EP2186370B1 - Reduced transmission time interval - Google Patents

Reduced transmission time interval Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2186370B1
EP2186370B1 EP08786212A EP08786212A EP2186370B1 EP 2186370 B1 EP2186370 B1 EP 2186370B1 EP 08786212 A EP08786212 A EP 08786212A EP 08786212 A EP08786212 A EP 08786212A EP 2186370 B1 EP2186370 B1 EP 2186370B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pdch
pairs
pair
configuration
assignment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08786212A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2186370A1 (en
Inventor
David Philip Hole
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Original Assignee
Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Siemens Networks Oy filed Critical Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
Publication of EP2186370A1 publication Critical patent/EP2186370A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2186370B1 publication Critical patent/EP2186370B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/04Wireless resource allocation
    • H04W72/044Wireless resource allocation based on the type of the allocated resource
    • H04W72/0446Resources in time domain, e.g. slots or frames
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/06Optimizing the usage of the radio link, e.g. header compression, information sizing, discarding information

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the new means of reducing the transmission time interval (TTI) in enhanced general packet radio service (GPRS) EGPRS networks.
  • TTI transmission time interval
  • GPRS general packet radio service
  • radio blocks are divided into four bursts; up to and including in 3GPP GERAN Release 6 the bursts are transmitted on a specific timeslot in four time division multiple access (TDMA) frames.
  • TDMA time division multiple access
  • Each TDMA frame is approximately 5ms in duration, making the transmission time interval approximately 20ms.
  • timeslots (of which there are eight, numbered 0 through 7, per TDMA frame) can be combined into pairs; then four bursts are transmitted using two (paired) timeslots in each of two TDMA frames, reducing the TTI to approximately 10ms.
  • the configuration of a pair of timeslots (which may or may not be on the same carrier) is referred to as a packet data channel (PDCH)-pair.
  • PDCH packet data channel
  • a method for communicating to a mobile which timeslot are configured as PDCH-pairs and on which of these PDCH-pairs the mobile station is assigned resources, as set forth in claim 1, is provided.
  • Preferred embodiments of the invention are claimed in the dependent claims.
  • this invention considers that PDCH pairs cannot 'split' another pair e.g. a pair on 1,3 cannot co-exist with a pair on 2,4.
  • the problem here is to communicate efficiently to the mobile which timeslots are configured as PDCH-pairs and on which of these PDCH-pairs the mobile is assigned resources.
  • a mobile may receive a message which describes a change in configuration or assignment or both.
  • Two methods of encoding the configuration are specified using a bitmap, either fixed or variable length, depending on whether or not 'split PDCH-pairs' are permitted.
  • Rules for informing the mobile of a change in assignment or a change in configuration, or both are specified, including the definition of a new message to inform mobiles (possibly a broadcast message) that a configuration has changed, but the assignment remains (broadly) as before, based on the new configuration.
  • a mobile may be sent a message describing a modification to an existing configuration, without a corresponding change in assignment, e.g., downlink PDCH-pair 3 now uses timeslots 5 & 6, rather than on 5 & 7. Any resources assigned on DL PDCH-pair 3 remain unchanged (but using the new timeslots).
  • a message indicating a change of configuration is defined which is a broadcast message.
  • that message is sent repeatedly to ensure reception.
  • that message includes a 'start time' at which the new configuration will apply.
