EP2276905B1 - On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment - Google Patents

On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2276905B1
EP2276905B1 EP09717529A EP09717529A EP2276905B1 EP 2276905 B1 EP2276905 B1 EP 2276905B1 EP 09717529 A EP09717529 A EP 09717529A EP 09717529 A EP09717529 A EP 09717529A EP 2276905 B1 EP2276905 B1 EP 2276905B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
treatment fluid
well treatment
pipe
component
valve
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP09717529A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2276905A2 (en
Inventor
Robert Douglas Hayworth
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Original Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Halliburton Energy Services Inc filed Critical Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Publication of EP2276905A2 publication Critical patent/EP2276905A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2276905B1 publication Critical patent/EP2276905B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/06Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole
    • E21B21/062Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole by mixing components

Definitions

  • On-the-fly blending of well treatment fluids is not typically used for corrosive chemicals.
  • blending corrosive chemicals otherwise known as acids, or hazardous chemicals, is done at a location other than the well site, using batch mixing.
  • the chemicals are mixed in a tank at a bulk chemical plant and then transported to the well site.
  • the mixing and the transportation are costly.
  • Specialized transports arc required to transport the mix.
  • specially trained personnel are required. In addition to being costly, this can be undesirably time consuming.
  • any real-time change to the mix presents problems, as an entire new batch must be mixed and transported. While this occurs, the job must wait, which can be extremely costly.
  • batch mixing requires that the tank be emptied prior to changing the mix. It is difficult to anticipate the exact amount of mix that will be required for a given application. This generally leads to excess mix left in the tank at the end of a job, or at a change point. Proper disposal of this mix can be environmentally hazardous, costly, and dangerous.
  • a valve and bucket approach is used to take a sample of the treatment fluid out of the system for testing and analysis. Specifically, the onsite personnel would have to open a valve and obtain a sample of the treatment fluid in a bucket for analysis.
  • the treatment fluid often comprises hazardous, corrosive or flammable material thereby posing a danger to the equipment, environment and the personnel taking the sample.
  • exposure to elements can compromise the sample properties leading to inaccurate results when analyzing the sample.
  • EP 0630728 which is considered the closest prior art, relates to a continuous multicomponent slurrying process for an oil or gas well.
  • EP 0845291 relates to a homogenizer/high shear mixing process for on-the-fly hydrogenation of fracturing fluids and on-the-fly mixing of cement fluids.
  • Figure 1 is a system for on-the-fly blending of treatment fluids with a sampling device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a system for on-the-fly blending of treatment fluids with a sampling device in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is an in-line sampling device in the closed position accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 4 is an in-line sampling device in the open position in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a sampling device with a safety enclosure in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention is directed to blending fluids. Specifically, the present invention is directed to improved methods and systems of blending and analyzing well treatment fluids at a well site.
  • the present invention is directed to a method for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising: providing a first centrifugal pump for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe; providing a first valve for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; providing a second centrifugal pump for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; providing a second valve for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and providing a sampling device for analyzing the well treatment fluid.
  • the present invention is directed to a system for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising: a first centrifugal pump for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe; a first valve for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; a second centrifugal pump for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; a second valve for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; means for controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and a sampling device for monitoring the well treatment fluid.
  • the present invention is directed to blending fluids. Specifically, the present invention is directed to improved methods and systems of blending and analyzing well treatment fluids at a well site.
  • FIG. 1 an exemplary embodiment of a system for preparing and analyzing acids on-the-fly at a desired rate is depicted generally with reference numeral 100.
  • the system 100 blends various components of the well treatment fluid directly into a pipe 110. This reduces or eliminates the need for standard mixing tanks or tubs. This may be accomplished using at least two centrifugal pumps 120 (shown as 120a, 120b, and 120c). The centrifugal pumps 120 may each pump a different component of the desired well treatment fluid.
  • centrifugal pumps may be used to allow for more than two different components to be mixed together.
  • the system may include three centrifugal pumps for an acid treatment, where a first centrifugal pump may pump a hazardous chemical such as hydrochloric acid (“HCl”), a second centrifugal pump may pump water, and a third centrifugal pump may pump a highly corrosive chemical such as Ammonium Bi-Fluoride ("AF').
