EP2243903A1 - Locking system for wired panels of a fence - Google Patents
Locking system for wired panels of a fence Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2243903A1 EP2243903A1 EP10004162A EP10004162A EP2243903A1 EP 2243903 A1 EP2243903 A1 EP 2243903A1 EP 10004162 A EP10004162 A EP 10004162A EP 10004162 A EP10004162 A EP 10004162A EP 2243903 A1 EP2243903 A1 EP 2243903A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- plate
- panel
- locking system
- aimed
- post
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H17/00—Fencing, e.g. fences, enclosures, corrals
- E04H17/14—Fences constructed of rigid elements, e.g. with additional wire fillings or with posts
- E04H17/16—Fences constructed of rigid elements, e.g. with additional wire fillings or with posts using prefabricated panel-like elements, e.g. wired frames
- E04H17/161—Fences constructed of rigid elements, e.g. with additional wire fillings or with posts using prefabricated panel-like elements, e.g. wired frames using wire panels
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the technical field concerning boundary walls, placed to fence working areas of yards, industrial facilities and machineries, automated robots, storage areas and generally any place, where it is necessary to separate an area from the surrounding areas, so as to protect workers, users, unauthorised persons or passers-by.
- the above mentioned barriers are usually made of a plurality of posts, which have a base or are secured to the ground, and which are arranged suitably spaced apart, and a corresponding series of wall panels, aimed at closing the gaps between the adjacent posts.
- the panels are made of a metallic net structure, which gives appropriate strength without being excessively heavy, and at the same time, it allows a visual control of what is going on inside the fenced area.
- the net structure of the panels is preferred, where possible, also for aesthetic reasons, since it is visually less “overwhelming" with respect to a blind panel.
- the panels are fastened to the posts by means of shaped plates, which are associated to the two ends of each rib and are then secured to the corresponding posts by means of relative bolts, screwed into corresponding threaded holes made on the posts; as a consequence of tightening the plates to the posts, the respective portions of the vertical wires of the net situated along the panel sides becomes locked, so that the panel cannot slide in any way.
- each plate has temporary coupling elements, which include holding teeth allowing the plate to remain hung to the panel, in determined conditions, during the transitory step between the panel positioning and the beginning of screwing the relative bolt.
- the shape of said temporary coupling elements allows the plate to be kept fastened to the panel in a very precarious way, only if the panel is kept perfectly vertical, moved slowly, in absence of shakes and accidental hits.
- said temporary coupling elements are functional, with due care, only during the assembly step, as it has been specified, among other things, in said patent objects, while they are almost inefficient during the panel disassembling step and when the panel, separated from the posts, is replaced at the side in a casual position.
- a further aspect that does not meet the requirements derives from the fact that, if in a panel, fastened to the relative posts, for example with four plates for each side, three plates are removed on each side, leaving only the two highest ones, the panel can be supported, but it is not prevented from being rotated, in either direction, about the horizontal axis of the two remaining bolts, thus nullifying the barrier function.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a locking system that overcomes the reported disadvantages of the known solution, occurring during the assembly step, as mentioned in the introduction.
- Still a further object of the invention is to develop a locking system, formed so that it can be used also on the previous type boundary walls, so as to adapt them to the most recent regulations.
- Yet a further object of the invention is to present a locking system so designed as not to require right and left elements in order to avoid errors during the assembling step, and at the same time, to contain the production costs.
- reference numeral 1 indicates a boundary wall as a whole, mentioned in the introduction, aimed at fencing working areas of yards, industrial facilities and machineries, automated robots, storage areas and generally any place where it is necessary to separate an area from the surrounding areas, so as to protect workers, users, unauthorised persons or passers-by.
- the boundary wall 1 includes, in a way known in itself, a modular structure, stackable as required, made of a plurality of posts 2, for example of the type that can be fastened to the ground by means of rawlplugs, spaced out at prefixed distances along the periphery of the area to circumscribe, and a corresponding series of wall panels 3, fastened to the posts 2 and aimed at closing the gaps between the adjacent posts.
