EP1619152A1 - Method for identifying overlapping mailings - Google Patents

Method for identifying overlapping mailings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1619152A1
EP1619152A1 EP05300598A EP05300598A EP1619152A1 EP 1619152 A1 EP1619152 A1 EP 1619152A1 EP 05300598 A EP05300598 A EP 05300598A EP 05300598 A EP05300598 A EP 05300598A EP 1619152 A1 EP1619152 A1 EP 1619152A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sorting
pass
postal
postal items
physical quantity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP05300598A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1619152B1 (en
Inventor
Didier Tresse
François Madar
Bruno Cartal
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Solystic SAS
Original Assignee
Solystic SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=34948636&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1619152(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Solystic SAS filed Critical Solystic SAS
Publication of EP1619152A1 publication Critical patent/EP1619152A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1619152B1 publication Critical patent/EP1619152B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H7/00Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles
    • B65H7/02Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors
    • B65H7/06Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed
    • B65H7/12Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed responsive to double feed or separation
    • B65H7/125Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed responsive to double feed or separation sensing the double feed or separation without contacting the articles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/10Size; Dimensions
    • B65H2511/11Length
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/10Size; Dimensions
    • B65H2511/13Thickness
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/10Size; Dimensions
    • B65H2511/15Height, e.g. of stack
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2515/00Physical entities not provided for in groups B65H2511/00 or B65H2513/00
    • B65H2515/10Mass, e.g. mass flow rate; Weight; Inertia
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2515/00Physical entities not provided for in groups B65H2511/00 or B65H2513/00
    • B65H2515/20Volume; Volume flow
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S209/00Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
    • Y10S209/90Sorting flat-type mail

