EP2449140A1 - Nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles - Google Patents

Nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles

Info

Publication number
EP2449140A1
EP2449140A1 EP10727610A EP10727610A EP2449140A1 EP 2449140 A1 EP2449140 A1 EP 2449140A1 EP 10727610 A EP10727610 A EP 10727610A EP 10727610 A EP10727610 A EP 10727610A EP 2449140 A1 EP2449140 A1 EP 2449140A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight percent
optionally
superalloy composition
superalloy
rhenium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10727610A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2449140B1 (en
Inventor
Joshua Leigh Miller
Brian Thomas Hazel
Douglas Gerard Konitzer
Paul John Fink
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Publication of EP2449140A1 publication Critical patent/EP2449140A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2449140B1 publication Critical patent/EP2449140B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D5/00—Blades; Blade-carrying members; Heating, heat-insulating, cooling or antivibration means on the blades or the members
    • F01D5/12—Blades
    • F01D5/28—Selecting particular materials; Particular measures relating thereto; Measures against erosion or corrosion
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C19/00—Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03—Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05—Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/051—Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W
    • C22C19/057—Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium and Mo or W with the maximum Cr content being less 10%
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01D—NON-POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, e.g. STEAM TURBINES
    • F01D9/00—Stators
    • F01D9/02—Nozzles; Nozzle boxes; Stator blades; Guide conduits, e.g. individual nozzles
    • F01D9/04—Nozzles; Nozzle boxes; Stator blades; Guide conduits, e.g. individual nozzles forming ring or sector
    • F01D9/041—Nozzles; Nozzle boxes; Stator blades; Guide conduits, e.g. individual nozzles forming ring or sector using blades

