EP1996367A1 - Verfahren zur bestimmung der form eines schweissbads, das während der durchführung eines schweissprozesses auftritt - Google Patents

Verfahren zur bestimmung der form eines schweissbads, das während der durchführung eines schweissprozesses auftritt

Info

Publication number
EP1996367A1
EP1996367A1 EP07712534A EP07712534A EP1996367A1 EP 1996367 A1 EP1996367 A1 EP 1996367A1 EP 07712534 A EP07712534 A EP 07712534A EP 07712534 A EP07712534 A EP 07712534A EP 1996367 A1 EP1996367 A1 EP 1996367A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
solid
temperature
points
melt
shape
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP07712534A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Duc Dung Doan
Franck Gabriel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives CEA
Original Assignee
Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique CEA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique CEA filed Critical Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique CEA
Publication of EP1996367A1 publication Critical patent/EP1996367A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K31/00Processes relevant to this subclass, specially adapted for particular articles or purposes, but not covered by any single one of main groups B23K1/00 - B23K28/00
    • B23K31/02Processes relevant to this subclass, specially adapted for particular articles or purposes, but not covered by any single one of main groups B23K1/00 - B23K28/00 relating to soldering or welding
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K9/00Arc welding or cutting
    • B23K9/10Other electric circuits therefor; Protective circuits; Remote controls
    • B23K9/1006Power supply
    • B23K9/1043Power supply characterised by the electric circuit
    • B23K9/1056Power supply characterised by the electric circuit by using digital means
    • B23K9/1062Power supply characterised by the electric circuit by using digital means with computing means

