EP2244492B1 - Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device - Google Patents

Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2244492B1
EP2244492B1 EP10172487.0A EP10172487A EP2244492B1 EP 2244492 B1 EP2244492 B1 EP 2244492B1 EP 10172487 A EP10172487 A EP 10172487A EP 2244492 B1 EP2244492 B1 EP 2244492B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hearing device
tubing
loudspeaker
electrical impedance
output transducer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10172487.0A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2244492A3 (en
EP2244492A2 (en
Inventor
Samuel Harsch
Evert Dijkstra
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sonova Holding AG
Original Assignee
Phonak AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Phonak AG filed Critical Phonak AG
Priority to EP10172487.0A priority Critical patent/EP2244492B1/en
Priority to DK10172487.0T priority patent/DK2244492T3/en
Publication of EP2244492A2 publication Critical patent/EP2244492A2/en
Publication of EP2244492A3 publication Critical patent/EP2244492A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2244492B1 publication Critical patent/EP2244492B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/30Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/30Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • H04R25/305Self-monitoring or self-testing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device and also to such an adjustable behind-the-ear hearing device.
  • Ear-worn hearing devices such as hearing aids (which have an integrated microphone system) or wireless systems (which comprise a remote audio signal source, such as a remote microphone, and an ear-piece receiver) usually comprise an electro-acoustic output transducer (loudspeaker) which is located in or at least close to the ear canal.
  • ITE in-the-ear
  • CIC completely in-the-canal
  • BTE behind-the-ear
  • a frequent problem of such ear-worn hearing devices is that the performance of the loudspeaker may be significantly deteriorated due to blocking with ear wax (cerumen) from the ear canal.
  • the loudspeaker performance is deteriorated by wax blocking, the user may not immediately notice this. This may be particularly true for systems used by children, since they usually have much more difficulty in noticing and communicating problems regarding the hearing device.
  • EP 1 276 349 B1 relates to a hearing aid with a self-test capability, wherein the hearing-aid automatically undergoes a self-test procedure for determining whether the hearing aid comprises a defect.
  • the hearing aid is capable to indicate the presence and the type of defect to the user, for example, on the display of a programming device connected to the hearing aid for service purposes.
  • the self-test procedure it is checked whether each of the hearing aid microphones produces a signal. From the absence of such signal it is concluded that the input port to the respective microphone has been occluded by ear wax.
  • US 2004/0202333 A1 relates to a hearing device, wherein for testing of the loudspeaker a test sound is reproduced by the loudspeaker, the energy level of which test sound is measured by the hearing aid microphone and is compared to a predetermined threshold level in order to determine whether the loudspeaker and the microphone, respectively, work properly.
  • WO 00/01196 A1 relates to a BTE hearing aid comprising a sound tube forming a Helmholtz resonator. It is mentioned that the resonance frequency of the sound tube can be adjusted by changes in the length and/or inner diameter of the sound tube, with the inner diameter of the sound tube having only a relatively small effect on the resonance frequency but a large effect on the level of the generated sound, that an acoustic damper having a specified acoustic impedance can be inserted into the sound tube and that, where electroacoustic resonance and acoustic tuning are efficient and effective ways of generating and altering sound, powder consumption can be minimized and device simplicity can be maximized.
  • It is an object of the invention to provide for a method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device comprising an electroacoustic output transducer connected to a tubing extending into a user's ear canal.
  • a hearing device should be provided.
  • the invention is beneficial in that, by measuring and analyzing the electrical impedance of the output transducer, the length and/or diameter of the tubing of a BTE hearing device can be estimated in a simple manner, and the thus estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing can be used to optimize the operation parameters of the hearing device according the estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing in order to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a first example of a hearing device for which the invention can be used, wherein the hearing device is a hearing aid 10 which comprises a microphone arrangement 12 (which may consist of two spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability), a central processing unit 14 for processing the audio signals produced by the microphone arrangement 12, a power amplifier 16 for amplifying the processed audio signals from the central processing unit 14, and a loudspeaker 18 for stimulating the user's hearing with the processed amplified audio signals from the microphone arrangement 12.
