EP2352148B1 - Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method - Google Patents

Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2352148B1
EP2352148B1 EP09827585.2A EP09827585A EP2352148B1 EP 2352148 B1 EP2352148 B1 EP 2352148B1 EP 09827585 A EP09827585 A EP 09827585A EP 2352148 B1 EP2352148 B1 EP 2352148B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
noise
audio signal
signal
signal level
spectrum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09827585.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2352148A4 (en
EP2352148A1 (en
Inventor
Ryo Tanaka
Naoto Kuriyama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yamaha Corp
Original Assignee
Yamaha Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yamaha Corp filed Critical Yamaha Corp
Publication of EP2352148A1 publication Critical patent/EP2352148A1/en
Publication of EP2352148A4 publication Critical patent/EP2352148A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2352148B1 publication Critical patent/EP2352148B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L21/00Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
    • G10L21/02Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
    • G10L21/0208Noise filtering
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00Speech recognition
    • G10L15/20Speech recognition techniques specially adapted for robustness in adverse environments, e.g. in noise, of stress induced speech
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03GCONTROL OF AMPLIFICATION
    • H03G3/00Gain control in amplifiers or frequency changers without distortion of the input signal
    • H03G3/20Automatic control
    • H03G3/30Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices
    • H03G3/34Muting amplifier when no signal is present or when only weak signals are present, or caused by the presence of noise signals, e.g. squelch systems
    • H03G3/345Muting during a short period of time when noise pulses are detected, i.e. blanking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L21/00Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
    • G10L21/02Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
    • G10L21/0208Noise filtering
    • G10L21/0216Noise filtering characterised by the method used for estimating noise
    • G10L21/0232Processing in the frequency domain
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10LSPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L25/00Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
    • G10L25/27Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00 characterised by the analysis technique

