EP1581745A2 - Surface aeration impellers - Google Patents
Surface aeration impellersInfo
- Publication number
- EP1581745A2 EP1581745A2 EP02802924A EP02802924A EP1581745A2 EP 1581745 A2 EP1581745 A2 EP 1581745A2 EP 02802924 A EP02802924 A EP 02802924A EP 02802924 A EP02802924 A EP 02802924A EP 1581745 A2 EP1581745 A2 EP 1581745A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- blades
- liquid
- surface aeration
- impeller
- impeller according
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D29/00—Details, component parts, or accessories
- F04D29/18—Rotors
- F04D29/22—Rotors specially for centrifugal pumps
- F04D29/2261—Rotors specially for centrifugal pumps with special measures
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01F—MIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
- B01F23/00—Mixing according to the phases to be mixed, e.g. dispersing or emulsifying
- B01F23/20—Mixing gases with liquids
- B01F23/23—Mixing gases with liquids by introducing gases into liquid media, e.g. for producing aerated liquids
- B01F23/234—Surface aerating
- B01F23/2342—Surface aerating with stirrers near to the liquid surface, e.g. partially immersed, for spraying the liquid in the gas or for sucking gas into the liquid, e.g. using stirrers rotating around a horizontal axis or using centrifugal force
- B01F23/23421—Surface aerating with stirrers near to the liquid surface, e.g. partially immersed, for spraying the liquid in the gas or for sucking gas into the liquid, e.g. using stirrers rotating around a horizontal axis or using centrifugal force the stirrers rotating about a vertical axis
- B01F23/234211—Stirrers thereof
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to rotating impellers. More specifically, the invention relates to surface aeration impellers that rotate on a vertical axis near the surface of a body of liquid in a tank causing liquid to be sprayed into the gas above the liquid and gas to be entrained into the liquid by the liquid spray impinging onto the liquid surface.
- activated sludge process One of the basic procedures for the treatment of sewage and other wastewater streams is known as the activated sludge process, which was discovered or invented more than seventy years ago. It is a biochemical type of reaction, involving the mass transfer of oxygen into water, and then the transfer and use of that dissolved oxygen to support the growth of aerobic microorganisms suspended in the water. These microorganisms, known as the biomass, oxidize the organic materials in the wastewater in different ways to eliminate the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of the wastewater.
- BOD biochemical oxygen demand
- the original activated sludge process involved introducing air from a blower through various forms of diffuser devices located in the bottom of the aeration tank or basin. These devices generally have low oxygen-transfer efficiency and poor solids- suspension characteristics. More than forty years ago, a different approach was taken to aeration in the activated sludge process. This different approach was known as mechanical surface aeration. This technique made use of a mechanical agitator operating at the liquid surface to throw or spray liquid into the air and to induce entraimnent of air into the liquid surface, without the use of a compressor and the diffusers.
- the standard measure of aeration efficiency is the number of pounds of oxygen transferred into the liquid per hour per horsepower of energy used to operate the aeration system. This measure is known as the Standard Aeration Efficiency (SAE).
- SAE Standard Aeration Efficiency
- the SAE for current state of the art surface aeration devices ranges from about 2.0 to about 3.3 pounds of oxygen per hour per horsepower in the larger aerator sizes. In smaller sizes, the efficiency values can be somewhat higher. Since wastewater treatment plants are pure cost centers (i.e. they do not sell a product) and since electric power is one of the main operating costs in such a plant, the oxygen- transfer efficiency performance of such aerators is extremely important, especially in the larger plants. This need has led to a number of attempts at producing surface aeration impeller designs with greater oxygen transfer efficiency.
- Typical of state of the art surface aeration impellers are those shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,479,017 to Thikotter; 3,576,316 and 3,610,590 to Kaelin; and 3,741,682 to
- Hove teaches a device and method for aerating wastewater.
- the device has multiple blades positioned on a disc-shaped mounting member.
- the blades appear to be entirely radial.
- Hove's blades are unique compared with the above patents in that they are located both above and below the disc-shaped mounting member.
- McWhirter '604 teaches a surface aeration impeller that is an axial flow impeller that may have either pitched blade turbine or airfoil shaped blades.
- the blades of the McWhirter patent are not mounted to the underside of a disc-shaped mounting member Additionally, while the upper section of the '604 blades are not strictly radial, the lower section is radial (at least at one point).
- This impeller does provide some up-pumping and mixing action but still leaves room for improved liquid pumping and oxygen transfer efficiency.
- the liquid spray mass transfer zone 11 is created in the immediate gas space surrounding the periphery of the surface aeration impeller where the liquid is discharged into the surrounding gas at high velocity.
