EP2048637B1 - Wireless networks for highly dependable applications - Google Patents

Wireless networks for highly dependable applications Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2048637B1
EP2048637B1 EP08165992.2A EP08165992A EP2048637B1 EP 2048637 B1 EP2048637 B1 EP 2048637B1 EP 08165992 A EP08165992 A EP 08165992A EP 2048637 B1 EP2048637 B1 EP 2048637B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
operable
sensors
wireless
communication system
wireless communication
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08165992.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2048637A2 (en
EP2048637A3 (en
Inventor
Yunjung c/o Honeywell International Inc. Patent Services M/S-AB/2B Yi
Vicraj T Thomas
Kelly P Muldoon
Michael R Franceschini
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell International Inc
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US12/246,370 external-priority patent/US9408250B2/en
Application filed by Honeywell International Inc filed Critical Honeywell International Inc
Publication of EP2048637A2 publication Critical patent/EP2048637A2/en
Publication of EP2048637A3 publication Critical patent/EP2048637A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2048637B1 publication Critical patent/EP2048637B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08CTRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
    • G08C17/00Arrangements for transmitting signals characterised by the use of a wireless electrical link
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08CTRANSMISSION SYSTEMS FOR MEASURED VALUES, CONTROL OR SIMILAR SIGNALS
    • G08C2201/00Transmission systems of control signals via wireless link
    • G08C2201/40Remote control systems using repeaters, converters, gateways

