2 Stripping as described in a recent patent [ US20080178907 ].
    Dry-ice particle blasting is similar to sand blasting, plastic bead blasting, or soda blasting where a media is accelerated in a pressurized air stream (or other inert gas) to impact the surface to be cleaned or prepared. With dry-ice blasting, the media that impacts the surface is solid carbon dioxide (CO2) particles. One unique aspect of using dry-ice particles as a blast media is that the particles sublimate (vaporize) upon impact with the surface. The combined impact energy dissipation and extremely rapid heat transfer between the pellet and the surface cause instantaneous sublimation of the solid CO2 into a gas. The gas expands to nearly eight hundred times the volume of the particle in a few milliseconds in what is effectively a "micro-explosion" at the point of impact that aids the coating removal process. Because of the CO2 vaporizing, the dry-ice blasting process does not generate any secondary waste. All that remains to be collected is the removed coating.
    As with other blast media, the kinetic energy associated with dry-ice blasting is a function of the particle mass density and impact velocity. Since CO2 particles have a relatively low density, the process relies on high particle velocities to achieve the needed impact energy. The high particle velocities are the result of supersonic propellant or air-stream velocities.
    Unlike other blast media, the CO2 particles have a very low temperature of -109°F (-78.5°C). This inherent low temperature gives the dry-ice blasting process unique thermodynamically induced surface mechanisms that affect the coating or contaminate in greater or lesser degrees, depending on coating type. Because of the temperature differential between the dry ice particles and the surface being treated, a phenomenon known as thermal shock can occur. As a material's temperature decreases, it becomes brittle, enabling the particle impact to break-up the coating and sever the chemical bond that is weakened by the lower temperature. The thermal gradient or differential between two dissimilar materials with different thermal expansion coefficients can serve to break the bond between the two materials. This thermal shock is most evident when blasting a nonmetallic coating or contaminate bonded to a metallic substrate.
    For example, in the case of TBC stripping, Dry Ice stripping should enable the removal of ceramic TC without modifying the MCrAlY bond coat characteristics and mainly the surface morphology.
    The state of the art of dry ice stripping developed in the previous cited patents offers a coating removal methods which risk to damage the substrate and suffer from low efficiency or very long term duration.
    Another example of the prior art is the document wo01/66365 which discloses a coating removal system having a solid particle nozzle with a detector for detecting particle flow and associated method; in this document an apparatus is provided for removing a coating from a substrate, comprising a nozzle having an outlet and adapted to direct a particle stream therethrough at a predetermined flow rate, a signal source for emitting a signal capable of traversing the particle stream, and a signal sensor positioned to detect the signal emitted by the signal source once the signal has passed through the particle stream. The particle stream is directed from the outlet of the nozzle toward a coating on a substrate to remove the coating from the substrate.
  • Document US5108512 discloses a method according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • Summary of the invention
  • It is an object of the invention to show the limit of the actual applied methods to remove ceramic protective layers and to provide a method and an equipment for removing ceramic thick and thin coatings with high removal efficiency and without damaging the substrate.
  • This method does not include the step of pre-demaging the ceramic coating before removing the ceramic layer using dry ice blasting as included instead in the previous cited patent [ US20080178907 ]. The pre-damaging using shot peening or another sand blasting method using abrasive media shows the risk to damage the substrate characteristics as roughness and thickness.
  • The only pre-heating is not able to pre-damage the ceramic coating. The authors tested different kind of pre-heating and quenching: pre-heating from 200°C to 1000°C and quenching in water or liquid nitrogen. The pre-heating alone or the combination of pre-heating and quenching are not able to pre-damage or to remove the ceramic coating as a TBC or to get faster the dry ice stripping process. The only thermal shock is not able to remove the ceramic coating. Dry Ice Blasting is not able to remove in a fast way the ceramic coatings treated with shot peening or/and pre-heating as indicate in the previous cited patent [ US20080178907 ]. Only a combination of a pre-heating during or immediately before the solid CO2 blasting can lead to a fast ceramic coating stripping. This method includes only pre-heating by irradiation performed during or immediately before the blasting with solid CO2. This is due to the ceramic coating damage mechanism.
