EP2572754A1 - Method and device for determining the radiation duration of a particle radiation plan - Google Patents
Method and device for determining the radiation duration of a particle radiation plan Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2572754A1 EP2572754A1 EP12179327A EP12179327A EP2572754A1 EP 2572754 A1 EP2572754 A1 EP 2572754A1 EP 12179327 A EP12179327 A EP 12179327A EP 12179327 A EP12179327 A EP 12179327A EP 2572754 A1 EP2572754 A1 EP 2572754A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- treatment plan
- treatment
- duration
- irradiation
- expected
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 title abstract description 6
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000002727 particle therapy Methods 0.000 description 13
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 9
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 8
- -1 protons Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010073306 Exposure to radiation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000920340 Pion Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010894 electron beam technology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001959 radiotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/103—Treatment planning systems
- A61N5/1031—Treatment planning systems using a specific method of dose optimization
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N2005/1085—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy characterised by the type of particles applied to the patient
- A61N2005/1087—Ions; Protons
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method and a device for determining the duration of irradiation in an irradiation planning.
- diseased tissue is irradiated with X-rays, with electron beams or with particle beams.
- Particle therapy in particular has developed in recent years to become an established method of treating tissue, in particular tumor diseases.
- irradiation techniques as used in particle therapy can also be used in non-therapeutic areas, such as the irradiation of phantoms or non-living bodies in the context of research, in the irradiation of materials, etc.
- Particle therapy generates particles, primarily ions such as protons, carbon ions or other types of ions. These particles are accelerated to high energies in an accelerator, formed into a particle beam and then directed to the tissue to be irradiated. The particles penetrate the tissue to be irradiated and release their energy in a circumscribed area. The penetration depth of the particle beam into the tissue to be irradiated depends primarily on the energy of the particle beam. The higher the energy of the particle beam, the deeper the particles penetrate into the tissue to be irradiated.
- the expected radiation duration of the plan and its individual fields / beams is unknown.
- a dose distribution is optimized according to dosimetric aspects and a fractional scheme is defined so that the irradiation time, which has no impact on patient comfort and throughput and on the radiation exposure of patients.
- variations in accelerator performance can have different effects on the duration of exposure.
- the factors which influence the irradiation time of a field / beam are known qualitatively. These include, in addition to the performance of the beam application system or the accelerator, which can not be influenced by the irradiation planning, the minimum particle number, the layer spacing and the size of the target area to be treated, e.g. a tumor size.
- the tumor size itself is not customizable; However, by adjusting the field angle / angle of incidence, the extent of the tumor in depth relative to the field direction can be changed, and thus the necessary number of layers to cover the tumor.
- the quantitative effect of the factors is patient dependent. For example, increasing the minimum number of particles in one case can result in a time savings of 15 percent, while in another case it is only three percent and thus within the range of expected variations in accelerator performance. Since an increase in the minimum particle / particle number is usually associated with a worsening of its clinical parameters (tumor coverage, max. Radiation dose), it is currently not possible to weigh the temporal benefit and the dosimetric effect.
- the method according to the invention for the most accurate estimation of the emission time taking into account different accelerator efficiencies at the time of the irradiation period. It uses planning data such as number of layers and particle number or particle energy and particle accelerator characteristics such as acceleration time, spill length and intensity levels of the particle emission and rules of process data generation to give an accurate estimate of the irradiation time with an accuracy of 1% + / - 4%. In addition, best case or worst case estimates can be made to account for day-to-day variability in accelerator efficiency.
- a targeted selection of a plan taking into account the expected irradiation duration in the treatment planning, is achieved in order to increase patient comfort and throughput.
- the accuracy of the estimation is improved in determining the irradiation duration.
- a further aspect of the invention is a device for determining the irradiation duration in a particle irradiation planning comprising means or modules for carrying out the above-mentioned method, which in each case can be pronounced in terms of hardware and / or software or as a computer program product.
- the device can be implemented in a computer unit.
- the device and the computer program product can be developed according to the method.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 schematically show a particle therapy system and an arrangement outside or within an irradiation room, as both of them, for example DE 10 2008 019 128 A1 already known.
- Fig. 1 shows a schematic overview of the structure of a particle therapy system 10.
