EP1613434A1 - Measuring froth stability - Google Patents

Measuring froth stability

Info

Publication number
EP1613434A1
EP1613434A1 EP04719877A EP04719877A EP1613434A1 EP 1613434 A1 EP1613434 A1 EP 1613434A1 EP 04719877 A EP04719877 A EP 04719877A EP 04719877 A EP04719877 A EP 04719877A EP 1613434 A1 EP1613434 A1 EP 1613434A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
froth
cell
column
stability
measuring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP04719877A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1613434A4 (en
EP1613434B1 (en
Inventor
Brett Triffett
Johannes Jacobus Le Roux Cilliers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Technological Resources Pty Ltd
University of Manchester
Original Assignee
Technological Resources Pty Ltd
University of Manchester
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Technological Resources Pty Ltd, University of Manchester filed Critical Technological Resources Pty Ltd
Priority to PL04719877T priority Critical patent/PL1613434T3/en
Publication of EP1613434A1 publication Critical patent/EP1613434A1/en
Publication of EP1613434A4 publication Critical patent/EP1613434A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1613434B1 publication Critical patent/EP1613434B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/14—Flotation machines
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/028—Control and monitoring of flotation processes; computer models therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/04—Froth-flotation processes by varying ambient atmospheric pressure
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/06—Froth-flotation processes differential

