EP2073702B1 - Collecte de données en vue d'une tomographie d'impédance électrique - Google Patents
Collecte de données en vue d'une tomographie d'impédance électrique Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2073702B1 EP2073702B1 EP07858927A EP07858927A EP2073702B1 EP 2073702 B1 EP2073702 B1 EP 2073702B1 EP 07858927 A EP07858927 A EP 07858927A EP 07858927 A EP07858927 A EP 07858927A EP 2073702 B1 EP2073702 B1 EP 2073702B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- electrodes
- measuring
- electrode
- current
- differential
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000002593 electrical impedance tomography Methods 0.000 title claims description 19
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 title claims description 11
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 44
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 10
- 210000000038 chest Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 5
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000342 Monte Carlo simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
- A61B5/0536—Impedance imaging, e.g. by tomography
Definitions
- the invention refers to a method and apparatus for carrying out data collection on electrodes placed on a body for subsequent processing of an electrical impedance tomography image of a corresponding part of said body.
- EIT Electrical impedance tomography
- a number of electrodes are placed around the thorax wherein an alternating current with e.g. 50 kHz at 5 mA peak to peak amplitude is applied via a pair of (preferably adjacent) electrodes.
- the other electrodes are used to carry out the measurements of the voltages against a defined reference potential resulting from the applied current.
- the pair of electrodes for applying the current consists of a driving electrode, i.e. positive pole, and a sinking electrode, i.e. negative pole.
- Spatial resolution and noise are the most important constraints in possible clinical applications. Spatial resolution is limited by the number of independent measurements that can be made from a given number of electrodes. It follows that if the number of electrodes used is increased, then the spatial resolution might be improved. If the number of electrodes is doubled, then the number of independent measurements will quadruple and the spatial resolution could be improved by a factor of two. However, increasing the number of electrodes also reduces the signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, the resolution is also limited by a three-dimensional spread of the current, so that the improvement in resolution cannot be increased continuously by increasing the number of electrodes.
- the method according to the invention comprises the steps of placing the electrodes on a peripheral line around the body, applying a current pattern from a current source to at least one pair of electrodes, and measuring differential potentials between pairs of electrodes, wherein at least one intermediate electrode lies in between each pair of electrodes for measuring the differential potentials and the differential potentials of one current pattern for the subsequent image processing refer to at least three different pairs of electrodes with no electrode used more than twice for each current pattern.
- the basic cognition of the invention is the fact that the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved if the distance between a pair of electrodes for a measurement of the differential potential is increased.
- the invention suggests to use one of the electrodes after the next electrode for measuring the differential potential.
- all possible combinations of pairs of electrodes on said peripheral line could still be used for one current pattern if an overlapping pattern of measurement pairs is applied for each current pattern.
- One further advantage of the method according to the invention is related to the dynamic range of differential potentials, i.e. the ratio between the highest and the lowest differential potential. It can be noted that a decrease of the dynamic range improves also the quality of the digital demodulation process.
- the proposed configuration resulted in a fourfold increase in voltage signals at the opposite side in the body with respect to the current application position. Consequently, the signal-to-noise ratio improved by the same amount and the image noise could be reduced considerably. Furthermore, the proposed configuration decreased the dynamic range twofold which resulted in an improvement of the quality of the digital demodulation process.
- the at least one intermediate electrode is part of another pair of electrodes for measuring the differential potentials.
- This aspect of the invention results in an interleaved configuration of the pairs of measurement electrodes. This can be accounted for in the subsequent processing of an electrical impedance tomography image of the body.
- any algorithm can incorporate the spatially overlapping voltage information generated by the proposed configuration during each specific current pattern.
- the trade-off between spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio has to be considered.
- the best number of interposed electrodes depends on the system noise as well as on the dimensions of the body to be measured. Principally, the number of electrodes lying in between the pairs of electrodes can be different for current applying pairs versus measuring pairs but most configurations will result in the same number of interposed electrodes used for current applying pairs and measuring pairs.