- a particle therapy system 10 takes place in particular irradiation of a body, in particular a tumor-affected tissue, with a particle beam.
- particles mainly ions such as protons, pions, helium ions, carbon ions or other types of ions are used.
- ions are generated in a particle source 11.
- two particle sources 11 are present, which produce two different types of ions can be switched between these two ion species within a short time interval.
- a solenoid 12 is used, which is arranged between the ion sources 11 on the one hand and a pre-accelerator 13 on the other.
- this allows the particle therapy system 10 to be operated simultaneously with protons and with carbon ions.
- the ions generated by the or one of the ion sources 11 and optionally selected by the switching magnet 12 are accelerated in the pre-accelerator 13 to a first energy level.
- the pre-accelerator 13 is, for example, a linear accelerator (LINAC for English: "LINear ACcelerator”).
- an accelerator 15 for example a synchrotron or cyclotron.
- a high-energy beam transport system 17 leads the particle beam to one or more irradiation spaces 19.
- the accelerated particles are directed onto a body to be irradiated. Depending on the configuration, this takes place from a fixed direction (in so-called "fixed beam” spaces) or else via a rotatable gantry 21 which can be moved about an axis 22 from different directions.
- FIG. 1 shown construction of a particle therapy system 10 is typical for many particle therapy equipment, but may also differ from this.
- the embodiments described below are both in connection with the basis of FIG. 1 used particle therapy system as well as with other particle therapy equipment used.
- FIG. 2 shows a possible arrangement outside or within an irradiation room.
- One in the FIG. 2 Imaging unit usually comprises an X-ray detector and an X-ray source, which are arranged on a support arm, for example a C-arm, lying opposite each other.
- the support arm itself can be flexibly positioned in the room using a robotic arm, for example with the aid of a six-axis articulated-arm robot.
- X-ray images for example fluoroscopic photographs, can be taken by a patient 39 who is positioned for irradiation on a patient couch 41.
- the target area to be irradiated or the target volume 43 to be irradiated for example an organ to be irradiated, which is affected by a tumor, can be imaged in the transillumination recordings.
- a particle jet 47 emerges from a jet outlet 45 and is directed toward the patient 39.
- the beam exit 45 remains generally stationary.
- control unit 51 and / or the computer unit 49 for image reconstruction can be implemented in a single computer unit or also split up into different subunits, implemented as independent units or in a control unit for the entire particle therapy system.
- treatment planning unit for planning the irradiation time can be used, which may be hardware or software formed.
- the value of the above-evaluated, expected treatment duration can be used for setting optimization of a particle accelerator 15, as has been proposed in the German patent application "Method and Apparatus for Optimizing a Particle Accelerator" with the same seniority of the present application.
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren sowie eine Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Bestrahlungsdauer bei einer Bestrahlungsplanung.The invention relates to a method and a device for determining the duration of irradiation in an irradiation planning.
In der Strahlentherapie wird unter anderem erkranktes Gewebe mit Röntgenstrahlen, mit Elektronenstrahlen oder mit Partikelstrahlen bestrahlt. Insbesondere die Partikeltherapie entwickelt sich in den letzten Jahren zu einem etablierten Verfahren zur Behandlung von Gewebe, insbesondere von Tumorerkrankungen. Bestrahlungsverfahren, wie sie im Rahmen der Partikeltherapie eingesetzt werden, können jedoch auch in nichttherapeutischen Bereichen eingesetzt werden, wie beispielsweise bei der Bestrahlung von Phantomen oder nicht-lebenden Körpern im Rahmen von Forschungsarbeiten, bei der Bestrahlung von Materialien, etc.In radiotherapy, inter alia, diseased tissue is irradiated with X-rays, with electron beams or with particle beams. Particle therapy in particular has developed in recent years to become an established method of treating tissue, in particular tumor diseases. However, irradiation techniques as used in particle therapy can also be used in non-therapeutic areas, such as the irradiation of phantoms or non-living bodies in the context of research, in the irradiation of materials, etc.
