EP2027750B1 - Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices - Google Patents
Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2027750B1 EP2027750B1 EP06763663A EP06763663A EP2027750B1 EP 2027750 B1 EP2027750 B1 EP 2027750B1 EP 06763663 A EP06763663 A EP 06763663A EP 06763663 A EP06763663 A EP 06763663A EP 2027750 B1 EP2027750 B1 EP 2027750B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- shock
- signal
- input signal
- detecting
- time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 206010068150 Acoustic shock Diseases 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 229
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000000703 anti-shock Effects 0.000 claims description 55
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000016354 hearing loss disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011982 device technology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000613 ear canal Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002635 electroconvulsive therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
- H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to a method and system for detecting acoustic shock signals in audio signals and to applications of that method in hearing devices.
- the invention relates to further reduce or minimize detected shock effects in audio signals.
- Detection of acoustic shock is a well-known problem in signal processing.
- Acoustic shock signals are referred to as impulse signals or transient signals.
- the nature of an impulse signal is such that its amplitude suddenly changes within a very short duration.
- transient signals There are two typical types of transient signals: aperiodic and periodic signals.
- An aperiodic impulse is for example generated by an explosion, gunfire or a firecracker.
- Aperiodic shocks last for very short timeframes such as 250 ⁇ s or less.
- a periodic impulse is usually generated from an impact between two mechanically and acoustically un-dampened objects such as two glass bottles hitting each other.
- Periodic shocks usually have much longer durations in the order of 5 to 200ms, and also usually have a lower peak level.
- Periodic shocks consist of multiple peaks, which come closely one after the other and have attenuated peak levels during their duration.
- a sub-band-based acoustic shock algorithm has been presented by Todd Schneider et al. in EP 1'471'767 .
- a pattern analysis-based approach is taken to an input signal to perform feature extraction.
- a parameter space is identified, which is corresponding to the signal space of the input signal.
- a rule-based decision approach is taken to the parameter space to detect an acoustic shock event and, then, the shock is removed from the input signal to generate a processed output signal.
- the sudden sound increase is detected with a block frame of a number of samples in time-domain and similar detection also happens within each sub-band.
- An additional sample delay of a further number of samples is used to allow the time-domain measurement enough time to notify the shock detection module in the frequency domain about the presence of a high level input before the shock reaches the filter bank, thus providing extra time for the shock-detection module to react.
- the shock detection module in the frequency domain detects if a shock has occurred in a particular sub-band, and determines the sub-band energy measurement to be used for the gain calculation.
- a state machine is used for sub-band shock determination by examining the sub-band energy with the shock flag. The acoustic shock phenomenon is eliminated by applying the appropriate gain reduction to the signal in each sub-band.
- the shock detection in the sub-band is very expensive cycle budget-wise and also difficult to synchronize with the time-domain parameter extraction.
- the sub-band strategy will not be able to detect very fast shocks reliably and accurately since the filter bank can smear the actual sound level change. It is also not desired to eliminate the shock in individual sub-bands, because this may cause the user to lose environmental awareness and, hence, not perceive correctly the nature of the shock, which might be very important information for the user. It is also expensive to implement this approach and to optimize this algorithm with existing hearing device technology. More complex hearing device systems may also suffer from excessive input-output latency or require very expensive computing power to process this strategy.
- US 5,579,404 describes a digital audio limiter.
- This signal processing system comprising components such as split-band perceptual coders that receive a peak amplitude limited input audio signal and can process the signal in such a manner that the processed signal preserves the apparent loudness of the input signal but is no longer peak-amplitude limited.
- up-sampling is used in estimating the resultant peak amplitude and gain factors established in response to the estimated peak amplitude are applied to one or more frequency sub-bands of the processed signal.
- This method and system for defining a threshold value are described to limit the output signal of a processing unit which is fed with an input signal.
- an input-signal level is determined and the threshold value is set as a function of that input-signal level to prevent the maximum output level in the device from exceeding a predefined threshold value, which protects the user of the device from excessive noise exposure.
- the threshold value is set as a function of the input-signal level, i.e. in adaptive fashion, it is also possible to limit transient noise whose level is well below the maximum value of the threshold value.
- a time-based mean value across the magnitude of the input signal is calculated with the averaging performed over a relative long time interval which may be a time span of for instance 5 seconds.
- This method uses a known fact that human speech occupies a dynamic range of about -15 to +18 dB (decibels) around the respective mean level; in quiet surroundings with little ambient noise, this mean level is about 60 to 65 dB.
- a minimum threshold level such as 80dB is required in order to not affect any first spoken syllable before the mean level has returned to 60dB.
- This method can effectively detect stronger transient signal over average acoustic environment such as 60dB. If the minimum threshold level is dropped below 80dB, it can affect speech signal. On the other hand, the transient signal below 80dB in the quiet acoustic environment, such as 40dB, can result in big perceived shock since the gain at this soft input level is usually very high.
- shock reduction algorithms are implemented in the form of shock reduction algorithms. Many of these are based on peak-clipping in order to minimize delay, but, which, as previously stated, usually introduce artifacts or distortion into the signal. Some more advanced peak-clipping technologies use an adaptive clipping threshold to handle different levels of shock. However, the problems of distortion or uncomfortable artificial effects still cannot be avoided with adaptive peak clipping. Some other more sophisticated shock reduction algorithms detect transient noises in both the time-domain and individual frequency bands, then apply shock reduction in specific frequency bands while keeping the normal signal in other frequency bands untouched, as presented in the above mentioned EP 1'471'767. Although many of these algorithms are quite successful for telecommunication applications, typically experienced by a user through headphones or a headset, they usually need to add more delay and require intensive computational power. Since hearing devices possess limited computational power, this restricts the application of such techniques.