- the posts 2 are preferably made of a square cross-section metallic tube.
- the panels 3 are made, at least along the respective sides 3A, 3B. of a net structure without a frame, generally metallic, defined by horizontal wires 30 and vertical wires 31, mutually arc-welded.
- the panels 3 are crossed by horizontal ribs 13, made at different heights, having a trapezoid profile, and extending from one side to the other; the depth of the ribs 13 is suitably smaller than the dimension of the post 2 side.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a boundary wall 1 defined by a single pair of posts 2 and only one panel 3.
- the locking system S is aimed at coupling the panels 3 with the respective posts 2 and includes at least two shaped plates 4 for each panel 3, in the minimum configuration; in the example of Fig. 1 , referred to a system for boundary walls 1 complying with the European regulations, there are four pairs of shaped plates 4.
- the shaped plates 4 are made of press-moulded metallic sheet and have a vertically elongated form with dimension longer than the height of the above mentioned ribs 13.
- Said holding means 15 are formed, for example, by a washer of elastomeric material, fitted adherently onto the threaded shank of the bolt 5, at the side corresponding to the face M of the plate 4 (see again Fig. 2 ).
- hook-shaped coupling means 6 in the plate 4, aimed at fixing the latter to the corresponding net structure of said panel 3, when the panel is separated from the above mentioned posts 2, with the hook-shaped coupling means 6 being also aimed at supporting the respective side 3A, 3B of said panel 3, as a consequence of at least partial screwing of said bolt 5 in the foregoing threaded hole 20; the above mentioned functions of the hook-shaped coupling means 6 will be better described later on.
- hook-shaped coupling means 6 are formed, for example, by two hooks 60, made integral with the plate 4, at the opposite ends thereof, oriented symmetrical to each other, so as to face each other and substantially coplanar with the plate 4.
- stabilising means 7 made working by tightening of said bolt 5 in said threaded hole 20 and aimed at preventing the plate 4 and the associated panel 3 from rotating with respect to the axis of the bolt 5, also in co-operation with said hook-shaped coupling means 6, as better described later on.
- Said stabilising means 7 are formed, for example, by at least one square wing 70, made integral with the plate 4 in the respective vertical side 4A interposed between said hooks 60, in an asymmetrical position, so as to be offset with respect to the slot 40.
- the square wing 70 extends horizontally and is formed by a first segment 70A, coplanar with the plate 4, and a terminal portion 70B, perpendicular to the plate and turned outwards of said face M.
- the mounting of the boundary wall 1 includes initially, as usual, placing the posts 2 at the determined distance and in a suitable alignment.
- Respective plates 4 are positioned at the two ends of each rib 13, the plates having their bolt 5 and washer 15 and being oriented so that the respective faces M are turned outwards.
- Each plate 4 is introduced in the last mesh of the net close to the corresponding side 3A, 3B of the panel 3, taking care to couple the hook 60, situated at top, to the corresponding horizontal wire 30; in this way, the face M contacts the portions of the outermost vertical wire 31, that define the oblique sides of the trapezoid profile of said rib 13.
- the panel 3 with the plates 4 and the respective bolts 5 are fastened one to another and consequently, it is possible to handle the whole without excessive care, to place it between the posts 2: by screwing partially, by hand, the bolts 5 of the topmost couple of plates 4, a temporary support of the panel 3 is obtained immediately, thus allowing to release it, so as to continue, with all ease, to screw the remaining bolts 5 and consequently to tighten them.
- Fig. 3 illustrates a portion of the upper rib 13, at the left side 3A, with the respective plate 4 clamping the rib to the corresponding post 2; the square wing 70, situated lower with respect to the slot 40, and consequently, to the axis of the bolt 5, gives a one direction anti-rotation constraint.
