EP1675333B1 - Detection of unwanted messages (spam) - Google Patents
Detection of unwanted messages (spam) Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1675333B1 EP1675333B1 EP05257715A EP05257715A EP1675333B1 EP 1675333 B1 EP1675333 B1 EP 1675333B1 EP 05257715 A EP05257715 A EP 05257715A EP 05257715 A EP05257715 A EP 05257715A EP 1675333 B1 EP1675333 B1 EP 1675333B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- spam
- message
- messages
- process system
- deep
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L51/00—User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
- H04L51/21—Monitoring or handling of messages
- H04L51/212—Monitoring or handling of messages using filtering or selective blocking
Definitions
- this invention relates to a method and apparatus for analyzing messages to detect unwanted (spam) messages.
- the messages include the short messages of short message service. These messages include unsolicited and unwanted messages (spam) which are a nuisance to the receiver of the message who has to clear the message and determine whether it is of any importance. Further, they are a nuisance to the carrier of the telecommunications network used for transmitting the message, not only because they present a customer relations problem with respect to irate customers who are flooded with spam, but also because these messages, for which there is usually little or no revenue, use network resources.
- SMS shorts message service
- a number of arrangements have been proposed and many implemented for cutting down on the number of delivered spam messages.
- Various arrangements have been proposed for analyzing messages prior to delivering them. According to one arrangement, if the calling party is not one of a pre-selected group specified by the called party, the message is blocked. Spam messages can also be intercepted by permitting a called party to specify that no messages destined for more than N destinations are to be delivered.
- WO 2004/061698 A discloses arrangements wherein incoming messages are categorized by a message categorizer as wanted or unwanted messages.
- the categorizer classifies a message according to feature information extracted from known valid messages.
- the message categorizer determines a presence of extracted feature information in the incoming message. If feature information in the incoming message matches feature information stored in the message categorizer, then the message received is classified as a wanted message.
- the message categorizer is a two-level system wherein a first level includes a fixed level of message feature information independent of prior message characteristics and a second level dynamically forms and adjusts new feature information sets or classification rules based on previously analyzed messages and extracted feature information.
- U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2004/0210640 A1 discloses arrangements for an e-mail server to filter spam prior to transmitting the e-mails to the addressed clients.
- the filter can use white lists, black lists, probability filter and key word filters to separate spam from non-spam e-mail.
- Applicants have carefully analyzed the process of detecting spam messages. Inventively, they have recognized that for many spam messages the detection process is relatively straightforward whereas for others it is very complex. Since the complex analysis is frequently important for detecting new generators of spam messages, these complex situations cannot be simply ignored. Applicants have made a contribution over the prior art in accordance with their invention wherein the process of analyzing messages to determine whether they are spam is a two or more stage process wherein if a straightforward recognition of a message as being a spam or non-spam message is accomplished, subsequent processing is avoided. For the fast stage, the incoming messages are screened quickly, and cleared messages sent downstream, with minimum delay; detected spam messages are blocked, and a few suspicious (grey) messages are sent to the second stage for deep analysis.
- the first stage may not have a huge database to hold spam messages, but a small database to hold screening rules and criteria.
- the second stage or deep stage performs content based analysis and screening, and has a big database for storing both good and bad messages.
- the second stage contains a self training analysis engine with an information model to identify spam messages.
- the second stage delays the transmission of non-spam messages which it has analyzed.
- the bulk of messages can be rapidly analyzed and categorized as being spam or non-spam whereas the residue of the messages can be analyzed in depth.
- FIG. 1 is a state and state transition diagram illustrating the operation of Applicants' invention.
- This rule-based multi-step spam detection concept and architecture can be used broadly in applications of detecting spam for SMS or e-mail and also applied to wireless, wire-line, and Internet Protocol networks.
- Anti-spam application can be a standalone entity in the network to intercept incoming messages and filter spam messages. It can be also housed in an SMS center (SMSC), Internet protocol router, e-mail server, network gateways, or location servers.
- SMS center SMS center
- e-mail server Internet protocol router
- e-mail server e-mail server
- One anti-spam application can be implemented with a set of fast and deep process rule engines; just one fast rule engine; just one deep rule engine; multiple fast process rule engines; multiple fast process rule engines and one deep process rule engine.
