EP2447413B1 - Paper recycling method - Google Patents

Paper recycling method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2447413B1
EP2447413B1 EP20110186573 EP11186573A EP2447413B1 EP 2447413 B1 EP2447413 B1 EP 2447413B1 EP 20110186573 EP20110186573 EP 20110186573 EP 11186573 A EP11186573 A EP 11186573A EP 2447413 B1 EP2447413 B1 EP 2447413B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
paper
waste
waste paper
recycled
recycling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20110186573
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2447413A1 (en
Inventor
Andrew Ian Craig
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Office2Office PLC
Original Assignee
Office2Office PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Office2Office PLC filed Critical Office2Office PLC
Publication of EP2447413A1 publication Critical patent/EP2447413A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2447413B1 publication Critical patent/EP2447413B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21BFIBROUS RAW MATERIALS OR THEIR MECHANICAL TREATMENT
    • D21B1/00Fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment
    • D21B1/04Fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment by dividing raw materials into small particles, e.g. fibres
    • D21B1/12Fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment by dividing raw materials into small particles, e.g. fibres by wet methods, by the use of steam
    • D21B1/30Defibrating by other means
    • D21B1/32Defibrating by other means of waste paper
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21CPRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • D21C5/00Other processes for obtaining cellulose, e.g. cooking cotton linters ; Processes characterised by the choice of cellulose-containing starting materials
    • D21C5/02Working-up waste paper
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/50Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
    • Y02W30/64Paper recycling

