EP1860625B1 - Electronic warning system and method - Google Patents

Electronic warning system and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1860625B1
EP1860625B1 EP06360019A EP06360019A EP1860625B1 EP 1860625 B1 EP1860625 B1 EP 1860625B1 EP 06360019 A EP06360019 A EP 06360019A EP 06360019 A EP06360019 A EP 06360019A EP 1860625 B1 EP1860625 B1 EP 1860625B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pulses
line
receiver
return
phenomenon
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP06360019A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1860625A1 (en
Inventor
Eldad Ben-Asher
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EL FAR Electronics Systems 2000 Ltd
Original Assignee
EL FAR Electronics Systems 2000 Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EL FAR Electronics Systems 2000 Ltd filed Critical EL FAR Electronics Systems 2000 Ltd
Priority to AT06360019T priority Critical patent/ATE412229T1/en
Priority to DE602006003317T priority patent/DE602006003317D1/en
Priority to ES06360019T priority patent/ES2316033T3/en
Priority to EP06360019A priority patent/EP1860625B1/en
Priority to PL06360019T priority patent/PL1860625T3/en
Publication of EP1860625A1 publication Critical patent/EP1860625A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1860625B1 publication Critical patent/EP1860625B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/22Electrical actuation
    • G08B13/26Electrical actuation by proximity of an intruder causing variation in capacitance or inductance of a circuit

