EP1563247B1 - Increased-range mortar projectile - Google Patents

Increased-range mortar projectile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1563247B1
EP1563247B1 EP02765127A EP02765127A EP1563247B1 EP 1563247 B1 EP1563247 B1 EP 1563247B1 EP 02765127 A EP02765127 A EP 02765127A EP 02765127 A EP02765127 A EP 02765127A EP 1563247 B1 EP1563247 B1 EP 1563247B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
projectile
fins
fin
stabiliser
slanted
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP02765127A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1563247A1 (en
Inventor
Kresimir Lovro Marcelic
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP1563247A1 publication Critical patent/EP1563247A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1563247B1 publication Critical patent/EP1563247B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/02Stabilising arrangements
    • F42B10/04Stabilising arrangements using fixed fins
    • F42B10/06Tail fins

Definitions

  • the invention is mortar projectile furnished with slanted and bent stabiliser wings that enable the projectile to rotate around its longitudinal axis, this enhancing its stability and precision as well as range and efficiency at the target.
  • F 42 B 10/00 Weapons - Ammunition and Blasting - Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding.
  • the technical problem that is solved by this invention relates to mortar projectiles with stabilisers, where fins' diameter is fixed and equal to the mortar barrel bore (calibre fins), but where fins are designed and fitted on the stabiliser, related to the projectile axis, to enable rotation of the axis during flight, this enhancing the projectile stability, precision and range.
  • stabilisers are based on classic solutions of flat fins. Such solutions are satisfactory with projectiles of low range and precision demands. Such projectiles are affected by weather.
  • Stabilisers with calibre fins has its outer diameter fixed and equal to the mortar barrel bore.
  • Stabilisers with have fins that unfold when the projectile leaves the barrel, after which the projectile has outer diameter larger than the mortar barrel bore.
  • the patent document GB 508 201 A shows a projectile where both fin sides are by their entire lengths parallel to each other and straight, and placed at an angle to the stabiliser body.
  • US 2 694 364 shows a mortar projectile according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • the essence of the invention is mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore mortars, furnished with fins of fixed outer diameter that is equal to the barrel bore (calibre fins). In their front part, the fins are flat, whereas in the rare part they are bent. All fins are fitted to the stabiliser slanted relative to the projectile axis by an angle larger than zero. This enables the projectile to rotate in the flight, which results in the projectile enhanced stability, precision and range.
  • All fins are of similar shape, area and dimensions. Related to the projectile calibre, they are made to produce minimum resistance in the flight. The fin bases and peaks are designed to approach the shape of a water drop.
  • the increased-range mortar projectile comprises point-detonating fuse with safety pin; shell with the basic charge and ring for lessening the powder gas losses; stabiliser with slanted and bent fins; additional charge with additional charge carrier; and propelling charge with detonating cap.
  • Figures 1, 2 and 3 show that the increased-range mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore barrel, consists of the following assemblies:
  • the increased-range mortar projectile to be fired from smooth bore barrels, and rotating around its longitudinal axis during the flight, may have stabilisers of various numbers of slanted and bent fins.
  • Figs. 1 and 2 show the increased-range mortar projectile furnished with the stabiliser C with eight regularly distributed fins. At projectiles with eight fins 9, fins are fitted on the stabiliser body 6 symmetrically relevant to the projectile axis, turned by 45° one from another, Fig. 4 .
  • All fins are identical by shape, area and dimensions and, as related to the projectile calibre, they are designed to produce minimum resistance during the projectile flight.
  • Figs. 5 and 6 show cross-section of the base of a fin 9
  • Fig. 7 show the top of a fin
  • Fig. 8 top view of a fin.
  • the side 10 of the fin 9 is straight
  • the side 11 is designed as a curve of two lines: line 12 and line 13, crossing each other in the centre of gravity of the cross-section 14, so that the line 13 is slanted relative to the line 12 by the angle ⁇ , which is larger then zero, in the positive direction.
  • Crossing of the lines 12 and 13 in the fin centre of gravity 14 is rounded from the fin base to the top in order to reduce resistance during the projectile flight.
  • the line 12 is parallel to the edge 10.
  • the front part of the edge 11 follows the line 12.
  • the rear crossing of the side 10 and the bent part of the side 11 is constructed of the minimum, technologically required, thickness - ideal would be the shape of a dull knife 15.
  • the front part of the fin 16, from base to top, is designed like a half of ellipse.
  • Fin base cross-section, Fig. 6 , and top cross-sections, Fig. 7 are designed so that their aerodynamic shape approaches the shape of a water drop, Fig. 8 .
  • fins 9 change their thickness from the centre towards the ends, by technological angles designed to make its extracting from the tool easier.
  • Fins 9, viewed from a side, Fig. 3 are designed to enable extraction from the tool and to achieve the most favourable aerodynamic shape.
  • Each fin 9 is fitted on the stabiliser body 6 slanted by its front edge by the angle ⁇ , which is larger than zero, relative to the projectile axis. Therefore, air flow over the fins during the flight creates on the slanted fin surface a force that makes the projectile to rotate around its longitudinal axis.
  • the described fin geometric shape and projectile rotation during the flight increase the projectile stability which, again, results in the projectile increased range with lesser scattering of hits and larger shooting precision.
  • Centre of gravity of the projectile is determined by distribution of masses within the projectile.
  • the increased-range mortar projectile to be fired from smooth bore barrels, with stabiliser that enables rotation of the projectile during the flight, embodied in the above described way, results in enhanced projectile stability and range, larger precision and lesser scattering of hits, which has a positive effect to the projectile technology and cost.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Portable Nailing Machines And Staplers (AREA)
  • Carbon Steel Or Casting Steel Manufacturing (AREA)
  • Stereo-Broadcasting Methods (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to increased-range mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore barrels, furnished with stabiliser (C) with aerodynamically designed fins (9), of fixed maximum outer diameter, equal to the barrel bore (calibre fins).The fins (9) are in their front part straight, and in the rear part bent in positive direction by the angle /3, which is greater than zero. On the stabiliser body (6), fins (9) are fitted slanted relative to the stabiliser and projectile axes by the angle a, which is greater than zero, which enables the projectile to rotate during the flight, this resulting in enhanced projectile stability and range, larger precision and lesser scattering of hits. All fins are similar by their shape, area and dimensions, and designed to produce minimum resistance during the projectile flight. The fin bases and tops are designed so that their shape approaches the shape of a water drop.

