EP2463423A1 - Method for producing a knitted pattern described with knit data in multiple processing stages and knit design system - Google Patents
Method for producing a knitted pattern described with knit data in multiple processing stages and knit design system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2463423A1 EP2463423A1 EP11190031A EP11190031A EP2463423A1 EP 2463423 A1 EP2463423 A1 EP 2463423A1 EP 11190031 A EP11190031 A EP 11190031A EP 11190031 A EP11190031 A EP 11190031A EP 2463423 A1 EP2463423 A1 EP 2463423A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- processing stage
- subsequent processing
- changes
- knit
- knit pattern
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 title claims description 129
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 3
- 238000009940 knitting Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 abstract 2
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012805 post-processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000000059 patterning Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D04—BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
- D04B—KNITTING
- D04B37/00—Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines
- D04B37/02—Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines with weft knitting machines
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for producing a knit pattern described in knitting data in several processing stages, as well as a design device for the design of knitted patterns produced on a knitting or knitting machine in several processing stages.
- the creation of knit patterns for flat knitting machines basically takes place over several processing stages, as long as the system offers automatic supports for patterning.
- the first processing stage initial processing stage, the appearance of the knit pattern is determined.
- the applicable knitting techniques are defined.
- changes are made to the knit pattern. These changes may be made by a designer automatically or by a user.
- Each processing level represents an approximation from an abstract knit pattern description to machine control data.
- patterning systems that include automatics, a minimum of two processing steps are needed in patterning. Usually, however, three to four processing stages are used.
- the goal of patterning is always to make all the inputs as much as possible in the first stage of processing and to transfer the machine control program to the knitting machine after the last stage of processing, there is a growing need for a user to make changes in a subsequent processing stage. There are multiple reasons for that. In most cases, however, the problem is that the input in the first processing stage for a particular situation is not possible to achieve a desired result in the machine control data.
- the object of the present invention is to provide a method and a design device in which the said restrictions do not exist.
- This object is achieved according to the invention by a method for creating a knit pattern described in knitting data in several processing stages, wherein at least in a subsequent processing stage subsequent processing stage or at a transition from the output processing stage to a subsequent processing stage or a subsequent processing stage to another subsequent processing stage changes to the knitting data of the knitted pattern be performed, with a change in the knitting data, the positions in the knit pattern, in particular automatically, are marked on which the changes were made.
- a follow-up processing stage when loaded, may have the status "unchanged."
- the subsequent processing stage may be assigned the "changed" state. For example, if the follow-up processing step is displayed on a display device of a designator and a change is made in this step, the entire post-process step is marked as changed. This makes it clear to a user that changes will be lost when reloading the processing stage that preceded the next processing step. It can be provided that the transition to a subsequent subsequent processing stage, this always first the state "unchanged" is assigned. This always shows exactly if changes are lost when loading certain subsequent processing levels.
- the state assigned to the subsequent processing stage is displayed on a display device. For example, if the knit pattern was changed in the first post-processing stage and then moved to the next post-processing step, only the first post-processing step will be displayed as "changed”. This shows that reloading the first postprocessing level of the previous initial processing level will result in changes being lost, but not when loading the first postprocessing level as it will be saved along with the changed data.
- the output processing stage is not intended to assign a state or status to it.
- changes made are stored separately. This will allow these changes to be reused. For example, changes made in the first post-processing step can be saved. Subsequently, the output processing stage could be loaded again. After a new transition to the first subsequent processing stage, the previously saved changes can be reloaded and used.
- the changes are stored classified, as to whether the changes were caused by a design device automatically or by a user. As a result, it can be understood whether the changes were introduced by a design facility in the transition from one processing stage to a subsequent subsequent processing stage, or whether the changes were made by a user.
- the knitting data associated with a processing stage can be stored.
- the knitting data of a processing stage can be reloaded and then changed.
- a knit pattern can easily be loaded by a third party and then edited and changed.
- the inventive method offers a great time savings. Containing the time-consuming documentation of changes in further processing stages.
- the scope of the invention also includes a design device for designing knit patterns produced on a knitting or knitting machine in a plurality of processing stages, with at least one of them Memory device for receiving the knitting data necessary for the description of the knit pattern, at least one display device for displaying at least one symbol representation of the knit pattern in at least one processing stage and at least one input device for changing the at least one symbol representation, wherein a mark is provided, for marking the position the knit pattern has been changed in a subsequent processing stage following an initial processing stage.
