EP1678526B1 - Method and system for reversing performance degradation in semi-conductor gamma radiation detectors - Google Patents
Method and system for reversing performance degradation in semi-conductor gamma radiation detectors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1678526B1 EP1678526B1 EP04770190.9A EP04770190A EP1678526B1 EP 1678526 B1 EP1678526 B1 EP 1678526B1 EP 04770190 A EP04770190 A EP 04770190A EP 1678526 B1 EP1678526 B1 EP 1678526B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- degraded
- semiconductor elements
- energy resolution
- elements
- semiconductor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 title claims description 60
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 title claims description 33
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 27
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 title claims description 24
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 title claims description 24
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- QWUZMTJBRUASOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium tellanylidenezinc Chemical compound [Zn].[Cd].[Te] QWUZMTJBRUASOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- MARUHZGHZWCEQU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 5-phenyl-2h-tetrazole Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1C1=NNN=N1 MARUHZGHZWCEQU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002059 diagnostic imaging Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229940121896 radiopharmaceutical Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 239000012217 radiopharmaceutical Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000002799 radiopharmaceutical effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012633 nuclear imaging Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002603 single-photon emission computed tomography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003484 anatomy Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002600 positron emission tomography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013077 target material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/24—Measuring radiation intensity with semiconductor detectors
- G01T1/249—Measuring radiation intensity with semiconductor detectors specially adapted for use in SPECT or PET
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01T—MEASUREMENT OF NUCLEAR OR X-RADIATION
- G01T1/00—Measuring X-radiation, gamma radiation, corpuscular radiation, or cosmic radiation
- G01T1/16—Measuring radiation intensity
- G01T1/24—Measuring radiation intensity with semiconductor detectors
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the radiation detector arts. It particularly relates to the nuclear imaging systems using semiconductor detectors such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging system.
- semiconductor detectors such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging system.
- SPECT single photon emission computed tomography
- PET positron emission tomography
- the invention will also find application in other radiation detection devices using semiconductor detectors for non-imaging applications, other imaging modalities, manufacturing processes for solid-state detectors, and the like.
- Nuclear imaging employs a source of radioactivity to image the anatomy of a subject.
- a radiopharmaceutical is injected into the patient.
- Radiopharmaceutical compounds contain a radioisotope that undergoes gamma-ray decay at a predictable rate and characteristic energy.
- a radiation detector is placed adjacent to the patient to monitor and record emitted radiation. Often, the detector is rotated or indexed around the patient to monitor the emitted radiation from a plurality of directions. Based on information such as detected position and energy, the radiopharmaceutical distribution in the body is determined and an image of the distribution is reconstructed to study the circulatory system, radiopharmaceutical uptake in selected organs or tissue, and the like.
- detector heads with a single, large scintillator and an array of photomultiplier tubes are currently the most common, others have proposed using an array of small scintillators, each associated with a photodiode or other photosensitive solid-state device which senses scintillation in each individual scintillation crystal.
- Arrays of individual solid state radiation detectors such as cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors, cadmium-telluride detectors, and the like, which utilize the photoelectric effect to detect radiation have advantages over the scintillation crystal/photodetector designs.
- CZT cadmium-zinc-telluride
- cadmium-telluride detectors and the like, which utilize the photoelectric effect to detect radiation have advantages over the scintillation crystal/photodetector designs.
- received radiation photons liberate electrons from their orbits around atoms of the target material.
- a high bias voltage is applied across the detector material to aid the photoelectric phenomenon and electron propagation.
- the electrons are detected as an electrical pulse signal.
- Document WO03/001243 discloses a radiation detector assembly of semiconductor elements that are responsive to gamma radiation, comprising a means for identifying semiconductor elements that exhibit a degraded energy resolution.
- the present inventors have identified the degradation as being associated with the presence of the bias voltage. Turning off the bias between uses of the system significantly reduces the rate of degradation.
- medical imaging systems are typically operated substantially continually or at least for extended hours. For good patient throughput with these expensive machines, on average, the "OFF" time for the imaging machine is typically small as compared to the "ON" time. With such a schedule, noticeable degradation can occur in as little as six months.
- the present invention provides a new and improved imaging apparatus and method which overcomes the above-referenced problems and others.
- a system for reversing degraded energy resolution of semiconductor radiation detection elements which are used in a radiation detector assembly is disclosed.
- a means identifies semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution.
- a means restores the degraded semiconductor elements to the initial level of energy resolution by applying a reverse bias.
- a method of restoring a degraded performance of semiconductor elements is disclosed.
- Semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution are identified.
