EP1860625B1 - Electronic warning system and method - Google Patents
Electronic warning system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1860625B1 EP1860625B1 EP06360019A EP06360019A EP1860625B1 EP 1860625 B1 EP1860625 B1 EP 1860625B1 EP 06360019 A EP06360019 A EP 06360019A EP 06360019 A EP06360019 A EP 06360019A EP 1860625 B1 EP1860625 B1 EP 1860625B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- pulses
- line
- receiver
- return
- phenomenon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 8
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/26—Electrical actuation by proximity of an intruder causing variation in capacitance or inductance of a circuit
Definitions
- the present invention relates electronic warning systems and more particularly to electronic intrusion detection systems extending along a fence, protecting against unauthorized activity on, and in the vicinity of, the fence.
- Fig. 1 of Israel Patent 87071 describes an electronic warning system composed of two main portions: a central control unit 2 and a line 4 in a fence.
- the central control unit 2 includes a timer 6 governing the operation of a transmitter 8 electrically connected to the line 4 and of a counter 10 driven by an oscillator 12.
- a receiver 14 also connected to the fence 4 and arranged in circuit for actuating an alarming unit 16 and for activating the counter 10.
- the latter operates a time-to-distance translator 18, which translates the signal received by the receiver into distances measured from any reference point and displays the same on a suitable display unit 20.
- the line 4 stretchable along a practical distance of up to about 1000 meters from each side of the central control unit 2, is composed of a pair of wires 22 interconnected at their ends by a resistor 24 and of a plurality of sensors 26, e.g., inertial sensors.
- the sensors 26 can be connected to the wires 22 in series, in parallel, or in a combined series and parallel fashion.
- the sensors 26 are spaced-apart from each other at typical distances of between 3 to 5 meters. Satisfactory detection results were obtained with the usage of sensors detecting and responding to vibrations or to changes in volume, operating in the ultrasonic or infrared frequency ranges.
- the resistor 24 is chosen to possess resistance, which is substantially identical to the characteristic resistance of the fence.
- It is therefore a broad object of the present invention is to ameliorate the disadvantages of such known warning systems and to provide an intrusion detection warning system and method for reducing the rate of false alarms, as compared with the prior art known systems.
- an electronic warning system comprising an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; a processor for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location
- the invention further provides a method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising: providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time ; transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n”; counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of
- a pulser 28 actuated by the processor 30 activates the transmitter 8 for a duration of e.g., two microseconds.
- the transmitter 8 transmits a pulse of a predetermined width to the sensors 26.
- the time counter 10 counts the pulses emitted by the oscillator 12 from the instant that the pulse is transmitted to the line 4, until the instant of the identification of the returning pulses, by the receiver/comparator 30.
- the processor 32 decides whether or not to send a pre-alarm signal to the alarm and display unit 34.
- a first returning pulse namely a pulse which is not absorbed by the resistor 24
- the time of return is registered in the register 36.
- the latter will activate the pulse counter 38 for counting, e.g., 10 consecutive pulses.
- the comparator 40 will then determine whether each of the pulses originates at the same fence section, by comparing its time of arrival to the time of the first pulse. Should the comparator 40 will determine that this is the case, the pulse will be fed via the reset counter 42 to the comparator 44 for comparing the number of pulses received with the number set by the "n" parameter set-up unit 46, which determines and presets the sensitivity of the system.
- the comparator 44 sends a signal to the pre-alarm unit 48.
- the latter will initiate the preset timer 50 for a duration as set by the time parameter set-up 52 and the preset counter 54. If the number of pulses counted by the pre- alarm parameter set-up 56 is equal to or greater than the set number "n" before the termination of time in the preset timer 50, the preset counter 54 will activate the alarm and/or display unit 34. If, however, the preset timer 50 will terminate the counting before the termination of that number by the pre-alarm parameter set-up 56, the preset counter 54 will be reset, an alarm will not be activated and the counting will recommence.
