EP2030112A2 - Framework für laufzeiterweiterung - Google Patents

Framework für laufzeiterweiterung

Info

Publication number
EP2030112A2
EP2030112A2 EP07795841A EP07795841A EP2030112A2 EP 2030112 A2 EP2030112 A2 EP 2030112A2 EP 07795841 A EP07795841 A EP 07795841A EP 07795841 A EP07795841 A EP 07795841A EP 2030112 A2 EP2030112 A2 EP 2030112A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
event
control system
distributed control
event handlers
manager
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP07795841A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Thomas A. Deininger
Michael S. Horn
John J. Mautz
Michael Hogan
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Industry Inc
Original Assignee
Siemens Energy and Automation Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Energy and Automation Inc filed Critical Siemens Energy and Automation Inc
Publication of EP2030112A2 publication Critical patent/EP2030112A2/de
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/46Multiprogramming arrangements
    • G06F9/54Interprogram communication
    • G06F9/542Event management; Broadcasting; Multicasting; Notifications

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an extension architecture for systems and more particularly, to a device, method, and system for providing an event based framework for extending a system.
  • Manufacturing systems and other control systems for dynamic process may be regulated by Distributed Control Systems (DCS) .
  • DCS Distributed Control Systems
  • the DCS monitors and controls the various mechanical components, for example, regulators, flow controllers valves, gauges, filters, heaters, temperature controllers, liquid-drop out assemblies, vaporizers, and more.
  • the DCS functions like a node network in that various components and sub-systems function independently.
  • the various components and subsystems are networked to communicate and provide status information.
  • the DCS uses a processor and software, often custom and proprietary interfaces and protocols, to communicate and direct the various components.
  • the processor receives, translates, and transmits information from components using a variety of application program interfaces.
  • human interaction with a DCS may be handled via a sub-system known as the Human/Machine Interface (HMI) .
  • HMI Human/Machine Interface
  • modern HMIs support abstraction layers that permit them to interact with several different kinds of controllers simultaneously.
  • supervisory applications such as Batch management Systems, Manufacturing Execution Systems and the like.
  • Due to this role as an "enabling layer” HMI 's are often the most attractive DCS element for system modernization.
  • Embodiment of the present invention may also retrofit to the HMI sub-system of a DCS can bring a consistent look and feel to a formerly "patchwork" system.
  • the present invention is a novel device, system, and method for runtime extension framework architecture for extending a system.
  • the present invention may be capable of extending the behavior of applications even if said applications were not designed for such extension. Further, the present invention may allow the behavior of applications to be modified over time, thus permitting a system's behavior to "grow" over time.
  • runtime extension framework architecture may have an event manager for identifying and coordinating handling of events.
  • the architecture may have two or more event handlers . Some event handlers may be dedicated to handling events associated with interfacing with an application program interface and some of the internal event handlers handle events as directed by the event manager.
  • the present invention may incorporate one or more of the following exemplary embodiments.
  • some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some of the event handlers may be a batch adapter; and the event manager may be a batch manager for controllers of the distributed control system.
  • some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some of the event handlers may be a persist agent for determining when events are stored in a persisted data store; and the event manager may provide persist runtime state information.
  • some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some of the event handlers may be a persist agent for determining when events are communicated to other computers of the distributed control system; and the event manager may- provide synchronization of state information for the distributed control system.
  • some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some of the event handlers may be an alarm state adapter for communicating with a distributed control system controller and a human media interface; and the event manager may coordinate alarm behavior between the controller and the human media interface.
  • some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some event handlers may be a resource pool manager; and the event manager may coordinate pooled resources of the distributed control system. " ' In yet another exemplary embodiment, some of the event handlers may be a distributed control system adapter; some of the event handlers may be a peer manager and may coordinate resource assignment of the distributed control system; and the event manager may coordinate between two or more controllers of the distributed control system. [0008] It is important to note that the present invention is not intended to be limited to a system or method which must satisfy one or more of any stated objects or features of the invention. It is also important to note that the present invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments described herein.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary event based runtime extension framework architecture 100 according to the present invention.