  • HCl, water, and AF are disclosed, it should be understood that the chemicals may include any acid, hazardous chemical, corrosive, or other fluid.
  • a non-aqueous fluid may be used as a primary flow stream.
  • the non-aqueous fluid may include diesel.
  • the system 100 may also include one or more valves 140 (shown as 140a, 140b, and 140c) for controlling the flow of the various components from the centrifugal pumps 120 into the pipe 110.
  • the valves 140 may be butterfly valves, or any other valve suitable for use with well treatment fluids.
  • the system 100 may include one or more pressure transducers 150 (shown as 150a, 150b, and 150c) that act as pressure controls on the centrifugal pumps 120, preventing the centrifugal pumps 120 from pushing one another off line. Feedback from pressure transducers 150 may signal pressure set points in centrifugal pumps 120, such that the centrifugal pumps 120 maintain a desirable balance.
  • pressure transducers 150 shown as 150a, 150b, and 150c
  • the system 100 may additionally include one or more flow meters 160 (shown as 160a, 160b, and 160c) and one or more check valves 162 (shown as 162a, 162b, and 162c) to monitor and control flow rates from the pumps 140.
  • flow meters 160 shown as 160a, 160b, and 160c
  • check valves 162 shown as 162a, 162b, and 162c
  • Additional liquid additives may also be introduced into the pipe 110.
  • the additives may be stored in liquid additive storage tanks (not shown), and pumped into the pipe 110 via one or more liquid additive pumps 130. While the liquid additive pump 130 is shown as a hand pump, the liquid additive pump 130 may be any type of pump, including, but not limited to, a positive displacement pump.
  • One or more liquid additive valves may be included to control the flow of liquid additives from the liquid additive pumps 130 into the pipe 110.
  • the well treatment fluid may be blended directly in the pipe 110, without the use of any tank.
  • the flow rate and pressure of any of the components may be controlled by controlling the pumps 120 and 130 and the valves 140. This allows for the ratio of the various components and additives of the well treatment fluid to be modified as necessary for the specific field conditions at any given time. This modification can take place in real-time, allowing the desired well treatment fluid mix to be pumped into the well as it is needed.
  • the system 100 may have a number of additional valves (not shown), with locations suitable for controlling flow in various ways as would be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • these additional valves may be butterfly valves, some of which are open and some of which are closed.
  • the additional valves may be used to address the mixing orders of some specific fluids by allowing a user to inject liquid additives into the raw product flow streams prior to entering the pipe 110.
  • a discharge flow meter 190 may be included in the system 100. This may allow for adjustments to be made to the pumps 120 and valves 140, such that the correct mix ratio is maintained without creating undesirable negative pressure in the system 100. After the mix has passed through the discharge flow meter 190, it may pass through another pump (not shown), which then pumps the mix downhole.
  • the system 100 may also optionally include a discharge recirculation pump 194.
  • the discharge recirculation pump 194 may serve two purposes. The first may be for recirculation. The second may be for discharge at very low flow rates.
  • the recirculation pump 194 may be any type of pump for discharge recirculation (e.g., a 120 HP pump).
  • a sampling device 170 may be coupled to the system 100.
  • the sampling device 170 may be coupled to the system in parallel to the discharge recirculation pump 194.
  • the sampling device may allow the operator to take samples of the fluid produced by the system 100 while protecting personnel from exposure to the material flowing through the pipe 110 which is often comprised of hazardous chemicals.
  • Figure 2 depicts another exemplary embodiment of the present invention where the sampling device 170 is coupled to the pipe 110 just before the fluid enters the discharge flow meter 190.
  • the sampling device 170 may be removably coupled to the system 100. It may be desirable to attach the sampling device 170 to the system 100 when a sample is to be taken and remove it when the sampling process has been completed.
  • One or more valves may be used to control the fluid flow through the sampling device 170. The valves may be closed when no sample is to be taken or when the sampling device 170 is not coupled to the system 100. Once the operator decides to take a sample the valves may be opened to allow fluid flow through the sampling device 170.
  • FIG. 3 Shown in Figure 3 is an in-line sampling device in the closed position in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention denoted generally by reference numeral 300.
  • the in-line sampling device 300 allows fluid samples to be taken directly from the pipe 110 into a sampling container 302. This ensures that a real-time sample is taken from the fluid stream and eliminates sample exposure while eradicating the health and safety risks to personnel who would otherwise be responsible for taking a sample.
  • a number of different methods may be used to couple the sampling device 300 with the pipe 110.
  • the in-line sampling device 300 mounts onto the pipe 110 between two standard flanges 304.
  • a sampling container 302 may be coupled at one end of the sampling device 300 and a lever 306 at the other.
  • a valve spindle 308 When a sample is not being taken, a valve spindle 308 may be pressed by a spring 310 against a soft seal 312.
  • Figure 4 depicts an in-line sampling device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention in the open position.
  • the lever 306 When the lever 306 is turned, the valve spindle 308 may be lifted from the soft seal 312.
  • the stroke of the lever 306 can be adjusted by a travel stop 314.
