EP2239415A1 - Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir - Google Patents
Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2239415A1 EP2239415A1 EP09157775A EP09157775A EP2239415A1 EP 2239415 A1 EP2239415 A1 EP 2239415A1 EP 09157775 A EP09157775 A EP 09157775A EP 09157775 A EP09157775 A EP 09157775A EP 2239415 A1 EP2239415 A1 EP 2239415A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- injection
- oil
- aqueous
- permeable
- fluid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/30—Specific pattern of wells, e.g. optimizing the spacing of wells
- E21B43/305—Specific pattern of wells, e.g. optimizing the spacing of wells comprising at least one inclined or horizontal well
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of enhancing oil recovery(EOR) in layered oil reservoirs.
- Fluid flow in porous media is governed by the interaction of viscous, gravity and capillary forces. It is well recognized that cross-flow has significant impact on sweep efficiency of immiscible displacement in layered reservoirs. Both gravity and viscous forces have been extensively studied in the literature. However, the impact of capillary forces is generally under-estimated in field simulation studies especially for carbonate reservoirs.
- a variety of enhanced oil recovery techniques have been employed in order to increase the recovery of oil from oil reservoirs. These techniques include thermal recovery methods, chemical methods and miscible flooding.
- Fluid drive displacement of oil from an oil-containing formation utilizing CO 2 is known to enhance the recovery of oil by vaporizing/condensing drive, which results in reducing residual oil saturation.
- a conventional CO 2 (immiscible or miscible) flood becomes less effective because of gravity override and/or viscous fingering due to unfavourable mobility ratio. Therefore, gas based EOR methods (including CO 2 and other miscible gases) will suffer from the same problem encountered during water flooding as injected gas will migrate rapidly to the high permeable layers (even faster than water) in the upper zone and results in poor sweep (worse than water flooding case) of the low permeable lower zone of the reservoir.
- the oil displacing efficiency of a CO 2 drive can be improved by mixing the CO 2 with a foaming agent to produce a CO 2 foam oil recovery driving fluid.
- the foam is effective at controlling CO 2 (or other gases) channelling due to stratification and fingering.
- the foam also effectively reduces the mobility of CO 2 (or other gases) in porous media and controls CO 2 (gas) injection profiles, resulting in increased oil recovery and sweep improvements.
- a method of enhancing the oil recovery from a layered oil reservoir with an upper layer that is more permeable than a lower layer of the reservoir comprises:
- the foaming agent mixed with an aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer and simultaneously a non-aqueous fluid is injected into the lower layer.
- the non-aqueous fluid is injected intermittently in slugs, which are alternated by injection of slugs of water, known as water alternating gas (WAG) cycling, into the lower layer and simultaneously a foam agent mixed with the aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer.
- WAG water alternating gas
- the method may further comprise contacting the hydrocarbons in the reservoir with the foam so as to assist in the recovery of hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
- foam may be formed in-situ, which results in reducing the gas mobility in the upper high permeable layer.
- the formation of foam will confine the gas in the lower zone and improves the sweep efficiency and recovery of oil.
- the aqueous liquid is injected in the upper zone through a first injection well and non-aqueous fluid is injected through a second injection well with a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section through which the non-aqueous fluid is injected into the lower layer.
- the first and second injection wells may be formed by substantially horizontal branches of a branched multilateral injection well.
- the production well may also have a substantially horizontal fluid transfer section, which is oriented substantially parallel to the substantially horizontal fluid transfer section of the second injection well.
- the present invention more effectively utilizes the CO 2 (or other gases) foam in a CO 2 (or other gases) foam enhanced oil recovery process from a hydrocarbon bearing formation penetrated by at least one injection well and at least one spaced-apart production well wherein the gas is only injected in the low permeable lower zone and simultaneously injecting aqueous liquid in the high permeable upper zone of oil reservoir.
- the foaming agent is either injected together with the non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer or together with the aqueous liquid into the upper layer.
- the invention is particularly suited for layered oil reservoirs having a zone that is more permeable than the other zones and where there is an impediment for water to flow from the upper to the lower reservoir section due to e.g. (vertical) permeability reduction at the interface or a capillary pressure barrier. It is also applicable for improving oil recovery from the low permeable layers inter-bedded within the more permeable reservoir unit.
- the current invention aims to provide a method that is stable and robust to reservoir lateral and vertical heterogeneity using both vertical and horizontal well technology.
- improved recovery can be achieved by either enhancing cross flow from the upper zone into the lower zone or reducing cross flow from the lower zone into the upper zone.
- Enhancing cross-flow of the aqueous phase from the upper to the lower zone can be achieved by reducing the mobility of the aqueous phase in the upper zone forcing it to cross-flow into the lower zone.
