EP2513256A1 - Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils - Google Patents
Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oilsInfo
- Publication number
- EP2513256A1 EP2513256A1 EP10784720A EP10784720A EP2513256A1 EP 2513256 A1 EP2513256 A1 EP 2513256A1 EP 10784720 A EP10784720 A EP 10784720A EP 10784720 A EP10784720 A EP 10784720A EP 2513256 A1 EP2513256 A1 EP 2513256A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sample
- reactor
- viscosity
- effected
- pressure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G15/00—Cracking of hydrocarbon oils by electric means, electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations, by particle radiation or with gases superheated in electric arcs
- C10G15/08—Cracking of hydrocarbon oils by electric means, electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations, by particle radiation or with gases superheated in electric arcs by electric means or by electromagnetic or mechanical vibrations
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G32/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms
- C10G32/02—Refining of hydrocarbon oils by electric or magnetic means, by irradiation, or by using microorganisms by electric or magnetic means
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/10—Feedstock materials
- C10G2300/1033—Oil well production fluids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2300/00—Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
- C10G2300/20—Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
- C10G2300/30—Physical properties of feedstocks or products
- C10G2300/302—Viscosity
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process for reducing the viscosity of crude-oils by means of treatment with microwaves .
- microwaves In the oil industry, numerous applications of microwaves to the production-extraction of petroleum are claimed, in particular from reservoirs of heavy oils, oil sands, oil shales.
- the inventions relate to methods for the application of microwaves directly in situ, in the reservoir.
- the extraction of heavy crude oils and non-conventional oils is difficult due to the high viscosity of these crude oils.
- Particular techniques are used for their extraction, such as CSS (Cyclic Steam Simulation) or SAGD (Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage) which are based on injections of hot vapour into the reservoir to favour the movement of the crude oil and consequently its emission. Techniques of this type are also called "thermal stimulation" of the reservoir.
- microwaves generated in- situ in the reservoir causes a targeted heating of the crude oil, which facilitates its movement and consequently its extraction.
- Applications of this kind are described for example in US 5,082,054, which describes how to apply electromagnetic radiations having a suitable frequency to favour the extraction of oils from reservoirs, essentially by means of "selective" heating induced by microwaves.
- the patent describes a kind of protocol for optimizing the type and conditions of irradiation to be applied subsequently in the underground reservoir. This method is mainly applied for non-conventional oils (tar sand, oil shale) .
- Us 4419214 claims an ameliorative method for the recovery of heavy oil or kerogen from oil shales, or for obtaining heavy hydrocarbons (tar) from low-grade carbons or lignites.
- These processes which are conventionally effected by heating the rocks containing the oils to 450-550°C (up to 750°C for coal) , can be carried out at a much lower temperature (230°C) by irradiation with microwaves having a suitable frequency.
- the technique described also uses a gas as expelling medium which favours the recovery of liquid hydrocarbons; this aspect is considered particular and ameliorative with respect to previous patents such as US 3,104,711, which describe the use of the energy supplied by microwaves for favouring the production of oil from reservoir formations.
- the moving and more generally the reduction in the viscosity of heavy crude oils or residues of crude oil and its processing is normally effected by flushing with lighter hydrocarbon products (e.g. gas oil) and/or by means of thermal processes (e.g. visbreaking) .
- lighter hydrocarbon products e.g. gas oil
- thermal processes e.g. visbreaking
- the flushing is in fact effected as indicated above, with high-quality light hydrocarbon products: the elimination or reduction in the entity of the flushing provides economical and operative advantages. In this way, a method is obtained for fluidifying and facilitating the movement of crude oils or heavy residues without having to add other products or additives.
- the process, object of the present invention, for reducing the viscosity of crude oils substantially comprises a separation step of said crude oils in order to separate a light fraction and a heavy fraction having a residual water content not higher than 1,400 ppm, preferably not higher than 1,000 ppm, more preferably not higher than 500 ppm, and a treatment step of said heavy fraction separated by irradiation with microwaves (in continuous or pulsed mode) operating at temperatures ranging from 50 to 350 °C, preferably from 100 to 320°C, more preferably from 170 to 280 °C, for a period of time ranging from 1 second to 120 minutes, preferably from 10 seconds to 60 minutes, more preferably from 20 seconds to 40 minutes, and with frequencies ranging from 0.3 to 300 GHz, preferably from 0.5 to 30 GHz, more preferably from 0.8 to 7 GHz.
