EP2513256B1 - Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils - Google Patents

Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2513256B1
EP2513256B1 EP10784720.4A EP10784720A EP2513256B1 EP 2513256 B1 EP2513256 B1 EP 2513256B1 EP 10784720 A EP10784720 A EP 10784720A EP 2513256 B1 EP2513256 B1 EP 2513256B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sample
reactor
effected
viscosity
pressure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10784720.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2513256A1 (en
Inventor
Luigi D'elia
Emilio Sentimenti
Giuseppe Guadalupi
Giacomo Fernando Rispoli
Paolo Pollesel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eni SpA
Original Assignee
Eni SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eni SpA filed Critical Eni SpA
Priority to SI201030650T priority Critical patent/SI2513256T1/en
Priority to PL10784720T priority patent/PL2513256T3/en
Publication of EP2513256A1 publication Critical patent/EP2513256A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2513256B1 publication Critical patent/EP2513256B1/en
Priority to CY20141100444T priority patent/CY1115207T1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G15/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils by electric means, electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations, by particle radiation or with gases superheated in electric arcs
    • C10G15/08Cracking of hydrocarbon oils by electric means, electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations, by particle radiation or with gases superheated in electric arcs by electric means or by electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G32/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms
    • C10G32/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms by electric or magnetic means
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1033Oil well production fluids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/30Physical properties of feedstocks or products
    • C10G2300/302Viscosity

