EP1676148A1 - System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles - Google Patents

System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles

Info

Publication number
EP1676148A1
EP1676148A1 EP04802633A EP04802633A EP1676148A1 EP 1676148 A1 EP1676148 A1 EP 1676148A1 EP 04802633 A EP04802633 A EP 04802633A EP 04802633 A EP04802633 A EP 04802633A EP 1676148 A1 EP1676148 A1 EP 1676148A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
laser array
warning device
missile warning
transport
laser
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP04802633A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1676148B1 (en
Inventor
Andrea THUM-JÄGER
Bernhard Molocher
Rudolf Protz
Rainer Ackermann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Defence and Space GmbH
Original Assignee
EADS Deutschland GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EADS Deutschland GmbH filed Critical EADS Deutschland GmbH
Priority to PL04802633T priority Critical patent/PL1676148T3/en
Publication of EP1676148A1 publication Critical patent/EP1676148A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1676148B1 publication Critical patent/EP1676148B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/495—Counter-measures or counter-counter-measures using electronic or electro-optical means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
    • F41G7/224—Deceiving or protecting means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00—Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0043—Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target
    • F41H13/005—Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target the high-energy beam being a laser beam
    • F41H13/0056—Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target the high-energy beam being a laser beam for blinding or dazzling, i.e. by overstimulating the opponent's eyes or the enemy's sensor equipment
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/4804—Auxiliary means for detecting or identifying lidar signals or the like, e.g. laser illuminators
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/48—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S17/00
    • G01S7/481—Constructional features, e.g. arrangements of optical elements

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a system and a method for the protection of means of transport against IR-guided missiles according to the preambles of claims 1 and 12.
  • a disadvantage of the weapon systems in which IR radiation is directed onto the attacking missiles by means of lamps is the high weight and the large volume of the system. Further disadvantages are the low efficiency of the system due to a low interference-to-signal ratio and the high power consumption. In the laser DIRCM weapon systems so-called trackers are usually required to track the attacking missiles, which makes the construction of the system expensive.
  • the system according to the invention is characterized in that a laser array for disturbing the IR-guided missile is coupled to the missile warning device.
  • the laser array comprises a number, usually several hundred, of laser diodes.
  • the laser diodes advantageously operate with a wavelength in the range of 2-5 microns, wherein suitably laser diodes are used with an output power of 1 KW / cm 2 at a temperature of 300K.
  • the laser diodes in their wavelength range.
  • a first part of the laser diodes covers a wavelength range of 2-3.5 ⁇ m and a second part of the laser diodes covers the wavelength range of 3.5-5 ⁇ m.
  • the two types of laser diodes can be arranged arbitrarily or according to a predeterminable pattern on the laser diode array.
  • the laser array comprises diode-pumped semiconductor lasers or diode-pumped disk lasers or diode-pumped semiconductor wafer lasers.
  • the laser array comprises diode-pumped semiconductor lasers or diode-pumped disk lasers or diode-pumped semiconductor wafer lasers.
  • the sole FIGURE shows the system according to the invention in an exemplary basic representation.
  • the reference symbol G designates the housing which encloses the system components, in particular the missile warning device F, the laser array LA arranged on a joint GK, the power supply SV and cooling systems KS and the data processing unit DV.
  • Another system, not shown, which is located in the housing G, is an image sensor for reading the data from the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F.
  • means (not shown) are provided with which the housing G to the Shell of an aircraft FL can be attached.
  • the missile WAM device F is advantageously aligned in a predeterminable spatial direction.
  • the field of view SF of the missile warning device F advantageously covers a solid angle of 90 °.
  • the spatial direction of the line of sight of the missile warning device depends in particular on which position of the aircraft the system according to the invention is attached.
  • the missile warning device F is aligned in a system which is provided for example for installation at the bow of the aircraft at 45 ° to the direction of flight.
  • the missile warning device F in a system which is provided, for example, for installation on the underside of the aircraft, is preferably oriented at 90 ° to the flight direction. This ensures that with a number of eg 4-6 systems, the entire environment of an aircraft can be covered by the sensors.
  • the effective field WF of the laser array LA is greater than or equal to the field of view SF of the missile warning device F. This ensures that the effective fields WF cover several systems mounted on the aircraft, thereby ensuring a higher efficiency of the defensive measures. In addition, it is thus possible to simultaneously disturb a plurality of objects identified in the field of view SF of the missile warning device F and possibly identified as a threat.
  • the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F sweep over a field of view SF, in which the signal of an approaching object (not shown) can be detected.
  • the signals of the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F are read out by the image sensor and further processed for identification and tracking of the detected object.
  • the evaluation of the exhaust gas jet of the approaching object in particular takes place taking into account definable parameters, e.g. Temperature, length. This information is compared by the system according to the invention with the behavior of an attacking rocket, whereby a statement can be made as to which threat emanates from the approaching object against the aircraft to be protected.
  • a warning signal is sent to the data processing unit DV.
  • This warning signal expediently includes precise details of the attacking object, in particular the height and the azimuth direction.
  • the data processing unit DV is expediently a tactical computer which continues the tracking of the object.
  • the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F identify several objects as a threat.
  • several warning signals are sent to the data processing unit DV, which sorts possible defenses regarding the relevance of the threat.
  • the data processing unit DV calculates the direction of the object to be defended.
  • the line of sight of the laser array LA is aligned in this direction.
  • the alignment of the laser array LA is advantageously carried out by means of the joint GK on which the laser array LA is arranged.
  • the joint GK is mounted with two axes (not shown). This ensures that the line of sight of the laser array LA can be aligned quickly and reliably in any spatial direction.
  • a laser beam in particular a modulated laser beam, is emitted in the predetermined direction with the laser array LA.
  • the line of sight of the laser array is already aligned in the direction of a detected object before it is eventually identified as a threat.

