EP1681793B1 - A method for verifying the subscriber s validity - Google Patents

A method for verifying the subscriber s validity Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1681793B1
EP1681793B1 EP04789868.9A EP04789868A EP1681793B1 EP 1681793 B1 EP1681793 B1 EP 1681793B1 EP 04789868 A EP04789868 A EP 04789868A EP 1681793 B1 EP1681793 B1 EP 1681793B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tid
naf
bsf
secret key
validity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP04789868.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1681793A1 (en
EP1681793A4 (en
Inventor
Yingxin Huawei Administration Building Huang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SnapTrack Inc
Original Assignee
SnapTrack Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SnapTrack Inc filed Critical SnapTrack Inc
Publication of EP1681793A1 publication Critical patent/EP1681793A1/en
Publication of EP1681793A4 publication Critical patent/EP1681793A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1681793B1 publication Critical patent/EP1681793B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0869Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities for achieving mutual authentication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0838Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these
    • H04L9/0841Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these involving Diffie-Hellman or related key agreement protocols
    • H04L9/0844Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these involving Diffie-Hellman or related key agreement protocols with user authentication or key authentication, e.g. ElGamal, MTI, MQV-Menezes-Qu-Vanstone protocol or Diffie-Hellman protocols using implicitly-certified keys
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06Authentication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/12Detection or prevention of fraud
    • H04W12/126Anti-theft arrangements, e.g. protection against subscriber identity module [SIM] cloning

