EP1814307B9 - Method for detecting the quality of the multimedia communication - Google Patents

Method for detecting the quality of the multimedia communication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1814307B9
EP1814307B9 EP20060753011 EP06753011A EP1814307B9 EP 1814307 B9 EP1814307 B9 EP 1814307B9 EP 20060753011 EP20060753011 EP 20060753011 EP 06753011 A EP06753011 A EP 06753011A EP 1814307 B9 EP1814307 B9 EP 1814307B9
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
watermark
data
embedded
original
multimedia video
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP20060753011
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1814307A1 (en
EP1814307A4 (en
EP1814307B1 (en
Inventor
Fuzheng Yang
Zhong Luo
Shuai Wan
Yilin Chang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huawei Technologies Co Ltd filed Critical Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Publication of EP1814307A1 publication Critical patent/EP1814307A1/en
Publication of EP1814307A4 publication Critical patent/EP1814307A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1814307B1 publication Critical patent/EP1814307B1/en
Publication of EP1814307B9 publication Critical patent/EP1814307B9/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N17/00—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N17/00—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details
    • H04N17/004—Diagnosis, testing or measuring for television systems or their details for digital television systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T1/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T1/0021—Image watermarking
    • G06T1/0028—Adaptive watermarking, e.g. Human Visual System [HVS]-based watermarking
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
    • H04N21/80—Generation or processing of content or additional data by content creator independently of the distribution process; Content per se
    • H04N21/83—Generation or processing of protective or descriptive data associated with content; Content structuring
    • H04N21/835—Generation of protective data, e.g. certificates
    • H04N21/8358—Generation of protective data, e.g. certificates involving watermark
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N5/00—Details of television systems
    • H04N5/76—Television signal recording
    • H04N5/91—Television signal processing therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2201/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T2201/005—Image watermarking
    • G06T2201/0051—Embedding of the watermark in the spatial domain
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2201/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T2201/005—Image watermarking
    • G06T2201/0061—Embedding of the watermark in each block of the image, e.g. segmented watermarking
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2201/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T2201/005—Image watermarking
    • G06T2201/0083—Image watermarking whereby only watermarked image required at decoder, e.g. source-based, blind, oblivious
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2201/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T2201/005—Image watermarking
    • G06T2201/0202—Image watermarking whereby the quality of watermarked images is measured; Measuring quality or performance of watermarking methods; Balancing between quality and robustness