Abstract

A system for protecting a vehicle against IR-guided missiles, includes at least one missile warning device, and a device for jamming IR-guided missiles. A laser array is coupled to the at least one missile warning devices for jamming the IR-guided missiles.

Description

System und Verfahren zum Schutz von Transportmitteln gegen IR-gelenkteSystem and method for protecting means of transport against IR-guided
Flugkörpermissile
Die Erfindung betrifft ein System und ein Verfahren zum Schutz von Transportmit- teln gegen IR-gelenkte Flugkörper gemäß den Oberbegriffen der Patentansprüche 1 und 12.The invention relates to a system and a method for the protection of means of transport against IR-guided missiles according to the preambles of claims 1 and 12.
Aus dem Stand der Technik sind Waffensysteme mit Flugkörperwarngeräten zur Selbstverteidigung von Flugzeugen bekannt, welche Flugkörper mit IR-Suchköpfen dadurch bekämpfen, dass sie die so gut wie möglich gebündelte, breitbandige IR- Strahlung von Lampen oder bei DIRCM (directional infrared countermeasures)- Waffensystemen schmalbandige IR-Laserstrahlung auf den Suchkopf des angreifenden Flugkörpers richten. Ein derartiges DIRCM-Waffensystem ist z.B. aus DE 197 45 785 bekannt.Weapon systems with missile warning devices for self-defense of aircraft are known from the prior art, which combat missiles with IR seekers in that they narrowband the widest possible bundled broadband IR radiation of lamps or DIRCM (directional infrared countermeasures) weapon systems Direct IR laser radiation at the seeker's head of the attacking missile. Such a DIRCM weapon system is e.g. known from DE 197 45 785.
Ein Nachteil der Waffensysteme bei denen mittels Lampen IR-Strahlung auf die angreifenden Flugkörper gerichtet wird, ist das hohe Gewicht sowie das große Volumen des Systems. Weitere Nachteile sind die durch ein niedriges Stör-zu-Signal- Verhältnis bedingte geringe Effizienz des Systems sowie der hohe Leistungs- verbrauch. Bei den Laser-DIRCM-Waffensystemen werden üblicherweise sogenannte Tracker zur Verfolgung der angreifenden Flugkörper benötigt, wodurch der Aufbau des Systems aufwendig wird.A disadvantage of the weapon systems in which IR radiation is directed onto the attacking missiles by means of lamps is the high weight and the large volume of the system. Further disadvantages are the low efficiency of the system due to a low interference-to-signal ratio and the high power consumption. In the laser DIRCM weapon systems so-called trackers are usually required to track the attacking missiles, which makes the construction of the system expensive.
Weitere Waffensysteme basieren auf dem Prinzip des Auswurfs von Täuschkör- pern, sogenannten Flares. Als nachteilig erweist sich hierbei, dass die Handhabung explosiver Materialien in einem Flugzeug, insbesondere bei einem Verkehrsflugzeug, sehr gefährlich ist. Außerdem besteht beim Auswurf von Flares in geringer Flughöhe eine erhöhte Brandgefahr der darunterliegenden Umgebung, z.B. Felder, Wälder. Es ist Aufgabe der Erfindung ein gattungsgemäßes System zu schaffen, welches bei kompakter und einfacher Bauweise höchst effektiv bei der Abwehr von angreifenden Flugkörpern ist. Eine weitere Aufgabe besteht in der Angabe eines Verfah- rens zum Betrieb des Systems.Other weapon systems are based on the principle of ejecting decoys, so-called flares. A disadvantage here proves that the handling of explosive materials in an aircraft, especially in a commercial aircraft, is very dangerous. In addition, there is an increased risk of fire of the underlying environment, such as fields, forests when ejecting flares at low altitudes. It is an object of the invention to provide a generic system, which is highly effective in the defense of attacking missiles in a compact and simple design. Another task is to specify a method for operating the system.
Diese Aufgabe wird durch das System mit den Merkmalen gemäß Patentanspruch 1 und dem Verfahren gemäß den Merkmalen des Patentanspruchs 12 gelöst. Vorteilhafte Ausführungen des erfindungsgemäßen Systems sind Gegenstand von Un- teransprüchen.This object is achieved by the system having the features according to patent claim 1 and the method according to the features of patent claim 12. Advantageous embodiments of the system according to the invention are the subject of sub-claims.