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of processing postal items in a postal sorting machine, wherein the postal items are passed several times in a machine according to a sorting plan for preparing a tour of the factor.
  • a known malfunction of a sorting machine is related to the fact that postal items may not be correctly unstacked and are therefore injected "multiple catch" in the conveyor, ie overlapping or overlapping. This type of malfunction can occur during successive sorting passes.
  • DE19625043 already discloses a method for identifying the presence of multiple-mailed postal items by the combination of probabilities on measurements of the length, height and thickness of postal items.
  • Also known from GB2279634 is another method for detecting multiple taps by means of a belt system driven at different speeds combined with a length measurement of the incoming and outgoing shipments of the belt system.
  • the object of the present invention is to propose another method of processing postal items capable of detecting multiple taps occurring between two sorting passes.
  • the physical quantity measured during the first and second passes is compared for the mailpiece preceding the current mailpiece in the second sorting pass so as to verify that the expected mailing detected as absent is or is not in progress. multiple catch with the shipment preceding the current shipment.
  • the measured physical quantity is the thickness and / or the height and / or the length and / or the volume and / or the weight of the current shipment.
  • distribution points are assigned to the postal items and if the presence of at least two postal items is identified, the distribution points of the postal items are compared. in multiple socket for directing them to the same sorting outlet.
  • the invention also extends to a postal sorting machine arranged to implement the method defined above.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic perspective view of a sorting machine arranged to implement the method according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the different steps of the method according to the invention in connection with a particular case of sorting.
  • the postal sorting machine 1 shown in FIG. 1 comprises an introductory bench 2 for postal items, a destacker 3, an automatic address reading unit 4 and a conveyor 5 for postal items to sorting outlets 6.
  • an operator lays singing postal items on the introductory bench 2 which are separated one by one by the 3, and injected into the automatic address reading unit 4.
  • Different members of the automatic address reading unit 4 such as an OCR / VCS address recognition device or a code reader. identification bars, determine in which sorting outlet 6 must be sent each postal item according to the distribution point to which it is assigned and the predetermined sorting plan.
  • the postal items contained in the sorting outlets 6 are reintroduced into the sorting machine 1 while keeping a precise order for a second sorting pass at the end of which they are sorted according to the predetermined sorting plan, for example for the postman's tour. .
  • the sequence of postal items observed during the first pass is memorized, that is to say that for each current mail item, an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass.
  • an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass.
  • it also stores its distribution point and a physical quantity specific to the mailpiece capable of distinguishing a multiple plug.
  • the identifier of the postal item is for example the identification code known as "Chronomarque" or the digital print of the postal item as described in the patent application FR-2841673.
  • the knowledge of the distribution points assigned to the postal items and the sorting plan it is possible to calculate an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass. Therefore, by simple comparison between the expected sequence and the real sequence obtained in the second pass, it is able to detect if a mailpiece present in the first pass is not in the second pass.
  • the non-detection of one or more postal items may be due to a multiple plug or to a non-unloading or manipulation error. In order to improve the efficiency of the sorting machine as much as possible by avoiding unnecessary rejection of postal items, it is interesting to know if this non-detection is linked or not to a multiple plug.
  • a comparison is made between the physical quantity of a postal item of the sequence expected for the second sorting pass and the physical quantity of the corresponding mail piece of the actual sequence for the second pass.
  • the physical quantity specific to the postal item suitable for distinguishing a multiple plug is, for example, the thickness, the height, the length, the volume, the surface or the weight and is measured by means of appropriate known detectors which are preferably already available.
  • methods for detecting multiple taps from the length of postal items are known from FR2842127 and US6737633. Other techniques can still be employed to distinguish multiple taps such as the known contour analysis of FR2841487.
  • Figure 2 provides a better understanding of the invention with respect to a particular example.
  • a sequence of mailings passes into the automatic address reading unit 4 in front of an identification barcode reader, a thickness sensor and a height and weight sensor.
  • width and each mail item is routed to a sorting outlet 6 determined from the predetermined sorting plan and the distribution point obtained from the identification code.
  • the thickness, the height and the length of the mailpiece make it possible to determine its volume.
  • the sorting machine 1 calculates the sequence of postal items expected. for the second pass, ie the expected identification code sequence, keeping in correspondence the distribution points and the volume.
  • Figure 2 shows an expected sequence of four consecutive mail items, designated respectively by A, B, C, D and recognized by their identification codes.
  • the references Pd A , Pd B , Pd C , Pd D represent the respective distribution points of the postal items and the references GP A , GP B , GP C , GP D represent the respective physical quantities of the postal items measured during the first pass. and more particularly the volumes.
  • FIG. 2 also shows a corresponding real sequence 11 obtained during the second pass which has a difference with respect to the expected sequence 10 with regard to the consecutive postal items which are the postal items A, B and D, with respective volumes GP ' A , GP' B , GP ' D.
  • the current mailing of the actual sequence 11 is indeed the expected mailing in the expected sequence 10.
  • the first mailing has passed matches well with the first mailing expected.
  • the second mailpiece B passed corresponds well with the second mailpiece B expected.
  • the third mail piece D that has passed does not correspond with the third mail piece C expected but is a close mail item in the expected sequence 11.
  • the comparison between the expected sequence 10 and the actual sequence 11 shows that the mail piece C which should have been between postal items B and D was not detected in step 12.
  • Mailing C is not in the actual sequence 11 either because of an error or because it is in multiple engagement with the mailpiece B preceding the current mailing (or with the current mailpiece D according to the configuration of the postal sorting machine with regard to the unstacker 3 and the automatic reading unit of address 4).
  • the shipment C is in multiple connection with the shipment B. It is therefore necessary to know if sort out postal item B or reject it.
  • a step of the method according to the invention noted under the reference 13 in FIG.
  • step 13 it is checked whether the items B and C are in multiple engagement during a step 17 in which the volume GP B of the postal item B measured at during the first sorting pass at the volume GP ' B of the postal item B measured during the second pass. If the difference between the volumes GP B and GP ' B does not exceed a given threshold, it is considered that the transmission B is not in multiple connection with the shipment C and the shipment B is sorted at the step 15, otherwise the sending B is rejected in step 18 and therefore the shipment C. The postal items B and C will then be manually sorted later.
  • This method according to the invention reliably allows rejection of multi-taped postal items when this is necessary and avoids as much as possible rejecting the postal items assumed to be multiple-ended while they are not.
  • the method according to the invention described with reference to FIG. 2 in the case where a single postal item has not been detected can obviously apply when two or more postal items have not been detected.
  • the unit between all the distribution points of the mail items supposed to be multiple-taped is considered during step 13 and the threshold for the comparison of the volumes is adapted during step 17.
  • Steps 13 and 17 can be reversed or independent.
  • the method described above for a treatment of postal items in two sorting passes can of course be applied for a postal item processing in addition to two sorting passes.
  • the knowledge of the expected sequence for the second sorting pass and the thickness (physical quantity) of the postal items measured during the first sorting pass can also serve to size the logistical requirements, in particular number of bins needed, number of rounds simultaneous packaging of objects by distribution point or group of distribution points, etc., for the downstream sorting and distribution process.

Landscapes

  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Communication Control (AREA)
  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

The method involves passing mails (A-D) in a machine along a sorting plane during a sorting pass, and measuring references (GPA-GPD) for each mail, and finding an expected mail sequence (10) for another sorting pass. Volumes (GP` a, GP`B, GP`D) is measured for each current mail. The reference (GPB) and volume (GP`B) are compared to identify presence of overlapping mails, between the two passes. The reference (GPB) and volume (GP`B) are compared during the two passes, if the current mail is not an expected mail in the sequence (10). An independent claim is also included for a mail sorting machine.

Description

La présente invention concerne un procédé de traitement d'envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal, dans lequel les envois postaux sont passés plusieurs fois en machine selon un plan de tri pour préparer une tournée du facteur.The present invention relates to a method of processing postal items in a postal sorting machine, wherein the postal items are passed several times in a machine according to a sorting plan for preparing a tour of the factor.