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for determining the shape of a liquid metal melt occurring during the implementation of a method of welding a first part and a second part.
  • the direct method is to attempt to solve the problem of heat transfer in the two parts of welded structure, the melted part and the solid part. To do this, we must resolve the Navier equations Stored in the liquid, the energy conservation equations taking into account the interaction between the energy arc and the part, the interaction between the liquid part and the solid part, and the equations of the transfer of heat in the solid.
  • the equivalent source method consists of giving a priori a form of the energy source and then solving a problem of nonlinear conduction of heat in the parts to be assembled.
  • the parameters of this source of energy are identified by an inverse problem from the temperature measured in the solid and the macrography of the welding bath (cf ref [2] or ref [3]).
  • This method provides access to the thermal loading of the welding process but:
  • the present invention relates to a method for determining the shape of a melt which overcomes these disadvantages.
  • This process is characterized by the following steps: a) a welding method is chosen; b) a two-dimensional or three-dimensional virtual bath shape is chosen according to the welding method chosen in step (a); c) model the shape of the virtual melt by a mathematical function that contains parameters to identify; d) calculating the temperature field in a virtual solid surrounding the melt by imposing boundary conditions; e) making a real copy of the first and second pieces; f) they are welded using the process chosen in step (a), which reveals a real melt and solid zone; g) measuring the temperature in M points of the real solid zone, M being at least equal to the number of parameters to be identified; h) comparing the temperatures measured in step (g) with the calculated temperatures at the same points in step (d) by calculating the function
  • the mathematical function that contains parameters to be identified is a Bezier curve or surface.
  • the mathematical function that contains parameters to be identified is a Bézier surface defined by the equation: mn TYl Tl
  • step (j) the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is used to choose another form of virtual bath.
  • step (d) the temperature field is calculated in a virtual solid surrounding the melt by solving the following equation system: dT s (x, y) r -, hp
  • T (x, y) T f (x, y) eF (3)
  • step (d) the temperature field is calculated in a virtual solid surrounding the melt by solving the following equation system:
  • the welding process is chosen from the group comprising TIG, MIG / MAG, electron beam, plasma, laser, hybrid welding processes.
  • the degree of the Bézier curve is equal to 3 or 4 in 2D and the degree of the Bézier surface is between 2x3 and 4x3 in 3D.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a Bezier curve with four control points
  • Figure 2 is a macrography of a non-debonding melt
  • FIG. 3 is a view of a curve of
  • FIG. 5 is a view of a curve of
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a two-dimensional melt
  • Figures 7 to 9 are three Bézier curves of degree 4 (of order 5)
  • Fig. 10 is a diagram of the welding process
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram of the spatial domain in 2D case
  • Figure 12 is a diagram of the spatial domain in 3D case
  • Figure 13 illustrates the Bezier surface of degree 3x2 with its control points
  • Figure 14 illustrates the temperature field calculated in 3D case.
  • the shape of the bath is parameterized with a Bézier curve of degree n (or a Bézier surface of degree m ⁇ n).
  • the classical definition of Bézier curves and surfaces is based on the family of Bernstein polynomials. These polynomials were used by Bernstein for the polynomial approximation of functions. They are used in the description of the Bézier model by the definition points named also Bézier points or "points of control".
  • the Bezier curve with four control points is then formulated as follows:
  • This curve passes through the points Po (x0, y0) and P3 (x3, y3). Its tangent to these points is the line connecting Po (xO, yO) to Pi (xl, yl) and the connecting line
  • FIG. 2 shows a macrography of the fusion front of a non-emergent weld and in FIG. 3 the parametrization of this fusion front by a Bezier curve of degree 3.
  • FIG. 4 shows the macrography of the melting front of an open weld and in FIG. 5 the parametrization of this fusion front by another Bezier curve of degree 3.
  • FIG. 3 shows a macrography of the melting front of an open weld and in FIG. 5 the parametrization of this fusion front by another Bezier curve of degree 3.
  • FIG. 3 shows only half of the fusion front has been shown.
  • FIGS. 7 to 9 show Bezier curves of order 5.
  • a parametric surface is the extension of the parametric curve in which we have two parameters u and v which each vary in [0,1].
  • P (u, v) passes through all points on the Bézier surface.
  • P 13 is the control point
  • mxn is the degree of the Bézier surface
  • the surface is continuous in the convex envelope of polygon P 00 , P 0n , P m0 , P mn . "The control of the surface is global. • The Bezier surface is independent of the axis system to which it is attached.
  • melts can be configured in three dimensions.
  • the fusion front F is interpreted by the coordinates of the control points.