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns an improved method for recycling paper.
  • the process is particularly advantageous, since it allows entities that wish to recycle paper to obtain recycled paper that is formed from their own waste. This provides a heightened incentive for companies and other individuals to recycle, since they are able to receive the product of their own recycling, and see the direct result and benefit of their efforts. This leads to increases in recycling within the sector, with the clear benefit to the environment that this brings.
  • Recycled paper is typically formed from waste paper that is collected from homes, offices and other sources in various different schemes. These typically include governmental schemes funded by the state to promote recycling for the benefit of the environment, or by private enterprise which may be interested in the business opportunity that recycling affords.
  • Recycled paper is formed in a typical paper-making process, with the exception that the feedstock is re-pulped waste paper rather than virgin pulp (although some virgin pulp may be added in certain cases). Steps may need to be taken to remove undesirable impurities that are present in the waste feedstock, and to remove ink or other materials that are present in the used paper forming the feedstock.
  • Mill broke contains paper scrap from the manufacture of paper.
  • Pre-consumer waste contains material which has been discarded before it was ready for consumer use.
  • Post-consumer waste contains material discarded after consumer use, such as newspaper, office waste, and residential waste.
  • post-consumer waste is collected in government schemes which are not selective - waste from individual entities is mixed together and taken in large batches for processing. Whilst this may be cost effective, it de-couples the consumer from his or her waste -recycled paper that the consumer might purchase can come from any source.
  • no scheme is in place which would re-connect the consumer with his or her own waste, despite the incentives to recycling that such feelings of ownership would bring.
  • the need is especially acute in an office environment, where use of paper can be high, and the feeling of connection with the waste can be low.
  • EP 2 224 057 A1 discloses a method for recycling paper using a small-sized waste paper recycling apparatus of furniture size installed at the site of origin of the waste paper for recycling and processing the waste paper into re-usable paper at the same site, without disposing or discarding the discharged used paper.
  • US 2009/01178774 A1 discloses a method of recycling paper in which used office paper is collected from an office or a suite of offices in an office building and then recycled into new office paper using a device located in the same office or suite of offices, or within the same office building from which the used paper is collected, the device being of a size similar to that of a typical copy machine.
  • the present invention aims to address the problems set out above in known recycling methods and systems. Accordingly, the present invention aims to provide a recycling system that is capable of collecting waste paper from a particular entity, and delivering to that entity recycled paper that is formed from its own waste.
  • the present invention provides a method for recycling paper, which method comprises:
  • the first and second entities can be any entity. Thus they may be one or more consumers, such as companies and/or private individuals.
  • the entities are preferably companies, or government entities such as government departments, since it is preferred that office waste paper is used. Office waste paper is preferable, since it is not mixed with food products and other domestic waste, which may make the recycled paper seem undesirable to the consumer (even though such waste would be removed before processing and would not in any case be present in the recycled paper).
  • the company may also be a specialist recycling company that collects (or arranges collection) of the waste paper, and sells the recycled paper (or arranges selling) back to the entities from which it was collected.
  • first and second entities are the same, typically a specialist recycling company.
  • the method of the present invention is not especially limited and any steps may be used to produce the paper, provided that it is of acceptable quality, and does not contain any waste paper not associated with the first entity.
  • the recycling apparatus before recycling the waste paper, the recycling apparatus is stopped and cleaned so as to remove any waste paper that is not associated with the first entity.
  • the machinery before recycling the waste paper, the machinery is run to remove foreign paper from the apparatus, to ensure that it is rejected from the finished product. Typically some 5 to 10 tonnes of waste paper may be produced at this changeover and this is returned as feedstock for making other customers' paper.
  • the volume and/or the weight of the waste paper (and/or the recycled paper) is recorded in addition to tagging.
  • Figure 1 shows typical BannerTM waste paper, segregated on arrival at the recycling plant - at least one bale from each load is tagged to enable tracking.
  • a simple Excel spreadsheet existing systems are capable of tracking the input waste through to pallets of finished product.
  • SAP, Product Tracking and Quality Management systems provide full traceability and quality assurance.
  • the waste paper consists of post-consumer waste paper.
  • the waste paper consists of office waste paper.
  • the method of producing the recycled paper is not especially limited and any known method may be employed.
  • the method includes one or more of the following steps:
  • step (e) may be optional. Therefore in one embodiment the method of the invention may comprise all of steps (f) to (i) and optionally step (e).
  • step (e) When step (e) is carried out it may be employed in order to control the recycled paper such that it has a desired whiteness (e.g. by including a larger or smaller quantity of brown paper fibres).
  • the desired whiteness is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put.