- the mark can be displayed on the display device and stored together with the knitting data of the subsequent processing step.
- state allocation means which assign a state to a subsequent processing stage. For example, if a subsequent editing stage is loaded for the first time, it will be assigned the "unchanged” state. However, if a change of the knitting data is carried out in a subsequent processing stage, this subsequent processing stage is assigned the state "changed".
- FIG. 1 is a displayed on a display device section of a yarn guide representation of a knit pattern 10 is shown.
- the yarn running representation of the knitted pattern 10 shown are four rows 11 to 14 shown. In rows 11, 13 and 14 knitting operations for the individual needles are shown. In the knitting row 12 cape operations are shown, which is indicated by the arrows 15.
- a clip was drawn by a user. The position 16 was therefore marked by a frame 17.
- This change can be stored with the knitting data of the entire knit pattern 10. However, it is also possible to store only this change with the associated position data separately. This information can then be loaded at a later time to a knit pattern in a processing stage, so that then for this knit pattern in this processing stage, the same change is performed.
- FIG. 2 is designated by the reference numeral 1 an output processing stage and the reference numeral 2, a subsequent processing stage.
- the in the FIG. 2 The illustration shown can also be displayed on a display device of a design device.
- the arrow 18 indicates that the subsequent processing stage 2 has arisen from a transition from the output processing stage 1.
- the arrow 19 indicates that the follow-up processing level 2 is the currently active processing level at which changes can be made.
- the subsequent processing stage 2 is shaded, which indicates that the subsequent processing stage 2 has the status "changed". Therefore, if a change is made in this processing stage while the subsequent processing stage 2 is active, the entire subsequent processing stage is marked as changed by being shaded in the present example. This shows that reloading the initial processing level 1 will result in changes being lost walk.
- a change as in the FIG. 1 shown, the assigned subsequent processing stage is assigned a different state, namely the state "changed".
- the subsequent processing stage 2 has been changed and then transferred to the subsequent processing stage 3.
- the arrow 19 points to the subsequent processing stage 3 to indicate that this is the active processing stage.
- the subsequent processing level 2 is shaded, which makes it clear that this processing level is assigned the "changed" state.
- the changes made to a knit pattern can be stored separately and reused.
- the changes to the subsequent processing level 2 can therefore be saved become.
- the output processing stage 1 could be loaded.
- the previously stored changes can be loaded again to the subsequent processing stage 2 and applied to them. In this case, the state of the subsequent processing stage 2 again changes to the state "changed".
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Knitting Machines (AREA)
- Knitting Of Fabric (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Erstellung eines mit Strickdaten beschriebenen Gestrickmusters in mehreren Bearbeitungsstufen, sowie eine Entwurfseinrichtung zum Entwurf von auf einer Strick- oder Wirkmaschine hergestellten Gestrickmustern in mehreren Bearbeitungsstufen.The invention relates to a method for producing a knit pattern described in knitting data in several processing stages, as well as a design device for the design of knitted patterns produced on a knitting or knitting machine in several processing stages.
Die Erstellung von Gestrickmustern für Flachstrickmaschinen erfolgt grundsätzlich über mehrere Bearbeitungsstufen, sofern das System automatische Unterstützungen zur Mustererstellung anbietet. In der ersten Bearbeitungsstufe (Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe) wird das Aussehen des Gestrickmusters festgelegt. Weiterhin werden die anzuwendenden Stricktechniken definiert.The creation of knit patterns for flat knitting machines basically takes place over several processing stages, as long as the system offers automatic supports for patterning. In the first processing stage (initial processing stage), the appearance of the knit pattern is determined. Furthermore, the applicable knitting techniques are defined.
In einer der folgenden Bearbeitungsstufen (Folgebearbeitungsstufen), oder in den Bearbeitungen beim Übergang auf eine Bearbeitungsstufe, werden Veränderungen am Gestrickmuster durchgeführt. Diese Veränderungen können durch eine Entwurfseinrichtung automatisch oder durch einen Anwender durchgeführt werden.In one of the following processing stages (subsequent processing steps), or in the processing during the transition to a processing step, changes are made to the knit pattern. These changes may be made by a designer automatically or by a user.
