EP1896883A2 - Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification - Google Patents
Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnificationInfo
- Publication number
- EP1896883A2 EP1896883A2 EP06774363A EP06774363A EP1896883A2 EP 1896883 A2 EP1896883 A2 EP 1896883A2 EP 06774363 A EP06774363 A EP 06774363A EP 06774363 A EP06774363 A EP 06774363A EP 1896883 A2 EP1896883 A2 EP 1896883A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- reflector
- focal point
- rays
- target
- optical device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B17/00—Systems with reflecting surfaces, with or without refracting elements
- G02B17/02—Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system
- G02B17/06—Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror
- G02B17/0605—Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror using two curved mirrors
- G02B17/0615—Catoptric systems, e.g. image erecting and reversing system using mirrors only, i.e. having only one curved mirror using two curved mirrors off-axis or unobscured systems in wich all of the mirrors share a common axis of rotational symmetry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B19/00—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics
- G02B19/0004—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed
- G02B19/0019—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed having reflective surfaces only (e.g. louvre systems, systems with multiple planar reflectors)
- G02B19/0023—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the optical means employed having reflective surfaces only (e.g. louvre systems, systems with multiple planar reflectors) at least one surface having optical power
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G02—OPTICS
- G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
- G02B19/00—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics
- G02B19/0033—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use
- G02B19/0047—Condensers, e.g. light collectors or similar non-imaging optics characterised by the use for use with a light source
Definitions
- This invention relates to systems for collecting and condensing electromagnetic radiation, particularly a system incorporating asymmetric parabolic reflectors for collecting radiation emitted from a radiation source and focusing the collected radiation onto a target.
- the functional objective for systems that collect, condense, and couple electromagnetic radiation into a waveguide, such as a single fiber or fiber bundle, or outputs to a homogenizer of a projector, is to maximize the brightness (i.e., maximize the flux intensity) of the electromagnetic radiation at the target.
- the prior art teaches the use of so-called on-axis reflector systems involving spherical, ellipsoidal, and parabolic reflectors and off-axis reflector systems involving spherical, toroidal, and ellipsoidal reflectors.
- off-axis reflector systems achieve higher efficiency and brightness at the target than on-axis systems, thereby maximizing the amount of light that can be collected by a fiber optic target.
- both on-axis and off-axis reflector systems are effective for collecting, condensing, and coupling the radiation from a radiation source into a wave guide.
- An optical collecting and condensing system comprises various optical elements, such as reflectors and lenses that receives lights energy from a light source, such as a light bulb, and directs the light energy toward a target.
- the optical system collects and condenses electromagnetic radiation to couple the light energy to a standard waveguide, such as a single fiber or fiber bundle or to output the light energy to a homogenizer of a projector.
- the functional objective for the optical system is to maximize the brightness (i.e., the flux intensity) of the electromagnetic radiation at the target.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a known on-axis optical system that uses a paraboloid reflector with an imaging lens.
- the paraboloid reflector has the feature that light energy emanating from a focus is substantially collimated to travel parallel to the optical axis.
- the optical system of FIG. 1 uses this feature of the paraboloid reflector by positioning the light source at the focus in order to collimate the light from the light source.
- a condensing lens positioned in the optical stream receives the substantially collimated light energy and redirects the light energy toward the target. In this way, the light energy is collected and condensed at the target.
- the use of the paraboloid reflector further allows the use of various types of optical filters to improve the performance and durability of the optical system.
- the divergence of the light varies continuously along the reflector, with rays traveling near the optical axis having the greatest divergence.
- the magnification of the system varies along the different paths taken by the light emitted from the light source, causing degradation of the brightness of the system.
- the focusing lens produces a distorted image even under perfect conditions and under actual operation typically produces badly aberrated images which effectively increase the image size and reduce flux intensity at the target.
- FIG. 2 illustrates another known on-axis optical system.
- This system uses an ellipsoidal reflector, which ahs the feature that all light emanating from one focal point is directed to a second focal point.
- the optical system of FIG. 2 uses an ellipsoidal reflector with a light source placed at the first focus and a target placed at the second focus.
- the on-axis ellipsoidal system suffers from brightness degradation caused because the divergence of the light varies continuously along the reflector, with rays traveling near the optical axis having the greatest divergence.