- a network can have multiple anti-spam applications which include combinations of the fast and deep rule engines.
- the fast process sends it to a spam database 53 for storage in anticipation of legal processing and for use by legal authorities.
- the fast process sends this message in step 6.
- the fast process sends information for updating the number of new and remaining messages to be analyzed to the filter-based rule process 51.
- the fast process assigns an aggregate suspect level to a message that does not cross the predefined threshold, it will alert the deep analysis process 54 by sending it a pointer to the suspect message in step 8.
- the deep process 54 extracts the message from the buffer 53 along with correlated identification and sends a request to an analysis-based rule engine 55 to perform a further spam check (step 9).
- the rule engine which performs deep processing will run deep analysis, mostly based on message type and content, and send the result back to deep process 54 in step 10.
- the deep process 54 determines whether this message is a spam message in an internal step 11. If the message is deemed to be clean, the deep process forwards it to the relay message element 52 (step 12). If the message is deemed to be spam, it sends the spam to a spam storage 53 in step 13.
- the deep process sends a command with an update request to the fast process database, step 14, if it determines there is a need to update the fast process's filter data and/or the deep process sends a command with an update request to the analysis-based rule process and data function 55 if it is determined that there is a need to update the deep process filter data (step 15). If the deep process function cannot make a decision, the suspect message or associated index information (for privacy protection) is sent to a human analyst 56 for a recommendation to the deep process (step 16). The human analyst examines the message or index information and makes a recommendation to the deep process 54 (step 19). After receiving the human analyst's recommendations, the deep process further processes the spam check (step 20) internal in the deep process 54.
- the message is cleared it is sent to the relay message element (step 21). If it is considered a spam message, it is sent to the storage database 53 (step 22). The relay message sends cleared messages to an interworking network element, thence to a final termination address (step 23) and returns an acknowledgment to the message originator node.
- FIG. 2 is a more detailed flow diagram and block diagram illustrating the operation of Applicants' invention.
- FIG. 2 is aimed specifically at the short message service application.
- FIG. 2 has three primary blocks: an anti-spam control function 201, an anti-spam data function 202, and an anti-spam administrative function 203.
- Incoming messages include messages of the Signaling System 7 network (including the public switched telephone network and the mobile telephone network) and Internet Protocol messages as well as short message peer to peer protocol messages. All of these messages come into an incoming message filter 211 which filters out the non-SMS messages and sends these messages to relay unit 212.
- the relay unit forwards messages for the SS7 network to that network 213 and Internet Protocol messages to IP network 214.
- the remaining SMS messages are sent to spam check unit 221.
- This unit performs all the checks which can be performed very rapidly in order to ensure that the anti-spam data function unit 202, which performs the deep analysis, is not overloaded.
- the checks that are performed by spam rule engine 231 are checks for determining whether the source destination pair represents a pair for which messages are to be allowed, to be blocked, or are suspect.
- the spam rule engine 231 can also be used for filtering out cases of massive spam wherein one source sends the same message to hundreds or thousands of destinations.
- the spam check unit uses a spam rule engine 231 to filter possible spam messages against rules for detecting spam messages and data such as source destination, allow/block tables, stored in counter table and rule sets (block 233).
- the counter table and rule sets block is populated in part by newly discovered spam types identified by the administrative system and/or the anti-spam data function, the deep analysis unit. For example, either of these units may detect a sudden spurt of messages having a subject "lottery" to attempt to defraud recipients of the message through false lottery reports.
- spam check unit 221 decides that a message is suspect and should be subjected to further analysis by the anti-spam data function unit 202, the message is transmitted to buffer 241. If the message has been identified as a spam message it is also passed directly to message storage unit 249.
- the message storage unit 249 communicates with a storage manager 251 of the administrative office to bring appropriate messages to the attention of an analyst in human analysis (block 253) and if the message is no longer worth retaining allows the message storage 249 to clear the message.
- the human analysts in human analysis (block 253) may detect situations in which a new class of spam messages has been found or an old class which had previously been ignored has suddenly re-emerged.
- the data provision (block 255) initializes further rule sets in data and rule sets database 247 and, where appropriate, also in the counter table and rule sets 233.