Jede Bearbeitungsstufe stellt eine Annäherung von einer abstrakten Gestrickmusterbeschreibung hin zu Maschinensteuerdaten dar. Bei Musterungssystemen die Automatiken enthalten, werden minimal zwei Bearbeitungsstufen bei der Mustererstellung benötigt. Meistens werden jedoch drei bis vier Bearbeitungsstufen verwendet. Obwohl bei der Mustererstellung immer das Ziel besteht, alle Eingaben möglichst in der ersten Bearbeitungsstufe durchzuführen und nach der letzten Bearbeitungsstufe das Maschinensteuerprogramm zur Herstellung des Gestrickmusters auf die Strickmaschine zu übertragen, besteht häufiger die Notwendigkeit für einen Anwender, in einer nachfolgenden Bearbeitungsstufe Änderungen vorzunehmen. Die Gründe hierfür sind vielfältig. Zumeist liegt aber das Problem vor, dass die Eingabe in der ersten Bearbeitungsstufe für eine bestimmte Situation nicht möglich ist, um ein gewünschtes Ergebnis in den Maschinensteuerdaten zu erzielen.Each processing level represents an approximation from an abstract knit pattern description to machine control data. For patterning systems that include automatics, a minimum of two processing steps are needed in patterning. Mostly, however, three to four processing stages are used. Although the goal of patterning is always to make all the inputs as much as possible in the first stage of processing and to transfer the machine control program to the knitting machine after the last stage of processing, there is a growing need for a user to make changes in a subsequent processing stage. There are multiple reasons for that. In most cases, however, the problem is that the input in the first processing stage for a particular situation is not possible to achieve a desired result in the machine control data.
Für einen Anwender ergeben sich dabei folgende Probleme: Sobald in einer nachfolgenden Bearbeitungsstufe das Gestrickmuster modifiziert wurde, gehen Benutzereingaben verloren, wenn eine vorherige Bearbeitungsstufe geladen wird. Selbst bei einem Gestrickmuster, bei dem keine Änderungen in nachfolgenden Bearbeitungsstufen vorgenommen worden sind, kann sich ein Anwender nie sicher sein, ob Daten verloren gehen, sobald eine vorherige Bearbeitungsstufe geladen wird. Daher müssen vom Anwender Änderungen an anderen Stellen dokumentiert werden.The following problems arise for a user: As soon as the knit pattern has been modified in a subsequent processing stage, user inputs are lost when a previous processing stage is loaded. Even with a knit pattern in which no changes have been made in subsequent processing stages, a user can never be sure that data will be lost as soon as a previous processing stage is loaded. Therefore, the user must document changes to other locations.
Aufgabe der vorliegenden Erfindung ist es, ein Verfahren und eine Entwurfseinrichtung bereitzustellen, bei denen die genannten Einschränkungen nicht bestehen.The object of the present invention is to provide a method and a design device in which the said restrictions do not exist.
Gelöst wird diese Aufgabe erfindungsgemäß durch ein Verfahren zur Erstellung eines mit Strickdaten beschriebenen Gestrickmusters in mehreren Bearbeitungsstufen, wobei zumindest in einer einer Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe folgenden Folgebearbeitungsstufe oder bei einem Übergang von der Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe zu einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe oder einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe zu einer anderen Folgebearbeitungsstufe Veränderungen an den Strickdaten des Gestrickmusters durchgeführt werden, wobei bei einer Veränderung der Strickdaten die Positionen im Gestrickmuster, insbesondere automatisch, markiert werden, an denen die Änderungen durchgeführt wurden. Insbesondere kann vorgesehen sein, dass bei jeder Änderung an den Strickdaten des Gestrickmusters, welche in einer Bearbeitungsstufe durchgeführt werden, die nach der ersten Bearbeitungsstufe liegt (es muss nicht zwingend die unmittelbar auf die erste Bearbeitungsstufe folgende Folgebearbeitungsstufe sein), alle geänderten Musterpositionen rasterpositionsgenau markiert werden. Somit ist unmittelbar ersichtlich, dass die Strickdaten der Bearbeitungsstufe verändert wurden. Beispielsweise kann dann nach dem Einzeichnen eines Maschenumhängevorgangs die entsprechende Position des Gestrickmusters, an der das Maschenumhängen durchgeführt wird, markiert beziehungsweise hervorgehoben werden. Insbesondere kann das Gestrickmuster in einer Symboldarstellung, z. B. als Fadenlaufdarstellung, Flächendarstellung oder Farbdarstellung, dargestellt werden und die Positionen optisch, insbesondere farblich, hervorgehoben werden, an denen Änderungen durchgeführt wurden. An einer Anzeigeeinrichtung einer Entwurfseinrichtung kann beispielsweise die Position durch einen grünen Rahmen visualisiert werden. In der Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe werden vorzugsweise nur Zeichnungen erstellt, wobei es keine Speichermöglichkeit von Änderungen gibt.This object is achieved