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for reducing the viscosity of crude-oils by means of treatment with microwaves.
  • microwaves In the oil industry, numerous applications of microwaves to the production-extraction of petroleum are claimed, in particular from reservoirs of heavy oils, oil sands, oil shales.
  • the inventions relate to methods for the application of microwaves directly in situ, in the reservoir.
  • the extraction of heavy crude oils and non-conventional oils is difficult due to the high viscosity of these crude oils.
  • Particular techniques are used for their extraction, such as CSS (Cyclic Steam Simulation) or SAGD (Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage) which are based on injections of hot vapour into the reservoir to favour the movement of the crude oil and consequently its emission. Techniques of this type are also called "thermal stimulation" of the reservoir.
  • Us 4419214 claims an ameliorative method for the recovery of heavy oil or kerogen from oil shales, or for obtaining heavy hydrocarbons (tar) from low-grade carbons or lignites.
  • These processes which are conventionally effected by heating the rocks containing the oils to 450-550°C (up to 750°C for coal), can be carried out at a much lower temperature (230°C) by irradiation with microwaves having a suitable frequency.
  • the technique described also uses a gas as expelling medium which favours the recovery of liquid hydrocarbons; this aspect is considered particular and ameliorative with respect to previous patents such as US 3,104,711 , which describe the use of the energy supplied by microwaves for favouring the production of oil from reservoir formations.
  • the moving and more generally the reduction in the viscosity of heavy crude oils or residues of crude oil and its processing is normally effected by flushing with lighter hydrocarbon products (e.g. gas oil) and/or by means of thermal processes (e.g. visbreaking). These thermal processes produce, by cracking the heavier molecules, the lighter and less viscous fraction, accompanied by the deposition of coke in the furnaces.
  • lighter hydrocarbon products e.g. gas oil
  • thermal processes e.g. visbreaking
  • the flushing is in fact effected as indicated above, with high-quality light hydrocarbon products: the elimination or reduction in the entity of the flushing provides economical and operative advantages. In this way, a method is obtained for fluidifying and facilitating the movement of crude oils or heavy residues without having to add other products or additives.
  • the process, object of the present invention, for reducing the viscosity of crude oils substantially comprises a separation step of said crude oils in order to separate a light fraction and a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 1,400 ppm, preferably not higher than 1,000 ppm, more preferably not higher than 500 ppm, and a treatment step of said separated heavy fraction by irradiation with microwaves (in continuous or pulsed mode) operating at temperatures ranging from 50 to 350°C, preferably from 100 to 320°C, more preferably from 170 to 280°C, for a period of time ranging from 1 second to 120 minutes, preferably from 10 seconds to 60 minutes, more preferably from 20 seconds to 40 minutes, and with frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 300 GHz, preferably from 0.5 to 30 GHz, more preferably from 0.8 to 7 GHz.
  • microwaves in continuous or pulsed mode
  • the treatment by irradiation with microwaves can preferably be effected on a heavy fraction of the crude oil not containing gas and the light components which boil within the range of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
  • LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
  • Said tratment of irradiation can be preferibly carried out by a particular system of irradiation, described in the examples, which allows to concentrate the irradiation intensity in the reactor zone where the crude oil is present by obtaining better irradiation in shorter times and additional gains such as the decrease of pour point and asphaltenes and stability of p-value.
  • Said treatment of irradiation does not use microwave absorbent materials.
  • the separation step can be a flash or distillation.
  • separation steps of heavy fractions which can be obtained with deasphalting units are also considered effective; these heavy fractions are subsequently subjected to treatment with microwaves.
  • a desalting step can be present upstream of the flash or distillation, consisting of a traditional desalting step, to be preferably effected at 120°C to 130°C with the addition of de-emulsifiers until the water content useful for the application of the invention is reached.
  • the light fraction obtained in the separation step, after being separated from the gases, can be advantageously joined with the heavy fraction treated by irradiation with microwaves.
  • the crude oil, indicated as Gela 55, is a crude oil with 11.6° API and a viscosity of 2540 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C; other characteristics of the crude oil are indicated in the table: Table: Properties of the sample Gela 55 as such Properties Value Water [% v/v] 2.25 Sulphur [%m/m] 6.65 TAN [mg KOH/g] 1.11 Asphaltenes (C7) [% m/m] 14.41
  • the 230°C+ fraction obtained by distillation (Gela 55 230+) and used for the treatment with microwaves was first characterized from a rheological point of view: it is more viscous than the starting crude oil and its dynamic viscosity, measured at the temperature of 38°C, falls within a range of values of 300,000 to 460,000 mPa ⁇ s, depending on the aging state of the sample (UV exposure, presence of an oxidizing environment, etc.). As this, moreover, is a heavier fraction, its asphaltene percentage is also higher with respect to that of the starting crude oil: the C7 asphaltenes are in fact 18.4%.
  • the microwave generation system consists of a magnetron, which emits radiations at 2.45 GHz with a maximum suppliable power of 2,000 W, connected to a circulator for the absorption, through a water charge, of possible reflected radiation, a directional coupler for measuring the direct and reflected power (through which the power absorbed by the sample can be estimated), a 3-stub system for the impedance adjustment, a rectangular waveguide transition with a coaxial line suitable for high powers.
  • the system provided for irradiating the sample being charged is innovative.
  • Said system comprises in particular, a metal flange (1), preferably produced in aluminium as in these examples, to be fixed to the external conductor of the coaxial transition line (2), on which flange a window (3) of material transparent to microwaves (as PTFE (used in these examples), quartz, etc.) is assembled, which supports a cylinder (4), antenna, which is inserted in the central conductor of the coaxial transition line (5) and which protrudes from the window for an appropriate length, suitable for guaranteeing the transmission of the microwaves.
  • This object called also pressure window, allows the sample to be treated to be physically isolated with respect to the microwave generation system, guaranteeing however the transmission of radiation.
  • the pressure sealing system between antenna and PTFE window is obtained with o-rings (6) made of materials transparent to microwaves (silicone, PTFE, etc.).
  • the applicator consists of an aluminium reactor, produced for housing the sample during the treatment: this is a cylindrical recipient, with a useful volume of 200 cc.