- the following functions are carried out in the anti-spam control function (the fast process):
- the anti-spam data function buffers suspect messages and analyzes these messages to accumulate a score for each message. Scores above a certain threshold are treated as spam and scores below such a threshold are treated as good messages to be forwarded to the destination. In addition, uncertain suspect messages are forwarded to an administrative bureau for human analysis.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating one preferred embodiment of Applicants' invention.
- a set of anti-spam control function units 310, 311, 312, 313,...,314 receives messages from and transmits messages to both Internet Protocol networks 301 and SS7 networks 303. These units are connected by an Internet protocol connection to anti-spam data function units 320, arranged as a pair 321, 322 for reliability.
- the anti-spam data function units are connected to a service bureau 330 for further analysis by a human operator.
- the anti-spam control function units perform the rapid anti-spam checks and send non-SMS messages and cleared SMS messages back to signaling 7 or Internet Protocol networks to be forwarded to the message destinations. Enough anti-spam control function units are provided so that if up to K anti-spam control function units fail then the system can still operate. Reliability for the anti-spam data function is provided by simple duplication.
- Spam content analysis by the anti-spam data function analyzes both good and spam messages in order to update analysis information models within the anti-spam data function, and to update rules and counters for use by the anti-spam control function. These updated rules and counters are distributed to the various anti-spam control functions. The system therefore becomes a self-training system, in addition to the changes in the rules and counters made by operators at the anti-spam data function.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/018,269 US8396927B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2004-12-21 | Detection of unwanted messages (spam) |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1675333A1 EP1675333A1 (en) | 2006-06-28 |
EP1675333B1 true EP1675333B1 (en) | 2007-09-05 |
Family
ID=35735192
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05257715A Expired - Fee Related EP1675333B1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2005-12-15 | Detection of unwanted messages (spam) |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8396927B2 (zh) |
EP (1) | EP1675333B1 (zh) |
JP (1) | JP2006178995A (zh) |
KR (1) | KR101186743B1 (zh) |
CN (1) | CN1801854B (zh) |
DE (1) | DE602005002340T2 (zh) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI749349B (zh) * | 2018-10-25 | 2021-12-11 | 開曼群島商創新先進技術有限公司 | 文本還原方法、裝置及電子設備與電腦可讀儲存媒體 |
Families Citing this family (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7451487B2 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2008-11-11 | Sonicwall, Inc. | Fraudulent message detection |
US8135779B2 (en) * | 2005-06-07 | 2012-03-13 | Nokia Corporation | Method, system, apparatus, and software product for filtering out spam more efficiently |
GB2430284A (en) * | 2005-09-16 | 2007-03-21 | Jeroen Oostendorp | Platform for message management |
US20070233861A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for implementing SMS SPAM filtering |
JP4574675B2 (ja) | 2006-08-24 | 2010-11-04 | デュアキシズ株式会社 | 通信管理システム |
JP4571184B2 (ja) | 2006-08-24 | 2010-10-27 | デュアキシズ株式会社 | 通信管理システム |
US8763114B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2014-06-24 | Mcafee, Inc. | Detecting image spam |
US8214497B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2012-07-03 | Mcafee, Inc. | Multi-dimensional reputation scoring |
US20080293389A1 (en) * | 2007-05-24 | 2008-11-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system of forwarding SMS messages |
US8880617B2 (en) * | 2007-05-29 | 2014-11-04 | Unwired Planet, Llc | Method, apparatus and system for detecting unwanted digital content delivered to a mail box |
CN101321340A (zh) * | 2007-06-08 | 2008-12-10 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | 短信自动删除系统及方法 |
US8144841B2 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2012-03-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Multimedia spam determination using speech conversion |
CN101488946A (zh) * | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-22 | 华为技术有限公司 | 报文检测方法及系统 |
JP2009223802A (ja) * | 2008-03-18 | 2009-10-01 | Fujitsu Shikoku Systems Ltd | 不適切コンテンツ判別装置、コンテンツ提供システム、不適切コンテンツ判別方法、およびコンピュータプログラム |
US7865561B2 (en) * | 2008-04-01 | 2011-01-04 | Mcafee, Inc. | Increasing spam scanning accuracy by rescanning with updated detection rules |