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a noise gate for removing a noise included in an audio signal, a sound collection device and a noise removing method.
  • a sound collection device of the related art is provided with a noise gate as a unit for removing a noise (e.g., JP-A-2006 50067 ).
  • JP-A-2006 50067 discloses a noise gate device that changes a threshold value of a noise gate in accordance with an amplification degree of a head amplifier for amplifying an audio signal and removes an audio signal less than the threshold value.
  • US 4,811,404 A discloses a noise suppression system which performs speech quality enhancement upon the speech-plus-noise signal available at the input to generate a clean speech signal at the output by spectral gain modification.
  • the measures taken include the addition of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold mechanism to reduce background noise flutter by offsetting the gain rise of the gain tables until a certain SNR threshold is reached, the use of a voice metric calculator to produce more accurate background noise estimates via performing the update decision based on the overall voice-like characteristics in the channels and the time interval since the last update, and the use of a channel SNR modifier to provide immunity to narrowband noise bursts through modification of the SNR estimates based on the voice metric calculation and the channel energies.
  • SNR signal-to-noise ratio
  • WO 87/00366 A1 discloses a noise suppression system which performs speech quality enhancement upon speech-plus-noise signal available at the input to generate a clean speech signal at the output by spectral gain modification.
  • the noise suppression system includes a background noise estimator which generates and stores an estimate of the background noise power spectral density based upon pre-processed speech, as determined by the detected minima of the post-processed speech energy level.
  • This post-processed speech may be obtained directly from the output of the noise suppression system, or may be simulated by multiplying the pre-processed speech energy by the channel gain values of the modification signal.
  • the channel gain controller produces these individual channel gain values for application to both the channel gain modifier and the background noise estimator.
  • Each individual channel gain value is selected as a function of (a) the channel number, (b) the current channel SNR estimate, and (c) the overall average background noise level.
  • the technique of implementing post-processed signal to generate the background noise estimate provides a more accurate measurement of the background noise energy since it is based upon much cleaner speech signal.
  • the present invention performs acoustic noise suppression in high ambient noise backgrounds with significantly less voice quality degradation.
  • the noise gate device described in JP-A-2006 50067 removes an audio signal less than a threshold value. Therefore, the problem arises that in a case where an utterance voice of a speaking person is included in the audio signal less than the threshold value, the noise gate device removes the utterance voice having a signal level less than the threshold value.
  • a purpose of the invention is to provide a noise gate, a sound collection device and a noise removing method each capable of readily removing a stationary noise without degrading an audio signal.
  • a noise gate is provided as set forth in claim 1 and estimates a noise spectrum of a stationary noise included in an input audio signal (hereinafter, referred to as the stationary noise) based on a frequency spectrum of the input audio signal.
  • the noise gate computes a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the input audio signal to the estimated noise spectrum.
  • the noise gate outputs the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the signal level in a frequency band is decreased by a certain level in the frequency band having the computed signal level ratio which is less than a predetermined threshold value and outputs said spectrum having the signal level maintained in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal or greater than said threshold.
  • the noise gate outputs a frequency spectrum of an audio signal including an utterance voice of a speaking person and suppresses a signal level in a frequency spectrum of an audio signal formed of a stationary noise so that the audio signal in which only the stationary noise is removed can be output without degrading the utterance voice of the speaking person.
  • the threshold value can be set to a value greater than 1 which is a value compared to the signal level ratio by a value corresponding to an estimation error of an estimation unit. Since the noise gate computes the signal level ratio to be compared to the threshold value by using the estimated stationary noise, the estimation error of the stationary noise is considered.
  • the noise gate can remove the stationary noise even in a case where the signal level of the stationary noise is estimated to be a value less than an actual value.
  • a sound collection device is provided as set forth in claim 2 and has the above described noise gate.
  • the sound collection device transforms an audio signal generated by collecting a sound into a frequency spectrum as a signal of a frequency domain and outputs it to the noise gate.
  • the sound collection device inversely transforms a frequency spectrum of an audio signal output from the noise gate into an audio signal as a signal of a time domain.
  • the sound collection device can remove a stationary noise from the collected audio signal by using the above described noise gate. Therefore, the sound collection device can output a sound without degrading a collected utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • a noise removing method includes a process of inputting a frequency spectrum of an audio signal, a process of estimating a noise spectrum based on the frequency spectrum of the audio signal input in the inputting process, a process of computing a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the audio signal to the noise spectrum estimated in the estimating process, and a process of outputting the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the gain in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than a predetermined threshold value is decreased by a certain level, and outputs said spectrum having the signal level maintained in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal or greater than said threshold, the signal level ratio being computed in the computing process.
  • the threshold value can be set to a value greater than 1 which is a value compared to the signal level ratio by a value corresponding to an estimation error of an estimation unit used in the estimating process.
  • the noise gate according to the invention can output an audio signal in which only a stationary noise is removed without degrading an utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a function and a structure of the sound collection device 1.
  • Fig. 2 is a graph showing an example of a gain table.
  • the sound collection device 1 has a noise gate 12 (see Fig. 1 ).
  • the sound collection device 1 transforms a collected audio signal NE'T into a frequency spectrum NE'N.
  • the sound collection device 1 removes a stationary noise N'N included in the audio signal NE'N by using the noise gate 12. At that time, the stationary noise N'N is estimated based on the frequency spectrum NE'N by the noise gate 12.
  • the sound collection device 1 outputs an audio signal CO'T which is generated in such a manner that a frequency spectrum CO'N after removing the stationary noise N'N is inversely transformed with respect to a time axis. Meanwhile, an end symbol of a signal in a time domain is indicated by 'T and an end symbol of a signal in a frequency domain is indicated by 'N in the descriptions below.