- Acoustic shock is a type of acoustic event, which belongs to the acoustic environment. It is important that any acoustic event is not taken away from the user for his safety. In extreme examples such as a gun shot or car crash, common sense dictates that the user should be able to sense such an event so that he or she can react accordingly, but this is also true in more moderate cases of acoustic shock such as dishes breaking or a door slam.
- the international application WO 03/003790 A1 discloses a method for detecting the presence of one or more shrieks within an audible frequency range of an audio signal. Detection is achieved by calculating the frequency spectrum of the sound present during short, successive intervals of time. From this frequency spectrum the peak power level and the average surrounding power spectral level are determined. The ratio of the peak power level to the average surrounding power spectral level is then calculated. This ratio is compared to a predetermined threshold. Furthermore, the peak power level is compared to a predetermined threshold. If the ratio of the peak power to the average surrounding power spectral level exceeds a predetermined threshold and the absolute peak power level also exceeds a predetermined threshold then a peak is deemed to be present in the current analysis block.
- the present invention provides a method for detecting acoustic shock in a audio input signal (s(t)), comprising the steps of
- the present method provides a quick and reliable shock detector that operates in the time-domain.
- the shock detection takes place with zero time delay, or even predicts the shock before.it fully goes through the signal processing.
- the signal floor (Sn) is obtained through a signal processing method catching up the non-transient signal change over time.
- the signal processing method is provided by a lowpass filter or a fast smooth signal processing.
- the signal processing method is catching up the non-transient signal change over time.
- the method further comprises the step of applying anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) when a shock event has been indicated.
- g(t) anti-shock gain reduction
- the present invention further provides a system for performing the claimed method.
- This system is adapted to be used in small devices with only limited electrical power, such as in hearing devices.
- a hearing device with adaptive shock management qualities to achieve a natural anti-shock treatment without impacting audio signals such as speech or music, thus keeping the acoustic shock event natural and comfortable for the user of the hearing device.
- the sound input 1 a mixture of signal and noise, is first acquired by a transducer 2, i.e. a microphone, and then converted to a digital input signal 4 by an A/D converter 3.
- This digital input signal 4 is then fed to a digital subsystem 5 comprising the below described anti-shock system.
- a digital output signal 6, which has been treated by the anti-shock system by applying the present anti-shock method as well as by other digital components such as filters and amplifiers within the digital subsystem 5, will then be converted by a D/A converter 7 into an analog output signal 8 that will be applied to a receiver for outputting a corresponding sound 9.
- the digital input signal 4 is on one path framed and windowed with a low-pass filter 10.
- the windowed data is then converted from the time domain to the frequency domain via a time-to-frequency transformation such as 2N-point FFT.
- the coefficient of the 2N-point FFT represent N frequency bands of a band-pass filter-bank.
- the signal strength of a band is calculated from its FFT coefficients.
- the signal strength of the band in the frequency-domain varies with time.
- the input signal changes its frequency components over time.
- the signal at each frequency band is processed accordingly.
- a frequency-to-time transformation such as reverse FFT 11 is then applied to convert the coefficients from the frequency-domain to the time-domain, providing a digital output signal 6 that may be converted to an analog output signal with a D/A converter 7, as shown in Figure 1 .
- transformation of the digital signal between the time-domain and frequency-domain also can be performed with other methods such as band-pass filters or wavelet transforms.
- the digital input signal will be introduced into a shock detection module 12 for an immediate detection of a shock.
- This shock detection module 12 thus continuously monitors and detects the digital input signal 4 in real time in the time-domain.
- Figure 3 depicts the plot of the curve of the Signal s(t) of a typical aperiodic shock event as a function of the time t.
- a periodic shock can be viewed as if it consists of a train of attenuating aperiodic shocks. Therefore, the detection of a periodic shock can be treated as a set of individual detections of aperiodic shocks, which follow one after the other.
- shock event could start off with soft shocks and then be followed by stronger shocks. Therefore, the detection of shock needs to be designed to handle each individual shock independently. Then, an adaptive shock reduction can be applied accordingly to handle different kinds of shock within a set of successive shocks. With this approach, shock detection is simplified and different shock reduction strategies can be applied to different kinds of individual shocks.
- Time t0 is defined as the starting point of the shock and time t2 is defined as the half-way point between peak level L and the signal floor Sn.
- signal Floor Sn can be obtained through a fast smooth processing that can catch up the non-transient signal change over time.
- the fast averaging of input signal s(t) is processed over a short duration of such as 1ms so that it can reflect the normal speech signal or the music signal change over time.
- Other smoothing functions of s(t) can be applied to derive Signal Floor Sn to achive the same characteristic as the above fast averaging example.
- the higher the shock peak level L the stronger the shock will be perceived.
- the perceived shock strength depends on the actual shock contrast level dL and the duration T.
- the longer the duration T of the shock the stronger the shock will be perceived. Therefore, it is critical to detect the shock level T and shock contrast in order to determine the shock impact and the necessary solution in managing the shock with an appropriate anti-shock strategy.
- SIL L t 1 - t 0
- SES shock energy strength
- the shock index normalization constant ⁇ can be defined according to the individual's preference.
- the shock index S_Index will drop.
- the constant may be defined by using other typical shock events or shock sounds respectively as a reference for the normalization.
- MCL minimum shock contrast level
- MSI minimum shock Index
- the shock detection runs in real-time with the use of the thresholds of minimum shock contrast level (MCL) and minimum Shock Index (MSI).
- MCL minimum shock contrast level
- MSI minimum Shock Index
- the present shock detection includes the shock detection as such and the shock strength detection. According to the shock contrast level dL and Shock Index SI, it can determine whether a shock happens and how strong the shock is. Since the shock detection runs continuously, the shock can be detected anytime as long as it meets with the shock detection criteria; it is not necessary that shock detection happens solely at the shock peak time. This implies that a shock can be detected during its build-up process before it reaches its peak level.
