EP2310796B1 - Rudder machinery - Google Patents

Rudder machinery Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2310796B1
EP2310796B1 EP08876552.4A EP08876552A EP2310796B1 EP 2310796 B1 EP2310796 B1 EP 2310796B1 EP 08876552 A EP08876552 A EP 08876552A EP 2310796 B1 EP2310796 B1 EP 2310796B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
rudder
machinery
coil
shaft
missile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP08876552.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2310796A4 (en
EP2310796A1 (en
Inventor
Johan Jarnhamn
Lars Ahlgren
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Saab AB
Original Assignee
Saab AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Saab AB filed Critical Saab AB
Publication of EP2310796A1 publication Critical patent/EP2310796A1/en
Publication of EP2310796A4 publication Critical patent/EP2310796A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2310796B1 publication Critical patent/EP2310796B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/60Steering arrangements
    • F42B10/62Steering by movement of flight surfaces
    • F42B10/64Steering by movement of flight surfaces of fins

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns machinery intended for actuating and controlling a rudder on a missile.
  • Missile control rudders are commonly positioned by rudder machinery mounted within the missile body.
  • the machinery exerts appropriate rotational torque and control on the rudder in response to commands from the guidance control system to steer the missile.
  • a rudder machinery stringent requirements of size, weight, torque and angle of deflection delivered to the rudder shaft, backlash, cost, and ease of construction.
  • the small body diameter requirement intensifies the mechanical problem of converting rotary motion from a motor into torque to be applied to a rudder shaft.
  • all of the missile components must withstand great temperature variations due to their shipment and use in many different climates.
  • the rudder machinery is a very costly part of traditional missile design due to its very high demands for mechanically precision and low tolerances.
  • Missile rudders are normally controlled by pneumatic or electro-mechanical means.
  • the invention disclosed in US 6,827,310 is an example of the electro-mechanical principle.
  • the patent concerns a fin actuator for a portable missile and a method of using the same.
  • An electric motor converts a rotating force to a linear force and thereafter to a new rotating force on the fin shaft using a lead screw fixedly coupled to the power shaft of the motor, the lead screw having a lead nut threadingly engaged and moving linearly along the lead screw in relation to the direction of rotation of the power shaft.
  • the means for converting the linear movement of the lead nut to rotational movement of the fin shaft includes the lead nut operatively coupled to a crank arm including slots to allow freedom of movement, the crank arm being fixedly coupled to and effecting the rotation of the fin shaft.
  • an actuation system for bringing an aerodynamic control surface into one or other of two active stable positions opposite each other relative to a neutral position.
  • the actuation system includes two electromagnetic coils arranged on a fixed support, one facing the other; a moving blade, one of the ends of which is fixed elastically to the said fixed support, and the other end of which is arranged between the said coils and is capable of being attracted by each of the said coils; and a moving element secured to said blade and carrying said aerodynamic control surface.
  • This type of actuation system is adapted for moving the aerodynamic control surface into one of two stable positions opposite one another in relation to a neutral position and quickly switching from one stable position to the other, however it lacks the ability to achieve arbitrary deflection angles and control the actual movements of the aerodynamic control surface.
  • the object of the invention is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means is less expensive than the known type, but yet gives as high precision.
  • a further object is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means has less mechanical play between the motor and the rudder.
  • Another objective is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means is light and small enough to be built into a portable missile.
  • the invention concerns a rudder machinery for actuating and controlling a rudder in a missile, wherein the rudder comprises a shaft and the machinery comprises means for rotating the shaft, which means comprises at least one linear electric motor, each motor having a magnetic circuit fixedly mounted on the missile structure and a mobile coil connected to the shaft, such that a current passing through the coil will result in a force acting on the coil, the coil moving to push or pull the shaft, the direction and magnitude of the force being determined by the magnitude and direction of the electrical current in the coil.
  • the electric motor of the machinery is controlled by commands from a guidance control system.
  • a motor To position and actuate the rudder on a missile there is need for a motor.
  • a dc linear motor is used.
  • the entire rudder machinery of the invention contains: regulator, drive, DC linear motor, and position potentiometer for regulator feedback.
  • the rudder machinery must be able to deliver a certain torque to the rudder.
  • the weight of the rudder machinery has to be as low as possible.
  • the rudder machinery shall have high bandwidth, to be able to move from one end position to the other several times per second. Further the rudder machinery has to use as little energy as possible in view of minimizing the size of the batteries.
  • the idea of the invention is to use a linear force acting directly on the rudder. Such a solution has the advantage that the need of mechanical components decreases.