  • Figure 2A is a block diagram of an exemplary batch manager controller using event based runtime extension framework architecture according to the present invention.
  • Figure 2B is a more detailed block diagram of an exemplary batch manager controller using event based runtime extension framework architecture according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a overview block diagram of an exemplary batch manager controller using event based runtime extension framework architecture 300 according to the present invention previous described in Figures 2A and 2B .
  • Figure 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary persistent data storage system using event based runtime extension framework architecture 400 according to the present invention.
  • Figure 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary redundant synchronization data system using event based runtime extension framework architecture 500 according to the present invention.
  • Figure 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary event state management system using event based runtime extension framework architecture 600 according to the present invention.
  • Figure 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary resource pool management system using event based runtime extension framework architecture 700 according to the present invention.
  • Figure 8 is a block diagram of an exemplary peer-to-peer communication manager using event based runtime extension framework architecture 800 according to the present invention.
  • An event manager host 102 receives and transmits external events 104-104n for a system, for example, an application program interface of a DCS.
  • One or more external event handlers 106-106n may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events from the Application Program Interface (API) and/or the Human Machine Interface (HMI) .
  • API Application Program Interface
  • HMI Human Machine Interface
  • the external event handlers 106- 106n provide a framework for extending an existing system in a uniform way, so that it is possible to create 1 'plug-in 11 extensions to enhance functionality.
  • Each external event handler 106 ⁇ 106n may be designed to handle specific events or a category of events.
  • Internal event handlers 110-11On handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system. The response may be produced and designed via the HMI allowing the operator to work with a consistent interface.
  • An event interface may provide the ability to create a set of Event Handlers that encapsulate the behavior of various system API's that provide a uniform interface for dealing with various different API's. This same event interface can be used to create additional "plug-in" extensions that extend the behavior of the system.
  • the event manager 108 coordinates the event handlers and events . Events are passed through the system through a centralized Event Manager 108. Plug-In "Event Handlers" 106 and 110 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the Event Manager 108. Some event handlers are conceptually external event handlers 106, since they are responding to events from the outside world (such as the system being extended) . While there is no real difference between internal event handlers 110 and external event handlers 106, they are conceptually different in that they generally may include various use interfaces as would be known to an individual skilled in the art. For example, a WinCC Data Manager interface may be required to use a WinCC API for accessing tag data from WinCC.
  • a system for example PCS 7/0S
  • PCS 7/0S often provides a set of API's that allow for interfacing to the system. These API provide for a means to create applications that "extend" the system.
  • the "plug-in" Event Handlers 106, 110 can be simple to create, not requiring the full knowledge of the underlying API of the system being extended.
  • an example embodiment used to illustrate features of the Run Time Extension concept is its use as a protocol translation layer in order to support communications between an application known as a Batch Manager and various legacy DCS controllers.
  • the Batch management system expects a certain interaction model when sending batch-related commands to a DCS. Ordinarily, this would prevent the Batch Manager from successfully managing batch control in legacy DCS equipment, since most DCS controllers have proprietary interaction models for Batch Control and these interaction models are incompatible with the interaction model expected by out Batch Manager.
  • Run Time Extension Framework such that it is able to function as a bi-directional protocol translation later, thus converting commends form our batch Manger into semantically equivalent commands for diverse DCS controllers and conversely translating the diverse responses from said controllers into semantically equivalent responses that can be successfully interpreted by our batch management system.
  • FIG. 2A shows an overall view of the process.
  • the Batch Manager Application 2A00 communicates with DCS controllers indirectly, using an HMI application 2A10 as a proxy. This allows the Batch manager to disregard the details of communicating with said DCS controllers, since the HMI application handles the details of such interactions.
  • the controllers in our exemplary embodiment are legacy controllers 2A40, the commands issued by the Batch Manager have no inherent meaning to said controllers.
  • a Run Time Extension application residing in the Event manager Host application 2A20 observes changes in the tags managed by our HMI application 2A10. This Run Time Extension has Event Handlers which observe changes in Batch relevant tags and react by making appropriate changes to other tags in order to implement a protocol translation.