  • a hearing aid 10 which comprises a microphone arrangement 12 (which may consist of two spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability), a central processing unit 14 for processing the audio signals produced by the microphone arrangement 12, a power amplifier 16 for amplifying the processed audio signals from the central processing unit 14, and a loudspeaker 18 for stimulating the user's hearing with the processed amplified audio signals from the microphone arrangement 12.
  • the loudspeaker 18 cooperates with an acoustical system 20 located downstream of the loudspeaker 18, which comprises, for example, a wax filter 22, acoustical filters 24 and some kind of tubing 26.
  • acoustical system 20 located downstream of the loudspeaker 18, which comprises, for example, a wax filter 22, acoustical filters 24 and some kind of tubing 26.
  • tubing 26 has a significant length since the hearing aid 10 is of the BTE type, in which case the loudspeaker, together with the hearing aid 10, is be located behind the ear, while the tubing 26 extends into the ear canal.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a hearing device which does not form part of the invention, wherein the hearing device is a wireless ear-piece 110 which represents the receiver unit of a wireless audio system and which receives audio signals from a remote transmission unit 143 via a wireless audio link 145.
  • the hearing device is a wireless ear-piece 110 which represents the receiver unit of a wireless audio system and which receives audio signals from a remote transmission unit 143 via a wireless audio link 145.
  • the transmission unit comprises a microphone arrangement 144 (which may consist of two or more spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability), an audio signal processing unit 146 for processing the audio signals from the microphone arrangement 144, a transmitter 148 and an antenna 150.
  • the audio link 145 will be an FM link.
  • the receiver unit 110 comprises an antenna 152, a receiver 154 for recovering the audio signals from the signal received at the antenna 152, a central processing unit 114 for processing the received audio signals, a power amplifier 116 for amplifying the processed audio signals, and a loudspeaker 118.
  • a microphone arrangement 144 which may consist of two or more spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability
  • an audio signal processing unit 146 for processing the audio signals from the microphone arrangement 144
  • a transmitter 148 for a transmitter 148 and an antenna 150.
  • the audio link 145 will be an FM link.
  • the receiver unit 110 comprises an antenna 152, a receiver 154 for
  • the loudspeaker 118 cooperates with an acoustical system located downstream of the loudspeaker 118, for example, a wax filter 22. As in the case of Fig. 1 , the loudspeaker 118 will be located in or at the ear canal.
  • the loudspeaker 118 may be integrated into the receiver unit 110, as shown in Fig. 2 , or it may be mechanically and electrically connected thereto.
  • an analyzer unit 30 is provided which may be activated by the central processing unit 14, 114 and which serves to measure the electrical impedance as a function of frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and to provide the corresponding measurement result to the central processing unit 14, 114 in order to enable the central processing 14, 114 to produce a status signal representative of the status of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and/or the acoustical system 20, 120 cooperating with the loudspeaker 18, 118.
  • the measured electrical impedance as a function of frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 provided by the analyzer unit 30 is evaluated in the central processing unit 14, 114 in order to generate the respective status signal.
  • an acoustic alarm signal may be produced by the central processing unit 14, 114 with the help of the loudspeaker 18, 118 in order to provide the user with an acoustic alarm.
  • acoustic alarm may comprise an alarm tone and/or a voice message.
  • the status signal may be transmitted from the central processing unit 14, 114 to a remote device 32 via a wireless link 34 which possibly is an inductive link utilizing an inductive antenna 38 included in the remote device 32 and an inductive antenna 36 connected to the central processing unit 14, 114.
  • the remote device 32 further includes a signal processing unit 40 for processing the signals received by the antenna 38 and a display 40 for displaying the alarm signal received via the inductive link 34, which in this embodiment will be an optical alarm signal rather than an acoustic alarm signal.
  • the remote device 32 could be used by the user of the hearing device 10, 110, or, in particular in the case of Fig. 2 , it could be used by the person using the transmission unit 143, for example, the teacher in a classroom of pupils using the receiver unit 110. In this case, the remote device 32 could be functionally integrated within the transmission unit 143.
  • the inductive link 34 may be bidirectional link. In this case, transmission of the status signal from the hearing device 10, 110 may be initiated by receipt of a polling command at the hearing device 10, 110 transmitted from the remote device 32. Thereby, for example, the teacher in the classroom may check whether the loudspeaker 118 used by each pupil works properly.
  • the bidirectional link 34 may serve to monitor also other components of the system, such as battery status, status of the audio link 145, etc.
