EP1956147B1 - Local seismic protection method for existing and/or possible construction sites destined for the foundation areas and those surrounding the building construction - Google Patents

Local seismic protection method for existing and/or possible construction sites destined for the foundation areas and those surrounding the building construction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1956147B1
EP1956147B1 EP08001690A EP08001690A EP1956147B1 EP 1956147 B1 EP1956147 B1 EP 1956147B1 EP 08001690 A EP08001690 A EP 08001690A EP 08001690 A EP08001690 A EP 08001690A EP 1956147 B1 EP1956147 B1 EP 1956147B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ground
injection
seismic
products
chemical
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08001690A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1956147A1 (en
Inventor
Marco Occhi
Andrea Occhi
Daniele Gualerzi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GEOSEC Srl
Original Assignee
GEOSEC Srl
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GEOSEC Srl filed Critical GEOSEC Srl
Publication of EP1956147A1 publication Critical patent/EP1956147A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1956147B1 publication Critical patent/EP1956147B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D3/00Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
    • E02D3/12Consolidating by placing solidifying or pore-filling substances in the soil
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D27/00Foundations as substructures
    • E02D27/32Foundations for special purposes
    • E02D27/34Foundations for sinking or earthquake territories
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D37/00Repair of damaged foundations or foundation structures

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for local seismic protection intended for opposing potential damages resulting from energized mechanical actions of seismic events on building and/or built areas in general, in particular, on foundations and on the zones surrounding the buildings.
  • German patent application n. DE 4304816 discloses a displacement tip designed as a tapered slide at the end of a pipe driven into the ground.
  • an annular gap opens up through which a granular paste or a dry powder penetrates into the cavity produced by the withdrawal.
  • the pipe is advanced again, the granulate is displaced and compacted together with the surrounding subsoil; axial and torsional vibrations assist this action without disturbing the sensitive environment.
  • the implement is pressed in by a protective and guide pipe and is repeatedly withdrawn and advanced for injecting and compacting the granulate in various working positions.
  • the implement is set up as a pump with drive and control members.
  • the same implement also serves as a probe so that the type and quantity of the granulate can be adapted.
  • a group of injection rods of this type can be fed in such a way that economically optimum, reliable and careful stabilising occurs. Rods or pipes for further improvement, reinforcement or test monitoring can subsequently be inserted into the column-shaped improved areas.
  • This document describes an equipment to measure vibrations in static conditions.
  • the object of this invention is based on these assumptions.
  • the active types (more complex and expensive) exert dynamic counter force against the seismic action during the event occurrence
  • passive control types (more recent) in some cases pursue isolation effects that envisage the interposition of disconnecting elements with strong (horizontal) deformability and strong axial (vertical) rigidity between foundations and superstructures, in an attempt to disassociate the ground motion from that of the structures above the earth, as an alternative to dissipation effects which envisage the insertion of dissipating wind braces into the building structures suitable for absorbing the seismic energy themselves.
  • the method for seismic protection according to this invention aims at focussing mainly on the ground under and around the buildings, with the aim of attaining a higher level of local seismic response in that ground, by suitably modifying the chemical and physical features thereof.
  • the latter represents the average propagation speed of waves "S" within the first 30 meters of depth (under the building foundation levels) and depends on the thickness in meters and on the speed of the shear waves through the layer, nth by a total of N layers into which such depth is divided.
  • Vs 30 measurement leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the medium crossed with consequent increase in the rigidity thereof. Similarly, a reduction in the Vs 30 value would correspond to less rigidity of the medium itself.
  • the object of this invention is to propose a non-invasive and effective anthropic intervention method, capable of acting directly not on the structures but on the foundation grounds of existing buildings, in building areas in general and in surrounding grounds, by injecting products, also expanding ones, such as to modify the chemical and physical features, and consequently, the mechanical properties of grounds themselves, favouring the attenuation of any seismic effects directed to the buildings in ways that are different and customised according to their context.
  • the invention solves the problem by a method that varies the physical and chemical features and consequently, the mechanical features of the foundation grounds in general, which consists of targeted injections of products, also expanding ones, into the ground, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, performed through special injection pipes and directed to act on the portions of ground that require a reduction in the potential seismic effect towards the overlying structures, with improvement of the local seismic response.
  • Such portions of ground are localised and monitored with predetermined frequency and geometries before, during, and after said targeted injection interventions, through a series of seismic sources (energizers) and series of receivers (transducers) for geophysical instrumental measurement connected to multi-channel acquisition (seismographs/accelerometers) and computer electronic processing systems capable of analysing and verifying the features of the grounds themselves and of establishing the extent of the injection interventions to be performed to oppose the effects generated by potential seismic phenomena at a local level. This is in order to create uniform conditions in the same portions of ground corresponding to those present in the zones wherein local seismic phenomena are naturally attenuating in a satisfactory manner.