  • the material can be stirred during the treatment with a metallic anchor housed on the bottom.
  • the pressure measurement (P) is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement (T) is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the generator is piloted via software developed in a LabView environment and the main process parameters (P, T, Power supplied and reflected) are monitored in continuous and in real time.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 185°C with microwave irradiation with an average power of 600 W in 13', without stirring; this temperature is maintained almost constant for a further 30' with a power of 230 W, again under static conditions.
  • an operator acts manually on the tuning system, varying the insertion depth of the stubs in waveguide in order to minimize the power reflected, which in this example is normally lower than 20-30 W.
  • Figure 2 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the sample is cooled to room temperature and is characterized from a rheological point of view: the viscosity of the product treated with microwaves shows a viscosity of 250,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C, equal to a reduction in the viscosity of 19% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C).
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1, whereas an innovative system different from Example 1 is provided for irradiating the charge.
  • the sample is charged into an aluminium reactor having a useful capacity of 200 cc.
  • the central conductor of the coaxial line protrudes from the pressure window and extends to the bottom of the reactor.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple housed in a specific metallic thermocouple-holder, protruding inside the reactor and completely immersed in the liquid.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with microwave irradiation with a power of 600-800 W in 20', under static conditions; the temperature is then maintained almost constant for a further 15' with an average power of 270 W.
  • the reflected power level is maintained at a value normally lower than 70 W.
  • the maximum temperature reached is 185°C approximately with a maximum pressure of 9 bar.
  • Figure 3 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the rheological characterization is effected: the viscosity of the oil treated is 98,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction in the viscosity of 68.5% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C).
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with a configuration similar to that of Example 2, except for the absence of the metallic thermocouple-holder and the presence of a resistive heating band in contact with the walls of the reactor. In this way, it is only possible to irradiate the sample when this has reached a sufficiently high temperature.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with the resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 900 W for 3', with an average absorbed power of 790 W.
  • the maximum temperature reached is 200°C with a pressure of about 15 bar.
  • Figure 4 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 48,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction of 85% with respect to the product as such characterized by a viscosity at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 5', with an average absorbed power of 785 W.
  • the maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached.
  • the sample At the end of the treatment with microwaves, the sample is kept at a temperature close to 180°C for 30' and is then left to cool.
  • Figure 5 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 39,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial product with a viscosity at 38°C of about 320,000 mPa ⁇ s.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 2', with an average absorbed power of 780 W. The maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 8.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 6 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 240,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial value at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 1,200 W for 2'; the sample absorbs 1,100 W on an average.
  • the maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 7 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 54,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 250 W for 15'; the sample absorbs 245 W on an average.
  • the maximum temperature of 195°C and a pressure of 6.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 8 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 228,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 800 W for 4'; the sample absorbs 750 W on an average.
  • the maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 16.5 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 4.5 bar is measured.
  • Figure 9 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 430,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
  • the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 850 W for 4' 30"; the sample absorbs 760 W on an average.
  • the maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 5 bar is measured.
  • Figure 10 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 35,000 mPa ⁇ s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
  • the instrument used for measuring the dynamic viscosity is an AR 1500 viscometer of TA Instruments with a plate-cone coupling (40 mm, 2°steel).
  • the coupling temperature is first regulated and the sample is subsequently charged at room temperature or already hot on the preheated fixed plate, using a spatula if the sample is extremely viscous, or a dropper if it is fluid.
  • the gap between the plates is brought to 52 microns, care being taken that the sample is well-distributed and that there are no bubbles entrapped in its interior and the plate-cone is left to rotate with a torque suitable for the analysis for about 10 minutes before proceeding with the measurement.
  • Example 2 The characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 2 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
  • the microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38°C to 98,000 mPa ⁇ s against a starting value of 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C (torque applied 90 ⁇ N ⁇ m, share rate at 38°C 0.05116 s -1 ) generating a reduction of 68.5%.
  • the microwave treatment modifies the distribution of the high-molecular-weight molecules, as revealed by the GPC technique: the starting residue has a weight average molecular weight of 3524 with a polydispersity index equal to 5.26, whereas the sample processed has a weight average molecular weight of 2924 and a polydispersity index of 4.6.
  • Example 4 The characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 4 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
  • the microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38°C to 39,000 mPa ⁇ s against a starting value of 320,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C generating a reduction of about 88%.
  • the transformation induced by the method, object of the present invention is surprising as it drastically reduces the viscosity with a modest depression of the PV, unlike the traditional thermal conversions.
  • the table shows the analysis of the gases developed during the treatment with the innovative method: paraffins and light olefins are present together with hydrogen sulfide demonstrating the transformation of the charge at low temperature.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
