EP2147291B1 - Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2147291B1
EP2147291B1 EP08737045A EP08737045A EP2147291B1 EP 2147291 B1 EP2147291 B1 EP 2147291B1 EP 08737045 A EP08737045 A EP 08737045A EP 08737045 A EP08737045 A EP 08737045A EP 2147291 B1 EP2147291 B1 EP 2147291B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sample
plates
fracture
freeze
analysis
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08737045A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2147291A1 (en
Inventor
Paul William Miles Blenkinsopp
Andrew Mark Barber
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ionoptika Ltd
Original Assignee
Ionoptika Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ionoptika Ltd filed Critical Ionoptika Ltd
Publication of EP2147291A1 publication Critical patent/EP2147291A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2147291B1 publication Critical patent/EP2147291B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/28Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
    • G01N1/42Low-temperature sample treatment, e.g. cryofixation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/28Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
    • G01N1/2813Producing thin layers of samples on a substrate, e.g. smearing, spinning-on

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an apparatus and method that facilitates the surface and near-surface analysis of fluid bearing materials such as biological and organic materials where the fluid content needs to be frozen to prevent evaporation of the fluid in the vacuum system of the analyser prior to, during and after the analysis process. Surface ice formation and surface contamination is also minimised.
  • a surface analytical technique comprise of a probe beam or primary radiation comprising charged particles, neutral particles or photons which acts so as to stimulate the surface or near surface to emit a secondary emission or radiation in the form of charged particles, neutral particles or electromagnetic radiation of which the mass, energy, wavelength, intensity, dispersion or any combination thereof gives a measure of a quantifiable parameter of the sample.
  • Such techniques can include Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), in which the sample is bombarded by a beam of ions to dislodge secondary ions from the surface, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), in which electrons are ejected from a sample by incident x-rays and measurement is made of the electrons' energy spectra, and Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), in which measurement is made of Auger electrons' energy spectra.
  • SIMS Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
  • XPS X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
  • AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy
  • SIMS a primary ion beam is incident on the sample surface and primary ion impacts cause secondary ions to be ejected from the surface. These can be captured and analysed in a mass spectrometer. With scanning of the primary beam, data from the mass spectrometer can be related to specific areas (pixels) on the surface to provide a mass spectrum for each pixel position creating a chemical image or map of the surface.
  • pixels specific areas
  • Using atomic primary ions it is very rare to see whole molecules or large fragments in the spectra, however, advances in cluster ion beam technology have substantially increased the mass range that can be measured using the SIMS technique and also the sensitivity of that measurement.
  • cluster primary ions such as fullerene molecular ions (e.g. C 60 + )
  • SIMS single-semiconductor ions
  • biological samples in their native state are typically formed of at least 70% liquid which makes them not particularly conducive to analysis in vacuum systems due to the problems of evaporation or outgassing.
  • Outgassing is a process whereby the liquid, vapour or gas contained in a sample effectively evaporates form the sample at a highly accelerated rate when placed in a vacuum.
  • This outgassing results in both changes to the structure, the chemical composition of the sample and can have a detrimental effect on the vacuum quality in the analyser making analysis difficult or almost impossible.