- the surface reaeration mass transfer zone 13 exists primarily outside the spray umbrella and in the bulk liquid near the surface in the area that is circumferential to the periphery of the liquid spray mass transfer zone.
- the two zones are indicated in Figure 4.
- the liquid spray mass transfer zone can be reasonably characterized and modeled as a single-stage gas-liquid contacting zone wherein the liquid is dispersed into a virtually infinite, continuous gas phase of constant gas composition above the liquid surface.
- the mechanism in the surface reaeration mass transfer zone is predominately characterized by oxygen transfer to a highly turbulent liquid surface containing entrained gas from the gas phase above the liquid surface.
- the surface reaeration mass transfer zone also includes the oxygen transfer to the highly turbulent liquid surface beneath the spray umbrella and thus includes all oxygen transfer to the surface liquid due to bubble entrainment and contact of the highly turbulent liquid surface with the gas above the liquid surface.
- the invention is an improved surface aeration impeller for use in a liquid filled tank that has a free liquid surface and an enclosed or open gas space above the liquid surface in the tank.
- the impeller is rotatable about an axis perpendicular to the static liquid surface.
- the impeller has a plurality of blades mounted on the underside of a disc or disc-like surface. Each blade has a multi-faceted or curved geometry ranging from vertical at the point of attachment to the disc to partially inclined at the bottom.
- the blades are spaced circumferentially about the axis and are disposed radially or at acute angles to radial lines from the axis of rotation of the impeller.
- the lower portions of the blades which are less inclined or less vertical than the upper portions, are positioned below the static liquid surface.
- the lower portion of the impeller blade pumps the liquid up onto the vertical portion of the blades where the liquid is discharged into a spray umbrella in a direction upwardly from the static liquid surface and outwardly away from the rotating impeller.
- Figure 1 is a top plan view of a preferred impeller design according to the present invention.
- Figure 2 shows an isometric view of an impeller in accordance with this invention.
- Figure 3 (A) is a profile view of a single blade with an endcap on the trailing edge.
- Figure 3 (B) shows the profile of a curved blade used in one embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 4 shows the surface aeration impeller in operation in a tank.
- the discharge velocity of the spray from the surface aeration impeller is much lower than most state-of-the-art surface aeration impellers. This results in a liquid spray that does not travel as high or as far as current commercial designs.
- the liquid spray travels only about 8 to 12 feet from the tip of the aerator impeller whereas current state-of- the-art surface aerators operate with a spray distance of about 15 to 18 feet or more from the tip of the impeller.
- the spray of the present invention travels a shorter distance, much more liquid is pumped tlirough the liquid spray mass transfer zone per unit of horse power input.
- the surface aeration impellers of the present invention are designed in a way that maximize the volume of liquid flow through the liquid spray and surface reaeration zones per unit of power input. This result is accomplished by dramatically increasing the up-pumping capability of the surface aeration impeller.
- the surface aerator designs of the present invention have at least four primary advantages that distinguish them over the prior art. These four primary advantages are: 1.
- the invention provides more liquid pumping and the spraying of more liquid per unit of horsepower.
- the invention provides higher oxygen transfer energy efficiency (SAE).
- the invention provides better overall tank mixing and higher tank bottom velocities for improved biomass solids suspension.
- the invention operates at higher speed and lower torque which reduces the equipment cost (gear reducer) while simultaneously providing all of the above advantages.
- FIG. 1 a top view of an improved surface aeration impeller according to the present invention.
- the impeller has a plurality of vertically extending blades 2 attached to the underside of a rotatable disc or disc-like mounting member 1.
- Each blade in the embodiment shown in Figure 1 is disposed at an angle ( ⁇ ) of approximately 30-38° to a successive, circumferentially spaced radial line around the axis 3 of the impeller.
- ⁇ angle
- the blades 2 are more clearly shown in Figure 2 which is an isometric view of the impeller. These blades have substantially vertical portions 6 at the upward sections thereof.
- the blades 2 also have a non- vertical and non-horizontal lower section 7 which extends downwardly and outwardly in the direction of rotation of the impeller. This downwardly direction forms angle ⁇ with the horizontal as shown in Figure 3 (A).
- the lower portion 7 of the blades acts as up-pumping pitched blade turbines to provide a high volume of liquid flow to the vertical upper portion 6 of the turbine blade which creates the liquid spray umbrella and liquid spray mass transfer zone 11.
- the blades 2 in the present invention consist of at least two sections as shown in Figure 2: (1) the generally vertical upper portion 6 and (2) the non-vertical but inclined lower portion 7.
