EP2431663B1 - Control for monitoring flame integrity in a heating appliance - Google Patents
Control for monitoring flame integrity in a heating appliance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2431663B1 EP2431663B1 EP11177579.7A EP11177579A EP2431663B1 EP 2431663 B1 EP2431663 B1 EP 2431663B1 EP 11177579 A EP11177579 A EP 11177579A EP 2431663 B1 EP2431663 B1 EP 2431663B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- flame
- current signal
- indicative
- controller
- burner
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N1/00—Regulating fuel supply
- F23N1/02—Regulating fuel supply conjointly with air supply
- F23N1/022—Regulating fuel supply conjointly with air supply using electronic means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N3/00—Regulating air supply or draught
- F23N3/08—Regulating air supply or draught by power-assisted systems
- F23N3/082—Regulating air supply or draught by power-assisted systems using electronic means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
- F23N5/02—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium
- F23N5/12—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium using ionisation-sensitive elements, i.e. flame rods
- F23N5/123—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium using ionisation-sensitive elements, i.e. flame rods using electronic means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
- F23N5/18—Systems for controlling combustion using detectors sensitive to rate of flow of air or fuel
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N2229/00—Flame sensors
- F23N2229/08—Flame sensors detecting flame flicker
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N2229/00—Flame sensors
- F23N2229/12—Flame sensors with flame rectification current detecting means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N2233/00—Ventilators
- F23N2233/06—Ventilators at the air intake
- F23N2233/08—Ventilators at the air intake with variable speed
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
- F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
- F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
- F23N5/02—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium
- F23N5/12—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium using ionisation-sensitive elements, i.e. flame rods
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to control of burner operation, and more particularly to detecting characteristics of ionization current resulting from a burner flame.
- Gas fired heating appliances use a source of gas and a source of air that are mixed and transmitted to a burner where an igniter initiates combustion.
- the ratio of gas to air in the gas/air mixture is essential to maintaining good combustion and keeping efficiency within an acceptable range. While a flame becomes more conductive as the ratio of the air/fuel mixture approaches near-stoichiometric conditions, attempts to use ionic flame monitoring to maintain a peak flame rod current have resulted in incomplete combustion due to shortage of primary air, as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,356,199 to Niziolek .
- the sensor supplying the ionization signal ages during burner operation as a result of dirt deposited on the sensor and chemical decomposition, which makes the ionization sensor signal no longer reliable since the electrical behavior of the sensor changes, as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 6,783,355 to Blaauwwiekel .
- ionic flame monitoring equipment is only reliable for indicating a flame presence, and does not provide reliable feedback over time about the quality of the flame.
- DE 10220772 which is considered to represent the closest prior art, discloses a system for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance having a burner, comprising: a fuel flow control for controlling the rate of fuel flow to the burner; and a combustion air blower having a variable speed motor for varying the flow rate of combustion air supplied to the burner, the system comprising; a sensor for sensing a flame at the burner and providing an output of a flame current signal; and a controller in communication with the combustion air blower, the gas flow control, and the sensor for sensing flame current, and operable to detect the occurrence of a flame instability, the controller being configured to process the flame current signal by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data into a frequency spectrum having a spectrum shape defined by various frequency components of varying amplitude.
- the present invention further provides a method of controlling the operation of a dual-fired heating appliance as defined in claim 7.
- a control apparatus for sensing flame instability that may be caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, for example.
- the apparatus includes a sensor for sensing a flame and generating a flame current signal, and a controller in communication with the sensor.
- the controller is configured to receive the flame current signal and to detect the occurrence of a flame instability condition from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum which changes from a stable to an instable spectrum when flame instability occurs.
- the controller is configured to respond to the detection of a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to adjust the speed of a combustion air blower supplying air to the burner, to thereby adjust the air flow relative to fuel flow until the controller detects a flame current signal that is indicative of normal combustion.
- the sensor for sensing flame at the burner may be any number of sensor configurations that generate an appropriate flame current signal, as explained below.
- an alternating current line voltage source may be applied across a flame zone that lies between a flame probe electrode and an electrical contact at the burner that is spaced from the probe electrode. Since a flame is characterized by a stream of ions that induce flame ionization, the flame imparts a direct current voltage to the alternating current that is applied across the flame probe electrode and the electrical contact (e.g., electrical ground). This phenomenon is referred to as flame rectification. The resulting flame current waveform generally varies depending on flame consistency. Thus, in the presence of a flame, a time varying flame current signal is generated that is characterized by various frequency components, such as that of the 60 Hertz frequency of the line voltage applied across the flame.
- the flame current input signal is measured, or digitized, at a high sampling rate and the transformed by a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm.
- the flame current signal is first passed through an analog filter to attenuate all frequency components above the frequency range in which the signal is to be analyzed.
- Nyquist's theorum indicates that a sampling rate should be at least twice the maximum frequency component of the filtered signal for the sampled data to accurately represent the input signal, where the frequency resolution is ⁇ v - 1/T (the inverse of the time T over which the waveform is measured and Fourier transformed).
- the primary frequency range of interest is from near DC (direct current) to at least 1 kilohertz.
- the sampled flame current signal establishes a time record of data for a given time portion of the flame current signal.
- the signal's time record is then transformed into a frequency spectrum that shows the frequency components of the input signal.
- the Fast Fourier Transform also enables the flame current signal data to be analyzed to identify variations in the flame that have hitherto been observed only by complex acoustic or optic techniques, which are generally referred to as thermo-acoustic spectrum.
