EP1623070A1 - Procede pour la fabrication de papier - Google Patents

Procede pour la fabrication de papier

Info

Publication number
EP1623070A1
EP1623070A1 EP04730781A EP04730781A EP1623070A1 EP 1623070 A1 EP1623070 A1 EP 1623070A1 EP 04730781 A EP04730781 A EP 04730781A EP 04730781 A EP04730781 A EP 04730781A EP 1623070 A1 EP1623070 A1 EP 1623070A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aqueous flow
molecular weight
paper
organic polymer
flow
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04730781A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Duncan Carr
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Akzo Nobel NV
Nouryon Pulp and Performance Chemicals AB
Original Assignee
Akzo Nobel NV
Eka Chemicals AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Akzo Nobel NV, Eka Chemicals AB filed Critical Akzo Nobel NV
Priority to EP04730781A priority Critical patent/EP1623070A1/fr
Publication of EP1623070A1 publication Critical patent/EP1623070A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H23/00—Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper
    • D21H23/02—Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper characterised by the manner in which substances are added
    • D21H23/22—Addition to the formed paper
    • D21H23/24—Addition to the formed paper during paper manufacture
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/06—Paper forming aids
    • D21H21/10—Retention agents or drainage improvers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the production of paper in which papermaking additives are introduced into a cellulosic stock before it is ejected from a headbox onto a wire and dewatered to form a web of paper.
  • an aqueous suspension containing cellulosic fibres and optional fillers and additives referred to as stock
  • stock is fed into a headbox which ejects the stock onto a forming wire.
  • Water is drained from the stock so that a wet web of paper is formed on the wire, and the web is further dewatered and dried in the drying section of the paper machine.
  • Retention agents are usually introduced into the stock in order to increase adsorption of fine particles, e.g. fine fibres and filler particles, onto the cellulosic fibres so that they are retained with the fibres on the wire.
  • a wide variety of retention agents are known in the art, examples of which include anionic, non-ionic, amphoteric and cationic organic polymers of different molecular weights, inorganic materials, and combinations thereof. Due to incomplete retention, the water obtained by dewatering the stock and the wet web, referred to as white water, contains fine particles not being retained on the wire and the white water is usually recirculated in different flow circuits.
  • white water is used to dilute the stock within the headbox.
  • the headbox can have a series of mixing sections or dilution lines distributed over the width of the headbox.
  • White water is injected into the mixing sections to locally control the stock dilution thereby forming a variable consistency profile leaving the slice opening at a constant volume flow.
  • the dilution headbox design provides better control of paper properties; by adjusting the amount of dilution, i.e.
  • Pitch generally refers to emulsified hydrophobic organic compounds. Pitch can be defined as the sticky, resinous materials that are released from wood during the pulping process.
  • Pitch has also come to include sticky materials which arise from components of coated broke and recycled fibres, such as adhesives, and are often referred to as stickies and tackies.
  • pitch exists as unstable, colloidal dispersions of hydrophobic particles. Therefore, typical papermaking process conditions, such as hydrodynamical and mechanical shear forces and abrupt changes of temperature as well as chemical environment and equilibrium, may cause the colloidal pitch particles to agglomerate within the cellulosic suspension or deposit on the surfaces of the wire or other equipment. This may lead to quality defects in the finished product, such as formation of spots or holes and a poor quality paper surface, and shortened equipment life, runnability problems, paper machine downtime and, ultimately, lost profit for the mill. These problems are magnified in paper mills with high level of process water closure, such as extensive white water recirculation.
  • the present invention is further directed to a process for the production of paper on a paper machine containing a dilution headbox, the process comprising:
  • the invention is also directed to a process for the production of paper from an aqueous suspension containing cellulosic fibres, and optional filler, which comprises introducing one or more retention components into the suspension followed by introducing into the suspension a low molecular weight cationic organic polymer having a weight average molecular weight up to 5,000,000, and thereafter forming and draining the suspension on a wire.
  • pitch problems can be reduced by the introduction of additives into a stock in a certain manner before it is dewatered on a wire to form the web of paper. This finding is particularly applicable to papermaking processes where paper is produced on a paper machine with a dilution headbox. It has also been found that pitch deposition in the papermaking system can be better controlled according to the present invention. It has further been found that the process of this invention renders possible production of paper with improved properties.
  • Dilution headboxes generally can be described as devices comprising at least one inlet for a first partial volume flow, at least one inlet for a second partial volume flow, at least one section for mixing the partial volume flows to form a mixture volume flow, and at least one outlet for ejecting the mixture volume flow.