- a third section, the top or mounting section 8 is also shown, but is optional.
- This top section is generally horizontal and contains holes for bolting 10 through corresponding holes in the mounting disc 1.
- This section is optional as other means of mounting the blades to the disc are possible.
- the vertical section 6 could be directly welded to the mounting disc 1 or the vertical section 6 could be mounted directly to a vertical flange on the mounting disc.
- These types of blades are similar in shape to those on pitched blade turbine mixing impellers.
- the blades are made from a single rectangular piece of metal that has been creased in two positions.
- One crease is at a 90-degree angle and occurs near the top edge of the blade to provide the horizontal top portion 8 for easy mounting to the underside of the mounting disc 1 and a substantially vertical upper section 6.
- the second crease on this embodiment occurs approximately two-thirds to three-forths of the way down the length of the entire rectangular piece of metal. This crease provides for the downward and outwardly (in the direction of rotation) extending lower section of the blade 7.
- the second crease forms angle ⁇ shown in Figure 3 (A).
- the angle ⁇ is from about 20° to about 60°, preferably about 30° to 50°, and most preferably is about 35 to 45°.
- the point at which the upper section of the blades meets the mounting member is a straight line (i.e. the upper section of the blades are straight in the horizontal plane).
- all sections of the blades are planer (e.g. rectangular or trapezoid), and are thus non-curved.
- the outer edge of the upper section is typically contiguous with the outer edge of the disc-shaped mounting member. While the inventors have found rectangular shaped blades most desirable, other shapes are useable without diverting from the spirit of the invention. It is important for the blades to begin at the top with a substantially vertical section and end with an outwardly facing (in the direction of rotation) non-vertical section that will lie at least partially under the liquid surface.
- the incline and size of this lower portion is such that it is sufficient to provide a substantial amount of upward pumping flow of liquid onto the vertical section when the impeller is rotated.
- These requirements can be met with the two- section blade described above as well as by a multi-sectioned (more than two) blade and a continuously curved blade as shown in Figure 3B.
- Such continuously curved blades can be termed "airfoil" shaped as described in US Patent 5,988,604, especially Figure 6 (incorporated by reference).
- the blades of the invention (both curved and non-curved) preferably have an approximately constant width W along their entire length.
- Such blades can be made relatively easily from a single rectangular piece of material (e.g. stainless steel).
- the number of blades on the surface aeration impeller of the present invention is generally in the range of about 6 to 12.
- the optimal number of blades will depend on the specific application, however, smaller diameter impellers will generally have fewer blades and larger diameter impellers typically have 8 or more blades. In preferred embodiments the number of blades is about 6-8 and in an even more preferred embodiment there are exactly 8 blades.
- the positioning of the blades is important but can also vary considerably. The inventors have found that positioning the blades radially under the disc-shaped mounting member produces a surface aeration impeller that out performs all prior art designs. However, the inventors have also discovered that positioning the blades non- radially - i.e.
- the inner edge of the vertical section of the blade is pushed forward in the direction of rotation forming a non-zero angle ( ⁇ ) where ⁇ is defined as the angle between a radial line (through the outer edge of the vertical section) and the top edge of the vertical section 6 of the blade (see Figure 1).
- ⁇ is defined as the angle between a radial line (through the outer edge of the vertical section) and the top edge of the vertical section 6 of the blade (see Figure 1).
- This angle is typically between 20° and 60°, preferably between about 25° and 50° and most preferably is about 30-45°.
- Another way of characterizing the positioning of the blades is that they are "swept back" or "off-axis" (i.e.
- the width W of the blades are within the range of about 0.1 to 0.4 the diameter d of the disc. Preferably W is less than 1/3 d and most preferably is about 0.2 to 0.3 d.
- the height H of the vertical section of the blades are within the range of 0.05-0.25 d, preferably 0.1-0.2 d.
- the length L of the lower section of the blade is typically less than the height of the vertical section. Length L can be from 0.03-0.2 d, preferably less than 0.1 d or about 0.05 d.
- the width T of the optional top section 8 for mounting onto the disc is not critical as long as it allows for adequate mounting, for example by bolts.
- the blades of the invention have an optional additional segment known as an endcap.
- the endcap 9 is shown in Figures 2 and 3 (A).
- the endcap is a relatively flat geometric piece positioned essentially perpendicular to the vertical section 6 and connects the outer or trailing edges of both the vertical section 6 and the lower section 7. While the exact shape of the endcap can vary widely, the critical feature of the endcap is that it prevents liquid from flowing or "sliding" off the trailing edge of the blades below the vertical section 6 and simultaneously enhances the uplifting or up- pumping capability of the impeller.