  • the mobile should be informed of the configuration currently being used.
  • the configuration need not be described in subsequent assignment messages if it has not changed.
  • PDCH-pairs within a configuration are identified by a number, and the identifying number is increased in order of the timeslot numbers used in the configuration.
  • PDCH-pair using timeslots 1 & 2 is PDCH-pair number 1
  • PDCH-pair on timeslots 3 & 5 is PDCH-pair number 2.
  • these identifying numbers are considered equivalent to timeslot numbers in legacy configurations - legacy messages/structures etc. referring to timeslot numbers can be used without change, to refer to PDCH-pairs.
  • the described PDCH-pair configuration need not match the actual PDCH-pair configuration, provided that assignments refer only to PDCH-pairs which actually exist. This means that, for example, the default configuration may be indicated even if only a subset of PDCH-pairs in the described configuration exist. This has the benefit of reducing the amount of signaling information both for the default configuration and where the actual configuration changes but, thanks to this rule, no actual notification is required to mobiles.
  • PDCH pair 1 is configured on the two lowest-numbered timeslots whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1.
  • PDCH pair 2 is configured on the two timeslots with the next lowest timeslot numbers whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1 and so on.
  • the bit corresponding to timeslot 7 need not be included in the assignment message but can be considered a 1 if there are an odd number of 1's in the included bitmap, otherwise it shall be considered a 0 (since there must be an even number of 1's in the total bitmap).
  • the absence of the UL PDCH Pairs bitmap and DL PDCH pairs bitmap shall indicate that the PDCH pair configuration has not changed since the previous assignment message was received.
  • Timeslot Numbers For existing assignment messages, structures and information elements (IEs) which allocate resources in RTTI mode, and other messages, e.g., measurement report messages, references to Timeslot Numbers shall refer to PDCH Pairs.
  • a message which refers to resources on a PDCH pair that is not known e.g., for all PDCH pairs 4, 5, 6, 7 which cannot exist for a non-downlink dual carrier configuration shall be considered to be an error.
  • variable-length bitmap is used to code the PDCH-pairs, according to the following algorithm:
  • any trailing zeros can be omitted, if the bitmap is preceded by an indication of its length.
  • the last '1' can be omitted (if the bitmap is always terminated by a 1, then this can be implicit).
  • a one or two default codes are assigned to indicate that every timeslot forms part of a PDCH, where the first default code indicates that all PDCH-pairs use timeslots on the same carrier and on contiguous timeslots and there are four PDCH-pairs per carrier; the second default code indicates that all PDCH-pairs are split PDCH-pairs, and there are 8 PDCH-pairs per two carriers.
  • Example coding of default options (using CSN.1 coding): ⁇ 00 -- no PDCH pairs configured (or configuration as per previously received description)
  • This scheme is beneficial, because it efficiently encodes the arrangement of PDCH pairs in a logical manner. It is logical, insofar as timeslots are processed in order (unless already specified); it is efficient in that it makes use of the redundancy by not encoding timeslots that are known to be part of a PDCH pair when it is a 'split pair' and this has already been specified for the other timeslot (which must be on the same timeslot number).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
  • Superconductors And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)
  • Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method is suggested for communicating to a mobile station which timeslots are configured as packet data channel pairs and on which of these packet data channel pairs the mobile station is assigned resources, wherein a description of packet data channel pairs is separated into “configuration” and an “assignment”.