- an anti-shock management module After detection of a shock, an anti-shock management module has to react for reducing or minimizing the shock effect, by keeping the shock sound as natural as possible to allow awareness by the user of the shock event. Furthermore it should keep the relative loudness of shock so that the user can perceive the shock level and keep the shock within a comfort range of the user.
- the shock detection and the anti-shock management will be both performed in the time-domain, as depicted schematically in the block diagram of Figure 4 .
- the threshold delay beyond which this negative impact would happen is determined by the overall system delay, the type of shock and the actual shock detection. If the shock detection takes longer time, more samples, and thus more delay, is needed to reduce the artifacts. On the other hand the more delay is implemented due to this fact, the overall system delay could become longer than desired. Therefore, these two mechanisms are balanced to reduce artifacts and keep the overall system delay below the desired threshold.
- anti-shock manager will apply anti-shock gain reduction g(t) to the input signal s(t) to get a new signal x(t) with anti-shock processing already completed after a shock is detected.
- time constants ⁇ and ⁇ can be different to achieve different release speeds at different durations for different purposes; or be the same to simplify the anti-shock release process.
- the shock detection takes place in the time-domain whereas the treatment or management respectively of the signal takes place in the frequency-domain, as depicted schematically in Figure 6 .
- the shock detection will be carried out by the shock detection module 12 in the time domain as already described above with no additional time delay required.
- the signal s(t) in the time-domain is then transformed into frequency-domain by a TTF module 14 for any frequency-domain signal processing in module 15 and the anti-shock management by the anti-shock management module 13.
- the frequency-domain signal gain(f) is transformed back to time-domain by the FTT module 16 resulting in a new signal y(t).
- the signal transformation from time-domain to frequency-domain and then back to time-domain is frame-based by applying a certain window such as Hanning or Hamming.
- the fast shock detection in time-domain provides early prediction for anti-shock processing in frequency-domain.
- An adaptive anti-shock management plan can thus be specified to suppress shock without artificial break of anti-shock.
- the anti-shock gain reduction g(t) may be divided into three anti-shock phases, such as anti-shock attack phase, anti-shock holding phase and anti-shock release phase.
- the factors A 0 , ⁇ , ⁇ or ⁇ can be pre-defined as constants or they can be adaptively updated according to the shock contrast level dL, shock index SI or Shock Duration T.
- the higher the shock contrast level dL and/or the higher Shock Index SI the higher A 0 and/or ⁇ will be.
- each frequency band can have a different weighting factor adjusted according to preferences. This can result in an effective anti-shock system for the preferable hearing compensation or comfort.
- different activation functions can be selected according to the shock type and the user preference.
- the method according the present invention is not only suitable for single shock events, but will also handle multiple shock events.
- Figures 8 to 10 displays three different types of multiple shock events:
- An equal shock follows a first shock, as depicted in Figure 9 .
- the actual anti-shock relation depends on time difference between the two shocks. If they are very close, they will be detected as only one shock. If the time difference is big enough, they will be detected as two separate shocks and a similar anti-shock processing will be applied to both independently.
- A.weaker second shock follows a stronger first shock, as depicted in Figure 10 .
- the weaker shock after the strong shock can be masked by the stronger shock, if the time difference between them is short. If the weaker shock happens a certain time after the stronger one, it can be detected as a new shock and new anti-shock processing is applied.
- a zero-delay or predictive shock detection and adaptive shock management has thus been achieved. Shock detection takes place with zero time delay, or even predicts the shock before it fully goes through the signal processing.
- the present method thus is highly efficient and very fast and may be used for shock detection and shock reduction. While reducing acoustic shock adaptively, it keeps the natural sound quality of shock events for environmental awareness by the user maintained and does not hamper the user's safety.
- This method is capable of detecting and canceling acoustic shocks adaptively under different environments and reducing the shock in an optimized way to keep the natural sound quality of shock events. It can detect various acoustic shocks reliably and adaptively to the environment.
- the acoustic shock detection results in a shock index, which reflects the actual shock strength and allows more adaptive shock reduction accordingly. This is also very different from most other transient or impulse detection technologies which simply detect whether a transient or impulse is present or not. Based on the continuous shock detection resulting shock index SI, an adaptive shock management is carried out to adaptively reduce the acoustic shock.
- hearing device must be understood as hearing aid, be it introduced in the ear canal or implanted into a patient, to correct a hearing impairment as well as to any communication device used to facilitate or improve communication.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates generally to a method and system for detecting acoustic shock signals in audio signals and to applications of that method in hearing devices.
- Furthermore, the invention relates to further reduce or minimize detected shock effects in audio signals.
- Detection of acoustic shock is a well-known problem in signal processing. Acoustic shock signals are referred to as impulse signals or transient signals. The nature of an impulse signal is such that its amplitude suddenly changes within a very short duration. There are two typical types of transient signals: aperiodic and periodic signals. An aperiodic impulse is for example generated by an explosion, gunfire or a firecracker. Aperiodic shocks last for very short timeframes such as 250µs or less. On the other hand, a periodic impulse is usually generated from an impact between two mechanically and acoustically un-dampened objects such as two glass bottles hitting each other. Periodic shocks usually have much longer durations in the order of 5 to 200ms, and also usually have a lower peak level. Periodic shocks consist of multiple peaks, which come closely one after the other and have attenuated peak levels during their duration.
- Many different approaches have been developed to address the detrimental effects of such acoustic shocks. General input-output compression strategies such as WDRC (Wide Dynamic Range Compression) reacts too slowly versus the very fast acoustic shock impulses. MPO (Maximum Power Output) in the frequency domain can be applied to prevent overshooting, but it is also too slow to be effective. Peak-clipping in the time-domain such as time-domain MPO is effective and fast, but it usually causes serious distortion of sound quality. For shock detection, high pass filters are often used; since the transient noise has most of the energy at high frequencies (sudden signal changes mean rich high frequency components). Low-pass filters are also often used to attenuate the transient noise without affecting simultaneously speech content of the signal.