  • the run time extension translates commands from the Batch Manager which have no inherent meaning to our legacy DCS equipment into commands which the legacy DCSs can understand
  • the protocol translation Event Handlers in our Batch protocol translation extension observe changes in tags that originate in our various DCS controllers 2A40.
  • the protocol translator for DCS A sees a "Batch Relevant" change in a Controller A tag
  • it may- respond by altering a corresponding tag in the Data Manager such that the Batch Manager will subsequently see the (translated) change and correctly interpret this as a Batch Relevant response from controller A.
  • the precise behavior of the runtime extension ⁇ nay be governed by the u Runtime Extension configuration and logic storage" 2A30," which describes which Event Handlers are present, how they are choreographed via the Event Manager, how they are bound to events and in some cases the precise logic that a given event manager performs.
  • this information may be stored in a single XML file or alternative storage formats .
  • FIG. 2B shows this process in greater detail, and these details help illustrate how rich the run-time extension behavior can be.
  • the Batch Manger 2B40 sends commands to the phase Reactorl .Mix 2B11 by writing to its BA_CONTROL tag 2B14. Changes to the
  • Reactorl.Mix.BA_CONTROL tag 2B14 are observed by an instance of an Event Handler which functions as a protocol translation state machine 2B22 that is apropos for managing translating the batch manager control protocol to corresponding commands that are sent to elements in Controller A 2B30.
  • Event Handler which functions as a protocol translation state machine 2B22 that is apropos for managing translating the batch manager control protocol to corresponding commands that are sent to elements in Controller A 2B30.
  • the Event Manager comprising a "Controller A BA_CONTROL state machine” 2B22 will send the value "TRUE" to the tag
  • the Batch Manager 2B40 receives notification of changes in the state of phases via the BA_STATE tag, for example Controller A ReactorlMix' s BA_STATE tag 2B15.
  • Reactorl .Mix.BA_STATE tag 2B15 is controlled by a state machine 2B23 that is apropos for Controller A 2B30.
  • the BA_STATE state machine 2B23 subscribes to changes in Controller A's A.Reactorl .Mix. STATE tag 2B34 and also subscribes to changes in the very ReactorlMix.BA_STATE tag 2B15 that it controls.
  • BA_STATE state machine 21200 Since the BA_STATE state machine 21200 is subscribed to the ReactorlMix.BA_STATE tag 2B15, it will see the value of ReactorlMix. BA_STATE 2B15 change some time later to the value 0x200 and it will react by writing the value 0x400 to ReactorlMix.BA_STATE 2B15, informing the batch manager 2B40 that the phase is now in a HOLD state. Note that this mechanism has effectively taken Controller A's "HOLD" state and augmented with a preceding "HOLDING" state that is expected by the batch manager. In this example, our state machine may not only translating values, but may synthesizing additional, necessary state information as part of its protocol translation.
  • the state machines are substantially more complex and employ all of the above mentioned mechanisms value ( tag mapping, value ( value mapping and state augmentation and also may have complicated interaction between various entities in the data manager and the control target.
  • the above examples are only representative descriptions.
  • this complex translation of interaction models via a Run Time Extension constitutes a significant extension to the behavior of the HMI application, and that this extension in behavior is achieved without the HMI application having been designed for such an extension.
  • the HMI application may have no. "awareness" of the Batch manager, no "awareness” of the legacy DCSs as such and no knowledge of the various (incompatible) interaction models expected by the Batch manager and the various DCS controllers.
  • Embodiments of the present invention may provide ability to retroactively extend the capabilities of diverse applications. This example provides retroactively extending the HMI application such that it behaves as a protocol translation layer between otherwise incompatible subsystems in a Batch Control application.
  • An event manager host 302 receives and transmits external events 304-304n for a system, for example, events associated with a DCS Tag communication layer 304 from a batch manager 304n and various controllers 304n of a DCS.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 306-306n may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events from the DCS Tag Communication layer 304.
  • Internal event handlers 310-310n handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system.
  • An event manager 308 coordinates the event handlers and events. Events are passed through the system through a centralized event manager 308. Plug-In DCS and batch adaptors 306 and event handlers 310 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the event manager 308.
  • the event manager 308 notifies the batch adapter 306n of changes to "subscribed tags", for example, provox unit point status and simatic batch common words.
  • the batch adaptor 306 writes back changes of Tags to the event manager 308.
  • An event manager host 402 receives and transmits external events from a DCS state manager.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 406 may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events.
  • Internal event handlers 410-410n handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system.
