EP2513644A1

EP2513644A1 - Method for testing connections of metal workpieces to plastic compounds for cavities by means of ultrasound

Info

Publication number: EP2513644A1
Application number: EP10808895A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Michael Kaack; Christian Kremer; Jörn WINKELS; Holger Brauer
Original assignee: Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH
Current assignee: Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH
Priority date: 2009-12-17
Filing date: 2010-11-29
Publication date: 2012-10-24
Also published as: WO2011072638A1; AP3295A; AP2012006328A0; BR112012014750A2; RU2515202C2; CO6551717A2; CN102753968A; US20120318064A1; CN102753968B; US9535040B2; MX2012006840A; RU2012130135A; DE102009060106A1

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for testing connections of metal workpieces to plastic compounds for cavities by means of ultrasound, wherein the plastic compound is arranged between the workpiece as an intermediate layer or is connected to the workpiece on one side and the cavity is located within the plastic compound, wherein the cavity is connected to the workpiece by means of a remaining plastic layer or plastic skin and wherein the plastic compound is exposed to ultrasound signals of a certain test frequency and pulse length from the metal side of the workpiece by means of at least one ultrasonic probe, and in particular the ultrasound signals reflected by defects present in the plastic compound are detected by the same or another ultrasonic probe and converted into electrical signals that can be evaluated and subjected to a threshold observation. The test frequency of the ultrasound signals is set in a range of 1 to 10 MHz so that the damping of the sound after passing through the plastic skin is minimal.

Description

Method for testing compounds of metal workpieces with plastic masses on cavities by means of ultrasound

description

The invention relates to a method for testing compounds of metallic workpieces with plastic masses on cavities by means of ultrasound according to the preamble of claim 1.

Under plastic materials are understood in the following any types of plastics, z. B. as an adhesive for bonding metallic workpieces, as a sealant or as coating materials for metallic workpieces application. For example, these materials are used for the production of adhesive bonds in sheets or pipes or for coating them.

When coating workpieces, such as sheets or pipes, with a plastic defects can occur in the application, the z. B. as

Form cavities (air bubbles) in the coating or as a non-adhesive connection at the contact point between the coating and the workpiece. Such defects can lead to the rusting of the workpiece and thus to an early failure

Lead to pitting corrosion.

In the production of bonded compounds, for. As in pipes, it is known to connect the pipe ends by means of a sleeve by introducing adhesive into a joint gap between the sleeve and pipe.

Typical defects in such adhesive compounds are, for example, air bubbles and non-adhering connection areas (so-called kissing bonds).

For strength tests on glued pipe connections, it turned out that these errors only become critical in this application if they have a size of approx. 20 mm

exceed. It was further shown that, in particular, air bubbles of this size, although usually fill the entire height of the joint gap, but each of a thin

Adhesive skin (100pm - 20Όμιη thickness), which adheres to the pipe wall, are surrounded. To ensure a sufficiently firm and error-free connection of the pipes, adhesive joints are usually tested by means of ultrasound in perpendicular insonification. The sound is coupled into the first joining partner (cuff) and passes through it. Part of the sound is reflected at the interface with the adhesive layer while another part penetrates the adhesive. The part that penetrates provides another reflection echo at the back of the adhesive layer. The part that is reflected at the top of the adhesive layer, however, provides a long echo train through repeated reflections in the cuff wall.

In the simplest solution of the ultrasonic testing of pipe adhesive joints, which is known from JP 57037257 A, the amplitudes of the echoes from the back of the adhesive layer are used for the evaluation. Here, the adhesive is sounded through and the absence of the echo indicates an error.

For the evaluation of the reflected ultrasonic signals, these are converted into electrical signals and selected, amplified and evaluated via time windows and diaphragms. The ratings refer to amplitudes of the signals and the transit times between the signals.

The check information, d. H. the amplitudes, limit value overruns, running times etc.

be detected by means of an electronic data processing device, evaluated, logged and displayed on a monitor.

Other z. B. from JP 2000221173 A known solutions evaluate the echoes from the top of the adhesive layer. Here, in particular, the shape of the echo signals is evaluated to draw conclusions about the quality of the adhesive bond.

Since the attenuation of the ultrasonic signals is great even after curing of the adhesive layer or the coating material, all solutions based on a transmission have the disadvantage that the echoes from the underside of the adhesive layer or the coating material are very small, especially with larger layer thicknesses.

Experience shows that with layer thicknesses above a few millimeters no echoes from the underside of the layer can be detected anymore. In addition, with cuff adhesive connections, the small backwall echo from the echo train from the

Cuff is superimposed, which usually provides even large amplitudes. The procedures based on the detection of the phase of echoes from the top of the

Plastic layer based, have several disadvantages. On the one hand, the reliable automated detection of the phase position is very difficult. On the other hand, a change in the phase position from the transition steel / plastic to steel / cavity just for metallic workpieces due to the large acoustic density is not given.