- microwaves in continuous or pulsed mode
- the treatment by irradiation with microwaves can preferably be effected on a heavy fraction of the crude oil not containing gas and the light components which boil within the range of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) .
- LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
- Said tratment of irradiation can be preferibly carried out by a particular system of irradiation, described in the examples, which allows to concentrate the irradiation intensity in the reactor zone where the crude oil is present by obtaining better irradiation in shorter times and additional gains such as the decrease of pour point and asphaltenes and stability of p-value.
- Said treatment of irradiation does not use microwave absorbent materials .
- the separation step can be a flash or distillation.
- separation steps of heavy fractions which can be obtained with deasphalting units are also considered effective; these heavy fractions are subsequently subjected to treatment with microwaves.
- a desalting step can be present upstream of the flash or distillation, consisting of a traditional desalting step, to be preferably effected at 120°C to 130°C with the addition of de-emulsifiers until the water content useful for the application of the invention is reached.
- the light fraction obtained in the separation step, after being separated from the gases, can be advantageously joined with the heavy fraction treated by irradiation with microwaves.
- the crude oil indicated as Gela 55, is a crude oil with 11.6° API and a viscosity of 2540 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C; other characteristics of the crude oil are indicated in the table :
- the 230°C+ fraction obtained by distillation (Gela 55 230+) and used for the treatment with microwaves was first characterized from a rheological point of view: it is more viscous than the starting crude oil and its dynamic viscosity, measured at the temperature of 38 °C, falls within a range of values of 300,000 to 460,000 mPa ⁇ s , depending on the aging state of the sample (UV exposure, presence of an oxidizing environment, etc.). As this, moreover, is a heavier fraction, its asphaltene percentage is also higher with respect to that of the starting crude oil: the C7 asphaltenes are in fact 18.4%.
- the microwave generation system consists of a magnetron, which emits radiations at 2.45 GHz with a maximum suppliable power of 2,000 W, connected to a circulator for the absorption, through a water charge, of possible reflected radiation, a directional coupler for measuring the direct and reflected power (through which the power absorbed by the sample can be estimated) , a 3 -stub system for the impedance adjustment, a rectangular waveguide transition with a coaxial line suitable for high powers.
- the system provided for irradiating the sample being charged shown in fig. lb, is innovative.
- Said system comprises in particular, a metal flange (1) , preferably produced in aluminium as in these examples, to be fixed to the external conductor of the coaxial transition line (2), on which flange a window (3) of material transparent to microwaves (as PTFE (used in these examples), quartz, etc.) is assembled, which supports a cylinder (4) , antenna, which is inserted in the central conductor of the coaxial transition line (5) and which protrudes from the window for an appropriate length, suitable for guaranteeing the transmission of the microwaves.
- This object called also pressure window, allows the sample to be treated to be physically isolated with respect to the microwave generation system, guaranteeing however the transmission of radiation.
- the pressure sealing system between antenna and PTFE window is obtained with o- rings (6) made of materials transparent to microwaves (silicone, PTFE, etc.) .
- the applicator consists of an aluminium reactor, produced for housing the sample during the treatment: this is a cylindrical recipient, with a useful volume of 200 cc.
- the material can be stirred during the treatment with a metallic anchor housed on the bottom.
- the pressure measurement (P) is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement (T) is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the generator is piloted via software developed in a LabView environment and the main process parameters (P, T, Power supplied and reflected) are monitored in continuous and in real time.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 185°C with microwave irradiation with an average power of 600 W in 13', without stirring; this temperature is maintained almost constant for a further 30' with a power of 230 , again under static conditions.
- an operator acts manually on the tuning system, varying the insertion depth of the stubs in waveguide in order to minimize the power reflected, which in this example is normally lower than 20-30 W.
- Figure 2 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the sample is cooled to room temperature and is characterized from a rheological point of view: the viscosity of the product treated with microwaves shows a viscosity of 250,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38 °C, equal to a reduction in the viscosity of 19% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa-s at 38°C) .
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1, whereas an innovative system different from Example 1 is provided for irradiating the charge.
- the sample is charged into an aluminium reactor having a useful capacity of 200 cc .
- the central conductor of the coaxial line protrudes from the pressure window and extends to the bottom of the reactor.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple housed in a specific metallic thermocouple -holder , protruding inside the reactor and completely immersed in the liquid.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with microwave irradiation with a power of 600-800 W in 20', under static conditions; the temperature is then maintained almost constant for a further 15' with an average power of 270 W.
- the reflected power level is maintained at a value normally lower than 70 W.
- the maximum temperature reached is 185 °C approximately with a maximum pressure of 9 bar.