L'introduction des envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal s'effectue au moyen d'un dépileur qui sépare un à un les envois postaux en pile pour les injecter dans un convoyeur desservant les sorties de tri de la machine. Le dépilage est une étape très importante et délicate du traitement des envois postaux. Un disfonctionnement connu d'une machine de tri est lié au fait que des envois postaux peuvent ne pas être dépilés correctement et sont donc injectés en "prise multiple" dans le convoyeur, c'est à dire en se superposant ou en se chevauchant. Ce type de disfonctionnement peut survenir au cours des passes successives de tri.The introduction of postal items in a postal sorting machine is carried out by means of a destacker which separates one by one the postal items in stack for injecting them into a conveyor serving the sorting outlets of the machine. Unstacking is a very important and delicate step in the processing of postal items. A known malfunction of a sorting machine is related to the fact that postal items may not be correctly unstacked and are therefore injected "multiple catch" in the conveyor, ie overlapping or overlapping. This type of malfunction can occur during successive sorting passes.

On connaît déjà du document de brevet DE19625043 un procédé pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple par la combinaison de probabilités sur des mesures de longueur, de hauteur et d'épaisseur d'envois postaux.DE19625043 already discloses a method for identifying the presence of multiple-mailed postal items by the combination of probabilities on measurements of the length, height and thickness of postal items.

On connaît aussi du document de brevet GB2279634 un autre procédé pour détecter les prises multiples au moyen d'un système de courroies entraînées à des vitesses différentes combiné à une mesure de longueur des envois en entrée et en sorties du système de courroies.Also known from GB2279634 is another method for detecting multiple taps by means of a belt system driven at different speeds combined with a length measurement of the incoming and outgoing shipments of the belt system.

D'autres procédés pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple sont encore décrits dans les documents de brevets US3955812, US4121716 et FR2841487.Other methods for identifying the presence of multiple taped mail items are further described in US3955812, US4121716 and FR2841487.

La présente invention a pour but de proposer un autre procédé de traitement d'envois postaux apte à détecter des prises multiples survenant entre deux passes de tri.The object of the present invention is to propose another method of processing postal items capable of detecting multiple taps occurring between two sorting passes.

A cet effet, l'invention a pour objet un procédé de traitement d'envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal, dans lequel les envois postaux sont passés une première fois puis une seconde fois en machine selon un plan de tri, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend les étapes suivantes :

  • lors de la première passe de tri, on mesure pour chaque envoi courant une grandeur physique propre à l'envoi et à l'issue de la première passe de tri, on détermine, sur la base du passage des envois postaux en première passe de tri et du plan de tri, une séquence attendue des envois postaux pour la seconde passe de tri qui est l'ordre dans lequel les envois postaux doivent se présenter dans la machine pour la seconde passe de tri;
  • lors de la seconde passe de tri, on mesure de nouveau pour chaque envoi courant la même grandeur physique et si on détermine que cet envoi courant n'est pas l'envoi attendu dans ladite séquence, on compare les grandeurs physiques mesurées pour un même envoi postal respectivement lors de la première passe et de la seconde passe pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple.
To this end, the subject of the invention is a method for processing postal items in a postal sorting machine, in which the postal items are passed a first time and then a second time in a machine according to a sorting plan, characterized in that that it includes the following steps:
  • during the first sorting pass, a physical quantity specific to the sending and at the end of the first sorting pass is measured for each current item, it is determined, on the basis of the passage of the mail items in the first sorting pass, and the sorting plan, an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass;
  • during the second sorting pass, the same physical quantity is measured again for each current item and if it is determined that this current item is not the expected item in said sequence, the physical quantities measured for the same item are compared. at the first pass and the second pass to identify the presence of multiple-catch postal items.

Préférablement, on compare la grandeur physique mesurée lors de la première et de la seconde passe pour l'envoi postal précédant l'envoi postal courant dans la seconde passe de tri de façon à vérifier que l'envoi attendu détecté comme absent est ou non en prise multiple avec l'envoi précédant l'envoi courant.Preferably, the physical quantity measured during the first and second passes is compared for the mailpiece preceding the current mailpiece in the second sorting pass so as to verify that the expected mailing detected as absent is or is not in progress. multiple catch with the shipment preceding the current shipment.

Selon différents modes de mise en oeuvre particuliers du procédé selon l'invention, la grandeur physique mesurée est l'épaisseur et/ou la hauteur et/ou la longueur et/ou le volume et/ou le poids de l'envoi courant.According to various particular embodiments of the method according to the invention, the measured physical quantity is the thickness and / or the height and / or the length and / or the volume and / or the weight of the current shipment.

Selon un autre mode de mise en oeuvre du procédé selon l'invention, des points de distribution sont affectés aux envois postaux et si on identifie la présence d'au moins deux envois postaux en prise multiple, on compare les points de distribution des envois postaux en prise multiple en vue de les diriger vers une même sortie de tri.According to another embodiment of the method according to the invention, distribution points are assigned to the postal items and if the presence of at least two postal items is identified, the distribution points of the postal items are compared. in multiple socket for directing them to the same sorting outlet.

L'invention s'étend également à une machine de tri postal agencée pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé défini ci-dessus.The invention also extends to a postal sorting machine arranged to implement the method defined above.