- A sub-band-based acoustic shock algorithm has been presented by
Todd Schneider et al. in EP 1'471'767 . A pattern analysis-based approach is taken to an input signal to perform feature extraction. A parameter space is identified, which is corresponding to the signal space of the input signal. A rule-based decision approach is taken to the parameter space to detect an acoustic shock event and, then, the shock is removed from the input signal to generate a processed output signal. The sudden sound increase is detected with a block frame of a number of samples in time-domain and similar detection also happens within each sub-band. An additional sample delay of a further number of samples is used to allow the time-domain measurement enough time to notify the shock detection module in the frequency domain about the presence of a high level input before the shock reaches the filter bank, thus providing extra time for the shock-detection module to react. The shock detection module in the frequency domain detects if a shock has occurred in a particular sub-band, and determines the sub-band energy measurement to be used for the gain calculation. A state machine is used for sub-band shock determination by examining the sub-band energy with the shock flag. The acoustic shock phenomenon is eliminated by applying the appropriate gain reduction to the signal in each sub-band. The described technology in said document works well for some kinds of slow shocks since it samples input signal energy with a block of a number of samples of about 0.5ms. However, many fast shocks can be much shorter than 0.5ms and they may not be detected with this block level. The additional time-delay is required for the system, but can cause new problems for hearing aid devices since the overall signal delay over 10ms can be perceived as noticeable acoustic latency, which is not desired. - The shock detection in the sub-band is very expensive cycle budget-wise and also difficult to synchronize with the time-domain parameter extraction. The sub-band strategy will not be able to detect very fast shocks reliably and accurately since the filter bank can smear the actual sound level change. It is also not desired to eliminate the shock in individual sub-bands, because this may cause the user to lose environmental awareness and, hence, not perceive correctly the nature of the shock, which might be very important information for the user. It is also expensive to implement this approach and to optimize this algorithm with existing hearing device technology. More complex hearing device systems may also suffer from excessive input-output latency or require very expensive computing power to process this strategy.
-
US 5,579,404 describes a digital audio limiter. This signal processing system comprising components such as split-band perceptual coders that receive a peak amplitude limited input audio signal and can process the signal in such a manner that the processed signal preserves the apparent loudness of the input signal but is no longer peak-amplitude limited. In one embodiment, up-sampling is used in estimating the resultant peak amplitude and gain factors established in response to the estimated peak amplitude are applied to one or more frequency sub-bands of the processed signal. - Long signal-delay may thus be required and the duration of the delay is usually set substantially equal to the length of time required for control system to respond to PLI (Peak level increase) requiring correction. Furthermore, this technology is more focused on broadcasting or audio recording and therefore no acoustic environment factors are considered. The signal processing required for the system, particularly peak estimator (prefer to up-sample the input signal), is higher than it is available in low-power digital systems such as digital hearing devices, thus this system is not suitable for miniaturized, low-power digital devices.
- A method for processing an input signal to generate an output signal, and application of said method in hearing aids and listening devices is described in
US 20030031335 A1 . - This method and system for defining a threshold value are described to limit the output signal of a processing unit which is fed with an input signal. According to the invention of document
US 2003 0031335 , an input-signal level is determined and the threshold value is set as a function of that input-signal level to prevent the maximum output level in the device from exceeding a predefined threshold value, which protects the user of the device from excessive noise exposure. By virtue of the fact that the threshold value is set as a function of the input-signal level, i.e. in adaptive fashion, it is also possible to limit transient noise whose level is well below the maximum value of the threshold value. As a result, when this method or system is applied in a hearing device, the hearing comfort of the wearer of the hearing device can be significantly enhanced. - Detecting acoustic transient signal well for average level or higher level acoustic environments since the threshold value can be set by defining a momentary mean level of the input signal. A time-based mean value across the magnitude of the input signal is calculated with the averaging performed over a relative long time interval which may be a time span of for
instance 5 seconds. - This method uses a known fact that human speech occupies a dynamic range of about -15 to +18 dB (decibels) around the respective mean level; in quiet surroundings with little ambient noise, this mean level is about 60 to 65 dB. A minimum threshold level such as 80dB is required in order to not affect any first spoken syllable before the mean level has returned to 60dB.
- This method can effectively detect stronger transient signal over average acoustic environment such as 60dB. If the minimum threshold level is dropped below 80dB, it can affect speech signal. On the other hand, the transient signal below 80dB in the quiet acoustic environment, such as 40dB, can result in big perceived shock since the gain at this soft input level is usually very high.
- In known digital systems and devices, the above described known solutions are implemented in the form of shock reduction algorithms. Many of these are based on peak-clipping in order to minimize delay, but, which, as previously stated, usually introduce artifacts or distortion into the signal. Some more advanced peak-clipping technologies use an adaptive clipping threshold to handle different levels of shock. However, the problems of distortion or uncomfortable artificial effects still cannot be avoided with adaptive peak clipping. Some other more sophisticated shock reduction algorithms detect transient noises in both the time-domain and individual frequency bands, then apply shock reduction in specific frequency bands while keeping the normal signal in other frequency bands untouched, as presented in the above mentioned EP 1'471'767. Although many of these algorithms are quite successful for telecommunication applications, typically experienced by a user through headphones or a headset, they usually need to add more delay and require intensive computational power. Since hearing devices possess limited computational power, this restricts the application of such techniques.
- Furthermore, the requirement in this regard is different in hearing devices compared to other audio devices, in that acoustic shock should never be cancelled out completely in hearing devices, even if technically possible to do so. Acoustic shock is a type of acoustic event, which belongs to the acoustic environment. It is important that any acoustic event is not taken away from the user for his safety. In extreme examples such as a gun shot or car crash, common sense dictates that the user should be able to sense such an event so that he or she can react accordingly, but this is also true in more moderate cases of acoustic shock such as dishes breaking or a door slam.