- Reducing the mobility of the aqueous phase in the upper zone is achieved by, for example, polymer solution, polymer-surfactant solution or alkaline-polymer surfactant, which is a subject of European patent application 09154794.3 .
- the mobility of the aqueous phase is reduced by trapping gas or foam hence forcing it to cross-flow into the lower zone and to the low permeable layers within the upper zone. Therefore, oil recovery and sweep efficiency of oil in the lower zone is improved by the combination of water cross-flow from the upper to the lower zone and confining the injected gas into the lower zone due to reducing gas mobility in the upper zone. Limited or no foam is generated in the lower zone, hence the mobility of fluids in this zone is not affected.
- the foam-forming composition may comprise water and an effective foam-forming amount of surfactant, which may be any surfactant type known in the art.
- the method may further comprise contacting the hydrocarbons in the reservoir with the foam so as to assist in the recovery of hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
- the gas which can be employed includes any of those known in the art, e.g., carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, flue gas and the like or mixtures of hydrocarbons such as methane with any of ethane, propane, or butane, flue gas and the like.
- composition can be used either in cyclic ("huff and puff") or drive recovery methods under either miscible or immiscible conditions.
- Figure 1 shows schematically a layered subsurface oil reservoir 1. For the sake of clarity the layers above and below the reservoir 1 are not shown.
- the layered oil reservoir 1 comprises an upper layer 2 and a lower layer 3.
- the upper layer 2 of the oil reservoir 1 is more permeable than the lower layer 3.
- the layered reservoir is penetrated by a first injection well 5 and a second injection well 7, and by a production well 10.
- an aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer 2 of the layered reservoir 1. Simultaneously a non-aqueous fluid that is injected through the second injection well 7 into the lower layer 3. Produced oil is recovered from the production well 10, which is perforated in the lower layer 3.
- the streams can be injected through two strings in one well (not shown).
- foaming agent can be mixed with either the aqueous liquid injected in the upper layer 2 or the gas injected in the lower layer 3.
- the gas can be miscible or immiscible with miscible gas performing better than immiscible gas.
- the injection in the lower layer can be either continuous gas or WAG.
- aqueous phase water or brine
- the ratio of the injection rates for aqueous liquid and non-aqueous fluid is suitably so selected that the rate of advance of the aqueous liquid (arrow 11) in the upper layer 2 is larger than or equal to the rate of advance of the non-aqueous fluid (arrow 12) in the lower layer 3.
- the rate of advance of the aqueous liquid (arrow 11) in the upper layer 2 is larger than or equal to the rate of advance of the non-aqueous fluid (arrow 12) in the lower layer 3.
- the flow rate of the hydrocarbons (arrow 15) flowing through the more permeable upper layer 2 is much larger than the flow rate of the hydrocarbons (arrow 16) flowing through the less permeable lower layer 3.
- the gaseous fluid can include carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, or any other hydrocarbon combination.
- the gas can be miscible or immiscible with the reservoir oil.
- the gas which can be employed includes any of those known in the art, e.g., carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, flue gas and the like or mixtures of hydrocarbons such as methane with any of ethane, propane, or butane, flue gas and the like.
- a numerical model that comprises the most salient characteristics of an actual reservoir will serve to illustrate the merits of the invention.
- About 60% of the original oil in place is in the lower layer 3.
- the CO 2 is continuously injected in the lower zone (supplied through the second injection well 7), aqueous liquid that carries the foaming agent is injected in the upper zone (supplied through the first injection well 5).
- FIG. 2 shows a comparison between the method according to the present invention and a typical water flood.
- the amount of liquid injected both aqueous and gaseous
- the cumulative amount of oil produced (as a fraction of the original oil in place) and the water-cut (as a volume fraction of water in the mixture of water and oil)
- the gas-oil-ratio (in 1000 cubic feet at standard pressure and temperature per barrel of oil).
- the forecasts were generated with a three dimensional numerical model, which simulated a line drive of horizontal injector(s)/producer(Solid line 20 shows the cumulative oil production for the method according to the present invention, and dashed line 21 shows the cumulative oil production for the water flood.
- Solid line 24 shows the water-cut for the method according to the present invention and dashed line 25 shows the water-cut for the water flood.
- Solid line 28 shows the gas-oil-ratio for the method according to the present invention and dashed line 29 shows the gas-oil-ratio for the water flood.
- Figure 2 illustrates how oil production from a layered oil reservoir is enhanced by the method according to the present invention.
- Figure 3 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layered oil reservoir 2,3 which is traversed at one side thereof by a production well 10 having a substantially horizontal inflow section 10A, and at an opposite side by a substantially vertical first injection well 5 and a second injection well 7, where the second injection well 7 has a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section 7A in the lower layer.