  • Fig 1 shows schematically and in cross section a dc linear motor that may be used in the present machinery.
  • the motor comprises a yoke 9 of a magnetic material having a high permeability, coil 8, ring 10 of a magnetic material having a high permeability and magnet 1 of a magnetic material having high magnetic saturation level, resulting in magnetic field 11 and force 12 working on the coil 8.
  • Figs 1 and 2 illustrate how the torque 17 induced by the force 12 from the motor 13 actuates the rudder 2.
  • the electrical current in the coil 8 induces the force 12.
  • the force 12 will work on the coil 8, pushing it out of or pulling it into the magnetic field 11 of the motor 13.
  • the coil 8 is fastened to the rudder shaft 3 of the rudder 2.
  • the current in the coil 8 will generate a force 12 pushing or pulling the rudder.
  • the direction of the current will decide the direction in which the rudder 2 will move.
  • the average magnitude of the current will decide the magnitude of the force 12, and therefore of the torque 17 working on the rudder shaft 3.
  • the idea of the invention is that the rudder is positioned by a linear force that acts directly on the rudder.
  • Such a solution has the advantages that the need of mechanical components decreases.
  • the rudder machinery has to deliver sufficient high torque to keep the rudder in the required position.
  • the rudder machinery should further have a high bandwidth.
  • Fig. 3 The principle of the rudder machinery is showed in Fig. 3 .
  • Two motors 13, one on each side of the rudder 2, will push and pull the rudder into the desired position.
  • the voltage cross the motors 13 is supplied by a drive 15.
  • the rudder 2 is deflected by the angle ⁇ .
  • the new position of the rudder 13 is measured by a position potentiometer 7 and given as feedback.
  • a regulator 16 receives the signal from the potentiometer 7 and regulates the position of the rudder 2 via the drive 15.
  • R the magnetic field
  • F the force
  • Figs 4a,b show more clearly the principle of how the motor pushes, pulls the rudder 2 into the right position.
  • the force of the coil 8 is transferred to the rudder 2 via a lever 6 on the rudder shaft 3.
  • the magnetic part 1 of the motor is fastened to the missile structure 5.
  • the coil 8 is fastened to the lever 6 which is fastened to the rudder shaft passing through the bearings 4.
  • the force acting on the coil 8 will move the coil in a direction toward or away from the lever, pushing, pulling the end of the lever 6 in the same direction.
  • the movement of the coil end of the lever 6 will rotate the rudder shaft 3 and thus the rudder.
  • the position of the rudder and rudder shaft is detected by the position potentiometer 7 on the shaft.
  • the design requires a bearing point between the coil and lever and the motor and missile structure, respectively.
  • This bearing point must be designed depending on specific system requirement such as folded missile rudders. It could in its simplest form be the usage of ball bearings or ball joints.
  • Figs. 5a and b show different locations for the rudders on the missile.
  • Fig 5a shows the rudders 2 on the tail part with two motors 13 as dotted lines under the upper rudder 2.
  • Fig 5b illustrates a missile with tail fins 14 and canard rudders 2 near the missile nose.
  • Fig 5c is a schematic cross section through the missile on Fig 5a or 5b .
  • the machinery for one rudder is described above as two linear motors and a potentiometer mounted on the rudder shaft for detecting the position of the rudder.
  • the machinery is controlled by a guidance control system sending a signal to the machinery which adjusts the position of the rudder.
  • a guidance control system is schematically shown on Fig. 6 . It is fed with the actual value in the form of a voltage signal from the position potentiometer and with the desired value, also in the form of a voltage signal defining the desired position of the rudder and obtained form the missile's guidance system.
  • the actual value, e.g. 2V, and the desired value, e.g. 3V, are compared in a comparator resulting in a signal showing the voltage difference, in this case 1V.
  • the signal is delivered to two operational amplifiers (OP-amplifiers) in parallel in conjuction with a triangular puls (wave), resulting in two mirrored "pulse width modulated” (PWM) signals in the form of square waves where the pulse length is proportional to the voltage difference.
  • OP-amplifiers operational amplifiers
  • PWM pulse width modulated
  • the PWM signal generation is shown on Fig 7 together with a full-bridge dc-dc-converter and the dc motor.
  • the triangular wave and thus the PWM-signal has a high frequency, about 200 kHz. This is very much higher than the band width of the rudder machinery. Therefore the mechanical inertia of the rudder result in the rudder not reacting in the form of twitches but with a smooth movement based on the average polarity voltage level.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Control Of Multiple Motors (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention concerns machinery intended for actuating and controlling a rudder on a missile.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • One specific area of concern in the construction of a portable missile is the operation of the rudders. Missile control rudders are commonly positioned by rudder machinery mounted within the missile body. The machinery exerts appropriate rotational torque and control on the rudder in response to commands from the guidance control system to steer the missile. In a portable missile, there exists for a rudder machinery stringent requirements of size, weight, torque and angle of deflection delivered to the rudder shaft, backlash, cost, and ease of construction. The small body diameter requirement intensifies the mechanical problem of converting rotary motion from a motor into torque to be applied to a rudder shaft. In addition, all of the missile components must withstand great temperature variations due to their shipment and use in many different climates.
