EP2529489B1 - Closed loop precoding weight estimation - Google Patents

Closed loop precoding weight estimation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2529489B1
EP2529489B1 EP10844841.6A EP10844841A EP2529489B1 EP 2529489 B1 EP2529489 B1 EP 2529489B1 EP 10844841 A EP10844841 A EP 10844841A EP 2529489 B1 EP2529489 B1 EP 2529489B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coding
communication node
weights
reports
sub
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP10844841.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2529489A4 (en
EP2529489A1 (en
Inventor
Peter ÖKVIST
Arne Simonsson
Henrik Asplund
Jonas FRÖBERG OLSSON
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from PCT/SE2010/050071 external-priority patent/WO2011093753A1/en
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Publication of EP2529489A1 publication Critical patent/EP2529489A1/en
Publication of EP2529489A4 publication Critical patent/EP2529489A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2529489B1 publication Critical patent/EP2529489B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0026Transmission of channel quality indication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/20Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using signal quality detector
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/0202Channel estimation
    • H04L25/0224Channel estimation using sounding signals
    • H04L25/0226Channel estimation using sounding signals sounding signals per se
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • H04W72/542Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using measured or perceived quality
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/04Error control

Definitions

  • radio network controller In some versions of the radio access network, several base stations are typically connected, e.g., by landlines or microwave, to a Radio Network Controller (RNC).
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • the radio network controller also sometimes termed a Base Station Controller (BSC), supervises and coordinates various activities of the plural base stations connected thereto.
  • BSC Base Station Controller
  • the radio network controllers are typically connected to one or more core networks.
  • a base station selects a pre-coder matrix from a predefined codebook with the help of a user equipment's (UE) suggestion in the shape of one or more pre-coding matrix indicators signaled as part of the channel knowledge or information.
  • UE user equipment's
  • the x-axis of Figure 1 shows mobile speed in km/h.
  • the y-axis of Figure 1 shows normalized system tp and normalized cell-edge user tp.
  • the line marked with triangles refers to Single Input, Multiple Output (SIMO)
  • the line marked with squares refers to Alamouti codes
  • the line marked with circles refers to a closed-loop multiplexing
  • the line marked with diamonds refers to open-loop multiplexing.
  • Alamouti codes is a MIMO transmit diversity scheme for two transmit antennas that does not require transmit channel knowledge. It is known in that prediction can mitigate the PMI deterioration due to delays.
  • the embodiments herein enable refined pre-coding selection from a discrete channel state information improving the MIMO performance. From the code-book based PMI reporting a non-code book based pre-coder may be selected. Further, from a sub-band grouped PMI reporting, a sub-carrier PMI may be selected.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a communication network 200.
  • the network may use technologies such as e.g. LTE, WiMAX, or other radio access where the frequency band is divided into sub-bands, etc.
  • the network 200 comprises at least one first communication node 201 and at least one second communication node 203.
  • the first communication node 201 may be e.g. a base station, eNodeB, etc.
  • the second communication node 203 may be any suitable communication device or computational device with communication capabilities, for instance but not limited to user equipment, mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), laptop, MP3 player, portable DVD player or similar media content devices, digital camera, or even stationary devices such as a PC.
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • the user equipment is referred to as UE in some of the figures.
  • the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203 communicates with each other using any suitable kind of communication channel 205, e.g. a wireless channel.
  • the communication channel 205 comprises a plurality of radio carriers that may take different multiple paths, i.e. rays, over the air around and reflected on obstacles, and may use any suitable protocol depending on type and level of layer, e.g. as indicated by the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, as understood by the person skilled in the art.
  • OSI Open System Interconnection
  • the first communication node 201 may be connected to a core network 212 providing e.g. internet services to the second communication node 203.
  • the present method for estimating pre-coding weights for transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and a second communication node 203 in a communication network 200 will now be described with reference to the combined signaling diagram and flowchart depicted in Figure 3 .
  • the method comprises the following steps, which steps may as well be carried out in another suitable order than described below:
  • the first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203 obtains at least two pre-coding reports.
  • the pre-coding report may be a Pre-coding Matrix Indicator.
  • Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance.
  • a first pre-coding report may be for time instance t1 and a second pre-coding report may be for time instance t2, where t1 takes place before t2.
  • Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. Indications to pre-coding weights may be an index pointing to pre-coding weights in a table, i.e. PMI and code-book based as mentioned above.
  • the pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band.
  • a pre-coding report comprises a matrix with one vector per data stream.
  • the obtained pre-coding reports are transmitted to the first communication node 201.
  • the pre-coding reports may be transmitted to the first communication node 201 at regular intervals, or when triggered.
  • Figure 4 illustrates channel gain vs. time and frequency from radio channel measurements.
  • the x-axis of Figure 4 illustrates the time measured in seconds (s) and the y-axis of Figure 4 illustrates a frequency offset measured in MHz.
  • Figure 5 shows a time-frequency channel for a two-ray channel with differing delay and direction of arrival of two channel rays.
  • the Doppler offset between the rays is 20 Hz and the delay offset is 0.5 ⁇ s.
  • Figure 6 illustrates optimal, in mutual information sense, rank-1 PMI for different sub-bands.
  • Mutual information is a theoretical approach to estimate the bitrate.
  • the x-axis shows time ticks, where each tick corresponds to 5.33 ms, while the y-axis shows the sub-band number, where each sub-band is 600 kHz.
  • the different grayscale intensities in the squares represent the different rank-1 PMIs.
  • the figure 6 shows a clear and strong sub-band drift in optimal rank-1 PMIs
  • a basic algorithm utilizing the drift shown in Figure 6 may be to determine the shift s that gives the highest correlation c between reported PMIs of two neighbouring sub-bands, sb 1 and sb 2 .
  • the reported PMIs of the two neighbouring sub-bands correspond to the obtained pre-coding reports described in step 301. If the correlation exceeds some specified threshold, then PMI override is applied.
  • One example may be the following algorithm:
  • Figure 7 illustrating a Cumulative Distribution-Function (CDF) of wide-band average of mutual information using Shannon's formula.
  • CDF Cumulative Distribution-Function
  • the x-axis of Figure 7 illustrates the average (WB) MI measured in bit/s/Hz
  • the y-axis of Figure 7 illustrates the CDF.
  • the continuous line in Figure 7 illustrates an optimal situation, the dotted line illustrates no delay and no prediction, the dotted and broken line illustrates delay, but no prediction and the broken line illustrates delay and prediction.
