EP2378058A2 - Monitoring sand screen - Google Patents
Monitoring sand screen Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2378058A2 EP2378058A2 EP11159183A EP11159183A EP2378058A2 EP 2378058 A2 EP2378058 A2 EP 2378058A2 EP 11159183 A EP11159183 A EP 11159183A EP 11159183 A EP11159183 A EP 11159183A EP 2378058 A2 EP2378058 A2 EP 2378058A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sand screen
- borehole
- sand
- steps
- electromagnetic wave
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 93
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- XOJVVFBFDXDTEG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Norphytane Natural products CC(C)CCCC(C)CCCC(C)CCCC(C)C XOJVVFBFDXDTEG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003909 pattern recognition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005488 sandblasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010618 wire wrap Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/02—Subsoil filtering
- E21B43/08—Screens or liners
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/09—Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes
- E21B47/092—Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes by detecting magnetic anomalies
Definitions
- This invention relates to a method of monitoring sand screens.
- Oil, gas or water wells are conventionally drilled with a drill string, which comprises drill pipe, drill collars and drill bit(s).
- the drilled open hole is hereinafter referred to as a "borehole".
- a borehole is typically lined with casing sections, liners and/or production tubing. The casing is usually cemented in place to prevent the borehole from collapse and is usually in the form of one large diameter pipe.
- sand screens to limit the entry of sand grains produced with the hydrocarbons.
- the sand screen is a type of mesh on a perforated base pipe and prevents sand and rocks from collapsing into and blocking the well bore.
- Sand screens are often installed in open hole completions in a final drilled, uncased reservoir section. These maintain structural integrity of the borehole in the absence of casing, while still allowing flow from the reservoir into the borehole. Gravel packing is often used to supplement the sand filtering process
- sand screens are constructed using two main elements:
- Sand screens are available in many sizes, varieties and makes but essentially, all are filters to control the passage of formation sands into the borehole.
- Sand screens therefore control the migration of formation sands into production tubulars and surface equipment, which can cause washouts and other problems, particularly from unconsolidated sand formations in many fields.
- Sand screens are however susceptible to damage from sand particle erosion or other damage. When damage occurs, it allows sand to penetrate the completion causing many problems in the well's completion elements and surface pipework and plant.
- a method to monitor the integrity of a sand screen comprising:
- step (a) is a logging step.
- step (a) there is a plurality of electromagnetic waves directed towards the sand screen in step (a), thus forming a scan of said sand screen.
- steps (a) and (b) are done after the borehole has been in use, that is producing fluids, for a period of time such as more than 1 day, typically more than 6 months, often more than 3 years; or alternatively when it is thought there may be damage to the sand screen for any reason.
- a sand screen is monitored outwith a borehole, and the results from this monitoring compared to a sand screen monitored in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention.
- steps (i) and (ii) are also conducted, steps (i) and (ii) being:
- step (i) is a logging step.
- step (i) there is a plurality of electromagnetic waves directed towards the sand screen in step (i), thus forming a scan of said sand screen.
- the sand screen in steps (i) and (ii) is an undamaged sand screen.
- step (ii) may be referred to as a 'signature' or "finger print” result of the sand screen.
- the results found in step (ii) may be also referred to as a "baseline” result.
- the method of the invention may include deploying the sand screen from step (ii) into the borehole.
- the method of the invention may include producing fluid, especially hydrocarbons, from the borehole after step (ii) and before step (a).
- the sand screen in step (i) and (ii) is the same sand screen as that in steps (a) and (b) - the difference being that the sand screen is outwith the borehole in steps (i) and (ii) and inside the borehole in steps (a) and (b).
- Step (i) may be prior to deployment of a sand screen in a borehole.
- a sand screen may, for example, be already deployed in a borehole without steps (i) and (ii) performed.
- steps (i) and (ii) can be taken from another screen, preferably the same type of screen as that in the borehole, after deployment of a sand screen in a borehole.
- steps (a) and (b) are not necessarily performed after steps (i) and (ii), they may be performed before steps (i) and (ii).
- the method also includes:
- step (c) normally includes comparison between the data measurements in step (ii) and step (b).
- Data processing and analysis may be performed on any difference determined in step (c) to determine and preferably quantify the location of damaged areas.