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to nickel-base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles and more particularly to such alloys for use in high pressure turbine (HPT) nozzle applications.
  • HPT high pressure turbine
  • no-rhenium superalloys may exhibit inadequate stress rupture capability.
  • Other known superalloys that provide desired stress rupture capability may include relatively high amounts of rhenium. It is desirable to provide an alloy able to provide sufficient stress rupture capability with a reduced rhenium level.
  • exemplary embodiments that provide nickel-base superalloy compositions for use in high temperature applications.
  • Exemplary embodiments exhibit sufficient stress rupture capability, at relatively low- or no- rhenium levels.
  • a superalloy composition comprises, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0-7.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 1.5-2.5 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.15-0.60 hafnium (Hf), 0.0-1.0 rhenium (Re), 6.5-9.0 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B,) optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), balance nickel (Ni), such that the superalloy composition exhibits a stress rupture capability improvement of at least about 15% over a base stress rupture capability of a base composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 H
  • a superalloy composition consists of, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 2.0 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.6 hafnium (Hf), from 0.0 to 0.5 rhenium (Re), about 7.5 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B), optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), and a balance of nickel (Ni) and incidental impurities.
  • an article formed from an exemplary superalloy composition is provided.
  • the article may be a high pressure turbine nozzle, nozzle segment, or other gas turbine engine component.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a component article such as a gas turbine engine high pressure turbine (HPT) nozzle segment.
  • HPT high pressure turbine
  • FIG. 1 depicts an HPT nozzle segment 10 including at least one vane 12.
  • the nozzle segment 10 comprises a single crystal nickel-base superalloy composition as disclosed herein.
  • Articles incorporating the disclosed superalloy composition include HPT nozzles or nozzle segments and may include other gas turbine engine components.
  • Exemplary nickel-base superalloy composition comprise reduced levels of rhenium (Re), defined herein as being from 0 up to about 0.5 weight %.
  • Increased amounts of other strengthening alloying elements such as tantalum (Ta), tungsten (W) and molybdenum (Mo) may be utilized to offset the lower levels of Re.
  • tantalum may be present in amounts from about 6.5 to about 7.0 weight %
  • molybdenum may be present in amounts from about 1.5 to about 2.5 weight %
  • tungsten may be present in amounts from about 6.25 to about 7.0 weight %.
  • tantalum may be present at levels of from about 6.5 to about 6.6 weight %. All percentages presented herein are percentages by weight, unless noted otherwise.
  • Table 1 provides a series of exemplary compositions. A theoretical stress rupture prediction generated by computer modeling for the compositions was compared with the predicted stress rupture (in hours) of a base, no-rhenium superalloy composition. As evidenced in Table 1, each of the enumerated compositions provided an improved predicted stress rupture, presented as % improvement.
  • compositions presented in Table 1 are highlighted. These exemplary compositions exhibit excellent improvement in the predicted stress rupture as compared to the Base composition. These exemplary compositions may provide desired outcomes with reduced rhenium levels (0.0-0.5 weight %). Other exemplary compositions include rhenium in levels up to about 1.0 weight %.
  • Alloys 25 and 27 listed in Table 1 are provided as comparative examples and include about 1.5 weight % rhenium. Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein consider the contributions of various alloying elements to the thermal mechanical properties and oxidation resistance of the superalloy composition. 58-2
  • Certain exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include from about 6.2 to about 6.6 weight percent aluminum. In other exemplary embodiments, the aluminum may be present in amounts from about 6.3 to about 6.5 percent.
