EP2024038B1 - Process for the regeneration of a used oil - Google Patents

Process for the regeneration of a used oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2024038B1
EP2024038B1 EP07748485.5A EP07748485A EP2024038B1 EP 2024038 B1 EP2024038 B1 EP 2024038B1 EP 07748485 A EP07748485 A EP 07748485A EP 2024038 B1 EP2024038 B1 EP 2024038B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
transformer
hydrogen
gas phase
separator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP07748485.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2024038A4 (en
EP2024038A1 (en
Inventor
Björn HARRYSSON
Ahmad Kalantar
Gunnar Stang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nynas AB
Original Assignee
Nynas AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nynas AB filed Critical Nynas AB
Publication of EP2024038A1 publication Critical patent/EP2024038A1/en
Publication of EP2024038A4 publication Critical patent/EP2024038A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2024038B1 publication Critical patent/EP2024038B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
    • C10G67/06Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including a sorption process as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01FMAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
    • H01F27/00Details of transformers or inductances, in general
    • H01F27/08Cooling; Ventilating
    • H01F27/10Liquid cooling
    • H01F27/12Oil cooling
    • H01F27/14Expansion chambers; Oil conservators; Gas cushions; Arrangements for purifying, drying, or filling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the regeneration of a used oil. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the regeneration of a used oil, in particular a used transformer oil, by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and at an elevated temperature.
  • Hydrocarbon oils used in industrial and other environments will gradually deteriorate over time due to oxidation of the hydrocarbons and contamination by other impurities.
  • the oxidation results in compounds such as acids, ketones, phenols and other oxygen containing molecules being formed in the oil.
  • Some of these molecules are strongly polar and will be oriented in an electrical field giving field losses when the oil is used as a transformer oil.
  • transformer oils may have been added/contaminated with halogenated organic compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), the disposal or recycling of which possesses environmental hazards.
  • PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls
  • organo-copper and organo-iron compounds are known catalysts for catalytic oxidation of transformer oils. Hence, removal of these compounds from the used transformer oil will greatly improve the oxidation stability of the oil. Additionally, these organo-metallic compounds, mostly organo-copper compounds, could deteriorate the insulation properties of the insulation paper around the copper windings.
  • spots of copper oxide and/or copper sulphides can be formed on the insulation paper which will deteriorate the insulation properties of the insulating paper.
  • the copper oxide is being formed by interaction of organo-copper compounds with oxygen (or oxygenated compounds in the oil)
  • the copper sulphides are formed by interaction of organo-copper compounds with reactive organic sulphur compounds (OSC) present in the used old transformer oil.
  • OSC reactive organic sulphur compounds
  • the oil to be regenerated can either be collected and transported to the regeneration facilities or be regenerated on-site.
  • the former approach involves blending and logistical complications.
  • the on-site oil-reclamation approach is commonly carried out using adsorption methods, in which the used oxidised oil, e.g. a transformer oil, to be regenerated is passed over a solid adsorbent, which adsorbs the highly polar oxidised molecules.
  • the saturated solid adsorbent is itself regenerated by combustion at elevated temperatures.
  • a used oil containing oxygenated species can, however, also be regenerated chemically, in particular by the application of hydrotreatment technology. Hydrogenation effectively converts all the oxygenated organic molecules, both polar and non-polar oxygenated species, into less harmful compounds.
  • the hydrogenation technique also provides the opportunity to remove polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other halogenated compounds from the oil.
  • WO94/14731 discloses a process for simultaneous removal of halide from a halide containing organic compound and reduction of an oxygen containing compound in a hydrocarbon oil by exposing the oil to a catalyst in the presence of hydrogen and a hydrogen halide scavenger resulting in the reduction of the oxygen containing compound and the conversion of the halide to hydrohalic acid which is neutralized with the hydrogen halide scavenger.
  • the hydrogen halide i.e. the HCl is formed by hydrogenation of the PCBs in the used transformer oil. Hydrogen halides, besides being harmful substances can also cause metallurgical corrosion problems.
  • the hydrogen halide scavenger used in this prior art process is basically ammonia or any nitrogen-containing compound which upon reaction with hydrogen over a hydrotreament catalyst can form ammonia.
  • the role of the hydrogen halide scavenger is to react with hydrogen chloride, HCl, (which is the prime hydrogen halide in this connection) to form ammonium chloride (NH 4 Cl), hence "neutralising" the hydrochloric acid which can deactivate the catalyst. Since NH 4 Cl is a salt and can deposit/precipitate on the catalyst or heat exchangers resulting in corrosion under hydrogen media, etc., it was found necessary to keep the temperature of the reactor and the lines thereafter at a sufficiently high level to keep the majority of the NH 4 Cl in the gas phase.
  • ammonia is disadvantageous since the ammonium chloride formed thereby has to be removed. According to this prior art process this is done by contacting the effluents from the reactor with wash water to dissolve the ammonium chloride in a static mixer. The mixed stream from the static mixer is then passed to a high pressure separator where oil, water and gas phases containing NH 4 Cl, NH 3 and H 2 S is then sent to a neutraliser drum.
  • the hydrogen halide scavenger used in this prior art process is ammonia (NH 3 ) or any nitrogen-containing compound which upon reaction with hydrogen over a hydrotreament catalyst (or thermal decomposition) can form ammonia (NH 3 ). Ammonia is very corrosive and can cause serious corrosion problems to the equipment.
  • OSC organic sulphur compounds
  • concentration of these OSC can vary from 5-5000 ppm w/w on sulphur basis.
  • H 2 S hydrogen sulphide
  • Another big source of H 2 S formed in the hydrotreatment reactor is from the decomposition of so called spiking agents added to the feed oil.
  • ammonia or other nitrogen containing compounds to the feed which over the catalyst can form ammonia will result in a) material corrosion b) formation of ammonium sulphide and ammonium chloride which could result in pipe clogging , c) slippage of NH 3 from the system could result in pollution of a harmful compound; and d) need for additional processes and equipment for removal of ammonium chloride and ammonium sulphide such as a static mixer for water wash and neutralizer drum (see page 4, lines 16-23).
  • this prior art process may be configured as a mobile transformer oil treatment unit for on-site re-treatment of oils in transformers.
  • the oil of the transformer is transferred to a transportable storage tank which is also brought on-site. Oil is processed from this tank through the hydrogenation unit and the regenerated oils is transferred to a transportable product oil tank from which regenerated oil later will be returned to the transformer via a vacuum de-gassing unit.
  • insulating paper in the transformer which has adsorbed a considerable quantity of oil, may be damaged by its own weight.
  • the risks for such insulation paper damage are more probable in older transformers.
  • the insulating paper in the transformer may have very high contents of water which may have a negative impact on the performance of the transformer and the oil and water trapped in the insulation paper will retain impurities the removal of which is aimed at by means of the regeneration process thus causing contamination of the regenerated oil and faster oxidation thereof.
  • US-A-4 816 138 relates to a process for converting toxic liquid waste materials containing harmful amounts of biologically difficult to degrade organic halogen compounds into an innocuous hydrocarbon stream wherein the liquid feed is first filtered and then mixed with hydrogen and heated.
  • the warm mixture is passed over an adsorption column filled with alumina of high porosity in order to remove catalyst poisons contained in the feed. Then it is fed to a hydrogenolysis reactor.
  • the effluent from the reactor is cooled by being mixed with water; whereafter the mixture of water-effluent enters a separator. Oil + water go to an expansion tank.
  • the vapour phase is discharged by a gas line and the liquid phase is sent to a phase separation where water and hydrocarbon phase (product line 22) is discharged.
  • the claimed process is contemplated for the treatment of water-containing wastes as well as wastes which are substantially water-free but although transformer oil is mentioned as one example of a waste material to be treated, the claimed process is not particularly suited for transformer oil in view of the fact that the product of the process will have a high content water (water dissolved in hydrocarbon (oil)).