Description

    1. FIELD OF APPLICATION
  • The invention is mortar projectile furnished with slanted and bent stabiliser wings that enable the projectile to rotate around its longitudinal axis, this enhancing its stability and precision as well as range and efficiency at the target.
  • In the International Patent Classification, it is classified as F 42 B 10/00: Weapons - Ammunition and Blasting - Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding.
  • 2. TECHNICAL PROBLEM
  • Achieving of better stability, larger range and lesser scattering of hits with projectiles fired from mortars, where the bore is smooth and stabilising fins have the largest outer diameter fixed and equal to the mortar barrel bore (calibre fins). This problem is particularly present at various projectile initial speeds (minimum and maximum).
  • The technical problem that is solved by this invention relates to mortar projectiles with stabilisers, where fins' diameter is fixed and equal to the mortar barrel bore (calibre fins), but where fins are designed and fitted on the stabiliser, related to the projectile axis, to enable rotation of the axis during flight, this enhancing the projectile stability, precision and range.
  • 3. STATE OF THE ART
  • At existing projectiles, with regard to fin number (6 to 8), shape and position, stabilisers are based on classic solutions of flat fins. Such solutions are satisfactory with projectiles of low range and precision demands. Such projectiles are affected by weather.
  • When larger ranges are demanded, such projectiles are unstable, this resulting in non-precision (large scattering of hits).
  • There are two basic stabiliser solutions: stabilisers with calibre fins, and stabilisers with over-calibre fins. Stabilisers with calibre fins has its outer diameter fixed and equal to the mortar barrel bore. Stabilisers with have fins that unfold when the projectile leaves the barrel, after which the projectile has outer diameter larger than the mortar barrel bore.
  • The patent document GB 508 201 A shows a projectile where both fin sides are by their entire lengths parallel to each other and straight, and placed at an angle to the stabiliser body.
  • The patent document US 3 650 213 A shows a projectile where both fin sides are by their entire lengths of regular aerodynamic shape and positioned parallel to the projectile axis.
  • The patent document US 2 494 026 A shows a projectile with several fin designs, straight and parallel and leaned against the projectile body. One of the designs shows over-calibre fins.
  • US 2 694 364 shows a mortar projectile according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • 4. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • The essence of the invention is mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore mortars, furnished with fins of fixed outer diameter that is equal to the barrel bore (calibre fins). In their front part, the fins are flat, whereas in the rare part they are bent. All fins are fitted to the stabiliser slanted relative to the projectile axis by an angle larger than zero. This enables the projectile to rotate in the flight, which results in the projectile enhanced stability, precision and range.
  • All fins are of similar shape, area and dimensions. Related to the projectile calibre, they are made to produce minimum resistance in the flight. The fin bases and peaks are designed to approach the shape of a water drop.
  • The increased-range mortar projectile comprises point-detonating fuse with safety pin; shell with the basic charge and ring for lessening the powder gas losses; stabiliser with slanted and bent fins; additional charge with additional charge carrier; and propelling charge with detonating cap.
  • 5. ILLUSTRATION DESCRIPTIONS
  • Figure 1.
    shows the complete increased-range mortar projectile, with a partial cross-section, side view.
    Figure 2.
    shows the mortar projectile from Fig. 1, with no additional charge (partial cross-section) - side view.
    Figure 3.
    shows stabiliser of the increased-range mortar projectile - side view.
    Figure 4.
    shows stabiliser of the increased-range mortar projectile - front view.
    Figure 5.
    shows the stabiliser fin position relative to the stabiliser and projectile axes, base cross-section - top view.
    Figure 6.
    shows stabiliser fin, base cross-section - top view.
    Figure 7.
    shows stabiliser fin, top cross-section - top view.