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the third generation (3G) wireless communication technology, and more specifically to a method for verifying the validity of a user.
  • the generic authentication architecture describes a generic architecture adopted by a number of Network Application Functions (NAFs) for verifying the validity of users.
  • NAFs Network Application Functions
  • the above various application functions may include multicast/broadcast service, subscribers certificates service, and instant message supply service, as well as proxy service, e.g. multiple services functions entities may be connected with a proxy entity.
  • the generic authentication architecture handles the proxy as a kind of service where the construction may be very flexible.
  • the generic authentication architecture may be adopted for the authentication and verification of users requesting newly developed services.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic structure diagram of the generic authentication architecture.
  • the generic authentication architecture includes a User Equipment (UE) 101, a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF) 102, a Home Subscriber System (HSS) 103 and an NAF 104.
  • the BSF 102 is used for mutual authentication with the UE 101, and simultaneously generating a secret key shared with the UE 101.
  • a Profile document used for describing the subscriber information is stored in the HSS 103 which will generate authentication information.
  • the UE When a UE requests a service, if the UE knows that the service requires a mutual authentication procedure in the BSF, the UE will perform a mutual authentication in the BSF directly; otherwise, the UE will first contact the NAF corresponding to the service. If the NAF applying the generic authentication architecture requires the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication by means of the generic authentication architecture; otherwise, the NAF executes other appropriate processing.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart for authentication by the generic authentication architecture in the prior art.
  • Step 201 A UE sends to an NAF an application request message.
  • Step 202 Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication in a BSF, then instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 203 The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 204 Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the necessary authentication information of the UE and the profile document thereof to the HSS, and receives a response from the HSS.
  • Step 205 Upon receiving the response message from the HSS containing the information inquired, the BSF performs an Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA) protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information inquired.
  • AKA Authentication and Key Agreement
  • the BSF When completing the AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 206 The BSF assigns the UE a Transaction Identifier (TID) including only the identity and valid for one or more than one NAFs.
  • TID Transaction Identifier
  • the TID is associated with the Ks.
  • Step 207 Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE resends to the NAF an application request message which contains the information of the TID.
  • Step 208 Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF will first conduct local inquiry, if the NAF finds the information of the TID locally, proceed directly to Step 210; otherwise, send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing local identity of the NAF, and then proceed to Step 209.
  • Step 209 Upon receiving the TID inquiring message from the NAF, the BSF will, if finding the TID inquired by the NAF, send to the NAF a response message of success.
  • the NAF stores the contents of the response message and proceeds to Step 210; otherwise, the BSF will send to the NAF a response message of failure, notifying the NAF that there is no information of the UE.
  • the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a authentication in the BSF, and end the procedure.
  • the response message of success includes the TID found, the Ks corresponding to the TID or a derived secret key generated from the Ks according to the security level of the NAF. As long as receiving a response message of success from the BSF, the NAF will believe that the UE is a legitimate UE passing authentication by the BSF and share the Ks or the derived secret key with the UE.
  • Step 210 The NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key.
  • the authenticated TID is used for further communications between the UE and the NAF. Since the TID may be used repeatedly and any NAF may inquire the corresponding TID from the BSF if it can not find the TID locally, as long as obtaining a legitimate TID, the UE may make communications with the NAF using the TID for an indefinite period.
  • 3RD Generation Partnership Project "3GPP TS ab.cde V0.3.0:3rd Generation Partnership Project ; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Bootstrapper of application security using AKA and Support for Subscriber Certificates; System Description" (3GPP TSG SA WG3 Security-S3#30, October 2003 ) discloses the security features and a mechanism to bootstrap authentication and key agreement for application security from the 3GPP AKA mechanism.
  • Candidate applications to use this bootstrapping mechanism include but are not restricted to subscriber certificate distribution, etc. Subscriber certificates services whose provision mobile operator assists, as well as services that mobile operator provides.
  • the TID assigned by the BSF for a UE is only a bridge for establishing confidence between a NAF and the UE, and generally, there is only the identity information in a TID, i.e., there is no definition on how to construct a TID and which information the TID should be associated with. Meanwhile, it is unlikely for the NAF to manage the TID.
  • the UE may perform communications with the NAF using the TID for an indefinite period, which impairs the system security and increases the possibility of a UE's secret key being stolen.
  • the present invention provides a method for verifying the validity of a user by means of checking whether a TID of a user is valid.
  • the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF. If the BSF finds the TID inquired by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID found and the term of validity for the TID, the NAF first stores the contents in the response message from the BSF and then makes normal communications with the UE. If the BSF fails to find the TID required by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of failure, and the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • the present invention takes full advantage of the TID being a bridge of establishing confidence relationship between the NAF and the UE, through a BSF assigning a term of validity for a TID, extends the functions of the TID and enables an NAF to verify the term of validity of the TID used by the UE, thereby implements a further verification of the validity to the UE.
  • the method of the present invention it is possible to avoid the situation where a TID is permanently valid for an NAF, improve the system security, lower the possibility of a UE's TID and the corresponding secret key thereof being stolen, and implement the management of TIDs by an NAF.
  • a combination of the method with the billing system will make it easy to implement the charging of a user.
  • an NAF when an NAF receives an application request message containing the information of a TID, it determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, determines whether the UE is legitimate by determining whether a preset term of validity for the TID used by the UE is overrun. If the UE is legitimate, the NAF will make normal communications with the UE; otherwise, the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in a BSF again;
  • the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF. If the BSF finds the TID inquired by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID found and the term of validity for the TID, the NAF first stores the contents in the response message from the BSF and then makes normal communications with the UE. If the BSF fails to find the TID required by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of failure, and the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • a BSF assigns a UE a TID which is valid for one or more NAFs while not enciphering the TID.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 301 A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 302 Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with a BSF, and then instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 303 The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 304 Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 305 Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from the HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Ks secret key shared with the UE
  • Step 306 the BSF assigns the UE a TID containing only an identity and valid for one or more NAFs at the same time.
  • Step 307 Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE resends to the NAF an application request message containing the information of the TID.
  • Step 308 Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, the NAF determines whether the valid lifetime or the valid times of use for the TID is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 309; otherwise, proceeds to Step 310.
  • the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF, if the BSF finds the TID, the BSF will first generate a derived secret key valid for the inquiring NAF based on the user identity, the NAF identity and the root secret key corresponding to the TID, and then assign, according to the security level of the inquiring NAF and the profile information of the UE, a term of validity for the derived secret key generated for the inquired TID, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use and is valid only for the inquiring NAF.
  • the BSF thereafter, sends a response message of success to the NAF, and the NAF stores the contents of the response message of success and proceeds to Step 310. If the BSF fails to find the TID, the BSF will send to the NAF a response message of failure and proceed to Step 309.
  • the above mentioned response message of success includes the TID inquired by the NAF, the derived secret key corresponding to the TID and generated for the inquiring NAF as well as the term of validity of the derived secret key.
  • the derived secret key for the inquiring NAF has been generated when the UE sends the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF.
  • the NAF receives the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF with the UE.
  • Step 309 the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends this procedure.
  • Step 310 the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the secret key derived from the Ks.