  • the sound collection device 1 includes a microphone MIC, an FFT processing unit 11, the noise gate 12 and an IFFT processing unit 13.
  • the microphone MIC generates an audio signal by collecting ambient sounds.
  • the microphone MIC outputs the generated audio signal NE'T to the FFT processing unit 11.
  • the FFT processing unit 11 is a fast Fourier transform circuit that transforms the audio signal NE'T as the signal in the time domain into the audio signal NE'N as the signal in the frequency domain and outputs the audio signal NE'N to an estimation unit 121 and a noise removal unit 122 in the noise gate 12.
  • the noise gate 12 has the estimation unit 121 and the noise removal unit 122.
  • the estimation unit 121 performs a process of estimating a stationary noise N'N included in the audio signal NE'N input from the FFT processing unit 11.
  • the estimation unit 121 sequentially acquires frequency spectrums (hreinafter, referred to as the audio spectrum(s)) S (NE'N) at certain sampling times of the stationary noise N'N and stores them temporarily.
  • the estimation unit 121 estimates frequency spectrums (hereinafter, referred to as the noise spectrum(s)) S (N'N) at certain sampling timings of the stationary noise N'N based on the plurality of times of audio spectrums S (NE'N) acquired and stored as in the above.
  • the estimation unit 121 outputs the estimated noise spectrums S(N'N) to the noise removal unit 122.
  • the noise spectrum at a certain sampling timing T is represented by S(N'N(T))
  • the audio spectrum at the same sampling timing T is represented by S(NE'N(T))
  • the noise spectrum at the previous sampling timing T-1 is represented by S(N'N(T-1)).
  • the noise spectrum S(N'N(T)) is represented by the following formula 1.
  • the estimation unit 121 performs an estimating process of a noise spectrum only in a case where a level of an audio signal collected by the microphone MIC is in a low state (a silent state).
  • the noise removal unit 122 removes the stationary noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N input from the FFT processing unit 11 and outputs the audio signal CO'N after removing the noise to the IFFT processing unit 13.
  • the noise removal unit 122 computes a signal level ratio of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to the noise spectrum S(N'N) input from the estimation unit 121. In a case where the computed signal level ratio is less than the threshold value, the noise removal unit 122 decreases the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than the threshold value, and outputs the audio signal.
  • the noise removal unit 122 has a gain table TBL shown in Fig. 2 .
  • the gain table TBL determines the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) in accordance with the computed signal level ratio.
  • the gain table TBL makes the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to be 1 in a case where the signal level ratio is equal to or greater than the threshold value and makes the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to be 0 in a case where the signal level ratio is less than the threshold value.
  • the frequency spectrum S(CO'N) at a certain sampling timing of the audio signal CO'N after removing the noise can be represented by the following formula 2.
  • the noise removal unit 122 outputs the audio spectrum S(NE'N) as it is without changing the signal level of the audio spectrum S(NE'N).
  • the noise removal unit 122 outputs the audio spectrum S(NE'N) having a signal level which is zero since the audio spectrum S(NE'N) is assumed as the noise spectrum S(N'N).
  • the noise removal unit 122 may set a threshold value of the signal level ratio to a value being slightly greater than the threshold value (1.0) of the signal level ratio. With this, the noise removal unit 122 can remove the stationary noise N'N even in a case where the signal level of the stationary noise N'N is estimated to be less than an actual level because of the estimation error of the stationary noise N'N.
  • the IFFT processing unit 13 is an inverse fast Fourier transform circuit that transforms the audio signal CO'N as a signal of a frequency domain into an audio signal CO'T as a signal of a time domain.
  • the sound collection device 1 can leave the audio signal as it is without attenuating the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person, the utterance voice of the speaking person can be output without being degraded.
  • Figs. 3(A) to 3(C) are graphs respectively showing examples of the stationary noise, the audio signal and the audio signal after removing the stationary noise.
  • Fig. 3(A) indicates a signal level of the stationary noise
  • Fig. 3(B) indicates a signal level of the audio signal including the stationary noise
  • Fig. 3(C) indicates a signal level of the audio signal after removing the stationary noise.
  • the sound collection device 1 estimates the stationary noise N'N as shown in Fig. 3(A) and generates the audio signal NE'N as shown in Fig. 3(B) .
  • the sound collection device 1 simply subtracts the noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N in order to remove the stationary noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N
  • the signal level of the audio signal NE'N is attenuated even in a frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person as shown by a dotted line in Fig. 3(C) so that the sound collection device 1 may output a sound having degraded quality.
  • the sound collection device 1 may have a case where the stationary noise N'N remains in the audio signal NE'N because of the estimation error of the stationary noise N'N. In this case, the sound collection device 1 may generate a musical noise because the signal level is remarkably varied in a frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • the sound collection device 1 since the sound collection device 1 leaves a frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person as shown by a solid line in Fig. 3(C) and decreases the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in a frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person (a frequency band only having a noise), the sound collection device 1 can output a sound without degrading the quality of the utterance voice of the speaking person.
  • the sound collection device 1 determines the output value CO'N in accordance with the signal level ratio of the audio signal NE'N to the stationary noise N'N, variation in the signal level is not liable to occur in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person and occurrence of the musical noise can be prevented.
  • the sound collection device 1 computes the signal level ratio of the audio signal NE'N to the stationary noise N'N, a frequency band only having a noise can be detected even when a level of an utterance voice of a speaking person is low.
  • the sound collection device 1 maintains the signal level of the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person and makes the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be 0, and then outputs the audio signal.
  • the sound collection device 1 can maintain the signal level of the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person and can decrease the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be a value greater than 0.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing another example of a gain table. In this case, for example, as shown in Fig.
  • the sound collection device 1 determines the gain of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be 0.5 and outputs the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person by multiplying 0.5 to the signal level of the audio signal. With this, since the stationary noise in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person is not remarkable, the sound collection device 1 can naturally output the voice of the speaking person.
  • noise gate that outputs an audio signal in which only a stationary noise is removed without degrading an utterance voice of a speaking person.