  • Certain embodiments disclosed herein include at least about 6 to about 7 weight % chromium (Cr) sufficient to provide hot corrosion resistance, but not high enough to detrimentally lead to TCP phase instability and poor cyclic oxidation resistance.
  • Certain embodiments disclosed herein include from about 6.5% to about 9%, and more preferably about 7% to about 8% cobalt (Co). Lower amounts of cobalt may reduce alloy stability. Greater amounts may reduce the gamma prime solvus temperature thus impacting high temperature strength and oxidation resistance.
  • Mo molybdenum
  • the minimum value is sufficient to impart solid solution strengthening. Amounts exceeding the maximum may lead to surface instability. Greater amounts of Mo may also negatively impact both hot corrosion and oxidation resistance.
  • Certain embodiments disclosed herein include tungsten (W) in amounts from about 6.25 to about 7.0 weight %. Lower amounts of W may decrease strength. Higher amounts may produce instability with respect to TCP phase formation. Higher amounts may also reduce oxidation capability.
  • Certain embodiments disclosed herein provide reduced levels of rhenium, preferably from 0.0 to about 1.0 weight percent, and more preferably not greater than about 0.5 weight %. It is contemplated that some or all of the rhenium may be provided as revert from scrap material. Compositions 25 and 27 illustrate significant improvement in predicted stress rupture capability with the addition of 1.5 weight % rhenium. It is desired to provide improved performance at reduced rhenium levels.
  • Hafnium (Hf) may be included at relatively low levels of about 0.15 weight % up to higher levels of about 0.6 weight %. Hafnium can improve oxidation resistance and the adherence of thermal barrier coatings when utilized. However, hafnium can degrade the corrosion resistance of uncoated alloys. Hafnium additions of about 0.7% can be satisfactory, but additions of greater than about 1% adversely impact stress rupture properties and the incipient melting temperature.
  • Optional additions may include about 0.03-0.06 weight % carbon (C), up to about 0.004 weight % boron (B), or up to about 0.03 weight% of one or more rare earth elements such as yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), and cesium (Ce).
  • C carbon
  • B boron
  • Y yttrium
  • La lanthanum
  • Ce cesium
  • Boron provides strength for low angle boundaries and enhanced acceptability limits for components having low angle grain boundaries.
  • the lower limit for carbon provides sufficient carbon to improve alloy cleanliness since carbon provides de-oxidation. Beyond the upper 0.06% amount, the carbide volume fraction increases, reducing fatigue life.
  • Rare earth additions i.e., yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), and cerium (Ce), may be provided in certain embodiments in amounts up to about 0.03%. These additions may improve oxidation resistance by enhancing the retention of the protective alumina scale. Greater amounts may promote mold/metal reaction at the casting surface, increasing the component inclusion content.
  • Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include each of the enumerated compositions in Table 1 with the exception of the base composition, and comparative alloys 25 and 27. Additionally, exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include compositions employing the endpoints of disclosed ranges and all intermediate values. For example, a range of aluminum from about 6.2 to about 6.6 weight percent is defined to include 6.2 weight percent, 6.6 weight percent, and any intervening percentage between 6.2 and 6.6 weight percent.
  • Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein provide improved stress rupture capability of at least 15% as compared to a base stress rupture capability of a base
  • composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 Hf, 0.0 Re, 7.5Co, balance Ni, identified as "Base” in Table 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Abstract

A superalloy composition comprising, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 Al, about 6.5-7.0 Ta, about 6.0-7.0 Cr, about 6.25-7.0 W, about 1.5-2.5 Mo, about 0.15-0.60 Hf, 0.0-1.0 Re, 6.5-9.0 Co, optionally, 0.03-0.06 C, optionally, up to about 0.004 B, optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), balance nickel, such that the superalloy composition exhibits a stress rupture capability improvement of at least 15% over a base stress rupture capability of a base composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 Hf, 0.0 Re, 7.5Co. Articles incorporating the superalloy composition include a gas turbine engine component such as a high pressure turbine nozzle or nozzle segment.