  • US-A-4 840 721 discloses a process for the regeneration of used transformer oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature, which process comprises: a) contacting said used oil with a first hot gaseous hydrogen stream in a first separator; contacting the bottom stream from the first separator with a second hot hydrogen stream in a second separator and separating a second hydrocarbonaceous vapour stream comprising hydrogen to remove sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, the preheating of the hydrogen-oil mixture is performed by contacting with hot hydrogen-rich gaseous; b) passing the second hydrocarbonaceaous vapor stream comprising hydrogen from step a) through a guard reactor in order to remove soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds and obtaining a hydrogen-oil mixture; c) subjecting the hydrogen-oil mixture from step b) to a catalytic hydrogenation in at least one hydrogenation fixed bed at a temperature within the range of from 100
  • no supplementary processes for the removal of ammonia and/or the un-reacted nitrogen-containing compounds are required.
  • no extra processes and equipment for the removal of the salts such as ammonium chloride and ammonium sulfide (which are formed upon the interaction of HCl or H 2 S with ammonia and/or N-containing compounds) is required.
  • a process for the regeneration of a used oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature wherein sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds are removed by filtration and soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds are removed by means of a guard reactor before the used oil is subjected to hydrogenation, the effluent from the hydrogenation step is passed through an adsorbent bed to remove inorganic gases and then to a warm high pressure separator where the gas phase and the liquid hydrocarbon phases are separated. The latter is fed to a stripper unit from the bottom of which the regenerated oil is recovered.
  • used oil may be pumped from the bottom of the transformer via a buffer tank to the filters for the removal of sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds and the regenerated oil is pumped back to the transformer while used oil is still remaining therein thus creating a back-mixing process.
  • Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the process for the regeneration of a used oil according to the invention.
  • the flow pattern in Fig. 1 is presented as "up-flow” flow pattern.
  • the invented process is not limited to "up-flow” flow pattern but down flow pattern could also be applied.
  • a process for the regeneration of a used oil, in particular a used transformer oil, by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature comprises:
  • Water of the aqueous phase mentioned in step h) is partially water initially dissolved in the used oil, partially water formed as a by-product of catalytic hydrogenation of oxygenated compounds presented in the used oil.
  • filters 1 and 2 which can be operated alternating.
  • filters 1 and 2 are filter bags or plated filter cartridges rating from 1 to 100 microns, preferably from 1 to 50 microns.
  • FIG. 1 The flow pattern in Fig. 1 is schematically presented as up-flow mode (oil introduced from the bottom of the reactors 3, 4 and 5).
  • a down-flow mode (oil introduced from the top of the reactors 3, 4 and 5) is also in the scope of the present invention where the oil flows downwards through the reactors 3, 4 and 5. The rest of the process is the same with both down-flow and up-flow modes.
  • the combinations of up-flow and down-flow modes through the reactors 3, 4 and 5 is also covered by this invention.
  • the reaction mixture of oil and hydrogen thus obtained is heated up to a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C, preferably from 200°C to 400°C and is then fed to catalytic guard reactors 3 and 4, operating alternatingly.
  • the guard reactor is operated at pressure within the range of 1 to 200 bars and preferably at 1 to 100 bars.
  • the reaction mixture is contacted with a catalyst with lower hydrotreatment activity, having wider pore size distribution.
  • Hydrogenation refers to the process of addition of hydrogen to the oil molecules to be refined.
  • Hydrogenation catalyst refers to substance which under operational condition by activation of hydrogen and the organic molecule could promote hydrogen addition reactions.
  • the conventional hydrotreatment catalyst in hydrogenation reactor (5) is usually comprised of one or more components of Group VIB metals of Table of Elements with one or more Group VIII non-noble metals of Table of Elements as promoters on a refractory support.
  • Hydrotreating catalyst generally contain Mo or W (or their combinations) as the group VI metal on alumina support promoted with cobalt, nickel, iron or combination thereof as the group VIII metal(s).
  • the amount of group VIII metal(s) component on the catalyst can vary from about 0.5 to 15 wt%; and the amount of group VIB metal(s) component can vary from 1 to 30 wt%.
  • the catalytic active metals are supported on low acidity porous support such as silica-alumina or alumina.
  • the metals on the catalyst are in sulphided state and during the hydrotreatment they should stay sulphided in order to exhibit their highest activity.
  • the catalyst can be: a) pre-sulphided, b) in-situ sulphided; or c) both a and b.
  • the active component of the catalyst should remain in sulphided state for highest activity.
  • the sulphide state of the active catalyst component in the course of hydrotreatment is maintained by: i) interaction of the catalyst active metals with H 2 S generated by hydrodesul-furization of sulphur-containing compound of the feed; and/or ii) by injection of a spiking agent to the feed.
  • any sulphur-containing compound, which upon hydrotreating conditions can undergo hydrogenation and decomposition to form hydrogen sulphide can be used.
  • Hydrotreating catalysts are commercially available, among others, catalysts from Tops ⁇ e, Albemarle; and Criterion could be used.
  • the catalyst in the guard reactor (3 and 4) is designated to trap and remove the metals from oil-soluble organo-metallic compounds such as organo-copper and organo-iron compounds in the feed used oil (de-metalation catalyst).
  • oil-soluble organo-metallic compounds such as organo-copper and organo-iron compounds in the feed used oil (de-metalation catalyst).
  • Such catalysts are similar to hydrogenation catalyst discussed earlier.
  • the active metals are supported on a large surface area support having wider pores and wider average pore size distribution, preferably having bimodal pore size distribution. It is widely known to the people familiar with the art of hydrotreatment and hydroprocessing that the guard reactor performance is maximized by grading the catalyst bed. The optimum bed grading is achieved by combination of e.g.
  • inert materials low or medium hydrogenation activity catalyst, variation in the carrier's surface area/pore size distribution and the catalyst shape along with catalyst particle sizes.
  • examples of commercially available hydrotreatment guard reactor catalysts are Ketjenfine KG 5, Ketjenfine KF 542, Ketjenfine KG 1, Ketjenfine KG 3 from and TK-711 and TK-551 from Tops ⁇ e.
  • the guard reactors 3 and 4 effectively remove organo-metallic species such as oil-soluble organo-copper and organo-iron compounds which may poison the hydrogenation catalyst from the oil to be regenerated. The presence of such organo-copper and organo-iron-compounds in the regenerated oil will deteriorate the performance of the transformer oil and the insulation properties of the transformer's copper windings insulation paper.
  • doping of the used oil to be regenerated may be performed by adding an organo-sulfur compound or organo-sulphur compounds (so-called spiking agent) before the oil is fed to guard reactors 3 and 4.
  • organo-sulfur compound or organo-sulphur compounds such as spiking agent
  • spiking agents may be any organo-sulphur compound which upon heating at a temperature >100°C over a hydrotreating catalyst can react with hydrogen or to decompose to produce H 2 S.
  • the aim of the spiking agent is to keep the catalyst in sulphide form.
  • the concentration of the spiking agent may vary between 10 and 1000 ppmw calculated on the feed oil.
  • the stream from guard reactors 3 and 4 is fed to a main hydrogenation fixed-bed reactor 5 in which the oil-hydrogen mixture is contacted with a highly active hydrogenation catalyst at temperatures within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at pressures within the range from 1 bar to 200 bars, preferably at a temperature of 200-400°C and a pressure of 1-100 bars.
  • More than one reactor 5 can be applied in series, containing single bed or staged graded catalyst bed. Catalysts used are as aforementioned.
  • the undesired oxygen-containing molecules in the oil are catalytically converted in reactor 5 to desired ones by the catalytically addition of hydrogen to their structure.
  • the undesired reactive organo-sulphur containing compounds in the oil are also catalytically converted in reactor 5 to desired ones by the catalytically addition of hydrogen to their structure (hence the regenerated oil will have less or non corrosivity tendency toward the metal surfaces in the transformer).
  • Hydrogenation, hydrodesulphurization, hydrodeoxy-genation and, if required, hydrodechlorination reactions are carried out simultaneously over the hydrogenation catalyst in reactor 5.
  • the residence time of the oil in reactor 5, in terms of Liquid Hourly Space Velocity, LHSV, could be in the range of 0.1 to 15 h -1 ; and preferably in the range of 2 to 8 h -1 .
  • the preferred hydrogen-to-oil ratio (at STP) is in the range of 10 to 300 on volume basis and more preferably in the range of 10 to 100 (at STP).