- the controllers of the various embodiments are configured to analyze the flame current signal to identify variations within the flame current signal data that are comparable to thermo-acoustic spectra for identifying flame variations, as explained below.
- thermo-acoustic spectrum In normal combustion conditions where air flow to the burner is in excess of that required for stoichiometry, the flame exhibits a generally flat thermo-acoustic spectrum. Similarly, during normal combustion conditions, the sampled flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed provides a generally steady frequency spectrum. When combustion approaches a lean condition, it creates instabilities in the frequency spectrum, which may be visibly observed via a display output of a spectrum analyzer, for example.
- a spectrum analyzer is capable of displaying a spectrum over a given frequency range, where the spectrum displayed changes as properties of the signal change.
- a spectrum analyzer is an SR760 Fast Fourier Transform spectrum analyzer.
- the flame current input signal may be digitized at a high sampling rate for an interval in which the waveform is measured and Fourier transformed.
- the magnitude of the spectrum represents the total signal amplitude at each discrete frequency value/component, and allows for determining the amplitude of various frequency components within the frequency span of the spectrum.
- the controllers of the various embodiments can determine whether the amplitude of frequencies across the entire spectrum represents a generally flat 'thermo-acoustic' spectrum indicative of normal combustion, as in the example shown in FIG. 2 .
- the flame current signal viewed on an oscilloscope would appear as shown in FIG. 3 . From the waveform in FIG. 3 , it is apparent that no characterization as to flame quality can be derived from the flame current signal due to its noise.
- the controller 110 can determine whether a change in shape of the spectrum has occurred, such as where there are a number of spikes or component frequencies of higher amplitude in the spectrum that are representative of 'thermo-acoustic' and decreased combustion quality, as in the example shown in FIG. 4 .
- the flame current signal data processed via a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm provides a means for detecting changes in the spectrum that indicate an occurrence of flame instability and compromised combustion quality. This approach overcomes the effects of aging or contamination of the flame sensor, which causes the magnitude of the flame current signal to decrease overtime. Since the present detection is based on a change in shape or signature of the frequency spectrum (and not flame current level), it is generally immune to sensor aging and contamination, as long as a sufficient signal magnitude is available to measure.
- a system for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance.
- a functional block diagram is shown of one embodiment of a system having a burner 102 and a fuel flow control 140 for controlling the rate of fuel flow to the burner 102.
- the system also includes a combustion air blower 130 having a motor for varying the flow rate of combustion air supplied to the burner 102, and a sensor 104 that senses a flame presence and outputs a flame current signal.
- the combustion air blower 130 and fuel flow control 140 are controlled by an apparatus 100 that includes a controller 110 in communication with the combustion air blower 130, the fuel flow control 140, and the sensor 104, as described below.
- the apparatus 100 provides for detecting flame instability that may be caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, in controlling operation of a burner 102.
- the apparatus 100 includes a probe sensor 104 that senses a flame at the burner 102 and provides an output of a flame current signal.
- the apparatus 100 further includes a controller 110 in communication with the sensor 104.
- the controller 110 is preferably programmable, and encoded with an instruction operable to output a signal to reduce the speed of the combustion air blower 130 to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner 102.
- the controller 110 is further configured to monitor the flame current signal to detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data into a spectrum of frequency components to identify a change from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability. Such flame instability may be caused by an inadequate air flow relative to fuel flow to the burner 102, for example.
- the controller 110 adjusts one of the speed of the combustion air blower 130 or the fuel flow control 140 to increase the air flow relative to the fuel flow until the controller 110 detects that the sensed flame current signal is indicative of flame stability associated with normal combustion.
- the controller 110 is in communication with the combustion air blower 130 and upon detecting flame instability (from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum that changes to an instable spectrum), the controller 110 responsively generates a signal to the combustion air blower. Specifically, the controller 110 responds to a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to a combustion air blower motor to increase the speed of the combustion air blower 130 that supplies air to the burner, to thereby increase the ratio of air-to-fuel to remedy the flame instability that is caused by an inadequate air-fuel ratio. The controller 110 may output one or more signals to incrementally increase the air flow to the burner 102 until the controller 110 detects a flame current signal representing a stable flame, as explained below.
- the controller 110 receives the flame current signal via a signal conditioning device 112, which may include an analog filter to attenuate frequencies above the range in which the signal is to be analyzed.
- the filtered flame current signal is measured at a given sampling rate, and the data input to a processor 114 (or other suitable circuitry) in which the signal data is measured and Fourier transformed to provide an output of a spectrum 116.
- the controller 110 may include a comparator 118 or other circuitry for analyzing the frequency spectrum.
- the controller 110 may further compare the measured spectrum to a predefined spectrum or frequency pattern associated with the particular type of burner that is stored in an electronic memory 120, to determine whether the flame current signal represents a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability and normal combustion.
- the controller 110 is configured to determine whether spectrum for the flame current signal changes from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability and less than desirable combustion. Such a condition may be caused by an inadequate air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate.
- the controller 110 is configured to response to such a change by generating a signal via mixture control 122 to adjust the speed of the combustion air blower 130 to increase the air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate until the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion.
- the controller 110 may generating a signal to adjust the fuel flow control 140 for reducing the gas flow rate to the burner 102 to effectively increase the air flow rate relative to gas flow to the burner 102 until the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion.
- the controller 110 may adaptively identify an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability for a particular type of burner installed in the system.
