EP1991759A1 - Tracer method and apparatus - Google Patents

Tracer method and apparatus

Info

Publication number
EP1991759A1
EP1991759A1 EP07712982A EP07712982A EP1991759A1 EP 1991759 A1 EP1991759 A1 EP 1991759A1 EP 07712982 A EP07712982 A EP 07712982A EP 07712982 A EP07712982 A EP 07712982A EP 1991759 A1 EP1991759 A1 EP 1991759A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tracer
reservoir
metal
sample
tool
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP07712982A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1991759B1 (en
Inventor
Darrell Green
David Stubbs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Johnson Matthey PLC
Original Assignee
Johnson Matthey PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Johnson Matthey PLC filed Critical Johnson Matthey PLC
Publication of EP1991759A1 publication Critical patent/EP1991759A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1991759B1 publication Critical patent/EP1991759B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/10Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements
    • E21B47/11Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements using tracers; using radioactivity
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/11Perforators; Permeators
    • E21B43/116Gun or shaped-charge perforators
    • E21B43/117Shaped-charge perforators

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for tracing fluids, particularly fluids flowing within a well such as from an oil or gas reservoir, and to a perforation tool suitable for introducing a tracer into such a reservoir.
  • tracers It is common in the oil exploration and recovery industry to place tracers within a well in order to determine the flow of fluid from the well or from a particular section of it.
  • the tracer When the tracer is incorporated in the fluid flowing from the well, it may be detected in the fluid by analysis of the fluid arriving at the well-head.
  • US 3,623842 describes a method of determining fluid saturations in reservoirs by injecting at least two tracers having different partition coefficients between fluid phases (e.g. oil and water) into the formation and monitoring the appearance of the two tracers in the produced fluids.
  • This example uses ethyl acetate as a tracer chemical.
  • Radioactive tracers have been widely used for many years in well-monitoring applications. As an example, see US 5,077,471 , in which radioactive tracers are injected into a perforated well-bore, sealed and then monitored for decay to indicate the fluid flow from the formation.
  • radioactive tracers One problem encountered with the use of radioactive tracers is that their transport and use is highly regulated, leading to greater expense and difficulty with their use. In addition, it has become quite common to use tracers associated with a perforation tool, in which the tracer is fired by explosive devices located around the tool into the formation to perforate the formation and thereby to embed the tracer in the formation. Since explosive devices are also highly controlled, it has become very difficult to arrange the transport of devices incorporating both radioactive sources and explosives. Although non-radioactive tracers, i.e. chemical tracers, may be used, these require careful selection to ensure that they are sufficiently soluble in the phase to be monitored and that they are readily detectable at low concentrations.
  • US 4,755,469 describes the use of rare metal tracers for tracing oil and associated reservoir fluids by mixing an oil-dispersible rare metal salt with oil or an oil-like composition, injecting the dissolved tracer composition it into a subterranean reservoir and analysing oil fluids produced from a different part of the reservoir for the presence of the rare metal to determine whether the oil mixed with the tracer has been produced from the reservoir.
  • a method of monitoring the flow of fluid within or from a reservoir comprising the steps of inserting in said reservoir a solid non-radioactive tracer comprising at least one metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof, thereafter collecting a sample of fluid within or flowing from the reservoir and analysing said sample to determine the amount of said tracer contained in the sample.
  • the reservoir is normally a subterranean oil and/or natural gas reservoir.
  • the fluid flowing within the reservoir normally contains oil, natural gas, water and solids such as sand or other particles.
  • a perforation tool comprising an elongate body having a central longitudinal axis, a control means, deployment means and at least one explosive charge mounted on or within said body and associated with detonation means, said charge being arranged to direct energy explosively, outwardly, and, preferably transversely, along a path with respect to the elongate body upon detonation, and at least one tracer material mounted on or within said body within the path of said explosive energy, characterised in that the tracer material comprises at least one non-radioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof.
  • the tracer comprises at least one non-radioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof.
  • the metals of the Lanthanide series comprise the elements of atomic numbers from 57 to 71.
  • Preferred metals include niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, europium, platinum and rhodium, and especially preferred are niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium and europium. These metals are not naturally abundant and have a low detection limit using standard elemental analysis methods such as inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS).
  • ICP-MS inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy
  • the metals naturally contain more than one isotope.
  • non-radioactive we mean that the metals used in the tracer do not contain a greater proportion of radioactive isotopes than found in the naturally occurring metal, i.e. they have not been enriched with radioactive isotopes.
  • Some of the metals may contain unstable radioactive isotopes in their natural state but the emission of radioactivity is very low, and they are unsuitable for use as radioactive tracers at the dilutions typically used without enrichment with one or more radioactive isotopes.
  • a metal is treated, e.g.
  • the metals used in the tracers of the present inventive method may have a composition of isotopes which is not naturally occurring, by enrichment with one or more stable non-radioactive isotopes to assist identification of the metal, particularly by mass-spectrometry.
  • the tracer or tracers may be formed of the selected metal or metals in elemental form.
  • the tracer may be supplied as salts of the metals.
  • inorganic anions are preferred, particularly, a low-mass anion such as nitride or carbide in order to increase the amount of tracer metal in a given mass of tracer composition.
  • a tracer in elemental form may be conveniently supplied as a discrete tracer unit such as a disc, wire or rod or as a coating for placement in or attachment to a reservoir perforator gun (perforation tool).
  • the tracer metal may be moulded to fit around an explosive charge.
  • the salts may be supplied as pressed discs or in another form. More than one metal may be used in a tracer. When more than one metal is used as a tracer they may be simply mixed or alloyed. Alternatively more than one discrete tracer unit, e.g. metallic disc, may be used in the same location or different tracers may be placed in different locations.
  • the tracer may take the physical form of a moulded metal shape such as a disc, wire or rod or may comprise finely divided particles of metal or as a salt of the metal.
  • the particles may be formed into a shape, such as a tablet or disk, e.g. by pressing, extruding, granulating or other method, optionally using a binder.
  • the tablet may further comprise other materials such as a diluent (i.e. a non-traceable material) to add mass, and/or a dispersant to aid dispersal and / or dissolution of the particles into the fluid to be traced.
  • the tablet or other shape may be encased in a protective coating, preferably of a soluble or permeable material.
  • a tracer metal For insertion of a tracer by means of a perforator gun, it is preferred to form the tracer metal into a disc for placement into a perforation gun apparatus, either in an external scallop or in close proximity to the explosive charge.
  • a disc may contain from about 0.1 g - 2Og especially 5 - 20 g of metal, preferably from about 8 to 12 g.
  • the tracer may be associated with each explosive charge or only some of them.
  • the amount of tracer used in a well section provides from about 20 to about 500 g (more preferably between about 50 and 200 g) of tracer metal.
  • the sample of fluid may be taken from the top of the well or may be withdrawn from within a well using a suitable well tool.
  • the sample may be analysed by any suitable means to determine the amount of tracer present.
  • suitable methods for the detection and measurement of metals in a sample by elemental analysis There are many suitable methods for the detection and measurement of metals in a sample by elemental analysis.
  • One suitable method is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) calibrated for the metal used in the tracer.
  • the collected fluid sample may be aspirated into the plasma, optionally after a treatment to separate the phases or to concentrate the sample.
  • the sample is a hydrocarbon such as crude oil
  • the sample may be ashed and then extracted into acid which may then be introduced into the plasma.
  • ICP-AES Inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry
  • ICP-AES is also a suitable elemental analysis method to determine the metal tracer content of the sample.
  • a complexing agent maintains the tracer metals in solution and avoids loss of tracer on surfaces within the analytical apparatus. When metal tracers stick to surfaces within the apparatus, they may be leached into successive samples passing through the apparatus and lead to inaccurate estimates of tracer within the sample.
  • Any suitable complexing agent may be used, provided it does not interfere with the analysis of the tracers and forms a stable complex with the metal in the selected solvent. Suitable complexing agents include quaternary ammonium compounds.
  • quaternary ammonium compounds having long-chain or bulky alkyl groups are very suitable, for example methyltrioctylammonium chloride, sold commercially as ALIQUATTM 336.
  • an internal standard is added to the sample which is believed to contain the tracer and diluted with a solvent containing a complexing agent.
  • the resulting solution is then analysed by ICP-MS configured for organics operation.