  • the TID used by a UE is valid for one or more NAFs at the same time, the derived secret keys for different NAFs as well as the terms of validity thereof assigned by the BSF are different, i.e. the same TID, when used for different NAFs, corresponds to different derived secret keys and different terms of validity thereof. In terms of one NAF, however, the TID of the UE and the corresponding derived secret key thereof is unique.
  • the UE When the TID used by the UE and the corresponding secret key for a certain NAF expires, the UE will perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key (Ks') corresponding to the new TID. Upon receiving the new TID, the UE will send a new application request message using the new TID while the new request message also contains the information of the old TID.
  • Ks' shared secret key
  • the NAF using the old TID and the derived secret key thereof will not be affected, and a new TID will not be used unless the UE sends an application request again or the NAF requires that the UE update the TID, thereby avoiding the impact by the NAF requesting to update the TID on other NAFs currently using the TID.
  • the NAF When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will always conduct inquiry of the TID in the BSF, if the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also includes the TID inquired by the NAF, the secret key derived for the TID based on such parameters as the identity of the inquiring NAF and the root secret key, and the term of validity corresponding to the derived secret key.
  • the NAF Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF will store the new TID in the response message of success, the derived secret key corresponding to the TID and the term of validity thereof. At the same time, the NAF will disable or delete the old TID stored in it and the secret key corresponding to the old TID.
  • each NAF receiving a new TID will conduct inquiry in the BSF, for the sake of system security, each NAF receiving a new TID will replace the old TID and the related information thereof with the new TID of the UE and the related information thereof. In this way, not only TID management becomes less complex, but the security of TID and the corresponding secret keys is enhanced.
  • the BSF may assign the UE a TID only valid for a certain NAF and including only an identity. Accordingly, in Step 308, upon receiving an application request message containing the information of the TID from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the TID is valid for the NAF, if invalid, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message, if valid, continues with the subsequent steps. The rest steps of the procedure are the same as those shown in Figure 3 and no further description is hereby given.
  • the term of validity of the secret key corresponding to a TID is actually the term of validity of the TID, for the TID is associated with the secret key corresponding to the TID. If a secret key corresponding to a TID expires, it means that the term of validity of the TID for an NAF expires.
  • a BSF assigns a UE a TID valid for only a certain NAF, and the TID is enciphered.
  • Figure 4 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 401 A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 402 Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with the BSF, thus instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 403 The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 404 Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 405 Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from the HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 406 the BSF assigns the UE an identity valid only for a certain NAF, and then, based on the identity or name of the NAF and the profile information of the UE, assigns a term of validity for the identity of the UE, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use.
  • the BSF then enciphers the identity valid for the NAF and the term of validity of the identity using the preset secret key shared between the BSF and the NAF (Knb), takes the enciphered information as a TID and sends the TID to the UE. Since the UE does not have Knb the UE is unable to modify the term of validity of the TID.
  • Step 407 Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE sends to the NAF an application request message containing the enciphered TID.
  • Step 408 Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, the NAF deciphers the TID using Knb and determines whether the valid lifetime or valid times of use is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 409; otherwise, proceeds to Step 410.
  • the NAF will first decipher the TID using Knb and then determine whether the TID is valid for the NAF, where the specific method for performing the determination has been described in detail in the patent application submitted by this inventor and titled as "method for assigning transaction identities" with the application number "200310114069.9". If the TID is valid for the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF; otherwise, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message.
  • the BSF finds the information of the TID, it will send to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID inquired by the NAF and Ks, the secret key shared between the UE and the BSF and corresponding to the TID or a derived secret key generated from Ks, i.e. the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF.
  • the NAF starts to share with the UE the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF.
  • the derived secret key corresponding to the inquiring NAF has been generated by the UE when the UE sent the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF.
  • the NAF stores the contents in the response message of success from the BSF, proceeds to Step 410. If the BSF fails to find the information, it will send a response message of failure to the NAF and proceeds to Step 409.
  • Step 409 the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends the procedure.
  • Step 410 the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects the further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key from Ks.
  • the UE When the TID used by the UE has expired for a certain NAF, the UE will perform mutual authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key, Ks', corresponding to the new TID, where the new TID is also enciphered.
  • the request message contains the information of both the new TID and the old TID.
  • the NAF When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will always conduct inquiry of the TID in the BSF. If the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also contains the TID inquired by the NAF, and Ks' or the derived secret key generated from Ks'. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share Ks' or the derived secret key from Ks' with the UE. The NAF will store the new TID and the Ks', and disable or delete the locally-stored old TID and the Ks.
  • the BSF assigns a UE a TID valid only for a certain NAF, and does not encipher the TID.
  • Figure 5 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the third embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 501 A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 502 Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with the BSF, thus instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 503 The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 504 Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 505 Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Ks secret key shared with the UE
  • Step 506 the BSF assigns the UE an identity valid only for a certain NAF, and takes the identity as a TID. Then, based on the identity or name of the NAF and the profile information of the UE, the BSF assigns and stores a term of validity for the TID of the UE, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use, and sends the assigned TID to the UE.
  • Step 507 Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE sends to the NAF an application request message containing the information of the TID again.
  • Step 508 Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the TID is valid for the NAF, if invalid, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message; if valid, the NAF will further determine whether the information of the TID exists locally. If the information of the TID exists, the NAF determines whether the valid lifetime or valid times of use is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 509; otherwise, proceeds to Step 510.
  • the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the local NAF. If the BSF finds the TID, it will send to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID inquired by the NAF, the term of validity corresponding to the TID, and Ks, the secret key for the TID shared between the UE and the BSF or the derived secret key generated from Ks, i.e. the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF.
  • the NAF Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share with the UE the derived secret key generated according to the inquiring NAF, which has been generated by the UE when the UE sent the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF. After the NAF stores the contents in the response message of success from the BSF, proceeds to Step 510. If the BSF fails to find the information, it will send a response message of failure to the NAF, informs the NAF that there is no information of the UE, and proceeds to Step 509.
  • Step 509 the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends this procedure.
  • Step 510 the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key from Ks.
  • the UE When the TID used by a UE has expired for a certain NAF, the UE will perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key, Ks', corresponding to the new TID.
  • the request message When the UE sends an application request again to the NAF, the request message will contain the information of both the new TID and the old TID.
  • the NAF When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will conduct inquiry of the new TID in the BSF. If the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also contains the TID inquired by the NAF, the term of validity corresponding to the TID, and Ks' or the derived secret key generated from Ks'. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share Ks' or the derived secret key from Ks' with the UE. The NAF will store the new TID and the secret key associated with the TID, and disable or delete the locally-stored old TID and the secret key associated with the old TID.
  • the BSF when assigning a TID for a UE, may not assign the term of validity corresponding to the TID at first. Instead, the BSF may assign a term of validity corresponding to the TID according to the identity of the NAF and the profile information of the UE when the NAF conducts inquiry of the TID in the BSF.
  • the term of validity of the TID may be used in billing. If the billing is based on time, a TID may be taken as a time unit, and charging for one day's use may be made whenever a new TID is assigned. If the billing is based on times of use, a TID may be charged according to the times of use it is assigned.
  • the billing operation may be implemented when a BSF assigns a TID, or implemented when an NAF uses a TID.

