EP2339774B1 - Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system - Google Patents
Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2339774B1 EP2339774B1 EP10165261A EP10165261A EP2339774B1 EP 2339774 B1 EP2339774 B1 EP 2339774B1 EP 10165261 A EP10165261 A EP 10165261A EP 10165261 A EP10165261 A EP 10165261A EP 2339774 B1 EP2339774 B1 EP 2339774B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sub
- packet
- softbits
- data packet
- packets
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
- H04L1/1829—Arrangements specially adapted for the receiver end
- H04L1/1835—Buffer management
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
- H04L1/1812—Hybrid protocols; Hybrid automatic repeat request [HARQ]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/18—Automatic repetition systems, e.g. Van Duuren systems
- H04L1/1829—Arrangements specially adapted for the receiver end
- H04L1/1835—Buffer management
- H04L1/1845—Combining techniques, e.g. code combining
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for decoding data packets in wireless communication schemes that use a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request technique, and also relates to a receiver for wireless communication that performs such a method.
- Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (Hybrid ARQ, or brief HARQ) is applied to sustain link quality between transmitter and receiver even under bad channel conditions.
- the receiver in case the receiver detects an erroneous reception of a data packet or a decoding error, e.g. by evaluating a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) sum, it indicates this to the transmitter by returning a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message.
- NACK negative acknowledgement
- the transmitter encodes and modulates the same data packet again and repeats the previous transmission.
- the receiver demodulates the repeated data packet, combines the newly computed softbits with the softbits from the previous transmission, and starts another decoding attempt. In this way, the probability of erroneous decoding at the receiver is decreased. This interaction of feedback and retransmission can be repeated multiple times, which increases link robustness between transmitter and receiver.
- a memory (HARQ memory) is required at the receiver, in order to store the received signal to be combined with the retransmitted signal at a later time.
- the received signal is stored after softbit computation.
- the receiver always has to store the softbits of a complete data packet in the HARQ memory, the HARQ memory's size thereby being determined by the maximum length of the encoded data packet.
- LTE which uses multi-antenna arrangements at the transmitter and/or receiver, multiple HARQ processes that include information feedback and retransmission are running in parallel. Since the receiver has to provide memory for every HARQ process, the total HARQ memory size required is increased significantly.
- WO2004/062184A1 describes the problem that in case of poor air link conditions the receiver memory might fail to comply with some (H)ARQ schemes.
- a method is proposed to free at least a portion of memory space of a memory device from at least a portion of a stored data block. A way how to design the memory size at an HARQ receiver is not disclosed.
- the HARQ memory is one of the dominant contributors to die size and power consumption.
- the HARQ memory size defined for LTE is very significant for embedded receiver designs in terms of both, silicon area and power consumption.
- different receiver categories have been defined which require HARQ memory sizes for up to 3,667,200 softbits.
- the invention provides a method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system that uses a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) technique.
- the method comprises the steps of providing a HARQ memory in a receiver; receiving softbits of each of a plurality of demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet; storing the softbits of said demodulated sub-packets in said HARQ memory; receiving softbits of each of a plurality of retransmitted demodulated sub-packets of a retransmitted data packet; combining the softbits of a sub-packet from an initially transmitted data packet with the softbits of the respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet.
- HARQ Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request
- the inventive method further comprises, prior to the storing step, the step of performing an error check on each sub-packet which can be a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in one embodiment.
- CRC cyclic redundancy check
- the storing step comprises storing, in said HARQ memory, only softbits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet which failed the error check, and the method further comprises storing decoded data bits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet that have passed the error check, in a second memory.
- the size of the HARQ memory required at the receiver can be significantly reduced. While prior art HARQ processing and decoding algorithms always store the softbits for all sub-packets in the HARQ memory, the invention allows a significant reduction of the HARQ memory size since softbits of sub-packets without decoding errors are not stored in the HARQ memory. Rather, the decoded sub-packet is stored in a separate memory.
- the method further comprises combining the softbits of each sub-packet stored in said HARQ memory with the softbits of a respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet. So, in case of retransmission of an entire packet, newly received softbits are combined with those stored in HARQ memory only for the sub-packets that had decoding errors detected during initial transmission.
- the combining step can comprise an addition of the respective softbits of a sub-packet from a first transmission of a data packet with the softbits of a sub-packet from a retransmission of the same data packet, with applying a weighting in function of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the transmission and the retransmission. So the softbits from a transmission exhibiting a better SNR can be given a stronger weight than the softbits from a transmission with a poorer channel quality.