- Identified degraded semiconductor elements are restored to the initial level of energy resolution by applying a reverse.
- One advantage of the present invention resides in recovering the initial intrinsic performance of semiconductor elements.
- Another advantage of the present invention resides in screening new semiconductor elements for susceptibility to degraded performance and applying a recovery procedure before semiconductor elements are installed in a detector.
- Another advantage of present invention resides in grouping new semiconductor elements based on performance criteria to install semiconductor elements with similar characteristics in one assembly.
- the invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps.
- the drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
- a nuclear imaging device 10 typically includes a stationary gantry 12 that supports a rotating gantry 14.
- One or more detector heads 16 are carried by the rotating gantry 14 to detect radiation events emanating from a region of interest or examination region 18.
- Each detector head includes a two-dimensional array 20 of detector elements.
- the detector array 20 includes an array of cadmium telluride or cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) solid state semiconductor detector elements or crystals. Other semiconductor detectors, which convert gamma radiation directly into electrical charge, are also contemplated.
- Each head 16 includes circuitry 22 for converting each radiation response into a digital signal indicative of its location (x, y) on the detector face and its energy (z).
- a collimator 24 controls the direction and angular spread, from which each detector element of the array 20 can receive radiation.
- an object to be imaged is injected with one or more radiopharmaceutical or radioisotopes and placed in the examination region 18 supported by a couch 26.
- the presence of the pharmaceuticals within the object produces emission radiation from the object.
- Radiation is detected by the detector heads 16 which are, preferably, angularly indexed or rotated around the examination region 18 to collect the emission data from a plurality of directions.
- the projection emission data (x, y, z) and an angular position ( ⁇ ) of each detector head 16 around the examination region 18 are stored in a data storage 28.
- a reconstruction processor 30 processes the event and detector orientation data from the data storage 28 into a volumetric image representation.
- the image representation is then stored at a volume image memory 32 for manipulation by a video processor 34 and display on an image display 36 such as a video monitor, printer, or the like.
- a degraded detector element monitoring or identifying means or identifying process 38 monitors the output of individual detector elements and indicates degraded elements.
- the means 38 can monitor all elements or, if elements with a tendency to degrade have been identified in a screening procedure during manufacture, only selected elements are watched to identify degrading beyond a preselected limit.
- a degradation reversing system or restoring means 40 is enabled to reverse the degradation monitored by the monitor 38 either periodically or if a threshold level of degradation is detected.
- the detector arrays are prescreened to identify defective elements and elements with a tendency to degrade.
- the detector array 20 includes individual semiconductor tiles 42 each including a plurality, e.g., 32, of individual elements or pixels 44 arranged in a rectangular matrix.
- a screening technique screens the array 20 on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
- the response of each pixel 44 is collected by a pixel response readout 46 and stored in the data memory 28.
- the pixel response readout 46 includes analog-to-digital converters, multiplexers, and so forth, as necessary to treat each pixel as a separate channel.
- the monitoring means 38 retrieves the pixel data from the data memory 28 to identify pixels exhibiting a reduced performance as discussed in a greater detail below.
- the monitoring means 38 alternatively includes a screening procedure or means 48, which initiates screening of newly manufactured semiconductor elements 44 to detect reduced performance prior to a use with an imaging system.
- a forward bias means 50 applies a normal bias to the semiconductor elements 44 for a predetermined period of time.
- a temperature means or heater 52 is used to increase the ambient temperature to accelerate the screening process, e.g. to make latently degradable semiconductor elements to degrade faster, since the increased temperature has been shown to be conducive to the performance degradation.
- a pixel response readout 46 collects the response of each pixel 44 and stores the data in the data memory 28.
- the monitoring means 38 includes a pixel analyzer 54, which analyzes the radiation activity of each pixel.
- the pixel analyzer 54 includes a counter 56, which sums the number of radiation events for each channel. A sufficient number of counts are needed to provide an accurate or reproducible depiction of each pixel's energy spectrum.
- the number of counts recorded by each pixel 44 is counted. The counts are sorted according to pixel and energy, e.g., using a multichannel analyzer and a pulse analyzer, to generate a spectrum.
- the spectrum of each semiconductor element 44 is examined by a spectrum analyzing circuit 58 to determine the energy of each photon and find the element's distribution of the radiation intensity.
- the distribution of the radiation intensity for Co-57 can be expressed as a curve of number of received photons versus energy as shown in FIGURE 3 for an ideal element.
- a histogram of the response of a given pixel 44 is representative of the two emission peaks of Co-57 at 122 and 136keV respectively.
- the low background is composed of scatter events and incomplete charge collection.