Description

    Field of the invention
  • The present invention relates to the third generation (3G) wireless communication technology, and more specifically to a method for verifying the validity of a user.
  • Background of the invention
  • In the 3G wireless communication standards, the generic authentication architecture describes a generic architecture adopted by a number of Network Application Functions (NAFs) for verifying the validity of users. By means of generic authentication architecture, it is possible to implement the authentication and verification of a user requesting a service. The above various application functions may include multicast/broadcast service, subscribers certificates service, and instant message supply service, as well as proxy service, e.g. multiple services functions entities may be connected with a proxy entity. The generic authentication architecture handles the proxy as a kind of service where the construction may be very flexible. Moreover, the generic authentication architecture may be adopted for the authentication and verification of users requesting newly developed services.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic structure diagram of the generic authentication architecture. Typically, the generic authentication architecture includes a User Equipment (UE) 101, a Bootstrapping Server Function (BSF) 102, a Home Subscriber System (HSS) 103 and an NAF 104. The BSF 102 is used for mutual authentication with the UE 101, and simultaneously generating a secret key shared with the UE 101. A Profile document used for describing the subscriber information is stored in the HSS 103 which will generate authentication information.
  • When a UE requests a service, if the UE knows that the service requires a mutual authentication procedure in the BSF, the UE will perform a mutual authentication in the BSF directly; otherwise, the UE will first contact the NAF corresponding to the service. If the NAF applying the generic authentication architecture requires the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication by means of the generic authentication architecture; otherwise, the NAF executes other appropriate processing.
  • Figure 2 is a flowchart for authentication by the generic authentication architecture in the prior art.
  • Step 201: A UE sends to an NAF an application request message.
  • Step 202: Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication in a BSF, then instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 203: The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 204: Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the necessary authentication information of the UE and the profile document thereof to the HSS, and receives a response from the HSS.
  • Step 205: Upon receiving the response message from the HSS containing the information inquired, the BSF performs an Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA) protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information inquired. When completing the AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 206: The BSF assigns the UE a Transaction Identifier (TID) including only the identity and valid for one or more than one NAFs. The TID is associated with the Ks.
  • Step 207: Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE resends to the NAF an application request message which contains the information of the TID.
  • Step 208: Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF will first conduct local inquiry, if the NAF finds the information of the TID locally, proceed directly to Step 210; otherwise, send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing local identity of the NAF, and then proceed to Step 209.
  • Step 209: Upon receiving the TID inquiring message from the NAF, the BSF will, if finding the TID inquired by the NAF, send to the NAF a response message of success. The NAF stores the contents of the response message and proceeds to Step 210; otherwise, the BSF will send to the NAF a response message of failure, notifying the NAF that there is no information of the UE. The NAF will instruct the UE to perform a authentication in the BSF, and end the procedure.
  • The response message of success includes the TID found, the Ks corresponding to the TID or a derived secret key generated from the Ks according to the security level of the NAF. As long as receiving a response message of success from the BSF, the NAF will believe that the UE is a legitimate UE passing authentication by the BSF and share the Ks or the derived secret key with the UE.
  • Step 210: The NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key.
  • After the first communication process between the UE and the NAF is over, the authenticated TID is used for further communications between the UE and the NAF. Since the TID may be used repeatedly and any NAF may inquire the corresponding TID from the BSF if it can not find the TID locally, as long as obtaining a legitimate TID, the UE may make communications with the NAF using the TID for an indefinite period.
  • "Handbook of Applied Cryptography" (Menezes, Oorschot, Vanstone, 1997) discloses key lift cycle issues. Controls are necessary to protect keys both during usage and storage. Regarding long-term storage of keys, the duration of protection required depends on the cryptographic function (e.g., encryption, signature, data origin authentication/integrity) and the time-sensitivity of the data in question. Except in simple systems where secret keys remain fixed for all time, cryptoperiods associated with keys require that keys be updated periodically.
  • 3RD Generation Partnership Project "3GPP TS ab.cde V0.3.0:3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Bootstrapper of application security using AKA and Support for Subscriber Certificates; System Description" (3GPP TSG SA WG3 Security-S3#30, October 2003) discloses the security features and a mechanism to bootstrap authentication and key agreement for application security from the 3GPP AKA mechanism. Candidate applications to use this bootstrapping mechanism include but are not restricted to subscriber certificate distribution, etc. Subscriber certificates services whose provision mobile operator assists, as well as services that mobile operator provides.
  • It can be seen from the above solution that, the TID assigned by the BSF for a UE is only a bridge for establishing confidence between a NAF and the UE, and generally, there is only the identity information in a TID, i.e., there is no definition on how to construct a TID and which information the TID should be associated with. Meanwhile, it is unlikely for the NAF to manage the TID. In addition, once a UE obtains a legitimate TID, the UE may perform communications with the NAF using the TID for an indefinite period, which impairs the system security and increases the possibility of a UE's secret key being stolen.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • The present invention provides a method for verifying the validity of a user by means of checking whether a TID of a user is valid.
  • The solution in accordance with the present invention is implemented as follows:
    • According to an aspect of the present invention, when an NAF receives an application request message containing TID information, it determines whether the TID information exists locally, if exists, determines whether the TID expires. If the TID has not expired, the NAF will make normal communications with the UE; if the TID has expired, the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in a BSF again;
  • If there is no TID information in the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF. If the BSF finds the TID inquired by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID found and the term of validity for the TID, the NAF first stores the contents in the response message from the BSF and then makes normal communications with the UE. If the BSF fails to find the TID required by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of failure, and the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • It can be seen from the above-mentioned scheme that, the present invention takes full advantage of the TID being a bridge of establishing confidence relationship between the NAF and the UE, through a BSF assigning a term of validity for a TID, extends the functions of the TID and enables an NAF to verify the term of validity of the TID used by the UE, thereby implements a further verification of the validity to the UE. By the method of the present invention, it is possible to avoid the situation where a TID is permanently valid for an NAF, improve the system security, lower the possibility of a UE's TID and the corresponding secret key thereof being stolen, and implement the management of TIDs by an NAF. In addition, a combination of the method with the billing system will make it easy to implement the charging of a user.
  • Brief description of the drawings
    • Figure 1 is a schematic structure diagram illustrating the generic authentication architecture.
    • Figure 2 is a flowchart of a UE authentication using the generic authentication architecture in the prior art.
    • Figure 3 is a flowchart of verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
    • Figure 4 is a flowchart of verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
    • Figure 5 is a flowchart of verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention.
    Detailed description of the invention
  • In order to make the technical solution of the present invention clearer, a further and detailed description of the present invention is hereinafter given with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
  • According to an aspect of the present invention, when an NAF receives an application request message containing the information of a TID, it determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, determines whether the UE is legitimate by determining whether a preset term of validity for the TID used by the UE is overrun. If the UE is legitimate, the NAF will make normal communications with the UE; otherwise, the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in a BSF again;
  • If there is no information of the TID in the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF. If the BSF finds the TID inquired by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID found and the term of validity for the TID, the NAF first stores the contents in the response message from the BSF and then makes normal communications with the UE. If the BSF fails to find the TID required by the NAF, it will return to the NAF a response message of failure, and the NAF will instruct the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • The invention is hereinafter described in detail by several specific embodiments.
  • First embodiment:
  • A BSF assigns a UE a TID which is valid for one or more NAFs while not enciphering the TID.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 301: A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 302: Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with a BSF, and then instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 303: The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 304: Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 305: Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from the HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 306: the BSF assigns the UE a TID containing only an identity and valid for one or more NAFs at the same time.
  • Step 307: Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE resends to the NAF an application request message containing the information of the TID.
  • Step 308: Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, the NAF determines whether the valid lifetime or the valid times of use for the TID is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 309; otherwise, proceeds to Step 310.
  • If there is no information of the TID in the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF, if the BSF finds the TID, the BSF will first generate a derived secret key valid for the inquiring NAF based on the user identity, the NAF identity and the root secret key corresponding to the TID, and then assign, according to the security level of the inquiring NAF and the profile information of the UE, a term of validity for the derived secret key generated for the inquired TID, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use and is valid only for the inquiring NAF. The BSF, thereafter, sends a response message of success to the NAF, and the NAF stores the contents of the response message of success and proceeds to Step 310. If the BSF fails to find the TID, the BSF will send to the NAF a response message of failure and proceed to Step 309.
  • The above mentioned response message of success includes the TID inquired by the NAF, the derived secret key corresponding to the TID and generated for the inquiring NAF as well as the term of validity of the derived secret key. The derived secret key for the inquiring NAF has been generated when the UE sends the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF. When the NAF receives the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF with the UE.