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to multimedia communication technology, and particularly to a method for measuring multimedia video communication quality.
  • Digital video signal transmission includes some processes such as sampling, quantifying, compression coding, network transmitting, decoding and restoring for an analog video signal, wherein in some processes, especially, network transmitting without guaranteeing QoS(Quality of Service) (e.g.
  • Multimedia video communication quality is a measurement for measuring distortion of a digital multimedia signal relative to an original signal.
  • Video quality evaluation plays a very important role in the field of video compression, processing and video communication. Performance of a real-time or non real-time video system and the QoS of various video communication transmission channels are finally reflected by the video quality, and feedback for adjusting parameters of a codec or a channel is given, thus guaranteeing the video quality within an acceptable range.
  • An easy to understand measurement for output video quality of various different codecs is presented so that the performance of the codec may be designed, evaluated and optimized.
  • a graphics and image display system according with a human visual model is designed and optimized.
  • Two factors affecting the video quality in a wireless and IP (Internet Protocol) transmission video system are: one is that the video quality is degraded due to video compression; the other is that the video quality is affected by channel packet loss and random error codes due to relatively bad channel environment, especially video contents are damaged by various errors of header information and motion vectors. Some unendurable mosaic blocks are often formed in these damaged video contents, and greatly affect the subjective quality of the recovered video. Therefore, video quality measurement, feedback correction and test development based on the measurement are desired for the current multimedia video communication evolving towards a direction of wireless and IP transmission.
  • the video quality evaluation is also very significant for video communication equipment manufacturers and telecom operators.
  • For the equipment manufacturers providing a convictive video quality evaluation result of a system may greatly facilitate the sale of their products.
  • the evaluation data of the video quality may be used for popularization and propagation of their services.
  • developing an automatic real-time video quality evaluation method based on which both the manufacturers and the operators are capable of performing real-time monitoring to video equipment, will facilitate trouble shooting and fault diagnosis.
  • the video quality evaluation may be classified into subjective quality evaluation and objective quality evaluation.
  • a result of the subjective quality evaluation is reliable, but the evaluation for video subjective quality is strict with a Human Test Subject because it relies on participation of the Human Test Subject, the process of which is complicated and hard to be widely applied, especially for evaluation in an application environment with real-time demand.
  • the objective quality evaluation measures the video quality using a quantifying method from another aspect, and may be performed automatically with high efficiency and without human participation.
  • the objective quality evaluation may be further classified into three categories:
  • VQEG Video Quality Experts Group
  • PSNR Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio
  • Digital media is easy to be accessed, copied, transmitted and edited, while some problems such as pirating a digital media copyright and interpolating digital media contents will arise.
  • a digital watermark technique early used for protecting a digital media copyright is presented.
  • the digital watermark technique is developed and widely used in recent years. Watermark information embedded in original media data always coexists with the original media data by embedding a series of information in the original media data, thus the copyright of the original media data and the integrity of contents may be protected. With development of technologies, besides copyright protection, the digital watermark technique may be used in many other fields.
  • the multimedia video communication quality measurement mentioned above may be achieved by embedding and extracting a digital watermark, which is a Partial Reference Model method, without knowing an original video image but indirectly reflecting status of the original image with reference to a watermark image before channel transmission and a distorted watermark image after channel transmission, accordingly the quality measurement, calculation and evaluation are performed.
  • the digital watermark may be embedded in any portion of the original data, but its effect on the original data needs to be reduced to the utmost extent.
  • the digital watermark technology may be classified into a digital watermark technology of the spatial domain and a digital watermark technology of the transform domain according to digital watermark embedding approaches.
  • watermark information is directly embedded in the spatial domain of a media.
  • the information is embedded in pixels of an image.
  • a transform is performed on a media firstly, such as DFT (Discrete Fourier Transform), DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) or DWT (Discrete Wavelet Transform) etc., and then the watermark information is embedded in the transform domain.
  • DFT Discrete Fourier Transform
  • DCT Discrete Cosine Transform
  • DWT Discrete Wavelet Transform
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram illustrating a principle of a digital watermark.
  • the master media I 0 generally is original or compressed multimedia data such as video or audio etc., and the data b 0 to be hidden only has less data in comparison with I 0 .
  • the difference between the media I 1 embedded with a watermark and I 0 is distortion caused by the embedded watermark. In general, such distortion is not desired to be perceived by human.
  • the media I 2 is obtained by performing some processing on I 1 , such as data compression, noise contamination and intended attacks to the watermark, which may be regarded as noise.
  • the watermark b 1 extracted from I 2 may be distorted to a certain extent in comparison with the original watermark b 0 If I 2 is identical with I 1 , the watermark b 1 extracted from I 2 should be identical with the original watermark b 0 .
  • N represents noise.
  • the noise may be caused by data compression, noise contamination and intended attacks to the watermark etc.
  • the data embedded with the watermark will be distorted to a certain extent after processing, so the watermark measured from the processed data may be different from the original watermark to a certain extent.