Das erfindungsgemäße System zeichnet sich dadurch aus, dass ein Laserarray zum Stören der IR-gelenkten Flugkörper mit dem Flugkörperwarngerät gekoppelt ist. In einer vorteilhaften Ausführung der Erfindung umfaßt das Laserarray eine Anzahl, üblicherweise einige hundert, von Laserdioden. Ein Vorteil hierbei ist die kompakte und einfache Bauweise, wodurch das System einfach an z.B. ein Flugzeug, ein Bodenfahrzeug oder ein Schiff angebracht werden kann. Da Laserdioden wesentlich kleiner sind, als herkömmliche Laser oder Lampen, ist es möglich, nicht nur Laserdiodenarrays auf ebenen Oberflächen, sondern auch auf gekrümmten Ober- flächen aufzubauen. Dadurch wird der Wirkungsradius des Arrays wesentlich vergrößert, was zu einer Verbesserung der Effektivität des Waffensystems führt.The system according to the invention is characterized in that a laser array for disturbing the IR-guided missile is coupled to the missile warning device. In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the laser array comprises a number, usually several hundred, of laser diodes. An advantage here is the compact and simple construction, whereby the system can be easily attached to e.g. an airplane, a ground vehicle or a ship can be installed. Since laser diodes are significantly smaller than conventional lasers or lamps, it is possible to construct not only laser diode arrays on flat surfaces but also on curved surfaces. As a result, the radius of action of the array is significantly increased, resulting in an improvement of the effectiveness of the weapon system.
Die Laserdioden, arbeiten vorteilhaft mit einer Wellenlänge im Bereich von 2-5 μm, wobei zweckmäßig Laserdioden mit einer Ausgangsleistung von 1 KW/cm2 bei einer Temperatur von 300K verwendet werden.The laser diodes, advantageously operate with a wavelength in the range of 2-5 microns, wherein suitably laser diodes are used with an output power of 1 KW / cm 2 at a temperature of 300K.
Selbstverständlich ist es möglich, die Laserdioden in ihrem Wellenlängenbereich aufzuteilen. So kann z.B. vorgesehen werden, dass ein erster Teil der Laserdioden einen Wellenlängenbereich von 2-3,5 μm und ein zweiter Teil der Laserdioden den Wellenlängenbereich von 3,5-5 μm abdeckt. Die beiden Typen der Laserdioden können dabei beliebig oder nach einem vorgebbaren Muster auf dem Laserdioden- array angeordnet sein.Of course, it is possible to divide the laser diodes in their wavelength range. For example, it may be provided that a first part of the laser diodes covers a wavelength range of 2-3.5 μm and a second part of the laser diodes covers the wavelength range of 3.5-5 μm. The two types of laser diodes can be arranged arbitrarily or according to a predeterminable pattern on the laser diode array.
In weiteren vorteilhaften Ausführungen der Erfindung umfaßt das Laserarray dio- dengepumpte Halbleiterlaser oder diodengepumpte Scheibenlaser oder diodengepumpte Halbleiterscheibenlaser. Selbstverständlich ist es möglich, ein Laserarray aus einer Kombination der genannten Laser aufzubauen.In further advantageous embodiments of the invention, the laser array comprises diode-pumped semiconductor lasers or diode-pumped disk lasers or diode-pumped semiconductor wafer lasers. Of course, it is possible to build a laser array from a combination of said laser.
Die einzige Figur zeigt das erfindungsgemäße System in einer beispielhaften Prin- zipdargestellung. Mit dem Bezugszeichen G ist das Gehäuse bezeichnet, welches die Systemkomponenten, insbesondere das Flugkörperwarngerät F, das auf einem Gelenk GK angeordneten Laserarray LA, die Stromversorgungs-SV und Kühlungssysteme KS sowie der Datenverarbeitungseinheit DV umschließt. Ein weiteres, nicht dargestelltes System, welches sich im Gehäuse G befindet, ist ein Bildsensor zum Auslesen der Daten aus den Sensorköpfen SK des Flugkörperwarngeräts F. Zweckmäßig sind ferner an dem Gehäuse G Mittel (nicht dargestellt) vorhanden, mit denen das Gehäuse G an die Außenhaut eines Flugzeugs FL angebracht werden kann.The sole FIGURE shows the system according to the invention in an exemplary basic representation. The reference symbol G designates the housing which encloses the system components, in particular the missile warning device F, the laser array LA arranged on a joint GK, the power supply SV and cooling systems KS and the data processing unit DV. Another system, not shown, which is located in the housing G, is an image sensor for reading the data from the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F. Expediently further to the housing G means (not shown) are provided with which the housing G to the Shell of an aircraft FL can be attached.