  • the samples may be converted to a relatively rigid and solid form by rapidly freezing them. This greatly reduces the outgassing, provides a fixed surface and structure facilitating structurally related analysis and retains the chemical information thus making SIMS analysis a very powerful and practical tool.
  • Rapid freezing of samples for microscopy has been in use since well before the 1960's but the vast majority of analysis was carried out in near normal or normal atmospheric conditions. This rapid freezing is usually achieved using liquid nitrogen which has a boiling point of 77K. At these low temperatures, ice formation on the surface has always been a problem, but a simple cleaning by suction removal of ice crystals formed on the surface has often sufficed to make the technique viable for early analytical purposes. Where a cleaner surface is required, the sample is frozen between two microscope slides and then, once frozen, the slides are forcibly separated. This results in the sample being fractured along the path of least resistance which is hopefully through the sample and reveals features of interest for analysis.
  • the resultant surface exposed is clean and highly suited for surface analysis.
  • This technique is known as freeze-fracturing.
  • the sample can be cleaved by a blade exposing a clean surface, a process known as freeze-cleaving.
  • a variety of specific techniques have been developed for optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (for example, Nakamoto et al.; In-Situ Observation of Freeze Fractured Red Blood Cell with High-Vacuum Low-Temperature Atomic Force Microscope ).
  • One method is to assemble the frozen slides with the sample placed between them, mount them securely to a sample holder used in the SIMS analyser, perform a simple fracture in a dry gas environment and then rapidly transfer the sample to the insertion lock and onto a cold stage where the frozen condition is hopefully preserved.
  • dry gas contains sufficient moisture to cause the formation of ice crystals on the surface and the whole process is highly dependent on the operator's manual dexterity and speed in loading the sample into the vacuum to prevent the sample warming or excessive ice forming on the surface. In either case it is not suitable for surface analysis.
  • the frozen slide & sample assemblage is transferred to a cold stage in the instrument via an insertion lock and brought under vacuum.
  • the slides can be prized apart manually using a movable probe (vacuum probe) through the vacuum wall, fracturing the sample. All of this must take place without any frosting of the sample or sample holder whatsoever.
  • the lower glass slide should remain in place with a new sample surface exposed for analysis. There is no mechanism for recovery of the top glass slide which is often subsequently lost, often dropping into the bottom of the insertion lock chamber from where recovery may be extremely difficult to achieve.
  • the portion of the sample still attached to this slide will then start to increase in temperature and outgas which can compromise the instrument vacuum.
  • the apparatus includes a pair of hinged sample plates which can be separated, and caused to rotate with respect to each other, by the action of a coil spring incorporated within the hinge of the sample plates.
  • the current invention overcomes all these limitations in both a novel and cost effective manner.
  • the sample fracture is achieved by an automated mechanism built into the sample holder instead of using a manual method similar to those described above.
  • the invention completely removes the probability of losing the sample, completely removes the problem of loss of the top slide by allowing it to be retained and available for analysis thereby removing the problem of which slide the sample adheres to. It also significantly improves control of the temperature of the whole sample and slide assembly and, through simpler and easier handling, reduces the possibility of frosting of the sample or sample slide during transfer into the vacuum.