  • Watermark measurement technology is commonly implemented by the classical Signal Detection technology, which is used for researching how to determine whether a destination signal exists in noise, such as whether a reflecting signal from a destination is contained in a radar echo signal, and if the destination signal exists, how to perform optimal signal extraction using a statistic principle.
  • Statistic Hypothesis Test/Validation is used for determining whether a signal exists in noise.
  • a watermark measurement process includes: presenting two hypotheses H 0 and H 1 , determining which hypothesis is true according to a test result, and accordingly knowing whether a watermark exists.
  • FIG.2 shows a block diagram illustrating a principle of a video communication quality measurement based on a digital watermark, and the basic principle of which will be described hereinafter.
  • a watermark image which is very small relative to an original image, is embedded in the original image, thus the added additional data quantity is negligible in comparison with the data quantity of the original image, and has little effect on the multimedia quality.
  • the original image embedded with the watermark is distorted after passing through a transmission channel, and the watermark image extracted from which will be accordingly distorted.
  • the watermark is embedded in the original image everywhere, so the quality measurement for the watermark image is equivalent to the measurement for the original image after distributed sampling. As long as the distribution of the watermark is uniform enough, the quality of the distorted image may be sufficiently reflected by measuring the quality of the watermark image. While the original image is shared by both sides of a communication, the receiving side measures communication quality by comparing the recovered watermark image with the known original watermark image, thus the quality evaluation for the watermark is actually a kind of evaluation with reference.
  • FIG.3 shows an example of measuring the multimedia video communication quality based on a digital watermark.
  • the left is an original watermark image, which is a black-and-white (easy to determine error positions) bi-level image.
  • the middle is a distorted image of an international standard test image Lena after being embedded with the watermark and JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) standard compression and network packet loss during a transmission process, wherein there are three obvious block distortions in the image.
  • the right is a recovered watermark extracted from the distorted Lena image, wherein scatteredly distributed black spots and white spots are distortions due to the compression, while big black and white blocks, the positions of which correspond to three obvious distortions in the recovered Lena image, are caused by errors such as packet loss.
  • the watermark image embedment inevitably results in a degradation of the validity of the multimedia video data and the video quality when the above-mentioned solution is used.
  • the more watermark information are embedded in video the better the whole image may be covered by the watermark information, and the more samples may be presented. Accordingly the extracted watermark information may fully reflect the original video, and the obtained video quality evaluation is more accurate.
  • the more watermark information is embedded in video the more the quality of the video is affected.
  • the video quality is decreased. Namely, there is a contradiction in the video quality evaluation methods based on a digital watermark: the more information is embedded in video, the more accurate the video quality measurement is, but the more the embedded watermark information affects the video quality.
  • the prior art is unable to solve the contradiction, so the video communication quality may not be measured and calculated accurately by embedding and extracting a watermark under a precondition that the video communication quality is not affected.
  • U.S. patent application US 2002/157005 A1 discloses a method for authenticating a media signal and related software, systems and applications.
  • a digital watermark is embedded in the media signal.
  • a metric is calculated for the digital watermark and then embedded in the media signal with the digital watermark.
  • a detector computes the metric for a potentially corrupted version of the embedded media signal, and then compares its computed metric to the embedded metric to detect whether the alteration has occurred.
  • U.S. patent application US 2003/112996 A1 discloses a method for dynamic monitoring and correcting network or transcoding service quality by use of watermarking techniques.
  • a method for measuring multimedia video communication quality is an objective quality evaluation, so that the multimedia video communication quality may be objectively reflected by embedding and extracting a digital watermark under a precondition that the quality of the multimedia video data is not obviously affected
  • a method for measuring multimedia video communication quality including:
  • the method may also includes: uniformly embedding the original watermark in the original multimedia data, performing compression coding or data packaging or framing at the transmitting side, and transmitting the data to the receiving side.
  • the method may also include: uniformly dividing the multimedia video data frames into blocks of equal size, and embedding equal amount of the original watermark data in a part of the blocks or all of the blocks at the transmitting side.
  • the method further includes: dividing the multimedia video data into groups at the transmitting side, each group including equal number of frames, and selecting at least two frames with equal interval in a same group as embedded frames, uniformly dividing each of the embedded frame into a plurality of blocks of equal size, selecting equal number of blocks from the plurality of blocks as embedded blocks, and embedding equal amount of the original watermark data in each of the embedded block.
  • Each multimedia video data frame includes M rows ⁇ N columns pixels in which the M rows are numbered from 0 to M -1 and the N columns are numbered from 0 to N -1, and uniformly dividing a multimedia video data frame into blocks of equal size includes:
  • Each frame of the multimedia video data is uniformly divided into L blocks numbered from 0 to L -1, and the embedding the original watermark further includes:
  • each group including P ⁇ Q frames, which sequentially are frame 0 to frame P ⁇ Q -1 of the group;
  • the method may also includes: determining a bit number of the original watermark data embedded in a part of the blocks or all of the blocks according to the size of the data block.
  • Embedding 1-bit data of the original watermark in the multimedia video data block includes:
  • b' b+c , wherein, b' is a modified value of a pixel, b is a value of the pixel before modification, and c is a modification amount;
  • the modification amount is calculated according to the following formula:
  • ⁇ is a remainder of ⁇ being divided by 2 A