- an ignition control 124 for controlling activation of fuel flow control 140 and an igniter 126 for establishing flame at the burner 102. Thereafter, the presence of flame may be detected either by the ignition control 124 or by the flame current monitoring circuitry of controller 110.
- the ignition control 124 and controller 110 may be combined in a signal integral control, or alternatively, the controller 110 may be separate from the ignition control 124.
- FIG. 5 shows a system for controlling the operation of a burner, and also an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 100 for monitoring flame instability that has a sensor 104 for providing a flame current signal and a controller 110 in communication with the sensor 104.
- the controller 110 is configured to detect the occurrence of a flame instability condition from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum that changes from a steady to instable spectrum when flame instability is caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, wherein the controller 110 is configured to respond to the detection of a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to increase the speed of a combustion air blower 130 that supplies air to the burner 102, to thereby increase the air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate until the controller 110 detects that the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion.
- the controller 110 of the apparatus 100 determines whether the operation of the burner is in a normal run mode or a start-up mode. In start-up mode, the controller 110 sets the fuel flow control 140, igniter 126, and combustion air blower 130 to initial conditions for establishing operation of the burner 102 at steps 520, 530. In normal run mode 540, the controller 110 proceeds at step 550 to read or measure the flame current signal at a given data sampling rate, and then save the data at step 555. The flame current signal data is then transformed using a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm at step 560, into a frequency spectrum that shows the frequency components of the flame current signal.
- the Fourier transformed data or frequency spectrum is analyzed, to determine whether the flame current signal represents a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability and normal combustion at 570, or whether the spectrum has changed from a generally steady spectrum to an instable spectrum 580 that is indicative of flame instability and less than desirable combustion.
- the controller 110 is configured to respond to spectrum indicating flame instability by generating an output signal to increase the speed of the combustion air blower 130 and combustion air flow to the burner 102 at step 590.
- the loop in FIG. 5 may be repeated and the speed of the blower increased again at step 590 until the controller 110 detects Fourier transformed flame current data with a spectrum that is indicative of normal combustion (570).
- the method also provides for generating an output signal to reduce the speed of the blower's variable speed motor, to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner until the occurrence of flame instability is detected at step 595.
- a method for controlling operation of a burner in a fuel-fred heating appliance comprises sensing a flame current at a burner and providing an output of a flame current signal, and monitoring the flame current signal to detect flame instability.
- the method may detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate, and transforming the measured data into a spectrum of frequency components of varying amplitude, to detect a change from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability.
- the method further includes reducing the speed of a combustion air blower to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner until the occurrence of flame instability is detected, and incrementally increasing the speed of a combustion air blower until the sensed flame current signal and associated spectrum is indicative of normal combustion.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Control Of Combustion (AREA)
Description
- The present disclosure relates to control of burner operation, and more particularly to detecting characteristics of ionization current resulting from a burner flame.
- Gas fired heating appliances use a source of gas and a source of air that are mixed and transmitted to a burner where an igniter initiates combustion. However, the ratio of gas to air in the gas/air mixture is essential to maintaining good combustion and keeping efficiency within an acceptable range. While a flame becomes more conductive as the ratio of the air/fuel mixture approaches near-stoichiometric conditions, attempts to use ionic flame monitoring to maintain a peak flame rod current have resulted in incomplete combustion due to shortage of primary air, as disclosed in
U.S. Patent No. 5,356,199 to Niziolek . Moreover, the sensor supplying the ionization signal ages during burner operation as a result of dirt deposited on the sensor and chemical decomposition, which makes the ionization sensor signal no longer reliable since the electrical behavior of the sensor changes, as disclosed inU.S. Patent No. 6,783,355 to Blaauwwiekel . Thus, ionic flame monitoring equipment is only reliable for indicating a flame presence, and does not provide reliable feedback over time about the quality of the flame. -
DE 10220772 , which is considered to represent the closest prior art, discloses a system for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance having a burner, comprising: a fuel flow control for controlling the rate of fuel flow to the burner; and a combustion air blower having a variable speed motor for varying the flow rate of combustion air supplied to the burner, the system comprising; a sensor for sensing a flame at the burner and providing an output of a flame current signal; and a controller in communication with the combustion air blower, the gas flow control, and the sensor for sensing flame current, and operable to detect the occurrence of a flame instability, the controller being configured to process the flame current signal by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data into a frequency spectrum having a spectrum shape defined by various frequency components of varying amplitude. - Other prior art systems are disclosed in
DE 10220773 andUS 5049063 . - According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance as defined in
claim 1. - The present invention further provides a method of controlling the operation of a dual-fired heating appliance as defined in
claim 7. - In order that the invention may be well understood, there will now be described some embodiments thereof, given by way of example, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 shows a flame current signal during normal combustion, as utilized in various system and apparatus embodiments of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 2 shows a spectrum derived using Fourier transformed flame current data obtained from the flame current signal inFIG. 1 , which indicates flame stability in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 3 shows a flame current signal that includes an occurrence of flame instability associated with abnormal combustion, in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 4 shows a spectrum derived using Fourier transformed flame current data obtained from the flame current signal inFIG. 3 , which indicates an instable flame in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system and apparatus for burner control, in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure; and -
FIG. 6 shows a flow chart illustrating the control of burner operation by the embodiment shown inFIG. 5 , in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure. Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings. - Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- In the various embodiments of a control for a heating appliance, a control apparatus is provided for sensing flame instability that may be caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, for example. The apparatus includes a sensor for sensing a flame and generating a flame current signal, and a controller in communication with the sensor. The controller is configured to receive the flame current signal and to detect the occurrence of a flame instability condition from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum which changes from a stable to an instable spectrum when flame instability occurs. The controller is configured to respond to the detection of a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to adjust the speed of a combustion air blower supplying air to the burner, to thereby adjust the air flow relative to fuel flow until the controller detects a flame current signal that is indicative of normal combustion. It should be noted that the sensor for sensing flame at the burner may be any number of sensor configurations that generate an appropriate flame current signal, as explained below.
