EP2167710B1 - Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same - Google Patents

Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2167710B1
EP2167710B1 EP08780812A EP08780812A EP2167710B1 EP 2167710 B1 EP2167710 B1 EP 2167710B1 EP 08780812 A EP08780812 A EP 08780812A EP 08780812 A EP08780812 A EP 08780812A EP 2167710 B1 EP2167710 B1 EP 2167710B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fiber
fluoropolymer
rotational speed
sintering
polytetrafluoroethylene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08780812A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2167710A4 (en
EP2167710A1 (en
Inventor
Mike Donckers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toray Fluorofibers America Inc
Original Assignee
Toray Fluorofibers America Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/763,249 external-priority patent/US7498079B1/en
Application filed by Toray Fluorofibers America Inc filed Critical Toray Fluorofibers America Inc
Publication of EP2167710A1 publication Critical patent/EP2167710A1/en
Publication of EP2167710A4 publication Critical patent/EP2167710A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2167710B1 publication Critical patent/EP2167710B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01DMECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D10/00Physical treatment of artificial filaments or the like during manufacture, i.e. during a continuous production process before the filaments have been collected
    • D01D10/02Heat treatment
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F6/00Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F6/02Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D01F6/08Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds from polymers of halogenated hydrocarbons
    • D01F6/12Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds from polymers of halogenated hydrocarbons from polymers of fluorinated hydrocarbons
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F6/00Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F6/44Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from mixtures of polymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds as major constituent with other polymers or low-molecular-weight compounds
    • D01F6/48Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from mixtures of polymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds as major constituent with other polymers or low-molecular-weight compounds of polymers of halogenated hydrocarbons
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01DMECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
    • D01D1/00Treatment of filament-forming or like material
    • D01D1/02Preparation of spinning solutions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a thermally stable fluoropolymer fiber and method of making same, and in particular to a thermally stable, dispersion spun polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”) fiber prepared by heat setting the fiber subsequent to drawing.
  • PTFE thermally stable, dispersion spun polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Dispersion spun or wet PTFE yarns are typically produced by forming a spin mix containing an aqueous dispersion of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) particles and a solution of a cellulosic ether matrix polymer.
  • the spin mix is then extruded at relatively low pressure (e.g., less than 150 pounds per square inch) through an orifice into a coagulation solution usually containing sulfuric acid to coagulate the matrix polymer and form an intermediate fiber structure.
  • the intermediate fiber structure once washed free of acid and salts, is passed over a series of heated rolls to dry the fiber structure and sinter the PTFE particles into a continuous PTFE filament yarn.
  • the dried and sintered yarn is often drawn by accelerating the yarn speed over the last pair of heated rolls by passing the yarn onto a series of draw rolls having a rotational speed greater than the rotational speed of the heated rolls.
  • the yarn is drawn or stretched over the last pair of heated rolls since it is being retrieved by the drawing rolls faster than it is being supplied by the heated rolls.
  • the amount the yarn is drawn is referred to as the draw length or draw ratio.
  • Typical draw ratios for a dispersion spun PTFE yarn range between 6.7 and 7.4, (i.e., the yarn is drawn to a length that is between 6.7 and 7.4 times greater than its pre-drawn length). After drawing, the yarn is wound into packages.
  • drawing PTFE yarn increases the tenacity of the yarn, it has the undesired effect of decreasing the yarn's thermal stability and elongation prior to break of the yarn. Accordingly, what is needed is a method of making a dispersion spun PTFE yarn that allows for increased productivity while maintaining or increasing yarn thermal stability and elongation prior to break of the yarn.
  • the primary benefit of maintaining or increasing yarn thermal stability in a dispersion spun PTFE yarn is centered in the hot gas filtration market. Because filter media made from PTFE yarn are exposed to and in continuous service in applications where air temperatures are regularly at or above 260 degrees Celsius, it is necessary to heat treat the PTFE yarn prior to putting it into service. When this step is accomplished standard yarns produced by dispersion spinning PTFE homopolymer shrink 20% or more. While the resulting shrunken PTFE yarn filter media performs well, it requires users to buy greater amounts of PTFE yarn to cover the loss of filter surface area caused by the shrinking.
  • the present invention is based on the discovery that by modifying the draw scenario for a dispersion spun PTFE fiber yarn, the long established understanding that increasing the total draw of a PTFE yarn decreases yarn elongation prior to yarn break can be inverted while simultaneously increasing the yarn's thermal stability, (i.e., decreasing the amount the yarn shrinks at elevated temperatures.).
  • the fiber is drawn and the PTFE molecules aligned and held above the Tg of the PTFE molecules for a period of time. It is believed that by maintaining the drawn fiber at or above the Tg while the fiber is held at length relaxes the internal stresses within the fiber created by drawing.
  • the present invention is directed to a dispersion spun fluoropolymer fiber that exhibits improved elongation prior to fiber break and increased thermally stability.
  • dispersion spun it is meant that the fiber is prepared by forming a dispersion of insoluble fluoropolymer particles, such as PTFE and polymers generally known as fluorinated olefinic polymers, and mixing the dispersion with a solution of a soluble matrix polymer to produce a spin mix. This spin mix is then coagulated into an intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure by extruding the mixture into a coagulation solution in which the matrix polymer becomes insoluble.
  • insoluble fluoropolymer particles such as PTFE and polymers generally known as fluorinated olefinic polymers