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to a noise gate for removing a noise included in an audio signal, a sound collection device and a noise removing method.
  • Background Art
  • A sound collection device of the related art is provided with a noise gate as a unit for removing a noise (e.g., JP-A-2006 50067 ).
  • For example, JP-A-2006 50067 discloses a noise gate device that changes a threshold value of a noise gate in accordance with an amplification degree of a head amplifier for amplifying an audio signal and removes an audio signal less than the threshold value.
  • US 4,811,404 A discloses a noise suppression system which performs speech quality enhancement upon the speech-plus-noise signal available at the input to generate a clean speech signal at the output by spectral gain modification. The measures taken include the addition of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold mechanism to reduce background noise flutter by offsetting the gain rise of the gain tables until a certain SNR threshold is reached, the use of a voice metric calculator to produce more accurate background noise estimates via performing the update decision based on the overall voice-like characteristics in the channels and the time interval since the last update, and the use of a channel SNR modifier to provide immunity to narrowband noise bursts through modification of the SNR estimates based on the voice metric calculation and the channel energies.
  • WO 87/00366 A1 discloses a noise suppression system which performs speech quality enhancement upon speech-plus-noise signal available at the input to generate a clean speech signal at the output by spectral gain modification. The noise suppression system includes a background noise estimator which generates and stores an estimate of the background noise power spectral density based upon pre-processed speech, as determined by the detected minima of the post-processed speech energy level. This post-processed speech may be obtained directly from the output of the noise suppression system, or may be simulated by multiplying the pre-processed speech energy by the channel gain values of the modification signal. The channel gain controller produces these individual channel gain values for application to both the channel gain modifier and the background noise estimator. Each individual channel gain value is selected as a function of (a) the channel number, (b) the current channel SNR estimate, and (c) the overall average background noise level. The technique of implementing post-processed signal to generate the background noise estimate provides a more accurate measurement of the background noise energy since it is based upon much cleaner speech signal. As a result, the present invention performs acoustic noise suppression in high ambient noise backgrounds with significantly less voice quality degradation.
  • Summary of Invention Problems that the Invention is to Solve
  • However, the noise gate device described in JP-A-2006 50067 removes an audio signal less than a threshold value. Therefore, the problem arises that in a case where an utterance voice of a speaking person is included in the audio signal less than the threshold value, the noise gate device removes the utterance voice having a signal level less than the threshold value.
  • In view of the above problem, a purpose of the invention is to provide a noise gate, a sound collection device and a noise removing method each capable of readily removing a stationary noise without degrading an audio signal.
  • Means for solving the Problems
  • A noise gate according to the invention is provided as set forth in claim 1 and estimates a noise spectrum of a stationary noise included in an input audio signal (hereinafter, referred to as the stationary noise) based on a frequency spectrum of the input audio signal. The noise gate computes a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the input audio signal to the estimated noise spectrum. The noise gate outputs the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the signal level in a frequency band is decreased by a certain level in the frequency band having the computed signal level ratio which is less than a predetermined threshold value and outputs said spectrum having the signal level maintained in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal or greater than said threshold.
  • With this configuration, the noise gate outputs a frequency spectrum of an audio signal including an utterance voice of a speaking person and suppresses a signal level in a frequency spectrum of an audio signal formed of a stationary noise so that the audio signal in which only the stationary noise is removed can be output without degrading the utterance voice of the speaking person.
  • Further, the threshold value can be set to a value greater than 1 which is a value compared to the signal level ratio by a value corresponding to an estimation error of an estimation unit. Since the noise gate computes the signal level ratio to be compared to the threshold value by using the estimated stationary noise, the estimation error of the stationary noise is considered.
  • With the above configuration, the noise gate can remove the stationary noise even in a case where the signal level of the stationary noise is estimated to be a value less than an actual value.
  • Moreover, a sound collection device according to the invention is provided as set forth in claim 2 and has the above described noise gate. The sound collection device transforms an audio signal generated by collecting a sound into a frequency spectrum as a signal of a frequency domain and outputs it to the noise gate. In addition, the sound collection device inversely transforms a frequency spectrum of an audio signal output from the noise gate into an audio signal as a signal of a time domain.
  • With the above configuration, the sound collection device can remove a stationary noise from the collected audio signal by using the above described noise gate. Therefore, the sound collection device can output a sound without degrading a collected utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • A noise removing method according to the invention is provided as set forth in claim 3 and includes a process of inputting a frequency spectrum of an audio signal, a process of estimating a noise spectrum based on the frequency spectrum of the audio signal input in the inputting process, a process of computing a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the audio signal to the noise spectrum estimated in the estimating process, and a process of outputting the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the gain in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than a predetermined threshold value is decreased by a certain level, and outputs said spectrum having the signal level maintained in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal or greater than said threshold, the signal level ratio being computed in the computing process.
  • In addition, the threshold value can be set to a value greater than 1 which is a value compared to the signal level ratio by a value corresponding to an estimation error of an estimation unit used in the estimating process.
  • Advantage of the Invention
  • The noise gate according to the invention can output an audio signal in which only a stationary noise is removed without degrading an utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
    • [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing a function and a structure of a sound collection device.
    • [Fig. 2] Fig. 2 is a graph showing an example of a gain table.
    • [Fig. 3] Figs. 3(A), 3(B) and 3(C) are graphs respectively showing examples of a stationary noise, an audio signal and an audio signal after removing a noise.
    • [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 is a graph showing another example of a gain table.
    Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
  • A sound collection device 1 according to the invention is described below with reference to Figs. 1 and 2. Fig. 1 is a block diagram showing a function and a structure of the sound collection device 1. Fig. 2 is a graph showing an example of a gain table. The sound collection device 1 has a noise gate 12 (see Fig. 1). The sound collection device 1 transforms a collected audio signal NE'T into a frequency spectrum NE'N. The sound collection device 1 removes a stationary noise N'N included in the audio signal NE'N by using the noise gate 12. At that time, the stationary noise N'N is estimated based on the frequency spectrum NE'N by the noise gate 12. The sound collection device 1 outputs an audio signal CO'T which is generated in such a manner that a frequency spectrum CO'N after removing the stationary noise N'N is inversely transformed with respect to a time axis. Meanwhile, an end symbol of a signal in a time domain is indicated by 'T and an end symbol of a signal in a frequency domain is indicated by 'N in the descriptions below.
  • First, the function and the structure of the sound collection device 1 are described with reference to Figs. 1 and 2. As shown in Fig. 1, the sound collection device 1 includes a microphone MIC, an FFT processing unit 11, the noise gate 12 and an IFFT processing unit 13.
  • The microphone MIC generates an audio signal by collecting ambient sounds. The microphone MIC outputs the generated audio signal NE'T to the FFT processing unit 11.
  • The FFT processing unit 11 is a fast Fourier transform circuit that transforms the audio signal NE'T as the signal in the time domain into the audio signal NE'N as the signal in the frequency domain and outputs the audio signal NE'N to an estimation unit 121 and a noise removal unit 122 in the noise gate 12.
  • The noise gate 12 has the estimation unit 121 and the noise removal unit 122.
  • The estimation unit 121 performs a process of estimating a stationary noise N'N included in the audio signal NE'N input from the FFT processing unit 11. The estimation unit 121 sequentially acquires frequency spectrums (hreinafter, referred to as the audio spectrum(s)) S (NE'N) at certain sampling times of the stationary noise N'N and stores them temporarily. The estimation unit 121 estimates frequency spectrums (hereinafter, referred to as the noise spectrum(s)) S (N'N) at certain sampling timings of the stationary noise N'N based on the plurality of times of audio spectrums S (NE'N) acquired and stored as in the above. The estimation unit 121 outputs the estimated noise spectrums S(N'N) to the noise removal unit 122.
  • For example, the noise spectrum at a certain sampling timing T is represented by S(N'N(T)), the audio spectrum at the same sampling timing T is represented by S(NE'N(T)), and the noise spectrum at the previous sampling timing T-1 is represented by S(N'N(T-1)). "α" and "β" are forgetting constants and they are, for example, set to be α=0.9 and β=0.1. The noise spectrum S(N'N(T)) is represented by the following formula 1.
  • S NʹN T = αS NʹN T - 1 + βS NEʹN T
    Figure imgb0001