- the same number of electrodes lies in between each pair of electrodes for measuring a differential potential.
- This kind of configuration has the advantage that there is a regular pattern of the pairs of electrodes for measuring the differential potentials which simplifies the subsequent processing of the electrical impedance tomography image.
- the optimum number of electrodes between said pairs of electrodes for obtaining the best trade-off between spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio depends on the spatial dimensions of the whole configuration.
- the spatial dimensions i.e. in particular the distance between the electrodes which are placed on the peripheral line around the body
- the same number of electrodes lies in between each pair of electrodes for applying a current.
- This kind of configuration has the same advantage as described above with regard to the pairs of electrodes for measuring the differential potentials, i.e. the resulting current patterns are similar to each other which simplifies the subsequent processing of the electrical impedance tomography image.
- the distance between the pairs of electrodes for applying a current does not influence in the first place the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement. Rather, there is a further criterion for choosing the optimum number of electrodes between the pairs of electrodes for applying a current which is the resulting number of independent data collection measurements for all possible current patterns.
- Monte-Carlo simulations which have been carried out in this regard suggest that the maximum number of independent measurements can be obtained when the number of interleaved electrodes is equal both for the pairs of electrodes for measuring the differential potentials and for the pairs of electrodes for applying a current.
- the benefit between the maximum and the next best combination according to the Monte-Carlo simulations was not substantial, namely just one additional measurement.
- each electrode on said peripheral line is used either for applying a current or for measuring differential potentials.
- the advantage of excluding the electrodes for applying a current from measuring differential potentials is the fact that the contamination of the reading voltage by the contact impedance (electrode-skin) can be avoided.
- the potentials in the skin and at the electrode will be in close equilibrium.
- the potential at the skin will be always different from the potential generated at the electrode metal.
- Having a 32-electrode configuration there are still 28 independent differential voltage measurements for each current pattern if the electrodes for applying a current are excluded. Even considering the redundancy caused by the reciprocity principle, this configuration results in approximately the same amount of independent information as in the adjacent configuration. Therefore, resolution is minimally affected while the signal-to-noise ratio improves 3 to 4 times.
- each electrode on said peripheral line is used for measuring differential potentials.
- each electrode is used twice for measuring differential potentials. In this way the maximum information possible will be obtained from the given number of electrodes.
- the number of differential potential measurements is equal to the number of electrodes. Consequently, this requires that the electrodes for applying a current also are used for the differential potential measurements, wherein in this configuration the influence of the current application has to be taken into account with regard to the differential potential measurement.
- a differential potential measurement is performed by measuring a first voltage of a first electrode with regard to the ground of the current source, measuring a second voltage of a second electrode with regard to the ground of the current source and subtracting the second voltage from the first voltage.
- a balanced current source having the mid-point earthing as ground.
- the advantage of this configuration is the fact that no reference electrode is needed for the ground potential. Instead, the mid-point earthing of the current source can serve as a reference potential.
- the electrodes are placed on at least one electrode unit.
- An electrode unit combines a number of electrodes into one element which can be applied to the patient's body.
- Either an electrode unit comprises all electrodes required for the measurement, e.g. an electrode belt, or several electrode units, so-called electrode modules, are combined in order to obtain the required number of electrodes.
- Various configurations of an electrode belt are known, e.g. from WO 03/043493 A2 .
- electrode modules are available having e.g. 8 electrodes per module. In this way four modules can be used to perform measurements with 32 electrodes. Advantages of electrode modules are their easier production and easier clinical use.
- Fig. 1 shows the adjacent configuration for applying a current and for measuring a differential potential according to the prior art using 16 electrodes. Depicted is a cross-sectional view of a test subject in the plane of an electrode belt. Fig. 1 shows an adjacent configuration for applying a current and for measuring a differential potential. A high output current source is applied across electrodes 1 and 2, while the difference of the potential between other electrode pairs is measured - to simplify matters only the opposite differential potential, i.e. between electrodes 9 and 10, is depicted. The opposite differential potential corresponds usually to the lowest one.