  • The rudder machinery is a very costly part of traditional missile design due to its very high demands for mechanically precision and low tolerances.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • Missile rudders are normally controlled by pneumatic or electro-mechanical means.
  • The invention disclosed in US 6,827,310 is an example of the electro-mechanical principle. The patent concerns a fin actuator for a portable missile and a method of using the same. An electric motor converts a rotating force to a linear force and thereafter to a new rotating force on the fin shaft using a lead screw fixedly coupled to the power shaft of the motor, the lead screw having a lead nut threadingly engaged and moving linearly along the lead screw in relation to the direction of rotation of the power shaft. The means for converting the linear movement of the lead nut to rotational movement of the fin shaft includes the lead nut operatively coupled to a crank arm including slots to allow freedom of movement, the crank arm being fixedly coupled to and effecting the rotation of the fin shaft.
  • This type of machinery is very expensive. Such high costs are problematic and especially not justified in small, less expensive missiles.
  • In EP0628783A1 , an actuation system is described for bringing an aerodynamic control surface into one or other of two active stable positions opposite each other relative to a neutral position. The actuation system includes two electromagnetic coils arranged on a fixed support, one facing the other; a moving blade, one of the ends of which is fixed elastically to the said fixed support, and the other end of which is arranged between the said coils and is capable of being attracted by each of the said coils; and a moving element secured to said blade and carrying said aerodynamic control surface. This type of actuation system is adapted for moving the aerodynamic control surface into one of two stable positions opposite one another in relation to a neutral position and quickly switching from one stable position to the other, however it lacks the ability to achieve arbitrary deflection angles and control the actual movements of the aerodynamic control surface.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The object of the invention is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means is less expensive than the known type, but yet gives as high precision.
  • A further object is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means has less mechanical play between the motor and the rudder.
  • Another objective is to achieve a means for actuating and controlling a missile rudder which means is light and small enough to be built into a portable missile.
  • This problem is solved by the invention through the use of a machinery comprising a linear electric motor as means for actuating the rudder.
  • Thus, the invention concerns a rudder machinery for actuating and controlling a rudder in a missile, wherein the rudder comprises a shaft and the machinery comprises means for rotating the shaft, which means comprises at least one linear electric motor, each motor having a magnetic circuit fixedly mounted on the missile structure and a mobile coil connected to the shaft, such that a current passing through the coil will result in a force acting on the coil, the coil moving to push or pull the shaft, the direction and magnitude of the force being determined by the magnitude and direction of the electrical current in the coil.
  • Preferably the electric motor of the machinery is controlled by commands from a guidance control system.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • Fig. 1 shows a schematic cross-section through the type of motor used in the machinery of the invention.
    • Fig. 2 is a schematic view of a rudder with a motor attached, seen from above.
    • Fig 3 shows the principle of the present machinery.
    • Figs. 4a and b show two schematic cross sectional views, from the rear and from the side, through a rudder having two motors attached.
    • Figs. 5a, b and c show schematically two missiles having the rudders arranged at the end and at the front, respectively, and also a cross section through the missiles showing four rudders with motors attached.
    • Fig. 6 is a flow chart showing how the motor of the machinery is controlled.
    • Fig. 7 is circuit diagram showing the guidance control system.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • To position and actuate the rudder on a missile there is need for a motor. According to the present invention a dc linear motor is used. To have accurate control of the rudder there is need of a feedback in the system. The entire rudder machinery of the invention contains: regulator, drive, DC linear motor, and position potentiometer for regulator feedback.
  • To manufacture the rudder machineries of the missiles of today is costly and constitutes a significant part of the complete missile cost. The rudder machinery must be able to deliver a certain torque to the rudder. The weight of the rudder machinery has to be as low as possible. The rudder machinery shall have high bandwidth, to be able to move from one end position to the other several times per second. Further the rudder machinery has to use as little energy as possible in view of minimizing the size of the batteries.
  • The idea of the invention is to use a linear force acting directly on the rudder. Such a solution has the advantage that the need of mechanical components decreases.
  • Fig 1 shows schematically and in cross section a dc linear motor that may be used in the present machinery. The motor comprises a yoke 9 of a magnetic material having a high permeability, coil 8, ring 10 of a magnetic material having a high permeability and magnet 1 of a magnetic material having high magnetic saturation level, resulting in magnetic field 11 and force 12 working on the coil 8.
