EP2161406A1 - Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz - Google Patents

Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2161406A1
EP2161406A1 EP08252920A EP08252920A EP2161406A1 EP 2161406 A1 EP2161406 A1 EP 2161406A1 EP 08252920 A EP08252920 A EP 08252920A EP 08252920 A EP08252920 A EP 08252920A EP 2161406 A1 EP2161406 A1 EP 2161406A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
values
independent variables
sets
variables
oil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP08252920A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
designation of the inventor has not yet been filed The
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd
Original Assignee
BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd filed Critical BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd
Priority to EP08252920A priority Critical patent/EP2161406A1/fr
Priority to CA2727334A priority patent/CA2727334A1/fr
Priority to EP09766109.4A priority patent/EP2313607B1/fr
Priority to NO09766109A priority patent/NO2313607T3/no
Priority to EA201100002A priority patent/EA019510B1/ru
Priority to AU2009261723A priority patent/AU2009261723A1/en
Priority to US12/737,152 priority patent/US20110087476A1/en
Priority to PCT/GB2009/001477 priority patent/WO2009153548A1/fr
Priority to BRPI0915280A priority patent/BRPI0915280A2/pt
Priority to MX2010013757A priority patent/MX2010013757A/es
Publication of EP2161406A1 publication Critical patent/EP2161406A1/fr
Priority to AU2016201955A priority patent/AU2016201955B2/en
Priority to US15/634,333 priority patent/US20180023373A1/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and system for identifying operating points for an oil and/or gas producing system and is particularly, but not exclusively suitable for identifying operating points for extracting fluid from an oil or gas reservoir.
  • optimization algorithms have been extensively applied within the oil and gas sector to deduce an optimum operating point of an oil and gas system, which is to say the configuration of components from the sand face to the export pipeline that constitute the oil and gas installation and control the recovery of oil and gas from an oil or gas reservoir.
  • a model of the process is created and an optimization algorithm is coupled with the model to deduce the optimum simulated operating point subject to a set of operating constraints. In all cases, a single operating point is deduced from the optimization run.
  • a computer-implemented method of identifying a plurality of operating points for an oil and/or gas producing system comprises a well, a flow line and riser unit and a separator unit, said well, flow line and riser unit being arranged to output fluid to said separator unit on the basis of a plurality of independent variables and the separator unit being arranged to separate liquid and gas from the fluid output thereto on the basis of further independent variables, wherein operation of the oil and/or gas producing system is simulated by means of a producing system model, the producing system model being arranged to generate values for a plurality of dependent variables corresponding to pressure and/or flow rates achieved by respective units of the oil and/or gas producing system under control of said independent variables, the method comprising randomly generating a plurality of sets of values of said independent variables; performing a process in respect of said randomly generated plurality of sets of values of said independent variables, the process comprising:
  • the independent variables represent operating degrees of freedom available to an operator of the oil and/or gas producing system, and correspond to operating parameters that can be configured by the operator.
  • the independent variables might include flow rate of lift gas injected into a production well; the speed of the electrical submersible pump; the pressure drop across the well head valve; the well to riser routing; the pressure drop across the discharge valve at the surface; the pressure of the separator(s) and the gas discharge pressure from the train. It will be appreciated that this is an exemplary list and that the actual independent variables will vary from environment to environment, in particular whether the reservoir from which fluid is being extracted is oil or gas, and indeed the other fluids present within the reservoir in question.
  • the dependent variables represent parameters that are dependent on the independent variables, and include the objective function (a representation of the overall operating strategy of the oil and/or gas producing system), constraints (a process limitation that restricts the envelope of operation of the oil and/or gas producing system) and so-called properties of interest.
  • the latter dependent variable is typically an attribute that may impact the operating strategy but cannot be stated with sufficient confidence or clarity to allow it to be expressed as a constraint; an example of a property of interest is process stability.
  • the data generation and evaluation process ends and the data that have been stored are accessible from the appropriate data storage system via a query interface.
  • the values of.the independent and dependent variables are retrieved by a suitable query and used in a mapping function to map at least one said successively stored sets of values of said dependent variables against one more said independent variables so as to identify one or more potential operating points.
  • This mapping of sets of values of the dependent variables against sets of the independent variables preferably involves presenting, in a graphical manner, the operating points in a three-dimensional representation, where the dependent variable is plotted against two of the independent variables and represented by colours or other distinguishing symbols in the two dimensional space provided by the two independent variables.
  • Other mapping techniques such as parallel coordinate plotting methods, can be used.
  • Embodiments of the invention therefore identify a plurality of operating points for oil and/or gas producing systems, each operating point being characterised by a set of operating parameters which can be used to control components of the actual oil and/or gas producing system.
  • These generated operating points are preferably collectively presented in a graphical manner to an operator of the oil and/or gas producing system, who can systematically configure the components of the oil and/or gas producing system to move, in an informed manner, through a path of operating points in order to reach what appears from the generated operating point data to be an optimal operating region.
  • the method can further comprise mapping at least one said successively stored sets of values to the constraints so as to identify one or more potential operating points. In practice this can involve depicting the constraints in the graphical representation, and thereby provides constraint-based context for the data generated by the process.