  • During impact of the dry ice grains, some of the kinetic energy due to the high velocity of the CO2 pellets and thermal energy due to the component high temperature after pre-heating is converted into sublimation energy. The solid carbon dioxide sublimates to gas growing the volume by a factor of up to hundreds. The fast sublimation of the solid CO2 creates powerful shock waves which shot the protective coating surface and creates cracks and removes particles of the protective coating which are already blasted off, or which have only poor adhesion to the coating.
  • This effect decreases in function of the coating/substrate temperature up to the quenching. In fact starting, for example, from room temperature, the TBC removing speed is very slow. So the pre-damaging is not useful. The dry ice stripping method developed in this invention takes care of all the parameters involved in the stripping mechanism.
  • The density of the solid CO2 pellets is proportional to the shock wave power. The more the pellets are dense, the more the gas volume growing during the sublimation is greater, the more the shock wave is stronger. The equipment used in this invention is able to maintain high the density of the CO2 pellets sudden out of the spray gun nozzle.
  • The mass flow of the solid CO2 pellets is proportional to the shock wave power. The more the amount of Dry Ice pellets interact with the coating surface subliming, the stronger is the shock wave. The higher is the gas pressure transporting the solid CO2 pellets, the higher is the removal rate. In fact the gas pressure helps the removal of the fragments from the fragmented ceramic coating after the impact of the shock waves. The higher is the gas pressure transporting the solid CO2 pellets, the higher the solid CO2 pellets mass flow can be.
  • At the state of the art blasting machines for dry ice can use only a discontinuous (pulsed) solid CO2 blasting flow. This limits the removal rate because the stripping happens only when solid CO2 sublimation is present and it is greater if the temperature of the substrate/coating is higher. If the mass flow is not constant the cool air gets the substrate/coating colder without generating the removal effect. This invention presents a sand blasting equipment able to have a continuous (not pulsed) solid CO2 blasting flow (constant pressure). These optimized parameters with very fast pre-heating permit fast ceramic coating removal without damaging the characteristics of the substrate.
  • Brief description of the drawings
  • The invention is subsequently explained in more detail with reference to exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 shows a scheme of the ceramic coating to be removed (Fig.1(2)) by means of blasting by solid CO2 without damaging the substrate (Fig.1 (1)) characteristics where the coating is deposited. Substrate characteristics are thickness and roughness.
    • Figure 2 shows in a plurality of sub-Figs. 2 (a) and 2(b) the two different how the pre-heating step is carried out during the solid CO2 blasting (Fig.2 (a)) or immediately before (Fig.2 (b)); 3 schematizes the sand blasting gun during the stripping phase spraying the dry ice pellets schematized as 4. 5 schematizes the IR lamp used to obtain fast pre-heating of the substrate (1)/Coating (2) using IR radiation schematized as 6.
    • Figure 3 schematized the Pre-Heating and Solid CO2 Blasting Stations.
    • Figure 4 schematized the Core of the Solid CO2 pellets Feeder where stationary part are indicated by the motif 7 and the part in movement are indicated by the motif 8.
    • Figure 5 shows the Scheme of the CO2 Pellets Two-Hose Nozzle.
    Detailed description
  • The present invention refers to a method and an equipment to remove ceramic protective coatings 2 (i.e. Thermal Barrier Coating such a Yttria Partially Stabilized Zirconia - YPSZ) with high removal efficiency and without damaging the substrate 1 characteristics.
    The removing of the ceramic coating 2 without damaging the substrate 1 characteristics is obtained by a combination of coating/substrate pre-heating by irradiation immediately before (Fig.2 (b)) or during the stripping (Fig.2 (a)) and improved solid CO 2 4 blasting parameters. The substrate 1 can be metallic, ceramic, plastic or composite. The substrate characteristics not affected by the present invention are the substrate thickness and roughness. Substrate thickness can vary in an range of 1 µm to 1 m. The substrate can be rough (Ra > 9 µm) or smooth (Ra < 9 µm).
    The stripping method is a single stage process where only a combination of a pre-heating during or immediately before the blasting with solid CO 2 4 can lead to the ceramic coating stripping. The equipment to remove ceramic protective coatings is divided in two parts: Pre-heating Station 5 and Sand Blasting Machine Station 20.
    This method does not include the step of pre-damaging the ceramic coating 2 before stripping step by dry ice blasting. The substrates 1 coated with ceramic coating 2 are pre-heated in sequence in the pre-heating stations 5 (Fig.3) up to the maximum temperature that the substrate can tolerate. The pre-heating station 5 is able to heat the coating/substrate up to a maximum temperature of 1000°C.
    When the substrate/coating systems is arrived at the optimized temperature to obtain the maximum removing velocity, the coated component in moved in the solid CO2 blasting station 20.
    The coating stripping using solid CO2 blasting with optimized parameters is performed up to the quenching of the process at room temperature.