- Overall, on-axis systems generally suffer from the basic limitations of losing brightness in the coupling, thus degrading the overall efficiency of the optical illumination and projection system.
- the divergence of the reflected beam in known on-axis systems is undesirably dependent on the angle of emission from the radiation source.
- the outputs of the on-axis system are substantially circular and symmetric and, therefore, may not be suitable for non-circular targets, such as a rectangular homogenizer for use in projection.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an optical system in which the light source is positioned at a focal point of a retro-reflector and the target is positioned on a focal point of a primary reflector, but the reflectors are positioned off the optical axis between the light source and the target.
- light energy from the light source reflects from the retro-reflector and travels to the primary reflector. The optical energy then reflects from the primary reflector and converges at the target.
- the magnification is very close to 1- to -1 for all angles of light when the numerical aperture of the system is small.
- the magnification reduces the brightness at the target and overall decreases the performance of the optical system.
- the amount of deviation in the magnification depends on the size of the mirror, the radius of curvatures, and the separation of the arc lamp and the target. Accordingly, the off-axis configuration of FIG. 3 is more suitable for applications that use smaller numerical apertures.
- U.S. Patent No. 4,757,431 (“the '431 patent”) provides a condensing and collecting system employing an off-axis spherical concave reflector which enhances the maximum flux intensity illuminating a small target and the amount of collectable flux density by the small target. Enhancements to the optical system of the '431 patent are provided by U.S. Patent No. 5,414,600 (“the '600 patent”), in which the off-axis concave reflector is an ellipsoid, and by U.S. Patent No. 5,430,634 (“the '634 patent”), in which the off-axis concave reflector is a toroid.
- the known off-axis optical systems provide a generally near 1-to-l (i.e., magnification free) image of the light source at the target and conserve brightness.
- magnification deviates from 1-to-l as the amount of light collected is increased by increasing the collection angle of the reflector.
- the overall performance of the optical system degrades.
- U.S. Patent No. 6,672,740 provides an on-axis, dual paraboloid reflector system that is advantageous in many respects to other known systems, including the achievement of near 1-to-l magnification for small-sized light source.
- This optical collection and condensing system uses two generally symmetric paraboloid reflectors that are positioned so that light reflected from the First reflector is received in a corresponding section of the second reflector.
- light emitted from the light source is collected by the first paraboloid reflector and collimated along the optical axis toward the second reflector.
- the second receives the collimated beam of light and focuses this light at the target positioned at the focal point.
- FIG. 4 includes the light paths for three different rays (a, b, and c) emitted from the light source.
- Ray a travels a relatively small distance before intersecting the first parabolic reflector, but the divergence of ray a at the first parabolic reflectors is relatively large.
- ray c travels further between the light source and the first parabolic reflector but has a smaller relative divergence at the first parabolic reflector but has a smaller relative divergence at the first reflector.
- Ray b positioned between rays a and c, travels an intermediate distance before intersecting the first parabolic reflector and has an intermediate divergence, hi this optical system, due to the symmetry of the two parabolic reflectors, the rays a, b, and c are reflected at corresponding positions in the second parabolic reflector such that the distance fro each ray between the second parabolic reflector and the target is the same as the distance between the second parabolic reflector and the target is the same as the distance between the light source and the first parabolic reflector. In this way, the second reflector compensates for the divergence. Consequently, the optical system collects and condenses light energy from the light source with a near 1-to-l magnification and preserves the brightness of the light source.
- the optical system of FIG. 4 may further employ a retro-reflector in conjunction with the first paraboloid reflector to capture radiation emitted by the source in a direction away from the first paraboloid reflector and reflect the captured radiation back through the source.
- the retro -reflector has a generally spherical shape with a focus located substantially near the light source (i.e., at the focal point of the first paraboloid reflector) toward the first paraboloid reflector to thereby increase the intensity of the collimated rays reflected therefrom.
- an improved system for collecting and condensing electromagnetic radiation employs opposing asymmetric reflectors and optimizes magnification between a source image and a focused image at a target, thereby producing maximum focused intensity at the target.
- the present invention is directed to an optical device for collecting electromagnetic radiation from a source of electromagnetic radiation and focusing the collected radiation onto a target to be illuminated with at least a portion of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the source.
- the device comprises a first and second reflectors, each reflector generally comprising at least a portion of a paraboloid or ellipsoid of revolution and has an optical axis A and a focal point on the optical axis A.