  • One method which is commonly used to spin PTFE and related polymers includes spinning the polymer from a mixture of an aqueous dispersion of the polymer particles and viscose, where cellulose xanthate is the soluble form of the matrix polymer, as taught for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,655,853 ; 3,114,672 and 2,772,444 .
  • the fluoropolymer fiber of the present invention is prepared using a more environmentally friendly method than those methods utilizing viscose.
  • One such method is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,984 ; 5,762,846 , and 5,723,081 , which patents are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
  • this method employs a cellulosic ether polymer such as methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, methylhydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, ethylcellulose or carboxymethylcellulose as the soluble matrix polymer, in place of viscose.
  • a cellulosic ether polymer such as methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, methylhydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, ethylcellulose or carboxymethylcellulose
  • the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure is sintered and partially dried by heating the fiber and passing it over a series of sintering rolls operating at a temperature greater than the Tg of the PTFE molecules of the fiber. Sintering the structure coalesces and entangles the fluoropolymer particles, forming a continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber.
  • the partially dried continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is passed directly from the series of sintering rolls to a series of drawing rolls operating at ambient temperature.
  • the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber cools slightly, preferably about 30 degrees Fahrenheit, but remains in a transitional state.
  • the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is drawn or elongated by passing the fiber directly from the series of drawing rolls to a series of heat setting rolls rotating at a speed greater than the series of sintering and drawing rolls.
  • the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is accelerated and stretched between the next to last drawing roll and the first heat setting roll and slid across the last drawing roll resulting in the fiber undergoing drawing.
  • the series of heating rolls operate at a rotational speed that is approximately six times the rotational speed of the series of drawing rolls. This results in the fiber having a total draw ratio ranging from 6.7 to 7.4.
  • the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is further dried and heat set or stabilized by passing the fiber over the series of heat setting rolls.
  • the heat setting rolls operate at a temperature that is greater than the series of drawing rolls and essentially the same as the sintering rolls.
  • the drawn continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is heated and maintained at or near the temperature of the heat setting rolls for a period of time allowing the internal stresses created within the fiber by drawing to relax.
  • the continuous fluoropolymer filament is wound and stored.
  • the intermediate, cellulosic ether-based PTFE fiber structures were prepared in accordance with the method described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,984 ; 5,762,846 , and 5,723,081 and subsequently processed.
  • the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the prior art and a number of 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined for comparing to PTFE yarns made in accordance with the present invention.
  • the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the present invention and a number of 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined.
  • the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the present invention and a number of 1200 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined.
  • tensile strength and elongation prior to break a fiber section was pulled and force applied to the fiber using the instron tensile tester. Throughout the pull the amount of force applied to the fiber is measured. Tensile strength was determined by dividing the total pound force by the denier. The amount the fiber stretches prior to breaking is the elongation. For example, 6 inch lengths of fiber are pulled and tested. At break the fibers are 7.2 inches long. Thus, the amount of stretch is 1.2 inches. This amount is divided by the original length of 6 inches to provide the elongation prior to breaking of 0.20 or 20% elongation at break.
  • the intermediate PTFE fiber structure was prepared from a spin mix having a density of 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter. The fiber structure was then processed by heating it to a temperature about two times greater than the Tg of the PTFE molecules by passing it over a series of heated rolls. The resulting continuous PTFE filament yarn was passed directly to a series of drawing rolls operating at ambient temperature at rotating at a speed approximately six times greater than the rotational speed of the heated rolls.
  • Example 1 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarn production with altered draw scenario
  • the test comprised 2 different spin mix ratios. They were 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter and 1.291 grams per cubic centimeter. 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter is considered a standard spin mix ratio and is used commercially on Teflon® yarns within a defined range. All test conditions labeled "1" were run at this spin mix ratio. 1.291 grams per cubic centimeter is considered a "PTFE rich” spin mix ratio and is not presently used commercially on Teflon® yarns within a defined range. All test conditions labeled "2" were run at this spin mix ratio.
  • the test was performed with 3 different draw scenarios resulting in 6 sample sets.
  • the draw scenarios were denoted as A, B, and C, resulting in test condition 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, and 2C.
  • the "A” samples represent a standard draw scenario, but with an increased total draw.
  • the "B” samples represent separating the total draw into 2 steps for instance drawing between a set of rolls, followed by heat setting on a second set of rolls, followed a second draw. This scenario had no merit.
  • the "C” sample represent a draw scenario in accordance the present invention.
  • Test 2 Production of a 1200 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarn with an early draw section and heat setting prior to winding.
  • Shrinkage of yarn at elevated temperatures was measured as follows: 200 millimeter lengths of yarn were measure and placed in a preheated, calibrated, hot air oven for 30 minutes and then measured. Percent shrink was then determined. A graphical representation of the results and test settings is shown at FIG. 4.