  • the gain is highly dependent on how stable the PMIs are in time, how fast the PMIs are reported, the reporting delay, etc.
  • optimal shift may be achieved adaptively comparing different shift factors on historical data gathered near in time.
  • the algorithm should retreat back to zero sub-band shift if no gain may be derived on historical data.
  • the pre-coding weights are selected from a codebook as for ordinary closed loop spatial multiplexing in LTE.
  • the estimated pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports. For example, in case of two antenna ports, 3GPP supports the following rank 1 precoders: (1; 1), (1; -1), (1; j) and (1; -j)
  • a normalization factor is selected to give the same transmitted energy in case of rank 1 and rank 2.
  • the PMI is reported per sub-band and pre-coding is performed per sub-band, that is the pre-coder is set equal for all 12 sub-carriers within the sub-band.
  • the suggested frequency-time pre-coding shift a pre-coder per sub-carrier may be estimated improve the frequency selectivity of the precoding.
  • Estimating the pre-coding weights with finer granularity improves the performance. Better performance may be obtained by using a larger codebook, but this comes with the cost of increased signaling. In certain cases there is no requirement that the reporting codebook and the transmitting codebook are equal. It may be possible to, for example, have a small reporting codebook, i.e. small signaling overhead, but a larger codebook from transmitting pre-coder is selected, providing possibility for increased performance.
  • the first communication node 201 provides the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • the first communication node 201 applies the estimated pre-coding weights to the data transmission to the second communication node 203.
  • data is transmitted from the first communication node 201 to the second communication node 203 using the estimated pre-coding weights.
  • the method shown in figure 3 may be used in MIMO beam forming, pre-coding and Coordinated Multipoint Transmission.
  • MIMO systems with several transmit antennas is supported for several mobile accesses, WCDMA, WiMax and LTE.
  • frequency selective adaptive pre-coding is also supported enabling relative phase adjustments between transmit antennas to adapt to channel phases.
  • the phase shifts may be adapted to add constructively and avoid nulling from several antennas with different channel paths to the receiver's antenna (s).
  • the receiver corresponds to the second communication node 203
  • the receiver corresponds to the first communication node 201.
  • multi-layer, i.e. multi-stream, transmissions may be improved by increased channel orthogonally.
  • the delay and user equipment speed has an even larger impact on phase and pre-coding than on channel quality.
  • the method described above predicts frequency selective phase deviation as a function of time.
  • FIG. 8 is a flowchart describing the present method in the first communication node 201 for estimating pre-coding weights for multi-antenna transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and a second communication node 203 in a communication network 200.
  • the first communication node 201 comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. In some embodiments, the at least two transmit antennas are positioned in different sites in the communication network 200. The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel 205.
  • the pre-coding weights may be a function of time and frequency. In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights comprise a pre-coding matrix indicator.
  • the pre-coding weights comprise antenna channel phase or antenna channel amplitude.
  • the method comprises the steps to be performed in the first communication node 201:
  • the first communication node 201 obtains at least two pre-coding reports. Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band.
  • the at least two pre-coding reports are obtained from the first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203.
  • the first communication node 201 estimates pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the first communication node 201 estimates a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for difference time instances.
  • step 802 This is a subset of step 802 which is to be performed after step 802a.
  • the first communication node 201 estimates a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the first communication node 201 compares shift factors for the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances.
  • step 802b This is a subset of step 802b which is to be performed after step 802b1.
  • the first communication node 201 estimates a gain for the compared shift factors.
  • step 802b This is a subset of step 802b which is to be performed after step 802b2.
  • the first communication node 201 sets the shift to zero when the estimated gain is below a threshold. In some embodiments, the threshold is zero.
  • the first communication node 201 provides the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • the first communication node 201 applies the estimated pre-coding weights to the transmission to the second communication node 203.
  • the first communication node 201 comprises an arrangement as shown in Figure 9 .
  • the first communication node 201 comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. In some embodiments, the at least two transmit antennas are positioned in different sites in the communication network 200. The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel 205.
  • the first communication node 201 is a base station and the second communication node 203 is a user equipment, or the first communication node 201 is a user equipment and the second communication node 203 is a base station.
  • the pre-coding weights comprise an antenna channel phase or an antenna channel amplitude.
  • the first communication node 201 further comprises an obtaining unit 901 which is configured to obtain at least two pre-coding reports.
  • Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance.
  • Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights.
  • the pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band.
  • the at least two pre-coding reports are obtained from the first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203.
  • the pre-coding weights are a function of time and frequency.
  • the pre-coding weights comprise a pre-coding matrix indicator.
  • the first communication node 201 comprises an estimating unit 902 configured to, for each transmit antenna, estimate pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the estimating unit 902 is further configured to estimate a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for difference time instances, and, based on the estimated correlation, estimate a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the estimating unit 902 is configured to select pre-coding weights from a codebook.
  • the pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • the first communication node 201 comprises a providing unit 907 configured to provide the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • the present mechanism for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203 in a communication network 200 may be implemented through one or more processors, such as a processor 910 in the first communication node arrangement depicted in Figure 8 , together with computer program code for performing the functions of the embodiments herein.
  • the processor may be for example a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) processor, Field-programmable gate array (FPGA) processor or micro processor.
  • DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
  • FPGA Field-programmable gate array
  • the program code mentioned above may also be provided as a computer program product, for instance in the form of a data carrier carrying computer program code for performing the embodiments herein when being loaded into the first communication node 201.
  • One such carrier may be in the form of a CD ROM disc. It is however feasible with other data carriers such as a memory stick.
  • the computer program code may