- Fig. 4 illustrates another portion of the upper rib 13, at the right side 3B, with the respective plate 4 clamping the rib to the corresponding post 2; since this plate 4 is identical with the other one and is only arranged overturned, the respective square wing 70 is situated, in this case, higher than the slot 40 and therefore gives an anti-rotation constraint in the direction opposite to the one of the other wing 70.
- the panel 3 rotation is advantageously prevented also by the fact that a hook 60 of each plate 4 is always engaged with a corresponding horizontal wire 30 and consequently makes the constraint between the panel 3 and plate 4 more stable; depending on the height, at which the plate is locked, the engaged hook can be the lower hook 60 ( Fig. 3 ) or the upper one ( Fig. 4 ).
- the proposed locking system is thus suitable for obtaining boundary walls provided with the required safety certifications; this important property allows also to adapt the pre-existing barriers.
- a further advantageous aspect of the locking system under discussion derives from the fact that the same plate is used without distinction in the two sides of the panel and the only asymmetric element, i.e. the square wing, performs a function that completes the function of the other, due to this asymmetry.
- the positive characteristics of the described locking system allow the barrier to be assembled and disassembled, easily and without errors, by only one operator.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to the technical field concerning boundary walls, placed to fence working areas of yards, industrial facilities and machineries, automated robots, storage areas and generally any place, where it is necessary to separate an area from the surrounding areas, so as to protect workers, users, unauthorised persons or passers-by. The above mentioned barriers are usually made of a plurality of posts, which have a base or are secured to the ground, and which are arranged suitably spaced apart, and a corresponding series of wall panels, aimed at closing the gaps between the adjacent posts. According to a widespread solution, the panels are made of a metallic net structure, which gives appropriate strength without being excessively heavy, and at the same time, it allows a visual control of what is going on inside the fenced area.
- The net structure of the panels is preferred, where possible, also for aesthetic reasons, since it is visually less "overwhelming" with respect to a blind panel.
- The same Applicant owns the Italian Patent no.
1,334,471 - The panels are fastened to the posts by means of shaped plates, which are associated to the two ends of each rib and are then secured to the corresponding posts by means of relative bolts, screwed into corresponding threaded holes made on the posts; as a consequence of tightening the plates to the posts, the respective portions of the vertical wires of the net situated along the panel sides becomes locked, so that the panel cannot slide in any way.
- In order to facilitate the assembly step, each plate, according to the invention, has temporary coupling elements, which include holding teeth allowing the plate to remain hung to the panel, in determined conditions, during the transitory step between the panel positioning and the beginning of screwing the relative bolt.
- In many applications of the above mentioned boundary walls, it is necessary that the latter satisfy precise safety regulations.
- In the European Union, there have been introduced regulations (L. 157/43 EU's Official Gazette of 9/6/2006), which provide the following requirements for fixed protections:
- avoiding them or making them inefficient must not be easy;
- the fixed protections must be fastened with systems that require tools to be used to open or disassemble them;
- the fastening systems must remain attached to the protections or to the machine when the protections are removed;
- if possible, the protections must not remain in their position in absence of their fastening means.
- The boundary walls obtained according to the above mentioned patent meet only partially the above specified requirements.
- In particular, it is found that the shape of said temporary coupling elements allows the plate to be kept fastened to the panel in a very precarious way, only if the panel is kept perfectly vertical, moved slowly, in absence of shakes and accidental hits.
- Therefore, in practice, said temporary coupling elements are functional, with due care, only during the assembly step, as it has been specified, among other things, in said patent objects, while they are almost inefficient during the panel disassembling step and when the panel, separated from the posts, is replaced at the side in a casual position.
- Still with reference to the assembly step, it has been also found that the plates of known type, due to the precarious holding by said temporary coupling elements, do not ensure sufficient support for the panel in the correct position when the bolts are screwed only partially, which from time to time causes some difficulties in the respective assembling operations.
- The regulation, according to which the fastening systems must remain fastened to the protections, concerns obviously, also the bolt associated to each plate; in the solution reported in the above mentioned patent, it is inserted freely in a slotted hole of the plate and thus the bolt is not constrained thereto in any way.