- SNR signal-to-noise ratio
- the invention makes use of the fact, that the longest data packets which require the largest HARQ memory size can be decoded as individual sub-packets including individual CRC based detection of decoding errors.
- the method of the invention takes advantage of the individual error detection on a sub-packet basis.
- the invention provides a receiver for wireless communication comprising a decoder which employs a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) technique for decoding data packets and which is adapted to perform the inventive decoding method described above.
- HARQ Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request
- Fig. 1 shows a model of a communication system in which the invention can be employed as comprising a transmitter 1 and a receiver 2 which are connected through a radio channel.
- transmitter 1 subsequent data packets comprised of individual data bits are encoded (at 10) by some known encoding technique.
- any of this encoding technique causes a multiplication of the bits of each packet, for example, turbo coding in LTE implies a tripling of the bit number.
- the encoded data packets are then modulated (at 20) by any known modulation scheme, and the modulated bit stream is fed to an antenna for transmission.
- the received bit stream is demodulated (at 30), and the receiver computes softbits for each received and demodulated bit (log-likelihood ratios), which represent a reliability measure for the received data packet.
- the sign of a softbit correspond to the likelihood of a demodulated bit being 0 or 1.
- the magnitude of a softbit is a measure for the reliability of the respective sign information (in a range of +/- 7 which corresponds to a resolution of 4 bits).
- the softbits are now decoded (at 40) and the decoded data packets are checked for decoding errors, e.g. by evaluating a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) sum.
- CRC cyclic redundancy check
- a HARQ memory 50 resides at the receiver and stores the softbits of a received data packet.
- NACK negative acknowledgement
- the receiver could not decode the data packet without decoding error, it indicates this to the transmitter by returning a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message.
- the transmitter encodes and modulates the same data packet again and repeats the previous transmission.
- the receiver can now combine the newly received softbits with those stored in HARQ memory 50 and start a new decoding attempt, for which the probability of decoding errors is decreased.
- Fig. 2 shows a flow chart of a prior art HARQ processing and decoding algorithm for sub-packets which is particularly applied for the Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile communication standard where the data packets are referred to as transport blocks and the sub-packets are referred to as code-blocks.
- LTE Long Term Evolution
- the received softbits for all sub-packets of a demodulated packet are stored (214) in a HARQ memory which is dimensioned according to the maximum size of a transmitted data packet.
- step 216 the current sub-packet is decoded, and in step 240 the sub-packet number is incremented and loop 212 to 240 is performed for each sub-packet, e.g.
- the CRC check sum is calculated over the entire packet, in step 260. That is why a single error in one sub-packet (code-block) may cause a decoding error of an entire packet (transport block). If the CRC of the entire packet is correct ("yes" in decision block 270), the receiver returns an ACK message (positive acknowledgement) to the transmitter in step 280, otherwise a NACK message (negative acknowledgement) is sent, in step 290. In case of a NACK message, control is returned to block 210 to repeat the retrieving step 212 for each sub-packets i received in a retransmission operation.
- step 214 the softbits of each retransmitted sub-packet are combined with the softbits received in the first transmission.
- This combination comprises calculation of a weighted sum of the softbits, with a stronger weight attributed the softbits from a transmission exhibiting a better SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) than that from a transmission exhibiting a poorer SNR.
- the combined softbits are stored in the HARQ memory (such as 50 in Fig. 1 ), and steps 216 to 270 are repeated for these combined softbits.
- Fig. 3 shows a graph of decoding error probabilities for transport block and code-blocks for a number of code-blocks N cb of 13.
- the probability for code-block errors is less than 10 %.
- N cb the number of sub-packets per packet.
- Fig. 6 illustrates an example of a data packet, referred to as transport block in LTE terminology, as comprising a number N cb of 13 code-blocks with an CRC block at the end of each code block, and a transport block CRC at the end of the packet.
- the code block CRCs are intended by the standard to support early termination decoding which implies termination of a decoding operation once an error has been detected in a code block.
- the transport block CRC is provided to support data packet error check, such as e.g. at 260 in Fig. 2 .
- the invention is based on the realization that notwithstanding decoding of an entire packet fails, a majority of sub-packets have been decoded error-free.
- the HARQ memory incorporated in a receiver for wireless communication is minimized to a size which only reserves memory for an average amount of erroneous sub-packets.
- QoS quality-of-service
- Fig. 4 shows a flow chart of a HARQ processing and decoding algorithm according to the invention
- Fig. 5 shows a block diagram of a portion of a receiver including a decoder 60 which is adapted to perform the combining and channel decoding tasks of Fig. 4
- the decoder For every sub-packet i, the decoder first checks whether the sub-packet has already been decoded successfully, in decision block 420. If the answer is "yes", the decoded sub-packet is loaded from a separate memory 70 which is provided in the receiver of the invention to store successfully decoded sub-packets, as illustrated in step 438. Otherwise, the decoder tries to combine the respective softbits with softbits from previous transmissions and to store them in HARQ memory 50, as indicated in block 426.
