EP1805742A1 - Pre-tactical control device - Google Patents
Pre-tactical control deviceInfo
- Publication number
- EP1805742A1 EP1805742A1 EP05789840A EP05789840A EP1805742A1 EP 1805742 A1 EP1805742 A1 EP 1805742A1 EP 05789840 A EP05789840 A EP 05789840A EP 05789840 A EP05789840 A EP 05789840A EP 1805742 A1 EP1805742 A1 EP 1805742A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- traffic
- tactical
- tactical control
- time
- control device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012913 prioritisation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004393 prognosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0043—Traffic management of multiple aircrafts from the ground
Definitions
- the invention relates to a nostitaktische control device for traffic control, which is provided for connection to a tactical control system for the allocation of traffic event times, which are to be followed by means of transport at fixed traffic junctions.
- Tactical control systems are well-known for air traffic control, which allocate aircraft take-off and landing times to aircraft within the tactical control horizon up to approximately half an hour before the planned launch or landing. The pilot then has to ensure that he complies with the assigned traffic event times, which may be short windows of a few minutes.
- the tactical control systems take into account near-time and local information in the allocation of traffic event times, but are often only able to respond to an incoming situation. Due to their relatively short temporal control time horizon, tactical control systems have no way of detecting a looming unfavorable traffic situation and reacting to it in good time. Furthermore, strategic planning systems are known with which in the traffic events comprehensive strategic
- Forecast time horizons which are significantly larger than the pre-tactical control time horizons, one time and several hours before the actual traffic event time slots, so-called slots, are awarded to the means of transport.
- These time windows remain relatively untouched by newly occurring traffic situations. Although they can be repealed, renegotiated and exchanged with each other after negotiations.
- time windows are only planned based on less long-term local information, such as: B. the airport capacity. Since strategic planning systems take into account the traffic flows in a large area, taking into account a large number of airports, the planning is limited to the pursuit of a few overarching optimization targets.
- the object of the invention is therefore to provide a lessnesstaktische control device for traffic control, with a response to a medium term foreseeable developing problematic traffic situation is possible and can be counteracted by targeted and timely control of the resulting traffic problem.
- the pre-tactical control device is designed to determine target times for traffic events of individual means of transport at the designated traffic junctions in a pre-tactical control time horizon that is greater than the tactical control time horizon of the tactical control system and the at least one assigned Traffic event time, wherein the target times at least depending on predetermined traffic plans, of updates the traffic schedules and forecasts of traffic capacities that can be handled at a transport hub over time are determined so that the times of destination are the traffic events at the transport hub in terms of capacity in compliance with the traffic capacities that can be handled at a transport hub, adherence to the prescribed traffic plans and the stability of the planning and Optimize control, and wherein the target times are managed as control parameters in the tactical control system.
- a further interface to a strategic planning system for determining time windows for traffic events of transport at a transport hub in a longer-term strategic planning horizon.
- the pre-tactical control time horizon is smaller than the longer-term strategic traffic planning time horizon, which also includes at least one assigned traffic event time.
- the target times specified by the pre-tactical control device are then also entered into the strategic planning system as a planning input variable.
- Such strategic planning systems are known in air traffic control systems to allocate slots, as stated at the outset.
- the pre-tactical control device thereby closes a gap between the strategic control system and the tactical control system.
- the pre-tactical control time horizon begins about two to three hours and ends about half an hour before the traffic event.
- the strategic planning system has a longer-term traffic planning horizon of two to three hours and more before the traffic event.
- the tactical control time horizon of the tactical control system is approximately half an hour before the traffic event.
- the control by the pre-tactical control device takes place, for example, in a control time window between the beginning of the tactical control time horizon and the beginning of the strategic control time horizon, but may also overlap with the planning time window of the strategic planning system and the tactical control system.
- an interface to the tactical control system is provided for returning an anticipated traffic event time for a traffic event in order to return the traffic event time determined as a function of the target times to the pretactic control device as a basic variable for the optimization of the subsequent target times of further traffic events.
- This traffic event time which can be a time range, is allocated for each means of transport, for example flying object, and can be checked for feasibility in order to change the flight schedule accordingly in the short term.
- the nostitaktische control device for controlling the aviation, in particular the takeoffs and landings is used as traffic events of aircraft as a means of transport from a runway as the traffic hub of an airport, it is advantageous if the target times by temporal juxtaposition of the traffic events of the aircraft optimized for utilization capacity, taking into account staggered intervals, capacity forecasts separated for take-offs and landings, and demand for traffic events.