- Fig. 2 shows the same configuration as Fig. 1 but illustrates that, when the number of electrodes doubles to 32 electrodes, while keeping the adjacent configuration, the distance between electrodes 1 and 2 shortens, increasing the shunting current through the skin in between these electrodes. As a result, current density decreases in the opposite side of the body, decreasing potential gradients. The distance separating the opposite measurement pair, namely electrodes 17 and 18, becomes also less, decreasing further the potential gradients.
- Fig. 3 shows a configuration according to the invention for applying a current and for measuring a differential potential employing an electrode belt with 32 electrodes.
- One current pattern is depicted, where driving and sinking electrodes are electrodes 1 and 3, respectively. The subsequent current pattern would occur using electrodes 2 and 4 for current application, and so on.
- the measured differential potential gradients are similar to those in Fig. 1 .
- Current density is higher in the opposite side of the body, and the distance within measurement pairs increases. There is some spatial overlapping of information, which can easily be accounted for by the reconstruction algorithm.
- each differential potential is an independent information, and there is much more independent information for the image reconstruction in this configuration than in a 16-electrode configuration. Therefore, the image resolution is better than in Fig. 1 , while the signal-to-noise ratio is better than in Fig. 2 .
- all measurements of differential potentials are performed simultaneously. Possible movements of the body and/or changes in the impedance within the body during the measurements are taking place will reduce the quality of the electrical impedance tomography image. It is therefore desirable to reduce the time required for the differential potential measurements for a given current pattern. Performing the differential potential measurements simultaneously leads to the shortest possible measurement time and consequently the best measurement conditions.
- a single bipolar current source is preferably used to apply the current to each pair of electrodes selected for applying current. This current source with high output impedance is multiplexed among all possible pairs of electrodes. Compared to systems using a current source at each electrode pair employed for applying current, this will further reduce the noise in the system.
- Fig. 4 shows a detail of a configuration according to the invention with 32 electrodes surrounding a section of the body with homogeneous resistivity.
- the electrodes for applying a current are 1 and 3 at the opposite side of the body. Isopotential lines connecting the dipole formed between electrodes 1 and 3 and electrodes 12 and 14 are depicted. It can be observed that there is some spatial overlap of information carried by the differential potentials measured by amplifiers 16 and 17, respectively, which must be accounted for by the reconstruction algorithm. Any impedance perturbation occurring in the overlapping region will cause a simultaneous change in the differential potentials measured by amplifiers 16 and 17.
- Fig. 5 shows a typical case of differential potential measurements in a tank simulating a human thorax, with a 32-electrode adjacent configuration according to the prior art. To simplify matters, the differential potential measurements corresponding to pairs 32-1, 1-2, and 2-3 are not depicted.
- Fig. 6 shows a typical case of differential potential measurements in the same tank as in Fig. 5 , with the same current source and intensity, using a 32-electrode configuration according to the invention. To simplify matters, measurements corresponding to electrode pairs 31-1, 32-2, 1-3, 2-4 and 3-5 are not shown.
- Fig. 7 shows a comparison of the measurements of differential potential signals between a configuration according to the prior art as shown in Fig. 5 and a configuration according to the invention as shown in Fig. 6 .
- Fig. 7 shows the increase in differential potential signals up to fourfold, which usually causes an improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio by the same order of magnitude.
- One additional advantage of the configuration according to the invention is related to the dynamic range of differential potentials, which decreased almost twofold, potentially improving the quality of the digital demodulation process.
- Fig. 8 shows an illustration of a saline tank model and a non-conductive object placed in it to be used within the following simulations.
- a physiological solution with 0,9% NaCl composition was used and the current source applied 0,1 mA at 125 kHz. This setup resulted in a nearly constant random noise in all channels with a standard deviation of about 0,01 mV.
- An acrylic cylinder, with 4,5 cm diameter was placed in the position illustrated, that is midway between the centre and the border.