- Finally, the international application
WO 03/003790 A1 - It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of reliably and fast detecting acoustic shock events in audio signals.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide an additional method of managing acoustic shock events after its detection in order to input such events to the user in a reasonable range without causing hearing damage or discomfort.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method of detecting reliably and rapidly acoustic shock within an acoustic input signal with a minimum of computational effort and to consequently attenuate or cancel the shock while maintaining the input signal unaffected.
- These objects are achieved by the invention as claimed.
- The present invention provides a method for detecting acoustic shock in a audio input signal (s(t)), comprising the steps of
- monitoring the input signal (s(t)) in the time-domain, thereby
- detecting the signal floor (Sn),
- detecting the peak level of the input signal (L),
- detecting the attack time of the input signal (t1-t0),
- detecting the duration of the input signal (T),
- determining a shock contrast level (SCL) as difference between the peak level (L) and the signal floor (Sn),
- determining a shock index (SI) by use of a shock index normalization constant ( σ )
- comparing the shock contrast level (SCL) and the shock index (SI) with respective thresholds and
- indicating an acoustic shock if one or both thresholds are exceeded.
- Thus, the present method provides a quick and reliable shock detector that operates in the time-domain. The shock detection takes place with zero time delay, or even predicts the shock before.it fully goes through the signal processing.
- In one embodiment, the signal floor (Sn) is obtained through a signal processing method catching up the non-transient signal change over time. For example, the signal processing method is provided by a lowpass filter or a fast smooth signal processing. Thus, the signal processing method is catching up the non-transient signal change over time.
- In one embodiment, the method further comprises the step of applying anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) when a shock event has been indicated. Thus, the acoustic shock is not only detected but as well adaptively reduced, thereby keeping the natural sound quality of the shock events for environmental awareness.
- Based on this method, it is not only possible to detect and treat a single shock event, but also multiple shock events, even with different strength of the individual shocks.
- The present invention further provides a system for performing the claimed method. This system is adapted to be used in small devices with only limited electrical power, such as in hearing devices.
- Thus, there is provided a hearing device with adaptive shock management qualities to achieve a natural anti-shock treatment without impacting audio signals such as speech or music, thus keeping the acoustic shock event natural and comfortable for the user of the hearing device.
- For purpose of facilitating and understanding of the invention, a preferred embodiment thereof is illustrated in the accompanying drawings to be considered in connection with the following description. Thus the invention may be readily understood and appreciated.
- Fig. 1
- schematically, a block diagram of an anti-shock system according to the present invention;
- Fig. 2
- again schematically, a more detailed block diagram of an embodiment of the digital subsystem of
Figure 1 according to the present invention; - Fig. 3
- a plot of a curve showing the signal of a typical aperiodic shock signal as a function of time;
- Fig. 4
- schematically, a block diagram of the detection and treatment of a signal both in the time-domain according to the present invention;
- Fig. 5
- a double plot of curves showing above the signal of a typical aperiodic shock signal as a function of time and below the implemented gain reduction as a function of time;
- Fig. 6
- schematically, a block diagram of the detection of a shock event in the time-domain and the treatment or management respectively in the frequency domain according an embodiment of the present invention;
- Fig. 7
- a double plot of curves showing above the signal of a shock signal as a function of time, the delayed shock signal with the system group-delay ( τ ) and below the implemented gain reduction in the frequency-domain according to
Figure 6 with the consideration of system group-delay ( τ ) for zero-delay or predictable anti-shock management; - Fig. 8
- a double plot of curves according to
Figure 7 with a second stronger shock following a first weaker shock; - Fig. 9
- a double plot of curves according to
Figure 7 with two equal shocks following each other in a short period of time; - Fig. 10
- a double plot of curves according to
Figure 7 with a second weaker shock following a first stronger shock. - Referring to
Figure 1 , a purely schematic overview of the present anti-shock method and system is shown. Thesound input 1, a mixture of signal and noise, is first acquired by atransducer 2, i.e. a microphone, and then converted to a digital input signal 4 by an A/D converter 3. This digital input signal 4 is then fed to adigital subsystem 5 comprising the below described anti-shock system. Adigital output signal 6, which has been treated by the anti-shock system by applying the present anti-shock method as well as by other digital components such as filters and amplifiers within thedigital subsystem 5, will then be converted by a D/A converter 7 into an analog output signal 8 that will be applied to a receiver for outputting acorresponding sound 9. - Referring now to
Figure 2 , an example of a digital subsystem according toFigure 1 is described in more details. The digital input signal 4 is on one path framed and windowed with a low-pass filter 10. The windowed data is then converted from the time domain to the frequency domain via a time-to-frequency transformation such as 2N-point FFT. The coefficient of the 2N-point FFT represent N frequency bands of a band-pass filter-bank. The signal strength of a band is calculated from its FFT coefficients. The signal strength of the band in the frequency-domain varies with time. In addition, the input signal changes its frequency components over time. The signal at each frequency band is processed accordingly. - A frequency-to-time transformation such as
reverse FFT 11 is then applied to convert the coefficients from the frequency-domain to the time-domain, providing adigital output signal 6 that may be converted to an analog output signal with a D/A converter 7, as shown inFigure 1 . - It is to be noted that the transformation of the digital signal between the time-domain and frequency-domain also can be performed with other methods such as band-pass filters or wavelet transforms.
- On a second path, the digital input signal will be introduced into a
shock detection module 12 for an immediate detection of a shock. Thisshock detection module 12 thus continuously monitors and detects the digital input signal 4 in real time in the time-domain. -
Figure 3 depicts the plot of the curve of the Signal s(t) of a typical aperiodic shock event as a function of the time t. A periodic shock can be viewed as if it consists of a train of attenuating aperiodic shocks. Therefore, the detection of a periodic shock can be treated as a set of individual detections of aperiodic shocks, which follow one after the other. - In a real world environment, the shock event could start off with soft shocks and then be followed by stronger shocks. Therefore, the detection of shock needs to be designed to handle each individual shock independently. Then, an adaptive shock reduction can be applied accordingly to handle different kinds of shock within a set of successive shocks. With this approach, shock detection is simplified and different shock reduction strategies can be applied to different kinds of individual shocks.