L'invention sera mieux comprise à la lecture de la description qui suit et à l'examen des figures qui l'accompagnent. Cette description n'est donnée qu'à titre d'exemple indicatif et nullement limitatif de l'invention.The invention will be better understood on reading the description which follows and the examination of the figures which accompany it. This description is given as an indicative and non-limiting example of the invention.

La figure 1 est une vue en perspective schématique d'une machine de tri agencée pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'invention.Figure 1 is a schematic perspective view of a sorting machine arranged to implement the method according to the invention.

La figure 2 est un synoptique montrant les différentes étapes du procédé selon l'invention en rapport avec un cas particulier de tri.Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the different steps of the method according to the invention in connection with a particular case of sorting.

La machine de tri postal 1 représentée sur la figure 1 comporte un banc d'introduction 2 des envois postaux, un dépileur 3, une unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4 et un convoyeur 5 des envois postaux vers des sorties de tri 6.The postal sorting machine 1 shown in FIG. 1 comprises an introductory bench 2 for postal items, a destacker 3, an automatic address reading unit 4 and a conveyor 5 for postal items to sorting outlets 6.

Lors d'une première passe de tri, un opérateur dépose sur chant des envois postaux sur le banc d'introduction 2 qui sont séparés un à un par le dépileur 3 et injectés dans l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4. Différents organes de l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4, tels qu'un dispositif de reconnaissance d'adresse par OCR/VCS ou un lecteur de code à barres d'identification, déterminent dans quelle sortie de tri 6 doit être envoyé chaque envoi postal en fonction du point de distribution auquel il est affecté et du plan de tri prédéterminé. Les envois postaux contenus dans les sorties de tri 6 sont réintroduits dans la machine de tri 1 en conservant un ordre précis pour une seconde passe de tri à la fin de laquelle ils sont triés selon le plan de tri prédéterminé par exemple pour la tournée du facteur.During a first sorting pass, an operator lays singing postal items on the introductory bench 2 which are separated one by one by the 3, and injected into the automatic address reading unit 4. Different members of the automatic address reading unit 4, such as an OCR / VCS address recognition device or a code reader. identification bars, determine in which sorting outlet 6 must be sent each postal item according to the distribution point to which it is assigned and the predetermined sorting plan. The postal items contained in the sorting outlets 6 are reintroduced into the sorting machine 1 while keeping a precise order for a second sorting pass at the end of which they are sorted according to the predetermined sorting plan, for example for the postman's tour. .

Dans le procédé selon l'invention, on mémorise la séquence des envois postaux observée lors de la première passe, c'est à dire que pour chaque envoi postal courant on met en correspondance un identifiant de l'envoi postal avec son ordre de passage en première passe de tri ou avec son ordre de déchargement dans chaque sortie de tri en première passe de tri. On mémorise également pour chaque envoi postal courant son point de distribution et une grandeur physique propre à l'envoi postal propre à distinguer une prise multiple. L'identifiant de l'envoi postal est par exemple le code d'identification plus connu sous le nom de "chronomarque" ou encore l'empreinte numérique de l'envoi postal telle que décrite dans la demande de brevet FR-2841673. A partir de la séquence des envois postaux observée lors de la première passe, de la connaissance des points de distribution affectés aux envois postaux et du plan de tri, on peut calculer une séquence attendue des envois postaux pour la seconde passe de tri qui est l'ordre dans lequel les envois postaux doivent se présenter dans la machine pour la seconde passe de tri. Par conséquent, par simple comparaison entre la séquence attendue et la séquence réelle obtenue en deuxième passe, on est capable de détecter si un envoi postal présent lors de la première passe ne l'est plus lors de la seconde passe. La non-détection d'un ou plusieurs envois postaux peut être due soit à une prise multiple, soit à une erreur de non-déchargement ou de manipulation. Afin d'améliorer au maximum l'efficacité de la machine de tri en évitant de rejeter inutilement des envois postaux, il est intéressant de savoir si cette non-détection est liée ou non à une prise multiple. A cet effet, on effectue une comparaison entre la grandeur physique d'un envoi postal de la séquence attendue pour la deuxième passe de tri et la grandeur physique de l'envoi postal correspondant de la séquence réelle pour la seconde passe. La grandeur physique propre à l'envoi postal propre à distinguer une prise multiple est par exemple l'épaisseur, la hauteur, la longueur, le volume, la surface ou encore le poids et est mesurée au moyen de détecteurs appropriés connus qui sont préférablement déjà disponibles dans la machine de tri 1. Par exemple, des méthodes pour détecter des prises multiples à partir de la longueur des envois postaux sont connues des documents de brevet FR2842127 et US6737633. D'autres techniques peuvent encore être employées pour distinguer des prises multiples telle que l'analyse de contour connue du document de brevet FR2841487.In the method according to the invention, the sequence of postal items observed during the first pass is memorized, that is to say that for each current mail item, an identifier of the mail item is matched with its order of passage in first sorting pass or with its unloading order in each sorting outlet in the first sorting pass. For each current mailpiece, it also stores its distribution point and a physical quantity specific to the mailpiece capable of distinguishing a multiple plug. The identifier of the postal item is for example the identification code known as "Chronomarque" or the digital print of the postal item as described in the patent application FR-2841673. From the sequence of mailings observed during the first pass, the knowledge of the distribution points assigned to the postal items and the sorting plan, it is possible to calculate an expected sequence of postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which the postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass. Therefore, by simple comparison between the expected sequence and the real sequence obtained in the second pass, it is able to detect if a mailpiece present in the first pass is not in the second pass. The non-detection of one or more postal items may be due to a multiple plug or to a non-unloading or manipulation error. In order to improve the efficiency of the sorting machine as much as possible by avoiding unnecessary rejection of postal items, it is interesting to know if this non-detection is linked or not to a multiple plug. For this purpose, a comparison is made between the physical quantity of a postal item of the sequence expected for the second sorting pass and the physical quantity of the corresponding mail piece of the actual sequence for the second pass. The The physical quantity specific to the postal item suitable for distinguishing a multiple plug is, for example, the thickness, the height, the length, the volume, the surface or the weight and is measured by means of appropriate known detectors which are preferably already available. In the sorting machine 1, for example, methods for detecting multiple taps from the length of postal items are known from FR2842127 and US6737633. Other techniques can still be employed to distinguish multiple taps such as the known contour analysis of FR2841487.