  • the valve spindle 308 allows a smooth and controlled sample flow into the sampling container 302 through an inlet 316.
  • any displaced air vents through a ventilation outlet 318.
  • the ventilation outlet 318 may be coupled to a scrubber system when the samples taken include hazardous materials. The operation of scrubber systems is well know to those of ordinary skill in the art and will therefore not be discussed in detail herein.
  • a multi-turn hand wheel may be used to lift the valve spindle 308.
  • a multi-turn hand wheel allows accurate metering of the sample into a container, it is not fail-safe as the operator may mistakenly leave the sample valve open and overflow the sampling container 302.
  • the spring 310 is used to create a spring loaded handle which will automatically close the valve when the operator releases the lever 306 handle.
  • a number of different mechanisms including, but not limited to, a spring loaded lever, a multi-turn hand wheel, or any other device suitable for opening and/or closing a valve may be used to control the sampling process.
  • sampling containers 302 may be used in conjunction with the in-line sampling device 300.
  • the sampling container 302 comprises a glass bottle which is threaded into the bottom of the sample device 300. The bottle will then hold the sample as it is drawn from the pipe 110.
  • the sampling container 302 may be enclosed in a glove box 500 as depicted in Figure 5 . This allows the bottle to be capped inside the glove box thereby preventing the exposure of the sample taker to any fumes from the sample while minimizing sample exposure to outside elements.
  • the glove box 500 may be any type of container suitable for containing spills and or fumes.
  • Computer software may be used to control the mix ratio.
  • the computer software may include a pressure control system, a rate control system, and/or a concentration control system.
  • the pressure control system may control pressure by controlling the pumps 120.
  • the rate control system may control flow rate by controlling the valves 140.
  • the concentration control system may control the concentration by controlling the pumps 120.
  • the pressure control system may include a drive signal to the centrifugal pumps 120 and feedback from pressure transducers 150.
  • Each of the centrifugal pumps 120 may maintain a separate pressure set point. These pressure set points may be based on expected rate and resultant discharge pressure.
  • the optimal pressure set point may place the valves 140 at a predetermined percentage open for each respective expected rate.
  • the rate control system may include a drive signal to each valve 140 and feedback from the respective flow meter 160.
  • the valve 140 for a first (or master) component e.g., water
  • the rate may be set by the discharge rate, as measured by the discharge flow meter 190.
  • the rate set points for the remaining valves 140 may be set by the concentration control system.
  • the concentration control system may include the rate control system and the rate feedback from the master (e.g., water) rate, which may be measured by the corresponding flow meter 160.
  • the rate set points for the other components may be calculated from a concentration or parts per thousand of the master rate. As the master rate increases, the rate for the other components may also increase. The increasing rate of other components will slow the increasing master rate until the desired concentration is established.
  • the system 100 may optionally include additional components.
  • the system 100 may include a tank 192. Due to the nature of the types of chemicals used, the tank 192 may be situated on the discharge side of the system 100. The tank 192 may be used to prevent loss if something goes wrong and the job must be stopped. Additionally, the tank 192 may be useful in situations where the flow rates are very low.
  • additional valves 196 may be used to control the flow of the fluid through the tank 192. For example, these additional valves may be butterfly valves, some of which are open and some of which are closed.
  • This system 100 may be used for acid blending for acidizing wells, otherwise known as "Acid-On-the-Fly," which involves blending two or more major hazardous chemical components into a pressurized piping system and injecting one or more liquid additives into that flow stream.
  • This system 100 may alternatively be used for fracturing operations, in which case the treatment fluid would be a fracturing fluid. Additionally, this system 100 may be used for drilling operations, in which case the treatment fluid would be drilling mud.
  • the system and methods of the present invention may also apply to non-acids or other material requiring high-shear preparation on a single pass such as on-location preparation of emulsion based fracturing fluids, completion fluids, cementing fluids such as spacers, and drilling fluids.
  • the ability to blend "On-the-Fly" may reduce the amount of blended chemicals requiring disposal upon completion of the process. It may also lower exposure of hazardous chemicals to personnel and the environment. Furthermore, it may decrease the number of personnel required for the process and decrease the amount of time hazardous chemicals would be in use. Additionally, by blending the chemicals as they are pumped downhole, there may be a significant reduction of waste that must be disposed of, and cost associated with that disposal process. Further, there may be a reduction in cost for transporting the mixed chemicals, since that would no longer be a requirement. Additionally, there may be a reduction of cost for buying and maintaining the highly regulated cargo tank motor vehicles. Additionally, there may be a reduction and/or elimination of the bulk chemical plants (otherwise known as acid plants) currently being used. By eliminating bulk acid plants, transports, and the physical handling of these types of chemicals, the risk of personal and environmental exposure may be significantly reduced.
  • the bulk chemical plants also known as acid plants

