EP2417116A1 - Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof - Google Patents

Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof

Info

Publication number
EP2417116A1
EP2417116A1 EP10714128A EP10714128A EP2417116A1 EP 2417116 A1 EP2417116 A1 EP 2417116A1 EP 10714128 A EP10714128 A EP 10714128A EP 10714128 A EP10714128 A EP 10714128A EP 2417116 A1 EP2417116 A1 EP 2417116A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
compound
formula
process according
hydrogen
reactor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP10714128A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2417116B1 (en
Inventor
Keith W. Hutchenson
Sourav Kumar Sengupta
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP2417116A1 publication Critical patent/EP2417116A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2417116B1 publication Critical patent/EP2417116B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07DHETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07D307/00Heterocyclic compounds containing five-membered rings having one oxygen atom as the only ring hetero atom
    • C07D307/02Heterocyclic compounds containing five-membered rings having one oxygen atom as the only ring hetero atom not condensed with other rings
    • C07D307/04Heterocyclic compounds containing five-membered rings having one oxygen atom as the only ring hetero atom not condensed with other rings having no double bonds between ring members or between ring members and non-ring members
    • C07D307/06Heterocyclic compounds containing five-membered rings having one oxygen atom as the only ring hetero atom not condensed with other rings having no double bonds between ring members or between ring members and non-ring members with only hydrogen atoms or radicals containing only hydrogen and carbon atoms, directly attached to ring carbon atoms
    • C07D307/08Preparation of tetrahydrofuran