according to the invention by a method for creating a knit pattern described in knitting data in several processing stages, wherein at least in a subsequent processing stage subsequent processing stage or at a transition from the output processing stage to a subsequent processing stage or a subsequent processing stage to another subsequent processing stage changes to the knitting data of the knitted pattern be performed, with a change in the knitting data, the positions in the knit pattern, in particular automatically, are marked on which the changes were made. In particular, it can be provided that with every change to the knit data of the knit pattern, which is performed in a processing stage that is after the first processing stage (it does not necessarily have to be the subsequent processing stage directly following the first processing stage), all changed pattern positions are marked with exact grid position , Thus, it is immediately apparent that the knitting data of the processing stage has been changed. For example, then after marking a stitching process, the corresponding position of the knit pattern on which the stitching is performed can be marked or highlighted. In particular, the knit pattern in a symbol representation, z. B. as a thread running representation, surface representation or color representation, are shown and the positions are highlighted visually, in particular color, where changes were made. On a display device of a design device, for example, the position can be visualized by a green frame. In the initial processing stage, only drawings are preferably created, wherein there is no storage possibility of changes.
Besondere Vorteile ergeben sich, wenn jeder Folgebearbeitungsstufe ein Zustand zugewiesen wird. Beispielsweise kann eine Folgebearbeitungsstufe, wenn sie geladen wird, den Zustand "unverändert" aufweisen. Wird jedoch eine Änderung der Strickdaten in einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe durchgeführt, kann der Folgebearbeitungsstufe der Zustand "geändert" zugewiesen werden. Ist zum Beispiel die Folgebearbeitungsstufe auf einer Anzeigeeinrichtung einer Entwurfseinrichtung angezeigt und wird eine Änderung in dieser Stufe durchgeführt, wird die gesamte Folgebearbeitungsstufe als geändert markiert. Dadurch ist es für einen Anwender klar, dass bei erneutem Laden der Bearbeitungsstufe, die der Folgebearbeitungsstufe vorangegangen ist, Änderungen verloren gehen. Dabei kann vorgesehen sein, dass beim Übergang auf eine nachfolgende Folgebearbeitungsstufe, dieser zunächst immer der Zustand "unverändert" zugeordnet wird. Damit ist immer genau ersichtlich, ob beim Laden bestimmter Folgebearbeitungsstufen Änderungen verloren gehen. In diesem Zusammenhang ist es besonders vorteilhaft, wenn der der Folgebearbeitungsstufe zugewiesene Zustand auf einer Anzeigeeinrichtung angezeigt wird. Wurde beispielsweise das Gestrickmuster in der ersten Folgebearbeitungsstufe geändert und anschließend auf die nächste Folgebearbeitungsstufe übergegangen, wird nur die erste Folgebearbeitungsstufe mit dem Zustand "geändert" dargestellt. Damit ist ersichtlich, dass bei erneutem Laden der der ersten Folgebearbeitungsstufe vorhergehender Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe Änderungen verloren gehen, nicht aber beim Laden der ersten Folgebearbeitungsstufe, da diese zusammen mit den veränderten Daten gespeichert wird. Für die Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe ist nicht vorgesehen, dieser einen Zustand oder Status zuzuweisen.Special advantages arise when a status is assigned to each subsequent processing stage. For example, a follow-up processing stage, when loaded, may have the status "unchanged." However, if a change in the knitting data is made in a subsequent processing stage, the subsequent processing stage may be assigned the "changed" state. For example, if the follow-up processing step is displayed on a display device of a designator and a change is made in this step, the entire post-process step is marked as changed. This makes it clear to a user that changes will be lost when reloading the processing stage that preceded the next processing step. It can be provided that the transition to a subsequent subsequent processing stage, this always first the state "unchanged" is assigned. This always shows exactly if changes are lost when loading certain subsequent processing levels. In this context, it is particularly advantageous if the state assigned to the subsequent processing stage is displayed on a display device. For example, if the knit pattern was changed in the first post-processing stage and then moved to the next post-processing step, only the first post-processing step will be displayed as "changed". This shows that reloading the first postprocessing level of the previous initial processing level will result in changes being lost, but not when loading the first postprocessing level as it will be saved along with the changed data. The output processing stage is not intended to assign a state or status to it.