- Figure 4 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layered oil reservoir 2,3 which is traversed by a production well 10 having a substantially horizontal inflow section 10A and a branched multilateral fluid injection well 5,7 having an upper substantially horizontal fluid injection branch 5A through which an aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer, as illustrated by arrow H 2 O, and a lower substantially horizontal fluid injection branch 7A, through which a non-aqueous fluid is injected into the lower layer 3 as illustrated by arrow CO 2 .
- the substantially vertical upper section (5,7) of the branched multilateral fluid injection well may comprise co-axial or parallel liquid and fluid injection conduits (not shown) through which aqueous liquid is supplied to the upper branch 5A and through which non-aqueous fluid is supplied to the lower branch 7A.
Abstract
A foam assisted enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method in a layered oil reservoir (1) with an upper layer(2) that is more permeable than a lower reservoir layer(3) comprises:
a) injecting an aqueous liquid through an injection well(5) into the upper layer(2);
b) injecting a non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer(3);
c) recovering oil from the layered oil reservoir through a production well(10); and wherein:
- the aqueous liquid and/or the non-aqueous fluid carries a foaming agent; and
- the injection and/or production well(5,10) has a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section (10A).
a) injecting an aqueous liquid through an injection well(5) into the upper layer(2);
b) injecting a non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer(3);
c) recovering oil from the layered oil reservoir through a production well(10); and wherein:
- the aqueous liquid and/or the non-aqueous fluid carries a foaming agent; and
- the injection and/or production well(5,10) has a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section (10A).
The generated foam may be used as a means to confine a majority of injected non-aqueous fluid, which may comprise carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane, butane and/or flue gas within the low permeable lower layer(3) and to enhance cross-flow of aqueous liquid from the high permeable upper layer (2) into the lower permeable lower layer (3) such that oil recovery from the layered oil reservoir (1) is enhanced.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method of enhancing oil recovery(EOR) in layered oil reservoirs.
- Fluid flow in porous media is governed by the interaction of viscous, gravity and capillary forces. It is well recognized that cross-flow has significant impact on sweep efficiency of immiscible displacement in layered reservoirs. Both gravity and viscous forces have been extensively studied in the literature. However, the impact of capillary forces is generally under-estimated in field simulation studies especially for carbonate reservoirs.
- In reservoirs where the high-permeability zone is at the top of low permeability zone, under water flooding the injected water tends to flow through the upper zone along the high permeability layers and no or very slow cross flow of water into the lower zone occurs, resulting in very poor sweep of the lower zone. The main difficulty with achieving high recovery factors for the low permeable lower zone is the limited vertical drainage of injection water that in the first instance enters the high permeable upper zones. If fluid flow would be controlled by viscous and gravity forces alone, a much more efficient recovery of the oil in the lower zone would take place than is apparently occurring as gravity leads to cross flow of injected water from the top to the bottom zone of the reservoir. Moreover, in water-wet reservoirs, capillary forces align with gravity (i.e. act in the same direction, helping to flood the Lower reservoir) and result in very good sweep efficiency of the low permeability lower zone. However, for non-water-wet layered reservoirs capillary forces will act opposite to gravity and that results in a barrier which retards water from moving downwards, limits cross-flow between the different zones and leads to poor sweep efficiency of the lower zone.
- A variety of enhanced oil recovery techniques have been employed in order to increase the recovery of oil from oil reservoirs. These techniques include thermal recovery methods, chemical methods and miscible flooding.
- Fluid drive displacement of oil from an oil-containing formation utilizing CO2 is known to enhance the recovery of oil by vaporizing/condensing drive, which results in reducing residual oil saturation. However, for reservoirs of high permeability contrast especially when the high permeable layers are in the upper part of the reservoir, a conventional CO2 (immiscible or miscible) flood becomes less effective because of gravity override and/or viscous fingering due to unfavourable mobility ratio. Therefore, gas based EOR methods (including CO2 and other miscible gases) will suffer from the same problem encountered during water flooding as injected gas will migrate rapidly to the high permeable layers (even faster than water) in the upper zone and results in poor sweep (worse than water flooding case) of the low permeable lower zone of the reservoir.
- It is known that the oil displacing efficiency of a CO2 drive can be improved by mixing the CO2 with a foaming agent to produce a CO2 foam oil recovery driving fluid. The foam is effective at controlling CO2 (or other gases) channelling due to stratification and fingering. In addition, the foam also effectively reduces the mobility of CO2 (or other gases) in porous media and controls CO2 (gas) injection profiles, resulting in increased oil recovery and sweep improvements.
- Numerous patents have been issued on the recovery of oil using a CO2 foam drive, which include
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,330,346 ;4,113,011 ;4,380,266 ,4,860,828 and5,502,538 . In addition,U.S. Pat. No. 4,577,688 discloses the use of steam, CO2 and a foaming agent in an enhanced oil recovery process. - It is an object of the present invention to enhance oil recovery in oil reservoirs of different levels of heterogeneity, both lateral and vertical heterogeneity, and different wettability characteristics (mixed-wet to oil-wet).