  • Separation By Low-Temperature Treatments (AREA)
  • Glass Compositions (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)
  • Fats And Perfumes (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a process for reducing the viscosity of crude-oils by means of treatment with microwaves.
  • In the oil industry, numerous applications of microwaves to the production-extraction of petroleum are claimed, in particular from reservoirs of heavy oils, oil sands, oil shales. The inventions relate to methods for the application of microwaves directly in situ, in the reservoir. The extraction of heavy crude oils and non-conventional oils is difficult due to the high viscosity of these crude oils. Particular techniques are used for their extraction, such as CSS (Cyclic Steam Simulation) or SAGD (Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage) which are based on injections of hot vapour into the reservoir to favour the movement of the crude oil and consequently its emission. Techniques of this type are also called "thermal stimulation" of the reservoir. The use of microwaves generated in-situ in the reservoir, causes a targeted heating of the crude oil, which facilitates its movement and consequently its extraction. Applications of this kind are described for example in US 5,082,054 , which describes how to apply electromagnetic radiations having a suitable frequency to favour the extraction of oils from reservoirs, essentially by means of "selective" heating induced by microwaves. The patent describes a kind of protocol for optimizing the type and conditions of irradiation to be applied subsequently in the underground reservoir. This method is mainly applied for non-conventional oils (tar sand, oil shale).
  • US 2007/131591 (Al ) describes the application of microwaves for producing oil from non-conventional oil sources among which: tar sands, oil sands, oil shales, oil cuttings, and slurry oil. The microwave radiations suitably used allow these materials to be at least partially decomposed, obtaining a "petroleum-based product".
  • Us 4419214 claims an ameliorative method for the recovery of heavy oil or kerogen from oil shales, or for obtaining heavy hydrocarbons (tar) from low-grade carbons or lignites. These processes, which are conventionally effected by heating the rocks containing the oils to 450-550°C (up to 750°C for coal), can be carried out at a much lower temperature (230°C) by irradiation with microwaves having a suitable frequency. The technique described also uses a gas as expelling medium which favours the recovery of liquid hydrocarbons; this aspect is considered particular and ameliorative with respect to previous patents such as US 3,104,711 , which describe the use of the energy supplied by microwaves for favouring the production of oil from reservoir formations.
  • The use of electromagnetic waves and in particular microwaves for stimulating the production of hydrocarbons from their reservoirs is therefore known but complex in its set-up, as it envisages the transmission of electromagnetic waves in the subsoil by means of specific devices.
  • The moving and more generally the reduction in the viscosity of heavy crude oils or residues of crude oil and its processing is normally effected by flushing with lighter hydrocarbon products (e.g. gas oil) and/or by means of thermal processes (e.g. visbreaking). These thermal processes produce, by cracking the heavier molecules, the lighter and less viscous fraction, accompanied by the deposition of coke in the furnaces. US 20070056880 describes a process to reduce acidity of hydrocarbon mixtures, whereby additional gains, such as viscosity reduction, are possible. The process includes sending a hydrocarbon stream to a Microwave Treatment Unit.
  • It has now been found that by suitably applying microwaves to the heavier part of crude oil, after separation of the heaviest fraction, the viscosity of this heavy fraction is considerably reduced, permanently and not temporarily, consequently favouring its movement and improving its quality.
  • This partially or totally avoids having to flush the crude oil or residue to reduce its viscosity. The flushing is in fact effected as indicated above, with high-quality light hydrocarbon products: the elimination or reduction in the entity of the flushing provides economical and operative advantages. In this way, a method is obtained for fluidifying and facilitating the movement of crude oils or heavy residues without having to add other products or additives.
  • The process, object of the present invention, for reducing the viscosity of crude oils substantially comprises a separation step of said crude oils in order to separate a light fraction and a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 1,400 ppm, preferably not higher than 1,000 ppm, more preferably not higher than 500 ppm, and a treatment step of said separated heavy fraction by irradiation with microwaves (in continuous or pulsed mode) operating at temperatures ranging from 50 to 350°C, preferably from 100 to 320°C, more preferably from 170 to 280°C, for a period of time ranging from 1 second to 120 minutes, preferably from 10 seconds to 60 minutes, more preferably from 20 seconds to 40 minutes, and with frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 300 GHz, preferably from 0.5 to 30 GHz, more preferably from 0.8 to 7 GHz.
  • More specifically, the treatment by irradiation with microwaves can preferably be effected on a heavy fraction of the crude oil not containing gas and the light components which boil within the range of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
  • Said tratment of irradiation can be preferibly carried out by a particular system of irradiation, described in the examples, which allows to concentrate the irradiation intensity in the reactor zone where the crude oil is present by obtaining better irradiation in shorter times and additional gains such as the decrease of pour point and asphaltenes and stability of p-value.
  • Said treatment of irradiation does not use microwave absorbent materials.
  • The separation step can be a flash or distillation.
  • For the purposes of the present invention, separation steps of heavy fractions which can be obtained with deasphalting units are also considered effective; these heavy fractions are subsequently subjected to treatment with microwaves.
  • A desalting step can be present upstream of the flash or distillation, consisting of a traditional desalting step, to be preferably effected at 120°C to 130°C with the addition of de-emulsifiers until the water content useful for the application of the invention is reached.
  • The light fraction obtained in the separation step, after being separated from the gases, can be advantageously joined with the heavy fraction treated by irradiation with microwaves.
  • The following examples, whose purpose is to provide a better illustration of the invention, should not be considered as limiting the same.
  • EXAMPLES
  • A heavy aromatic crude oil from which the lighter fractions had been removed by distillation (sample consisting of the fraction 230°C + Gela crude oil), was used as sample for the experimentation.
  • CRUDE OIL
  • The crude oil, indicated as Gela 55, is a crude oil with 11.6° API and a viscosity of 2540 mPa·s at 38°C; other characteristics of the crude oil are indicated in the table: Table: Properties of the sample Gela 55 as such
    Properties Value
    Water [% v/v] 2.25
    Sulphur [%m/m] 6.65