  • the effluent from reactor 5 is passed through an adsorbent bed 6 or 7 in order to remove inorganic gases, i.e. H 2 S and possibly HCl, formed by the hydrogenation step in reactor 5 in which the H 2 S is formed by hydrogenation of the reactive organic sulphur compounds in the used transformer oil whereas the HCl is formed by the hydrogenation of chlorine containing molecules such as PCBs in the feed used transformer oil (i.e. if the feed contain PCBs).
  • the hydrogen chloride gas formed in reactor 5 can be adsorbed in adsorbent beds 6 or 7.
  • the adsorbent of adsorbent beds 6 or 7 for the adsorption of hydrogen chloride gas part thereof may be used for adsorption of hydrogen sulphide gas.
  • Adsorbent materials for use in adsorbent beds 6 and 7 are primarily based on alkaline and alkaline earth compounds which are commercially available, such as those which are discussed later in the text in connection with sorbent beds 12 and 13.
  • adsorbent bed 6 and/or 7 After having passed an adsorbent bed 6 and/or 7 the stream thus purified from inorganic gases, mainly hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen chloride, is fed to a warm high pressure separator 8 where it is separated into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase. Separator 8 is operated at a temperature within the range of from 40 to 200 °C and at a pressure within the range from 1 to 200 bars, preferably at from 50 to 150°C and from 1 to 100 bars.
  • the liquid hydrocarbon phase leaving the warm high pressure separator 8 is subjected to a stripping process in a stripper unit 10 which may be operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, i.e. under pressures within the range of 1-760 mmHg and a temperature within the range of 10-200°C.
  • a stripper unit 10 which may be operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, i.e. under pressures within the range of 1-760 mmHg and a temperature within the range of 10-200°C.
  • nitrogen gas is used for the stripping process.
  • Regenerated oil is recovered from the condenser bottom of the stripper unit 10 (Line 1), whereas the gas phase is fed to a cold separator 11 to be separated into one mostly hydrocarbon phase, one mostly aqueous phase (i.e. two liquid phases; and a gas phase).
  • the liquid phases from cold separator 11 are sent to disposal (Lines 2, 3).
  • said process also comprises a first additional step, wherein the gas phase leaving the warm high pressure separator 8 is separated into a gas phase, a liquid hydrocarbon phase and an aqueous phase in a cold high pressure separator 9, and a second additional step wherein the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the cold high pressure separator 9 is fed into the stripper unit 10 while the aqueous phase is sent to disposal (Line 3).
  • Cold high pressure separator 9 may be operated at pressures within the range of from 1 to 200 bars and at temperatures within the range of from 30 to 100°C.
  • the separator 11 may be operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, preferably within the range of from 1 to 760 mmHg and at temperatures of 25°C to 120°C.
  • the gas phase from the respective cold separators 9 and 11 is preferably passed through sorption beds 13 and 12, respectively, in order to remove hydrogen sulphide and potentially hydrogen chloride gases.
  • the gas phases from separators 9 and 11 may be mixed and passed through a common sorption bed.
  • adsorbent beds 6 and 7 are omitted and thus the effluent from the hydrogenation fixed-bed 5 is fed directly into the warm high pressure separator 8.
  • the gas phase leaving warm high pressure separator 8 is subjected to a further separation in a cold high pressure separator 9 into two liquid phases and a gas phase whereas the liquid phase leaving warm high pressure separator 8 is fed to the stripper unit 10 as in the basic process illustrated in the drawing.
  • the gas phase obtained from the stripper unit 10 is subjected to a separation in a cold separator 11 into two liquid phases (one thereof being a mostly hydrocarbon phase and the other being a mostly aqueous phase) and a gas phase. Furthermore, like in case of the basic process, the gas phases from the cold high pressure separator 9 and cold separator 11, respectively, are passed through at least one sorbent bed 13 and 12, respectively, in order to remove at least one of mercaptanes and H 2 S therefrom.
  • the sorbent beds 12 and 13 can be filled with any inorganic compound or mixture of inorganic compounds that upon reaction with H 2 S and traces of HCl gases is able to form the corresponding stable metal sulphides and chlorides, respectively, and thereby removing said gases from the gas stream.
  • Materials suited for use in the sorbent beds 12 and 13 are commercially available and are based e.g.
  • iron oxides such as SulfatreatTM, Sulfur-RiteTM and Meida-G2TM
  • transition metal oxides such as ZnO and other mixed transition metal oxides doped with alkaline oxides deposited on alumina (e.g. PuraspecTM products); or activated carbon impregnated/deposited with alkali metal carbonate (such as Sofno-CarbTM).
  • the sorbent beds 12 and 13 are preferably packed with dual trap materials, one thereof being specifically adapted for the removal of HCl and the other for the removal of H 2 S.
  • the purified gas stream leaving sorbent beds 12 and 13 is passed through a catalytic combustor or a burner 14 where complete combustion of the flue gases to water and carbon dioxide is carried out or part or all of the purified gas stream is recycled through a gas compressor 15.
  • said gas phases are passed through a hydrogen purifier membrane in order to separate hydrogen gas from H 2 S, O 2 , N 2 and CO 2 .
  • the hydrogen lean stream from the hydrogen purifying membrane is fed to sorbent beds 12 and 13.
  • Hydrogen rich stream from the purifier membrane is fed to the gas compressor 15 to be recycled in the process whereas the hydrogen lean gases leaving sorbent beds 12 and 13 are sent to the catalytic combustor or burner 14. Part of the purified hydrogen may also be sent to burning by the burner 14.
  • the gas membrane to be used in this embodiment will be operated by a size exclusion approach.
  • Such membranes are commercially available, e.g. MedalTM from Air Liquide.
  • the process according to the invention is carried out in a mobile plant unit.
  • the mobile plant is placed on-site in the vicinity of a transformer and used transformer oil is pumped from the bottom of the transformer to a buffer tank before being subjected to the regeneration process according to the invention starting with step a) of said process and regenerated transformer oil from step g) of said process is returned into the transformer thus carrying out the process in a recirculation mode avoiding complete emptying of the transformer.
  • the regenerated oil when being pumped back into the transformer, will be contacted with non-regenerated oil therein (back-mixing) and become contaminated. For that reason the regeneration process should be continued until the volume of oil that has passed through the regeneration system is several times the volume of oil originally contained in the transformer, preferably at least three times that volume.
  • the volume of oil that has passed through the regeneration system is several times the volume of oil originally contained in the transformer, preferably at least three times that volume.
  • contaminated oil that is held by the insulating paper in the transformer and that would remain therein if completely emptying the transformer, will be brought into the circulation system and thus regenerated according to the present invention and there is no risk of causing damage to the insulating paper due to the own weight of said paper with oil adsorbed therein.
  • Such re-circulation will also help in removing the excess water in the transformer's insulating paper (in which some organic acid might be dissolved) and shift the paper water-oil equilibrium.
  • the used transformer oil is subjected to a treatment step before starting the regeneration process according to this embodiment.
  • the used transformer oil after being filtered for removal of coarse materials in filters (1 or 2), is fed to the stripper (10). This is done for dewatering (dehydration) of the transformer oil.
  • the stripper (10) is in this case operated at temperatures of 10-150°C and pressures of 1-760 mm Hg. The dehydrated oil is returned to the transformer and the removed water is collected from Line 3.
  • the used oil from the transformer is discharged to a separated dedicated tank called the feed tank.
  • the used transformer oil is further pumped from the aforementioned feed tank to the mobile regeneration unit for being regenerated.
  • the regenerated oil from the regeneration unit is fed to a receiver tank for the regenerated transformer oil with restored oil's electrical properties and will contain no or negligible amounts of oil-soluble organo-copper and organo-iron compounds.
  • Example 2 Similarly to Example 1 the required TAN and electrical properties are restored to the values required for good transformer oil.
  • Highly oxidised transformer oils were subjected to regeneration at conditions typical of examples one and two.
  • the copper content of the feed used oils (I-III) and their corresponding regenerated oils (I-III) were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry with graphite oven.
  • Table 3 the invented process completely removed the soluble in oil organo-copper compounds. Up to 80% of the soluble in oil organo-iron compounds were also removed. All the non-treated used oil samples failed the CCD test.
  • the regeneration of these oils resulted in an oil which passed the state of the art CCD test, indicating that the corrosive organic sulphur compounds in oil are removed by the process described in this invention.
  • Table 3 The properties of the feed used oils (I-III) and their corresponding regenerated oil (I-III).