  • an apparatus for the freeze-fracture and presentation for surface analysis in a SIMS instrument, in a vacuum, of clean surfaces from frozen fluid containing material comprising: a pair of sample plates joined by a hinge pin to form a hinge, said plates being so disposed as to be able to face each other and to be capable of rotating about said hinge pin with respect to each other; and support means for supporting said sample plates for insertion into a vacuum system; characterised in that said hinge is a floating hinge and the apparatus includes: a spring-loaded bar pivotally mounted on the support means, and release means mounted on the support means for releasably retaining the spring-loaded bar in a set position, the release means being triggerable, in use, from outside the vacuum system, whereby the release means is caused to push on a sample plate to mechanically prise the sample plates apart causing sample to fracture, and to release the spring-loaded bar from said set position, the spring-loaded bar, released from the set position by the release means, acting to cause the prised-apart samples
  • FIG. 1 A preferred embodiment of the invention as related to the presentation of clean surfaces from biological sample such as tissue for SIMS analysis is shown in figures 1 to 4 .
  • Fig. 1 shows a replacement for the two slides that were described above and Fig 4 a schematic of the operation of the plates.
  • This comprises of two stainless steel metal plates (1) and (2) joined together by a hinge pin (3) said plates being so disposed as to allow rotation with respect to each other around the hinge pin (3).
  • the slide plates may be constructed from any suitable material such as any metal, glass, silicon or other material or combination thereof.
  • the two plates and the pin form a floating hinge assembly whereby the plates can accommodate samples of varying thickness and of different thicknesses.
  • the sample (44) would typically be a drop of liquid suspension or a piece of biological tissue which is placed on the surface of the lower plate (1) as shown in Fig 4a with the upper plate opened so that the upper side of the lower plate is accessible to mount the sample.
  • the upper plate (2) is then rotated around the hinge pin (3) to be approximately facing the lower plate and the sample (44) is trapped between the lower side of the upper sample plate and the upper side of the lower sample plate as shown schematically in fig 4b .
  • a suitable spacer arrangement may be used to maintain a minimum sample thickness.
  • pressure to the plates may be applied to give, for example, exclusion of air and to ensure good contact of the sample with both plates.
  • the hinge assembly, complete with trapped sample is then transferred to a cryogenic bath (often liquid Nitrogen (LN2) or a "slush" of ice and LN2) which already contains the sample holder assembly. Once the sample has frozen completely the upper plate should be bonded to the lower plate by the frozen sample.
  • LN2 liquid Nitrogen
  • a cryogenic bath often liquid Nitrogen (LN2) or a "slush" of ice and LN2
  • the lower plate of the hinge is clamped to the holder using screws or clips. This procedure can either take place within a dry atmosphere glove box or, if outside of the dry atmosphere, the assemblage is kept cooled in the cryogenic bath while the bath is transferred to a dry atmosphere glove box which is mounted around the entry lock of the vacuum instrument.
  • the assembly of hinge and sample holder is shown in isometric view in Fig. 2 and in section in Fig. 3 .
  • the sample holder (23) is a heat-conductive metal block.
  • a spring-loaded flipper bar (27) is mounted on a pin (26) and a release lever (21) retains this flipper bar.
  • the fracture mechanism is set and the complete sample holder and the hinge assembly is then promptly transferred from the cryogenic bath to the insertion lock of the instrument where it is placed on cold stage and the insertion lock is pumped down to UHV.
  • a transfer probe is used to engage the sample and move it to the analysis chamber where it is mounted on a cryogenically cooled stage. In the process of engaging the sample, the probe is used to trigger the fracture mechanism.
  • the probe which can exert significant force, presses against the protrusion on the release lever (21), the release lever pivots and the spigot (38) pushes upward on the top plate (2) of the hinged sample plates at point (A). This causes the sample (44) to fracture in a place approximately parallel to the hinged plates.
  • the release lever pivots further and releases the flipper bar (27).
  • This flipper bar automatically opens the hinge to a preferred angle of 180 degrees, leaving both halves (45 & 46) of the sample (44) facing up and available for analysis as shown schematically in Fig. 4c .
  • the spring and flipper bar also retains the upper plate firmly against the sample holder.