  • a primary object of the invention is to obtain attenuation of the potentially dangerous seismic effects on building grounds and on existing buildings and surrounding zones by acting directly on the ground, modifying with targeted injection of products, also expanding ones, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, the weight/volume correlations of the various phases: solid, liquid and gaseous, considering that these correlations may be variable and different according to the components constituting the grounds concerned, such as: peat, clay, silt, sand, gravel, rock, mixed fractions of the same or as classified by recent standards.
  • Another object of this method aimed at ensuring both a satisfactory attenuation of seismic effects and effective stability over time of the interventions carried out, is to perform monitoring that also takes into account the correct distribution of the products injected, and above all, the effects they have in the ground, in order to select the same according to the most suitable features thereof, such as: density, dimensional stability level over time, iteration with humidity or water over time, shear resistance, elastic modulus, and so on, according to the specific applications that appear to be necessary in each intervention point.
  • CPT punctual quantitative tests
  • a further object consists in the fact of using a method for measuring and controlling the injection system in the ground, not simply punctual, but based on the overall analysis and on the cross-referenced comparison of the main parameters of the ground during mutation; this is obtained with an integrated system of injection and monitoring allows managing the different intervention steps: planning, execution and final validation, by determining the distribution of precise geotechnical parameters underground and the variation thereof over time; the geophysical monitoring adopted can attain different levels of graphical/interpretive restitution even at a three dimensional (3D) level and allows measuring the conditions of the ground in question, the effects induced by the injections on the same and the consequent attenuation of seismic waves, even under the imprint of the buildings, without having to perform excavation or demolition works for traditional inspection and diagnostic purposes.
  • 3D three dimensional
  • the object is to monitor the behaviour of the ground in question before, during and after the injection interventions, and it is achieved by arranging into the same ground, on the surface with seismic arrays or in depth through vertical probing holes (not shown), at least one series of source transmitter elements (6) (energizers) of simulated elastic waves, and at least one aligned series of receivers (4) (transducers) which, after the controlled generation of simulated seismic waves in a predetermined ground point, by means of explosive charges, seismic cannons, pounding hammer or the like, receive the arrival thereof in other predetermined geometric points.
  • Energizers and transducers are connected to at least one multi-channel data acquisition system (5) (seismograph/accelerometer) that detects the data measured so as to allow at least one electronic processor (PC, 7) to trace ground models characterised by a different propagation/acceleration speed of the elastic waves, to determine the geometries and the spatial distribution thereof, to accurately obtain all the important mechanical parameters that characterise the medium crossed.
  • the number of measurements of the transmitter and receiver elements (4) is increasingly higher according to the necessary level of precision to be achieved.
  • the various combinations of measurements performed, as well as the geometrical arrangement of the monitoring elements are then selected so as to ensure specific coverage of the ground volume in question and of the resting structure.
  • the operating measurement techniques can be different according to the level of precision required; in fact, it is possible to operate both at natural ground level, by arranging receivers and transmitters on predetermined lines and distances, and by using one or more drilled holes wherein both receivers and transmitters are inserted.
  • the electronic PC calculator(s) can, without distinction, be set up directly on site or in separate locations and connected over a network, for example via the Internet.
  • the injection systems (11) and the data acquisition and processing units can be positioned on the ground or on self-moving means.
  • Numeral (8) indicates examples of targeted positioning of injection pipes for the products, also expanding ones, to be injected, numeral (9) the zone being reclaimed, numeral (10) an injection terminal connected to a mobile injection unit, not illustrated.
  • the injection/monitoring system according to the invention can optionally be integrated, besides as already mentioned above with electric tomography quality surveys, also with traditional punctual quantitative tests without departing from the scope and object thereof.
  • Said motion sensors are arranged in relation to each other to form a suitable geometrical grid mesh and connected via cable or wireless with PC processors that process the acquired data in real time and return movement, rotation and inclination values consequent to the anthropic actions on the ground to the display and as a whole.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)

Abstract

A method for local seismic protection of building and/or built areas and/or of foundations and building adjacent zones, consists of interventions for injecting into the ground products, also expanding ones, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, and directed through special injection pipes (8) to act on the portions of ground (9) that require a reduction in the potential seismic effect towards overlying structures. Such portions of ground are localized and monitored with predetermined frequency and geometries before, during and after said injection interventions through a series of seismic sources (6) (energizers) and series of receivers (4) (transducers) for geophysical instrumental measurement connected to multi-channel acquisition systems (5) (seismograph/accelerometer). The attenuation of seismic effects is controlled by an increase in the mechanical features (elastic moduli) of the treated ground, in turn influenced by the progress of the surface Vs wave speed in the ground, essential parameter for the evaluation of the potential local seismic attenuation or amplification phenomenon.