  • X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy may be used to determine the amount of fluorescence emitted by the sample at one or more characteristic frequencies when irradiated by X-rays. All of these methods are widely used in analysis and may be operated by the skilled person in a suitable manner. Alternative methods of elemental analysis may also be used, as would be known to the skilled analyst. Such methods may include chemical analysis, atomic absorption spectroscopy, the use of metal sensitive electrodes, voltammetry etc but these methods are likely to be less sensitive than the preferred instrumental analysis methods described above and so are less preferred. It is preferred to analyse a blank sample from the well (i.e.
  • the sample preparation may differ from that used for an organic sample; e.g. by evaporating the sample rather than ashing.
  • the above-described methods are generally capable of quantitatively determining the amount of metal found in a sample, with suitable calibration.
  • the tracer technique itself may not be quantitative because, especially when the tracer is forced into the reservoir formation by a perforation gun, at least some of the metal may stick to the formation in an unpredictable manner. Therefore the method may be most useful for determining the presence or absence of flow from a particular region of the reservoir.
  • the tracer method of the invention may be varied according to conventional methodologies used in the industry. Therefore, two or more tracers may be combined in a predetermined ratio in order to produce a unique tracer composition for marking a particular well or section of a well. It may be desired to determine the flow of tracer from a particular part of a well or reservoir. In this case a single reservoir may be marked by inserting different tracers or combinations of tracers in different locations in order to determine the part of the reservoir from which a particular sample has originated or flowed through.
  • the tracer may be inserted in the reservoir by one or more different methods.
  • a preferred method comprises associating the tracer with a part of a perforation tool or perforation gun.
  • the placement of tracers into the formation using a perforation tool (also known as a perforation gun) is already known.
  • a perforation tool is used in the oil and gas drilling, exploration and recovery industry for perforating a well, i.e. for forming channels or perforations extending from a well-bore into the reservoir formation. Each channel or perforation is formed by detonating an explosive charge carried on a tool located in the well.
  • the explosive energy is directed into the well casing (if the well has been cased) or the side of the well to penetrate the formation so that the well casing or well bore side is perforated allowing communication with the formation in the region of the tool.
  • the perforations form channels through which reservoir fluids may flow out of the formation and into the well bore, thereby to flow to the surface of the well for recovery.
  • Perforation tools vary in their size and design according to the result they are to achieve and any description herein of perforation tools is given as general background and not intended to limit the invention. Perforation tools are equipment already known and used in the oil exploration industry, and so a skilled designer of such tools is able to construct a tool suitable for use in the present invention.
  • the tool is typically of generally cylindrical shape and has a length typically of between about 0.5 and about 10 metres.
  • the perforation tool carries more than one charge, usually arranged around the circumference of the tool or gun.
  • the number of charges carried on a perforation tool varies but typically may be between about 2 and about 12 charges per foot (300 mm), normally arranged in a pattern, e.g. approximately helically, along the length of the tool.
  • the explosive charge, detonation means, deployment means and control means comprise materials and apparatus which are known in the industry.
  • the charge is normally shaped to direct the explosive energy along the desired path relative to the body of the perforation tool.
  • the detonator is usually an electrically operated detonator.
  • Control means may comprise a microprocessor and associated control program mounted within the perforation tool or an associated tool or the tool may be controlled directly by means of signals carried to the tool from an operator, normally located at the head of the well.
  • the signals may be carried along a cable connecting the tool and the well-head.
  • the tool is normally deployed by lowering it down a well suspended on a wire or string before, during or after completion of a well.
  • the tool generally has an outer sleeve covering the explosive charges.
  • the tracer When a perforation tool is used to insert tracer into a formation, the tracer may be placed into indentations or "scallops" formed in the outer sleeve, usually directly over one or more of the explosive charges carried by the tool.
  • the tracer compounds may be held in place by an adhesive or a covering film, such as an epoxy resin covering.
  • the tracer compounds may be located within the outer sleeve or casing of the perforation tool, for example in contact with an inner sleeve within the gun. It is preferred that the tracer materials are not placed in contact with the explosive charges in order to avoid destabilising the charges by redirecting the angle of the blast.
  • the tracer is therefore placed spaced away from the charge in the path of the blast so that at least some of the tracer material is carried into the reservoir formation with the explosive gases when the charge is detonated. It is likely that some of the tracer is vaporised in the explosion and then condenses within the formation. At least some of the tracer particles are then carried out of the formation with the flow of fluids released by the perforation of the formation by the explosive charge.
  • the tracer or tracers may be placed in the gun or perforation tool in the form of shaped units as described hereinbefore or coated onto a part of a perforator gun. Alternatively the tracer metal may be moulded to fit around an explosive charge.
  • a metal salt tracer may be selected to be soluble in the fluid which is to be traced.
  • an oil-soluble metal salt may be selected, e.g. a salt of an organic acid, particularly a long-chain fatty acid.
  • a water-soluble salt of the tracer metal(s) such as a sulphate, nitrate or halide.
  • a solid tracer comprising a soluble salt of the metal is placed in the well and is then dissolved in the water flowing within the well.
  • the method of the invention is for the placement of solid tracers comprising nonradioactive metals in a reservoir for tracing the flow of fluids in and from a well bored into the reservoir. It is known from US 5,711 ,900 and US 6,001 ,280 to use as a tracer a solution of a gadolinium salt of a carboxylic acid. The deployment of tracer solutions as disclosed in those references is not within the scope of the present invention.
  • Figure 1 a graph showing the concentration of Nb and Ta found in a sample of reservoir fluids against time when the sample was taken.
  • 1 ⁇ g/ml stock standards were prepared by diluting 50 ⁇ l aliquots of the 1000 ⁇ g/ml and 500 ⁇ l of the 100 ⁇ g/ml ICP standards to 50 ml with stock standard dilution solution.
  • Y + Tl internal standard A 0.1 mg/ml combined standard was the prepared by combining 1 ml aliquots of stock solutions 1 , 2 and 3 and diluting to 10 ml with stock standard dilution solution.
  • Instrumentation ICP-MS, Thermo X Series Il fitted with organics kit, peltier cooled spray chamber, micromist low flow nebuliser (Glass Expansion), extra mass flow controller for addition of oxygen into the plasma and platinum cones. The instrument was initially set up with a standard aqueous introduction system and a detector cross-calibration and full system tune were preformed. An instrument performance check was then performed to confirm that the instrument was performing within the manufacturers acceptance limits.
  • the organics kit was then fitted and the instrument stabilised on isopropanol.
  • a blank solution containing internal standard was aspirated.
  • the oxygen flow was adjusted until the green carbon emission was removed and the ICP-MS optics were then optimised on the low and high mass internal standards.
  • High level calibration standards were prepared by combining aliquots of stock solutions 1 , 2 and 3, plus 500 ⁇ l of internal std solution and 1 g of base oil and diluting to 10 g with sample dilution solution.
  • Low level calibration standards were prepared by adding aliquots of the 0.1 ⁇ g/ml combined standard, 1 g of base oil and 500 ⁇ l of internal std solution and diluting to 10 g with sample dilution solution.
  • the instrument was calibrated using the prepared high-level and low-level calibration standards. Instrument response was linear over the calibration range 0 - 20 ng/g with a relative standard deviation of less than 2%.
  • the detection limits for the metals was determined as 3x standard deviation (limit of detection, LOD) and 10x standard deviation (limit of quantification, LOQ) of the results of ten repeated determinations of a measuring a 100 pg/g standard solution.
  • LOD limit of detection
  • LOQ limit of quantification
  • the concentration of each of the metals found in the background i.e. the un-spiked sample
  • concentration of each of the metals found in the background is shown together with the percentage of added metal tracer found in the spiked sample after subtraction of the background level.
  • the results show that recovery of the metal tracer elements was between 80 and 1 10 %. Values greater than 100% are believed to be caused by the spiked sample responding better in the plasma than the calibration samples, an effect which may be due to the different viscosity of the sample and calibration solutions.
  • 12g of niobium carbide powder was mixed with a microcrystalline wax binder and formed into 40 disk-shaped tablets, each approximately 10mm diameter and 2mm thick by pressing.
  • the tablets were placed into indentations, known as scallops, in the outer surface of the casing of a perforation tool and covered in an epoxy material.
  • a second batch of 40 tablets containing a total of 12g of tantalum carbide mixed with the wax binder was prepared in the same way and the tablets were placed into the scallops of a second perforation tool.
  • the perforation tools were of a standard type, each being provided with a plurality of explosive charges arranged to fire outwardly from the perforation tool in a predetermined direction upon operation of the tool.
  • the perforation tools were placed down a well into different locations in the formation of an oil reservoir and fired to perforate the formation. When the reservoir fluids had reached the surface, samples of the reservoir fluid were collected every 30 minutes. The samples were later analysed using the ICP-MS method described above. The results are plotted in Figure 1 as the concentration of Nb and Ta found in a sample against time when the sample was taken. The plot shows that both Nb and Ta have been detected confirming that both perforation tools fired and that fluid is flowing up the well from the locations of each of the perforation tools.