Description

  • This invention relates to the new means of reducing the transmission time interval (TTI) in enhanced general packet radio service (GPRS) EGPRS networks.
  • "Introduction of RTTI", 3GPP TSG-GERAN Meeting #34, 45.002 CR 0117 en, China refers to change requests considering RTTI, in particular introducing RTTI definitions, mappings, channel combinations and configurations.
  • Currently, radio blocks are divided into four bursts; up to and including in 3GPP GERAN Release 6 the bursts are transmitted on a specific timeslot in four time division multiple access (TDMA) frames. Each TDMA frame is approximately 5ms in duration, making the transmission time interval approximately 20ms.
  • According to the reduced transmission time interval (TTI) RTTI scheme introduced in Release 7 of the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)/ Enhanced Data for global system for mobile communication (GSM) Evolution (EDGE) Radio Access Network (GERAN) 3GPP GERAN standards, timeslots (of which there are eight, numbered 0 through 7, per TDMA frame) can be combined into pairs; then four bursts are transmitted using two (paired) timeslots in each of two TDMA frames, reducing the TTI to approximately 10ms. The configuration of a pair of timeslots (which may or may not be on the same carrier) is referred to as a packet data channel (PDCH)-pair.
  • In the case of downlink dual carrier assignments a mobile can receive on two different carriers simultaneously. This invention addresses both the case where PDCH-pairs must use timeslots on the same carrier and the case where no such restriction exists (where so-called 'split PDCH-pairs' are possible). In the latter case, this invention concerns only the case where, if PDCH-pairs are on different carriers, the timeslot numbers are the same.
  • In accordance with the present invention a method for communicating to a mobile which timeslot are configured as PDCH-pairs and on which of these PDCH-pairs the mobile station is assigned resources, as set forth in claim 1, is provided. Preferred embodiments of the invention are claimed in the dependent claims.
  • In general, this invention considers that PDCH pairs cannot 'split' another pair e.g. a pair on 1,3 cannot co-exist with a pair on 2,4.
  • It is assumed that in any RTTI configuration, there must be at least one uplink (UL) PDCH pair and one downlink (DL) PDCH pair (even though it is not essential that the mobile has resources assigned on both, they are needed for packet associated control channel (PACCH)).
  • Due to the medium access control (MAC) protocols used in GERAN, it is not required that every UL PDCH pair must have a corresponding DL PDCH pair (in such a case, either extended dynamic allocation (EDA) can be used, or a modified shifted uplink status flag (USF) approach can be used see 3GPP TS 44.060 v.7.0.0).
  • Similarly, it is not required that every DL PDCH pair must have a corresponding UL PDCH pair: the network is forbidden from polling a mobile on a DL PDCH pair for which no corresponding UL PDCH pair exists.
  • The problem here is to communicate efficiently to the mobile which timeslots are configured as PDCH-pairs and on which of these PDCH-pairs the mobile is assigned resources.
  • A subset of this problem is to efficiently encode the description of how PDCH-pairs are assigned to different timeslots and, in the case of Downlink Dual Carrier, different carriers.
  • It is further necessary to specify how a mobile determines, based on the configuration and/or its assignment, which uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) PDCH-pairs correspond to each other. These so-called 'corresponding pairs' govern, for example, on which DL PDCH-pair the mobile should expect to receive an uplink state flag (USF) indicating that it may transmit on a given UL PDCH-pair; also, on which UL PDCH-pair should a mobile respond to a poll sent on a given downlink PDCH-pair.
  • Description of PDCH-pairs is separated into a "configuration" and an "assignment". A mobile may receive a message which describes a change in configuration or assignment or both.
  • Broadly speaking, the configuration describes all RTTI PDCH-pairs currently in use on a given carrier (or pair of carriers), and is distinct from timeslots which are used for non-RTTI packet transfer, or for circuit-switched voice or data transfer. The assignment describes the subset of PDCH-pairs on which a given mobile can expect to transmit or receive data, and also specifies various RLC and MAC parameters (uplink state flag, etc.).
  • Two methods of encoding the configuration are specified using a bitmap, either fixed or variable length, depending on whether or not 'split PDCH-pairs' are permitted.
  • Rules for determining which PDCH-pairs are 'corresponding PDCH-pairs' are specified, based on either the configuration or the assignment.