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to the manufacture of tetrahydrofuran and related compounds, and to the industrial use thereof for the synthesis of other useful materials.
  • Tetrahydrofuran and related compounds are useful as solvents and as intermediates in the preparation of industrial chemicals used as pharmaceuticals, herbicides and polymers.
  • tetrahydrofuran is used to make polytetramethylene glycol, which may in turn be used to make polyether ester elastomers and polyurethane elastomers.
  • “Sponge” metal catalysts such as Raney® nickel catalysts have been used to catalyze the hydrogenation of furan to produce tetrahydrofuran, as discussed e.g. in U. S. Patent No. 2,846,449.
  • the catalyst has been promoted with a small amount of an additional catalytically-active metal such as chromium, as discussed in "Tetrahydrofuran II, Kinetics of Hydrogenation of Furan", Wang et al in KO Hsueh T'ung Pao (1958) pages 434-5; and “Tetrahydrofuran III, High Pressure Hydrogenation of Furan", Jen et al in K'o Hsueh T'ung Pao (1958) pages 435-7.
  • the inventions disclosed herein include processes for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran, and related compounds, and for the preparation of products into which such tetrahydro (or substituted) furans can be converted, that are improved by catalyst selection.
  • this invention provides a process for the synthesis of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (I)
  • R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are each independently selected from H and a Ci to C 4 alkyl group.
  • a process for preparing a Formula (I) product, as described above, that further includes a step of subjecting the product to a reaction (including a multi-step reaction) to prepare therefrom a compound (such as that useful as a monomer), oligomer or polymer.
  • An advantageous feature of the processeses hereof is the increased selectivity, lifetime and productivity of the sponge nickel catalysts selected for use herein.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the performance in Control A of an unpromoted sponge nickel catalyst over four successive runs in the hydrogenation of furan in a slurry reactor.
  • Figure 2 illustrates the performance in Example 1 of a Fe, Cr-promoted sponge nickel catalyst over five successive runs in the hydrogenation of furan in a slurry reactor.
  • Figure 3 illustrates the performance in Example 2 of an unpromoted sponge nickel catalyst and a Fe, Cr-promoted sponge nickel catalyst in the hydrogenation of furan in a fixed bed reactor.
  • the inventions disclosed herein include processes for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and processes for the preparation of products into which tetrahydrofuran can be converted.
  • this invention provides a process for the synthesis of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (I)
  • R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are each independently selected from H and a Ci to C 4 alkyl group, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl and any combination thereof.
  • R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 all equal H, in which case the Formula (I) product is tetrahydrofuran and the Formula (II) compound the starting material, is furan.
  • the hydrogenation of furan to produce tetrahydrofuran may in such case be represented by the following equation:
  • Formula (II) compound used as the feed material in the processes hereof is obtained by the decarbonylation of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (III):
  • R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are defined as described above.
  • R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 all equal H, in which case the compound of Formula (III) is furfural and the decarbonylation reaction may be represented by the following equation:
  • Formula (III) is derived from a biological material, which is typically a good source of hemicellulose.
  • biological materials suitable for use herein for such purpose include, without limitation, straw, corn cobs, corn stalks/corn stover, sugar bagasse, hardwoods, cotton stalks, kenaf, oat hulls, and hemp.
  • a Formula (II) compound as feed material for the processes hereof is obtained from a Formula (III) compound, especially when it is furfural, the Formula (III) compound should be freshly distilled before use, since it can oxidize and change color, producing undesirable high-boiling oxidation products.
  • the hydrogenation reaction is catalyzed by a sponge nickel catalyst that includes iron and chromium along with nickel in the contents thereof.
  • the sponge nickel catalyst is promoted with or by iron and chromium.
  • Sponge nickel catalysts as used herein, as do catalysts known as "skeletal” nickel catalysts, “skeleton” nickel catalysts and Raney® nickel catalysts refer to metallic catalysts that are prepared by leaching out aluminum from an alloy of nickel and aluminum using aqueous alkali. The alloy is typically about 50% aluminum by weight before leaching, and the majority, but not all, of the aluminum is removed during leaching.
  • Sponge metal catalysts can be prepared by leaching alloys of aluminum with other metals as well, e.g., cobalt, iron, copper, and others.
  • the term "Raney” as a descriptor of sponge metal catalysts prepared by this process is a registered trademark of W.R. Grace & Co.
  • the sponge nickel catalysts used in the processes described herein contain small amounts of iron and chromium metals; that is, as aforesaid, the sponge nickel catalyst is promoted with or by iron and chromium.
  • Such catalysts are prepared in the same manner as unpromoted sponge nickel catalysts, i.e. by forming an alloy of nickel, aluminum, chromium and iron and then using aqueous alkali to remove aluminum.
  • a sponge nickel catalyst as used herein may contain about 0.5% to about 6% iron by weight and/or about 0.5% to about 6% chromium by weight, based on the combined weight of all components of the catalyst together.
  • Raney® 2400 Nickel which is a product of W.R. Grace & Co. (Columbia, Maryland). This is a sponge catalyst that contains 81.0 wt% or more nickel, 6.0-13.0 wt% aluminum, 2.0-3.0 wt% iron, and 2.0-3.0 wt% chromium [according to the manufacturer's information as reported by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA)].
  • the Raney® 2400 Nickel catalyst is supplied in a slurry grade (i.e. a catalyst powder with particle size typically in the range 25-55 micrometers effective diameter), and a similar catalyst, Raney® 2486 Nickel, is also available in a fixed bed grade (i.e. catalyst pellets typically of a 3x8 standard mesh size).
  • Catalyst loading in the reactor may be in the amount of at least about 1 wt% or at least about 4 wt%, and yet in an amount of no more than about 15 wt% or no more than about 12 wt%, catalyst relative to the amount of Formula (II) compound present on a dry basis.
  • the reaction may be run in a solvent such as n-propanol, or excess Formula (I) compound may be used as a solvent.
  • the reaction mixture may contain about 60 to about 80.0 wt% solvent.
  • Formula (I) compound used as a solvent may be used in an amount of about 5 to about 10 times the amount that would be expected to be produced by the reaction being conducted.
  • the temperature of the hydrogenation reaction in the processes hereof may range from about 30 0 C to about 150 0 C. In various embodiments, for example, the reaction temperature may range from about 100 0 C to about 120 0 C.
  • the reaction temperature referred to here is, in certain embodiments, the temperature that has been provided for the catalyst in the catalyst zone of the reactor. A temperature in these ranges is provided, for example, by heating the various portions of the reactor from a source external thereto, in particular a heating element designed to surround and heat the catalyst zone of the reactor, and thus the catalyst itself. The selected temperature thus exists in the catalyst zone of the reactor upon the occasion when the compound of Formula (II) is contacted with the catalyst.
  • the reactor may be equipped with an external cooling coil that is connected to a recirculating water bath, and an electrical heating jacket may be mounted around the reactor and cooling coil.
  • the reaction can be conducted in an adiabatic reactor where the elevated reaction temperature of, for example, about 100 0 C to about 120 0 C is achieved by the exothermic heat of reaction.
  • the reaction is generally run at a hydrogen pressure of about 200 to about 2500 psig (1.4 to 17.2 MPa), and in one embodiment may be run at a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 1000 psig (3.4 to 6.9 MPa).
  • the pressure should be high enough to quickly saturate the liquid Formula (II) compound with hydrogen in the reactor.
  • a setpoint hydrogen pressure may be maintained as a constant condition during the course of the reaction by supplying hydrogen from a high- pressure storage vessel via a pressure regulator.
  • Hydrogen is mixed in a reaction mixture with the Formula (II) compound in a ratio of about 2 to about 4 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound, i.e. from about a stoichiometric amount of hydrogen up to about a 100% molar excess of hydrogen.
  • hydrogen is mixed with the Formula (II) compound in a ratio of about 2.4 to about 3.0 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound, i.e. from about a 20% to about a 50% molar excess of hydrogen.