    The component is then moved in another pre-heating station 5 while another hot component is moved into the stripping station 20 (Fig.3). The steps of pre-heating and solid CO2 blasting are repeated for each substrate up to the complete coating removal. The equipment can be made by n (N=1-100) pre-heating stations 5 and n sand blasting machine stations 20 (M = 1-50) (Fig.3).
    The Sand Blasting Machine Station 20 for blasting by solid CO 2 4 used in the method consists of a compressor, a feeder unit to feed dry ice into one or more spray guns 3.
    There are two general classes of blast machines as characterized by the method of transporting pellets to the nozzle: two-hose (suction design) and single-hose (pressure design) systems. In either system, proper selection of blast hose is important because of the low temperatures involved and the need to preserve particle integrity as the particles travel through the hose. In the two-hose system, dry-ice particles are delivered and metered by various mechanical means to the inlet end of a hose and are drawn through the hose to the nozzle by means of vacuum produced by an ejector-type nozzle. Inside the nozzle, a stream of compressed air (supplied by the second hose) is sent through a primary nozzle and expands as a high velocity jet confined inside a mixing tube. When flow areas are properly sized, this type of nozzle produces vacuum on the cavity around the primary jet and can therefore drag particles up through the ice hose and into the mixing tube where they are accelerated as the jet mixes with the entrained air/particle mixture. The exhaust Mach number from this type of nozzle is, in general, slightly supersonic. Advantages of this type of system are relative simplicity and lower material cost, along with an overall compact feeder system.
    Blast machines are also differentiated into dry ice block shaver blasters and dry-ice pellet blasters. Pellet blast machines have a hopper that is filled with pre-manufactured CO2 pellets.
    The hopper uses mechanical agitation to move the pellets to the bottom of the hopper and into the feeder system.
    The pellets are extruded through a die plate under great pressure.
    This creates an extremely dense pellet for maximum impact energy.
    The pellets are available in several sizes ranging from 0.040 inch (1 mm) to 0.120 inch (3 mm) in diameter.
    The 0.120 inch (3 mm) in diameter pellets are commercially available.
    The solid CO2 blasting machine station use a continuous (not pulsing) solid CO2 blasting flow (constant pressure).
    Said continuous flow is obtained using a core in the feeder device (Figure 4) in combination with a spray two-hose nozzle gun 3 (Figure 5).
    The Dry Ice is fed using a special feeding device as schematized in Figure 4.
    The dry ice pellets contained in a box 9 are moved by a rotating scoop 10 in a large hole 11.
    Then the dry ice pellets are moved from the position 11 by a rotating punched tool in a further hole in the position 12.
    In this way the dry ice pellets 4 are continuously stocked in the feedstock area 12.
    An air pressure flow (in a range of 1-5 bar) coming from 13 moves the pellets accumulated in 12 in the direction 14 up to the two-hose nozzle of the spray gun 3. The two-hose nozzle is schematized in Figure 5.
    Solid CO2 pellets are fed in the main nozzle hose 17 by axial injection 16 in the internal injector 18. A second pipe with high pressure air up to thirty bar is connected with the convergent/divergent nozzle 19 (Fig.5). The high pressure air is accelerated by convergent/divergent nozzle up to supersonic speed. The dry ice pellets 4 are injected directly in the accelerated high pressure air stream after the nozzle throat 19.
    The continuous flow shows a mass flow of solid CO 2 4 in a range of about 100 - 3500 g/min and a pressure in a range of 1 - 30 bar.
    A continuous flow of solid CO2 is very important in order to reach very high removal rate. In fact if the flow is pulsed not only solid CO2 will arrive on the coating surface but cool air, too.
    The cool air will decrease the substrate/coating temperature without a contribution to the stripping process that is due to the shock waves due to the solid CO2 sublimation. In that way the removal rate will be less than using a continuous flow of solid CO2. High pressure is very important to increase the mass flow and to increase the removal rate. In fact, when the shock waves crumble ceramic coatings, the high pressure aids ceramic fragments removal.
    The solid CO2 Pellets used for blasting have very high density (Density 1.4 - 1.6 g/cm3). The CO2 pellets density is very important because the more is the density, the more is the shock wave power due to the solid CO2 sublimation.
    The sand blasting equipment is designed to maintain the pellets density in a range of 1.525 - 1.6 g/cm3 before the impact on the ceramic coating. This is obtained using in combination the above mentioned feeder and two-hose nozzle.
    The pre-heating systems is performed by IR lamps 6 using irradiation.
    This method shows two advantages:
    • The irradiation with IR allows to perform the pre-heating during the solid CO2 blasting;
    • The irradiation with IR is able to heat the substrate/coating system up to 1000°C.
    The heating speed depend on the nature of the substrate and it can be in a range of 1°C/min to 100°C/min. The pre-heating systems consist of IR lamps 6 in a range of wavelength of 1-10 µm and with a power output in a range of 1000 - 50000 W. The method as recited in claim 1 is able to remove a ceramic coating with a speed of 1 - 100 cm2/min.