  • the dilution headbox comprises a plurality of such inlets, sections and outlets across its working width.
  • suitable dilution headboxes include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,909,904; 5,196,091; 5,316,383; 5,545,293; and 5,549,793.
  • main aqueous flow refers to the main flow of stock containing cellulosic fibres, and optional filler, entering the headbox which has a high consistency (hereafter HC), i.e. a high solids content, HC stock, thereby representing the high consistency flow (hereafter HC flow).
  • HC high consistency
  • the consistency of the HC flow can be within the range of from 0.1% to 3.5% by weight, suitably from 0.3% to 2.2% and preferably from 0.4% to 1.9%.
  • dilute HC flow refers to the aqueous flow which is used to dilute the HC flow and which, in relation to the HC flow, has a low consistency (LC), i.e.
  • LC flow a low solids content, LC stock, thereby representing the low consistency flow
  • the consistency of the LC flow can be within the range of from 0-1.5% by weight, suitably 0.002-0.9%, and preferably 0.005-0.8% with the proviso that the consistency of the LC flow is lower than that of the HC flow.
  • the HC flow is mixed and diluted with the LC flow, for example just before the turbulence generator, to form a resulting flow which is discharged onto the wire for dewatering.
  • the volume ratio of HC flow to LC flow can be within the range of from 99:1 to 50:50, suitably from 97:3 to 60:40, preferably from 95:5 to 75:25 and typically about 85:15.
  • the volume ratio of HC flow to LC flow preferably is varying at a plurality of points of the headbox across its width in order to adjust the amount of dilution, thereby enabling better control of the basis weight cross profile of the paper web formed.
  • the partial volume flows i.e.
  • the aqueous LC flow used for dilution can be selected from fresh water, white water and other types of aqueous flows that are recycled in the process.
  • the diluting LC flow may contain fibre fines and filler, and it may be treated by means of any purification step before being fed into the headbox. Examples of suitable steps that can be used for purifying or clarifying aqueous flows of these types include filtration, flotation, sedimentation, anaerobic and aerobic treatment.
  • the LC flow is white water containing, for example, cellulosic fines, extractives and other materials released from wood during the pulping process as well as filler and other additives introduced into the HC flow but not retained on the wire.
  • the white water used is preferably obtained by dewatering the stock and/or the wet web on the wire, and it may be clarified as mentioned above before being fed into the dilution headbox.
  • the LC flow usually has a composition that is different from that of the HC flow. When filler is used in the process the filler content of the LC flow usually differs from that of the HC flow; the LC flow normally has a higher filler content, expressed as percentage of the dry substance of the flow, than the HC flow.
  • the additional flow is preferably a flow that contains water alone.
  • the additional flow may also be a flow of stock or pulp, the consistency and/or composition of which differs from that of the HC flow.
  • the retention component(s) to be introduced into the HC flow according to this invention may be a single retention agent or a retention system, for example any of those defined hereinafter.
  • the single component can be any component functioning as a retention agent, preferably a cationic polymer such as, for example, any of those defined herein.
  • the amount of the component introduced into the main aqueous flow should be sufficient so as to give better retention than is obtained when not adding the component.
  • retention system refers to two or more components, or agents which, when being added to a stock, give better retention than is obtained when not adding the two or more components, or agents.
  • the components of retention systems are preferably selected from two or more organic polymers and one or more organic polymers in combination with aluminium compounds and/or inorganic microparticles.
  • microparticle retention system refers to a retention system comprising a microparticulate material, or microparticles, such as, for example, anionic inorganic particles, cationic inorganic particles and organic microparticles, as defined herein.
  • the microparticulate material is used in combination with at least one further component, usually at least one organic polymer, herein also referred to as a main polymer, preferably a cationic, amphoteric or anionic polymer.
  • Anionic microparticles are preferably used in combination with at least one amphoteric and/or cationic polymer, whereas cationic microparticles are preferably used in combination with at least one amphoteric and/or anionic polymer.
  • the microparticles are anionic inorganic particles. It is further preferred that the microparticles are in the colloidal range of particle size.
  • the retention system e.g. systems comprising microparticles, can comprise more than two components; for example, it can be a three- or four-component retention system.
  • suitable additional components include, for example, aluminium compounds and low molecular weight cationic organic polymers.
  • retention systems including microparticle retention systems, also give better dewatering than is obtained when not adding the components, and the systems are commonly referred to as retention and dewatering systems.