- In accordance with the invention there is provided a method of enhancing the oil recovery from a layered oil reservoir with an upper layer that is more permeable than a lower layer of the reservoir, which method comprises:
- a) injecting an aqueous liquid through an injection well into the upper layer;
- b) injecting a non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer; and
- c) recovering oil from the layered oil reservoir through a production well; and wherein:
- the aqueous liquid and/or the non-aqueous fluid carries a foaming agent; and
- at least one of the injection and production wells comprises a permeable fluid transfer section with a substantially horizontal orientation.
- Optionally the foaming agent mixed with an aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer and simultaneously a non-aqueous fluid is injected into the lower layer.
- Optionally the non-aqueous fluid is injected intermittently in slugs, which are alternated by injection of slugs of water, known as water alternating gas (WAG) cycling, into the lower layer and simultaneously a foam agent mixed with the aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer.
- The method may further comprise contacting the hydrocarbons in the reservoir with the foam so as to assist in the recovery of hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
- As the gas migrates to the high permeability upper layers, foam may be formed in-situ, which results in reducing the gas mobility in the upper high permeable layer. In combination with the high-pressure gradient in the upper zone due to water injection, the formation of foam will confine the gas in the lower zone and improves the sweep efficiency and recovery of oil.
- Optionally, the aqueous liquid is injected in the upper zone through a first injection well and non-aqueous fluid is injected through a second injection well with a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section through which the non-aqueous fluid is injected into the lower layer. The first and second injection wells may be formed by substantially horizontal branches of a branched multilateral injection well.
- The production well may also have a substantially horizontal fluid transfer section, which is oriented substantially parallel to the substantially horizontal fluid transfer section of the second injection well.
- The present invention more effectively utilizes the CO2 (or other gases) foam in a CO2 (or other gases) foam enhanced oil recovery process from a hydrocarbon bearing formation penetrated by at least one injection well and at least one spaced-apart production well wherein the gas is only injected in the low permeable lower zone and simultaneously injecting aqueous liquid in the high permeable upper zone of oil reservoir. The foaming agent is either injected together with the non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer or together with the aqueous liquid into the upper layer.
- The invention is particularly suited for layered oil reservoirs having a zone that is more permeable than the other zones and where there is an impediment for water to flow from the upper to the lower reservoir section due to e.g. (vertical) permeability reduction at the interface or a capillary pressure barrier. It is also applicable for improving oil recovery from the low permeable layers inter-bedded within the more permeable reservoir unit.
- The current invention aims to provide a method that is stable and robust to reservoir lateral and vertical heterogeneity using both vertical and horizontal well technology. As the main reason for the low recovery factor of oil and the poor sweep efficiency of the lower zone is the lack of cross flow of water from the upper zone to the lower zone by either vertical permeability reduction at the interface and/or capillary pressure barrier, improved recovery can be achieved by either enhancing cross flow from the upper zone into the lower zone or reducing cross flow from the lower zone into the upper zone. Enhancing cross-flow of the aqueous phase from the upper to the lower zone can be achieved by reducing the mobility of the aqueous phase in the upper zone forcing it to cross-flow into the lower zone. Reducing the mobility of the aqueous phase in the upper zone is achieved by, for example, polymer solution, polymer-surfactant solution or alkaline-polymer surfactant, which is a subject of European patent application
09154794.3 - In accordance with the present invention, the mobility of the aqueous phase is reduced by trapping gas or foam hence forcing it to cross-flow into the lower zone and to the low permeable layers within the upper zone. Therefore, oil recovery and sweep efficiency of oil in the lower zone is improved by the combination of water cross-flow from the upper to the lower zone and confining the injected gas into the lower zone due to reducing gas mobility in the upper zone. Limited or no foam is generated in the lower zone, hence the mobility of fluids in this zone is not affected.
- In practicing the invention, a variety of injection schemes can be used:
- 1- Simultaneously injecting an aqueous liquid in the upper high permeable zone and a mixture of gas and foaming agent in the lower low permeable zone.
- 2- Simultaneously injecting an aqueous liquid and foaming agent in the upper high permeable upper zone and gas (preferable miscible with the reservoir oil) in the low permeable lower zone.
- 3- Simultaneously injecting an aqueous liquid and foaming agent in the upper high permeable upper zone and WAG (water alternating gas) in the low permeable lower zone.
- 4- The mixture of aqueous liquid and foaming agent is injected intermittently in slugs, which are alternated by injection of slugs of aqueous liquid alone into the high permeable upper zone and injecting non-aqueous fluid into the lower low permeable zone.