- a source located proximate the focal point of the first reflector produces collimated rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector in a direction parallel to the optical axis A.
- the second reflector comprises at least a portion of a paraboloid or ellipsoid of revolution and has an optical axis B and a focal point on the optical axis B.
- the second reflector is positioned and oriented with respect to the first reflector so that the rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector are reflected by the second reflector and focused toward a target located proximate the focal point of the second reflector.
- the first and second reflectors have slightly different shapes and sizes.
- the second reflector is positioned and oriented with respect to the first reflector so that the rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector converse at a focal point of the second reflector. The rays of radiation then continue until reflected by the second reflector and focused toward a target located proximate a second focal point of the second reflector.
- the first and second reflectors can be oriented optically about asymmetrically with respect to each other to optimize magnification.
- a retro-reflector may be used in conjunction with the first reflector to capture radiation emitted by the source in a direction away from the first reflector and reflect the captured radiation back through the source (i.e., through the focal point of the first reflector) toward the first reflector to thereby increase the intensity of the rays reflected therefrom.
- the first and second reflectors comprise an asymmetric ellipsoid/hyperboloid pair with one of the first and second reflectors having a substantially ellipsoid shape, and the other of the first and second reflectors having a corresponding substantially hyperboloid shape with each reflector of the ellipsoid/hyperboloid pair having a corresponding size and optical orientation with respect to each other so that each ray of radiation reflected by a surface portion of the first reflector is reflected by a corresponding surface portion of the second reflector toward the target so as to preferably optimize magnification between the source and an image focused onto the target.
- an optical device for illuminating a target with rays of electromagnetic radiation comprises a first reflector and a second reflector.
- the first reflector comprises a first focal length, a first focal point and a first optical axis, the rays of electromagnetic radiation being directed substantially proximate to the first focal point of the first reflector.
- the second reflector comprising a second focal length, a second focal point and a second optical axis, which is not coincident with the first optical axis.
- the second reflector being positioned and oriented with respect to the first reflector to receive at least a portion of the rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector and reflect the portion of the rays of radiation to a target located substantially proximate to the second focal point of the second reflector.
- the second reflector being asymmetric with respect to the first reflector.
- the focal length of the second reflector is longer than the focal length of the first reflector, which lowers the incidence angle of the rays of radiation inputted to the target, thereby reducing the Fresnel reflection loss.
- the asymmetric characteristics of the first and second reflectors are selected to maximize net output coupling efficiency.
- the focal length difference between the focal lengths of the two reflectors is selected to optimize the tradeoff between Fresnel reflection loss and image aberration, thereby providing a maximum net output coupling efficiency.
- an optical device for illuminating a target with rays of electromagnetic radiation comprises a first reflector and a second reflector.
- the first reflector comprises a first focal length, a first focal point, a second focal point, and a first optical axis.
- the rays of electromagnetic radiation being directed substantially proximate to the first focal point of the first reflector to reflect from the first reflector and substantially converge at the second focal point.
- the second reflector comprising a second focal length, a first focal point and a second focal point and a second optical axis, which is not coincident with the first optical axis.
- a target being located substantially proximate to the first focal point of the second reflector to receive at least a portion of the rays of radiation that pass through the second focal point of the second reflector and are reflected by the second reflector to substantially converge at the first focal point of the second reflector.
- the second reflector being positioned and oriented with respect to the first reflector such that the second focal point of the first reflector and the second focal point of the second reflector are positioned substantially proximate.
- the second reflector being asymmetric with respect to the first reflector, which optimizes net output coupling efficiency.
- a method for collecting rays of electromagnetic radiation and focusing the collected rays of electromagnetic radiation onto a target comprises the steps of directing the rays of electromagnetic radiation substantially proximate to a focal point on a first optical axis of a first reflector; positioning and orienting a second reflector with respect to the first reflector to receive at least a portion of the rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector; and positioning the target proximate to a focal point of the second reflector to receive at least portion of the rays of radiation reflected from the second reflector, wherein the second reflector being asymmetric with respect to the first reflector to effectively reduce Fresnel reflection loss.