- Fig. 9 shows the result of an image reconstruction of the non-conductive object according to Fig. 8 using an adjacent configuration and a back-projection algorithm.
- the back-projection algorithm is explained for example in Santosa F. and Vogelius M., "A backprojection algorithm for electrical impedance imaging", SIAM, 50: 216-243, 1990 .
- the contour of the original non-conductive object is superposed to illustrate the expected position of the object in the image.
- the signal-to-noise ratio in the lowest voltages was about 40 dB.
- Fig. 10 shows the result of an image reconstruction using a configuration according to the invention with one electrode lying in between the current applying pairs/measuring pairs and a back-projection algorithm.
- the current source and intensity was the same as in Fig. 9 , with the same system and cables, generating exactly the same background noise.
- the signal-to-noise ratio improved fourfold, with a visible improvement in the image quality.
- Fig. 11 shows the result of an image reconstruction using a configuration according to the invention with three electrodes lying in between the current applying pairs/measuring pairs and a back-projection algorithm.
- the current source and intensity was the same as in Fig. 9 , with the same system and cables, generating exactly the same background noise.
- the signal-to-noise ratio improved further, when compared to Fig. 10 , but there is already some deterioration in the object positioning and in the resolution.
- Fig. 12 shows the result of an image reconstruction using an adjacent configuration and a reconstruction algorithm based on the sensitivity matrix calculations for a finite element mesh model.
- This reconstruction algorithm is explained for example in Morucci J.P. et al., "A direct sensitivity matrix approach for fast reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography", Physiological Measurement, 15: A104-A114, 1994 .
- the current source and intensity was the same as in Fig. 9 , with the same system and cables, generating exactly the same background noise. Under the particular conditions tested, with a constant random noise across the electrodes, the algorithm resulted in better spatial resolution and it propagated less noise to the image than the back projection algorithm.
- Fig. 13 shows the result of an image reconstruction using a configuration according to the invention with one electrode lying in between the current applying pairs/measuring pairs and a reconstruction algorithm based on the sensitivity matrix calculations for a finite element mesh model.
- current source settings and background noise were kept constant like in Fig. 9 .
- image noise decreased and the spatial resolution improved.
- the reason for this improvement is the better signal-to-noise ratio in differential potential measurements, without loosing the major advantage of a differential potential system with current applying electrodes located comparatively close to each other, namely its high spatial frequency of excitation, leading to a greater number of independent measurements.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
Claims (18)
- Procédé destiné à effectuer une collecte de données sur des électrodes placées sur un corps pour un traitement ultérieur d'une image de tomographie par impédance électrique d'une partie correspondante dudit corps au moyen d'un algorithme de reconstruction, comprenant les étapes qui consistent :à placer les électrodes sur une ligne périphérique autour du corps,à appliquer un motif de courant à partir d'une source de courant à au moins une paire d'électrodes, età mesurer des potentiels différentiels du motif de courant entre les paires d'électrodes, où- au moins une électrode intermédiaire se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes afin de mesurer les potentiels différentiels,- les potentiels différentiels d'un motif de courant pour le traitement ultérieur d'image se réfère à au moins trois différentes paires d'électrodes sans aucune électrode utilisée plus de deux fois pour le motif de courant, et- la collecte de données est soumise à certaines informations de chevauchement spatial qui sont représentées par l'algorithme de reconstruction.caractérisé en ce que la mesure des potentiels différentiels du motif de courant entre des paires d'électrodes comprend en outre le fait que l'au moins une électrode intermédiaire fait partie d'une autre paire d'électrodes destinée à mesurer les potentiels différentiels.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le même nombre d'électrodes se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes pour mesurer un potentiel différentiel.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel le même nombre d'électrodes se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes pour appliquer un courant.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel pour un motif de courant, chaque électrode sur ladite ligne périphérique est utilisée soit pour appliquer un courant soit pour mesurer les potentiels différentiels.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel, pour un motif de courant, chaque électrode sur ladite ligne périphérique est utilisée pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels.
- Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel pour un motif de courant chaque électrode est utilisée deux fois pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, dans lequel une mesure de potentiel différentiel est réalisée par une mesure d'une première tension d'une première électrode par rapport à la masse de la source de courant, une mesure d'une deuxième tension d'une deuxième électrode par rapport à la masse de la source de courant et une soustraction de la deuxième tension de la première tension.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, dans lequel une source de courant équilibrée est utilisée en ayant la mise à la terre par prise médiane comme masse.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8, dans lequel les électrodes sont placées sur au moins une unité d'électrode.
- Appareil destiné à effectuer une collecte de données pour une image de tomographie par impédance électrique, comprenant :des électrodes placées sur une ligne périphérique autour d'un corps pour le traitement de ladite image de tomographie par impédance électrique d'une partie correspondante du corps au moyen d'un algorithme de reconstruction,une source de courant destinée à appliquer un motif de courant sur au moins une paire d'électrodes, etun moyen de mesure configuré pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels du motif de courant entre des paires d'électrodes, où- au moins une électrode intermédiaire se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes afin de mesurer les potentiels différentiels,- les potentiels différentiels d'un motif de courant pour le traitement ultérieur d'image se réfère à au moins trois différentes paires d'électrodes sans aucune électrode utilisée plus de deux fois pour le motif de courant, et- la collecte de données est soumise à certaines informations de chevauchement spatial qui sont représentées par l'algorithme de reconstruction.caractérisé en ce que le moyen de mesure est configuré en outre de sorte que l'au moins une électrode intermédiaire fasse partie d'une autre paire d'électrodes configurée pour mesurer les différences de potentiel.
- Appareil selon la revendication 10, dans lequel le même nombre d'électrodes se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes pour mesurer un potentiel différentiel.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 11, dans lequel le même nombre d'électrodes se trouve entre chaque paire d'électrodes pour appliquer un courant.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 12, dans lequel pour un motif de courant chaque électrode sur ladite ligne périphérique est utilisée soit pour appliquer un courant soit pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 12, dans lequel pour un motif de courant, chaque électrode sur ladite ligne périphérique est utilisée pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels.
- Appareil selon la revendication 14, dans lequel pour un motif de courant chaque électrode est utilisée deux fois pour mesurer des potentiels différentiels.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 15, dans lequel une mesure de potentiel différentiel est réalisée par une mesure d'une première tension d'une première électrode par rapport à la masse de la source de courant, une mesure d'une deuxième tension d'une deuxième électrode par rapport à la masse de la source de courant et une soustraction de la deuxième tension de la première tension.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 16, dans lequel une source de courant équilibrée est utilisée en ayant la mise à la terre par prise médiane comme masse.
- Appareil selon l'une des revendications 10 à 17, dans lequel les électrodes sont placées sur au moins une unité d'électrode.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
BRPI0604484-0A BRPI0604484B1 (pt) | 2006-08-28 | 2006-08-28 | Método para realização de coleta de dados sobre eletrodos colocados em um corpo |
PCT/IB2007/003726 WO2008041127A2 (fr) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-28 | Collecte de données en vue d'une tomographie d'impédance électrique |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2073702A2 EP2073702A2 (fr) | 2009-07-01 |
EP2073702B1 true EP2073702B1 (fr) | 2012-11-21 |
EP2073702B2 EP2073702B2 (fr) | 2016-08-03 |
Family
ID=39247102
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07858927.2A Active EP2073702B2 (fr) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-28 | Collecte de données en vue d'une tomographie d'impédance électrique |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8352016B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP2073702B2 (fr) |
BR (1) | BRPI0604484B1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2008041127A2 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2008544777A (ja) | 2005-07-01 | 2008-12-11 | インぺディメッド リミテッド | 監視システム |