Bei der Partikeltherapie werden Partikel erzeugt, vornehmlich Ionen wie Protonen, Kohlenstoffionen, oder andere Ionensorten. Diese Partikel werden auf hohe Energien in einem Beschleuniger beschleunigt, zu einem Partikelstrahl geformt und anschließend auf das zu bestrahlende Gewebe gerichtet. Die Partikel dringen in das zu bestrahlende Gewebe ein und geben dort in einem umschriebenen Bereich ihre Energie ab. Die Eindringtiefe des Partikelstrahls in das zu bestrahlende Gewebe hängt vornehmlich von der Energie des Partikelstrahls ab. Je höher die Energie des Partikelstrahls ist, desto tiefer dringen die Partikel in das zu bestrahlende Gewebe ein.Particle therapy generates particles, primarily ions such as protons, carbon ions or other types of ions. These particles are accelerated to high energies in an accelerator, formed into a particle beam and then directed to the tissue to be irradiated. The particles penetrate the tissue to be irradiated and release their energy in a circumscribed area. The penetration depth of the particle beam into the tissue to be irradiated depends primarily on the energy of the particle beam. The higher the energy of the particle beam, the deeper the particles penetrate into the tissue to be irradiated.
Während der Bestrahlungsplanung ist die zu erwartende Abstrahldauer des Plans und seiner einzelnen Felder/Beams unbekannt. Durch Einstellung der Optimierungsparameter wird nach dosimetrischen Gesichtspunkten eine Dosisverteilung optimiert und ein Fraktionsschema festgelegt, so dass die Bestrahlungszeit, die sich auf den Patientenkomfort und -durchsatz sowie auf die Strahlenbelastung der Patienten auswirkt, nicht feststeht. Hinzu kommt, dass sich Variationen in der Beschleunigerperformance unterschiedlich stark auf die Bestrahlungsdauer auswirken können.During radiation planning, the expected radiation duration of the plan and its individual fields / beams is unknown. By setting the optimization parameters, a dose distribution is optimized according to dosimetric aspects and a fractional scheme is defined so that the irradiation time, which has no impact on patient comfort and throughput and on the radiation exposure of patients. In addition, variations in accelerator performance can have different effects on the duration of exposure.
Die Faktoren, die die Bestrahlungsdauer eines Feldes/Beams beeinflussen, sind qualitativ bekannt. Hierzu zählen neben der Performance des Strahlapplikationssystems bzw. des Beschleunigers, die sich nicht durch die Bestrahlungsplanung beeinflussen lässt, die minimale Teilchenzahl, der Schichtabstand und die Größe des zu behandelnden Zielbereichs z.B. eine Tumorgröße. Die Tumorgröße selbst ist nicht anpassbar; durch Anpassung des Feldwinkels/Einstrahlwinkels lassen sich jedoch die Ausdehnung des Tumors in der Tiefe relativ zur Feldrichtung verändern und damit die notwendige Anzahl der Schichten zur Abdeckung des Tumors.The factors which influence the irradiation time of a field / beam are known qualitatively. These include, in addition to the performance of the beam application system or the accelerator, which can not be influenced by the irradiation planning, the minimum particle number, the layer spacing and the size of the target area to be treated, e.g. a tumor size. The tumor size itself is not customizable; However, by adjusting the field angle / angle of incidence, the extent of the tumor in depth relative to the field direction can be changed, and thus the necessary number of layers to cover the tumor.
Die quantitative Auswirkung der Faktoren ist jedoch patientenabhängig. Beispielsweise kann eine Erhöhung der minimalen Teilchenzahl in einem Fall zu einer Zeitersparnis von 15 Prozent führen, während sie in einem anderen Fall nur drei Prozent beträgt und damit im Bereich der erwartbaren Schwankungen der Beschleunigerperformance liegt. Da eine Erhöhung der minimalen Teilchen-/Partikelzahl üblicherweise mit einer Verschlechterung seiner klinischen Kenngrößen (Tumorabdeckung, Max. Strahlendosis) einhergeht, ist derzeit eine Abwägung des zeitlichen Nutzens und der dosimetrischen Auswirkung nicht möglich.However, the quantitative effect of the factors is patient dependent. For example, increasing the minimum number of particles in one case can result in a time savings of 15 percent, while in another case it is only three percent and thus within the range of expected variations in accelerator performance. Since an increase in the minimum particle / particle number is usually associated with a worsening of its clinical parameters (tumor coverage, max. Radiation dose), it is currently not possible to weigh the temporal benefit and the dosimetric effect.