  • measurement of the electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and the subsequent analysis of the measured electrical impedance will be repeated in regular intervals.
  • the measured electrical impedance as a function of frequency will be analyzed by comparing the measured electrical impedance to reference data stored in the hearing device 10, 110.
  • reference data may be generated in the manufacturing process of the hearing device 10, 110.
  • the resonance frequency and/or the quality factor of the loudspeaker 18, 118 are analyzed by measuring the electrical impedance as a function of frequency.
  • the status signal will be provided as an alarm signal if the difference between the actually measured electrical impedance data and the stored reference data exceeds a predetermined threshold, wherein the magnitude of the difference between the measured data and the stored reference data may be taken as a measure of the degree of disturbance of the loudspeaker 18, 118, for example of the degree of the mechanical obstruction of the loudspeaker 18, 118 by ear wax.
  • the evaluation of the status of loudspeaker 18, 118 and/or the acoustical system 20, 120 cooperating with the loudspeaker 18, 118 may include an evaluation of whether the loudspeaker 18, 118 is working according to specification.
  • such evaluation will include a check of whether the loudspeaker is still working properly or whether it is out of order.
  • a BTE hearing aid includes a tubing 26 extending from the loudspeaker 18 into the user's ear canal.
  • the length and/or the diameter of such tubing 26 can be selected individually by the fitter. If the length/diameter of the tubing 26 is known, the acoustical performance of the BTE hearing aid can be optimized. Due to the acoustical coupling of the tubing 26 to the loudspeaker 18 it is possible to estimate from the measured electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18 the length/diameter of the tubing 26 used for each BTE hearing aid 10.
  • the central processing unit 14 of the hearing aid 10 may provide for a signal representative of the estimated length/diameter of the tubing 26, which signal is supplied to the fitting computer.
  • FIG. 3 An example of how the measurement of the electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18, 118 can be done by the analyzer unit 30 as given in Fig. 3 .
  • the voltage on a serial resistor 60 located between the ground and the loudspeaker 18 is measured by voltmeter 62.
  • the voltage curve i.e. the voltage as a function of frequency
  • the electric impedance - and hence the voltage measured by the voltmeter 62 - will be different depending on whether the loudspeaker is open or blocked. Even if the loudspeaker 18 is only partly blocked (resulting in a relatively small acoustic attenuation), a change in voltage will be observed.
  • Fig. 5 shows the voltage measured at the resistor 60 as a function of frequency for different levels of obstruction, namely for totally closed filter (close acoustic output, labeled “close”), different intermediate levels of obstruction (partly closed acoustic output, labeled "Half 1" to "Half 4", measurement without filter (open acoustic output, labeled "Nofilter”) and measurement with filter (open acoustic output, labeled "Wsfilter”).
  • the loudspeaker 18 was fluid damped.
  • Fig. 5 different voltage levels are obtained for different obstruction levels of the loudspeaker 18, 118.
  • the voltage difference is obviously the largest at the resonance frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 (in the present case about 3,200 Hz).
  • the quality factor decreases due to the parasitic acoustical resistance.
  • the air volume between the loudspeaker 18 and the "stopper" creates a compliance (acoustic capacitor) in parallel with the standard compliance of the loudspeaker diaphragm. If the acoustic resistor is replaced by a compliance, the quality factor increases, but the resonance frequency also increase to about 4,000 Hz.
  • Fig. 6 shows the acoustic output level of the loudspeaker 18 measured in a 1.4 cc coupler as a function of frequency for the various obstruction levels of Fig. 5 .
  • the resonance frequency of the loudspeaker in free space is stored in the hearing device 10, 110 during the manufacturing process. Later, when the hearing device 10, 110 is operated, the analyzer unit 30 generates the stored resonance frequency and measures the voltage on the resistor 60 at this frequency. If the measurement shows too much of a difference, an alarm signal is created, as already explained above, for example, telling the user that the loudspeaker is blocked and should be cleaned.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
  • Selective Calling Equipment (AREA)
  • Headphones And Earphones (AREA)
  • Stereophonic System (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device (10) comprising an electroacoustic output transducer (18) connected to a tubing (26) extending into a user's ear canal, said method comprising: measuring the electrical impedance of the output transducer (18, 118); analyzing the measured electrical impedance of the output transducer (18, 118) in order to determine the length and/or diameter of the tubing (26); and adjusting the operation parameters of the hearing device according the determined length and/or diameter of the tubing (26) in order to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device..