  • Rules for informing the mobile of a change in assignment or a change in configuration, or both are specified, including the definition of a new message to inform mobiles (possibly a broadcast message) that a configuration has changed, but the assignment remains (broadly) as before, based on the new configuration.
  • A mobile may be sent a message describing a modification to an existing assignment, without a corresponding change in configuration, e.g. a downlink assignment message may indicate that the mobile now is assigned resources on downlink PDCH-pairs 1 & 2, instead of on 2 & 3.
  • A mobile may be sent a message describing a modification to an existing configuration, without a corresponding change in assignment, e.g., downlink PDCH-pair 3 now uses timeslots 5 & 6, rather than on 5 & 7. Any resources assigned on DL PDCH-pair 3 remain unchanged (but using the new timeslots).
  • Since the configuration affects all mobiles using resources on a specific carrier, a message indicating a change of configuration is defined which is a broadcast message.
  • Preferably, that message is sent repeatedly to ensure reception. Preferably, that message includes a 'start time' at which the new configuration will apply.
  • The mobile should be informed of the configuration currently being used. The configuration need not be described in subsequent assignment messages if it has not changed.
  • PDCH-pairs within a configuration are identified by a number, and the identifying number is increased in order of the timeslot numbers used in the configuration. E.g., PDCH-pair using timeslots 1 & 2 is PDCH-pair number 1, PDCH-pair on timeslots 3 & 5 is PDCH-pair number 2. In order to reuse existing message structures, these identifying numbers are considered equivalent to timeslot numbers in legacy configurations - legacy messages/structures etc. referring to timeslot numbers can be used without change, to refer to PDCH-pairs.
  • A default configuration is specified, comprising 4 PDCH-pairs per carrier, with PDCH pair i (0 ≤ i ≤ 3) using timeslots 2i and 2i+1, both in the UL and DL.
  • The described PDCH-pair configuration need not match the actual PDCH-pair configuration, provided that assignments refer only to PDCH-pairs which actually exist. This means that, for example, the default configuration may be indicated even if only a subset of PDCH-pairs in the described configuration exist. This has the benefit of reducing the amount of signaling information both for the default configuration and where the actual configuration changes but, thanks to this rule, no actual notification is required to mobiles.
  • Embodiments of the invention are shown and illustrated in the following figures:
  • Fig.1
    shows a first coding example;
    Fig.2
    shows a second coding example;
    Fig.3
    shows a third coding example;
    Fig.4
    shows a coding example regarding ALTERNATIVE 1;
    Fig.5
    shows a further coding example regarding ALTERNATIVE 1;
    Fig.6
    shows a coding example regarding ALTERNATIVE 2.
    Coding of the configuration description when split PDCH-pairs is not permitted
  • If split PDCH-pairs are not permitted, then up to four PDCH pairs may be configured on a carrier. These are described in a 7- or 8-bit bitmap as follows . PDCH pair 1 is configured on the two lowest-numbered timeslots whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1. PDCH pair 2 is configured on the two timeslots with the next lowest timeslot numbers whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1 and so on. The bit corresponding to timeslot 7 need not be included in the assignment message but can be considered a 1 if there are an odd number of 1's in the included bitmap, otherwise it shall be considered a 0 (since there must be an even number of 1's in the total bitmap).
  • For mobiles currently in packet transfer mode or Dual Transfer Mode (i.e. currently having some packet resources), the absence of the UL PDCH Pairs bitmap and DL PDCH pairs bitmap shall indicate that the PDCH pair configuration has not changed since the previous assignment message was received.
  • For mobiles currently in packet idle mode or dedicated mode (i.e. having no packet resources), the absence of the UL PDCH Pairs bitmap and DL PDCH pairs bitmap shall indicate that the PDCH pair configuration are according to a default configuration, as follows: on both uplink and downlink, PDCH pair i (0 ≤ i ≤ 3) is on timeslots 2i and 2i+1.
  • An explicit indication of the use of the default configuration shall also be specified.
  • For existing assignment messages, structures and information elements (IEs) which allocate resources in RTTI mode, and other messages, e.g., measurement report messages, references to Timeslot Numbers shall refer to PDCH Pairs. A message which refers to resources on a PDCH pair that is not known (e.g., for all PDCH pairs 4, 5, 6, 7 which cannot exist for a non-downlink dual carrier configuration) shall be considered to be an error.