Abstract

A dispersion spun polytetrafluoroethylene fiber exhibiting improved elongation prior to fiber break and increased thermal stability, the fiber prepared by forming a spin mix containing a dispersion of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) particles, forming an intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure from the spin mix, sintering the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure and forming a continuous fluoropolymer filament yarn, drawing the continuous fluoropolymer filament yarn, and thereafter heat setting the continuous fluoropolymer filament yarn.

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to a thermally stable fluoropolymer fiber and method of making same, and in particular to a thermally stable, dispersion spun polytetrafluoroethylene ("PTFE") fiber prepared by heat setting the fiber subsequent to drawing.
  • Background Art
  • Dispersion spun or wet PTFE yarns are typically produced by forming a spin mix containing an aqueous dispersion of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) particles and a solution of a cellulosic ether matrix polymer. The spin mix is then extruded at relatively low pressure (e.g., less than 150 pounds per square inch) through an orifice into a coagulation solution usually containing sulfuric acid to coagulate the matrix polymer and form an intermediate fiber structure. The intermediate fiber structure, once washed free of acid and salts, is passed over a series of heated rolls to dry the fiber structure and sinter the PTFE particles into a continuous PTFE filament yarn.
  • In order to increase PTFE yarn productivity and improve the yarn's functional properties (e.g., tenacity), the dried and sintered yarn is often drawn by accelerating the yarn speed over the last pair of heated rolls by passing the yarn onto a series of draw rolls having a rotational speed greater than the rotational speed of the heated rolls. Thus, the yarn is drawn or stretched over the last pair of heated rolls since it is being retrieved by the drawing rolls faster than it is being supplied by the heated rolls. The amount the yarn is drawn is referred to as the draw length or draw ratio. Typical draw ratios for a dispersion spun PTFE yarn range between 6.7 and 7.4, (i.e., the yarn is drawn to a length that is between 6.7 and 7.4 times greater than its pre-drawn length). After drawing, the yarn is wound into packages.
  • Although drawing PTFE yarn increases the tenacity of the yarn, it has the undesired effect of decreasing the yarn's thermal stability and elongation prior to break of the yarn. Accordingly, what is needed is a method of making a dispersion spun PTFE yarn that allows for increased productivity while maintaining or increasing yarn thermal stability and elongation prior to break of the yarn.
  • The primary benefit of maintaining or increasing yarn thermal stability in a dispersion spun PTFE yarn is centered in the hot gas filtration market. Because filter media made from PTFE yarn are exposed to and in continuous service in applications where air temperatures are regularly at or above 260 degrees Celsius, it is necessary to heat treat the PTFE yarn prior to putting it into service. When this step is accomplished standard yarns produced by dispersion spinning PTFE homopolymer shrink 20% or more. While the resulting shrunken PTFE yarn filter media performs well, it requires users to buy greater amounts of PTFE yarn to cover the loss of filter surface area caused by the shrinking.
  • Disclosure of Invention
  • Sintering a dispersion spun, intermediate PTFE fiber structure causes the PTFE particles in the structure to coalesce and entangle thus forming a continuous PTFE filament fiber. Drawing the continuous PTFE filament fiber causes elongation of the fiber and molecular alignment and orientation of the PTFE molecules to a degree. This situation causes internal stresses within the fiber created by overcoming the entanglement forces. Pursuant to the prior art, the continuous PTFE filament fiber is quickly cooled after drawing to below the Tg of PTFE (Tg of PTFE is approximately 320 to 350 degrees Celsius, depending on the molecular weight of the PTFE) in order to freeze or maintain the aligned molecules in place against these internal stresses and entanglement forces. It is believed that when such continuous PTFE filament fibers are later heated near or above the PTFE molecule's Tg, for example during hot gas filtration applications, the forces maintaining alignment of the PTFE molecules relax and are therefore overcome to an extent thus causing the fiber to shrink as the PTFE molecules resort to a less aligned state and orientation.