Description

  • This invention relates to a method for local seismic protection intended for opposing potential damages resulting from energized mechanical actions of seismic events on building and/or built areas in general, in particular, on foundations and on the zones surrounding the buildings.
  • German patent application n. DE 4304816 discloses a displacement tip designed as a tapered slide at the end of a pipe driven into the ground. When the pipe is withdrawn, an annular gap opens up through which a granular paste or a dry powder penetrates into the cavity produced by the withdrawal. When the pipe is advanced again, the granulate is displaced and compacted together with the surrounding subsoil; axial and torsional vibrations assist this action without disturbing the sensitive environment. The implement is pressed in by a protective and guide pipe and is repeatedly withdrawn and advanced for injecting and compacting the granulate in various working positions. The implement is set up as a pump with drive and control members. The same implement also serves as a probe so that the type and quantity of the granulate can be adapted. A group of injection rods of this type can be fed in such a way that economically optimum, reliable and careful stabilising occurs. Rods or pipes for further improvement, reinforcement or test monitoring can subsequently be inserted into the column-shaped improved areas.
  • This document describes an equipment to measure vibrations in static conditions.
  • International patent application n. WO 2004044335 describes a method in which holes (1) are drilled into the ground for the injection of highly expansive grouts (5), so that the subsoil is void filled and compacted and thus the liquefaction potential under earthquake and vibration forces are reduced.
  • In this patent application, a control based on distance which is performed during injection is described.
  • It is known that when an earthquake occurs, the accumulated elastic energy releases into the ground, partly in the form of elastic seismic waves that propagate with variable speed according to the medium they cross. In particular, during a seismic event the waves that propagate on the surface "S" are responsible for the most serious damages to buildings in general, and are those that must be taken into major consideration for local seismic problems. These effects on sites are particularly important in the vertical section of the ground (for example, within the first 30 meters from the surface level) and especially in urban areas where, during earthquakes, most damages often tend to concentrate in zones where, for example, strong structural and underground heterogeneity favour complex seismic wave interference phenomena that can locally produce considerable amplifications of the ground motion.
  • Considering that seismic danger is defined as the probable level of ground shaking associated with the occurrence of an earthquake, in order to meet current regulations each territory has been divided into dangerousness categories according to a procedure called Seismic macrozonation; however, we know that such division does not take into account the possible effects of amplification due to the passage of the seismic motion through the sedimentary layers closer to the surface, and therefore it may be inadequate in representing local situations that, because of particular features thereof, can show very different seismic dangerousness levels. This is the reason why it is essential to refer to the seismic microzonation of the territory wherein the dangerousness values more strictly reflect local conditions. In this case, the Local Seismic Response analysis constitutes the fundamental part of Microzonation activities: it requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates contributions provided by seismology, geophysics, geotechnics and structural engineering.
  • The object of this invention is based on these assumptions.
  • It is known that various defence/control techniques are currently adopted in order to protect buildings in general from the seismic action, mainly applied to building structures. These interventions are planned passively taking "the ground context" at seismic dangerousness level and mainly concentrating the attention on the structure of the buildings.
  • Therefore, several different types of intervention on supported structures exist. The active types (more complex and expensive) exert dynamic counter force against the seismic action during the event occurrence, whereas passive control types (more recent) in some cases pursue isolation effects that envisage the interposition of disconnecting elements with strong (horizontal) deformability and strong axial (vertical) rigidity between foundations and superstructures, in an attempt to disassociate the ground motion from that of the structures above the earth, as an alternative to dissipation effects which envisage the insertion of dissipating wind braces into the building structures suitable for absorbing the seismic energy themselves.
  • It is also known that it is possible to oppose seismic effects also through hybrid controls, that is, combinations of active and passive control techniques; as a consequence, therefore, in certain cases it is very complex and expensive to plan and carry seismic adaptation works on existing buildings.
  • The method for seismic protection according to this invention aims at focussing mainly on the ground under and around the buildings, with the aim of attaining a higher level of local seismic response in that ground, by suitably modifying the chemical and physical features thereof.
  • Only at a later stage, after having attained a better local seismic response, it will be possible to provide the structure designers with the basic geotechnical and seismic project parameters for a suitable and more accurate intervention on the buildings, to great advantage of the safety and costs of the works.
  • For this purpose, we know that the propagation of surface seismic waves in the ground occurs in a heterogeneous medium according to dispersive modes, and also taking into consideration that different frequencies correspond to different phase speed; in particular, geometric dispersion, as opposed to the intrinsic dispersion of materials, depends on the geometries (thickness) of the layers crossed. In fact, in non-homogeneous or stratified ground having variable mechanical properties, heterogeneity is also reflected on the propagation of surface waves.
  • Different wavelengths, relating to different depths, affect materials with unequal mechanical properties and propagate according to phase speed depending on mechanical properties (elastic moduli). As a result, surface waves are those which are most reliable in providing accurate information on the mechanical features of the crossed ground because, as mentioned above, they do not propagate in fluids but only in the solid framework. For this reason, besides introducing new calculation methods, recent technical standards for seismic-proof project design in adaptation to European and world standards, have also introduced a new ground classification to define the project seismic action based on the Vs30 parameter. The latter represents the average propagation speed of waves "S" within the first 30 meters of depth (under the building foundation levels) and depends on the thickness in meters and on the speed of the shear waves through the layer, nth by a total of N layers into which such depth is divided.
  • An increase in the Vs30 measurement leads to an increase in the mechanical properties of the medium crossed with consequent increase in the rigidity thereof. Similarly, a reduction in the Vs30 value would correspond to less rigidity of the medium itself.
  • It is also known that, in particular conditions of mechanical stress from the exterior, the more a medium is mechanically rigid, the stronger its resistance to seismic action, as far as its final rupture point, where inevitably it collapses.
  • Therefore, in the hypothesis of any anthropic action on the ground that will favour an increase in the "S" wave speed, called Vs, this would result in an increase in the rigidity of the medium crossed, with consequent improvement of the mechanical features of the volume of the ground concerned.
  • Therefore, in some cases where it may be necessary, an increase in the rigidity of the medium could result in a reduction in the potentially dangerous seismic effects on buildings.