- the decoder since the size of the HARQ memory according to the invention is reduced and is possibly smaller than required, the decoder, prior to this combining and storing operation, tries to allocate HARQ memory.
- HARQ memory allocation for the current sub-packet i is stored in a look-up table, e.g. the array-variable memTbl[i], as shown at 424 in Fig. 4 .
- the decoder cannot decode the current sub-packet i. Otherwise, the sub-packet is decoded, in step 428, and is CRC checked for decoding errors, in step 430.
- the allocated HARQ memory is set free, in block 434, so that memTbl[i] of the HARQ memory can be reused for subsequent sub-packets.
- a dynamic memory allocation is implemented by blocks 424 and 434 of Fig. 4 .
- the receiver stores the decoded sub-packet in dedicated sub-packet memory 70.
- the decoder continues with the next sub-packet, as indicated in step 440.
- Steps 412 to 440 are repeated until all sub-packets have been decoded successfully.
- the decoder computes a packet CRC, in step 460. If the CRC check sum of the entire packet is correct which is determined in block 470, the receiver sends back an ACK message (positive acknowledgement) to the transmitter, at 480, otherwise (490) a NACK message (negative acknowledgement) is sent.
- the disclosed method requires a trade-off between memory reduction and link robustness.
- the size of a conventional HARQ memory is given by the maximum packet length of a communication system. Therefore, shrinking the HARQ memory size can only affect the transmission of long packets, which corresponds to high-throughput transmission scenarios only. It has been shown analytically and proved by simulations that the impact on system performance in terms of throughput vs. signal-to-noise ratio is very limited, even when the HARQ memory size is shrinked significantly.
- Fig. 7 is a graph illustrating the trade-off of HARQ memory reduction according to the invention versus link robustness.
- the throughput results illustrated were obtained by simulations for LTE with the highest data rate of 75.4 Mbps per transport block, which corresponds to the maximum data packet length of 75.4 Mbits.
- the diagram shows that even when the HARQ memory is reduced to less than 50%, the maximum throughput can be achieved at the same signal-to-noise ratio of 20dB. Around 70% of the throughput can be achieved within around 1dB higher signal-to-noise ratio.
- the disclosed method exhibits the highest decrease in link robustness in cases of high throughput scenarios and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which correlates with a high retransmission rate. Only with these scenarios the inventive receiver cannot allocate enough HARQ memory for all sub-packets, as shown at decision block 422 in Fig. 4 .
- Link adaptation schemes prevent the transmitter from increasing the retransmission rate for high throughput transmissions. Instead of retransmitting the entire packet with the same high throughput over and over again, the transmitter will adapt coding and modulation schemes for the retransmissions in order to lower the throughput and to increase the error free decoding probability at the receiver.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a method for decoding data packets in wireless communication schemes that use a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request technique, and also relates to a receiver for wireless communication that performs such a method.
- In wireless communication systems employing LTE or WiMax, Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (Hybrid ARQ, or brief HARQ) is applied to sustain link quality between transmitter and receiver even under bad channel conditions.
- In Hybrid ARQ systems, in case the receiver detects an erroneous reception of a data packet or a decoding error, e.g. by evaluating a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) sum, it indicates this to the transmitter by returning a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message. In this case, the transmitter encodes and modulates the same data packet again and repeats the previous transmission. The receiver demodulates the repeated data packet, combines the newly computed softbits with the softbits from the previous transmission, and starts another decoding attempt. In this way, the probability of erroneous decoding at the receiver is decreased. This interaction of feedback and retransmission can be repeated multiple times, which increases link robustness between transmitter and receiver.
- To this end, however, a memory (HARQ memory) is required at the receiver, in order to store the received signal to be combined with the retransmitted signal at a later time. In particular, the received signal is stored after softbit computation. The receiver always has to store the softbits of a complete data packet in the HARQ memory, the HARQ memory's size thereby being determined by the maximum length of the encoded data packet. In LTE which uses multi-antenna arrangements at the transmitter and/or receiver, multiple HARQ processes that include information feedback and retransmission are running in parallel. Since the receiver has to provide memory for every HARQ process, the total HARQ memory size required is increased significantly.