- A further aspect that does not meet the requirements derives from the fact that, if in a panel, fastened to the relative posts, for example with four plates for each side, three plates are removed on each side, leaving only the two highest ones, the panel can be supported, but it is not prevented from being rotated, in either direction, about the horizontal axis of the two remaining bolts, thus nullifying the barrier function.
- The
patent documents FR 2 175 171 US 5 747 040 describe as many fastening devices for modular delimiting panels that present the characteristics described in the preamble of theclaim 1. However, the above mentioned devices do not support efficiently and securely the corresponding panels, to which they are associated, before locking the devices to the relative posts is completed. - Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to propose a system for defining and fastening a boundary wall, conceived so as to fully meet the current Community regulations concerning fixed protections, and consequently, capable of obtaining all the necessary certificates.
- Another object of the invention is to provide a locking system that overcomes the reported disadvantages of the known solution, occurring during the assembly step, as mentioned in the introduction.
- Still a further object of the invention is to develop a locking system, formed so that it can be used also on the previous type boundary walls, so as to adapt them to the most recent regulations.
- Yet a further object of the invention is to present a locking system so designed as not to require right and left elements in order to avoid errors during the assembling step, and at the same time, to contain the production costs.
- The characteristic features of the invention will become evident from the following description of a preferred embodiment of the locking system under discussion, in accordance with the contents of the claims and with the help of the enclosed drawings, in which:
-
Fig. 1 shows a perspective view of a panel with the locking system under discussion separated by a respective pair of posts; -
Fig. 2 shows a perspective view, enlarged with respect toFig. 1 , of a portion of a post and a plate of said locking system, from the side, from which the associated holding means are visible: -
Fig. 3 shows a perspective view, enlarged with respect toFig. 1 , of the left upper portion of the panel, fastened to the corresponding post. -
Fig. 4 shows a perspective view, symmetrical toFig. 3 , of the right upper portion of the panel, fastened to the corresponding post. - With reference to the above mentioned Figures,
reference numeral 1 indicates a boundary wall as a whole, mentioned in the introduction, aimed at fencing working areas of yards, industrial facilities and machineries, automated robots, storage areas and generally any place where it is necessary to separate an area from the surrounding areas, so as to protect workers, users, unauthorised persons or passers-by. - The
boundary wall 1 includes, in a way known in itself, a modular structure, stackable as required, made of a plurality ofposts 2, for example of the type that can be fastened to the ground by means of rawlplugs, spaced out at prefixed distances along the periphery of the area to circumscribe, and a corresponding series ofwall panels 3, fastened to theposts 2 and aimed at closing the gaps between the adjacent posts. Theposts 2 are preferably made of a square cross-section metallic tube. - The
panels 3 are made, at least along therespective sides 3A, 3B. of a net structure without a frame, generally metallic, defined byhorizontal wires 30 andvertical wires 31, mutually arc-welded. - The
panels 3 are crossed byhorizontal ribs 13, made at different heights, having a trapezoid profile, and extending from one side to the other; the depth of theribs 13 is suitably smaller than the dimension of thepost 2 side. - For sake of simplicity,
Fig. 1 illustrates aboundary wall 1 defined by a single pair ofposts 2 and only onepanel 3. - The locking system S according to the invention is aimed at coupling the
panels 3 with therespective posts 2 and includes at least twoshaped plates 4 for eachpanel 3, in the minimum configuration; in the example ofFig. 1 , referred to a system forboundary walls 1 complying with the European regulations, there are four pairs ofshaped plates 4. - The
shaped plates 4 are made of press-moulded metallic sheet and have a vertically elongated form with dimension longer than the height of the above mentionedribs 13. - In the