Description

    Technical field
  • The present invention relates to a process for the regeneration of a used oil. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the regeneration of a used oil, in particular a used transformer oil, by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and at an elevated temperature.
  • Background
  • Hydrocarbon oils used in industrial and other environments, e.g. transformer oils, will gradually deteriorate over time due to oxidation of the hydrocarbons and contamination by other impurities. The oxidation results in compounds such as acids, ketones, phenols and other oxygen containing molecules being formed in the oil. Some of these molecules are strongly polar and will be oriented in an electrical field giving field losses when the oil is used as a transformer oil.
  • In addition some transformer oils may have been added/contaminated with halogenated organic compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), the disposal or recycling of which possesses environmental hazards.
  • It is known to the people familiar with the transformers and transformer oil performance that metal dissolution from the copper winding or the core to the oil can take place. These metals; namely copper and to lower extent iron, will be present and are soluble in the oil as organo-copper and organo-iron compounds. Such compounds are detrimental to the transformer oil and to the insulation paper around the copper windings. Organo-copper and organo-iron compounds are known catalysts for catalytic oxidation of transformer oils. Hence, removal of these compounds from the used transformer oil will greatly improve the oxidation stability of the oil. Additionally, these organo-metallic compounds, mostly organo-copper compounds, could deteriorate the insulation properties of the insulation paper around the copper windings. In this case spots of copper oxide and/or copper sulphides can be formed on the insulation paper which will deteriorate the insulation properties of the insulating paper. Here the copper oxide is being formed by interaction of organo-copper compounds with oxygen (or oxygenated compounds in the oil), whereas the copper sulphides are formed by interaction of organo-copper compounds with reactive organic sulphur compounds (OSC) present in the used old transformer oil.
  • Therefore, ideally one should also be able to remove the reactive organic sulphur compounds from the used oil. The detection of the presence of the reactive, and hence corrosive OSC, in the oil is usually carried out by following their interactions with copper strip e.g. ASTM D130. The requirement for non-corrosiveness toward the copper surfaces has become increasingly stringent during the years. Used transformer oil which is in need of the regeneration may not pass the current anti-corrosion requirements although it has passed the requirements of the time when the oil was commissioned. Current state of the art test for corrosive sulphur compounds is the Cigre test A2Wg32, commonly known as CCD test (for 72 hours). Ideally, regenerated oils should pass the CCD test. This means that the regeneration technique should be able to remove the corrosive organic sulphur compounds in the used transformer oil.
  • The oil to be regenerated can either be collected and transported to the regeneration facilities or be regenerated on-site. The former approach involves blending and logistical complications.
  • The on-site oil-reclamation approach is commonly carried out using adsorption methods, in which the used oxidised oil, e.g. a transformer oil, to be regenerated is passed over a solid adsorbent, which adsorbs the highly polar oxidised molecules. The saturated solid adsorbent is itself regenerated by combustion at elevated temperatures.
  • A used oil containing oxygenated species can, however, also be regenerated chemically, in particular by the application of hydrotreatment technology. Hydrogenation effectively converts all the oxygenated organic molecules, both polar and non-polar oxygenated species, into less harmful compounds. The hydrogenation technique also provides the opportunity to remove polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other halogenated compounds from the oil.
  • Advantages in employment of the hydrotreatment technology to regeneration of oxidised oil is that in addition to the removal of highly polar oxidised molecules also less polar oxidised molecules could effectively be converted. This is of particular importance since if the oxidised molecules with lower polarity remain in the regenerated oil, they could continue the oxidation process and deteriorate the quality of the regenerated oil in a shorter period of time.
  • Regeneration of different kinds of used oils by means of hydrogenation is extensively described in patent literature.
  • Thus WO94/14731 discloses a process for simultaneous removal of halide from a halide containing organic compound and reduction of an oxygen containing compound in a hydrocarbon oil by exposing the oil to a catalyst in the presence of hydrogen and a hydrogen halide scavenger resulting in the reduction of the oxygen containing compound and the conversion of the halide to hydrohalic acid which is neutralized with the hydrogen halide scavenger. The hydrogen halide i.e. the HCl is formed by hydrogenation of the PCBs in the used transformer oil. Hydrogen halides, besides being harmful substances can also cause metallurgical corrosion problems.
  • The hydrogen halide scavenger used in this prior art process is basically ammonia or any nitrogen-containing compound which upon reaction with hydrogen over a hydrotreament catalyst can form ammonia.
  • The role of the hydrogen halide scavenger is to react with hydrogen chloride, HCl, (which is the prime hydrogen halide in this connection) to form ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), hence "neutralising" the hydrochloric acid which can deactivate the catalyst. Since NH4Cl is a salt and can deposit/precipitate on the catalyst or heat exchangers resulting in corrosion under hydrogen media, etc., it was found necessary to keep the temperature of the reactor and the lines thereafter at a sufficiently high level to keep the majority of the NH4Cl in the gas phase.
  • The use of ammonia is disadvantageous since the ammonium chloride formed thereby has to be removed. According to this prior art process this is done by contacting the effluents from the reactor with wash water to dissolve the ammonium chloride in a static mixer. The mixed stream from the static mixer is then passed to a high pressure separator where oil, water and gas phases containing NH4Cl, NH3 and H2S is then sent to a neutraliser drum. As mentioned the hydrogen halide scavenger used in this prior art process is ammonia (NH3) or any nitrogen-containing compound which upon reaction with hydrogen over a hydrotreament catalyst (or thermal decomposition) can form ammonia (NH3). Ammonia is very corrosive and can cause serious corrosion problems to the equipment. Additionally, as in most of the transformer oils certain amount of organic sulphur compounds (OSC) exist. The concentration of these OSC can vary from 5-5000 ppm w/w on sulphur basis. During the hydrotreatment of the used transformer oils a certain amount of these OSC might react with hydrogen to form hydrogen sulphide, H2S, gas. Another big source of H2S formed in the hydrotreatment reactor is from the decomposition of so called spiking agents added to the feed oil. To those familiar with the art of hydrotreatment over conventional hydrotreatment catalysts consisting of cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, tungsten and their binary and tertiary combinations it is known that the catalyst should be kept on the so called sulphided state. This means that the metals on the catalyst are in sulphided form. This is achieved by addition of the so called spiking agents to the feed to the hydrotreater reactors. The spiking agents depending on their nature decompose at certain temperature yielding H2S which in turn reacts with the metal to form metal sulphides. To keep the catalyst in sulphided state (that is active catalyst) a certain amount of H2S should be present at any given time in the feed. H2S will also react with ammonia resulting in the formation of ammonium sulphide. Ammonium sulphide can in turns result in pipe clogging at places where the temperature is relatively lower. Hence, addition of ammonia or other nitrogen containing compounds to the feed which over the catalyst can form ammonia will result in a) material corrosion b) formation of ammonium sulphide and ammonium chloride which could result in pipe clogging , c) slippage of NH3 from the system could result in pollution of a harmful compound; and d) need for additional processes and equipment for removal of ammonium chloride and ammonium sulphide such as a static mixer for water wash and neutralizer drum (see page 4, lines 16-23).
  • According to page 21 of WO94/14731 this prior art process may be configured as a mobile transformer oil treatment unit for on-site re-treatment of oils in transformers. In doing this the oil of the transformer is transferred to a transportable storage tank which is also brought on-site. Oil is processed from this tank through the hydrogenation unit and the regenerated oils is transferred to a transportable product oil tank from which regenerated oil later will be returned to the transformer via a vacuum de-gassing unit.
  • Emptying the transformer as thus contemplated by this process has disadvantages as insulating paper in the transformer, which has adsorbed a considerable quantity of oil, may be damaged by its own weight. The risks for such insulation paper damage are more probable in older transformers. Moreover, the insulating paper in the transformer may have very high contents of water which may have a negative impact on the performance of the transformer and the oil and water trapped in the insulation paper will retain impurities the removal of which is aimed at by means of the regeneration process thus causing contamination of the regenerated oil and faster oxidation thereof.
  • US-A-4 816 138 relates to a process for converting toxic liquid waste materials containing harmful amounts of biologically difficult to degrade organic halogen compounds into an innocuous hydrocarbon stream wherein the liquid feed is first filtered and then mixed with hydrogen and heated. According to one embodiment the warm mixture is passed over an adsorption column filled with alumina of high porosity in order to remove catalyst poisons contained in the feed. Then it is fed to a hydrogenolysis reactor. The effluent from the reactor is cooled by being mixed with water; whereafter the mixture of water-effluent enters a separator. Oil + water go to an expansion tank. The vapour phase is discharged by a gas line and the liquid phase is sent to a phase separation where water and hydrocarbon phase (product line 22) is discharged. The claimed process is contemplated for the treatment of water-containing wastes as well as wastes which are substantially water-free but although transformer oil is mentioned as one example of a waste material to be treated, the claimed process is not particularly suited for transformer oil in view of the fact that the product of the process will have a high content water (water dissolved in hydrocarbon (oil)).
  • US-A-4 840 721 discloses a process for the regeneration of used transformer oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature, which process comprises: a) contacting said used oil with a first hot gaseous hydrogen stream in a first separator; contacting the bottom stream from the first separator with a second hot hydrogen stream in a second separator and separating a second hydrocarbonaceous vapour stream comprising hydrogen to remove sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, the preheating of the hydrogen-oil mixture is performed by contacting with hot hydrogen-rich gaseous; b) passing the second hydrocarbonaceaous vapor stream comprising hydrogen from step a) through a guard reactor in order to remove soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds and obtaining a hydrogen-oil mixture; c) subjecting the hydrogen-oil mixture from step b) to a catalytic hydrogenation in at least one hydrogenation fixed bed at a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at an elevated pressure; d) contacting the effluent from step c) with a scrubbing solution to remove inorganic gases formed in step c); e) separating the stream from step d) in a warm high pressure separator into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase; f) stabilizing the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the warm high pressure separator in a low pressure vapour/liquid separator; and g) recovering the regenerated oil from the bottom of the separator, which process is carried out for the recycle of hydrocarbonaceaous waste streams.
  • Summary of the invention