  • the method comprises ranking the range of sets of values of said independent variables into a number of groups according to the respective value of the objective function. Doing so allows the sensitivity of the objective function to be reviewed in terms of the set of independent variables. With knowledge of the sensitivity of the objective function to the independent variables, the operator can generate a set of process configurations that capture the majority of the benefit (that is to say, improvement in objective function) with the minimal amount of intervention to the gathering system and production facility
  • the dataset that had previously been ranked according to a pre-specified range of values for the objective function is further filtered according to a plurality of values for a given constraint, and the method comprises identifying a plurality of potential operating points on the basis of an evaluated set of values of a dependent variable corresponding to said values of the constraint.
  • a series of operating points is identified, with each point corresponding to the optimal point for the specified range of the constraint. If the optimal point lies on a constraint, then a path, which points in the direction of increasing profitability but closer proximity to the constraint, is formed by connecting the points together. With knowledge of the direction of this path, the producing system can then be modified to move through the series of points in a systematic manner, with the operator able to review the response of the gathering system and production facility to each step along the path before moving to the next step along the path.
  • generation of the further plurality of sets of values of said independent variables on the basis of the evaluated values of dependent variables can involve use of a global search heuristic such as a genetic algorithm.
  • a plurality of said generated sets of values of independent variables can be selected on the basis of the evaluated values of dependent variables, and the selected generated sets of values of independent variables modified in accordance with a recombination operator, whereby to generate a further plurality of sets of values of said independent variables.
  • generation of the further sets of values of independent variables can involve applying a mutation operator to the selected plurality of generated sets of values of independent variables.
  • selection from the generated sets of values of independent variables comprises selecting from sets of values of independent variables generated within the same previous iteration of the process, while in other arrangements selection from the generated sets of values of independent variables comprises selecting from sets of values of independent variables generated within different previous iterations of the process. For example, selection can be performed on the basis of respective evaluations of dependent variables corresponding to values of independent variables generated across different generations of values, and thereby enables selection of the best performing values of all independent variables generated thus far.
  • a configuration system comprising a suite of software components configured individually or cooperatively to provide the functionality described above.
  • the software components can be distributed on computing terminals remote from one another or integrated within a single computing system.
  • certain of the software components can be configured on computing devices within a Local Area Network (LAN), whilst others can be remote therefrom and accessible via, for example, a public network such as the Internet.
  • LAN Local Area Network
  • a computer readable medium arranged to store the software components.
  • embodiments of the invention are concerned with identifying a plurality of operating points for oil and/or gas producing systems, these operating points being characterised by a set of operating parameters for components of the various systems.
  • the configuration of a system for, and processes involved in, identifying these points will be described in detail below, but first an overview of a representative oil and/or gas producing system will be presented.
  • Oil and/or gas producing systems comprise a gathering system and a production facility; the gathering system is typically configured to displace fluid from an oil reservoir, and comprises a network of flow lines and risers in fluid communication with an oil reservoir.
  • the production facility is configured to process fluid output from the gathering system so as to separate oil, gas and water therefrom, and typically comprises a plurality of separators, each arranged to operate at a particular pressure and comprising a plurality of stages. The various separators and stages thereof act on the fluid to remove gas, water, solids and impurities (such as sand) to as to facilitate recovery of oil (and gas) from the fluid.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing a simplified representation of a typical gathering system 100 for an offshore oil field.
  • a plurality of production wells 1a ... 1d is used to drain at least one formation 3 making up an oil reservoir.
  • Each production well 1a has a production tubing 5a arranged therein and is provided with a wellhead 9a that has at least one flow control component associated therewith such as a choke valve. Accordingly, the production tubing serves to transport fluids produced from the formation 3 to the wellhead 9a. From the wellhead 9a, the produced fluids pass into flow line 7a which connects with a main flow line 11 which transfers the produced fluids to the production facility 13 via riser 17.
  • the riser 17 is provided with at least one flow control component (e.g.
  • valves may be provided on the flow line 7a so that the flow path or routing of the produced fluids can be changed such that the fluid can flow into a further main flow line that communicates with the production facility 13 via a further riser.
  • the gathering system may include at least one water injection well 10, which receives pressurised water via a water injection line 12 from the production facility 13 for injection into the reservoir 3, with the water serving to maintain reservoir pressure thereby enhancing recovery of fluids from the reservoir; in addition the gathering system may include at least one gas injection well 14, which receives pressurised gas via injection lines 16, 18 from the production facility 13 and serves to push fluids out of the reservoir 3 via the production wells 1a ...1d.
  • the gas injection line 16 may also deliver gas into a plurality of gas lift pipes that introduce gas to the production wells 1a ... 1d (shown collectively as pipes 20), each acting to reduce the hydrostatic pressure within a given well 1a ... 1d.
  • one or more of the production wells 1a ... 1d may operate under natural flow or that one or more the production wells may be provided with an electrical submersible pump that is used to raise produced fluids to the wellhead 9a ?? 9d.
  • the production facility 13 can conveniently be located on a platform or floating production, storage and offloading installation (FPSO), which typically houses one or more separator units (not shown), located in series with one another, and including pumps, emulsifiers, coolers, heaters, desalters, dehydrators, H 2 S, natural gas liquids (NGL) and/or CO 2 absorption units etc. interspersed between the separation units, together with pipes dedicated to the removal of gas, water and solids from the produced fluid.
  • FPSO floating production, storage and offloading installation
  • FPSO floating production, storage and offloading installation
  • the separated oil and/or gas streams can then be transported by means of oil and/or gas export pipelines (not shown) to a land-based storage tank (or distribution system), else will be stored in cargo tanks of the platform or FPSO.