Claims (11)

  1. A method for removing ceramic coatings (2) applied on metallic, ceramic, plastic or composite substrates (1), comprising stripping by blasting phase with solid CO2 (4) blasting; said method being applied without modifying or damaging the substrate (1) characteristics, thickness and roughness, the method being configured to prepare the substrate (1) to be recoated with a new ceramic layer (2); characterized in that the method provides a combination of coating (2) and substrate (1) pre-heating by irradiation during or immediately before said stripping by blasting with solid CO2 (4).
  2. Method, as recited in claim 1, wherein said components are pre-heated in sequence in the pre-heating stations (5) then the coating is stripped with solid CO2 (4) up to the quenching of the process, namely room temperature; the steps of pre-heating and solid CO2 blasting are repeated for each substrate up to the complete coating removal.
  3. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that apply a continuous, namely not pulsed, solid CO2 blasting flow.
  4. Method, as recited in claim 3, characterized in that said solid CO2 blasting flow is applied with constant pressure.
  5. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that said coating/substrate pre-heating by irradiation applies with a speed in a range of 1°C/min to 100°C/min.
  6. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that said coating/substrate pre-heating by irradiation is increased up to 1000°C.
  7. Method, as recited in claim 3, characterized in that said continuous flow applies a mass flow of solid CO2 in a range of about 100 - 3500 g/min.
  8. Method, as recited in claim 3, characterized in that said continuous flow can vary the pressure in a range of 1 - 30 bar.
  9. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that is able to jet the solid CO2 saving the pellets density in a range of 1.525 - 1.6 g/cm3 before the impact on the ceramic coating.
  10. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that removes ceramic coating with a speed of 1 - 100 cm2/min.
  11. Method, as recited in claim 1, characterized in that does not include the step of pre-damaging the ceramic coating before stripping step by dry ice blasting.
EP11723670.3A 2010-04-29 2011-04-27 Method for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co² blasting Active EP2576138B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITPR2010A000031A IT1399945B1 (en) 2010-04-29 2010-04-29 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVING CERAMIC COATINGS, WITH CARBON DIOXIDE SOLID SOLID.
PCT/IB2011/051839 WO2011135526A1 (en) 2010-04-29 2011-04-27 Method and equipment for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co2 blasting