    Thus, by estimating the noise spectrum S(N'N(T)) based on the audio spectrum, a stationary noise such as a background noise or the like can be estimated. The estimation unit 121 performs an estimating process of a noise spectrum only in a case where a level of an audio signal collected by the microphone MIC is in a low state (a silent state).
  • The noise removal unit 122 removes the stationary noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N input from the FFT processing unit 11 and outputs the audio signal CO'N after removing the noise to the IFFT processing unit 13. To be specific, the noise removal unit 122 computes a signal level ratio of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to the noise spectrum S(N'N) input from the estimation unit 121. In a case where the computed signal level ratio is less than the threshold value, the noise removal unit 122 decreases the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than the threshold value, and outputs the audio signal.
  • For example, the noise removal unit 122 has a gain table TBL shown in Fig. 2. The gain table TBL determines the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) in accordance with the computed signal level ratio. The gain table TBL makes the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to be 1 in a case where the signal level ratio is equal to or greater than the threshold value and makes the gain of the audio spectrum S(NE'N) to be 0 in a case where the signal level ratio is less than the threshold value. In this case, the frequency spectrum S(CO'N) at a certain sampling timing of the audio signal CO'N after removing the noise can be represented by the following formula 2.
  • S COʹN = TBL S NEʹN / S NʹN S NEʹN
    Figure imgb0002