- In the four injection schemes described above, as the gas migrates to the high permeable upper zone, foam is generated in-situ only in the high permeable upper zone and leads to reducing the mobility of fluids in this zone. Oil recovery from the lower zone is improved by a combination of two effects:
- 1- The mobility of the aqueous stream in the high permeable upper zone is reduced due to the generation of foam. Gas (or foam) trapped in the upper zone will reduce water relative permeability in the upper zone and enhance cross flow of water into the lower zone.
- 2- The continuous water injection in the upper zone creates a pressure gradient which in combination with the reduced mobility of the gas due to the generation of foam will limit cross flow of gas into the upper zone and lead to the confinement of a significant portion of the gas into the lower zone.
- The foam-forming composition may comprise water and an effective foam-forming amount of surfactant, which may be any surfactant type known in the art.
- The method may further comprise contacting the hydrocarbons in the reservoir with the foam so as to assist in the recovery of hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
- The gas which can be employed includes any of those known in the art, e.g., carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, flue gas and the like or mixtures of hydrocarbons such as methane with any of ethane, propane, or butane, flue gas and the like.
- It is to be understood by those skilled in the art that this composition can be used either in cyclic ("huff and puff") or drive recovery methods under either miscible or immiscible conditions.
- The invention will now be described by way of example in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
-
Figure 1 shows schematically a cross-section of the subsurface two-layer oil reservoir; -
Figure 2 shows a comparison between the method according to the present invention and a typical water flood; -
Figure 3 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layered oil reservoir which is traversed by and a production well having a substantially horizontal inflow section and two injection wells of which one has a substantially horizontal permeable lower fluid transfer section; and -
Figure 4 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layered oil reservoir which is traversed by a branched fluid injection well having two substantially horizontal fluid injection branches and a production well having a substantially horizontal inflow section. - Reference is now made to
Figure 1. Figure 1 shows schematically a layeredsubsurface oil reservoir 1. For the sake of clarity the layers above and below thereservoir 1 are not shown. The layeredoil reservoir 1 comprises anupper layer 2 and alower layer 3. Theupper layer 2 of theoil reservoir 1 is more permeable than thelower layer 3. The layered reservoir is penetrated by a first injection well 5 and a second injection well 7, and by aproduction well 10. - Through the first injection well 5 an aqueous liquid is injected into the
upper layer 2 of thelayered reservoir 1. Simultaneously a non-aqueous fluid that is injected through the second injection well 7 into thelower layer 3. Produced oil is recovered from the production well 10, which is perforated in thelower layer 3. - Instead of injecting the aqueous and gaseous streams through two
wells - In accordance with the invention, foaming agent can be mixed with either the aqueous liquid injected in the
upper layer 2 or the gas injected in thelower layer 3. - In accordance with the invention, the gas can be miscible or immiscible with miscible gas performing better than immiscible gas.
- In accordance with the invention, in case the foaming agent is added to the aqueous phase and injected in the
upper layer 2, the injection in the lower layer can be either continuous gas or WAG. - In accordance with the invention, in case the foaming agent is carried by the gas injected in the
lower layer 3, then aqueous phase (water or brine) is continuously injected in theupper layer 2. - In accordance with the invention (the case of injected aqueous liquid in the
upper layer 2 and gas carrying foaming agent in the lower layer 3), the ratio of the injection rates for aqueous liquid and non-aqueous fluid is suitably so selected that the rate of advance of the aqueous liquid (arrow 11) in theupper layer 2 is larger than or equal to the rate of advance of the non-aqueous fluid (arrow 12) in thelower layer 3. In this cross flow of the injected non-aqueous fluid to theupper layer 2 is reduced. However, downstream of thefronts upper layer 2 is much larger than the flow rate of the hydrocarbons (arrow 16) flowing through the less permeablelower layer 3. - Suitably, the gaseous fluid can include carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, or any other hydrocarbon combination. Moreover, the gas can be miscible or immiscible with the reservoir oil. The gas which can be employed includes any of those known in the art, e.g., carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, flue gas and the like or mixtures of hydrocarbons such as methane with any of ethane, propane, or butane, flue gas and the like.
- The invention will now be described with reference to the below example which uses CO2 as the non-aqueous injected fluid. However, it should be noted that the invention is not limited to this example and other gases can be used in actual field applications.