  • Step 309: the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends this procedure.
  • Step 310: the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the secret key derived from the Ks.
  • Though the TID used by a UE is valid for one or more NAFs at the same time, the derived secret keys for different NAFs as well as the terms of validity thereof assigned by the BSF are different, i.e. the same TID, when used for different NAFs, corresponds to different derived secret keys and different terms of validity thereof. In terms of one NAF, however, the TID of the UE and the corresponding derived secret key thereof is unique.
  • When the TID used by the UE and the corresponding secret key for a certain NAF expires, the UE will perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key (Ks') corresponding to the new TID. Upon receiving the new TID, the UE will send a new application request message using the new TID while the new request message also contains the information of the old TID. Thus the NAF using the old TID and the derived secret key thereof will not be affected, and a new TID will not be used unless the UE sends an application request again or the NAF requires that the UE update the TID, thereby avoiding the impact by the NAF requesting to update the TID on other NAFs currently using the TID.
  • When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will always conduct inquiry of the TID in the BSF, if the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also includes the TID inquired by the NAF, the secret key derived for the TID based on such parameters as the identity of the inquiring NAF and the root secret key, and the term of validity corresponding to the derived secret key. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF will store the new TID in the response message of success, the derived secret key corresponding to the TID and the term of validity thereof. At the same time, the NAF will disable or delete the old TID stored in it and the secret key corresponding to the old TID.
  • Since the old TID used by a UE corresponds to multiple NAFs at the same time, when the TID expires for a certain NAF, it is quite possible that the TID is still valid for other NAFs. Since each NAF receiving a new TID will conduct inquiry in the BSF, for the sake of system security, each NAF receiving a new TID will replace the old TID and the related information thereof with the new TID of the UE and the related information thereof. In this way, not only TID management becomes less complex, but the security of TID and the corresponding secret keys is enhanced.
  • In Step 306 of this embodiment, the BSF may assign the UE a TID only valid for a certain NAF and including only an identity. Accordingly, in Step 308, upon receiving an application request message containing the information of the TID from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the TID is valid for the NAF, if invalid, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message, if valid, continues with the subsequent steps. The rest steps of the procedure are the same as those shown in Figure 3 and no further description is hereby given.
  • The method for assigning a UE a TID only valid for a certain NAF and the method for determining whether the TID is valid for the NAF have been described in detail in the patent application submitted by this inventor and titled as "method for assigning transaction identities" with the application number "200310113233.4", and no further description is hereby given.
  • In this embodiment, the term of validity of the secret key corresponding to a TID is actually the term of validity of the TID, for the TID is associated with the secret key corresponding to the TID. If a secret key corresponding to a TID expires, it means that the term of validity of the TID for an NAF expires.
  • Second embodiment
  • A BSF assigns a UE a TID valid for only a certain NAF, and the TID is enciphered.
  • Figure 4 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 401: A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 402: Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with the BSF, thus instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 403: The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 404: Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 405: Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from the HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 406: the BSF assigns the UE an identity valid only for a certain NAF, and then, based on the identity or name of the NAF and the profile information of the UE, assigns a term of validity for the identity of the UE, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use. The BSF then enciphers the identity valid for the NAF and the term of validity of the identity using the preset secret key shared between the BSF and the NAF (Knb), takes the enciphered information as a TID and sends the TID to the UE. Since the UE does not have Knb the UE is unable to modify the term of validity of the TID.
  • Step 407: Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE sends to the NAF an application request message containing the enciphered TID.
  • Step 408: Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the information of the TID exists locally, if exists, the NAF deciphers the TID using Knb and determines whether the valid lifetime or valid times of use is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 409; otherwise, proceeds to Step 410.
  • If there is no information of the TID in the NAF, the NAF will first decipher the TID using Knb and then determine whether the TID is valid for the NAF, where the specific method for performing the determination has been described in detail in the patent application submitted by this inventor and titled as "method for assigning transaction identities" with the application number "200310114069.9". If the TID is valid for the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the NAF; otherwise, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message.
  • If the BSF finds the information of the TID, it will send to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID inquired by the NAF and Ks, the secret key shared between the UE and the BSF and corresponding to the TID or a derived secret key generated from Ks, i.e. the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share with the UE the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF. The derived secret key corresponding to the inquiring NAF has been generated by the UE when the UE sent the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF. After the NAF stores the contents in the response message of success from the BSF, proceeds to Step 410. If the BSF fails to find the information, it will send a response message of failure to the NAF and proceeds to Step 409.
  • Step 409: the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends the procedure.
  • Step 410: the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects the further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key from Ks.
  • When the TID used by the UE has expired for a certain NAF, the UE will perform mutual authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key, Ks', corresponding to the new TID, where the new TID is also enciphered. When the UE sends an application request to the NAF again, the request message contains the information of both the new TID and the old TID.
  • When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will always conduct inquiry of the TID in the BSF. If the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also contains the TID inquired by the NAF, and Ks' or the derived secret key generated from Ks'. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share Ks' or the derived secret key from Ks' with the UE. The NAF will store the new TID and the Ks', and disable or delete the locally-stored old TID and the Ks.
  • Third embodiment
  • The BSF assigns a UE a TID valid only for a certain NAF, and does not encipher the TID.
  • Figure 5 is a flowchart for verifying the validity of a UE in accordance with the third embodiment of the present invention.
  • Step 501: A UE sends an application request message to an NAF.
  • Step 502: Upon receiving the message, the NAF finds that the UE has not performed a mutual authentication with the BSF, thus instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF.
  • Step 503: The UE sends to the BSF a bootstrapping request message.
  • Step 504: Upon receiving the bootstrapping request message from the UE, the BSF conducts inquiry of the authentication information and profile of the UE to an HSS, and receives a response message from the HSS.
  • Step 505: Upon receiving the response message containing the information found sent from HSS, the BSF performs an AKA protocol based mutual authentication with the UE using the information found. When completing the AKA based mutual authentication with the UE, i.e. passing the mutual authentication, the BSF generates a secret key shared with the UE (Ks).
  • Step 506: the BSF assigns the UE an identity valid only for a certain NAF, and takes the identity as a TID. Then, based on the identity or name of the NAF and the profile information of the UE, the BSF assigns and stores a term of validity for the TID of the UE, where the term of validity is a valid lifetime and/or valid times of use, and sends the assigned TID to the UE.
  • Step 507: Upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF, the UE sends to the NAF an application request message containing the information of the TID again.
  • Step 508: Upon receiving the application request message containing the information of the TID sent from the UE, the NAF first determines whether the TID is valid for the NAF, if invalid, the NAF will prompt the UE with an error message; if valid, the NAF will further determine whether the information of the TID exists locally. If the information of the TID exists, the NAF determines whether the valid lifetime or valid times of use is overrun, if overrun, proceeds to Step 509; otherwise, proceeds to Step 510.
  • If there is no information of the TID in the NAF, the NAF will send to the BSF a TID inquiring message containing the identity of the local NAF. If the BSF finds the TID, it will send to the NAF a response message of success containing the TID inquired by the NAF, the term of validity corresponding to the TID, and Ks, the secret key for the TID shared between the UE and the BSF or the derived secret key generated from Ks, i.e. the derived secret key generated for the inquiring NAF. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share with the UE the derived secret key generated according to the inquiring NAF, which has been generated by the UE when the UE sent the application request to the NAF using the TID assigned by the BSF. After the NAF stores the contents in the response message of success from the BSF, proceeds to Step 510. If the BSF fails to find the information, it will send a response message of failure to the NAF, informs the NAF that there is no information of the UE, and proceeds to Step 509.
  • Step 509: the NAF instructs the UE to perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF, and ends this procedure.
  • Step 510: the NAF makes normal communications with the UE, i.e. data transmission, and protects further communications using the Ks or the derived secret key from Ks.
  • When the TID used by a UE has expired for a certain NAF, the UE will perform a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF again. After the authentication succeeds, the BSF will assign the UE a new TID and generate a new shared secret key, Ks', corresponding to the new TID. When the UE sends an application request again to the NAF, the request message will contain the information of both the new TID and the old TID.
  • When an NAF receives a new TID, the NAF will conduct inquiry of the new TID in the BSF. If the inquiry succeeds, the BSF will return to the NAF a response message of success which also contains the TID inquired by the NAF, the term of validity corresponding to the TID, and Ks' or the derived secret key generated from Ks'. Upon receiving the response message of success from the BSF, the NAF starts to share Ks' or the derived secret key from Ks' with the UE. The NAF will store the new TID and the secret key associated with the TID, and disable or delete the locally-stored old TID and the secret key associated with the old TID.
  • In the third embodiment, when assigning a TID for a UE, the BSF may not assign the term of validity corresponding to the TID at first. Instead, the BSF may assign a term of validity corresponding to the TID according to the identity of the NAF and the profile information of the UE when the NAF conducts inquiry of the TID in the BSF.
  • The term of validity of the TID may be used in billing. If the billing is based on time, a TID may be taken as a time unit, and charging for one day's use may be made whenever a new TID is assigned. If the billing is based on times of use, a TID may be charged according to the times of use it is assigned. The billing operation may be implemented when a BSF assigns a TID, or implemented when an NAF uses a TID.