    Figure 8.
    shows stabiliser fin - top view.
    6. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION EMBODIMENT
  • Figures 1, 2 and 3 show that the increased-range mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore barrel, consists of the following assemblies:
    • Assembly A: projectile head, including the fuse 1 with safety pin 2, which, upon hitting the target causes explosion of the basic charge;
    • Assembly B: projectile body, including the shell 3 which houses the basic charge 4 and the ring 5 which seals between the projectile and the barrel to lessen powder gas losses from the lower part of the barrel at the moment of firing the projectile;
    • Assembly C: stabiliser, including the stabiliser body 6, on the outer side of which there are fins 9, and through the body there are openings 7 to let the basic-charge powder gas out, and thread 8 to connect the stabiliser and the projectile body 3;
    • Assembly D: propelling charge, including the propelling charge 17 and the detonating cap 18; and
    • Assembly E: additional charge, including the vessels 19 with powder charge 20 and carrier 21 which keeps the vessels 19 in a given position.
  • The increased-range mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore barrels, and rotating around its longitudinal axis during the flight, may have stabilisers of various numbers of slanted and bent fins. Figs. 1 and 2 show the increased-range mortar projectile furnished with the stabiliser C with eight regularly distributed fins. At projectiles with eight fins 9, fins are fitted on the stabiliser body 6 symmetrically relevant to the projectile axis, turned by 45° one from another, Fig. 4.
  • All fins are identical by shape, area and dimensions and, as related to the projectile calibre, they are designed to produce minimum resistance during the projectile flight.
  • Figs. 5 and 6 show cross-section of the base of a fin 9, Fig. 7 show the top of a fin, and Fig. 8 top view of a fin. As shown in Figs. 6 and 7, the side 10 of the fin 9 is straight, whereas the side 11 is designed as a curve of two lines: line 12 and line 13, crossing each other in the centre of gravity of the cross-section 14, so that the line 13 is slanted relative to the line 12 by the angle β, which is larger then zero, in the positive direction. Crossing of the lines 12 and 13 in the fin centre of gravity 14 is rounded from the fin base to the top in order to reduce resistance during the projectile flight. The line 12 is parallel to the edge 10. The front part of the edge 11 follows the line 12. The rear crossing of the side 10 and the bent part of the side 11 is constructed of the minimum, technologically required, thickness - ideal would be the shape of a dull knife 15. The front part of the fin 16, from base to top, is designed like a half of ellipse.
  • Fin base cross-section, Fig. 6, and top cross-sections, Fig. 7, are designed so that their aerodynamic shape approaches the shape of a water drop, Fig. 8.
  • The projectile viewed from the front side, Fig. 4, fins 9 change their thickness from the centre towards the ends, by technological angles designed to make its extracting from the tool easier.
  • Fins 9, viewed from a side, Fig. 3, are designed to enable extraction from the tool and to achieve the most favourable aerodynamic shape.
  • Position of fins 9 on the stabiliser body 6 is shown on Figs. 3 and 5. Each fin 9 is fitted on the stabiliser body 6 slanted by its front edge by the angle α, which is larger than zero, relative to the projectile axis. Therefore, air flow over the fins during the flight creates on the slanted fin surface a force that makes the projectile to rotate around its longitudinal axis.
  • The described fin geometric shape and projectile rotation during the flight increase the projectile stability which, again, results in the projectile increased range with lesser scattering of hits and larger shooting precision.
  • Centre of gravity of the projectile is determined by distribution of masses within the projectile.
  • 7. INVENTION APPLICATION
  • The increased-range mortar projectile, to be fired from smooth bore barrels, with stabiliser that enables rotation of the projectile during the flight, embodied in the above described way, results in enhanced projectile stability and range, larger precision and lesser scattering of hits, which has a positive effect to the projectile technology and cost.