- Figure 3 shows the temperature trend (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the rheological characterization is effected: the viscosity of the oil treated is 98,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction in the viscosity of 68.5% approximately with respect to the starting value (310,000 mPa-s at 38°C).
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with a configuration similar to that of Example 2, except for the absence of the metallic thermocouple-holder and the presence of a resistive heating band in contact with the walls of the reactor. In this way, it is only possible to irradiate the sample when this has reached a sufficiently high temperature.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen; the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with the resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 900 W for 3', with an average absorbed power of 790 W.
- the maximum temperature reached is 200°C with a pressure of about 15 bar.
- Figure 4 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 48,000 mPa-s at 38°C, corresponding to a reduction of 85% with respect to the product as such characterized by a viscosity at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa-s.
- Example 4 reactor connected to an industrial microwave generator.
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180 °C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 5', with an average absorbed power of 785 W.
- the maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached.
- the sample is kept at a temperature close to 180 °C for 30' and is then left to cool.
- Figure 5 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 39,000 mPa-s, with respect to the initial product with a viscosity at 38°C of about 320,000 mPa-s.
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves at 800 W for 2', with an average absorbed power of 780 W.
- the maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 8.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
- Figure 6 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the viscosity at 38°C of the oil treated is 240,000 mPa ⁇ s , with respect to the initial value at 38°C of about 310,000 mPa ⁇ s .
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen-, the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 1,200 for 2'; the sample absorbs 1,100 W on an average.
- the maximum temperature of 200°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
- Figure 7 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the end-product has a viscosity at 38 °C of 54,000 mPa ⁇ s , with respect to the initial value of about 310, 000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 250 for 15'; the sample absorbs 245 W on an average.
- the maximum temperature of 195°C and a pressure of 6.5 bar are reached and the sample is left to cool.
- Figure 8 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 228,000 mPa ⁇ s , with respect to the initial value of about
- the system upstream of the reactor (generator, directional coupler, tuner, waveguide/coaxial transition) is the same as Example 1.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 800 W for 4'; the sample absorbs 750 W on an average.
- the maximum temperature of 215 °C and a pressure of 16.5 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 4.5 bar is measured.
- Figure 9 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 430,000 mPa ⁇ s , with respect to the initial value of about 310, 000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, according to a configuration equal to that of Example 3.
- the pressure measurement is effected with a pressure transducer connected to the pressure window, whereas the temperature measurement is effected with a thermocouple by means of a cavity situated on the bottom of the reactor.
- the sample is charged into the reactor, with an initial pressure of 3 bar of nitrogen: the oil is brought to a temperature of 180°C with a resistive band fixed on the side walls of the reactor; the sample is subsequently irradiated with microwaves with an average power of 850 W for 4' 30"; the sample absorbs 760 W on an average.
- the maximum temperature of 215°C and a pressure of 17 bar are reached; at the end of the irradiation, the sample is maintained at a temperature of about 185°C for 30' and is then left to cool. When cold, a residual pressure of 5 bar is measured.
- Figure 10 shows the temperature and pressure profiles (a) and the graph of the power supplied, reflected (values measured) and power absorbed by the sample (estimated) (b) .
- the end-product has a viscosity at 38°C of 35,000 mPa ⁇ s , with respect to the initial value of about 310, 000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C.
- the instrument used for measuring the dynamic viscosity is an AR 1500 viscometer of TA Instruments with a plate-cone coupling (40 mm, 2°steel) .
- the coupling temperature is first regulated and the sample is subsequently charged at room temperature or already hot on the preheated fixed plate, using a spatula if the sample is extremely viscous, or a dropper if it is fluid.
- the gap between the plates is brought to 52 microns, care being taken that the sample is well- distributed and that there are no bubbles entrapped in its interior and the plate-cone is left to rotate with a torque suitable for the analysis for about 10 minutes before proceeding with the measurement.
- Example 2 The characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 2 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
- the microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38 °C to 98,000 mPa-s against a starting value of 310,000 mPa ⁇ s at 38°C
- the microwave treatment modifies the distribution of the high-molecular-weight molecules, as revealed by the GPC technique: the starting residue has a weight average molecular weight of 3524 with a polydispersity index equal to 5.26, whereas the sample processed has a weight average molecular weight of 2924 and a polydispersity index of 4.6.
- Example 4 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRODUCT FROM GELA 55 230+ OF EXAMPLE 4
- the characterizations effected on the sample obtained in Example 4 clearly show the effectiveness of the microwave radiation in terms of both reduction in the viscosity and improvement in the quality with respect to the starting charge consisting of Gela 55 230+.