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Accessories For Mixers (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)

Abstract

Improved methods and systems of blending and analyzing well treatment fluids at a well site are disclosed. A first centrifugal pump pumps a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe and a first valve controls the flow of the first component into the pipe. A second centrifugal pump pumps a second component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe and a second valve controls the flow of the second component into the pipe. The pumps and the valves are then controlled in order to control the ratio of the first and second component of the well treatment fluid as they are delivered to the pipe and a sampling device is used to analyze the well treatment fluid.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • On-the-fly blending of well treatment fluids is not typically used for corrosive chemicals. Generally, blending corrosive chemicals, otherwise known as acids, or hazardous chemicals, is done at a location other than the well site, using batch mixing. The chemicals are mixed in a tank at a bulk chemical plant and then transported to the well site. The mixing and the transportation are costly. Specialized transports arc required to transport the mix. Additionally, specially trained personnel are required. In addition to being costly, this can be undesirably time consuming. Further, any real-time change to the mix presents problems, as an entire new batch must be mixed and transported. While this occurs, the job must wait, which can be extremely costly. Further, batch mixing requires that the tank be emptied prior to changing the mix. It is difficult to anticipate the exact amount of mix that will be required for a given application. This generally leads to excess mix left in the tank at the end of a job, or at a change point. Proper disposal of this mix can be environmentally hazardous, costly, and dangerous.
  • Moreover, it is important to monitor the properties of a treatment fluid to ensure proper performance. Traditionally, a valve and bucket approach is used to take a sample of the treatment fluid out of the system for testing and analysis. Specifically, the onsite personnel would have to open a valve and obtain a sample of the treatment fluid in a bucket for analysis. However, the traditional methods of retrieving samples have several drawbacks. The treatment fluid often comprises hazardous, corrosive or flammable material thereby posing a danger to the equipment, environment and the personnel taking the sample. Moreover, exposure to elements can compromise the sample properties leading to inaccurate results when analyzing the sample.
    EP 0630728 ,which is considered the closest prior art, relates to a continuous multicomponent slurrying process for an oil or gas well. EP 0845291 relates to a homogenizer/high shear mixing process for on-the-fly hydrogenation of fracturing fluids and on-the-fly mixing of cement fluids.
  • FIGURES
  • Some specific example embodiments of the disclosure may be understood by referring, in part, to the following description and the accompanying drawings.
  • Figure 1 is a system for on-the-fly blending of treatment fluids with a sampling device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a system for on-the-fly blending of treatment fluids with a sampling device in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is an in-line sampling device in the closed position accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 4 is an in-line sampling device in the open position in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 5 is a perspective view of a sampling device with a safety enclosure in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted and described and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention is directed to blending fluids. Specifically, the present invention is directed to improved methods and systems of blending and analyzing well treatment fluids at a well site.
  • In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising: providing a first centrifugal pump for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe; providing a first valve for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; providing a second centrifugal pump for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; providing a second valve for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and providing a sampling device for analyzing the well treatment fluid.
  • In another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a system for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising: a first centrifugal pump for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe; a first valve for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; a second centrifugal pump for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; a second valve for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe; means for controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and a sampling device for monitoring the well treatment fluid.
  • The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of exemplary embodiments, which follows.
  • DESCRIPTION
  • The present invention is directed to blending fluids. Specifically, the present invention is directed to improved methods and systems of blending and analyzing well treatment fluids at a well site.
  • An improved method of blending the components of a well treatment fluid is disclosed in patent application Serial No. 11/673,290, filed February 9, 2007 .
  • Referring now to Figure 1, an exemplary embodiment of a system for preparing and analyzing acids on-the-fly at a desired rate is depicted generally with reference numeral 100. The system 100 blends various components of the well treatment fluid directly into a pipe 110. This reduces or eliminates the need for standard mixing tanks or tubs. This may be accomplished using at least two centrifugal pumps 120 (shown as 120a, 120b, and 120c). The centrifugal pumps 120 may each pump a different component of the desired well treatment fluid.
  • As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, more than two centrifugal pumps may be used to allow for more than two different components to be mixed together. For example, in one embodiment the system may include three centrifugal pumps for an acid treatment, where a first centrifugal pump may pump a hazardous chemical such as hydrochloric acid ("HCl"), a second centrifugal pump may pump water, and a third centrifugal pump may pump a highly corrosive chemical such as Ammonium Bi-Fluoride ("AF'). While HCl, water, and AF are disclosed, it should be understood that the chemicals may include any acid, hazardous chemical, corrosive, or other fluid. For instance, in another exemplary embodiment a non-aqueous fluid may be used as a primary flow stream. In one embodiment, the non-aqueous fluid may include diesel.