- a tool is used to direct the electromagnetic wave towards the sand screen in steps (i) and (a) and detect any reflection in steps (ii) and (b).
- the tool may be an electronic logging tool.
- Electromagnetic logging tools have hitherto been used to measure thickness of tubing (production tubing and liner and casing for example) in order to measure the corrosion on either the inside or the outside of solid pipe.
- their use on a sand screen is unprecedented and surprisingly effective.
- a variety of logging tools may be used, but preferably the same tool is used in each of steps (i), (ii), (a) and (b).
- the tool comprises at least one emitter and at least one detector.
- the tool emits and detects alternating magnetic fields/waves.
- the tool is an electromagnetic tool.
- the electromagnetic wave is of a frequency in the range of 5 to 20 Hz.
- the wave permeates through the sand screen wall and travels a short distance along the outside before passing back through to be detected by the at least one sensor of the tool.
- phase and amplitude of the emitted wave are affected by the metal thickness; thinner walls resulting in faster wave propagation and less attenuation. These differences are used to detect and quantify mechanical variations in the pipe's structure.
- the tool may also comprise a device which measures the internal profile of the sand screen.
- the tool may comprise a set of arms which may be activated from the logging system or by the memory tool to open the arms.
- the tool comprises callipers. This can provide information on the inner diameter of the sand screen.
- images can be created on a computer screen in three dimensions.
- the tool comprises an inclinometer to indicate the arm positions relative to the high side of the pipe, so that features can be orientated correctly during data processing.
- a continuous measurement of the pipe's surface condition is made as the tool is logged.
- damage including corrosive damage, may be located using method in accordance with the present invention.
- An electromagnetic (EM) logging tool 10 as shown in Fig. 1 has one emitter 12, twelve sensors 14 mounted on bowsprings 16 and is provided within a sand screen 18 in a wellbore 19.
- the electromagnetic tool used in preferred embodiments of the invention may be obtained from GE Energy (formerly Sondex) and is known as the Magnetic Thickness Tool (MTT).
- the EM logging tool is used to scan a portion of a sand screen at the surface before it is deployed in the well. After the sand screen has been in used in the well it may be scanned again to check for damage or specifically locate damage which may have been observed by sand production or other problems.
- the emitter 12 emits an alternating magnetic field 17 which travels through the sand screen 18.
- the technique is called the Remote Field Eddy Current method.
- the emitted EM field 17 travels through the pipe wall and sets up eddy currents which prevents re-entry of the signal until such time that the strength of the wave (and the induced eddy currents) have decayed sufficiently to allow the wave to travel back through the pipe - it therefore makes two transits across the sand screen thickness.
- the sensors 14 are spaced away from the emitter 12 such that they match the decay and are positioned optimally to capture the returning wave.
- the wave 17 at a damaged area (the inner wall) 15 returns faster in comparison to the other points in the same circumference and with higher amplitude.
- the electronic logging tools are capable of identifying the location of the damage, characterising the type of damage and quantifying the extent of the damaged area.
- the EM logging tool 10 is also coupled with an electromechanical device such as callipers (not shown) to measure internal wall profile when the scan is performed downhole and along with the EM tool 10 provides useful information.
- an electromechanical device such as callipers (not shown) to measure internal wall profile when the scan is performed downhole and along with the EM tool 10 provides useful information.
- One suitable tool may be a Multifinger Calliper tool.
- a second series of fingerprints was obtained from the same screens with deliberately induced damage of known nature and dimensions in order to provide better characterisation of the damage when found on logged data and to provide data may allow a predictive element for possible early indication of potential damage.
- the types of damage induced included full wall penetration, partial wall penetrations, cut slots and holes of different dimensions, gouges and dents.
- the penetrative damage was performed by a sand blasting device, a mechanism similar in nature to actual damage commonly observed in deployed screens.
- the gouges and dents were included as indications of damage sustained during the deployment of the screens during well completion - see Fig. 3 for a typical scan of 100% and 50% penetrations of the sand screen.
- the EM logging tool may be deployed in a surface read out or a memory mode. It can obtain consistent data while travelling either downwards or upwards in the well, is easy to deploy (light and short), centralisation is noncritical, can gather the same data with the well shut in or flowing, operates equally well in gas or liquid and has a smooth mode of travel on bowspring arms therefore eliminating road noise against the irregular surface of a typical sand screen.