  • the desired whiteness is from 65-100 ⁇ 2.5, or 70-100 ⁇ 2.5, in accordance with ISO 11475, more preferably wherein the desired whiteness is 70 ⁇ 2.5, 75 ⁇ 2.5, 80 ⁇ 2.5, 85 ⁇ 2.5, 90 ⁇ 2.5, 95 ⁇ 2.5 or 100 ⁇ 2.5 in accordance with ISO 11475.
  • step (f) the method of pulping is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used.
  • the paper pulp formed has a pulp consistency of 10% or above, more preferably 15% or above, and more preferably still 20% or above.
  • the method of removing impurities is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used, to remove whatever impurities are present. This will depend on the nature of the waste.
  • the impurities comprise one or more impurities selected from discoloured fibres, staples, plastic such as polyethylene, adhesive labels, dirt, glass, and other non-paper-based materials.
  • step (g) comprises a method of screening.
  • the type of screening employed is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used.
  • screening is carried out at a pulp consistency of 0.1-5%, more preferably from 0.4-3.0%, more preferably from 0.5-1.0% and/or from 2-2.8%.
  • screening may be optimized to remove discoloured fibres, such as brown fibres.
  • step (h) the method of decolourising and/or de-inking is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used.
  • step (h) comprises one, other, or both of the decolourising step and the deinking step.
  • step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does not employ a brightening agent.
  • step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does employ a brightening agent.
  • the brightening agent is not especially limited. However, in typical embodiments, the brightening agent is an agent that is not harmful to the environment. The brightening agent is typically employed to ensure that the recycled paper has a desired brightness.
  • the desired brightness of the paper is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put.
  • the desired brightness is from 65-100% ⁇ 2.5%, or 70-100% ⁇ 2.5%, in accordance with ISO 2470, more preferably the brightness is 70% ⁇ 2.5%, 75% ⁇ 2.5%, 80% ⁇ 2.5%, 85% ⁇ 2.5%, 90% ⁇ 2.5, 95% ⁇ 2.5% or 100% ⁇ 2.5% in accordance with ISO 2470.
  • the brightening agent comprises hydrogen peroxide and/or sulphur dioxide.
  • the hydrogen peroxide is employed in a quantity that is not harmful to the environment, and may be employed in a concentration of 1% by weight, or less, more preferably about 0.8% by weight.
  • sulphur dioxide is employed as a brightening agent where brightness of 85% or more is desired, for example brightnesses of 85% ⁇ 2.5%. 90% ⁇ 2.5, 95% ⁇ 2.5% or 100% ⁇ 2.5%.
  • step (i) the method of forming recycled paper from the pulp is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used.
  • step (i) comprises forming a web of wet paper and then drying the web to form the recycled paper.
  • no virgin fibre is added to the waste paper starting material during the method. This ensures that the final recycled paper is formed entirely from waste paper, and reduces the environmental impact.
  • the purpose of the recycled paper produced is not especially limited. Typically, but not exclusively, it is paper suitable for office use. In certain embodiments it is suitable for use in photocopying, printing such as inkjet printing and laser printing, and/or typing.
  • the desired whiteness of the paper is not especially limited, provided that the paper is of acceptable quality. The whiteness may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put. In some embodiments, the desired whiteness is from 65-100 ⁇ 2.5, or 70-100 ⁇ 2.5, in accordance with ISO 11475, more preferably wherein the whiteness is 70 ⁇ 2.5, 75 ⁇ 2.5, 80 ⁇ 2.5, 85 ⁇ 2.5, 90 ⁇ 2.5, 95 ⁇ 2.5 or 100 ⁇ 2.5 in accordance with ISO 11475.
  • the desired brightness of the paper is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put.
  • the desired brightness is from 65-100% ⁇ 2.5%, or 70-100% ⁇ 2.5%, in accordance with ISO 2470, more preferably wherein the brightness is 70% ⁇ 2.5%, 75% ⁇ 2.5%, 80% ⁇ 2.5%, 85% ⁇ 2.5%, 90% ⁇ 2.5, 95% ⁇ 2.5% or 100% ⁇ 2.5% in accordance with ISO 2470.
  • the recycled paper is formed without employing an optical brightening agent.
  • the brightening agent is an agent that is not harmful to the environment.
  • the brightening agent comprises hydrogen peroxide.
  • the hydrogen peroxide is employed in a quantity that is not harmful to the environment, and may be employed in a concentration of 1% by weight, or less.
  • the provenance of the recycled paper is particularly important to some individuals. As mentioned above, some persons prefer to receive their own waste paper back in recycled form. In some instances this encourages recycling by developing a feeling of ownership. Therefore, in the present invention, it is necessary to ensure that the source of the waste paper from which the recycled paper is produced is recorded.
  • a unique identifier (such as a consignment note) is issued for each load of bales of recovered paper delivered to the paper mill; upon arrival, the material is re-weighed at consignment or batch level, and a unique label for each batch and/or consignment is securely fixed to each bale.
  • the bales are subsequently unloaded and stored in a segregated storage area. They may remain there until a new production run of finished paper commences. Consequently, each production batch records which paper consignments were used in the manufacture, and from which original recycling location they came. The owner of the waste may then receive his or her own waste paper back in recycled form.
  • Waste paper is collected from government offices by a recycling company. No initial sorting is carried out.
  • the waste paper comprises substantially all office waste paper and consists entirely of post-consumer waste.
  • the paper is then transported to the mill for processing. Before processing, the paper is stored by the mill in such a manner that the paper is kept separate from other waste paper so as not to contaminate it with other waste.
  • the paper is tagged, so that the government offices from which the waste originates can be identified.
  • the paper recycling apparatus in the recycling plant is stopped and cleaned to remove any waste paper (or recycled paper) that is from a different source.
  • the paper is sorted into batches for forming papers having differing desired whiteness -typically four batches are employed for forming paper having whiteness of 70, 80, 90 and 100 (ISO 11475). Then the waste is processed through the newly cleaned apparatus.