Claims (3)

  1. Mortar projectile of increased range, launched from a mortar barrel, the inner surface of which is smooth, and which consists of the following assemblies: assembly (A): projectile head, including a fuse (1) with a safety pin; assembly (B): projectile body, including a shell (3) with a basic charge (4) and a sealing ring (5); assembly (C): a stabiliser, including a stabiliser body (6) on the outer side of which are symmetrically placed fins (9) that enable rotation of the projectile in flight; assembly (D): a propelling charge, including a charge (17) and a detonating cap (18); assembly (E): additional charge, including vessels (19) with powder charge (20) and carrier (21), characterised in that the fins (9) have a straight side (10) and a slanted side (11); the slanted side (11) being in its front part relative to the fin gravity point (14), parallel to the straight side (10); the slanted side (11), from the fin gravity point (14) to the fin end (15), being designed as the curve defined by a line (12) that is parallel to the straight side (10) and a line (13) that crosses the line (12) in the gravity point (14) of the cross-section of the base of a fin (9), so that the line (13) is, as relative to the line (12), slanted by the angle β which is greater than zero in the positive direction; the connection of the lines (12 and 13), in the gravity point (14) of the cross-section of the base of a fin (9), being mildly bent from the root to the tip of the fin; and in that the fins (9) are positioned to the stabiliser body (6), slanted as related to the projectile axis by the angle α which is greater than zero.
  2. Mortar projectile of increased range as claimed in the Claim 1, whereby said fins (9) have the front side of the fin root and tip designed as one half of ellipse; the connection of the straight side (10) and the bent part of the slanted side (11) at the end (15) of the fin is shaped as a blunt knife.
  3. Mortar projectile of increased range as claimed in the Claims 1 and 2, whereby said fins (9) have a shape and surface, with regard to cross sections of the fin root and tip, designed so that their aerodynamic shape produces the minimum resistance in flight.
EP02765127A 2002-08-06 2002-08-06 Increased-range mortar projectile Expired - Lifetime EP1563247B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/HR2002/000036 WO2003029747A1 (en) 2002-08-06 2002-08-06 Increased-range mortar projectile

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1563247A1 EP1563247A1 (en) 2005-08-17
EP1563247B1 true EP1563247B1 (en) 2008-04-02

Family

ID=10947027

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02765127A Expired - Lifetime EP1563247B1 (en) 2002-08-06 2002-08-06 Increased-range mortar projectile

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1563247B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE391280T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60225949D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003029747A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE425483A (en) * 1937-01-04
US2494026A (en) * 1945-03-28 1950-01-10 Anderson Nelson Projectile
US2694364A (en) * 1949-01-18 1954-11-16 Lyle K Liljegren Streamlined mortar shell
US3650213A (en) * 1969-06-19 1972-03-21 Aai Corp Frangible filled-projectile ammunition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2003029747A8 (en) 2004-07-08
EP1563247A1 (en) 2005-08-17
WO2003029747A1 (en) 2003-04-10
ATE391280T1 (en) 2008-04-15
DE60225949D1 (en) 2008-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11808550B2 (en) Projectile with enhanced ballistics
US8151710B2 (en) Surface ship, deck-launched anti-torpedo projectile
US8893621B1 (en) Projectile
EP4071437B1 (en) Projectile of small arms ammunition
US4612860A (en) Projectile
US8176850B2 (en) Special purpose small arms ammunition
EP3049754B1 (en) Projectiles for ammunition and methods of making and using the same
US20080092768A1 (en) Special purpose small arms ammunition
EP2834590B1 (en) Missile warhead
WO2018136894A1 (en) Rifle cartridge with improved bullet upset and separation
US20190113318A1 (en) Small arms projectile
US7448324B1 (en) Segmented rod projectile
US4351503A (en) Stabilized projectiles
US20190120602A1 (en) Cartridge
US5691501A (en) Long-range nonlethal bullet
EP1563247B1 (en) Increased-range mortar projectile
US11156442B1 (en) Dynamic instability reduced range round
US5092246A (en) Small arms ammunition
US7096791B2 (en) Projectile with improved dynamic shape
CN109323621B (en) Projectile bullet holds in palm with responsive closed loop and separation windage face
US11976906B2 (en) Bullet stabilization in subsonic flight
RU2075035C1 (en) Bullet
WO2017116058A1 (en) Bullet
JP3257962B2 (en) Gun bullet
RU2294523C1 (en) Supersonic jet projectile

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050610

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: DE

Ref document number: 1083641

Country of ref document: HK

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20061128

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60225949

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080515

Kind code of ref document: P

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080713

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080903

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080702

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: WD

Ref document number: 1083641

Country of ref document: HK

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080702

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080703

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080806

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090123