Es ist die Aufgabe der Erfindung, eine Vorrichtung sowie ein Verfahren zur Planung einer Bestrahlungsbehandlung anzugeben, wobei eine möglichst genaue Bestrahlungsdauer bestimmt werden soll.It is the object of the invention to specify a device and a method for planning an irradiation treatment, wherein the most accurate irradiation time is to be determined.
Die Aufgabe wird mit einem Verfahren sowie einer Vorrichtung gemäß den unabhängigen Patentansprüchen gelöst. Vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen des Verfahrens sowie der Vorrichtung sind Gegenstand der abhängigen Patentansprüche oder lassen sich aus der nachfolgenden Beschreibung sowie den Ausführungsbeispielen entnehmen.The object is achieved by a method and a device according to the independent patent claims. Advantageous embodiments of the method and the device are the subject The dependent claims or can be taken from the following description and the exemplary embodiments.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren zur möglichst genauen Abschätzung der Abstrahlzeit unter Berücksichtigung verschiedener Beschleunigereffizienzen zum Zeitpunkt der Bestrahlungsdauer zu verwenden. Es verwendet Plandaten bzw. Behandlungsgrößen wie Schichtanzahl und Teilchenzahl bzw. Partikelenergie sowie Partikelbeschleunigerkenngrößen wie Beschleunigungszeit, Spilllänge und Intensitätsstufen der Teilchenabstrahlung und Regeln der Prozessdatengenerierung, um eine exakte Abschätzung der Bestrahlungsdauer mit einer Genauigkeit von 1%+/-4% zu geben. Zusätzlich lassen sich Abschätzungen für den besten Fall (best case) bzw. schlechtesten Fall (worst case) machen, um den tagesabhängigen Schwankungen in der Beschleunigereffizienz Rechnung zu tragen.To use the method according to the invention for the most accurate estimation of the emission time taking into account different accelerator efficiencies at the time of the irradiation period. It uses planning data such as number of layers and particle number or particle energy and particle accelerator characteristics such as acceleration time, spill length and intensity levels of the particle emission and rules of process data generation to give an accurate estimate of the irradiation time with an accuracy of 1% + / - 4%. In addition, best case or worst case estimates can be made to account for day-to-day variability in accelerator efficiency.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren - wie in den
- 1. Bildung einer Mehrzahl von Plänen, für die die Bestrahlungszeit berechnet wird und deren Auswahl durch einen Vergleichsmodus erfolgt,
- 2. Bildung eines Plans und Entscheidung, ob die erwartbare Bestrahlungsdauer (Mittelwert, Worst/Best case) zufriedenstellend ist.
- 1. formation of a plurality of plans for which the irradiation time is calculated and whose selection is made by a comparison mode,
- 2. Formulate a plan and decide if the expected irradiation time (mean, worst / best case) is satisfactory.
Erfindungsgemäß wird eine gezielte Auswahl eines Plans unter Berücksichtigung der erwartbaren Bestrahlungsdauer bei der Bestrahlungsplanung zur Erhöhung des Patientenkomfort und - durchsatz erreicht. Zudem wird bei der Bestimmung der Bestrahlungsdauer die Genauigkeit der Abschätzung verbessert. Ein weiterer Aspekt der Erfindung ist eine Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Bestrahlungsdauer bei einer Partikelbestrahlungsplanung aufweisend Mittel bzw. Module zur Durchführung des oben genannten Verfahrens, die jeweils hardwaremäßig und/oder softwaremäßig bzw. als Computerprogrammprodukt ausgeprägt sein können.In accordance with the invention, a targeted selection of a plan, taking into account the expected irradiation duration in the treatment planning, is achieved in order to increase patient comfort and throughput. In addition, the accuracy of the estimation is improved in determining the irradiation duration. A further aspect of the invention is a device for determining the irradiation duration in a particle irradiation planning comprising means or modules for carrying out the above-mentioned method, which in each case can be pronounced in terms of hardware and / or software or as a computer program product.