-
-
- In such a Signal Floor Sn, the fast averaging of input signal s(t) is processed over a short duration of such as 1ms so that it can reflect the normal speech signal or the music signal change over time. Other smoothing functions of s(t) can be applied to derive Signal Floor Sn to achive the same characteristic as the above fast averaging example. The higher the shock peak level L, the stronger the shock will be perceived. For the same source of shock, the perceived shock strength depends on the actual shock contrast level dL and the duration T. With the same shock peak level L, the lower the signal floor Sn, the higher the shock contrast, which will result in a stronger shock impact perception. Also, the longer the duration T of the shock, the stronger the shock will be perceived. Therefore, it is critical to detect the shock level T and shock contrast in order to determine the shock impact and the necessary solution in managing the shock with an appropriate anti-shock strategy.
-
- That means: the higher the shock peak level L is, the shorter the attack time (t1-t0) and the longer duration T are, the stronger the shock is perceived.
-
- In an exemplary system, σ may be defined by referring to a typical dish transient noise with a shock level L=70dB in quiet (Sn=40dB) with 0.2ms attack time (t1-t0) and 10ms duration T.
- By applying the formula for the Shock Index SI, σ will be 0.0067 (ms/dB) with SI = 1 as normalized shock index.
- If the environment noise level increases for the same dish noise, the shock index S_Index will drop. The constant may be defined by using other typical shock events or shock sounds respectively as a reference for the normalization.
-
- Therefore, two thresholds, the minimum shock contrast level (MCL) and the minimum shock Index (MSI), are used for shock detection. These two thresholds (MCL; MSI) can be determined through a self-learning process or predetermined measurement so that daily life non-transient signals such as speech, music, normal acoustic sound are not detected as shock, and that a transient sound such as a gun shot or a door slam will be detected as shock. A stronger and sharper shock will generate a stronger shock Index SI. The duration of shock T will be used together with shock index SI as the measurement of shock strength, which is used for anti-shock reduction control.
- The shock detection runs in real-time with the use of the thresholds of minimum shock contrast level (MCL) and minimum Shock Index (MSI). The present shock detection includes the shock detection as such and the shock strength detection. According to the shock contrast level dL and Shock Index SI, it can determine whether a shock happens and how strong the shock is. Since the shock detection runs continuously, the shock can be detected anytime as long as it meets with the shock detection criteria; it is not necessary that shock detection happens solely at the shock peak time. This implies that a shock can be detected during its build-up process before it reaches its peak level.
- The continuous growth of the shock will result in up-dated shock detection with stronger shock contrast and stronger shock index SI, which will overtake the previous shock detection.
- After detection of a shock, an anti-shock management module has to react for reducing or minimizing the shock effect, by keeping the shock sound as natural as possible to allow awareness by the user of the shock event. Furthermore it should keep the relative loudness of shock so that the user can perceive the shock level and keep the shock within a comfort range of the user.
- In a first embodiment, the shock detection and the anti-shock management will be both performed in the time-domain, as depicted schematically in the block diagram of
Figure 4 . The shock peak thus can be detected without delay but the anti-shock process could be delayed until a shock is detected. Therefore, a few samples of signal delay such as 250µs (i.e. n=4 for sampling rate 16kHz) for anti-shock management is required. As can be see from the lower curve ofFigure 5 , the whole shock part cannot be handled with the anti-shock process in the time-domain without adding additional delay, which will cause distortion of shock event. - Hence, additional time delay is required to be added by these few samples in addition to the existing system time delay. Adding additional time delay at this juncture could cause artificial effects on the input signals. The threshold delay beyond which this negative impact would happen is determined by the overall system delay, the type of shock and the actual shock detection. If the shock detection takes longer time, more samples, and thus more delay, is needed to reduce the artifacts. On the other hand the more delay is implemented due to this fact, the overall system delay could become longer than desired. Therefore, these two mechanisms are balanced to reduce artifacts and keep the overall system delay below the desired threshold.
-
- A is the anti-shock strength, and
- β is a time constant for anti-shock control.
-
- λ is a time constant for anti-shock release.
- As can be seen, time constants β and λ can be different to achieve different release speeds at different durations for different purposes; or be the same to simplify the anti-shock release process.
- As one typical implementation, it may be desired to have slow anti-shock release for the peak shock duration (t ∈ (t1,t2)) so that the shock can be efficiently controlled. In another typical implementation, it may be desired to have fast anti-shock release for the peak shock duration (t ∈ (t1,t2)) so that the useful signal following the shock is less affected. In a further typical implementation, it may be desired to use the same anti-shock release speed in order to simplify the design.
- In addition to using the above gain reduction function g(t), different activation functions can be selected according to the shock type and the user preference. A very simple one is linear reaction to shock.
- In a second embodiment of the present invention, the shock detection takes place in the time-domain whereas the treatment or management respectively of the signal takes place in the frequency-domain, as depicted schematically in
Figure 6 . - The shock detection will be carried out by the
shock detection module 12 in the time domain as already described above with no additional time delay required. The signal s(t) in the time-domain is then transformed into frequency-domain by aTTF module 14 for any frequency-domain signal processing inmodule 15 and the anti-shock management by theanti-shock management module 13. Afterwards, the frequency-domain signal gain(f) is transformed back to time-domain by theFTT module 16 resulting in a new signal y(t). - For example, the signal transformation from time-domain to frequency-domain and then back to time-domain is frame-based by applying a certain window such as Hanning or Hamming. The frame size is typical 2 N samples such as 64(N=5) for 32-bit FFT, which corresponds to a time length 3.2ms for a sampling rate of 20kHz. This creates a certain time-delay τ (such as 1ms-10ms; according to the actual system implementation) between the signal input and signal output. The fast shock detection in time-domain provides early prediction for anti-shock processing in frequency-domain. An adaptive anti-shock management plan can thus be specified to suppress shock without artificial break of anti-shock.