EP3287073A1 (fr) | 2005-07-01 | 2018-02-28 | Impedimed Limited | Système de surveillance |
EP1948017B1 (fr) | 2005-10-11 | 2014-04-02 | Impedimed Limited | Surveillance de l'etat d'hydratation |
JP5419861B2 (ja) | 2007-04-20 | 2014-02-19 | インぺディメッド リミテッド | インピーダンス測定装置および方法 |
JP5542050B2 (ja) | 2007-08-09 | 2014-07-09 | インぺディメッド リミテッド | インピーダンス測定方法及び装置 |
AU2010312305B2 (en) | 2009-10-26 | 2014-01-16 | Impedimed Limited | Fluid level indicator determination |
WO2011060497A1 (fr) | 2009-11-18 | 2011-05-26 | Impedimed Limited | Distribution de signal pour des mesures d'électrode de patient |
US8700121B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2014-04-15 | Intersection Medical, Inc. | Devices for determining the relative spatial change in subsurface resistivities across frequencies in tissue |
TWI461180B (zh) * | 2011-12-30 | 2014-11-21 | Univ Nat Chiao Tung | 增進電阻抗斷層攝影影像解析度的方法 |
US8983578B2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2015-03-17 | General Electric Company | System and method for transducer placement in soft-field tomography |
US9581627B2 (en) | 2012-05-21 | 2017-02-28 | General Electric Company | Method and system for tomographic imaging |
CN102894961B (zh) * | 2012-10-30 | 2014-04-09 | 中国人民解放军第四军医大学 | 一种自构造背景帧的电阻抗断层成像方法 |
US10357177B2 (en) | 2013-12-13 | 2019-07-23 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for electrical impedance imaging |
US10874324B2 (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2020-12-29 | General Electric Company | Detection of physiological changes in impedance monitoring |
US12053269B2 (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2024-08-06 | Bilab Co., Ltd. | Electrode belt device for measuring bio-signal |
DE102017123034B4 (de) * | 2017-10-04 | 2023-10-26 | Krohne Messtechnik Gmbh | Verfahren zum Kalibrieren eines Tomografiegeräts zur elektrischen Impedanztomografie |
US11412946B2 (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2022-08-16 | Timpel Medical B.V. | Electrical impedance tomography device and system having a multi-dimensional electrode arrangement |
CN111024772B (zh) * | 2019-12-03 | 2022-06-14 | 西安科技大学 | 激光熔覆熔池微电阻分布成像方法与装置 |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4649932A (en) * | 1983-04-13 | 1987-03-17 | National Research Development Corp. | Method and apparatus for deriving currents and potentials representative of the impedances of zones of a body |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4920490A (en) * | 1988-01-28 | 1990-04-24 | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | Process and apparatus for distinguishing conductivities by electric current computed tomography |
GB9013177D0 (en) * | 1990-06-13 | 1990-08-01 | Brown Brian H | Real-time imaging, etc. |
US5272624A (en) * | 1990-10-02 | 1993-12-21 | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | Current patterns for impedance tomography |
US5381333A (en) * | 1991-07-23 | 1995-01-10 | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | Current patterns for electrical impedance tomography |
GB9226376D0 (en) † | 1992-12-18 | 1993-02-10 | British Tech Group | Tomography |
DE4332257C2 (de) † | 1993-09-22 | 1996-09-19 | P Osypka Gmbh Medizintechnik D | Vorrichtung zum Erzeugen tomografischer Bilder |
US6363275B1 (en) † | 1997-07-25 | 2002-03-26 | Werner Alois Kaiser | Device for detecting, for characterizing by differential diagnosis, and treating tumors |
EP1410050A1 (fr) * | 2001-06-15 | 2004-04-21 | Mississippi State University | Detecteur de densite dans une grume |
DE10156833A1 (de) | 2001-11-20 | 2003-05-28 | Boehm Stephan | Elektrode für biomedizinische Messungen |
US7603158B2 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2009-10-13 | Adrian Nachman | Current density impedance imaging (CDII) |
US20050107833A1 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-19 | Freeman Gary A. | Multi-path transthoracic defibrillation and cardioversion |
WO2005051163A2 (fr) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-06-09 | University-Industry Cooperation Group Of Kyunghee University | Systeme et procede pour visualiser la conductivite et la distribution des densites de courant dans un objet |
US7865236B2 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2011-01-04 | Nervonix, Inc. | Active electrode, bio-impedance based, tissue discrimination system and methods of use |
US20070083239A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2007-04-12 | Denise Demarais | Methods and apparatus for inducing, monitoring and controlling renal neuromodulation |
DE102005031752B4 (de) * | 2005-07-07 | 2017-11-02 | Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA | Elektroimpedanztomographie-Gerät mit Gleichtaktsignalunterdrückung |
-
2006
- 2006-08-28 BR BRPI0604484-0A patent/BRPI0604484B1/pt active IP Right Grant
-
2007