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • Embodiments herein relate generally to a first communication node and a method in the first communication node. More particularly the embodiments herein relate to estimating pre-coding weights for a multi-antenna transmission on a radio channel between the first communication node and a second communication node in a communication network.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In a typical cellular system, also referred to as a wireless communications network, wireless terminals communicate via a Radio Access Network (RAN) to one or more core networks. The wireless terminals may be mobile stations or user equipment units such as mobile telephones also known as "cellular" telephones, and laptops with wireless capability.
  • The radio access network covers a geographical area which is divided into cell areas, with each cell area being served by a base station, e.g., a Radio Base Station (RBS), which in some networks is also called Evolved Node B (eNB), NodeB or B node and which in this document also is referred to as a base station. A cell is a geographical area where radio coverage is provided by the radio base station equipment at a base station site. Each cell is identified by an identity within the local radio area, which is broadcast in the cell. A base station communicates over the air interface operating on radio frequencies with the user equipment units within range of the base stations.
  • In some versions of the radio access network, several base stations are typically connected, e.g., by landlines or microwave, to a Radio Network Controller (RNC). The radio network controller, also sometimes termed a Base Station Controller (BSC), supervises and coordinates various activities of the plural base stations connected thereto. The radio network controllers are typically connected to one or more core networks.
  • The Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) is a third generation mobile communication system, which evolved from the Global System for Mobile
  • Communications (GSM), and is intended to provide improved mobile communication services based on Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) access technology. UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) is essentially a radio access network using wideband code division multiple access for user equipment units. The Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) has undertaken to further evolve the UTRAN and GSM based radio access network technologies. In 3GPP this work regarding the 3rd Generation (3G) Long Term Evolution (LTE) system is ongoing.
  • Pre-coding is a technique which supports multi-layer transmission in multi-antenna wireless communications. In short, a transmitter sends coded information to a receiver in order to the pre-knowledge of the channel. In single-layer beamforming, the same signal is emitted from each of the transmit antennas with appropriate weighting such that the signal power is maximized at the receiver output. When the receiver has multiple antennas, single-layer beamforming cannot simultaneously maximize the signal level at all of the receive antenna. Thus, in order to maximize the throughput in multiple receive antenna systems, multi-layer beamforming is required.
  • Single-layer transmission refers to transmission of the same signal is emitted from each of a plurality of antennas, and multi-layer transmission refers to transmission of multiple data streams.
  • In point-to-point systems, pre-coding means that multiple data streams are emitted from the transmit antennas with independent and appropriate weightings such that the link throughput is maximized at the receiver output. In multi-user Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO), the data streams are intended for different users and some measure of the total throughput, e.g., the total cell performance is maximized. In point-to-point systems, some of the benefits of pre-coding may be realized without requiring channel state information at the transmitter, while such information is essential to handle the co-user interference in multi-user systems.
  • When code book based pre-coding is used a selected set of pre-coders are defined in a table, the code book. When code book based pre-coding is used a selected set of pre-coders are defined in a table, the code book. A pre-coding matrix indicator (PMI) refers to a referring index into that code book. Pre-coding may also be selected unlimited non discrete or in a non-discrete manner, i.e. called non-code book based pre-coding. PMI or other type of indicator which enables selection of a pre-coding vector may be applied to wireless transmissions in a communication network as a feedback metric used for MIMO pre-coding. The pre-coding process is used to optimize the quality of the signal at the receiver. The following PMI reporting is described for LTE, as an example, but similar reporting procedure applies for e.g. Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) as well.
  • In the LTE closed-loop spatial multiplexing mode, i.e. with a code book based pre-coding, a base station selects a pre-coder matrix from a predefined codebook with the help of a user equipment's (UE) suggestion in the shape of one or more pre-coding matrix indicators signaled as part of the channel knowledge or information.
  • LTE is an OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) access. The bandwidth is divided into a number of 15kHz sub-carriers, orthogonal frequency. 12 such sub-carriers are further grouped into a sub-band, i.e. resource block, of 180kHz. These sub-bands are the resource block for scheduling and channel state reporting, such as PMI.
  • The user equipment may be configured to send PMI reports either periodical, e.g. on Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH), or scheduled, e.g. on Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH). The PMI for the last reporting period may to a various degree of accuracy indicate forthcoming channel quality. However, e.g. user equipment position, user equipment speed and changes in the local propagation environment will alter the fast fading. This makes it clear that the estimated PMI has better short-term than long term accuracy, and that a long delay between measurement and PMI usage may reduce potential gains. Typical shortest feasible delay between measurement and application of PMI is e.g. 10 to 15 ms. For example, the reporting delay may be 6 ms and the reporting interval may be in the order of 5 to 40 ms.
  • The larger the pre-coding frequency granularity, the larger the gain is but at the cost of larger the reporting overhead. It is desired to increase the reporting period to save uplink radio resources.
  • The user equipments bases PMI reports on measurements on downlink reference signals. PMI reports are transmitted on uplink control channels to the eNodeB. PMI reporting is comprised in the Channel State Information (CSI) report. Depending on CSI report configuration, a CSI report may comprise of a PMI rank indicator (RI), and CQI (Channel Quality Indicator). The PMI may be reported wideband or frequency selective.
  • As a user equipment moves, the radio channel will be affected by the altering fast fading. For a given frequency, i.e. sub-band, the channel will fade in the time domain and the fading speed is primarily dependent on the user equipment speed. If considering a specific point in time, one will have more or less similar occurrence, but in the frequency domain instead.
    Due to the delays involved in the CSI reporting procedure, the sub-band PMI to be used for pre-coding will be more or less outdated. Having a too outdated PMI will be similar to having a random selection procedure or to have transmit diversity, that is open-loop spatial multiplexing in LTE. This is described in Figure 1 , showing user equipment speed impact on closed loop pre-coding efficiency. The x-axis of Figure 1 shows mobile speed in km/h. The y-axis of Figure 1 shows normalized system tp and normalized cell-edge user tp. The line marked with triangles refers to Single Input, Multiple Output (SIMO), the line marked with squares refers to Alamouti codes, the line marked with circles refers to a closed-loop multiplexing and the line marked with diamonds refers to open-loop multiplexing. Alamouti codes is a MIMO transmit diversity scheme for two transmit antennas that does not require transmit channel knowledge.
    It is known in that prediction can mitigate the PMI deterioration due to delays. In the patent document US 2007/0206626 it is describes a method of predicting future PMIs at the receiver based on a history of channel estimates, where the receiver additionally feeds back the predicted PMI values to the transmitter. One drawback of such a method is the added complexity in the receiver, which may create an undesirable increase of cost and power consumption. Another drawback is that the prediction is restricted to PMIs which can be fed back to the transmission using efficient signaling, i.e. PMIs belonging to a pre-determined codebook.
  • US patent application 2009/0046569 discloses an electronic device that includes a first circuit operable to generate a precoding matrix index (PMI) vector associated with a plurality of configured subbands, and further operable to form a compressed PMI vector, which includes one reference PMI and at least one differential subband PM defined relative to the reference PMI, and a second circuit operable to initiate transmission of a signal communicating the compressed PMI vector.
  • US patent application 2009/0059844 discloses a method in a multiple antenna system for scheduling and transmitting data, which can cope with errors that may occur in uplink control signals needed for scheduling radio resources.