  • An event manager 408 coordinates the event handlers and events. Events are passed through the system through a centralized event manager 408.
  • Plug-In DCS and batch adaptors 406 and event handlers 410 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the Event Manager 408.
  • the event handlers may provide a system to persist (saved and restored on restart) various runtime state information that was not originally intended to be persisted.
  • a persist agent 412 stores and/or updates a persisted data store 414.
  • the event manager 308 notifies the batch adapter 406n of subscribed changes for data that is being persisted and saved to file.
  • the batch adaptor 406 restores persisted data on, for example, startup to the event manager 408.
  • An event manager host 502 receives and transmits external events from a DCS state manager 504.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 506 may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events.
  • Internal event handlers 510-510n handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system.
  • An event manager 508 coordinates the event handlers and events . Events are passed through the system through a centralized Event Manager 508. Plug-In DCS and batch adaptors 406 and event handlers 510 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the Event Manager 508.
  • the event handlers may provide a system to persist (save and restore) various information between computer A 401a and computer B 501b to be persisted. When an event is determined to be updated, a persist agent 512a updates the other persist agent 512b via a peer-to-peer communication layer 514.
  • the event manager 508 notifies the batch adapter 506n of subscribed changes for data that is being persisted and saved to file.
  • the persist agent 512 restores persisted data on, for example, startup to the event manager 508.
  • FIG. 6 a possible configuration for event state management system using event based runtime extension framework architecture 600 is shown.
  • An event manager host 502 receives and transmits external events from a DCS Tag communication layer 604 received from other controllers 604a.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 606 may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events .
  • Internal event handlers 610-610n handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system.
  • An event manager 608 coordinates the event handlers and events. Events are passed through the system through a centralized Event Manager 608. Plug-In event handlers 610 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the Event Manager 608.
  • An alarm state adapter 612 can be used to adapt the alarm state behavior of one DCS controller to fit the alarm state behavior that is expected of a specific DCS HMI.
  • the event manager 608 subscribes to controller data to be interpreted for alarming, and subscribes to alarm acknowledgement from DCS.
  • the alarm state adapter 612 reports alarm state changes to the HMI and/or controller.
  • An event manager host 702 receives and transmits external events from a DCS Tag communication layer 704 received from other controllers 704a.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 706 may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events .
  • Internal event handlers 710-71On handle responses to events related to the actual extension of the system.
  • An event manager 708 coordinates the event handlers and events. Events are passed through the system through a centralized event manager 708.
  • Plug-In event handlers 710 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the event manager 708.
  • a resource pool manager 712 can be used to coordinate resource assignments 714.
  • the event manager 708 and event handlers 710-71On can be used to provide an external resource pool management capability for a system that does not already provide such functionality. For example, if a DCS provides a data tag management functionality, it is possible to use "tags" as an interface to an external application that will serve to request the reservation of a limited resource and to notify a requester of a successful reservation.
  • the event manager 708 subscribes to changes in. Tag Data that will signal resource reservations to the resource pool manager 712.
  • the resource pool manager 712 writes back to tag data to signal resource assignments to the event manager 708.
  • An event manager host 802 receives and transmits external events from a DCS Tag communication layer 804 received from other controllers 804a and 804b.
  • One or more external event handlers acting as DCS adaptors 806 may be configured to convert, translate, transmit, receive and/or identify events.
  • An event manager 808 coordinates the event handlers and events. Events are passed through " the system through a centralized Event Manager 808. Plug-In event handlers 810 can subscribe to receive events that are raised via the Event Manager 808.
  • a peer manager 812 can be used to coordinate tag equivalence list 814. For example, assume a DCS has a mechanism for communicating to tag data with two different controllers. It is possible to configure an "equivalence" list, so that a change to a tag in one controller is reflected to a different tag in the other controller.
  • the event manager 808 subscribes to changes to tags that are to be "equivalenced" in a peer manager 812.
  • the resource pool manager 812 writes tag values to peer controller to the event manager 808.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)
EP07795841A 2006-06-06 2007-06-06 Framework für laufzeiterweiterung Ceased EP2030112A2 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US81128406P 2006-06-06 2006-06-06
PCT/US2007/013401 WO2007146054A2 (en) 2006-06-06 2007-06-06 Runtime extension framework