Description

240858-2
NICKEL BASE SUPERALLOY COMPOSITIONS AND SUPERALLOY ARTICLES
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This Application claims priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/221,946, filed June 30, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates generally to nickel-base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles and more particularly to such alloys for use in high pressure turbine (HPT) nozzle applications.
[0003] Currently known no-rhenium superalloys may exhibit inadequate stress rupture capability. Other known superalloys that provide desired stress rupture capability may include relatively high amounts of rhenium. It is desirable to provide an alloy able to provide sufficient stress rupture capability with a reduced rhenium level.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The above-mentioned need or needs may be met by exemplary embodiments that provide nickel-base superalloy compositions for use in high temperature applications. Exemplary embodiments exhibit sufficient stress rupture capability, at relatively low- or no- rhenium levels.
[0005] In an exemplary embodiment, a superalloy composition comprises, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0-7.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 1.5-2.5 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.15-0.60 hafnium (Hf), 0.0-1.0 rhenium (Re), 6.5-9.0 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B,) optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), balance nickel (Ni), such that the superalloy composition exhibits a stress rupture capability improvement of at least about 15% over a base stress rupture capability of a base composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 Hf, 0.0 Re, 7.5 Co, balance nickel.
[0006] In an exemplary embodiment, a superalloy composition consists of, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 2.0 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.6 hafnium (Hf), from 0.0 to 0.5 rhenium (Re), about 7.5 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B), optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), and a balance of nickel (Ni) and incidental impurities.
[0007] In an exemplary embodiment, an article formed from an exemplary superalloy composition is provided. The article may be a high pressure turbine nozzle, nozzle segment, or other gas turbine engine component.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding part of the specification. The invention, however, may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
[0009] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a component article such as a gas turbine engine high pressure turbine (HPT) nozzle segment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0010] Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 depicts an HPT nozzle segment 10 including at least one vane 12. In an exemplary embodiment, the nozzle segment 10 comprises a single crystal nickel-base superalloy composition as disclosed herein.
-2- 58-2
Articles incorporating the disclosed superalloy composition include HPT nozzles or nozzle segments and may include other gas turbine engine components.
[0011] Exemplary nickel-base superalloy composition comprise reduced levels of rhenium (Re), defined herein as being from 0 up to about 0.5 weight %. Increased amounts of other strengthening alloying elements such as tantalum (Ta), tungsten (W) and molybdenum (Mo) may be utilized to offset the lower levels of Re. For example, tantalum may be present in amounts from about 6.5 to about 7.0 weight %, molybdenum may be present in amounts from about 1.5 to about 2.5 weight %, and tungsten may be present in amounts from about 6.25 to about 7.0 weight %. In other exemplary embodiments, tantalum may be present at levels of from about 6.5 to about 6.6 weight %. All percentages presented herein are percentages by weight, unless noted otherwise.
[0012] Table 1 provides a series of exemplary compositions. A theoretical stress rupture prediction generated by computer modeling for the compositions was compared with the predicted stress rupture (in hours) of a base, no-rhenium superalloy composition. As evidenced in Table 1, each of the enumerated compositions provided an improved predicted stress rupture, presented as % improvement.
[0013] Certain of the exemplary compositions presented in Table 1 are highlighted. These exemplary compositions exhibit excellent improvement in the predicted stress rupture as compared to the Base composition. These exemplary compositions may provide desired outcomes with reduced rhenium levels (0.0-0.5 weight %). Other exemplary compositions include rhenium in levels up to about 1.0 weight %.
[0014] Alloys 25 and 27 listed in Table 1 are provided as comparative examples and include about 1.5 weight % rhenium. Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein consider the contributions of various alloying elements to the thermal mechanical properties and oxidation resistance of the superalloy composition. 58-2
[0015] Certain exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include from about 6.2 to about 6.6 weight percent aluminum. In other exemplary embodiments, the aluminum may be present in amounts from about 6.3 to about 6.5 percent.
[0016] Certain embodiments disclosed herein include at least about 6 to about 7 weight % chromium (Cr) sufficient to provide hot corrosion resistance, but not high enough to detrimentally lead to TCP phase instability and poor cyclic oxidation resistance.
[0017] Certain embodiments disclosed herein include from about 6.5% to about 9%, and more preferably about 7% to about 8% cobalt (Co). Lower amounts of cobalt may reduce alloy stability. Greater amounts may reduce the gamma prime solvus temperature thus impacting high temperature strength and oxidation resistance.
[0018] Certain embodiments disclosed herein include molybdenum (Mo) in amounts from about 1.5 to 2.5 weight %. The minimum value is sufficient to impart solid solution strengthening. Amounts exceeding the maximum may lead to surface instability. Greater amounts of Mo may also negatively impact both hot corrosion and oxidation resistance.
[0019] Certain embodiments disclosed herein include tungsten (W) in amounts from about 6.25 to about 7.0 weight %. Lower amounts of W may decrease strength. Higher amounts may produce instability with respect to TCP phase formation. Higher amounts may also reduce oxidation capability.
[0020] Certain embodiments disclosed herein provide reduced levels of rhenium, preferably from 0.0 to about 1.0 weight percent, and more preferably not greater than about 0.5 weight %. It is contemplated that some or all of the rhenium may be provided as revert from scrap material. Compositions 25 and 27 illustrate significant improvement in predicted stress rupture capability with the addition of 1.5 weight % rhenium. It is desired to provide improved performance at reduced rhenium levels. [0021] Hafnium (Hf) may be included at relatively low levels of about 0.15 weight % up to higher levels of about 0.6 weight %. Hafnium can improve oxidation resistance and the adherence of thermal barrier coatings when utilized. However, hafnium can degrade the corrosion resistance of uncoated alloys. Hafnium additions of about 0.7% can be satisfactory, but additions of greater than about 1% adversely impact stress rupture properties and the incipient melting temperature.
[0022] Optional additions may include about 0.03-0.06 weight % carbon (C), up to about 0.004 weight % boron (B), or up to about 0.03 weight% of one or more rare earth elements such as yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), and cesium (Ce).
[0023] Boron provides strength for low angle boundaries and enhanced acceptability limits for components having low angle grain boundaries. The lower limit for carbon provides sufficient carbon to improve alloy cleanliness since carbon provides de-oxidation. Beyond the upper 0.06% amount, the carbide volume fraction increases, reducing fatigue life. Rare earth additions, i.e., yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), and cerium (Ce), may be provided in certain embodiments in amounts up to about 0.03%. These additions may improve oxidation resistance by enhancing the retention of the protective alumina scale. Greater amounts may promote mold/metal reaction at the casting surface, increasing the component inclusion content.
[0024] Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include each of the enumerated compositions in Table 1 with the exception of the base composition, and comparative alloys 25 and 27. Additionally, exemplary embodiments disclosed herein include compositions employing the endpoints of disclosed ranges and all intermediate values. For example, a range of aluminum from about 6.2 to about 6.6 weight percent is defined to include 6.2 weight percent, 6.6 weight percent, and any intervening percentage between 6.2 and 6.6 weight percent.
[0025] Exemplary embodiments disclosed herein provide improved stress rupture capability of at least 15% as compared to a base stress rupture capability of a base
-5- 58-2
composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 Hf, 0.0 Re, 7.5Co, balance Ni, identified as "Base" in Table 1.
[0026] EXAMPLES
TABLE 1
58-2
[0027] This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.