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to recovering valuable material from mined minerals by means of froth flotation of a slurry of the mined materials.
  • the present invention relates particularly to a method of measuring froth stability in a cell of a flotation circuit for recovering valuable material from a slurry of mined minerals containing valuable material and gangue material .
  • the present invention also relates to an apparatus for measuring froth stability.
  • the present invention also relates to a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell using froth stability as a control parameter for the method.
  • a froth is a three phase structure comprising air bubbles, solids and water.
  • the bubbles are defined by a thin water film or lamellae, which separates two bubbles, while the intersection of three lamellae results in the formation of a narrow water channel called a Plateau border.
  • the entire froth is therefore made up of a continuous network of narrow water channels in which water and solid particles can flow.
  • the solids contained in the froth are either valuable material attached to lamellae or a mixture of valuable material and gangue material contained freely within the Plateau borders .
  • a froth is a highly dynamic system in which solids and water movement is governed by the following processes :
  • froth stability is understood herein to mean the ability of bubbles in a froth to resist coalescence and bursting.
  • a more stable froth will have less coalescence and bursting events, a smaller mean bubble size and may carry more water. All of these factors will ultimately determine the structure and volume of the froth (water, solids and air) carried over the cell weir into the 5 concentrate launder and therefore the recovery of attached and unattached (carried in Plateau border) particles - in other words, the valuable material recovery and concentrate grade.
  • Each of these variables can change rapidly or gradually over time and can significantly influence froth stability and the overall flotation performance.
  • the present invention provides such a method.
  • a method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell.
  • the froth stability parameter may be any parameter that provides information on the stability of the froth in the cell that can (a) be measured directly by means of the column or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column.
  • the method includes washing the column to collapse the froth in the column to the pre-determined starting height, for example the interface between the slurry and the froth, and thereafter repeating the above- described measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
  • an apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:
  • a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:
  • froth stability data is understood herein to mean data that is directly measured by means of the column or is derived from directly measured data.
  • the method includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
  • the model may be any suitable model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
  • the model may be a fundamental model derived from theoretical considerations.
  • the model may be based on comparing measured froth stability data and data on the historical operation of the cell.
  • One particular model is a model that is being developed by the applicant.
  • the model relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) .
  • the model is a fundamental model and is based on foam physics and interprets the effect of froth structure on flotation.
  • the model links the flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water to froth structure.
  • the mass flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water are related to the flow rate of bubble surface area and the total volumetric flow rate of Plateau borders overflowing the weir. These last two parameters can be estimated through analysis of video images of the overflowing froth.
  • testwork program carried out at the applicant's mine involved the use of a column 30cm square by 165cm high constructed of perspex.
  • the objective of the program was to investigate how to measure froth stability parameters.
  • the column was inserted into the pulp phase to a depth of 30cm and an operator manually recorded the level of the rising froth with time.
  • the data was entered into a spreadsheet and the appropriate parameters were calculated.
  • Figure 1 shows a typical column froth height versus time curve generated during the testwork.
  • the graph has raw data as well as a "fitted model" for the data.
  • the fitted model is a separate model to the previously described model .
  • the fitted model has the form shown in equation (1) where H 0 is the maximum height the froth reaches and ⁇ is a fitted stability parameter.
  • Figure 2 and 3 are graphs of column froth height versus time for selected operating conditions.
  • the instantaneous rise velocity can be calculated from the froth stability curve and the superficial gas velocity can be measured, then the instantaneous bursting fraction (1- ⁇ ) can be calculated for a given froth height.
  • a x is the fraction of airflow retained in the froth at a froth height of zero.
  • ⁇ is the dynamic froth stability factor
  • the above-described testwork determined how to measure two particular froth stability parameters, namely the maximum height attained by the froth in the column and the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a pre-determined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column.
  • Figure 5 is a conceptual diagram of an apparatus for measuring froth stability in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell.
  • the main, but not only, operating conditions that can be adjusted in response to froth stability measurements include reagents (frother, collector, pH modifier or other modifier) , air rate, pulp density, particle size and ore blend.
  • the apparatus includes a column (6) that is constructed from 300mm diameter perspex pipe with a wear resistant and replaceable HDPE extension piece (9) which, in use, is inserted into the pulp in a cell. While the original column used in the testwork at the applicant's mine was square, it is anticipated that a circular column will provide better movement of the froth as there is no interference from the corners. Having said this, a square column would still suffice.
  • the column (6) is constructed in a number of sections so the measurement height of the column can be reduced if necessary.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a grid esh walkway above the cell on which to secure the column (6) . This may not always be the case and an alternate securing arrangement may be required.
  • the column (6) is secured to the gridmesh via a securing plate (7) and the depth that the column is inserted into the pulp can be adjusted slightly via the level adjustment bolts (8) .
  • the adjustable length tie down bars are required to minimise any bending of the column as a result of the pulp movement at the base .
  • tie down bars may not be required.
  • the froth height inside the column (6) is measured by an ultrasonic level sensor, although any other suitable means of continuously monitoring the froth level will suffice.
  • the froth height data is monitored by a commercially available Citect monitoring and control system, which collects the data and performs the calculation of the froth stability parameters described previously.
  • Froth stability data is supplied to the above- described model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) and the model assesses the cell performance and, if required, initiates adjustments to selected operating conditions of the cell to improve the cell performance.
  • a water solenoid valve (2) is actu ⁇ ited to wash down the froth.
  • the measurement sequence, data input to the model, and adjustment of cell operating conditions is then repeated.
  • the sequence requires a 20-60 minute period and can be repeated on a continuous or periodic basis during the operation of the cell.
  • the measurement sequence period may be any suitable period.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)
  • Degasification And Air Bubble Elimination (AREA)
  • Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Anti-Oxidant Or Stabilizer Compositions (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

A method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue materials is disclosed. The method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell. A method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell that is based on the froth stability measurement method is also disclosed.