- the monitoring means 38 further includes a performance analyzer 60, which determines whether any of the semiconductor elements 44 exhibits a degraded performance. More specifically, the performance of each element 44 is measured against a predetermined performance criteria, preferably, an exemplary or nominal distribution of the radiation intensity of a perfect crystal expressed as a corrective curve.
- the performance analyzer 60 includes an energy resolution calculator 62 which compares the response of the pixel 44 with the response of the perfect element and calculates an offset of the width of the pixel's 44 peak at half its height from the location of the corrective peak.
- the performance of the given pixel has been computed to be 3.6% FWHM, i.e., good energy resolution.
- the performance of the semiconductor tile 42 which has thirty two elements, averages at about 3-3.5% FWHM.
- the performance of semiconductor elements, which exhibit a good performance at the beginning of service might drop from about 3-3.5% FWHM to about 6-7% FWHM after being exposed to forward bias over time. Exemplary spectra of pixel having poor energy resolution of 7.3% FWHM is shown in FIGURE 4 .
- a threshold means 64 compares the energy resolution before any forward bias degredation has occurred with a preselected threshold value. Pixel addresses corresponding to pixels having energy resolution above the preselected threshold value are logged or recorded in a database or memory 70 as defective.
- the defective detector elements are shut off, e.g., the gain correction value is set to zero, so that they produce no image output. Rather, the electronics of the detector head generate an output value for the turned off detector element based on the output of the surrounding elements, e.g., an average.
- the pixel analyzer 54 and the performance analyzer 60 again analyze the energy resolution of each detector element 44.
- the energy resolution of some of the detector elements will not degrade and others will degrade. Those elements whose energy resolution does degrade may also degrade at different rates or to different degrees.
- this analysis can be performed at intervals to determine the rate of energy resolution degradation for each detector element 44.
- a single measurement can be made at a preselected time, e.g., a time corresponding to a normal maintenance interval.
- the identity of the defective pixels and the identity of the pixels whose energy resolution degrade with time is stored in a memory or look-up table 70.
- a rate of degradation can also be stored.
- the restoring means 40 restores the degraded pixels, which have been identified by the screening procedure 48. More specifically, the restoring means 40 applies a reverse bias with a reverse bias applying means 72 to each of the detectors whose performance is degraded. Preferably, a heater 74 elevates the ambient temperature to about 60° C to accelerate the recovery process. Once the arrays have been restored, they are ready for installation in a radiation detector. Preferably, the identified degradable semiconductor elements are grouped based on the degradation rate. The semiconductor elements with similar characteristics are installed in one assembly so that uniform recovery procedure can be applied. Such assembly simplifies the construction and use of the radiation detector while ensuring the maximum yield from the semiconductor manufacturer.
- the restoration process can also be applied to those elements which were denoted as defective.
- the restoring process may restore a crystal that was initially defective.
- the identifying process 38 can be repeated to be sure that all of the degraded elements have been restored to their full and optimum energy resolution. Any updates to the memory 70 can be made at the end of this restoration and checking process.
- the monitoring means 38 monitors the outputs of the individual semiconductor elements 44, which are stored in the data memory 28, to check the energy distribution of the detected radiation. More specifically, the resultant data sets for acquired images can be examined to determine which elements detected a sufficient number of radiation events to be analyzed. The pixel analyzer 54 and the performance analyzer 60 then determine the energy resolution for at least the detector elements which were identified as being degradable elements. When the energy resolution of the degradable elements has risen above a preselected threshold, the detector is marked for restoration.
- the monitoring means 38 may include a timer 76 which measures the time to which the detector elements had been subject to a forward bias. After a preselected amount of time, the detector is marked for the restoration process.
- the restoring means 40 associated with each imaging apparatus 10 automatically performs the restoration process or, alternatively, places a service call.
- the restoration process can be performed manually by a maintenance technician as a result of the service call, or during routine service.
- the maintenance technician may replace the degraded elements and/or put them in an identified recovery box.
- the restoration can be performed automatically when the diagnostic imaging apparatus is not in use.
- a check of the amount of energy resolution degradation or a check of the total number of hours of operating time can be made and an appropriate correction can be made during the down time. In this manner, the detector elements might be restored every night, once a week, between patients, or the like.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to the radiation detector arts. It particularly relates to the nuclear imaging systems using semiconductor detectors such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems and with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging system. However, the invention will also find application in other radiation detection devices using semiconductor detectors for non-imaging applications, other imaging modalities, manufacturing processes for solid-state detectors, and the like.
