EP2420554B1 - A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production - Google Patents

A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2420554B1
EP2420554B1 EP10173052.1A EP10173052A EP2420554B1 EP 2420554 B1 EP2420554 B1 EP 2420554B1 EP 10173052 A EP10173052 A EP 10173052A EP 2420554 B1 EP2420554 B1 EP 2420554B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
olives
treated
oil
ffa
level
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10173052.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2420554A1 (en
Inventor
Yariv Gershony
Nir Padan
Zohar Kerem
Shimon Levee
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Olive X Tend Ltd
Original Assignee
Olive X Tend Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Olive X Tend Ltd filed Critical Olive X Tend Ltd
Priority to EP10173052.1A priority Critical patent/EP2420554B1/en
Priority to ES10173052.1T priority patent/ES2558571T3/en
Priority to PT101730521T priority patent/PT2420554E/en
Publication of EP2420554A1 publication Critical patent/EP2420554A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2420554B1 publication Critical patent/EP2420554B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B1/00Production of fats or fatty oils from raw materials
    • C11B1/02Pretreatment
    • C11B1/04Pretreatment of vegetable raw material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D81/00Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents
    • B65D81/18Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents providing specific environment for contents, e.g. temperature above or below ambient
    • B65D81/20Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents providing specific environment for contents, e.g. temperature above or below ambient under vacuum or superatmospheric pressure, or in a special atmosphere, e.g. of inert gas
    • B65D81/2007Containers, packaging elements, or packages, for contents presenting particular transport or storage problems, or adapted to be used for non-packaging purposes after removal of contents providing specific environment for contents, e.g. temperature above or below ambient under vacuum or superatmospheric pressure, or in a special atmosphere, e.g. of inert gas under vacuum
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65DCONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D85/00Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials
    • B65D85/70Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials for materials not otherwise provided for
    • B65D85/72Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials for materials not otherwise provided for for edible or potable liquids, semiliquids, or plastic or pasty materials