  • A represents an embedding strength and is equal to 2 ⁇ Q P -1
  • Q P represents a quantization factor for the multimedia video communication compression coding.
  • Extracting a data bit of the recovered watermark from the received multimedia video data block includes:
  • ⁇ ' is a remainder of ⁇ ' being divided by 2A
  • A represents an embedding strength and is equal to 2 ⁇ Q P -1
  • Q P represents a quantization factor for the multimedia video communication compression coding.
  • the method further includes:
  • the method may also include: calculating the distortion degree of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark to measure the objective quality of the multimedia video communication.
  • the method also includes: calculating the distortion degree of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark using the Pixel Recovery Rate of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark.
  • the method may also include: on extracting the recovered watermark, post-processing the received multimedia video data to eliminate effect of the watermark embedment, wherein the post-processing includes one of the following
  • the method also includes:
  • the original watermark is embedded in a luminance component of the original multimedia data.
  • the original watermark is embedded in one or more channels of the original multi-channel image data.
  • the original watermark is a bi-level image.
  • each frame of the multimedia video data is uniformly divided into blocks of equal size, and the watermark data is embedded in each block for completely uniform watermark distribution.
  • the accuracy of reflecting the multimedia video communication quality by the watermark is improved.
  • frames of the multimedia video data are divided into groups and the watermark is uniformly embedded with equal interval in a part of the frames in each group for completely uniform watermark distribution.
  • the amount of the watermark information is decreased.
  • the effect of the watermark embedment on the multimedia video data is reduced.
  • the multimedia video communication quality is ensured and measured accurately.
  • the watermark information is directly and uniformly embedded in the original multimedia data or the video spatial domain, so that the watermark may be completely equivalent to an intuitive quality reflection of multimedia or video, and the accuracy of the multimedia video communication quality evaluation is improved.
  • Post-processing such as smoothing filtering is performed on the video image after watermark extraction to eliminate the effect of the watermark on the multimedia video data quality.
  • a linearly fitted PSNR of the multimedia video data using the accuracy rate of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark is regarded as a measurement standard for the multimedia video communication quality, which is able to reflect the communication status accurately.
  • Post-processing such as smoothing filtering, median filtering, neural network filtering, mathematical morphology filtering or filtering based on fuzzy mathematics methods is performed on the video image after watermark extraction to eliminate the effect of the watermark on the multimedia video data or video quality.
  • the amount of watermark information may be reduced, and the damage of the watermark to the quality of the multimedia video data may be greatly decreased.
  • the accuracy for reflecting the multimedia video communication quality by the watermark is improved.
  • the watermark is directly embedded in the original multimedia data before coding or in the video spatial domain, so that the watermark may completely equivalently reflect the intuitive quality of the multimedia.
  • the accuracy of the multimedia video communication quality measurement is improved, and a quality loss degree caused by the multimedia coding process may be reflected.
  • the accuracy of the objective quality evaluation for the multimedia video communication is improved.
  • the effect of the watermark on the quality of the multimedia video data or video data may be reduced by performing smooth filtering post-processing for the watermark extraction, and the video communication quality may be ensured.
  • the quality of the multimedia video communication may be accurately reflected under the precondition that the video communication quality is not damaged.
  • Rapid and real-time communication quality measurement may be provided in the video communication to facilitate positioning network faults and other system faults. It may facilitate the operators to display a service quality in real time and improve customer trust degree. It may facilitate the manufacturers to perform tests and validations during a developing process of a video communication product, so that the performance of the video communication product may be improved and video communication services may be popularized.
  • FIG.1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a principle of digital watermark technology
  • FIG.2 is a block diagram illustrating a principle of a video communication quality measurement based on a digital watermark
  • FIG.3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a image embedded with a watermark and watermark recovery situation
  • FIG.4 is a flow chart of a method for measuring multimedia video communication quality according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG.5 is a schematic diagram illustrating uniformly dividing a frame into blocks of equal size according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG.6 (a) and (b) are schematic diagrams illustrating experimental results according to the embodiment 8 of the present invention.
  • a method for measuring video communication quality based on a digital watermark which is able to balance the effect of a embedded watermark on video quality and the accuracy of reflecting the video quality, so that the video quality is not damaged and the video communication quality is accurately measured.
  • the principle of the method is: according to characteristics of compressed video, the watermark is completely and uniformly embedded in the video spatial domain using a watermark embedding algorithm based on dividing into blocks and groups, and the PSNR is fitted using the watermark recovery accuracy rate.
  • the so-called fitting is a data processing method for computation mathematics: based on a series of discrete data points, a curve is obtained to represent these data points, wherein the total distance between the curve and these discrete data points is minimal according to a certain optimal criterion.
  • the fitting refers to approximating the PSNR curve with the PRR (Pixel Recovered Rate) data, the object of which is to show that both of them are very approximate and have very high correlativity and consistency, and accordingly provide quality evaluation indications applicable to compressed video with low code rate.
  • PRR Picture Recovered Rate
  • the effect of the embedded digital watermark on the video quality is greatly reduced.