Description

  • The invention relates to a method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device and also to such an adjustable behind-the-ear hearing device.
  • Ear-worn hearing devices, such as hearing aids (which have an integrated microphone system) or wireless systems (which comprise a remote audio signal source, such as a remote microphone, and an ear-piece receiver) usually comprise an electro-acoustic output transducer (loudspeaker) which is located in or at least close to the ear canal. This applies particularly to in-the-ear (ITE) or completely in-the-canal (CIC) systems. However, also behind-the-ear (BTE) systems have a tubing extending from the loudspeaker (which in this case is located behind the ear) into the ear canal. A frequent problem of such ear-worn hearing devices is that the performance of the loudspeaker may be significantly deteriorated due to blocking with ear wax (cerumen) from the ear canal.
  • It is known to use special wax filters in order to protect the loudspeaker for preventing the loudspeaker from getting blocked by wax. However, none of these wax filters is capable of providing for a full protection from wax blocking.
  • If the loudspeaker performance is deteriorated by wax blocking, the user may not immediately notice this. This may be particularly true for systems used by children, since they usually have much more difficulty in noticing and communicating problems regarding the hearing device.
  • EP 1 276 349 B1 relates to a hearing aid with a self-test capability, wherein the hearing-aid automatically undergoes a self-test procedure for determining whether the hearing aid comprises a defect. The hearing aid is capable to indicate the presence and the type of defect to the user, for example, on the display of a programming device connected to the hearing aid for service purposes. During the self-test procedure it is checked whether each of the hearing aid microphones produces a signal. From the absence of such signal it is concluded that the input port to the respective microphone has been occluded by ear wax.
  • US 2004/0202333 A1 relates to a hearing device, wherein for testing of the loudspeaker a test sound is reproduced by the loudspeaker, the energy level of which test sound is measured by the hearing aid microphone and is compared to a predetermined threshold level in order to determine whether the loudspeaker and the microphone, respectively, work properly.
  • WO 00/01196 A1 relates to a BTE hearing aid comprising a sound tube forming a Helmholtz resonator. It is mentioned that the resonance frequency of the sound tube can be adjusted by changes in the length and/or inner diameter of the sound tube, with the inner diameter of the sound tube having only a relatively small effect on the resonance frequency but a large effect on the level of the generated sound, that an acoustic damper having a specified acoustic impedance can be inserted into the sound tube and that, where electroacoustic resonance and acoustic tuning are efficient and effective ways of generating and altering sound, powder consumption can be minimized and device simplicity can be maximized.
  • It is an object of the invention to provide for a method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device comprising an electroacoustic output transducer connected to a tubing extending into a user's ear canal. In addition such a hearing device should be provided.
  • These objects are achieved by a method as defined in claim 1 and a hearing device as claimed in claim 4, respectively. The invention is beneficial in that, by measuring and analyzing the electrical impedance of the output transducer, the length and/or diameter of the tubing of a BTE hearing device can be estimated in a simple manner, and the thus estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing can be used to optimize the operation parameters of the hearing device according the estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing in order to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device.
  • Preferred embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.
  • In the following, examples of the invention will be illustrated by reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
  • Fig. 1
    is a block diagram of an embodiment of a hearing device according to the invention;
    Fig. 2
    is a block diagram of a hearing device not forming part of the invention;
    Fig. 3
    is an example of how the electrical impedance of the output transducer of a hearing device according to the invention may be measured;
    Fig. 4
    shows schematically the set-up for the test measurements of Figs. 5 and 6;
    Fig. 5
    is a plot of the voltage measured at the resistor of Fig. 4 as a function of frequency obtained in test measurements with the set-up of Fig. 4 for different obstruction levels of the loudspeaker; and
    Fig. 6
    is a plot of the acoustic output level curve of the loudspeaker measured with the set-up of Fig. 4 in a 1.4 cc coupler for different loudspeaker obstruction levels.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a first example of a hearing device for which the invention can be used, wherein the hearing device is a hearing aid 10 which comprises a microphone arrangement 12 (which may consist of two spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability), a central processing unit 14 for processing the audio signals produced by the microphone arrangement 12, a power amplifier 16 for amplifying the processed audio signals from the central processing unit 14, and a loudspeaker 18 for stimulating the user's hearing with the processed amplified audio signals from the microphone arrangement 12.