- the inventors have found that an endcap can significantly increase the power delivered and simultaneously increase the standard aeration efficiency as the examples below demonstrate.
- the blades 2 of the invention are mounted on the underside of a disc 1 or a disc-like mounting member for mounting onto a shaft 4 that provides axial rotation.
- the disc provides a convenient method for positioning the blades radially or at an acute angle ⁇ as described above.
- the term disc-like is meant to include any rotatable mounting member having at least a top surface and a bottom surface and capable of attaching to the vertical section of the blades radially or at an angle ⁇ on a bottom surface. Included in the term "disc-like” are discs with a saw-toothed shaped edge and spoke and ring type structures.
- the mounting member is substantially a disc with a hole in the center for receiving and connecting to a rotatable shaft 4 using an attachment means 12 which is attached to the disc with bolts 5 and to the shaft with pins.
- the overall diameter of the impellers according to the invention will depend on the specific application. In the case of sewage or wastewater aeration, typical diameters will be from about 50 to 100 inches. In other applications, the diameter could be much smaller, especially if the tank size is smaller.
- the size of the impeller is largely determined by the power required to meet the specific process requirements (i.e. the oxygen transfer rate) but can also be influenced by the size and configuration of the tank in which it is employed.
- Impellers substantially as shown in Figure 1 were made and tested in a 49 feet by 49 feet square tank containing about 17 feet of static liquid which corresponds to about 320,000 gallons of water.
- the test involved mounting the impeller on a vertical shaft connected to a power source and gear reduction means. All the impellers used in the examples below contained 8 blades and the overall impeller diameter was 76.25 inches. Additionally, all blades tested had a width W of 20.5 inches and an upper/vertical section height H of 12.5 inches.
- the horsepower used in the examples ranged from about 30 to 85 HP.
- the primary variables were: (1) the "off-axis" angle ⁇ , (2) the inclined lower section angle ⁇ , (3) liquid submergence, where submergence is defined as the static liquid level in inches above the intersection of the vertical and lower sections of the blades, (4) length L of the lower section 7, and (5) the presence or not of an endcap 9.
- SAE standard aeration efficiency
- Example 2 This example uses the same impeller as demonstrated in Example 1 with the addition of an endcap.
- the top of the endcap was approximately one inch above the crease defining the intersection of the upper and lower sections of the blades.
- the results (in SAE) show that there is little effect in operating this embodiment of the impeller at various submergence levels.
- the SAE results clearly show the dramatic improvement in oxygen transfer efficiency possible with the use of the endcap.
- Example 4 This example is similar to Example 1 except that the lower section inclination angle ⁇ is increased to 45° and the length of the lower section 7 of the blade is reduced to 7 inches.
- the results (in SAE) are significantly improved over Example 1 teaching that in this configuration a larger ⁇ and shorter lower section / provide increased oxygen transfer efficiency. Again this example suggests a general trend of increasing oxygen transfer efficiency with increasing submergence values.
- Example 4 This example is the same as Example 4 with the additional of an endcap having its top edge 1 inch above the crease where the vertical and lower sections meet. The results again are generally excellent with SAE above 4. The addition of an endcap shows some improvement in oxygen transfer efficiency compared with the corresponding example without an endcap.
- Example 5 This example is similar to Example 5 except that the lower blade length / was decreased to 4 inches. This impeller also gave excellent efficiency values consistently above 4.0 for various submergence values.
- the impeller used in this example is the same as that used in Example 6 except that the "off-axis" angle ⁇ was changed to 38° instead of 30°. This impeller also gave excellent efficiency values which were significantly and consistently above 4.0 for most submergence levels.