  • Coding of the configuration description when split PDCH-pairs is permitted
  • If split PDCH-pairs are permitted then, according to the approach provided herein, a variable-length bitmap is used to code the PDCH-pairs, according to the following algorithm:
    • For each timeslot/carrier, starting at TN0 on C1 going through (TN7, C1), then (TN0, C2) -> (TN7, C2):
      • if this timeslot forms part of a PDCH pair *and* forms part of a split PDCH (i.e. the other timeslot is on a different carrier) *and* the other timeslot in the pair has already been referenced in the bitmap, then skip this timeslot, otherwise:
        • if this timeslot does not form part of a PDCH pair -> insert 0 in bitmap
        • if this timeslot forms part of a PDCH pair -> insert 1 in bitmap
          • if the other timeslot which forms part of this PDCH pair has already been denoted in the bitmap proceed to the next timeslot, otherwise
          • if the other timeslot which forms part of this PDCH pair has not already been denoted in the bitmap:
            • if the other timeslot in this PDCH pair is on the same carrier -> insert 0 in bitmap
            • if the other timeslot in this PDCH pair is on a different carrier but on the same timeslot (i.e. a 'split PDCH pair') -> insert 0 in bitmap
  • As an option, any trailing zeros can be omitted, if the bitmap is preceded by an indication of its length.
  • As a further option, in addition to trailing zeros, the last '1' can be omitted (if the bitmap is always terminated by a 1, then this can be implicit).
  • As a further option, a one or two default codes are assigned to indicate that every timeslot forms part of a PDCH, where the first default code indicates that all PDCH-pairs use timeslots on the same carrier and on contiguous timeslots and there are four PDCH-pairs per carrier; the second default code indicates that all PDCH-pairs are split PDCH-pairs, and there are 8 PDCH-pairs per two carriers.
  • Coding examples:
    • With PDCH pairs on (see Fig.1 )
      • [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)]
      • [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)]
      • [(C1,TN6) , (C2,TN6)]
      • [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)]
      is coded as:
      0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 (3 trailing zeros omitted)
    • PDCH pairs on (see Fig.2 )
      • [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)]
      • [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)]
      • [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)]
      • [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)]
      is coded as:
      1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 (8 trailing zeros omitted)
    • With PDCH pairs as (see Fig.3 )
      • [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)]
      • [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)]
      • [(C1, TN4), (C2, TN4)]
      • [(C1, TN5), (C2, TN5)]
      is coded as:
      1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 (7 trailing zeros omitted)
  • Example coding of default options (using CSN.1 coding):
    { 00 -- no PDCH pairs configured (or configuration as per previously received description)
    | 01 -- default option 1
    | 10 -- default option 2
    | 11 < PDCH Description length : bit (5) > < PDCH Description : bit (val(PDCH Description length)) > }
  • This scheme is beneficial, because it efficiently encodes the arrangement of PDCH pairs in a logical manner. It is logical, insofar as timeslots are processed in order (unless already specified); it is efficient in that it makes use of the redundancy by not encoding timeslots that are known to be part of a PDCH pair when it is a 'split pair' and this has already been specified for the other timeslot (which must be on the same timeslot number).
  • Determining corresponding PDCH-pairs: ALTERNATIVE 1:
    1. (1) Default PDCH-pair correspondence is according to the set of PDCH-pairs used in the assignment: The i-th PDCH-pair in the DL assignment corresponds to the i-th PDCH-pair in the UL assignment. (for mTBF, these refer to the union of all PDCH-pairs in assignments for all TBFs).
    2. (2) If there are n DL PDCH-pairs and m UL PDCH-pairs in the assignment, and m > 0, n > 0, m ≠ n:
      1. a. if n > m , the jth DL PDCH-pair (j > m) corresponds to the m th UL PDCH-pair.
        • If there are PDCH pairs on (see Fig.4 )
          • Downlink [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)]
          • Downlink [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)]
          • Uplink [(C2,TN1), (C2,TN2)]