  • the method of the embodiments of the present invention belongs to a Partial Reference Model method according to the above-mentioned quality evaluation categories. Without need of knowing the original video image, the method indirectly reflects the status of the original image using the original watermark image and the distorted watermark image which pass a transmission channel as a reference, and accordingly measures the video communication quality.
  • the objective quality measurement method for multimedia video communication based on a digital watermark includes three basic steps: embedding an original watermark in multimedia video data uniformly at a transmitting side, and transmitting the data to a receiving side; extracting a recovered watermark from the received multimedia video data through a process contrary to the process of watermark embedding at the receiving side; measuring objective quality of the multimedia video communication according to a distortion degree of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark.
  • FIG4 is a flow chart of an objective quality measurement method for multimedia video communication based on a digital watermark according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the video data includes consecutive frame sequences.
  • the B-DCT Block-based DCT
  • the motion compensated compression algorithm such as H.263, H.264 and MPEG (Moving Picture Expert Group)
  • H.263, H.264 and MPEG Motion compensated compression algorithm
  • an original watermark image and a relevant algorithm or solution for video quality evaluation is determined. It needs to select a proper watermark at first for communication quality evaluation based on a digital watermark. In fact, selecting a proper digital watermark, which may not only reflect the video quality but also affect the video quality as little as possible, is important for the video communication quality evaluation.
  • a bi-level image is selected in the embodiment, which is able to reduce the amount of information and appropriate for hiding watermark pixels.
  • a black-and-white pattern such as the watermark image shown in FIG.3 , is also used.
  • Black-and-white means 0-and-1, so that the amount of information carried by such an image is not large, but the image has high sensitivity and strong robustness for detecting error codes.
  • a watermark image needs to be determined through a negotiation between both sides of communication, so in Embodiment 3 of the present invention, a transmitting side and a receiving side of the video communication negotiate through signaling communication to determine an original watermark and a specific solution for watermark embedment and watermark extraction.
  • the watermark After the original watermark is determined, the watermark will be uniformly embedded in a video image in accordance with the principle of the present invention.
  • quantifying and coding are performed through a motion prediction, i.e. prediction and difference coding of a frame are performed with reference to anterior frames or posterior frames.
  • a DCT transform is used for coding, so the transformed coding stream data is not completely equivalent to the former intuitive video image.
  • a digital watermark is embedded in the video spatial domain before a DCT transform, i.e. an original watermark is uniformly embedded in original multimedia data at a transmitting side, then compression coding and data packeting (for packet switching network) or framing (for circuit-switched network) are performed, and finally the data are transmitted to a receiving side via a network.
  • the method for embedding the watermark in the spatial domain has advantages on the above-mentioned two sides over the method for embedding the watermark in the transform domain.
  • an original watermark is embedded in a luminance component of the original multimedia data, i.e. a watermark signal is embedded in the luminance component (Y component) of a video image sequence.
  • an original watermark may be embedded in one or more channels of the original multi-channel image data.
  • each frame of the image is uniformly divided into blocks of equal size at the transmitting side, and equal amount of the original watermark data is embedded in a part of the blocks or all of the blocks.
  • each frame includes M rows ⁇ N columns pixels in which the M rows are numbered from 0 to M -1 and the N columns are numbered from 0 to N- 1.
  • Each frame is uniformly divided into blocks according to the following solution:
  • the size of the image in the video to be compressed is M ⁇ N
  • the size of the watermark image is ⁇ M/k v ⁇ x ⁇ N/k h ⁇ .
  • ⁇ ⁇ represents ceiling.
  • One watermark pixel is embedded in each block whose size is k v ⁇ k h pixels in the original image, so that an error may be positioned and the effect of the watermark on the image quality is reduced.
  • k v represents a vertical direction period of the embedment
  • k h represents a horizontal direction period of the embedment.
  • M or N is not divisible by k v or k h , the remainders of them are respectively r v and r h .
  • Both of M and N are not divisible in a most complicated instance, thus four categories of areas exist in the top left part, on the right edge, on the lower edge and at the lower right corner of the image, which are marked with 1, 2, 3 and 4 in FIG5 .
  • the sizes of the blocks in the Area 1 are all k v ⁇ k h pixels.
  • the sizes of the blocks in the Area 2 are all k v ⁇ r h pixels.
  • the sizes of the blocks in the Area 3 are all r v ⁇ k h pixels.
  • the size of the only one block in the Area 4 is r v ⁇ r h pixels.
  • the Area 1 is certain to exist, while the other areas may exist or not exist, depending on the situation of dividing. If the row number M is divisible by k v , neither the Area 3 nor the Area 4 exists. Similarly, if the column N is divisible by k h , neither the Area 2 nor the Area 4 exists.
  • the watermark is distributed and embedded uniformly in each frame.
  • a grouping embedding method is further needed to process different frames and embed the watermark in multiple frames. Especially for some instances, for example, when the communication bandwidth is very low or the selected watermark image is relatively large, it needs to further reduce the amount of the watermark data embedded in each frame of the image, i.e. it needs multiple frames to share a watermark.
  • the video frame sequence is divided into groups at the transmitting side.
  • Each group includes equal number of frames. At least two frames with equal interval in a same group are selected as the embedded frames, and equal number of blocks in each embedded frame are selected as the embedded blocks. Equal amount of the original watermark data are embedded in each embedded block.
  • the digital watermark image may be uniformly distributed in different frames.