  • Using a molar excess of hydrogen appears to help prevent catalyst deactivation.
  • the reactor may be maintained at the prescribed temperature and pressure until the hydrogen consumption subsides, as evidenced by a steady pressure in the hydrogen supply vessel. Typical reaction times are on the order of one to three hours.
  • Reactors suitable for use in the processes hereof include stirred slurry reactors; fluidized bed reactors; and fixed-bed reactors, and pipe, tubular or other plug-flow reactors (and the like) in which the catalyst particles are held in place and do not move with respect to a fixed residence frame.
  • Reactants may be flowed into and through reactors such as these on a continuous basis to give a corresponding continuous flow of product at the downstream end of the reactor.
  • These and other suitable reactors are more particularly described, for example, in Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall Inc. (1992).
  • the hydrogenation reaction can be run continuously or in batch mode. Ordinarily, it is run continuously.
  • the process may also involve purifying the Formula (I) product by a further step such as distillation.
  • the Formula (I) product may be fed, for example, into a distillation column to remove unreacted Formula (II) compound and other impurities that may be present, and the distilled product can then be isolated and recovered.
  • the product may also, however, be subjected with or without recovery from the reaction mixture to further steps to convert it to another product such as another compound (such as a type useful, for example, as a monomer), or an oligomer or a polymer.
  • another product such as another compound (such as a type useful, for example, as a monomer), or an oligomer or a polymer.
  • Another embodiment of a process hereof thus provides a process for converting the Formula (I) product, through a reaction (including a multi-step reaction), into another compound, or into an oligomer or a polymer.
  • the Formula (I) product tetrahydrofuran may be made from the Formula (II) compound furan by a process such as described above, and then used for the preparation of polytetramethylene ether glycol, which in turn can be reacted with 1,4-butanediol and terephthalic acid to produce polyetherester elastomers, or with diisocyanates to produce polyurethanes.
  • Processes suitable fo the preparation of products such as those named above are well known to the artisan.
  • Furan (CAS# 110-00- 9, >99% purity), 1-propanol (CAS# 71-23-8, 99.5% purity), and hexadecane (CAS# 544-76-3, 99% purity), which were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and used as received without further purification; and tetrahydrofuran (CAS# 109-99-9, anhydrous, >99.9% purity), which was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA) and used as received without further purification.
  • Raney® 2400 Nickel a slurry grade sponge nickel catalyst promoted with iron and chromium
  • Raney® 2800 Nickel a slurry grade sponge nickel catalyst
  • Raney® 2486 Nickel a fixed-bed grade sponge nickel catalyst promoted with iron and chromium
  • Raney® 5886 Nickel a fixed-bed grade sponge nickel catalyst.
  • the processes hereof advantageously provide an increased selectivity to, and yield of, the desired Formula (I) compound product as compared to known processes.
  • selectivity for a product (“P") denotes the molar fraction or molar percentage of P in the final product mix
  • conversion denotes how much reactant was used up as a fraction or percentage of the theoretical amount.
  • the conversion multiplied by the selectivity thus equals the maximum “yield” of P, while the actual yield, also referred to as “net yield,” will normally be somewhat less than this because of sample losses incurred in the course of activities such as isolating, handling, drying, and the like.
  • purity denotes what percentage of the in-hand, isolated sample is actually the specified substance.
  • Example 1 and Control A were conducted in a 50-mL Microclave ® autoclave (from Autoclave Engineers) configured as an agitated batch slurry reactor.
  • the reactor was equipped with a gas entrainment agitator and a flat blade impeller operating at about 800 rpm.
  • the reactor was also equipped with an external cooling coil which was connected to a recirculating water bath operated at 15°C. An electrical heating jacket was mounted around the reactor and cooling coil.
  • the reactor, furan, and reaction solvent were chilled overnight in a refrigerator due to the volatility of the furan.
  • a reactor feed solution consisting of furan, n-hexadecane (used as an internal standard for offline GC analysis) and n-propanol (solvent) was prepared in advance of charging the reactor. This solution contained approximately 29.4 wt% furan, 0.6 wt% n-hexadecane and 70.0 wt% n-propanol.
  • Chilled reactor feed and water- wet catalysts were charged to the reactor at a catalyst loading of about 5 wt% catalyst relative to furan on a dry basis, and the catalysts were reduced in situ during the course of the reactions.
  • the reactor headspace was flushed with three successive hydrogen flushes of about 3 bar (0.3 MPa) each.
  • the reactor was then charged with about 60 bar (6.0 MPa) of hydrogen and isolated to monitor for any reactor leaks. Agitation was then begun at about 800 rpm, the cooling water flow was stopped, and the temperature controller was activated to initiate heating.
  • the reactor was opened to a pressure regulated hydrogen supply from a calibrated volume and adjusted to the setpoint pressure of 70 bar (7.0 MPa).
  • the reaction was conducted at about 120 0 C under a constant total pressure of hydrogen of about 70 bar (7.0 MPa). This pressure was maintained during the course of the reaction by supplying hydrogen from a high-pressure storage vessel via a pressure regulator.
  • the reactor was maintained at the prescribed temperature and pressure until the hydrogen consumption subsided, as evidenced by a steady pressure in the hydrogen supply vessel. Typical reaction times were on the order of one to three hours.
  • the temperature controller was deactivated and the cooling water was valved into the reactor cooling coil. After the reactor had cooled to about 15°C, the reactor was disconnected from the head assembly, and the reaction products and used catalyst were recovered. A sample of this reaction product was analyzed offline by gas chromatography.
  • This reaction demonstrates the performance of a Fe, Cr-promoted nickel sponge metal catalyst in a slurry reactor.
  • a 50 mL stirred batch autoclave reactor was charged with a solution of 9.6 g of furan (CAS # 110-00-9), 0.48 g hexadecane (CAS # 544-76-3) in 21.1 g n- propanol (CAS# 71-23-8) and 0.452 g of a powder iron and chromium promoted sponge nickel catalyst (Raney® Nickel 2400 from W.R. Grace), and the hydrogenation reaction was conducted as described above. Following this reaction, the reaction mixture was removed from the reactor via a dip tube equipped with a 2-micron sintered metal filter, thus retaining the catalyst in the reactor. The reactor was flushed three times with 25 mL of n-propanol, each flush being removed through the dip tube. The reactor was then recharged with a fresh solution of furan, hexadecane, and n-propanol, and the reaction was repeated. This process was repeated for a total of five successive reactions using the same catalyst charge.
  • This reaction demonstrates the performance of an unpromoted nickel sponge metal catalyst in a slurry reactor.
  • a 50 rnL stirred batch autoclave reactor was charged with a solution of 8.7 g of furan (CAS # 110-00-9), 0.43 g hexadecane (CAS # 544-76-3) in 21.1 g n- propanol (CAS# 71-23-8) and 0.456 g of a powder sponge nickel catalyst (Raney® Nickel 2800 from W.R. Grace), and the hydrogenation reaction was conducted as described above. Following this reaction, the reaction mixture was removed from the reactor via a dip tube equipped with a 2-micrometer sintered metal filter, thus retaining the catalyst in the reactor. The reactor was flushed three times with 25 mL of n-propanol, each flush being removed through the dip tube. The reactor was then recharged with a fresh solution of furan, hexadecane, and n-propanol, and the reaction was repeated. This process was repeated for a total of four successive reactions using the same catalyst charge.
  • This reaction demonstrates the performance of a Fe, Cr-promoted nickel sponge metal catalyst, compared with an unpromoted nickel sponge metal catalyst, in a fixed bed reactor.
  • range includes the endpoints thereof and all the individual integers and fractions within the range, and also includes each of the narrower ranges therein formed by all the various possible combinations of those endpoints and internal integers and fractions to form subgroups of the larger group of values within the stated range to the same extent as if each of those narrower ranges was explicitly recited.
  • range of numerical values is stated herein as being greater than a stated value, the range is nevertheless finite and is bounded on its upper end by a value that is operable within the context of the invention as described herein.
  • range of numerical values is stated herein as being less than a stated value, the range is nevertheless bounded on its lower end by a non-zero value.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