Das Flugkörperwamgerät F ist vorteilhaft in eine vorgebbare Raumrichtung ausgerichtet. Das Sichtfeld SF des Flugkörperwarngeräts F überstreicht dabei vorteilhaft einen Raumwinkel von 90°. Die Raumrichtung der Sichtlinie des Flugkörperwarngeräts richtet sich dabei insbesondere danach, an welcher Position des Flugzeugs das erfindungsgemäße System angebracht wird. So ist das Flugkörperwarngerät F in einem System, welches z.B. für den Einbau am Bug des Flugzeugs vorgesehen ist unter 45° zur Flugrichtung ausgerichtet. Das Flugkörperwarngerät F in einem System, welches z.B. für den Einbau an der Unterseite des Flugzeugs vorgesehen ist, ist vorzugsweise unter 90° zur Flugrichtung ausgerichtet. Somit wird gewährleistet, dass mit einer Anzahl von z.B. 4-6 Systemen die gesamte Umgebung eines Flug- zeugs mit den Sensoren abgedeckt werden kann. Vorteilhaft ist das Wirkungsfeld WF des Laserarray LA größer oder gleich dem Sichtfeld SF des Flugkörperwarngeräts F. Dadurch wird gewährleistet, dass sich die Wirkungsfelder WF mehrerer am Flugzeug angebrachter Systeme überdecken, wo- durch eine höhere Effizienz der Abwehrmaßnahmen gewährleistet wird. Außerdem ist es somit möglich, mehrere im Sichtfeld SF des Flugkörperwarngeräts F detek- tierten und eventuell als Bedrohung identifizierten Objekte gleichzeitig zu stören.The missile WAM device F is advantageously aligned in a predeterminable spatial direction. The field of view SF of the missile warning device F advantageously covers a solid angle of 90 °. The spatial direction of the line of sight of the missile warning device depends in particular on which position of the aircraft the system according to the invention is attached. Thus, the missile warning device F is aligned in a system which is provided for example for installation at the bow of the aircraft at 45 ° to the direction of flight. The missile warning device F in a system which is provided, for example, for installation on the underside of the aircraft, is preferably oriented at 90 ° to the flight direction. This ensures that with a number of eg 4-6 systems, the entire environment of an aircraft can be covered by the sensors. Advantageously, the effective field WF of the laser array LA is greater than or equal to the field of view SF of the missile warning device F. This ensures that the effective fields WF cover several systems mounted on the aircraft, thereby ensuring a higher efficiency of the defensive measures. In addition, it is thus possible to simultaneously disturb a plurality of objects identified in the field of view SF of the missile warning device F and possibly identified as a threat.
Im weiteren wird eingehend auf den Betrieb eines erfindungsgemäßen Systems eingegangen.In the following, the operation of a system according to the invention will be discussed in detail.
Die Sensorköpfe SK des Flugkörperwarngerät F überstreichen ein Sichtfeld SF, in welchem das Signal eines sich nähernden Objekts (nicht dargestellt) erfaßt werden kann. Die Signale der Sensorköpfe SK des Flugkörperwarngeräts F werden von dem Bildsensor ausgelesen und zur Identifizierung und Verfolgung des detektierten Objekts weiterverarbeitet. Während der Signalauswertung durch den Bildsensor oder durch nicht dargestellte an den Bildsensor angeschlossene weitere Systeme erfolgt die Auswertung insbesondere des Abgasstrahls des sich nähernden Objekts unter Berücksichtigung vorgebbarer Parameter, z.B. Temperatur, Länge. Diese Informationen werden von dem erfindungsgemäßen System mit dem Verhalten einer angreifenden Rakete verglichen, wodurch eine Aussage getroffen werden kann, welche Bedrohung