  • F (P 0 , Pi ..., PN) where N is the number of parameters to identify.
  • M M measuring points to identify N parameters, then M ⁇ N.
  • F (P 0 , Pi ..., P N ) is known, the temperature field in the solid T (F) can be obtained by solving the heat transfer problem. It also means that the temperature field changes when we modify the shape of F (P 0 , Pi, ..., P N ).
  • coefficient of sensitivity ie the derivative of the temperature in relation to the parameters to be identified
  • the sensitivity matrix is defined as follows:
  • T 1 T 0 + [(J (T 0) YJ (T 0) + (P 0 Q 0 Y (J (T 0) Y [YT (T 0)]
  • ⁇ o is a positive scalar appointed damping parameter
  • ⁇ o is a diagonal matrix
  • the objective of the term ⁇ o ⁇ o is to dampen the oscillations and instabilities due to the misplaced nature of the problem.
  • the damping parameter ⁇ o is chosen large at the beginning of the iterative procedure (the method is then close to the method of the steepest slope) then, is reduced when one approaches the solution (the method joins the method of Gauss).
  • Example 1 two-dimensional fusion front. It is desired to weld two plates 2.4 end to end. Each of the plates has a width L y , a length 2L x and a thickness e.
  • a torch 6 generates an electric arc having sufficient intensity to melt the metal and form a melt 8. It travels with a constant speed u along the x-axis on the edge of the two plates 2 and 4.
  • the bath 8 melting zone is moved at the same speed as the torch 6.
  • a melting zone 10 is formed behind the displacement of the melt 8.
  • the objective is to find by the inverse method the shape of the bath and the temperature field in the solid region with the minimum of parameters to identify.
  • the thermal field in the solid is determined by considering the temperature imposed on the liquid-solid interface, equal to the melting temperature T f .
  • This curve is based on four control points Po, Pi, P2 and P3 (that is to say eight coordinates in two-dimensional case), and has the formula:
  • X to identify remains limited.
  • some coordinates of the control points may be constrained a priori by the physical nature of the problem.
  • T (x, y) T f (x, y) eT (3)
  • the temperature field T (x, y; F) in the solid is accessed for the form of the melt of step 1.
  • the temperature Y m in the solid is measured in a number of M measuring points 12 at least equal to the number of parameters to be identified (3 as we have seen above).
  • M 5 is chosen (ie 5 temperature measurements are made using a single thermocouple). Only one thermocouple is needed to have multiple measurement points. In quasi stationary, the different positions x m correspond to different recording times x m -uxt m , therefore, one can have several measurement points using a single thermocouple.
  • Example 2 3D case opening. As in the case of the two-dimensional example, it is desired to weld two plates end to end.
  • Each of the plates has a width L y , a length 2L x and a thickness e (see Figure 12).
  • the problem is physically defined as follows: an electric arc of sufficient intensity moves with a constant speed along the x-axis and is applied to the edge of two metal plates. A melt is formed and moves at the same speed as the electric arc.
  • the assumptions made to define this problem are as follows: • At torch speed u constant, the transfers are non-stationary in a reference linked to the plate. However, by using a reference linked to the torch, a quasi-steady state is obtained: the shape of the molten bath remains constant in this frame while the material enters and leaves the field of study. The mobile repository of the torch is therefore used for the analysis of the inverse problem.
  • the shape of the liquid-solid interface F is parameterized by a Bézier surface.
  • the thermal field in the solid is determined by considering the temperature imposed on the liquid-solid interface, equal to the melting temperature T f .
  • Step 1
  • T (x, y, z) T f in (x, y, z) eT (5)
  • S is the area of the section of the room and its perimeter Adiabatic conditions (2) are considered on the edges of the computational domain without loss of generality.
  • the temperature is imposed (5)
  • the temperature field T (x, y, z; F) in the solid is accessed for the melt form of step 1.
  • This estimated field is represented in FIG. 14.
  • thermocouples the temperature Y m in the solid in a number of points M at least equal to the number of parameters to be identified (9 as has been seen above) .
  • M 10 is chosen (ie 10 temperature measurements are made using a single thermocouple). Only one thermocouple is needed to have multiple measurement points. In quasi stationary, the different positions xm correspond to different recording times x m -uxt m , therefore, one can have several measurement points using a single thermocouple.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Arc Welding In General (AREA)
EP07712534A 2006-03-17 2007-03-16 Verfahren zur bestimmung der form eines schweissbads, das während der durchführung eines schweissprozesses auftritt Withdrawn EP1996367A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0650935A FR2898530B1 (fr) 2006-03-17 2006-03-17 Procede de determination de la forme d'un bain de fusion apparaissant lors de la mise en oeuvre d'un procede de soudage
PCT/EP2007/052488 WO2007107504A1 (fr) 2006-03-17 2007-03-16 Procede de determination de la forme d'un bain de fusion apparaissant lors de la mise en œuvre d'un procede de soudage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1996367A1 true EP1996367A1 (de) 2008-12-03