- a method for collecting rays of electromagnetic radiation and focusing the collected rays of electromagnetic radiation onto a target comprising the steps of: directing the rays of electromagnetic radiation substantially proximate to a first focal point on a first optical axis of a first reflector so that the first reflector substantially converges the rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector at a second focal point on the first optical axis; positioning a second reflector so that a first focal point on a second optical axis of the second reflector is substantially proximate with the second focal point of the first reflector, whereby the converging rays of radiation reflected from the first reflector pass through the first focal point of the first reflector and are redirected by the second reflector toward a second focal point on the second optical axis; and positioning the target proximate to the second focal point of the second reflector, wherein the second reflector being asymmetric with respect to the first reflector
- Filters or other optical elements can be arranged between the collimating and focusing reflectors.
- the shape of the first and second reflectors may deviate from an ellipsoid or a paraboloid as needed by the system. Similarly, the first and second reflectors may have a toroidal or spherical shape that approximate an ellipsoid.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of a known on-axis condensing and collecting optical system that uses a paraboloid reflector and a focusing lens;
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of a known on-axis condensing and collecting optical system that uses an ellipsoidal reflector;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of a known off-axis condensing and collecting optical system
- FTG. 4 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of a known on-axis condensing and collecting optical system that uses two paraboloid reflectors;
- FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of an off-axis condensing and collecting optical system using two ellipsoidal reflectors in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram, shown in cross-section, of a condensing and collecting optical system using two reflectors of greater eccentricity in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention
- FIGS. 7a- 7j are schematic views of a plurality of waveguide targets in cross-sections which may be employed in embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG 8a is a schematic view of a dual paraboloid reflector system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG 8b is a schematic view of angles of incidences with a standard dual paraboloid reflector system
- FIG 9a- 9b are schematic views of a dual paraboloid or ellipsoidal reflector system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG 10 is a schematic view of a dual paraboloid or ellipsoidal reflector system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
- FIGS. 5-6 and 8-10 as showing representative exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the invention has associated therewith the following four main components: an electromagnetic source 10, a first reflector 20, a second reflector 30 and a target or tapered light pipe (TLP) 50.
- an electromagnetic source 10 a first reflector 20, a second reflector 30 and a target or tapered light pipe (TLP) 50.
- TLP tapered light pipe
- the electromagnetic source 10 is preferably a light source having an envelope 12.
- the source 10 comprises an arc lamp such as a xenon lamp, a metal-halide lamp, a HID lamp, or a mercury lamp.
- arc lamp such as a xenon lamp, a metal-halide lamp, a HID lamp, or a mercury lamp.
- filament lamps e.g., halogen lamps
- any source of electromagnetic radiation which is of similar size to or smaller than the target may be used (e.g., fiber, filament lamp, gas discharge lamp, laser, LED, semiconductor, etc.)
- the size of the electromagnetic source here is better defined by the 1/e intensity of the intensity contour map which characterizes the brightness (flux density over angular extent) of the source. Brightness is related to the size of the arc gap and determines the theoretical limit of coupling efficiency.
- the contour approximates axial symmetry and is a complex function of electrical rating, electrode design and composition, gas pressure, arc gap size, and gas composition.
- the effective relative position and intensity distribution of the source imaged by the reflector undergoes aberration. This is caused by the shape of the envelope which essentially functions as a lens and requires a compensating optical element.
- Optical compensation can be achieved either by modifying the design of the reflector to compensate for the astigmatism caused by the envelope or by inserting a correcting optic between the source and the target. Additionally, optical coatings can be applied to the envelope to minimize Fresnel reflections and thereby maximize collectable radiation at the target or to control and/or filter the radiation flux.
- the first reflector 20 comprises a portion of an ellipsoid or a paraboloid of revolution having an optical axis 22 and focal points 24 and 26.
- the first reflector 20 preferably has a reflective coating 28 (e.g., aluminum or silver) and the surface is highly polished.
- the first reflector 20 can be made from glass coated with a wavelength-selective multi-layer dielectric coating.
- the coating 28 may be a cold coating with high reflectivity only in the visible wavelengths for use in visual light applications.
- the source 10 placed at the first focal point 24 of the first reflector 20, electromagnetic radiation that contacts the first reflector 20 is reflected as a beam of energy that converges the second focal point 26 of the first reflector 20.
- the source 20 is an arc lamp
- the arc gap is preferably small compared to the focal length of the first reflector 20.