  • The present invention is based on the discovery that by modifying the draw scenario for a dispersion spun PTFE fiber yarn, the long established understanding that increasing the total draw of a PTFE yarn decreases yarn elongation prior to yarn break can be inverted while simultaneously increasing the yarn's thermal stability, (i.e., decreasing the amount the yarn shrinks at elevated temperatures.). According to the present invention, after a continuous PTFE filament fiber is formed by sintering, the fiber is drawn and the PTFE molecules aligned and held above the Tg of the PTFE molecules for a period of time. It is believed that by maintaining the drawn fiber at or above the Tg while the fiber is held at length relaxes the internal stresses within the fiber created by drawing. It is further believed that when the continuous PTFE filament fiber is later subjected to temperatures near or in excess of the Tg of the P1FE molecules, less shrinkage occurs since the internal stresses and entanglement forces of the fiber were previously relaxed. Thus, by drawing a sintered PTFE yarn and thereafter heat setting or heat stabilizing the drawn PTFE yarn there is provided a dispersion spun PTFE yarn exhibiting improved thermal stability and elongation prior to yarn break.
  • In one aspect of the invention there is provided a polytetrafluoroethylene fiber as claimed in claim 1.
  • In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of making a fiber as claimed in claim 8.
  • Brief Description of Drawings
    • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the thermal stability of a number of 400 denier yarns prepared in accordance with the present invention.
    • FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the thermal stability of a number of 1200 denier yarns prepared in accordance with the present invention.
    Best Mode for Carrying Out Invention
  • The present invention is directed to a dispersion spun fluoropolymer fiber that exhibits improved elongation prior to fiber break and increased thermally stability. By "dispersion spun" it is meant that the fiber is prepared by forming a dispersion of insoluble fluoropolymer particles, such as PTFE and polymers generally known as fluorinated olefinic polymers, and mixing the dispersion with a solution of a soluble matrix polymer to produce a spin mix. This spin mix is then coagulated into an intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure by extruding the mixture into a coagulation solution in which the matrix polymer becomes insoluble.
  • One method which is commonly used to spin PTFE and related polymers includes spinning the polymer from a mixture of an aqueous dispersion of the polymer particles and viscose, where cellulose xanthate is the soluble form of the matrix polymer, as taught for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,655,853 ; 3,114,672 and 2,772,444 . Preferably, the fluoropolymer fiber of the present invention is prepared using a more environmentally friendly method than those methods utilizing viscose. One such method is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,984 ; 5,762,846 , and 5,723,081 , which patents are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. In general, this method employs a cellulosic ether polymer such as methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, methylhydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, ethylcellulose or carboxymethylcellulose as the soluble matrix polymer, in place of viscose.
  • Once washed free of acid and salts, the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure is sintered and partially dried by heating the fiber and passing it over a series of sintering rolls operating at a temperature greater than the Tg of the PTFE molecules of the fiber. Sintering the structure coalesces and entangles the fluoropolymer particles, forming a continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber.
  • After sintering, the partially dried continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is passed directly from the series of sintering rolls to a series of drawing rolls operating at ambient temperature. As a result, the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber cools slightly, preferably about 30 degrees Fahrenheit, but remains in a transitional state.
  • After sintering, the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is drawn or elongated by passing the fiber directly from the series of drawing rolls to a series of heat setting rolls rotating at a speed greater than the series of sintering and drawing rolls. As a consequence, the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is accelerated and stretched between the next to last drawing roll and the first heat setting roll and slid across the last drawing roll resulting in the fiber undergoing drawing. Preferably, the series of heating rolls operate at a rotational speed that is approximately six times the rotational speed of the series of drawing rolls. This results in the fiber having a total draw ratio ranging from 6.7 to 7.4.