  • a retention system comprising one or more cationic organic polymers and one or more anionic organic polymers.
  • a retention system includes a cationic organic polymer having one or more aromatic groups and/or an anionic organic polymer having one or more aromatic groups, as defined herein.
  • Anionic inorganic particles that can be used according to the invention include anionic silica-based particles and clays of the smectite type.
  • Anionic silica-based particles i.e. particles based on SiO 2 or silicic acid, including colloidal silica and different types of poly- silicic acid and polysilicates, are preferably used.
  • Anionic silica-based particles are usually supplied in the form of aqueous colloidal dispersions, so called sols.
  • Suitable silica-based sols according to the invention may also contain other elements, for example nitrogen, aluminium and boron. Such elements may be present as a result of modification using organic nitrogen-containing organic compounds, aluminium-containing compounds and boron-containing compounds, respectively.
  • These compounds may be present in the aqueous sol and/or in the silica-based particles.
  • Retention and dewatering systems comprising suitable anionic silica-based particles are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,388,150; 4,927,498; 4,954,220; 4,961,825; 4,980,025; 5,127,994; 5,176,891; 5,368,833; 5,447,604; 5,470,435; 5,543,014; 5,571,494; 5,584,966; 5,603,805; and 6,379,500, which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • Anionic silica-based particles suitably have an average particle size below about 50 nm, preferably below about 20 n and more preferably in the range of from about 1 to about 10 nm.
  • the particle size refers to the average size of the primary particles, which may be aggregated or non-aggregated.
  • the specific surface area of the silica-based particles is suitably above 50 m 2 /g and preferably above 100 m 2 /g. Usually, the specific surface area is up to about 1700 m 2 /g and preferably up to 1000 m 2 /g. The specific surface area is measured by means of titration with NaOH in known manner, e.g.
  • the anionic inorganic particles are silica-based particles having a specific surface area within the range of from 50 to 1000 m 2 /g and preferably from 100 to 950 m 2 /g.
  • the anionic inorganic particles are present in a silica-based sol having an S-value in the range of from 8 to 45%, preferably from 10 to 35%, containing silica-based particles with a specific surface area in the range of from 300 to 1000 m 2 /g, suitably from 500 to 950 m 2 /g, which particles can be non-aluminium-modified or aluminium-modified, suitably surface-modified with aluminium.
  • the S-value is measured and calculated as described by Her & Dalton in J. Phys. Chem. 60(1956), 955-957.
  • the S-value indicates the degree of aggregate or microgel formation and a lower S-value is indicative of a higher degree of aggregation.
  • the anionic inorganic particles are selected from polysilicic acid, optionally reacted with aluminium, having a high specific surface area, suitably above about 1000 m 2 /g.
  • the specific surface area can be within the range of from 1000 to 1700 m 2 /g and preferably from 1050 to 1600 m 2 /g.
  • polysilicic acid is also referred to as polymeric silicic acid, polysilicic acid microgel, polysilicate and polysilicate microgel, which are all encompassed by the term polysilicic acid used herein.
  • Aluminium-containing polysilicic acid is commonly referred to as polyaluminosilicate and poly- aluminosilicate microgel, which are both encompassed by the term polysilicic acid used herein.
  • Clays of the smectite type that can be used in the process of the invention are known in the art and include naturally occurring, synthetic and chemically treated materials.
  • suitable smectite clays include montmorillonite/bentonite, hectorite, beidelite, nontronite and saponite, preferably bentonite and especially such which after swelling preferably has a surface area of from 400 to 800 m 2 /g.
  • Suitable clays are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.
  • Cationic inorganic particles that can be used include cationic silica-based particles, cationic alumina, and cationic zirconia.
  • Suitable organic polymers for use as a retention agent or part of a retention system according to this invention can be anionic, non-ionic, amphoteric, or cationic in nature, they can be derived from natural or synthetic sources and they can be linear, branched or cross- linked, e.g. in the form of microparticles.
  • the polymer is water-soluble or water- dispersable.
  • Suitable cationic polymers include cationic polysaccharides, e.g. starches, guar gums, celluloses, chitins, chitosans, glycans, galactans, glucans, xanthan gums, pectins, mannans, dextrins, preferably starches and guar gums, suitable starches including potato, corn, wheat, tapioca, rice, waxy maize, barley, etc.; cationic synthetic organic polymers such as cationic chain-growth polymers, e.g.
  • cationic vinyl addition polymers like acrylate-, acrylamide-, vinylamine-, vinylamide- and allylamine-based polymers, and cationic step-growth polymers, e.g. cationic polyamidoamines, polyethylene imines, polyamines and polyurethanes.