  • The loudspeaker 18 cooperates with an acoustical system 20 located downstream of the loudspeaker 18, which comprises, for example, a wax filter 22, acoustical filters 24 and some kind of tubing 26. Such tubing 26 has a significant length since the hearing aid 10 is of the BTE type, in which case the loudspeaker, together with the hearing aid 10, is be located behind the ear, while the tubing 26 extends into the ear canal.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a hearing device which does not form part of the invention, wherein the hearing device is a wireless ear-piece 110 which represents the receiver unit of a wireless audio system and which receives audio signals from a remote transmission unit 143 via a wireless audio link 145.
  • The transmission unit comprises a microphone arrangement 144 (which may consist of two or more spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming capability), an audio signal processing unit 146 for processing the audio signals from the microphone arrangement 144, a transmitter 148 and an antenna 150. Usually the audio link 145 will be an FM link. The receiver unit 110 comprises an antenna 152, a receiver 154 for recovering the audio signals from the signal received at the antenna 152, a central processing unit 114 for processing the received audio signals, a power amplifier 116 for amplifying the processed audio signals, and a loudspeaker 118. As in the example of Fig. 1, the loudspeaker 118 cooperates with an acoustical system located downstream of the loudspeaker 118, for example, a wax filter 22. As in the case of Fig. 1, the loudspeaker 118 will be located in or at the ear canal. The loudspeaker 118 may be integrated into the receiver unit 110, as shown in Fig. 2, or it may be mechanically and electrically connected thereto.
  • Both in the embodiment of Fig. 1 and the system of Fig. 2 an analyzer unit 30 is provided which may be activated by the central processing unit 14, 114 and which serves to measure the electrical impedance as a function of frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and to provide the corresponding measurement result to the central processing unit 14, 114 in order to enable the central processing 14, 114 to produce a status signal representative of the status of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and/or the acoustical system 20, 120 cooperating with the loudspeaker 18, 118. The measured electrical impedance as a function of frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 provided by the analyzer unit 30 is evaluated in the central processing unit 14, 114 in order to generate the respective status signal.
  • According to one example, an acoustic alarm signal may be produced by the central processing unit 14, 114 with the help of the loudspeaker 18, 118 in order to provide the user with an acoustic alarm. Such acoustic alarm may comprise an alarm tone and/or a voice message.
  • According to an alternative example, the status signal may be transmitted from the central processing unit 14, 114 to a remote device 32 via a wireless link 34 which possibly is an inductive link utilizing an inductive antenna 38 included in the remote device 32 and an inductive antenna 36 connected to the central processing unit 14, 114. The remote device 32 further includes a signal processing unit 40 for processing the signals received by the antenna 38 and a display 40 for displaying the alarm signal received via the inductive link 34, which in this embodiment will be an optical alarm signal rather than an acoustic alarm signal.
  • The remote device 32 could be used by the user of the hearing device 10, 110, or, in particular in the case of Fig. 2, it could be used by the person using the transmission unit 143, for example, the teacher in a classroom of pupils using the receiver unit 110. In this case, the remote device 32 could be functionally integrated within the transmission unit 143.
  • The inductive link 34 may be bidirectional link. In this case, transmission of the status signal from the hearing device 10, 110 may be initiated by receipt of a polling command at the hearing device 10, 110 transmitted from the remote device 32. Thereby, for example, the teacher in the classroom may check whether the loudspeaker 118 used by each pupil works properly. In addition, the bidirectional link 34 may serve to monitor also other components of the system, such as battery status, status of the audio link 145, etc.
  • According to an alternative example, rather than being initiated by receipt of a polling signal, measurement of the electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18, 118 and the subsequent analysis of the measured electrical impedance will be repeated in regular intervals.