- This predetermined period of time represents a predetermined length along a fence, e.g., a length of 20 m, which provides a workable degree of accuracy.
- the system can simultaneously handle “events” occurring at different sections along the fence, each having a different pulse return time.
- the processor 32 will govern the reset time of events which will not reoccur within the preset number of times "n".
- the system detects several events which took place at the same time at several locations along the fence, and if the number of events exceeds a preset number, then the system is reset under the understanding that these events occurred due to weather conditions, e.g., a storm. After reset, the count of events commences as described hereinabove.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates electronic warning systems and more particularly to electronic intrusion detection systems extending along a fence, protecting against unauthorized activity on, and in the vicinity of, the fence.
- The prior art,
Fig. 1 ofIsrael Patent 87071 central control unit 2 and a line 4 in a fence. Thecentral control unit 2 includes a timer 6 governing the operation of atransmitter 8 electrically connected to the line 4 and of acounter 10 driven by anoscillator 12. Areceiver 14 also connected to the fence 4 and arranged in circuit for actuating analarming unit 16 and for activating thecounter 10. The latter operates a time-to-distance translator 18, which translates the signal received by the receiver into distances measured from any reference point and displays the same on asuitable display unit 20. - The line 4, stretchable along a practical distance of up to about 1000 meters from each side of the
central control unit 2, is composed of a pair ofwires 22 interconnected at their ends by aresistor 24 and of a plurality ofsensors 26, e.g., inertial sensors. Thesensors 26 can be connected to thewires 22 in series, in parallel, or in a combined series and parallel fashion. Thesensors 26 are spaced-apart from each other at typical distances of between 3 to 5 meters. Satisfactory detection results were obtained with the usage of sensors detecting and responding to vibrations or to changes in volume, operating in the ultrasonic or infrared frequency ranges. Theresistor 24 is chosen to possess resistance, which is substantially identical to the characteristic resistance of the fence. - The teachings of the above-described Israel Patent are incorporated herein by reference.
- Experience with this and other warning systems has shown that the rate of false alarms caused by wind, rain or hail, animals, birds and the like, is high, thus imposing an unnecessary burden on the guards.
- It is therefore a broad object of the present invention is to ameliorate the disadvantages of such known warning systems and to provide an intrusion detection warning system and method for reducing the rate of false alarms, as compared with the prior art known systems.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide an intrusion detection system and method which assist the security personnel in pinpointing the location of actual intrusion attempts, as opposed to alarms initiated by non-intruding influences.
- In accordance with the present invention, there is therefore provided an electronic warning system, comprising an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; a processor for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location of the actuated sensor and thus determine the location at which the phenomenon occurred; characterized in that said processor further includes means for presetting and determining the number of pulses received during a preset period of time from receipt of a first pulse, resulting from an occurrence and repeated occurrences of said phenomenon at the same location, and for actuating a warning signal beyond said number of pulses.
- The invention further provides a method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising: providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time ; transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n"; counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of time ; determining whether the number received equals the number "n", and if it is at least equal, actuating a warning signal.
- The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments with reference to the following illustrative figures, so that it may be more fully understood.