Description

MEASURING FROTH STABILITY
The present invention relates to recovering valuable material from mined minerals by means of froth flotation of a slurry of the mined materials.
The present invention relates particularly to a method of measuring froth stability in a cell of a flotation circuit for recovering valuable material from a slurry of mined minerals containing valuable material and gangue material .
The present invention also relates to an apparatus for measuring froth stability.
The present invention also relates to a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell using froth stability as a control parameter for the method.
It has been long understood that the froth phase of a flotation cell has a significant influence on the overall performance of the flotation process.
A froth is a three phase structure comprising air bubbles, solids and water. The bubbles are defined by a thin water film or lamellae, which separates two bubbles, while the intersection of three lamellae results in the formation of a narrow water channel called a Plateau border. The entire froth is therefore made up of a continuous network of narrow water channels in which water and solid particles can flow. The solids contained in the froth are either valuable material attached to lamellae or a mixture of valuable material and gangue material contained freely within the Plateau borders .
A froth is a highly dynamic system in which solids and water movement is governed by the following processes :
• The flow of air bubbles from the pulp froth interface to the top surface of the froth. Typically, 5-10% of the air entering the froth is carried over a cell weir into a concentrate launder and the other 90-95% leaves the top of the froth as bubbles burst. As the bubbles flow upwards they carry valuable material which is directly attached to the bubble lamellae. The upward flow of bubbles also drags a portion of the water contained in Plateau borders upwards along with its load of entrained particles (both valuable material and gangue material) .
• Bubble coalescence. Water contained in the thin film lamellae defining each bubble tends to flow towards the Plateau borders.
As this takes place the lamellae become thin, and eventually break, resulting in the coalescence of two adjacent bubbles into a single larger bubble. The coalescence process releases attached particles into the Plateau borders. The thinning and rupture of lamellae at the top surface of the froth results in bubbles bursting. This results in loss of air from the froth and release of attached particles into the Plateau borders .
The term "froth stability" is understood herein to mean the ability of bubbles in a froth to resist coalescence and bursting.
A more stable froth will have less coalescence and bursting events, a smaller mean bubble size and may carry more water. All of these factors will ultimately determine the structure and volume of the froth (water, solids and air) carried over the cell weir into the 5 concentrate launder and therefore the recovery of attached and unattached (carried in Plateau border) particles - in other words, the valuable material recovery and concentrate grade.
10 It is evident from the above-described processes that a more stable froth will recover a greater amount of valuable material attached to bubbles and within the Plateau borders.
15 It is also evident from the above that a more stable froth will also recover more gangue material.
Accordingly, from a viewpoint of maximising recovery and concentrate grade, there is an optimum froth
20 stability for any given flotation cell and any given operating conditions for that cell.
The term "operating conditions^ is understood herein to mean: 25
(a) chemical conditions (frother, collector, pH and other modifiers or contaminants) of the cell;
30 (b) grade of hydrophobia particles in the cell feed (valuable material and gangue material) ;
(c) slimes and clay content in the cell feed;
•35
(d) particle size of the cell feed; (e) air rate for the cell; and
(f) pulp density of the slurry supplied to the cell.
Each of these variables can change rapidly or gradually over time and can significantly influence froth stability and the overall flotation performance.
A method by which froth stability can be measured online in a flotation circuit for the purposes of process monitoring and control would add great value to any flotation operation.
The present invention provides such a method.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material, which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell.
The froth stability parameter may be any parameter that provides information on the stability of the froth in the cell that can (a) be measured directly by means of the column or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column.
Two preferred froth stability parameters that can be measured directly by means of the column are:
(a) the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a pre-determined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column; and
(b) the maximum height attained by the froth in the column.
Preferably the method includes washing the column to collapse the froth in the column to the pre-determined starting height, for example the interface between the slurry and the froth, and thereafter repeating the above- described measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
According to the present invention there is also provided an apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:
(a) a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell; and
(b) a means for measuring froth stability parameters directly by means of the column or indirectly from measurements made using the column; and
(c) a means for processing data measured directly or indirectly from the column and adjusting one or more than one of the operating conditions of the cell (as described herein) to optimize cell performance.
According to the present invention there is also provided a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:
(a) measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in the cell in accordance with the method described above;
(b) inputting froth stability data into a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance; and
(c) adjusting one or more than one of the operating conditions of the cell (as described herein) to optimise cell performance.
The term "froth stability data" is understood herein to mean data that is directly measured by means of the column or is derived from directly measured data.
Preferably the method includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
The model may be any suitable model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
The model may be a fundamental model derived from theoretical considerations.
Alternatively, the model may be based on comparing measured froth stability data and data on the historical operation of the cell.
One particular model is a model that is being developed by the applicant.
The development of the model has been supported by testwork carried out by the applicant to determine how to measure selected froth stability parameters in a single laboratory batch flotation cell and along the rougher bank of a flotation circuit at one of the mines operated by the applicant.
As indicated above, the model relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) .
The model is a fundamental model and is based on foam physics and interprets the effect of froth structure on flotation. The model links the flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water to froth structure.
The mass flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water are related to the flow rate of bubble surface area and the total volumetric flow rate of Plateau borders overflowing the weir. These last two parameters can be estimated through analysis of video images of the overflowing froth.
The testwork program carried out at the applicant's mine involved the use of a column 30cm square by 165cm high constructed of perspex. The objective of the program was to investigate how to measure froth stability parameters.
The column was inserted into the pulp phase to a depth of 30cm and an operator manually recorded the level of the rising froth with time. At the end of the test, when the froth had reached a stable maximum height, the data was entered into a spreadsheet and the appropriate parameters were calculated.
Figure 1 shows a typical column froth height versus time curve generated during the testwork. The graph has raw data as well as a "fitted model" for the data. The fitted model is a separate model to the previously described model .