  • The system 100 may also include one or more valves 140 (shown as 140a, 140b, and 140c) for controlling the flow of the various components from the centrifugal pumps 120 into the pipe 110. The valves 140 may be butterfly valves, or any other valve suitable for use with well treatment fluids.
  • Between the centrifugal pumps 120 and the valves 140, the system 100 may include one or more pressure transducers 150 (shown as 150a, 150b, and 150c) that act as pressure controls on the centrifugal pumps 120, preventing the centrifugal pumps 120 from pushing one another off line. Feedback from pressure transducers 150 may signal pressure set points in centrifugal pumps 120, such that the centrifugal pumps 120 maintain a desirable balance.
  • Between the valves 140 and the pipe 110, the system 100 may additionally include one or more flow meters 160 (shown as 160a, 160b, and 160c) and one or more check valves 162 (shown as 162a, 162b, and 162c) to monitor and control flow rates from the pumps 140.
  • Additional liquid additives may also be introduced into the pipe 110. The additives may be stored in liquid additive storage tanks (not shown), and pumped into the pipe 110 via one or more liquid additive pumps 130. While the liquid additive pump 130 is shown as a hand pump, the liquid additive pump 130 may be any type of pump, including, but not limited to, a positive displacement pump. One or more liquid additive valves (not shown) may be included to control the flow of liquid additives from the liquid additive pumps 130 into the pipe 110.
  • The well treatment fluid may be blended directly in the pipe 110, without the use of any tank. The flow rate and pressure of any of the components may be controlled by controlling the pumps 120 and 130 and the valves 140. This allows for the ratio of the various components and additives of the well treatment fluid to be modified as necessary for the specific field conditions at any given time. This modification can take place in real-time, allowing the desired well treatment fluid mix to be pumped into the well as it is needed.
  • Additionally, the system 100 may have a number of additional valves (not shown), with locations suitable for controlling flow in various ways as would be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, these additional valves may be butterfly valves, some of which are open and some of which are closed. In one exemplary embodiment, the additional valves may be used to address the mixing orders of some specific fluids by allowing a user to inject liquid additives into the raw product flow streams prior to entering the pipe 110.
  • A discharge flow meter 190 may be included in the system 100. This may allow for adjustments to be made to the pumps 120 and valves 140, such that the correct mix ratio is maintained without creating undesirable negative pressure in the system 100. After the mix has passed through the discharge flow meter 190, it may pass through another pump (not shown), which then pumps the mix downhole.
  • The system 100 may also optionally include a discharge recirculation pump 194. The discharge recirculation pump 194 may serve two purposes. The first may be for recirculation. The second may be for discharge at very low flow rates. The recirculation pump 194 may be any type of pump for discharge recirculation (e.g., a 120 HP pump).
  • A sampling device 170 may be coupled to the system 100. In one embodiment, the sampling device 170 may be coupled to the system in parallel to the discharge recirculation pump 194. The sampling device may allow the operator to take samples of the fluid produced by the system 100 while protecting personnel from exposure to the material flowing through the pipe 110 which is often comprised of hazardous chemicals.
  • Figure 2 depicts another exemplary embodiment of the present invention where the sampling device 170 is coupled to the pipe 110 just before the fluid enters the discharge flow meter 190.
  • As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment (not shown) the sampling device 170 may be removably coupled to the system 100. It may be desirable to attach the sampling device 170 to the system 100 when a sample is to be taken and remove it when the sampling process has been completed. One or more valves (not shown) may be used to control the fluid flow through the sampling device 170. The valves may be closed when no sample is to be taken or when the sampling device 170 is not coupled to the system 100. Once the operator decides to take a sample the valves may be opened to allow fluid flow through the sampling device 170.
  • Shown in Figure 3 is an in-line sampling device in the closed position in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention denoted generally by reference numeral 300. The in-line sampling device 300 allows fluid samples to be taken directly from the pipe 110 into a sampling container 302. This ensures that a real-time sample is taken from the fluid stream and eliminates sample exposure while eradicating the health and safety risks to personnel who would otherwise be responsible for taking a sample. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, a number of different methods may be used to couple the sampling device 300 with the pipe 110. In one embodiment, the in-line sampling device 300 mounts onto the pipe 110 between two standard flanges 304.
  • A sampling container 302 may be coupled at one end of the sampling device 300 and a lever 306 at the other. When a sample is not being taken, a valve spindle 308 may be pressed by a spring 310 against a soft seal 312. Figure 4 depicts an in-line sampling device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention in the open position. When the lever 306 is turned, the valve spindle 308 may be lifted from the soft seal 312. The stroke of the lever 306 can be adjusted by a travel stop 314. The valve spindle 308 allows a smooth and controlled sample flow into the sampling container 302 through an inlet 316. As the sample fills the sampling container 302, any displaced air vents through a ventilation outlet 318. The ventilation outlet 318 may be coupled to a scrubber system when the samples taken include hazardous materials. The operation of scrubber systems is well know to those of ordinary skill in the art and will therefore not be discussed in detail herein.