  • WO publication 2009/002087 discloses a method of transmitting feedback data in a multiple antenna system, which includes generating feedback data based on the channel information and transmitting the feedback data at transmission periods.
  • SUMMARY
  • The objective of embodiments herein is therefore to obviate at least one of the above disadvantages and to improve the throughput and signal quality in a communication network.
  • According to a first aspect, the objective is achieved by a method in a first communication node for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel between the first communication node and a second communication node in a communication network. The first communication node comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel. The method comprises obtaining at least two pre-coding reports, wherein each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. Each pre-coding report comprises pre- coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band. The method further comprises for each transmit antenna, estimating pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports. The estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports. Still further, the method comprises providing the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node.
  • According to a second aspect, the objective is achieved by a first communication node for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel between the first communication node and a second communication node in a communication network. The first communication node comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel. The first communication node further comprises an obtaining unit, which is configured to obtain at least two pre-coding reports. Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weight. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band. The first communication node also comprises an estimating unit, which is configured to, for each transmit antenna, estimate pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports. The estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding report. The first communication node also comprises a providing unit, which is configured to provide the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node.
  • Thanks to the possibility to utilize pre-coding weights for other, neighbouring, sub-bands when predicting the pre-order for a particular sub-band and using frequency selective pre-coding in combination with channel prediction, the throughout/ signal quality in a wireless communication network is improved MIMO pre-coding.
  • Embodiments herein afford many advantages, for which a non-exhaustive list of examples follows:
    The embodiments herein provide the advantage of improved performance of frequency selective closed loop pre-coding on user equipments with speed above e.g. 3 km/h, basically, for non-static user equipments. Closed loop spatial multiplexing may be used for user equipments at higher speed. Another advantage is that the PMI reporting interval may be reduced that result in decreased uplink control signaling load.
  • The embodiments herein enable refined pre-coding selection from a discrete channel state information improving the MIMO performance. From the code-book based PMI reporting a non-code book based pre-coder may be selected. Further, from a sub-band grouped PMI reporting a sub-carrier PMI may be selected.
  • The embodiments herein enable refined pre-coding selection from a discrete channel state information improving the MIMO performance. From the code-book based PMI reporting a non-code book based pre-coder may be selected. Further, from a sub-band grouped PMI reporting, a sub-carrier PMI may be selected.
  • The embodiments herein are not limited to the features and advantages mentioned above. A person skilled in the art will recognize additional features and advantages upon reading the following detailed description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The embodiments herein will now be further described in more detail in the following detailed description by reference to the appended drawings in which:
  • Fig. 1
    is a graphical illustration of user equipment speed impact on closed loop pre-coding efficiency.
    Fig. 2
    is a schematic block diagram illustrating embodiments of a wireless communication network.
    Fig. 3
    is a combined signaling and flow diagram illustrating embodiments of a method.
    Figure 4
    is a graph illustrating a measured time-frequency channel.
    Figure 5
    is a graph illustrating a time frequency channel for a two-ray channel.
    Figure 6
    is a graph illustrating a PMI time versus sub-band pattern.
    Figure 7
    is a graph illustrating a Cumulative Distribution-Function (CDF) of wide-band average of mutual information using Shannon's formula.
    Figure 8
    is a flowchart depicting embodiments of a method in a first communication node.
    Figure 9
    is a schematic block diagram illustrating embodiments of a first communication node.
  • The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasize is instead being placed upon illustrating the principle of the embodiments herein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The embodiments herein are related to use of sub-band PMI behavior to predict how a radio channel fades, i.e. sub-band PMI moves in frequency domain, and to use this knowledge as input to frequency selective pre-coding. In more detail, the embodiments herein relate to utilizing frequency selective PMI for other, neighboring, sub-bands when predicting the pre-coder for a particular sub-band. It is also related to frequency selective pre-coding in combination with channel prediction.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a communication network 200. The network may use technologies such as e.g. LTE, WiMAX, or other radio access where the frequency band is divided into sub-bands, etc. The network 200 comprises at least one first communication node 201 and at least one second communication node 203. The first communication node 201 may be e.g. a base station, eNodeB, etc. The second communication node 203 may be any suitable communication device or computational device with communication capabilities, for instance but not limited to user equipment, mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), laptop, MP3 player, portable DVD player or similar media content devices, digital camera, or even stationary devices such as a PC. The user equipment is referred to as UE in some of the figures. The first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203 communicates with each other using any suitable kind of communication channel 205, e.g. a wireless channel. The communication channel 205 comprises a plurality of radio carriers that may take different multiple paths, i.e. rays, over the air around and reflected on obstacles, and may use any suitable protocol depending on type and level of layer, e.g. as indicated by the Open System Interconnection (OSI) model, as understood by the person skilled in the art.
  • The first communication node 201 may be connected to a core network 212 providing e.g. internet services to the second communication node 203.
  • It should be appreciated that the network 200 is configured with cabling, routers, switches, and other network building elements (not shown) as understood by the skilled person, for instance as used for building an Ethernet or Wide Area Network (WAN) network.
  • The present method for estimating pre-coding weights for transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and a second communication node 203 in a communication network 200, according to some embodiments will now be described with reference to the combined signaling diagram and flowchart depicted in Figure 3 . The method comprises the following steps, which steps may as well be carried out in another suitable order than described below:
  • Step 301
  • The first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203 obtains at least two pre-coding reports. The pre-coding report may be a Pre-coding Matrix Indicator. Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. For example, a first pre-coding report may be for time instance t1 and a second pre-coding report may be for time instance t2, where t1 takes place before t2. Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. Indications to pre-coding weights may be an index pointing to pre-coding weights in a table, i.e. PMI and code-book based as mentioned above. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band.
  • For example, a pre-coding report may comprise, for one data stream between the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203:
    • For sub-band 1: the vector [w1 ... wN]_1 with complex, i.e. amplitude and phase, weights for the N antennas.
    • For sub-band 2: the vector [w1 ... wN]_2 with complex, i.e. amplitude and phase, weights for the N antennas.
    • etc..
  • For more than one date stream, a pre-coding report comprises a matrix with one vector per data stream.
  • In some embodiments, where code book based pre-coding is performed, the pre-coding report may comprise indexes to a table. The table comprises valid pre-coding weights.
  • A pre-coding report has at least one pre-coding weight per antenna for each data stream that is to be transmitted between the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203. The number of weights may be calculated by number of antennas times the number of data streams/layer/code words. If one data stream is transmitted, one pre-coding weight is used per antenna and sub-band. If two or more data streams are transmitted, two ore more pre-coding weights are used per antenna and sub-bands, one for each data stream. The pre-coding weight vectors are preferably orthogonal between the various data streams.