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to olive oil production and more specifically to olive oil production at a prolonged time after olive harvesting.
  • Olive oil is produced by grinding fresh olives into a paste and extracting the oil from the paste by mechanical or chemical means.
  • the amount of oil contained in the olive depends on the particular cultivar and the degree of ripeness. Typically 1 Kg of olives yields about 150 - 200ml of oil.
  • the oil is accumulated in the mesocarp cells, mostly in the vacuoles and to a smaller extent in the cytoplasm. Grinding or crushing of the olives breaks the olive stones and flesh, creating a paste.
  • grinding is followed by malaxation of the paste to facilitate breaking of the mesocarp cells, assisted by the sharp stone segments, thus releasing the oil contained in the vacuoles and resulting in coalescence of the oil droplets and separation of the liquids from the solids.
  • the liquid which contains both oil and vegetation water, is extracted from the paste by applying pressure or centrifugation and is then separated into oil and water.
  • the separation of the paste into liquid and solid and the separation of the liquid into oil and water may be performed sequentially or concurrently.
  • the method known as "Sinolea” is based on the different surface tension of the vegetable water and the oil. According to this method, rows of metal discs or plates are dipped into the paste. The oil adheres to the metal disks and is removed with scrapers in a continuous process while the solid and water phases stay behind.
  • the quality of olive oil depends on the extraction method, the olive cultivar, the maturity (ripeness) index of the olives and also, to a great extent, on the time delay between olive harvest and oil extraction. Because olive oil is extracted from the fruit flesh, the time elapsing from harvesting to oil extraction is very crucial. In the period between harvesting and oil extraction, the fruits' enzymes are very active. The oxidation and enzymatic reactions, which begin in the fruit immediately upon harvesting, increasingly degrade the quality of the oil. Therefore, olive oil needs to be extracted from the fresh harvested olives as soon as possible, preferably within no more than 24 hours. Oil obtained after a longer wait is of lower quality presenting higher acidity levels.
  • the olive oil industry is a seasonal industry which depends on availability of fresh olives.
  • Harvesting time varies in each country and with the season and the cultivar.
  • fresh olives are available for about four months during opposing seasons in the Northern and Southern hemispheres (October to January in the Northern Hemisphere and April to July in the Southern hemisphere).
  • Another important factor that influences the oil quality is the freshness of the olive oil itself, namely the storage period and the storage conditions until consumption. Olive oil, even when stored under optimal conditions, deteriorates over time. It is therefore recommended to consume olive oil close to its production time.
  • the quality of olive oil can be characterized by various analytic and organoleptic parameters, the most common being the free fatty acid (FFA) expressed as percent of oleic acid. Other characteristics include peroxide value and various positive and negative organoleptic attributes.
  • FFA free fatty acid
  • Other characteristics include peroxide value and various positive and negative organoleptic attributes.
  • IOC International Olive Council
  • the IOC which has a United Nations charter to develop criteria for olive oil quality and purity, consolidates standards for olive oils categories as well as guidelines for analyzing and tasting the oils. For example, olive oils that can be qualified under the category of virgin olive oils are oils that are obtained from the olives by using only mechanical or other physical means which do not involve any chemical processes such as use of solvents or re-esterification.
  • the oils fit for consumption are classified as Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Virgin Olive Oil and Ordinary Virgin Olive Oil according to their FFA level ( ⁇ 0.8%, ⁇ 2% and ⁇ 3.3, respectively).
  • Olive oil production is a traditional industry originating in the Mediterranean and known since as early as 3,000 B.C.
  • Today olives are cultivated in many regions of the world and olive oil is used throughout the world. However, olive oil production and consumption is still the highest in the Mediterranean.
  • the oil is considered to be a prime component of the so called 'Mediterranean diet'.
  • the olive oil market has been growing dramatically.
  • the increasing interest in olive oil stems from both its unique rich taste and its health benefits and coincides with the growing public awareness to health food, as well as with the general increasing interest in gourmet food.
  • the health benefits associated with olive oil consumption include controlling LDL level while raising HDL level and reducing risk of coronary heart diseases.
  • These health benefits are attributed to the high level of monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly oleic acid, and to the relatively high content of minor nutrients, in particular antioxidants such as polyphenols.
  • Studies also suggest beneficial effects of olive oil consumption on blood sugar level and on the gastrointestinal tract, including reducing the risk of ulcers, gastritis and colon cancer. Indeed, olive oil is considered by many to be superior to other vegetable oils.
  • Olive oil is one of the most adulterated agricultural products. Customers are therefore becoming increasingly aware of the possibility that oil distributed as high quality olive oil is actually adulterated oil mixed with, or even consists almost entirely of, inferior oils of lower cost.
  • One aspect of the invention is a method for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain the quality of oil contained therewithin for enabling production of high quality olive oil from said treated olives at a prolonged time after harvest.
  • the method comprises: washing the freshly harvested olives in a washing liquid; heating the olives to a temperature in the range of 40 to 80°C to achieve enzymatic inactivation; rapidly cooling the heated olives to a temperature in the range of 0 to -10°C; removing excess liquid from skin of olives; vacuum packaging a predetermined quantity of olives; and storing the packed olives at a refrigerating temperature.
  • the specific conditions in each step of the method are preselected in accordance with the cultivar and maturity index of the treated olives.
  • the washing liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof.
  • the heating may be performed by subjecting the olives to microwave radiation or by immersing the olives in a liquid bath of said predetermined temperature.
  • a salt or a mineral powder is added to the treated olives before packaging.
  • the salt or mineral powder may be NaCl, KCI, NAHCO 3 , talcum powder and lime powder, or a combination thereof.
  • Another aspect of the invention is the vacuum packaged treated freshly harvested olives with retained oil qualities obtainable by the method described above and characterized in that the oil extracted from the treated olives at a prolonged storage time after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  • the Free Fatty Acid level may be of less than or equal to 0.8 %.
  • the prolonged storage time is of at least one month.
  • the prolong storage time may be of at least three months or of at least six months.
  • the oil extracted from the treated olives after a storage time of at least 2 months has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level which does not exceed the FFA level in the oil extracted at the time immediately after treatment by more than 1 %.
  • the freshly harvested olives are treated within 24 hours from being harvested and are vacuum packaged and kept at refrigerating temperatures until use. Extraction of oil from the treated olives of the invention for the purpose of measuring FFA level or other parameters is performed by using an Abencor system.
  • the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system at any time of up to at least three months after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  • FFA Free Fatty Acid
  • the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system at any time of up to at least six months after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  • FFA Free Fatty Acid