- the embodiments of the invention provide a new method of identifying damage to sand screens by comparison of reference signatures (or fingerprints) of new, undamaged sand screens to that of deployed, in-situ sand screens has been demonstrated through the technique of pattern recognition. Early indication of potential damage and sand breakthrough may be a beneficial outcome of the analysis.
- embodiments of the invention relate to a technique of using electromagnetic logging tools to identify areas of damage in sand screens after deployment in a borehole.
- the "noise" in a tool response from a logging pass can be compared to a tool response from screens of known condition.
- the sand screens of known condition are logged in a controlled environment.
- the condition is then changed by imparting mechanical damage to the screen.
- the variation from pristine condition can be assessed for a sand screen installed in a well.
- the identification of location of damage in a well and potentially the level of damage means a series of solutions can be, with the agreement of the well owner, constructed to improve well (productivity) performance.
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a method of monitoring sand screens.
- Oil, gas or water wells are conventionally drilled with a drill string, which comprises drill pipe, drill collars and drill bit(s). The drilled open hole is hereinafter referred to as a "borehole". A borehole is typically lined with casing sections, liners and/or production tubing. The casing is usually cemented in place to prevent the borehole from collapse and is usually in the form of one large diameter pipe.
- Migration of sand into production tubulars and surface equipment can cause catastrophic damage and in the worst case completely block hydrocarbon production. To avoid these unwanted events, sand producing wells are often choked back or shut-in with the unfortunate effect of reducing revenues for the well owner.
- However, many wells drilled into unconsolidated sand formations are now completed with sand screens to limit the entry of sand grains produced with the hydrocarbons. The sand screen is a type of mesh on a perforated base pipe and prevents sand and rocks from collapsing into and blocking the well bore. Sand screens are often installed in open hole completions in a final drilled, uncased reservoir section. These maintain structural integrity of the borehole in the absence of casing, while still allowing flow from the reservoir into the borehole. Gravel packing is often used to supplement the sand filtering process
- Typically, sand screens are constructed using two main elements:
- (i) mechanical filter, such as mesh or wire wrap, to block entry of particles above a certain minimum size;
- (ii) a supporting pipe which has a series of holes or slots to allow entry of the particle free hydrocarbon
- Sand screens are available in many sizes, varieties and makes but essentially, all are filters to control the passage of formation sands into the borehole.
- Sand screens therefore control the migration of formation sands into production tubulars and surface equipment, which can cause washouts and other problems, particularly from unconsolidated sand formations in many fields.
- Sand screens are however susceptible to damage from sand particle erosion or other damage. When damage occurs, it allows sand to penetrate the completion causing many problems in the well's completion elements and surface pipework and plant.
- According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method to monitor the integrity of a sand screen, the method comprising:
- (a) directing at least one electromagnetic wave towards a sand screen inside a borehole;
- (b) detecting at least one reflected or emitted electromagnetic wave from said sand screen inside the borehole in order to produce at least one data measurement.
- In normal, uniformly smooth walled pipe such as tubing or casing (as opposed to a sand screen of the present invention) various electromagnetic devices are used to measure wall thickness. Certain devices use a transmitter to emit an alternating magnetic wave which permeates through the pipe wall and travels a short distance along the outside before passing back through to be detected by an array of sensors. The velocity and amplitude of the emitted wave are affected by the metal thickness; thinner walls resulting in faster wave propagation and less attenuation. These results are used to detect and quantify mechanical variations in the pipe's structure.
- In marked contrast, the nature of sand screens is not at all uniformly smooth being constructed with a series of high density perforations and so such a technique clearly appears unsuitable to monitor sand screens. The skilled person would be dissuaded from such use since the signal reflected or emitted from the device would have no clear route through the mesh or slotted pipe of the sand screen and the resulting data would be so full of 'noise' that it would not be expected to be useful.
- Against these expectations the inventors of the present invention have surprisingly found that useful information can in fact be taken from such monitoring, and that damage to the sand screen can be detected. To do this a sand screen is analysed according to the first aspect of the invention.
- Preferably step (a) is a logging step.
- Preferably there is a plurality of electromagnetic waves directed towards the sand screen in step (a), thus forming a scan of said sand screen.