plate 4, which defines a face M, aimed at being turned towards the corresponding side of thepost 2, there is made aslot 40, with introduced therein a screw element, formed by abolt 5, aimed at engaging with a corresponding threadedhole 20 made in the post 2 (Fig. 2 ). Holding means 15, associated to saidbolt 5, are aimed at keeping the latter fixed to therespective plate 4, when the plate is separated from thepost 2. - Said
holding means 15 are formed, for example, by a washer of elastomeric material, fitted adherently onto the threaded shank of thebolt 5, at the side corresponding to the face M of the plate 4 (see againFig. 2 ). - There are hook-shaped coupling means 6 in the
plate 4, aimed at fixing the latter to the corresponding net structure of saidpanel 3, when the panel is separated from the above mentionedposts 2, with the hook-shaped coupling means 6 being also aimed at supporting therespective side panel 3, as a consequence of at least partial screwing of saidbolt 5 in the foregoing threadedhole 20; the above mentioned functions of the hook-shaped coupling means 6 will be better described later on. - The above mentioned hook-shaped coupling means 6 are formed, for example, by two
hooks 60, made integral with theplate 4, at the opposite ends thereof, oriented symmetrical to each other, so as to face each other and substantially coplanar with theplate 4. - In the
plate 4, there are also stabilisingmeans 7, made working by tightening of saidbolt 5 in said threadedhole 20 and aimed at preventing theplate 4 and the associatedpanel 3 from rotating with respect to the axis of thebolt 5, also in co-operation with said hook-shaped coupling means 6, as better described later on. - Said stabilising
means 7 are formed, for example, by at least onesquare wing 70, made integral with theplate 4 in the respectivevertical side 4A interposed between saidhooks 60, in an asymmetrical position, so as to be offset with respect to theslot 40. - The
square wing 70 extends horizontally and is formed by afirst segment 70A, coplanar with theplate 4, and aterminal portion 70B, perpendicular to the plate and turned outwards of said face M. - The mounting of the
boundary wall 1 includes initially, as usual, placing theposts 2 at the determined distance and in a suitable alignment. -
Respective plates 4 are positioned at the two ends of eachrib 13, the plates having theirbolt 5 and washer 15 and being oriented so that the respective faces M are turned outwards. Eachplate 4 is introduced in the last mesh of the net close to thecorresponding side panel 3, taking care to couple thehook 60, situated at top, to the correspondinghorizontal wire 30; in this way, the face M contacts the portions of the outermostvertical wire 31, that define the oblique sides of the trapezoid profile of saidrib 13. - The
panel 3 with theplates 4 and the respective bolts 5 (Fig. 1 ) are fastened one to another and consequently, it is possible to handle the whole without excessive care, to place it between the posts 2: by screwing partially, by hand, thebolts 5 of the topmost couple ofplates 4, a temporary support of thepanel 3 is obtained immediately, thus allowing to release it, so as to continue, with all ease, to screw theremaining bolts 5 and consequently to tighten them. - Similarly to the known solution mentioned in the introduction, due to tightening the
bolts 5, theplates 4 clamp said respective portions of thevertical wires 31 against thecorresponding post 2, so that thepanel 3 is prevented from sliding in any direction (Figs. 3 and4 ). - Due to tightening the
respective bolt 5, theterminal portion 70B of thewing 70 of eachplate 4 goes in abutment against the side of thecorresponding post 2, orthogonal to the one, against which theplate 4 rests. -
Fig. 3 illustrates a portion of theupper rib 13, at theleft side 3A, with therespective plate 4 clamping the rib to thecorresponding post 2; thesquare wing 70, situated lower with respect to theslot 40, and consequently, to the axis of thebolt 5, gives a one direction anti-rotation constraint. -
Fig. 4 illustrates another portion of theupper rib 13, at theright side 3B, with therespective plate 4 clamping the rib to thecorresponding post 2; since thisplate 4 is identical with the other one and is only arranged overturned, the respectivesquare wing 70 is situated, in this case, higher than theslot 40 and therefore gives an anti-rotation constraint in the direction opposite to the one of theother wing 70. - With only one
wing 70 for eachplate 4 and making use of the alternate orientation that derives from its asymmetrical position on the plate, the regulations mentioned in the introductory note are met; actually, even after removing the threeplates 4 below the upper one from eachside panel 3 is prevented from rotating with respect to the common axis of the tworemaining bolts 5, in either direction, due to the combined action of the twowings 70. - The