- To generate a flame current signal, an alternating current line voltage source may be applied across a flame zone that lies between a flame probe electrode and an electrical contact at the burner that is spaced from the probe electrode. Since a flame is characterized by a stream of ions that induce flame ionization, the flame imparts a direct current voltage to the alternating current that is applied across the flame probe electrode and the electrical contact (e.g., electrical ground). This phenomenon is referred to as flame rectification. The resulting flame current waveform generally varies depending on flame consistency. Thus, in the presence of a flame, a time varying flame current signal is generated that is characterized by various frequency components, such as that of the 60 Hertz frequency of the line voltage applied across the flame. However, when a flame current signal in normal combustion is viewed on an oscilloscope (as shown in
FIG. 1 ), the displayed waveform only provides a measure of noise amplitude of the overall flame current signal. Moreover, it is difficult to characterize or quantify the distortion caused by the ionizing current to the alternating current sine waveform, and no characterization as to flame quality can be derived from the flame current signal due to its noise. While analog filters can be used to isolate select frequencies within the flame current signal by tuning the filters and repeating measurements to identify select frequencies within the flame current signal, this process would be tedious and time consuming. - In the apparatus of the first embodiment, the flame current input signal is measured, or digitized, at a high sampling rate and the transformed by a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm. The flame current signal is first passed through an analog filter to attenuate all frequency components above the frequency range in which the signal is to be analyzed. Nyquist's theorum indicates that a sampling rate should be at least twice the maximum frequency component of the filtered signal for the sampled data to accurately represent the input signal, where the frequency resolution is Δv - 1/T (the inverse of the time T over which the waveform is measured and Fourier transformed). In the present application, the primary frequency range of interest is from near DC (direct current) to at least 1 kilohertz. The sampled flame current signal establishes a time record of data for a given time portion of the flame current signal. Using a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm, the signal's time record is then transformed into a frequency spectrum that shows the frequency components of the input signal. This Fast Fourier Transform technique provides an advantage of speed in measuring the entire spectrum of frequency in a short time, as explained below,
- If 1024 sampled data values are measured at 256 kilohertz, for example, it would take only 4 milliseconds to capture a spectrum from the highest to lowest frequency, where the highest frequency is determined by the period of two consecutive samples (128 kHz), and the lowest frequency is determined by the period of all samplings (1/4 milliseconds = 250 Hz). The output spectrum would represent frequencies from 250 Hertz to 128 kilohertz with frequency resolution points at every 250 Hertz. The magnitude of the spectrum and its frequencies is proportional to the square root of the Fast Fourier Transform.
- The Fast Fourier Transform also enables the flame current signal data to be analyzed to identify variations in the flame that have hitherto been observed only by complex acoustic or optic techniques, which are generally referred to as thermo-acoustic spectrum. The controllers of the various embodiments are configured to analyze the flame current signal to identify variations within the flame current signal data that are comparable to thermo-acoustic spectra for identifying flame variations, as explained below.
- In normal combustion conditions where air flow to the burner is in excess of that required for stoichiometry, the flame exhibits a generally flat thermo-acoustic spectrum. Similarly, during normal combustion conditions, the sampled flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed provides a generally steady frequency spectrum. When combustion approaches a lean condition, it creates instabilities in the frequency spectrum, which may be visibly observed via a display output of a spectrum analyzer, for example. A spectrum analyzer is capable of displaying a spectrum over a given frequency range, where the spectrum displayed changes as properties of the signal change. One example of a spectrum analyzer is an SR760 Fast Fourier Transform spectrum analyzer. In a Fast Fourier Transform spectrum analyzer, the flame current input signal may be digitized at a high sampling rate for an interval in which the waveform is measured and Fourier transformed. The magnitude of the spectrum represents the total signal amplitude at each discrete frequency value/component, and allows for determining the amplitude of various frequency components within the frequency span of the spectrum.