  • Although the depicted sampling device 300 utilizes the lever 306, in another exemplary embodiment a multi-turn hand wheel may be used to lift the valve spindle 308. Although a multi-turn hand wheel allows accurate metering of the sample into a container, it is not fail-safe as the operator may mistakenly leave the sample valve open and overflow the sampling container 302. In contrast, in a lever 306 operated design the spring 310 is used to create a spring loaded handle which will automatically close the valve when the operator releases the lever 306 handle. Thus, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, a number of different mechanisms, including, but not limited to, a spring loaded lever, a multi-turn hand wheel, or any other device suitable for opening and/or closing a valve may be used to control the sampling process.
  • Different types of sampling containers 302 may be used in conjunction with the in-line sampling device 300. In one embodiment, the sampling container 302 comprises a glass bottle which is threaded into the bottom of the sample device 300. The bottle will then hold the sample as it is drawn from the pipe 110. In order to minimize sample exposure and the possibility of spills, the sampling container 302 may be enclosed in a glove box 500 as depicted in Figure 5. This allows the bottle to be capped inside the glove box thereby preventing the exposure of the sample taker to any fumes from the sample while minimizing sample exposure to outside elements. The glove box 500 may be any type of container suitable for containing spills and or fumes.
  • Computer software may be used to control the mix ratio. The computer software may include a pressure control system, a rate control system, and/or a concentration control system. The pressure control system may control pressure by controlling the pumps 120. The rate control system may control flow rate by controlling the valves 140. The concentration control system may control the concentration by controlling the pumps 120.
  • The pressure control system may include a drive signal to the centrifugal pumps 120 and feedback from pressure transducers 150. Each of the centrifugal pumps 120 may maintain a separate pressure set point. These pressure set points may be based on expected rate and resultant discharge pressure. The optimal pressure set point may place the valves 140 at a predetermined percentage open for each respective expected rate.
  • The rate control system may include a drive signal to each valve 140 and feedback from the respective flow meter 160. The valve 140 for a first (or master) component (e.g., water) may be set to 100% open and the rate may be set by the discharge rate, as measured by the discharge flow meter 190. The rate set points for the remaining valves 140 may be set by the concentration control system. Thus, as the requirements for concentrations change (even during a job), the operator has the ability to ramp up or down the concentration and/or liquid additives depending on the specific need. This may be a desirable alternative to the standard practice of mixing a new batch at the acid plant and transporting the mixture to the well site.
  • The concentration control system may include the rate control system and the rate feedback from the master (e.g., water) rate, which may be measured by the corresponding flow meter 160. Based on a predetermined well treatment fluid mix, the rate set points for the other components may be calculated from a concentration or parts per thousand of the master rate. As the master rate increases, the rate for the other components may also increase. The increasing rate of other components will slow the increasing master rate until the desired concentration is established.
  • The system 100 may optionally include additional components. For example, as shown in Figure 1, the system 100 may include a tank 192. Due to the nature of the types of chemicals used, the tank 192 may be situated on the discharge side of the system 100. The tank 192 may be used to prevent loss if something goes wrong and the job must be stopped. Additionally, the tank 192 may be useful in situations where the flow rates are very low. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, additional valves 196 may be used to control the flow of the fluid through the tank 192. For example, these additional valves may be butterfly valves, some of which are open and some of which are closed.
  • This system 100 may be used for acid blending for acidizing wells, otherwise known as "Acid-On-the-Fly," which involves blending two or more major hazardous chemical components into a pressurized piping system and injecting one or more liquid additives into that flow stream. This system 100 may alternatively be used for fracturing operations, in which case the treatment fluid would be a fracturing fluid. Additionally, this system 100 may be used for drilling operations, in which case the treatment fluid would be drilling mud. Therefore, although the present invention is described in the context of acids, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the system and methods of the present invention may also apply to non-acids or other material requiring high-shear preparation on a single pass such as on-location preparation of emulsion based fracturing fluids, completion fluids, cementing fluids such as spacers, and drilling fluids.
  • The ability to blend "On-the-Fly" may reduce the amount of blended chemicals requiring disposal upon completion of the process. It may also lower exposure of hazardous chemicals to personnel and the environment. Furthermore, it may decrease the number of personnel required for the process and decrease the amount of time hazardous chemicals would be in use. Additionally, by blending the chemicals as they are pumped downhole, there may be a significant reduction of waste that must be disposed of, and cost associated with that disposal process. Further, there may be a reduction in cost for transporting the mixed chemicals, since that would no longer be a requirement. Additionally, there may be a reduction of cost for buying and maintaining the highly regulated cargo tank motor vehicles. Additionally, there may be a reduction and/or elimination of the bulk chemical plants (otherwise known as acid plants) currently being used. By eliminating bulk acid plants, transports, and the physical handling of these types of chemicals, the risk of personal and environmental exposure may be significantly reduced.