  • a land-based storage tank or distribution system
  • this can be utilised by the gathering system, for example, being injected into the gas injection well 14.
  • the system is conventionally simulated by means of one or more models, each dedicated to a specific part of the oil and/or gas producing system.
  • models there can be a model associated with the reservoir, a model associated with the gathering system, and a model associated with the production facility.
  • there can be one model associated with the gathering system 100 (which inclusively couples the reservoir 3 with the components from the sand face to the production facility 13) and one model associated with the production facility 13.
  • These models enable calculation of least flow rates and pressures at any point in the integrated producing system based on predefined operating characteristics of the components making up the system and specified operating conditions.
  • models of the gathering system 100 and the production facility can be generated in accordance with conventional techniques via user terminals T1 ... T3; specifically, the gathering system 100 can be modelled using the proprietary software tool GAP (TM) developed by Petroleum Experts Ltd. and the production facility 13 can be modelled using the proprietary software tool HYSYS (TM) supplied by AspenTech.
  • GAP proprietary software tool developed by Petroleum Experts Ltd.
  • HYSYS proprietary software tool supplied by AspenTech.
  • Both of these proprietary applications provide a toolkit, from which a user at a user terminal T1 can select and add physical components such as production wells (depth and diameter), injection wells (depth and diameter), production tubing (lengths and diameters) wellheads, flowlines, valves, risers (lengths and diameters), separator trains (one or more separators arranged in series, each being arranged to reduce the pressure of fluid passing therethrough) and connections therebetween so as to define a particular implementation of a gathering system 100 and a production facility 13.
  • sets of data representing components of the modelled systems are stored in the database DB1, for subsequent execution by a server S 1 during tuning and optimisation of the models, as will be described in more detail below.
  • the component data set will be transmitted from the user terminal T1 via a network, such as a corporate Local Area Network N1, or it could be transmitted over a public network involving fixed, satellite and wireless networks if the user is using a terminal remote from the server system S1 and database system DB 1.
  • a network such as a corporate Local Area Network N1
  • DB 1 database system DB 1
  • An optimisation problem can be posed by declaring an objective function along with a set of inequality and quality constraints and a range for each independent variable.
  • An example of a typical objective function and associated constraints between the independent variables are as follows: min ⁇ x - 3 2 + 3 ⁇ y Objective function profitability
  • embodiments of the invention are concerned with a new optimisation and mapping process for identifying operating points for a gas and/or oil producing system; for ease of understanding embodiments will be described after a description of suitable pre-processing and configuration of the models forming the basis of the optimisation process.
  • the pre-processing steps are entirely conventional, and are included for completeness only.
  • the overall process can be characterised as comprising three distinct stages: tuning of the models (201), data generation and evaluation (203) and mapping of the generated data through a query interface (205) to provide a set of operating parameters for use by an operator of a gathering system and production facility in the final stage 205 (described in more detail in Figures 7a ... 7f , 8 ... 15c ).
  • the models are tuned according to operating conditions of an actual gathering system and production facility; this involves running the models configured with a set of operating parameters (i.e. values of independent variables) and comparing the output with measured parameters of the actual gathering system and production facility; referring to Figures 3 and 4 , the models are executed by server system S1, which comprises conventional operating system and storage components (system bus connecting the central processing unit (CPU) 305, hard disk 303, random access memory (RAM) 301, I/O and network adaptors 307 facilitating connection to user input/output devices interconnection with other devices on the network N1).
  • the Random Access Memory (RAM) 301 contains operating system software 331 which control, in a known manner, low-level operation of the server S1.
  • the server RAM 301 also contains the gathering system model 321 and the production facility model 323, each being configured with the component data stored in DB1 according to the user-specified models.
  • the purpose of the tuning process is to generate an accurate and fully representative model of the gathering system and the production facility.
  • specific tuning parameters of components making up the models 321, 323 are automatically adjusted to maximise the fit between the model and the observed conditions of the actual gathering system and the production facility.
  • the model is tuned to a data set comprising recorded process data taken at a multitude of points in time.
  • the models 321, 323 have, as input, values associated with so-called independent variables and generate, as output, values associated with so-called dependent variables; these variables each correspond to a measured parameter associated with the actual gathering system and the production facility. For each point in time, a set of recorded values (taken from a process data historian) for the independent variables is input to the models 321, 323. The models 321, 323 are then run and, where possible, the dependent variables calculated by the models 321, 323 are compared against the recorded values for the dependent variables taken at the same time step of the model. The absolute error is calculated for each dependent variable and the total error is used in the tuning process, per conventional model tuning techniques.
  • the adjustable parameters include, but are not limited to, reservoir pressure, gas to oil ratio, water cut, productivity index, friction coefficient for the well bore 1a ... 1d and friction coefficient for each pipe (riser) 5a ... 5d.
  • steps S401 and S403 can be considered initialisation steps, in so far as they provide a means of configuring the models 321, 323 so as to accurately reflect operation of the physical gathering system and production facility that they are simulating.
  • the server system S1 comprises a bespoke optimisation engine 331, which cooperates with data input to, and output from, the respective models 321, 323 so as to modify the behaviour of the various components making up the models.