- Nuclear imaging employs a source of radioactivity to image the anatomy of a subject. Typically, a radiopharmaceutical is injected into the patient. Radiopharmaceutical compounds contain a radioisotope that undergoes gamma-ray decay at a predictable rate and characteristic energy. A radiation detector is placed adjacent to the patient to monitor and record emitted radiation. Often, the detector is rotated or indexed around the patient to monitor the emitted radiation from a plurality of directions. Based on information such as detected position and energy, the radiopharmaceutical distribution in the body is determined and an image of the distribution is reconstructed to study the circulatory system, radiopharmaceutical uptake in selected organs or tissue, and the like.
- Although detector heads with a single, large scintillator and an array of photomultiplier tubes are currently the most common, others have proposed using an array of small scintillators, each associated with a photodiode or other photosensitive solid-state device which senses scintillation in each individual scintillation crystal. Arrays of individual solid state radiation detectors, such as cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors, cadmium-telluride detectors, and the like, which utilize the photoelectric effect to detect radiation have advantages over the scintillation crystal/photodetector designs. In a solid state detector, received radiation photons liberate electrons from their orbits around atoms of the target material. A high bias voltage is applied across the detector material to aid the photoelectric phenomenon and electron propagation. The electrons are detected as an electrical pulse signal. Although very good performance can generally be expected from CZT, the inventors herein have noted that a fraction of pixels show significant degradation of the energy resolution with time. The energy resolution of a semiconductor detector, e.g. the ability of the system to distinguish between two events of different energy, is a critical element of the imaging system.
- Because nuclear cameras are typically in use with their detectors biased for long duty cycles and have exacting performance standards, degradation of their detectors is a significant problem. However, this inconsistent solid-state detector degradation adversely affects a wide range of equipment that incorporate CZT and other solid-state detectors.
- Document
WO03/001243 - The present inventors have identified the degradation as being associated with the presence of the bias voltage. Turning off the bias between uses of the system significantly reduces the rate of degradation. However, medical imaging systems are typically operated substantially continually or at least for extended hours. For good patient throughput with these expensive machines, on average, the "OFF" time for the imaging machine is typically small as compared to the "ON" time. With such a schedule, noticeable degradation can occur in as little as six months.
- There is a need for a technique that allows identifying or recovering degraded pixels to avoid costly replacements and stoppages of the imaging equipment. The present invention provides a new and improved imaging apparatus and method which overcomes the above-referenced problems and others.
- In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a system for reversing degraded energy resolution of semiconductor radiation detection elements which are used in a radiation detector assembly is disclosed. A means identifies semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution. A means restores the degraded semiconductor elements to the initial level of energy resolution by applying a reverse bias.
- In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of restoring a degraded performance of semiconductor elements is disclosed. Semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution are identified. Identified degraded semiconductor elements are restored to the initial level of energy resolution by applying a reverse.
- One advantage of the present invention resides in recovering the initial intrinsic performance of semiconductor elements.
- Another advantage of the present invention resides in screening new semiconductor elements for susceptibility to degraded performance and applying a recovery procedure before semiconductor elements are installed in a detector.
- Another advantage of present invention resides in grouping new semiconductor elements based on performance criteria to install semiconductor elements with similar characteristics in one assembly.
- Still further advantages and benefits of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
- The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
-
FIGURE 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a diagnostic imaging system; -
FIGURE 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of a restoring system in accordance with the present application; -
FIGURE 3 is a histogram of the response of a pixel exhibiting good energy resolution; and -
FIGURE 4 is a histogram of the response of a pixel exhibiting bad energy resolution. - With reference to
FIGURE 1 , anuclear imaging device 10 typically includes astationary gantry 12 that supports a rotatinggantry 14. One ormore detector heads 16 are carried by the rotatinggantry 14 to detect radiation events emanating from a region of interest orexamination region 18. Each detector head includes a two-dimensional array 20 of detector elements. In the preferred embodiment, thedetector array 20 includes an array of cadmium telluride or cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) solid state semiconductor detector elements or crystals. Other semiconductor detectors, which convert gamma radiation directly into electrical charge, are also contemplated. Eachhead 16 includescircuitry 22 for converting each radiation response into a digital signal indicative of its location (x, y) on the detector face and its energy (z). In SPECT imaging, acollimator 24 controls the direction and angular spread, from which each detector element of thearray 20 can receive radiation. - Typically, an object to be imaged is injected with one or more radiopharmaceutical or radioisotopes and placed in the
examination region 18 supported by acouch 26. The presence of the pharmaceuticals within the object produces emission radiation from the object. Radiation is detected by thedetector heads 16 which are, preferably, angularly indexed or rotated around theexamination region 18 to collect the emission data from a plurality of directions. The projection emission data (x, y, z) and an angular position (θ) of eachdetector head 16 around theexamination region 18 are stored in adata storage 28. Areconstruction processor 30 processes the event and detector orientation data from thedata storage 28 into a volumetric image representation. The image representation is then stored at avolume image memory 32 for manipulation by avideo processor 34 and display on animage display 36 such as a video monitor, printer, or the like. - With time, the response of the detector elements degrades. However, the degradation is not the same for every element. Some may show no noticeable degradation when others show significant degradation. To counter the degradation, a degraded detector element monitoring or identifying means or identifying