    TAN [mg KOH/g] 1.11
    Asphaltenes (C7) [% m/m] 14.41
  • The 230°C+ fraction obtained by distillation (Gela 55 230+) and used for the treatment with microwaves was first characterized from a rheological point of view: it is more viscous than the starting crude oil and its dynamic viscosity, measured at the temperature of 38°C, falls within a range of values of 300,000 to 460,000 mPa·s, depending on the aging state of the sample (UV exposure, presence of an oxidizing environment, etc.). As this, moreover, is a heavier fraction, its asphaltene percentage is also higher with respect to that of the starting crude oil: the C7 asphaltenes are in fact 18.4%.
  • The samples of Gela 55 230+ were treated with microwave radiation with a frequency of 2.45 GHz, adopting different plant configurations, with very different results depending on the set-up selected.
  • Example 1
  • Approximately 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor (applicator) connected to an industrial microwave generator, according to the scheme shown in figure 1a.
  • The microwave generation system consists of a magnetron, which emits radiations at 2.45 GHz with a maximum suppliable power of 2,000 W, connected to a circulator for the absorption, through a water charge, of possible reflected radiation, a directional coupler for measuring the direct and reflected power (through which the power absorbed by the sample can be estimated), a 3-stub system for the impedance adjustment, a rectangular waveguide transition with a coaxial line suitable for high powers.
  • The system provided for irradiating the sample being charged, shown in fig. 1b, is innovative. Said system comprises in particular, a metal flange (1), preferably produced in aluminium as in these examples, to be fixed to the external conductor of the coaxial transition line (2), on which flange a window (3) of material transparent to microwaves (as PTFE (used in these examples), quartz, etc.) is assembled, which supports a cylinder (4), antenna, which is inserted in the central conductor of the coaxial transition line (5) and which protrudes from the window for an appropriate length, suitable for guaranteeing the transmission of the microwaves. This object, called also pressure window, allows the sample to be treated to be physically isolated with respect to the microwave generation system, guaranteeing however the transmission of radiation. The pressure sealing system between antenna and PTFE window is obtained with o-rings (6) made of materials transparent to microwaves (silicone, PTFE, etc.).
  • The applicator consists of an aluminium reactor, produced for housing the sample during the treatment: this is a cylindrical recipient, with a useful volume of 200 cc. The material can be stirred during the treatment with a metallic anchor housed on the bottom.
  • The pressure measurement (P) is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement (T) is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The generator is piloted via software developed in a LabView environment and the main process parameters (P, T, Power supplied and reflected) are monitored in continuous and in real time.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 185°C with microwave irradiation with an average power of 600 W in 13', without stirring; this temperature is maintained almost constant for a further 30' with a power of 230 W, again under static conditions. During the treatment, an operator acts manually on the tuning system, varying the insertion depth of the stubs in waveguide in order to minimize the power reflected, which in this example is normally lower than 20-30 W.
  • A temperature of 195°C and a pressure of 6.3 bar are reached.
  • Figure 2 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • At the end of the test the sample is cooled to room temperature and is characterized from a rheological point of view: the viscosity of the product treated with microwaves shows a viscosity of 250,000 mPa·s at 38°C, equal to a reduction in the viscosity of 19% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa·s at 38°C).
  • Example 2
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1, whereas an innovative system different from Example 1 is provided for irradiating the charge.
  • In particular, the sample is charged into an aluminium reactor having a useful capacity of 200 cc. The central conductor of the coaxial line protrudes from the pressure window and extends to the bottom of the reactor.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple housed in a specific metallic thermocouple-holder, protruding inside the reactor and completely immersed in the liquid.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with microwave irradiation with a power of 600-800 W in 20', under static conditions; the temperature is then maintained almost constant for a further 15' with an average power of 270 W. By manipulating the stubs, the reflected power level is maintained at a value normally lower than 70 W.
  • The maximum temperature reached is 185°C approximately with a maximum pressure of 9 bar.
  • Figure 3 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • After cooling the sample, the rheological characterization is effected: the viscosity of the oil treated is 98,000 mPa·s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction in the viscosity of 68.5% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa·s at 38°C).
  • Example 3
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator. The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1, whereas a variant of the innovative system is provided for irradiating the charge described in Example 2.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with a configuration similar to that of Example 2, except for the absence of the metallic thermocouple-holder and the presence of a resistive heating band in contact with the walls of the reactor. In this way, it is only possible to irradiate the sample when this has reached a sufficiently high temperature.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with the resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 900 W for 3', with an average absorbed power of 790 W.
  • The maximum temperature reached is 200°C with a pressure of about 15 bar.
  • Figure 4 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • After cooling, a pressure of 4.5 bar is measured, higher with respect to the initial value of 1.5 bar, an index of the gas production.
  • The viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 48,000 mPa·s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction of 85% with respect to the product as such characterized by a viscosity at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa·s.
  • Example 4
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 5', with an average absorbed power of 785 W. The maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached.
  • At the end of the treatment with microwaves, the sample is kept at a temperature close to 180°C for 30' and is then left to cool.
  • Figure 5 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • After cooling, a final pressure of 5 bar is measured, much higher with respect to the initial value of 3 bar: from the mass balance, a production of 1.0 g of gas is estimated, which proves to be methane (29%), H2S (28%), ethane (14%), propane (7%), N-butane (2%), H2 (2%), and other gases (18%).
  • The viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 39,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial product with a viscosity at 38°C of about 320,000 mPa·s.