- With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
- In the drawings:
-
Fig. 1 is a block circuit diagram of a prior art electronic warning system ; -
Fig. 2 is a block circuit diagram of an electronic intrusion detection system according to the invention ; and -
Fig. 3 is a more detailed block diagram also displaying the method of operation. - Referring to
Fig. 2 , there is illustrated the intrusion detection system according to the present invention in which apulser 28 actuated by theprocessor 30 activates thetransmitter 8 for a duration of e.g., two microseconds. Thetransmitter 8 transmits a pulse of a predetermined width to thesensors 26. Thetime counter 10 counts the pulses emitted by theoscillator 12 from the instant that the pulse is transmitted to the line 4, until the instant of the identification of the returning pulses, by the receiver/comparator 30. Theprocessor 32 then decides whether or not to send a pre-alarm signal to the alarm anddisplay unit 34. - Referring now to
Fig. 3 for better understanding the functions of theprocessor 32 are shown separately. When there is received a first returning pulse, namely a pulse which is not absorbed by theresistor 24, the time of return is registered in theregister 36. The latter will activate thepulse counter 38 for counting, e.g., 10 consecutive pulses. Thecomparator 40 will then determine whether each of the pulses originates at the same fence section, by comparing its time of arrival to the time of the first pulse. Should thecomparator 40 will determine that this is the case, the pulse will be fed via thereset counter 42 to thecomparator 44 for comparing the number of pulses received with the number set by the "n" parameter set-up unit 46, which determines and presets the sensitivity of the system. When the preset number "n" is reached, thecomparator 44 sends a signal to thepre-alarm unit 48. The latter will initiate thepreset timer 50 for a duration as set by the time parameter set-up 52 and thepreset counter 54. If the number of pulses counted by the pre- alarm parameter set-up 56 is equal to or greater than the set number "n" before the termination of time in thepreset timer 50, thepreset counter 54 will activate the alarm and/ordisplay unit 34. If, however, thepreset timer 50 will terminate the counting before the termination of that number by the pre-alarm parameter set-up 56, thepreset counter 54 will be reset, an alarm will not be activated and the counting will recommence. - The above technique will prevent false alarms, since only return pulses which are counted during a predetermined period of time from a first return pulse, will effect the sounding of an alarm. This predetermined period of time represents a predetermined length along a fence, e.g., a length of 20 m, which provides a workable degree of accuracy.
- It should be understood that the system can simultaneously handle "events" occurring at different sections along the fence, each having a different pulse return time. The
processor 32 will govern the reset time of events which will not reoccur within the preset number of times "n". Thus, when the system detects several events which took place at the same time at several locations along the fence, and if the number of events exceeds a preset number, then the system is reset under the understanding that these events occurred due to weather conditions, e.g., a storm. After reset, the count of events commences as described hereinabove. - It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from theessential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Claims (4)
- An electronic warning system, comprising:an electrical line (4) of a fence extending along a protected area;a pulser (28);a transmitter (8) for transmitting pulses through said line;a receiver (30) for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line;an impedance (24) having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver;a plurality of sensors (26) disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver;a processor (32) for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means (10) for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location of the actuated sensor and thus determine the location at which the phenomenon occurred;means (46) for presetting and determining the number of pulses received during a preset period of time from receipt of a first pulse, resulting from an occurrence and repeated occurrences of said phenomenon at the same location, and for actuating a warning signal beyond said number of pulses,characterized in that said processor further includesmeans (56) for presetting a number of pulses which result from simultaneous occurrences at different parts of said lines, andmeans (54) for determining if the number of said pulses occurring simultaneously at different parts of the line exceeds said preset number and if it exceeds, reset the system.
- The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said means include a pulse counter receiving signals from said pulser.
- The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said processor includes a comparator for comparing the number of pulses received during a predetermined duration of time and a preset number.