  • Cationic starches and cationic acrylamide-based polymers are particularly preferred cationic polymers, both as single retention components as well as in retention systems with and without anionic inorganic particles.
  • suitable cationic organic polymers having one or more aromatic groups include those disclosed in WO 02/12626.
  • the weight average molecular weight of the cationic organic polymer can vary within wide limits depending on, inter alia, the type of polymer used, and usually it is above 2,000,000, more often above 3,000,000, suitably above 5,000,000.
  • the upper limit is not critical; it can be about 600,000,000, usually 150,000,000, and suitably 100,000,000.
  • Examples of further suitable cationic polymers that can be introduced into the HC flow according to the invention include cationic organic polymers having a low molecular weight.
  • Such cationic organic polymers include those commonly referred to as anionic trash catcher (hereafter ATC).
  • ATC anionic trash catcher
  • the weight average molecular weight of the ATC cationic organic polymer is usually at least 2,000, suitably at least 10,000 and preferably at least 50,000, and it is usually up to 2,000,000 and often up to 1,500,000.
  • Suitable ATC's include linear, branched and cross-linked polymers, usually highly charged, which can be derived from natural and synthetic sources. Examples of suitable ATC's include low molecular weight degraded polysaccharides, e.g.
  • starches those based on starches, guar gums, celluloses, chitins, chitosans, glycans, galactans, glucans, xanthan gums, pectins, mannans, dextrins, preferably starches and guar gums, suitable starches including potato, corn, wheat, tapioca, rice, waxy maize, barley, etc.; cationic synthetic organic polymers such as cationic chain- growth polymers, e.g.
  • cationic vinyl addition polymers like acrylate-, acrylamide-, vinylamine-, vinylamide- and allylamine-based polymers, for example homo- and copolymers based on diallyldialkyl ammonium halide, e.g. diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride, as well as (meth)- acrylamides and (meth)acrylates; and cationic step-growth polymers, e.g. cationic polyamido- amines, polyethylene imines, polyamines, e.g. dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymers, and polyurethanes.
  • diallyldialkyl ammonium halide e.g. diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride
  • cationic step-growth polymers e.g. cationic polyamido- amines, polyethylene imines, polyamines, e.g. dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymers, and polyurethanes.
  • suitable anionic organic polymers according to the invention can be selected from step-growth polymers, chain-growth polymers, polysaccharides, naturally occurring aromatic polymers and modifications thereof.
  • suitable anionic step- growth polymers include anionic benzene-based and naphthalene-based condensation polymers, preferably naphthalene-sulphonic acid based and naphthalene-sulphonate based condensation polymers; and addition polymers, i.e. polymers obtained by step-growth addition polymerization, e.g. anionic polyurethanes.
  • suitable anionic chain- growth polymers include anionic vinyl addition polymers, e.g.
  • acrylate- and acrylamide-based polymers comprising anionic or potentially anionic monomers like (meth)acrylic acid and paravinyl phenol (hydroxy styrene).
  • suitable naturally occurring aromatic polymers and modifications thereof, i.e. modified naturally occurring aromatic anionic polymers, according to the invention include lignin-based polymers, preferably sulphonated lignins, e.g. lignosulphonates, kraft lignin, sulphonated kraft lignin, and tannin extracts.
  • suitable anionic organic polymers having one or more aromatic groups include those disclosed in WO 02/12626.
  • the weight average molecular weight of the anionic polymer can vary within wide limits dependent on, inter alia, the type of polymer used, and usually it is at least about 500, suitably above about 2,000 and preferably above about 5,000.
  • the upper limit is not critical; it can be about 600,000,000, usually 150,000,000, suitably 100,000,000 and preferably 10,000,000.
  • step-growth polymer refers to a polymer obtained by step-growth polymerization, also being referred to as step-reaction polymer and step-reaction polymerization, respectively.
  • chain-growth polymer refers to a polymer obtained by chain-growth polymerization, also being referred to as chain reaction polymer and chain reaction polymerization, respectively.
  • Aluminium compounds that can be used according to the invention include alum, aluminates, aluminium chloride, aluminium nitrate and polyaluminium compounds, such as polyaluminium chlorides, polyaluminium sulphates, polyaluminium compounds containing both chloride and sulphate ions, polyaluminium silicate-sulphates, and mixtures thereof.
  • the polyaluminium compounds may also contain other anions, for example anions from phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, organic acids such as citric acid and oxalic acid.