  • the oil extracted from the treated olives after the prolonged storage time is further characterized by having a peroxide value that meets the standard of the International Olive Council (IOC) for peroxide value in Virgin Olive Oils and/or organoleptic characteristics that meet the standards of the International Olive Council (IOC) for organoleptic characteristics of Virgin Olive Oils.
  • IOC International Olive Council
  • the treated olives of the invention are vacuum packaged and are kept at refrigerating temperatures until use.
  • a vacuum package is disclosed, comprising treated olives of the invention, optionally further comprising a salt or mineral powder selected from one or more of the following: NaCl, KCI, NAHCO 3 , talcum powder and lime powder.
  • the present invention is generally directed at enabling off-seasonal olive oil production and/or at areas remote from olive growing regions.
  • freshly harvested olives are treated to substantially retain their oil qualities for a prolonged time after treatment such that when stored under appropriate conditions they can be used as a "raw material" for olive oil production at a prolonged time after being harvested.
  • the treated olives can be stored for at least one month and up to at least ten months or even for longer periods, providing the capability to produce fresh olive oil all year round.
  • the treated olives are packaged into relatively small quantities of 0.5 to 5 Kg that can be shipped and distributed to retailers and consumers.
  • the treated olives maintain the appearance and texture of fresh olives.
  • the oil extracted from the stored treated olives of the invention is characterized by having Free Fatty Acidity (FFA) of no more than 2% and other characteristics, such as peroxide value and organoleptic characteristics that meet the standards of the International Olive Council (IOC) for the category of Virgin Olive Oils.
  • FFA Free Fatty Acidity
  • IOC International Olive Council
  • oil extracted from the treated olives should be understood as oil extracted by purely mechanical or other physical means. More specifically, since even when the oil is extracted by purely mechanical means, its composition may vary with specific method and specific conditions, extraction of oil from the treated olives of the invention for the purpose of assessment is preferably performed using an Abencor system.
  • the invention further provides methods for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain their oil qualities for a prolonged storage time under refrigerating temperatures without adding any chemical food preservative.
  • the olives selected to undergo the treatment process of the invention should be freshly harvested, high quality olives carefully selected. Any bruised, defected or otherwise poor quality olives and any twigs, stems and leaves should be carefully removed before treatment.
  • the selected olives may be of any maturity index, preferably in the range of 2-6, and of any olive cultivar, or a mixture of different cultivars.
  • the olives are organically grown olives.
  • Fig. 1 is a flow chart of the process of treating freshly harvested olives, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • the process may be performed in a batch manner or may be a continuous process with any degree of automation.
  • the treatment is preferably performed within 24 hours from harvesting.
  • the exact conditions in each step e.g. temperatures, duration of step, etc.
  • the first step (10) in the process is washing the olives to remove pesticides, dust, and any dirt left on the surface of the fruit.
  • this step is performed by immersing the olives in a liquid bath at room temperature for about 0.5 to 10 minutes.
  • the washing liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof. Use of ethanol in the washing step provides the benefits of disinfection in addition to general cleaning. It also facilitates evaporation of the washing liquid from the olives' surface upon drying.
  • step (20) the olives are heated to a predetermined temperature in the range of about from 40 to 80°C for deactivating the enzymes present in the fruit so as to stop any enzymatic reactions.
  • step 20 is performed by immersing the olives in a liquid bath at the selected temperature for about 2 to 10 minutes.
  • the liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof.
  • heating may be performed by subjecting the olives to microwave radiation.
  • Step (30) the heated olives are rapidly cooled to a temperature in the range of 0° to -10°C to prevent over-heating and possible oxidation or any other reactions.
  • Step (30) may be performed by immersing the olives in an ice-water, by cold air blowers or by any other method known in the art.
  • the olives are dried, if necessary, by blowing dry air to remove any water left on their skins and in the following step (60) predetermined quantities of olives are packaged in sealed vacuum packages in air impervious flexible film, using standard equipment typical in the art.
  • the packaged olives are then stored at regular refrigeration temperatures of 0 - 4°C (step 70). Once the treated olives are sealed in packages, the packages can be handled in an integral manner from the packaging area to storage and through distribution channels to the final consumption site using regular refrigeration equipment.
  • different salts and/or mineral powders may be added to the olives (step 50) before packaging for inhibiting mold growth and for maintaining the fruit texture by lowering the water activity of the olives.
  • the added salts and mineral powders also facilitate phase separation between the oil and vegetable water during the oil extraction process.
  • Optional added minerals are selected from sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, micronized talc and lime powder. The amount of added salts and/or minerals is preferably 50g or more per 1 Kg of packed olives.
  • Treatment procedure 1 Fresh olives from three different harvests in winter 2007-2008 were treated according to a first treatment procedure (treatment procedure 1) of the invention as in the following: After cleaning and washing, the freshly harvested olives were subjected to microwave radiation of 600 Watt for 1 minute, followed by immediate cooling in ice water. The olives were dried, vacuum packed into packages of 700g (using a LEVAC C30 M8 vacuum packaging machine, manufactured by Lerica, Italy) and stored at 4°C. At one, three and five months after treatment, oil was extracted from one or more packages of the olives using an Abencor system (MC2 Ingenieria y Schemeas, Barcelona, Spain). Organoleptic characteristics assessment and analysis of the extracted oil for Free acidity (FFA), peroxide level and polyphenols concentration were carried out according to the IOC guidelines. The results are summarized in Table 1.
  • FFA Free acidity
  • Phenolic fraction was isolated from a solution of oil in hexane by triple extraction with water-methanol (60:40 v/v). Total phenols, expressed as catechin equivalents (ppm), were determined with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. Fullerton, California, US) at 735nm using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Phenolic compounds were separated by a HPLC system consisting of a TSP P4000 pump coupled to a UV 6000LP Diode Array detector and with Chromquest software. Analytical separation was achieved on an Ultrasphere RP-C18, 5 ⁇ m column (250x4.6 mm i.d.) (Beckman, USA).
  • Phenolic compounds were monitored at 280 nm, and identified on the basis of their absorbance spectrum and retention times compared to those of standard compounds following the IOC official method (COI/T.20/Doc No. 29).
  • Table1 Assessment of oil extracted from three harvests (treatment procedure # 1) Variety, orchard & Date Storage period (months) FFA 1 (%) Peroxide Value 2 Polyphenols content in [mg/kg Oil] Organoleptic assessment Picual, Kish 14.12.2007 1 0.23 3.28 210.0 Bitterness level 1, pungency level 0 3 0.30 2.03 141.0 5 0.64 8.76 142.0 Picual, Revivim, 27.12.2007 0 0.10 2.20 175.0 Fruity and grassy oil (level 4-5), Bitterness level 0, pungency level 3 1 0.64 3.17 125 3 1.57 3.55 108.0 5 1.45 6.80 130.0 Picholine, Gshur 03.01.2008 0 0.06 5.50 168.0 Strong "apple smell" and aroma, Bitterness level 1, pungency level 2-3
  • Table 2 Assessment of oil extracted from olives of the same harvest treated according to different procedures Treatment procedure number Storage period (months)