  • the optimisation engine 331 is preferably implemented as a genetic algorithm solver and its usage and configuration in conjunction with these known models represents a significant departure from known methods and techniques for creating a dataset that fully characterises the operation of a given oil and/or gas producing system.
  • Figures 5 and 6 show the configuration of the optimisation engine 331 in relation to the models 321, 323 together with the steps executed by the optimisation engine 331 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the optimisation engine 331 is preferably embodied as a genetic algorithm, for example using the Java (TM) Solver SDK (TM) toolkit provided by Frontline Systems (TM) .
  • the optimisation engine 331 is arranged to generate a population of operating points, each corresponding to a set of values for the independent variables listed above, and, for each point in the population, to evaluate a corresponding set of output values generated by the models 321, 323.
  • This evaluation provides a measure of the performance of the simulated oil and/or gas producing system, when operated according to the set of values for the independent variables generated by the optimisation engine 331.
  • the optimisation engine 331 is arranged to store each operating point together with its associated dependent variable values and the evaluation thereof.
  • the optimisation engine 331 is arranged to generate an initial population of operating points randomly, within the operating bounds of the models 321, 323 and/or according to prespecified operating bounds data. Successive generations of operating points are created on the basis of the evaluated data corresponding to previous generations of operating points and modifications thereof, these modifications being generated using combination and/or mutation operators.
  • step S601a the optimisation engine 331 generates an initial population of operating points; in a preferred arrangement this involves randomly selecting values for the independent variables, specifically selecting, at random, as many sets of values of the independent variables as there are to be points in a given population.
  • each set of input values is successively input to the models 321, 323 and the models are run for each set of input values (step S603, in conjunction with loop 1).
  • Output values corresponding to each set of input values are passed from the models 321, 323 to the optimisation engine 331, which evaluates each set of output values (S605, in conjunction with loop 1).
  • this evaluation involves the optimisation engine 331 evaluating the fitness of each set of output values and evaluating whether or not the output values violate any of the model constraints.
  • These fitness values and constraint viability, or feasibility, values are then stored in the storage system DB1 (step S607, in conjunction with loop 1) in association with a respective operating point, k.
  • the optimisation engine 331 then proceeds to generate a second population of operating points (step S601b, following loop 2), which in one arrangement involves selecting operating points from a previous generation of operating points on the basis of their respective evaluated fitness values, and modifying these selected points.
  • the modification involves applying a recombination operator to the selected points and in another arrangement the modification involves applying a recombination operator together with a mutation operator to the selected points, in a manner that is commonly employed by genetic algorithms and is known in the art.
  • Each member of this new population of operating points i.e.
  • each set of values for independent variables output from the process performed at step S601b) is then input to the models 321, 323, the models are run (step S603 in conjunction with loop 1), the corresponding values of dependent variables are evaluated, and these values are stored as described above and shown at steps S605, S607 (in conjunction with loop 1) in Figure 6 .
  • the optimisation engine 331 again follows loop 2; assuming neither the evaluated fitness of the populations of operating points generated thus far satisfy a predetermined fitness criterion nor the number of generations created thus far exceeds a predetermined maximum number of generations (i_max) the optimisation engine 331 repeats steps S601b - S607, for a further generation of operating points.
  • the predetermined fitness criterion relates directly to the objective function set out above as Equation (1), which is a dependent variable, expressed either directly in terms of the independent variables or alternatively in terms of one or more dependent variables, which are related to the set of independent variables, so provides a convenient mechanism for controlling the data generation process.
  • Equation (1) is a dependent variable, expressed either directly in terms of the independent variables or alternatively in terms of one or more dependent variables, which are related to the set of independent variables, so provides a convenient mechanism for controlling the data generation process.
  • Equation (1) is a dependent variable, expressed either directly in terms of the independent variables or alternatively in terms of one or more dependent variables, which are related to the set of independent variables, so provides a convenient mechanism for controlling the data generation process.
  • Equation (1) is a dependent variable, expressed either directly in terms of the independent variables or alternatively in terms of one or more dependent variables, which are related to the set of independent variables, so provides a convenient mechanism for controlling the data generation process.
  • An example of the data generation and evaluation stage is shown in Figure
  • the server system S1 also comprises an output engine 327, which retrieves data generated by the optimisation engine 331 for output to a terminal for display thereon by means of a suitable visualisation algorithm, or to another process for manipulation thereby.
  • the output engine 327 is triggered to retrieve the generations of operating points and corresponding fitness and constraint values that were stored in the database system DB1 at step S607 (i.e. each, or a selected number of, successive iterations thereof).
  • the data are output to one of the terminals T1 ... T3 shown in Figure 2 , and received by the data visualization application running thereon.
  • the visualization application is arranged to display the sets of operating points, preferably rendering operating points associated with a given generation in a dedicated display area. This display area corresponds to the model tuned at step S401, in particular depicting the set of constraints as a function of selected independent variables. Accordingly the set of data characterizing the model and stored at step S403 is also transmitted to the terminal to enable the visualization application to create a graphical backdrop and then display the operating points therein.
  • FIG 8 most preferably all of the sets of operating points are then collectively displayed in a single display area with an indication of their fitness (i.e. how well they fare against the objective function, per Equation (1) ); most conveniently this is indicated by means of different shades on the grayscale, and in the example shown in Figure 8 , the points are shaded on a sliding scale such that darker points indicate operating points with the highest fitness (e.g. point 805c) and lighter points indicate operating points with lower fitness values (e.g. point 803b).