  • In code based pre-coding, there is a limited amount of possible pre-coding weights known for both the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203, e.g. a code book. It may be reported which is the preferred one, e.g. number two, i.e. PMI. In some embodiments, the number of requested data streams, i.e. rank indicator, is reported, in addition to which pre-coding weights that is most suitable, i.e. RI.
  • The pre-coding weights comprise an antenna channel phase or antenna channel amplitude. The antenna channel phase indicates the phase difference between data streams on channels from each respective antenna, and the antenna channel amplitude indicates the amplitude of the data streams on channels from each respective antenna.
  • The at least two transmit antennas may be positioned in different sites at different geographical positions in the communication network 200.
  • Step 302
  • If the pre-coding reports are obtained from the second communication node 203, the obtained pre-coding reports are transmitted to the first communication node 201.
  • The pre-coding reports may be transmitted to the first communication node 201 at regular intervals, or when triggered.
  • If the pre-coding reports are obtained internally in the first communication node 201, step 302 is not performed.
  • Step 303
  • For each transmit antenna, the first communication node 201, e.g. the base station, estimates pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports. The estimated pre-coding weights are different from the most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports. If the obtained reports are for e.g. times t1 and t2, the estimated pre-coding weights are different for the most recent of the obtained reports, i.e. it is different from the report obtained at t2. The estimated pre-coding weights are a function of time and frequency.
  • As mentioned above, for a given frequency, i.e. sub-band, the channel will fade in the time domain and the fading speed is primarily dependent on the user equipment speed. If considering a specific point in time, more or less similar occurrence will take place, but in the frequency domain instead. The corresponding diagonal banded structure achieved from direct radio channel measurement is seen in Figure 4. Figure 4 illustrates channel gain vs. time and frequency from radio channel measurements. The x-axis of Figure 4 illustrates the time measured in seconds (s) and the y-axis of Figure 4 illustrates a frequency offset measured in MHz.
  • To illustrate the physical background that gives rise to this particular structure in the time-frequency response of the channel 205 as shown in Figure 4, the following scenario is considered:
    A two-ray channel, with one ray having amplitude 1, delay 0, and direction of arrival = 0, and a second ray having amplitude 1, delay τ, and direction of arrival = ϕ. The second communication node 203, e.g. a user equipment, is assumed to move with velocity v in the direction π/2. For this case, the channel 205 may be expressed as: H t , f = exp 2 π i cos 0 π / 2 vt / λ exp 2 πif 0 + + exp 2 π i cos ϕ π / 2 vt / λ exp 2 πifτ = 1 + exp 2 π i sin ϕ vt / λ exp 2 πifτ
    Figure imgb0001
  • With the assumptions that sin(ϕ)v/λ = 20 Hz and τ = 0.5 µs the resulting channel will be as depicted in Figure 5 . The x-axis of Figure 5 illustrates the time measured in seconds (s) and the y-axis of Figure 5 illustrates a frequency offset measured in MHz. This figure shows a banded structure quite similar to what observed in the measurements illustrated in Figure 4. Figure 5 shows a time-frequency channel for a two-ray channel with differing delay and direction of arrival of two channel rays. In this particular example, the Doppler offset between the rays is 20 Hz and the delay offset is 0.5 µs.
  • In general, there will be many more than two rays making up the channel 205 between the transmitter in the second communication node 203 and a receiver in the first communication node 201. However, not all rays will be equally strong, and therefore it may be expected that some parts of the diagonal structure may be present also in more complex channels, in particular when two rays are dominating in power over the others.
  • From Figure 4 and Figure 5 it may be understood that it is possible to potentially benefit from compensating for the sub-band drift, and that the overall gain will hence be a function of involved CSI reporting delay, user equipment speed and general channel properties.
  • Figure 6 illustrates optimal, in mutual information sense, rank-1 PMI for different sub-bands. Mutual information is a theoretical approach to estimate the bitrate. The x-axis shows time ticks, where each tick corresponds to 5.33 ms, while the y-axis shows the sub-band number, where each sub-band is 600 kHz. The different grayscale intensities in the squares represent the different rank-1 PMIs. The figure 6 shows a clear and strong sub-band drift in optimal rank-1 PMIs
  • A basic algorithm utilizing the drift shown in Figure 6 may be to determine the shift s that gives the highest correlation c between reported PMIs of two neighbouring sub-bands, sb1 and sb2. The reported PMIs of the two neighbouring sub-bands correspond to the obtained pre-coding reports described in step 301. If the correlation exceeds some specified threshold, then PMI override is applied.
  • One example may be the following algorithm:
 pmi(sb, n): Value of last reported PMI for sub-band sb at time
                        n.
 pmi_used(sb, n) : PMI used in sub-band sb at time n.
 win: Correlation window size
  corr_thres: Correlation threshold
  report_delay: Time between reported PMI is selected and time
                        until it become available.
  s: Variabel.
  for sb = 1:8
    best_shift = 0;
    best_corr = -100;
    for s = 1:10
       c = corr(pmi(sb, n-win:n), pmi(sb+1, n-win-s:n-s));
       if c > best corr
          best_corr = c;
          best_shift = s;
       end
    end
    if best corr > corr thres
       // Select shift to be maximum of 1 and difference
       // between best shift and PMI reporting delay
       selected_shift = max([best_shift - report_delay 1]);
       pmi_used(sb,n) = pmi(sb+1, n - selected_shift);
    else
       pmi_used(sb,n) = pmi(sb+1, n);
    end
  end
  • The above algorithm is applied on the data shown in Figure 7 with the following assumptions:
    • PMI is reported every 3 tick, i.e., 3 * 5.33 ms.
    • There is a reporting delay of 1 tick.
    • corr_thres = 0.
    • PMI override is only allowed if the difference between current time and receiving time of last PMI report is at least 1 tick.
  • The result may be seen Figure 7 , illustrating a Cumulative Distribution-Function (CDF) of wide-band average of mutual information using Shannon's formula. Using the above algorithm, the mean value of the prediction gain is approximately 5.6 %. More elaborated algorithms may potentially increase the gain. The x-axis of Figure 7 illustrates the average (WB) MI measured in bit/s/Hz, and the y-axis of Figure 7 illustrates the CDF. The continuous line in Figure 7 illustrates an optimal situation, the dotted line illustrates no delay and no prediction, the dotted and broken line illustrates delay, but no prediction and the broken line illustrates delay and prediction.
  • The gain is highly dependent on how stable the PMIs are in time, how fast the PMIs are reported, the reporting delay, etc.
  • In one embodiment, optimal shift may be achieved adaptively comparing different shift factors on historical data gathered near in time. The algorithm should retreat back to zero sub-band shift if no gain may be derived on historical data.
  • In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights are selected from a codebook as for ordinary closed loop spatial multiplexing in LTE.
  • In some embodiments, the estimated pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports. For example, in case of two antenna ports, 3GPP supports the following rank 1 precoders:
    (1; 1), (1; -1), (1; j) and (1; -j)
  • Adding a factor 2 higher granularity may be obtained by adding the following rank 1 precoders
    (1; a), (1; a*), (1; b) and (1; b*), where a = (1 + j)/sqrt(2) and b = (-1 + j)/sqrt(2).
  • Note that a normalization factor is omitted. A normalization factor is selected to give the same transmitted energy in case of rank 1 and rank 2.
  • With the suggested frequency-time pre-coding shift the estimated best pre-coder may be in between the granularity of the code-book reported with PMI. With higher granularity of used precoders a more accurate beam forming may be done.
  • For LTE the PMI is reported per sub-band and pre-coding is performed per sub-band, that is the pre-coder is set equal for all 12 sub-carriers within the sub-band. With the suggested frequency-time pre-coding shift a pre-coder per sub-carrier may be estimated improve the frequency selectivity of the precoding.
  • Estimating the pre-coding weights with finer granularity improves the performance.
    Better performance may be obtained by using a larger codebook, but this comes with the cost of increased signaling. In certain cases there is no requirement that the reporting codebook and the transmitting codebook are equal. It may be possible to, for example, have a small reporting codebook, i.e. small signaling overhead, but a larger codebook from transmitting pre-coder is selected, providing possibility for increased performance.
  • Returning to figure 3.
  • Step 304
  • The first communication node 201 provides the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • Step 305