- From the Fast Fourier Transform of flame current data, the controllers of the various embodiments can determine whether the amplitude of frequencies across the entire spectrum represents a generally flat 'thermo-acoustic' spectrum indicative of normal combustion, as in the example shown in
FIG. 2 . When an insufficient air to fuel flow ratio leads to less than desirable combustion, the flame current signal viewed on an oscilloscope would appear as shown inFIG. 3 . From the waveform inFIG. 3 , it is apparent that no characterization as to flame quality can be derived from the flame current signal due to its noise. However, using the flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed, thecontroller 110 can determine whether a change in shape of the spectrum has occurred, such as where there are a number of spikes or component frequencies of higher amplitude in the spectrum that are representative of 'thermo-acoustic' and decreased combustion quality, as in the example shown inFIG. 4 . Thus, as changes in the air-fuel ratio affect combustion and flame quality, the flame current signal data processed via a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm provides a means for detecting changes in the spectrum that indicate an occurrence of flame instability and compromised combustion quality. This approach overcomes the effects of aging or contamination of the flame sensor, which causes the magnitude of the flame current signal to decrease overtime. Since the present detection is based on a change in shape or signature of the frequency spectrum (and not flame current level), it is generally immune to sensor aging and contamination, as long as a sufficient signal magnitude is available to measure. - According to one aspect of the present disclosure, a system is provided for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance. Referring to
FIG. 5 , a functional block diagram is shown of one embodiment of a system having aburner 102 and afuel flow control 140 for controlling the rate of fuel flow to theburner 102. The system also includes acombustion air blower 130 having a motor for varying the flow rate of combustion air supplied to theburner 102, and asensor 104 that senses a flame presence and outputs a flame current signal. Thecombustion air blower 130 andfuel flow control 140 are controlled by an apparatus 100 that includes acontroller 110 in communication with thecombustion air blower 130, thefuel flow control 140, and thesensor 104, as described below. - The apparatus 100 provides for detecting flame instability that may be caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, in controlling operation of a
burner 102. The apparatus 100 includes aprobe sensor 104 that senses a flame at theburner 102 and provides an output of a flame current signal. The apparatus 100 further includes acontroller 110 in communication with thesensor 104. Thecontroller 110 is preferably programmable, and encoded with an instruction operable to output a signal to reduce the speed of thecombustion air blower 130 to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to theburner 102. Thecontroller 110 is further configured to monitor the flame current signal to detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data into a spectrum of frequency components to identify a change from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability. Such flame instability may be caused by an inadequate air flow relative to fuel flow to theburner 102, for example. In response to detecting a change of the measured spectrum to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability, thecontroller 110 adjusts one of the speed of thecombustion air blower 130 or thefuel flow control 140 to increase the air flow relative to the fuel flow until thecontroller 110 detects that the sensed flame current signal is indicative of flame stability associated with normal combustion. - In
FIG. 5 , thecontroller 110 is in communication with thecombustion air blower 130 and upon detecting flame instability (from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum that changes to an instable spectrum), thecontroller 110 responsively generates a signal to the combustion air blower. Specifically, thecontroller 110 responds to a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to a combustion air blower motor to increase the speed of thecombustion air blower 130 that supplies air to the burner, to thereby increase the ratio of air-to-fuel to remedy the flame instability that is caused by an inadequate air-fuel ratio. Thecontroller 110 may output one or more signals to incrementally increase the air flow to theburner 102 until thecontroller 110 detects a flame current signal representing a stable flame, as explained below. - As shown in
FIG. 5 , thecontroller 110 receives the flame current signal via asignal conditioning device 112, which may include an analog filter to attenuate frequencies above the range in which the signal is to be analyzed. The filtered flame current signal is measured at a given sampling rate, and the data input to a processor 114 (or other suitable circuitry) in which the signal data is measured and Fourier transformed to provide an output of aspectrum 116. Thecontroller 110 may include acomparator 118 or other circuitry for analyzing the frequency spectrum. Thecontroller 110 may further compare the measured spectrum to a predefined spectrum or frequency pattern associated with the particular type of burner that is stored in anelectronic memory 120, to determine whether the flame current signal represents a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability and normal combustion. Similarly, thecontroller 110 is configured to determine whether spectrum for the flame current signal changes from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability and less than desirable combustion. Such a condition may be caused by an inadequate air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate. Thecontroller 110 is configured to response to such a change by generating a signal viamixture control 122 to adjust the speed of thecombustion air blower 130 to increase the air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate until the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion. Alternatively, thecontroller 110 may generating a signal to adjust thefuel flow control 140 for reducing the gas flow rate to theburner 102 to effectively increase the air flow rate relative to gas flow to theburner 102 until the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion. Additionally, thecontroller 110 may adaptively identify an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability for a particular type of burner installed in the system. - Also shown in
FIG. 5 is anignition control 124 for controlling activation offuel flow control 140 and anigniter 126 for establishing flame at theburner 102. Thereafter, the presence of flame may be detected either by theignition control 124 or by the flame current monitoring circuitry ofcontroller 110. Theignition control 124 andcontroller 110 may be combined in a signal integral control, or alternatively, thecontroller 110 may be separate from theignition control 124. - Accordingly,
FIG. 5 shows a system for controlling the operation of a burner, and also an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 100 for monitoring flame instability that has asensor 104 for providing a flame current signal and acontroller 110 in communication with thesensor 104. Thecontroller 110 is configured to detect the occurrence of a flame instability condition from flame current signal data that is measured and Fourier transformed into a frequency spectrum that changes from a steady to instable spectrum when flame instability is caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio, wherein thecontroller 110 is configured to respond to the detection of a flame instability condition by generating an output signal to increase the speed of acombustion air blower 130 that supplies air to theburner 102, to thereby increase the air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate until thecontroller 110 detects that the flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion. - Referring to
FIG. 6 , a flow chart is shown illustrating the control method of the apparatus 100 of the first embodiment. Atstep 510, thecontroller 110 of the apparatus 100 determines whether the operation of the burner is in a normal run mode or a start-up mode. In start-up mode, thecontroller 110 sets thefuel flow control 140,igniter 126, andcombustion air blower 130 to initial conditions for establishing operation of theburner 102 atsteps normal run mode 540, thecontroller 110 proceeds atstep 550 to read or measure the flame current signal at a given data sampling rate, and then save the data atstep 555. The flame current signal data is then transformed using a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm atstep 560, into a frequency spectrum that shows the frequency components of the flame current signal. Atstep 565, the Fourier transformed data or frequency spectrum is analyzed, to determine whether the flame current signal represents a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability and normal combustion at 570, or whether the spectrum has changed from a generally steady spectrum to aninstable spectrum 580 that is indicative of flame instability and less than desirable combustion. Thecontroller 110 is configured to respond to spectrum indicating flame instability by generating an output signal to increase the speed of thecombustion air blower 130 and combustion air flow to theburner 102 atstep 590. The loop inFIG. 5 may be repeated and the speed of the blower increased again atstep 590 until thecontroller 110 detects Fourier transformed flame current data with a spectrum that is indicative of normal combustion (570). The method also provides for generating an output signal to reduce the speed of the blower's variable speed motor, to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner until the occurrence of flame instability is detected atstep 595. - Accordingly, one embodiment of a method for controlling operation of a burner in a fuel-fred heating appliance is a provided. The method comprises sensing a flame current at a burner and providing an output of a flame current signal, and monitoring the flame current signal to detect flame instability. The method may detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate, and transforming the measured data into a spectrum of frequency components of varying amplitude, to detect a change from a generally steady spectrum indicative of flame stability to an instable spectrum indicative of flame instability. The method further includes reducing the speed of a combustion air blower to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner until the occurrence of flame instability is detected, and incrementally increasing the speed of a combustion air blower until the sensed flame current signal and associated spectrum is indicative of normal combustion.