          The UL PDCH-pair corresponds to both downlink PDCH-pairs, i.e. a poll on either downlink PDCH-pair is responded to on the single UL PDCH-pair. However, only the USF on the first downlink PDCH-pair signals an UL allocation.
          A preferable alternative is that there is no corresponding UL PDCH-pair; network is never allowed to poll on this PDCH-pair.
      2. b. if m > n , the j-th UL PDCH-pair (j > n) corresponds to the m-th DL PDCH-pair.
        • An example is shown in Fig.5 :
          • Downlink [(C1, TN1), (C1, TN2)]
          • Uplink [(C2, TN1), (C2, TN2)]
          • Uplink [(C2, TN4), (C2, TN5)]
          In the example above, there are two options:
          1. i) use Extended Dynamic Allocation (EDA) to signal allocations on the two UL PDCH-pairs;
          2. ii) use a modified 'shifted USF' approach i.e. define two separate USFs to be sent on the DL PDCH-pair which correspond to each of the two UL PDCH-pairs.
    3. (3) UPLINK_CONTROL_TIMESLOT can be re-used to mean UPLINK_CONTROL_PDCH_PAIR.
    4. (4) If n = 0 (i.e. no DL PDCH-pairs in the assignment), then the corresponding PDCH-pair is found according to Alternative 2, see below.
  • Determining corresponding PDCH-pairs: ALTERNATIVE 2:
    1. (1) Default PDCH-pairs correspondence is according to the timeslots used in the PDCH pair configuration. For an UL PDCH pair using timeslots i and j (i < j), the corresponding downlink pair is
      1. a. the one which uses DL timeslot i and some other timeslot k, k > i, or, if that does not exist,
      2. b. the one which uses DL timeslot i-1 and some other timeslot k, k ≥ i ; or, if that does not exist,
      3. c. keep searching by increasing x (starting at 1) for a PDCH pair which uses DL timeslot i - x and some other timeslot k, k > i - x.
  • An example is shown in Fig.6 :
    • Downlink [(C1,TN3), (C1,TN5)]
    • Downlink [(C1,TN6) , (C1,TN7)]
    • Uplink [(C2,TN4), (C2,TN5)]
  • In the above example, the DL PDCH-pair on 3, 5 corresponds to UL PDCH pair on 4, 5.
  • Note that the above search may find nothing (you get to the beginning of the frame); in this case, search forward until you find a PDCH-pair in the DL; in the above example, if the PDCH-pair on 3,5 did not exist, then the PDCH-pair on 6,7 would be the corresponding pair.
  • Changing Assignments/Configurations
  • It is likely that over time, a mobile's assignment will change, also that the cell RTTI configuration will change. These can change independently of each other or jointly.
  • Considering four possible cases:
    • a. The configuration changes, the assignment doesn't change [the timeslots used for the PDCH-pairs which make up the assignment do not change]. In this case, the PDCH-pair numbers may change; this will have no impact except for measurement reports. The mobile report will have to use the new PDCH-pair numbers, rather than the old numbers.
      In this case, a new message is required to notify the mobile of the new configuration.
    • b. The configuration changes, and as a direct result, the assignment changes [the timeslots used for the PDCH-pairs which make up the assignment do change]. A new assignment message is not needed if:
      • i) resources (inc. USFs) on PDCH-pair i remain on PDCH-pair i; and,
      • ii) resources on PDCH-pairs (including, in the case of DL PDCH-pairs, their USFs) which no longer exist in the new configuration are implicitly released;
      • iii) all remaining corresponding pairs (i.e. not those involving pairs released under rule 2 above) remain the same (i.e. DL PDCH-pair i and UL PDCH-pair j were corresponding pairs before and after the re-configuration).
      In this case, a new message is required to notify the mobile of the new configuration.
    • c. The assignment and the configuration change. In this case, a new assignment message, including a description of the new configuration is required.
    • d. The assignment changes, but the configuration does not change. In this case a new assignment message is required; the configuration description may be omitted.
  • Further advantages comprise that
    • by specifying a means of calculating the corresponding pairs based on the configuration and/or assignment information, no additional signaling is required between the network and the mobile;
    • by defining a new message to indicate that the configuration has changed, but the assignment has not (except for some implicit indications) no new assignment message is needed, thereby reducing signaling;
    • by specifying that the configuration information should be sent to mobiles in addition to the assignment information, the new message may be broadcast to multiple devices where the assignment information has not changed, further reducing signaling; and
    • by specifying a default configuration reduces the average amount of signaling for RTTI messages, since this default configuration would use a very short code but would be applicable in many scenarios.