  • The first communication node 201 applies the estimated pre-coding weights to the data transmission to the second communication node 203. In other words, data is transmitted from the first communication node 201 to the second communication node 203 using the estimated pre-coding weights.
  • The method shown in figure 3 may be used in MIMO beam forming, pre-coding and Coordinated Multipoint Transmission.
  • MIMO systems with several transmit antennas is supported for several mobile accesses, WCDMA, WiMax and LTE. For WiMax and LTE; frequency selective adaptive pre-coding is also supported enabling relative phase adjustments between transmit antennas to adapt to channel phases. The phase shifts may be adapted to add constructively and avoid nulling from several antennas with different channel paths to the receiver's antenna (s). For downlink, the receiver corresponds to the second communication node 203, for uplink, the receiver corresponds to the first communication node 201. Also multi-layer, i.e. multi-stream, transmissions may be improved by increased channel orthogonally. The delay and user equipment speed has an even larger impact on phase and pre-coding than on channel quality. The method described above predicts frequency selective phase deviation as a function of time.
  • The method described above will now be described seen from the perspective of the first communication node 201. Figure 8 is a flowchart describing the present method in the first communication node 201 for estimating pre-coding weights for multi-antenna transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and a second communication node 203 in a communication network 200. The first communication node 201 comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. In some embodiments, the at least two transmit antennas are positioned in different sites in the communication network 200.The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel 205. The pre-coding weights may be a function of time and frequency. In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights comprise a pre-coding matrix indicator.
  • In some embodiments the first communication node 201 is a base station and the second communication node 203 is a user equipment, or the first communication node 201 is a user equipment and the second communication node 203 is a base station.
  • In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights comprise antenna channel phase or antenna channel amplitude.
  • The method comprises the steps to be performed in the first communication node 201:
  • Step 801
  • The first communication node 201 obtains at least two pre-coding reports. Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band.
  • In some embodiments, the at least two pre-coding reports are obtained from the first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203.
  • Step 802
  • For each transmit antenna, the first communication node 201 estimates pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports. The estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • Step 802a
  • This is a subset of step 802. In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 estimates a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for difference time instances.
  • Step 802b
  • This is a subset of step 802 which is to be performed after step 802a. In some embodiments, based on the estimated correlation, the first communication node 201 estimates a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • Step 802b1
  • This is a subset of step 802b. In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 compares shift factors for the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances.
  • Step 802b2
  • This is a subset of step 802b which is to be performed after step 802b1. In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 estimates a gain for the compared shift factors.
  • Step 802b3
  • This is a subset of step 802b which is to be performed after step 802b2. In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 sets the shift to zero when the estimated gain is below a threshold. In some embodiments, the threshold is zero.
  • Step 802c
  • This is a subset of step 802 which is to be performed instead of step 802a and 802b, or after 802b or after step 802b3. The first communication node 201 selects pre-coding weights from a codebook.
  • Step 803
  • In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 provides the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • Step 804
  • In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 applies the estimated pre-coding weights to the transmission to the second communication node 203.
  • To perform the method steps shown in figure 8 for estimating pre-coding weights for transmission on a radio channel 205 between a first communication node 201 and a second communication node 203 in a communication network 200, the first communication node 201 comprises an arrangement as shown in Figure 9 . The first communication node 201 comprises at least two transmit antennas. Each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands. In some embodiments, the at least two transmit antennas are positioned in different sites in the communication network 200. The at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel 205. In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 is a base station and the second communication node 203 is a user equipment, or the first communication node 201 is a user equipment and the second communication node 203 is a base station. In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights comprise an antenna channel phase or an antenna channel amplitude.
  • The first communication node 201 further comprises an obtaining unit 901 which is configured to obtain at least two pre-coding reports. Each pre-coding report is for a different time instance. Each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights. The pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band. In some embodiments, the at least two pre-coding reports are obtained from the first communication node 201 or the second communication node 203. In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights are a function of time and frequency. In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights comprise a pre-coding matrix indicator.
  • The first communication node 201 comprises an estimating unit 902 configured to, for each transmit antenna, estimate pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports. The estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • In some embodiments, the estimating unit 902 is further configured to estimate a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for difference time instances, and, based on the estimated correlation, estimate a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • In some embodiments, the estimating unit 902 is further configured to compare shift factors for the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances, estimate a gain for the compared shift factors, and to set the shift to zero when the estimated gain is below a threshold. In some embodiments, the threshold may be zero.
  • In some embodiments, the estimating unit 902 is configured to select pre-coding weights from a codebook.
  • In some embodiments, the pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
  • In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 further comprises an applying unit 904 which is configured to apply the estimated pre-coding weights to the transmission to the second communication node 203.
  • In some embodiments, the first communication node 201 comprises a providing unit 907 configured to provide the estimated pre-coding weights to the second communication node 203.
  • The present mechanism for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel 205 between the first communication node 201 and the second communication node 203 in a communication network 200 may be implemented through one or more processors, such as a processor 910 in the first communication node arrangement depicted in Figure 8, together with computer program code for performing the functions of the embodiments herein. The processor may be for example a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) processor, Field-programmable gate array (FPGA) processor or micro processor. The program code mentioned above may also be provided as a computer program product, for instance in the form of a data carrier carrying computer program code for performing the embodiments herein when being loaded into the first communication node 201. One such carrier may be in the form of a CD ROM disc. It is however feasible with other data carriers such as a memory stick. The computer program code may furthermore be provided as pure program code on a server and downloaded to the first communication node 201 remotely.
  • The embodiments herein are not limited to the above described preferred embodiments. Various alternatives, modifications and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above embodiments should not be taken as limiting the scope of the embodiments, which is defined by the appending claims.
  • It should be noted that the term "comprises/comprising" when used in this specification is taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components or groups thereof. It should also be noted that the words "a" or "an" preceding an element do not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements.
  • It should also be emphasized that the steps of the methods defined in the appended claims may, without departing from the embodiments herein, be performed in another order than the order in which they appear in the claims.
  • Claims (12)