- Typically steps (a) and (b) are done after the borehole has been in use, that is producing fluids, for a period of time such as more than 1 day, typically more than 6 months, often more than 3 years; or alternatively when it is thought there may be damage to the sand screen for any reason.
- In preferred embodiments, a sand screen is monitored outwith a borehole, and the results from this monitoring compared to a sand screen monitored in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention. Thus preferably further steps (i) and (ii) are also conducted, steps (i) and (ii) being:
- (i) directing at least one electromagnetic wave towards a sand screen under controlled conditions outside of a borehole; and
- (ii) detecting reflected or emitted electromagnetic wave from said sand screen in order to produce at least one data measurement.
- Preferably steps (i) and (ii) and conducted before steps (a) and (b).
- Preferably step (i) is a logging step.
- Preferably there is a plurality of electromagnetic waves directed towards the sand screen in step (i), thus forming a scan of said sand screen.
- Preferably the sand screen in steps (i) and (ii) is an undamaged sand screen.
- The results detected in step (ii) may be referred to as a 'signature' or "finger print" result of the sand screen. The results found in step (ii) may be also referred to as a "baseline" result.
- The method of the invention may include deploying the sand screen from step (ii) into the borehole.
- The method of the invention may include producing fluid, especially hydrocarbons, from the borehole after step (ii) and before step (a).
- Preferably the sand screen in step (i) and (ii) is the same sand screen as that in steps (a) and (b) - the difference being that the sand screen is outwith the borehole in steps (i) and (ii) and inside the borehole in steps (a) and (b).
- Step (i) may be prior to deployment of a sand screen in a borehole. However for some alternative embodiments, a sand screen may, for example, be already deployed in a borehole without steps (i) and (ii) performed. For such or other embodiments, steps (i) and (ii) can be taken from another screen, preferably the same type of screen as that in the borehole, after deployment of a sand screen in a borehole. Indeed for certain embodiments steps (a) and (b) are not necessarily performed after steps (i) and (ii), they may be performed before steps (i) and (ii).
- 'Outside of a borehole' is typically on land or on a platform or ship.
- Preferably the method also includes:
- (c) data processing and analysis of the comparison between the data measurements in step (ii) and step (b).
- The data processing and analysis of step (c) normally includes comparison between the data measurements in step (ii) and step (b).
- Data processing and analysis may be performed on any difference determined in step (c) to determine and preferably quantify the location of damaged areas.
- Preferably a tool is used to direct the electromagnetic wave towards the sand screen in steps (i) and (a) and detect any reflection in steps (ii) and (b).
- The tool may be an electronic logging tool. Electromagnetic logging tools have hitherto been used to measure thickness of tubing (production tubing and liner and casing for example) in order to measure the corrosion on either the inside or the outside of solid pipe. However their use on a sand screen is unprecedented and surprisingly effective.
- A variety of logging tools may be used, but preferably the same tool is used in each of steps (i), (ii), (a) and (b).
- Typically the tool comprises at least one emitter and at least one detector.
- There may be one emitter and a plurality of detectors, such as more than 5 detectors, preferably more than ten detectors and one certain embodiment comprises twelve detectors.
- Preferably the tool emits and detects alternating magnetic fields/waves. Preferably therefore the tool is an electromagnetic tool.
- Preferably the electromagnetic wave is of a frequency in the range of 5 to 20 Hz. The wave permeates through the sand screen wall and travels a short distance along the outside before passing back through to be detected by the at least one sensor of the tool.
- The phase and amplitude of the emitted wave are affected by the metal thickness; thinner walls resulting in faster wave propagation and less attenuation. These differences are used to detect and quantify mechanical variations in the pipe's structure.
- The tool may also comprise a device which measures the internal profile of the sand screen. The tool may comprise a set of arms which may be activated from the logging system or by the memory tool to open the arms. Preferably the tool comprises callipers. This can provide information on the inner diameter of the sand screen.
- By combining information from the two tools, images can be created on a computer screen in three dimensions.
- Preferably the tool comprises an inclinometer to indicate the arm positions relative to the high side of the pipe, so that features can be orientated correctly during data processing.
- A continuous measurement of the pipe's surface condition is made as the tool is logged.
- Thus damage, including corrosive damage, may be located using method in accordance with the present invention.