-
WO2004/062184A1 describes the problem that in case of poor air link conditions the receiver memory might fail to comply with some (H)ARQ schemes. In this context, a method is proposed to free at least a portion of memory space of a memory device from at least a portion of a stored data block. A way how to design the memory size at an HARQ receiver is not disclosed. - For wireless communication systems that apply the Hybrid ARQ protocol, the HARQ memory is one of the dominant contributors to die size and power consumption. In other words, the HARQ memory size defined for LTE is very significant for embedded receiver designs in terms of both, silicon area and power consumption. In LTE, different receiver categories have been defined which require HARQ memory sizes for up to 3,667,200 softbits.
- Therefore, it is very much desirable to shrink the HARQ memory size. Any reduction of the HARQ memory size is desirable for a chipset vendor in order to gain competitiveness.
- The invention provides a method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system that uses a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) technique. The method comprises the steps of providing a HARQ memory in a receiver; receiving softbits of each of a plurality of demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet; storing the softbits of said demodulated sub-packets in said HARQ memory; receiving softbits of each of a plurality of retransmitted demodulated sub-packets of a retransmitted data packet; combining the softbits of a sub-packet from an initially transmitted data packet with the softbits of the respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet. In contrary to the conventional standard requirements, the size M p of the HARQ memory according to the invention is defined by M P =(1-(1- ptp ) - N cb)·N cb· L cb, where p tp is the probability of data packet errors, N cb is the number of sub-packets per data packet, and L cb is the maximum length of a sub-packet. The inventive method further comprises, prior to the storing step, the step of performing an error check on each sub-packet which can be a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in one embodiment. The storing step comprises storing, in said HARQ memory, only softbits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet which failed the error check, and the method further comprises storing decoded data bits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet that have passed the error check, in a second memory.
- By storing in the HARQ memory only softbits for those sub-packets, for which decoding errors have been detected, the size of the HARQ memory required at the receiver can be significantly reduced. While prior art HARQ processing and decoding algorithms always store the softbits for all sub-packets in the HARQ memory, the invention allows a significant reduction of the HARQ memory size since softbits of sub-packets without decoding errors are not stored in the HARQ memory. Rather, the decoded sub-packet is stored in a separate memory. Since encoding involves a multiplication of the bits to be processed, the factor of which is given by the code rate, it will be understood that storing a decoded sub-packet requires far less memory space than storing the demodulated softbits of the same sub-packet. To give an example, with a 4 bit resolution for demodulation to softbits and a code rate of one third introduced by a turbo encoding technique, which are common figures in LTE SISO, a memory smaller by a factor of 12 is required for storing the decoded bits of a sub-packet instead of the softbits.
- The method further comprises combining the softbits of each sub-packet stored in said HARQ memory with the softbits of a respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet. So, in case of retransmission of an entire packet, newly received softbits are combined with those stored in HARQ memory only for the sub-packets that had decoding errors detected during initial transmission.
- The combining step can comprise an addition of the respective softbits of a sub-packet from a first transmission of a data packet with the softbits of a sub-packet from a retransmission of the same data packet, with applying a weighting in function of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the transmission and the retransmission. So the softbits from a transmission exhibiting a better SNR can be given a stronger weight than the softbits from a transmission with a poorer channel quality.
- The invention makes use of the fact, that the longest data packets which require the largest HARQ memory size can be decoded as individual sub-packets including individual CRC based detection of decoding errors. The method of the invention takes advantage of the individual error detection on a sub-packet basis.
- In another aspect, the invention provides a receiver for wireless communication comprising a decoder which employs a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) technique for decoding data packets and which is adapted to perform the inventive decoding method described above.
- Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of specific embodiments which is given by way of example only and in which reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
- Fig. 1
- shows a model of a communication system in which the invention can be employed;
- Fig. 2
- shows a flow chart of a prior art HARQ processing and decoding algorithm;
- Fig. 3
- is a graph of decoding error probabilities in a decoder of
Fig. 1 ; - Fig. 4
- shows a flow chart of a HARQ processing and decoding algorithm according to the invention;
- Fig. 5
- is a block diagram of a portion of a receiver according to the invention;
- Fig. 6
- schematically illustrates a transport block according to the LTE standard; and
- Fig. 7
- is a graph illustrating the trade-off of HARQ memory reduction according to the invention versus link robustness.