Claims (7)
- A system for controlling a fuel-fired heating appliance having a burner (102), comprising: a fuel flow control (140) for controlling the rate of fuel flow to the burner (102); and a combustion air blower (130) having a variable speed motor for varying the flow rate of combustion air supplied to the burner (102), the system comprising;
a sensor (104) for sensing a flame at the burner (102) and providing an output of a flame current signal; and
a controller (110) in communication with the combustion air blower (130), the gas flow control (140), and the sensor (104) for sensing flame current, and operable to detect the occurrence of a flame instability, the controller (110) being configured to process the flame current signal by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and using a Fourier transformation to transform the measured data into a frequency spectrum (116) having a spectrum shape defined by various frequency components of varying amplitude, characterized in that the controller is configured to determine, based on comparison of frequency spectrum shapes, whether the flame current signal changes from presenting a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame stability and normal combustion to presenting a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame instability and less than desirable combustion caused by an inadequate air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate, and in response to said change the controller (110) adjusts one of the combustion air blower speed or the fuel flow rate to increase the air flow rate relative to the fuel flow rate until the controller detects that the sensed flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion. - A system of claim 1, wherein the controller (110) is configured to detect the occurrence of flame instability from the flame current signal data by measuring the flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data to a spectrum (116) of various frequency components of varying amplitude, and determining, adaptively for the burner type, whether the flame current signal changes from a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame stability (116) and hence indicative of normal combustion to a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame instability (116) and hence indicative of flame instability caused by an inadequate air-to-fuel ratio.
- A system of claim 1, wherein the controller (110) is encoded with an instruction operable to output a signal to reduce the speed of the combustion air blower (130) to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner (102), and configured to monitor the flame current signal to detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and transforming the measured data into a spectrum (116) of frequency components to identify a change from a frequency spectrum shape generally indicative of flame stability to a frequency spectrum shape generally indicative of flame instability caused by an inadequate air flow relative to fuel flow, where in response to detecting a change to a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame instability, the controller (110) adjusts one of the combustion air blower speed or the gas flow rate to increase the air flow relative to the fuel flow until the controller (110) detects that the sensed flame current signal is indicative of flame stability associated with normal combustion.
- A system of claim 1 or claim 3, wherein the controller (110) is configured to transform the data measured from the flame current signal waveform using a Fast Fourier Transformation algorithm.
- A system of claim 1 or claim 3, wherein the controller (110) is configured to determine whether the flame current signal presents a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame stability and normal combustion by comparing the spectrum shape to a predefined spectrum pattern associated with the particular type of burner that is stored in an electronic memory (120).
- A system of claim 5, wherein the controller (110) is configured to identify a frequency spectrum shape indicative of flame instability for the particular type of burner (102) installed in the system.