  • Water is added to the waste and then the waste is pulped. This process is performed in a large vessel, known as a 'pulper'.
  • the waste paper starting material is diluted with up to 100 times its weight in water and then subjected to mechanical mixing using rotor blades.
  • the stock is then screened. It is 'slushed' into a pulp consistency of 20% or above and large non-fibrous contaminants are removed (for example staples, plastic such as polyethylene, adhesive labels, glass etc.). The resulting pulp is further filtered and screened to remove further impurities.
  • the printing inks are then removed to increase whiteness and purity (de-inking).
  • the fibres are progressively cleaned and the ink removed in a flotation process where air is blown into the solution.
  • the ink adheres to bubbles of air and rises to the surface from where it is separated.
  • the stock may be brightened, and further additives introduced.
  • the stock is then transferred to a papermaking apparatus, to make paper.
  • some papers may also undergo surface treatments e.g. sizing and calendaring - a process consisting of smoothing the surface of the paper to produce a glazed or glossy appearance.
  • the paper is then wound into a reel, and cut and appropriately packaged for delivery.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention concerns an improved method for recycling paper. The process is particularly advantageous, since it allows entities that wish to recycle paper to obtain recycled paper that is formed from their own waste. This provides a heightened incentive for companies and other individuals to recycle, since they are able to receive the product of their own recycling, and see the direct result and benefit of their efforts. This leads to increases in recycling within the sector, with the clear benefit to the environment that this brings.
  • Recycling is desirable, not only for environmental and sustainability reasons, but also because it maximises the efficiency of use of limited resources, which has a clear economic benefit for all. Recycled paper is typically formed from waste paper that is collected from homes, offices and other sources in various different schemes. These typically include governmental schemes funded by the state to promote recycling for the benefit of the environment, or by private enterprise which may be interested in the business opportunity that recycling affords.
  • Recycled paper is formed in a typical paper-making process, with the exception that the feedstock is re-pulped waste paper rather than virgin pulp (although some virgin pulp may be added in certain cases). Steps may need to be taken to remove undesirable impurities that are present in the waste feedstock, and to remove ink or other materials that are present in the used paper forming the feedstock.
  • Generally, there are three categories of feedstock for making recycled paper. These include mill broke, pre-consumer waste, and post-consumer waste. Mill broke contains paper scrap from the manufacture of paper. Pre-consumer waste contains material which has been discarded before it was ready for consumer use.
  • Post-consumer waste contains material discarded after consumer use, such as newspaper, office waste, and residential waste. Typically post-consumer waste is collected in government schemes which are not selective - waste from individual entities is mixed together and taken in large batches for processing. Whilst this may be cost effective, it de-couples the consumer from his or her waste -recycled paper that the consumer might purchase can come from any source. Currently, no scheme is in place which would re-connect the consumer with his or her own waste, despite the incentives to recycling that such feelings of ownership would bring.
  • The need is especially acute in an office environment, where use of paper can be high, and the feeling of connection with the waste can be low.
  • EP 2 224 057 A1 discloses a method for recycling paper using a small-sized waste paper recycling apparatus of furniture size installed at the site of origin of the waste paper for recycling and processing the waste paper into re-usable paper at the same site, without disposing or discarding the discharged used paper.
  • US 2009/01178774 A1 discloses a method of recycling paper in which used office paper is collected from an office or a suite of offices in an office building and then recycled into new office paper using a device located in the same office or suite of offices, or within the same office building from which the used paper is collected, the device being of a size similar to that of a typical copy machine.
  • The present invention aims to address the problems set out above in known recycling methods and systems. Accordingly, the present invention aims to provide a recycling system that is capable of collecting waste paper from a particular entity, and delivering to that entity recycled paper that is formed from its own waste.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for recycling paper, which method comprises:
    1. (a) obtaining post-consumer waste paper;
    2. (b) tagging the waste paper such that a first entity is associated with the waste paper, wherein tagging is carried out by attaching a label to the waste paper;
    3. (c) recycling the waste paper to produce recycled paper; and
    4. (d) tagging the recycled paper such that a second entity is associated with the recycled paper, wherein tagging is carried out by attaching a label to the recycled paper;
    wherein, in step (c) the recycling process is conducted such that the recycled paper contains no waste paper that is not associated with the first entity.
  • In the context of the present invention, the first and second entities can be any entity. Thus they may be one or more consumers, such as companies and/or private individuals. The entities are preferably companies, or government entities such as government departments, since it is preferred that office waste paper is used. Office waste paper is preferable, since it is not mixed with food products and other domestic waste, which may make the recycled paper seem undesirable to the consumer (even though such waste would be removed before processing and would not in any case be present in the recycled paper). The company may also be a specialist recycling company that collects (or arranges collection) of the waste paper, and sells the recycled paper (or arranges selling) back to the entities from which it was collected.