Definitions

  • the present invention relates electronic warning systems and more particularly to electronic intrusion detection systems extending along a fence, protecting against unauthorized activity on, and in the vicinity of, the fence.
  • Fig. 1 of Israel Patent 87071 describes an electronic warning system composed of two main portions: a central control unit 2 and a line 4 in a fence.
  • the central control unit 2 includes a timer 6 governing the operation of a transmitter 8 electrically connected to the line 4 and of a counter 10 driven by an oscillator 12.
  • a receiver 14 also connected to the fence 4 and arranged in circuit for actuating an alarming unit 16 and for activating the counter 10.
  • the latter operates a time-to-distance translator 18, which translates the signal received by the receiver into distances measured from any reference point and displays the same on a suitable display unit 20.
  • the line 4 stretchable along a practical distance of up to about 1000 meters from each side of the central control unit 2, is composed of a pair of wires 22 interconnected at their ends by a resistor 24 and of a plurality of sensors 26, e.g., inertial sensors.
  • the sensors 26 can be connected to the wires 22 in series, in parallel, or in a combined series and parallel fashion.
  • the sensors 26 are spaced-apart from each other at typical distances of between 3 to 5 meters. Satisfactory detection results were obtained with the usage of sensors detecting and responding to vibrations or to changes in volume, operating in the ultrasonic or infrared frequency ranges.
  • the resistor 24 is chosen to possess resistance, which is substantially identical to the characteristic resistance of the fence.
  • It is therefore a broad object of the present invention is to ameliorate the disadvantages of such known warning systems and to provide an intrusion detection warning system and method for reducing the rate of false alarms, as compared with the prior art known systems.
  • an electronic warning system comprising an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; a processor for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location
  • the invention further provides a method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising: providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time ; transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n”; counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of
  • a pulser 28 actuated by the processor 30 activates the transmitter 8 for a duration of e.g., two microseconds.
  • the transmitter 8 transmits a pulse of a predetermined width to the sensors 26.
  • the time counter 10 counts the pulses emitted by the oscillator 12 from the instant that the pulse is transmitted to the line 4, until the instant of the identification of the returning pulses, by the receiver/comparator 30.
  • the processor 32 decides whether or not to send a pre-alarm signal to the alarm and display unit 34.
  • a first returning pulse namely a pulse which is not absorbed by the resistor 24
  • the time of return is registered in the register 36.
  • the latter will activate the pulse counter 38 for counting, e.g., 10 consecutive pulses.
  • the comparator 40 will then determine whether each of the pulses originates at the same fence section, by comparing its time of arrival to the time of the first pulse. Should the comparator 40 will determine that this is the case, the pulse will be fed via the reset counter 42 to the comparator 44 for comparing the number of pulses received with the number set by the "n" parameter set-up unit 46, which determines and presets the sensitivity of the system.
  • the comparator 44 sends a signal to the pre-alarm unit 48.
  • the latter will initiate the preset timer 50 for a duration as set by the time parameter set-up 52 and the preset counter 54. If the number of pulses counted by the pre- alarm parameter set-up 56 is equal to or greater than the set number "n" before the termination of time in the preset timer 50, the preset counter 54 will activate the alarm and/or display unit 34. If, however, the preset timer 50 will terminate the counting before the termination of that number by the pre-alarm parameter set-up 56, the preset counter 54 will be reset, an alarm will not be activated and the counting will recommence.
  • This predetermined period of time represents a predetermined length along a fence, e.g., a length of 20 m, which provides a workable degree of accuracy.
  • the system can simultaneously handle “events” occurring at different sections along the fence, each having a different pulse return time.
  • the processor 32 will govern the reset time of events which will not reoccur within the preset number of times "n".
  • the system detects several events which took place at the same time at several locations along the fence, and if the number of events exceeds a preset number, then the system is reset under the understanding that these events occurred due to weather conditions, e.g., a storm. After reset, the count of events commences as described hereinabove.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
  • Emergency Alarm Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides an electronic warning system, including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area, a pulser, a transmitter for transmitting pulses through the line, a receiver for receiving the pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of the line, an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of the line, for absorbing the pulses when the pulses are received thereby at the end of the line so that the pulses do not return to said receiver, a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along the line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing the pulses to return to the receiver, and a processor for operating the transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of the sensors, of the phenomenon. The processor has means for determining the time taken by the pulse to return to the receiver in response to the actuation of the sensor so as to determine the location of the actuated sensor, thus determining the location at which the phenomenon occurred, characterized in that the processor further includes means for presetting and determining the number of pulses received during a preset period of time from receipt of a first pulse, resulting from an occurrence and repeated occurrences of the phenomenon at the same location, and for actuating a warning signal beyond the number of pulses. A method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, is also provided.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates electronic warning systems and more particularly to electronic intrusion detection systems extending along a fence, protecting against unauthorized activity on, and in the vicinity of, the fence.
  • Background of the Invention
  • The prior art, Fig. 1 of Israel Patent 87071 describes an electronic warning system composed of two main portions: a central control unit 2 and a line 4 in a fence. The central control unit 2 includes a timer 6 governing the operation of a transmitter 8 electrically connected to the line 4 and of a counter 10 driven by an oscillator 12. A receiver 14 also connected to the fence 4 and arranged in circuit for actuating an alarming unit 16 and for activating the counter 10. The latter operates a time-to-distance translator 18, which translates the signal received by the receiver into distances measured from any reference point and displays the same on a suitable display unit 20.
  • The line 4, stretchable along a practical distance of up to about 1000 meters from each side of the central control unit 2, is composed of a pair of wires 22 interconnected at their ends by a resistor 24 and of a plurality of sensors 26, e.g., inertial sensors. The sensors 26 can be connected to the wires 22 in series, in parallel, or in a combined series and parallel fashion. The sensors 26 are spaced-apart from each other at typical distances of between 3 to 5 meters. Satisfactory detection results were obtained with the usage of sensors detecting and responding to vibrations or to changes in volume, operating in the ultrasonic or infrared frequency ranges. The resistor 24 is chosen to possess resistance, which is substantially identical to the characteristic resistance of the fence.
  • The teachings of the above-described Israel Patent are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Experience with this and other warning systems has shown that the rate of false alarms caused by wind, rain or hail, animals, birds and the like, is high, thus imposing an unnecessary burden on the guards.
  • Disclosure of the Invention
  • It is therefore a broad object of the present invention is to ameliorate the disadvantages of such known warning systems and to provide an intrusion detection warning system and method for reducing the rate of false alarms, as compared with the prior art known systems.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide an intrusion detection system and method which assist the security personnel in pinpointing the location of actual intrusion attempts, as opposed to alarms initiated by non-intruding influences.
  • In accordance with the present invention, there is therefore provided an electronic warning system, comprising an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; a processor for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location of the actuated sensor and thus determine the location at which the phenomenon occurred; characterized in that said processor further includes means for presetting and determining the number of pulses received during a preset period of time from receipt of a first pulse, resulting from an occurrence and repeated occurrences of said phenomenon at the same location, and for actuating a warning signal beyond said number of pulses.
  • The invention further provides a method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising: providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area ; a pulser ; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line ; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line ; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver ; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver ; setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time ; transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n"; counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of time ; determining whether the number received equals the number "n", and if it is at least equal, actuating a warning signal.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • The invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments with reference to the following illustrative figures, so that it may be more fully understood.
  • With specific reference now to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
  • In the drawings:
    • Fig. 1 is a block circuit diagram of a prior art electronic warning system ;
    • Fig. 2 is a block circuit diagram of an electronic intrusion detection system according to the invention ; and
    • Fig. 3 is a more detailed block diagram also displaying the method of operation.
    Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
  • Referring to Fig. 2, there is illustrated the intrusion detection system according to the present invention in which a pulser 28 actuated by the processor 30 activates the transmitter 8 for a duration of e.g., two microseconds. The transmitter 8 transmits a pulse of a predetermined width to the sensors 26. The time counter 10 counts the pulses emitted by the oscillator 12 from the instant that the pulse is transmitted to the line 4, until the instant of the identification of the returning pulses, by the receiver/comparator 30. The processor 32 then decides whether or not to send a pre-alarm signal to the alarm and display unit 34.
  • Referring now to Fig. 3 for better understanding the functions of the processor 32 are shown separately. When there is received a first returning pulse, namely a pulse which is not absorbed by the resistor 24, the time of return is registered in the register 36. The latter will activate the pulse counter 38 for counting, e.g., 10 consecutive pulses. The comparator 40 will then determine whether each of the pulses originates at the same fence section, by comparing its time of arrival to the time of the first pulse. Should the comparator 40 will determine that this is the case, the pulse will be fed via the reset counter 42 to the comparator 44 for comparing the number of pulses received with the number set by the "n" parameter set-up unit 46, which determines and presets the sensitivity of the system. When the preset number "n" is reached, the comparator 44 sends a signal to the pre-alarm unit 48. The latter will initiate the preset timer 50 for a duration as set by the time parameter set-up 52 and the preset counter 54. If the number of pulses counted by the pre- alarm parameter set-up 56 is equal to or greater than the set number "n" before the termination of time in the preset timer 50, the preset counter 54 will activate the alarm and/or display unit 34. If, however, the preset timer 50 will terminate the counting before the termination of that number by the pre-alarm parameter set-up 56, the preset counter 54 will be reset, an alarm will not be activated and the counting will recommence.
  • The above technique will prevent false alarms, since only return pulses which are counted during a predetermined period of time from a first return pulse, will effect the sounding of an alarm. This predetermined period of time represents a predetermined length along a fence, e.g., a length of 20 m, which provides a workable degree of accuracy.
  • It should be understood that the system can simultaneously handle "events" occurring at different sections along the fence, each having a different pulse return time. The processor 32 will govern the reset time of events which will not reoccur within the preset number of times "n". Thus, when the system detects several events which took place at the same time at several locations along the fence, and if the number of events exceeds a preset number, then the system is reset under the understanding that these events occurred due to weather conditions, e.g., a storm. After reset, the count of events commences as described hereinabove.
  • It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from theessential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims (4)