Gemäß einer vorteilhaften Verfahrensvariante kann vorgesehen sein, dass durchgeführte Änderungen separat gespeichert werden. Dadurch können diese Änderungen wieder verwendet werden. Beispielsweise können Änderungen, die in der ersten Folgebearbeitungsstufe durchgeführt wurden, gespeichert werden. Anschließend könnte wiederum die Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe geladen werden. Nach einem erneuten Übergang auf die erste Folgebearbeitungsstufe können die zuvor gespeicherten Änderungen wieder geladen und eingesetzt werden.According to an advantageous variant of the method it can be provided that changes made are stored separately. This will allow these changes to be reused. For example, changes made in the first post-processing step can be saved. Subsequently, the output processing stage could be loaded again. After a new transition to the first subsequent processing stage, the previously saved changes can be reloaded and used.
Weiterhin kann vorgesehen sein, dass die Änderungen klassifiziert gespeichert werden, dahingehend, ob die Änderungen durch eine Entwurfseinrichtung automatisch oder von einem Anwender verursacht wurden. Dadurch kann nachvollzogen werden, ob die Änderungen durch eine Entwurfseinrichtung beim Übergang von einer Bearbeitungsstufe auf eine nachfolgende Folgebearbeitungsstufe eingebracht wurden oder ob die Änderungen durch einen Anwender durchgeführt wurden.Furthermore, it can be provided that the changes are stored classified, as to whether the changes were caused by a design device automatically or by a user. As a result, it can be understood whether the changes were introduced by a design facility in the transition from one processing stage to a subsequent subsequent processing stage, or whether the changes were made by a user.
Die einer Bearbeitungsstufe (Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe oder Folgebearbeitungsstufe) zugeordneten Strickdaten können gespeichert werden. Somit können auch die Strickdaten einer Bearbeitungsstufe wieder geladen und anschließend verändert werden. Dadurch, dass Änderungen hervorgehoben werden, kann ein Gestrickmuster problemlos von einem Dritten geladen und dann bearbeitet und geändert werden. Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren bietet eine große Zeitersparnis. Das zeitaufwendige Dokumentieren der Änderungen in weiterführenden Bearbeitungsstufen enthält.The knitting data associated with a processing stage (initial processing stage or subsequent processing stage) can be stored. Thus, the knitting data of a processing stage can be reloaded and then changed. By highlighting changes, a knit pattern can easily be loaded by a third party and then edited and changed. The inventive method offers a great time savings. Containing the time-consuming documentation of changes in further processing stages.
In den Rahmen der Erfindung fällt außerdem eine Entwurfseinrichtung zum Entwurf von auf einer Strick- oder Wirkmaschine hergestellten Gestrickmustern in mehreren Bearbeitungsstufen, mit mindestens einer Speichereinrichtung zur Aufnahme der für die Beschreibung des Gestrickmusters notwendigen Strickdaten, mindestens einer Anzeigeeinrichtung zur Darstellung mindestens einer Symboldarstellung des Gestrickmusters in zumindest einer Bearbeitungsstufe und mit mindestens einer Eingabeeinrichtung zur Veränderung der mindestens einen Symboldarstellung, wobei eine Markierung vorgesehen ist, zur Markierung der Position, an der das Gestrickmuster in einer einer Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe folgenden Folgebearbeitungsstufe geändert wurde. Die Markierung kann auf der Anzeigeeinrichtung angezeigt werden und zusammen mit den Strickdaten der Folgebearbeitungsstufe gespeichert werden. Dadurch bleiben Änderungen nachvollziehbar und müssen nicht separat dokumentiert werden.The scope of the invention also includes a design device for designing knit patterns produced on a knitting or knitting machine in a plurality of processing stages, with at least one of them Memory device for receiving the knitting data necessary for the description of the knit pattern, at least one display device for displaying at least one symbol representation of the knit pattern in at least one processing stage and at least one input device for changing the at least one symbol representation, wherein a mark is provided, for marking the position the knit pattern has been changed in a subsequent processing stage following an initial processing stage. The mark can be displayed on the display device and stored together with the knitting data of the subsequent processing step. As a result, changes remain traceable and need not be documented separately.