    1. A method in a first communication node (201) for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel (205) between the first communication node (201) and a second communication node (203) in a communication network (200), wherein the first communication node (201) comprises at least two transmit antennas, and wherein each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands, and wherein the at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel (205), the method comprising:
      obtaining (301,801) at least two pre-coding reports, wherein each pre-coding report is for a different time instance, wherein each pre-coding report comprises pre- coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights, wherein the pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band;
      for each transmit antenna, estimating (303,802) pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports, wherein the estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports, characterized by the estimating (303,802) pre-coding weights comprises:
      estimating (802a) a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances; and
      based on the estimated correlation, estimating (802b) a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
    2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
      applying (305,804) the estimated pre-coding weights to the transmission to the second communication node (203).
    3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the estimating a shift further comprises:
      comparing (802b1) shift factors for the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances;
      estimating (802b2) a gain for the compared shift factors; and
      setting (802b3) the shift to zero when the estimated gain is below a threshold.
    4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the estimating pre-coding weights further comprises:
      selecting (802c) pre-coding weights from a codebook.
    5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the pre-coding weights are estimated with finer granularity than the pre-coding weights comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports.
    6. The method according to any of the preceding claims,_wherein the at least two pre-coding reports are obtained from the first communication node (201) or the second communication node (203).
    7. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pre-coding weights are a function of time and frequency.
    8. The method according to any of the preceding claims,_wherein the pre-coding weights comprise a pre-coding matrix indicator.
    9. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first communication node (201) is a base station and the second communication node (203) is a user equipment, or wherein the first communication node (201) is a user equipment and the second communication node (203) is a base station.
    10. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the at least two transmit antennas are positioned in different sites in the communication network (200).
    11. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the pre-coding weights comprise an antenna channel phase or an antenna channel amplitude.
    12. A first communication node (201) for estimating pre-coding weights for a transmission on a radio channel (205) between the first communication node (201) and a second communication node (203) in a communication network (200), wherein the first communication node (201) comprises at least two transmit antennas, and wherein each respective transmit antenna is configured to transmit on each of at least two sub-bands, and wherein the at least two sub-bands are comprised in the radio channel (205), the first communication node (201) further comprising:
      an obtaining unit (901) configured to obtain (301,801) at least two pre-coding reports, wherein each pre-coding report is for a different time instance, wherein each pre-coding report comprises pre-coding weights or indications to pre-coding weights, wherein the pre-coding weights are associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band;
      an estimating unit (902) configured to, for each transmit antenna, estimate (303,802) pre-coding weights for at least one of the at least two sub-bands based on the pre-coding weights in the at least two obtained pre-coding reports, wherein the estimated pre-coding weights are different from a most recent of the obtained pre-coding reports, characterized in that the estimating unit (902) is further configured to:
      estimate a correlation of the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances; and
      based on the estimated correlation, estimate a time shift between the pre-coding weights associated with each of the respective transmit antennas and associated with each of the respective sub-band comprised in the obtained pre-coding reports, wherein the estimating unit (902) is further configured to:
      compare shift factors for the at least two pre-coding reports for different time instances;
      estimate a gain for the compared shift factors; and
      set the shift to zero when the estimated gain is below a threshold.
    EP10844841.6A 2010-01-27 2010-12-29 Closed loop precoding weight estimation Not-in-force EP2529489B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (2)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    PCT/SE2010/050071 WO2011093753A1 (en) 2010-01-27 2010-01-27 Adaptive cqi sub band
    PCT/SE2010/051492 WO2011093761A1 (en) 2010-01-27 2010-12-29 Closed loop precoding weight estimation