A process is provided for the synthesis of tetrahydrofuran and related compounds by hydrogenation of furan and derivatives, using a sponge nickel catalyst that has been promoted with iron and chromium.

Description

TITLE
HYDROGENATION PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF
TETRAHYDROFURAN AND ALKYLATED
DERIVATIVES THEREOF
Technical Field
This disclosure relates to the manufacture of tetrahydrofuran and related compounds, and to the industrial use thereof for the synthesis of other useful materials.
Background
Tetrahydrofuran ("THF") and related compounds are useful as solvents and as intermediates in the preparation of industrial chemicals used as pharmaceuticals, herbicides and polymers. For example, tetrahydrofuran is used to make polytetramethylene glycol, which may in turn be used to make polyether ester elastomers and polyurethane elastomers.
"Sponge" metal catalysts such as Raney® nickel catalysts have been used to catalyze the hydrogenation of furan to produce tetrahydrofuran, as discussed e.g. in U. S. Patent No. 2,846,449. In some instances, the catalyst has been promoted with a small amount of an additional catalytically-active metal such as chromium, as discussed in "Tetrahydrofuran II, Kinetics of Hydrogenation of Furan", Wang et al in KO Hsueh T'ung Pao (1958) pages 434-5; and "Tetrahydrofuran III, High Pressure Hydrogenation of Furan", Jen et al in K'o Hsueh T'ung Pao (1958) pages 435-7.
There nevertheless remains a need for catalytic hydrogenation processes to produce tetrahydrofuran, and related compounds, that have greater commercial viability. Summary
The inventions disclosed herein include processes for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran, and related compounds, and for the preparation of products into which such tetrahydro (or substituted) furans can be converted, that are improved by catalyst selection.
Features of certain of the processes of this invention are described herein in the context of one or more specific embodiments that combine various such features together. The scope of the invention is not, however, limited by the description of only certain features within any specific embodiment, and the invention also includes (1) a subcombination of fewer than all of the features of any described embodiment, which subcombination may be characterized by the absence of the features omitted to form the subcombination; (2) each of the features, individually, included within the combination of any described embodiment; and (3) other combinations of features formed by grouping only selected features taken from two or more described embodiments, optionally together with other features as disclosed elsewhere herein. Some of the specific embodiments of the processes hereof are as follows:
In one embodiment hereof, this invention provides a process for the synthesis of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (I)
by contacting in a reaction mixture a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (II)
II
with hydrogen in the presence of a sponge nickel catalyst that comprises iron and chromium; wherein R1, R2, and R3 are each independently selected from H and a Ci to C4 alkyl group.
In another embodiment hereof, a process is provided for preparing a Formula (I) product, as described above, that further includes a step of subjecting the product to a reaction (including a multi-step reaction) to prepare therefrom a compound (such as that useful as a monomer), oligomer or polymer.
An advantageous feature of the processeses hereof is the increased selectivity, lifetime and productivity of the sponge nickel catalysts selected for use herein.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 illustrates the performance in Control A of an unpromoted sponge nickel catalyst over four successive runs in the hydrogenation of furan in a slurry reactor. Figure 2 illustrates the performance in Example 1 of a Fe, Cr-promoted sponge nickel catalyst over five successive runs in the hydrogenation of furan in a slurry reactor.
Figure 3 illustrates the performance in Example 2 of an unpromoted sponge nickel catalyst and a Fe, Cr-promoted sponge nickel catalyst in the hydrogenation of furan in a fixed bed reactor.
Detailed Description
The inventions disclosed herein include processes for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and processes for the preparation of products into which tetrahydrofuran can be converted.
In one embodiment hereof, this invention provides a process for the synthesis of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (I)
by contacting a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (II)
II
with hydrogen, in the presence of a sponge nickel catalyst that contains iron and chromium; wherein R1, R2, and R3 are each independently selected from H and a Ci to C4 alkyl group, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl and any combination thereof.
In one embodiment of the processes hereof, R1, R2, and R3 all equal H, in which case the Formula (I) product is tetrahydrofuran and the Formula (II) compound the starting material, is furan. The hydrogenation of furan to produce tetrahydrofuran may in such case be represented by the following equation:
Sponge Ni catalyst (Fe, Cr promoted) Furan Tetrahydrofuran
In another embodiment, the Formula (II) compound used as the feed material in the processes hereof is obtained by the decarbonylation of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (III):
III
wherein R1, R2, and R3 are defined as described above. In yet another embodiment of the processes hereof, R1, R2, and R3 all equal H, in which case the compound of Formula (III) is furfural and the decarbonylation reaction may be represented by the following equation:
Decarbonylation Catalyst
+ co Furan
A decarbonylation reaction, and catalysts useful therein, are well known to the artisan.
In a further embodiment of the processes hereof, the compound of
Formula (III) is derived from a biological material, which is typically a good source of hemicellulose. Examples of biological materials suitable for use herein for such purpose include, without limitation, straw, corn cobs, corn stalks/corn stover, sugar bagasse, hardwoods, cotton stalks, kenaf, oat hulls, and hemp. When a Formula (II) compound as feed material for the processes hereof is obtained from a Formula (III) compound, especially when it is furfural, the Formula (III) compound should be freshly distilled before use, since it can oxidize and change color, producing undesirable high-boiling oxidation products. In the processes hereof, the hydrogenation reaction is catalyzed by a sponge nickel catalyst that includes iron and chromium along with nickel in the contents thereof. In such case, it is often said that the sponge nickel catalyst is promoted with or by iron and chromium. Sponge nickel catalysts as used herein, as do catalysts known as "skeletal" nickel catalysts, "skeleton" nickel catalysts and Raney® nickel catalysts, refer to metallic catalysts that are prepared by leaching out aluminum from an alloy of nickel and aluminum using aqueous alkali. The alloy is typically about 50% aluminum by weight before leaching, and the majority, but not all, of the aluminum is removed during leaching. The original process to prepare such porous nickel catalysts was discovered by Raney in 1925 with removal of silicon from a nickel/silicon alloy by an alkaline solution (as further discussed in U.S. Patent No.1,563,587). Raney later discovered that using nickel/aluminum alloys was an improvement over the nickel/silicon alloy (as further discussed in U.S. Patent No. 1,628,190). Sponge metal catalysts can be prepared by leaching alloys of aluminum with other metals as well, e.g., cobalt, iron, copper, and others. The term "Raney" as a descriptor of sponge metal catalysts prepared by this process is a registered trademark of W.R. Grace & Co.