- An embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
-
Fig. 1 is a view of an electromagnetic logging tool used in accordance with the present invention; -
Fig. 2 is a scan of an undamaged sand screen; -
Fig. 3 is a scan of a damaged sand screen. - An electromagnetic (EM)
logging tool 10 as shown inFig. 1 has oneemitter 12, twelvesensors 14 mounted onbowsprings 16 and is provided within asand screen 18 in awellbore 19. The electromagnetic tool used in preferred embodiments of the invention may be obtained from GE Energy (formerly Sondex) and is known as the Magnetic Thickness Tool (MTT). - The EM logging tool is used to scan a portion of a sand screen at the surface before it is deployed in the well. After the sand screen has been in used in the well it may be scanned again to check for damage or specifically locate damage which may have been observed by sand production or other problems.
- As shown in
Fig. 1 , theemitter 12 emits an alternatingmagnetic field 17 which travels through thesand screen 18. The technique is called the Remote Field Eddy Current method. The emittedEM field 17 travels through the pipe wall and sets up eddy currents which prevents re-entry of the signal until such time that the strength of the wave (and the induced eddy currents) have decayed sufficiently to allow the wave to travel back through the pipe - it therefore makes two transits across the sand screen thickness. Thesensors 14 are spaced away from theemitter 12 such that they match the decay and are positioned optimally to capture the returning wave. Thewave 17 at a damaged area (the inner wall) 15 returns faster in comparison to the other points in the same circumference and with higher amplitude. By measuring the transit time (which is related to phase of the sinusoid) a mathematical relationship allows an estimation of damage. Optionally this can be combined with other data from callipers, described below. - By visually comparing the individual fingerprints of in-situ sand screens with the pre-logged signature of a new and undamaged screen of the same type, differences are clearly identifiable, which, by inference must represent damage to the screens. These differences therefore pinpoint the depth of damaged areas and allow appropriate remedial action to be taken.
- This information allows remedial work to be carried out to repair or block off the damaged section of sand screen. The electronic logging tools are capable of identifying the location of the damage, characterising the type of damage and quantifying the extent of the damaged area.
- The
EM logging tool 10 is also coupled with an electromechanical device such as callipers (not shown) to measure internal wall profile when the scan is performed downhole and along with theEM tool 10 provides useful information. One suitable tool may be a Multifinger Calliper tool. - Using the EM logging tool described above, a series of tests was conducted under controlled conditions to obtain the signatures of a variety of undamaged sand screens. Data was obtained in both logging directions and at a range of speeds and operating parameters to obtain the best possible images of the sand screens - the raw data being displayed on scaled plots labelled with the key match points and elements making up the screen. A library of signatures was thus obtained for later use in the field for comparison purposes - see
figure 2 for a scan of a common type of sand screen logged with the electromagnetic tool. - A second series of fingerprints was obtained from the same screens with deliberately induced damage of known nature and dimensions in order to provide better characterisation of the damage when found on logged data and to provide data may allow a predictive element for possible early indication of potential damage. The types of damage induced included full wall penetration, partial wall penetrations, cut slots and holes of different dimensions, gouges and dents. The penetrative damage was performed by a sand blasting device, a mechanism similar in nature to actual damage commonly observed in deployed screens. The gouges and dents were included as indications of damage sustained during the deployment of the screens during well completion - see
Fig. 3 for a typical scan of 100% and 50% penetrations of the sand screen. - Comparing the scans in
Figs. 2 and 3 , joints between adjacent sand screens can be observed referenced 22, as well as aweld band 24. However the differences in thescans 20 are indicative of damage to the screens. Thus certain embodiments of the present invention provide a new method to enable damaged sand screens to be identified in a consistent and reliable manner. - Indeed in the example of
Fig. 2 it would be possible to ascertain that damage had occurred even without reference toFig. 3 . In certain situations this would not always be possible since it may be unclear from a single scan in itself where damage had occurred. Even if possible, it would normally be easier to make a reference scan to highlight any changes. Thus whilst certain embodiments do not require a reference or baseline scan, it is preferable to use one. - Thus comparison of fingerprints and signatures of new and in-situ screens may be performed using EM logging tools. Also certain embodiments using EM logging tools provide additional benefits in terms of economics, flexibility, ease of deployment.