  • the sliding scale is being indicated via a key to the figure (only some points are labeled in the Figure for clarity).
  • some of the operating points are infeasible, in the sense that they violate some of the constraints of the model (specifically the solutions that lie within the hatched regions R1, R2). Accordingly these solutions can be depicted as circles 811a ... 811k to indicate that they are not to be considered as viable operating points.
  • a curve 820 can be fitted around these infeasible operating points.
  • the visualization application is invoked at a terminal in operation at the production facility 13, thereby providing an operator with a selection of possible operating points and indeed some context for making decisions as to how to move between operating points.
  • a particular advantage of embodiments of the invention is that operators of the oil and/or gas producing system can configure the components of the oil and/or gas producing system to move, in an informed manner, through a path of operating points in order to reach what appears to be an optimal operating region.
  • an informed manner means that the oil and/or gas producing system can be configured to move through a series of viable operating points and thereby avoid any operating points that violate the associated operating constraints (these being represented by curve 820).
  • Figure 9 shows two operating pathways from a current operating point 807a to an improved operating point 805c: a first path 901, which appears to be a direct path to a good solution 805c but which involves moving through the infeasible curve 820, and a second path 903, which comprises two parts.
  • the second path 903 comprises two parts since it involves moving via a couple of operating points so as to avoid the infeasible region defined by the curve 820.
  • known methods provide an operator with a set of operating parameters that correspond to a single optimized operating point, with no context as regards how this operating point sits in relation to other possible operating points or indeed the current operating point.
  • the operator would modify the configuration of the components of the oil and/or gas producing system so as to move to this operating point with no information as to whether or not this would be a sensible modification given the current operating state of the producing system and indeed other possible options.
  • operators are provided with a significantly enhanced set of operating instructions, specifically performance- and constraints-based information relating to the landscape of operating points output by the data generation and evaluation engine 331.
  • This advantageously enables the operator to move between operating points in an informed manner.
  • models cannot simulate the exact conditions of an actual oil and/or gas producing system, they cannot predict optimal operating points with 100% accuracy (in the absolute sense).
  • Figure 9 also provides an indication of how the various operating points fare relative to one another; accordingly, if the operator can extrapolate between a given simulated operating point and the current actual operating point, the extrapolation metrics can be similarly applied in relation to the operating points output by the output engine 327, thereby enabling the operator to make a realistic assessment of the actual performance of the potential operating points.
  • the output engine 327 is arranged to depict values of the independent variables of the model as feasible, or infeasible, operating points, instead of bounding off infeasible regions per the curve 820 shown in Figure 8 .
  • the output engine 327 could colour-code the operating points according to their status as feasible/infeasible, using the data stored in the database DB1 at step S607 of the data generation stage 203; this enables the operator to concentrate further analysis on the feasible operating regions.
  • An example is shown in Figure 10 for an optimisation problem comprising two variables and three constraints, representing the gas handling capacity and the minimum liquid and gas velocities that must be achieved within the riser.
  • This model is different from the model described above and illustrated in Figures 7a-9 and relates to an oil producing system comprising two wells CP01, CP21 flowing into a common riser that is connected to one separation train.
  • the two wells are gas-lifted and the gas lift rate to each well can be varied between 0 and 7 mmscfd.
  • a minimum liquid and gas superficial velocity must be achieved within the riser to ensure stability across the process; specifically, at velocities below the minimum constraint, the riser becomes unstable resulting in wild fluctuations in the discharge flow rate flowing from the gathering system 100 into the liquid train of the production facility 13.
  • the amount of gas lift that can be used to lift the two wells is restricted by the gas handling capacity of the separation train of the production facility 13.
  • the objective function is set to equal the total production rate of oil from the two-well system.
  • the data points created within the data generation stage 203 are presented as a function of gas lift to the two wells CP01, CP21.
  • the output engine 327 is configured to retrieve values of the gas lift to the two wells CP01, CP02 generated during successive iterations of step S601b and the initial data generation step S601a, and to depict the points differently based on their feasibility: in the arrangement shown in Figure 10 , all the data points that are feasible are solid whilst all the data points that are infeasible are hollow; other distinguishing depiction schemes could be used based on different shapes, RBG colours, shading, line effects or labels.
  • the representation can thus be split into feasible and unfeasible operating regions, with region 1001 comprising feasible operating points.
  • the output engine 327 can be used to generate data for use in generating a profitability map for the feasible values of the gas lift to each respective well (i.e. in relation to points lying within region 1001); this involves accessing the database DB1 in order to retrieve the fitness values for respective operating points, and sending data to the visualization application that can be used to depict each feasible operating point differently dependent on their respective fitness values.
  • the resulting representation generated by the visualization application is shown in Figure 11 : conveniently different shades of grey can be used to show the fitness of respective operating points, but shapes, RBG colours, shading, line effects or labels could alternatively be used.
  • mapping phase a subset of the total number of values for the independent variables generated during the data generation stage 203 and stored in the database DB1 can be selected).
  • point A appears to be the preferred operating point; this point is preferably identified from a query submitted by the output engine 327 of the following form:
  • QUERY ⁇ max> (objective function) gas lift CP01 , gas lifi CP21 .
  • the gathering system and production facility do not function as stable processes; furthermore the models 321, 323 - being an approximation of the actual processes - are not a wholly accurate representation thereof.