  • Thus, the natures of the entities in the present invention are not especially limited. However, in typical embodiments the first and second entities are the same, typically a specialist recycling company.
  • The method of the present invention is not especially limited and any steps may be used to produce the paper, provided that it is of acceptable quality, and does not contain any waste paper not associated with the first entity. In some embodiments of the invention, before recycling the waste paper, the recycling apparatus is stopped and cleaned so as to remove any waste paper that is not associated with the first entity. In addition to this, or as an alternative, before recycling the waste paper, the machinery is run to remove foreign paper from the apparatus, to ensure that it is rejected from the finished product. Typically some 5 to 10 tonnes of waste paper may be produced at this changeover and this is returned as feedstock for making other customers' paper.
  • In some embodiments, the volume and/or the weight of the waste paper (and/or the recycled paper) is recorded in addition to tagging.
  • The invention will now be explained in more detail, by way of example only, with reference to the following Figure.
  • Figure 1 shows typical Banner™ waste paper, segregated on arrival at the recycling plant - at least one bale from each load is tagged to enable tracking. With the addition of a simple Excel spreadsheet existing systems are capable of tracking the input waste through to pallets of finished product. A combination of SAP, Product Tracking and Quality Management systems provide full traceability and quality assurance.
  • The invention will now be described in further detail.
  • As has been mentioned above, the waste paper consists of post-consumer waste paper. In some embodiments, the waste paper consists of office waste paper.
  • As has been mentioned, the method of producing the recycled paper is not especially limited and any known method may be employed. In some embodiments the method includes one or more of the following steps:
    • (e) sorting the waste paper starting material;
    • (f) pulping the waste paper starting material to form a paper pulp;
    • (g) removing impurities from the paper pulp;
    • (h) decolourising and/or de-inking the paper pulp; and
    • (i) forming the recycled paper from the pulp.
  • In some embodiments a sorting step may be avoided entirely, and so step (e) may be optional. Therefore in one embodiment the method of the invention may comprise all of steps (f) to (i) and optionally step (e).
  • In other embodiments all of steps (e) to (i) are employed. When step (e) is carried out it may be employed in order to control the recycled paper such that it has a desired whiteness (e.g. by including a larger or smaller quantity of brown paper fibres). The desired whiteness is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put. In some embodiments, the desired whiteness is from 65-100 ±2.5, or 70-100 ±2.5, in accordance with ISO 11475, more preferably wherein the desired whiteness is 70±2.5, 75±2.5, 80±2.5, 85±2.5, 90±2.5, 95±2.5 or 100±2.5 in accordance with ISO 11475.
  • In step (f), the method of pulping is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used. In some embodiments, in step (f) the paper pulp formed has a pulp consistency of 10% or above, more preferably 15% or above, and more preferably still 20% or above.
  • In step (g), the method of removing impurities is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used, to remove whatever impurities are present. This will depend on the nature of the waste. In some embodiments, in step (g) the impurities comprise one or more impurities selected from discoloured fibres, staples, plastic such as polyethylene, adhesive labels, dirt, glass, and other non-paper-based materials.
  • In some embodiments step (g) comprises a method of screening. The type of screening employed is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used. In some embodiments, screening is carried out at a pulp consistency of 0.1-5%, more preferably from 0.4-3.0%, more preferably from 0.5-1.0% and/or from 2-2.8%. In some embodiments screening may be optimized to remove discoloured fibres, such as brown fibres.
  • In step (h), the method of decolourising and/or de-inking is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used. In some embodiments, step (h) comprises one, other, or both of the decolourising step and the deinking step. In some embodiments step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does not employ a brightening agent. In other embodiments step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does employ a brightening agent. The brightening agent is not especially limited. However, in typical embodiments, the brightening agent is an agent that is not harmful to the environment. The brightening agent is typically employed to ensure that the recycled paper has a desired brightness. The desired brightness of the paper is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put. In some embodiments, the desired brightness is from 65-100% ±2.5%, or 70-100% ±2.5%, in accordance with ISO 2470, more preferably the brightness is 70%±2.5%, 75%±2.5%, 80%±2.5%, 85%±2.5%, 90%±2.5, 95%±2.5% or 100%±2.5% in accordance with ISO 2470. In some embodiments the brightening agent comprises hydrogen peroxide and/or sulphur dioxide. Typically the hydrogen peroxide is employed in a quantity that is not harmful to the environment, and may be employed in a concentration of 1% by weight, or less, more preferably about 0.8% by weight. Typically, sulphur dioxide is employed as a brightening agent where brightness of 85% or more is desired, for example brightnesses of 85%±2.5%. 90%±2.5, 95%±2.5% or 100%±2.5%.
  • In step (i), the method of forming recycled paper from the pulp is not especially limited, and any method typically employed in known paper recycling methods may be used. In some embodiments, step (i) comprises forming a web of wet paper and then drying the web to form the recycled paper.