panel 3 rotation is advantageously prevented also by the fact that ahook 60 of eachplate 4 is always engaged with a correspondinghorizontal wire 30 and consequently makes the constraint between thepanel 3 andplate 4 more stable; depending on the height, at which the plate is locked, the engaged hook can be the lower hook 60 (Fig. 3 ) or the upper one (Fig. 4 ). - The constructive solution that includes only one
asymmetric wing 70, aimed at having the foregoing alternate orientation, appears to be still further convenient, when anpost 2 is positioned at a corner of theboundary wall 1, since it allows to fasten twoplates 4 on two adjacent sides of saidpost 2 without interference of thewing 70 of one plate with the other one. - When a
panel 3 must be removed from therespective posts 2, the operation can be performed keeping therespective plates 4, as well as thecorresponding bolts 5, locked to thepanel 3, according to the regulation that sets out this requirement (see againFig. 1 ). The peculiar characteristics of the locking system under discussion appear extremely evident from what above, said system allowing to prepare boundary walls which are totally complying with the Community regulations that concern fixed protections and, at the same time, avoiding the reported drawbacks of the known solution during the assembly step. - The proposed locking system is thus suitable for obtaining boundary walls provided with the required safety certifications; this important property allows also to adapt the pre-existing barriers.
- A further advantageous aspect of the locking system under discussion derives from the fact that the same plate is used without distinction in the two sides of the panel and the only asymmetric element, i.e. the square wing, performs a function that completes the function of the other, due to this asymmetry.
- The positive characteristics of the described locking system allow the barrier to be assembled and disassembled, easily and without errors, by only one operator.
- Finally, the system simplicity allows the production costs to be contained within a range of values very similar to those of the previous solution.
- It is understood that what above has been said as a not limiting example, therefore possible detail changes, that could become necessary due to the technical-functional reasons, are hitherto considered within the protective scope defined by the following claims.
Claims (8)
- A locking system for defining a boundary wall, the latter of the type comprising at least two posts (2), arranged at a predetermined distance from one each other, and a wall panel (3), in which panel at least the respective sides (3A, 3B) are formed by a net structure, said panel being designed to be fastened to said posts (2) to close the gap between them, said locking system (S) comprising at least two shaped plates (4), aimed at engaging with corresponding vertical wires (31), situated at the ends of said net structure, for fastening said corresponding side (3A, 3B), each of said shaped plates (4) including: a screw member (5), designed to engage with a corresponding threaded hole (20) made in said corresponding post (2); hook-shaped coupling means (6), defined in said shaped plate (4) and aimed at fastening the latter to the corresponding net structure of said panel (3), said locking system (S) being characterized in that said hook-shaped coupling means (6) are substantially coplanar with the respective shaped plate (4) to support the respective side (3A, 3B) of said panel (3), due to at least partial screwing of said screw member (5) in the foregoing threaded hole (20).
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 1, wherein said wall panels (3) include horizontal ribs (13), made at different heights, with a trapezoid profile and extending from one side of said panel (3) to the other, said locking system being characterised in that said shaped plates (4) are fastened at the two opposite ends of each of said horizontal ribs (13) and have a respective face (M) turned outwards, in the direction of the corresponding side of the post (2), and aimed at going in abutment against at least the portions of said vertical wire (31) which define the oblique sides of said trapezoid profile of the rib (13).
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 1 or in claim 2, characterised in that said hook-shaped coupling means (6) are formed by two hooks (60), made integral with said shaped plate (4), at the opposite ends thereof, oriented symmetrical, so as to be turned one towards the other.