Definitions

  • Modern vehicles such as aircraft, automobiles, space craft, satellites, etc.
  • use computer networks to control operation of the vehicle.
  • modern industrial control plants, campus buildings, etc. use computer networks for control of operations.
  • sensor data and/or control inputs from an operator are provided to a processing unit for processing.
  • the components of these networks in modern vehicles and buildings are interconnected via wires.
  • wires increase production and maintenance costs associated with the vehicles and buildings. For example, designers must take into consideration space for the wires in designing a vehicle and manufacturers must ensure that the wires are properly connected.
  • new wires may also need to be added or replaced.
  • wires increase the weight of a vehicle which is a consideration for flying vehicles such as aircraft and spacecraft.
  • wireless networks unlike wired networks, where wired lines can protect communication and provide some degree of guaranteed reliability, wireless networks use broadcast medium which can be easily interfered/corrupted by intentional or unintentional sources. Also, the quality of wireless medium can be affected by surrounding environments. For example, wireless networks in indoor environments generally experience multi-path fading, shadowing and some obstacles by humans.
  • Patent document number US2005/065743A1 describes an energy monitoring device including procedures for secure communication of data.
  • the energy monitoring device includes a public/private key pair used to encrypt and/or digitally sign communications by the device. This allows the receivers of these communications to authenticate the communications to ensure that the device and/or communications have not been compromised.
  • the energy monitoring device is further capable of communications via an ad-hoc "mesh" network, thereby facilitating communications among devices which are substantially inaccessible due to either physical or economic limitations.
  • Patent document number WO2005/010214A2 describes a method and apparatus for communication in a wireless sensor network.
  • One or more routers in a network are available for communication with one or more star nodes at a randomized time and/or frequency.
  • a connectivity assessment is performed at several different frequencies and/or times, is performed to evaluate the quality of communications between devices in the network.
  • Primary and secondary communication relationships are formed between devices to provide for system redundancy.
  • One or more proxies are maintained where each proxy includes a status of one or more devices in the network, e.g., one or more star nodes or routers.
  • Proxies are used to handle information requests and/or status change requests, e.g., a proxy may be requested to change a communication relationship between devices in the network and may generate command signals to cause the corresponding devices to make the change.
  • Patent document number US6658850B1 describes a system and method for establishing communications in a power plant.
  • the system comprises a power generation system having an interface for establishing wireless communication, at least one power plant auxiliary system having an interface for enabling wireless communication, and a wireless communications link, having at least two redundant wireless communications channels, established between the power generation system and the power plant auxiliary system.
  • the two redundant wireless communications channels are two redundant wireless radio frequency channels.
  • the communications link is established utilizing a network communications controller which wirelessly communicates with the power generation system and the power plant auxiliary system.
  • One or more of the power plant auxiliary systems communicate with the network communications controller through a repeater.
  • Any wireless vehicle network for essential services needs to handle unpredictable and dynamic link quality and reliability.
  • certain wireless networks, such as in aircraft must meet certain required levels of reliability.
  • a wireless communication system comprising one or more control units operable to transmit control signals, a plurality of actuators responsive to the control signals, and a plurality of sensors operable to transmit sensor data used by the one or more control units in generating the control signals.
  • Each of the sensors, actuators, and one or more control units are located at a fixed position in the system relative to one another.
  • Each of the plurality of sensors and each of the plurality of actuators are coupled to at least one of the one or more control units via a plurality of wireless paths.
  • Each of the plurality of sensors are operable to transmit the sensor data in an assigned time slot to at least one of the one or more control units over a plurality of wireless channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths.
  • the number of channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths is determined based, at least in part, on a worst-case estimate of potential interference, and each of the plurality of sensors is operable to pseudo-randomly switch the plurality of channels over which the sensor data is transmitted.
  • the embodiments described below utilize new techniques incorporating wireless network technologies to achieve low bit error rate (e.g., 10 -6 or 10 -9 ) and low packet error rate.
  • the embodiments described below utilize techniques at multiple layers (e.g., network layer, physical layer, data link layer, etc.) to increase reliability and resilience to jamming.
  • the embodiments described below utilize multi-path routing (also referred to as route diversity or path diversity), multiple channels for each path at the link layer (also referred to as link diversity or frequency diversity) and multiple redundant copies of transmitted data (also referred to as time diversity) to achieve necessary low error rates.
  • Fig. 1A is a block diagram of one embodiment of a wireless communication system 100.
  • Wireless communication system 100 includes a plurality of nodes A-F. Although only six nodes are depicted in this embodiment, for purposes of explanation, it is to be understood that any number of nodes can be used in other embodiments.
  • Each of nodes A-F includes a transmitter/receiver pair or transceiver (TX/RX) 104 and an antenna 106.
  • TX/RX transmitter/receiver pair or transceiver
  • each of nodes A-F is operable to receive and transmit wireless communication signals.
  • each of nodes A-F is operable to transmit in an assigned Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA) time slot in this example.
  • TDMA Time-Division Multiple Access
  • CSMA Carrier Sense Multiple Access
  • CDMA Code Division Multiple Access
  • Each of nodes A-F is located within range of at least two other nodes via wireless links 102.
  • node A is in range of and coupled to nodes B, C, and D via wireless links 102.
  • each of nodes A-F is operable to forward received signals that have a destination address indicating another node.
  • each of nodes A-F is located in a fixed position relative to the other nodes.
  • node A transmits a signal with a destination address indicating node F.
  • the signal is received by nodes B, C, and D over wireless links 102.
  • Each of nodes B, C, and D in turn retransmit the received signal which is then received by nodes E and F.
  • Node E then retransmits the received signal which is received by node F.
  • Node F in this example, received the signal originally transmitted by node A via intermediate nodes in each of 3 separate wireless paths.
  • an intermediate node is a node located in the wireless path, between the original node and the destination node, which forwards the received wireless signal.
  • a wireless path is the path a wireless signal travels from an original node to a destination node.
  • the first wireless path in this example includes nodes A, B and F, (node B being an intermediate node, node A being the transmitting or original node, and node F being the destination node).
  • the second wireless path includes nodes A, C, and F and the third wireless path includes nodes A, D, E, and F.
  • the portion of a wireless path between two nodes is referred to herein as a wireless segment.
  • the portion of the first wireless path between nodes A and B is the first segment of the first wireless path.
  • the destination node, node F in this example implements a voting scheme based on the received wireless signal input from the plurality of wireless paths. For example, if the received wireless signal from the first wireless path is the same as the received wireless signal from the third wireless path, but different from the wireless signal received from the second wireless path, the destination node selects the signal received from the first and third wireless paths. It is to be understood that this exemplary voting scheme is provided by way of example and that other voting schemes based on received input from the plurality of wireless paths can be implemented in other embodiments.
  • a voting scheme is not implemented.
  • a default order is determined a priori to determine which signal to use.
  • node F can be assigned a priori to use the signal received over the first wireless path unless it is unavailable. If it is unavailable, the wireless signal received over the second wireless path is to be used.
  • a priori schemes can be used in other embodiments.