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2576138A1 EP2576138A1 (en) 2013-04-10
EP2576138B1 true EP2576138B1 (en) 2015-02-11
EP2576138B2 EP2576138B2 (en) 2023-04-05

Family

ID=42942267

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11723670.3A Active EP2576138B2 (en) 2010-04-29 2011-04-27 Method for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co² blasting

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20130040538A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2576138B2 (en)
CN (1) CN103108725B (en)
CA (1) CA2797184A1 (en)
IT (1) IT1399945B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011135526A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8679246B2 (en) * 2010-01-21 2014-03-25 The University Of Connecticut Preparation of amorphous mixed metal oxides and their use as feedstocks in thermal spray coating
WO2013144022A1 (en) 2012-03-28 2013-10-03 Alstom Technology Ltd Method for removing a ceramic
US10293465B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2019-05-21 Hzo, Inc. Equipment for removing protective coatings from substrates
KR20160065226A (en) * 2014-11-07 2016-06-09 세메스 주식회사 Apparatus and method for treating a subtrate
JP6718477B2 (en) 2018-03-08 2020-07-08 三菱重工業株式会社 Additive manufacturing method
CN109536868A (en) * 2018-11-27 2019-03-29 广东省新材料研究所 The method of the inner hole supersonic flame spraying metal-cermic coating of oil transportation flow splitter
US11441974B2 (en) 2019-08-01 2022-09-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Detection of surface particles on chamber components with carbon dioxide
BR112022013018A2 (en) 2019-12-31 2022-09-06 Cold Jet Llc METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED BLASTING FLOW

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001066365A2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2001-09-13 The Boeing Company Coating removal system having a solid particle nozzle with a detector for detecting particle flow and associated method

Family Cites Families (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5108512A (en) * 1991-09-16 1992-04-28 Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation Cleaning of CVD reactor used in the production of polycrystalline silicon by impacting with carbon dioxide pellets
US5472369A (en) * 1993-04-29 1995-12-05 Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. Centrifugal accelerator, system and method for removing unwanted layers from a surface
US5792275A (en) * 1995-06-06 1998-08-11 International Business Machines Corporation Film removal by chemical transformation and aerosol clean
US5723078A (en) 1996-05-24 1998-03-03 General Electric Company Method for repairing a thermal barrier coating
US6199276B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2001-03-13 General Electric Company Method for removing a dense ceramic thermal barrier coating from a surface
US6235352B1 (en) 1999-11-29 2001-05-22 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Method of repairing a thermal barrier coating
US6379749B2 (en) 2000-01-20 2002-04-30 General Electric Company Method of removing ceramic coatings
US6238743B1 (en) 2000-01-20 2001-05-29 General Electric Company Method of removing a thermal barrier coating
WO2001074538A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-10-11 The Deflex Llc Dense fluid spray cleaning process and apparatus
US7451941B2 (en) * 2001-03-13 2008-11-18 Jackson David P Dense fluid spray cleaning process and apparatus
EP1251191B1 (en) 2001-04-21 2004-06-02 ALSTOM Technology Ltd A method of repairing a ceramic coating
US6656017B2 (en) * 2001-04-24 2003-12-02 David P. Jackson Method and apparatus for creating an open cell micro-environment for treating a substrate with an impingement spray
US6561872B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2003-05-13 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for stripping coating
DE10128507B4 (en) 2001-06-14 2008-07-17 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Use of a device for the chemical or electrochemical machining of components
US6598379B2 (en) 2001-09-07 2003-07-29 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Multi-tab folder for ring type stretch film wrapping machine, and a method of operating the same
US20030101587A1 (en) 2001-10-22 2003-06-05 Rigney Joseph David Method for replacing a damaged TBC ceramic layer
US6699101B2 (en) 2001-11-29 2004-03-02 General Electric Company Method for removing a damaged substrate region beneath a coating
EP1317995A1 (en) 2001-12-05 2003-06-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and apparatus for smoothing the surface of a gas turbine airfoil
US6663919B2 (en) 2002-03-01 2003-12-16 General Electric Company Process of removing a coating deposit from a through-hole in a component and component processed thereby
WO2004014581A2 (en) * 2002-08-08 2004-02-19 Consolidated Engineering Company, Inc. Methods and apparatus for heat treatment and sand removal for castings
US6955308B2 (en) 2003-06-23 2005-10-18 General Electric Company Process of selectively removing layers of a thermal barrier coating system
US7805822B2 (en) 2003-12-15 2010-10-05 Turbocombustor Technology, Inc. Process for removing thermal barrier coatings
DE10360063B4 (en) 2003-12-19 2006-08-10 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Method for stripping components
DE102004009757B4 (en) 2004-02-28 2015-12-31 MTU Aero Engines AG Method for electrochemical stripping of components, use of the method and electrode for electrochemical stripping of components
DE102004049825B4 (en) 2004-10-13 2006-11-09 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Method for stripping coated components
DE102008004559B4 (en) * 2007-01-23 2017-03-16 General Electric Technology Gmbh Method for processing a thermally loaded component
DE102007022174B3 (en) * 2007-05-11 2008-09-18 Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh Method for creating and removing a temporary protective layer for a cathodic coating
CN101398351A (en) * 2008-10-31 2009-04-01 湘潭大学 Method for preparing thermal curtain coating sample for researching flection damage of flat-plate structure thermal curtain coating interface