  • Example 5
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 2', with an average absorbed power of 780 W. The maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 8.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 6 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • After cooling, a final pressure of 4.5 bar is measured, higher than the initial value of 3 bar.
  • The viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 240,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial value at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa·s.
  • On comparing the results obtained in the test of Example 4, carried out with the same power, can be verified the importance of the irradiation times of the sample.
  • Example 6
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 1,200 W for 2'; the sample absorbs 1,100 W on an average. The maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 7 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • After cooling, a final pressure of 5 bar is measured.
  • The end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 54,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa·s at 38°C.
  • With respect to the test of Example 5, the use of higher powers, with the same duration of the treatment, allows to obtain a much greater reduction in the viscosity.
  • Example 7
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 250 W for 15'; the sample absorbs 245 W on an average. The maximum temperature of 195°C and a pressure of 6.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
  • Figure 8 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • The end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 228,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa·s at 38°C.
  • From the results, it is evident that the prolonged treatment times but with lower powers do not induce significant reductions in the viscosity.
  • Example 8
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 800 W for 4'; the sample absorbs 750 W on an average. The maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 16.5 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 4.5 bar is measured.
  • Figure 9 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • The end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 430,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa·s at 38°C.
  • The results show the repeatability of the treatment with respect to the data obtained from the test of Example 4, the operative conditions adopted being similar.
  • Example 9
  • 120 g of Gela 55 230+ are treated in a metallic reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
  • The system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
  • The pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
  • The sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 850 W for 4' 30"; the sample absorbs 760 W on an average. The maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 5 bar is measured.
  • Figure 10 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b).
  • The end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 35,000 mPa·s, with respect to the initial value of about 310,000 mPa·s at 38°C.
  • The results again show the repeatability of the treatment with microwaves with respect to the data obtained from the test of Example 4, the operative conditions adopted being similar.
  • CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SAMPLES TREATED Measurement of the viscosity
  • The instrument used for measuring the dynamic viscosity is an AR 1500 viscometer of TA Instruments with a plate-cone coupling (40 mm, 2°steel).
  • For effecting the measurement, the coupling temperature is first regulated and the sample is subsequently charged at room temperature or already hot on the preheated fixed plate, using a spatula if the sample is extremely viscous, or a dropper if it is fluid. The gap between the plates is brought to 52 microns, care being taken that the sample is well-distributed and that there are no bubbles entrapped in its interior and the plate-cone is left to rotate with a torque suitable for the analysis for about 10 minutes before proceeding with the measurement.
  • CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRODUCT FROM GELA 55 230+ OF EXAMPLE 2
  • The characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 2 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
  • The microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38°C to 98,000 mPa·s against a starting value of 310,000 mPa·s at 38°C (torque applied 90 µN·m, share rate at 38°C 0.05116 s-1) generating a reduction of 68.5%.
  • This reduction in viscosity was observed within a wide temperature range (from 38 to 90°C) and is maintained with time, except for the "hardening" due to the oxidation of the sample, UV exposure, etc. (figure 11 (a)). In particular (figure 11 (b)) five consecutive determinations of the viscosity at 38°C of the product were diagrammed, effected over a period of two months following irradiation, against the viscosity determinations at 38°C of the charge: it can be deduced that the reduction generated by the microwaves is permanent and not temporary. On comparing the distillation curves obtained with the "simulated" distillation technique SIM-DIST, a slight shift of the yield towards lighter fractions up to 570°C, can be observed in the product compared with the charge. In particular, a decrease of about 1.53% m/m of the 500°C+ fraction is observed.
  • The microwave treatment modifies the distribution of the high-molecular-weight molecules, as revealed by the GPC technique: the starting residue has a weight average molecular weight of 3524 with a polydispersity index equal to 5.26, whereas the sample processed has a weight average molecular weight of 2924 and a polydispersity index of 4.6.
  • CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRODUCT FROM GELA 55 230+ OF EXAMPLE 4
  • The characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 4 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
  • The microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38°C to 39,000 mPa·s against a starting value of 320,000 mPa·s at 38°C generating a reduction of about 88%.
  • On comparing the distillation curves obtained with the "simulated" distillation technique SIM-DIST, a shift of the yield towards lighter fractions, can be observed in the product compared with the charge; in particular, a decrease of about 5% m/m of the 500°C+ fraction is observed.
  • The measurement of the colloidal stability of the asphaltene agglomerates of the product, determined with the method Peptization Value (PV) SMS 1600-01, is PV = 2.4 slightly lower than the value of the charge equal to PV = 3.0. The transformation induced by the method, object of the present invention is surprising as it drastically reduces the viscosity with a modest depression of the PV, unlike the traditional thermal conversions.
  • The table shows the analysis of the gases developed during the treatment with the innovative method: paraffins and light olefins are present together with hydrogen sulfide demonstrating the transformation of the charge at low temperature.
    Example 4
    gas % moles
    hydrogen 2.16
    carbon monoxide 2.23
    carbon dioxide 1.41
    methane 29.38
    ethane 13.96
    ethylene 1.57
    propane 6.75
    Propylene 3.54
    Isobutane 0.44
    n.butane 2.39
    H2S 28.13
    1-butene 0.99
    Isobutene 0.96
    tr.2-butene 0.30
    Isopentane 0.37
    cis 2-butene 0.21
    n.pentane 0.75
    C5+ 4.46
    100.00