  • system 100 is able to tolerate transmission failures in a given wireless path, such as failures due to environmental noise, jamming, node failure or other interference.
  • each of nodes A-F includes a plurality of antennae 106-1 ... 106-N for transmission and reception, as shown in Fig. 1B .
  • each of nodes A-F in Fig. 1B is operable to simultaneously transmit and receive multiple copies of a wireless signal (one for each antenna 106) through implementation of a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) scheme.
  • MIMO Multiple-Input Multiple-Output
  • the MIMO scheme is used to increase the signal gain at the destination node, thereby reducing multipath fading effects.
  • Each of antennae 106-1 ... 106-N are operable to transmit on different channels.
  • a channel refers to a range of frequencies.
  • each of nodes A-F is operable to dynamically select a coding technique for each channel.
  • exemplary coding techniques include, but are not limited to, Reed-Solomon coding, convolution coding, and BCH coding.
  • Each coding technique has advantages under certain conditions.
  • each of nodes A-F selects an appropriate coding technique for each channel based on the conditions of the respective channel. For example, in some embodiments, the coding technique for each channel is selected based on the worst bit error rate of the respective channel.
  • the wireless signal from the original node is transmitted over the same channel for each segment. In other embodiments, the wireless signal from the original node is transmitted over a different channel for each segment of the wireless path.
  • each antenna transmits the wireless signal at a different channel as discussed above and shown in Fig. 2A (also referred to as link diversity).
  • the black rectangles represent channels (CHI to CHn) being used at a given moment in time. In the example shown in Fig. 2A , three separate channels are used simultaneously. The channels are separate enough to be independent of one another so that interference in one channel does not influence the other channels. The total number of channels to use is determined based on a worst case estimate of potential interference. For example, if it is estimated that a jammer can jam 3 channels at any given moment in time, 4 or more channels are used to transmit wireless signals between nodes A-F.
  • each antenna pseudo-randomly switches the channel over which it transmits data.
  • a Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) technique is used for each antenna.
  • the hopping sequence is determined a-priori in some embodiments.
  • a pseudo-random number generator in each node is used to determine the hopping sequence.
  • a Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) technique is used in each channel.
  • Fig. 2B shows the effect of jamming (either intentional or unintentional) on the transmission channels of Fig. 2A .
  • jamming causes some channels to periodically have unsuccessful transmissions
  • at least one successful transmission is completed at each moment in time.
  • a TDMA schedule is used.
  • a time slot is periodically reserved for retransmission of unsuccessful transmissions.
  • retransmission slots are used in some embodiments to transmit parity bits.
  • multiple copies of each signal are transmitted at distinct moments in time as depicted in Fig. 3 .
  • four separate copies of the same signal 308 are transmitted at distinct moments in time regardless of whether or not the first transmission was determined to be successful (also referred to as time diversity).
  • a TDMA schedule is used.
  • the same signal 408 is transmitted in three distinct time slots.
  • Other signals originating from the same node or other nodes are transmitted in the other time slots.
  • Fig. 5 depicts one embodiment of a wireless communication system 500 implemented in an aircraft 501.
  • system 500 is provided by way of example and not by way of limitation.
  • other embodiments of wireless communication systems as described herein can be implemented in other environments, such as, but not limited to, ground vehicles, control plants, etc.
  • System 500 comprises four types of nodes, control unit 503, sensor 505, actuator 507, and relay 509.
  • system 500 includes one or more control units 503 operable to process data from a plurality of sensors 505 and output commands or control signals to other nodes.
  • the sensors 505 are operable to obtain data regarding operation of the aircraft 501.
  • sensors 505 can include, but are not limited to, engine sensors, wing flap sensors, navigation sensors, etc.
  • System 500 also includes a plurality of actuators 507 operable to adjust operation of aircraft 501 based on commands received from control units 503.
  • actuators 507 can adjust engine throttle, apply brakes, adjust wing flap position, etc.
  • System 500 also optionally includes one or more relays 509 to provide additional wireless paths, thereby increasing the reliability of system 500 and/or enabling otherwise isolated nodes to communicate wirelessly in system 500. For example, if a node is not within range of other nodes, one or more relays 509 can be included to enable communication with that node from other nodes in system 500.
  • each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 comprise a plurality of antennae 506 and are located in a fixed position relative to each other.
  • System 500 implements one or more of the techniques for route diversity, link diversity and time diversity as discussed above with respect to Figs. 1-4 .
  • each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 are operable to transmit a signal to another destination node via multiple wireless paths and over a plurality of channels.
  • each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 are operable to pseudo-randomly switch transmission channels and to transmit multiple copies of a wireless signal at distinct moments in time as discussed above.
  • Fig. 6 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method 600 of communicating in a wireless communication system, such as system 100 above.
  • method 600 is implemented in a node such as nodes A-F discussed above.
  • the node dynamically selects an encoding technique from a plurality of available encoding techniques.
  • the node dynamically selects an encoding technique for each of a plurality of channels over which data is to be transmitted.
  • the encoding technique is selected for each channel based on conditions of the channel. For example, in some embodiments, the encoding technique is selected based on the worst bit error rate (BER) of the respective channel.
  • the data to be transmitted can be data originating from the node or data received from another node which is being forwarded in a wireless path.
  • BER worst bit error rate
  • the node encodes the data to be transmitted using the selected encoding technique.
  • the node transmits the encoded data over the plurality of channels to each of a plurality of intermediate nodes.
  • An intermediate node is a node located in the wireless path between the original node and the destination node.
  • the number of channels over which the data is transmitted is determined, in some embodiments, based on a worst case estimate of potential interference, such as jamming and environmental noise.
  • transmitting the encoded data includes transmitting the data according to a TDMA schedule.
  • transmitting the encoded data includes transmitting the encoded data using CSMA or CDMA techniques.
  • the node pseudo-randomly switches the channels over which the data is being transmitted as described above.
  • the node determines if the transmission of the data is complete. In other words, the node determines if any bits of the data remain to be transmitted. For example, in some embodiments, the node switches channels after each bit. In such embodiments, each bit is transmitted on a new channel with an encoding technique selected for its respective channel. If transmission of the data is not complete, method 600 returns to 602, where an encoding technique is selected for each new channel. If transmission of the data is complete (e.g. all bits have been transmitted), the node determines, at 612, if additional copies of the data remain to be sent. As discussed above, each node transmits multiple copies of the same data at distinct moments in time, in some embodiments. If additional copies are to be transmitted, method 600 returns to 602, where an encoding technique is selected for each new channel.
  • machine-readable media include recordable-type media, such as a portable memory device; a hard disk drive (HDD); a random-access memory (RAM); a read-only memory (ROM); transmission-type media, such as digital and analog communications links; and wired or wireless communications links using transmission forms, such as radio frequency and light wave transmissions.
  • the variety of program products may take the form of coded formats that are decoded for actual use in a particular communications network by a combination of digital electronic circuitry and software residing in a programmable processor (for example, a special-purpose processor or a general-purpose processor in a computer).
  • the programmable processing unit of the communications node comprises at least one of a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a field-programmable object array (FPOA), a programmable logic device (PLD), or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC).