The sponge nickel catalysts used in the processes described herein contain small amounts of iron and chromium metals; that is, as aforesaid, the sponge nickel catalyst is promoted with or by iron and chromium. Such catalysts are prepared in the same manner as unpromoted sponge nickel catalysts, i.e. by forming an alloy of nickel, aluminum, chromium and iron and then using aqueous alkali to remove aluminum. In one embodiment, a sponge nickel catalyst as used herein may contain about 0.5% to about 6% iron by weight and/or about 0.5% to about 6% chromium by weight, based on the combined weight of all components of the catalyst together.
One example of a commercially available catalyst suitable for use in the processes hereof is Raney® 2400 Nickel, which is a product of W.R. Grace & Co. (Columbia, Maryland). This is a sponge catalyst that contains 81.0 wt% or more nickel, 6.0-13.0 wt% aluminum, 2.0-3.0 wt% iron, and 2.0-3.0 wt% chromium [according to the manufacturer's information as reported by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA)]. The Raney® 2400 Nickel catalyst is supplied in a slurry grade (i.e. a catalyst powder with particle size typically in the range 25-55 micrometers effective diameter), and a similar catalyst, Raney® 2486 Nickel, is also available in a fixed bed grade (i.e. catalyst pellets typically of a 3x8 standard mesh size).
Catalyst loading in the reactor may be in the amount of at least about 1 wt% or at least about 4 wt%, and yet in an amount of no more than about 15 wt% or no more than about 12 wt%, catalyst relative to the amount of Formula (II) compound present on a dry basis. The reaction may be run in a solvent such as n-propanol, or excess Formula (I) compound may be used as a solvent. The reaction mixture may contain about 60 to about 80.0 wt% solvent. Formula (I) compound used as a solvent may be used in an amount of about 5 to about 10 times the amount that would be expected to be produced by the reaction being conducted.
The temperature of the hydrogenation reaction in the processes hereof may range from about 300C to about 1500C. In various embodiments, for example, the reaction temperature may range from about 1000C to about 1200C. Depending on the choice of reactor to be used, the reaction temperature referred to here is, in certain embodiments, the temperature that has been provided for the catalyst in the catalyst zone of the reactor. A temperature in these ranges is provided, for example, by heating the various portions of the reactor from a source external thereto, in particular a heating element designed to surround and heat the catalyst zone of the reactor, and thus the catalyst itself. The selected temperature thus exists in the catalyst zone of the reactor upon the occasion when the compound of Formula (II) is contacted with the catalyst. In various other embodiments, the reactor may be equipped with an external cooling coil that is connected to a recirculating water bath, and an electrical heating jacket may be mounted around the reactor and cooling coil.
Alternatively, however, in other embodiments, the reaction can be conducted in an adiabatic reactor where the elevated reaction temperature of, for example, about 1000C to about 1200C is achieved by the exothermic heat of reaction.
The reaction is generally run at a hydrogen pressure of about 200 to about 2500 psig (1.4 to 17.2 MPa), and in one embodiment may be run at a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 1000 psig (3.4 to 6.9 MPa). The pressure should be high enough to quickly saturate the liquid Formula (II) compound with hydrogen in the reactor. A setpoint hydrogen pressure may be maintained as a constant condition during the course of the reaction by supplying hydrogen from a high- pressure storage vessel via a pressure regulator.
Hydrogen is mixed in a reaction mixture with the Formula (II) compound in a ratio of about 2 to about 4 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound, i.e. from about a stoichiometric amount of hydrogen up to about a 100% molar excess of hydrogen. In another embodiment, hydrogen is mixed with the Formula (II) compound in a ratio of about 2.4 to about 3.0 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound, i.e. from about a 20% to about a 50% molar excess of hydrogen. Using a molar excess of hydrogen appears to help prevent catalyst deactivation. The reactor may be maintained at the prescribed temperature and pressure until the hydrogen consumption subsides, as evidenced by a steady pressure in the hydrogen supply vessel. Typical reaction times are on the order of one to three hours.
Reactors suitable for use in the processes hereof include stirred slurry reactors; fluidized bed reactors; and fixed-bed reactors, and pipe, tubular or other plug-flow reactors (and the like) in which the catalyst particles are held in place and do not move with respect to a fixed residence frame. Reactants may be flowed into and through reactors such as these on a continuous basis to give a corresponding continuous flow of product at the downstream end of the reactor. These and other suitable reactors are more particularly described, for example, in Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall Inc. (1992). The hydrogenation reaction can be run continuously or in batch mode. Ordinarily, it is run continuously.
The process may also involve purifying the Formula (I) product by a further step such as distillation. The Formula (I) product may be fed, for example, into a distillation column to remove unreacted Formula (II) compound and other impurities that may be present, and the distilled product can then be isolated and recovered.
The product may also, however, be subjected with or without recovery from the reaction mixture to further steps to convert it to another product such as another compound (such as a type useful, for example, as a monomer), or an oligomer or a polymer. Another embodiment of a process hereof thus provides a process for converting the Formula (I) product, through a reaction (including a multi-step reaction), into another compound, or into an oligomer or a polymer. For example, the Formula (I) product tetrahydrofuran may be made from the Formula (II) compound furan by a process such as described above, and then used for the preparation of polytetramethylene ether glycol, which in turn can be reacted with 1,4-butanediol and terephthalic acid to produce polyetherester elastomers, or with diisocyanates to produce polyurethanes. Processes suitable fo the preparation of products such as those named above are well known to the artisan.
Examples.
The advantageous attributes and effects of the processes hereof may be more fully appreciated from a series of examples (Examples 1 ~ 2), as described below. The embodiments of these processes on which the examples are based are representative only, and the selection of those embodiments to illustrate the invention does not indicate that reactants, components, materials, conditions, specifications and/or techniques not described in these examples are not suitable for practicing these processes, or that subject matter not described in these examples is excluded from the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof. The significance of the examples is better understood by comparing the results obtained therefrom with the results obtained from a trial run (Control A) that is designed to serve as a controlled experiment and provide a basis for such comparison in respect of the fact that the catalyst used therein did not contain iron or chromium.