  • Preferred retention systems comprise: (i) anionic silica-based particles in combination with cationic starch, cationic guar gum or cationic acrylamide-based polymer, optionally in combination with anionic organic particles and/or ATC and/or aluminium compound; (ii) anionic silica-based particles in combination with anionic chain-growth polymer, preferably anionic acrylamide-based polymer in combination with cationic organic polymer and/or ATC; (iii) bentonite in combination with cationic acrylamide-based polymer, optionally in combination with ATC and/or aluminium compound;
  • cationic polysaccharide preferably cationic starch, in combination with anionic step- growth polymer, preferably anionic naphthalene-based condensation polymer; optionally in combination with ATC and/or aluminium compound;
  • cationic polysaccharide preferably cationic starch, in combination with naturally occurring aromatic anionic polymer and modifiations thereof, preferably sulphonated lignin, optionally in combination with ATC and/or aluminium compound;
  • cationic chain-growth polymer preferably cationic acrylamide-based polymer, in combination with anionic step-growth polymer, preferably anionic naphthalene-based condensation polymer, optionally in combination with ATC and/or aluminium compound;
  • cationic chain-growth polymer preferably cationic acrylamide-based polymer, in combination with naturally occurring aromatic anionic polymer and modifiations thereof, preferably sulphonated lignin, optionally in combination with ATC and/or aluminium compound;
  • cationic chain-growth polymer preferably cationic acrylamide-based polymer, in combination with ATC; and
  • cationic chain-growth polymer preferably cationic acrylamide-based polymer, in combination with anionic organic particles.
  • the retention component(s) is/are introduced into the HC flow which is to be mixed with the LC flow, preferably in the headbox, thereby introducing the component(s) into the resulting aqueous flow in the dilution process.
  • the components can be added to the stock flow in conventional manner, preferably at different points and in any order.
  • a retention system comprising anionic inorganic particles and a cationic polymer
  • the cationic polymer When using a retention system comprising cationic and anionic organic polymers, it is preferred to add the cationic polymer to the HC stock flow before adding the anionic polymer, even if the opposite order of addition may be used. It is further preferred to add the first component, e.g. the cationic polymer, before a shear stage, which can be selected from pumping, mixing, cleaning, etc., and to add the second component, e.g. the anionic inorganic microparticles or organic polymer, after that shear stage.
  • a low molecular weight cationic organic polymer as an ATC, it is preferably introduced into the HC stock flow prior to or simultaneous with other retention component(s).
  • an aluminium compound it is preferably introduced into the HC stock flow prior to or simultaneous with other retention component(s).
  • the components of the retention system are introduced into the stock to be dewatered in amounts which can vary within wide limits depending on, inter alia, type and number of components, type of stock, type of filler, filler content, point of addition, etc. Generally the components are added in amounts that give better retention than is obtained when not adding the components.
  • the total amount added is usually at least 0.001% by weight, often at least 0.005% by weight, based on dry substance of the stock.
  • the upper limit is usually 1.0% and suitably 0.6% by weight.
  • the total amount is suitably within the range of from 0.005 to 0.5% by weight, calculated as SiO 2 and based on dry stock substance, preferably within the range of from 0.01 to 0.2% by weight.
  • Organic polymers e.g. cationic and anionic polymers, are usually added in total amounts of at least 0.001%, often at least 0.005% by weight, based on dry stock substance. The upper limit is usually 3% and suitably 1.5% by weight.
  • a low molecular weight cationic organic polymer as an ATC it can be introduced into the HC stock flow in an amount of at least 0.01%, based on dry stock substance, suitably the amount is in the range from 0.05% to 0.5%.
  • the total amount introduced into the stock to be dewatered is dependent on the type of aluminium compound used and on other effects desired from it. It is for instance well-known in the art to utilize aluminium compounds as precipitants for rosin-based sizing agents.
  • the total amount added is usually at least 0.05%, calculated as AI 2 O 3 and based on dry stock substance. Suitably the amount is in the range of from 0.08 to 2.8%, preferably in the range from 0.1 to 2.0%.
  • a low molecular weight cationic organic polymer is introduced into the LC flow to be mixed with the HC flow, preferably in the dilution headbox.
  • Suitable low molecular weight (hereafter L W) cationic organic polymers include v linear, branched and cross-linked polymers, usually highly charged, which can be derived from natural and synthetic sources.
  • suitable LMW cationic organic polymers include LMW degraded polysaccharides, e.g.