Claims (10)

  1. A method for verifying the validity of a user, applied to 3rd generation wireless communication technology in which a network application function (104), NAF, verifies the validity of a user by means of an authentication architecture, the method comprising:
    receiving an application request message containing a transaction identifier, TID, from a user equipment (101), UE;
    checking whether there is TID information stored in the NAF (104);
    if the TID information is found, determining whether the TID has expired based on a preset term of validity for the TID,
    if the TID has expired, instructing the UE (101) to connect to a bootstrapping server function (102) BSF, to perform a bootstrapping authentication;
    if the TID information is not found, the NAF (104) sends, to the BSF (102), a TID inquiring message containing an identity of the NAF (104);
    if the TID inquired by the NAF (104) is found, the BSF (102) returns, to the NAF (104), a response message of success containing the information of the TID and the term of validity of the TID wherein said term of validity is determined by the BSF (102) based on the identity or name of the NAF (104) and on profile information of the UE (101), and the method further comprises:
    storing the TID information and the term of validity of the TID in the response message and making normal communications with the UE (101); or
    if the TID information inquired by the NAF is not found, the BSF (102) returns to the NAF (104) a response message of failure, and the method further comprises:
    instructing the UE (101) to perform a bootstrapping authentication with the BSF (102).
  2. The method according to Claim 1, further comprising before the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information:
    a secret key shared by the UE and the BSF (102), Ks, being generated after passing a mutual authentication between the UE (101) and the BSF (102);
    the BSF (102) assigning the UE (101) a TID including only a TID identity, which is valid for one or more NAFs at the same time and associated with the secret key;
    upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF (102), the UE (101) sending to the NAF (104) the service application request message containing the TID, and the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information in the NAF (104);
    further comprising after the BSF (102) finding the TID inquired by the NAF (104):
    based on the TID found, the secret key associated with the TID and the identity of the inquiring NAF (104), the BSF (102) generating a derived secret key associated with the TID and valid for the inquiring NAF (104), assigning a term of validity for the derived secret key, and sending a response message of success to the NAF (104);
    wherein the response message of success further comprises the derived secret key, and the term of validity of the TID in the response message of success returned by the BSF (102) is the term of validity of the derived secret key.
  3. The method according to Claim 1, further comprising before the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information:
    after a secret key shared between the UE (101) and the BSF (102), Ks, is generated during a mutual authentication between the UE (101) and the BSF (102), the BSF (102) assigning the UE (101) a TID including only one TID identity, which is valid only for the NAF (104) and associated with the secret key, and sending the assigned TID to the UE (101);
    upon receiving an application request message containing the TID from the UE (101), the NAF (104) determining whether the TID is valid for the NAF (104), if valid, the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information in the NAF (104); otherwise, the NAF (104) prompting the UE (101) with an error message;
    further comprising after the BSF (102) finding the TID inquired by the NAF (104):
    based on the information of the TID found, the secret key associated with the TID and an identity of the inquiring NAF (104), the BSF (102) generating a derived secret key associated with the TID and valid for the inquiring NAF (104), assigning a term of validity for the derived secret key, and sending a response message of success to the NAF (104);
    wherein the response message of success further comprises the derived secret key valid for the inquiring NAF (104), and the term of validity of the TID in the response message of success returned by the BSF (102) is the term of validity of the derived secret key.
  4. The method according to Claim 1, further comprising before the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information:
    setting a secret key shared between the BSF (102) and the NAF (104), Knb;
    after a secret key shared between the UE (101) and the BSF (102), Ks, is generated during a mutual authentication between the UE (101) and the BSF (102),
    the BSF (102) assigning the UE (101) an identity valid only for the NAF (104) as well as the term of validity for using the identity, enciphering the assigned identity and the term of
    validity thereof using the Knb, taking the enciphered identity as a TID associated with the secret key, and sending the TID to the UE (101);
    upon receiving the TID assigned by the BSF (102), the UE (101) sending to the NAF (104) an application request message containing the TID, and the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information in the NAF (104);
    further comprising before the NAF (104) determining whether the TID expires: the NAF (104) deciphering the received TID using the Knb;
    further comprising before the NAF (104) sending to the BSF (102) the TID inquiring message: the NAF (104) deciphering the received TID using the Knb, and determining whether the TID is valid for the NAF (104), if valid, the NAF (104) sending to the BSF (102) the TID inquiring message; otherwise, prompting the UE (101) with an error message;
    wherein the response message of success returned by the BSF (102) further comprises the secret key associated with the TID inquired by the NAF (104).
  5. The method according to Claim 1, further comprising before the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information:
    after a secret key shared between the UE (101) and the BSF (102), Ks, is generated from a mutual authentication between the UE (101) and the BSF (102), the BSF (102) assigning the UE (101) a TID including only the identity valid for the NAF (104) and assigning a term of validity for the TID, wherein the TID is associated with the secret key, storing the assigned TID and the term of validity thereof, and sending the assigned TID to the UE (101);
    upon receiving an application request message containing the TID from the UE (101), the NAF (104) determining whether the TID is valid for the NAF (104), if valid, the NAF (104) checking whether there is the TID information in the NAF (104); otherwise, prompting the UE (101) with an error message;
    wherein the response message of success returned by the BSF (102) further comprises the secret key associated with the TID inquired by the NAF (104).
  6. The method according to any of Claims 1 to Claim 5, further comprising:
    after succeeding in performing a bootstrapping authentication in the BSF (102), the UE (101) receiving a new TID assigned by the BSF (102), and generating a secret key, Ks', associated with the new TID;
    upon receiving an application request message containing the new TID and the old TID from the UE (101), the NAF (104) conducting inquiry in the BSF (102); upon receiving a
    response message of success from the BSF (102), the NAF (104) storing the new TID of the UE (101) and the secret key associated with the new TID, and deleting or disabling the old TID previously stored in the NAF (104) and the secret key associated with the old TID.
  7. The method according to Claim 6, wherein said secret key associated with the TID is a derived secret key which is derived, in connection with the inquiring NAF (104), from a root secret key associated with the TID.
  8. The method according to Claim 2 or Claim 3, wherein said term of validity is determined by the BSF (102) based on a security level of the inquiring NAF (104) and profile information of the UE (101).
  9. The method according to Claim 1, further comprising: the NAF (104) or the BSF (102) performing billing operations according to the term of validity of the TID.
  10. The method according to Claim 1, wherein said term of validity is a lifetime or valid times of use.
EP04789868.9A 2003-11-07 2004-10-25 A method for verifying the subscriber s validity Active EP1681793B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CNB2003101132300A CN1315268C (en) 2003-11-07 2003-11-07 Method for authenticating users
PCT/CN2004/001209 WO2005046118A1 (en) 2003-11-07 2004-10-25 A method for verifying the subscriber's validity