Claims

240858-2 WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A superalloy composition comprising, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0-7.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 1.5-2.5 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.15-0.60 hafnium (Hf), 0.0-1.0 rhenium (Re), 6.5-9.0 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B,) optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), balance nickel (Ni), such that the superalloy composition exhibits a stress rupture capability improvement of at least about 15% over a base stress rupture capability of a base composition nominally comprising, in weight percent: 6.5 Al, 6.6 Ta, 6.0 Cr, 6.25 W, 1.5 Mo, 0.15 Hf, 0.0 Re, 7.5 Co, balance nickel.
2. The superalloy composition according to claim 1 comprising not more than about 0.5 weight percent rhenium.
3. The superalloy composition according to claim 1 comprising substantially 0 weight percent rhenium.
4. The superalloy composition according to claim 1 comprising about 0.
5 weight percent rhenium.
6. The superalloy composition according to claim 2 comprising from 6.5 to about 6.6 weight percent tantalum. 240858-2
7. A superalloy composition consisting of, in weight percent: about 6.2-6.6 aluminum (Al), about 6.5-7.0 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0 chromium (Cr), about 6.25-7.0 tungsten (W), about 2.0 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.6 hafnium (Hf), from 0.0 to 0.5 rhenium (Re), about 7.5 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B), optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), and a balance of nickel (Ni) and incidental impurities.
8. The superalloy composition according to claim 7 consisting of about 6.5 to about 6.6 weight percent tantalum.
9. The superalloy composition according to claim 7 consisting of substantially 0 weight percent rhenium.
10. The superalloy composition according to claim 7 consisting of about 0.5 weight percent rhenium.
11. The superalloy composition according to claim 7, consisting of, in weight percent: about 6.3 aluminum (Al), about 6.5 tantalum (Ta), about 6.0 chromium (Cr), from about 6.25 to about 7 tungsten (W), about 2.0 molybdenum (Mo), about 0.60 hafnium (Hf), substantially 0.0 rhenium (Re), about 7.5 cobalt (Co), optionally, 0.03-0.06 carbon (C), optionally, up to about 0.004 boron (B), optionally up to about 0.03 total of one or more rare earth elements selected from yttrium (Y), lanthanum (La), or cerium (Ce), and a balance of nickel and incidental impurities. 240858-2
12. An article formed of a superalloy composition according to claim 1.
13. The article according to claim 12 comprising a gas turbine engine component.
14. The article according to claim 13 comprising a high pressure turbine nozzle or nozzle segment.
15. An article formed of a superalloy composition according to claim 7.
16. The article according to claim 15 comprising a gas turbine engine component.
17. The article according to claim 16 comprising a high pressure turbine nozzle or nozzle segment.
18. An article formed of a superalloy composition according to claim 11.
19. The article according to claim 18 comprising a gas turbine engine component.
20. The article according to claim 19 comprising a high pressure turbine nozzle or nozzle segment.
EP20100727610 2009-06-30 2010-06-15 Nickel base superalloy compositions and articles thereof Active EP2449140B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22194609P 2009-06-30 2009-06-30
US12/794,244 US20100329921A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-06-04 Nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles
PCT/US2010/038640 WO2011002605A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-06-15 Nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2449140A1 true EP2449140A1 (en) 2012-05-09
EP2449140B1 EP2449140B1 (en) 2015-05-20

Family

ID=43380980

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20100727610 Active EP2449140B1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-06-15 Nickel base superalloy compositions and articles thereof

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20100329921A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2449140B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5763062B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2766552A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2011002605A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014093826A2 (en) 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 United Technologies Corporation Multi-shot casting
EP3513889B1 (en) 2012-12-14 2021-04-14 Raytheon Technologies Corporation Alloy and hybrid turbine blade for improved engine performance or architecture
RU2519075C1 (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-06-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Научно-производственное объединение "Сатурн" Refractory nickel-based alloy for casting gas turbine hot section parts