-
Fig. 1 shows a model of a communication system in which the invention can be employed as comprising atransmitter 1 and areceiver 2 which are connected through a radio channel. Intransmitter 1 subsequent data packets comprised of individual data bits are encoded (at 10) by some known encoding technique. As is known in the art, any of this encoding technique causes a multiplication of the bits of each packet, for example, turbo coding in LTE implies a tripling of the bit number. The encoded data packets are then modulated (at 20) by any known modulation scheme, and the modulated bit stream is fed to an antenna for transmission. - At the receiver's side the received bit stream is demodulated (at 30), and the receiver computes softbits for each received and demodulated bit (log-likelihood ratios), which represent a reliability measure for the received data packet. The sign of a softbit correspond to the likelihood of a demodulated bit being 0 or 1. The magnitude of a softbit is a measure for the reliability of the respective sign information (in a range of +/- 7 which corresponds to a resolution of 4 bits). The softbits are now decoded (at 40) and the decoded data packets are checked for decoding errors, e.g. by evaluating a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) sum.
- In communication schemes that use Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) to sustain link quality between transmitter and receiver even under bad channel conditions, a HARQ memory (50) resides at the receiver and stores the softbits of a received data packet. In case the receiver could not decode the data packet without decoding error, it indicates this to the transmitter by returning a negative acknowledgement (NACK) message. In this case, the transmitter encodes and modulates the same data packet again and repeats the previous transmission. The receiver can now combine the newly received softbits with those stored in
HARQ memory 50 and start a new decoding attempt, for which the probability of decoding errors is decreased. -
Fig. 2 shows a flow chart of a prior art HARQ processing and decoding algorithm for sub-packets which is particularly applied for the Long Term Evolution (LTE) mobile communication standard where the data packets are referred to as transport blocks and the sub-packets are referred to as code-blocks. In a first pass, the received softbits for all sub-packets of a demodulated packet are stored (214) in a HARQ memory which is dimensioned according to the maximum size of a transmitted data packet. Instep 216 the current sub-packet is decoded, and instep 240 the sub-packet number is incremented andloop 212 to 240 is performed for each sub-packet, e.g. for i = 0 to 12. Once all sub-packets have been decoded individually ("yes" in decision block 250), the CRC check sum is calculated over the entire packet, instep 260. That is why a single error in one sub-packet (code-block) may cause a decoding error of an entire packet (transport block). If the CRC of the entire packet is correct ("yes" in decision block 270), the receiver returns an ACK message (positive acknowledgement) to the transmitter instep 280, otherwise a NACK message (negative acknowledgement) is sent, instep 290. In case of a NACK message, control is returned to block 210 to repeat the retrievingstep 212 for each sub-packets i received in a retransmission operation. Instep 214, the softbits of each retransmitted sub-packet are combined with the softbits received in the first transmission. This combination comprises calculation of a weighted sum of the softbits, with a stronger weight attributed the softbits from a transmission exhibiting a better SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) than that from a transmission exhibiting a poorer SNR. The combined softbits are stored in the HARQ memory (such as 50 inFig. 1 ), and steps 216 to 270 are repeated for these combined softbits. - It has now been realized by the inventors that even for very high probabilities of packet errors, i.e. transport block errors p tp, the probability of sub-packet errors, i.e. code-block errors, remains quite low.
Fig. 3 shows a graph of decoding error probabilities for transport block and code-blocks for a number of code-blocks N cb of 13. As can be seen fromFig. 3 , in an operation range exhibiting a transport block error probability p tp from 0.3 to 0.7 which is relevant in practice, the probability for code-block errors is less than 10 %. -
- In the above equation the number of sub-packets per packet is denoted by N cb.
- Though the invention is described in detail with LTE terminology, is has to be appreciated, however, that the invention can also be employed with other communication schemes which provide error check means per sub-packet.
-
Fig. 6 illustrates an example of a data packet, referred to as transport block in LTE terminology, as comprising a number N cb of 13 code-blocks with an CRC block at the end of each code block, and a transport block CRC at the end of the packet. The code block CRCs are intended by the standard to support early termination decoding which implies termination of a decoding operation once an error has been detected in a code block. The transport block CRC is provided to support data packet error check, such as e.g. at 260 inFig. 2 . - The invention is based on the realization that notwithstanding decoding of an entire packet fails, a majority of sub-packets have been decoded error-free. According to the invention, the HARQ memory incorporated in a receiver for wireless communication is minimized to a size which only reserves memory for an average amount of erroneous sub-packets.