Besondere Vorteile ergeben sich, wenn Zustandszuweismittel vorgesehen sind, die einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe einen Zustand zuweisen. Wird beispielsweise eine Folgebearbeitungsstufe zum ersten Mal geladen, wird dieser der Zustand "unverändert" zugewiesen. Wird jedoch eine Änderung der Strickdaten in einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe durchgeführt, so wird dieser Folgebearbeitungsstufe der Zustand "verändert" zugewiesen.Particular advantages arise when state allocation means are provided which assign a state to a subsequent processing stage. For example, if a subsequent editing stage is loaded for the first time, it will be assigned the "unchanged" state. However, if a change of the knitting data is carried out in a subsequent processing stage, this subsequent processing stage is assigned the state "changed".
Besondere Vorteile ergeben sich, wenn auf der Anzeigeeinrichtung der Zustand einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe anzeigbar ist. Dadurch kann ein Anwender einfach erkennen, ob beim Laden einer vorhergehenden Bearbeitungsstufe möglicherweise Änderungen verloren gehen.Particular advantages arise when the state of a subsequent processing stage can be displayed on the display device. This allows a user to easily see if changes may be lost when loading a previous stage of processing.
Weiterhin kann vorgesehen sein, dass lediglich die Änderungen eines Grundmusters einer Folgebearbeitungsstufe speicherbar sind und zu einer Bearbeitungsstufe ladbar sind. Damit kann eine unveränderte Bearbeitungsstufe geladen werden und zu dieser Bearbeitungsstufe können die vorher anhand einer anderen Bearbeitungsstufe durchgeführten Änderungen geladen werden und in die gerade geladene Bearbeitungsstufe übernommen werden.Furthermore, it can be provided that only the changes of a basic pattern of a subsequent processing stage can be stored and can be loaded to a processing stage. This can be used to load an unchanged processing level, and for this processing level, you can use another processing level before changes are loaded and transferred to the currently loaded processing level.
Weitere Merkmale und Vorteile der Erfindung ergeben sich aus der nachfolgenden Beschreibung von Ausführungsbeispielen der Erfindung, anhand der Figuren der Zeichnung, die erfindungswesentliche Einzelheiten zeigt, sowie aus den Ansprüchen. Die dort gezeigten Merkmale sind nicht notwendig maßstäblich zu verstehen und derart dargestellt, dass die erfindungsgemäßen Besonderheiten deutlich sichtbar gemacht werden können. Die verschiedenen Merkmale können je einzeln für sich oder zu mehreren in beliebigen Kombinationen bei Varianten der Erfindung verwirklicht sein.Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description of embodiments of the invention, with reference to the figures of the drawing, which shows essential to the invention, and from the claims. The features shown there are not necessarily to scale and presented in such a way that the features of the invention can be made clearly visible. The various features may be implemented individually for themselves or for a plurality of combinations in variants of the invention.
In der schematischen Zeichnung sind Ausführungsbeispiele der Erfindung dargestellt und in der nachfolgenden Beschreibung näher erläutert.In the schematic drawing embodiments of the invention are illustrated and explained in more detail in the following description.
Es zeigen:
- Fig. 1:
- einen Ausschnitt einer Fadenlaufdarstellung eines Gestrickmusters in einer Bearbeitungsstufe;
- Fig. 2:
- eine schematische Darstellung zur Erläuterung des Zuweisens von Zuständen zu einzelnen Bearbeitungsstufen;
- Fig. 3:
- eine weitere Darstellung zur Erläuterung des Arbeitens in unterschiedlichen Bearbeitungsstufen.
- Fig. 1:
- a section of a yarn guide representation of a knit pattern in a processing stage;
- Fig. 2:
- a schematic representation for explaining the assignment of states to individual processing stages;
- 3:
- another illustration to explain the working in different processing stages.