Further aggravating added that cavities are always within the plastic compound and at the interface with the metallic workpiece is still a thin layer of the plastic material as a cavity surrounding the skin is present, so that the transition steel / cavity does not occur. The ultrasonic signals thus always hit the material combination in the case of such errors

Steel / plastic / cavity, which makes a meaningful ultrasound examination difficult.

This is equally a problem with air pockets in plastic coatings, which may also be surrounded by a thin plastic skin.

When changing the adhesive or coating parameters (thickness of the adhesive layer or coating, nature of the workpiece surface, etc.), there are fluctuations in the ultrasonic signals, which in turn easily at a local evaluation only

Misinterpretations can lead.

Overall, the following problem arises in the ultrasonic testing in the detection of defects in plastic joints with metallic workpieces:

1. Air bubbles when coating a workpiece or when filling a

Gap gaps occur with adhesive, are located within the plastic mass and therefore always have to the interface of the workpiece always a cavity

on the final plastic skin.

Even in the presence of such a cavity is therefore always the transition steel / plastic and not the transition steel / air (cavity) available. The detection of air bubbles under the plastic skin is therefore particularly for procedures that the

Using reflections from the boundary layer in the metallic workpiece makes it more difficult.

2. Changes in the thickness and surface quality of the metallic workpiece as well as by interference effects lead to variations in the

Echo amplitudes. The local evaluation of these amplitudes and their relationships without inclusion of neighborhood criteria will be so unreliable. 3. The object of the invention is therefore to provide a safe and cost effective method for testing compounds of metallic workpieces with plastic masses by means of ultrasound, which avoids the disadvantages of the known methods, so that cavities in the plastic layer can be clearly detected and evaluated.

According to the invention, this object is achieved in that the test frequency of

Ultrasonic signals in a range between 1 and 10 MHz is set so that the attenuation of the sound after passing through the plastic skin at the interface

Steel / cavity is minimal.

In a further embodiment of the invention, the test frequency and the pulse length are readjusted after adjustment for a minimum damping, so that in comparison to a faultless plastic material signal amplification or -Schwächung by

Interference between that from the top of the plastic skin at the interface

Steel / cavity and from the bottom of the plastic skin at the interface

Plastic skin / cavity signals reflected.

The advantage of the invention described is that with the special testing and evaluation reliably cavities in the adhesive layer or in the

Coating material detected and thus reliable statements about the quality of the coating or the bond can be made.

Extensive testing for air bubbles in adhesive compounds and coatings has shown that choosing the right test frequencies is critical.

Although the sound penetrates into the plastic, it is strongly attenuated, whereby the attenuation is frequency-dependent. The test frequency is therefore initially to be chosen so that the weakening of the sound remains small after passing through the plastic skin. The echo from the interface of the underside of the skin / air then interferes with the echo of the interface

Steel / skin upper side in a reinforcing or weakening way, so that these significant amplitude changes can be evaluated. Test frequencies between 1 and 10 or 3-7 MHz have proven to be favorable in tests.

In addition, the pulse length and the test frequency should be chosen so that the

Interference provides a large contrast in the signal amplitudes to improve the readability of the ultrasonic signals. The pulse length should be at least twice the remaining residual layer between the cavity and the workpiece. However, the pulse length should only be chosen so long that an overlay with the next following ultrasonic pulse is avoided so as not to complicate the evaluation of the signals.

The experiments also showed that the selection of the "right echoes" for the

Evaluation of the signals is of great importance. Advantageously, therefore, the signals should be used for the evaluation, the amplitude levels have the largest differences compared to error-free plastic compositions. Evaluations with the 6th or a subsequent echo show a greater contrast in the signal amplitudes, than, for example, evaluations with that of the second echo and are therefore excellent to evaluate.

It should be noted, however, that the signal-to-noise ratio decreases with increasing number of echoes. The choice of the echo to be evaluated must therefore always be adapted to the respective test situation.

Differences in adhesive parameters, such as (thickness and surface finish of the metallic workpiece, gap width, etc., or altered coating thickness, can lead locally to test signals similar to those of defects such as air bubbles usually extend over a larger area of the workpiece, a reliable separation between the two signal causes is also advantageously possible by a two-dimensional display and evaluation using neighborhood criteria with this method.

In addition, since echo amplitudes are evaluated in the method according to the invention, good and uniform coupling must be ensured. Precise mechanical guidance of the probe during scanning can help detect errors.

Advantageously, in this method, so-called EMUS probes (electromagnetically excited ultrasound) can be used, unlike the

conventional piezo technology coupling without coupling agent such. As water, allow.

The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to FIGS. Like reference numerals in different figures indicate like components. Show it:

Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a typical adhesive joint of pipes below

Using a cuff, FIG. 2 ultrasonic testing of an adhesive bond according to FIG. 1,

FIG. 3 Representation of the amplitude ratios in an ultrasonic test according to FIG. 2.