- According to this general idea, the required HARQ memory size per HARQ process M p is found statistically by:
wherein L cb is the maximum length of a code block, and wherein p tp will be in the operation range which is typically defined by quality-of-service (QoS) agreements between user and communication provider. -
Fig. 4 shows a flow chart of a HARQ processing and decoding algorithm according to the invention, andFig. 5 shows a block diagram of a portion of a receiver including adecoder 60 which is adapted to perform the combining and channel decoding tasks ofFig. 4 . For every sub-packet i, the decoder first checks whether the sub-packet has already been decoded successfully, indecision block 420. If the answer is "yes", the decoded sub-packet is loaded from aseparate memory 70 which is provided in the receiver of the invention to store successfully decoded sub-packets, as illustrated instep 438. Otherwise, the decoder tries to combine the respective softbits with softbits from previous transmissions and to store them inHARQ memory 50, as indicated inblock 426. - Since the size of the HARQ memory according to the invention is reduced and is possibly smaller than required, the decoder, prior to this combining and storing operation, tries to allocate HARQ memory. HARQ memory allocation for the current sub-packet i is stored in a look-up table, e.g. the array-variable memTbl[i], as shown at 424 in
Fig. 4 . - In case sufficient HARQ memory is not available ("no" in decision block 422), the decoder cannot decode the current sub-packet i. Otherwise, the sub-packet is decoded, in
step 428, and is CRC checked for decoding errors, instep 430. - If no decoding errors occurred, which is detected in
block 432, the allocated HARQ memory is set free, inblock 434, so that memTbl[i] of the HARQ memory can be reused for subsequent sub-packets. In fact, a dynamic memory allocation is implemented byblocks Fig. 4 . Subsequently, inblock 436, the receiver stores the decoded sub-packet in dedicatedsub-packet memory 70. - In case the sub-packet CRC check failed ("no" in decision block 432) and a decoding error has been detected, the decoder continues with the next sub-packet, as indicated in
step 440. -
Steps 412 to 440 are repeated until all sub-packets have been decoded successfully. - Once the entire packet has been decoded, which is determined in
decision block 450, the decoder computes a packet CRC, instep 460. If the CRC check sum of the entire packet is correct which is determined inblock 470, the receiver sends back an ACK message (positive acknowledgement) to the transmitter, at 480, otherwise (490) a NACK message (negative acknowledgement) is sent. - When comparing the disclosed method shown in
Fig. 4 with the state of the art shown inFig. 2 , it can be seen that the disclosed method leads to a slightly higher retransmission rate. If the HARQ memory size is reduced, as proposed by the invention, it might happen that for certain sub-packets the receiver cannot allocate enough HARQ memory, which means that no decoding attempt occurs. By definition this circumstance increases the probability for retransmitting the entire packet and thus decreases link quality between transmitter and receiver. - Therefore, the disclosed method requires a trade-off between memory reduction and link robustness.
- The size of a conventional HARQ memory is given by the maximum packet length of a communication system. Therefore, shrinking the HARQ memory size can only affect the transmission of long packets, which corresponds to high-throughput transmission scenarios only. It has been shown analytically and proved by simulations that the impact on system performance in terms of throughput vs. signal-to-noise ratio is very limited, even when the HARQ memory size is shrinked significantly.
-
Fig. 7 is a graph illustrating the trade-off of HARQ memory reduction according to the invention versus link robustness. The throughput results illustrated were obtained by simulations for LTE with the highest data rate of 75.4 Mbps per transport block, which corresponds to the maximum data packet length of 75.4 Mbits. The diagram shows that even when the HARQ memory is reduced to less than 50%, the maximum throughput can be achieved at the same signal-to-noise ratio of 20dB. Around 70% of the throughput can be achieved within around 1dB higher signal-to-noise ratio. - The disclosed method exhibits the highest decrease in link robustness in cases of high throughput scenarios and low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which correlates with a high retransmission rate. Only with these scenarios the inventive receiver cannot allocate enough HARQ memory for all sub-packets, as shown at
decision block 422 inFig. 4 . - However, these scenarios are very unlikely to occur in a multiuser cellular network. Link adaptation schemes prevent the transmitter from increasing the retransmission rate for high throughput transmissions. Instead of retransmitting the entire packet with the same high throughput over and over again, the transmitter will adapt coding and modulation schemes for the retransmissions in order to lower the throughput and to increase the error free decoding probability at the receiver.
- Therefore, only high throughput scenarios with a relative throughput of more than 70% shall be assessed for the tradeoff between HARQ memory size and link robustness.