- the impeller used in this example was the same as Example 7 except that the blades were positioned radially. That is the top edge of the upper vertical section was connected to the underside of the disc mounting member in a radial manner.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aeration Devices For Treatment Of Activated Polluted Sludge (AREA)
- Mixers Of The Rotary Stirring Type (AREA)
- Accessories For Mixers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2002/029280 WO2004025125A2 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2002-09-16 | Surface aeration impellers |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1581745A2 true EP1581745A2 (en) | 2005-10-05 |
EP1581745A4 EP1581745A4 (en) | 2010-12-15 |
Family
ID=34374683
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02802924A Withdrawn EP1581745A4 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2002-09-16 | Surface aeration impellers |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1581745A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2006503687A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002365076B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2499051C (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA05002888A (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL1027600C2 (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2006-05-29 | Andries Visser | Device and method for aeration of waste water. |
EP2216395A1 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2010-08-11 | Lonza Biologics plc. | Bioreactor for the cultivation of mammalian cells |
JP5704928B2 (en) * | 2011-01-11 | 2015-04-22 | 株式会社環境測定サービス | Water circulation device |
CN102583720B (en) * | 2012-02-23 | 2013-09-25 | 安徽国祯环保节能科技股份有限公司 | Deep-water type down-umbrella aerator impeller |
DE102013225662A1 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2015-06-11 | Invent Umwelt- Und Verfahrenstechnik Ag | Stirring device for circulating wastewater and equipment received in a basin |
JP6169207B1 (en) * | 2016-02-29 | 2017-07-26 | 株式会社メデック | Rotating body for stirring and stirring device |
JP6908502B2 (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2021-07-28 | 新明和工業株式会社 | Aeration device |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2003759A1 (en) * | 1970-01-28 | 1971-09-23 | Bamag Verfahrenstechnik Gmbh | Effluent surface aeration centrifugal impeller |
DE2418679A1 (en) * | 1974-02-28 | 1975-10-30 | Sotralentz Sa | DEVICE FOR SPRAYING WATER INTO THE AIR |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3290016A (en) * | 1965-01-08 | 1966-12-06 | Nettco Corp | Mixer means and impeller therefor |
US4066383A (en) * | 1976-06-18 | 1978-01-03 | General Signal Corporation | Surface aeration impeller |
-
2002
- 2002-09-16 CA CA2499051A patent/CA2499051C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-09-16 JP JP2004535370A patent/JP2006503687A/en active Pending
- 2002-09-16 EP EP02802924A patent/EP1581745A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-09-16 AU AU2002365076A patent/AU2002365076B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-09-16 MX MXPA05002888A patent/MXPA05002888A/en active IP Right Grant
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2003759A1 (en) * | 1970-01-28 | 1971-09-23 | Bamag Verfahrenstechnik Gmbh | Effluent surface aeration centrifugal impeller |
DE2418679A1 (en) * | 1974-02-28 | 1975-10-30 | Sotralentz Sa | DEVICE FOR SPRAYING WATER INTO THE AIR |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2004025125A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2002365076B2 (en) | 2008-12-18 |
JP2006503687A (en) | 2006-02-02 |
MXPA05002888A (en) | 2005-10-05 |
CA2499051A1 (en) | 2004-03-25 |
EP1581745A4 (en) | 2010-12-15 |
AU2002365076A1 (en) | 2004-04-30 |
CA2499051C (en) | 2010-06-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6715912B2 (en) | Surface aeration impellers | |
WO2005099881A9 (en) | Improved surface aeration impeller designs | |
US6877959B2 (en) | Surface aeration impellers | |
EP0015050B1 (en) | Fluids mixing apparatus | |
CA2570936C (en) | Apparatus and method for diffused aeration | |
US4066722A (en) | Apparatus for sparging gas into liquid | |
US3341450A (en) | Gasification apparatus and method | |
US4684614A (en) | Mixing or pumping apparatus for the treatment of flowable thin or highly viscous media | |
US4844843A (en) | Waste water aerator having rotating compression blades | |
US6811296B2 (en) | Aeration apparatus and method | |
US7114844B2 (en) | Aeration apparatus and method | |
JPH0133234B2 (en) | ||
US4334826A (en) | Surface aerator impeller | |
US7661659B2 (en) | Swing-type submersible floating aerator | |
AU595633B2 (en) | Apparatus for introducing a gas into a liquid | |
US20040188334A1 (en) | Novel biochemical oxidation system | |
US5525269A (en) | Impeller tiplets for improving gas to liquid mass transfer efficiency in a draft tube submerged turbine mixer/aerator | |
AU2002365076B2 (en) | Surface aeration impellers | |
US6896246B2 (en) | Aeration apparatus and method | |
US6997444B2 (en) | Radial disc impeller apparatus and method | |
US4249863A (en) | Surface aerator impeller | |
JPS5852686B2 (en) | Mandarin Congouriyu Haneguruma | |
US4163631A (en) | Surface aerator impeller | |
JP2010042411A (en) | Surface aeration blade wheel | |
WO2005107930A1 (en) | Novel biochemical oxidation system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050510 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PUAK | Availability of information related to the publication of the international search report |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009015 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B01F 3/04 19680901AFI20051123BHEP |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: MIXING AND MASS TRANSFER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Owner name: THE PENN STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20101111 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: F04D 29/22 20060101ALI20101105BHEP Ipc: B01F 3/04 20060101AFI20051123BHEP |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20110404 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20130403 |