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Modern vehicles, such as aircraft, automobiles, space craft, satellites, etc., use computer networks to control operation of the vehicle. Similarly, modern industrial control plants, campus buildings, etc. use computer networks for control of operations. For example, sensor data and/or control inputs from an operator are provided to a processing unit for processing. Typically, the components of these networks in modern vehicles and buildings are interconnected via wires. However, wires increase production and maintenance costs associated with the vehicles and buildings. For example, designers must take into consideration space for the wires in designing a vehicle and manufacturers must ensure that the wires are properly connected. In addition, if a component needs to be upgraded or added, new wires may also need to be added or replaced. Furthermore, wires increase the weight of a vehicle which is a consideration for flying vehicles such as aircraft and spacecraft.
  • Hence, it is desirable to replace the wired networks with wireless networks. Unfortunately, unlike wired networks, where wired lines can protect communication and provide some degree of guaranteed reliability, wireless networks use broadcast medium which can be easily interfered/corrupted by intentional or unintentional sources. Also, the quality of wireless medium can be affected by surrounding environments. For example, wireless networks in indoor environments generally experience multi-path fading, shadowing and some obstacles by humans.
  • Patent document number US2005/065743A1 describes an energy monitoring device including procedures for secure communication of data. The energy monitoring device includes a public/private key pair used to encrypt and/or digitally sign communications by the device. This allows the receivers of these communications to authenticate the communications to ensure that the device and/or communications have not been compromised. The energy monitoring device is further capable of communications via an ad-hoc "mesh" network, thereby facilitating communications among devices which are substantially inaccessible due to either physical or economic limitations.
  • Patent document number WO2005/010214A2 describes a method and apparatus for communication in a wireless sensor network. One or more routers in a network are available for communication with one or more star nodes at a randomized time and/or frequency. A connectivity assessment, performed at several different frequencies and/or times, is performed to evaluate the quality of communications between devices in the network. Primary and secondary communication relationships are formed between devices to provide for system redundancy. One or more proxies are maintained where each proxy includes a status of one or more devices in the network, e.g., one or more star nodes or routers. Proxies are used to handle information requests and/or status change requests, e.g., a proxy may be requested to change a communication relationship between devices in the network and may generate command signals to cause the corresponding devices to make the change.
  • Patent document number US6658850B1 describes a system and method for establishing communications in a power plant. The system comprises a power generation system having an interface for establishing wireless communication, at least one power plant auxiliary system having an interface for enabling wireless communication, and a wireless communications link, having at least two redundant wireless communications channels, established between the power generation system and the power plant auxiliary system. The two redundant wireless communications channels are two redundant wireless radio frequency channels. The communications link is established utilizing a network communications controller which wirelessly communicates with the power generation system and the power plant auxiliary system. One or more of the power plant auxiliary systems communicate with the network communications controller through a repeater.
  • Any wireless vehicle network for essential services needs to handle unpredictable and dynamic link quality and reliability. In addition, certain wireless networks, such as in aircraft, must meet certain required levels of reliability.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention in its various aspects is as set out in the appended claims.
  • In one embodiment a wireless communication system is provided. The wireless communication system comprises one or more control units operable to transmit control signals, a plurality of actuators responsive to the control signals, and a plurality of sensors operable to transmit sensor data used by the one or more control units in generating the control signals. Each of the sensors, actuators, and one or more control units are located at a fixed position in the system relative to one another. Each of the plurality of sensors and each of the plurality of actuators are coupled to at least one of the one or more control units via a plurality of wireless paths. Each of the plurality of sensors are operable to transmit the sensor data in an assigned time slot to at least one of the one or more control units over a plurality of wireless channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths. The number of channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths is determined based, at least in part, on a worst-case estimate of potential interference, and each of the plurality of sensors is operable to pseudo-randomly switch the plurality of channels over which the sensor data is transmitted..
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The embodiments described below utilize new techniques incorporating wireless network technologies to achieve low bit error rate (e.g., 10-6 or 10-9) and low packet error rate. In particular, the embodiments described below utilize techniques at multiple layers (e.g., network layer, physical layer, data link layer, etc.) to increase reliability and resilience to jamming. In particular, the embodiments described below utilize multi-path routing (also referred to as route diversity or path diversity), multiple channels for each path at the link layer (also referred to as link diversity or frequency diversity) and multiple redundant copies of transmitted data (also referred to as time diversity) to achieve necessary low error rates.
  • Fig. 1A is a block diagram of one embodiment of a wireless communication system 100. Wireless communication system 100 includes a plurality of nodes A-F. Although only six nodes are depicted in this embodiment, for purposes of explanation, it is to be understood that any number of nodes can be used in other embodiments. Each of nodes A-F includes a transmitter/receiver pair or transceiver (TX/RX) 104 and an antenna 106. Hence, each of nodes A-F is operable to receive and transmit wireless communication signals. For example, each of nodes A-F is operable to transmit in an assigned Time-Division Multiple Access (TDMA) time slot in this example. However, it is to be understood that other techniques such as Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA) or Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) can be used in other embodiments.