- In the
anti-shock management module 13, the anti-shock gain reduction g(t) may be divided into three anti-shock phases, such as anti-shock attack phase, anti-shock holding phase and anti-shock release phase. - Anti-shock attack phase:
where A 0 is an initial gain reduction and
α is the time constant for anti-shock attack speed; - Anti-shock holding phase:
where β can have the same meaning as described above; and - Anti-shock release phase:
where λ can have the same meaning as described above. - The factors A 0, α, β or λ can be pre-defined as constants or they can be adaptively updated according to the shock contrast level dL, shock index SI or Shock Duration T. In general, the higher the shock contrast level dL and/or the higher Shock Index SI, the higher A 0 and/or α will be. The shorter the system delay, the higher α will be.
- Unlike the shock-detection which is applied in the time-domain and performs broadband, the above described anti-shock processing is applied in different frequency bands independently, as already shown in
Figure 2 . Each frequency band can have a different weighting factor adjusted according to preferences. This can result in an effective anti-shock system for the preferable hearing compensation or comfort. - In addition to using the above anti-shock management functions, different activation functions can be selected according to the shock type and the user preference.
- The method according the present invention is not only suitable for single shock events, but will also handle multiple shock events.
Figures 8 to 10 displays three different types of multiple shock events: - A second stronger shock follows a first weaker shock, as depicted in
Figure 8 . In this case, the stronger shock will mask the previous one and the new anti-shock for the stronger shock will take over the control once the stronger shock is detected. - An equal shock follows a first shock, as depicted in
Figure 9 . In this case, the actual anti-shock relation depends on time difference between the two shocks. If they are very close, they will be detected as only one shock. If the time difference is big enough, they will be detected as two separate shocks and a similar anti-shock processing will be applied to both independently. - A.weaker second shock follows a stronger first shock, as depicted in
Figure 10 . In this case, the weaker shock after the strong shock can be masked by the stronger shock, if the time difference between them is short. If the weaker shock happens a certain time after the stronger one, it can be detected as a new shock and new anti-shock processing is applied. - Therefore, a stronger shock happening right after a weaker shock will overtake the weaker shock management, while a stronger shock management will not be affected by a following weaker shock.
- A zero-delay or predictive shock detection and adaptive shock management has thus been achieved. Shock detection takes place with zero time delay, or even predicts the shock before it fully goes through the signal processing.
- The present method thus is highly efficient and very fast and may be used for shock detection and shock reduction. While reducing acoustic shock adaptively, it keeps the natural sound quality of shock events for environmental awareness by the user maintained and does not hamper the user's safety. This method is capable of detecting and canceling acoustic shocks adaptively under different environments and reducing the shock in an optimized way to keep the natural sound quality of shock events. It can detect various acoustic shocks reliably and adaptively to the environment. The acoustic shock detection results in a shock index, which reflects the actual shock strength and allows more adaptive shock reduction accordingly. This is also very different from most other transient or impulse detection technologies which simply detect whether a transient or impulse is present or not. Based on the continuous shock detection resulting shock index SI, an adaptive shock management is carried out to adaptively reduce the acoustic shock.
- Finally, it is expressly pointed out that the method and system according to the present invention can not only be used in connection with a correction of hearing impairment, but also can be very well used in connection with any wired or wireless communication device. In this sense, the term "hearing device" must be understood as hearing aid, be it introduced in the ear canal or implanted into a patient, to correct a hearing impairment as well as to any communication device used to facilitate or improve communication.
Claims (17)
- A method for detecting acoustic shock in an audio input signal (s(t)), comprising the steps of- monitoring the input signal (s(t)) in the time-domain, thereby- detecting a signal floor (Sn),- detecting a peak level (L) of the input signal (s(t)),- detecting an attack time (t1-t0) of the input signal (s(t)),- detecting a shock duration (T) of the input signal (s(t)),- determining a shock contrast level (dL) as difference between the peak level (L) and the signal floor (Sn),- determining a shock index (SI) by use of the following formula:
wherein σ is a shock index normalization constant,- comparing the shock contrast level (dL) and the shock index (SI) with respective thresholds (MCL;MSI), and- indicating an acoustic shock if both thresholds (MCL;MSI) are exceeded. - Method according to claim 1 characterized in that the signal floor (Sn) is obtained through a signal processing method catching up the non-transient signal change over time.
- Method according to claim 2 characterized in that the signal processing method is provided by a lowpass filter or a fast smooth signal processing.
- Method according claim 4 characterized in that the averaging of s(t) is performed for a short time period T 0 of about 4ms or less.
- A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the coefficient for shock index normalization ( σ ) is pre-defined for typical shock events or is determined by a self-learning process.
- A method according to one of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that it further comprises the step of- applying anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) when a shock event has been indicated.
- A method according to claim 7 characterized in that an anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) is applied in time-domain to the input signal (s(t)) resulting in a new signal (x(t)) with completed anti-shock processing.
- A method according to claim 8 characterized in that the anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) is applied to the input signal (s(t)) after adding signal delay.
- A method according to claim 7 characterized in that an anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) is applied in the frequency-domain.
- A method according to claim 7 characterized in that the anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) is applied in different frequency bands independently.
- A method according to claim 7 characterized in that additionally different activation functions are selected according to the shock type or a user preference.
- Application of the method according to one of the claims 1 to 12 for operating a hearing device.