  • starches those based on starches, guar gums, celluloses, chitins, chitosans, glycans, galactans, glucans, xanthan gums, pectins, mannans, dextrins, preferably starches and guar gums, suitable starches including potato, corn, wheat, tapioca, rice, waxy maize, barley, etc.; LMW cationic synthetic organic polymers such as cationic chain-growth polymers, e.g.
  • cationic vinyl addition polymers like acrylate-, acryl- amide-, vinylamine-, vinylamide- and allylamine-based polymers, for example homo- and copolymers based on diallyldialkyl ammonium halide, e.g. diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride, as well as (meth)acrylamides and (meth)acrylates; and LMW cationic step-growth polymers, e.g. cationic polyamidoamines, polyethylene imines, polyamines, e.g. dimethylamine- epichlorhydrin copolymers, and polyurethanes.
  • diallyldialkyl ammonium halide e.g. diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride
  • LMW cationic step-growth polymers e.g. cationic polyamidoamines, polyethylene imines, polyamines, e.g. dimethylamine- epichlorhydrin copolymers, and polyurethanes.
  • the weight average molecular weight of the LMW cationic organic polymer is usually at least 100,000, suitably at least 500,000 and preferably at least 1,000,000, and it is usually up to 5,000,000, suitably up to 3,000,000 and preferably up to 2,000,000.
  • the weight average molecular weight of the LMW cationic organic polymer added to the LC flow is lower than that of the cationic organic polymer added to the HC flow.
  • the LMW cationic organic polymer is usually added to the LC flow in an amount of at least 0.01%, based on dry substance of the stock to be dewatered.
  • the amount is in the range of from 0.05 to 1.0%, preferably in the range from 0.1 to 0.5%.
  • the LC flow containing the LMW cationic organic polymer into the HC flow containing one or more retention components to form the resulting aqueous flow
  • no further retention components are introduced into the resulting aqueous flow.
  • the formation of the resulting aqueous flow preferably takes in the dilution headbox, but may also take place outside the headbox.
  • the process of this invention is applicable to all papermaking processes and cellulosic suspensions, and it is particularly useful in the manufacture of paper from a stock that has a high conductivity.
  • the conductivity of the stock that is dewatered on the wire is usually at least about 1.5 mS/cm, suitably at least 3.5 mS/cm, and preferably at least 5.0 mS/cm.
  • Conductivity can be measured by standard equipment such as, for example, a WTW LF 539 instrument supplied by Christian Berner. The values referred to above are determined by measuring the conductivity of the resulting aqueous flow that is ejected onto the wire to be dewatered.
  • High conductivity levels mean high contents of salts (electrolytes) which are usually derived from materials used to form the stock, from various additives introduced into the stock, from the fresh water supplied to the process, etc. Further, the content of salts is usually higher in processes where white water is extensively recirculated, which may lead to considerable accumulation of salts in the water circulating in the process.
  • salts electrophiltes
  • the present invention further encompasses papermaking processes where white water is extensively recycled, or recirculated, i.e. with a high degree of white water closure, for example where from 0 to 30 tons of fresh water are used per ton of dry paper produced, usually less than 20, suitably less than 15, preferably less than 10 and notably less than 5 tons of fresh water per ton of paper.
  • Fresh water can be introduced in the process at any stage; for example, fresh water can be mixed with cellulosic fibres in order to form a suspension, and fresh water can be mixed with a thick suspension containing cellulosic fibres to dilute it so as to form a thin suspension that is fed into the headbox as a high consistency flow.
  • the process according to the invention is used for the production of paper.
  • paper as used herein, of course include not only paper and the production thereof, but also other web-like products, such as for example board and paperboard, and the production thereof.
  • the process can be used in the production of paper from different types of suspensions of cellulosic fibres, and the suspensions should suitably contain at least 25% and preferably at least 50% by weight of such fibres, based on dry substance.
  • the suspensions can be based on fibres from chemical pulp, such as sulphate and sulphite pulp, thermomechanical pulp, chemo-thermomechanical pulp, organosolv pulp, refiner pulp or groundwood pulp from both hardwood and softwood, or fibers derived from one year plants like elephant grass, bagasse, flax, straw, etc., and can also be used for suspensions based on recycled fibres.
  • the invention is preferably applied to processes for making paper from wood-containing suspensions.
  • the suspension also contain mineral fillers of conventional types, such as, for example, kaolin, clay, titanium dioxide, gypsum, talc and both natural and synthetic calcium carbonates, such as, for example, chalk, ground marble, ground calcium carbonate, and precipitated calcium carbonate.