  • Figs 1 and 2 illustrate how the torque 17 induced by the force 12 from the motor 13 actuates the rudder 2. The electrical current in the coil 8 induces the force 12. As the magnet 1 of the motor 13 is fastened to the missile structure 5 (figs 4a and b) and therefore stationary, the force 12 will work on the coil 8, pushing it out of or pulling it into the magnetic field 11 of the motor 13. The coil 8 is fastened to the rudder shaft 3 of the rudder 2. Thus, the current in the coil 8 will generate a force 12 pushing or pulling the rudder. The direction of the current will decide the direction in which the rudder 2 will move. The average magnitude of the current will decide the magnitude of the force 12, and therefore of the torque 17 working on the rudder shaft 3. For the force 12 and torque 17 to be linear throughout the movement there should preferably be two motors 13, one assembled on each side of the rudder 2 as shown in Fig 2.
  • The idea of the invention is that the rudder is positioned by a linear force that acts directly on the rudder. Such a solution has the advantages that the need of mechanical components decreases. To be usable, the rudder machinery has to deliver sufficient high torque to keep the rudder in the required position. The rudder machinery should further have a high bandwidth.
  • The principle of the rudder machinery is showed in Fig. 3. Two motors 13, one on each side of the rudder 2, will push and pull the rudder into the desired position. The voltage cross the motors 13 is supplied by a drive 15. The rudder 2 is deflected by the angle ϕ. The new position of the rudder 13 is measured by a position potentiometer 7 and given as feedback. A regulator 16 receives the signal from the potentiometer 7 and regulates the position of the rudder 2 via the drive 15. On this figure the magnetic field is denoted by R and the force by F.
  • Figs 4a,b show more clearly the principle of how the motor pushes, pulls the rudder 2 into the right position. The force of the coil 8 is transferred to the rudder 2 via a lever 6 on the rudder shaft 3.
  • Thus, the magnetic part 1 of the motor is fastened to the missile structure 5. The coil 8 is fastened to the lever 6 which is fastened to the rudder shaft passing through the bearings 4. For each rudder 2 there are two motors 1, 8, mounted on either side of the plane of the rudder 2. The force acting on the coil 8 will move the coil in a direction toward or away from the lever, pushing, pulling the end of the lever 6 in the same direction. The movement of the coil end of the lever 6 will rotate the rudder shaft 3 and thus the rudder. The position of the rudder and rudder shaft is detected by the position potentiometer 7 on the shaft.
  • Since the rudder and lever are moving in a circular movement, but the motor and coil is moving in linear movement, the design requires a bearing point between the coil and lever and the motor and missile structure, respectively. This bearing point must be designed depending on specific system requirement such as folded missile rudders. It could in its simplest form be the usage of ball bearings or ball joints.
  • Figs. 5a and b show different locations for the rudders on the missile. Fig 5a shows the rudders 2 on the tail part with two motors 13 as dotted lines under the upper rudder 2. Fig 5b illustrates a missile with tail fins 14 and canard rudders 2 near the missile nose. Fig 5c is a schematic cross section through the missile on Fig 5a or 5b.
  • The machinery for one rudder is described above as two linear motors and a potentiometer mounted on the rudder shaft for detecting the position of the rudder.
  • The machinery is controlled by a guidance control system sending a signal to the machinery which adjusts the position of the rudder.
  • A guidance control system is schematically shown on Fig. 6. It is fed with the actual value in the form of a voltage signal from the position potentiometer and with the desired value, also in the form of a voltage signal defining the desired position of the rudder and obtained form the missile's guidance system.
  • In the system shown on Fig 6 the actual value, e.g. 2V, and the desired value, e.g. 3V, are compared in a comparator resulting in a signal showing the voltage difference, in this case 1V. The signal is delivered to two operational amplifiers (OP-amplifiers) in parallel in conjuction with a triangular puls (wave), resulting in two mirrored "pulse width modulated" (PWM) signals in the form of square waves where the pulse length is proportional to the voltage difference.
  • The PWM signal generation is shown on Fig 7 together with a full-bridge dc-dc-converter and the dc motor.
  • The triangular wave and thus the PWM-signal has a high frequency, about 200 kHz. This is very much higher than the band width of the rudder machinery. Therefore the mechanical inertia of the rudder result in the rudder not reacting in the form of twitches but with a smooth movement based on the average polarity voltage level.
  • Example:
    • In a laboratory test machinery of a size suitable for a portable missile was constructed in accordance with Fig 3 using a drive and a regulator as shown on Figs 6 and 7. This machinery had the following parameters:
      • The weight of each motor 0.940 kg.
      • The size of each motor, diameter 40 mm, length 30 mm.
      • The length of the moment arm about 50 mm.
      • The torque acting on the rudder 2-3 Nm.
      • The maximum deflection of the rudder ±9 degrees.
      • The stroke of the coil 16 mm (±8mm).
  • This performance of a linear DC motor in actuating and controlling a rudder was achieved with parts and materials easily accessible at low cost. A person skilled in the art can without problem find components and materials for optimizing the performance and for adjusting the machinery to a larger missile.