Description

    Field of the invention
  • This invention relates to an apparatus and method that facilitates the surface and near-surface analysis of fluid bearing materials such as biological and organic materials where the fluid content needs to be frozen to prevent evaporation of the fluid in the vacuum system of the analyser prior to, during and after the analysis process. Surface ice formation and surface contamination is also minimised.
  • Background of the invention
  • A variety of surface and near surface analysis techniques are widely used to identify chemical structure and composition on or just below the surface in solid inorganic materials. These techniques are typically highly dependent on surface condition and cleanliness and so the condition of the surface of sample to be analysed is critical to obtaining optimal results. Typically, a surface analytical technique comprise of a probe beam or primary radiation comprising charged particles, neutral particles or photons which acts so as to stimulate the surface or near surface to emit a secondary emission or radiation in the form of charged particles, neutral particles or electromagnetic radiation of which the mass, energy, wavelength, intensity, dispersion or any combination thereof gives a measure of a quantifiable parameter of the sample. Such techniques can include Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS), in which the sample is bombarded by a beam of ions to dislodge secondary ions from the surface, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), in which electrons are ejected from a sample by incident x-rays and measurement is made of the electrons' energy spectra, and Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), in which measurement is made of Auger electrons' energy spectra.
  • Because of the surface specificity of surface analytical techniques, it is usually a requirement that the analysis process takes place in an Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) environment, normally in the range of 1e-6 mbar to 1e-11 mbar, to prevent previously cleaned surfaces from being contaminated on the surface by gas absorption and particulates. The analysis of many solid materials such as most metals, alloys, polymers, ceramics and semiconductors is now relatively straightforward as the samples can be surface cleaned by a number of established techniques. This cleaning of the sample takes place either prior to the sample being placed in the vacuum, under vacuum in the analysis chamber or whilst in a secondary or sample preparation chamber under vacuum which is attached to the high vacuum analysis chamber. Such sample-preparation techniques are well known, are accepted practice for most solid materials, are well understood and relatively inexpensive to implement. Additionally, solid samples typically do not significantly outgas during the analysis, a process which can lead to the degradation of the sample and to contamination of the analysis chamber.
  • More recently, a great deal of interest has been shown in the analysis of biological samples, which typically have a relatively high fluid content, by the aforementioned surface analysis techniques, for studying the chemical composition of cells and the mapping the concentrations of these chemicals inside the cell in order to understand functionality. As a result, a great deal of effort has been made to find methods and techniques to undertake this type of analysis. The SIMS technique, in particular, has seen advances in the past few years which extend the potential of the technique from mere elemental identification into extensive imaging and chemical mapping of complex organic surfaces in both 2 and 3 dimensions (for example: Fletcher et al; Molecular depth profiling of organic and biological materials and Vickerman; Static SIMS - A Surface Mass Spectrometry for Organic Materials in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry).
  • In SIMS, a primary ion beam is incident on the sample surface and primary ion impacts cause secondary ions to be ejected from the surface. These can be captured and analysed in a mass spectrometer. With scanning of the primary beam, data from the mass spectrometer can be related to specific areas (pixels) on the surface to provide a mass spectrum for each pixel position creating a chemical image or map of the surface. Using atomic primary ions, it is very rare to see whole molecules or large fragments in the spectra, however, advances in cluster ion beam technology have substantially increased the mass range that can be measured using the SIMS technique and also the sensitivity of that measurement.
  • The use of cluster primary ions, such as fullerene molecular ions (e.g. C60 +), has made SIMS applicable to the analysis of biological and biochemical samples, subject to overcoming two problems in sample preparation: firstly, that of stopping vaporisation and outgassing into the vacuum system of the analysis instrument, and secondly, that of presenting a clean surface for analysis.
  • Unlike solid samples, biological samples in their native state are typically formed of at least 70% liquid which makes them not particularly conducive to analysis in vacuum systems due to the problems of evaporation or outgassing.
  • Outgassing is a process whereby the liquid, vapour or gas contained in a sample effectively evaporates form the sample at a highly accelerated rate when placed in a vacuum. This outgassing results in both changes to the structure, the chemical composition of the sample and can have a detrimental effect on the vacuum quality in the analyser making analysis difficult or almost impossible. In order to overcome these problems, the samples may be converted to a relatively rigid and solid form by rapidly freezing them. This greatly reduces the outgassing, provides a fixed surface and structure facilitating structurally related analysis and retains the chemical information thus making SIMS analysis a very powerful and practical tool.