  • Therefore, the object of this invention is to propose a non-invasive and effective anthropic intervention method, capable of acting directly not on the structures but on the foundation grounds of existing buildings, in building areas in general and in surrounding grounds, by injecting products, also expanding ones, such as to modify the chemical and physical features, and consequently, the mechanical properties of grounds themselves, favouring the attenuation of any seismic effects directed to the buildings in ways that are different and customised according to their context.
  • The problem is solved by a method according to claim 1.
  • The invention solves the problem by a method that varies the physical and chemical features and consequently, the mechanical features of the foundation grounds in general, which consists of targeted injections of products, also expanding ones, into the ground, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, performed through special injection pipes and directed to act on the portions of ground that require a reduction in the potential seismic effect towards the overlying structures, with improvement of the local seismic response.
  • Such portions of ground are localised and monitored with predetermined frequency and geometries before, during, and after said targeted injection interventions, through a series of seismic sources (energizers) and series of receivers (transducers) for geophysical instrumental measurement connected to multi-channel acquisition (seismographs/accelerometers) and computer electronic processing systems capable of analysing and verifying the features of the grounds themselves and of establishing the extent of the injection interventions to be performed to oppose the effects generated by potential seismic phenomena at a local level. This is in order to create uniform conditions in the same portions of ground corresponding to those present in the zones wherein local seismic phenomena are naturally attenuating in a satisfactory manner.
  • A primary object of the invention is to obtain attenuation of the potentially dangerous seismic effects on building grounds and on existing buildings and surrounding zones by acting directly on the ground, modifying with targeted injection of products, also expanding ones, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, the weight/volume correlations of the various phases: solid, liquid and gaseous, considering that these correlations may be variable and different according to the components constituting the grounds concerned, such as: peat, clay, silt, sand, gravel, rock, mixed fractions of the same or as classified by recent standards.
  • Another object of this method, aimed at ensuring both a satisfactory attenuation of seismic effects and effective stability over time of the interventions carried out, is to perform monitoring that also takes into account the correct distribution of the products injected, and above all, the effects they have in the ground, in order to select the same according to the most suitable features thereof, such as: density, dimensional stability level over time, iteration with humidity or water over time, shear resistance, elastic modulus, and so on, according to the specific applications that appear to be necessary in each intervention point.
  • For further research, it may be useful to integrate the step of injection into the ground with an electric surface or depth tomography or with punctual quantitative tests (CPT) and core sampling.
  • Furthermore, thanks to monitoring also during operation, it is possible to suitably modify both the injection system parameters on site, such as product temperature and correct mixing of the formulas used, and the chemical, physical and mechanical features during ground mutation.
  • In achieving the reduction/attenuation of the potential seismic effects in the ground and improve the local seismic response, it is advantageously and cost-effectively possible to intervene using an integrated action system, with targeted injections, and a direct control during operation, with geophysical readings, and perform the suitable changes to the initial project on the basis of data constantly measured in the total monitoring, completing and/or correcting any deficiencies in the primitive elements available.
  • A further object consists in the fact of using a method for measuring and controlling the injection system in the ground, not simply punctual, but based on the overall analysis and on the cross-referenced comparison of the main parameters of the ground during mutation; this is obtained with an integrated system of injection and monitoring allows managing the different intervention steps: planning, execution and final validation, by determining the distribution of precise geotechnical parameters underground and the variation thereof over time; the geophysical monitoring adopted can attain different levels of graphical/interpretive restitution even at a three dimensional (3D) level and allows measuring the conditions of the ground in question, the effects induced by the injections on the same and the consequent attenuation of seismic waves, even under the imprint of the buildings, without having to perform excavation or demolition works for traditional inspection and diagnostic purposes.
  • In the substance, in attenuating local seismic effects in the vicinity of buildings, by intervening directly on the ground by the method of this invention, it is possible to obtain also a considerable optimisation of costs and final benefits, advantageously defining an accurate seismic microzonation of that treated ground, modifying suitably and as needed the relative local seismic response with the achievement of the following main advantages:
    • reduction of any structural adaptation and improvement of buildings;
    • actual increase of seismic safety according to the relative local seismic response and consequent limitation of damages provided by potential earthquakes to the structures;
    • targeted and localised definition of ground volumes whereon it is necessary to intervene.
  • Furthermore, monitoring of the effects encountered on ground volume during operation also provides the following further advantages:
    • targeted definition of the required quantities and features of the products, also expanding ones, to be injected;
    • optimisation of intervention times.
  • The invention is described in detail according to a non-limiting embodiment with reference to the annexed drawing, wherein:
    • the figure shows the injection-monitoring system according to the invention, applied on a typical ground in the vicinity of a building.
  • With reference to the figure and to the exemplifying embodiment of the invention to a building F with foundations (3), set on a ground, which over a compact substratum (1), has ground features (2) (layer 1, layer 2) favourable for amplification of the potential seismic phenomena effects towards the same building unlike the deeper layers, the object is to monitor the behaviour of the ground in question before, during and after the injection interventions, and it is achieved by arranging into the same ground, on the surface with seismic arrays or in depth through vertical probing holes (not shown), at least one series of source transmitter elements (6) (energizers) of simulated elastic waves, and at least one aligned series of receivers (4) (transducers) which, after the controlled generation of simulated seismic waves in a predetermined ground point, by means of explosive charges, seismic cannons, pounding hammer or the like, receive the arrival thereof in other predetermined geometric points.
  • Energizers and transducers are connected to at least one multi-channel data acquisition system (5) (seismograph/accelerometer) that detects the data measured so as to allow at least one electronic processor (PC, 7) to trace ground models characterised by a different propagation/acceleration speed of the elastic waves, to determine the geometries and the spatial distribution thereof, to accurately obtain all the important mechanical parameters that characterise the medium crossed. The number of measurements of the transmitter and receiver elements (4) is increasingly higher according to the necessary level of precision to be achieved. The various combinations of measurements performed, as well as the geometrical arrangement of the monitoring elements are then selected so as to ensure specific coverage of the ground volume in question and of the resting structure. The operating measurement techniques can be different according to the level of precision required; in fact, it is possible to operate both at natural ground level, by arranging receivers and transmitters on predetermined lines and distances, and by using one or more drilled holes wherein both receivers and transmitters are inserted.