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1681793A1 EP1681793A1 (en) 2006-07-19
EP1681793A4 EP1681793A4 (en) 2008-01-09
EP1681793B1 true EP1681793B1 (en) 2017-06-21

Family

ID=34558462

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04789868.9A Active EP1681793B1 (en) 2003-11-07 2004-10-25 A method for verifying the subscriber s validity

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US7941121B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1681793B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2007510391A (en)
CN (1) CN1315268C (en)
CA (1) CA2545229C (en)
ES (1) ES2640471T3 (en)
HU (1) HUE033544T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005046118A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7487363B2 (en) 2001-10-18 2009-02-03 Nokia Corporation System and method for controlled copying and moving of content between devices and domains based on conditional encryption of content key depending on usage
CN1315268C (en) 2003-11-07 2007-05-09 华为技术有限公司 Method for authenticating users
CN100563154C (en) * 2004-11-05 2009-11-25 华为技术有限公司 A kind of method that ensures user identity mark secret
GB0504865D0 (en) * 2005-03-09 2005-04-13 Nokia Corp User authentication in a communications system
CN100450283C (en) * 2005-05-18 2009-01-07 华为技术有限公司 Method for establishing trust relation of access end and service application entity
DE602005019255D1 (en) * 2005-07-07 2010-03-25 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR AUTHENTICATION AND PRIVACY
CN1921682B (en) * 2005-08-26 2010-04-21 华为技术有限公司 Method for enhancing key negotiation in universal identifying framework
CN100382506C (en) * 2005-09-20 2008-04-16 华为技术有限公司 Method for verifying network-unit server in network management system
US20070124807A1 (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-05-31 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Password update systems and methods
US8948012B2 (en) 2005-12-29 2015-02-03 Nokia Corporation System and method for interactive session provision
JP5123209B2 (en) 2006-01-24 2013-01-23 ▲ホア▼▲ウェイ▼技術有限公司 Method, system, and authentication center for authentication in end-to-end communication based on a mobile network
CN101039311B (en) * 2006-03-16 2010-05-12 华为技术有限公司 Identification web page service network system and its authentication method
US8522025B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2013-08-27 Nokia Corporation Authenticating an application
CN101090513B (en) * 2006-06-13 2012-05-23 华为技术有限公司 Method for getting service key
CN101136747B (en) * 2006-08-30 2010-05-12 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Information checking system and method
CN101170409B (en) * 2006-10-24 2010-11-03 华为技术有限公司 Method, system, service device and certification server for realizing device access control
JP5043416B2 (en) * 2006-12-15 2012-10-10 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, system and program, device, and storage medium
CN101222488B (en) * 2007-01-10 2010-12-08 华为技术有限公司 Method and network authentication server for controlling client terminal access to network appliance
CN101291221B (en) * 2007-04-16 2010-12-08 华为技术有限公司 Privacy protecting method for identity of customer, and communication system, device
CN101163010B (en) * 2007-11-14 2010-12-08 华为软件技术有限公司 Method of authenticating request message and related equipment
CN102065070B (en) * 2009-11-18 2014-09-03 中国移动通信集团江苏有限公司 Method and device for controlling information safety of telecommunications service (TS)
UA106642C2 (en) * 2009-12-11 2014-09-25 Нокіа Корпорейшн SMART CARD SECURITY PROFILE PROFILE IN SUBSCRIBER DATA SERVER
FR2992811A1 (en) * 2012-07-02 2014-01-03 France Telecom ESTABLISHING A SECURITY ASSOCIATION WHEN ATTACHING A TERMINAL TO AN ACCESS NETWORK
US9820132B2 (en) 2014-12-01 2017-11-14 Nokia Technologies Oy Wireless short-range discovery and connection setup using first and second wireless carrier
US9473941B1 (en) * 2015-06-16 2016-10-18 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus, and computer program product for creating an authenticated relationship between wireless devices
CN107548051A (en) * 2016-06-29 2018-01-05 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method for processing business, network application function entity and generic authentication architecture system
CN112654013B (en) * 2019-09-25 2022-06-14 华为技术有限公司 Certificate issuing method and device