Claims (8)

  1. A process for the reduction of the viscosity of crude oils, substantially comprising a separation step of said crude oils in order to separate a light fraction and a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 1,400 ppm and a treatment step of said separated heavy fraction by means of microwave irradiation, operating at temperatures ranging from 50 to 350°C, for a time period of between 1 sec. and 120 min. and with frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 300 GHz where said irradiation is carried out by a system comprising a metal flange (1) to be fixed to the external conductor of the coaxial transition line (2), on which flange a window (3) of material transparent to microwaves is assembled, which supports a cylinder (4), antenna, which is inserted in the central conductor of the coaxial transition line (5), said antenna protruding from the window for an appropriate length, suitable for guaranteeing the transmission of the microwaves.
  2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the treatment step by means of microwave irradiation is effected operating at temperatures ranging from 100 to 320°C, for a period of time of between 10 sec. and 60 min. and with frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 30 GHz.
  3. The process according to claim 2, wherein the treatment step by means of microwave irradiation is effected operating at temperatures ranging from 170 to 280°C, for a period of time of between 20 sec. and 40 min. and with frequencies ranging from 0.8 to 7 GHz.
  4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the light fraction, after being separated from the gases, is mixed with the heavy fraction treated by means of microwave irradiation.
  5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the separation of the crude oils is effected so as to have a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 1,000 ppm.
  6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the separation of the crude oils is effected so as to have a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 500 ppm.
  7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the separation step is a flash or a distillation.
  8. The process according to claim 1, wherein upstream of the flash or distillation there is a desalting step.
EP10784720.4A 2009-12-14 2010-11-30 Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils Active EP2513256B1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SI201030650T SI2513256T1 (en) 2009-12-14 2010-11-30 Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils
PL10784720T PL2513256T3 (en) 2009-12-14 2010-11-30 Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils
CY20141100444T CY1115207T1 (en) 2009-12-14 2014-06-18 METHOD TO REDUCE THE Viscosity of Petroleum