  • Each of nodes A-F is located within range of at least two other nodes via wireless links 102. For example, node A is in range of and coupled to nodes B, C, and D via wireless links 102. In addition, each of nodes A-F is operable to forward received signals that have a destination address indicating another node. Furthermore, each of nodes A-F is located in a fixed position relative to the other nodes.
  • For example, node A transmits a signal with a destination address indicating node F. The signal is received by nodes B, C, and D over wireless links 102. Each of nodes B, C, and D in turn retransmit the received signal which is then received by nodes E and F. Node E then retransmits the received signal which is received by node F. Node F, in this example, received the signal originally transmitted by node A via intermediate nodes in each of 3 separate wireless paths. As used herein, an intermediate node is a node located in the wireless path, between the original node and the destination node, which forwards the received wireless signal. Additionally, a wireless path is the path a wireless signal travels from an original node to a destination node.
  • The first wireless path in this example includes nodes A, B and F, (node B being an intermediate node, node A being the transmitting or original node, and node F being the destination node). The second wireless path includes nodes A, C, and F and the third wireless path includes nodes A, D, E, and F. The portion of a wireless path between two nodes is referred to herein as a wireless segment. For example, the portion of the first wireless path between nodes A and B is the first segment of the first wireless path.
  • In some embodiments, the destination node, node F in this example, implements a voting scheme based on the received wireless signal input from the plurality of wireless paths. For example, if the received wireless signal from the first wireless path is the same as the received wireless signal from the third wireless path, but different from the wireless signal received from the second wireless path, the destination node selects the signal received from the first and third wireless paths. It is to be understood that this exemplary voting scheme is provided by way of example and that other voting schemes based on received input from the plurality of wireless paths can be implemented in other embodiments.
  • Furthermore, in some embodiments, a voting scheme is not implemented. In such embodiments, a default order is determined a priori to determine which signal to use. For example, in Fig. 1A, node F can be assigned a priori to use the signal received over the first wireless path unless it is unavailable. If it is unavailable, the wireless signal received over the second wireless path is to be used. It is to be understood that other a priori schemes can be used in other embodiments. However, by using multiple paths (route diversity), system 100 is able to tolerate transmission failures in a given wireless path, such as failures due to environmental noise, jamming, node failure or other interference.
  • In addition, in some embodiments, each of nodes A-F includes a plurality of antennae 106-1 ... 106-N for transmission and reception, as shown in Fig. 1B. In particular, each of nodes A-F in Fig. 1B is operable to simultaneously transmit and receive multiple copies of a wireless signal (one for each antenna 106) through implementation of a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) scheme. In particular, in this example, the MIMO scheme is used to increase the signal gain at the destination node, thereby reducing multipath fading effects. Each of antennae 106-1 ... 106-N are operable to transmit on different channels. As used herein, a channel refers to a range of frequencies.
  • In some such embodiments, each of nodes A-F is operable to dynamically select a coding technique for each channel. Exemplary coding techniques include, but are not limited to, Reed-Solomon coding, convolution coding, and BCH coding. Each coding technique has advantages under certain conditions. Hence, each of nodes A-F selects an appropriate coding technique for each channel based on the conditions of the respective channel. For example, in some embodiments, the coding technique for each channel is selected based on the worst bit error rate of the respective channel.
  • Furthermore, in some embodiments, the wireless signal from the original node is transmitted over the same channel for each segment. In other embodiments, the wireless signal from the original node is transmitted over a different channel for each segment of the wireless path. In addition, in some embodiments with more than one antenna 106, each antenna transmits the wireless signal at a different channel as discussed above and shown in Fig. 2A (also referred to as link diversity). The black rectangles represent channels (CHI to CHn) being used at a given moment in time. In the example shown in Fig. 2A, three separate channels are used simultaneously. The channels are separate enough to be independent of one another so that interference in one channel does not influence the other channels. The total number of channels to use is determined based on a worst case estimate of potential interference. For example, if it is estimated that a jammer can jam 3 channels at any given moment in time, 4 or more channels are used to transmit wireless signals between nodes A-F.
  • Additionally, as shown in the example in Fig. 2A, in some embodiments, each antenna pseudo-randomly switches the channel over which it transmits data. In particular, in some embodiments, a Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) technique is used for each antenna. The hopping sequence is determined a-priori in some embodiments. In other embodiments, a pseudo-random number generator in each node is used to determine the hopping sequence. Furthermore, in some embodiments, a Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) technique is used in each channel.
  • Fig. 2B shows the effect of jamming (either intentional or unintentional) on the transmission channels of Fig. 2A. As shown in Fig. 2B, even though jamming causes some channels to periodically have unsuccessful transmissions, at least one successful transmission is completed at each moment in time. In addition, in the example shown in Fig. 2B, a TDMA schedule is used. In the TDMA schedule a time slot is periodically reserved for retransmission of unsuccessful transmissions. Thus, by retransmitting any unsuccessful transmissions, the reliability of system 100 is further improved. In addition, retransmission slots are used in some embodiments to transmit parity bits.