Materials.
The following materials were used in the examples: Furan (CAS# 110-00- 9, >99% purity), 1-propanol (CAS# 71-23-8, 99.5% purity), and hexadecane (CAS# 544-76-3, 99% purity), which were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and used as received without further purification; and tetrahydrofuran (CAS# 109-99-9, anhydrous, >99.9% purity), which was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA) and used as received without further purification.
The following sponge nickel catalysts were obtained from W.R. Grace & Co. (Columbia, Maryland, USA):
• Raney® 2400 Nickel, a slurry grade sponge nickel catalyst promoted with iron and chromium;
• Raney® 2800 Nickel, a slurry grade sponge nickel catalyst;
• Raney® 2486 Nickel, a fixed-bed grade sponge nickel catalyst promoted with iron and chromium; and
• Raney® 5886 Nickel, a fixed-bed grade sponge nickel catalyst.
Abbreviations.
The meaning of abbreviations as used in the example is as follows: "cm" means centimeter(s), "FID" means flame ionization detector, "g" means gram(s), "GC" means gas chromatography, "gmol" means gram mole(s), "mL" means milliliter(s), "mol%" means mole percent, "MPa" means megapascal(s), "rpm" means revolutions per minute, "THF" means tetrahydrofuran, and "wt%" means weight percent.
The processes hereof advantageously provide an increased selectivity to, and yield of, the desired Formula (I) compound product as compared to known processes. As used herein, the term "selectivity" for a product ("P") denotes the molar fraction or molar percentage of P in the final product mix, and the term "conversion" denotes how much reactant was used up as a fraction or percentage of the theoretical amount. The conversion multiplied by the selectivity thus equals the maximum "yield" of P, while the actual yield, also referred to as "net yield," will normally be somewhat less than this because of sample losses incurred in the course of activities such as isolating, handling, drying, and the like. As used herein, the term "purity" denotes what percentage of the in-hand, isolated sample is actually the specified substance. General Method for Example 1 and Control A
Example 1 and Control A were conducted in a 50-mL Microclave® autoclave (from Autoclave Engineers) configured as an agitated batch slurry reactor. The reactor was equipped with a gas entrainment agitator and a flat blade impeller operating at about 800 rpm. The reactor was also equipped with an external cooling coil which was connected to a recirculating water bath operated at 15°C. An electrical heating jacket was mounted around the reactor and cooling coil.
The reactor, furan, and reaction solvent (n-propanol) were chilled overnight in a refrigerator due to the volatility of the furan. A reactor feed solution consisting of furan, n-hexadecane (used as an internal standard for offline GC analysis) and n-propanol (solvent) was prepared in advance of charging the reactor. This solution contained approximately 29.4 wt% furan, 0.6 wt% n-hexadecane and 70.0 wt% n-propanol. Chilled reactor feed and water- wet catalysts were charged to the reactor at a catalyst loading of about 5 wt% catalyst relative to furan on a dry basis, and the catalysts were reduced in situ during the course of the reactions.
After charging the contents and chilling the reactor, the reactor headspace was flushed with three successive hydrogen flushes of about 3 bar (0.3 MPa) each. The reactor was then charged with about 60 bar (6.0 MPa) of hydrogen and isolated to monitor for any reactor leaks. Agitation was then begun at about 800 rpm, the cooling water flow was stopped, and the temperature controller was activated to initiate heating.
As the reactor temperature approached the setpoint temperature of 1200C, the reactor was opened to a pressure regulated hydrogen supply from a calibrated volume and adjusted to the setpoint pressure of 70 bar (7.0 MPa). The reaction was conducted at about 1200C under a constant total pressure of hydrogen of about 70 bar (7.0 MPa). This pressure was maintained during the course of the reaction by supplying hydrogen from a high-pressure storage vessel via a pressure regulator. The reactor was maintained at the prescribed temperature and pressure until the hydrogen consumption subsided, as evidenced by a steady pressure in the hydrogen supply vessel. Typical reaction times were on the order of one to three hours.
When the reaction was complete, the temperature controller was deactivated and the cooling water was valved into the reactor cooling coil. After the reactor had cooled to about 15°C, the reactor was disconnected from the head assembly, and the reaction products and used catalyst were recovered. A sample of this reaction product was analyzed offline by gas chromatography.
Example 1
This reaction demonstrates the performance of a Fe, Cr-promoted nickel sponge metal catalyst in a slurry reactor.
A 50 mL stirred batch autoclave reactor was charged with a solution of 9.6 g of furan (CAS # 110-00-9), 0.48 g hexadecane (CAS # 544-76-3) in 21.1 g n- propanol (CAS# 71-23-8) and 0.452 g of a powder iron and chromium promoted sponge nickel catalyst (Raney® Nickel 2400 from W.R. Grace), and the hydrogenation reaction was conducted as described above. Following this reaction, the reaction mixture was removed from the reactor via a dip tube equipped with a 2-micron sintered metal filter, thus retaining the catalyst in the reactor. The reactor was flushed three times with 25 mL of n-propanol, each flush being removed through the dip tube. The reactor was then recharged with a fresh solution of furan, hexadecane, and n-propanol, and the reaction was repeated. This process was repeated for a total of five successive reactions using the same catalyst charge.
Product analysis by gas chromatography (GC-FID) using the hexadecane as an internal standard was used to determine the composition of the reactant and products in the recovered reaction mixture for each of these successive experiments, and the initial rate of reaction was calculated from the hydrogen consumption. Results are summarized in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the consumption of hydrogen over the course of the five reactions, plotted as the fraction of hydrogen consumed relative to the theoretical amount required for complete hydrogenation of the furan charged to the reactor. The initial reaction rate is relatively stable over these successive runs, showing the benefit of the promoting iron and chromium metals in this sponge nickel catalyst versus an unpromoted sponge nickel catalyst, as is shown below in Control A.
Table 1.
Control A
This reaction demonstrates the performance of an unpromoted nickel sponge metal catalyst in a slurry reactor.
A 50 rnL stirred batch autoclave reactor was charged with a solution of 8.7 g of furan (CAS # 110-00-9), 0.43 g hexadecane (CAS # 544-76-3) in 21.1 g n- propanol (CAS# 71-23-8) and 0.456 g of a powder sponge nickel catalyst (Raney® Nickel 2800 from W.R. Grace), and the hydrogenation reaction was conducted as described above. Following this reaction, the reaction mixture was removed from the reactor via a dip tube equipped with a 2-micrometer sintered metal filter, thus retaining the catalyst in the reactor. The reactor was flushed three times with 25 mL of n-propanol, each flush being removed through the dip tube. The reactor was then recharged with a fresh solution of furan, hexadecane, and n-propanol, and the reaction was repeated. This process was repeated for a total of four successive reactions using the same catalyst charge.