  • Preferably, the measured electrical impedance as a function of frequency will be analyzed by comparing the measured electrical impedance to reference data stored in the hearing device 10, 110. Such reference data may be generated in the manufacturing process of the hearing device 10, 110. Preferably the resonance frequency and/or the quality factor of the loudspeaker 18, 118 are analyzed by measuring the electrical impedance as a function of frequency. Preferably the status signal will be provided as an alarm signal if the difference between the actually measured electrical impedance data and the stored reference data exceeds a predetermined threshold, wherein the magnitude of the difference between the measured data and the stored reference data may be taken as a measure of the degree of disturbance of the loudspeaker 18, 118, for example of the degree of the mechanical obstruction of the loudspeaker 18, 118 by ear wax.
  • The evaluation of the status of loudspeaker 18, 118 and/or the acoustical system 20, 120 cooperating with the loudspeaker 18, 118 may include an evaluation of whether the loudspeaker 18, 118 is working according to specification.
  • Preferably such evaluation will include a check of whether the loudspeaker is still working properly or whether it is out of order.
  • A BTE hearing aid includes a tubing 26 extending from the loudspeaker 18 into the user's ear canal. The length and/or the diameter of such tubing 26 can be selected individually by the fitter. If the length/diameter of the tubing 26 is known, the acoustical performance of the BTE hearing aid can be optimized. Due to the acoustical coupling of the tubing 26 to the loudspeaker 18 it is possible to estimate from the measured electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18 the length/diameter of the tubing 26 used for each BTE hearing aid 10. With this knowledge, it is possible to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device automatically by optimizing the setting the operation parameters of the hearing aid according to the estimated length/diameter of the tubing 26, eliminating therefore the need for the fitter to enter the length/diameter data into the computer (not shown) for a fine tuning procedure, thus saving time and avoiding possible errors. To this end, the central processing unit 14 of the hearing aid 10 may provide for a signal representative of the estimated length/diameter of the tubing 26, which signal is supplied to the fitting computer.
  • In addition to estimating the length/diameter of the tubing 26 from the measured electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18 it is also possible to evaluate whether the end of the tubing 26 suffers from a mechanical obstruction, for example by ear wax.
  • An example of how the measurement of the electrical impedance of the loudspeaker 18, 118 can be done by the analyzer unit 30 as given in Fig. 3. According to Fig. 3, the voltage on a serial resistor 60 located between the ground and the loudspeaker 18 is measured by voltmeter 62. For such an arrangement the voltage curve (i.e. the voltage as a function of frequency) on the resistor 60 becomes the image of the impedance curve of the loudspeaker 18. The electric impedance - and hence the voltage measured by the voltmeter 62 - will be different depending on whether the loudspeaker is open or blocked. Even if the loudspeaker 18 is only partly blocked (resulting in a relatively small acoustic attenuation), a change in voltage will be observed.
  • Test measurements have been performed with the set-up of Fig. 4, wherein the resistor 60 had a resistance of 22 Ohms, the loudspeaker 18 had a resistance of 260 Ohms and the acoustic output level measurements were performed in a 1.4 cc coupler with perfect sealing.
  • Fig. 5 shows the voltage measured at the resistor 60 as a function of frequency for different levels of obstruction, namely for totally closed filter (close acoustic output, labeled "close"), different intermediate levels of obstruction (partly closed acoustic output, labeled "Half 1" to "Half 4", measurement without filter (open acoustic output, labeled "Nofilter") and measurement with filter (open acoustic output, labeled "Wsfilter"). The loudspeaker 18 was fluid damped.
  • According to Fig. 5, different voltage levels are obtained for different obstruction levels of the loudspeaker 18, 118. The voltage difference is obviously the largest at the resonance frequency of the loudspeaker 18, 118 (in the present case about 3,200 Hz). In the case of small obstruction the quality factor decreases due to the parasitic acoustical resistance. For a totally blocked filter, the air volume between the loudspeaker 18 and the "stopper" creates a compliance (acoustic capacitor) in parallel with the standard compliance of the loudspeaker diaphragm. If the acoustic resistor is replaced by a compliance, the quality factor increases, but the resonance frequency also increase to about 4,000 Hz.
  • Fig. 6 shows the acoustic output level of the loudspeaker 18 measured in a 1.4 cc coupler as a function of frequency for the various obstruction levels of Fig. 5.
  • According to one example, the resonance frequency of the loudspeaker in free space is stored in the hearing device 10, 110 during the manufacturing process. Later, when the hearing device 10, 110 is operated, the analyzer unit 30 generates the stored resonance frequency and measures the voltage on the resistor 60 at this frequency. If the measurement shows too much of a difference, an alarm signal is created, as already explained above, for example, telling the user that the loudspeaker is blocked and should be cleaned.