  • In some embodiments of the present invention no virgin fibre is added to the waste paper starting material during the method. This ensures that the final recycled paper is formed entirely from waste paper, and reduces the environmental impact.
  • As has been mentioned above, the purpose of the recycled paper produced is not especially limited. Typically, but not exclusively, it is paper suitable for office use. In certain embodiments it is suitable for use in photocopying, printing such as inkjet printing and laser printing, and/or typing. As has been mentioned, the desired whiteness of the paper is not especially limited, provided that the paper is of acceptable quality. The whiteness may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put. In some embodiments, the desired whiteness is from 65-100 ±2.5, or 70-100 ±2.5, in accordance with ISO 11475, more preferably wherein the whiteness is 70±2.5, 75±2.5, 80±2.5, 85±2.5, 90±2.5, 95±2.5 or 100±2.5 in accordance with ISO 11475.
  • Similarly, the desired brightness of the paper is not especially limited, and may be selected according to the use to which the recycled paper will be put. In some embodiments, the desired brightness is from 65-100% ±2.5%, or 70-100% ±2.5%, in accordance with ISO 2470, more preferably wherein the brightness is 70%±2.5%, 75%±2.5%, 80%±2.5%, 85%±2.5%, 90%±2.5, 95%±2.5% or 100%±2.5% in accordance with ISO 2470.
  • In some embodiments, the recycled paper is formed without employing an optical brightening agent. In typical embodiments, the brightening agent is an agent that is not harmful to the environment. In some embodiments the brightening agent comprises hydrogen peroxide. Typically the hydrogen peroxide is employed in a quantity that is not harmful to the environment, and may be employed in a concentration of 1% by weight, or less.
  • The provenance of the recycled paper is particularly important to some individuals. As mentioned above, some persons prefer to receive their own waste paper back in recycled form. In some instances this encourages recycling by developing a feeling of ownership. Therefore, in the present invention, it is necessary to ensure that the source of the waste paper from which the recycled paper is produced is recorded. In one preferred embodiment, a unique identifier (such as a consignment note) is issued for each load of bales of recovered paper delivered to the paper mill; upon arrival, the material is re-weighed at consignment or batch level, and a unique label for each batch and/or consignment is securely fixed to each bale. The bales are subsequently unloaded and stored in a segregated storage area. They may remain there until a new production run of finished paper commences. Consequently, each production batch records which paper consignments were used in the manufacture, and from which original recycling location they came. The owner of the waste may then receive his or her own waste paper back in recycled form.
  • The invention will now be explained further with reference to the following non-limiting specific embodiments, which are provided by way of example only.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1 ― Recycling government office paper
  • Waste paper is collected from government offices by a recycling company. No initial sorting is carried out. The waste paper comprises substantially all office waste paper and consists entirely of post-consumer waste. The paper is then transported to the mill for processing. Before processing, the paper is stored by the mill in such a manner that the paper is kept separate from other waste paper so as not to contaminate it with other waste. The paper is tagged, so that the government offices from which the waste originates can be identified.
  • The paper recycling apparatus in the recycling plant is stopped and cleaned to remove any waste paper (or recycled paper) that is from a different source.
  • Optionally, before processing, the paper is sorted into batches for forming papers having differing desired whiteness -typically four batches are employed for forming paper having whiteness of 70, 80, 90 and 100 (ISO 11475). Then the waste is processed through the newly cleaned apparatus.
  • Water is added to the waste and then the waste is pulped. This process is performed in a large vessel, known as a 'pulper'. The waste paper starting material is diluted with up to 100 times its weight in water and then subjected to mechanical mixing using rotor blades.
  • The stock is then screened. It is 'slushed' into a pulp consistency of 20% or above and large non-fibrous contaminants are removed (for example staples, plastic such as polyethylene, adhesive labels, glass etc.). The resulting pulp is further filtered and screened to remove further impurities.
  • The printing inks are then removed to increase whiteness and purity (de-inking). The fibres are progressively cleaned and the ink removed in a flotation process where air is blown into the solution. The ink adheres to bubbles of air and rises to the surface from where it is separated.
  • Subsequent to this process, the stock may be brightened, and further additives introduced. The stock is then transferred to a papermaking apparatus, to make paper.
  • To make paper, more water is added to produce a fibre suspension of as little as 1-10 parts fibre to 1000 parts water. The resulting suspension is sprayed through a thin, horizontal slit on to a moving wire mesh. The water is then removed using gravity and suction in a process known as sheet formation. The fibres spread and consolidate into a thin mat, which is a web of wet paper. This web of wet paper is then lifted from the wire mesh and squeezed between a series of presses where its water content is lowered to about 50%. It then passes around a series of cylinders, heated to temperatures in excess of 100°C, where drying takes place. Here the water content is lowered to between 5% and 8%.
  • After drying, some papers may also undergo surface treatments e.g. sizing and calendaring - a process consisting of smoothing the surface of the paper to produce a glazed or glossy appearance. The paper is then wound into a reel, and cut and appropriately packaged for delivery.
  • It is tagged and stored in a location separate from other recycled paper to avoid contamination. It is then delivered to the original government department, or to a recycling company operating on behalf of the department.