- The EM logging tool may be deployed in a surface read out or a memory mode. It can obtain consistent data while travelling either downwards or upwards in the well, is easy to deploy (light and short), centralisation is noncritical, can gather the same data with the well shut in or flowing, operates equally well in gas or liquid and has a smooth mode of travel on bowspring arms therefore eliminating road noise against the irregular surface of a typical sand screen.
- Other logging tools could be deployed but are less preferred. Various factors are important when considering a suitable tool. These factors include:
- well state (flowing or shut in - Production Logging Tools)
- size and dimension (long and/or large diameter tools)
- well fluid (ultrasonic tools only operate in liquid)
- dedicated SRO (memory tools may be easier to deploy in certain situations eg with coiled tubing)
- need to be well centralised (Production Logging Tools)
- road noise (tools with fingers/arms or roller centralisers)
- Thus certain other tools may be used for alternative embodiments of the invention.
- The embodiments of the invention provide a new method of identifying damage to sand screens by comparison of reference signatures (or fingerprints) of new, undamaged sand screens to that of deployed, in-situ sand screens has been demonstrated through the technique of pattern recognition. Early indication of potential damage and sand breakthrough may be a beneficial outcome of the analysis.
- In summary, embodiments of the invention relate to a technique of using electromagnetic logging tools to identify areas of damage in sand screens after deployment in a borehole. In particular, the "noise" in a tool response from a logging pass can be compared to a tool response from screens of known condition. The sand screens of known condition are logged in a controlled environment. The condition is then changed by imparting mechanical damage to the screen. The variation from pristine condition can be assessed for a sand screen installed in a well. The identification of location of damage in a well and potentially the level of damage means a series of solutions can be, with the agreement of the well owner, constructed to improve well (productivity) performance.
- Improvements and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims (15)
- A method to monitor the integrity of a sand screen, the method comprising:(a) directing at least one electromagnetic wave towards a sand screen inside a borehole;(b) detecting at least one reflected or emitted electromagnetic wave from said sand screen inside the borehole in order to produce at least one data measurement.
- A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step (a) is a logging step.
- A method as claimed in either preceding claim, wherein there is a plurality of electromagnetic waves directed towards the sand screen in step (a), thus forming a scan of said sand screen.
- A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein steps (a) and (b) are done after the borehole has been in use, that is producing fluids, for more than 1 day, optionally more than 6 months, often more than 3 years.
- A method as claimed in any preceding claim, including:(i) directing at least one electromagnetic wave towards a sand screen under controlled conditions outside of a borehole; and(ii) detecting at least one reflected or emitted electromagnetic wave from said sand screen in step (i) in order to produce at least one data measurement.
- A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein steps (i) and (ii) are conducted before steps (a) and (b).
- A method as claimed in claim 5 or claim 6, wherein the sand screen in step (i) and (ii) is the same sand screen as that in steps (a) and (b).
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 7, comprising producing fluid, especially hydrocarbons, from the borehole after step (ii) and before step (a).
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 8, the method also including:(c) data processing and analysis of the comparison between the data measurements in step (ii) and step (b).
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 9, wherein an electronic logging tool directs the electromagnetic wave towards the sand screen in steps (i) and (a) and detect any reflection in steps (ii) and (b).
- A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the tool comprises at least one emitter and more than 5 detectors, optionally more than ten detectors.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 11, wherein the tool comprises a device which measures the internal profile of the sand screen.
- A method as claimed in claim 12, wherein information from the electromagnetic tool and the device which measures the internal profile of the sand screen is used to create images on a computer screen in three dimensions.
- A method as claimed in any preceding claim, comprising emitting and detecting alternating magnetic fields/waves.