FIG. 1 schematically shows a typical adhesive connection of pipes using a sleeve. The metallic pipes 1, 1 'to be joined together by gluing are in alignment with the end faces in the axial line using a

Seal ring 3 placed in front of each other. The sealing ring 3 serves to ensure that

to be introduced adhesive 6 can not penetrate through the contact point in the tube 1, V.

A metal collar 4 is held at a radial distance from the pipe 1, 1 'via a casting aid 2, 2' arranged on both sides of the tubes 1, 1 ', so that a hollow chamber is formed for introducing the adhesive 6. The sleeve 4 covers the contact point of the two tubes 1, 1 ', whose overlap width is adapted to the respective requirements. The cuff should be made of metal, as the

Ultrasonic testing of the adhesive bond can only be made from the metallic side of the workpiece and is advantageously carried out in the case of pipe connections from the outside of the pipe. Alternatively, an examination of the adhesive bond from the inside of the tube into consideration, if necessary, would be considered.

The potting aid 2, 2 'is designed so that it radially surrounds the tube 1, 1' on the one hand and on the other hand axially thereto - according to the width of the sleeve 4 - can be moved. With each in the region of the ends of the sleeve 4 on the circumference of the tubes 1, 1 'arranged spacers 5, 5', the radial distance of the sleeve 4 to the tube 1, 1 ', d. H. the radial width of the gap to be filled with adhesive 6, be adjusted.

FIG. 2 schematically shows the ultrasonic testing of an adhesive connection according to FIG. The pipe joint to be tested consists of the two sections of pipes 1, 1 'to be connected, the adhesive layer e (shown with enclosed air bubble 7) and the sleeve 4.

It is in accordance with the left lower part of Figure 2 in the test with a piezoelectric probe 8 in a z. B. immersed with water test tub 8, or it is realized in a suitable manner a sound coupling to the specimen by means of coupling fluid. In the case of the EMUS test technique shown in the lower right-hand part of FIG. 2, this is not necessary; instead of a piezo probe 9, an EMUS probe 10 is used here. In both cases, the probe is passed over the sleeve 4 for scanning. The pulses generated and received by the ultrasound machine 11 are recorded by a PC system 12. The amplitudes of selected echoes are evaluated, digitally filtered and displayed areally.

According to the test frequency of the ultrasonic signals is adjusted so that the attenuation of the sound after passing through the plastic skin at the interface

Steel / cavity is as low as possible and the test frequency and the pulse length is adjusted so that compared to a good plastic mass signal amplification or - weakening due to interference between the top of the plastic skin at the interface steel / plastic skin and the bottom of the plastic skin at the

Interface plastic skin / cavity reflects reflected signals.

FIG. 3 shows the resulting representation of the amplitude ratios in FIG

Dependence on the reflected echoes of the signal pulse. Evident is the increasing the echo number significantly increasing contrast ratio of the amplitude signals from the adhesive and the air bubble, which makes the signal analysis and thus clear detection of trapped air bubbles in the plastic of the adhesive joints or the coating possible.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

No, name

1, r tube

2, 2 'casting aid

3 sealing ring

4 cuff

5, 5 'spacer

6 glue

7 bubble

8 water-filled test bath

9 Piezo test head

10 EMUS probe

11 ultrasound machine

12 PC system

Claims

claims

1. A method for testing connections of metallic workpieces with

Plastic masses on cavities by means of ultrasound, wherein the plastic material arranged as an intermediate layer between the workpiece or on one side with the

Workpiece is connected and the cavity are located within the plastic mass, wherein the cavity over a remaining plastic layer or

Plastic skin is connected to the workpiece and wherein at least one Ultraschallprüfkopf the plastic mass from the metallic side of the workpiece with ultrasonic signals of a certain test frequency and pulse length is applied and in particular the reflected from the defects located in the plastic mass ultrasonic signals detected by a same or other Ultraschallprüfkopf and in evaluable electrical signals converted and a

Threshold be subjected

characterized,

that the test frequency of the ultrasonic signals is set in a range between 1 and 10 MHz so that the attenuation of the sound after passing through the

Plastic skin is minimal.

2. The method according to claim 1

characterized,

the test frequency is set between 3 and 7 MHz.

3. Method according to claims 2 and 3

characterized,

after setting the test frequency for minimum attenuation, the

Test frequency and the pulse length are readjusted so that in comparison to a good plastic mass signal amplification or -Schwächung by

Interference between that from the top of the plastic skin at the steel / cavity interface and from the bottom of the plastic skin at the interface

Plastic skin / cavity signals reflected. Method according to one of claims 1 to 3

characterized,

that the pulse length is adjusted so that it is at least twice the remaining residual layer between the cavity and the workpiece.

Method according to claim 4

characterized,

that the pulse length is only so long that an overlay with the next following ultrasonic pulse is avoided.

Method according to one of claims 1 to 5

characterized,

in that the signals reflected from the upper side of the cavity and from the underside of the cavity are used for the evaluation, the amplitude heights of which have the greatest differences with a simultaneously high signal-to-noise ratio.