Claims (7)

  1. A method for recycling paper, which method comprises:
    (a) obtaining post-consumer waste paper;
    (b) tagging the waste paper such that a first entity is associated with the waste paper, wherein tagging is carried out by attaching a label to the waste paper;
    (c) recycling the waste paper to produce recycled paper ;
    (d) tagging the recycled paper such that a second entity is associated with the recycled paper, wherein tagging is carried out by attaching a label to the recycled paper;
    wherein, in step (c) the recycling process is conducted such that the recycled paper contains no waste paper that is not associated with the first entity.
  2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second entities are the same,
    and/or wherein in step (c), before recycling the waste paper, the recycling apparatus is stopped and cleaned so as to remove any waste paper that is not associated with the first entity,
    and/or wherein the waste paper consists of office waste paper,
    and/or wherein the recycled paper is formed without employing an optical brightening agent.
  3. A method according to any preceding claim, which method includes one or more of the following steps:
    (e) sorting the waste paper starting material;
    (f) pulping the waste paper starting material to form a paper pulp;
    (g) removing impurities from the paper pulp;
    (h) decolourising and/or de-inking the paper pulp; and
    (i) forming the recycled paper from the pulp.
  4. A method according to claim 3 which comprises all of steps (f) to (i) and optionally step (e),
    and/or wherein in step (e) sorting is carried out in order to control the recycled paper such that it has a desired whiteness, preferably wherein the desired whiteness is from 65-100 ±2.5, or 70-100 ±2.5, in accordance with ISO 11475, more preferably wherein the desired whiteness is 70±2.5, 75±2.5, 80±2.5, 85±2.5, 90±2.5, 95±2.5 or 100±2.5 in accordance with ISO 11475,
    and/or wherein in step (f) the paper pulp formed has a pulp consistency of 10% or above, more preferably 15% or above, more preferably still 20% or above,
    and/or wherein in step (g) the impurities comprise one or more impurities selected from discoloured fibres, staples, plastic such as polyethylene, adhesive labels, dirt, glass, and other non-paper-based materials,
    and/or wherein step (g) comprises a method of screening, preferably wherein screening is carried out at a pulp consistency of 0.1-5%, more preferably from 0.4-3.0%, more preferably from 0.5-1.0% and/or from 2-2.8%, and/or preferably wherein screening is optimized to remove discoloured fibres, such as brown fibres,
    and/or wherein step (h) comprises one or both of the decolourising step and the deinking step,
    and/or wherein step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does not employ a brightening agent, or alternatively wherein step (h) comprises a decolourising step and/or a de-inking step, which does employ a brightening agent, preferably wherein the brightening agent is employed in order to control the recycled paper such that it has a desired brightness of from 65-100% ±2.5%, or 70-100% ±2.5%, in accordance with ISO 2470, more preferably wherein the brightness is 70%±2.5%, 75%±2.5%, 80%±2.5%, 85%±2.5%, 90%t2.5, 95%±2.5% or 100%±2.5% in accordance with ISO 2470, preferably wherein the brightening agent comprises hydrogen peroxide, preferably wherein the hydrogen peroxide is employed in a concentration of 1% by weight, or less, and/or wherein the brightening agent comprises sulphur dioxide, preferably wherein sulphur dioxide is employed as a brightening agent where a brightness of 85% or more is desired,
    and/or wherein step (i) comprises forming a web of wet paper and then drying the web to form the recycled paper.
  5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein no virgin fibre is added to the waste paper starting material during the method.
  6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the recycled paper comprises paper suitable for office use.
  7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the recycled paper is suitable for use in photocopying, printing such as laser printing and/or inkjet printing, and/or typing.
EP20110186573 2010-10-26 2011-10-25 Paper recycling method Active EP2447413B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1018060.2A GB2484936A (en) 2010-10-26 2010-10-26 Paper Recycling System