Claims (15)

  1. A method for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising:
    providing a first centrifugal pump (12) for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe (110);
    providing a first valve (140) for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    providing a second centrifugal pump (120) for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    providing a second valve (140) for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and characterised by
    providing a sampling device (300) for analyzing the well treatment fluid.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sampling device comprises:
    a valve (308); and
    a sampling container (302) coupled to the valve.
  3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
    opening a valve (308) in the sampling device to direct the well treatment fluid to a sampling container (302); and
    closing the valve once a sample is collected in the sampling container.
  4. The method of claim 3, wherein opening and closing the valve is carried out by a spring loaded lever (306).
  5. The method of claim 2, wherein the sampling container is placed in a glove box (500).
  6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
    providing at least one liquid additive storage tank;
    providing at least one liquid additive pump (130); and
    providing at least one liquid additive valve for controlling the flow of liquid additive into the pipe;
    wherein controlling the liquid additive pump and the liquid additive valve controls the ratio of the liquid additive to the other components of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe.
  7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: pumping the well treatment fluid from the pipe into the well.
  8. The method of claim 1, wherein the well treatment fluid is a fracturing fluid.
  9. The method of claim 1, wherein the well treatment fluid is a drilling mud.
  10. A system (100) for blending a well treatment fluid at a well site, comprising:
    a first centrifugal pump (120) for pumping a first component of the well treatment fluid into a pipe (110);
    a first valve (140) for controlling the flow of the first component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    a second centrifugal pump (120) for pumping a second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    a second valve (140) for controlling the flow of the second component of the well treatment fluid into the pipe;
    means for controlling the pumps and the valves so as to control the ratio of the first component of the well treatment fluid to the second component of the well treatment fluid being delivered to the pipe; and characterised by
    a sampling device for monitoring the well treatment fluid.
  11. The system of claim 10, wherein the sampling device comprises:
    a sampling container (302);
    a valve (308) for controlling a flow of the well treatment fluid from the pipe to the sampling container; and
    a mechanism for opening and closing the valve.
  12. The system of claim 11, wherein the mechanism for opening and closing the valve comprises a spring loaded lever (306).
  13. The system of claim 11, wherein the sampling container comprises:
    an inlet (316) for the flow of the well treatment fluid into the sampling container; and
    an outlet (318) for the flow of air from the sampling container.
  14. The system of claim 13, wherein the outlet is coupled to a scrubber system.
  15. The system of claim 11, wherein the sampling container is enclosed.
EP09717529A 2008-03-07 2009-03-04 On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment Not-in-force EP2276905B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/044,228 US20090223664A1 (en) 2008-03-07 2008-03-07 On-the-Fly Acid Blender with Sampling Equipment
PCT/GB2009/000606 WO2009109758A2 (en) 2008-03-07 2009-03-04 On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2276905A2 EP2276905A2 (en) 2011-01-26
EP2276905B1 true EP2276905B1 (en) 2012-04-25