Landscapes

  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)
  • Manufacture, Treatment Of Glass Fibers (AREA)
  • Other Investigation Or Analysis Of Materials By Electrical Means (AREA)
  • Supplying Of Containers To The Packaging Station (AREA)
  • Vending Machines For Individual Products (AREA)
  • Telephone Function (AREA)

Abstract

The invention describes a method of monitoring the flow of fluid within or from an oil or gas reservoir in which a solid tracer is inserted into the reservoir according to known methods, the tracer comprising at least one metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof. A sample of fluid within or flowing from the reservoir is collected and analysed to determine the amount of said tracer contained in the sample. A perforation tool for insertion of the tracer within the formation is also described.

Description

Tracer method and apparatus
The present invention relates to a method for tracing fluids, particularly fluids flowing within a well such as from an oil or gas reservoir, and to a perforation tool suitable for introducing a tracer into such a reservoir.
It is common in the oil exploration and recovery industry to place tracers within a well in order to determine the flow of fluid from the well or from a particular section of it. When the tracer is incorporated in the fluid flowing from the well, it may be detected in the fluid by analysis of the fluid arriving at the well-head. For example, US 3,623842 describes a method of determining fluid saturations in reservoirs by injecting at least two tracers having different partition coefficients between fluid phases (e.g. oil and water) into the formation and monitoring the appearance of the two tracers in the produced fluids. This example uses ethyl acetate as a tracer chemical. Radioactive tracers have been widely used for many years in well-monitoring applications. As an example, see US 5,077,471 , in which radioactive tracers are injected into a perforated well-bore, sealed and then monitored for decay to indicate the fluid flow from the formation.
One problem encountered with the use of radioactive tracers is that their transport and use is highly regulated, leading to greater expense and difficulty with their use. In addition, it has become quite common to use tracers associated with a perforation tool, in which the tracer is fired by explosive devices located around the tool into the formation to perforate the formation and thereby to embed the tracer in the formation. Since explosive devices are also highly controlled, it has become very difficult to arrange the transport of devices incorporating both radioactive sources and explosives. Although non-radioactive tracers, i.e. chemical tracers, may be used, these require careful selection to ensure that they are sufficiently soluble in the phase to be monitored and that they are readily detectable at low concentrations. The high limit of detection of many chemicals makes them unsuitable for use as tracers. US 4,755,469 describes the use of rare metal tracers for tracing oil and associated reservoir fluids by mixing an oil-dispersible rare metal salt with oil or an oil-like composition, injecting the dissolved tracer composition it into a subterranean reservoir and analysing oil fluids produced from a different part of the reservoir for the presence of the rare metal to determine whether the oil mixed with the tracer has been produced from the reservoir.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a tracer and a method of monitoring fluids flowing from a reservoir using the tracer which overcomes some of the problems with the existing tracers and methods. According to the invention, we provide a method of monitoring the flow of fluid within or from a reservoir comprising the steps of inserting in said reservoir a solid non-radioactive tracer comprising at least one metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof, thereafter collecting a sample of fluid within or flowing from the reservoir and analysing said sample to determine the amount of said tracer contained in the sample. From the presence or absence of tracer in the sample, its amount and other parameters such as sample size, timing of the sample collection etc, information about the fluid flow within the reservoir may be gathered. The reservoir is normally a subterranean oil and/or natural gas reservoir. The fluid flowing within the reservoir normally contains oil, natural gas, water and solids such as sand or other particles.
According to a second aspect of the invention we provide a perforation tool comprising an elongate body having a central longitudinal axis, a control means, deployment means and at least one explosive charge mounted on or within said body and associated with detonation means, said charge being arranged to direct energy explosively, outwardly, and, preferably transversely, along a path with respect to the elongate body upon detonation, and at least one tracer material mounted on or within said body within the path of said explosive energy, characterised in that the tracer material comprises at least one non-radioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof..
The tracer comprises at least one non-radioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt thereof. The metals of the Lanthanide series comprise the elements of atomic numbers from 57 to 71. Preferred metals include niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, europium, platinum and rhodium, and especially preferred are niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium and europium. These metals are not naturally abundant and have a low detection limit using standard elemental analysis methods such as inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS).
Many of the metals naturally contain more than one isotope. By non-radioactive, we mean that the metals used in the tracer do not contain a greater proportion of radioactive isotopes than found in the naturally occurring metal, i.e. they have not been enriched with radioactive isotopes. Some of the metals may contain unstable radioactive isotopes in their natural state but the emission of radioactivity is very low, and they are unsuitable for use as radioactive tracers at the dilutions typically used without enrichment with one or more radioactive isotopes. Normally for use as a radioactive tracer a metal is treated, e.g. by bombardment with neutrons in a nuclear reactor, to enrich the composition of isotopes with unstable, radioactive isotopes which can emit detectable radiation. The metals used in the tracers of the present inventive method may have a composition of isotopes which is not naturally occurring, by enrichment with one or more stable non-radioactive isotopes to assist identification of the metal, particularly by mass-spectrometry.
In one preferred embodiment, the tracer or tracers may be formed of the selected metal or metals in elemental form. Alternatively the tracer may be supplied as salts of the metals. When used as salts, inorganic anions are preferred, particularly, a low-mass anion such as nitride or carbide in order to increase the amount of tracer metal in a given mass of tracer composition.
A tracer in elemental form may be conveniently supplied as a discrete tracer unit such as a disc, wire or rod or as a coating for placement in or attachment to a reservoir perforator gun (perforation tool). Alternatively the tracer metal may be moulded to fit around an explosive charge. The salts may be supplied as pressed discs or in another form. More than one metal may be used in a tracer. When more than one metal is used as a tracer they may be simply mixed or alloyed. Alternatively more than one discrete tracer unit, e.g. metallic disc, may be used in the same location or different tracers may be placed in different locations.
The tracer may take the physical form of a moulded metal shape such as a disc, wire or rod or may comprise finely divided particles of metal or as a salt of the metal. The particles may be formed into a shape, such as a tablet or disk, e.g. by pressing, extruding, granulating or other method, optionally using a binder. The tablet may further comprise other materials such as a diluent (i.e. a non-traceable material) to add mass, and/or a dispersant to aid dispersal and / or dissolution of the particles into the fluid to be traced. The tablet or other shape may be encased in a protective coating, preferably of a soluble or permeable material.