  • the stock can of course also contain papermaking additives of conventional types, such as wet-strength agents, stock sizes, such as those based on rosin, ketene dimers , ketene multimers, alkenyl succinic anhydrides, etc.
  • papermaking additives of conventional types, such as wet-strength agents, stock sizes, such as those based on rosin, ketene dimers , ketene multimers, alkenyl succinic anhydrides, etc.
  • the invention is applied on paper machines producing wood- containing paper and paper based on recycled fibres, such as SC, LWC and different types of book and newsprint papers, and on machines producing wood-free printing and writing papers, the term wood-free meaning less than about 15% of wood-containing fibers.
  • the invention is also applicable for the production of board on single layer machines as well as on machines producing paper or board in multilayered headboxes, and on machines with several headboxes, in which one or more of the layers essentially consist of recycled fibres.
  • the invention can be applied to one or more of these layers.
  • the invention is applied on paper machines running at a speed of from 300 to 2500 m/min and preferably from 1000 to 2000 m/min.
  • the invention is further illustrated in the following example which, however, is not intended to limit the same. Parts and % relate to parts by weight and % by weight, respectively, unless otherwise stated.
  • Example 1 The process of this invention was tested using different LMW cationic organic polymers as additive to the LC stock.
  • Paper was produced from a cellulosic suspension on a paper machine utilizing a dilution headbox to make SC grades. Retention agents were added to the HC stock; first 0.8 kg/ton based on dry furnish of dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymer with a weight average molecular weight of about 1 million and then 0.36 kg/ton based on dry furnish of cationic polyacrylamide with a weight average molecular weight of 4.6 million.
  • the LC stock was obtained by draining the stock. 500 ml of LC stock was added to a Dynamic Drainage Jar and mixed at 1000 rpm for 15 seconds, and then LMW cationic organic polymer was added to the stock and mixed for 30 seconds.
  • the LC stock was added to a Dynamic Drainage Jar and mixed at 1000 rpm for 45 seconds without the addition of LMW cationic organic polymer. The obtained LC stock was then drained and the filtrate was collected and passed through a 1 micron filter. An Ocean Optics S2000 UV spectrophotometer with a fast scanning rate was used to measure the UV absorption as a representation of the pitch content of the filtered fraction.
  • LMW-1 was a dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymer with a weight average molecular weight of about 120,000;
  • LMW-2 was a dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymer with a weight average molecular weight of about 1 ,000,000
  • LMW-3 was a polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride with a weight average molecular weight of about 680,000
  • LMW-2 was a dimethylamine-epichlorhydrin copolymer with a weight average molecular weight of about 1 ,000,000
  • LMW-3 was a polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride with a weight average molecular weight of about 680,000;
  • LMW-4 was a polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride with a weight average molecular weight of about 1 ,800,000.
  • the most effective process according to the invention was the one employing the polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride with a weight average molecular weight of about 1 ,800,000.
  • Table 1 UV absorbance at different wavelengths.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de fabrication du papier comprenant les opérations suivantes: (i) utilisation d'un flux aqueux principal contenant des fibres cellulosiques; (ii) introduction d'un ou de plusieurs composants de rétention; (iii) recours à un flux aqueux de dilution; (iv) introduction d'un polymère organique cationique de faible poids moléculaire dans le flux aqueux de dilution dans le but de former un flux aqueux de dilution renfermant un polymère organique cationique de faible poids moléculaire, lequel polymère organique cationique de faible poids moléculaire a un poids moléculaire moyen pouvant atteindre 5 000 000; (v) introduction du flux aqueux principal contenant un ou plusieurs composants de rétention de manière à former un flux aqueux correspondant; et (vi) éjection du flux aqueux correspondant sur un treillis et évacuation de l'eau dudit flux aqueux pour former une feuille de papier continue. De plus, l'invention concerne un procédé de fabrication du papier sur une machine à papier équipée d'une caisse de tête de dilution qui consiste : (i) à introduire un ou plusieurs composants de rétention dans un flux principal aqueux cotonnant des fibres cellulosiques et transférer le flux aqueux principal ainsi obtenu dans une caisse de tête de dilution; (ii) à introduire un polymère organique cationique de faible poids moléculaire dont le poids moléculaire moyen peut atteindre 5,000,000 dans un flux aqueux de dilution et transférer ce flux dans la caisse de tête de dilution; (iii) à mélanger le flux aqueux principal avec le flux aqueux de dilution dans la caisse de tête pour former un flux aqueux correspondant ; et (iv) à éjecter ledit flux aqueux correspondant sur le treillis et à en évacuer l'eau pour former une feuille de papier continu. L'invention concerne en outre un procédé de fabrication de papier à partir d'une suspension aqueuse contenant des fibres cellulosiques et éventuellement une charge, consistant à introduire un ou plusieurs composants de rétention dans la suspension, puis à introduire dans la suspension un polymère organique cationique de faible poids moléculaire dont le poids moléculaire moyen peut atteindre 5 000 000, à former une suspension et à en évacuer l'eau sur un treillis.