  • FFA 1 (%) Peroxide Value 2 Polyphenols content in [mg/kg Oil]
  • Organoleptic assessment 2 0 0.17 6.34 103.84 Strong fruitness, "orange smell", Bitterness level 2-3, pungency level 0 2.5 0.37 5.89 65.09 3 0 0.13 5.89 281.30 2.5 0.20 5.43 189.86 4 0 0.24 11.10 87.18 Delicate oil, fruity aroma 2.5 0.35 4.98 33.71 Good oil, neutral 5 0 0.21 7.93 91.05 Good oil, balanced (slightly strong), low bitterness, pungency level 2 2.5 0.22 8.15 54.24 Good oil
  • oils extracted in both Examples 2 and 3 meet the criteria of the IOC for Extra Virgin Olive Oil with respect to free acidity and peroxide level ( ⁇ 0.8%, ⁇ 20 millieq. Peroxide oxygen per Kg oil, respectively).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Fats And Perfumes (AREA)
  • Edible Oils And Fats (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to olive oil production and more specifically to olive oil production at a prolonged time after olive harvesting.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Olive oil is produced by grinding fresh olives into a paste and extracting the oil from the paste by mechanical or chemical means. The amount of oil contained in the olive depends on the particular cultivar and the degree of ripeness. Typically 1 Kg of olives yields about 150 - 200ml of oil. The oil is accumulated in the mesocarp cells, mostly in the vacuoles and to a smaller extent in the cytoplasm. Grinding or crushing of the olives breaks the olive stones and flesh, creating a paste. Typically, grinding is followed by malaxation of the paste to facilitate breaking of the mesocarp cells, assisted by the sharp stone segments, thus releasing the oil contained in the vacuoles and resulting in coalescence of the oil droplets and separation of the liquids from the solids. The liquid, which contains both oil and vegetation water, is extracted from the paste by applying pressure or centrifugation and is then separated into oil and water. Depending on the specific method and equipment, the separation of the paste into liquid and solid and the separation of the liquid into oil and water may be performed sequentially or concurrently. There exist various modifications of these basic steps. For example, the method known as "Sinolea" is based on the different surface tension of the vegetable water and the oil. According to this method, rows of metal discs or plates are dipped into the paste. The oil adheres to the metal disks and is removed with scrapers in a continuous process while the solid and water phases stay behind.
  • The quality of olive oil depends on the extraction method, the olive cultivar, the maturity (ripeness) index of the olives and also, to a great extent, on the time delay between olive harvest and oil extraction. Because olive oil is extracted from the fruit flesh, the time elapsing from harvesting to oil extraction is very crucial. In the period between harvesting and oil extraction, the fruits' enzymes are very active. The oxidation and enzymatic reactions, which begin in the fruit immediately upon harvesting, increasingly degrade the quality of the oil. Therefore, olive oil needs to be extracted from the fresh harvested olives as soon as possible, preferably within no more than 24 hours. Oil obtained after a longer wait is of lower quality presenting higher acidity levels. Thus, unlike seed oils (eg., sunflower oil, sesame oil, soybeans oil, etc.) which are extracted from seeds or nuts that can be stored for prolonged time and processed all year round, the olive oil industry is a seasonal industry which depends on availability of fresh olives. Harvesting time varies in each country and with the season and the cultivar. Generally, fresh olives are available for about four months during opposing seasons in the Northern and Southern hemispheres (October to January in the Northern Hemisphere and April to July in the Southern hemisphere). Another important factor that influences the oil quality is the freshness of the olive oil itself, namely the storage period and the storage conditions until consumption. Olive oil, even when stored under optimal conditions, deteriorates over time. It is therefore recommended to consume olive oil close to its production time.
  • The quality of olive oil can be characterized by various analytic and organoleptic parameters, the most common being the free fatty acid (FFA) expressed as percent of oleic acid. Other characteristics include peroxide value and various positive and negative organoleptic attributes. Most countries use the International Olive Council (IOC) standards for defining oil quality and oil category. The IOC, which has a United Nations charter to develop criteria for olive oil quality and purity, consolidates standards for olive oils categories as well as guidelines for analyzing and tasting the oils. For example, olive oils that can be qualified under the category of virgin olive oils are oils that are obtained from the olives by using only mechanical or other physical means which do not involve any chemical processes such as use of solvents or re-esterification. Additionally, they should meet the specific standards set by the IOC with regard to the concentration of specific ingredients and organoleptic tests. Within the Virgin Olive Oil category, the oils fit for consumption are classified as Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Virgin Olive Oil and Ordinary Virgin Olive Oil according to their FFA level (≤ 0.8%, ≤ 2% and ≤ 3.3, respectively).
  • Olive oil production is a traditional industry originating in the Mediterranean and known since as early as 3,000 B.C. Today, olives are cultivated in many regions of the world and olive oil is used throughout the world. However, olive oil production and consumption is still the highest in the Mediterranean. The oil is considered to be a prime component of the so called 'Mediterranean diet'.
  • In recent years, the olive oil market has been growing dramatically. The increasing interest in olive oil stems from both its unique rich taste and its health benefits and coincides with the growing public awareness to health food, as well as with the general increasing interest in gourmet food. The health benefits associated with olive oil consumption include controlling LDL level while raising HDL level and reducing risk of coronary heart diseases. These health benefits are attributed to the high level of monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly oleic acid, and to the relatively high content of minor nutrients, in particular antioxidants such as polyphenols. Studies also suggest beneficial effects of olive oil consumption on blood sugar level and on the gastrointestinal tract, including reducing the risk of ulcers, gastritis and colon cancer. Indeed, olive oil is considered by many to be superior to other vegetable oils. However, side by side with the prosperity in the olive oil market, the olive oil fraud industry flourishes as well. Olive oil is one of the most adulterated agricultural products. Customers are therefore becoming increasingly aware of the possibility that oil distributed as high quality olive oil is actually adulterated oil mixed with, or even consists almost entirely of, inferior oils of lower cost.
  • The awareness to health food products, as well as to their freshness and authenticity, has brought with it a new trend of small scale production of basic food products (e.g. bread) for self consumption at home or in small food establishments such as restaurants, delicatessen and specialized boutiques. This way control over freshness and ingredients is ensured. In accordance with this trend, small scale appliances, sized to be placed on a kitchen counter, such as bread machine, home-use coffee roasting device, etc., are now gaining popularity. With respect to olive oil, recent years show an increasing number of olive oil boutiques which specialize in production of high quality oil by careful selection of olives and close control over production. A household countertop cold press machine for producing small quantities of olive oil designed by the inventors of the present invention is described in international publication WO2010/007610 . However, although olive oil can be consumed as is when freshly pressed from the fruit, the need to extract olive oil within a very short time from harvesting does not enable producing olive oil out of season or in countries distant from olive growing regions.