  • After drawing, the continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is further dried and heat set or stabilized by passing the fiber over the series of heat setting rolls. The heat setting rolls operate at a temperature that is greater than the series of drawing rolls and essentially the same as the sintering rolls. As a consequence, the drawn continuous fluoropolymer filament fiber is heated and maintained at or near the temperature of the heat setting rolls for a period of time allowing the internal stresses created within the fiber by drawing to relax. After heat setting, the continuous fluoropolymer filament is wound and stored.
  • The present invention will be explained further in detail by the following Examples. In each of the Examples, the intermediate, cellulosic ether-based PTFE fiber structures were prepared in accordance with the method described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,820,984 ; 5,762,846 , and 5,723,081 and subsequently processed. In one instance, the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the prior art and a number of 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined for comparing to PTFE yarns made in accordance with the present invention. In a further instance, the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the present invention and a number of 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined. In another instance, the fiber structures were processed in accordance with the present invention and a number of 1200 denier 6.7 denier per filament PTFE yarns were prepared and examined.
  • Unless otherwise indicated below, in each instance, the draw ratio, elongation prior to break, tenacity and shrinkage of the PTFE yarns were measure. All shrinkage data represent the average of 6 specimens place in a calibrated oven under tension for 30 minutes. All tensile test data represent the average of 5 yarn breaks from each of 4 different bobbins. All pulls were performed on a calibrated instron tensile tester. Elongation prior to break was measured as break strength on an instron tensile tester.
  • More specifically with regard to tensile strength and elongation prior to break, a fiber section was pulled and force applied to the fiber using the instron tensile tester. Throughout the pull the amount of force applied to the fiber is measured. Tensile strength was determined by dividing the total pound force by the denier. The amount the fiber stretches prior to breaking is the elongation. For example, 6 inch lengths of fiber are pulled and tested. At break the fibers are 7.2 inches long. Thus, the amount of stretch is 1.2 inches. This amount is divided by the original length of 6 inches to provide the elongation prior to breaking of 0.20 or 20% elongation at break.
  • Control Yarn - 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarn production with standard draw scenario
  • The intermediate PTFE fiber structure was prepared from a spin mix having a density of 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter. The fiber structure was then processed by heating it to a temperature about two times greater than the Tg of the PTFE molecules by passing it over a series of heated rolls. The resulting continuous PTFE filament yarn was passed directly to a series of drawing rolls operating at ambient temperature at rotating at a speed approximately six times greater than the rotational speed of the heated rolls.
  • The production conditions for the PTFE control yarn and aim finished yarn properties are described below.
    Spin mix ratio 1.275g/cc
    draw ratio - single stage 6.7
    Aim elongation 22%
    Typically achieved tenacity 1.8q/d
    Aim Color "L" 15.00
    Shrinkage at 177dC 7.58%
    Shrinkage at 230dC 5.33%
    Shrinkage at 260dC 13.67%
    Shrinkage at 300dC 21.25%
  • Example 1 - 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarn production with altered draw scenario
  • The following parameters were adjusted to determine there effect on tenacity and thermal stability: length of draw or total draw ratio, stage in the sintering process in which the yarn was drawn, addition of an annealing or heat setting step after the draw, and spin mix density. The test being described was performed on 400 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarns.
  • Six sets of conditions were tested and the results were positive. It was found that the long established relationship of increasing the total draw to decrease the elongation, and increasing the tenacity could be inverted while decreasing the amount the yarn shrinks at elevated temperatures by ∼35%. Continuity of the altered draw scenarios was surprisingly good resulting in more production than expected. In all cases increasing the total draw by means of a two stage or early draw resulted in better continuity than an increased total draw ratio in the standard draw zone.