- the microwave treatment in fact reduces the viscosity of the product at 38°C to 39,000 mPa ⁇ s against a starting value of 320,000 mPa-s at 38°C generating a reduction of about 88%.
- the transformation induced by the method, object of the present invention is surprising as it drastically reduces the viscosity with a modest depression of the PV, unlike the traditional thermal conversions.
- the table shows the analysis of the gases developed during the treatment with the innovative method: paraffins and light olefins are present together with hydrogen sulfide demonstrating the transformation of the charge at low temperature .
- Example 4 gas % moles hydrogen 2.16 carbon monoxide 2.23 carbon dioxide 1.41 methane 29.38 ethane 13.96 ethylene 1.57 propane 6.75
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
- Fats And Perfumes (AREA)
- Lubricants (AREA)
- Glass Compositions (AREA)
- Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
- Separation By Low-Temperature Treatments (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PL10784720T PL2513256T3 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-11-30 | Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils |
| SI201030650T SI2513256T1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-11-30 | Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils |
| CY20141100444T CY1115207T1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2014-06-18 | METHOD TO REDUCE THE Viscosity of Petroleum |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| IT002183A ITMI20092183A1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2009-12-14 | PROCEDURE TO REDUCE THE VISCOSITY OF CRUDES |
| PCT/EP2010/007284 WO2011072804A1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-11-30 | Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2513256A1 true EP2513256A1 (en) | 2012-10-24 |
| EP2513256B1 EP2513256B1 (en) | 2014-03-19 |
Family
ID=42557310
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP10784720.4A Active EP2513256B1 (en) | 2009-12-14 | 2010-11-30 | Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2513256B1 (en) |
| CY (1) | CY1115207T1 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2473540T3 (en) |
| HR (1) | HRP20140574T1 (en) |
| IT (1) | ITMI20092183A1 (en) |
| PL (1) | PL2513256T3 (en) |
| PT (1) | PT2513256E (en) |
| SI (1) | SI2513256T1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2011072804A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108003921B (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2019-11-05 | 广东石油化工学院 | A kind of heavy oil faces hydrogen microwave-heating reaction system and method |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3104711A (en) | 1963-09-24 | haagensen | ||
| US4067683A (en) * | 1976-06-14 | 1978-01-10 | Frank T. Sullivan, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling fluency of high viscosity hydrocarbon fluids |
| US4234402A (en) * | 1978-10-24 | 1980-11-18 | Kirkbride Chalmer G | Sulfur removal from crude petroleum |
| CA2009782A1 (en) | 1990-02-12 | 1991-08-12 | Anoosh I. Kiamanesh | In-situ tuned microwave oil extraction process |
| WO1996010065A1 (en) * | 1994-09-28 | 1996-04-04 | Phonon Technologies, Inc. | A differential dielectric heating process for crude petroleum |
| WO1996013621A1 (en) * | 1994-10-31 | 1996-05-09 | Krogh Ole D | An ecr plasma source |
| BRPI0503793B1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2014-12-30 | Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | ACIDITY REDUCTION PROCESS FOR HYDROCARBON MIXTURES |
| CA2633091A1 (en) | 2005-12-14 | 2007-07-19 | Mobilestream Oil, Inc. | Microwave-based recovery of hydrocarbons and fossil fuels |
| CA2729336A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-30 | Kambiz A. Safinya | Apparatus and process for upgrading crude oil using microwave radiation |
| WO2010039782A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-08 | Global Resource Corporation | Microwave-based conveying devices and processing of carbonaceous materials |
| IT1396576B1 (en) * | 2009-10-22 | 2012-12-14 | Eni Spa | PROCEDURE FOR REDUCING VISCOSITY OF PETROLEUM RESIDUES FROM DISTILLATION AT ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE OR UNDER VACUUM |
-
2009
- 2009-12-14 IT IT002183A patent/ITMI20092183A1/en unknown
-
2010
- 2010-11-30 HR HRP20140574AT patent/HRP20140574T1/en unknown
- 2010-11-30 PT PT107847204T patent/PT2513256E/en unknown
- 2010-11-30 SI SI201030650T patent/SI2513256T1/en unknown
- 2010-11-30 PL PL10784720T patent/PL2513256T3/en unknown
- 2010-11-30 EP EP10784720.4A patent/EP2513256B1/en active Active
- 2010-11-30 WO PCT/EP2010/007284 patent/WO2011072804A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-11-30 ES ES10784720.4T patent/ES2473540T3/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-06-18 CY CY20141100444T patent/CY1115207T1/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| See references of WO2011072804A1 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2011072804A8 (en) | 2011-09-29 |
| PL2513256T3 (en) | 2014-09-30 |
| WO2011072804A1 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
| ES2473540T3 (en) | 2014-07-07 |
| HRP20140574T1 (en) | 2014-08-01 |
| PT2513256E (en) | 2014-06-25 |
| EP2513256B1 (en) | 2014-03-19 |
| SI2513256T1 (en) | 2014-08-29 |
| CY1115207T1 (en) | 2017-01-04 |
| ITMI20092183A1 (en) | 2011-06-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Taheri-Shakib et al. | Experimental investigation of comparing electromagnetic and conventional heating effects on the unconventional oil (heavy oil) properties: Based on heating time and upgrading | |