- the second reflector 30 comprises a portion of an ellipsoid or a paraboloid of revolution having an optical axis 32 and focal points 34 and 36.
- the second reflector 30 may also have a coating 38, as described above to selectively reflect light energy.
- the second reflector 30 can differ in shape or size from first reflector 20. That is, the first and second reflectors are asymmetric with respect to each other.
- the second reflector 30 is positioned and oriented so that the electromagnetic radiation reflected by the first ellipsoidal reflector 20 converges at the second focal point 36 of the second reflector 30. The radiation continues until impinging the surface of the second reflector 30 and is thereafter focused toward the first focal point 34 of the second reflector 30.
- a focused image that is substantially the same size as the source
- the target 50 is a small object requiring illumination with the highest intensity possible.
- the target 50 is a waveguide, such as a light pipe, a tapered light pipe, single core optic fiber, a fused bundle of optic fibers, and a fiber bundle, as illustrated in FIG. 6.
- An input end of the target e.g., a proximal end of the optic fiber
- the optical collection and condensing systems of the present invention are applied to applications for illuminations or projection of an image, there is a need to homogenize the output intensity profile at the target such that the output is more uniform.
- the uniform intensity allows higher power to be coupled to a particular fiber optic configuration without being damaged by hot spots.
- the uniform intensity will be needed to produce a uniform intensity profile at the screen.
- the target may be a homogenizer, as illustrated in FIG. 5 that adjusts the output intensity profile.
- the waveguide may be polygonal (square, rectangle, triangle, etc.) in cross-section as shown in as shown in FIGS. 7a-7f or rounded (circular, elliptical, etc.) in cross-section as shown in as shown in FIGS. 7g-7h.
- the homogenizer can be tapered from smaller to larger sizes or vice versa.
- the target 50 can be an increasing taper waveguide as shown in FIG. 7i, or a decreasing taper waveguide as shown in FIG. 7j.
- the homogenizer allows changes in the shape of the output of the illumination.
- the ideal output of the homogenizer will be rectangular with a ratio of width-to-height of 4-to-3 or 16-to-9, or other ratios, depending on the format of the displays. Nevertheless, the angle of the illuminating radiation in both directions should be similar and such that a circular projection lens 90 can be used with the optical system efficiently.
- the system relates to the use of two reflectors of slightly different size and/or shape arranged so as to share a single focal point (i.e., the second focal point 26 of the first reflector 20 and the second focal point 36 of the second reflector 30 are located substantially identical positions).
- the first reflector 20 and the second reflector 30 are positioned in an opposed, facing relation with respect to each other so as to be concave toward each other.
- Optical symmetry is achieved in the arrangements of FIGS. 5-6 by arranging the first reflector 20 and the second reflector 30 so that their respective optical axes 22 and 32 are collinear and so that the reflective surface of the first reflector 30 is an opposed, facing relation with the substantially corresponding reflecting surface of the second reflector 30 optimizing magnification.
- FIGS. 5-6 three rays a, b, and c are drawn to illustrate the function of the reflectors in view of different possible paths for the electromagnetic radiation produced by the source 10.
- the rays a, b, and c are in substantially the same positions as in FIG. 4 in order to illustrate the effectiveness of the present optical system in reducing aberration.
- Each of the rays a, b, and c emitted from the light source 10 impinges the first reflector 20 at a different point, each point having a different distance from source 10.
- each of the rays a, b, and c is also focused onto the target 50 from a corresponding position of the second reflector 30, thus produces a substantially 1:1 magnification or slight magnification for the three rays.
- ray a has the shortest distance from the source 10 and the first reflector 20 and consequentially produces a larger divergence in comparison to rays b and c.
- radiation from the light source is focused from the first focal point 24 of the first reflector 20 to the second point 26.
- the distances traveled by the radiation from the source 10 is relatively larger than the corresponding distance in the system of FIG. 4 that uses paraboloid reflectors.
- the larger distance reduces the amount of aberration because the distances of rays a, b, and c are now relatively more uniform.
- FIG. 6 shows an exemplary embodiment of the present invention in which the first and second reflectors 20' and 30' have greater eccentricity (i.e., the first and second reflectors are more circular).
- the first and second reflectors 20' and 30' have greater eccentricity (i.e., the first and second reflectors are more circular).