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001066365A2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2001-09-13 The Boeing Company Coating removal system having a solid particle nozzle with a detector for detecting particle flow and associated method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT1399945B1 (en) 2013-05-09
US20130040538A1 (en) 2013-02-14
CA2797184A1 (en) 2011-11-03
EP2576138A1 (en) 2013-04-10
EP2576138B2 (en) 2023-04-05
CN103108725A (en) 2013-05-15
WO2011135526A1 (en) 2011-11-03
CN103108725B (en) 2015-07-08
ITPR20100031A1 (en) 2011-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2576138B1 (en) Method for removal of ceramic coatings by solid co² blasting
EP1674595B1 (en) Structural repair using cold sprayed aluminum material
EP1705266B1 (en) Applying bond coat to engine components using cold spray
US6955308B2 (en) Process of selectively removing layers of a thermal barrier coating system
EP1887097B1 (en) Method for concurrent thermal spray and cooling hole cleaning
JP2004076157A (en) THERMAL SPRAYING METHOD FOR MCrAlX COATING
US20060090593A1 (en) Cold spray formation of thin metal coatings
JP2006176882A (en) Component restoration process using cold spray
CN101711290A (en) Method for forming bond coats for thermal barrier coatings on turbine engine components
JP2006131997A (en) Method for repairing workpiece
JP2005511327A (en) Gas turbine blade surface smoothing method and equipment
US20080131612A1 (en) Method for making an environment-resistant and thermal barrier coating system on a component
US20080178907A1 (en) Method for treating a thermally loaded component
WO2007091102A1 (en) Kinetic spraying apparatus and method
US20050079286A1 (en) Method of applying coatings
Chwa et al. Thermal diffusivity and erosion resistance of ZrO2–8 wt.% Y2O3 coatings prepared by a laser hybrid spraying technique
JP5647608B2 (en) Melt-resistant metal member and method for producing molten metal member
JP2018508644A (en) Thermal spraying method that integrates selective removal of particles
Boulos et al. Plasma Spray Process Integration
Meyer et al. Production Coating Cost Comparison
WO2023028693A1 (en) Method and system for cold deposition of powdered materials on a substrate
CN114182250A (en) Preparation method of large-thickness CoNiCrAlY sealing coating of turbine outer ring and CoNiCrAlY sealing coating
Kharlamov et al. Cleaning and surface preparation technology and other factors related to coatings produced by flame spraying
Willson Low Pressure Plasma Spraying of Highly Dense NiCrAlY-CuCrAl Coating System on Copper Alloy Substrates
Archambault Lay-up Moulding of a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite on a Cold Sprayed Metallic Layer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121017

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20131120

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140715

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 709756

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011013636

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150326

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20150211

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602011013636

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 709756

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150211

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150511

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20150710

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150611

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150427

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150427

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20150710

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150211

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20230405

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 602011013636

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230428

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230426

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230428

Year of fee payment: 13

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230622

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230428

Year of fee payment: 13