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2447413A1 EP2447413A1 (en) 2012-05-02
EP2447413B1 true EP2447413B1 (en) 2013-04-17

Family

ID=43365528

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20110186573 Active EP2447413B1 (en) 2010-10-26 2011-10-25 Paper recycling method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2447413B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2484936A (en)

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6322664B1 (en) * 2000-10-17 2001-11-27 Voith Sulzer Paper Technology North America, Inc. Method of processing recycled waste paper by separating fibers of different colors
US20090178774A1 (en) * 2005-07-11 2009-07-16 Stefano Brambilla Office equipment for paper recycling
JP2010180512A (en) * 2009-02-07 2010-08-19 Seed:Kk Method and system for producing pulp using waste paper-recycling apparatus, and the waste paper-recycling apparatus
JP2010261120A (en) * 2009-05-02 2010-11-18 Seed:Kk Paper-making device of waste paper-reclaiming apparatus and waste paper-reclaiming apparatus
CN101851872B (en) * 2010-06-22 2012-02-01 岳阳林纸股份有限公司 Pulping technology for deinked waste paper pulp used for making high-grade culture printing paper

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201018060D0 (en) 2010-12-08
EP2447413A1 (en) 2012-05-02
GB2484936A (en) 2012-05-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bajpai Recycling and deinking of recovered paper
CN101851872B (en) Pulping technology for deinked waste paper pulp used for making high-grade culture printing paper
Scott Recovered paper
Faul Quality requirements in graphic paper recycling
Blanco et al. Extending the limits of paper recycling-improvements along the paper value chain
Onusseit The influence of adhesives on recycling
Miranda et al. Impact of increased collection rates and the use of commingled collection systems on the quality of recovered paper. Part 1: Increased collection rates
EP2447413B1 (en) Paper recycling method
EP2447414B1 (en) Paper recycling
US20180002865A1 (en) Method and system for recycling papers
Keränen et al. Changing quality of recycled fiber material. Part 1. Factors affecting the quality and an approach for characterisation of the strength potential
Grossmann et al. Paper recycling
CN112298847B (en) Express package recycling method
Bilek et al. Recycling Paper-Plastic laminate coffee cups using a Single-Disk Refiner: Energy requirements and recovered fiber quality
US6187135B1 (en) Process for making recycled paper having improving strength properties
CN104695264A (en) Biological enzyme composition for synchronous treatment of waste cardboard paper ink and sticker, and application thereof
Runte et al. Recyclability criteria for paper based packaging products
US6322664B1 (en) Method of processing recycled waste paper by separating fibers of different colors
Bowyer Selection of Printing and Writing Paper for Minimum Environmental Impact
Gangwar Benefits of Polycups Stock over Other Waste Paper Grades in Paper Recycling
Smolin et al. Secondary fibrous materials from cardboard and paper production and consumption waste
Martire Taking in the recycling
JP2003253579A (en) Method for recycling recovered paper pack
Blasius et al. Improving the cost-effectiveness of white top linerboard based on recycled pulp
Kumar The brief review on the paper recycling techniques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20111025

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: CRAIG, ANDREW IAN

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 607393

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011001387

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 607393

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130417

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130728

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130819

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130718

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130817

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130717

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140120

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011001387

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140120

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131025

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111025

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20161028

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20161025

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20161026

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20161026

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161024

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011001387

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180531 AND 20180606

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171101

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171025

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231013

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20231012

Year of fee payment: 13