- the greater curvature of the first and second reflectors 20' and 30' in this exemplary embodiment, the distance between the first focus 24' of the first reflector 20' and the first focus 34' of the second reflector 30' is reduced.
- the greater curvature of the reflectors 20' and 30' increased the distance between the first reflector 20' and its first focus 24' along ray a.
- the corresponding distance between the second reflector 30' and its first focus 34' along ray a is increased.
- the distances traveled between the radiation source 10' and the first reflector 20' (as well as the total distance between the source 10' and the target 50') for the rays a, b, and c in FIG. 6 are relatively more uniform in comparison to the embodiment of FIG. 5.
- This feature allows the system to produce less aberration between the light source and the target, even with electromagnetic energy traveling near the optical axis 22', such as energy traveling paths similar to ray a.
- FIG. 6 uses reflectors 20' and 30' covering a greater portion of an ellipsoid in order to collect the same angle of output radiation from the source 10.
- reflectors 20' and 30' in FIG. 6 have approximately the same diameter as reflectors 20' and 30' in FIG. 5.
- the collecting and condensing system of the present invention may incorporate the use of a retro-reflector 40, which, in the illustrated embodiment, is a spherical retro-reflector.
- the retro-reflector 40 is positioned to capture electromagnetic radiation emitted by the source 10 that would not otherwise impinge on the first ellipsoidal reflector 20. More particularly, the spherical retro-reflector 40 is constructed and arranged so that radiation emitted by the source 10 in a direction away from the first reflector 20 is reflected by the retro -reflector 40 back through the first focal point 24 of the first reflector 20 and thereafter toward the first reflector 20.
- This additional radiation reflected by the first reflector 20 is added to the radiation that impinges the first reflector 20 directly from the source 10 to thereby increase the intensity of the radiation reflected toward the second reflector 30. Consequently, the intensity of the radiation at the first focal point 34 of the second reflector 30 is also increased.
- the retro-reflector cannot be oriented so that it focuses radiation back through the first focal point 24 of the first reflector 20, because the retro-reflected radiation would be blocked by the opaque filaments located at the first focal point 24. hi this case, the position of the retro-reflector 40 should be adjusted so that the retro-reflected radiation passes near but not precisely through the first focal point 24.
- the retro-reflector 40 It should be appreciated that several different retro-reflectors 40 are known and may be employed in the present invention.
- the retro-reflecting function can be performed by a two- dimensional corner cube array (not shown) with unit elements sized on the order of the arc size of the source 10 or smaller.
- a two-dimensional corner cube array eliminates the need for precisely positioning a retro-reflector and will produce a tighter focus at the arc of the source 10.
- first and second reflector 20 and 30 may be approximated using shapes that are slightly different from an ideal geometric ellipsoid or paraboloid shape.
- the first and second reflector 20 and 30 may have altered ellipsoidal or parabolic shapes to compensate of various parameters, such as bulb envelops, filters, etc. hi this case, the deviation in the shape of the generally ellipsoidal or parabolic reflectors 20 and 30 can be small and the final output may be slightly different from the optimum.
- Deviations in the shape of the reflectors can also be introduced to reduce cost of the reflectors 20 and 30, or increase performance for particular lamp types and arc shapes.
- reflectors 20 and 30 can be approximated by toroidal reflectors (having two perpendicular and unequal radii of curvature) or spherical reflectors, which can be manufactured at a lower relative cost. If non-ellipsoidal reflectors are used, the output coupling may not be optimum, but the reduced expense for the first and second reflectors 20 and 30 may be sufficient to justify the loss through the inefficient coupling.
- a dual paraboloid reflector (DPR) system 100 comprises a first reflector 20 and a second reflector 30, which are asymmetric with respect to each other.
- first and second reflectors 20, 30 can be replaced with a single reflector having two sections of different shape and/or size.
- the asymmetric relationship of these two reflectors 20, 30 results in slight magnification, which introduces image distortion.
- the light or radiation inputted to the TLP 50 has smaller angles of incidences than standard DPR system, thereby maximizing net output coupling efficiency.
- the DPR system 200 of FIG. 9a comprises the electromagnetic source 10, a first 20, a second reflector 30 and the TLP 50, wherein the two reflectors 20, 30 are asymmetric such that that slight magnification is applied.
- the first and second reflectors 20, 30 can be replaced with a single reflector having two sections of different shape and/or size.