  • In addition, to retransmitting unsuccessful transmissions, in some embodiments, multiple copies of each signal are transmitted at distinct moments in time as depicted in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3, four separate copies of the same signal 308 are transmitted at distinct moments in time regardless of whether or not the first transmission was determined to be successful (also referred to as time diversity). For example, as stated above and shown in Fig. 4, in some embodiments a TDMA schedule is used. In Fig. 4, the same signal 408 is transmitted in three distinct time slots. Other signals originating from the same node or other nodes are transmitted in the other time slots. By transmitting multiple copies at distinct moments in time, corruption of the signal received by the destination node due to temporary interference is mitigated.
  • Fig. 5 depicts one embodiment of a wireless communication system 500 implemented in an aircraft 501. Notably, system 500 is provided by way of example and not by way of limitation. In particular, other embodiments of wireless communication systems as described herein can be implemented in other environments, such as, but not limited to, ground vehicles, control plants, etc. System 500 comprises four types of nodes, control unit 503, sensor 505, actuator 507, and relay 509. In particular, system 500 includes one or more control units 503 operable to process data from a plurality of sensors 505 and output commands or control signals to other nodes.
  • The sensors 505 are operable to obtain data regarding operation of the aircraft 501. For example, sensors 505 can include, but are not limited to, engine sensors, wing flap sensors, navigation sensors, etc. System 500 also includes a plurality of actuators 507 operable to adjust operation of aircraft 501 based on commands received from control units 503. For example, actuators 507 can adjust engine throttle, apply brakes, adjust wing flap position, etc. System 500 also optionally includes one or more relays 509 to provide additional wireless paths, thereby increasing the reliability of system 500 and/or enabling otherwise isolated nodes to communicate wirelessly in system 500. For example, if a node is not within range of other nodes, one or more relays 509 can be included to enable communication with that node from other nodes in system 500.
  • In one embodiment, each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 comprise a plurality of antennae 506 and are located in a fixed position relative to each other. System 500 implements one or more of the techniques for route diversity, link diversity and time diversity as discussed above with respect to Figs. 1-4. In particular, each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 are operable to transmit a signal to another destination node via multiple wireless paths and over a plurality of channels. In addition, each of control units 503, sensors 505, actuators 507, and relay 509 are operable to pseudo-randomly switch transmission channels and to transmit multiple copies of a wireless signal at distinct moments in time as discussed above.
  • Fig. 6 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method 600 of communicating in a wireless communication system, such as system 100 above. In particular, method 600 is implemented in a node such as nodes A-F discussed above. At 602, the node dynamically selects an encoding technique from a plurality of available encoding techniques. In particular, the node dynamically selects an encoding technique for each of a plurality of channels over which data is to be transmitted. The encoding technique is selected for each channel based on conditions of the channel. For example, in some embodiments, the encoding technique is selected based on the worst bit error rate (BER) of the respective channel. In addition, the data to be transmitted can be data originating from the node or data received from another node which is being forwarded in a wireless path.
  • At 604, the node encodes the data to be transmitted using the selected encoding technique. At 606, the node transmits the encoded data over the plurality of channels to each of a plurality of intermediate nodes. An intermediate node is a node located in the wireless path between the original node and the destination node. The number of channels over which the data is transmitted is determined, in some embodiments, based on a worst case estimate of potential interference, such as jamming and environmental noise. In addition, in some embodiments, transmitting the encoded data includes transmitting the data according to a TDMA schedule. In other embodiments, transmitting the encoded data includes transmitting the encoded data using CSMA or CDMA techniques.
  • At 608, the node pseudo-randomly switches the channels over which the data is being transmitted as described above. At 610, the node determines if the transmission of the data is complete. In other words, the node determines if any bits of the data remain to be transmitted. For example, in some embodiments, the node switches channels after each bit. In such embodiments, each bit is transmitted on a new channel with an encoding technique selected for its respective channel. If transmission of the data is not complete, method 600 returns to 602, where an encoding technique is selected for each new channel. If transmission of the data is complete (e.g. all bits have been transmitted), the node determines, at 612, if additional copies of the data remain to be sent. As discussed above, each node transmits multiple copies of the same data at distinct moments in time, in some embodiments. If additional copies are to be transmitted, method 600 returns to 602, where an encoding technique is selected for each new channel.
  • While the embodiments disclosed have been described in the context of a communications network, apparatus embodying these techniques are capable of being distributed in the form of a machine-readable medium of instructions and a variety of program products that apply equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media actually used to carry out the distribution. Examples of machine-readable media include recordable-type media, such as a portable memory device; a hard disk drive (HDD); a random-access memory (RAM); a read-only memory (ROM); transmission-type media, such as digital and analog communications links; and wired or wireless communications links using transmission forms, such as radio frequency and light wave transmissions. The variety of program products may take the form of coded formats that are decoded for actual use in a particular communications network by a combination of digital electronic circuitry and software residing in a programmable processor (for example, a special-purpose processor or a general-purpose processor in a computer). In one example embodiment, the programmable processing unit of the communications node comprises at least one of a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a field-programmable object array (FPOA), a programmable logic device (PLD), or an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
  • Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, which is calculated to achieve the same purpose, may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the embodiments described herein. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that the embodiments be limited only by the claims.