  • a part of the watermark is embedded in each frame of the image in the video sequence, or a sub-block is embedded in every other frame, etc., and the group of consecutive images is regarded as an embedding period. All the pixel points of the watermark are embedded in different positions in the image uniformly and dispersedly, and the watermark embedding positions of different images within a same embedding period are also different.
  • the position for embedding the watermark in each image within each embedding period is fixed.
  • Each frame is uniformly divided into L blocks numbered from 0 to L -1.
  • the image may be uniformly divided into L strips horizontally or vertically, or uniformly divided in other ways.
  • the solution L M ⁇ N shown in block 403.
  • the method for embedding the original watermark also includes:
  • each group including P ⁇ Q frames, from the frame 0 to the frame P ⁇ Q -1 of this group;
  • the watermark is divided into Q blocks of equal size, and each block corresponds to one embedded frame.
  • the frames 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,..., 2Q-2 of this group of image is divided into blocks, and the blocks are numbered with 0, 1, 2, 3,..., L-1 according to the order from the top to the bottom and from the left to the right.
  • the blocks 0, Q ,L , R ⁇ Q are regarded as the embedded blocks
  • the blocks 1, Q +1,L R ⁇ Q +1 are regarded as the embedded blocks; and the rest may be deduced analogically.
  • a method for embedding 1-bit data of the original watermark in one block of the multimedia video data includes:
  • the modification amount is calculated according to the following formula:
  • ⁇ is a remainder of ⁇ being divided by 2 A .
  • a recovered watermark is extracted from the received video data at the receiving side through a process contrary to the process of watermark embedding.
  • the watermark extraction is exactly a reverse process of the above-mentioned process: grouping and determining the embedded frames; determining the embedded blocks in each embedded frame; extracting the watermark information from each block.
  • grouping and determining the embedded frames determining the embedded blocks in each embedded frame
  • extracting the watermark information from each block As for how to determine the embedded frames and further determine the embedded blocks, the details will not be described here.
  • a method for extracting a watermark from an embedded block will be described.
  • a method for extracting 1-bit data of the recovered watermark from one block of the received video data based on the watermark embedding algorithm described in the embodiment 6 is:
  • ⁇ ' is a remainder of ⁇ ' being divided by 2 A .
  • a frame of integral watermark image may be recovered through recovering the watermark bit information.
  • a PSNR is evaluated using a PRR (Pixel Recovered Rate) of the recovered watermark relative to the original watermark at the receiving side to measure the objective quality of the multimedia video communication.
  • the pixel recovery rate of the watermark is defined as PRR for evaluating the video quality by means of the watermark.
  • PRR refers to comparing the distorted watermark with the original watermark to obtain a ratio of the number of correct watermark pixels after distortion to the total number of the watermark pixels. I.e.,
  • PRR 100*(the number of the correct pixels in the distorted watermark/the total number of the watermark image pixels)%
  • the estimation value of the PSNR is fitted using a linear function of the PRR according to the MSE (Mean Square Error) criterion to measure the objective quality of the multimedia video communication in this embodiment.
  • MSE Mel Square Error
  • the watermark information is embedded in a standard test sequence Claire (in QCIF format). Then, the video sequence embedded with the watermark is compressed according to a video compression standard H.263. The compressed video stream enters the decoder after channel "transmission" for video decoding. Finally, the embedded digital watermark is extracted from the decoded video and the PRR is calculated.
  • a BSC Binary Symmetric Channel
  • the noise is uniformly distributed random noise.
  • the average code error rate of the channel is 10 -5 .
  • the first diagram in FIG.6 shows the PSNR of the recovered video relative to the original video and the PRR of the watermark. It could be seen there is better consistency between the PSNR and the PRR.
  • X and Y respectively represent the PSNR and the PRR.
  • Cov ( X,Y ) represents the covariance of X and Y.
  • D ( X ) and D ( Y ) respectively represent the variances of X and Y.
  • the estimation PSNR' of the PSNR is calculated, as shown in FIG.6(a) . Comparing the PSNR' with the PSNR, the MSE of them 0.735 is obtained. It could be seen that the PSNR' fits the PSNR very well.
  • the code error rate of the channel is changed to 1.5 ⁇ 10 -5 .
  • the obtained PSNR of the recovered video and the estimation value PSNR' obtained through the PRR mapping are shown in FIG.6(b) .
  • the obtained correlation coefficient ⁇ of the two groups of data is 98.6%, and the MSE is only 0.696. It is obvious that the PSNR' fits the PSNR very well.
  • the received video image will be post-processed after the recovered watermark is extracted to eliminate the effect of the watermark embedment.
  • the post-processing may be smoothing filtering, median filtering, neural network filtering, mathematical morphology filtering or filtering based on fuzzy mathematics methods.
  • the watermark is embedded based on a block. If the embedding strength is too high, it will result in man-induced block effect and lead to decreased image quality. If the embedding strength is too low, it is difficult to resist the effect caused by video compression and results in a very low PRR of the recovered watermark.
  • a self-adaptive watermark embedding method is selected, and on restoring the watermark, smoothing filtering is performed for the image embedded with the watermark at the decoding side. An experiment shows that the effect of the watermark on the video objective quality may be effectively weakened in this way.
  • Table 1 and Table 2 respectively show the effect on the coded video quality and the bit rate caused by watermark embedding using the method of the embodiment of the present invention. It could be seen that the effect on the multimedia video data quality brought by the method of the embodiment of the present invention is little.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Editing Of Facsimile Originals (AREA)
  • Compression Or Coding Systems Of Tv Signals (AREA)
  • Testing, Inspecting, Measuring Of Stereoscopic Televisions And Televisions (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Two-Way Televisions, Distribution Of Moving Picture Or The Like (AREA)
  • Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
EP20060753011 2005-06-25 2006-06-23 Method for detecting the quality of the multimedia communication Not-in-force EP1814307B9 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CNB2005100355669A CN100461864C (zh) 2005-06-25 2005-06-25 基于数字水印的多媒体视频通信客观质量评价方法
PCT/CN2006/001433 WO2007000103A1 (fr) 2005-06-25 2006-06-23 Detection de la qualite d'une communication multimedia