von dem anfliegenden Objekt gegen das zu schützende Flugzeug ausgeht.The sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F sweep over a field of view SF, in which the signal of an approaching object (not shown) can be detected. The signals of the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F are read out by the image sensor and further processed for identification and tracking of the detected object. During the signal evaluation by the image sensor or by other systems not shown connected to the image sensor, the evaluation of the exhaust gas jet of the approaching object in particular takes place taking into account definable parameters, e.g. Temperature, length. This information is compared by the system according to the invention with the behavior of an attacking rocket, whereby a statement can be made as to which threat emanates from the approaching object against the aircraft to be protected.
Wird das sich nähernde Objekt als eine Bedrohung für das zu schützende Flugzeug eingestuft, wird ein Warnsignal an die Datenverarbeitungseinheit DV gesendet. Dieses Warnsignal umfaßt dabei zweckmäßig genaue Angaben des angreifenden Objekts, insbesondere der Höhe und der Azimutrichtung. Die Datenverarbeitungseinheit DV ist hierbei zweckmäßig ein taktischer Computer, welcher die Verfolgung (Tracking) des Objekts fortführt. Selbstverständlich kann es vorkommen, dass die Sensorköpfe SK des Flugkörperwarngeräts F mehrere Objekte als Bedrohung identifizieren. In diesem Fall werden mehrere Warnsignale an die Datenverarbeitungseinheit DV gesendet, welche eventuelle Abwehrmaßnahmen bezüglich der Relevanz der Bedrohung sortiert.If the approaching object is classified as a threat to the aircraft to be protected, a warning signal is sent to the data processing unit DV. This warning signal expediently includes precise details of the attacking object, in particular the height and the azimuth direction. The data processing unit DV is expediently a tactical computer which continues the tracking of the object. Of course, it may happen that the sensor heads SK of the missile warning device F identify several objects as a threat. In this case, several warning signals are sent to the data processing unit DV, which sorts possible defenses regarding the relevance of the threat.
Abhängig von den Warnsignalen berechnet die Datenverarbeitungseinheit DV die Richtung des abzuwehrenden Objekts. Die Sichtlinie des Laserarrays LA wird in diese Richtung ausgerichtet. Die Ausrichtung des Laserarrays LA erfolgt dabei vorteilhaft mittels des Gelenks GK auf das das Laserarray LA angeordnet ist. Zweck- mäßig ist das Gelenk GK mit zwei Achsen (nicht dargestellt) gelagert. Dadurch wird gewährleistet, dass die Sichtlinie des Laserarrays LA schnell und zuverlässig in jede beliebige Raumrichtung ausgerichtet werden kann.Depending on the warning signals, the data processing unit DV calculates the direction of the object to be defended. The line of sight of the laser array LA is aligned in this direction. The alignment of the laser array LA is advantageously carried out by means of the joint GK on which the laser array LA is arranged. Expediently, the joint GK is mounted with two axes (not shown). This ensures that the line of sight of the laser array LA can be aligned quickly and reliably in any spatial direction.
Zur Abwehr und Störung des angreifenden IR-gelenkten Objekts wird mit dem La- serarray LA ein Laserstrahl, insbesondere ein modulierter Laserstrahl in die vorgegebene Richtung ausgesendet.To ward off and disturb the attacking IR-guided object, a laser beam, in particular a modulated laser beam, is emitted in the predetermined direction with the laser array LA.
Zur Verbesserung der Reaktionszeit des Systems zum Einleiten von Gegenmaßnahmen kann es vorteilhaft vorgesehen werden, dass die Sichtlinie des Laserarrays schon in Richtung eines detektierten Objekts ausgerichtet wird, bevor es eventuell als Bedrohung identifiziert wird. To improve the reaction time of the system for initiating countermeasures, it can be advantageously provided that the line of sight of the laser array is already aligned in the direction of a detected object before it is eventually identified as a threat.