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used oil which process may be operated without any supply of water.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used oil which process results in a minor waste water phase.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used oil which process can be applied to a mobile processing unit for use on-site.
  • It is still another object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used transformer oil which process can be applied to a mobile processing unit for use on-site without the need of emptying the transformer completely of oil.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used transformer oil which process can be applied to a mobile processing unit for use on-site with reduced risk of causing damage to insulation paper in the transformer.
  • It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used transformer oil which process can be applied to a mobile processing unit for use on-site resulting also in regeneration of used oil withheld by insulating paper in the transformer.
  • It is also an object of the present invention to provide a process for the regeneration of a used oil which process may be operated without addition of ammonia or any other nitrogen-containing compound that can form ammonia upon decomposition or by hydrogenation over the catalyst bed. Hence, no supplementary processes for the removal of ammonia and/or the un-reacted nitrogen-containing compounds are required. In such way also no extra processes and equipment for the removal of the salts such as ammonium chloride and ammonium sulfide (which are formed upon the interaction of HCl or H2S with ammonia and/or N-containing compounds) is required. These and other objects are achieved according to the present invention by a process for the regeneration of a used oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature wherein sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds are removed by filtration and soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds are removed by means of a guard reactor before the used oil is subjected to hydrogenation, the effluent from the hydrogenation step is passed through an adsorbent bed to remove inorganic gases and then to a warm high pressure separator where the gas phase and the liquid hydrocarbon phases are separated. The latter is fed to a stripper unit from the bottom of which the regenerated oil is recovered.
  • When applying the process of the present invention to a mobile processing unit for use on-site for the regeneration of a transformer oil, used oil may be pumped from the bottom of the transformer via a buffer tank to the filters for the removal of sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds and the regenerated oil is pumped back to the transformer while used oil is still remaining therein thus creating a back-mixing process.
  • Brief description of the figure
  • Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the process for the regeneration of a used oil according to the invention. The flow pattern in Fig. 1 is presented as "up-flow" flow pattern. However, the invented process is not limited to "up-flow" flow pattern but down flow pattern could also be applied.
  • Detailed description of the invention
  • According to the present invention as described in claim 1 a process for the regeneration of a used oil, in particular a used transformer oil, by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature is provided, which process comprises:
    1. a) filtrating said used oil to remove sludge and insoluble in oil organometallic compounds whereafter pressurized hydrogen gas is added and the hydrogen-oil mixture thus obtained is subjected to a preheatment;
    2. b) passing the preheated mixture from step a) through a guard reactor in order to remove soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds which may poison the hydrogenation catalysts and by their presence in the regenerated oil will cause problems in the quality of the regenerated oil as well as the performance of the transformer itself;
    3. c) subjecting the hydrogen-oil mixture from step b) to a catalytic hydrogenation in at least one hydrogenation fixed-bed at a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at an elevated pressure;
    4. d) passing the effluent from step c) through an adsorbent bed to remove inorganic gases (H2S and HCl) formed in step c);
    5. e) separating the stream from step d) in a warm high pressure separator into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase;
    6. f) subjecting the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the warm high pressure separator to a stripping process in a stripper unit; and
    7. g) recovering the regenerated oil from the bottom of the stripper unit.
  • According to a preferred embodiment the process according to the present invention additionally comprises:
    • h) separating the gas phase from the warm high pressure separator used in step e) into a gas phase, a liquid hydrocarbon phase and an aqueous phase in a cold high pressure separator; and
    • i) feeding said liquid hydrocarbon phase from step h) into the stripper unit and the aqueous phase to disposal.
  • Water of the aqueous phase mentioned in step h) is partially water initially dissolved in the used oil, partially water formed as a by-product of catalytic hydrogenation of oxygenated compounds presented in the used oil.
  • The invention will now become further described with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a diagrammatic representation of the process according to the invention applied to the generation of used transformer oil and which embodiment represents the best mode contemplated at present for carrying out the invention.
  • Referring to Fig. 1, a feed of used transformer oil is passed through filters 1 and 2, which can be operated alternating. Examples of the applicable filters are filter bags or plated filter cartridges rating from 1 to 100 microns, preferably from 1 to 50 microns.
  • The flow pattern in Fig. 1 is schematically presented as up-flow mode (oil introduced from the bottom of the reactors 3, 4 and 5). A down-flow mode (oil introduced from the top of the reactors 3, 4 and 5) is also in the scope of the present invention where the oil flows downwards through the reactors 3, 4 and 5. The rest of the process is the same with both down-flow and up-flow modes. The combinations of up-flow and down-flow modes through the reactors 3, 4 and 5 is also covered by this invention.
  • After the feed oil having passed a filter 1 or 2 hydrogen is introduced thereinto. Both fresh and recycled hydrogen gas can be used fully or partially. However, the purity of the hydrogen should be above 90% by volume.
  • The reaction mixture of oil and hydrogen thus obtained is heated up to a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C, preferably from 200°C to 400°C and is then fed to catalytic guard reactors 3 and 4, operating alternatingly. The guard reactor is operated at pressure within the range of 1 to 200 bars and preferably at 1 to 100 bars. In the guard reactor(s) the reaction mixture is contacted with a catalyst with lower hydrotreatment activity, having wider pore size distribution. Hydrogenation refers to the process of addition of hydrogen to the oil molecules to be refined. Hydrogenation catalyst refers to substance which under operational condition by activation of hydrogen and the organic molecule could promote hydrogen addition reactions. The conventional hydrotreatment catalyst in hydrogenation reactor (5) is usually comprised of one or more components of Group VIB metals of Table of Elements with one or more Group VIII non-noble metals of Table of Elements as promoters on a refractory support. Hydrotreating catalyst generally contain Mo or W (or their combinations) as the group VI metal on alumina support promoted with cobalt, nickel, iron or combination thereof as the group VIII metal(s). The amount of group VIII metal(s) component on the catalyst can vary from about 0.5 to 15 wt%; and the amount of group VIB metal(s) component can vary from 1 to 30 wt%. The catalytic active metals are supported on low acidity porous support such as silica-alumina or alumina. The metals on the catalyst are in sulphided state and during the hydrotreatment they should stay sulphided in order to exhibit their highest activity. The catalyst can be: a) pre-sulphided, b) in-situ sulphided; or c) both a and b. During the hydrotreating process the active component of the catalyst should remain in sulphided state for highest activity. The sulphide state of the active catalyst component in the course of hydrotreatment is maintained by: i) interaction of the catalyst active metals with H2S generated by hydrodesul-furization of sulphur-containing compound of the feed; and/or ii) by injection of a spiking agent to the feed. In the latter case any sulphur-containing compound, which upon hydrotreating conditions can undergo hydrogenation and decomposition to form hydrogen sulphide can be used. Hydrotreating catalysts are commercially available, among others, catalysts from Topsøe, Albemarle; and Criterion could be used.
  • The catalyst in the guard reactor (3 and 4) is designated to trap and remove the metals from oil-soluble organo-metallic compounds such as organo-copper and organo-iron compounds in the feed used oil (de-metalation catalyst). Such catalysts are similar to hydrogenation catalyst discussed earlier. However, in the case of guard reactor catalyst, the active metals are supported on a large surface area support having wider pores and wider average pore size distribution, preferably having bimodal pore size distribution. It is widely known to the people familiar with the art of hydrotreatment and hydroprocessing that the guard reactor performance is maximized by grading the catalyst bed. The optimum bed grading is achieved by combination of e.g. inert materials, low or medium hydrogenation activity catalyst, variation in the carrier's surface area/pore size distribution and the catalyst shape along with catalyst particle sizes. Examples of commercially available hydrotreatment guard reactor catalysts are Ketjenfine KG 5, Ketjenfine KF 542, Ketjenfine KG 1, Ketjenfine KG 3 from and TK-711 and TK-551 from Topsøe. The guard reactors 3 and 4 effectively remove organo-metallic species such as oil-soluble organo-copper and organo-iron compounds which may poison the hydrogenation catalyst from the oil to be regenerated. The presence of such organo-copper and organo-iron-compounds in the regenerated oil will deteriorate the performance of the transformer oil and the insulation properties of the transformer's copper windings insulation paper.
  • According to an embodiment of the process according to the present invention doping of the used oil to be regenerated may be performed by adding an organo-sulfur compound or organo-sulphur compounds (so-called spiking agent) before the oil is fed to guard reactors 3 and 4. Such spiking agents may be any organo-sulphur compound which upon heating at a temperature >100°C over a hydrotreating catalyst can react with hydrogen or to decompose to produce H2S. The aim of the spiking agent is to keep the catalyst in sulphide form. The concentration of the spiking agent may vary between 10 and 1000 ppmw calculated on the feed oil.
  • The stream from guard reactors 3 and 4 is fed to a main hydrogenation fixed-bed reactor 5 in which the oil-hydrogen mixture is contacted with a highly active hydrogenation catalyst at temperatures within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at pressures within the range from 1 bar to 200 bars, preferably at a temperature of 200-400°C and a pressure of 1-100 bars.
  • More than one reactor 5 can be applied in series, containing single bed or staged graded catalyst bed. Catalysts used are as aforementioned.
  • The undesired oxygen-containing molecules in the oil are catalytically converted in reactor 5 to desired ones by the catalytically addition of hydrogen to their structure.
    The undesired reactive organo-sulphur containing compounds in the oil are also catalytically converted in reactor 5 to desired ones by the catalytically addition of hydrogen to their structure (hence the regenerated oil will have less or non corrosivity tendency toward the metal surfaces in the transformer). Hydrogenation, hydrodesulphurization, hydrodeoxy-genation and, if required, hydrodechlorination reactions are carried out simultaneously over the hydrogenation catalyst in reactor 5.
  • The residence time of the oil in reactor 5, in terms of Liquid Hourly Space Velocity, LHSV, could be in the range of 0.1 to 15 h-1; and preferably in the range of 2 to 8 h-1. The preferred hydrogen-to-oil ratio (at STP) is in the range of 10 to 300 on volume basis and more preferably in the range of 10 to 100 (at STP).
  • The effluent from reactor 5 is passed through an adsorbent bed 6 or 7 in order to remove inorganic gases, i.e. H2S and possibly HCl, formed by the hydrogenation step in reactor 5 in which the H2S is formed by hydrogenation of the reactive organic sulphur compounds in the used transformer oil whereas the HCl is formed by the hydrogenation of chlorine containing molecules such as PCBs in the feed used transformer oil (i.e. if the feed contain PCBs). If the used oil to be treated by the process of the present invention contains PCBs, the hydrogen chloride gas formed in reactor 5 can be adsorbed in adsorbent beds 6 or 7. In addition to the use of the adsorbent of adsorbent beds 6 or 7 for the adsorption of hydrogen chloride gas part thereof may be used for adsorption of hydrogen sulphide gas.