  • The publication FARAG R S et al.: " Stabilization of olive oil by microwave heating", International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 48, n°6, 1 January 1997 ( 1997-01-01), pages 365-371 discloses the effect of heating olives by microwave radiation on the quality of oil extracted from the heated olives immediately after irradiation. More precisely, this publication demonstrates that microwave treatment decreases the enzyme activities during storage and consequently increases the stability of olive oil. But, this publication does not disclose a method for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain the quality of oil contained therewith.
  • It is therefore the general object of the present invention to provide olives suitable for oil extraction all year round and/or at locations remote from olive growing regions.
  • In particular, it is an object of the invention to provide olives which retain their oil qualities for a prolonged storage period without adding chemical food preservatives.
  • It is a further object of the invention to provide methods for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain their oil quality for a prolonged time after being treated so as to enable extraction of high quality oil from the olives at a prolonged time after they have been harvested.
  • SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • One aspect of the invention is a method for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain the quality of oil contained therewithin for enabling production of high quality olive oil from said treated olives at a prolonged time after harvest. The method comprises: washing the freshly harvested olives in a washing liquid; heating the olives to a temperature in the range of 40 to 80°C to achieve enzymatic inactivation; rapidly cooling the heated olives to a temperature in the range of 0 to -10°C; removing excess liquid from skin of olives; vacuum packaging a predetermined quantity of olives; and storing the packed olives at a refrigerating temperature. The specific conditions in each step of the method are preselected in accordance with the cultivar and maturity index of the treated olives. The washing liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof. The heating may be performed by subjecting the olives to microwave radiation or by immersing the olives in a liquid bath of said predetermined temperature. In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a salt or a mineral powder is added to the treated olives before packaging. The salt or mineral powder may be NaCl, KCI, NAHCO3, talcum powder and lime powder, or a combination thereof.
  • Another aspect of the invention is the vacuum packaged treated freshly harvested olives with retained oil qualities obtainable by the method described above and characterized in that the oil extracted from the treated olives at a prolonged storage time after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%. According to some embodiments, the Free Fatty Acid level may be of less than or equal to 0.8 %. The prolonged storage time is of at least one month. For some embodiments, the prolong storage time may be of at least three months or of at least six months. Preferably, the oil extracted from the treated olives after a storage time of at least 2 months has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level which does not exceed the FFA level in the oil extracted at the time immediately after treatment by more than 1 %. Preferably, the freshly harvested olives are treated within 24 hours from being harvested and are vacuum packaged and kept at refrigerating temperatures until use. Extraction of oil from the treated olives of the invention for the purpose of measuring FFA level or other parameters is performed by using an Abencor system.
  • According to some embodiments of the invention, the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system at any time of up to at least three months after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  • According to some embodiments of the invention, the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system at any time of up to at least six months after being treated is characterized by having a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  • According to some embodiments of the invention the oil extracted from the treated olives after the prolonged storage time is further characterized by having a peroxide value that meets the standard of the International Olive Council (IOC) for peroxide value in Virgin Olive Oils and/or organoleptic characteristics that meet the standards of the International Olive Council (IOC) for organoleptic characteristics of Virgin Olive Oils.
  • In an embodiment of the invention, the treated olives of the invention are vacuum packaged and are kept at refrigerating temperatures until use. A vacuum package is disclosed, comprising treated olives of the invention, optionally further comprising a salt or mineral powder selected from one or more of the following: NaCl, KCI, NAHCO3, talcum powder and lime powder.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will be better understood and appreciated from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
    • Fig. 1 is an overall flow chart illustrating the method of treating freshly harvested olives in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is generally directed at enabling off-seasonal olive oil production and/or at areas remote from olive growing regions. In accordance with the invention, freshly harvested olives are treated to substantially retain their oil qualities for a prolonged time after treatment such that when stored under appropriate conditions they can be used as a "raw material" for olive oil production at a prolonged time after being harvested. The treated olives can be stored for at least one month and up to at least ten months or even for longer periods, providing the capability to produce fresh olive oil all year round. Preferably, the treated olives are packaged into relatively small quantities of 0.5 to 5 Kg that can be shipped and distributed to retailers and consumers. Preferably, the treated olives maintain the appearance and texture of fresh olives.
  • The oil extracted from the stored treated olives of the invention is characterized by having Free Fatty Acidity (FFA) of no more than 2% and other characteristics, such as peroxide value and organoleptic characteristics that meet the standards of the International Olive Council (IOC) for the category of Virgin Olive Oils. In this respect, it should be emphasized that in the context of the invention, extraction of oil mainly refers to purely mechanical or other physical extraction methods that do not involve chemical processing. Thus, the expression "oil extracted from the treated olives" should be understood as oil extracted by purely mechanical or other physical means. More specifically, since even when the oil is extracted by purely mechanical means, its composition may vary with specific method and specific conditions, extraction of oil from the treated olives of the invention for the purpose of assessment is preferably performed using an Abencor system.
  • The invention further provides methods for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain their oil qualities for a prolonged storage time under refrigerating temperatures without adding any chemical food preservative.
  • The olives selected to undergo the treatment process of the invention should be freshly harvested, high quality olives carefully selected. Any bruised, defected or otherwise poor quality olives and any twigs, stems and leaves should be carefully removed before treatment. The selected olives may be of any maturity index, preferably in the range of 2-6, and of any olive cultivar, or a mixture of different cultivars. In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the olives are organically grown olives.
  • Fig. 1 is a flow chart of the process of treating freshly harvested olives, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The process may be performed in a batch manner or may be a continuous process with any degree of automation. In order to obtain high quality oil from the end product of the process, the treatment is preferably performed within 24 hours from harvesting. The exact conditions in each step (e.g. temperatures, duration of step, etc.) vary with the specific cultivar and maturity index of the treated olives and are pre-selected for each cultivar/maturity-index combination to optimize results.