    Publications (3)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP2529489A1 EP2529489A1 (en) 2012-12-05
    EP2529489A4 EP2529489A4 (en) 2016-05-25
    EP2529489B1 true EP2529489B1 (en) 2018-10-17

    Family

    ID=56739123

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP10844841.6A Not-in-force EP2529489B1 (en) 2010-01-27 2010-12-29 Closed loop precoding weight estimation

    Country Status (3)

    Country Link
    US (1) US9198190B2 (en)
    EP (1) EP2529489B1 (en)
    WO (1) WO2011093761A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (5)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    WO2013183946A1 (en) * 2012-06-05 2013-12-12 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for reporting channel state information
    US20150349897A1 (en) * 2012-12-27 2015-12-03 Zet (USA) Inc. Method and system for ue measurements in support of mimo ota
    MX350515B (en) * 2013-04-28 2017-09-08 Huawei Tech Co Ltd Precoding matrix indicator feedback method, receiving end and transmitting end.
    US9386627B1 (en) * 2014-05-20 2016-07-05 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Customized call setup procedure based on predicted call quality
    IL267295B (en) * 2016-12-13 2022-08-01 Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd Method and device for controlling uplink power

    Family Cites Families (9)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    WO2008115585A2 (en) 2007-03-21 2008-09-25 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for communicating precoding or beamforming information to users in mimo wireless communication systems
    US8179775B2 (en) 2007-08-14 2012-05-15 Texas Instruments Incorporated Precoding matrix feedback processes, circuits and systems
    US8457235B2 (en) 2007-06-25 2013-06-04 Lg Electronics Inc. Method of transmitting feedback data in multiple antenna system
    KR101293373B1 (en) * 2007-06-25 2013-08-05 엘지전자 주식회사 Method for transmitting data in multiple antenna system
    US8009617B2 (en) 2007-08-15 2011-08-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Beamforming of control information in a wireless communication system
    KR100995045B1 (en) * 2007-12-31 2010-11-19 엘지전자 주식회사 A method for receiving a precoded signal in collaborative multiple input multiple output communication system
    US8983397B2 (en) * 2008-10-10 2015-03-17 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for channel feedback by multiple description coding in a wireless communication system
    US8498252B2 (en) * 2009-07-06 2013-07-30 Intel Corporation Midamble for wireless networks
    JP5637486B2 (en) * 2009-12-17 2014-12-10 マーベル ワールド トレード リミテッド MIMO feedback scheme for cross-polarized antennas

    Non-Patent Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Title
    INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS ET AL: "Simulation results for implicit and explicit Carrier Indication", 3GPP DRAFT; R1-093069, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP), MOBILE COMPETENCE CENTRE ; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES ; F-06921 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS CEDEX ; FRANCE, no. Shenzhen, China; 20090819, 19 August 2009 (2009-08-19), XP050351456 *

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    EP2529489A4 (en) 2016-05-25
    EP2529489A1 (en) 2012-12-05
    US20120314798A1 (en) 2012-12-13
    WO2011093761A1 (en) 2011-08-04
    US9198190B2 (en) 2015-11-24

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    US10742303B1 (en) Configuration of spatially QCL reference signal resources for transmissions in communication equipment having multiple antenna panels
    EP3520226B1 (en) System and method for hierarchical beamforming and rank adaptation for hybrid antenna architecture
    CN107615856B (en) System and method for multi-stage beamforming non-orthogonal multiple access communication
    US9154210B2 (en) Downlink transmission method for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) system, and base station
    US8670719B2 (en) Multi-point opportunistic beamforming with selective beam attenuation
    EP2767126B1 (en) Transmit power adjustment to reduce a relative phase discontinuity
    KR101875397B1 (en) System and methods for coping with doppler effects in distributed-input distributed-output wireless systems
    KR101507088B1 (en) Aparatus and method for uplink baemforming and space-division multiple access in multi-input multi-output wireless communication systems
    JP5542144B2 (en) Method and apparatus for MIMO based multiple base station cooperative communication
    US20040235433A1 (en) Determining transmit diversity order and branches
    KR101978771B1 (en) Method and apparatus for estimating multiple stream multi user cqi based on per stream channel gain feedback in wireless communication system
    US10523298B2 (en) Method for controlling wireless communication, wireless communication system, reception device, and transmission device
    EP2529489B1 (en) Closed loop precoding weight estimation
    JP7175992B2 (en) Coordinated beam management for beamformed transmissions
    US20180006704A1 (en) Stochastic transmission/reception method and apparatus for mu-mimo scheme in mimo radio communication system
    CN102724726B (en) Method and device for switching multiple input multiple output (MIMO) mode in transmission mode (TM8) in long-term evolution (LTE) system
    US8855094B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for reducing interference in wireless communication systems
    CN112583501A (en) Channel measurement method and communication device
    WO2018143995A1 (en) Codebook selection among codebooks with different spatial granularity for wireless networks
    KR20090077185A (en) A method for performing codebook based beamforming in the collaborative multiple input multiple output communication system
    US9031162B2 (en) Mobility-resilient multi-antenna communications
    Han et al. Location-aided multi-user beamforming for 60 GHz WPAN systems
    CN107370529B (en) user scheduling method and system based on multi-user multiple input multiple output
    US11431388B2 (en) Wavelet transform-based tracking for estimating an aging wireless channel
    Suzuki Downlink capacity improvement of closed-loop MU-MIMO by CSI prediction

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20120516

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

    DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
    RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

    Effective date: 20160422

    RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

    Ipc: H04L 1/20 20060101ALI20160418BHEP

    Ipc: H04L 25/02 20060101ALI20160418BHEP

    Ipc: H04B 7/06 20060101ALI20160418BHEP

    Ipc: H04W 72/12 20090101ALI20160418BHEP

    Ipc: H04B 7/04 20060101AFI20160418BHEP

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20160506

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

    INTG Intention to grant announced

    Effective date: 20180622

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R096

    Ref document number: 602010054489

    Country of ref document: DE

    Ref country code: AT

    Ref legal event code: REF

    Ref document number: 1055219

    Country of ref document: AT

    Kind code of ref document: T

    Effective date: 20181115

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: NL

    Ref legal event code: MP

    Effective date: 20181017

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: LT

    Ref legal event code: MG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: AT

    Ref legal event code: MK05

    Ref document number: 1055219

    Country of ref document: AT

    Kind code of ref document: T

    Effective date: 20181017

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: IS

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20190217

    Ref country code: BG

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20190117

    Ref country code: LT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: NO

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20190117

    Ref country code: AT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: LV

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: PL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: HR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: PT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20190217

    Ref country code: AL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: RS

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: SE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: GR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20190118

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R081

    Ref document number: 602010054489

    Country of ref document: DE

    Owner name: GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., CN

    Free format text: FORMER OWNER: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL), STOCKHOLM, SE

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R097

    Ref document number: 602010054489

    Country of ref document: DE

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: CZ

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: DK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: PL

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: SM

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: EE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: SK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: RO

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: LU

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181229

    Ref country code: MC

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20190718

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: MM4A

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: BE

    Ref legal event code: MM

    Effective date: 20181231

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181231

    Ref country code: IE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181229

    Ref country code: SI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: 732E

    Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20191031 AND 20191106

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181231

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181231

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181231

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: MT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181229

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: TR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: HU

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

    Effective date: 20101229

    Ref country code: MK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20181017

    Ref country code: CY

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20181017

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20211210

    Year of fee payment: 12

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20211220

    Year of fee payment: 12

    P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

    Effective date: 20230412

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 602010054489

    Country of ref document: DE

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20221229

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20221229

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20230701