  • point A appears, from simulation and optimisation, to be the optimum operating point, since there is a considerable amount of uncertainty both in how the processes will work in practice and how well the models 321, 323 represent the processes, point A cannot be relied on as more than an indicator of a likely preferred operating point.
  • the output engine 327 rather than configuring the actual components of the gathering system and production facility according to the values of gas lift for the two wells CP01, CP21 corresponding to a single endpoint A, the output engine 327 generates a series of operating points, each lying along a path that heads towards the region of point A, and the producing system is modified to move through the series of points in a systematic manner; this allows the operator to review the response of the gathering system and production facility to each step along the path before moving to the next step along the path.
  • this path can be derived by configuring the output engine 327 to filter the optimized data stored in database DB1 and retrieve subsets of data, each relating to different constraints. Since the optimized data stored at step S607 includes the independent variables generated at steps 601a, 601b, the output engine 327 can be configured to query the database DB1 so as to retrieve just the independent variables that lie within a specified range of values.
  • Figures 12a-12d show a mapping generated by the output engine 327 and visualization application for four different gas-handling constraints:
  • Figure 12a shows the fewest number of operating points, since it relates to selection of operating points that fall within the most conservative range of the constraint (original constraint-3 mmscfd), while
  • Figure 12d shows the greatest number of operating points, since it relates to selection of operating points that fall within the least conservative range of the constraint (the original value of the constraint).
  • a "local" optimum operating point can be identified (A1 in Figure 12a , A2 in relation to Figure 12b , A3 in relation to Figure 12c and A4 in relation to Figure 12d ).
  • the path 903 shown in Figure 12d is a direction taken by moving, systematically, between the selected operating points A1 ... A4.
  • An advantage of moving the gathering system and production facility gradually in this manner is that the process can be modified step-wise and within bounded values of the constraints through a series of local optimum points (local in the sense that each relates to a particular value of the constraint), thus enabling the operator to review how the process is actually performing as a whole in response to the change.
  • the operator can take appropriate action; since any given operating point along the path 903 relates to an incremental change in values of the constraints, each corresponding change to the process is an incremental change in operating conditions as opposed to a significant modification thereto.
  • the process can be reviewed and remedial action taken before incurring any significant damage to the components of the gathering system or production facility.
  • the representation of Figure 11 in particular the representation of different fitness values of the various operating points, can be used to evaluate the merits of moving through one, two, three or four (or more depending on the particular case under consideration) different operating points along the path 903.
  • the objective function can be increased from 28500 to 29000 in one step (point B2) by changing the gas lift to well CP21 from 3.5 to 4.8 mmscfd and without having to modify the settings associated with gas lift well CP01 at all; further improvements in the objective function, such as would be enjoyed by moving to point B3, can be selected by modifying the gas lift to well CP01, while leaving the gas lift settings of well CP21 unchanged. It will therefore be appreciated that moving through this path of operating points B1, B2, B3 clearly has practical advantages since any given move only requires changes to be made to one well.
  • the output engine 327 can determine these operating points by performing the following queries on the data stored in database DB1 at step S607:
  • the visualisation application is then arranged to map the output of these queries onto the two-dimensional representation of operating points so that the operator can view the potential operating points and indeed configuration changes that are required to move from the initial operating point thereto.
  • the number of returns generated based on this query is limited by specifying a maximum value for the objective function (in addition to the minimum), or by specifying a maximum number of operating points to be retrieved that satisfy the query.
  • step S1401 the output engine 327 accesses the database DB1 to retrieve values of selected independent variables.
  • the model in this case comprises only two independent variables, so values for both are selected.
  • step S1403 the feasible values are identified, and in one arrangement the visualization application depicts feasible values differently from infeasible values, as shown in Figure 10 .
  • step S 1405 the feasible values are selected and thereafter values of the objective function generated at step S605 of the optimization process are retrieved (step S1407).
  • the individual data points are then rendered according to their respective performance, as shown in Figure 11 , and these values are used generate contours for the objective function; such contours are shown in the representations of Figures 7a-9 .
  • the region of feasible values can be split into groups of values, for example based on several different ranges of constraints on one of the independent variables at step S1409 - each of Figures 12a, 12b , 12c and 12d relates to a different constraint range - and the data point having the highest performance value is identified for each group (A1, A2, A3, A4).
  • the output engine 327 can process queries on the performance values retrieved at step S1407, specifically to identify a data point relating to a specified increase in performance for a change in value of only one of the independent variables (step S1413). This step can be repeated for as many independent variables as were selected at step S 1401 and thereby provide a series of potential changes to operating conditions that affect only one independent variable, yet result in a desired increase in performance. This is shown by points B1, B2, B3 in Figure 13 .
  • the aforementioned queries and mapping processes performed by the output engine 327 relate to a two-variable problem domain (since the data shown in Figures 10-13 relate to a gathering system and production facility comprising two wells flowing into a common riser that is connected to one separation train).
  • the gathering system comprises far more wells and riser units (20-30 wells is not untypical), and thus far more independent variables.
  • the processes performed by the optimization engine 331 and the output engine 327 involve processing, querying and retrieval of a greater set of data, and indeed mapping the retrieved data according to a commensurately greater number of dimensions.