  • By processing the data acquired by PC and dedicated software, and a graphical reconstruction is executed that allows performing controlled and targeted injections of the required products, in the specifically determined proportions and combinations. The electronic PC calculator(s) can, without distinction, be set up directly on site or in separate locations and connected over a network, for example via the Internet.
  • The injection systems (11) and the data acquisition and processing units can be positioned on the ground or on self-moving means. Numeral (8) indicates examples of targeted positioning of injection pipes for the products, also expanding ones, to be injected, numeral (9) the zone being reclaimed, numeral (10) an injection terminal connected to a mobile injection unit, not illustrated.
  • The operating procedure of this method is substantially articulated in the following main operating steps:
    1. a) Arrangement of at least one series of receivers (4) anchored to the virgin ground and/or to the structure to be examined and connected to at least one multi-channel data acquisition unit (5) (seismograph/accelerometer) and at least one electronic processor (PC 7), located on site or in a separate location, with connection over a network.
    2. b) Arrangement of one or more energizing sources (6) of elastic waves in the ground.
    3. c) Energizing of the ground by means of explosive charges or pounding hammers or equivalent and preliminary measurement of the simulated seismic wave propagation speed values in the medium crossed.
    4. d) Computer processing with dedicated software of the measured data and consequent graphic representation (mapping) even in multiple dimensions of the features found in the surveyed ground (Pre-intervention Local Seismic Response) that allows setting the first level of targeted injection project; more specifically: possible geometry of the injection interventions, number and horizontal and vertical levels of the injection points, type and features of the product or products to be injected.
    5. e) Drilling of holes in the ground, intended to attain the lithological volumes that require an improvement of the local seismic response also according to the required level of attenuation of the mechanical effects of seism on the building.
    6. f) Insertion of injection pipes (8) into the above holes, preferably but not limitedly provided with static mixers, and execution of the targeted injection into the ground according to sequences established on the basis of the data monitored and processed by electronic calculator (PC, 7); the injection products, also expanding ones, by way of a non-exhaustive example being bi-component polyurethane foams consisting of dedicated chemical formulas or others, either with open cells or closed cells for the prevalently mechanical actions, and preferably natural or synthetic zeolites, molecular sieves or alternatively, silica gel and the like, for "paralysing" actions of the volume of ground treated, in order to reduce the effects of swelling and sagging of the treated lithology, and to ensure an increase in the duration of the mechanical compacting benefits over time, thanks to the hydrophobic action of capture of interstitial water molecules that may be present in the ground, or alternatively, to crystallize the bonds thereof with the ground itself.
      Said "paralysing" chemical mixtures can be introduced even on multiple injection levels, in holes drilled in the ground both vertically and inclined, and at any distance between two adjacent ones, in a single solution or separately for each component thereof, either with compressed air or in liquid form by slow or pressurised permeation, using injection systems provided or not provided with terminal nozzles to control the flow direction.
    7. g) In the case of medium-high water saturation in the underground being treated, where deemed necessary, it is possible to activate also an effective draining effect to favour at least a partial expulsion thereof, thus preventing it from being accidentally confined or concentrated subsequent to the injections in other portions of surrounding ground. Such actions can be developed optionally using special pipes inserted into injection channels not yet used and suitably positioned according to the images obtained from the ground readings.
    8. h) During the following targeted injections of products also expanding ones, effective even in the presence of water and/or humidity, and directed at acting on the identified portions of ground (2) that require a reduction of the potential seismic effect towards the overlying structures, the monitoring system continues to measure, according to timed frequency and even on possible different installation geometries, the variations of the geophysical parameters on the ground portion concerned, allowing continuous and direct comparison on site with the previous measurements acquired.
    9. i) The acquired data are then inverted/modelled/processed by the electronic PC which, by means of dedicated software comprising simulator algorithms of the variable speed and/or acceleration features for mathematical system analysis, determines and directly on site arranges graphical interpretive restitutions also on multiple dimensions up to 3D level, of the ground volumes being treated, according to the geophysical features thereof at that moment.
    10. l) Based on the comparisons between the measurements carried out at different and sequential times, it is possible to correct and/or modify the project injection parameters during operation, comparing the latest acquired data and intervening with additional and more accurately targeted injections, acting on the physical mechanical parameters of the injection systems, such as: injection levels, temperatures, pressures, amounts of products injected, types of injection products, degree of any mixing, density and so on, until the required local seismic response level is achieved.
  • The injection/monitoring system according to the invention can optionally be integrated, besides as already mentioned above with electric tomography quality surveys, also with traditional punctual quantitative tests without departing from the scope and object thereof.
  • In the injection steps specifically regarding the interface: foundation ground, and volumes underneath the foundation structure and the perimeter thereof, it is necessary to integrate above ground monitoring, preferably with one or more precision motion sensors suitably fixed to both the ground and the building structure (vertical and horizontal) also in order to anticipate and consequently avoid possible damages to the structures during the injections of expanding resins. In the substance, in order to work close to buildings, the method is carried out safely by previously positioning a series of further motion sensors x, y, z on the ground and on the structure concerned. Said motion sensors, different from the previous ones for ground monitoring, are arranged in relation to each other to form a suitable geometrical grid mesh and connected via cable or wireless with PC processors that process the acquired data in real time and return movement, rotation and inclination values consequent to the anthropic actions on the ground to the display and as a whole.
  • While this invention has been described and illustrated according to embodiments thereof, provided by way of a non-limiting example only, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that it is possible to make changes to the operating steps, measurements, data acquisition and processing and targeted injection interventions in order to modify the physical and chemical features of the grounds in order to attenuate the potentially dangerous seismic effects, without departing from the scope and object of the appended claims.