Family

ID=41052406

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09717529A Not-in-force EP2276905B1 (en) 2008-03-07 2009-03-04 On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20090223664A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2276905B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE555272T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2009220989B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0909355A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2717490C (en)
DK (1) DK2276905T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2010009808A (en)
WO (1) WO2009109758A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10088393B2 (en) * 2014-05-16 2018-10-02 Russ Dehaven Water sampling device
US10094186B2 (en) 2014-11-17 2018-10-09 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc Controlled pressure drilling system with flow measurement and well control

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2039816A (en) * 1934-03-16 1936-05-05 James A Lupfer Well drilling apparatus
US3326536A (en) * 1962-05-09 1967-06-20 Dow Chemical Co Mixing apparatus
US3902558A (en) * 1973-12-20 1975-09-02 Mobil Oil Corp Method of recovering oil using a chemical blending system
US4454773A (en) * 1981-11-06 1984-06-19 Texaco Inc. Time interval automatic well multi-phase fluid sampler
CA2114294A1 (en) * 1993-01-05 1995-07-27 Thomas Earle Allen Apparatus and method for continuously mixing fluids
US5522459A (en) * 1993-06-03 1996-06-04 Halliburton Company Continuous multi-component slurrying process at oil or gas well
CA2220972C (en) * 1996-11-29 1999-03-09 Canadian Fracmaster Ltd. Homogenizer/high shear mixing technology for on-the-fly hydration of fracturing fluids and on-the-fly mixing of cement slurries
US7090017B2 (en) * 2003-07-09 2006-08-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Low cost method and apparatus for fracturing a subterranean formation with a sand suspension

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009109758A2 (en) 2009-09-11
US20090223664A1 (en) 2009-09-10
AU2009220989A1 (en) 2009-09-11
CA2717490C (en) 2013-04-30
AU2009220989B2 (en) 2013-07-11
DK2276905T3 (en) 2012-07-23
MX2010009808A (en) 2010-09-30
CA2717490A1 (en) 2009-09-11
EP2276905A2 (en) 2011-01-26
WO2009109758A3 (en) 2009-11-19
BRPI0909355A2 (en) 2015-09-29
ATE555272T1 (en) 2012-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090154288A1 (en) On-the-Fly Acid Blender with High-Rate, Single Pass, Emulsification Equipment
CA2123756C (en) Continuous multi-component slurrying process at oil or gas well
RU2618877C2 (en) Homogenized oilfield gel production system and method
US9770712B2 (en) In-situ catalyst sulfiding, passivating and coking systems and methods
US9353585B2 (en) On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment
US20080190618A1 (en) Method of Blending Hazardous Chemicals to a Well Bore
EP2275195A2 (en) Method for treating ballast water with aqueous acrolein solution
EP2276905B1 (en) On-the-fly acid blender with sampling equipment
NO20140633A1 (en) Mixing Methods and Systems for Fluids
CN108593522B (en) Automatic online labeling water purification filter element test line and labeling method
CN205217598U (en) Normal position injection system
US11002644B2 (en) Hybrid product sampling system employing suction and discharge lines
US20140128297A1 (en) System and Method for Injecting Peracetic Acid
WO2015009450A1 (en) Apparatus for evaluating carbonate solubility
EP3326716A1 (en) In-situ catalyst sulfiding, passivating and coking methods and systems
FI107645B (en) An automatic sampling and processing system
EP3870545B1 (en) System for friction reduction using nano-bubbles or microbubbles
US11255711B1 (en) Real time additive processing system for crude oil, fuels, or refined products and method
US20130094323A1 (en) Mixer for pulp-and fiber-containing beverages
Jackson Hydrated lime handling systems for thermal enhanced oil recovery: Toolkit
WO2013070728A1 (en) System and method for injecting peracetic acid
Fink Plug Removal Inspection and Measurement Equipment (PRIME) Performance Criteria for Simulated Pipeline Plugs for WTP Process Piping: A Focused Survey of Literature and Knowledgeable Personnel
Chang et al. Wellsite Mixing Minimizes the Environmental Impact and Reduces Costs During Pumping Operation
Hodge et al. Improved Process Used to Treat Aqueous Mixed Waste Results in Cost Savings and Improved Worker Safety
Abraham Cold Test Loop Integrated Test Loop Results

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20101006

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 555272

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009006577

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120621

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20120425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 555272

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120425

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120825

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120827

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120726

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009006577

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120725

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20131129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602009006577

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131001

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130304

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130304

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090304

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20160315

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20160224

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20160223

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160224

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20170331

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: MMEP

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170304

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170304

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170304

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331