    As a result, in a frequency band in which the signal level ratio is equal to or greater than the threshold value, the noise removal unit 122 outputs the audio spectrum S(NE'N) as it is without changing the signal level of the audio spectrum S(NE'N). Alternatively, in a frequency band in which the signal level ratio is less than the threshold value, the noise removal unit 122 outputs the audio spectrum S(NE'N) having a signal level which is zero since the audio spectrum S(NE'N) is assumed as the noise spectrum S(N'N).
  • In addition, by considering an estimation error of the stationary noise N'N, the noise removal unit 122 may set a threshold value of the signal level ratio to a value being slightly greater than the threshold value (1.0) of the signal level ratio. With this, the noise removal unit 122 can remove the stationary noise N'N even in a case where the signal level of the stationary noise N'N is estimated to be less than an actual level because of the estimation error of the stationary noise N'N.
  • The IFFT processing unit 13 is an inverse fast Fourier transform circuit that transforms the audio signal CO'N as a signal of a frequency domain into an audio signal CO'T as a signal of a time domain.
  • With the above, since the sound collection device 1 can leave the audio signal as it is without attenuating the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person, the utterance voice of the speaking person can be output without being degraded.
  • The audio signal CO'N after removing the noise as the output value of the noise gate 12 is described with reference to Figs. 3(A) to 3(C). Figs. 3(A) to 3(C) are graphs respectively showing examples of the stationary noise, the audio signal and the audio signal after removing the stationary noise. Fig. 3(A) indicates a signal level of the stationary noise, Fig. 3(B) indicates a signal level of the audio signal including the stationary noise, and Fig. 3(C) indicates a signal level of the audio signal after removing the stationary noise.
  • The sound collection device 1 estimates the stationary noise N'N as shown in Fig. 3(A) and generates the audio signal NE'N as shown in Fig. 3(B). When the sound collection device 1 simply subtracts the noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N in order to remove the stationary noise N'N from the audio signal NE'N, the signal level of the audio signal NE'N is attenuated even in a frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person as shown by a dotted line in Fig. 3(C) so that the sound collection device 1 may output a sound having degraded quality. The sound collection device 1 may have a case where the stationary noise N'N remains in the audio signal NE'N because of the estimation error of the stationary noise N'N. In this case, the sound collection device 1 may generate a musical noise because the signal level is remarkably varied in a frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person.
  • In the embodiment, since the sound collection device 1 leaves a frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person as shown by a solid line in Fig. 3(C) and decreases the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in a frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person (a frequency band only having a noise), the sound collection device 1 can output a sound without degrading the quality of the utterance voice of the speaking person. In addition, since the sound collection device 1 determines the output value CO'N in accordance with the signal level ratio of the audio signal NE'N to the stationary noise N'N, variation in the signal level is not liable to occur in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person and occurrence of the musical noise can be prevented. Further, since the sound collection device 1 computes the signal level ratio of the audio signal NE'N to the stationary noise N'N, a frequency band only having a noise can be detected even when a level of an utterance voice of a speaking person is low.
  • In the above embodiment, the sound collection device 1 maintains the signal level of the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person and makes the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be 0, and then outputs the audio signal. However, the sound collection device 1 can maintain the signal level of the audio signal in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person and can decrease the signal level (the gain) of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be a value greater than 0. Fig. 4 is a graph showing another example of a gain table. In this case, for example, as shown in Fig. 4, the sound collection device 1 determines the gain of the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person to be 0.5 and outputs the audio signal in the frequency band not having an utterance voice of a speaking person by multiplying 0.5 to the signal level of the audio signal. With this, since the stationary noise in the frequency band having an utterance voice of a speaking person is not remarkable, the sound collection device 1 can naturally output the voice of the speaking person.
  • While the invention is described in detail by referring to the specific embodiment, it is understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
  • Industrial Applicability
  • It is possible to provide a noise gate that outputs an audio signal in which only a stationary noise is removed without degrading an utterance voice of a speaking person.