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2366938B (en) * 2000-08-03 2004-09-01 Orange Personal Comm Serv Ltd Authentication in a mobile communications network
US7266684B2 (en) * 2000-08-08 2007-09-04 Wachovia Corporation Internet third-party authentication using electronic tickets
US7107248B1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2006-09-12 Nokia Corporation System and method of bootstrapping a temporary public-key infrastructure from a cellular telecommunication authentication and billing infrastructure
US20020147913A1 (en) * 2001-04-09 2002-10-10 Lun Yip William Wai Tamper-proof mobile commerce system
US8140845B2 (en) * 2001-09-13 2012-03-20 Alcatel Lucent Scheme for authentication and dynamic key exchange
WO2003088578A1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 Nokia Corporation Method, system and device for service selection via a wireless local area network
US7197301B2 (en) * 2002-03-04 2007-03-27 Telespree Communications Method and apparatus for secure immediate wireless access in a telecommunications network
CN1150726C (en) * 2002-10-01 2004-05-19 华中科技大学 Safe network transmission method and system
US20040093419A1 (en) * 2002-10-23 2004-05-13 Weihl William E. Method and system for secure content delivery
CN1194498C (en) * 2002-11-07 2005-03-23 上海交通大学 Content safe monitoring system based on digital label and its method
CN1315268C (en) 2003-11-07 2007-05-09 华为技术有限公司 Method for authenticating users
CN100456671C (en) 2003-11-07 2009-01-28 华为技术有限公司 Method for distributing session affairs identifier
CN100466515C (en) 2003-11-11 2009-03-04 华为技术有限公司 Method for establishing interaction between conversation business mark and network application entity
US8260259B2 (en) * 2004-09-08 2012-09-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Mutual authentication with modified message authentication code

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2007510391A (en) 2007-04-19
HUE033544T2 (en) 2017-12-28
EP1681793A1 (en) 2006-07-19
EP1681793A4 (en) 2008-01-09
US7941121B2 (en) 2011-05-10
CA2545229A1 (en) 2005-05-19
CA2545229C (en) 2011-05-31
US20060253424A1 (en) 2006-11-09
WO2005046118A1 (en) 2005-05-19
CN1614903A (en) 2005-05-11
ES2640471T3 (en) 2017-11-03
CN1315268C (en) 2007-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1681793B1 (en) A method for verifying the subscriber s validity
CN101194529B (en) Method for agreeing on a security key between at least one first and one second communications station for securing a communications link
EP2037621B1 (en) Method and device for deriving local interface key
EP1884060B1 (en) Method for producing key material
EP1705828B1 (en) A method of obtaining the user identification for the network application entity
US6879690B2 (en) Method and system for delegation of security procedures to a visited domain
EP1933498B1 (en) Method, system and device for negotiating about cipher key shared by ue and external equipment
US20020120844A1 (en) Authentication and distribution of keys in mobile IP network
US20090019284A1 (en) Authentication method and key generating method in wireless portable internet system
EP1683322B1 (en) Shared secret usage for bootstrapping
WO2008009238A1 (en) A method and system for generating and distributing mobile ip key
WO2005027559A1 (en) Fast authentication method and apparatus for inter-domain handover
WO2007085175A1 (en) Authentication method, system and authentication center based on end to end communication in the mobile network
WO2005096644A1 (en) A method for establishing security association between the roaming subscriber and the server of the visited network
KR20080053177A (en) The generation method and the update method of authorization key for mobile communication
WO2008006312A1 (en) A realizing method for push service of gaa and a device
KR20080057981A (en) Security system and method in mobile wimax network system
US8447981B2 (en) Method and system for generating and distributing mobile IP security key after re-authentication
Ciou et al. A handover security mechanism employing the Diffie-Hellman key exchange approach for the IEEE802. 16e wireless networks
KR20080056055A (en) Communication inter-provider roaming authentication method and key establishment method, and recording medium storing program including the same
WO2005104432A1 (en) A method for deleting the session traffic identifier and corresponding information
KR20100054191A (en) Improved 3gpp-aka method for the efficient management of authentication procedure in 3g network
Leu et al. A handover security mechanism employing diffie-Hellman PKDS for IEEE802. 16e wireless networks
Kim et al. An efficient Kerberos authentication mechanism associated with X. 509 and DNS (Domain name system)
KR20180109037A (en) Secure authentication of binary CDMA telecommunication network and drive system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060427

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20071210

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20121214

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SNAPTRACK, INC.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602004051432

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0009320000

Ipc: H04L0009080000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04W 12/12 20090101ALI20161202BHEP

Ipc: H04L 9/08 20060101AFI20161202BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/06 20060101ALI20161202BHEP

Ipc: H04W 12/06 20090101ALI20161202BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170105

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 903821

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602004051432

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170922

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2640471

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20171103

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 903821

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170921

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E033544

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602004051432

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180322

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171025

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20171031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171025

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170621

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602004051432

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: MAUCHER JENKINS PATENTANWAELTE & RECHTSANWAELT, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20210927

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20211112

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20211013

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20210925

Year of fee payment: 18

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221025

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230919

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230914

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230914

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221026

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230915

Year of fee payment: 20