- A method of controlling the operation of a fuel-fired heating appliance, comprising:sensing a flame current at a burner (102) and providing an output of a flame current signal;monitoring the flame current signal to detect flame instability by measuring the sensed flame current signal waveform at a given data sampling rate and using a Fourier transformation to transform the measured data into a frequency spectrum (116) having a spectrum shape defined by a plurality of frequency components of varying amplitude, performing the measuring and transforming to obtain another frequency spectrum (116) shape and comparing frequency spectral shapes to detect a change from a frequency spectrum shape generally indicative of flame stability to a frequency spectrum shape generally indicative of flame instability;reducing the speed of a combustion air blower (130) to reduce the flow rate of combustion air to the burner (102) until flame instability is detected by the monitoring process; andincrementally increasing the speed of the combustion air blower (130) until the frequency spectrum shape of the sensed flame current signal is indicative of normal combustion.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/873,560 US9366433B2 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2010-09-16 | Control for monitoring flame integrity in a heating appliance |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2431663A2 EP2431663A2 (en) | 2012-03-21 |
EP2431663A3 EP2431663A3 (en) | 2012-12-19 |
EP2431663B1 true EP2431663B1 (en) | 2016-12-21 |
Family
ID=43756924
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11177579.7A Not-in-force EP2431663B1 (en) | 2010-09-16 | 2011-08-15 | Control for monitoring flame integrity in a heating appliance |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9366433B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2431663B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102021006182A1 (en) | 2021-12-14 | 2023-06-15 | Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG | Method for controlling a burner and burner arrangement with a burner |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8773137B2 (en) * | 2008-03-07 | 2014-07-08 | Bertelli & Partners, S.R.L. | Method and device to detect the flame in a burner operating on a solid, liquid or gaseous combustible |
DE102011117736A1 (en) * | 2011-11-07 | 2013-05-08 | Honeywell Technologies Sarl | Method for operating a gas burner |
US8904971B2 (en) * | 2011-12-01 | 2014-12-09 | Grand Mate Co., Ltd | Method of controlling combustion of gas appliance |
US20140170574A1 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-19 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Flame instability detector |
DE102015210636A1 (en) * | 2015-06-10 | 2016-12-15 | Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co Kg | Measuring device for a turbomachine |
US10801722B2 (en) | 2018-07-16 | 2020-10-13 | Emerson Electric Co. | FFT flame monitoring for limit condition |
Family Cites Families (51)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US336749A (en) | 1886-02-23 | Blast fuknage | ||
US3304989A (en) | 1964-11-19 | 1967-02-21 | American Radiator & Standard | Fuel feed control system responsive to flame color |
GB1277402A (en) | 1968-08-27 | 1972-06-14 | United Gas Industries Ltd | Flame detection system |
US3740574A (en) | 1971-12-30 | 1973-06-19 | Combustion Eng | Ionic flame monitor |
US3820097A (en) | 1973-04-16 | 1974-06-25 | Honeywell Inc | Flame detection system with compensation for the flame detector |
CH558577A (en) | 1973-09-25 | 1975-01-31 | Cerberus Ag | METHOD OF FLAME DETECTION AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THIS METHOD. |
DE2460066C3 (en) | 1974-12-19 | 1981-08-06 | Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim | Method and device for the automatic control of the fuel-air ratio of a combustion |
US4039844A (en) | 1975-03-20 | 1977-08-02 | Electronics Corporation Of America | Flame monitoring system |
JPS51140684A (en) | 1975-05-28 | 1976-12-03 | Sony Corp | Flame detection apparatus |
US4043742A (en) | 1976-05-17 | 1977-08-23 | Environmental Data Corporation | Automatic burner monitor and control for furnaces |
US4059385A (en) | 1976-07-26 | 1977-11-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Combustion monitoring and control system |
US4157506A (en) | 1977-12-01 | 1979-06-05 | Combustion Engineering, Inc. | Flame detector |
DE2823410A1 (en) | 1978-04-25 | 1979-11-08 | Cerberus Ag | FLAME DETECTOR |
US4348169A (en) | 1978-05-24 | 1982-09-07 | Land Combustion Limited | Control of burners |
US4296727A (en) | 1980-04-02 | 1981-10-27 | Micro-Burner Systems Corporation | Furnace monitoring system |
JPS5815855U (en) | 1981-07-24 | 1983-01-31 | 株式会社東芝 | Combustion control circuit |
US4540886A (en) * | 1982-10-07 | 1985-09-10 | Bryant Jack A | Fail-safe monitoring system |
JPS60159515A (en) * | 1984-01-27 | 1985-08-21 | Hitachi Ltd | Furnace system |
US4913647A (en) | 1986-03-19 | 1990-04-03 | Honeywell Inc. | Air fuel ratio control |
US4927350A (en) | 1987-04-27 | 1990-05-22 | United Technologies Corporation | Combustion control |
JPH01244214A (en) | 1988-03-25 | 1989-09-28 | Agency Of Ind Science & Technol | Method and device for monitoring and controlling air ratio of burner in operation |
FR2645247B2 (en) | 1988-06-22 | 1991-06-07 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACTIVE CONTROL OF COMBUSTION INSTABILITIES |
US5049063A (en) | 1988-12-29 | 1991-09-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Combustion control apparatus for burner |
US5037391A (en) | 1989-01-09 | 1991-08-06 | Pilot Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Steerable angioplasty device |
US5120214A (en) | 1989-11-13 | 1992-06-09 | Control Techtronics, Inc. | Acoustical burner control system and method |
DE9003589U1 (en) | 1990-03-28 | 1991-07-25 | Fritz Hansens Eft. A/S, Alleroed | Seat mechanism |
US5112217A (en) | 1990-08-20 | 1992-05-12 | Carrier Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling fuel-to-air ratio of the combustible gas supply of a radiant burner |
US5077550A (en) | 1990-09-19 | 1991-12-31 | Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. | Burner flame sensing system and method |
US5190454A (en) | 1991-07-15 | 1993-03-02 | Cmi Corporation | Electronic combustion control system |
US5222887A (en) | 1992-01-17 | 1993-06-29 | Gas Research Institute | Method and apparatus for fuel/air control of surface combustion burners |
US5480298A (en) | 1992-05-05 | 1996-01-02 | General Electric Company | Combustion control for producing low NOx emissions through use of flame spectroscopy |
US5971745A (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 1999-10-26 | Gas Research Institute | Flame ionization control apparatus and method |
DE19632174C2 (en) | 1996-08-09 | 2002-02-07 | Abb Research Ltd | Temperature measurement method |
US5785512A (en) | 1996-12-17 | 1998-07-28 | Fireye, Inc. | Infrared emittance combustion analyzer |
US5997280A (en) * | 1997-11-07 | 1999-12-07 | Maxon Corporation | Intelligent burner control system |
DE19831648B4 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2004-12-23 | Stiebel Eltron Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process for the functional adaptation of control electronics to a gas heater |