- A numerical model that comprises the most salient characteristics of an actual reservoir will serve to illustrate the merits of the invention. There are two geological sections with a permeability contrast of up to 100:1, wherein the
upper layer 2 has the higher permeability. About 60% of the original oil in place is in thelower layer 3. The CO2 is continuously injected in the lower zone (supplied through the second injection well 7), aqueous liquid that carries the foaming agent is injected in the upper zone (supplied through the first injection well 5). - Reference is now made to
Figure 2 , which shows a comparison between the method according to the present invention and a typical water flood. On the horizontal axis is the amount of liquid injected (both aqueous and gaseous) into the upper and lower layers 2&3 in pore volumes injected. On the left vertical axis we put the cumulative amount of oil produced (as a fraction of the original oil in place) and the water-cut (as a volume fraction of water in the mixture of water and oil), and on the right vertical axis we put the gas-oil-ratio (in 1000 cubic feet at standard pressure and temperature per barrel of oil). The forecasts were generated with a three dimensional numerical model, which simulated a line drive of horizontal injector(s)/producer(Solid line 20 shows the cumulative oil production for the method according to the present invention, and dashedline 21 shows the cumulative oil production for the water flood. Solid line 24 shows the water-cut for the method according to the present invention and dashedline 25 shows the water-cut for the water flood.Solid line 28 shows the gas-oil-ratio for the method according to the present invention and dashedline 29 shows the gas-oil-ratio for the water flood. -
Figure 2 illustrates how oil production from a layered oil reservoir is enhanced by the method according to the present invention. -
Figure 3 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layeredoil reservoir horizontal inflow section 10A, and at an opposite side by a substantially vertical first injection well 5 and a second injection well 7, where the second injection well 7 has a substantially horizontal permeablefluid transfer section 7A in the lower layer. -
Figure 4 is a schematic three dimensional view of a layeredoil reservoir horizontal inflow section 10A and a branched multilateral fluid injection well 5,7 having an upper substantially horizontalfluid injection branch 5A through which an aqueous liquid is injected into the upper layer, as illustrated by arrow H2O, and a lower substantially horizontalfluid injection branch 7A, through which a non-aqueous fluid is injected into thelower layer 3 as illustrated by arrow CO2. - The substantially vertical upper section (5,7) of the branched multilateral fluid injection well may comprise co-axial or parallel liquid and fluid injection conduits (not shown) through which aqueous liquid is supplied to the
upper branch 5A and through which non-aqueous fluid is supplied to thelower branch 7A.
Claims (14)
- A method of enhancing oil recovery from a layered oil reservoir with an upper layer that is more permeable than a lower layer of the reservoir comprises:a) injecting an aqueous liquid through an injection well into the upper layer;b) injecting a non-aqueous fluid into the lower layer; andc) recovering oil from the layered oil reservoir through a production well; and wherein:- the aqueous liquid and/or the non-aqueous fluid carries a foaming agent; and- at least one of the injection and production wells comprises a permeable fluid transfer section with a substantially horizontal orientation.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the foaming agent is injected with the aqueous liquid through a first injection well into the upper layer and the non-aqueous fluid is injected simultaneously with step (a) through a second injection well into the lower layer.
- The method of claim 2, wherein:- the foaming agent is injected with the aqueous liquid through a first injection well into the upper layer; and- the non-aqueous fluid is injected intermittently in slugs, which injection is alternated by injection of water slugs, known as Water Alternating Gas (WAG)cycling, through the second injection well into the lower layer.
- The method of claim 2, wherein:- a mixture of foaming agent and aqueous liquid is injected intermittently in slugs, which injection is alternated by injection of slugs of aqueous liquid alone, through the first injection well into the upper layer; and- the non-aqueous fluid is injected through the second injection well into the lower layer.
- The method of claim 2, wherein the second injection well has a substantially horizontal permeable fluid transfer section.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the production well has a substantially horizontal fluid transfer section, which is oriented substantially parallel to the substantially horizontal fluid transfer section of the second injection well.
- The method according to claim 1, wherein the ratio of the respective fluid and liquid injection rates is so selected that the rate of advance of the aqueous liquid in the upper layer is larger than or substantially equal to the rate of advance of the non-aqueous fluid in the lower layer.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the aqueous liquid comprises a surfactant and/or an alkaline-surfactant.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the non-aqueous fluid comprises carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, ethane, propane, butane and/or flue gas.
- The method of any preceding claim where the non-aqueous fluid is first contact miscible or multi-contact miscible or immiscible with the reservoir oil.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the average permeability of the upper layer is higher than the average permeability of the lower layer.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the first and second injection wells are substantially parallel horizontal branches of a multilateral well.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the foam generated by the foaming agent is used as a means to confine a majority of the injected volume of non-aqueous fluid within the low permeable lower layer and to enhance cross-flow of aqueous liquid from the high permeable upper layer into the low permeable lower layer such that oil recovery from the layered oil reservoir is enhanced.