Claims

Patentansprüche claims
1. System zum Schutz von Transportmitteln gegen IR-gelenkte Flugkörper umfassend Flugkörperwarngeräte (F) und Mittel (LA) zum Stören der IR- gelenkten Flugkörper, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass ein Laserarray (LA) zum Stören der IR-gelenkten Flugkörper mit dem Flugkörperwarngerät (F) gekoppelt ist.1. A system for protecting means of transport against IR-guided missiles comprising missile warning devices (F) and means (LA) for disturbing the IR-guided missiles, characterized in that a laser array (LA) for disturbing the IR-guided missiles with the missile warning device ( F) is coupled.
2. System nach Anspruch 1 , dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Laserarray (LA) eine Anzahl von Laserdioden mit einer Wellenlänge im Bereich von 2-5 μm umfaßt.2. System according to claim 1, characterized in that the laser array (LA) comprises a number of laser diodes having a wavelength in the range of 2-5 microns.
3. System nach Anspruch 1 , dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Laserarray (LA) eine Anzahl von diodengepumpten Halbleiterlasern umfaßt.3. System according to claim 1, characterized in that the laser array (LA) comprises a number of diode-pumped semiconductor lasers.
4. System nach Anspruch 1 , dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Laserarray (LA) eine Anzahl von diodengepumpten Scheibenlasern umfaßt.4. System according to claim 1, characterized in that the laser array (LA) comprises a number of diode-pumped disk lasers.
5. System nach Anspruch 1 , dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Laserarray (LA) eine Anzahl von diodengepumpten Halbleiterscheibenlasern umfaßt.5. System according to claim 1, characterized in that the laser array (LA) comprises a number of diode-pumped semiconductor wafer lasers.
6. System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass ein das System einhausendes Gehäuse (G) vorhanden ist.6. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the system einhausendes housing (G) is present.
7. System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeich- net, dass das Flugkörperwarngerät (F) in eine vorgebbare Raumrichtung ausgerichtet ist. 7. System according to any one of the preceding claims, marked thereby, that the missile warning device (F) is aligned in a predeterminable spatial direction.
8. System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Raumwinkel des Sichtfelds (SF) des Flugkörperwarngeräts (F) etwa 90° beträgt.8. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the solid angle of the field of view (SF) of the missile warning device (F) is about 90 °.
9. System nach Anspruch 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Wirkungsfeld (WF) des Laserarrays (LA) größer oder gleich dem Sichtfeld des Flugkörperwarngeräts (F) ist.9. System according to claim 8, characterized in that the effective field (WF) of the laser array (LA) is greater than or equal to the field of view of the missile warning device (F).
10. System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Laserarray (LA) auf einem mit mindestens zwei Achsen (A) gelagerten Gelenk (GK) angebracht ist.10. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the laser array (LA) is mounted on a with at least two axes (A) mounted joint (GK).
11. System nach Anspruch 10, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine Datenverar- beitungseinheit (DV) zur Steuerung der Raumrichtung der Sichtlinie des Laserarrays (LA) vorhanden ist.11. System according to claim 10, characterized in that a data processing unit (DV) for controlling the spatial direction of the line of sight of the laser array (LA) is present.
12. System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das System an die Außenhaut eines Transportmittels angebracht ist.12. System according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the system is attached to the outer skin of a means of transport.
13. System nach Anspruch 12, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass Anschlüsse vorhanden sind zur Herstellung einer Strom (SV)- und/oder Datenversorgung mit dem Transportmittel.13. System according to claim 12, characterized in that connections are provided for producing a power (SV) and / or data supply with the means of transport.
14. Transportmittel mit mindestens einem System nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche 1-3. 14. Transport means with at least one system according to one of the preceding claims 1-3.
15. Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Systems gemäß den Ansprüchen 1-13, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass ein von dem Flugkörperwarngerät (F) detektiertes Objekt identifiziert wird.15. A method of operating a system according to claims 1-13, characterized in that an object detected by the missile warning device (F) is identified.
16. Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass im Falle meh- rerer detektierter angreifender Objekte Gegenmaßnahmen in Abhängigkeit der Relevanz der Bedrohung durchgeführt werden.16. The method according to claim 15, characterized in that in the case of several detected attacking objects countermeasures are performed depending on the relevance of the threat.
17. Verfahren nach Anspruch 15 oder 16, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Sichtlinie des Laserarrays (LA) in Richtung eines als Bedrohung identifiziertes Objekt ausgerichtet wird.17. The method according to claim 15 or 16, characterized in that the line of sight of the laser array (LA) is aligned in the direction of an identified as a threat object.
18. Verfahren nach Anspruch 15 oder 16, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Sichtlinie des Laserarrays (LA) in Richtung eines detektierten Objekts ausgerichtet wird. 18. The method according to claim 15 or 16, characterized in that the line of sight of the laser array (LA) is aligned in the direction of a detected object.
EP04802633A 2003-10-25 2004-10-21 System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles Not-in-force EP1676148B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL04802633T PL1676148T3 (en) 2003-10-25 2004-10-21 System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10349869A DE10349869A1 (en) 2003-10-25 2003-10-25 System and method for protecting means of transport against IR-guided missiles
PCT/DE2004/002345 WO2005045465A1 (en) 2003-10-25 2004-10-21 System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1676148A1 true EP1676148A1 (en) 2006-07-05
EP1676148B1 EP1676148B1 (en) 2008-11-26