Claims (3)

  1. A noise gate (12) comprising:
    an input unit to which a frequency spectrum of an audio signal is input;
    an estimation unit (121) adapted to estimate a noise spectrum based on the frequency spectrum of the audio signal input to the input unit; and characterized by further comprising:
    an output unit adapted to compute a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the audio signal to the noise spectrum estimated by the estimation unit (121) and to output the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the signal level in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than a predetermined threshold value is decreased by a certain level and the signal level in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold is maintained.
  2. A sound collection device (1) comprising:
    the noise gate (12) according to claim 1;
    a sound collection unit (MIC)adapted to collect ambient sounds and to generate an audio signal;
    a transformation unit (11) adapted to transform the audio signal generated by the sound collection unit (MIC) into a frequency spectrum as a signal of a frequency domain and arranged such that the frequency spectrum transformed by the transformation unit (11) is input into the input unit of the noise gate (12); and
    an inverse transformation unit (13) adapted to inversely transform the frequency spectrum of the audio signal output by the output unit of the noise gate (12) into an audio signal as a signal in a time domain.
  3. A noise removing method, comprising the steps of:
    inputting a frequency spectrum of an audio signal;
    estimating a noise spectrum based on the frequency spectrum of the audio signal input in the inputting step;
    computing a signal level ratio of the frequency spectrum of the audio signal to the noise spectrum estimated in the estimating step; and characterized by further comprising:
    outputting the frequency spectrum of the audio signal in which the signal level in a frequency band having the signal level ratio less than a predetermined threshold value is decreased by a certain level and the signal level in the frequency band having the signal level ratio equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold is maintained, the signal level ratio being computed in the computing step.
EP09827585.2A 2008-11-21 2009-11-18 Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method Active EP2352148B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008298332A JP2010122617A (en) 2008-11-21 2008-11-21 Noise gate and sound collecting device
PCT/JP2009/069588 WO2010058804A1 (en) 2008-11-21 2009-11-18 Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2352148A1 EP2352148A1 (en) 2011-08-03
EP2352148A4 EP2352148A4 (en) 2012-08-22
EP2352148B1 true EP2352148B1 (en) 2013-10-16

Family

ID=42198243

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09827585.2A Active EP2352148B1 (en) 2008-11-21 2009-11-18 Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9036830B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2352148B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2010122617A (en)
KR (1) KR101254876B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102216984B (en)
WO (1) WO2010058804A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5614261B2 (en) * 2010-11-25 2014-10-29 富士通株式会社 Noise suppression device, noise suppression method, and program
FR2969435A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-22 France Telecom IMPULSIVE NOISE MEASUREMENT BY SPECTRAL DETECTION
CN102393986B (en) * 2011-08-11 2013-05-08 重庆市科学技术研究院 Illegal lumbering detection method, device and system based on audio frequency distinguishing
CN102868956B (en) * 2012-09-24 2015-02-11 深圳市纳芯威科技有限公司 Noise gate circuit and voice frequency power amplification equipment
US10283137B2 (en) * 2014-02-18 2019-05-07 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Device and method for tuning a frequency-dependent attenuation stage
WO2018148095A1 (en) * 2017-02-13 2018-08-16 Knowles Electronics, Llc Soft-talk audio capture for mobile devices
US10368173B1 (en) 2017-03-24 2019-07-30 Advanced Bionics Ag Systems and methods for minimizing an effect of system noise generated by a cochlear implant system
US10595134B1 (en) 2017-03-24 2020-03-17 Advanced Bionics Ag Systems and methods for detecting and reacting to system noise generated by a cochlear implant system
KR102466134B1 (en) * 2018-06-26 2022-11-10 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 Display apparatus
CN112447166A (en) * 2019-08-16 2021-03-05 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Processing method and device for target spectrum matrix
US11557307B2 (en) * 2019-10-20 2023-01-17 Listen AS User voice control system
JP2023106686A (en) 2022-01-21 2023-08-02 ヤマハ株式会社 Voice processor and voice processing method
JP2023137650A (en) 2022-03-18 2023-09-29 ヤマハ株式会社 Sound signal processing method and sound signal processing device