- the second reflector 30 is larger than the first reflector 20 and has longer focal length than the second reflector 30. The slight magnification introduces a small amount of image distortion but the input light to the TLP 50 has smaller angles of incidence, thereby reducing the Fresnel loss.
- the first reflector 20 is preferably a parabolic reflector having optical axis 22 (or axis of focus 22) and the second reflector 30 is preferably a parabolic reflector having optical axis 32 (or axis of focus 32).
- the two axes 22, 32 are not coincident.
- the resultant light incidence onto the TLP 50 from the second reflector 30 is shown in FIG. 9b.
- the output section or second reflector 30 is trimmed to the same focal plane 22 as the input section or first reflector 20, the axis of focus 32 of the output section or second reflector 30 will lie outside the DPR system 200, as shown in FIG. 9b. This advantageously result in incidence angle being smaller than ⁇ 90°, which reduces the effect of Fresnel reflection.
- the DPR 200 or dual elliptical reflector (DER) system 300 can be designed using ray tracing.
- the gain by reducing the Fresnel reflection in the present invention is partly lost by slight distortion of the image due to asymmetry of the DPR or DER system 200.
- the present system optimizes the tradeoff between the Fresnel reflection loss and the image aberration or distortion that maximizes the net output coupling efficiency.
- the DER system 200 of FIG. 10 comprises the electromagnetic source 10, a first 20, a second reflector 30 and the TLP 50, wherein the two ellipsoidal reflectors 20, 30 are asymmetric such that that slight magnification is applied.
- the second reflector 30 is larger than the first reflector 20 and has longer focal length than the second reflector 30. The slight magnification introduces a small amount of image distortion but the input light to the TLP 50 has smaller angles of incidence, thereby reducing the Fresnel loss.
- the first reflector 20 is preferably an elliptical reflector having optical axis 22 (or axis of focus 22) and the second reflector 30 is preferably an elliptical reflector having optical axis 32 (or axis of focus 32).
- the two axes 22, 32 are not coincident.
- the resultant light incidence onto the TLP 50 from the second reflector 30 similar to those in FIG. 9b for the DPR system 200.
- the output section or second reflector 30 is trimmed to the same focal plane 22 as the input section or first reflector 20, the axis of focus 32 of the output section or second reflector 30 will lie outside the DER system 300 (similar to those shown in FIG. 9b for the DPR system 200). This advantageously result in incidence angle being smaller than ⁇ 90°, which reduces the effect of Fresnel reflection.
- a first pair of exemplary optical systems in accordance with the present invention uses a low wattage lamp, in the order of 100 Watts, as the lights source.
- a reflection system in accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 5 each of the first and second reflectors has a diameter of 2.5 inches, and the separation between the source and target (i.e., the distance between the foci) is about 5 inches.
- a low wattage reflection system of greater eccentricity in accordance with the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6 uses first and second reflectors of similar size, each having diameter of approximately 2.5 inches, but has a distance between the source and target of approximately 2 inches.
- the optical system is relatively larger to provide desirable collection of the higher electromagnetic energy levels and to accommodate the potentially larger lamps.
- each of the primary reflectors has a diameter of 20 inches, and the separation between the source and the target is about 40 inches.
- the embodiment of FIG. 6 uses primary reflectors of similar size but results in a reduced distance between the source and target.