In der
In der
Aus dem Vorstehenden ergibt sich, dass die Änderung des Zustands der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 erst erfolgt ist, nachdem eine Änderung dieser Bearbeitungsstufe durchgeführt wurde. Beim Übergang von der Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe 1 auf die Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 wird der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 zunächst immer der Zustand "unverändert" zugewiesen, was dadurch ersichtlich ist, dass keine Hinterlegung mit einer Schraffur erfolgt. Somit ist immer genau ersichtlich, ob beim Laden bestimmter Bearbeitungsstufen Änderungen verloren gehen.From the above, it follows that the change of the state of the
Im in der
Somit ist ersichtlich, dass bei erneutem Laden der Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe 1 Änderungen verloren gehen, aber nicht beim Laden der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2, da die Änderungen der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 mit dieser abgespeichert wurden.Thus, it can be seen that changes are lost when reloading the
Die Änderungen, die an einem Gestrickmuster durchgeführt worden sind, können separat gespeichert werden und wieder verwendet werden. Die Änderungen der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 können daher gespeichert werden. Anschließend könnte die Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe 1 geladen werden. Nach einem erneuten Übergang auf die Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 (die in diesem Fall mit dem Zustand "unverändert" angezeigt wird) können die zuvor gespeicherten Änderungen wieder zur Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 geladen und auf diese angewendet werden. In diesem Fall ändert sich der Zustand der Folgebearbeitungsstufe 2 wieder auf den Zustand "geändert".The changes made to a knit pattern can be stored separately and reused. The changes to the
Claims (12)
Folgebearbeitungsstufe (2, 3) oder bei einem Übergang von der Ausgangsbearbeitungsstufe (1) zu einer
Folgebearbeitungsstufe (2, 3) oder einer
Folgebearbeitungsstufe (2, 3) zu einer anderen Folgebearbeitungsstufe (2, 3) Veränderungen an den Strickdaten des Gestrickmusters (10) durchgeführt werden, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass bei einer Veränderung der Strickdaten die Positionen (16) im Gestrickmuster (10), insbesondere automatisch, markiert werden, an denen die Änderungen durchgeführt wurden.Method for producing a knit pattern (10) described with knitting data in a plurality of processing stages to a subsequent processing stage (2, 3), wherein at least one of an initial processing stage (1) follows
Subsequent processing stage (2, 3) or at a transition from the output processing stage (1) to a
Subsequent processing stage (2, 3) or one
Following processing step (2, 3) to another subsequent processing stage (2, 3) changes to the knitting data of the knitted pattern (10) are performed, characterized in that when changing the knitting data, the positions (16) in the knit pattern (10), in particular automatically, be marked on which the changes were made.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102010053865A DE102010053865B4 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2010-12-08 | Method for producing a knit pattern described in knitting data in a plurality of processing stages, and design device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2463423A1 true EP2463423A1 (en) | 2012-06-13 |
EP2463423B1 EP2463423B1 (en) | 2015-10-28 |
Family
ID=45023711
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11190031.2A Active EP2463423B1 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2011-11-22 | Method for producing a knitted pattern described with knit data in multiple processing stages and knit design system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2463423B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5607019B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102605546B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102010053865B4 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103034142A (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2013-04-10 | 杭州佳谷数控技术有限公司 | Control method and system of self-adaptation hosiery machine |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4329875A1 (en) * | 1992-11-16 | 1994-05-19 | Schieber Universal Maschf | Device for developing a control program for a knitting or knitting machine |
EP0768416A2 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1997-04-16 | Shima Seiki Manufacturing, Ltd. | Knitting design method and knitting design apparatus |
EP1652983A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-05-03 | Shima Seiki Manufacturing, Ltd. | Method and device for knit design and program |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT323875B (en) * | 1969-04-05 | 1975-08-11 | Morat Gmbh Franz | DEVICE FOR PRODUCING CONTROL SIGNALS FOR THE AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF MACHINERY |
JPS5696933A (en) * | 1979-12-27 | 1981-08-05 | Hitachi Electr Eng | Color pattern knitting ordering *controlling and process assembling apparatus for traverse knitting machine |
JP2656405B2 (en) * | 1991-09-17 | 1997-09-24 | 旭化成工業株式会社 | Knit design system and method of creating knitting data |
ATE157786T1 (en) * | 1992-11-16 | 1997-09-15 | Schieber Universal Maschf | DEVICE FOR DEVELOPING A CONTROL PROGRAM FOR A KNITTING OR KNITTING MACHINE |
US5557527A (en) * | 1993-08-31 | 1996-09-17 | Shima Seiki Manufacturing Ltd. | Knit design system and a method for designing knit fabrics |
JP2000027055A (en) * | 1998-07-06 | 2000-01-25 | Shima Seiki Mfg Ltd | Design device |
KR101245156B1 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2013-03-19 | 가부시키가이샤 시마세이키 세이사쿠쇼 | Knit simulation device, knit simulation method, and program therefor |
JP5032995B2 (en) * | 2005-11-17 | 2012-09-26 | 株式会社島精機製作所 | Knit design apparatus, knit design method and program thereof |
-
2010
- 2010-12-08 DE DE102010053865A patent/DE102010053865B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-11-22 EP EP11190031.2A patent/EP2463423B1/en active Active