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1814307A1 EP1814307A1 (en) 2007-08-01
EP1814307A4 EP1814307A4 (en) 2008-03-19
EP1814307B1 EP1814307B1 (en) 2009-12-16
EP1814307B9 true EP1814307B9 (en) 2010-05-26

Family

ID=37583887

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20060753011 Not-in-force EP1814307B9 (en) 2005-06-25 2006-06-23 Method for detecting the quality of the multimedia communication

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US8184164B2 (ko)
EP (1) EP1814307B9 (ko)
JP (2) JP4763721B2 (ko)
KR (1) KR100934539B1 (ko)
CN (2) CN100461864C (ko)
AT (1) ATE452384T1 (ko)
DE (1) DE602006011119D1 (ko)
WO (1) WO2007000103A1 (ko)

Families Citing this family (63)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7644282B2 (en) 1998-05-28 2010-01-05 Verance Corporation Pre-processed information embedding system
US6737957B1 (en) 2000-02-16 2004-05-18 Verance Corporation Remote control signaling using audio watermarks
EP2782337A3 (en) 2002-10-15 2014-11-26 Verance Corporation Media monitoring, management and information system
US20060239501A1 (en) 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Verance Corporation Security enhancements of digital watermarks for multi-media content
CN100461864C (zh) * 2005-06-25 2009-02-11 华为技术有限公司 基于数字水印的多媒体视频通信客观质量评价方法
US8020004B2 (en) 2005-07-01 2011-09-13 Verance Corporation Forensic marking using a common customization function
US8781967B2 (en) 2005-07-07 2014-07-15 Verance Corporation Watermarking in an encrypted domain
KR100816089B1 (ko) * 2006-07-20 2008-03-24 광운대학교 산학협력단 3차원 정보를 가지고 있는 집적영상의 요소영상을워터마크로 사용하는 워터마킹 장치 및 그 방법
US8300877B2 (en) * 2007-02-20 2012-10-30 Sony Mobile Communications Ab Copy protected information distribution
JP5043183B2 (ja) * 2007-05-10 2012-10-10 トムソン ライセンシング 埋め込まれた透かしを使用した障害検出
US9275401B2 (en) * 2007-09-06 2016-03-01 Adobe Systems Incorporated Tamper resistant video rendering
KR100922898B1 (ko) 2007-12-17 2009-10-20 한국전자통신연구원 ＩＰ 미디어의 ＱｏＥ 보장형 영상품질 측정장치 및측정방법
KR100902887B1 (ko) * 2008-10-17 2009-06-16 주식회사 씨케이앤비 디지털 영상 장치의 영상 왜곡 판단 테스트 자동화 시스템
US8661118B2 (en) * 2010-03-08 2014-02-25 Microsoft Corporation Detection of end-to-end transport quality
US8614731B2 (en) * 2010-04-21 2013-12-24 Spirent Communications, Inc. System and method for testing the reception and play of media on mobile devices
US8838977B2 (en) 2010-09-16 2014-09-16 Verance Corporation Watermark extraction and content screening in a networked environment
CN102932649A (zh) * 2011-08-08 2013-02-13 华为软件技术有限公司 机顶盒视频解码质量检测方法及装置
EP2745531B1 (en) * 2011-09-07 2021-10-06 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Device and method to support the operating of the display of image data
US9338463B2 (en) * 2011-10-06 2016-05-10 Synopsys, Inc. Visual quality measure for real-time video processing
US8923548B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2014-12-30 Verance Corporation Extraction of embedded watermarks from a host content using a plurality of tentative watermarks
US8682026B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2014-03-25 Verance Corporation Efficient extraction of embedded watermarks in the presence of host content distortions
US8615104B2 (en) * 2011-11-03 2013-12-24 Verance Corporation Watermark extraction based on tentative watermarks
US8745403B2 (en) 2011-11-23 2014-06-03 Verance Corporation Enhanced content management based on watermark extraction records
US9323902B2 (en) 2011-12-13 2016-04-26 Verance Corporation Conditional access using embedded watermarks
US9330429B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2016-05-03 Mobitv, Inc. Scalable watermark insertion for fragmented media stream delivery
CN102630010A (zh) * 2012-03-30 2012-08-08 西安烽火电子科技有限责任公司 一种无线视频传输系统及其传输方法
CN102902929B (zh) * 2012-08-10 2015-09-09 西北大学 自然语言水印鲁棒性测试方法及其系统
US9571606B2 (en) 2012-08-31 2017-02-14 Verance Corporation Social media viewing system
US9106964B2 (en) 2012-09-13 2015-08-11 Verance Corporation Enhanced content distribution using advertisements
US8869222B2 (en) 2012-09-13 2014-10-21 Verance Corporation Second screen content
US9262794B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-02-16 Verance Corporation Transactional video marking system
US9251549B2 (en) 2013-07-23 2016-02-02 Verance Corporation Watermark extractor enhancements based on payload ranking
CN103533343B (zh) * 2013-09-29 2015-05-20 宁波大学 一种基于数字水印的立体图像质量客观评价方法
US9208334B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2015-12-08 Verance Corporation Content management using multiple abstraction layers
CN106170988A (zh) 2014-03-13 2016-11-30 凡瑞斯公司 使用嵌入式代码的交互式内容获取
US11064204B2 (en) 2014-05-15 2021-07-13 Arris Enterprises Llc Automatic video comparison of the output of a video decoder
EP3172717A4 (en) * 2014-07-22 2018-01-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Rapid image registration
US9811882B2 (en) * 2014-09-30 2017-11-07 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and apparatus for processing super resolution image using adaptive preprocessing filtering and/or postprocessing filtering
CN107018406B (zh) * 2016-01-27 2019-09-03 华为技术有限公司 视频信息处理方法及装置
US10085015B1 (en) * 2017-02-14 2018-09-25 Zpeg, Inc. Method and system for measuring visual quality of a video sequence
EP3445045A1 (en) * 2017-08-18 2019-02-20 NXP USA, Inc. Video device and method for embedded data capture on a virtual channel
CN108540867B (zh) * 2018-04-25 2021-04-27 中影数字巨幕（北京）有限公司 影片校正方法及系统
KR102637177B1 (ko) * 2018-05-23 2024-02-14 세종대학교산학협력단 워터마크 기반의 이미지 무결성 검증 방법 및 장치
US11025900B2 (en) * 2018-07-18 2021-06-01 Universal City Studios Llc System and method for identifying b-roll conditions in live streams or live rendered content
CN109120377B (zh) * 2018-07-19 2020-11-27 华北水利水电大学 一种新的数据传输中的信息隐藏方法、存储介质
CN109309869B (zh) * 2018-09-11 2021-01-26 东方网力科技股份有限公司 一种水印嵌入方法、装置及存储介质
WO2020080709A1 (en) * 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Artificial intelligence encoding and artificial intelligence decoding methods and apparatuses using deep neural network
US11616988B2 (en) 2018-10-19 2023-03-28 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and device for evaluating subjective quality of video
WO2020080665A1 (en) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Methods and apparatuses for performing artificial intelligence encoding and artificial intelligence decoding on image
KR102525578B1 (ko) 2018-10-19 2023-04-26 삼성전자주식회사 부호화 방법 및 그 장치, 복호화 방법 및 그 장치
US11720997B2 (en) 2018-10-19 2023-08-08 Samsung Electronics Co.. Ltd. Artificial intelligence (AI) encoding device and operating method thereof and AI decoding device and operating method thereof
WO2020080827A1 (en) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Ai encoding apparatus and operation method of the same, and ai decoding apparatus and operation method of the same
WO2020080873A1 (en) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for streaming data
WO2020080765A1 (en) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatuses and methods for performing artificial intelligence encoding and artificial intelligence decoding on image
WO2020080623A1 (ko) 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 삼성전자 주식회사 영상의 ａｉ 부호화 및 ａｉ 복호화 방법, 및 장치
CN109684796A (zh) * 2018-10-31 2019-04-26 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 一种基于数字水印的文档防伪方法、装置及可读存储介质
CN110289014B (zh) * 2019-05-21 2021-11-19 华为技术有限公司 一种语音质量检测方法及电子设备
CN110366004B (zh) * 2019-07-22 2021-08-13 中国人民解放军战略支援部队信息工程大学 一种二次成像混合帧信息解析方法及系统
KR102436512B1 (ko) 2019-10-29 2022-08-25 삼성전자주식회사 부호화 방법 및 그 장치, 복호화 방법 및 그 장치
KR20210056179A (ko) 2019-11-08 2021-05-18 삼성전자주식회사 Ai 부호화 장치 및 그 동작방법, 및 ai 복호화 장치 및 그 동작방법
CN113987550A (zh) * 2021-11-15 2022-01-28 阿里巴巴（中国）有限公司 数据安全处理方法、电子设备及计算机存储介质
CN114466181A (zh) * 2021-12-29 2022-05-10 沈阳中科创达软件有限公司 一种视频异常检测方法、装置、设备和系统
CN115278314B (zh) * 2022-07-08 2023-10-13 南京大学 一种多值数字视频水印嵌入及盲提取方法