- The method of any preceding claim, wherein the crude oil produced from the layered oil reservoir is converted into marketable fuel and/or other products.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP09157775A EP2239415A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2009-04-09 | Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP09157775A EP2239415A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2009-04-09 | Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2239415A1 true EP2239415A1 (en) | 2010-10-13 |
Family
ID=40996673
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09157775A Withdrawn EP2239415A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2009-04-09 | Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2239415A1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102071922A (en) * | 2011-01-15 | 2011-05-25 | 胜利油田鲁明油气勘探开发有限公司 | Low permeable oil deposit virtual horizontal well development method |
EP2716862A1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-09 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method and apparatus for producing hydrocarbons from a multilayer system |
EP2716731A1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-09 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method for the recovery of hydrocarbons from an oil reservoir |
WO2015030846A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the water-alternating-gas injection process by using downhole control valves (wag-cv) |
CN106968654A (en) * | 2017-04-10 | 2017-07-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method is altered in a kind of profile control suppression of heavy crude well |
WO2017140629A1 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2017-08-24 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | System and method of enhanced oil recovery combined with a gas lift |
US9784082B2 (en) | 2012-06-14 | 2017-10-10 | Conocophillips Company | Lateral wellbore configurations with interbedded layer |
CN113653475A (en) * | 2021-09-18 | 2021-11-16 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Treatment and utilization method of foam gas-displacement channel |
CN114856511A (en) * | 2021-02-03 | 2022-08-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Nitrogen gas miscible flooding method |
Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3269460A (en) * | 1963-08-12 | 1966-08-30 | Sun Oil Co | Secondary recovery of petroleum |
US3330346A (en) | 1965-01-27 | 1967-07-11 | Union Oil Co | Method of treating a subterranean formation with a foam bank |
US4113011A (en) | 1977-03-07 | 1978-09-12 | Union Oil Company Of California | Enhanced oil recovery process |
US4375238A (en) * | 1981-01-05 | 1983-03-01 | Marathon Oil Company | Method for recovery of oil from reservoirs of non-uniform permeability |
US4380266A (en) | 1981-03-12 | 1983-04-19 | Shell Oil Company | Reservoir-tailored CO2 -aided oil recovery process |
US4577688A (en) | 1984-02-03 | 1986-03-25 | Texaco Inc. | Injection of steam foaming agents into producing wells |
EP0305612A1 (en) * | 1987-09-01 | 1989-03-08 | Union Oil Company Of California | Method for foam emplacement in carbon dioxide enhanced recovery |
US4860828A (en) | 1988-06-01 | 1989-08-29 | The Dow Chemical Company | Gas flooding processing for the recovery of oil from subterranean formations |
US4971150A (en) * | 1989-10-11 | 1990-11-20 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Foam injection into a gravity override zone for improved hydrocarbon production |
US5502538A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1996-03-26 | Nikon Corporation | Focus detection device |
US20060180306A1 (en) * | 2003-05-12 | 2006-08-17 | Stone Herbert L | Method for improved vertical sweep of oil reservervoirs |
-
2009
- 2009-04-09 EP EP09157775A patent/EP2239415A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3269460A (en) * | 1963-08-12 | 1966-08-30 | Sun Oil Co | Secondary recovery of petroleum |
US3330346A (en) | 1965-01-27 | 1967-07-11 | Union Oil Co | Method of treating a subterranean formation with a foam bank |
US4113011A (en) | 1977-03-07 | 1978-09-12 | Union Oil Company Of California | Enhanced oil recovery process |
US4375238A (en) * | 1981-01-05 | 1983-03-01 | Marathon Oil Company | Method for recovery of oil from reservoirs of non-uniform permeability |
US4380266A (en) | 1981-03-12 | 1983-04-19 | Shell Oil Company | Reservoir-tailored CO2 -aided oil recovery process |
US4577688A (en) | 1984-02-03 | 1986-03-25 | Texaco Inc. | Injection of steam foaming agents into producing wells |
EP0305612A1 (en) * | 1987-09-01 | 1989-03-08 | Union Oil Company Of California | Method for foam emplacement in carbon dioxide enhanced recovery |
US4860828A (en) | 1988-06-01 | 1989-08-29 | The Dow Chemical Company | Gas flooding processing for the recovery of oil from subterranean formations |
US4971150A (en) * | 1989-10-11 | 1990-11-20 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Foam injection into a gravity override zone for improved hydrocarbon production |
US5502538A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1996-03-26 | Nikon Corporation | Focus detection device |
US20060180306A1 (en) * | 2003-05-12 | 2006-08-17 | Stone Herbert L | Method for improved vertical sweep of oil reservervoirs |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102071922B (en) * | 2011-01-15 | 2013-07-03 | 胜利油田鲁明油气勘探开发有限公司 | Low permeable oil deposit virtual horizontal well development method |
CN102071922A (en) * | 2011-01-15 | 2011-05-25 | 胜利油田鲁明油气勘探开发有限公司 | Low permeable oil deposit virtual horizontal well development method |
US9784082B2 (en) | 2012-06-14 | 2017-10-10 | Conocophillips Company | Lateral wellbore configurations with interbedded layer |