  • Referring to Fig. 1, the first step (10) in the process is washing the olives to remove pesticides, dust, and any dirt left on the surface of the fruit. Preferably, this step is performed by immersing the olives in a liquid bath at room temperature for about 0.5 to 10 minutes. The washing liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof. Use of ethanol in the washing step provides the benefits of disinfection in addition to general cleaning. It also facilitates evaporation of the washing liquid from the olives' surface upon drying.
  • In the next step (20) the olives are heated to a predetermined temperature in the range of about from 40 to 80°C for deactivating the enzymes present in the fruit so as to stop any enzymatic reactions. In accordance with one embodiment, step 20 is performed by immersing the olives in a liquid bath at the selected temperature for about 2 to 10 minutes. The liquid may be water or ethanol or a mixture thereof. Alternatively, heating may be performed by subjecting the olives to microwave radiation.
  • In the next step (30), the heated olives are rapidly cooled to a temperature in the range of 0° to -10°C to prevent over-heating and possible oxidation or any other reactions. Step (30) may be performed by immersing the olives in an ice-water, by cold air blowers or by any other method known in the art.
  • In the next step (40) the olives are dried, if necessary, by blowing dry air to remove any water left on their skins and in the following step (60) predetermined quantities of olives are packaged in sealed vacuum packages in air impervious flexible film, using standard equipment typical in the art. The packaged olives are then stored at regular refrigeration temperatures of 0 - 4°C (step 70). Once the treated olives are sealed in packages, the packages can be handled in an integral manner from the packaging area to storage and through distribution channels to the final consumption site using regular refrigeration equipment.
  • Optionally, different salts and/or mineral powders may be added to the olives (step 50) before packaging for inhibiting mold growth and for maintaining the fruit texture by lowering the water activity of the olives. The added salts and mineral powders also facilitate phase separation between the oil and vegetable water during the oil extraction process. Optional added minerals are selected from sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, micronized talc and lime powder. The amount of added salts and/or minerals is preferably 50g or more per 1 Kg of packed olives.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • Fresh olives from three different harvests in winter 2007-2008 were treated according to a first treatment procedure (treatment procedure 1) of the invention as in the following: After cleaning and washing, the freshly harvested olives were subjected to microwave radiation of 600 Watt for 1 minute, followed by immediate cooling in ice water. The olives were dried, vacuum packed into packages of 700g (using a LEVAC C30 M8 vacuum packaging machine, manufactured by Lerica, Italy) and stored at 4°C. At one, three and five months after treatment, oil was extracted from one or more packages of the olives using an Abencor system (MC2 Ingenieria y Sistemas, Barcelona, Spain). Organoleptic characteristics assessment and analysis of the extracted oil for Free acidity (FFA), peroxide level and polyphenols concentration were carried out according to the IOC guidelines. The results are summarized in Table 1.
  • Analysis methods: Determination of free acidity and peroxide value were carried out following the analytical methods recommended by Commission Regulation EEC n°2568/91 of July 11, 1991. Free acidity given as a percentage of oleic acid, was determined by titration of a solution of oil in ethanol-ether (1:1) with ethanolic potash. Peroxide value, expressed in milliequivalents of active oxygen per kilogram of oil (meq/kg) was determined as follows: a mixture of oil and isooctane-acetic acid 3:2 was left to react in darkness with a potassium iodide solution; the free iodine was then titrated with a sodium thiosulfate solution. Extraction and Analysis of Phenolics.: Phenolic fraction was isolated from a solution of oil in hexane by triple extraction with water-methanol (60:40 v/v). Total phenols, expressed as catechin equivalents (ppm), were determined with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc. Fullerton, California, US) at 735nm using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Phenolic compounds were separated by a HPLC system consisting of a TSP P4000 pump coupled to a UV 6000LP Diode Array detector and with Chromquest software. Analytical separation was achieved on an Ultrasphere RP-C18, 5 µm column (250x4.6 mm i.d.) (Beckman, USA). Phenolic compounds were monitored at 280 nm, and identified on the basis of their absorbance spectrum and retention times compared to those of standard compounds following the IOC official method (COI/T.20/Doc No. 29). Table1: Assessment of oil extracted from three harvests (treatment procedure # 1)
    Variety, orchard & Date Storage period (months) FFA1 (%) Peroxide Value2 Polyphenols content in [mg/kg Oil] Organoleptic assessment
    Picual, Kish 14.12.2007 1 0.23 3.28 210.0 Bitterness level 1, pungency level 0
    3 0.30 2.03 141.0
    5 0.64 8.76 142.0
    Picual, Revivim, 27.12.2007 0 0.10 2.20 175.0 Fruity and grassy oil (level 4-5), Bitterness level 0, pungency level 3
    1 0.64 3.17 125
    3 1.57 3.55 108.0
    5 1.45 6.80 130.0
    Picholine, Gshur 03.01.2008 0 0.06 5.50 168.0 Strong "apple smell" and aroma, Bitterness level 1, pungency level 2-3
    1 0.24 2.48 136.0 Fine "apple smell", Bitterness level 1, pungency level 2
    3 0.27 3.35 100.0
    5 0.35 4.08 111.0
    1 FFA is expressed as % free oleic acid (grams of oleic acid per 100 grams oil);
    2 Peroxide level measured in millieq. of oxygen / kg Oil
  • The results clearly demonstrate that the free acid level remains below 2% for all samples, including those extracted after 5-months storage period. The peroxide value remains well below the standard of the IOC for Virgin Olive Oil (≤ 20 millieq. Peroxide oxygen per Kg/oil)
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • Picual olives from the same harvest (Revivim, 18.12.2008) were treated by four different procedures as in the following:
    • Treatment procedure # 2: 1 min in 70% EtOH / Ice water cooling / Vacuum packaging / 4 C° storage
    • Treatment procedure # 3: 1 min in 70% EtOH / Ice water cooling / 100 gr KCI per 700 gr olives/ Vacuum packaging / 4 C° storage
    • Treatment procedure # 4: 4min at 60° / Ice water cooling / Vacuum packaging / 4 C° storage
    • Treatment procedure # 5: 4min at 60° / Ice water cooling / 100 gr KCI per 700 gr olives / Vacuum packaging / 4 C° storage
  • Oil was extracted from treated olives immediately after treatment (t=0) and after 2.5 month storage period. Oil assessment and analysis was performed as in Example 1. The results are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Assessment of oil extracted from olives of the same harvest treated according to different procedures
    Treatment procedure number Storage period (months) FFA1 (%) Peroxide Value2 Polyphenols content in [mg/kg Oil] Organoleptic assessment
    2 0 0.17 6.34 103.84 Strong fruitness, "orange smell", Bitterness level 2-3, pungency level 0
    2.5 0.37 5.89 65.09
    3 0 0.13 5.89 281.30
    2.5 0.20 5.43 189.86
    4 0 0.24 11.10 87.18 Delicate oil, fruity aroma
    2.5 0.35 4.98 33.71 Good oil, neutral
    5 0 0.21 7.93 91.05 Good oil, balanced (slightly strong), low bitterness, pungency level 2
    2.5 0.22 8.15 54.24 Good oil
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • The procedure 5 in Example 2 was repeated with Koroneiki olives. Oil was extracted from treated olives immediately after treatment (t=0) and after 2.5 month storage period. Oil assessment and analysis was performed as in Example 1. The results are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Assessment of oil extracted from Koroneiki olives treated according to treatment procedure # 5
    Treatment number Storage period (months) FFA1 (%) Peroxide Value2 Polyphenols content in [mg/kg Oil] Organoleptic assessment
    5 0 0.24 4.53 413.42 Good oil, bitterness level 5, pungency level 2, fruity and grassy
    2.5 0.35 5.89 370.80 Fruity-grassy oil (balanced), high bitterness
  • As can be clearly seen, the oils extracted in both Examples 2 and 3 meet the criteria of the IOC for Extra Virgin Olive Oil with respect to free acidity and peroxide level (≤ 0.8%, ≤ 20 millieq. Peroxide oxygen per Kg oil, respectively).
  • The scope of the present invention is defined only by the claims which follow.