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2194609A (en) 1939-05-20 1940-03-26 Miller Sigrid Yarn ball holder
FR2503188A1 (en) * 1981-04-03 1982-10-08 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) MONOCRYSTALLINE SUPERALLIAGE WITH MATRIX MATRIX BASED ON NICKEL, PROCESS FOR IMPROVING WORKPIECES IN THIS SUPERALLIATION AND PARTS OBTAINED THEREBY
US6054096A (en) * 1982-12-27 2000-04-25 United Technologies Corporation Stable heat treatable nickel superalloy single crystal articles and compositions
US4719080A (en) * 1985-06-10 1988-01-12 United Technologies Corporation Advanced high strength single crystal superalloy compositions
US6074602A (en) * 1985-10-15 2000-06-13 General Electric Company Property-balanced nickel-base superalloys for producing single crystal articles
US5068084A (en) * 1986-01-02 1991-11-26 United Technologies Corporation Columnar grain superalloy articles
JP3012652B2 (en) * 1986-12-30 2000-02-28 ゼネラル・エレクトリック・カンパニイ Improved, balanced nickel-based superalloys for producing single crystal products
US4895201A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant superalloys containing low sulfur levels
JP2552351B2 (en) * 1988-05-17 1996-11-13 日立金属株式会社 Single crystal Ni-based super heat resistant alloy
US5435861A (en) * 1992-02-05 1995-07-25 Office National D'etudes Et De Recherches Aerospatiales Nickel-based monocrystalline superalloy with improved oxidation resistance and method of production
WO1993024683A1 (en) * 1992-05-28 1993-12-09 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant single crystal superalloy castings
EP0789087B1 (en) * 1996-02-09 2000-05-10 Hitachi, Ltd. High strength Ni-base superalloy for directionally solidified castings
US6007645A (en) * 1996-12-11 1999-12-28 United Technologies Corporation Advanced high strength, highly oxidation resistant single crystal superalloy compositions having low chromium content
EP1054072B1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2003-04-02 ALSTOM (Switzerland) Ltd Nickel base superalloy
US6444057B1 (en) * 1999-05-26 2002-09-03 General Electric Company Compositions and single-crystal articles of hafnium-modified and/or zirconium-modified nickel-base superalloys
US20030041930A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2003-03-06 Deluca Daniel P. Modified advanced high strength single crystal superalloy composition
CA2440573C (en) * 2002-12-16 2013-06-18 Howmet Research Corporation Nickel base superalloy
US7008178B2 (en) * 2003-12-17 2006-03-07 General Electric Company Inboard cooled nozzle doublet
US20050227106A1 (en) * 2004-04-08 2005-10-13 Schlichting Kevin W Single crystal combustor panels having controlled crystallographic orientation
US20130230405A1 (en) * 2007-08-31 2013-09-05 Kevin Swayne O'Hara Nickel base superalloy compositions being substantially free of rhenium and superalloy articles
US8876989B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2014-11-04 General Electric Company Low rhenium nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles
WO2009085420A1 (en) * 2007-12-26 2009-07-09 General Electric Company Nickel base superalloy compositions, superalloy articles, and methods for stabilizing superalloy compositions

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2011002605A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100329921A1 (en) 2010-12-30
JP2012532250A (en) 2012-12-13
WO2011002605A1 (en) 2011-01-06
JP5763062B2 (en) 2015-08-12
CA2766552A1 (en) 2011-01-06
EP2449140B1 (en) 2015-05-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5696995B2 (en) Heat resistant superalloy
JP5595917B2 (en) Nickel-based superalloy composition and superalloy article substantially free of rhenium
JP5490001B2 (en) Low rhenium nickel-base superalloy composition and superalloy article
CN102803528B (en) Nickel-base single-crystal superalloy and turbine wing using same
US20100254822A1 (en) Super oxidation and cyclic damage resistant nickel-base superalloy and articles formed therefrom
CA2841329A1 (en) Hot-forgeable ni-based superalloy excellent in high temperature strength
WO2003080882A1 (en) Ni-BASE DIRECTIONALLY SOLIDIFIED SUPERALLOY AND Ni-BASE SINGLE CRYSTAL SUPERALLOY
WO2017006927A1 (en) HIGH-STRENGTH, HEAT-RESISTANT Ni-BASE ALLOY MEMBER, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND GAS TURBINE
EP2520678B1 (en) Nickel-base alloy
JP4266196B2 (en) Nickel-base superalloy with excellent strength, corrosion resistance and oxidation resistance
JP5626920B2 (en) Nickel-base alloy castings, gas turbine blades and gas turbines
JP5063550B2 (en) Nickel-based alloy and gas turbine blade using the same
EP2449140A1 (en) Nickel base superalloy compositions and superalloy articles
JP5595495B2 (en) Nickel-base superalloy
US20110076179A1 (en) Super oxidation and cyclic damage resistant nickel-base superalloy and articles formed therefrom
EP3366794B1 (en) Ni-based superalloy
EP4043600B1 (en) Nickel-based superalloy
EP4001445A1 (en) Nickel based superalloy with high corrosion resistance and good processability
JP5396445B2 (en) gas turbine
JP2013185210A (en) Nickel-based alloy and gas turbine blade using the same
JP2014047371A (en) Ni-BASED ALLOY AND GAS TURBINE BLADE AND GAS TURBINE USING THE SAME

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120130

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20130218

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150109

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 727796

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010024764

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 727796

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150820

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150921

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150820

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150821

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010024764

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150615

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150520

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230411

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20250520

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20250520

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250520

Year of fee payment: 16