Claims (4)

  1. A method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device (10) comprising an electroacoustic output transducer (18) connected to a tubing (26) extending into a user's ear canal and an analyzer unit (30) for measuring the electrical impedance of the output transducer (18, 118) as a function of frequency, said method comprising:
    (a) measuring the electrical impedance of the output transducer (18, 118) connected to the tubing (26);
    (b) analyzing the measured electrical impedance of the output transducer (18, 118) in order to estimate the length and/or diameter of the tubing (26); and
    (c) adjusting the operation parameters of the hearing device according the estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing (26) in order to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (b) the measured electrical impedance is analyzed by comparing the measured electrical impedance to reference data stored in the hearing device (10) and wherein in step (b) the resonance frequency and/or the quality factor of the output transducer (18) are analyzed.
  3. The method of one of claims 1 and 2, wherein a signal representative of the length and/or diameter of the tubing (26) is provided by the hearing device, which is used by an external fitting device communicating with the hearing device for adjusting the operation parameters of the hearing device.
  4. A behind-the-ear hearing device, comprising: an electroacoustic output transducer (18) connected to a tubing (26) adapted for extending into a user's ear canal, means (60, 62) for measuring the electrical impedance of the output transducer (18) connected to the tubing (26), means (14) for analyzing the measured electrical impedance of the output transducer (18) in order to estimate the length and/or diameter of the tubing (26); and means (14) for providing a signal representative of the estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing (26) for adjusting the operation parameters of the hearing device according to the estimated length and/or diameter of the tubing (26) in order to optimize the acoustical performance of the hearing device.
EP10172487.0A 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device Active EP2244492B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10172487.0A EP2244492B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device
DK10172487.0T DK2244492T3 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for adjusting a rear-ear hearing aid

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2006/005625 WO2007144010A1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for monitoring a hearing device and hearing device with self-monitoring function
EP06762017A EP2039216B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for monitoring a hearing device and hearing device with self-monitoring function
EP10172487.0A EP2244492B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06762017.9 Division 2006-06-12

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2244492A2 EP2244492A2 (en) 2010-10-27
EP2244492A3 EP2244492A3 (en) 2010-12-08
EP2244492B1 true EP2244492B1 (en) 2013-08-14

Family

ID=37607218

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10172487.0A Active EP2244492B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device
EP06762017A Active EP2039216B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for monitoring a hearing device and hearing device with self-monitoring function

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06762017A Active EP2039216B1 (en) 2006-06-12 2006-06-12 Method for monitoring a hearing device and hearing device with self-monitoring function

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (2) EP2244492B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE480109T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602006016655D1 (en)
DK (2) DK2039216T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2007144010A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2150076B1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2015-06-24 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Device for preventing loss of hearing aids
DK2280560T3 (en) * 2009-07-03 2015-12-14 Bernafon Ag Hearing aid system comprising a receiver in the ear and a system for identifying the receiver type
AU2009354393A1 (en) * 2009-10-19 2012-04-12 Widex A/S Hearing aid system with lost partner functionality
US9124991B2 (en) * 2011-10-26 2015-09-01 Cochlear Limited Sound awareness hearing prosthesis
EP2605546A1 (en) * 2011-12-13 2013-06-19 Oticon A/S Configurable FM receiver for hearing device
DK2744225T3 (en) * 2012-12-17 2015-11-09 Bernafon Ag Hearing device and method for identifying an output transducer for a hearing aid
JP6322339B2 (en) * 2014-10-15 2018-05-09 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Hearing aid system operating method and hearing aid system
JP6343397B2 (en) * 2014-10-15 2018-06-13 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Hearing aid system operating method and hearing aid system
JP6499289B2 (en) 2014-12-17 2019-04-10 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Hearing aid system operating method and hearing aid system
JP6323927B2 (en) 2014-12-17 2018-05-16 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Hearing aid and method of operating a hearing aid system
WO2016096011A1 (en) 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Widex A/S System and method for managing replacement parts for a hearing aid
DK3062532T3 (en) 2015-02-27 2018-10-22 Bernafon Ag PROCEDURE FOR ADAPTING A HEARING DEVICE TO A USER'S EAR AND A HEARING DEVICE
WO2018129242A1 (en) * 2017-01-05 2018-07-12 Knowles Electronics, Llc Load change diagnostics for acoustic devices and methods
CN111247813B (en) 2017-08-31 2022-03-22 索诺亚公司 Hearing device and method of testing a hearing device
CN113196802B (en) 2018-10-22 2023-04-04 美商楼氏电子有限公司 Acoustic device
DK180964B1 (en) * 2020-08-31 2022-08-18 Gn Hearing As DETECTION OF FILTER CLOGGING FOR HEARING DEVICES