  • The test comprised 2 different spin mix ratios. They were 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter and 1.291 grams per cubic centimeter. 1.275 grams per cubic centimeter is considered a standard spin mix ratio and is used commercially on Teflon® yarns within a defined range. All test conditions labeled "1" were run at this spin mix ratio. 1.291 grams per cubic centimeter is considered a "PTFE rich" spin mix ratio and is not presently used commercially on Teflon® yarns within a defined range. All test conditions labeled "2" were run at this spin mix ratio.
  • The test was performed with 3 different draw scenarios resulting in 6 sample sets. The draw scenarios were denoted as A, B, and C, resulting in test condition 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, and 2C. The "A" samples represent a standard draw scenario, but with an increased total draw. The "B" samples represent separating the total draw into 2 steps for instance drawing between a set of rolls, followed by heat setting on a second set of rolls, followed a second draw. This scenario had no merit. The "C" sample represent a draw scenario in accordance the present invention.
    Condition Test 1A Test 1B Test 1C
    Spin Mix ratio 1.275g/cc 1.275g/cc 1.275g/cc
    First stage draw 0.0 4.0 7.4
    Second stage draw 7.4 1.85 0
    Total draw 7.40 7.40 7.40
    Achieve elongation 14.13% 15.70% 33.51%
    Achieve tenacity 1.8g/d 1.53g/d 1.12g/d
    Achieved color 17.2 15.9 15.5
    Shrinkage at 177dC 7.17% 5.92% 1.67%
    Shrinkage at 230dC 5.50% 8.58% 5.08%
    Shrinkage at 260dC 13.25% 13.25% 3.58%
    Shrinkage at 300dC 22.33% 20.67% 8.50%
    Average bobbin size 0.471bs 1.6lbs 0.891bs
    Percent PTFE in final yarn 96.865 94.516 95.555
    Condition Test 2A Test 2B Test 2C
    Spin Mix ratio 1.291.g/cc 1.291g/cc 1.291g/cc
    First stage draw 0.0 4.0 7.4
    Second stage draw 6.8 1.85 0
    Total draw 6.80 7.40 7.40
    Achieve elongation 14.36% 16.18% 20.74%
    Achieve tenacity 1.84g/d 1.76g/d 1.81g/d
    Achieved color 14.4 16.2 20.7
    Shrinkage at 177dC 6.25% 7.00% 2.50%
    Shrinkage at 230dC 7.25% 9.17% 4.83%
    Shrinkage at 260dC 11.25% 14.00% 8.17%
    Shrinkage at 300dC 17.17% 22.75% 14.75%
    Average bobbin size 1.05lbs 1.251bs 0.06lbs
    Percent PTFE in final yarn 96.137 95.574 95.221
  • As the data shows, elongation was decreased as expected when the draw ratio was increased under standard draw conditions. However, under alternate draw scenarios the relationship was inverted and represented an unexpected result. The "B" test shows increased elongation at both draw scenarios while the "C" condition elongation result increases dramatically.
  • Tenacity was not positively affected in either of the spin mix scenarios. While tenacity is remains relatively unaffected under the 1.291g/cc condition, significant strength loss occurs at the standard 1.275g/cc condition as the draw scenario diverges from the standard condition.
  • Thermal stability of the "C" samples was dramatically improved in both 1 and 2 test conditions. A graphical representation of achieved shrinkage is presented in FIG. 1.
  • Test 2 - Production of a 1200 denier 6.7 denier per filament yarn with an early draw section and heat setting prior to winding.
  • This was the second test performed in the pursuit of creating a yarn with increased dimensional stability at elevated temperatures. This test resulted in the production of 420 pounds of 1200 denier 6.7 denier per filament fiber with a slightly reduced tenacity, improved denier uniformity, and dramatically improved dimensional stability at elevated temperatures.
  • During the test spin mix density was maintained at an output of 59.5 or 1.29 grams per cubic centimeter. Yarn was draw at a rate of 6.2X. The test suffered a dispersion yield of less than 50% due to an unexplained spin mix density upset that lasted nearly 6 hours. The average bobbin size was 1.3 pounds.
  • Bobbins produced during test: Standard 1200 denier campaigns commonly produce 12000-15000 pounds of yarn with an average bobbin size of 5 pounds. Tensile properties:
    1200 denier tensile properties
    W00843 Test production Aim
    Tenacity 1.57 1.25 Min 1.5
    Std Dev 0.08 0.11
    Elongation 28.54 57.76 32
    Std dev 3.41 16.59
  • Shrinkage of yarn at elevated temperatures was measured as follows: 200 millimeter lengths of yarn were measure and placed in a preheated, calibrated, hot air oven for 30 minutes and then measured. Percent shrink was then determined. A graphical representation of the results and test settings is shown at FIG. 4.