Claims (16)

  1. A method for communicating to a mobile which timeslots are configured as PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) and on which of these PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) the mobile station is assigned resources,
    characterized in that a description of PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) is separated into a "configuration" and an "assignment", and the configuration describes all RTTI PDCH-pairs currently in use on a given carrier or in use on a pair of carriers, excluding timeslots which are used for non-RTTI packet transfer, or for circuit-switched voice or data transfer, and the assignment describes a subset of PDCH-pairs on which a given mobile can expect to transmit or receive data, and also specifies various RLC and MAC parameters such as uplink state flag.
  2. The method of claim 1, wherein a set of resources is assigned to said mobile station by means of said "configuration" of PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) together with said "assignment" indicating on which PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1) , (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)])resources are assigned together with assignment parameters.
  3. The method according to any of the preceding claims, comprising the step of:
    - Encoding a description of how PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1) , (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4) , (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6) , (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2) , (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0) , (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1) , (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3) , (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4) , (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0) , (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) are assigned to different timeslots and, in the case of Downlink Dual Carrier, different carriers.
  4. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the mobile determines, based on the configuration and/or its assignment, which uplink, UL, and downlink, DL, PDCH-pairs correspond to each other.
  5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said uplink, UL, and said downlink, DL, PDCH-pairs govern on which DL PDCH-pair the mobile should expect to receive an uplink state flag, USF, indicating that it may transmit on a given UL PDCH-pair.
  6. The method according to any of claims 4 or 5, wherein said uplink, UL, and said downlink, DL PDCH-pairs govern on which UL PDCH-pair should a mobile respond to a poll sent on a given downlink PDCH-pair.
  7. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the mobile receives a message which describes a change in configuration or assignment or both.
  8. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein two methods of encoding the configuration are specified using a bitmap, either fixed or variable length, depending on whether or not 'split PDCH-pairs' are permitted.
  9. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein rules for determining which PDCH-pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) are 'corresponding PDCH-pairs' are specified, based on either the configuration or the assignment.
  10. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein rules for informing the mobile of a change in assignment or of a change in configuration, or both are specified.
  11. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein a default configuration is specified, comprising 4 PDCH-pairs per carrier, with PDCH pair i (0 ≤ i ≤ 3) using timeslots 2i and 2i+1, both in the UL and DL.
  12. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the described PDCH-pair configuration need not match the actual PDCH-pair configuration, provided that assignments refer only to PDCH-pairs which actually exist.
  13. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein up to four PDCH pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) may be configured on a carrier, wherein up to four PDCH pairs ([(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN4), (C1,TN5)] [(C1,TN6), (C2,TN6)] [(C2,TN2), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN2)] [(C1,TN3), (C2,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN0), (C2,TN0)] [(C1,TN1), (C1,TN3)] [(C1,TN4), (C2,TN4)] [(C1,TN5), (C2,TN5)]) are described in a 7- or 8-bit bitmap, wherein PDCH pair 1 is configured on the two lowest-numbered timeslots whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1 and PDCH pair 2 is configured on the two timeslots with the next lowest timeslot numbers whose corresponding bits in the bitmap are set to 1.
  14. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein an explicit indication of the use of the default configuration shall also be specified.
  15. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein PDCH-pairs correspondence is set according to the timeslots used in the PDCH pair configuration.
  16. The method according to claim 15, wherein said PDCH-pairs correspondence is set as follows:
    - For an UL PDCH pair using timeslots i and j (i < j), the corresponding downlink pair is
    - the one which uses DL timeslot i and some other timeslot k, k > i, or, if that does not exist,
    - the one which uses DL timeslot i-1 and some other timeslot k, k ≥ i ; or, if that does not exist,
    - keep searching by increasing x (starting at 1) for a PDCH pair which uses DL timeslot i - x and some other timeslot k, k > i - x.
EP08786212A 2007-08-07 2008-07-17 Reduced transmission time interval Active EP2186370B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0715281.2A GB0715281D0 (en) 2007-08-07 2007-08-07 Reduced transmission time interval
PCT/EP2008/059377 WO2009019116A1 (en) 2007-08-07 2008-07-17 Reduced transmission time interval

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2186370A1 EP2186370A1 (en) 2010-05-19
EP2186370B1 true EP2186370B1 (en) 2011-09-07

Family

ID=38529363

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08786212A Active EP2186370B1 (en) 2007-08-07 2008-07-17 Reduced transmission time interval