WO2010082803A2 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2010-07-22 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for delivering message based on cpm service and server thereof |
US9055414B2 (en) * | 2009-02-20 | 2015-06-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Text messaging pipeline configuration |
JP4695699B2 (ja) * | 2009-02-24 | 2011-06-08 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | 通信システム及び通信方法 |
CN101895828B (zh) * | 2009-05-20 | 2013-01-16 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 一种短消息监控系统及方法 |
CN101711013A (zh) * | 2009-12-08 | 2010-05-19 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 一种彩信处理的方法及装置 |
US20110161437A1 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2011-06-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Action-based e-mail message quota monitoring |
US8745143B2 (en) * | 2010-04-01 | 2014-06-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Delaying inbound and outbound email messages |
US9450781B2 (en) | 2010-12-09 | 2016-09-20 | Alcatel Lucent | Spam reporting and management in a communication network |
CN102098638A (zh) * | 2010-12-15 | 2011-06-15 | 成都市华为赛门铁克科技有限公司 | 短信分类处理方法、装置和终端 |
US9384471B2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2016-07-05 | Alcatel Lucent | Spam reporting and management in a communication network |
CN103368914A (zh) * | 2012-03-31 | 2013-10-23 | 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 | 一种用于拦截消息的方法、装置和设备 |
US9558445B1 (en) * | 2012-09-25 | 2017-01-31 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Input validation techniques |
US10148606B2 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2018-12-04 | Twitter, Inc. | Multi-tiered anti-spamming systems and methods |
CN105592429A (zh) * | 2014-10-20 | 2016-05-18 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | 短信过滤方法及短信过滤装置 |
US9942182B2 (en) | 2014-11-17 | 2018-04-10 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for cloud based IP mobile messaging spam detection and defense |
EP3104585B1 (fr) * | 2015-06-12 | 2018-08-01 | Orange | Dispositif et procédé de traitement d'une communication |
FR3037464A1 (fr) * | 2015-06-12 | 2016-12-16 | Orange | Procede et dispositif de mise a jour d'une liste de filtrage des communications destinees a un terminal destinataire |
CN106533893B (zh) * | 2015-09-09 | 2020-11-27 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | 一种消息处理方法及系统 |
CN111404887B (zh) * | 2015-11-02 | 2023-03-10 | 创新先进技术有限公司 | 一种业务处理方法及装置 |
JP6578035B1 (ja) * | 2018-04-03 | 2019-09-18 | ソフトバンク株式会社 | 電子メールシステム及びプログラム |
US11411990B2 (en) * | 2019-02-15 | 2022-08-09 | Forcepoint Llc | Early detection of potentially-compromised email accounts |
CN110059189B (zh) * | 2019-04-11 | 2021-03-05 | 厦门点触科技股份有限公司 | 一种游戏平台消息的分类系统及方法 |
CN113067765B (zh) * | 2020-01-02 | 2023-01-13 | 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 | 一种多媒体消息监控方法、装置及设备 |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5619648A (en) | 1994-11-30 | 1997-04-08 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Message filtering techniques |
US5999932A (en) * | 1998-01-13 | 1999-12-07 | Bright Light Technologies, Inc. | System and method for filtering unsolicited electronic mail messages using data matching and heuristic processing |
US7016939B1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2006-03-21 | Mcafee, Inc. | Intelligent SPAM detection system using statistical analysis |
JP2003244240A (ja) * | 2002-02-18 | 2003-08-29 | Yozan Inc | メールサーバ装置、電子メール分類方法、メールサーバプログラムおよびメール転送システム |
US8046832B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2011-10-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Spam detector with challenges |
US20040162795A1 (en) | 2002-12-30 | 2004-08-19 | Jesse Dougherty | Method and system for feature extraction from outgoing messages for use in categorization of incoming messages |
US7171450B2 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2007-01-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Framework to enable integration of anti-spam technologies |
US7219131B2 (en) * | 2003-01-16 | 2007-05-15 | Ironport Systems, Inc. | Electronic message delivery using an alternate source approach |
US7249162B2 (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2007-07-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptive junk message filtering system |
CN1180353C (zh) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-12-15 | 上海蓝飞通信设备有限公司 | 防止垃圾邮件的方法 |
US7219148B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2007-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Feedback loop for spam prevention |
US7320020B2 (en) | 2003-04-17 | 2008-01-15 | The Go Daddy Group, Inc. | Mail server probability spam filter |