La figure 2 permet de mieux comprendre l'invention au regard d'un exemple particulier. Lors d'une première passe de tri, une séquence d'envois postaux passe dans l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4 devant un lecteur de code à barres d'identification, un capteur d'épaisseur et un capteur de hauteur et de largeur et chaque envoi postal est acheminé vers une sortie de tri 6 déterminée à partir du plan de tri prédéterminé et du point de distribution obtenu à partir du code d'identification. L'épaisseur, la hauteur et la longueur de l'envoi postal permettent de déterminer son volume. Sur la base de l'ordre de passage des envois postaux à l'issue de la première passe de tri, des points de distribution affectés aux envois postaux et du plan de tri, la machine de tri 1 calcule la séquence d'envois postaux attendue pour la seconde passe, c'est à dire la séquence de code d'identification attendue, en gardant en correspondance les points de distribution et le volume.Figure 2 provides a better understanding of the invention with respect to a particular example. During a first sorting pass, a sequence of mailings passes into the automatic address reading unit 4 in front of an identification barcode reader, a thickness sensor and a height and weight sensor. width and each mail item is routed to a sorting outlet 6 determined from the predetermined sorting plan and the distribution point obtained from the identification code. The thickness, the height and the length of the mailpiece make it possible to determine its volume. On the basis of the order of passage of the postal items at the end of the first sorting pass, the distribution points assigned to the postal items and the sorting plan, the sorting machine 1 calculates the sequence of postal items expected. for the second pass, ie the expected identification code sequence, keeping in correspondence the distribution points and the volume.

La figure 2 montre une séquence attendue 10 de quatre envois postaux consécutifs, désignés respectivement par A, B, C, D et reconnus par leurs codes d'identification. Les références PdA, PdB, PdC, PdD représentent les points de distribution respectifs des envois postaux et les références GPA, GPB, GPC, GPD représentent les grandeurs physiques respectives des envois postaux mesurées lors de la première passe et plus particulièrement les volumes. La figure 2 montre également une séquence réelle 11 correspondante obtenue lors de la deuxième passe qui présente une différence par rapport à la séquence attendue 10 en ce qui concerne les envois postaux consécutifs qui sont les envois postaux A, B et D, avec comme volumes respectifs GP'A, GP'B, GP'D.Figure 2 shows an expected sequence of four consecutive mail items, designated respectively by A, B, C, D and recognized by their identification codes. The references Pd A , Pd B , Pd C , Pd D represent the respective distribution points of the postal items and the references GP A , GP B , GP C , GP D represent the respective physical quantities of the postal items measured during the first pass. and more particularly the volumes. FIG. 2 also shows a corresponding real sequence 11 obtained during the second pass which has a difference with respect to the expected sequence 10 with regard to the consecutive postal items which are the postal items A, B and D, with respective volumes GP ' A , GP' B , GP ' D.