process 38 monitors the output of individual detector elements and indicates degraded elements. Themeans 38 can monitor all elements or, if elements with a tendency to degrade have been identified in a screening procedure during manufacture, only selected elements are watched to identify degrading beyond a preselected limit. A degradation reversing system or restoring means 40 is enabled to reverse the degradation monitored by themonitor 38 either periodically or if a threshold level of degradation is detected. - During a manufacturing process, the detector arrays are prescreened to identify defective elements and elements with a tendency to degrade. With particular reference to
FIGURE 2 , thedetector array 20 includesindividual semiconductor tiles 42 each including a plurality, e.g., 32, of individual elements or pixels 44 arranged in a rectangular matrix. In a standard mode, a screening technique screens thearray 20 on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The response of each pixel 44 is collected by apixel response readout 46 and stored in thedata memory 28. Thepixel response readout 46 includes analog-to-digital converters, multiplexers, and so forth, as necessary to treat each pixel as a separate channel. The monitoring means 38 retrieves the pixel data from thedata memory 28 to identify pixels exhibiting a reduced performance as discussed in a greater detail below. - With continuing reference to
FIGURE 2 , the monitoring means 38 alternatively includes a screening procedure or means 48, which initiates screening of newly manufactured semiconductor elements 44 to detect reduced performance prior to a use with an imaging system. A forward bias means 50 applies a normal bias to the semiconductor elements 44 for a predetermined period of time. A temperature means orheater 52 is used to increase the ambient temperature to accelerate the screening process, e.g. to make latently degradable semiconductor elements to degrade faster, since the increased temperature has been shown to be conducive to the performance degradation. Apixel response readout 46 collects the response of each pixel 44 and stores the data in thedata memory 28. - The monitoring means 38 includes a
pixel analyzer 54, which analyzes the radiation activity of each pixel. Thepixel analyzer 54 includes a counter 56, which sums the number of radiation events for each channel. A sufficient number of counts are needed to provide an accurate or reproducible depiction of each pixel's energy spectrum. To determine which pixels degraded or drifted, the number of counts recorded by each pixel 44 is counted. The counts are sorted according to pixel and energy, e.g., using a multichannel analyzer and a pulse analyzer, to generate a spectrum. The spectrum of each semiconductor element 44 is examined by aspectrum analyzing circuit 58 to determine the energy of each photon and find the element's distribution of the radiation intensity. By way of example, the distribution of the radiation intensity for Co-57 can be expressed as a curve of number of received photons versus energy as shown inFIGURE 3 for an ideal element. A histogram of the response of a given pixel 44 is representative of the two emission peaks of Co-57 at 122 and 136keV respectively. The low background is composed of scatter events and incomplete charge collection. - With continuing reference to
FIGURE 2 , the monitoring means 38 further includes aperformance analyzer 60, which determines whether any of the semiconductor elements 44 exhibits a degraded performance. More specifically, the performance of each element 44 is measured against a predetermined performance criteria, preferably, an exemplary or nominal distribution of the radiation intensity of a perfect crystal expressed as a corrective curve. Theperformance analyzer 60 includes anenergy resolution calculator 62 which compares the response of the pixel 44 with the response of the perfect element and calculates an offset of the width of the pixel's 44 peak at half its height from the location of the corrective peak. - In the example illustrated in
FIGURE 3 , the performance of the given pixel has been computed to be 3.6% FWHM, i.e., good energy resolution. The majority of pixels similarly exhibits good energy resolution. Typically, the performance of thesemiconductor tile 42, which has thirty two elements, averages at about 3-3.5% FWHM. Some crystal elements, however, do not exhibit a single or well defined peak from the beginning of service or develop underperformance later on, after being subjected to voltage bias. The performance of semiconductor elements, which exhibit a good performance at the beginning of service, might drop from about 3-3.5% FWHM to about 6-7% FWHM after being exposed to forward bias over time. Exemplary spectra of pixel having poor energy resolution of 7.3% FWHM is shown inFIGURE 4 . - With continuing reference to
FIGURE 2 , a threshold means 64 compares the energy resolution before any forward bias degredation has occurred with a preselected threshold value. Pixel addresses corresponding to pixels having energy resolution above the preselected threshold value are logged or recorded in a database ormemory 70 as defective. When thedetector 20 is placed into adiagnostic imaging apparatus 10, the defective detector elements are shut off, e.g., the gain correction value is set to zero, so that they produce no image output. Rather, the electronics of the detector head generate an output value for the turned off detector element based on the output of the surrounding elements, e.g., an average. - After the forward bias and elevated temperatures have been applied for a selected duration, the
pixel analyzer 54 and theperformance analyzer 60 again analyze the energy resolution of each detector element 44. Typically, the energy resolution of some of the detector elements will not degrade and others will degrade. Those elements whose energy resolution does degrade may also degrade at different rates or to different degrees. - Optionally, this analysis can be performed at intervals to determine the rate of energy resolution degradation for each detector element 44. Alternately, a single measurement can be made at a preselected time, e.g., a time corresponding to a normal maintenance interval.