  • Adsorbent materials for use in adsorbent beds 6 and 7 are primarily based on alkaline and alkaline earth compounds which are commercially available, such as those which are discussed later in the text in connection with sorbent beds 12 and 13.
  • After having passed an adsorbent bed 6 and/or 7 the stream thus purified from inorganic gases, mainly hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen chloride, is fed to a warm high pressure separator 8 where it is separated into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase. Separator 8 is operated at a temperature within the range of from 40 to 200 °C and at a pressure within the range from 1 to 200 bars, preferably at from 50 to 150°C and from 1 to 100 bars.
  • The liquid hydrocarbon phase leaving the warm high pressure separator 8 is subjected to a stripping process in a stripper unit 10 which may be operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, i.e. under pressures within the range of 1-760 mmHg and a temperature within the range of 10-200°C. Preferably nitrogen gas is used for the stripping process.
  • Regenerated oil is recovered from the condenser bottom of the stripper unit 10 (Line 1), whereas the gas phase is fed to a cold separator 11 to be separated into one mostly hydrocarbon phase, one mostly aqueous phase (i.e. two liquid phases; and a gas phase). The liquid phases from cold separator 11 are sent to disposal (Lines 2, 3).
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention said process also comprises a first additional step, wherein the gas phase leaving the warm high pressure separator 8 is separated into a gas phase, a liquid hydrocarbon phase and an aqueous phase in a cold high pressure separator 9, and a second additional step wherein the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the cold high pressure separator 9 is fed into the stripper unit 10 while the aqueous phase is sent to disposal (Line 3).
  • Cold high pressure separator 9 may be operated at pressures within the range of from 1 to 200 bars and at temperatures within the range of from 30 to 100°C. The separator 11 may be operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures, preferably within the range of from 1 to 760 mmHg and at temperatures of 25°C to 120°C.
  • The gas phase from the respective cold separators 9 and 11 is preferably passed through sorption beds 13 and 12, respectively, in order to remove hydrogen sulphide and potentially hydrogen chloride gases. Alternatively the gas phases from separators 9 and 11 may be mixed and passed through a common sorption bed.
  • According to a modification of the process, as described in claim 13, especially when regenerating PCB free oils, illustrated in the drawing adsorbent beds 6 and 7 are omitted and thus the effluent from the hydrogenation fixed-bed 5 is fed directly into the warm high pressure separator 8. The gas phase leaving warm high pressure separator 8 is subjected to a further separation in a cold high pressure separator 9 into two liquid phases and a gas phase whereas the liquid phase leaving warm high pressure separator 8 is fed to the stripper unit 10 as in the basic process illustrated in the drawing. Like in case of the basic process the gas phase obtained from the stripper unit 10 is subjected to a separation in a cold separator 11 into two liquid phases (one thereof being a mostly hydrocarbon phase and the other being a mostly aqueous phase) and a gas phase. Furthermore, like in case of the basic process, the gas phases from the cold high pressure separator 9 and cold separator 11, respectively, are passed through at least one sorbent bed 13 and 12, respectively, in order to remove at least one of mercaptanes and H2S therefrom.
  • As an alternative to the feeding of the gas streams from cold high pressure separator 9 and cold separator 11 to separate sorbent beds 13 and 12 as shown in the drawing, said streams may be combined and fed alternatingly to one of the two sorbent beds 12 and 13 shown in the drawing.
    Principally the sorbent beds 12 and 13 can be filled with any inorganic compound or mixture of inorganic compounds that upon reaction with H2S and traces of HCl gases is able to form the corresponding stable metal sulphides and chlorides, respectively, and thereby removing said gases from the gas stream.
    Materials suited for use in the sorbent beds 12 and 13 are commercially available and are based e.g. on iron oxides (such as Sulfatreat™, Sulfur-Rite™ and Meida-G2™); transition metal oxides such as ZnO and other mixed transition metal oxides doped with alkaline oxides deposited on alumina (e.g. Puraspec™ products); or activated carbon impregnated/deposited with alkali metal carbonate (such as Sofno-Carb™).
  • In order to obtain best possible removal of both H2S and traces of HCl the sorbent beds 12 and 13 are preferably packed with dual trap materials, one thereof being specifically adapted for the removal of HCl and the other for the removal of H2S.
  • The purified gas stream leaving sorbent beds 12 and 13 is passed through a catalytic combustor or a burner 14 where complete combustion of the flue gases to water and carbon dioxide is carried out or part or all of the purified gas stream is recycled through a gas compressor 15.
  • According to an alternative treatment of the gas phases leaving cold high pressure separator 9 and cold separator 11, said gas phases are passed through a hydrogen purifier membrane in order to separate hydrogen gas from H2S, O2, N2 and CO2. The hydrogen lean stream from the hydrogen purifying membrane is fed to sorbent beds 12 and 13. Hydrogen rich stream from the purifier membrane is fed to the gas compressor 15 to be recycled in the process whereas the hydrogen lean gases leaving sorbent beds 12 and 13 are sent to the catalytic combustor or burner 14. Part of the purified hydrogen may also be sent to burning by the burner 14.
  • The gas membrane to be used in this embodiment will be operated by a size exclusion approach. Such membranes are commercially available, e.g. Medal™ from Air Liquide.
  • According to a preferred aspect of the invention the process according to the invention is carried out in a mobile plant unit.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, which embodiment represents the best mode contemplated at present of carrying out the invention, the mobile plant is placed on-site in the vicinity of a transformer and used transformer oil is pumped from the bottom of the transformer to a buffer tank before being subjected to the regeneration process according to the invention starting with step a) of said process and regenerated transformer oil from step g) of said process is returned into the transformer thus carrying out the process in a recirculation mode avoiding complete emptying of the transformer.
  • Thus the regenerated oil, when being pumped back into the transformer, will be contacted with non-regenerated oil therein (back-mixing) and become contaminated. For that reason the regeneration process should be continued until the volume of oil that has passed through the regeneration system is several times the volume of oil originally contained in the transformer, preferably at least three times that volume. In this way even contaminated oil, that is held by the insulating paper in the transformer and that would remain therein if completely emptying the transformer, will be brought into the circulation system and thus regenerated according to the present invention and there is no risk of causing damage to the insulating paper due to the own weight of said paper with oil adsorbed therein. Such re-circulation will also help in removing the excess water in the transformer's insulating paper (in which some organic acid might be dissolved) and shift the paper water-oil equilibrium.
  • According to another aspect of the invention, the used transformer oil is subjected to a treatment step before starting the regeneration process according to this embodiment. In this pre-treatment the used transformer oil, after being filtered for removal of coarse materials in filters (1 or 2), is fed to the stripper (10). This is done for dewatering (dehydration) of the transformer oil. The stripper (10) is in this case operated at temperatures of 10-150°C and pressures of 1-760 mm Hg. The dehydrated oil is returned to the transformer and the removed water is collected from Line 3.
  • In some cases, such as when the transformer is to be taken out of service for maintenance or e.g. the solid insulation is to be cleaned/dried, an embodiment wherein the process is carried out in a tank-to-tank mode may be preferred over that disclosed above. According to this embodiment, the used oil from the transformer is discharged to a separated dedicated tank called the feed tank. The used transformer oil is further pumped from the aforementioned feed tank to the mobile regeneration unit for being regenerated. The regenerated oil from the regeneration unit is fed to a receiver tank for the regenerated transformer oil with restored oil's electrical properties and will contain no or negligible amounts of oil-soluble organo-copper and organo-iron compounds.
  • The invention will now be further described by a number of examples illustrating the application of the process illustrated by the drawing for the regeneration of used oils.
  • Example 1:
  • An oxidized feedstock oil having a properties listed in Table one was feed to the regeneration unit at pressure, temperature and H2/oil ratio of 50 bar, 250°C and 100 m3/m3 (at STP) ; respectively. The product obtained after separator 10 (Figure 1) exhibited improved oxidation and electrical properties (Table 1). The TAN number of <0.01 and TanΔ90°C of < 0,001 is the requirements for a good transformer oil. In addition the reactive sulphur compounds which can further result in corrosion problems are removed.
  • Example 2:
  • A highly oxidised oil with properties tabulated in Table 2 was fed to the regeneration unit at pressure, temperature and H2/oil ratio of 30 bar, 275°C and 50 m3/m3 (at STP); respectively. Table 1: The properties of the feed and the regenerated oil
    Method Used oil Regenerated oil
    Specific Gravity. 60°F, kg/m3 D4052 882.0 881.5
    Viscosity@40°C, cSt D445 11.5 11.9
    Colour D1500 2.0 0.5
    Sulphur Content, wt.-% D2622 0.14 0.11
    TAN, mgKOH/g oil D974 0.08 <0.01
    Refractive Index 68°F D1747 1.4839 1.4835
    Aromatic Content, % D2140 8.8 8.4
    DDF@90°C, % IEC60247 0.045 0.0014
    Oxidation Stability:* IEC61125C
    Total Acidity, mgKOH/g oil 0,847
    Sludge, wt.-% 0,416
    DDF 90°C, oxidised 0,15
    Breakdown Voltage, kV D877 60
    Water Content, ppm D1533 <20
    *-500 hrs, 0,3%DBPC
    Table 2: The properties of the feed and the regenerated oil.
    Method Used oil Regenerated oil IEC limits
    Specific Gravity. 60°F, kg/m3 D4052 887.1 885 Max 0.895
    Viscosity@40°C, cSt D445 11.6 11.5 Max 12
    Colour D1500 3,5 0,5
    Sulphur Content, wt.-% D2622 0.095 0.05
    TAN, mgKOH/g D974 0.26 <0.01 Max 0.01
    Refractive Index 68°F D1747 1.4872 1.4858
    Aromatic Content, % D2140 10.8 10.1
    DDF@90°C, % IEC60247 0.07 0.0016 Max 0.005
    Breakdown Voltage, kV D877 44.4 67 Min 30
    Interfacial Tension, mN/m D971 18.4 41 Min 40
    Water Content, ppm D1533 40 <20 Max 40
  • Similarly to Example 1 the required TAN and electrical properties are restored to the values required for good transformer oil.
  • Example 3:
  • Highly oxidised transformer oils were subjected to regeneration at conditions typical of examples one and two. The copper content of the feed used oils (I-III) and their corresponding regenerated oils (I-III) were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry with graphite oven. As shown in Table 3 the invented process completely removed the soluble in oil organo-copper compounds. Up to 80% of the soluble in oil organo-iron compounds were also removed. All the non-treated used oil samples failed the CCD test. The regeneration of these oils resulted in an oil which passed the state of the art CCD test, indicating that the corrosive organic sulphur compounds in oil are removed by the process described in this invention. Table 3: The properties of the feed used oils (I-III) and their corresponding regenerated oil (I-III).
    Method Used Oil Regenerated Oil
    I II III I II III
    TAN, mgKOH/g D974 0.21 0.17 0.33 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
    Copper content, µg/kg a 195 83 1802 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
    Iron content, µg/kg a 63 113 126 5 44 1
    CCD test b F F F P P P
    a- Analysed by atom absorption spectrophotometry with graphite oven.
    b- Cigre test A2Wg 32 (CCD test 72 hrs).
    F = Failed the test; P = Passed the test.