Die Vorrichtung kann in einer Rechnereinheit implementiert sein.The device can be implemented in a computer unit.
Die Vorrichtung und das Computerprogrammprodukt können wie das Verfahren entsprechend weitergebildet werden.The device and the computer program product can be developed according to the method.
Weitere Vorteile, Einzelheiten und Weiterbildungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus der nachfolgenden Beschreibung von Ausführungsbeispielen in Verbindung mit den Zeichnungen.Further advantages, details and developments of the invention will become apparent from the following description of embodiments in conjunction with the drawings.
Es zeigen:
-
Fig. 1 einen schematischen Aufbau einer Partikeltherapieanlage, -
Fig. 2 eine Anordnung außerhalb bzw. innerhalb eines Bestrahlungsraums und -
schematisch ein Ablaufdiagramm zum erfindungsgemäßen Vorgehen, wobei eine Mehrzahl von Bestrahlungsplanen erstellt wird undFigur 3 -
schematisch ein Ablaufdiagramm zum erfindungsgemäßen Vorgehen, wobei ein Bestrahlungsplan erstellt wird.Figur 4
-
Fig. 1 a schematic structure of a particle therapy system, -
Fig. 2 an arrangement outside or within an irradiation room and -
FIG. 3 schematically a flowchart for the procedure according to the invention, wherein a plurality of irradiation plans is created and -
FIG. 4 schematically a flow chart for the procedure according to the invention, wherein an irradiation plan is created.
Die
Als Partikel werden vornehmlich Ionen wie beispielsweise Protonen, Pionen, Heliumionen, Kohlenstoffionen oder andere Ionensorten eingesetzt. Üblicherweise werden derartige Partikel in einer Partikelquelle 11 erzeugt. Wenn, wie in
Die von der oder einer der Ionenquellen 11 erzeugten und gegebenenfalls mit dem Schaltmagneten 12 ausgewählten Ionen werden in dem Vorbeschleuniger 13 auf ein erstes Energieniveau beschleunigt. Der Vorbeschleuniger 13 ist beispielsweise ein Linearbeschleuniger (LINAC für engl.: "LINear ACcelerator"). Anschließend werden die Partikel in einen Beschleuniger 15, beispielsweise ein Synchrotron oder Zyklotron, eingespeist. In dem Beschleuniger 15 werden sie auf hohe Energien, wie sie zur Bestrahlung nötig sind, beschleunigt. Nachdem die Partikel den (Partikel-)Beschleuniger 15 verlassen, führt ein Hochenergiestrahl-Transportsystem 17 den Partikelstrahl zu einem oder mehreren Bestrahlungsräumen 19. In einem Bestrahlungsraum 19 werden die beschleunigten Partikel auf einen zu bestrahlenden Körper gerichtet. Je nach Ausgestaltung erfolgt dies von einer festen Richtung (in so genannten "fixed beam"-Räumen) aus oder aber über eine um eine Achse 22 bewegliche rotierbare Gantry 21 von verschiedenen Richtungen aus.The ions generated by the or one of the
Der anhand der
Eine in der
Zur Bestrahlung tritt aus einem Strahlaustritt 45 ein Partikelstrahl 47 aus und ist auf den Patienten 39 gerichtet. Hier gezeigt ist ein im Raum räumlich fest installierter Strahlaustritt 45. Alternativ ist es auch möglich, den Strahlaustritt 45 an einer drehbaren Gantry zu befestigen, so dass der Strahlaustritt 45 um den Patienten 39 gedreht werden kann. Während der Applikation des Partikelstrahls 47 bleibt der Strahlaustritt 45 jedoch im Allgemeinen ortsfest.For irradiation, a
Die Steuerungseinheit 51 und/oder die Rechnereinheit 49 zur Bildrekonstruktion können in einer einzigen Rechnereinheit implementiert sein oder auch auf verschiedene Untereinheiten aufgesplittet, als eigenständige Einheiten implementiert werden oder in einer Steuerungseinheit für die gesamte Partikeltherapieanlage.The
In der Rechnereinheit 49 implementiert bzw. an die Rechnereinheit 49 direkt bzw. abgesetzt (remote) gekoppelt kann eine weitere in der
Im Folgenden werden mögliche erfindungsgemäße Arbeitsabläufe erläutert, deren Schritte in den
Gemäß Figur 3 werden folgende Schritte ausgeführt:- 1
- Lade Patientendaten
- 2
- Setze die Optimierungsparameter wie Behandlungsplangrößen fest
- 3
- Führe eine Optimierung der Optimierungsparameter aus
- 4
- Erstelle einen Behandlungsplan
- 5
- Prüfe den Behandlungsplan
Wenn Behandlungsplan nicht akzeptabel ist,dann wiederhole Schritte 2bis 5 - 6
- Wenn Behandlungsplan akzeptabel ist, dann werte die erwartete Bestrahlungsdauer aus
- 6a
- Lege den Behandlungsplan in einem Datenspeicher ab, der mehrere Behandlungspläne umfassen kann
- 7
- Wenn noch weitere Behandlungspläne notwendig sind,
dann wiederhole Schritt 2bis 6a und 7 - 7a
- Wenn keine weiteren Behandlungspläne notwendig sind, dann wird ein Behandlungsplan aus dem Daten-speichervorgeschlagen und/oder ausgewählt.