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6836295B1 (en) * 1995-12-07 2004-12-28 J. Carl Cooper Audio to video timing measurement for MPEG type television systems
US6496221B1 (en) * 1998-11-02 2002-12-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce In-service video quality measurement system utilizing an arbitrary bandwidth ancillary data channel
US6943827B2 (en) * 2001-04-16 2005-09-13 Kddi Corporation Apparatus for monitoring quality of picture in transmission
US7607016B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2009-10-20 Digimarc Corporation Including a metric in a digital watermark for media authentication
GB2377109B (en) * 2001-06-28 2003-12-03 Motorola Inc Video/image communication with watermarking
US20030112996A1 (en) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-19 Holliman Matthew J. Automatic monitoring of host signal quality using embedded data
JP4107851B2 (ja) * 2002-02-13 2008-06-25 三洋電機株式会社 電子透かし埋め込み方法およびその方法を利用可能な符号化装置と復号装置
US7636440B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2009-12-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Digital watermark with variable location
CA2523345A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2004-11-25 Avid Technology, Inc. Watermarking
JP2004348293A (ja) * 2003-05-20 2004-12-09 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> 画像品質計算装置および方法、そのプログラム並びに記録媒体
CN1256705C (zh) * 2003-07-28 2006-05-17 西安电子科技大学 基于图像目标区域的小波域数字水印方法
US7376241B2 (en) * 2003-08-06 2008-05-20 The Boeing Company Discrete fourier transform (DFT) watermark
US7706565B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2010-04-27 Digimarc Corporation Multi-channel digital watermarking
CN1306453C (zh) * 2003-12-30 2007-03-21 中国人民解放军第一军医大学 离散拉当变换域中抗冲击性的图像水印嵌入与检测方法
CN100461864C (zh) * 2005-06-25 2009-02-11 华为技术有限公司 基于数字水印的多媒体视频通信客观质量评价方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1814307A1 (en) 2007-08-01
CN101160951A (zh) 2008-04-09
KR20070088716A (ko) 2007-08-29
CN100461864C (zh) 2009-02-11
JP5161334B2 (ja) 2013-03-13
EP1814307A4 (en) 2008-03-19
KR100934539B1 (ko) 2009-12-29
ATE452384T1 (de) 2010-01-15
JP4763721B2 (ja) 2011-08-31
JP2008527810A (ja) 2008-07-24
WO2007000103A1 (fr) 2007-01-04
CN101160951B (zh) 2010-07-21
DE602006011119D1 (de) 2010-01-28
EP1814307B1 (en) 2009-12-16
CN1885947A (zh) 2006-12-27
US8184164B2 (en) 2012-05-22
US20080273861A1 (en) 2008-11-06
JP2011182423A (ja) 2011-09-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1814307B9 (en) Method for detecting the quality of the multimedia communication
US6563936B2 (en) Spatio-temporal channel for images employing a watermark and its complement
US6400400B1 (en) Method and apparatus for automated testing of a video decoder
US8031770B2 (en) Systems and methods for objective video quality measurements
Ma et al. Reduced-reference video quality assessment of compressed video sequences
Wang et al. An image quality evaluation method based on digital watermarking
US6771795B1 (en) Spatio-temporal channel for image watermarks or data
EP1689196B1 (en) Error concealment for video signals
JP4194029B2 (ja) 画像劣化自動検出装置
US20100026813A1 (en) Video monitoring involving embedding a video characteristic in audio of a video/audio signal
WO2010103112A1 (en) Method and apparatus for video quality measurement without reference
Pullano et al. PSNR evaluation and alignment recovery for mobile satellite video broadcasting
KR100902887B1 (ko) 디지털 영상 장치의 영상 왜곡 판단 테스트 자동화 시스템
JP2007501561A (ja) ブロックアーティファクトの検出
JP4026754B2 (ja) 画質劣化検出装置
Farias et al. Video quality assessment based on data hiding driven by optical flow information
Ong et al. Video quality monitoring of streamed videos
Fenimore et al. Test patterns and quality metrics for digital video compression
EP1276328B1 (en) Watermarking in video transmissions
Rahman et al. Reduced-reference Video Quality Metric Using Spatio-temporal Activity Information
Brandão Image communication quality assessment based on watermarking, an overview
KR0185836B1 (ko) 화질 평가장치 및 그 방법
EP2798846B1 (en) Assessing packet loss visibility in video
Abdul Rahman et al. Reduced-reference Video Quality Metric Using Spatio-temporal Activity Information.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070614

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20080215

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04N 17/00 20060101ALI20080211BHEP

Ipc: G06T 1/00 20060101AFI20080211BHEP

Ipc: H04N 1/56 20060101ALI20080211BHEP

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080812

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602006011119

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100128

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20091216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20091216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100416

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100416

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100316

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100317

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20100917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100623

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100617

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100623

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20160613

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170627

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170628

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170624

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006011119

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190101

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630