Of significance is the close fit of the fitted model to the raw data.
The fitted model has the form shown in equation (1) where H0 is the maximum height the froth reaches and τ is a fitted stability parameter.
H=Hn (l-e"t τ) Equation (1)
Other models may be appropriate also.
Figure 2 and 3 are graphs of column froth height versus time for selected operating conditions.
What is clear from Figures 2 and 3 is that alterations to operating conditions resulted in significantly different froth stability curves. These differences can be used to clearly explain differences in metallurgical performance, ie recovery and concentrate grade, of a cell.
An extension of the froth stability curves discussed above comes with consideration of the bursting fraction (1 - oc) of the froth. If all of the air entering the froth from the pulp was retained in the froth then the rise velocity within the column would be equal to the superficial gas velocity Jg (where Jg equals the gas flow rate per unit area of the column) . This would be the case if bubbles at the surface of the froth did not burst and release their contained air. This is obviously not the case with only a small fraction of the airflow retained in the froth.
It may be expected that the value of α in the column and the value of α for the entire cell at a given froth depth will be different. The relationship between α in the column and the actual α achieved for the entire cell is the subject of current research.
Given the considerations in the preceding paragraph, the following equation can be presented, relating the froth rise velocity (u) to the superficial gas velocity and the fraction of air retained in the froth (α) :
U = Jg (1-ra) Equation (2)
Given that the instantaneous rise velocity can be calculated from the froth stability curve and the superficial gas velocity can be measured, then the instantaneous bursting fraction (1-α) can be calculated for a given froth height.
The result is a plot of alpha versus height shown in Figure 4.
These graphs take the form:
α = OCid-H/Ho) Equation (3)
where ax is the fraction of airflow retained in the froth at a froth height of zero.
Using equations 1, 2 and 3 the following additional equations can be developed to assist with interpretation of the data:
Ho = τ Jg an; Equation (4)
U = Jg cCi - H/τ Equation (5)
Σ = Ho/Jg Equation (6)
where Σ is the dynamic froth stability factor.
In summary, the above-described testwork determined how to measure two particular froth stability parameters, namely the maximum height attained by the froth in the column and the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a pre-determined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column.
Figure 5 is a conceptual diagram of an apparatus for measuring froth stability in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell.
The main, but not only, operating conditions that can be adjusted in response to froth stability measurements include reagents (frother, collector, pH modifier or other modifier) , air rate, pulp density, particle size and ore blend.
With reference to Figure 5, the apparatus includes a column (6) that is constructed from 300mm diameter perspex pipe with a wear resistant and replaceable HDPE extension piece (9) which, in use, is inserted into the pulp in a cell. While the original column used in the testwork at the applicant's mine was square, it is anticipated that a circular column will provide better movement of the froth as there is no interference from the corners. Having said this, a square column would still suffice.
The column (6) is constructed in a number of sections so the measurement height of the column can be reduced if necessary.
The maximum height shown in Figure 5 will allow for two metres of froth, which might typically be expected in a high grade rougher cell, whereas a shorter column might be used for a scavenger cell where less froth is generated.
Figure 5 illustrates a grid esh walkway above the cell on which to secure the column (6) . This may not always be the case and an alternate securing arrangement may be required. The column (6) is secured to the gridmesh via a securing plate (7) and the depth that the column is inserted into the pulp can be adjusted slightly via the level adjustment bolts (8) .
When the column (6) is used at its maximum height the adjustable length tie down bars are required to minimise any bending of the column as a result of the pulp movement at the base .
If the column is used in a shortened form the tie down bars may not be required.
In use, the froth height inside the column (6) is measured by an ultrasonic level sensor, although any other suitable means of continuously monitoring the froth level will suffice. In this case, the froth height data is monitored by a commercially available Citect monitoring and control system, which collects the data and performs the calculation of the froth stability parameters described previously.
Any other suitable means of continuously logging and calculating the appropriate froth stability parameters for process control purposes will suffice.
Froth stability data is supplied to the above- described model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) and the model assesses the cell performance and, if required, initiates adjustments to selected operating conditions of the cell to improve the cell performance.
Once the froth stability parameters are calculated to a satisfactory level of accuracy in a first measurement cycle, a water solenoid valve (2) is actuεited to wash down the froth. The measurement sequence, data input to the model, and adjustment of cell operating conditions is then repeated. Typically, the sequence requires a 20-60 minute period and can be repeated on a continuous or periodic basis during the operation of the cell. The measurement sequence period may be any suitable period.
Many modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment of the present invention described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. A method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material, which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell.
2. The method defined in claim 1 wherein the froth stability parameter is any parameter that provides information on the stability of the froth in the cell that can (a) be measured directly by means of the column or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column.
3. The method defined in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the froth stability parameters that can be measured directly by means of the column include the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a predetermined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column.
4. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the froth stability parameters that can be measured directly by means of the column include the maximum height attained by the froth in the column above a pre-determined starting height.
5. The method defined in claim 3 or claim 4 includes washing the column to collapse the froth in the column to the pre-determined starting height at the end of a measurement step and thereafter repeating the measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
6. An apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:
(a) a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell; and
(b) a means for measuring froth stability parameters directly by means of the column or indirectly from measurements made using the column; and
(c) a means for processing data measured directly or indirectly from the column and adjusting one or more than one of the operating conditions of the cell (as described herein) to optimize cell performance .
7. A method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:
(a) measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in the cell in accordance with the method defined in any one of claims 1 to 6;
(b) inputting froth stability data into a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance; and (c) adjusting one or more than one of the operating conditions of the cell (as described herein) to optimize cell performance .
8. The method defined in claim 7 includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
9. The method defined in claim 6 or claim 7 wherein the model is a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
EP04719877A 2003-03-13 2004-03-12 Measuring froth stability Expired - Lifetime EP1613434B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL04719877T PL1613434T3 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-03-12 Measuring froth stability