For insertion of a tracer by means of a perforator gun, it is preferred to form the tracer metal into a disc for placement into a perforation gun apparatus, either in an external scallop or in close proximity to the explosive charge. Typically a disc may contain from about 0.1 g - 2Og especially 5 - 20 g of metal, preferably from about 8 to 12 g. The tracer may be associated with each explosive charge or only some of them. Preferably the amount of tracer used in a well section provides from about 20 to about 500 g (more preferably between about 50 and 200 g) of tracer metal. The sample of fluid may be taken from the top of the well or may be withdrawn from within a well using a suitable well tool. The sample may be analysed by any suitable means to determine the amount of tracer present. There are many suitable methods for the detection and measurement of metals in a sample by elemental analysis. One suitable method is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) calibrated for the metal used in the tracer. The collected fluid sample may be aspirated into the plasma, optionally after a treatment to separate the phases or to concentrate the sample. Alternatively, when the sample is a hydrocarbon such as crude oil, the sample may be ashed and then extracted into acid which may then be introduced into the plasma. Inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) is also a suitable elemental analysis method to determine the metal tracer content of the sample. We have found that it is beneficial to dilute the sample in a suitable solvent, preferably with the addition of a complexing agent. The complexing agent maintains the tracer metals in solution and avoids loss of tracer on surfaces within the analytical apparatus. When metal tracers stick to surfaces within the apparatus, they may be leached into successive samples passing through the apparatus and lead to inaccurate estimates of tracer within the sample. Any suitable complexing agent may be used, provided it does not interfere with the analysis of the tracers and forms a stable complex with the metal in the selected solvent. Suitable complexing agents include quaternary ammonium compounds. For the analysis of tracers in organic solution we have found that quaternary ammonium compounds having long-chain or bulky alkyl groups are very suitable, for example methyltrioctylammonium chloride, sold commercially as ALIQUAT™ 336.
In a preferred method for analysing an oil sample for a tracer, an internal standard is added to the sample which is believed to contain the tracer and diluted with a solvent containing a complexing agent. The resulting solution is then analysed by ICP-MS configured for organics operation.
Alternatively, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy may be used to determine the amount of fluorescence emitted by the sample at one or more characteristic frequencies when irradiated by X-rays. All of these methods are widely used in analysis and may be operated by the skilled person in a suitable manner. Alternative methods of elemental analysis may also be used, as would be known to the skilled analyst. Such methods may include chemical analysis, atomic absorption spectroscopy, the use of metal sensitive electrodes, voltammetry etc but these methods are likely to be less sensitive than the preferred instrumental analysis methods described above and so are less preferred. It is preferred to analyse a blank sample from the well (i.e. a sample taken before tracer was inserted in the reservoir) in order to determine the amount of the selected tracer metal occurring naturally in the fluids. When the tracer is to be detected in a water-based fluid such as produced water, for example, then the sample preparation may differ from that used for an organic sample; e.g. by evaporating the sample rather than ashing.
The above-described methods are generally capable of quantitatively determining the amount of metal found in a sample, with suitable calibration. However, it should be recognised that the tracer technique itself may not be quantitative because, especially when the tracer is forced into the reservoir formation by a perforation gun, at least some of the metal may stick to the formation in an unpredictable manner. Therefore the method may be most useful for determining the presence or absence of flow from a particular region of the reservoir.
The tracer method of the invention may be varied according to conventional methodologies used in the industry. Therefore, two or more tracers may be combined in a predetermined ratio in order to produce a unique tracer composition for marking a particular well or section of a well. It may be desired to determine the flow of tracer from a particular part of a well or reservoir. In this case a single reservoir may be marked by inserting different tracers or combinations of tracers in different locations in order to determine the part of the reservoir from which a particular sample has originated or flowed through.
The tracer may be inserted in the reservoir by one or more different methods. A preferred method comprises associating the tracer with a part of a perforation tool or perforation gun. The placement of tracers into the formation using a perforation tool (also known as a perforation gun) is already known. A perforation tool is used in the oil and gas drilling, exploration and recovery industry for perforating a well, i.e. for forming channels or perforations extending from a well-bore into the reservoir formation. Each channel or perforation is formed by detonating an explosive charge carried on a tool located in the well. The explosive energy is directed into the well casing (if the well has been cased) or the side of the well to penetrate the formation so that the well casing or well bore side is perforated allowing communication with the formation in the region of the tool. The perforations form channels through which reservoir fluids may flow out of the formation and into the well bore, thereby to flow to the surface of the well for recovery. Perforation tools vary in their size and design according to the result they are to achieve and any description herein of perforation tools is given as general background and not intended to limit the invention. Perforation tools are equipment already known and used in the oil exploration industry, and so a skilled designer of such tools is able to construct a tool suitable for use in the present invention. The tool is typically of generally cylindrical shape and has a length typically of between about 0.5 and about 10 metres. Typically the perforation tool carries more than one charge, usually arranged around the circumference of the tool or gun. The number of charges carried on a perforation tool varies but typically may be between about 2 and about 12 charges per foot (300 mm), normally arranged in a pattern, e.g. approximately helically, along the length of the tool. The explosive charge, detonation means, deployment means and control means comprise materials and apparatus which are known in the industry. For example, the charge is normally shaped to direct the explosive energy along the desired path relative to the body of the perforation tool. The detonator is usually an electrically operated detonator. Control means may comprise a microprocessor and associated control program mounted within the perforation tool or an associated tool or the tool may be controlled directly by means of signals carried to the tool from an operator, normally located at the head of the well. The signals may be carried along a cable connecting the tool and the well-head. The tool is normally deployed by lowering it down a well suspended on a wire or string before, during or after completion of a well.