Claims (4)

  1. Rudder machinery for actuating and controlling a rudder (2) in a missile, wherein the rudder (2) comprises a shaft (3) and the machinery comprises means for rotating the shaft (3), which means comprises at least one linear electric motor (13), characterized in that each motor (13) having a magnetic circuit fixedly mounted on the missile structure (5) and a mobile coil (8) connected to the shaft (3) via a lever (6), such that a current passing through the coil (8) will result in a force (12) acting on the coil (8), the coil (8) moving to push or pull the rudder (2), the direction and magnitude of the force (12) being determined by the magnitude and direction of the electrical current in the coil (8), and wherein the lever (6) is connected between the shaft (3) and the motor coil (8) whereby the coil will work on the lever (6) so that the shaft (3) will rotate the rudder (2) in the desired direction wherein the rudder machinery further comprises a guidance control system comprising a regulator (16), a drive (15) and a position potentiometer (7) on the rudder (2) which determines the position of the rudder (2) and sends a signal to the regulator (16), where the actual position is compared with the desired position and the necessary current for adjusting the rudder (2) is determined and delivered to the motor (13) or motors through the drive (15) and wherein the regulator (16) and drive (15) comprise a mirrored pulse width modulated signal controlling a full-bridge dc-dc converter.
  2. Machinery according to claim 1, comprising two motors (13) per rudder (2).
  3. Machinery according to any of claims 1-2, where the machinery actuates and controls a canard rudder (2).
  4. Machinery according to any of claims 1-3, where the machinery actuates and controls a rudder (2) on the tail part of the missile.
EP08876552.4A 2008-07-07 2008-07-07 Rudder machinery Not-in-force EP2310796B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/SE2008/050843 WO2010005350A1 (en) 2008-07-07 2008-07-07 Rudder machinery