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003901142A AU2003901142A0 (en) 2003-03-13 2003-03-13 Measuring froth stability
PCT/AU2004/000311 WO2004080600A1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-03-12 Measuring froth stability

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1613434A1 true EP1613434A1 (en) 2006-01-11
EP1613434A4 EP1613434A4 (en) 2007-07-04
EP1613434B1 EP1613434B1 (en) 2011-05-18

Family

ID=31500186

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04719877A Expired - Lifetime EP1613434B1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-03-12 Measuring froth stability

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1613434B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE509704T1 (en)
AU (3) AU2003901142A0 (en)
DK (1) DK1613434T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2371311T3 (en)
PL (1) PL1613434T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2004080600A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200507463B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0719432D0 (en) * 2007-10-04 2007-11-14 Imp Innovations Ltd Method of flotation control
US9764258B2 (en) * 2010-11-16 2017-09-19 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Controlling froth flotation
GB2487344A (en) * 2010-11-19 2012-07-25 Imp Innovations Ltd Controlling a froth flotation cell
US8701892B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2014-04-22 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Amine-containing formulations for reverse froth flotation of silicates from iron ore
GB2491134A (en) * 2011-05-23 2012-11-28 Imp Innovations Ltd Method and apparatus for froth flotation control for optimising gas recovery
MX381146B (en) * 2012-05-14 2025-03-12 Tech Resources Pty Ltd FOAM FLOTATION CONTROL.
CN113393432B (en) * 2021-06-09 2024-05-03 紫金智控(厦门)科技股份有限公司 Intelligent froth flotation detection system
CN115239665B (en) * 2022-07-21 2025-11-07 北矿机电科技有限责任公司 Flotation foam overflow state identification method, device and storage medium