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 1 or in claim 2, characterised by including holding means (15), associated to said screw member (5) and aimed at keeping the latter fastened to the respective shaped plate (4), when the plate is separated from said post (2).
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 4, characterised in that said holding means (15) are formed by a washer of elastomeric material, fitted adherently onto the threaded shank of said screw member (5), on the side corresponding to the face (M) of said shaped plate (4) turned towards said post (2).
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 1 or in claim 2, characterised by including, in each of said shaped plates (4), stabilising means (7), operated by tightening said screw member (5) in said threaded hole (20) and aimed at preventing the plate (4) and the associated panel (3) from rotating with respect to the axis of the screw member (5).
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 6, characterised in that said stabilising means (7) are aimed at preventing said rotations of said respective shaped plate (4) and the associated panel (3), in a prefixed direction and are aimed at co-operating with complementary stabilising means (7) of the opposite plate (4), in turn aimed at preventing rotations of the plate (4) and the panel (3) in the opposite direction.
- A locking system, as claimed in claim 6 or in claim 7, characterised in that said stabilising means (7) are formed by at least one square wing (70), made integral with said plate (4) at a respective vertical side (4A), so as to be offset with respect to the axis of said screw member (5), alternately above and below the latter, according to the side of the post (2), to which the plate (4) is fastened, with said square wing (70) extending horizontally to define a first segment (70A), coplanar with the plate (4) and a terminal portion (70B), perpendicular to the latter and aimed at going in abutment a side of said post (2), orthogonal to the one, to which the shaped plate (4) is fastened.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ITBO2009A000247A IT1396476B1 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2009-04-21 | FIXING SYSTEM FOR THE DEFINITION OF A DELIMITATION BARRIER |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2243903A1 true EP2243903A1 (en) | 2010-10-27 |
EP2243903B1 EP2243903B1 (en) | 2012-08-29 |
Family
ID=41796494
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10004162A Not-in-force EP2243903B1 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2010-04-20 | Locking system for wired panels of a fence |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2243903B1 (en) |
IT (1) | IT1396476B1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2009238273B2 (en) * | 2008-11-18 | 2011-04-21 | Ronald A. Young | Security partition system and universal clip for such system |
GB2493270A (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2013-01-30 | Shield Projects Ltd | Security fence with rigidifying channel with non uniform depth. |
US8939082B2 (en) | 2010-09-09 | 2015-01-27 | Detnet South Africa (Pty) Ltd | Blasting arrangement |
EP2657435B1 (en) * | 2012-04-27 | 2016-09-14 | Maurizio Della Casa | Device for fastening plugging panels in a boundary wall |
JP2018204217A (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2018-12-27 | 株式会社大里 | Long material holder and blindfold structure of fences using the same |
IT201900003643A1 (en) | 2019-03-13 | 2020-09-13 | Trentaquattrotrentotto Srl | ANTI-INTRUSION SHELTER WITH PERFECTED ASSEMBLY MEANS. |
IT201900009066A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-14 | C F Lamiere Di Fantini Claudio Duranti S Zanni M & C S A S | Device for fixing safety wire mesh panels |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2412381A1 (en) * | 1974-03-15 | 1975-09-18 | Hans Lechtenboehmer | Fixing mechanism for grids or fences - has rectangular clamping plate with curved edges and central holding screw |
FR2735171A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-12-13 | Eurofence | Clip for attaching panels of metal trellis to supporting posts |
US5746040A (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 1998-05-05 | Wireway/Husky Corp. | Modular wall construction |
-
2009
- 2009-04-21 IT ITBO2009A000247A patent/IT1396476B1/en active
-
2010
- 2010-04-20 EP EP10004162A patent/EP2243903B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2412381A1 (en) * | 1974-03-15 | 1975-09-18 | Hans Lechtenboehmer | Fixing mechanism for grids or fences - has rectangular clamping plate with curved edges and central holding screw |
FR2735171A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-12-13 | Eurofence | Clip for attaching panels of metal trellis to supporting posts |