Claims (15)

  1. A process for the regeneration of used transformer oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature, which process comprises:
    a) filtrating said used oil to remove sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds in filters (1 and/or 2) whereafter pressurized hydrogen gas is added and the hydrogen-oil mixture thus obtained is subjected to a preheating;
    b) passing the preheated mixture from step a) through a guard reactor (3, 4) in order to remove soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds;
    c) subjecting the hydrogen-oil mixture from step b) to a catalytic hydrogenation in at least one hydrogenation fixed bed (5) at a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at an elevated pressure;
    d) passing the effluent from step c) through an adsorbent bed (6, 7) to remove inorganic gases formed in step c);
    e) separating the stream from step d) in a warm high pressure separator (8) into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase;
    f) subjecting the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the warm high pressure separator (8) to a stripping process in a stripper unit (10); and
    g) recovering the regenerated oil from the bottom of the stripper unit (10),
    which process is carried out in a recirculation mode by pumping transformer oil from the bottom of the transformer to a buffer tank before step a) and returning regenerated transformer oil from step g) into the transformer, without completely emptying the transformer.
  2. The process of claim 1, which additionally comprises:
    h) separating the gas phase from the warm high pressure separator (8) used in step e) into a gas phase and liquid hydrocarbon phases in a cold high pressure separator (9); and
    i) feeding said liquid hydrocarbon phase from step h) into the stripper unit (10) and the aqueous phase to disposal (Line 3).
  3. The process of claim 1 or 2, wherein the guard (3 or 4) reactor in step b) is operated at a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at an elevated pressure of 1 to 100 bar over hydrotreatment catalyst.
  4. The process of claim 1, wherein the gas phase from the stripper unit (10) used in step f) is fed to a cold separator (11) to be separated into a gas phase and two liquid phases with the liquid phases from the separator (11) being sent to disposal (Lines 2 and 3).
  5. The process of claim 2 and 3, wherein the gas phase from the cold high pressure separator (9) and cold separator (11) is passed through sorption beds (12, 13) in order to remove hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen chloride gases.
  6. The process of claim 5, wherein the gas phase from the cold high pressure separator (9) and cold separator (11) is passed through hydrogen membrane system placed prior to the sorption beds (12, 13) for hydrogen gas purification.
  7. The process of claim 1, wherein the catalytic hydrogenation of step c) is carried out at a pressure within the range of 1-200 bar, preferably 1-100 bar, and/or at a temperature within the range of 200-400°C.
  8. The process of any one of claims 1-7, wherein the catalytic hydrogenation of step c) is carried out at a Liquid Hourly Space Velocity (LSVH) within the range of 0.1 to 15 h-1.
  9. The process of any one of claims 1-8, wherein the hydrogen-to-oil ratio of the feed mixture from step b) to the catalytic hydrogenation reactor (5) is within the range of from 5 to 300 on volume basis (at STP), and preferably within the range of from 10 to 100 on volume basis (at STP).
  10. The process of claim 1, wherein at least one member selected from the group consisting of hydrogen chloride gas and hydrogen sulphide gas is/are adsorbed by at least one of the adsorbent beds (6 and/or 7) in step d).
  11. The process of any one of claims 1-10, wherein the stripper unit (10) is operated at atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures and a temperature within the range of 10-200°C, preferably at a pressure within the range of from 1 to 760 mm Hg.
  12. The process of any one of claims 1-11, wherein at least one spiking agent is added to the used oil to be generated prior to the guard reactor (3, 4).
  13. A process for the regeneration of used transformer oil by catalytic hydrogenation at an elevated pressure and an elevated temperature, which process comprises:
    a) filtrating said used oil to remove sludge and insoluble in oil organo-metallic compounds in filters (1 and/or 2) whereafter pressurized hydrogen gas is added and the hydrogen-oil mixture thus obtained is subjected to a preheating;
    b) passing the preheated mixture from step a) through a guard reactor (3, 4) in order to remove soluble in oil organo-metallic compounds, primarily organo-copper and organo-iron compounds;
    c) subjecting the hydrogen-oil mixture from step b) to a catalytic hydrogenation in at least one hydrogenation fixed bed (5) at a temperature within the range of from 100°C to 450°C and at an elevated pressure;
    e) separating the stream from step c) in a warm high pressure separator (8) into a gas phase and a liquid hydrocarbon phase;
    f) subjecting the liquid hydrocarbon phase from the warm high pressure separator (8) to a stripping process in a stripper unit (10); and
    g) recovering the regenerated oil from the bottom of the stripper unit (10),
    which process is carried out in a recirculation mode by pumping transformer oil from the bottom of the transformer to a buffer tank before step a) and returning regenerated transformer oil from step g) into the transformer, without completely emptying the transformer, wherein
    - the gas phase from step e) is subjected to a further separation in a cold high pressure separator (9) into two liquid phases and a gas phase;
    - the gas phase obtained from the stripping process of step f) is subjected to a separation in a cold separator (11) into liquid phases and a gas phase;
    - the gas phase from the cold high pressure separator (9) is passed through at least one sorbent bed (12, 13) in order to remove at least one of HCl and H2S therefrom; and
    - the gas phase from the cold separator (11) is passed through at least one sorbent bed (12, 13) in order to remove at least one of HCl and H2S therefrom.
  14. The process of any one of claims 1-13, which is carried out in a mobile plant unit.
  15. The process of any one of the previous claims, wherein the used transformer oil is subjected to a pre-treatment in which the used transformer oil after having been filtered for removal of coarse materials in filters (1 or 2) is fed to the stripper (10) for dewatering and then returned to the transformer.
EP07748485.5A 2006-05-18 2007-05-10 Process for the regeneration of a used oil Active EP2024038B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0601110 2006-05-18
PCT/SE2007/050324 WO2007136340A1 (en) 2006-05-18 2007-05-10 Process for the regeneration of a used oil