- A method as claimed in any preceding claim, comprising emitting electromagnetic waves with a frequency in the range of 5 to 20 Hz.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB1006306.3A GB201006306D0 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2010-04-15 | Method |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2378058A2 true EP2378058A2 (en) | 2011-10-19 |
EP2378058A3 EP2378058A3 (en) | 2012-10-31 |
EP2378058B1 EP2378058B1 (en) | 2014-08-13 |
Family
ID=42245263
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11159183.0A Active EP2378058B1 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2011-03-22 | Monitoring sand screen |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2378058B1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2378058T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB201006306D0 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2015099736A1 (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2015-07-02 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Real-time monitoring of health hazards during hydraulic fracturing |
WO2015191320A1 (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2015-12-17 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system to quantify damage to gravel pack screens |
WO2019245723A1 (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2019-12-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Assessing expandable sand screens using electromagnetic tool |
CN111197471A (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2020-05-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Transient electromagnetic detection calculation model and detection method for underground screen pipe |
US11105195B2 (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2021-08-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method to assess sand screen system |
CN115450586B (en) * | 2022-07-26 | 2024-04-26 | 四川古叙科技咨询服务有限公司 | Gas layered extraction metering device |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4744030A (en) * | 1986-04-29 | 1988-05-10 | Western Atlas International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring internal casing wear |
-
2010
- 2010-04-15 GB GBGB1006306.3A patent/GB201006306D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2011
- 2011-03-22 EP EP11159183.0A patent/EP2378058B1/en active Active
- 2011-03-22 DK DK11159183.0T patent/DK2378058T3/en active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2015099736A1 (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2015-07-02 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Real-time monitoring of health hazards during hydraulic fracturing |
CN105874164A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2016-08-17 | 兰德马克绘图国际公司 | Real-time monitoring of health hazards during hydraulic fracturing |
GB2539773A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2016-12-28 | Landmark Graphics Corp | Real-time monitoring of health hazards during hydraulic fracturing |
US10487651B2 (en) | 2013-12-26 | 2019-11-26 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Real-time monitoring of health hazards during hydraulic fracturing |
WO2015191320A1 (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2015-12-17 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system to quantify damage to gravel pack screens |
US9624766B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2017-04-18 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system to quantify damage to gravel pack screens |
EP3152398A4 (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2018-02-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system to quantify damage to gravel pack screens |
US11105195B2 (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2021-08-31 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method to assess sand screen system |
WO2019245723A1 (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2019-12-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Assessing expandable sand screens using electromagnetic tool |
US10982531B2 (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2021-04-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Assessing expandable sand screens using electromagnetic tool |
CN111197471A (en) * | 2018-10-30 | 2020-05-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Transient electromagnetic detection calculation model and detection method for underground screen pipe |
CN115450586B (en) * | 2022-07-26 | 2024-04-26 | 四川古叙科技咨询服务有限公司 | Gas layered extraction metering device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2378058A3 (en) | 2012-10-31 |
EP2378058B1 (en) | 2014-08-13 |
GB201006306D0 (en) | 2010-06-02 |
DK2378058T3 (en) | 2014-10-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20220282611A1 (en) | Method for fracturing activity and intensity monitoring and pressure wave resonance analysis | |
US6843317B2 (en) | System and method for autonomously performing a downhole well operation | |
AU2017424961B2 (en) | Methods and systems for wellbore integrity management | |
US7634942B2 (en) | Tubing expansion | |
US7059404B2 (en) | Variable intensity memory gravel pack imaging apparatus and method | |
US20120046866A1 (en) | Oilfield applications for distributed vibration sensing technology | |
US6554065B2 (en) | Memory gravel pack imaging apparatus and method | |
EP2378058B1 (en) | Monitoring sand screen | |
CA2814494A1 (en) | Erosion tracer and monitoring system and methodology | |
US20170138182A1 (en) | Moving system and method | |
US20200355838A1 (en) | Detection and quantification of sand flows in a borehole | |
WO2019245723A1 (en) | Assessing expandable sand screens using electromagnetic tool | |
US10087746B2 (en) | Well treatment design based on three-dimensional wellbore shape | |
EP3181810B1 (en) | Distribution of radioactive tags around or along well for detection thereof | |
AU2020202708B2 (en) | Caliper-Behind-Casing From Pulsed Neutron Apparatus | |
WO2016025672A1 (en) | Method of treating an underground formation featuring single-point stimulation | |
US20240069238A1 (en) | Determining hydrocarbon production zones in a subterranean reservoir | |
Ruslan et al. | History Case: Integrated Approach to Sand Management and Completion Evaluation for Sand Producer in Mature Field North Sea |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: READ CASED HOLE LIMITED |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E21B 47/09 20120101ALI20120921BHEP Ipc: E21B 43/08 20060101AFI20120921BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130327 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20140313 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 682389 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140815 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011008990 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140925 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 682389 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141215 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141113 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141114 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141213 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011008990 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20150515 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602011008990 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150322 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20151130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150322 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110322 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140813 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230929 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20230929 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20231002 Year of fee payment: 13 |