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3474902A (en) 1968-09-26 1969-10-28 Westinghouse Electric Corp Froth height and liquid slurry level determination for a floatation cell
AU548578B2 (en) * 1981-08-28 1985-12-19 Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoe Obiedinenie "Sojuztsvetmetavtomatica" Froth flotation
US4552651A (en) 1983-11-14 1985-11-12 Conoco Inc. Control of froth cell performance through the use of differential bubbler tubes
SU1717237A1 (en) 1989-07-05 1992-03-07 Институт Горной Механики Им.Г.А.Цулукидзе Device for adjusting flotation
FR2677768B1 (en) * 1991-06-11 1994-08-05 Agronomique Inst Nat Rech DEVICE FOR CHARACTERIZING THE FOAMING PROPERTIES OF AN AT LEAST PARTIALLY SOLUBLE PRODUCT.
AU1590901A (en) * 1999-11-12 2001-06-06 Baker Hughes Incorporated Froth flow measurement system
CA2396435C (en) * 1999-11-24 2012-04-03 Francois Eberhardt Du Plessis Monitoring and control of a froth flotation plant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004080600A1 (en) 2004-09-23
AU2010212522B2 (en) 2013-10-24
EP1613434A4 (en) 2007-07-04
AU2004218778A1 (en) 2004-09-23
ZA200507463B (en) 2006-12-27
AU2010212522A1 (en) 2010-09-16
PL1613434T3 (en) 2012-02-29
ES2371311T3 (en) 2011-12-29
AU2003901142A0 (en) 2003-03-27
ATE509704T1 (en) 2011-06-15
EP1613434B1 (en) 2011-05-18
DK1613434T3 (en) 2011-09-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2010212522B2 (en) Measuring froth stability
CN103596695B (en) For the method and apparatus that froth flotation controls
Sripriya et al. Optimisation of operating variables of fine coal flotation using a combination of modified flotation parameters and statistical techniques
CN103221139B (en) Method and apparatus for froth flotation control
AU2016368685B2 (en) System and method for determining concentration
US4804460A (en) Column flotation
RU2490071C2 (en) Method of foam-flotation adjustment
CA2873232A1 (en) Controlling froth flotation
Garibay Effect of collection zone height and operating variables on recovery of overload flotation columns
Yianatos et al. Characterization of large size flotation cells
Kortelainen Utilization of digital twin in model-based control of flotation cells
Tholan et al. Reverse flotation of apatite from iron ore in a REFLUXTM flotation cell
Hassan et al. An approach to quantify the true flotation recovery of floatable minerals using natural entrainment tracers and particle-based separation modeling
AU2011331910B2 (en) Controlling froth flotation
Gorain Optimisation of flotation circuits with large flotation cells
Li et al. Reviewing the experimental procedure to determine the carrying capacity in flotation columns
Park et al. Amenability testing of fine coal beneficiation using laboratory flotation column
Welsby et al. A continuous pilot-scale flotation rig for the systematic study of flotation variables
Bergh et al. Economic impact of spargers degradation in flotation columns
Musara Coal flotation: statistical comparison of a pilot flotation column and a batch mechanical cell
Lloyd, PJD, Hinde, AL & Hebden The design and scale-up of a new flotation cell
AMELUNXEN et al. Aminpro’s Methodology for Executing and Interpreting Laboratory Batch Kinetics Tests (Part 1 of 2)
YIANATOS COLUMN FLOTATION
del Villar¹ et al. Flotation column amenablity and scale-up

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050928

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20070605

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070730

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602004032727

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20110518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110919

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2371311

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20111229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20120221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602004032727

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120312

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20110818

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040312

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20160328

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20160225

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20160329

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20160325

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20160325

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160329

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20160328

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20160222

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170312

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170313

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20171130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20180703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170312

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230214

Year of fee payment: 20

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20231206

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 602004032727

Country of ref document: DE