  • Rapid freezing of samples for microscopy has been in use since well before the 1960's but the vast majority of analysis was carried out in near normal or normal atmospheric conditions. This rapid freezing is usually achieved using liquid nitrogen which has a boiling point of 77K. At these low temperatures, ice formation on the surface has always been a problem, but a simple cleaning by suction removal of ice crystals formed on the surface has often sufficed to make the technique viable for early analytical purposes. Where a cleaner surface is required, the sample is frozen between two microscope slides and then, once frozen, the slides are forcibly separated. This results in the sample being fractured along the path of least resistance which is hopefully through the sample and reveals features of interest for analysis.
  • The resultant surface exposed is clean and highly suited for surface analysis. This technique is known as freeze-fracturing. Alternatively, the sample can be cleaved by a blade exposing a clean surface, a process known as freeze-cleaving. A variety of specific techniques have been developed for optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (for example, Nakamoto et al.; In-Situ Observation of Freeze Fractured Red Blood Cell with High-Vacuum Low-Temperature Atomic Force Microscope).
  • With the development of powerful surface analytical techniques such as imaging and mapping SIMS and the growing interest in performing surface analysis on organic samples, simple adaptations of the freeze-fracture and freeze cleave techniques (for example as described by Moller at al.; Introduction of a cryosectioning ToF SIMS instrument for analysis of non-dehydrated biological samples), have been made to permit their use in vacuum systems. However, the surface cleanliness and vacuum required to carry out a surface analysis imposes a unique set of challenges not previously encountered.
  • The following description uses a SIMS instrument but can easily be extrapolated to any surface analytical technique requiring HV or UHV.
  • The primary problem encountered is that after freeze fracturing or freeze cleaving, any exposure of the frozen sample surface to the normal atmosphere leads to the creation of a thin layer of ice crystals on the surface in only a few seconds thereby rendering the sample effectively unusable for surface analysis.
  • One method is to assemble the frozen slides with the sample placed between them, mount them securely to a sample holder used in the SIMS analyser, perform a simple fracture in a dry gas environment and then rapidly transfer the sample to the insertion lock and onto a cold stage where the frozen condition is hopefully preserved. However, even dry gas contains sufficient moisture to cause the formation of ice crystals on the surface and the whole process is highly dependent on the operator's manual dexterity and speed in loading the sample into the vacuum to prevent the sample warming or excessive ice forming on the surface. In either case it is not suitable for surface analysis.
  • Alternatively, the frozen slide & sample assemblage is transferred to a cold stage in the instrument via an insertion lock and brought under vacuum. Once under vacuum, the slides can be prized apart manually using a movable probe (vacuum probe) through the vacuum wall, fracturing the sample. All of this must take place without any frosting of the sample or sample holder whatsoever. At the end of this procedure, the lower glass slide should remain in place with a new sample surface exposed for analysis. There is no mechanism for recovery of the top glass slide which is often subsequently lost, often dropping into the bottom of the insertion lock chamber from where recovery may be extremely difficult to achieve. Once removed from the cold stage, the portion of the sample still attached to this slide will then start to increase in temperature and outgas which can compromise the instrument vacuum. Further problems such as the fracture probe misalignment resulting in failure to fracture the sample or even the loss of both slides frequently occur. Additionally, contact with the probe can cause temperature variations and any failure to maintain the whole sample assembly uniformly at low temperature can result in spoilage of the sample. Finally, there is no guarantee that the lower slide will contain a surface suitable for analysis as the sample may facture along the interface with the lower slide and the majority of the sample may remain on the top slide which is then lost in the vacuum chamber.
  • M. V. NERMUT et al; Journal of Microscopy, Vol 110(2) 1977, p121-132 and U. B. Sleytr et al: Journal of Microscopy, Vol 101(2), 1974 both disclose freeze-fracture apparatus used in scanning electron microscopy. The apparatus includes a pair of hinged sample plates which can be separated, and caused to rotate with respect to each other, by the action of a coil spring incorporated within the hinge of the sample plates.
  • Any solution to these problems should be effective to provide a clean surface with low outgassing suitable for surface analysis, reliable, robust and be easy to implement by the end user.
  • The current invention overcomes all these limitations in both a novel and cost effective manner.
  • According to the present invention, the sample fracture is achieved by an automated mechanism built into the sample holder instead of using a manual method similar to those described above. The invention completely removes the probability of losing the sample, completely removes the problem of loss of the top slide by allowing it to be retained and available for analysis thereby removing the problem of which slide the sample adheres to. It also significantly improves control of the temperature of the whole sample and slide assembly and, through simpler and easier handling, reduces the possibility of frosting of the sample or sample slide during transfer into the vacuum.