EP04730781A 2003-05-09 2004-04-30 Procede pour la fabrication de papier Withdrawn EP1623070A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04730781A EP1623070A1 (fr) 2003-05-09 2004-04-30 Procede pour la fabrication de papier

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US46901003P 2003-05-09 2003-05-09
EP03445057 2003-05-14
EP04730781A EP1623070A1 (fr) 2003-05-09 2004-04-30 Procede pour la fabrication de papier
PCT/SE2004/000671 WO2004104299A1 (fr) 2003-05-09 2004-04-30 Procede de fabrication du papier

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1623070A1 true EP1623070A1 (fr) 2006-02-08

Family

ID=42778147

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04730781A Withdrawn EP1623070A1 (fr) 2003-05-09 2004-04-30 Procede pour la fabrication de papier

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1623070A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2007501344A (fr)
AR (1) AR044128A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2004242046A1 (fr)
BR (1) BRPI0409990A (fr)
CA (1) CA2524697A1 (fr)
MX (1) MXPA05011802A (fr)
RU (1) RU2005138312A (fr)
WO (1) WO2004104299A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7955473B2 (en) * 2004-12-22 2011-06-07 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for the production of paper
US20060254464A1 (en) 2005-05-16 2006-11-16 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for the production of paper
US8273216B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2012-09-25 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for the production of paper
CA2635661C (fr) 2005-12-30 2015-01-13 Akzo Nobel N.V. Procede de fabrication de papier
JP5288538B2 (ja) * 2008-05-20 2013-09-11 ハイモ株式会社 抄紙方法
WO2012025228A1 (fr) * 2010-08-25 2012-03-01 Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc. Procédé d'augmentation des avantages de l'amidon dans un matériau cellulosique réduit en pâte lors de la production de papier et de carton

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE432951B (sv) * 1980-05-28 1984-04-30 Eka Ab Pappersprodukt innehallande cellulosafibrer och ett bindemedelssystem som omfattar kolloidal kiselsyra och katjonisk sterkelse samt forfarande for framstellning av pappersprodukten
DE3741603A1 (de) * 1987-12-09 1989-06-22 Voith Gmbh J M Stoffauflauf fuer eine papiermaschine od.dgl.
GB8828899D0 (en) * 1988-12-10 1989-01-18 Laporte Industries Ltd Paper & paperboard
US5647956A (en) * 1993-05-28 1997-07-15 Calgon Corporation Cellulosic, modified lignin and cationic polymer composition and process for making improved paper or paperboard
SE9502522D0 (sv) * 1995-07-07 1995-07-07 Eka Nobel Ab A process for the production of paper
US6113741A (en) * 1996-12-06 2000-09-05 Eka Chemicals Ab Process for the production of paper

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004104299A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MXPA05011802A (es) 2006-02-17
BRPI0409990A (pt) 2006-05-09
JP2007501344A (ja) 2007-01-25
WO2004104299A1 (fr) 2004-12-02
CA2524697A1 (fr) 2004-12-02
AR044128A1 (es) 2005-08-24
AU2004242046A1 (en) 2004-12-02
RU2005138312A (ru) 2006-06-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1586705B1 (fr) Procédé de production de papier
US20040250972A1 (en) Process for the production of paper
US9562327B2 (en) Process for the production of paper
US8888957B2 (en) Process for the production of paper
US9139958B2 (en) Process for the production of paper
EP1834040B1 (fr) Procédé de production de papier
US8273216B2 (en) Process for the production of paper
WO2003056099A1 (fr) Composition aqueuse contenant de la silice et procede de production de papier
EP1882062B1 (fr) Procédé pour la fabrication de papier
US20050061462A1 (en) Aqueous silica-containing composition
EP1623070A1 (fr) Procede pour la fabrication de papier
KR20060009008A (ko) 종이의 제조 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051019

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070507

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20070918