Claims (20)

  1. A polytetrafluoroethylene fiber exhibiting less than 15% shrinkage when subjected to a temperature of 300 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes wherein the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber is a dispersion spun fiber.
  2. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to claim 1 wherein the fiber exhibits less than 9% shrinkage when subjected to a temperature of 300 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes.
  3. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to claim 1 wherein the fiber exhibits less than 5% shrinkage when subjected to a temperature of 300 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes.
  4. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to any preceding claim exhibiting more than about 30% elongation prior to break of the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber.
  5. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to any preceding claim, wherein the fiber is in the range of 385 denier to 412 denier.
  6. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to any preceding claim prepared by a process including sintering the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber, thereafter drawing the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber, and thereafter heat setting the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber.
  7. The polytetrafluoroethylene fiber according to claim 6 wherein the process provides a total draw ratio for the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber of about 7.4.
  8. A method of making a fiber comprising,
    producing a dispersion spun fluoropolymer fiber,
    followed by sintering the fluoropolymer fiber,
    followed by drawing the fluoropolymer fiber, and
    followed by heat setting the fluoropolymer fiber.
  9. The method according to claim 8, wherein sintering the fluoropolymer is carried out by heating and passing the fluoropolymer fiber over a series of sintering rolls operating at a first temperature and a first rotational speed.
  10. The method according to claim 9, wherein drawing the fluoropolymer fiber is carried out by passing the fluoropolymer fiber between a series of drawing rolls operating at a second temperature and a second rotational speed and a series of heat setting rolls operating at a third temperature and a third rotational speed.
  11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the first rotational speed and the second rotational speed are essentially the same.
  12. The method according to claim 10 or claim 11, wherein the third rotational speed is greater than the second rotational speed.
  13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the third rotational speed is at least 5 times greater than the second rotational speed.
  14. A method according to any of claims 10 to 13, wherein the rotational speed of the heat setting rolls is greater than the rotational speed of the series of sintering and drawing rolls.
  15. The method according to any of claims 10 to 14, wherein the second temperature is less than the first temperature and the third temperatures.
  16. A method according to any of claims 10 to 15, wherein the temperature of the heat setting rolls is essentially the same as the temperature of the sintering rolls.
  17. The method according to any of claims 8 to 16, further comprising cooling the fluoropolymer fiber after the sintering and before the drawing.
  18. The method according to any of claims 8 to 17, wherein heat setting the fluoropolymer fiber is carried out by passing the polytetrafluoroethylene fiber over the series of heat setting rolls.
  19. A method of making a fiber as claimed in any of claims 1 to 7, the method comprising,
    extruding an intermediate fluoropolymer fiber from a spin mix,
    followed by sintering the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber,
    followed by drawing the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber, and
    followed by heat setting the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber.
  20. A method as claimed in any of claims 8 to 18, the method comprising,
    forming a spin mix containing a dispersion of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) particles,
    forming an intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure from the spin mix,
    sintering the intermediate fluoropolymer fiber structure and forming a continuous fluoropolymer filament yam,
    drawing the continuous fluoropolymer filament yam, and
    thereafter heat setting the continuous fluoropolymer filament yarn.
EP08780812A 2007-06-14 2008-06-13 Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same Active EP2167710B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US76324207A 2007-06-14 2007-06-14
US11/763,249 US7498079B1 (en) 2007-06-13 2007-06-14 Thermally stable polytetrafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same
PCT/US2008/066854 WO2008157307A1 (en) 2007-06-14 2008-06-13 Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2167710A1 EP2167710A1 (en) 2010-03-31
EP2167710A4 EP2167710A4 (en) 2011-01-05
EP2167710B1 true EP2167710B1 (en) 2012-01-25