- After the analysis process has been completed, the identity of the defective pixels and the identity of the pixels whose energy resolution degrade with time is stored in a memory or look-up table 70. Optionally, a rate of degradation can also be stored.
- Before shipping the detector array or installing it in a detector head, the restoring means 40 restores the degraded pixels, which have been identified by the
screening procedure 48. More specifically, the restoring means 40 applies a reverse bias with a reversebias applying means 72 to each of the detectors whose performance is degraded. Preferably, aheater 74 elevates the ambient temperature to about 60° C to accelerate the recovery process. Once the arrays have been restored, they are ready for installation in a radiation detector. Preferably, the identified degradable semiconductor elements are grouped based on the degradation rate. The semiconductor elements with similar characteristics are installed in one assembly so that uniform recovery procedure can be applied. Such assembly simplifies the construction and use of the radiation detector while ensuring the maximum yield from the semiconductor manufacturer. - Optionally, the restoration process can also be applied to those elements which were denoted as defective. In some instances, the restoring process may restore a crystal that was initially defective. During the restoring process, the identifying
process 38 can be repeated to be sure that all of the degraded elements have been restored to their full and optimum energy resolution. Any updates to thememory 70 can be made at the end of this restoration and checking process. - After the detector array has been installed in a detector, daily use of the detector will degrade the degradable detector elements. In one option, the monitoring means 38 monitors the outputs of the individual semiconductor elements 44, which are stored in the
data memory 28, to check the energy distribution of the detected radiation. More specifically, the resultant data sets for acquired images can be examined to determine which elements detected a sufficient number of radiation events to be analyzed. Thepixel analyzer 54 and theperformance analyzer 60 then determine the energy resolution for at least the detector elements which were identified as being degradable elements. When the energy resolution of the degradable elements has risen above a preselected threshold, the detector is marked for restoration. Alternately, the monitoring means 38 may include atimer 76 which measures the time to which the detector elements had been subject to a forward bias. After a preselected amount of time, the detector is marked for the restoration process. - Once the detector is marked for the restoration process, the restoring means 40 associated with each
imaging apparatus 10 automatically performs the restoration process or, alternatively, places a service call. The restoration process can be performed manually by a maintenance technician as a result of the service call, or during routine service. The maintenance technician may replace the degraded elements and/or put them in an identified recovery box. Alternatively, the restoration can be performed automatically when the diagnostic imaging apparatus is not in use. As another option, each time thediagnostic imaging apparatus 10 is shut off, a check of the amount of energy resolution degradation or a check of the total number of hours of operating time can be made and an appropriate correction can be made during the down time. In this manner, the detector elements might be restored every night, once a week, between patients, or the like. - The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Modifications and alterations may occur to others upon a reading and understanding of the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be constructed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (14)
- A system for reversing degraded energy resolution of semiconductor radiation detection elements (44) which are configured for use in a radiation detector assembly, and wherein the semiconductor elements (44) are responsive to gamma radiation, the system comprising:a means (38) for identifying semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution; anda means (40) for restoring the degraded semiconductor elements to the initial level of energy resolution; wherein the restoring means (40) comprises a reverse bias means (72) configured to apply a reverse bias to the identified degraded elements for a preselected time.
- The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein the restoring means (40) further includes:a heater (74), configured to supply an elevated ambient temperature, when the reversed bias is applied to the identified degraded elements, to accelerate the recovery of the degraded elements.
- The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein the semiconductor elements (44) include an array of crystals selected from one of cadmium-zinc-telluride crystals and cadmium-telluride crystals.