Family

ID=37101606

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07712534A Withdrawn EP1996367A1 (de) 2006-03-17 2007-03-16 Verfahren zur bestimmung der form eines schweissbads, das während der durchführung eines schweissprozesses auftritt

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1996367A1 (de)
FR (1) FR2898530B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2007107504A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100565138C (zh) * 2008-08-06 2009-12-02 中国航空工业第一集团公司北京航空制造工程研究所 一种激光焊接温度场三维测量方法
CN104006785B (zh) * 2014-05-20 2017-10-20 西安交通大学 厚钢板激光全穿透焊接熔池三维形状检测及重构方法
FR3036050B1 (fr) * 2015-05-13 2017-06-09 Univ Strasbourg Dispositif de traitement laser et station de travail comportant un tel dispositif
FR3075419B1 (fr) * 2017-12-19 2023-02-10 Commissariat Energie Atomique Procede de calibration d'une source de chaleur equivalente
CN118060670B (zh) * 2024-03-08 2024-12-06 广东汉高科技有限公司 一种焊缝自动跟踪方法及焊接装置
CN118797892B (zh) * 2024-06-11 2025-02-18 哈尔滨工业大学 基于伯恩斯坦基的导弹多约束闭环制导方法

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5487654A (en) * 1977-12-26 1979-07-12 Hitachi Ltd Remote operation automatic welding
BE1004964A6 (fr) * 1991-05-06 1993-03-09 Centre Rech Metallurgique Procede de controle d'une soudure bout a bout de bandes metalliques.
SE520140C2 (sv) * 2001-04-02 2003-06-03 Abb Ab Metod och anordning vid bågsvetsning samt användning, datorprogramprodukt och datorläsbart medium

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2007107504A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2898530A1 (fr) 2007-09-21
WO2007107504A1 (fr) 2007-09-27
FR2898530B1 (fr) 2008-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1996367A1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung der form eines schweissbads, das während der durchführung eines schweissprozesses auftritt
Schleifenbaum et al. Individualized production by means of high power Selective Laser Melting
Faraji et al. Numerical modeling of fluid flow, heat, and mass transfer for similar and dissimilar laser welding of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718
Bernauer et al. Toward defect-free components in laser metal deposition with coaxial wire feeding through closed-loop control of the melt pool temperature
Brice et al. Determination of bulk residual stresses in electron beam additive-manufactured aluminum
Moore et al. Mechanical properties of wire plus arc additive manufactured steel and stainless steel structures
Schleifenbaum et al. Direct photonic production: towards high speed additive manufacturing of individualized goods
Chuang et al. Optimization of Butt-joint laser welding parameters for elimination of angular distortion using High-fidelity simulations and Machine learning
Treutler et al. Properties oriented WAAM—microstructural and geometrical control in WAAM of low-alloy steel
Lu et al. Collaborative and quantitative prediction for reinforcement and penetration depth of weld bead based on molten pool image and deep residual network
Menold et al. Laser material processing optimization using bayesian optimization: a generic tool
Noori Rahim Abadi et al. Modelling of beam energy absorbed locally in conduction mode laser metal fusion
He et al. Process parameter selection for laser welding of aluminium alloy from the perspective of energy effectiveness
Soffel et al. Effect of clad height, substrate thickness and scanning pattern on cantilever distortion in direct metal deposition
Turk et al. In-situ thermographic monitoring and numerical simulations of laser-foil-printing additive manufacturing
Vemanaboina et al. Thermal and mechanical analysis of C-276 alloy using CO2 laser beam welding process
Deng et al. Effect of overlapped adjacent tracks on surface morphology in plasma beam polishing of austenitic stainless steel
Marumoto et al. Development of automation and monitoring methods for narrow-gap hot-wire laser welding using camera images
Hartwig et al. A volumetric heat source model for the approximation of the melting pool in laser beam welding
Karkadakattil Geometry aware laser polishing of LPBF AlSi10Mg defence components with physics inspired neural network based surface roughness prediction
Witkin et al. Laser post-processing of Inconel 625 made by selective laser melting
Schonrath et al. Analytical modeling of cooling rates in PBF-LB/M of bulk metallic glasses
Liu et al. Effect of different laser scanning sequences on temperature field and deformation of laser cladding
Ogino et al. Visualization of arc plasma and molten wire behavior in CO2 arc welding process by three-dimensional numerical simulation
Montoya-Zapata et al. 2D linear finite element simulation of laser metal heating for digital twins

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080822

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090115

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20121002