  1. An electronic warning system, comprising:
    an electrical line (4) of a fence extending along a protected area;
    a pulser (28);
    a transmitter (8) for transmitting pulses through said line;
    a receiver (30) for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line;
    an impedance (24) having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver;
    a plurality of sensors (26) disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver;
    a processor (32) for operating said transmitter and receiver and for actuating a warning signal upon the detection, by at least one of said sensors, of said phenomenon, said processor including means (10) for determining the time taken by a said pulse to return to said receiver in response to the actuation of a said sensor so as to determine the location of the actuated sensor and thus determine the location at which the phenomenon occurred;
    means (46) for presetting and determining the number of pulses received during a preset period of time from receipt of a first pulse, resulting from an occurrence and repeated occurrences of said phenomenon at the same location, and for actuating a warning signal beyond said number of pulses,
    characterized in that said processor further includes
    means (56) for presetting a number of pulses which result from simultaneous occurrences at different parts of said lines, and
    means (54) for determining if the number of said pulses occurring simultaneously at different parts of the line exceeds said preset number and if it exceeds, reset the system.
  2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said means include a pulse counter receiving signals from said pulser.
  3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said processor includes a comparator for comparing the number of pulses received during a predetermined duration of time and a preset number.
  4. A method for distinguishing between false alarms and true unauthorized activity along a fence or at the vicinity thereof, comprising:
    providing an electronic warning system including an electrical line of a fence extending along a protected area; a pulser; a transmitter for transmitting pulses through said line; a receiver for receiving said pulses after being transmitted along at least a portion of said line; an impedance having a resistance substantially identical to the line characteristic resistance and connected at the end of said line, for absorbing said pulses when said pulses are received thereby at the end of said line so that said pulses do not return to said receiver; a plurality of sensors disposed at spaced-apart locations along said line and actuated responsive to phenomenon occurring in the vicinity thereof, for, when actuated, causing said pulses to return to said receiver;
    setting a number "n" of repeatedly received pulses within a preset period of time;
    transmitting pulses of a number equal to or greater than "n";
    counting the number of pulses received within said preset period of time;
    determining whether the number received equals the number "n", and
    if it is at least equal, actuating a warning signal;
    presetting a number of events which occur simultaneously at different parts of the line, and
    determining if the number of said events exceeds said preset number, and
    if it exceeds, reset the system.
EP06360019A 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and method Active EP1860625B1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT06360019T ATE412229T1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 ELECTRONIC WARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD
DE602006003317T DE602006003317D1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and procedure
ES06360019T ES2316033T3 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 ELECTRONIC ALARM SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE.
EP06360019A EP1860625B1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and method
PL06360019T PL1860625T3 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06360019A EP1860625B1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1860625A1 EP1860625A1 (en) 2007-11-28
EP1860625B1 true EP1860625B1 (en) 2008-10-22