Claims (7)
- A method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system that uses a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request, HARQ, technique, the method comprising the steps of:providing a HARQ memory in a receiver;receiving (212, 412) softbits of each of a plurality of demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet;storing the softbits of said demodulated sub-packets in said HARQ memory;receiving softbits of each of a plurality of retransmitted demodulated sub-packets of a retransmitted data packet;combining the softbits of a sub-packet from an initially transmitted data packet with the softbits of the respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet;characterized in that
the size of the HARQ memory is defined according to Mp = (1 - (1 - ptp )-Ncb )·Ncb·Lcb , where ptp is the probability of data packet errors, Ncb is the number of sub-packets per data packet, and Lcb is the maximum length of a sub-packet; and that
the method further comprises:prior to the storing step, performing (430) an error check on each sub-packet; and thatthe storing step comprises:storing (426), in said HARQ memory, only softbits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet which failed the error check;the method further comprising:for those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet that have passed said error check, storing (436) decoded data bits in a second memory. - The method of claim 1, further comprising combining the softbits of each sub-packet stored in said HARQ memory with the softbits of a respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet.
- The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein said error check is a cyclic redundancy check, CRC.
- The method according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the combining step comprises addition of the respective softbits of a sub-packet from a first transmission of a data packet with the soft bits of a sub-packet from a retransmission of the same data packet, with a weighting in function of a signal-to-noise ratio of the transmission and the retransmission channel.
- A receiver for wireless communication comprising at least a demodulator and a decoder which employs a Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request, HARQ, technique for decoding data packets, and a HARQ memory (50), wherein said decoder (60) is adapted to:receive softbits of each of a plurality of demodulated sub-packets of a transmitted data packet;store the softbits of said demodulated sub-packets in said HARQ memory;receive softbits of each of a plurality of retransmitted demodulated sub-packets of a retransmitted data packet;combine the softbits of a sub-packet from an initially transmitted data packet with the softbits of the respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet;characterized in that
the HARQ memory (50) has a size of Mp = (1 - (1 - ptp )-Ncb )·Ncb ·Lcb , where ptp is the probability of data packet errors, Ncb is the number of sub-packets per data packet, and Lcb is the maximum length of a sub-packet; that
the receiver further comprises a second memory (70) for decoded data bits; and that
the decoder (60) is further adapted to
perform an error check on each sub-packet prior to softbit storing;
store, in said HARQ memory, only the softbits of those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet which failed the error check; and
for those demodulated sub-packets of a received data packet that have passed said error check, store decoded data bits in said second memory (70). - The receiver of claim 5 wherein the decoder (60) is further adapted to combine the softbits of each sub-packet stored in said HARQ memory with the softbits of a respective sub-packet from a retransmitted data packet.
- The receiver of claim 5 or 6, wherein the combination of sub-packet softbits comprises addition of the respective softbits of a sub-packet from a first transmission of a data packet with the softbits of a sub-packet from a retransmission of the same data packet, with a weighting in function of a signal-to-noise ratio of the transmission and the retransmission channel.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10165261A EP2339774B1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2010-06-08 | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system |
US12/963,708 US8443248B2 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2010-12-09 | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system |
CN201010603561.2A CN102142945B (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2010-12-22 | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP09180530 | 2009-12-23 | ||
EP10165261A EP2339774B1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2010-06-08 | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2339774A2 EP2339774A2 (en) | 2011-06-29 |
EP2339774A3 EP2339774A3 (en) | 2012-02-01 |
EP2339774B1 true EP2339774B1 (en) | 2012-11-14 |
Family
ID=43629302
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10165261A Not-in-force EP2339774B1 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2010-06-08 | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8443248B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2339774B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102142945B (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8595578B1 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2013-11-26 | Marvell International Ltd. | Significance of retransmission used in subsequent decoding |
CN103078721B (en) * | 2011-10-25 | 2016-03-30 | 联芯科技有限公司 | Mixed self-adapting retransmission request method and terminal |
US9203441B2 (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2015-12-01 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Partial packet recovery in wireless networks |
CN202887175U (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2013-04-17 | 上海晨思电子科技有限公司 | Controller of buffer storage device |
US9204437B2 (en) | 2013-02-27 | 2015-12-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for conditional offload of one or more log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) or decoded bits |
JP2014229944A (en) * | 2013-05-17 | 2014-12-08 | 富士通株式会社 | Signal processing device, control method and communication device |
WO2016095964A1 (en) * | 2014-12-16 | 2016-06-23 | Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd | Methods and nodes in a wireless communication system |
US10338996B2 (en) | 2015-01-27 | 2019-07-02 | Nxp Usa, Inc. | Pipelined decoder and method for conditional storage |
US20160380657A1 (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2016-12-29 | Intel IP Corporation | Interference cancellation |
US10476998B2 (en) * | 2016-07-11 | 2019-11-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reinforced list decoding |
IT201600073087A1 (en) | 2016-07-13 | 2018-01-13 | St Microelectronics Srl | RECEIVING CIRCUIT, RELATED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND DEVICE |