US7257564B2 (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2007-08-14 | Tumbleweed Communications Corp. | Dynamic message filtering |
-
2004
- 2004-12-21 US US11/018,269 patent/US8396927B2/en active Active
-
2005
- 2005-12-15 DE DE602005002340T patent/DE602005002340T2/de active Active
- 2005-12-15 EP EP05257715A patent/EP1675333B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-12-20 CN CN2005101377044A patent/CN1801854B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-12-21 JP JP2005367314A patent/JP2006178995A/ja active Pending
- 2005-12-21 KR KR1020050127299A patent/KR101186743B1/ko not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI749349B (zh) * | 2018-10-25 | 2021-12-11 | 開曼群島商創新先進技術有限公司 | 文本還原方法、裝置及電子設備與電腦可讀儲存媒體 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE602005002340T2 (de) | 2008-05-29 |
KR101186743B1 (ko) | 2012-09-28 |
CN1801854B (zh) | 2011-09-21 |
US20060168031A1 (en) | 2006-07-27 |
JP2006178995A (ja) | 2006-07-06 |
US8396927B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 |
DE602005002340D1 (de) | 2007-10-18 |
KR20060071364A (ko) | 2006-06-26 |
EP1675333A1 (en) | 2006-06-28 |
CN1801854A (zh) | 2006-07-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1675333B1 (en) | Detection of unwanted messages (spam) | |
EP1675330B1 (en) | Unwanted message (SPAM) detection based on message content | |
US9501746B2 (en) | Systems and methods for electronic message analysis | |
US8214438B2 (en) | (More) advanced spam detection features | |
EP2446411B1 (en) | Real-time spam look-up system | |
US8392357B1 (en) | Trust network to reduce e-mail spam | |
US7949759B2 (en) | Degrees of separation for handling communications | |
JP4917776B2 (ja) | 移動体通信装置のためにスパムメールをフィルタリングする方法 | |
US8561167B2 (en) | Web reputation scoring | |
US8635690B2 (en) | Reputation based message processing | |
US20050015626A1 (en) | System and method for identifying and filtering junk e-mail messages or spam based on URL content | |
EP1376420A1 (en) | Method and system for classifying electronic documents | |
US8205264B1 (en) | Method and system for automated evaluation of spam filters | |
US20040162795A1 (en) | Method and system for feature extraction from outgoing messages for use in categorization of incoming messages | |
US20050080857A1 (en) | Method and system for categorizing and processing e-mails | |
US20100306846A1 (en) | Reputation based load balancing | |
US20090019126A1 (en) | Authorized email control system | |
US20080175226A1 (en) | Reputation Based Connection Throttling | |
US20040177120A1 (en) | Method for filtering e-mail messages | |
Tran et al. | Evaluating the use of spam-triggered TCP/IP rate control to protect SMTP servers | |
KR20100013989A (ko) | VoIP 환경에서의 튜링 테스트 기반 스팸 차단 장치 및그 방법 | |
WO2004077710A2 (en) | Minimizing unsolicited e-mail based on prior communications | |
CN102598009A (zh) | 一种用于筛选信息的方法及装置 | |
KR20080093084A (ko) | 스팸메일 차단 시스템 | |
KR20080071629A (ko) | 스팸메일 차단 시스템 및 방법 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060111 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20060309 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20071018 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20080606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20131121 AND 20131127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD Owner name: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. Effective date: 20131122 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: GC Effective date: 20140410 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: RG Effective date: 20141015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20161222 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20171221 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180102 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20190131 AND 20190206 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, PITTSFORD, US Free format text: FORMER OWNER: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., MURRAY HILL, N.J., US |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, PITTSFORD, US Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. (N. D. GES. D. STAATES DELAWARE), MURRAY HILL, N.J., US Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: PROVENANCE ASSET GROUP LLC, PITTSFORD, US Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP. (N. D. GES. D. STAATES DELAWARE), MURRAY HILL, NJ, US |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20181215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181215 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201027 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0012580000 Ipc: H04L0051000000 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602005002340 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220701 |