Claims (13)

  1. A method for local seismic protection of building and/or built areas directed at foundation grounds and/or surrounding ground of said buildings and/or built areas consisting of integrated and/or simultaneous injections of chemical products, also expanding ones, into the ground, characterised in comprising the following steps:
    i. arranging a plurality of receivers (4) on said foundation grounds and/or surrounding ground or on the structure to be examined, said receivers being connected to an electronic processor (PC 7);
    ii. arranging one or more seismic sources (6) on the ground;
    iii. performing a controlled generation of seismic waves by means of said seismic sources (6);
    iv. measuring the speed values of the simulated seismic waves and other geophysical parameters indicative of the seismic response of the foundation ground and/or of the surrounding ground to said seismic waves generation;
    v. computer processing said measured geophysical parameters setting a first injection project;
    vi. injecting into the ground said chemical expanding products, which are polyurethane resins, according to said first injection project;
    vii. continuously measuring said geophysical parameters during said injection of said expanding chemical products;
    processing and comparing said measured geophysical parameters at different and sequential times to correct and/or modify said first injection project during injection to obtain an acceptable local seismic response.
  2. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that said first step of injections acts to reduce the plastic tendency of the treated lithology towards swelling and sagging effects, according to the hydrophobic action of capture of interstitial water molecules in contact, according to the generation of new and stronger bonds aimed at increasing the mechanical benefits of compacting and rigidity over time resulting from subsequent injections of expanding chemical mixtures.
  3. Method according to claims 1 to 2, characterised in that the definition of the position of injection points, the amount of chemical mixtures or products, and the reaction features of such products, are determined and modified on the basis of the effects identified during operation in the ground volumes before and during the targeted injections, and in that the conditions of the treated volumes are sequentially compared with the conditions prior to the latest injection performed, until a safer local seismic response level is achieved, also obtained through comparison with surrounding ground volumes having suitable seismic parameters.
  4. Method according to claims 1 to 3, characterised in that it uses measurements and controls of the targeted injections in the ground based on the overall analysis and on the comparison of the main ground parameters during the dynamic phase of re-equilibration by an integrated system of geophysical monitoring and injection that manages the various intervention steps
  5. Method according to claims 1 to 4, characterised in that it comprises a monitoring step to control the effects obtained during "above ground" to "underground" operations in the ground volumes treated with injections of chemical mixtures by means of tomographic geophysical scans up to the 3D level.
  6. Method according to claims 1 to 5, characterised in that said chemical expanding products are introduced into the ground either with compressed air or in liquid form for slow or pressurized permeation using injection systems.
  7. Method according to claims 1 to 6, characterised in that said chemical expanding products are introduced into the ground in a single solution or separately for each component thereof.
  8. Method according to claims 1 to 7, characterised in that said chemical expanding products for the preliminary stage are composed according to the lithological context of synthetic and/or natural zeolites, molecular sieves in general, or alternatively silica gel.
  9. Method according to claims 1 to 8, characterised in that said chemical expanding products are introduced into the ground also at multiple injection levels.
  10. Method for local seismic protection of building and/or built areas directed at foundation grounds and/or at those surrounding the buildings according to claims 1 to 9, characterised in that said chemical expanding products_are injected simultaneously through holes drilled in the ground which can be both vertical or inclined and at any distance between two adjacent ones.
  11. Method according to the previous claims, characterised in that said targeted injection interventions are based on corrections and/or modifications of the first project injection parameters during operation and are obtained and performed on the basis of the comparisons between the measurements carried out at different and sequential times, based on the evaluations of the latest measurements and based on interventions performed on the physical mechanical parameters of the injection systems, such as: injection levels, temperatures, pressures, times, amounts of injected products, types of injection products, degree of any mixing, density, viscosity.
  12. Method according to the previous claims, characterised in that the monitoring, carried out with predetermined frequencies and geometries before, during and after said targeted injection interventions comprises energizers (6) simulators of seismic waves, and at least one series of geophysical instrument measurement receivers (4), positioned on the ground or inserted in probing holes and/or fixed to the structure to be protected and connected to at least one multi-channel component (5) for acquiring series of measurements; said multi-channel unit (accelerometer/seismograph) being connected to at least one electronic processor (PC-7), provided with dedicated software comprising algorithms simulators of the seismic features of the grounds being treated, directly necessary for determining the multidimensional graphical configurations thereof.
  13. Method according to the previous claims, characterised in that for interventions to be carried out in the vicinity of buildings, the method is safely carried out by previously positioning a series of further motion sensors x, y, z on the ground and on the concerned structure; said sensors, different from the previous ones for ground monitoring, are connected to each other to form a suitable geometrical grid mesh and connected over a network via cable or wireless to PC processors capable of returning the set of measured data in real time.
EP08001690A 2007-02-09 2008-01-30 Local seismic protection method for existing and/or possible construction sites destined for the foundation areas and those surrounding the building construction Active EP1956147B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT000014A ITRE20070014A1 (en) 2007-02-09 2007-02-09 METHOD OF LOCAL SEISMIC PROTECTION OF MANUFACTURING AREAS AND / OR MANUFACTURED TO THE FOUNDATIONS AND THE SURROUNDING BUILDINGS.