- The system as set up forth in claim 1, wherein the identifying means (38) includes a screening means (48) which facilitates identifying degradable semiconductor elements in a batch of new semiconductor elements, the screening means (48) including: a forward bias means (50), configured to apply a forward bias to the semiconductor elements to induce a degradation of energy resolution; and
a heater (52), configured to increase an ambient temperature to accelerate the degradation of the energy resolution in the new semiconductor elements. - A method of restoring a degraded performance of semiconductor elements (44) that are responsive to gamma radiation, the method comprising the steps of:identifying semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution; andrestoring degraded semiconductor elements to the initial level of energy resolution by applying a reverse bias to the identified degraded elements for a preselected time.
- The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein during manufacture or assembly, the identified degradable semiconductor elements are grouped based on identified degradation criteria and groups with common degradation criteria are installed in a detector assembly and the restoring step is applied uniformly to the detector assembly.
- The apparatus of claim 1 wherein:the means (38) for identifying semiconductor elements which exhibit degraded energy resolution as compared to an initial level of energy resolution comprises an identifying processor configured to detect elements with degraded performance which results after application of forward bias; andwherein the means (40) for restoring the degraded semiconductor elements to the initial level of energy resolution further comprises a restoration processor configured to control restoration of energy resolution of degraded elements to an initial level of energy resolution.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 7, wherein the identifying processor includes:a pixel analyzer configured to analyze a response of each semiconductor element when the semiconductor elements are subjected to a radiation source, which pixel analyzer is further configured to determine a spectral response of each semiconductor element.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 8, wherein the identifying means further includes: a performance analyzer configured to compare a spectral response of each semiconductor element with preselected spectral response criteria and calculates energy resolution of each semiconductor element.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 9, wherein the identifying means further includes: a threshold processor configured to compare a calculated energy resolution for each semiconductor element with a predetermined energy resolution for each semiconductor element to identify non-degraded and degraded semiconductor elements.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 10, wherein the reverse bias means is reverse bias circuitry.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 11, further including:a heater configured to raise an ambient temperature to a preselected level when the reverse bias is supplied to the degraded semiconductor elements to accelerate the restoration process.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 12, further including:a timer configured to monitor the application of the forward bias to the semiconductor elements for a preselected time and to automatically engage the reverse bias circuitry and the heater to restore the identified degraded semiconductor elements, wherein the reverse bias circuitry and the heater are engaged for a predetermined time.
- The apparatus as set forth in claim 7, wherein the forward bias is configured to be selectively supplied to semiconductor elements being selected for testing, which forward bias is configured to induce degraded performance in the tested semiconductor elements and further including:a temperature control unit configured to increase an ambient temperature to accelerate performance degradation in the tested semiconductor elements.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51339703P | 2003-10-22 | 2003-10-22 | |
PCT/IB2004/052001 WO2005040854A2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2004-10-06 | Method and apparatus for reversing performance degradation in semi-conductor detectors |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1678526A2 EP1678526A2 (en) | 2006-07-12 |
EP1678526B1 true EP1678526B1 (en) | 2016-12-28 |
Family
ID=34520096
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04770190.9A Expired - Lifetime EP1678526B1 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2004-10-06 | Method and system for reversing performance degradation in semi-conductor gamma radiation detectors |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7402815B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1678526B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN100437146C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005040854A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6898138B2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2005-05-24 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method of reducing variable retention characteristics in DRAM cells |
US7514692B2 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2009-04-07 | Ge Medical Systems Israel, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for reducing polarization within an imaging device |
WO2009083920A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Electrical isolation of x-ray semiconductor imager pixels |
US7961032B1 (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of and structure for recovering gain in a bipolar transistor |
KR20150036840A (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2015-04-08 | 삼성전자주식회사 | X-ray detecter and x-ray photograghing apparatus including the same |
JP2017512997A (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2017-05-25 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. | Compensation for missing pixels in positron emission tomography (PET) |
US9989654B2 (en) | 2016-01-13 | 2018-06-05 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for reducing polarization in imaging detectors |
US9746565B2 (en) | 2016-01-13 | 2017-08-29 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for reducing polarization in imaging detectors |