- the traffic events of the aircraft are thus held up as sequences, which are always improved by a suitable optimization algorithm.
- the pre-tactical control device for determining the target times is dependent on current or predicted weather conditions. This weather data are used as criteria for optimization with.
- the developable traffic capacities can be determined depending on the weather.
- the traffic hub for the calculation of the target times is related to a threshold of the runway.
- the plan compliance of the given traffic plans should be evaluated in relation to a handling stand for the respective aircraft to optimize the target times.
- the conversion of the plan compliance to the threshold then takes place by means of taxi times and / or defrost times for the aircraft, which can be specified as standard or are currently measured comparison times.
- Figure 1 is a block diagram of a pre-tactical controller in conjunction with a tactical control system and a strategic planning system;
- Figure 2 diagram of the departing capacity on the incoming capacity to adapt an operating point for the optimization
- FIG. 3 shows the slots, target times and tactical traffic event times.
- the 1 shows a block diagram of the pre-tactical control device 1 connected to a tactical control system 2 for control in a tactical (short-term) control horizon of approximately 30 minutes before the traffic event and a strategic planning system 3.
- the strategic planning system 3 has a strategic (long-term) planning horizon of more than two to three hours before the traffic event, in particular the takeoff or landing of an aircraft.
- the pre-tactical control device receives capacity forecasts KAP (t) for the runways and the start and landing requests (DEMAND) of means of transport over time t.
- the capacity predictions KAP (t) are calculated with known capacity estimation tools 4 present at airports from a currently set capacity FPL, the so-called flow value of tactical control systems, and a statistical analysis of Created historical data depending on weather data W.
- FPL currently set capacity
- FPL flow value of tactical control systems
- a statistical analysis of Created historical data depending on weather data W are also made available to the capacity prognosis tool 4 and the pre-tactical control device 1 by an airport state determination tool 5.
- a flight plan generator 6 is provided to provide a current flight plan FP and updated flight plans FP "based on a database 7 of the pre-tactical controller 1.
- the airborne generator 6 is also connected to the tactical control system 2 to schedule the flight plans FP due to short-term Adapt control interventions to air traffic.
- the pre-tactical control device 1 is for determining target times for traffic events, in particular take-offs and landings or passing radio beacons, individual flying objects at the designated traffic junctions (runway, beacon, etc.) in a pragmatic medium-term control time horizon comprising the traffic event in the range between two trained up to three hours and about 30 minutes before the traffic event.
- the target times tz. are fed to the tactical control system 2 and optionally also to the strategic planning system 3 for further planning and in particular control.
- the target times t z are determined at least in dependence on the predefined schedules FP, the updates of the flight plans FP " and the capacity prognoses KAP (t) via the traffic capacities that can be processed at the transport hub over the time t such that the destination times t z are the traffic events on the Transport hub in terms of capacity KAP in compliance with the traffic at the hub interoperable traffic capacities KAP (t), the Adherence to the prescribed schedules FP and optimize the stability of planning and control.
- target times tz of the tactical control system 2 are expected tactical traffic event times fz for
- Traffic event such as an estimated time of arrival ETA
- the pre-tactical control device 1 can also be used to simulate different situations by varying boundary conditions, in particular by shifting traffic events, and thereby achieving an optimization of the handling of air traffic.
- the lessnesstaktische control device 1 operates in principle fully automatically, the data supplied via interfaces in the database 7 are organized and managed. Expected traffic event times ETA and ETD (Estimated Time of Arrival and Estimated Time of Departure) are in most cases determined for each flight, regardless of the overall situation. With the knowledge of the overall situation, in particular the capacity KAP (t) and the requirements of traffic events (demand), the traffic event times ETA, ETD are corrected accordingly. This is especially true in the event that the available capacity KAP (t) is below the predicted traffic event requirements. The adaptation is carried out based on the current frequency of traffic events set by the tactical control system 2.
- the lessnesstaktischen control device 1 is a target time tz under consideration of optimization functions based on information about
- the target times tz dynamically adapted to the changed boundary conditions.
- the lessnesstaktischen control device 1 and the possible target times .DELTA.tz, z. B. TTL / TTG (Time to Lose, Time to Gain) is determined.
- Also in a quantity control is intervening on individual aircraft controlling, so that the quantity control is the target to be achieved, as a means but all flights must work towards target times tz.
- Optimization is based on the following optimization criteria: a) Flow rate: taking into account the optimum arrival / departure operating point
- Plan compliance can be defined for time intervals to be defined both as forecast with the difference between estimate and schedule and / or the
- relative plan compliance may be taken into account in the optimization, which is determined from the schedule operating flights and the flights scheduled in slots.