Family

ID=37268113

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06360019A Active EP1860625B1 (en) 2006-05-23 2006-05-23 Electronic warning system and method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1860625B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE412229T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602006003317D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2316033T3 (en)
PL (1) PL1860625T3 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102024300B (en) * 2010-12-30 2013-12-18 上海睿堡电子科技发展有限公司 Front-end fence using line terminator and electronic impulse detector using front-end fence
CN112146232A (en) * 2020-09-15 2020-12-29 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Humidifier and water shortage control method thereof
CN112669557A (en) * 2020-12-21 2021-04-16 富盛科技股份有限公司 Alarm processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2314545A1 (en) * 1975-06-12 1977-01-07 Cit Alcatel Intruder detector for fence - uses two wire system through which pulse is transmitted and time for pulse to return is measured
US4622541A (en) * 1984-01-09 1986-11-11 Napco Security Systems, Inc. Intrusion detection system
IL87071A (en) * 1988-07-11 1990-11-05 Eldad Ben Asher Electronic warning system
GB2221990B (en) * 1988-08-17 1992-04-08 Shorrock Ltd Intrusion detection system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL1860625T3 (en) 2009-04-30
DE602006003317D1 (en) 2008-12-04
EP1860625A1 (en) 2007-11-28
ES2316033T3 (en) 2009-04-01
ATE412229T1 (en) 2008-11-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8415962B2 (en) Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability
EP1959408A1 (en) Sensor for detecting human intruders, and security system
US4054867A (en) Detecting damage to bulk material
CA2639898A1 (en) Dual technology sensor device with range gated sensitivity
EP1341139A3 (en) Intrusion detecting device
CA2421811A1 (en) Collision avoidance method and system
US5021766A (en) Intrusion detection system
US3042303A (en) Object or vehicle detection system
EP1860625B1 (en) Electronic warning system and method
US4468664A (en) Non-home run zoning system
US5223817A (en) Alarm signal processing means
US7323985B2 (en) Electronic warning system and method
US8810265B2 (en) Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability
GB2076195A (en) Non-home-run zoning system
GB2221990A (en) Vibration-sensitive intrusion detection system
CN101706983A (en) Mobile signal positioning alarm method and system used for security precaution
US3703000A (en) Security alarm system
JP3280589B2 (en) Human body detection device
JPH11352247A (en) Natural disaster occurrence detecting device and method therefor, and avalanche occurrence detecting device and method therefor
CN118506505B (en) Electronic fence-based false entry early warning method and system
AU2014216043A1 (en) Safe intrusion sensor unit
KR20120057505A (en) Transmission line based electric fence with intrusion location ability
JP3091590B2 (en) Alarm device
KR102347580B1 (en) Ultra-wideband intrusion detection appartus and detecting method threrof
US20240076900A1 (en) Devices, methods and systems for monitoring electric fences

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080110

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602006003317

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081204

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20090400191

Country of ref document: GR

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2316033

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090122

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090222

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090323

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090122

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090523

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090423

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081022

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160525

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20160523

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20160523

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20160511

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006003317

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171206

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20180704

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170524

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170523

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240522

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240523

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240531

Year of fee payment: 19