Claims (15)

  1. A method for treating freshly harvested olives to substantially retain the quality of oil contained therewithin for enabling production of high quality olive oil from said treated olives at a prolonged time after harvest, the method comprising:
    washing the freshly harvested olives in a washing liquid;
    heating the olives to a temperature in the range of 40 to 80°C to achieve enzymatic inactivation;
    rapidly cooling the heated olives to a temperature in the range of 0 to -10°C;
    removing excess liquid from skin of olives;
    vacuum packaging a predetermined quantity of olives; and
    storing the packed olives at a refrigerating temperature.
  2. The method of claim 1 wherein said washing liquid is water or ethanol or a mixture thereof.
  3. The method of claim 1 wherein said heating is performed by subjecting the olives to microwave radiation.
  4. The method of claim 1 wherein said heating is performed by immersing the olives in a liquid bath of said predetermined temperature.
  5. The method of claim 1 further comprising a step of adding a salt or a mineral powder to the treated olives.
  6. The method of claim 5 wherein said salt or mineral powder is selected from the group consisting of NaCl, KCl, NAHCO3, talcum powder and lime powder, or a combination thereof.
  7. The method of claim 1, wherein the specific conditions in each step of the method are preselected in accordance with the cultivar and maturity index of the treated olives.
  8. Vacuum packaged treated freshly harvested olives with retained oil qualities obtainable by the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 and characterized in that the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system after a storage period under refrigerating temperature of at least one month after being treated has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  9. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein said Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level is less than or equal to 0.8 %.
  10. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein said oil is further characterized by having a peroxide value that meets the standard of the International Olive Council (IOC) for peroxide value of Virgin Olive Oils.
  11. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein said oil is further characterized by having organoleptic characteristics that meet the standard of the International Olive Council (IOC) for organoleptic attributes of Virgin Olive Oil.
  12. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein the oil extracted from said treated olives after a storage period under refrigerating temperature of at least two months after being treated has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level which does not deviate from the FFA level in the oil extracted at the time immediately after treatment by more than 1% FFA.
  13. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein the olives are treated within 24 hours from being harvested.
  14. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system after a storage period under refrigerating temperature of at least three months after being treated has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
  15. The vacuum packaged treated olives of claim 8 wherein the oil extracted from said treated olives by an Abencor system after a storage period under refrigerating temperature of at least six months after being treated has a Free Fatty Acid (FFA) level of no more than 2%.
EP10173052.1A 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production Active EP2420554B1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10173052.1A EP2420554B1 (en) 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
ES10173052.1T ES2558571T3 (en) 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method to treat olives to be used for the production of olive oil
PT101730521T PT2420554E (en) 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10173052.1A EP2420554B1 (en) 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2420554A1 EP2420554A1 (en) 2012-02-22
EP2420554B1 true EP2420554B1 (en) 2015-10-07