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS468640B1 (en) * 1968-03-26 1971-03-04
US6269318B1 (en) * 1997-04-30 2001-07-31 Earl R. Geddes Method for determining transducer linear operational parameters
EP1093700A4 (en) * 1998-06-29 2006-04-26 Resound Corp High quality open-canal sound transduction device and method
ATE276635T1 (en) 2001-07-09 2004-10-15 Widex As HEARING AID WITH SELF-CHECK CAPABILITY
US7242778B2 (en) 2003-04-08 2007-07-10 Gennum Corporation Hearing instrument with self-diagnostics
EP1767055A4 (en) * 2004-06-14 2009-07-08 Johnson & Johnson Consumer At-home hearing aid testing and cleaning system
EP1638367B1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2015-10-21 Sonova AG Wireless hearing system and method for monitoring the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2039216A1 (en) 2009-03-25
DK2039216T3 (en) 2010-11-22
EP2244492A3 (en) 2010-12-08
EP2039216B1 (en) 2010-09-01
ATE480109T1 (en) 2010-09-15
DE602006016655D1 (en) 2010-10-14
WO2007144010A1 (en) 2007-12-21
DK2244492T3 (en) 2013-11-04
EP2244492A2 (en) 2010-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7949144B2 (en) Method for monitoring a hearing device and hearing device with self-monitoring function
EP2244492B1 (en) Method for adjusting a behind-the-ear hearing device
US7756283B2 (en) System and method for measuring vent effects in a hearing aid
US6603860B1 (en) Apparatus and method for monitoring magnetic audio systems
US11006225B2 (en) Auditory device assembly
CN106797520B (en) The method and hearing aid device system of operating hearing aid system
EP2207366A2 (en) System to estimate the sound pressure level at eardrum using measurements away from the eardrum
US8792669B2 (en) Earphone system and use of an earphone system
DK2104376T3 (en) Method of active occlusion reduction with plausibility testing and corresponding hearing aid
EP2673962B1 (en) Hearing aid with means for estimating the ear plug fitting
WO1997019573A9 (en) An apparatus and method for monitoring magnetic audio systems
JP6499289B2 (en) Hearing aid system operating method and hearing aid system
WO2002039784A1 (en) Method of automatically fitting hearing aid
US20100098262A1 (en) Method and hearing device for parameter adaptation by determining a speech intelligibility threshold
JP6323927B2 (en) Hearing aid and method of operating a hearing aid system
JP6322339B2 (en) Hearing aid system operating method and hearing aid system
JP6657307B2 (en) Method for characterizing a receiver of a hearing device, a hearing device, and a test device for a hearing device
CN217064005U (en) Hearing device
US20230173272A1 (en) Hearing device and method of using same
EP4075830A1 (en) System and method for estimating an acoustic attenuation of a hearing protection device
CN114268892A (en) Hearing device
Killion et al. Suitcase Lab Measurement of Digital Cellphone Interference Levels on Hearing Aids
JPH10117400A (en) Device for check for hearing aid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 2039216

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110608

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20110801

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 2039216

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 627430

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006037915

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20131031

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 627430

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130814

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131214

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131216

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602006037915

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140612

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140612

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130814

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20060612

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 602006037915

Country of ref document: DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240627

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240627

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240625

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240625

Year of fee payment: 19