The tool generally has an outer sleeve covering the explosive charges. When a perforation tool is used to insert tracer into a formation, the tracer may be placed into indentations or "scallops" formed in the outer sleeve, usually directly over one or more of the explosive charges carried by the tool. The tracer compounds may be held in place by an adhesive or a covering film, such as an epoxy resin covering. Alternatively the tracer compounds may be located within the outer sleeve or casing of the perforation tool, for example in contact with an inner sleeve within the gun. It is preferred that the tracer materials are not placed in contact with the explosive charges in order to avoid destabilising the charges by redirecting the angle of the blast. The tracer is therefore placed spaced away from the charge in the path of the blast so that at least some of the tracer material is carried into the reservoir formation with the explosive gases when the charge is detonated. It is likely that some of the tracer is vaporised in the explosion and then condenses within the formation. At least some of the tracer particles are then carried out of the formation with the flow of fluids released by the perforation of the formation by the explosive charge. The tracer or tracers may be placed in the gun or perforation tool in the form of shaped units as described hereinbefore or coated onto a part of a perforator gun. Alternatively the tracer metal may be moulded to fit around an explosive charge.
It is not necessary to dissolve the tracer in the fluid to be traced; it is sufficient in many circumstances to disperse particles of the metal or salt in the fluid so that the finely divided metal particles flow with the fluid. A metal salt tracer may be selected to be soluble in the fluid which is to be traced. For example when the tracer is for use in monitoring flows of oil in an oil well, then an oil-soluble metal salt may be selected, e.g. a salt of an organic acid, particularly a long-chain fatty acid. When the tracer is for use in a water-based system, e.g. for tracing water pumped into a well, then it is preferred to use a water-soluble salt of the tracer metal(s) such as a sulphate, nitrate or halide. Alternatively a solid tracer comprising a soluble salt of the metal is placed in the well and is then dissolved in the water flowing within the well. The method of the invention is for the placement of solid tracers comprising nonradioactive metals in a reservoir for tracing the flow of fluids in and from a well bored into the reservoir. It is known from US 5,711 ,900 and US 6,001 ,280 to use as a tracer a solution of a gadolinium salt of a carboxylic acid. The deployment of tracer solutions as disclosed in those references is not within the scope of the present invention.
The invention will be further described in the following examples with reference to the drawing which is:
Figure 1 a graph showing the concentration of Nb and Ta found in a sample of reservoir fluids against time when the sample was taken.
Preparation of reagents
The following reagents were used:
ICP standard solutions of 1000 mg/ml Nb, Ta, Y, Tl, La, (supplied by Inorganic ventures, Aldrich and VWR) Multi element precious metals standard containinglOO mg/ml Au, Ir, Os, Pt, Pd, Pt,
Re, Rh and Ru (supplied by Alfa-Aesar).
Dilution solution for stock standards, 10% w/v Aliquat™ 336, 10% v/v ethyl hexanol in
MIBK
Dilution solution for samples, 1% w/v Aliquat 336, 5% v/v ethyl hexanol in Lotoxane™ solvent.
1 μg/ml stock standards were prepared by diluting 50 μl aliquots of the 1000 μg/ml and 500 μl of the 100 μg/ml ICP standards to 50 ml with stock standard dilution solution.
The following 1 mg/ml combined stock solutions were prepared:
1 ) Nb,+Ta
2) La + In
3) Au, Ir, Os, Pt, Pd, Pt, Re, Rh + Ru
4) Y + Tl internal standard A 0.1 mg/ml combined standard was the prepared by combining 1 ml aliquots of stock solutions 1 , 2 and 3 and diluting to 10 ml with stock standard dilution solution. Instrumentation: ICP-MS, Thermo X Series Il fitted with organics kit, peltier cooled spray chamber, micromist low flow nebuliser (Glass Expansion), extra mass flow controller for addition of oxygen into the plasma and platinum cones. The instrument was initially set up with a standard aqueous introduction system and a detector cross-calibration and full system tune were preformed. An instrument performance check was then performed to confirm that the instrument was performing within the manufacturers acceptance limits. The organics kit was then fitted and the instrument stabilised on isopropanol. A blank solution containing internal standard was aspirated. The oxygen flow was adjusted until the green carbon emission was removed and the ICP-MS optics were then optimised on the low and high mass internal standards.
Calibration
High level calibration standards were prepared by combining aliquots of stock solutions 1 , 2 and 3, plus 500 μl of internal std solution and 1 g of base oil and diluting to 10 g with sample dilution solution. Low level calibration standards were prepared by adding aliquots of the 0.1 μg/ml combined standard, 1 g of base oil and 500 μl of internal std solution and diluting to 10 g with sample dilution solution. The instrument was calibrated using the prepared high-level and low-level calibration standards. Instrument response was linear over the calibration range 0 - 20 ng/g with a relative standard deviation of less than 2%.
Detection limits
The detection limits for the metals was determined as 3x standard deviation (limit of detection, LOD) and 10x standard deviation (limit of quantification, LOQ) of the results of ten repeated determinations of a measuring a 100 pg/g standard solution. The highest LOD and LOQ was found for La at 35 pg/g and 117 pg/g respectively.
Example 1
A 1g sample of crude oil was spiked with 50μl of 0.1 μg/ml combined standard. 500 μl of internal standard solution was added and diluted to 10 g with sample dilution solution. This gives a spike of 0.5 ng / g in the final solution (equivalent to 5 ng / g in the 1g sample). To establish a base level an un-spiked sample was prepared in the same way. The samples were analysed using the calibrated ICP-MS instrument and the results are shown in Table 1.
The concentration of each of the metals found in the background (i.e. the un-spiked sample) is shown together with the percentage of added metal tracer found in the spiked sample after subtraction of the background level. The results show that recovery of the metal tracer elements was between 80 and 1 10 %. Values greater than 100% are believed to be caused by the spiked sample responding better in the plasma than the calibration samples, an effect which may be due to the different viscosity of the sample and calibration solutions.
Table 1
Example 2
12g of niobium carbide powder was mixed with a microcrystalline wax binder and formed into 40 disk-shaped tablets, each approximately 10mm diameter and 2mm thick by pressing. The tablets were placed into indentations, known as scallops, in the outer surface of the casing of a perforation tool and covered in an epoxy material. A second batch of 40 tablets containing a total of 12g of tantalum carbide mixed with the wax binder was prepared in the same way and the tablets were placed into the scallops of a second perforation tool. The perforation tools were of a standard type, each being provided with a plurality of explosive charges arranged to fire outwardly from the perforation tool in a predetermined direction upon operation of the tool. The perforation tools were placed down a well into different locations in the formation of an oil reservoir and fired to perforate the formation. When the reservoir fluids had reached the surface, samples of the reservoir fluid were collected every 30 minutes. The samples were later analysed using the ICP-MS method described above. The results are plotted in Figure 1 as the concentration of Nb and Ta found in a sample against time when the sample was taken. The plot shows that both Nb and Ta have been detected confirming that both perforation tools fired and that fluid is flowing up the well from the locations of each of the perforation tools. This confirms that the perforation tool successfully perforated the formation and that fluid flowed from fissures in the formation opened by the operation of the tool The Ta peak appears to lag behind the Nb peak by a short time and this is believed to confirm that the tool containing the Ta tracer was placed further from the well-head than the tool containing the Nb tracer.