Product analysis by gas chromatography (GC-FID) using the hexadecane as an internal standard was used to determine the composition of the reactant and products in the recovered reaction mixture for each of these successive experiments, and the initial rate of reaction was calculated from the hydrogen consumption. Results are summarized in Table 2. Figure 1 shows the consumption of hydrogen over the course of the four reactions, plotted as the fraction of hydrogen consumed relative to the theoretical amount required for complete hydrogenation of the furan charged to the reactor. For this catalyst there is a rapid decline in initial reaction rate following the first 2-3 minutes of reaction for each of the four reactions. In addition, there is a significant decline in catalyst activity between Runs 1 and 2, and there is a continuing but smaller decline in catalyst activity [i.e. reaction rate) with subsequent runs. Table 2
Example 2
This reaction demonstrates the performance of a Fe, Cr-promoted nickel sponge metal catalyst, compared with an unpromoted nickel sponge metal catalyst, in a fixed bed reactor.
This reaction was conducted at larger scale in a continuous up-flow packed bed reactor with a constant heat input to the system at a set mass flow rate. The total liquid flow rate through the reactor was 20 g/min, with 1.8 g/min of that flow being furan and the balance being THF as a diluent. In addition a 50 mol% excess of hydrogen was fed to the reactor. The liquid and gas feeds were preheated to the inlet temperature prior to reaching the reactor. With no reactant flow through the system, only diluent, the steady state baseline temperature profile (Figure 3) was observed. The initial steady state exotherm with an unpromoted sponge nickel pellet catalyst (Raney® Nickel 5886 from W.R. Grace) after seven hours on-stream is shown in Figure 3; the corresponding conversion level was 97%. After 52 hours of operation, the conversion level had decreased to just under 55%. This decrease in conversion can also be observed in the relative temperature profiles (Figure 3). On repeating these reaction conditions with an iron and chromium- promoted sponge nickel pellet catalyst (Raney® Nickel 2486 from W.R. Grace), the steady state experiments showed an exotherm with better than 99% conversion after 21 hours on-stream. While the overall profile was different than with the unpromoted Ni case, the outlet temperatures were the same indicating similar furan conversion. This high level of activity was maintained over 64 hours at a similarly high level of conversion of over 97%.
In this specification, unless explicitly stated otherwise or indicated to the contrary by the context of usage, where an embodiment of the subject matter hereof is stated or described as comprising, including, containing, having, being composed of or being constituted by or of certain features or elements, one or more features or elements in addition to those explicitly stated or described may be present in the embodiment. An alternative embodiment of the subject matter hereof, however, may be stated or described as consisting essentially of certain features or elements, in which embodiment features or elements that would materially alter the principle of operation or the distinguishing characteristics of the embodiment are not present therein. A further alternative embodiment of the subject matter hereof may be stated or described as consisting of certain features or elements, in which embodiment, or in insubstantial variations thereof, only the features or elements specifically stated or described are present.
Where a range of numerical values is recited or established herein, the range includes the endpoints thereof and all the individual integers and fractions within the range, and also includes each of the narrower ranges therein formed by all the various possible combinations of those endpoints and internal integers and fractions to form subgroups of the larger group of values within the stated range to the same extent as if each of those narrower ranges was explicitly recited. Where a range of numerical values is stated herein as being greater than a stated value, the range is nevertheless finite and is bounded on its upper end by a value that is operable within the context of the invention as described herein. Where a range of numerical values is stated herein as being less than a stated value, the range is nevertheless bounded on its lower end by a non-zero value.
Further in this specification, unless explicitly stated otherwise or indicated to the contrary by the context of usage, amounts, sizes, ranges, formulations, parameters, and other quantities and characteristics recited herein, particularly when modified by the term "about", may but need not be exact, and may also be approximate and/or larger or smaller (as desired) than stated, reflecting tolerances, conversion factors, rounding off, measurement error and the like, as well as the inclusion within a stated value of those values outside it that have, within the context of this invention, functional and/or operable equivalence to the stated value.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A process for the synthesis of a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (I)
comprising contacting in a reaction mixture a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (II)
II
with hydrogen in the presence of a sponge nickel catalyst that comprises iron and chromium; wherein R1, R2, and R3 are each independently selected from H and a Ci to C4 alkyl group.
2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein R1, R2, and R3 are each H.
3. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the reaction mixture comprises hydrogen and Formula (II) compound in a ratio of between about 2.0 and about 4.0 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound.
4. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the reaction mixture comprises hydrogen and Formula (II) compound in a ratio of between about 2.4 and about
3.0 moles of hydrogen per mole of Formula (II) compound.
5. A process according to Claim 1 comprising feeding hydrogen to the reaction mixture at a pressure in the range of from about 200 to about 2500 psig.
6. A process according to Claim 1 comprising feeding hydrogen to the reaction mixture at a pressure in the range of from about 500 to about 1000 psig.
7. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the sponge nickel catalyst comprises iron in an amount of from about 0.5 to about 6 wt%.
8. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the sponge nickel catalyst comprises chromium in an amount of from about 0.5 to about 6 wt%.
9. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the reaction mixture has a temperature in the range of from about 300C to about 1500C.
10. A process according to Claim 1 further comprising a step of decarbonylating a compound as represented by the structure of the following Formula (III)
III
to provide the Formula (II) compound.
11. A process according to Claim 10 wherein the compound of Formula (III) is derived from a biological material which is selected from the group consisting of: straw, corn cobs, corn stalks/corn stover, sugar bagasse, hardwoods, cotton stalks, kenaf, oat hulls, and hemp.
12. A process according to Claim 1 further comprising a step of subjecting the Formula (I) compound to a reaction to prepare therefrom a compound, oligomer or polymer.
EP10714128.5A 2009-04-07 2010-04-06 Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof Not-in-force EP2417116B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16741309P 2009-04-07 2009-04-07
PCT/US2010/030047 WO2010117986A1 (en) 2009-04-07 2010-04-06 Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2417116A1 true EP2417116A1 (en) 2012-02-15
EP2417116B1 EP2417116B1 (en) 2014-04-02