US5746040A (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 1998-05-05 | Wireway/Husky Corp. | Modular wall construction |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU2009238273B2 (en) * | 2008-11-18 | 2011-04-21 | Ronald A. Young | Security partition system and universal clip for such system |
US8939082B2 (en) | 2010-09-09 | 2015-01-27 | Detnet South Africa (Pty) Ltd | Blasting arrangement |
GB2493270A (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2013-01-30 | Shield Projects Ltd | Security fence with rigidifying channel with non uniform depth. |
GB2500833A (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2013-10-02 | Shield Projects Ltd | Security fence with rigidifying channel with effectively reduced end depth by using security device. |
US9091096B2 (en) | 2011-07-26 | 2015-07-28 | Shield Projects Limited | Security fence |
GB2500833B (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2016-01-20 | Shield Projects Ltd | Security fence |
GB2493270B (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2018-09-26 | Shield Projects Ltd | Security fence |
EP2657435B1 (en) * | 2012-04-27 | 2016-09-14 | Maurizio Della Casa | Device for fastening plugging panels in a boundary wall |
JP2018204217A (en) * | 2017-05-31 | 2018-12-27 | 株式会社大里 | Long material holder and blindfold structure of fences using the same |
IT201900003643A1 (en) | 2019-03-13 | 2020-09-13 | Trentaquattrotrentotto Srl | ANTI-INTRUSION SHELTER WITH PERFECTED ASSEMBLY MEANS. |
EP3708742A3 (en) * | 2019-03-13 | 2020-09-23 | Trentaquattrotrentotto Srl | Fixed guard with improved assembly means |
IT201900009066A1 (en) * | 2019-06-14 | 2020-12-14 | C F Lamiere Di Fantini Claudio Duranti S Zanni M & C S A S | Device for fixing safety wire mesh panels |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2243903B1 (en) | 2012-08-29 |
ITBO20090247A1 (en) | 2010-10-22 |
IT1396476B1 (en) | 2012-12-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2243903B1 (en) | Locking system for wired panels of a fence | |
US20150041742A1 (en) | Fence column and fence system having the fence column | |
KR20100099683A (en) | Safety barriers | |
EP2602407B1 (en) | Device for shielding an area | |
EP2694752B1 (en) | Guardrail | |
KR20130005531U (en) | Fasten apparatus of angker bolt for prevent fall of gang form | |
CN111727293A (en) | Security fence assembly | |
US7137478B2 (en) | Ladder safety cage | |
EP0331686A1 (en) | Security closure | |
EP3775441B1 (en) | Fence post with attaching means and a modular fencing system | |
US8677790B2 (en) | Security enclosure and associated method | |
US20100294591A1 (en) | Scaffolding safety equipment | |
WO2014033423A2 (en) | Scaffolding safety equipment | |
EP2657435B1 (en) | Device for fastening plugging panels in a boundary wall | |
CA2869915A1 (en) | Secondary containment system | |
JP6530980B2 (en) | Belt conveyor safety fence | |
WO2013030805A1 (en) | Guiding and support device for temporary guard rail of a frame scaffolding system and frame scaffolding system comprising said devices | |
EP1921240A1 (en) | Intrusion prevention enclosure | |
US5655755A (en) | Stanchion rail support and stanchion | |
EP2189597A1 (en) | A temporary metal fence for restricting access | |
GB2594660A (en) | Barrier | |
EP3708742B1 (en) | Fixed guard with improved assembly means | |
KR102042201B1 (en) | A construction scaffold | |
EP3404171A1 (en) | Protection fence | |
AU2016394830B2 (en) | A balustrade post and balustrade used as a safety barrier |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA ME RS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20110421 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: E04H 17/16 20060101AFI20120120BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 573195 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602010002563 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 573195 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121129 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121229 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121130 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121231 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121210 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121129 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130530 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602010002563 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130530 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20131231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602010002563 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130420 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20140420 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140430 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140430 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140420 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100420 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120829 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130420 |