Family

ID=43385589

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10173052.1A Active EP2420554B1 (en) 2010-08-17 2010-08-17 A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2420554B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2558571T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2420554E (en)

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2704840B1 (en) * 1993-05-05 1995-07-13 Chenier Ste Civile PACKAGING FOR FOOD PRODUCTS WITH A SOLID OR SEMI-SOLID STRUCTURE.
FR2817556B1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2005-02-11 Jean Pierre Martel METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE INTEGRATED VALORIZATION OF OIL-BASED DRUGS, IN PARTICULAR OLIVES AND THE SPECIFIC PRODUCTS OBTAINED
PT2288266E (en) 2008-06-22 2015-02-06 Olive X Press Ltd Device and method for extracting olive oil

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2558571T3 (en) 2016-02-05
EP2420554A1 (en) 2012-02-22
PT2420554E (en) 2016-02-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Violeta et al. Compositional characteristics of fruits of several apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars
Henrietta et al. Coconut tree (Cocos nucifera) products: A review of global cultivation and its benefits
Olife et al. Cashew processing for economic development in Nigeria
Panda et al. Fermentation of sapota (Achras sapota Linn.) fruits to functional wine
Zafar et al. Avocado: production, quality, and major processed products
Chauhan et al. Bamboo shoots: composition, nutritional value, therapeutic role and product development for value addition
Wallace et al. Macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia, Macadamia tetraphylla and hybrids)
Zafar et al. Avocado production, processing, and nutrition
Wall Improving the quality and safety of macadamia nuts
Safdar et al. Extraction of phenolic compounds from (Mangifera indica L.) and kinnow (Citrus reticulate L.) peels for the development of functional fruit bars
AU2010206035B2 (en) A Method for Treating Olives to be Utilised for Olive Oil Production
JP5567962B2 (en) Method of processing olives used for olive oil production and processed olives
US8377488B2 (en) Method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
KR20170036844A (en) Method for manufacturing drink including peanut sprout extracts
KR101587072B1 (en) Manufacturing method for cooked laver containing aronia berry and cooked laver manufactured thereby
EP2420554B1 (en) A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
KR20120000457A (en) A method of cultivation soy bean sprout by using black garlic extract and the product thereby
KR101819686B1 (en) Manufacturing method for coffee fermentation Momordica charantia
CA2713830A1 (en) A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
SG177799A1 (en) A method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
Khatoon et al. Impact of various substrates on the physicochemical properties of radish microgreens
Wani et al. Nutritional and organoleptic evaluation of noodles prepared by supplementation with cauliflower leaves.
IL207265A (en) Method for treating olives to be utilized for olive oil production
Tullo Evaluation of Ogolcho and Kingbird Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum) Varieties for Wheatgrass Juice Content
Zeru Characterization and optimization of casimiroa (casimiroa edulis l) fruit juice

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME RS

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LEVEE, SHIMON

Inventor name: GERSHONY, YARIV

Inventor name: PASAN, HIR

Inventor name: KEREM, ZOHAR

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120808

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140616

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B65D 85/72 20060101ALI20150416BHEP

Ipc: C11B 1/04 20060101AFI20150416BHEP

Ipc: B65D 81/20 20060101ALI20150416BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150430

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: GERSHONY, YARIV

Inventor name: LEVEE, SHIMON

Inventor name: KEREM, ZOHAR

Inventor name: PADAN, NIR

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LEVEE, SHIMON

Inventor name: GERSHONY, YARIV

Inventor name: KEREM, ZOHAR

Inventor name: PADAN, NIR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 753770

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151015

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010028014

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20160105

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2558571

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20160205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 753770

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160207

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160107

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20160400001

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20160414

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010028014

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160708

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160817

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170517

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151007

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180822

Year of fee payment: 9

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190817

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230825

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230824

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230821

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231027

Year of fee payment: 14