US11171758B2 (en) * | 2017-03-24 | 2021-11-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Code block grouping and feedback that support efficient retransmissions |
US10554334B2 (en) * | 2017-10-17 | 2020-02-04 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Nominally unguaranteed error-detection codes for sub-data packets |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7302628B2 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2007-11-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Data compression with incremental redundancy |
DE60217097T2 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2007-05-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Kadoma | Hybrid automatic repeat request protocol |
US7103729B2 (en) * | 2002-12-26 | 2006-09-05 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus of memory management |
US7225382B2 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-05-29 | Telefonakiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Incremental redundancy operation in a wireless communication network |
CN1878030A (en) * | 2005-06-08 | 2006-12-13 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Transmission format group indicated decoding method |
KR100946894B1 (en) * | 2006-09-13 | 2010-03-09 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A Method and system for efficient control of dynamic allocation of hybrid automatic repeat request buffer in wireless communication system |
KR101492595B1 (en) * | 2007-05-21 | 2015-02-11 | 라모트 앳 텔-아비브 유니버시티 리미티드 | Memory-efficient ldpc decoding |
JP2009182780A (en) * | 2008-01-31 | 2009-08-13 | Nec Corp | Method for processing data in retransmission processes, and communication device using the same |
US8171362B2 (en) * | 2008-03-27 | 2012-05-01 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, method and computer program product for HARQ buffer size reduction |
EP2164202A1 (en) * | 2008-09-11 | 2010-03-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Method for automatic repeat request operation, transceiver arrangement, and computer program |
EP2380301A2 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2011-10-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Dynamic harq buffer management |
US8543880B2 (en) * | 2010-09-17 | 2013-09-24 | Intel Corporation | Techniques for successive refinement of metrics stored for HARQ combining |
-
2010
- 2010-06-08 EP EP10165261A patent/EP2339774B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2010-12-09 US US12/963,708 patent/US8443248B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-22 CN CN201010603561.2A patent/CN102142945B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2339774A2 (en) | 2011-06-29 |
CN102142945B (en) | 2014-05-28 |
US8443248B2 (en) | 2013-05-14 |
US20110154143A1 (en) | 2011-06-23 |
EP2339774A3 (en) | 2012-02-01 |
CN102142945A (en) | 2011-08-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2339774B1 (en) | Method for decoding data packets in a wireless communication system | |
US10541780B2 (en) | Code block level error correction and media access control (MAC) level hybrid automatic repeat requests to mitigate bursty puncturing and interference in a multi-layer protocol wireless system | |
EP2093921B1 (en) | Method and product for memory management in a HARQ communication system | |
US8271842B2 (en) | Reducing harq retransmissions using peak power management techniques | |
US8351400B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for overhead reduction in an enhanced uplink in a wireless communication system | |
EP1999878B1 (en) | Method and arrangement in a telecommunication system | |
US20090031185A1 (en) | Hybrid arq systems and methods for packet-based networks | |
US8495474B2 (en) | Method and system for data transmission in a data network | |
US20090028263A1 (en) | Mimo communication apparatus and data retransmission method | |
US20160173237A1 (en) | Method for a first network node for transmitting or retransmitting data to a second network node and first network node thereof and method for a second network node for receiving data transmitted or retransmitted from a first network node and second network node thereof | |
US9363047B2 (en) | Technique of encoding HARQ feedback information with two separate codewords with unequal error protection for DTX and ACK/NACK | |
US20210336719A1 (en) | Data retransmission in wireless network | |
CN102104463B (en) | Data message request retransmission method and device | |
US8880971B2 (en) | Cooperative H-ARQ supporting method | |
US9847853B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reduced HARQ buffer storage | |
US7664141B2 (en) | Method and device for decreasing a transmission delay in a multi-channel data transmission | |
EP2525522A1 (en) | Method for retransmitting data from a first network to a second network node in a radio communication system, first network node and second network node thereof | |
Fontenelle et al. | Blind recognition of retransmitted packets for HARQ system | |
KR101443624B1 (en) | Methods of transmitting and receiving data in communication system | |
Andres Quiroga | Link-to-System Interfaces for System Level Simulations Featuring Hybrid ARQ |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME RS |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME RS |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04L 1/18 20060101AFI20111228BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120314 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 584447 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121115 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010003577 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130110 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20121114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 584447 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130225 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130214 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130314 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130215 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20130719 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010003577 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130815 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130608 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20130701 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602010003577 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602010003577 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20150101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20150227 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140630 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130608 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100608 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20150603 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20160204 AND 20160210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160608 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121114 |