Family

ID=41718826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08780812A Active EP2167710B1 (en) 2007-06-14 2008-06-13 Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2167710B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101778968B (en)
AT (1) ATE542933T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008157307A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102493007B (en) * 2011-11-15 2014-01-29 厦门柏润氟材料科技有限公司 Microwave sintering and drafting device for pasty polytetrafluoroethylene extruded fibers
WO2013159020A1 (en) * 2012-04-19 2013-10-24 Toray Fluorofibers (America), Inc. Dispersion spun fluoropolymer fiber prepared from non-melt-processible polytetrafluoroethylene and perfluoroalkoxy
US9422642B2 (en) * 2013-07-29 2016-08-23 Toray Fluorofibers (America), Inc. Wear polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fiber and method of making same
EP2942426B1 (en) * 2014-05-05 2019-04-17 Filmop International s.r.l. Poy yarn
EP3670716A1 (en) * 2018-12-17 2020-06-24 Evonik Operations GmbH Oriented fluoropolymers
CN110158166A (en) * 2019-04-03 2019-08-23 苏州耐德新材料科技有限公司 A kind of preparation process of chlor-alkali amberplex polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) monofilament

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4064214A (en) * 1975-09-22 1977-12-20 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for making polytetrafluoroethylene yarn
JP2729837B2 (en) * 1988-07-25 1998-03-18 旭化成工業株式会社 Polytetrafluoroethylene filament and method for producing the same
DE69529746T2 (en) * 1994-06-30 2003-09-04 Daikin Ind Ltd VOLUMINOUS LONG FIBER AND SPLIT YARN FROM POLYTETRAFLUORETHYTEN, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTION OF COTTON-LIKE MATERIAL USING THIS FIBER AND THIS YARN AND FABRIC FOR DUST FILTERS
EP0790336B1 (en) * 1994-10-04 2003-08-27 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Polytetrafluoroethylene fiber, cotton-like article obtained therefrom, and method for their production
US5762846A (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-06-09 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Dispersion spinning process for polytetrafluoroethylene and related polymers
US5723081A (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-03-03 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Dispersion spinning process for polytetrafluoroethylene and related polymers
AU2002237116A1 (en) * 2002-03-07 2003-09-16 Manegro Administracao E Participacoes Ltda. Expanded ptfe fiber

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101778968A (en) 2010-07-14
CN101778968B (en) 2012-09-05
WO2008157307A1 (en) 2008-12-24
EP2167710A4 (en) 2011-01-05
ATE542933T1 (en) 2012-02-15
EP2167710A1 (en) 2010-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7498079B1 (en) Thermally stable polytetrafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same
EP2167710B1 (en) Thermally stable polyterafluoroethylene fiber and method of making same
RU2072006C1 (en) Method for manufacture of cellulose molded product
AU648618B2 (en) A method for producing a cellulose shaped article
CN101578401B (en) Process for producing cellulose multi-filament with lower coefficient of variation of section diameter
JP4935690B2 (en) Method for producing carbon fiber precursor fiber
CN109234820B (en) Preparation method of polylactic acid short fibers
US20140106167A1 (en) Method for hybrid dry-jet gel spinning and fiber produced by that method
CN113215669B (en) Thermoplastic polyurethane fiber and manufacturing method thereof
EP3686326A1 (en) High-strength polyethylene terephthalate yarn and method for producing the same
US3233023A (en) Spinning of polypropylene
US20210395924A1 (en) Method of producing precursor fiber for carbon fiber and carbon fiber
JPS62299513A (en) Production of polyphenylene sulfide monofilament
US20190186051A1 (en) Method for producing a multifilament yarn and multifilament yarn
JP3327027B2 (en) Method for producing polytetrafluoroethylene fiber
US20230295842A1 (en) Method of making polyacrylonitrile based carbon fibers and polyacrylonitrile based carbon fiber fabric
KR101957061B1 (en) Process for preparing carbon fiber having high strength
JP3259572B2 (en) Method for producing polytetrafluoroethylene fiber
US20200283932A1 (en) Method of making polyacrylonitrile based carbon fibers and polyacrylonitrile based carbon fiber fabric
KR100429949B1 (en) Manufacturing Method of Polyethylene Terephthalate Fiber for Dip Cord and PET Fiber Manufactured by the Same
JPH02300308A (en) Polyvinyl alcohol fiber and production thereof
JPH10273818A (en) Production of polytetrafluoroethylene-based fiber
CN115704116A (en) Method for manufacturing aromatic polysulfonamide fibers
JPH11200141A (en) Production of pilling-resistant acrylic fiber
CN115992398A (en) Preparation method and application of water-soluble polyvinyl alcohol

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100113

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20101202

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D01D 10/02 20060101ALI20110418BHEP

Ipc: D01F 6/12 20060101AFI20110418BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 542933

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008012923

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120322

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120125

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120426

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120525

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 542933

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20121026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008012923

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121026

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120613

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120506

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20220628

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20220630

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20220629

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20220630

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220629

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602008012923

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230613