- 8
- Beende die Behandlungsplanung und Auswertung der Bestrahlungssdauer
- Der Ablauf in
unterscheidet sich vom Ablauf inFigur 4 durch folgende Schritte:Figur 3 6a, 7 undSchritte 7a aus Figur 3 werden ersetzt durch Schritt- 6b
- Wenn die in
Schritt 6 ausgewertete Bestrahlungszeit akzeptabel ist, dannfahre mit Schritt 8 fort. Wenn die ausgewertete Bestrahlungszeit nicht akzeptabel ist,dann wiederhole Schritte 2bis 6 und 6b.
- According to
FIG. 3 the following steps are carried out:- 1
- Load patient data
- 2
- Set the optimization parameters such as treatment plan sizes
- 3
- Perform an optimization of the optimization parameters
- 4
- Create a treatment plan
- 5
- Check the treatment plan
If treatment plan is unacceptable, then repeatsteps 2 through 5 - 6
- If the treatment plan is acceptable then the expected irradiation time will be used
- 6a
- Place the treatment plan in a data store that can span multiple treatment plans
- 7
- If more treatment plans are needed, then repeat
steps 2 through 6a and 7 - 7a
- If no further treatment plans are needed then a treatment plan is suggested and / or selected from the data storage.
- 8th
- Finish the treatment planning and evaluation of the irradiation duration
- The process in
FIG. 4 differs from the process inFIG. 3 through the following steps: 6a, 7 and 7aSteps FIG. 3 will be replaced by step- 6b
- If the irradiation time evaluated in
step 6 is acceptable, then go tostep 8. If the evaluated irradiation time is not acceptable, then repeatsteps 2 through 6 and 6b.
Erfindungsgemäß kann der Wert der oben ausgewerteten, erwarteten Behandlungsdauer zur Einstellungsoptimierung eines Partikelbeschleunigers 15 verwendet werden, wie es in der Deutschen Patentanmeldung "Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Optimierung eines Partikelbeschleunigers" mit gleichem Zeitrang der vorliegenden Anmeldung vorgeschlagen worden ist.According to the invention, the value of the above-evaluated, expected treatment duration can be used for setting optimization of a
Claims (17)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE201110083196 DE102011083196B4 (en) | 2011-09-22 | 2011-09-22 | Determination of the duration of irradiation during particle irradiation planning |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2572754A1 true EP2572754A1 (en) | 2013-03-27 |
EP2572754B1 EP2572754B1 (en) | 2016-03-23 |
EP2572754B8 EP2572754B8 (en) | 2016-07-13 |
Family
ID=46614379
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12179327.7A Active EP2572754B8 (en) | 2011-09-22 | 2012-08-06 | Method and device for determining the radiation duration of a particle radiation plan |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2572754B8 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103007438B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102011083196B4 (en) |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004337371A (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2004-12-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Radiation therapy scheduling system |
WO2009052845A1 (en) * | 2007-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Elekta Ab (Publ) | Radiotherapeutic apparatus |
US20090134345A1 (en) * | 2007-11-26 | 2009-05-28 | John Roy Gentry | Treatment planning tool for heavy-ion therapy |
DE102008019128A1 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2009-10-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for carrying out an irradiation and method for monitoring such |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP5107709B2 (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2012-12-26 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Adapting radiotherapy treatment plans |
US7266176B2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2007-09-04 | Accuray Incorporated | Workspace optimization for radiation treatment delivery system |
EP2121135B1 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2014-12-24 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Treatment optimization |
EP2319002A2 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2011-05-11 | Tomotherapy Incorporated | System and method of calculating dose uncertainty |
-
2011
- 2011-09-22 DE DE201110083196 patent/DE102011083196B4/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-08-06 EP EP12179327.7A patent/EP2572754B8/en active Active
- 2012-09-21 CN CN201210355122.3A patent/CN103007438B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004337371A (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2004-12-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Radiation therapy scheduling system |
WO2009052845A1 (en) * | 2007-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Elekta Ab (Publ) | Radiotherapeutic apparatus |