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1956147A1 EP1956147A1 (en) 2008-08-13
EP1956147B1 true EP1956147B1 (en) 2012-04-18

Family

ID=39401341

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08001690A Active EP1956147B1 (en) 2007-02-09 2008-01-30 Local seismic protection method for existing and/or possible construction sites destined for the foundation areas and those surrounding the building construction

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1956147B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE554235T1 (en)
ES (1) ES2388154T3 (en)
IT (1) ITRE20070014A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110361720A (en) * 2019-07-31 2019-10-22 武昌理工学院 A kind of sonar quiets down plate control method

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1392229B1 (en) * 2008-12-09 2012-02-22 Tecnigest S R L APPARATUS FOR SUBACQUE PERFORATIONS
TR200906475A1 (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-03-21 Mete Erdemg�L Enver Building support system.
RU2451305C1 (en) * 2011-05-03 2012-05-20 Учреждение Российской академии наук геофизических исследований Владикавказского научного центра РАН и Правительства Республики Северная Осетия - Алания (ЦГИ ВНЦ РАН и РСО-А) Microseismic zoning method
US9074340B2 (en) 2013-02-06 2015-07-07 Aquadation Technologies, Llc Building foundation and soil stabilization method and system
LU92314B1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-05-27 Arman Innovations Sa Rehabilitation process for a structure exhibiting a crack by following a curve representative of the spacing of the edges of the crack
EP3040490B1 (en) 2014-12-30 2017-09-20 Universita' Degli Studi Di Cagliari Method and system for activating and controlling a water-repelling process in walls
CA3025141A1 (en) * 2015-05-21 2016-11-24 Aquadation Llc Structural foundation monitoring sensor system
JP6572030B2 (en) * 2015-07-09 2019-09-04 株式会社不動テトラ Seismic isolation structure for soft ground
ITUA20162691A1 (en) * 2016-04-18 2017-10-18 Geosec S R L Method and kit to mitigate the risk of liquefaction of a land to be consolidated
CN106703836A (en) * 2016-12-29 2017-05-24 中铁隧道勘测设计院有限公司 Treatment method of the bedding soft soil of existing circular shield tunnel
JP6627906B2 (en) * 2017-03-31 2020-01-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Reinforcement method of existing steel pipe pile foundation
EP3724297A1 (en) * 2017-12-15 2020-10-21 Redrock Ventures B.V. Method for control of expansive grouting technique
US10760236B2 (en) * 2017-12-15 2020-09-01 Redrock Ventures B.V. System and method for real-time displacement control using expansive grouting techniques
FR3079621B1 (en) * 2018-04-03 2020-03-27 Soletanche Freyssinet SOIL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
CN110820789A (en) * 2019-11-21 2020-02-21 太原理工大学 Synchronous water injection humidifying device for lime-soil compaction pile
CN110820790B (en) * 2019-11-21 2022-07-05 太原理工大学 Synchronous water injection humidifying construction process for lime-soil compaction pile
CN112182888B (en) * 2020-09-29 2022-11-01 广西大学 Method and device for identifying mechanical parameters of main control structural plane of small-sized sliding dangerous rock mass
CN115110599B (en) * 2022-08-25 2022-11-11 山西路桥市政工程有限公司 Automatic soil discharging construction process for deep foundation pit