Claims

Claims
1. A method of monitoring the flow of fluid within or from a reservoir comprising the steps of inserting in said reservoir a solid tracer comprising at least one nonradioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt of said metal, thereafter collecting a sample of fluid within or flowing from the reservoir and analysing said sample to determine the amount of said tracer contained in the sample.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the tracer comprises caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, europium, platinum or rhodium or a salt thereof.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the tracer comprises a water- soluble salt of at least one of said metals.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the tracer comprises a hydrocarbon-soluble salt of at least one of said metals.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the tracer comprises at least one of said metals in elemental form.
6. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the tracer is in the physical form of a disc, rod, wire or coating.
7. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the tracer is in the form of finely divided particles of metal or of a salt of the metal.
8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the particles are formed into a shaped unit.
9. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the reservoir is a subterranean oil and/or natural gas reservoir.
10. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the tracer is inserted into the reservoir by means of a perforation tool.
11. A perforation tool comprising an elongate body having a central longitudinal axis, a control means, deployment means and at least one explosive charge mounted on or within said body and associated with detonation means, said charge being arranged to direct energy explosively and outwardly from the elongate body upon detonation, and at least one tracer material mounted on or within said body within the path of said explosive energy, characterised in that the tracer material is solid and comprises at least one non-radioactive metal selected from caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, lanthanum, gold, iridium, osmium, silver, platinum, palladium, rhenium, ruthenium, rhodium, hafnium, indium a metal of the Lanthanide series of the periodic table, or a salt of said metal.
12. A perforation tool as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the tracer comprises caesium, niobium, tantalum, tellurium, terbium, europium, platinum and rhodium or a salt thereof.
13. A perforation tool as claimed in claim 11 or claim 12, wherein the tracer comprises a water-soluble salt of at least one of said metals.
14. A perforation tool as claimed in claim 11 or claim 12, wherein the tracer comprises a hydrocarbon-soluble salt of at least one of said metals.
15. A perforation tool as claimed in claim 11 or claim 12, wherein the tracer comprises at least one of said metals in elemental form.
16. A perforation tool as claimed in any of claims 11 - 15, wherein the tool comprises an outer sleeve covering the explosive charges and wherein the tracer is located in one or more indentations formed in the outer sleeve aligned with one or more of the explosive charges.
17. A perforation tool as claimed in any of claims 11 - 15, wherein the tracer is located spaced away from a charge between said charge and an outer sleeve of said tool in the intended path of the explosive blast so that at least some of the tracer material is carried into the reservoir formation with the explosive gases when the charge is detonated.
EP07712982A 2006-03-06 2007-03-05 Tracer method and apparatus Not-in-force EP1991759B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB0604451.5A GB0604451D0 (en) 2006-03-06 2006-03-06 Tracer method and apparatus
PCT/GB2007/050099 WO2007102023A1 (en) 2006-03-06 2007-03-05 Tracer method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1991759A1 true EP1991759A1 (en) 2008-11-19
EP1991759B1 EP1991759B1 (en) 2010-10-13