- A method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising:providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area; a pulser; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver;setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time;transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n";counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of time;determining whether the number received equals the number "n", andif it is at least equal, actuating a warning signal;presetting a number of events which occur simultaneously at different parts of the line, anddetermining if the number of said events exceeds said preset number, andif it exceeds, reset the system.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT06360019T ATE412229T1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | ELECTRONIC WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD |
DE602006003317T DE602006003317D1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Electronic warning system and procedure |
ES06360019T ES2316033T3 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | ELECTRONIC ALARM SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE. |
EP06360019A EP1860625B1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Electronic warning system and method |
PL06360019T PL1860625T3 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Electronic warning system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06360019A EP1860625B1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Electronic warning system and method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1860625A1 EP1860625A1 (en) | 2007-11-28 |
EP1860625B1 true EP1860625B1 (en) | 2008-10-22 |
Family
ID=37268113
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06360019A Active EP1860625B1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2006-05-23 | Electronic warning system and method |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1860625B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE412229T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602006003317D1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2316033T3 (en) |
PL (1) | PL1860625T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102024300B (en) * | 2010-12-30 | 2013-12-18 | 上海睿堡电子科技发展有限公司 | Front-end fence using line terminator and electronic impulse detector using front-end fence |
CN112146232A (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2020-12-29 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | Humidifier and water shortage control method thereof |
CN112669557A (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-04-16 | 富盛科技股份有限公司 | Alarm processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2314545A1 (en) * | 1975-06-12 | 1977-01-07 | Cit Alcatel | Intruder detector for fence - uses two wire system through which pulse is transmitted and time for pulse to return is measured |
US4622541A (en) * | 1984-01-09 | 1986-11-11 | Napco Security Systems, Inc. | Intrusion detection system |
IL87071A (en) * | 1988-07-11 | 1990-11-05 | Eldad Ben Asher | Electronic warning system |
GB2221990B (en) * | 1988-08-17 | 1992-04-08 | Shorrock Ltd | Intrusion detection system |
-
2006
- 2006-05-23 ES ES06360019T patent/ES2316033T3/en active Active
- 2006-05-23 AT AT06360019T patent/ATE412229T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-05-23 EP EP06360019A patent/EP1860625B1/en active Active
- 2006-05-23 PL PL06360019T patent/PL1860625T3/en unknown
- 2006-05-23 DE DE602006003317T patent/DE602006003317D1/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PL1860625T3 (en) | 2009-04-30 |
DE602006003317D1 (en) | 2008-12-04 |
EP1860625A1 (en) | 2007-11-28 |
ES2316033T3 (en) | 2009-04-01 |
ATE412229T1 (en) | 2008-11-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8415962B2 (en) | Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability | |
EP1959408A1 (en) | Sensor for detecting human intruders, and security system | |
US4054867A (en) | Detecting damage to bulk material | |
CA2639898A1 (en) | Dual technology sensor device with range gated sensitivity | |
EP1341139A3 (en) | Intrusion detecting device | |
CA2421811A1 (en) | Collision avoidance method and system | |
US5021766A (en) | Intrusion detection system | |
US3042303A (en) | Object or vehicle detection system | |
EP1860625B1 (en) | Electronic warning system and method | |
US4468664A (en) | Non-home run zoning system | |
US5223817A (en) | Alarm signal processing means | |
US7323985B2 (en) | Electronic warning system and method | |
US8810265B2 (en) | Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability | |
GB2076195A (en) | Non-home-run zoning system | |
GB2221990A (en) | Vibration-sensitive intrusion detection system | |
CN101706983A (en) | Mobile signal positioning alarm method and system used for security precaution | |
US3703000A (en) | Security alarm system | |
JP3280589B2 (en) | Human body detection device | |
JPH11352247A (en) | Natural disaster occurrence detecting device and method therefor, and avalanche occurrence detecting device and method therefor | |
CN118506505B (en) | Electronic fence-based false entry early warning method and system | |
AU2014216043A1 (en) | Safe intrusion sensor unit | |
KR20120057505A (en) | Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability | |
JP3091590B2 (en) | Alarm device | |
KR102347580B1 (en) | Ultra-wideband intrusion detection appartus and detecting method threrof | |
US20240076900A1 (en) | Devices, methods and systems for monitoring electric fences |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080110 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602006003317 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20081204 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20090400191 Country of ref document: GR |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2316033 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090122 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090222 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090323 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090122 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090723 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090523 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100531 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090523 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090423 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081022 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20160525 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20160523 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20160523 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20160511 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602006003317 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171206 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20180704 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170524 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170523 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240522 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240523 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20240531 Year of fee payment: 19 |