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4304816A1 (en) 1993-02-17 1994-08-18 Gerd Prof Dr Ing Gudehus Implement and method for stabilising and exploring soft subsoil
KR970027540A (en) * 1995-11-13 1997-06-24 다카하시 지즈코 Prevention of shape change of cohesive soils on roads, banks, and foundations and disaster prevention methods for earthquake disasters
EP1565620A1 (en) 2002-11-13 2005-08-24 E. Mete Erdemgil Method for reducing the liquefaction potential of foundation soils

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110361720A (en) * 2019-07-31 2019-10-22 武昌理工学院 A kind of sonar quiets down plate control method
CN110361720B (en) * 2019-07-31 2021-04-02 武昌理工学院 Sonar sound collecting board control method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2388154T3 (en) 2012-10-09
ATE554235T1 (en) 2012-05-15
EP1956147A1 (en) 2008-08-13
ITRE20070014A1 (en) 2008-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1956147B1 (en) Local seismic protection method for existing and/or possible construction sites destined for the foundation areas and those surrounding the building construction
CN101295027B (en) Synthetic nondestructive detecting method for hidden dangers of levee
Massarsch et al. Ground vibrations induced by impact pile driving
Ding et al. Stability of large underground caverns excavated in layered rock masses with steep dip angles: a case study
Ha et al. Simulation of soil–foundation–structure interaction of Hualien large-scale seismic test using dynamic centrifuge test
Zhou et al. Centrifuge modeling of dynamic response of high fill slope by using generalized scaling law
Hanson et al. Advanced techniques in site characterization and mining hazard detection for the underground coal industry
Wood et al. Design of large diameter monopiles in chalk atWestermost Rough offshore wind farm
Daryaei et al. Settlement evaluation of explosive compaction in saturated sands
Sica et al. Seismic response of large earth dams in near-source areas
CN108592720B (en) Vibration damping hole arrangement method for reducing ground blasting vibration
Ling et al. Vibration response and parameter influence of TBM cutterhead system under extreme conditions
CN112016201B (en) DFOS strain-based deep stope advanced support pressure evolution model reconstruction method
Lentini et al. Numerical modelling and experimental monitoring of a full-scale diaphragm wall
Qin et al. Detection of diaphragm wall defects using crosshole GPR
Jastrzębska et al. Analysis of the vibration propagation in the subsoil
Zhang et al. Experimental investigation of seismic performance of segmental tunnel with secondary lining under strong earthquake
Kamijo et al. Seismic tests of a pile-supported structure in liquefiable sand using large-scale blast excitation
SHI et al. Physical experimental study on excavation disturbance of TBM in deep composite strata
Kurtulus Field measurements of the linear and nonlinear shear moduli of soils using drilled shafts as dynamic cylindrical sources
Chen et al. Study on the liquefaction characteristics of saturated sands by millisecond delay blasting
Sun et al. Seismic analyses of the Bay Tunnel
Gabassi et al. 3D FEM analysis of soil improving resin injections underneath a mediaeval tower in Italy
Miller et al. Shear wave velocity field to detect anomalies under asphalt
Stewart et al. Determination of the dynamic shear modulus of Holocene bay mud for site-response analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080908

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20081023

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E02D 3/12 20060101ALN20110919BHEP

Ipc: E02D 37/00 20060101ALI20110919BHEP

Ipc: E02D 27/34 20060101AFI20110919BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 554235

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008014838

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ZIMMERLI, WAGNER & PARTNER AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120418

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20120401361

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20120713

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 554235

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120418

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20120418

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2388154

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20121009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120718

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120818

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120820

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008014838

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130131

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20130130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: WAGNER PATENT AG, CH

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130130

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20240122

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240223

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240119

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240202

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231214

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240124

Year of fee payment: 17