  • According to the invention, there is provided an apparatus for the freeze-fracture and presentation for surface analysis in a SIMS instrument, in a vacuum, of clean surfaces from frozen fluid containing material, the apparatus comprising: a pair of sample plates joined by a hinge pin to form a hinge, said plates being so disposed as to be able to face each other and to be capable of rotating about said hinge pin with respect to each other; and support means for supporting said sample plates for insertion into a vacuum system; characterised in that said hinge is a floating hinge and the apparatus includes: a spring-loaded bar pivotally mounted on the support means, and release means mounted on the support means for releasably retaining the spring-loaded bar in a set position, the release means being triggerable, in use, from outside the vacuum system, whereby the release means is caused to push on a sample plate to mechanically prise the sample plates apart causing sample to fracture, and to release the spring-loaded bar from said set position, the spring-loaded bar, released from the set position by the release means, acting to cause the prised-apart samples plates to rotate with respect to each other through a predetermined rotation angle.
  • Description of figures
  • An apparatus for the preparation and presentation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum and accompanying method are now described by way of example of embodiments only and by reference to the accompanying drawings, of which
    • Figure 1 shows an isometric view of an example of a sample slide assembly
    • Figure 2 shows an isometric view of an example of a sample slide and sample holder assembly with operating mechanism
    • Figure 3 shows a cross section view of an example of a sample slide and sample holder assembly with operating mechanism
    • Figure 4 shows a schematic of the operation of the plates.
    Detailed description
  • A preferred embodiment of the invention as related to the presentation of clean surfaces from biological sample such as tissue for SIMS analysis is shown in figures 1 to 4.
  • Fig. 1 shows a replacement for the two slides that were described above and Fig 4 a schematic of the operation of the plates. This comprises of two stainless steel metal plates (1) and (2) joined together by a hinge pin (3) said plates being so disposed as to allow rotation with respect to each other around the hinge pin (3). Alternatively the slide plates may be constructed from any suitable material such as any metal, glass, silicon or other material or combination thereof. The two plates and the pin form a floating hinge assembly whereby the plates can accommodate samples of varying thickness and of different thicknesses. The sample (44) would typically be a drop of liquid suspension or a piece of biological tissue which is placed on the surface of the lower plate (1) as shown in Fig 4a with the upper plate opened so that the upper side of the lower plate is accessible to mount the sample. The upper plate (2) is then rotated around the hinge pin (3) to be approximately facing the lower plate and the sample (44) is trapped between the lower side of the upper sample plate and the upper side of the lower sample plate as shown schematically in fig 4b. If required, a suitable spacer arrangement may be used to maintain a minimum sample thickness. At this point, if required, pressure to the plates may be applied to give, for example, exclusion of air and to ensure good contact of the sample with both plates. The hinge assembly, complete with trapped sample, is then transferred to a cryogenic bath (often liquid Nitrogen (LN2) or a "slush" of ice and LN2) which already contains the sample holder assembly. Once the sample has frozen completely the upper plate should be bonded to the lower plate by the frozen sample. Whilst still keeping both the hinge assembly and the sample plate assemblage submerged in the coolant, the lower plate of the hinge is clamped to the holder using screws or clips. This procedure can either take place within a dry atmosphere glove box or, if outside of the dry atmosphere, the assemblage is kept cooled in the cryogenic bath while the bath is transferred to a dry atmosphere glove box which is mounted around the entry lock of the vacuum instrument. Alternative procedures involving more rapid freezing and multiple cryogenic baths with different cooling properties (typically used to increase the speed of freezing to avoid crystalline structure formation in the sample fluid) are available and may be used provided the sample slide is kept optimally cooled during the procedure and the mounting of the sample to the sample holder is done under cryogenic conditions and the whole assembly is kept optimally cooled until final transfer under a dry gas environment into the vacuum.
  • The assembly of hinge and sample holder is shown in isometric view in Fig. 2 and in section in Fig. 3. The sample holder (23) is a heat-conductive metal block. A spring-loaded flipper bar (27) is mounted on a pin (26) and a release lever (21) retains this flipper bar.
  • The fracture mechanism is set and the complete sample holder and the hinge assembly is then promptly transferred from the cryogenic bath to the insertion lock of the instrument where it is placed on cold stage and the insertion lock is pumped down to UHV. A transfer probe is used to engage the sample and move it to the analysis chamber where it is mounted on a cryogenically cooled stage. In the process of engaging the sample, the probe is used to trigger the fracture mechanism. The probe, which can exert significant force, presses against the protrusion on the release lever (21), the release lever pivots and the spigot (38) pushes upward on the top plate (2) of the hinged sample plates at point (A). This causes the sample (44) to fracture in a place approximately parallel to the hinged plates. The release lever pivots further and releases the flipper bar (27). This flipper bar automatically opens the hinge to a preferred angle of 180 degrees, leaving both halves (45 & 46) of the sample (44) facing up and available for analysis as shown schematically in Fig. 4c. The spring and flipper bar also retains the upper plate firmly against the sample holder.