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT002183A ITMI20092183A1 (en) 2009-12-14 2009-12-14 PROCEDURE TO REDUCE THE VISCOSITY OF CRUDES
PCT/EP2010/007284 WO2011072804A1 (en) 2009-12-14 2010-11-30 Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2513256A1 EP2513256A1 (en) 2012-10-24
EP2513256B1 true EP2513256B1 (en) 2014-03-19

Family

ID=42557310

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10784720.4A Active EP2513256B1 (en) 2009-12-14 2010-11-30 Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2513256B1 (en)
CY (1) CY1115207T1 (en)
ES (1) ES2473540T3 (en)
HR (1) HRP20140574T1 (en)
IT (1) ITMI20092183A1 (en)
PL (1) PL2513256T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2513256E (en)
SI (1) SI2513256T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011072804A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108003921B (en) * 2017-12-26 2019-11-05 广东石油化工学院 A kind of heavy oil faces hydrogen microwave-heating reaction system and method

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3104711A (en) 1963-09-24 haagensen
US4067683A (en) * 1976-06-14 1978-01-10 Frank T. Sullivan, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling fluency of high viscosity hydrocarbon fluids
US4234402A (en) * 1978-10-24 1980-11-18 Kirkbride Chalmer G Sulfur removal from crude petroleum
CA2009782A1 (en) 1990-02-12 1991-08-12 Anoosh I. Kiamanesh In-situ tuned microwave oil extraction process
AU1568195A (en) * 1994-09-28 1996-04-19 Eagle Petro-Tech, Inc. A differential dielectric heating process for crude petroleum
WO1996013621A1 (en) * 1994-10-31 1996-05-09 Krogh Ole D An ecr plasma source
BRPI0503793B1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2014-12-30 Petroleo Brasileiro Sa ACIDITY REDUCTION PROCESS FOR HYDROCARBON MIXTURES
WO2007081493A2 (en) 2005-12-14 2007-07-19 Mobilestream Oil, Inc. Microwave-based recovery of hydrocarbons and fossil fuels
MX2010013531A (en) * 2008-06-27 2010-12-21 Schlumberger Technology Bv Apparatus and process for upgrading crude oil using microwave radiation.
WO2010039782A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-08 Global Resource Corporation Microwave-based conveying devices and processing of carbonaceous materials
IT1396576B1 (en) * 2009-10-22 2012-12-14 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR REDUCING VISCOSITY OF PETROLEUM RESIDUES FROM DISTILLATION AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE OR UNDER VACUUM

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2513256A1 (en) 2012-10-24
PT2513256E (en) 2014-06-25
WO2011072804A1 (en) 2011-06-23
WO2011072804A8 (en) 2011-09-29
CY1115207T1 (en) 2017-01-04
PL2513256T3 (en) 2014-09-30
ES2473540T3 (en) 2014-07-07
HRP20140574T1 (en) 2014-08-01
ITMI20092183A1 (en) 2011-06-15
SI2513256T1 (en) 2014-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Taheri-Shakib et al. Analysis of the asphaltene properties of heavy crude oil under ultrasonic and microwave irradiation
Taheri-Shakib et al. The experimental study of effect of microwave heating time on the heavy oil properties: Prospects for heavy oil upgrading
Taheri-Shakib et al. Heavy crude oil upgrading using nanoparticles by applying electromagnetic technique
Mutyala et al. Microwave applications to oil sands and petroleum: A review
US7441597B2 (en) Method and apparatus for in-situ radiofrequency assisted gravity drainage of oil (RAGD)
EP2225350B1 (en) Microwave-promoted desulfurization of crude oil
US8916042B2 (en) Upgrading heavy oil and bitumen with an initiator
Yang et al. Experimental investigation of the transformation of oil shale with fracturing fluids under microwave heating in the presence of nanoparticles
Adam et al. In-situ microwave-assisted catalytic upgrading of heavy oil: Experimental validation and effect of catalyst pore structure on activity
Mozafari et al. Operational conditions effects on Iranian heavy oil upgrading using microwave irradiation
Jia et al. In situ catalytic upgrading of heavy crude oil through low-temperature oxidation
Neto et al. The oil shale transformation in the presence of an acidic BEA zeolite under microwave irradiation
Nasri et al. Multivariable statistical analysis and optimization of Iranian heavy crude oil upgrading using microwave technology by response surface methodology (RSM)
Mohapatra et al. Bitumen heavy oil upgrading by cavitation processing: effect on asphaltene separation, rheology, and metal content
US20150090635A1 (en) Hydrocarbon resource processing device including radio frequency applicator and related methods
Nasri Upgrading vacuum distillation residue of oil refinery using microwave irradiation
EP2513256B1 (en) Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils
Taheri-Shakib et al. The influence of electromagnetic waves on the gas condensate characterisation: experimental evaluation
Kholmurodov et al. Innovative dual injection technique of nonionic surfactants and catalysts to enhance heavy oil conversion via aquathermolysis
Miadonye et al. Microwave radiation induced visbreaking of heavy crude oil
Hussein et al. Study the Effect of Using Microwave Radiation and H-Donors on Improving Heavy Oil
CA2566117C (en) Viscoelastic upgrading of heavy oil by altering its elastic modulus
WO2011047829A1 (en) Process for reducing the viscosity of oil residues coming from distillation at atmospheric pressure or under vacuum
Abbas et al. Improving the properties of the Iraqi vacuum oil by the effect of ultrasonic exposure time
Abdelsalam et al. Influence of FеР and Al (H2PO4) 3 Nanocatalysts on the Thermolysis of Heavy Oil in N2 Medium. Catalysts 2023, 13, 390

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120613

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20131030

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 657694

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010014497

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: TUEP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20140617

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2473540

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20140707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: T1PR

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140619

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140719

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010014497

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20141222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010014497

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20141222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140620

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20101130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20181107

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20191112

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20201105

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20211108

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20221103

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20140574

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20231106

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231126

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231201

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20231110

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20231102

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20231110

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20231129

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: MT

Payment date: 20231103

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231122

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: HR

Payment date: 20231106

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231127

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231129

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20231108

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: CY

Payment date: 20231101

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231102

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20231103

Year of fee payment: 14