Family

ID=34559201

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04802633A Not-in-force EP1676148B1 (en) 2003-10-25 2004-10-21 System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20080088496A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1676148B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE415637T1 (en)
DE (2) DE10349869A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2318355T3 (en)
PL (1) PL1676148T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2005045465A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2887327B1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2007-08-24 Thales Sa METHOD FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANTIMISSIL VEHICLES AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME
KR20090031346A (en) * 2006-04-10 2009-03-25 엘타 시스템즈 리미티드 Distributed jammer system
US8376277B2 (en) * 2006-10-04 2013-02-19 The Boeing Company Large aircraft self-defense system installation configuration
DE102007022820B4 (en) 2007-05-15 2013-10-02 Eads Deutschland Gmbh IR deception system for the defense of missiles with IR-sensitive seekers
US7961133B2 (en) * 2007-11-15 2011-06-14 Raytheon Company System and method for diverting a guided missile
FR2923915B1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2009-11-27 Thales Sa IR SENSOR INTERFERENCE AND DAMAGE SYSTEM
US8305252B2 (en) * 2009-08-14 2012-11-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Countermeasure device for a mobile tracking device
US8665421B1 (en) * 2010-04-19 2014-03-04 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Apparatus for providing laser countermeasures to heat-seeking missiles
DK3514477T3 (en) * 2018-01-22 2021-05-31 Hensoldt Sensors Gmbh SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTURBING A TARGET POINT

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19938398A1 (en) 1998-05-12 2002-09-19 Hoesel Holger Interference and measurement disruption system for defeating laser ranging- and speed-measurement of objects, uses optical interference signals radiated in direction of laser measurement system
US6903674B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2005-06-07 Holger Hösel Procedure and arrangement for jamming laser measuring instruments

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0237812A3 (en) * 1986-03-20 1988-06-29 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Semiconductor laser array with a collimated beam
DE3833635A1 (en) * 1988-10-04 1990-04-05 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm LASER WARNING RECEIVER
FR2711806B1 (en) * 1990-07-23 1995-12-29 Aerospatiale Detection and response system to an air threat.
JPH0772680B2 (en) * 1992-02-05 1995-08-02 防衛庁技術研究本部長 Proximity protection device
DE4402855C2 (en) * 1994-01-31 1996-02-29 Diehl Gmbh & Co Defense device for an attacking target airborne missile
DE4430830C2 (en) * 1994-01-31 2003-06-26 Diehl Stiftung & Co Device for defense against an air target missile attacking an aircraft
DE4444635C2 (en) * 1994-12-15 1996-10-31 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Self-defense device against missiles
US5742384A (en) * 1996-05-02 1998-04-21 Lockheed Martin Corporation Compact scanning infrared countermeasure emitter
EP0844495A1 (en) * 1996-11-26 1998-05-27 Matra Defense Device for the detection of optical elements aimed at it
US5909296A (en) * 1997-04-04 1999-06-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Effective wide angle beam steering using spherical laser diode arrays
DE19745785C2 (en) * 1997-10-16 2002-12-05 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Laser radiation source for a DIRCM weapon system
GB9804547D0 (en) * 1998-03-05 2000-02-23 Borrell Robert A Weapons decoy
US6244728B1 (en) * 1999-12-13 2001-06-12 The Boeing Company Light emitting diode assembly for use as an aircraft position light
DE10032698A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-17 Schrodt Stephan Directed high energy electromagnetic radiation detection system for mines, pipes and structures in earth, emits focused, penetrating, heating radiation, and returned radiation is analyzed
DE10204397A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-08-22 Optolab Licensing Gmbh Laser diode array has each diode fitted to intermediate carrier mounted on base body acting as heat sink
US6724792B2 (en) * 2002-09-12 2004-04-20 The Boeing Company Laser diode arrays with replaceable laser diode bars and methods of removing and replacing laser diode bars
US6977598B2 (en) * 2003-03-07 2005-12-20 Lockheed Martin Corporation Aircraft protection system and method
US6929214B2 (en) * 2003-07-22 2005-08-16 Northrop Grumman Corporation Conformal airliner defense (CAD) system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19938398A1 (en) 1998-05-12 2002-09-19 Hoesel Holger Interference and measurement disruption system for defeating laser ranging- and speed-measurement of objects, uses optical interference signals radiated in direction of laser measurement system
US6903674B2 (en) 1999-05-07 2005-06-07 Holger Hösel Procedure and arrangement for jamming laser measuring instruments