Claims (14)

  1. An apparatus for the freeze-fracture and presentation for surface analysis in a SIMS instrument, in a vacuum, of clean surfaces from frozen fluid containing material, the apparatus comprising:
    a pair of sample plates ( 1,2 ) joined by a hinge pin (3 ) to form a hinge, said plates ( 1,2 ) being so disposed as to be able to face each other and to be capable of rotating about said hinge pin ( 3 ) with respect to each other;
    and support means ( 23 ) for supporting said sample plates ( 1,2 ) for insertion into a vacuum system;
    characterised in that said hinge is a floating hinge and the apparatus includes:
    a spring-loaded bar ( 27 ) pivotally mounted on the support means ( 23 ), and
    release means ( 21,38 ) mounted on the support means ( 23 ) for releasably retaining the spring-loaded bar ( 27 ) in a set position,
    the release means ( 21,38 ) being triggerable, in use, from outside the vacuum system, whereby the release means ( 21,38 ) is caused to push on a sample plate ( 1,2 ) to mechanically prise the sample plates ( 1,2 ) apart causing sample to fracture, and to release the spring-loaded bar ( 27 ) from said set position,
    the spring-loaded bar ( 27 ), released from the set position by the release means (21,38 ), acting to cause the prised-apart samples plates ( 1,2 ) to rotate with respect to each other through a predetermined rotation angle.
  2. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said release means ( 21,38 ) is triggerable, in use, by a mechanical device.
  3. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein said mechanical device is a transfer probe.
  4. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein said release means ( 21,38 ) is triggerable, in use, by an electrical or electromagnetic device.
  5. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said predetermined rotation angle is in the range from 90° to 270°.
  6. An apparatus as claimed in claim 5 wherein said rotation angle is substantially 180° so that the sample plates lie in substantially the same plane, with both recently-fractured sample surfaces facing substantially in the same direction.
  7. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein samples of varying thicknesses between 0.001mm and 2.5mm can be accommodated between the sample plates.
  8. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein either sample plate has a well or indent for containing sample.
  9. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the sample plates are capable of accommodating multiple samples.
  10. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the sample plates are capable of accommodating biological samples for analysis in a SIMS instrument.
  11. An apparatus as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the sample plates are capable of accommodating biological samples for analysis in a surface analysis instrument.
  12. A method for presentation of a frozen sample with minimised surface contamination and frosting for analysis using a surface analysis technique, the method being characterised by the steps of:
    placing a sample between a pair of hinged sample plates comprising an upper and a lower plate of a freeze-fracture apparatus as claimed in claim 1,
    applying pressure if required to ensure a good contact between the sample plate and the sample;
    rapidly freezing the sample plates containing the sample between them in a cryogenic bath in a dry gas environment;
    mounting the lower sample plate on the support means of said freeze-fracture apparatus that is already immersed in the cryogenic bath by means of screws or clamps;
    setting the fracture mechanism, with the release means of the freeze-fracture apparatus releasably retaining the spring-loaded bar of the apparatus in the set position,
    whilst still in a dry gas environment transferring the freeze-fracture apparatus to a cryogenically cooled stage in an insertion lock and placing it promptly under ultra high vacuum;
    transferring the freeze-fracture apparatus to a second cryogenically cooled stage in the analysis position and;
    freeze-cleaving the sample by triggering the release means of the freeze-fracture apparatus to separate the sample plates and opening them such that both freeze-cleaved surfaces are facing in a direction suitable for surface analysis, the release means being caused to push on a sample plate to mechanically prise the sample plates apart causing sample to fracture, and to release the spring-loaded bar from the set position.
  13. A method for presentation of a frozen sample as claimed in claim 12 wherein the rapid freezing of the sample plates containing sample between them in a cryogenic bath takes place outside of a dry gas environment and whilst the freeze-fracture apparatus is still cooled in the cryogenic bath transferring them both to a dry gas environment.
  14. A method for presentation of a frozen sample as claimed in claim 13 wherein the sample is any biological or biochemical material requiring freezing for surface analysis.
EP08737045A 2007-04-19 2008-04-18 Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum Active EP2147291B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0707594.8A GB0707594D0 (en) 2007-04-19 2007-04-19 Freeze-fracture sample holder
PCT/GB2008/001386 WO2008129279A1 (en) 2007-04-19 2008-04-18 Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2147291A1 EP2147291A1 (en) 2010-01-27
EP2147291B1 true EP2147291B1 (en) 2012-11-07

Family

ID=38135093

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08737045A Active EP2147291B1 (en) 2007-04-19 2008-04-18 Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20100162736A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2147291B1 (en)
GB (1) GB0707594D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2008129279A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0707594D0 (en) * 2007-04-19 2007-05-30 Ionoptika Ltd Freeze-fracture sample holder
JP5336334B2 (en) * 2009-11-27 2013-11-06 下西技研工業株式会社 Hinge
JP5854781B2 (en) * 2011-01-14 2016-02-09 キヤノン株式会社 Mass spectrometry method and apparatus
CN114112625B (en) * 2021-11-19 2024-02-13 安徽理工大学 Frozen soil blasting model sample preparation device with high ice content
GB2616926A (en) * 2021-11-19 2023-09-27 Univ Anhui Sci & Technology Sample preparation device for high-ice-content frozen soil blasting model