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2030112A2 true EP2030112A2 (de) 2009-03-04

Family

ID=38694883

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07795841A Ceased EP2030112A2 (de) 2006-06-06 2007-06-06 Framework für laufzeiterweiterung

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2030112A2 (de)
WO (1) WO2007146054A2 (de)

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE9404294D0 (sv) * 1994-12-09 1994-12-09 Ellemtel Utvecklings Ab sätt och anordning vid telekommunikation
US6633923B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-10-14 Iona Technologies Inc. Method and system for dynamic configuration of interceptors in a client-server environment
US6757720B1 (en) * 1999-05-19 2004-06-29 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Profile service architecture
US6701383B1 (en) * 1999-06-22 2004-03-02 Interactive Video Technologies, Inc. Cross-platform framework-independent synchronization abstraction layer
AUPR753401A0 (en) * 2001-09-06 2001-09-27 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha A method of handling asynchronous events
US20040034860A1 (en) * 2002-08-15 2004-02-19 Microsoft Corporation Dynamically extensible application program framework including message and notification routing
US7500250B2 (en) * 2003-03-27 2009-03-03 Microsoft Corporation Configurable event handling for user interface components

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2007146054A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007146054A3 (en) 2008-02-14
WO2007146054A2 (en) 2007-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9594606B2 (en) Runtime extension framework
JP6537796B2 (ja) プロセス制御システムに関連する情報にアクセスする機器および方法
US8108200B2 (en) System and method for accessing and configuring field devices in a process control system using distributed control components
US8122161B2 (en) Associating and evaluating status information for a primary input parameter value from a profibus device
US5717614A (en) System and method for handling events in an instrumentation system
US8782539B2 (en) Generic utility supporting on-demand creation of customizable graphical user interfaces for viewing and specifying field device parameters
US5980078A (en) Process control system including automatic sensing and automatic configuration of devices
US6470377B1 (en) Networked file operations for computer numerical controls
US20070283030A1 (en) System and method for batch process control with diverse distributed control system protocols
US20040021679A1 (en) Human machine interface
US8521359B1 (en) Application-independent and component-isolated system and system of systems framework
US20070150081A1 (en) Integrated graphical runtime interface for process control systems
US20070079250A1 (en) Device home page for use in a device type manager providing graphical user interfaces for viewing and specifying field device parameters
CN104303117B (zh) 用于定期自动化生产的鲁棒实时控制的系统和方法
AU2001292689A1 (en) An industrial process control data access server supporting multiple client data exchange protocols
EP1330724A1 (de) Industrieller prozesssteuerdatenzugriffsserver, der mehrere client-daten-austauschprotokolle unterstützt
CN101174219A (zh) 根据使用环境执行和配置应用的方法和系统
CN111651332B (zh) 一种基于消息中间件的大规模异构设备集成控制方法
EP2743830A1 (de) Flexible Datenkommunikation unter Partitionen in integrierter modularer Bordelektronik
US8806343B2 (en) System and method for handling a data refresh procedure in a production execution system
US5712974A (en) Method and apparatus for controlling the configuration definitions in a data processing system with a plurality of processors
US8095619B2 (en) Automation system and method for operating such an automation system
EP2030112A2 (de) Framework für laufzeiterweiterung
US5946693A (en) System for communicating among objects and establishing linkages among them and method thereof
CN112468349B (zh) 适用于FT2000+平台部署Ceph的主节点

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090105

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090406

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.

APBK Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

APBT Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20221122