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1987000366A1 (en) 1985-07-01 1987-01-15 Motorola, Inc. Noise supression system
US4811404A (en) 1987-10-01 1989-03-07 Motorola, Inc. Noise suppression system
FI100840B (en) * 1995-12-12 1998-02-27 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Noise attenuator and method for attenuating background noise from noisy speech and a mobile station
US6549586B2 (en) 1999-04-12 2003-04-15 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson System and method for dual microphone signal noise reduction using spectral subtraction
US6175602B1 (en) * 1998-05-27 2001-01-16 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Signal noise reduction by spectral subtraction using linear convolution and casual filtering
US6717991B1 (en) 1998-05-27 2004-04-06 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) System and method for dual microphone signal noise reduction using spectral subtraction
US6459914B1 (en) 1998-05-27 2002-10-01 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Signal noise reduction by spectral subtraction using spectrum dependent exponential gain function averaging
US6574593B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-06-03 Conexant Systems, Inc. Codebook tables for encoding and decoding
AU7486200A (en) 1999-09-22 2001-04-24 Conexant Systems, Inc. Multimode speech encoder
US6959274B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2005-10-25 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Fixed rate speech compression system and method
US6604070B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-08-05 Conexant Systems, Inc. System of encoding and decoding speech signals
US6581032B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2003-06-17 Conexant Systems, Inc. Bitstream protocol for transmission of encoded voice signals
US6782360B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2004-08-24 Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. Gain quantization for a CELP speech coder
CN1204708C (en) * 2000-05-10 2005-06-01 Adc宽带通路系统公司 System and process for return channel spectrum manager
JP4483468B2 (en) 2004-08-02 2010-06-16 ソニー株式会社 Noise reduction circuit, electronic device, noise reduction method
US7742746B2 (en) * 2007-04-30 2010-06-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Automatic volume and dynamic range adjustment for mobile audio devices
JP2008298332A (en) 2007-05-30 2008-12-11 Aisin Seiki Co Ltd Refrigerator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2352148A4 (en) 2012-08-22
CN102216984A (en) 2011-10-12
KR101254876B1 (en) 2013-04-15
KR20110082176A (en) 2011-07-18
EP2352148A1 (en) 2011-08-03
US9036830B2 (en) 2015-05-19
CN102216984B (en) 2013-03-27
US20110268288A1 (en) 2011-11-03
JP2010122617A (en) 2010-06-03
WO2010058804A1 (en) 2010-05-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2352148B1 (en) Noise gate, sound collection device, and noise removal method
Jeub et al. Noise reduction for dual-microphone mobile phones exploiting power level differences
EP2031583B1 (en) Fast estimation of spectral noise power density for speech signal enhancement
EP2141695B1 (en) Speech sound enhancement device
US9113241B2 (en) Noise removing apparatus and noise removing method
US8983833B2 (en) Method and apparatus for masking wind noise
JP4916394B2 (en) Echo suppression device, echo suppression method, and computer program
US8160732B2 (en) Noise suppressing method and noise suppressing apparatus
JP4660578B2 (en) Signal correction device
EP2180465A2 (en) Noise suppression device and noice suppression method
JP2003534570A (en) How to suppress noise in adaptive beamformers
CN103021420A (en) Speech enhancement method of multi-sub-band spectral subtraction based on phase adjustment and amplitude compensation
KR20100053890A (en) Apparatus and method for eliminating noise
EP2752848B1 (en) Method and apparatus for generating a noise reduced audio signal using a microphone array
US7917359B2 (en) Noise suppressor for removing irregular noise
JP2004341339A (en) Noise restriction device
JP2836271B2 (en) Noise removal device
CN103929704B (en) The method and system that a kind of adaptive acoustic feedback based on transform domain is eliminated
EP3428918B1 (en) Pop noise control
KR100744375B1 (en) Apparatus and method for processing sound signal
Esch et al. Combined reduction of time varying harmonic and stationary noise using frequency warping
Abutalebi et al. Speech dereverberation in noisy environments using an adaptive minimum mean square error estimator
Gouhar et al. Speech enhancement using new iterative minimum statistics approach
CN116312592A (en) Howling processing method and device for voice broadcasting sound amplifying system
JP2001216000A (en) Noise suppressing method, voice signal processing method and signal processing circuit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110520

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20120720

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H03G 3/34 20060101ALN20120716BHEP

Ipc: G10L 21/02 20060101AFI20120716BHEP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602009019540

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G10L0021020000

Ipc: G10L0021020800

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G10L 21/0232 20130101ALN20130404BHEP

Ipc: H03G 3/34 20060101ALN20130404BHEP

Ipc: G10L 21/0208 20130101AFI20130404BHEP

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H03G 3/34 20060101ALN20130410BHEP

Ipc: G10L 21/0208 20130101AFI20130410BHEP

Ipc: G10L 21/0232 20130101ALN20130410BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130423

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 636834

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009019540

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 636834

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140216

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140116

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009019540

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140717

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009019540

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131118

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20091118

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131118

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131016

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20191120

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 15