Successivement, on détermine si l'envoi postal courant de la séquence réelle 11 est bien l'envoi postal attendu dans la séquence attendue 10. Dans l'exemple de la figure 2, le premier envoi postal A passé correspond bien avec le premier envoi postal A attendu. Aussi, le second envoi postal B passé correspond bien avec le second envoi postal B attendu. Par contre, le troisième envoi postal D passé ne correspond pas avec le troisième envoi postal C attendu mais est un envoi postal proche dans la séquence attendue 11. La comparaison entre la séquence attendue 10 et la séquence réelle 11 montre que l'envoi postal C qui aurait du se trouver entre les envois postaux B et D n'a pas été détecté à l'étape 12. L'envoi postal C n'est pas dans la séquence réelle 11 soit du fait d'une erreur, soit du fait qu'il est en prise multiple avec l'envoi postal B précédant l'envoi courant (ou avec l'envoi postal courant D selon la configuration de la machine de tri postal en ce qui concerne le dépileur 3 et l'unité de lecture automatique d'adresse 4). Afin d'éviter de trier l'envoi C de manière incorrecte, ce qui aurait des conséquences graves pour le distributeur postal, on considère que l'envoi C est en prise multiple avec l'envoi B. Il convient donc de savoir s'il faut trier l'envoi postal B ou le rejeter. Pour cela, une étape du procédé selon l'invention notée sous la référence 13 dans la figure 2 permet de déterminer à partir des informations mémorisées en correspondance avec la séquence attendue 10 si les envois postaux B et C doivent être envoyés dans la même sortie de tri 6 ou plus particulièrement si le point de distribution PdB de l'envoi B est le même que le point de distribution PdC de l'envoi C. En seconde passe de tri, des envois postaux ayant un même point de distribution ont une bonne probabilité d'être consécutifs dans la séquence. Dans le cas où les points de distribution PdB et PdC sont identiques comme à la sortie 14 de l'étape 13, on trie l'envoi B à l'étape 15 et par conséquent en cas de prise multiple on trie l'envoi C de manière correcte. Dans le cas contraire, à la sortie 16 de l'étape 13, on vérifie si les envois B et C sont en prise multiple au cours d'une étape 17 dans laquelle on compare le volume GPB de l'envoi postal B mesuré au cours de la première passe de tri au volume GP'B de l'envoi postal B mesuré au cours de la seconde passe. Si l'écart entre les volumes GPB et GP'B n'excède pas un seuil donné on considère que l'envoi B n'est pas en prise multiple avec l'envoi C et on trie l'envoi B à l'étape 15, sinon on rejète l'envoi B à l'étape 18 et par conséquent l'envoi C. Les envois postaux B et C seront alors triés manuellement ultérieurement.Successively, it is determined whether the current mailing of the actual sequence 11 is indeed the expected mailing in the expected sequence 10. In the example of Figure 2, the first mailing has passed matches well with the first mailing expected. Also, the second mailpiece B passed corresponds well with the second mailpiece B expected. On the other hand, the third mail piece D that has passed does not correspond with the third mail piece C expected but is a close mail item in the expected sequence 11. The comparison between the expected sequence 10 and the actual sequence 11 shows that the mail piece C which should have been between postal items B and D was not detected in step 12. Mailing C is not in the actual sequence 11 either because of an error or because it is in multiple engagement with the mailpiece B preceding the current mailing (or with the current mailpiece D according to the configuration of the postal sorting machine with regard to the unstacker 3 and the automatic reading unit of address 4). In order to avoid sorting the shipment C incorrectly, which would have serious consequences for the postal distributor, it is considered that the shipment C is in multiple connection with the shipment B. It is therefore necessary to know if sort out postal item B or reject it. For this purpose, a step of the method according to the invention, noted under the reference 13 in FIG. 2, makes it possible to determine from the information stored in correspondence with the expected sequence 10 whether the postal items B and C must be sent in the same output of sorting 6 or more particularly if the distribution point Pd B of the consignment B is the same as the distribution point Pd C of the consignment C. In the second sorting pass, postal items having the same distribution point have a good probability to be consecutive in the sequence. In the case where the distribution points Pd B and Pd C are identical as at the output 14 of step 13, the sending B is sent to step 15 and therefore, in the case of a multiple decision, the sending is sorted. C correctly. In the opposite case, at the exit 16 of the step 13, it is checked whether the items B and C are in multiple engagement during a step 17 in which the volume GP B of the postal item B measured at during the first sorting pass at the volume GP ' B of the postal item B measured during the second pass. If the difference between the volumes GP B and GP ' B does not exceed a given threshold, it is considered that the transmission B is not in multiple connection with the shipment C and the shipment B is sorted at the step 15, otherwise the sending B is rejected in step 18 and therefore the shipment C. The postal items B and C will then be manually sorted later.

Ce procédé selon l'invention permet de manière fiable de rejeter les envois postaux en prise multiple lorsque cela est nécessaire et d'éviter au maximum de rejeter les envois postaux supposés en prise multiple alors qu'ils ne le sont pas.This method according to the invention reliably allows rejection of multi-taped postal items when this is necessary and avoids as much as possible rejecting the postal items assumed to be multiple-ended while they are not.

Le procédé selon l'invention décrit en référence à la figure 2 dans le cas ou un unique envoi postal n'a pas été détecté peut s'appliquer bien évidemment lorsque deux envois postaux ou plus n'ont pas été détectés. Pour cela, l'unité entre tous les points de distribution des envois postaux supposés en prise multiple est considérée lors de l'étape 13 et le seuil pour la comparaison des volumes est adapté lors de l'étape 17.The method according to the invention described with reference to FIG. 2 in the case where a single postal item has not been detected can obviously apply when two or more postal items have not been detected. For this, the unit between all the distribution points of the mail items supposed to be multiple-taped is considered during step 13 and the threshold for the comparison of the volumes is adapted during step 17.

Les étapes 13 et 17 peuvent être inversées ou indépendantes.Steps 13 and 17 can be reversed or independent.