Family

ID=36219191

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07712982A Not-in-force EP1991759B1 (en) 2006-03-06 2007-03-05 Tracer method and apparatus

Country Status (16)

Country Link
US (1) US20090025470A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1991759B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101384794A (en)
AT (1) ATE484651T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2007222221B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0708570A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2636988A1 (en)
DE (1) DE602007009806D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1991759T3 (en)
EA (1) EA012563B1 (en)
GB (1) GB0604451D0 (en)
MX (1) MX2008011399A (en)
NO (1) NO20083437L (en)
NZ (1) NZ569759A (en)
WO (1) WO2007102023A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200806458B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10718167B2 (en) 2013-06-28 2020-07-21 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Well liner

Families Citing this family (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101952546A (en) 2007-12-17 2011-01-19 卢克斯创新有限公司 Compositions and methods for monitoring flow through fluid conducting and containment systems
FR2954796B1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2016-07-01 Total Sa USE OF NANOPARTICLES FOR THE MARKING OF PETROLEUM FIELD INJECTION WATER
EP2542759A4 (en) * 2010-03-04 2015-11-18 Peter E Rose QUANTIC COLLOIDAL CRYSTAL BOXES AS INDICATORS IN UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS
US8230731B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2012-07-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for determining incursion of water in a well
US8596354B2 (en) 2010-04-02 2013-12-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Detection of tracers used in hydrocarbon wells
US20110257887A1 (en) * 2010-04-20 2011-10-20 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Utilization of tracers in hydrocarbon wells
US9422793B2 (en) 2010-10-19 2016-08-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Erosion tracer and monitoring system and methodology
FR2976967B1 (en) * 2011-06-22 2015-05-01 Total Sa TRACER FLUIDS WITH MEMORY EFFECT FOR THE STUDY OF A PETROLEUM FACILITY
US20130087329A1 (en) 2011-10-05 2013-04-11 Johnson Mathey Plc Method of tracing flow of hydrocarbon from a subterranean reservoir
EP2782971B1 (en) 2011-11-22 2020-07-22 Baker Hughes Holdings LLC Method of using controlled release tracers
CN102587896B (en) * 2012-03-15 2015-08-05 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Composite pipe string for mechanical water finding, water blocking and channeling inspection
US9010421B2 (en) 2012-06-15 2015-04-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Flowpath identification and characterization
FR2999223B1 (en) * 2012-12-11 2014-11-21 Total Sa FLUORESCENT PLOTTERS FOR MARKING PETROLEUM FIELD INJECTION WATER
CN103132986B (en) * 2013-02-05 2016-06-15 中联煤层气国家工程研究中心有限责任公司 A kind of method of the Liquid output of the different reservoir measuring coal bed gas well
GB201315848D0 (en) 2013-09-05 2013-10-23 Johnson Matthey Plc Tracer and method
WO2015040041A2 (en) 2013-09-17 2015-03-26 Mærsk Olie Og Gas A/S A system and a method for determining inflow distribution in an openhole completed well
US9594070B2 (en) * 2013-11-05 2017-03-14 Spectrum Tracer Services, Llc Method using halogenated benzoic acid esters and aldehydes for hydraulic fracturing and for tracing petroleum production
FR3013846A1 (en) 2013-11-22 2015-05-29 Jacques Degroote CHEMICAL MARKING METHOD OF LOTS OF CARBON DIOXIDE TO ENSURE TRACEABILITY
CN103643942B (en) * 2013-12-13 2016-02-17 中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所 Test method for isotope labeling of water outlet parts of high water-cut horizontal wells
CN105735975B (en) * 2013-12-13 2019-04-23 中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所 Test method for isotope labeling of water-producing parts of high water-cut horizontal wells
CN105756670B (en) * 2013-12-13 2019-06-18 中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所 Test method for isotope labeling of water-producing parts of high water-cut horizontal wells
WO2015171561A1 (en) * 2014-05-05 2015-11-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Determining fluid reservoir connectivity using nanowire probes
US9297252B2 (en) 2014-06-27 2016-03-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Use of long chain amines and difunctional compounds as tracers
US9303497B2 (en) 2014-06-27 2016-04-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Use of long chain alcohols, ketones and organic acids as tracers
US9322269B2 (en) 2014-06-27 2016-04-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Use of long chain alcohols, ketones and organic acids as tracers
CA2980533A1 (en) 2015-03-24 2016-09-29 John A. Sladic Apparatus for carrying chemical tracers on downhole tubulars, wellscreens, and the like
NO343467B1 (en) * 2015-07-07 2019-03-18 Inst Energiteknik Tracers
WO2017005882A1 (en) * 2015-07-07 2017-01-12 Institutt For Energiteknikk Tracers
GB2540162B (en) * 2015-07-07 2018-02-21 Inst Energiteknik Tracers
US10641083B2 (en) 2016-06-02 2020-05-05 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Method of monitoring fluid flow from a reservoir using well treatment agents
US10413966B2 (en) 2016-06-20 2019-09-17 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Nanoparticles having magnetic core encapsulated by carbon shell and composites of the same
EP3354683B1 (en) * 2017-01-26 2024-10-30 Curt-Engelhorn-Zentrum Archäometrie gGmbH Mixture of substances for determining the origin of materials
US11254861B2 (en) 2017-07-13 2022-02-22 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Delivery system for oil-soluble well treatment agents and methods of using the same
US12060523B2 (en) 2017-07-13 2024-08-13 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Method of introducing oil-soluble well treatment agent into a well or subterranean formation
GB201715109D0 (en) * 2017-09-19 2017-11-01 Johnson Matthey Plc Release system and method
WO2019066811A1 (en) * 2017-09-27 2019-04-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Passive wellbore monitoring with tracers
CN109667574B (en) * 2017-10-13 2022-07-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Metal ion tracer for multi-section fracturing and application thereof
EP3704206A1 (en) 2017-11-03 2020-09-09 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Treatment methods using aqueous fluids containing oil-soluble treatment agents
US11193368B2 (en) 2018-04-27 2021-12-07 Ypf Tecnologia S.A. Nanotracer for oil recovery comprising an occluded polynucleotide and method of preparation thereof
US10995610B2 (en) 2018-04-27 2021-05-04 Ypf Technologia S.A. Nanotracer for oil recovery and method of preparation thereof
CN111236905A (en) * 2018-11-13 2020-06-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for testing horizontal well output profile
US20210047903A1 (en) * 2019-08-14 2021-02-18 Allied-Horizontal Wireline Services Deploying Fluid Tracer Material with a Perforating Gun
US11326440B2 (en) 2019-09-18 2022-05-10 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Instrumented couplings
CN110749642A (en) * 2019-10-29 2020-02-04 中广核工程有限公司 Tracer element concentration detection method for steam generator humidity measurement test
US10961444B1 (en) 2019-11-01 2021-03-30 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Method of using coated composites containing delayed release agent in a well treatment operation
CN111980639B (en) * 2020-09-23 2022-10-14 青岛大地新能源技术研究院 Oil layer tracing monitoring method based on cooperation of perforation and tracer and tracing perforating bullet
CN112324431B (en) * 2020-09-27 2023-01-10 四川瑞都石油工程技术服务有限公司 Multi-spectral-band high-resolution intelligent production test method for oil and gas well
CN119023372B (en) * 2024-10-31 2025-03-11 成都北方石油勘探开发技术有限公司 Method for oil source comparison by using platinum-palladium ratio