  • a process involving 20 independent variables requires the optimization engine 331 to run for a minimum of 10 iterations, more likely for between 20-40 iterations (each iteration being indicated by loop 1 shown in Figure 6 and the number of iterations is controlled by the setting of k_max), and generate approximately 50 operating points per population.
  • optimization according to embodiments of the invention for such a gathering system is likely to yield of the order 2,000-3,000 data points.
  • the output engine 327 is configured to retrieve values of the respective independent variables, together with their respective fitness values, and map the retrieved values according to input mapping instructions which may, for example, by input via an interface by an operator at one of the user terminals T1.
  • Figures 15a-15c show data retrieved by the output engine 327 for a gathering system and production facility that includes 22 wells flowing through a total of 9 risers that are connected to one of two liquid trains in the production facility. Each well can be gas lifted over a range of 0 to 7 mmscfd and can be re-routed to one of three risers. As described in relation to the two-variable problem, a minimum liquid and gas superficial velocity must be achieved within each riser to ensure flow stability.
  • retrieval and mapping instructions include the following:
  • Figure 15a shows the output generated by the output engine 327 for well CP01;
  • Figure 15b shows the output generated by the output engine 327 for well CP02 and
  • Figure 15c shows the output generated by the output engine 327 for well WP03.
  • every data point has been colour coded, on the grayscale, using data retrieved by the output engine 327 according to the value of the objective function for the whole system.
  • Figure 15a shows a high density of points with a gas lift rate between 2 and 2.4 mmscfd lying within 1000 barrels of the optimum operating point.
  • Figure 15c for well WP03, shows a broad arc of points that lie within 1000 barrels of the optimum spanning from 1.25 to 3.75 mmscfd.
  • the objective function is much more sensitive to the gas lift flow rate to well CP01 than it is to the gas lift flow rate to well WP03.
  • the sensitivity of the objective function to the variable set it is possible to generate a set of process configurations that capture the majority of the benefit (that is to say, improvement in objective function) with the minimal amount of intervention to the gathering system and production facility. It is also possible to determine a route to manoeuvre the process from the current operating point to a chosen "optimal" point, which maximises the improvements in productivity at the lowest risk of tripping the process.
  • the operability maps generated through the mapping software are typically analysed by the onshore support team on either a daily or weekly basis. From the set of maps, an operating strategy is deduced that will involve a set of modifications to the way in which the process is run. In determining the set of recommendations, the sensitivity of each change is analysed in terms of both the objective function (profitability of the process) and the process constraints (likelihood of tripping the process).
  • the set of recommendations are ranked in order of the greatest gain subject to a satisfactory risk.
  • the proposals are sent offshore for the operator to implement, e.g. in the form of flow rate of lift gas injected into the well or the speed of the electrical submersible pump; the pressure drop across the well head valve; the well to riser routing.
  • each recommendation is implemented in order. In all cases the change is made gradually over a period of 1 -4 hours. After a period of 6 to 12 hours, the impact of the change is assessed in terms of both the objective function and the constraints by the onshore support team. If the recommendation has proved to be successful, the next recommendation is implemented. In the unlikely event that the recommendation was unsuccessful, the model is retuned and the process mapping step is re-run the following day.
  • the visualisation application described above whose output is exemplified in Figures 7a-15c and which runs on one or more of user terminals T1 ... T3, can be implemented using proprietary software such as is provided by Tibco Inc .under product name Spotfire ® .
  • the output engine 327 is configured to retrieve data from the database DB1, process the results of the queries, and provide the processed results to the visualisation application as described with reference to Figures 7a-15c .
  • server system S1 is described as a single processing device it could alternatively be can comprise a distributed system of processors.
  • database system DB1 is depicted in the Figures as a single device, it could be implemented as a collection of physical storage systems.
  • each successively generated population comprises the same number of operating points
  • different generations can alternatively comprise a different number of operating points.
  • step S601b involves selecting operating points from the previous generation of operating points
  • the optimisation engine 331 could alternatively select points across generations of operating points so that, for example, as regards generation of the fourth generation of operating points, the engine 331 could select operating points from a mixture of the first, second and third generations of operating points.
  • Such a selection mechanism might be preferred in the event that the selection criteria for generating successive populations of operating points is based on fitness alone quite independently of the generation with which the operating point is associated.
  • the gathering system in the above-embodiments relates to retrieval of fluid from an oil reservoir
  • the gathering system could alternatively relate to retrieval of fluid from a gas reservoir, in which case the gathering system also comprises a network of wells and flow lines in fluid communication with a gas reservoir located in the subterranean region and the production facility is configured so as to separate gas, gas condensate and water from the process fluid output.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
EP08252920A 2008-06-16 2008-09-03 Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz Ceased EP2161406A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (12)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08252920A EP2161406A1 (fr) 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
AU2009261723A AU2009261723A1 (en) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Method and apparatus for configuring oil and/or gas producing system
EP09766109.4A EP2313607B1 (fr) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Procédé et appareil de configuration de système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
NO09766109A NO2313607T3 (fr) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11
EA201100002A EA019510B1 (ru) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Способ и устройство для конфигурирования системы добычи нефти и(или) газа
CA2727334A CA2727334A1 (fr) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Procede et appareil permettant de configurer un systeme de production de petrole et/ou de gaz
US12/737,152 US20110087476A1 (en) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Method and apparatus for configuring oil and/or gas production system
PCT/GB2009/001477 WO2009153548A1 (fr) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Procédé et appareil permettant de configurer un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
BRPI0915280A BRPI0915280A2 (pt) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 método e aparelho para configurar um sistema de produção de óleo e/ou gás
MX2010013757A MX2010013757A (es) 2008-06-16 2009-06-11 Metodo y aparato para configurar un sistema para la produccion de petroleo y/o gas.