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005045465A1 (en) 2005-05-19
ATE415637T1 (en) 2008-12-15
DE502004008550D1 (en) 2009-01-08
DE10349869A1 (en) 2005-06-16
PL1676148T3 (en) 2009-04-30
ES2318355T3 (en) 2009-05-01
EP1676148B1 (en) 2008-11-26
US20080088496A1 (en) 2008-04-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE4444635C2 (en) Self-defense device against missiles
EP0665445B1 (en) Apparatus for defence against an attacking missile
JP6893207B2 (en) System to defend against threats
DE10117007A1 (en) Method and device for protecting mobile military equipment
WO2007054278A1 (en) Self-protection system for combat vehicles or other objects to be protected
CA2611995A1 (en) Method for antimissile protection of vehicles and implementing device
EP1676148B1 (en) System and method for protecting means of transport from ir-guided missiles
WO2018086919A1 (en) Method and defence system for combating threats
DE977574C (en) Interception antenna
US7943914B2 (en) Back illumination method for counter measuring IR guided missiles
DE10230939A1 (en) Fighting vehicle has warning sensors to detect and analyze threats and select optimum countermeasures using bus connected detachable munition projectors
EP1845332B1 (en) Protective device and protective measure for a radar installation
DE102015002737B4 (en) Method and device for providing a decoy to protect a vehicle and/or object from radar-guided seekers
DE10229273A1 (en) Object self-protection device
DE4402855C2 (en) Defense device for an attacking target airborne missile
DE10050479A1 (en) System used for protecting objects, especially combat tanks, comprises an image-producing infra-red sensor attached to a missile launching device
US20090173822A1 (en) Distributed infrared countermeasure installation for fixed wing aircraft
EP3118563B1 (en) Method for protecting a vehicle against an attack by a laser beam
RU2799611C1 (en) Method for automatic integrated control of aircraft protection from air defense systems
Hull et al. Foreign counter-unmanned aerial systems: developments in the international arms markets
EP3118565B1 (en) Method for protecting a vehicle against an attack by a laser beam
RU2726351C1 (en) Method and system of aircraft protection against guided missiles with optical homing heads
Vollin Vigilant eagle: Ground-based countermeasure system against MANPADS
RU77409U1 (en) DEVICE OF OPTICAL ELECTRONIC PROTECTION OF OBJECT OF ARMORED EQUIPMENT
GB2483933A (en) Laser weapon mounted on aerial drone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060303

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080509

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20090108

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2318355

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090427

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090827

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: EADS DEUTSCHLAND G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20091031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081126

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: EADS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, 85521 OTTOBRUNN, DE

Effective date: 20140916

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: EADS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, 85521 OTTOBRUNN, DE

Effective date: 20140916

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: EADS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, 85521 OTTOBRUNN, DE

Effective date: 20140916

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20140922

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20141015

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20131021

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH, 85521 OTTOBRUNN, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH, 85521 OTTOBRUNN, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151021

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20161020

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20161020

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20161020

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20161011

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161024

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20161019

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: LIFETECH IP SPIES & BEHRNDT PATENTANWAELTE PAR, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH, 82024 TAUFKIRCHEN, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502004008550

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20171021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171021

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171031

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171022

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171022