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3508875A (en) * 1967-10-03 1970-04-28 Union Oil Co Method for tracing the flow of water in subterranean formations
US3623842A (en) 1969-12-29 1971-11-30 Exxon Research Engineering Co Method of determining fluid saturations in reservoirs
US3799261A (en) * 1972-04-12 1974-03-26 Exxon Production Research Co Technique for measuring fluid drift
US3993131A (en) * 1975-11-03 1976-11-23 Cities Service Company Tracing flow of petroleum in underground reservoirs
US4168746A (en) * 1978-03-02 1979-09-25 Continental Oil Company Single well surfactant test to evaluate surfactant floods using multi tracer method
FR2473180A1 (en) * 1980-01-08 1981-07-10 Petroles Cie Francaise METHOD OF TRACING THE DRILLING MUD BY DETERMINING THE CONCENTRATION OF A SOLUBLE ION
US4879181B1 (en) * 1982-02-09 1994-01-11 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Sintered spherical pellets containing clay as a major component useful for gas and oil well proppants
US4755469A (en) * 1982-09-27 1988-07-05 Union Oil Company Of California Oil tracing method
US4742873A (en) * 1985-05-06 1988-05-10 Mitchell Energy Corporation Subterranean flood tracer process
NO884929L (en) * 1987-12-14 1989-06-15 Halliburton Co PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR A DETERMINED DEPTH OF PERFORTS.
US5077471A (en) * 1990-09-10 1991-12-31 Halliburton Logging Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring horizontal fluid flow in downhole formations using injected radioactive tracer monitoring
US5246861A (en) * 1992-06-05 1993-09-21 Conoco Inc. Use of nonradioactive complex metal anion as tracer in subterranean reservoirs
US5711900A (en) * 1995-11-29 1998-01-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Gadolinium compounds for use as oil-soluble tracers
NO305181B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-04-12 Norsk Hydro As Method for determining the inflow of oil and / or gas into a well
NO20002137A (en) * 2000-04-26 2001-04-09 Sinvent As Reservoir monitoring using chemically intelligent tracer release
US6691780B2 (en) * 2002-04-18 2004-02-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Tracking of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6912898B2 (en) * 2003-07-08 2005-07-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of cesium as a tracer in coring operations
WO2005103446A1 (en) * 2004-04-05 2005-11-03 Carbo Ceramics, Inc. Tagged propping agents and related methods
US7373813B2 (en) * 2006-02-21 2008-05-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for ion-selective discrimination of fluids downhole

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2007102023A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10718167B2 (en) 2013-06-28 2020-07-21 Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company Well liner

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602007009806D1 (en) 2010-11-25
AU2007222221B2 (en) 2011-10-27
WO2007102023A1 (en) 2007-09-13
EA200870324A1 (en) 2008-12-30
US20090025470A1 (en) 2009-01-29
NO20083437L (en) 2008-09-09
NZ569759A (en) 2012-03-30
ZA200806458B (en) 2009-11-25
MX2008011399A (en) 2008-09-22
CN101384794A (en) 2009-03-11
GB0604451D0 (en) 2006-04-12
CA2636988A1 (en) 2007-09-13
BRPI0708570A2 (en) 2011-05-31
EA012563B1 (en) 2009-10-30
EP1991759B1 (en) 2010-10-13
ATE484651T1 (en) 2010-10-15
AU2007222221A1 (en) 2007-09-13
DK1991759T3 (en) 2011-01-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1991759B1 (en) Tracer method and apparatus
US8230731B2 (en) System and method for determining incursion of water in a well
US5182051A (en) Raioactive tracing with particles
EP1937937B1 (en) A method and apparatus for elemental analysis of a fluid downhole
US5243190A (en) Radioactive tracing with particles
US9575206B2 (en) Downhole evaluation with neutron activation measurement
US12110448B2 (en) Multifunctional fluorescent tags for subterranean applications
EP3669216B1 (en) Identifying oil and gas reservoirs with oxygen isotopes
US2592434A (en) Radioactive marker
Neymark et al. Consequences of slow growth for 230Th/U dating of Quaternary opals, Yucca Mountain, NV, USA
WO2018071029A1 (en) Gas isotope analysis
CN107109915A (en) From subsurface formations in-situ retorting ore
US11028687B2 (en) Tracers and trackers in a perf ball
CN107023286A (en) Depth/orientation detection instrument and depth/orientation detection
McLain et al. Independent confirmation of fluvial reworking at a Lance Formation (Maastrichtian) bonebed by traditional and chemical taphonomic analyses
CN112761618B (en) Horizontal oil well liquid production profile testing method
US3566979A (en) Formation marking system
Rabb Particle-size distribution study: Piledriver event
Xu et al. Research on oil well production analysis based on long-term slow-release tracer
US20250334044A1 (en) Method of using a perforator device for the transfer of tracer additives into a formation
US12460541B2 (en) Method of using a perforator device for the transfer of nanoparticle tracer additives into a formation and cluster level flow mapping
CN112761623A (en) Method for selecting marker for oil field logging
Gascoyne et al. Chlorine isotopes and their application to groundwater dating at Olkiluoto
CN112761619B (en) Horizontal oil well liquid production profile calculation method
US20260015938A1 (en) Systems and methods for the transfer of tracer additives into a wellbore

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080804

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090427

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602007009806

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101125

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20100402733

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20101013

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E009769

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110213

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110124

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602007009806

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110714

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120403

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20120322

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20120329

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120323

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20120305

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20120314

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20120301

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20120322

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20120329

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20120322

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120327

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120330

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110305

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20101013

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20131001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20100402733

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20131002

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130305

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20131129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602007009806

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131001

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130402

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131001

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130305