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2310796A1 EP2310796A1 (en) 2011-04-20
EP2310796A4 EP2310796A4 (en) 2013-05-29
EP2310796B1 true EP2310796B1 (en) 2014-04-16

Family

ID=41507273

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08876552.4A Not-in-force EP2310796B1 (en) 2008-07-07 2008-07-07 Rudder machinery

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2310796B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2464717T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2010005350A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103612748B (en) * 2013-10-12 2015-12-23 中国运载火箭技术研究院 A kind of positioning drive mechanisms being applicable to aircraft dynamic V tail entirely
CN105151279B (en) * 2015-09-24 2017-02-01 江西洪都航空工业集团有限责任公司 Synchronization mechanism with changeable mounting angle
CN110260728A (en) * 2019-07-05 2019-09-20 贵州航天控制技术有限公司 A kind of four rudder cluster type electric rudder systems
CN115200422A (en) * 2022-05-25 2022-10-18 浙江大学湖州研究院 Intelligent steering engine driving system based on voice coil motor

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3843075A (en) * 1973-06-11 1974-10-22 Atomic Energy Commission Roll rate control system
DE2721656A1 (en) * 1977-05-13 1978-11-16 Ver Flugtechnische Werke CONTROL ARRANGEMENT FOR THE CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT
US4560121A (en) * 1983-05-17 1985-12-24 The Garrett Corporation Stabilization of automotive vehicle
US5204573A (en) * 1991-07-17 1993-04-20 Vision Applications, Inc. Two-dimensional pointing motor
FR2706200B1 (en) * 1993-06-07 1995-08-11 Aerospatiale Actuation system for aerodynamic control surfaces and systems for piloting aircraft, comprising at least one such actuation system.
DE19922693A1 (en) * 1999-05-18 2000-11-23 Diehl Stiftung & Co Control device for the rudder of a missile
US6827310B1 (en) 2003-09-22 2004-12-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Apparatus and method for fin actuation in a portable missile

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2310796A4 (en) 2013-05-29
EP2310796A1 (en) 2011-04-20
WO2010005350A1 (en) 2010-01-14
ES2464717T3 (en) 2014-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11201530B2 (en) Actuating device and method of making the same
CN102130536B (en) Compact electromechanical actuator
EP2310796B1 (en) Rudder machinery
US10177641B2 (en) Stator assembly including stator elements with slotted stator cores for use in an electrical motor
JP6598879B2 (en) Motor-type device having reciprocating motion of moving member and accompanying control method
US20090072083A1 (en) Actuation system with redundant motor actuators
US8511621B2 (en) Device for piloting a craft having an electromagnetic actuator
US20140286745A1 (en) Apparatus and method for rotating fluid controlling vanes in small turbine engines and other applications
US20120175459A1 (en) Guidance control for spinning or rolling vehicle
EP1224116B1 (en) Flap actuator system
US8197212B2 (en) Power-assisted control system for a rotorcraft
US6513762B2 (en) Flap actuator system
EP3423352B1 (en) Arcuate motion actuator and fin servo based on piezo-electric motors
Bhushan et al. Design of an electromagnetic actuator for an insect-scale spinning-wing robot
US8753085B2 (en) Device for changing a pitch of a blade of an impeller/propeller and a fan comprising the device
CN111207630B (en) Rocket flight attitude control method
CN201750389U (en) Speed regulation system of switched reluctance motor
CN206948210U (en) Four-way formula piezoelectricity steering wheel based on adjustable precompressed force amplificatory structure
CN215928264U (en) Hollow type double-output harmonic speed reduction device
EP1745339B1 (en) Method of controlling a high-friction electro-mechanical servo-mechanism to minimize the power needed to hold a loaded output member
US4549707A (en) Torque optimizing neutral inertia device
JP2006142884A (en) Flying body
CN112441225B (en) Power system, aircraft and aircraft power control method
CN208760888U (en) A kind of adjustable tail distance changing mechanism and go straight up to unmanned plane
RU2326787C2 (en) Method of controlling wing placed in fluid medium at its interaction with said medium and device to of its realisation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110203

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: JARNHAMN, JOHAN

Inventor name: AHLGREN, LARS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20130502

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: F42B 10/64 20060101AFI20130424BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140124

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: JARNHAMN, JOHAN

Inventor name: AHLGREN, LARS

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 662830

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2464717

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20140603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008031621

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 662830

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140416

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20140416

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140816

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140716

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140716

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140717

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008031621

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20150119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008031621

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20190710

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20190801

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190704

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190716

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190715

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602008031621

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200707

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20211228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200708