- the relative plan compliance is for. time intervals to be defined both as forecast as difference from estimate and schedule / slot and / or as difference between target time and schedule / slot and as achieved characteristic value as difference from current value and
- an operational plan compliance can be used in the optimization, the compliance of the pre-tactical
- Control device 1 scheduled target times t z (positionally) evaluated at defined times. From the pre-tactical
- Control device 1 are determined block or rail-related target times tz optimized for all flights.
- the target times t z can deviate from the timetable and are dynamically updated due to changed boundary conditions.
- the operational plan compliance provides a measure of the quality of the determined target times tz. It is therefore not determined as a forecast, but solely as a parameter for subsequent valuation.
- the operational plan compliance is calculated from the difference between current value ATA / ATD (actual time of arrival, actual time of departure) and target time t z (at selected times t) and / or as the difference between the current value ATA / ATD and traffic event time (estimate). determined at selected times t.
- the current value ATA / ATD is the actual arrival or departure time.
- Boundary conditions are also target time windows ⁇ tz, planned time windows ⁇ t s (slots) to be met, confirmed off-block time COB (estimated earliest block-related departure time), estimated traffic event times, in particular estimated time of arrival ETA or estimated time Time of Departure ETD (estimated earliest possible departure time). Boundary conditions are still external criteria, such as the position availability, the maximum available aircraft traffic area and the maximum available aircraft taxi routes. Additional process times may also be taken into account if they are available in an automated system.
- the optimization is carried out by determining an optimal operating point for all time intervals, ie by optimal distribution between the landings and departures (arrivals and departures) with regard to maximum traffic flow and maximum compliance with the plan.
- This takes into account that requests for traffic events (demand), capacity KAP (t) and operating point are time-variable quantities.
- FIG. 2 shows a diagram for automatic adaptation of the operating point for a planning time. In the diagram the departure capacity is plotted on the arrival capacity. By taking into account the arrival / departure capacity distribution and the demand, a current operating point is determined. It is advantageous to treat the arrivals in an arrival peak and the departures with a high priority in a departure peak.
- the available optimal landing and take-off capacity is then determined, which are optimized with regard to the compliance with the plan and the demand for traffic events.
- the traffic events can then be divided by allocating target times tz to these particular capacities.
- FIG. 3 shows a diagram for representing the target times for an aircraft specified by the pretactic control device as well as the tactical traffic event times ETA, target time window ⁇ tz and slots ⁇ ts.
- the traffic event time t FP is fixed.
- a slot ⁇ t s within which the planned traffic event time t F p lies is awarded approximately two to three hours before departure.
- the scheduled traffic event time t F p may later be due to external events such as delays other airplanes, capacity shift in the handling on the runway and the terminal and delays of passengers, as well as technical problems.
- Target time windows ⁇ tz are defined here, within which a shift of the departure times and destination times tz can take place. The target time windows ⁇ tz are used to make a selection of which aircraft are to be considered in a planning interval and then to optimize those for these aircraft within the planning interval.
- the controller then eliminates capacity bottlenecks and optimizes existing capacity to meet traffic event requests.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
- Valve Device For Special Equipments (AREA)
- Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
- Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004050988A DE102004050988A1 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-10-20 | Pre-tactical control device |
PCT/DE2005/001597 WO2006042490A1 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2005-09-13 | Pre-tactical control device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1805742A1 true EP1805742A1 (en) | 2007-07-11 |
EP1805742B1 EP1805742B1 (en) | 2009-08-19 |
Family
ID=35457889
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05789840A Not-in-force EP1805742B1 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2005-09-13 | Pre-tactical control device |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20080262709A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1805742B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE440357T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102004050988A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2330457T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006042490A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110660274A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-07 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | Airport capacity demand balance prediction method |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007009005A1 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2007-10-11 | Fraport Ag Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide | Method, control system and software program for carrying out the method for the optimized use of the airside capacities of an airport |
DE102007015945A1 (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2008-06-12 | Fraport Ag Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide | Method and device for controlling air traffic handling at an airport |
DE102008008239A1 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method for aggregate analysis, evaluation and visualization of influences of associated resource planning during traffic control, involves determining efficiency of traffic resources by bringing multiple information together |
KR101329116B1 (en) * | 2009-12-01 | 2013-11-14 | 인하대학교 산학협력단 | Apparatus and method for managing a flight plan status for air traffic control |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5265023A (en) * | 1990-07-27 | 1993-11-23 | Mitre Corporation | Method for issuing adaptive ground delays to air traffic |