- an exemplary high wattage optical system in accordance with embodiment of the FIG. 6, also uses first and second reflectors with a diameter of approximately 20 inches but has a distance between of the source and target of 16 inches.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)
- Projection Apparatus (AREA)
- Lenses (AREA)
- Aerials With Secondary Devices (AREA)
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US69593405P | 2005-06-30 | 2005-06-30 | |
US11/274,241 US20060061894A1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2005-11-14 | Coupling of light from a light source to a target using dual ellipsoidal reflectors |
PCT/US2006/025608 WO2007005624A2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2006-06-29 | Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1896883A2 true EP1896883A2 (en) | 2008-03-12 |
EP1896883A4 EP1896883A4 (en) | 2009-01-21 |
Family
ID=37605048
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06774363A Withdrawn EP1896883A4 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2006-06-29 | Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1896883A4 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2608368A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007005624A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10151445B2 (en) | 2014-03-10 | 2018-12-11 | The Boeing Company | Light assembly having light homogenizer |
CN113625458B (en) * | 2021-09-13 | 2022-04-22 | 北京理工大学 | Double confocal reflection type zoom beam expander |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2021805A (en) * | 1978-05-24 | 1979-12-05 | Zeiss Stiftung | Optical tocusing system with two ellipsoidal mirrors |
EP0022346A1 (en) * | 1979-07-02 | 1981-01-14 | Ealing Infra-Red Limited | Confocal reflector system |
US5707131A (en) * | 1996-01-24 | 1998-01-13 | Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. | Collections and condensing optical system using cascaded concave reflectors |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2018829A (en) * | 1933-12-22 | 1935-10-29 | Philip J Berry | Headlight |
US2819649A (en) * | 1956-02-01 | 1958-01-14 | Eastman Kodak Co | Reflecting condenser system for projectors |
US4757431A (en) | 1986-07-01 | 1988-07-12 | Laser Media | Off-axis application of concave spherical reflectors as condensing and collecting optics |
US5430634A (en) | 1992-08-03 | 1995-07-04 | Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. | Concentrating and collecting optical system using concave toroidal reflectors |
JP2786796B2 (en) * | 1993-06-23 | 1998-08-13 | シャープ株式会社 | projector |
US5414600A (en) | 1993-07-30 | 1995-05-09 | Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. | Condensing and collecting optical system using an ellipsoidal reflector |
US6672740B1 (en) | 1999-07-01 | 2004-01-06 | Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. | Condensing and collecting optical system using parabolic reflectors or a corresponding ellipsoid/hyperboloid pair of reflectors |
-
2006
- 2006-06-29 EP EP06774363A patent/EP1896883A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2006-06-29 WO PCT/US2006/025608 patent/WO2007005624A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-06-29 CA CA002608368A patent/CA2608368A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2021805A (en) * | 1978-05-24 | 1979-12-05 | Zeiss Stiftung | Optical tocusing system with two ellipsoidal mirrors |
EP0022346A1 (en) * | 1979-07-02 | 1981-01-14 | Ealing Infra-Red Limited | Confocal reflector system |
US5707131A (en) * | 1996-01-24 | 1998-01-13 | Cogent Light Technologies, Inc. | Collections and condensing optical system using cascaded concave reflectors |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2007005624A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2007005624A2 (en) | 2007-01-11 |
WO2007005624A3 (en) | 2007-12-06 |
CA2608368A1 (en) | 2007-01-11 |
EP1896883A4 (en) | 2009-01-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2402560C (en) | Coupling of light from a light source to a target using dual ellipsoidal reflectors | |
US7513630B2 (en) | Compact dual ellipsoidal reflector (DER) system having two molded ellipsoidal modules such that a radiation receiving module reflects a portion of rays to an opening in the other module | |
KR101324807B1 (en) | Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification | |
US6856727B2 (en) | Coupling of light from a non-circular light source | |
JP3190680B2 (en) | Optical system using an elliptical reflector for collecting and converging electromagnetic radiation | |
CA2141684C (en) | Concentrating and collecting optical system using concave toroidal reflectors | |
US20010026450A1 (en) | Coupling of light from a small light source for projection systems using parabolic reflectors | |
JP2009122686A (en) | Optical device | |
US7631989B2 (en) | Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification | |
US6619820B2 (en) | Light condensing and collecting systems using lensed light pipes | |
US6672740B1 (en) | Condensing and collecting optical system using parabolic reflectors or a corresponding ellipsoid/hyperboloid pair of reflectors | |
WO2007005624A2 (en) | Dual paraboloid reflector and dual ellipsoid reflector systems with optimized magnification | |
EP1914573A2 (en) | Coupling of light from a light source to a target using dual ellipsoidal reflectors | |
EP1798579B1 (en) | Condensing and collecting optical system using parabolic reflectors or a corresponding ellipsoid/hyperboloid pair of reflectors | |
JP2001083435A (en) | Light guide illumination device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20071127 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
RAX | Requested extension states of the european patent have changed |
Extension state: RS Extension state: MK Extension state: HR Extension state: BA Extension state: AL |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20081218 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G02B 17/06 20060101ALI20081212BHEP Ipc: G02B 5/10 20060101AFI20070301BHEP |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20090402 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: WAVIEN, INC. |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20150721 |