US20090134345A1 (en) * | 2007-11-26 | 2009-05-28 | John Roy Gentry | Treatment planning tool for heavy-ion therapy |
DE102008019128A1 (en) | 2008-04-16 | 2009-10-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for carrying out an irradiation and method for monitoring such |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
HARALD PAGANETTI ET AL: "Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy", PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING, BRISTOL GB, vol. 53, no. 17, 7 September 2008 (2008-09-07), pages 4825 - 4853, XP020141398, ISSN: 0031-9155, DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/023 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2572754B8 (en) | 2016-07-13 |
DE102011083196A1 (en) | 2013-03-28 |
CN103007438B (en) | 2017-07-28 |
CN103007438A (en) | 2013-04-03 |
EP2572754B1 (en) | 2016-03-23 |
DE102011083196B4 (en) | 2014-10-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102007014715B4 (en) | Determination of control parameters for irradiation of a moving target volume in a body | |
EP2352556B1 (en) | Irradiation of at least two target volumes | |
DE102009055902B4 (en) | Method and device for controlling the dose application during irradiation | |
EP2344250B1 (en) | Irradiation of a target volume, taking into account a volume to be protected | |
EP2221088B1 (en) | Optimisation of control parameters for a particle radiation assembly considering particle count dynamics | |
DE102008036478A1 (en) | Device and method for evaluating an activity distribution and irradiation system | |
EP2506929B1 (en) | Irradiation device | |
DE102008051476A1 (en) | Device and method for the determination of control parameters for an irradiation facility, irradiation facility and irradiation method | |
EP2292298B1 (en) | Method for determining an irradiation plan, irradiation planning device and irradiation assembly | |
EP2790784B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for preparing an irradiation plan for a moving target volume without a movement compensation | |
DE102013203917A1 (en) | Device and method for planning a treatment beam directed at at least one target area | |
EP2366428B1 (en) | Method for registering an initial reproduction dataset to a second reproduction dataset | |
DE102012212341B3 (en) | Determining a time-optimized irradiation plan for a particle irradiation system under specification of a boundary condition | |
EP2572754B1 (en) | Method and device for determining the radiation duration of a particle radiation plan | |
DE102011083195B4 (en) | Method and device for optimizing a particle accelerator | |
EP2292299A1 (en) | Radiation therapy device for monitoring irradiation | |
DE102011083414B4 (en) | Dose normalization in radiotherapy with adaptation of isolines or isosurfaces | |
EP2814572B1 (en) | Method and device for determining an irradiation plan for a particle irradiation unit | |
EP2482927B1 (en) | Method for drawing up an irradiation plan, method for adapting and optimising an irradiation planning system, irradiation planning device and irradiation installation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130904 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20140515 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150922 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 782540 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160415 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012006374 Country of ref document: DE |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160623 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160624 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160723 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160725 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012006374 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160623 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170102 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502012006374 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160806 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160806 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160806 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170301 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160806 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCOW Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: WERNER-VON-SIEMENS-STRASSE 1, 80333 MUENCHEN (DE) |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20120806 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160323 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230828 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20230713 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230822 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20231113 Year of fee payment: 12 |