- 2007-08-28 EP EP07858927.2A patent/EP2073702B2/fr active Active
- 2007-08-28 WO PCT/IB2007/003726 patent/WO2008041127A2/fr active Application Filing
-
2009
- 2009-03-27 US US12/383,604 patent/US8352016B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4649932A (en) * | 1983-04-13 | 1987-03-17 | National Research Development Corp. | Method and apparatus for deriving currents and potentials representative of the impedances of zones of a body |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8352016B2 (en) | 2013-01-08 |
WO2008041127A2 (fr) | 2008-04-10 |
US20090234244A1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
BRPI0604484B1 (pt) | 2022-09-27 |
EP2073702A2 (fr) | 2009-07-01 |
WO2008041127A3 (fr) | 2008-07-17 |
BRPI0604484A (pt) | 2008-04-22 |
EP2073702B2 (fr) | 2016-08-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2073702B1 (fr) | Collecte de données en vue d'une tomographie d'impédance électrique | |
US6501984B1 (en) | Electrical impedance tomography method and electrode arrangement for use therein | |
McEwan et al. | A review of errors in multi-frequency EIT instrumentation | |
Schlebusch et al. | Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography | |
Hall et al. | Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex | |
EP0674772B1 (fr) | Tomographie | |
Kauppinen et al. | Sensitivity distribution visualizations of impedance tomography measurement strategies | |
Ryynanen et al. | Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull | |
US20230218902A1 (en) | Bioimpedance measurement method and apparatus with electrical stimulation performance | |
Dimas et al. | Electrical impedance tomography image reconstruction for adjacent and opposite strategy using FEMM and EIDORS simulation models | |
Hunold et al. | Head phantoms for electroencephalography and transcranial electric stimulation: a skull material study | |
Canali et al. | Electrical impedance tomography methods for miniaturised 3D systems | |
Liehr et al. | Vortex shaped current sources in a physical torso phantom | |
Chowdhury et al. | Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): electromagnetic simulations | |
US20230320608A1 (en) | Excitation response measurement method, electrical impedance tomography method, and storage medium | |
Meeson et al. | The dependence of EIT images on the assumed initial conductivity distribution: a study of pelvic imaging | |
EP4351403A1 (fr) | Tomographie d'impédance | |
Bonmassar et al. | The shape of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is altered in stroke patients | |
CA2272429C (fr) | Procede de tomographie d'impedance electrique et structure d'electrode pour ledit procede | |
Xu et al. | The acquisition hardware system with direct digital synthesis and filtered back-projection imaging in electrical impedance tomography | |
Kanti Bera et al. | Common ground method of current injection in electrical impedance tomography | |
Tanguay et al. | Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography | |
Kerner et al. | An improved data acquisition method for electrical impedance tomography | |
Kovačić et al. | An electrical impedance tomography system for current pulse measurements | |
Chitturi et al. | Narrowband array processing beamforming technique for electrical impedance tomography |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20090327 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 584623 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602007026910 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130117 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 584623 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130222 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130321 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130221 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: DRAEGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA Effective date: 20130821 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 602007026910 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130821 |
|
PLAF | Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130828 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20070828 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130828 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121121 |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20160803 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 602007026910 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: AELC |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20170626 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180828 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180828 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230903 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230825 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230829 Year of fee payment: 17 |