US6789011B2 (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2004-09-07 | R. Michael Baiada | Method and system for allocating aircraft arrival/departure slot times |
US6580998B2 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2003-06-17 | Rlm Software, Inc. | System and method for estimating aircraft flight delay |
US6584400B2 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | Louis J C Beardsworth | Schedule activated management system for optimizing aircraft arrivals at congested airports |
-
2004
- 2004-10-20 DE DE102004050988A patent/DE102004050988A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-09-13 WO PCT/DE2005/001597 patent/WO2006042490A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-09-13 EP EP05789840A patent/EP1805742B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-09-13 ES ES05789840T patent/ES2330457T3/en active Active
- 2005-09-13 AT AT05789840T patent/ATE440357T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-09-13 DE DE502005007960T patent/DE502005007960D1/en active Active
- 2005-09-13 US US11/577,481 patent/US20080262709A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2006042490A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110660274A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-07 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | Airport capacity demand balance prediction method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2330457T3 (en) | 2009-12-10 |
WO2006042490A9 (en) | 2007-09-20 |
DE502005007960D1 (en) | 2009-10-01 |
ATE440357T1 (en) | 2009-09-15 |
WO2006042490A8 (en) | 2006-07-13 |
DE102004050988A1 (en) | 2006-05-04 |
EP1805742B1 (en) | 2009-08-19 |
WO2006042490A1 (en) | 2006-04-27 |
US20080262709A1 (en) | 2008-10-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2097885A1 (en) | Method and device for the control of air traffic management at an airport | |
DE60206785T2 (en) | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING PLANE FLOWS | |
US9076327B1 (en) | Method and system to predict airport capacity, landing direction, landing runway and runways available | |
US6789011B2 (en) | Method and system for allocating aircraft arrival/departure slot times | |
JP2004526258A (en) | A schedule-based management system that optimizes aircraft arrivals at airports | |
EP1188137A1 (en) | Air traffic management system | |
DE19604931A1 (en) | Procedure for correcting the flight sequence of an aircraft | |
EP2186077A1 (en) | Method and device for controlling traffic flow | |
WO2007048237A1 (en) | System and method for use in air traffic management | |
EP1805742B1 (en) | Pre-tactical control device | |
EP2005374A1 (en) | Method, control system and software programme for executing a method for optimum use of airside capacity of an airport | |
Baxley et al. | Air traffic management technology demonstration-1 concept of operations (ATD-1 Conops) | |
WO2012110046A1 (en) | Device and method for monitoring and controlling traffic guidance at an airport | |
DE19944310C2 (en) | Method and system for prioritizing local public transport | |
Rodríguez-Sanz et al. | Tactical runway scheduling for demand and delay management | |
Verma et al. | Tactical surface metering procedures and information needs for charlotte douglas international airport | |
DE3126891A1 (en) | Method for organising air traffic by the introduction of four-dimensionally fixed-position optimum flight paths, taking into account the wind conditions | |
Verma et al. | Evaluation of a tactical surface metering tool for Charlotte Douglas international airport via human-in-the-loop simulation | |
AU764817B2 (en) | Air traffic management system | |
Lee et al. | Estimating Throughput for Urban Air Mobility Operations | |
Bradford | NextGen progress and ICAO | |
DE202006001614U1 (en) | System for controlling traffic adapts defined arrival/departure predictions to defined junction capacity to determine predicted achievable flow, allocating destination times to vehicles so predicted flow is achieved most optimally | |
Morgan et al. | Validation of the Runway Utilisation concept | |
Schaper et al. | First results of coupling ATM planning systems with different time horizons | |
Dias et al. | Aircraft spacing for continuous descent approach in a terminal area based on required time of arrival at a metering fix. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070417 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT E.V. Owner name: DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG GMBH |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: PICK, ANDREAS Inventor name: ALBERT, OLIVER, FRANZ Inventor name: PIEKERT, FLORIAN Inventor name: KAUFHOLD, RAINER |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070827 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005007960 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20091001 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2330457 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20091219 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE FLUGSICHERUNG G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20090930 Owner name: DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT E.V. Effective date: 20090930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20091119 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20091221 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090930 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20100520 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090930 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090930 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20091120 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100220 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090819 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005007960 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GRAMM, LINS & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWAEL, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20170829 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20170823 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20170913 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20170911 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20170928 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20171006 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502005007960 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181001 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180914 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190402 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20191030 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180914 |