Claims (10)

  1. A wireless communication system (500) comprising:
    one or more control units (503) operable to transmit control signals;
    a plurality of actuators (507) responsive to the control signals;
    a plurality of sensors (505) operable to transmit sensor data used by the one or more control units in generating the control signals;
    wherein each of the sensors, actuators, and one or more control units are located at a fixed position in the system relative to one another;
    wherein each of the plurality of sensors and each of the plurality of actuators are coupled to at least one of the one or more control units via a plurality of wireless paths;
    wherein each of the plurality of sensors are operable to transmit the sensor data in an assigned time slot to at least one of the one or more control units over a plurality of wireless channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths;
    wherein the number of channels in each of the plurality of wireless paths is determined based, at least in part, on a worst-case estimate of potential interference; and
    wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to pseudo-randomly switch the plurality of channels over which the sensor data is transmitted.
  2. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to transmit a copy of the sensor data in each of a plurality of assigned time slots.
  3. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to select an encoding technique for each of the plurality of channels.
  4. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to select an encoding technique for each of the plurality of channels based on a worst bit error rate for each channel.
  5. The wireless communication system of claim 4, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to select one of a Reed-Solomon encoding technique, a convolution encoding technique, and a BCH encoding technique.
  6. The wireless communication system of claim 4, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to transmit the sensor data using a direct sequence spread spectrum, DSSS, technique for each of the plurality of channels.
  7. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to pseudo-randomly switch the channels over which the sensor data is transmitted after each bit of the sensor data is transmitted.
  8. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the one or more control units is operable to implement a voting scheme based on the sensor data received over each of the plurality of wireless paths.
  9. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to transmit a wireless signal according to a Time Division Multiple Access, TDMA, schedule.
  10. The wireless communication system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of sensors is operable to retransmit unsuccessful transmissions for each channel.
EP08165992.2A 2007-10-08 2008-10-07 Wireless networks for highly dependable applications Active EP2048637B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US97836807P 2007-10-08 2007-10-08
US12/246,370 US9408250B2 (en) 2007-10-08 2008-10-06 Wireless networks for highly dependable applications