| Taheri-Shakib et al. | The experimental study of effect of microwave heating time on the heavy oil properties: Prospects for heavy oil upgrading | |
| Razavifar et al. | Experimental investigation of the ultrasonic wave effects on the viscosity and thermal behaviour of an asphaltenic crude oil | |
| Taheri-Shakib et al. | Analysis of the asphaltene properties of heavy crude oil under ultrasonic and microwave irradiation | |
| Djimasbe et al. | Deep insights into heavy oil upgrading using supercritical water by a comprehensive analysis of GC, GC–MS, NMR, and SEM–EDX with the aid of EPR as a complementary technical analysis | |
| Manasrah et al. | Conversion of petroleum coke into valuable products using oxy-cracking technique | |
| US8916042B2 (en) | Upgrading heavy oil and bitumen with an initiator | |
| Jia et al. | In situ catalytic upgrading of heavy crude oil through low-temperature oxidation | |
| US20170190984A1 (en) | A method of cracking and/or demulsification of hydrocarbons and/or fatty acids in emulsions | |
| US20150090635A1 (en) | Hydrocarbon resource processing device including radio frequency applicator and related methods | |
| Salehzadeh et al. | An optimized thermal cracking approach for onsite upgrading of bitumen | |
| EP2513256B1 (en) | Process for reducing the viscosity of crude oils | |
| Kholmurodov et al. | Influence of anionic and amphoteric surfactants on heavy oil upgrading performance with nickel tallate under steam injection processes | |
| Sawarkar et al. | Use of ultrasound in petroleum residue upgradation | |
| Torkaman et al. | Influence of heavy oil components and optimal magnetic nanocatalysts on the heavy oil upgrading by microwave-assisted | |
| Mukhamatdinov et al. | Upgrading of ultra-viscous oil using iron based catalyst under microwave radiation | |
| EP0436361A1 (en) | Method for improving the activity maintenance of plasma initiator | |
| CN101124303A (en) | Using Ultrasonics to Convert Petroleum Residues to Usable Oils | |
| Miadonye et al. | Microwave radiation induced visbreaking of heavy crude oil | |
| Zhang et al. | Applying a 532 nm laser to reduce the viscosity of crude oil | |
| Lin et al. | Ultrasound irradiation for upgrading vacuum residue: a comprehensive study on its effects on rheological, structural, thermal behavior, and catalytic hydrocracking Performance | |
| Hussein et al. | Study the effect of using microwave radiation and h-donors on improving heavy oil | |
| CA2864010A1 (en) | System and method of reducing viscosity of hydrocarbons | |
| Kholmurodov et al. | Hydrothermal In-Reservoir Upgrading of Heavy Oil in the Presence of Non-Ionic Surfactants. Processes 2022, 10, 2176 | |
| Abbas et al. | Improving the properties of the Iraqi vacuum oil by the effect of ultrasonic exposure time |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120613 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20131030 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 657694 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140415 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010014497 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140430 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: TUEP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20140617 Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2473540 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20140707 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: T1PR Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140619 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140719 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010014497 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20141222 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010014497 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20141222 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141130 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140620 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20101130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140319 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20181107 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20191112 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20201105 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20211108 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20221103 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20231106 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20241120 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HR Ref legal event code: ODRP Ref document number: P20140574 Country of ref document: HR Payment date: 20251104 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20251110 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20251126 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20251128 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20251127 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20251128 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20251128 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20251119 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Payment date: 20251104 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20251125 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20251104 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20251105 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: CY Payment date: 20251105 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Payment date: 20251031 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20251104 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Payment date: 20251030 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20251201 Year of fee payment: 16 |