- An audio signal processing system for detecting acoustic shock in an audio input signal s(t) comprising at least one shock detection module (12) with means that permits the- monitoring the input signal (s(t)) in the time-domain, thereby- detecting a signal floor (Sn),- detecting a peak level (L) of the input signal (s(t)),- detecting an attack time (t1-t0) of the input signal (s(t)),- detecting a shock duration (T) of the input signal (s(t)),- determining a shock contrast level (dL) as difference between the peak level (L) and the signal floor (Sn),- determining a shock index (SI) by use of the following formula:
wherein σ is a shock index normalization constant,- comparing the shock contrast level (dL) and the shock index (SI) with respective thresholds (MCL;MSI), and- indicating an acoustic shock if both thresholds (MCL;MSI) are exceeded. - A system according to claim 14 characterized in that it further comprises at least one managing module (13) with means that permits applying anti-shock gain reduction (g(t)) when a shock event has been indicated.
- A system according to claim 15 characterized in that the managing module (13) is working in the time-domain.
- A system according to claim 15 characterized in that the managing module (13) is working in the frequency-domain.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/063136 WO2007014795A2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2006-06-13 | Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2027750A2 EP2027750A2 (en) | 2009-02-25 |
EP2027750B1 true EP2027750B1 (en) | 2012-01-11 |
Family
ID=36717127
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06763663A Active EP2027750B1 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2006-06-13 | Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2027750B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE541413T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2006275003A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2646108A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2027750T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007014795A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011048101A1 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2011-04-28 | St-Ericsson (France) Sas | Acoustic shock processing |
WO2012010218A1 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2012-01-26 | Phonak Ag | Hearing system and method for operating a hearing system |
DE102016200637B3 (en) | 2016-01-19 | 2017-04-27 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | Method for reducing the latency of a filter bank for filtering an audio signal and method for low-latency operation of a hearing system |
EP3337186A1 (en) * | 2016-12-16 | 2018-06-20 | GN Hearing A/S | Binaural hearing device system with a binaural impulse environment classifier |
CN111341347B (en) * | 2020-03-11 | 2023-07-18 | 腾讯音乐娱乐科技(深圳)有限公司 | Noise detection method and related equipment |
CN113132880B (en) * | 2021-04-16 | 2022-10-04 | 深圳木芯科技有限公司 | Impact noise suppression method and system based on dual-microphone architecture |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AUPR604201A0 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2001-07-26 | Hearworks Pty Ltd | Telephony interface apparatus |
CA2424093A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-09-30 | Dspfactory Ltd. | Method and device for acoustic shock protection |
DE102004041199B4 (en) * | 2004-08-25 | 2006-06-29 | Dietmar Ruwisch | Process and facility calculates damping factor for the damping of acoustic signals, multiplies first acoustic signal with damping value to generate output signal |
-
2006
- 2006-06-13 DK DK06763663.9T patent/DK2027750T3/en active
- 2006-06-13 EP EP06763663A patent/EP2027750B1/en active Active
- 2006-06-13 AT AT06763663T patent/ATE541413T1/en active
- 2006-06-13 WO PCT/EP2006/063136 patent/WO2007014795A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-06-13 CA CA002646108A patent/CA2646108A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-06-13 AU AU2006275003A patent/AU2006275003A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE541413T1 (en) | 2012-01-15 |
WO2007014795A3 (en) | 2007-03-29 |
DK2027750T3 (en) | 2012-05-07 |
WO2007014795A2 (en) | 2007-02-08 |
CA2646108A1 (en) | 2007-02-08 |
EP2027750A2 (en) | 2009-02-25 |
AU2006275003A1 (en) | 2007-02-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7983425B2 (en) | Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices | |
EP1471767B1 (en) | Method and system for acoustic shock protection | |
US10614788B2 (en) | Two channel headset-based own voice enhancement | |
EP2082614B1 (en) | Hearing aid having an occlusion reduction unit, and method for occlusion reduction | |
CN108847208A (en) | A kind of noise reduction process method, apparatus and earphone | |
EP2027750B1 (en) | Method and system for acoustic shock detection and application of said method in hearing devices | |
US20130156208A1 (en) | Hearing aid and method of detecting vibration | |
EP2056296A2 (en) | Dynamic noise reduction | |
EP2372700A1 (en) | A speech intelligibility predictor and applications thereof | |
CN102984634A (en) | Digital hearing-aid unequal-width sub-band automatic gain control method | |
JP6250147B2 (en) | Hearing aid system signal processing method and hearing aid system | |
CN106911993A (en) | With the hearing devices that acoustic impluse suppresses | |
US8199928B2 (en) | System for processing an acoustic input signal to provide an output signal with reduced noise | |
JP2024517721A (en) | Audio optimization for noisy environments | |
CN115348507A (en) | Impulse noise suppression method, system, readable storage medium and computer equipment | |
EP1925185B1 (en) | Method for attenuating interfering noise and corresponding hearing device | |
CN110169081B (en) | Hearing device and method for acoustic shock control in a hearing device | |
WO2012098856A1 (en) | Hearing aid and hearing aid control method | |
EP3223278B1 (en) | Noise characterization and attenuation using linear predictive coding | |
US20220345832A1 (en) | Detection of feedback path change | |
CN116782084A (en) | Audio signal processing method and device, earphone and storage medium | |
Halawani et al. | Speech enhancement techniques for hearing impaired people: Digital signal processing based approach | |
WO2024093536A1 (en) | Audio signal processing method and apparatus, audio playback device, and storage medium | |
WO2023214020A1 (en) | Device for reducing noise during the reproduction of an audio signal using a headphone or hearing aid, and corresponding method | |
Luo | Acoustic shock detection and control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080930 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20090429 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 541413 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602006027029 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120411 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120511 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120511 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120412 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 541413 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602006027029 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121012 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120422 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060613 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 602006027029 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200625 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20200702 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240627 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240627 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20240625 Year of fee payment: 19 |