Family

ID=42199477

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10714128.5A Not-in-force EP2417116B1 (en) 2009-04-07 2010-04-06 Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US8658807B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2417116B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102388030B (en)
AU (1) AU2010234617B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI1006693A2 (en)
ES (1) ES2459883T3 (en)
HK (1) HK1168347A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2010117986A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1563587A (en) 1924-09-20 1925-12-01 Raney Murray Method of preparing catalytic material
US1628190A (en) 1926-05-14 1927-05-10 Raney Murray Method of producing finely-divided nickel
US2846499A (en) * 1952-10-13 1958-08-05 Zenith Radio Corp Color television transmitter
US2846449A (en) 1956-08-15 1958-08-05 Du Pont Production of tetrahydrofuran
GB1182932A (en) * 1967-04-17 1970-03-04 Ici Ltd Transition Metal Complexes
DE1939882A1 (en) * 1968-08-10 1970-02-19 Mitsubishi Chem Ind Process for the production of ta? Rahydrofuran
US4962210A (en) * 1990-04-02 1990-10-09 Eastman Kodak Company Process for the preparation of high-purity tetrahydrofuran
US5151543A (en) * 1991-05-31 1992-09-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Selective low pressure hydrogenation of a dinitrile to an aminonitrile
KR100841604B1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2008-06-26 주식회사 효성 Method of preparing tetrahydrofuran

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2010117986A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BRPI1006693A2 (en) 2015-08-25
CN102388030B (en) 2014-12-10
AU2010234617B2 (en) 2015-10-29
EP2417116B1 (en) 2014-04-02
ES2459883T3 (en) 2014-05-12
AU2010234617A1 (en) 2011-10-13
US8658807B2 (en) 2014-02-25
WO2010117986A1 (en) 2010-10-14
CN102388030A (en) 2012-03-21
US20120035378A1 (en) 2012-02-09
HK1168347A1 (en) 2012-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2920992C (en) Process for the preparation of glycols
US9783472B2 (en) Process for the continuous production of ethylene glycol from carbohydrates
EP2445855B1 (en) Carbohydrate route to para-xylene and terephthalic acid
US9914693B2 (en) Process for preparing EDA using SO2-free hydrocyanic acid
US20180362425A1 (en) Process for the preparation of glycols
US9550721B2 (en) Method for preparing dimethyl 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate and method for preparing 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol
US8710269B2 (en) DMAPN having a low DGN content and a process for preparing DMAPA having a low DGN content
WO2010080290A1 (en) Vapor phase decarbonylation process
US9475786B2 (en) Method for synthesising 2,5-di(hydroxymethyl)furan and 2,5-di(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran by selective hydrogenation of furan-2,5-dialdehyde
AU2010234617B2 (en) Hydrogenation process for the preparation of tetrahydrofuran and alkylated derivatives thereof
EP2646406A1 (en) Process for producing dibk
EP2398754B1 (en) Continuous process to produce hexafluoroisopropanol
KR20200044110A (en) Method for controlling the catalytic hydrogenation of 1,4-butynediol through the content of CO and / or CH₄ in the exhaust gas stream
JP6963050B2 (en) Method for producing 2-cyclohexylcyclohexanol
JP5970998B2 (en) Method for producing 1,4-butanediol
EP2459514B1 (en) Cycloaliphatic diamines and method of making the same
AU2010286449B2 (en) Vapor phase decarbonylation process
EP3317261A1 (en) Process for the production of 1,4-butanediol and tetrahydrofuran from furan

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110919

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20131025

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 660042

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2459883

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20140512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010014796

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 660042

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140703

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140702

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140702

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010014796

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140430

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140430

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20150106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010014796

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140406

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140402

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200325

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200312

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200325

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20200417

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20200504

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010014796

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210501

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210406

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211103

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210406

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20220630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210407