Le procédé décrit ci-dessus pour un traitement d'envois postaux en deux passes de tri peut bien entendu être appliqué pour un traitement d'envois postaux en plus de deux passes de tri.The method described above for a treatment of postal items in two sorting passes can of course be applied for a postal item processing in addition to two sorting passes.

La connaissance de la séquence attendue pour la seconde passe de tri et de l'épaisseur (grandeur physique) des envois postaux mesurée lors de la première passe de tri peut également servir à dimensionner les besoins logistiques, notamment nombre de bacs nécessaires, nombre de tournées simultanées, conditionnement des objets par point de distribution ou groupe de points de distribution, etc..., pour le processus de tri et de distribution en aval.The knowledge of the expected sequence for the second sorting pass and the thickness (physical quantity) of the postal items measured during the first sorting pass can also serve to size the logistical requirements, in particular number of bins needed, number of rounds simultaneous packaging of objects by distribution point or group of distribution points, etc., for the downstream sorting and distribution process.

Claims (9)

Procédé de traitement d'envois postaux dans une machine de tri postal (1), dans lequel les envois postaux sont passés une première fois puis une seconde fois en machine selon un plan de tri, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend les étapes suivantes : - lors de la première passe de tri, on mesure pour chaque envoi courant (A,B,C,D) une grandeur physique (GPA,GPB,GPC,GPD) propre à l'envoi et à l'issue de la première passe de tri, on détermine, sur la base du passage des envois postaux en première passe de tri et du plan de tri, une séquence attendue (10) des envois postaux pour la seconde passe de tri qui est l'ordre dans lequel les envois postaux doivent se présenter dans la machine pour la seconde passe de tri; - lors de la seconde passe de tri, on mesure de nouveau pour chaque envoi courant (A,B,D) la même grandeur physique (GP'A,GP'B,GP'D) et si on détermine que cet envoi courant n'est pas l'envoi attendu dans ladite séquence (10), on compare (17) les grandeurs physiques (GPB,GP'B) mesurées pour un même envoi postal respectivement lors de la première passe et de la seconde passe pour identifier la présence d'envois postaux en prise multiple. Method of processing postal items in a postal sorting machine (1), in which the postal items are first and secondly placed in a machine according to a sorting plan, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: during the first sorting pass, for each current item (A, B, C, D) a physical quantity (GP A , GP B , GP C , GP D ) specific to the sending and the exit is measured. of the first sorting pass, it is determined, based on the passage of the postal items in the first sorting pass and the sorting plan, an expected sequence (10) of the postal items for the second sorting pass which is the order in which postal items must appear in the machine for the second sorting pass; during the second sorting pass, the same physical quantity (GP ' A , GP' B , GP ' D ) is measured again for each current item (A, B, D ) and if it is determined that this current item n is not the expected sending in said sequence (10), one compares (17) the physical quantities (GP B , GP ' B ) measured for the same mailing respectively during the first pass and the second pass to identify the presence of mail items in multiple take. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel on compare la grandeur physique mesurée lors de la première passe et de la seconde passe pour l'envoi postal précédant l'envoi courant.Method according to claim 1, wherein the physical quantity measured during the first pass and the second pass is compared for the mailpiece preceding the current mailing. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel la grandeur physique mesurée est l'épaisseur de l'envoi courant.Method according to one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the measured physical quantity is the thickness of the current shipment. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel la grandeur physique mesurée est la hauteur de l'envoi courant.Method according to one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the measured physical quantity is the height of the current shipment. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel la grandeur physique mesurée est la longueur de l'envoi courant.Method according to one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the measured physical quantity is the length of the current shipment. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel la grandeur physique mesurée est le volume de l'envoi courant.Method according to one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the measured physical quantity is the volume of the current shipment. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 2, dans lequel la grandeur physique mesurée est le poids de l'envoi courant.Method according to one of claims 1 to 2, wherein the measured physical quantity is the weight of the current shipment. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel des points de distribution (PdA,PdB,PdC,PdD) sont affectés aux envois postaux (A,B,C,D) et dans lequel si on identifie la présence d'au moins deux envois postaux en prise multiple, on compare (13) les points de distribution des envois postaux en prise multiple en vue de les diriger vers une même sortie de tri.Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein distribution points (Pd A , Pd B , Pd C , Pd D ) are assigned to the postal items (A, B, C, D) and in which if the presence is identified. of at least two mailpieces in multiple take, we compare (13) the distribution points of the mail items in multiple take to direct them to the same sorting outlet. Machine de tri postal (1) agencée pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes.Postal sorting machine (1) arranged to implement the method according to one of the preceding claims.
EP05300598A 2004-07-22 2005-07-18 Method for identifying overlapping mailings Not-in-force EP1619152B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0451628A FR2873361B1 (en) 2004-07-22 2004-07-22 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MULTIPLE INPUT SENDS

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1619152A1 true EP1619152A1 (en) 2006-01-25
EP1619152B1 EP1619152B1 (en) 2007-11-14

Family

ID=34948636

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05300598A Not-in-force EP1619152B1 (en) 2004-07-22 2005-07-18 Method for identifying overlapping mailings