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2048637A2 EP2048637A2 (en) 2009-04-15
EP2048637A3 EP2048637A3 (en) 2016-04-13
EP2048637B1 true EP2048637B1 (en) 2020-01-15

Family

ID=40336585

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08165992.2A Active EP2048637B1 (en) 2007-10-08 2008-10-07 Wireless networks for highly dependable applications

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2048637B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2640815C (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011071487A1 (en) * 2009-12-08 2011-06-16 Masco Corporation Fault-tolerant non-random signal repeating system for building electric control
FR2973342B1 (en) * 2011-03-29 2014-09-19 Airbus METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING ON AN AIR OR A SPA VEHICLE VIA THE OUTSIDE ENVIRONMENT
US9015018B2 (en) 2012-03-20 2015-04-21 The Boeing Company Boundary system designer for wireless aircraft networks
WO2016191985A1 (en) * 2015-05-29 2016-12-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for redundant data transmission over multiple wireless links
US10841034B2 (en) 2017-03-16 2020-11-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Branched communications network
ES2821573T3 (en) 2017-03-16 2021-04-26 British Telecomm Broadcast on a communications network
GB2560568B (en) * 2017-03-16 2020-06-10 British Telecomm Broadcasting in a communications network
CN113160537A (en) * 2021-04-19 2021-07-23 石家庄科林电气股份有限公司 Micropower wireless network communication method based on biological fission algorithm

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6658850B1 (en) * 2002-11-05 2003-12-09 General Electric Company Radio frequency communications network for power plant control systems
US7089089B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2006-08-08 Power Measurement Ltd. Methods and apparatus for retrieving energy readings from an energy monitoring device
US7701858B2 (en) * 2003-07-17 2010-04-20 Sensicast Systems Method and apparatus for wireless communication in a mesh network

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2640815C (en) 2016-07-19
CA2640815A1 (en) 2009-04-08
EP2048637A2 (en) 2009-04-15
EP2048637A3 (en) 2016-04-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9408250B2 (en) Wireless networks for highly dependable applications
EP2048637B1 (en) Wireless networks for highly dependable applications
Jiang On reliable data transfer in underwater acoustic networks: A survey from networking perspective
Tannious et al. Spectrally-efficient relay selection with limited feedback
CN1685631B (en) Packet data transmission in a MIMO system
Dai et al. Survey on cooperative strategies for wireless relay channels
CA2913656C (en) Method and system for communication in a hybrid satellite/terrestrial network
US9227579B1 (en) Hybrid wireless-wired architecture based on power lines for intra-vehicular communication
Le et al. Link-layer retransmission-based error-control protocols in FSO communications: A survey
Li et al. Age-oriented transmission protocol design in space-air-ground integrated networks
Girs et al. Increased reliability or reduced delay in wireless industrial networks using relaying and Luby codes
Stanojev et al. Performance analysis of collaborative hybrid-ARQ incremental redundancy protocols over fading channels
US9457742B2 (en) Wireless communication extension for can based electrical architectures
EP2974495B1 (en) Protection of commercial communications
US8737455B2 (en) Method of selecting antennas in a wireless communicating network for high reliability and low latency
US20130155844A1 (en) Protection switching method, system and a node in an lte network
US20140140374A1 (en) Method And System For Transmitting Data In A Motor Vehicle
Marchenko et al. Incremental cooperative relaying in time-correlated Rayleigh fading channels
Muthukumar et al. Performance analysis of selective decode and forward protocol with partner selection
de Oliveira Brante et al. Cooperative coded partial retransmission scheme using type-I HARQ and LDPC codes
Kim et al. A dynamic paradigm for spectrally efficient half-duplex multi-antenna relaying
JP2008131408A (en) Aeronautical station, data link communication system, and uplink transmission control method used therefore
EP4092926A1 (en) Diversity control for multi-access wireless networks
Jung A practical physical-layer network coding for fading channels
CN110366228B (en) Three-hop relay cooperative transmission method based on interference elimination

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081007

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G08C 17/00 20060101AFI20160310BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160406

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AXX Extension fees paid

Extension state: RS

Extension state: MK

Extension state: BA

Extension state: AL

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190903

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008062004

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008062004

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201016

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231024

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231026

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231027

Year of fee payment: 16