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US8693445B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2186370B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101816211B (en)
AT (1) ATE524043T1 (en)
GB (1) GB0715281D0 (en)
RU (1) RU2487501C9 (en)
WO (1) WO2009019116A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201000828B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105101236B (en) * 2014-05-19 2019-03-15 中国移动通信集团湖北有限公司 A kind of modeling method and its device
US10128998B2 (en) * 2015-10-06 2018-11-13 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and device for performing channel estimation in wireless communication system
US10182427B2 (en) * 2015-11-06 2019-01-15 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Transmitting and receiving downlink grant and downlink data
JP6863752B2 (en) * 2016-01-21 2021-04-21 株式会社堀場製作所 Management device for measuring equipment

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10125909A1 (en) * 2001-05-28 2002-12-12 Infineon Technologies Ag Data transmission system with a high data transmission rate
GB2400279B (en) * 2003-06-18 2005-08-10 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Extended dynamic resource allocation in packet data transfer
KR20050000709A (en) * 2003-06-24 2005-01-06 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for transmitting/receiving data according to channel states in communication systems using multiple access scheme
CA2486289C (en) * 2003-11-25 2008-01-08 Weyerhaeuser Company Combination end seal and restraint
CN1985477B (en) 2004-05-13 2012-11-07 高通股份有限公司 Method and apparatus for allocation of information to channels of a communication system
US20070022126A1 (en) * 2005-07-21 2007-01-25 Caterpillar Inc. Method and apparatus for updating an asset catalog
US8638771B2 (en) 2005-08-12 2014-01-28 Qualcomm Incorporated Transmission structure supporting multi-user scheduling and MIMO transmission
CN100450215C (en) * 2006-04-06 2009-01-07 华为技术有限公司 Method for grouping data channel adopted by indicating terminal transmitting data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0715281D0 (en) 2007-09-12
RU2487501C9 (en) 2013-11-20
RU2487501C2 (en) 2013-07-10
CN101816211B (en) 2014-07-30
ZA201000828B (en) 2011-12-28
US8693445B2 (en) 2014-04-08
US20110090876A1 (en) 2011-04-21
WO2009019116A1 (en) 2009-02-12
CN101816211A (en) 2010-08-25
ATE524043T1 (en) 2011-09-15
EP2186370A1 (en) 2010-05-19
RU2010108236A (en) 2011-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3133887B1 (en) Methods, base station, and user terminal for implementing uplink resource indication
US8797991B2 (en) Optimized system access procedures
US9031046B2 (en) Methods and arrangements in a radio communication system
US9648513B2 (en) Optimized system access procedures
US7751363B1 (en) System and method for allocating traffic and associated control channels
EP3235320B1 (en) Uplink resource scheduling in multiple time instances
EP2196064B1 (en) Method for transmitting data in a network
US9232435B2 (en) Methods and devices for providing TFI
CN103457702A (en) Scheduling grant information signaling in wireless communication system
KR20150017682A (en) Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving resource allocating information in a wireless communication system
EP2544502B1 (en) Shared uplink notification bursts (SUNB)
EP2638759B1 (en) Method and apparatus for assigning wireless network packet resources to wireless terminals
EP3945743B1 (en) Systems and methods for collision handling and semi-persistently scheduled physical downlink shared channel release
EP2186370B1 (en) Reduced transmission time interval
US8130710B2 (en) Method of allocating terminal to group in base station of communication system and method of generating map
EP3245831B1 (en) Resource scheduling of uplink resources
US20030125051A1 (en) Acknowledgement of reception of downlink messages
KR20100090624A (en) Superframe header structure and method for efficiently transmitting thereof
WO2022073455A1 (en) Reducing power consumption in direct wireless communications systems
EP1164809A1 (en) Channel allocation method for facilitating downlink power control and downlink adaptive beam forming
CA2577161C (en) Method, and associated apparatus, for communicating data at reduced transmission latency in radio communication system having slotted interface
JPS63227135A (en) Radio selective calling system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100308

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100713

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008009627

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20111201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111207

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111208

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 524043

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120109

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120611

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008009627

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130329

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120731

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120731

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120717

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110907

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602008009627

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY, FI

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS OY, ESPOO, FI

Effective date: 20140521

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080717

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230527

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230601

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240604

Year of fee payment: 17