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7482549B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1619152B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE378277T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005003270T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2294662T3 (en)
FR (1) FR2873361B1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE529659C2 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-10-16 Straalfors Ab Procedure and apparatus for shipping control
DE102008003778A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for transporting and processing a plurality of objects

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3955812A (en) * 1972-02-17 1976-05-11 Nippon Electric Company Limited Flat-article separating apparatus for an automatic mail handling system and the like
US4121716A (en) * 1977-12-12 1978-10-24 Pitney-Bowes, Inc. Doubles and thickness detector and sorter
GB2279634A (en) * 1993-06-25 1995-01-11 Toshiba Kk Apparatus for transporting card-like articles
DE19625043C1 (en) * 1996-06-22 1997-04-10 Aeg Electrocom Gmbh Method of separating items for mailing distribution
FR2841487A1 (en) * 2002-06-26 2004-01-02 Solystic METHOD FOR DETECTING SINGLE PLIERS AND MULTIPLE PLUG PLUGS IN A POSTAL SORTING FACILITY

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH07185472A (en) * 1993-12-28 1995-07-25 Hitachi Ltd Paper sheet dividing apparatus

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3955812A (en) * 1972-02-17 1976-05-11 Nippon Electric Company Limited Flat-article separating apparatus for an automatic mail handling system and the like
US4121716A (en) * 1977-12-12 1978-10-24 Pitney-Bowes, Inc. Doubles and thickness detector and sorter
GB2279634A (en) * 1993-06-25 1995-01-11 Toshiba Kk Apparatus for transporting card-like articles
DE19625043C1 (en) * 1996-06-22 1997-04-10 Aeg Electrocom Gmbh Method of separating items for mailing distribution
FR2841487A1 (en) * 2002-06-26 2004-01-02 Solystic METHOD FOR DETECTING SINGLE PLIERS AND MULTIPLE PLUG PLUGS IN A POSTAL SORTING FACILITY

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060016730A1 (en) 2006-01-26
US7482549B2 (en) 2009-01-27
ES2294662T3 (en) 2008-04-01
FR2873361B1 (en) 2006-09-08
DE602005003270D1 (en) 2007-12-27
ATE378277T1 (en) 2007-11-15
FR2873361A1 (en) 2006-01-27
DE602005003270T2 (en) 2008-09-18
EP1619152B1 (en) 2007-11-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
FR2883493A1 (en) METHOD FOR PROCESSING SHIPMENTS INCLUDING DIGITAL IMPRINT MANAGEMENT OF SHIPMENTS
EP1770037B1 (en) Process of detecting double feeding of postal items by image analysis of the upright items
WO2012022866A1 (en) Postal sorting machine including gripping conveying means, and method for implementing same
EP1619152B1 (en) Method for identifying overlapping mailings
EP1519795B1 (en) Method for detecting single postal covers and postal covers stuck together in a mail sorting machine
EP1736250B1 (en) Process of merging letters and large or non-machine-treatable postal items into a single postman's walk
WO2011007077A1 (en) Device for unstacking flat objects that detects the path of unstacked objects
EP2928617B1 (en) Method for combining a postal object with sorted mail items including means for visual signalling of the inserting location for the postal object
FR2883494A1 (en) METHOD FOR PROCESSING POSTAL SHIPMENTS INCLUDING TANK CONTROL
EP1618969B1 (en) Method for handling postal items for preparation and separation of postman's routes and according sorting apparatus
EP1526924B1 (en) Method for detecting multiple overlapping covers in a mail sorting installation
FR2987763A1 (en) METHOD FOR MONITORING POSTAL SENDS FOR MEASURING ROUTE TIMES IN A MULTI-NETWORK POSTAL SORTING SYSTEM
EP2185296B1 (en) Item conveying device with refuse rate control
EP2133845A1 (en) Franking system enabling the handling of postage items with different destinations
EP1707275A1 (en) Method of treating postal items with dynamic overflow
EP2424802B1 (en) Method for detecting opened postal items such as envelope-free magazines
EP3310502B1 (en) Method and device for manually combining mail objects into a pile of already sorted mail items
WO2018011479A1 (en) Device for measuring the stiffness of postal articles
AU2014213871B2 (en) Method for combining non-mechanizable postal objects with machine-sorted mail items
JPH09220536A (en) Paper sheet processing apparatus and method
EP2364786A1 (en) Postal sorting device and method with selective weighing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060725

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20071129

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005003270

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20071227

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2294662

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080214

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080314

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SIEMENS AG CT IP MO

Effective date: 20080814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080414

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: SIEMENS AG CT IP MO

PLBP Opposition withdrawn

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009264

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PLBD Termination of opposition procedure: decision despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPC1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

PLBM Termination of opposition procedure: date of legal effect published

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009276

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION PROCEDURE CLOSED

27C Opposition proceedings terminated

Effective date: 20090524

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition

Effective date: 20090524

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080718

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080515

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20150721

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20150728

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150721

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20150713

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20150721

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20150721

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20150721

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20150729

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20150727

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005003270

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20160801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160719

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160801

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160801

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20181130