CN116577819B (en) * | 2023-05-18 | 2023-09-26 | 兰州大学 | Multi-head Compton detection method and system |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3255054A (en) * | 1963-09-11 | 1966-06-07 | Barnes Eng Co | Method of improving the signal to noise ratio of thin film semi-conductor thermistors |
WO2003001243A2 (en) * | 2001-06-23 | 2003-01-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics Nv | Fault-tolerant detector array for gamma ray imaging |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3533857A (en) * | 1967-11-29 | 1970-10-13 | Hughes Aircraft Co | Method of restoring crystals damaged by irradiation |
US4013485A (en) * | 1976-04-29 | 1977-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Process for eliminating undesirable charge centers in MIS devices |
JPH053337A (en) * | 1990-11-28 | 1993-01-08 | Hitachi Ltd | Semiconductor radioactive detecting device, semiconductor radioactive detector, and its manufacture |
US6204087B1 (en) * | 1997-02-07 | 2001-03-20 | University Of Hawai'i | Fabrication of three-dimensional architecture for solid state radiation detectors |
JPH11118934A (en) * | 1997-10-17 | 1999-04-30 | Aloka Co Ltd | Radiation detector |
US6323490B1 (en) * | 1998-03-20 | 2001-11-27 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | X-ray semiconductor detector |
US6486476B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2002-11-26 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Semiconductor radiation detector and manufacture thereof |
FI111759B (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2003-09-15 | Planmed Oy | Arrangement with sensor and procedure for digital x-ray imaging |
IL145745A (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2006-08-20 | Orbotech Medical Solutions Ltd | Two-dimensional radiation detector |
-
2004
- 2004-10-06 EP EP04770190.9A patent/EP1678526B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-06 CN CNB2004800311325A patent/CN100437146C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-10-06 WO PCT/IB2004/052001 patent/WO2005040854A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-10-06 US US10/595,433 patent/US7402815B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3255054A (en) * | 1963-09-11 | 1966-06-07 | Barnes Eng Co | Method of improving the signal to noise ratio of thin film semi-conductor thermistors |
WO2003001243A2 (en) * | 2001-06-23 | 2003-01-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics Nv | Fault-tolerant detector array for gamma ray imaging |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005040854A2 (en) | 2005-05-06 |
EP1678526A2 (en) | 2006-07-12 |
CN1871527A (en) | 2006-11-29 |
CN100437146C (en) | 2008-11-26 |
WO2005040854A3 (en) | 2005-07-28 |
US20060289776A1 (en) | 2006-12-28 |
US7402815B2 (en) | 2008-07-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6694172B1 (en) | Fault-tolerant detector for gamma ray imaging | |
US9195899B2 (en) | Self correcting portable digital radiography detector, methods and systems for same | |
RU2536773C2 (en) | Information gathering | |
US9002084B2 (en) | Systems and methods for summing signals from an imaging detector | |
EP2517048B1 (en) | Radiation detector assembly with test circuitry | |
JP6375054B2 (en) | Radiation imaging apparatus and radiation imaging method | |
US7573025B2 (en) | Energy calibration method and radiation detecting and radiological imaging apparatus | |
EP3077851B1 (en) | Imaging detector self-diagnostic circuitry | |
CA2786110A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for acquiring radiation data | |
CN107411768A (en) | A kind of equipment calibration method and device | |
EP1678526B1 (en) | Method and system for reversing performance degradation in semi-conductor gamma radiation detectors | |
US6472668B1 (en) | High voltage distribution system for CZT arrays | |
US9910172B2 (en) | Temperature compensation for thin film transistors in digital X-ray detectors | |
Vaquero et al. | rPET detectors design and data processing | |
US7518102B2 (en) | Calibration method and apparatus for pixilated solid state detector | |
Teo et al. | Evaluation of a EMCCD detector for emission-transmission computed tomography | |
JP5124332B2 (en) | Radiation inspection apparatus and calibration method | |
Boutaghane et al. | Conceptual design of a large pixelated CZT detector with four-hole collimator matched pixel detector for SPECT imaging: a Monte Carlo simulation study | |
Liang et al. | Feasibility Study of Adapting GaSerEye to Detect Low-Level Radioactive Contaminant | |
Amrami et al. | A comparison between the performance of a pixellated CdZnTe based gamma camera and Anger NaI (TI) scintillator gamma camera | |
JP6074337B2 (en) | Radiation detection apparatus, and radiation inspection apparatus and radiation imaging apparatus using the same | |
Tao et al. | Investigating silicon photomultipliers for use in a gamma camera | |
Butler et al. | CdZnTe detector arrays for nuclear medicine imaging | |
Barber et al. | High resolution position sensitive avalanche photodiode gamma ray imaging | |
Han et al. | An aging study of the signal and noise characteristics in large-area CMOS detectors |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060522 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20141125 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160719 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 857778 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602004050581 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170329 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 857778 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170328 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170428 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602004050581 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20171006 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171006 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171006 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171031 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171006 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20041006 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161228 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20191129 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602004050581 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210501 |