DK178646B1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2016-10-10 | Maersk Olie & Gas | Method and apparatus for producing hydrocarbons from a multilayer system |
EP2716862A1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-09 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method and apparatus for producing hydrocarbons from a multilayer system |
EP2716731A1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-09 | Maersk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method for the recovery of hydrocarbons from an oil reservoir |
WO2014056946A2 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-17 | Mærsk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method and apparatus for producing hydrocarbons from a multilayer system |
WO2014056948A1 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-04-17 | Mærsk Olie Og Gas A/S | A method for recovering oil |
WO2014056946A3 (en) * | 2012-10-08 | 2014-06-19 | Mærsk Olie Og Gas A/S | Method and apparatus for producing hydrocarbons from a multilayer system |
CN105473810A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-04-06 | 兰德马克绘图国际公司 | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the water-alternating-gas injection process by using downhole control valves (WAG-CV) |
GB2531216A (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2016-04-13 | Landmark Graphics Corp | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the water-alternating-gas injection process by using downhole control valves |
WO2015030846A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the water-alternating-gas injection process by using downhole control valves (wag-cv) |
US10428632B2 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2019-10-01 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the Water-Alternating-Gas injection process by using downhole control valves (WAG-CV) |
GB2531216B (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2020-05-20 | Landmark Graphics Corp | Method, system, and optimization technique to improve oil reservoir recovery in the water-alternating-gas injection process by using downhole control valves |
WO2017140629A1 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2017-08-24 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | System and method of enhanced oil recovery combined with a gas lift |
CN106968654A (en) * | 2017-04-10 | 2017-07-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method is altered in a kind of profile control suppression of heavy crude well |
CN114856511A (en) * | 2021-02-03 | 2022-08-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Nitrogen gas miscible flooding method |
CN113653475A (en) * | 2021-09-18 | 2021-11-16 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Treatment and utilization method of foam gas-displacement channel |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2239415A1 (en) | Foam assisted enhanced oil-recovery in a layered oil reservoir | |
Kumar et al. | A comprehensive review on chemically enhanced water alternating gas/CO2 (CEWAG) injection for enhanced oil recovery | |
Alagorni et al. | An overview of oil production stages: enhanced oil recovery techniques and nitrogen injection | |
Turta et al. | Field foam applications in enhanced oil recovery projects: screening and design aspects | |
Seyyedsar et al. | Experimental investigation of tertiary CO2 injection for enhanced heavy oil recovery | |
CA2812470C (en) | Methods for storing carbon dioxide compositions in subterranean geological formations and an apparatus for carrying out the method | |
Majidaie et al. | A simulation study of chemically enhanced water alternating gas CWAG injection | |
Katiyar* et al. | Industry-first hydrocarbon-foam EOR pilot in an unconventional reservoir: design, implementation, and performance analysis | |
US11002121B2 (en) | Single-well gas-assisted gravity draining process for oil recovery | |
US10472942B2 (en) | Blowdown pressure maintenance with foam | |
Syed et al. | Compositional analysis and screening for enhanced oil recovery processes in different reservoir and operating conditions | |
EP2228514A1 (en) | Improving crude oil production from a layered oil reservoir | |
Dindoruk et al. | Gas flooding: Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery (G-EOR) to CO2 sequestration | |
Chathurangani et al. | Near well simulation of CO2 injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) | |
Choi et al. | Analysis of oil flow in fractured oil reservoir using carbondioxide (CO2) foam injection | |
US11613968B2 (en) | Methodology to increase CO2 sequestration efficiency in reservoirs | |
Saxena | Low salinity water alternate gas injection process for Alaskan viscous oil EOR | |
Seyyedsar et al. | Experimental investigation of simultaneous water and CO2 (SWACO2) injection for oil recovery in immiscible and near‐miscible conditions: A comparative study | |
Sopitkamol | Efficiency of Miscible Gas Flooding in Oil Layered Reservoirs | |
Nazarian et al. | Method for CO 2 EOR and storage and use thereof | |
US11326431B2 (en) | Dense aqueous gravity displacement of heavy oil | |
Sobers | Injection design for simultaneous enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage in a heavy oil reservoir | |
Malik et al. | Potential of greenhouse gas storage and utilization through enhanced oil recovery in Canada | |
Davarpanah | A Feasible Experimental Evaluation of Surfactant Polymer Coupled with Direct Foam Flooding on the Oil Recovery Factor | |
Shokoya et al. | Effect of CO2 concentration on oil recovery in enriched flue gas flood |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN |
|
18W | Application withdrawn |
Effective date: 20110308 |