US7112796B2 (en) | 1999-02-08 | 2006-09-26 | General Electric Company | System and method for optical monitoring of a combustion flame |
US6350988B1 (en) | 1999-02-08 | 2002-02-26 | General Electric Company | Optical spectrometer and method for combustion flame temperature determination |
DE10003819C1 (en) | 2000-01-28 | 2001-05-17 | Honeywell Bv | Gas burner operating process, involving use of ionization signal and comparing differences in its readings |
US6261086B1 (en) | 2000-05-05 | 2001-07-17 | Forney Corporation | Flame detector based on real-time high-order statistics |
DE10023273A1 (en) | 2000-05-12 | 2001-11-15 | Siemens Building Tech Ag | Measuring device for a flame |
US6356199B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2002-03-12 | Abb Inc. | Diagnostic ionic flame monitor |
US6404342B1 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2002-06-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Flame detector using filtering of ultraviolet radiation flicker |
US7353140B2 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2008-04-01 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Methods for monitoring and controlling boiler flames |
DE10220773A1 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-20 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Gas burner regulation method in which a signal from an ionization sensor is subject to spectral frequency analysis to set a fuel-air ratio for regulation of the burner |
DE10220772A1 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-20 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Gas burner regulation method in which a measurement signal is used to define a regulation signal with a limiting value for an adjustable air number that is used to set the fuel to air ratio |
US6742341B2 (en) * | 2002-07-16 | 2004-06-01 | Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation | Automatic combustion control for a gas turbine |
US7255285B2 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2007-08-14 | Honeywell International Inc. | Blocked flue detection methods and systems |
US7241135B2 (en) | 2004-11-18 | 2007-07-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Feedback control for modulating gas burner |
US7756591B2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2010-07-13 | Pegasus Technologies, Inc. | System for optimizing oxygen in a boiler |
US8255087B2 (en) * | 2009-05-21 | 2012-08-28 | Lennox Industries Inc. | Constant air volume HVAC system with a dehumidification function and discharge air temperature control, an HVAC controller therefor and a method of operation thereof |
-
2010
- 2010-09-16 US US12/873,560 patent/US9366433B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-08-15 EP EP11177579.7A patent/EP2431663B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102021006182A1 (en) | 2021-12-14 | 2023-06-15 | Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG | Method for controlling a burner and burner arrangement with a burner |
WO2023110144A1 (en) | 2021-12-14 | 2023-06-22 | Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG | Method for controlling a burner and burner arrangement having a burner |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20110070550A1 (en) | 2011-03-24 |
US9366433B2 (en) | 2016-06-14 |
EP2431663A3 (en) | 2012-12-19 |
EP2431663A2 (en) | 2012-03-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2431663B1 (en) | Control for monitoring flame integrity in a heating appliance | |
JP3143500B2 (en) | Flame analyzer and method for determining flame characteristics | |
US7054769B2 (en) | Statistical method and apparatus for monitoring parameters in an electric power distribution system | |
US5798946A (en) | Signal processing system for combustion diagnostics | |
RU2640866C2 (en) | Method of monitoring and controlling combustion of device operating on gaseous fuel in burner and combustion controlling system operating in accordance with above-mentioned method | |
JP5722964B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for off-line test of electric motor | |
US20080266120A1 (en) | Combustion instability detection | |
US20200325835A1 (en) | Knocking detection method, ignition timing control method, and ignition timing control system | |
EP2265867B1 (en) | Improved method and device to detect the flame in a burner operating on a solid, liquid or gaseous combustible | |
US20210281071A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting low-frequency oscillations | |
US7134344B2 (en) | Control method and apparatus | |
US10801722B2 (en) | FFT flame monitoring for limit condition | |
US6277268B1 (en) | System and method for monitoring gaseous combustibles in fossil combustors | |
US7559234B1 (en) | Real-time combustion control and diagnostics sensor-pressure oscillation monitor | |
US10890123B2 (en) | In situ fuel-to-air ratio (FAR) sensor for combustion using a Fourier based flame ionization probe | |
US7113873B2 (en) | Method and system for using eddy current transducers in pressure measurements | |
KR101883276B1 (en) | Load disaggergation system in home using voltage signal and the controlling method thereof | |
US5796342A (en) | Diagnosing flame characteristics in the time domain | |
US20190242850A1 (en) | In situ fuel-to-air ratio (far) sensor for combustion using a fourier based flame ionization probe | |
US20140170574A1 (en) | Flame instability detector | |
JP2009064610A (en) | Plasma processing equipment | |
Zhang et al. | A Self-diagnostic Flame Monitoring System Incorporating Acoustic, Optical, and Electrostatic Sensors | |
CN113446623B (en) | Combustion state detection method and device, gas device and storage medium | |
NO20170660A1 (en) | Method for evaluation of integrity of tuneable laser spectrometers based on noise measurement | |
JP2006050732A (en) | Monitoring apparatus and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: F23N 1/02 20060101AFI20121114BHEP Ipc: F23N 3/08 20060101ALI20121114BHEP Ipc: F23N 5/12 20060101ALI20121114BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130614 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20150810 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160920 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 855825 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011033562 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170321 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170322 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 855825 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170421 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170421 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170321 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011033562 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170922 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161221 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200721 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20200722 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200721 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602011033562 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20210815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210815 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220301 |