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3236133A (en) * 1963-05-06 1966-02-22 Whirlpool Co Microtome cooling and dehumidifying
US3176472A (en) * 1963-05-08 1965-04-06 Whirlpool Co Microtome freezing system
US3353531A (en) * 1965-10-22 1967-11-21 Armao Thomas Anthony Biopsy instrument with specimen lifting means
US3369550A (en) * 1967-02-17 1968-02-20 Thomas A. Armao Cryogenic clamps
US3544446A (en) * 1968-02-21 1970-12-01 James H Mcalear Specimen preparing device for microscopes and the like
DE2028898C3 (en) * 1970-06-12 1979-03-22 Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Gmbh, 6300 Lahn- Wetzlar Device for removing frozen sections from the knife of a freezing microtome
DE2633409A1 (en) * 1976-07-24 1978-01-26 Leybold Heraeus Gmbh & Co Kg DEVICE FOR CREATING CORRESPONDING BREAK AREAS
JPH0371564A (en) * 1989-08-09 1991-03-27 Fuji Electric Co Ltd Measuring method for distribution of electrolyte in electrode
DK0587921T3 (en) * 1992-09-10 1996-08-05 Frisco Findus Ag Cutting machine
CA2130893A1 (en) * 1993-09-17 1995-03-18 Bayer Corporation Method and system for collecting, processing and storing blood components
US5499578A (en) * 1995-02-23 1996-03-19 Payne; Patricia K. Sausage cutter
US6289682B1 (en) * 1999-08-25 2001-09-18 David C. Rada Specimen preparation apparatus
US6802149B1 (en) * 2002-11-27 2004-10-12 John N. Albanese, Jr. Fish cutting device and method of using
JP3781723B2 (en) * 2002-12-20 2006-05-31 日本電子株式会社 Sample holder for freezing breakage of high-pressure freezing apparatus and high-pressure freezing apparatus
JP2004337096A (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method for freezing food, vessel for freezing, and freezer
US7816141B2 (en) * 2005-01-24 2010-10-19 The Board Of Governors For Higher Education, State Of Rhode Island And Providence Plantations Modified freeze fracture direct imaging apparatus and technique
GB0707594D0 (en) * 2007-04-19 2007-05-30 Ionoptika Ltd Freeze-fracture sample holder

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008129279A1 (en) 2008-10-30
EP2147291A1 (en) 2010-01-27
GB0707594D0 (en) 2007-05-30
US20100162736A1 (en) 2010-07-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2147291B1 (en) Apparatus and method for the preparation of fluid bearing materials for surface analysis in a vacuum
Parmenter et al. Cryo‐FIB‐lift‐out: practically impossible to practical reality
Issman et al. Cryo‐SEM specimen preparation under controlled temperature and concentration conditions
EP2558838B1 (en) Ion beam sample preparation apparatus and methods
JP5899377B2 (en) Charged particle beam apparatus and sample preparation method using the apparatus
JP6143487B2 (en) Method for making a vitrified sample for an electron microscope
US10170275B2 (en) Cryogenic specimen processing in a charged particle microscope
US8674323B2 (en) Forming an electron microscope sample from high-pressure frozen material
JP5204592B2 (en) Thin film sample observation system, cooling sample holder, and thin film sample observation method
Long et al. Cryo-FIB for TEM investigation of soft matter and beam sensitive energy materials
US20090138995A1 (en) Atom probe component treatments
US20230045321A1 (en) System for loading and/or manipulating a sample in a sample transfer device
Fuchs et al. Instrumentation and specimen preparation for electron beam X‐ray microanalysis of frozen hydrated bulk specimens
JP3584430B2 (en) Contaminant detection method
JP2002214091A (en) Specimen freezing method, cooling holder and scanning electron microscope
Hutchinson et al. Instrumentation for direct microscopic elemental analysis of frozen biological tissue
US11808679B2 (en) Method and apparatus for cryogenic and environmental controlled specimen handling
JP2008268100A (en) Cooled sample analyzing apparatus
Iyer et al. An improved specimen loader for cryo‐scanning electron microscopy
Lindfors Specimen handling: cleaning and processing
Schamberger et al. Optimization of Low Temperature Vitrification for Surface Analysis of Hydrate d Hydrogel Polymers
Melanson A versatile and affordable plunge freezing instrument for preparing frozen hydrated specimens for cryo transmission electron microscopy (CryoEM)
Stulik et al. Applications of environmental scanning electron microscopy in art conservation and archaeology
EP2270467A1 (en) Method of and device for preparing samples for microscopy
Schamberger et al. Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research 800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, VA 22217-5660

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20091118

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100312

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 583199

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008019950

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130103

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 583199

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130207

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130307

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130218

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130208

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130307

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130207

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130808

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008019950

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130808

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080418

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130418

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230208

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230223

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230222

Year of fee payment: 16