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2024038A1 EP2024038A1 (en) 2009-02-18
EP2024038A4 EP2024038A4 (en) 2014-09-10
EP2024038B1 true EP2024038B1 (en) 2016-06-29

Family

ID=38723568

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07748485.5A Active EP2024038B1 (en) 2006-05-18 2007-05-10 Process for the regeneration of a used oil

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2024038B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2007136340A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120141351A1 (en) * 2010-12-02 2012-06-07 General Electric Company Controlling the emission of volatile organic compounds from equipment for reclaiming oils
PL3046995T3 (en) * 2014-03-17 2019-02-28 Hydrodec Development Corporation Pty Ltd Refining of used oils
US9956553B2 (en) 2016-06-28 2018-05-01 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Regeneration of an ionic liquid catalyst by hydrogenation using a macroporous noble metal catalyst
CN111298510B (en) * 2020-03-31 2021-07-27 新疆金雪驰科技股份有限公司 Lubricating oil filtration system

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4840721A (en) * 1988-03-16 1989-06-20 Uop Process for treating a temperature-sensitive hydrocarbonaceous stream containing a non-distillable component to produce a hydrogenated distillable hydrocarbonaceous product
EP0675864A4 (en) * 1992-12-23 1995-12-20 Commw Scient Ind Res Org Destruction of halide containing organics and solvent purification.
US5354931A (en) * 1993-03-10 1994-10-11 Uop Process for hydrotreating an organic feedstock containing oxygen compounds and a halogen component
US5336834A (en) * 1993-05-20 1994-08-09 Uop Hydrocarbon conversion with additive loss prevention
US6461992B1 (en) * 1995-10-20 2002-10-08 Uop Llc Method for reducing chloride emissions from a moving bed catalyst regeneration process
US6060033A (en) * 1998-04-22 2000-05-09 Uop Llc Process for removing HCl from hydrocarbon streams

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2024038A4 (en) 2014-09-10
WO2007136340A1 (en) 2007-11-29
EP2024038A1 (en) 2009-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7276152B2 (en) Oxidative desulfurization and denitrogenation of petroleum oils
US6551501B1 (en) Combined process for improved hydrotreating of diesel fuels
US7790021B2 (en) Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams
CA3182517A1 (en) Process for purifying a crude pyrolysis oil originating from the pyrolysis of plastic waste
Kupareva et al. Technology for rerefining used lube oils applied in Europe: a review
KR100831590B1 (en) Crude oil desulfurization
JP2004501222A (en) Selective hydrogen treatment and mercaptan removal
MX2013003136A (en) Methods for upgrading of contaminated hydrocarbon streams.
EP0178001B1 (en) Process for cleaning of waste materials by refining and/or elimination of biologically difficult to degrade halogen-, nitrogen- and/or sulfur compounds
KR20140057562A (en) Process for oxidative desulfurization with integrated sulfone decomposition
KR20140064801A (en) Oxidative desulfurization in fluid catalytic cracking process
EP2024038B1 (en) Process for the regeneration of a used oil
KR910005348B1 (en) Method of removing mercury from hydrocarbon oils
US4775475A (en) Process for the removal of hydrocarbonaceous compounds from an aqueous stream and hydrogenating these compounds
EP0287729B1 (en) Hazardous waste treatment process
JPH0553196B2 (en)
US4758346A (en) Process for the removal of hydrocarbonaceous compounds from an aqueous stream and hydrogenating these compounds
US10954468B2 (en) Method for regeneration of used lubricating oils
JP6498270B2 (en) Purification of used oil
WO2011115707A1 (en) Mild hydrodesulfurization integrating targeted oxidative desulfurization to produce diesel fuel having an ultra-low level of organosulfur compounds
MXPA04008358A (en) Removal of sulfur-containing compounds from liquid hydrocarbon streams.
JPH0318481B2 (en)
CA1298794C (en) Hazardous waste treatment process
JPS59206486A (en) Method for denitrifying hydrocarbon oil
JPH03277693A (en) Removal of trace amount of chlorine from hydrocarbon-based oil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081107

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20140813

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: A62D 3/00 20070101AFI20140807BHEP

Ipc: C10G 67/06 20060101ALI20140807BHEP

Ipc: C10G 49/22 20060101ALI20140807BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20150602

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160104

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 808609

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602007046804

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160930

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 808609

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161029

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161031

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007046804

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170330

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160929

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170510

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20070510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230516

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230524

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230516

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20230512

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230523

Year of fee payment: 17