- 2011-12-06 JP JP2011280431A patent/JP5607019B2/en active Active
- 2011-12-08 CN CN201110462295.0A patent/CN102605546B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4329875A1 (en) * | 1992-11-16 | 1994-05-19 | Schieber Universal Maschf | Device for developing a control program for a knitting or knitting machine |
EP0768416A2 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1997-04-16 | Shima Seiki Manufacturing, Ltd. | Knitting design method and knitting design apparatus |
EP1652983A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-05-03 | Shima Seiki Manufacturing, Ltd. | Method and device for knit design and program |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103034142A (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2013-04-10 | 杭州佳谷数控技术有限公司 | Control method and system of self-adaptation hosiery machine |
CN103034142B (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2015-09-30 | 杭州佳谷数控技术有限公司 | A kind of self-adaptation hosiery machine control method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2012122185A (en) | 2012-06-28 |
DE102010053865B4 (en) | 2013-12-19 |
DE102010053865A1 (en) | 2012-06-14 |
CN102605546A (en) | 2012-07-25 |
JP5607019B2 (en) | 2014-10-15 |
EP2463423B1 (en) | 2015-10-28 |
CN102605546B (en) | 2014-06-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE10054542A1 (en) | Testing of automated program controlled system upon commissioning, by observation of individual module or routine calls by specification of a hierarchical request tree to monitor calls | |
DE1928202B2 (en) | Device for the creation of statistical data on the operational sequence of program-controlled data processing systems | |
DE1785192A1 (en) | Graphic textile design | |
DE19524402C2 (en) | Program execution control device with addressability according to an M-row pseudo-random number sequence | |
EP1300498A1 (en) | Method and system for designing tubular fabric knitted on a flat knitting machine | |
EP2407842B1 (en) | Method for operating machines or machines in a machine series and design system | |
DE112011105625T5 (en) | Sequence program creation device | |
EP0669015B1 (en) | Arrangement for developing a control program for a knitting machine or loom | |
EP1724385B1 (en) | Method of making knit fabric on a flat knitting machine | |
DE102016006202B4 (en) | Numerical control device for managing machining data and machining results | |
DE10041072A1 (en) | Automatic generation of program code involves forming symbol for component with interfaces in graphical editor, offering selection, generating code combining components | |
EP2463423B1 (en) | Method for producing a knitted pattern described with knit data in multiple processing stages and knit design system | |
DE69030942T2 (en) | Method and device for assigning operations | |
EP2009161B1 (en) | Design device for designing knitwear | |
EP2463422B1 (en) | Method for designing shaped knits to be produced on a flat knitting machine using a design device and design device | |
EP3474650B1 (en) | Method for producing a retrofitting set for an assembly machine | |
EP2484824B1 (en) | Simultaneous knitted fabric simulation during the creation of samples on the basis of a compressed symbol display | |
EP2574996B1 (en) | Method for determining a partial load state of a system | |
EP3246441A1 (en) | Plant for the production of warp-knitted goods and method for controlling a facility for producing warp-knitted goods | |
DE102010053863B4 (en) | Design device for the design of crocheted knit fabric on a flat knitting machine | |
EP4055472B1 (en) | Method for data migration for a pointer element in the course of a data migration for a program state of a control program of an automation system | |
DE2735874C2 (en) | ||
EP1111109A2 (en) | Method for forming new stitches on a knitting machine | |
DE102004023634B4 (en) | Method for checking the completeness and consistency of an information library | |
WO2014146716A1 (en) | Engineering system of a process plant and/or production plant |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20121130 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150507 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150806 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: H. STOLL AG & CO. KG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 757997 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502011008215 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: KOHLER SCHMID MOEBUS PATENTANWAELTE PARTNERSCH, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502011008215 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160128 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160228 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151130 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160229 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160129 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151130 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502011008215 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160128 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20160729 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20160907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160128 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151122 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151228 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20111122 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151122 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 757997 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161122 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161122 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151028 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502011008215 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: KM.ON GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: H. STOLL AG & CO. KG, 72760 REUTLINGEN, DE |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20231113 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231130 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231127 Year of fee payment: 13 |