AU2016201955A AU2016201955B2 (en) 2008-06-16 2016-03-30 Method and apparatus for configuring oil and/or gas producing system
US15/634,333 US20180023373A1 (en) 2008-06-16 2017-06-27 Method and apparatus for configuring oil and/or gas producing system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08252920A EP2161406A1 (fr) 2008-09-03 2008-09-03 Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2161406A1 true EP2161406A1 (fr) 2010-03-10

Family

ID=40120246

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08252920A Ceased EP2161406A1 (fr) 2008-06-16 2008-09-03 Procédé et appareil de configuration d'un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2161406A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9092124B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2015-07-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and method for effective plant performance monitoring in gas oil separation plant (GOSP)
WO2018210925A1 (fr) * 2017-05-16 2018-11-22 Bp Corporation North America Inc Outils pour sélectionner et séquencer des changements de paramètres de fonctionnement pour commander un système de production d'hydrocarbures

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002018744A2 (fr) * 2000-09-01 2002-03-07 Services Petroliers Schlumberger Optimisation de la production de puits de petrole tenant compte de l'incertitude concernant le reservoir et le financement
WO2002086277A2 (fr) * 2001-04-24 2002-10-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Procede pour ameliorer l'allocation de la production dans un systeme integre a reservoirs et installations de surface
WO2004046503A1 (fr) 2002-11-15 2004-06-03 Schlumberger Surenco Sa Optimisation de modeles de systemes de puits
WO2004046593A1 (fr) 2002-11-21 2004-06-03 Delavan Limited Clapet de non retour

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002018744A2 (fr) * 2000-09-01 2002-03-07 Services Petroliers Schlumberger Optimisation de la production de puits de petrole tenant compte de l'incertitude concernant le reservoir et le financement
WO2002086277A2 (fr) * 2001-04-24 2002-10-31 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Procede pour ameliorer l'allocation de la production dans un systeme integre a reservoirs et installations de surface
WO2004046503A1 (fr) 2002-11-15 2004-06-03 Schlumberger Surenco Sa Optimisation de modeles de systemes de puits
WO2004046593A1 (fr) 2002-11-21 2004-06-03 Delavan Limited Clapet de non retour

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
RALF SCHULZE-RIEGERT,MARKUS KROSCHE, ABUL FAHIMUDDIN AND SHAWKET GHEDAN: "Multiobjective optimization with application to model validation and uncertainty quantification", SOCIETEY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS, no. 105313, 11 March 2007 (2007-03-11) - 14 March 2007 (2007-03-14), Abu Dhabi, pages 1 - 7, XP002508474 *
TAPABRATA RAY AND RUHUL SARKER: "Optimum oil production planning using an evolutionary approach", STUDIES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, no. 49, 25 April 2007 (2007-04-25), Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, pages 273 - 292, XP002508473, ISSN: 1860-949X, ISBN: 978-3-540-48582-7, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.springerlink.com/content/32t5125456461425/> [retrieved on 20081216] *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9092124B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2015-07-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System and method for effective plant performance monitoring in gas oil separation plant (GOSP)
WO2018210925A1 (fr) * 2017-05-16 2018-11-22 Bp Corporation North America Inc Outils pour sélectionner et séquencer des changements de paramètres de fonctionnement pour commander un système de production d'hydrocarbures
US11486235B2 (en) * 2017-05-16 2022-11-01 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Tools for selecting and sequencing operating parameter changes to control a hydrocarbon production system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2016201955B2 (en) Method and apparatus for configuring oil and/or gas producing system
US9934338B2 (en) Methods and related systems of building models and predicting operational outcomes of a drilling operation
US8352227B2 (en) System and method for performing oilfield simulation operations
US8775141B2 (en) System and method for performing oilfield simulation operations
CA2693486C (fr) Valorisation d&#39;informations futures dans l&#39;incertitude
US20160154907A1 (en) Integrated network asset modeling
CA2691241C (fr) Systeme et procede pour realiser des operations de simulation de champ petrolifere
WO2014117030A1 (fr) Optimisation contrainte pour planification de positionnement de puits
WO2014169000A1 (fr) Système intégré d&#39;assistance à la conception de production
US20130226672A1 (en) Production by actual loss allocation
EP2161406A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de configuration d&#39;un système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
Nazarov et al. Integrated Asset Modeling in Mature Offshore Fields: Challenges and Successes
EP2151540A1 (fr) Procédé et appareil de configuration de système de production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
Ligero et al. Value of information during appraisal and development of petroleum fields
Pothapragada et al. Integrated Production System Modeling of the Bahrain Field
Shyeh et al. Examples of Right-Time Decisions from High Frequency Data
Gaspar et al. Estimation of the chance of success of a four-dimensional seismic project for a developed oil field
Airlie et al. Intelligent asset management: Successful integration of modelling tools and workflow processes
Gie et al. Data Science Empowers Well and Surface Network Modelling
Das et al. Optimizing Production & Operation through Automated Well & Network Modeling
Nurliana binti Alias A STUDY OF PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING PROSPER

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20100327